| • Wally Quevedo introduction and background
|
| • Overview of NATS project and its use cases
|
| • Purpose behind NATS in Cloud Foundry control plane
|
| • Resilience of NATS and why it's hard to crash
|
| • Transition from Ruby to Go implementation of NATS
|
| • Reasons for choosing Go, including performance and concurrency benefits
|
| • NATS is a high-performance messaging system that can be used for pub-sub, request-response, and RPC patterns
|
| • NATS has a "fire-and-forget" model, where messages are not persisted if clients are offline when they're received
|
| • NATS Streaming provides persistence and message redelivery capabilities, similar to Apache Kafka
|
| • The cost of durability in NATS Streaming is lower performance compared to regular NATS
|
| • NATS is highly flexible and can be used as a transport layer for microservices with libraries like Go Micro
|
| • There are numerous client implementations for various programming languages, including JavaScript, C#, Python, and more
|
| • Apcera uses NATS heavily in their own infrastructure, particularly in the control plane and service discovery.
|
| • NATS as a messaging system for low-latency communications
|
| • Benefits of using NATS (simple deployment, lower collective overhead)
|
| • Alternatives to NATS and when it's a good choice to use it
|
| • Performance improvements with new Go releases and NATS
|
| • Wally Quevedo's upcoming talk at GopherCon on Writing Network Clients In Go
|
| • Apcera's community-oriented culture and involvement in the Go community
|
| • Issue with MacOS 10.12.4 update breaking cgo-enabled binaries in Go
|
| • Call for proposals for Golang UK conference
|
| • GopherCon workshops announced
|
| • Go ERD tool for generating Entity Relationship Diagrams
|
| • Vim-Go 1.12 released
|
| • Emacs vs Vim discussion, including Wally Quevedo's use of Emacs and Domink Honnef's Go-mode
|
| • Discussion of NATS project, its evolution, and Wally Quevedo's involvement
|
| • Mention of a blog post by Nate Finch on his experience with Canonical and 500,000 lines of Go code
|
| • The speakers discuss how Go and its ecosystem have evolved over the past four years
|
| • They reminisce about the early days of Go when vendoring was not a concern and there were no external packages
|
| • Brian Ketelsen talks about his daughter's slime-making hobby and compares it to Oobleck
|
| • The discussion turns to #FreeSoftwareFriday, where they promote open-source projects, including Brian's work on Go Micro for microservices
|
| • They also discuss the increasing adoption of gRPC in communication protocols, including its use in Etcd and Kubernetes
|
| • The speakers briefly touch on NATS' plaintext protocol and their editors' preferences (VS Code vs Vim)
|
| • Carlisia has issues with Vim plugins not functioning correctly
|
| • Brian suggests trying different Vim plugins to resolve the issue
|
| • Wally recommends a Go utility called GHR for releasing NATS artifacts
|
| • Erik gives a shoutout to Kubernetes maintainers for their work on recent releases
|
| • The group discusses KubeCon in Berlin and related projects |