File size: 5,916 Bytes
a1a1fbf | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 | """
Resampling layers
=================
When working with neural operators, we often need to change the resolution of our data.
For some architectures, like the FNO, this is handled automatically due to the
resolution-invariant nature of the Fourier domain.
However, for other architectures, like the U-Net, we need to explicitly upsample and downsample
the data as it flows through the network. The ``neuralop.layers.resample`` function provides a
convenient way to do this.
In this example, we'll demonstrate how to use the ``resample`` function to upsample and downsample
a sample from a Gaussian Random Field, which serves as a better visual tool than piecewise
constant data for observing the effects of interpolation.
For 1D and 2D inputs, the ``resample`` function uses PyTorch’s built-in spatial interpolators
for efficiency, applying linear interpolation for 1D data and bicubic interpolation for 2D data directly
in the spatial domain.
For 3D or higher-dimensional inputs, the ``resample`` function switches to a spectral interpolation method
based on the Fourier transform. The input is transformed into the frequency domain using a real n-dimensional FFT,
which decomposes the signal into its frequency components. By resizing this frequency representation and
then applying an inverse FFT, the function achieves smooth, alias-free interpolation
that preserves the signal’s overall structure.
"""
import torch
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from neuralop.layers.resample import resample
# %%
# .. raw:: html
#
# <div style="margin-top: 3em;"></div>
#
# First, let's generate a data input. We create a high-resolution Gaussian Random Field (GRF), which
# is a smooth, continuous signal, making it ideal for visualizing the effects of resampling.
device = "cpu"
def generate_grf(shape, alpha=2.5, device="cpu"):
"""Generates a 2D Gaussian Random Field.
Parameters
----------
shape : tuple
The desired output shape (height, width).
alpha : float, optional
A parameter controlling the smoothness of the field.
Higher alpha leads to smoother fields, by default 2.5.
device : str, optional
The device to create the tensor on, by default 'cpu'.
Returns
-------
torch.Tensor
A 4D tensor of shape (1, 1, height, width) containing the GRF.
"""
n, m = shape
freq_x = torch.fft.fftfreq(n, d=1 / n, device=device).view(-1, 1)
freq_y = torch.fft.fftfreq(m, d=1 / m, device=device).view(1, -1)
norm_sq = freq_x**2 + freq_y**2
norm_sq[0, 0] = 1.0 # Avoid division by zero
# Generate white noise in frequency domain
noise = torch.randn(n, m, dtype=torch.cfloat, device=device)
# Apply a power-law filter
filtered_noise = noise * (norm_sq ** (-alpha / 2.0))
# Inverse FFT to get the spatial field
field = torch.fft.ifft2(filtered_noise).real
# Normalize to [0, 1] for visualization
field = (field - field.min()) / (field.max() - field.min())
return field.unsqueeze(0).unsqueeze(0) # Add batch and channel dims
# Generate a 128x128 sample as our ground truth
high_res = 128
high_res_data = generate_grf((high_res, high_res), device=device)
# Define the low resolution we want to simulate (4x downsampling)
low_res = 32
# %%
# .. raw:: html
#
# <div style="margin-top: 3em;"></div>
#
# Now, let's use the ``resample`` function to simulate downsampling and upsampling operations.
# This could for instance be used in the encoder and decoder of a U-Net architecture.
# The function takes an input tensor, a `scale_factor`, and a list of
# `axis` dimensions to which the resampling is applied.
# To downsample from 128x128 to 32x32, we need a scale factor of 32/128 = 0.25
downsample_factor = low_res / high_res
downsampled_data = resample(high_res_data, downsample_factor, [2, 3])
# To upsample from 32x32 back to 128x128, we need a scale factor of 128/32 = 4
upsample_factor = high_res / low_res
upsampled_data = resample(downsampled_data, upsample_factor, [2, 3])
# %%
# .. raw:: html
#
# <div style="margin-top: 3em;"></div>
#
# Finally, let's visualize the results to see the effect of the ``resample`` function.
fig, axs = plt.subplots(1, 3, figsize=(14, 6))
plt.subplots_adjust(wspace=0.04)
fig.suptitle("Resampling a Gaussian Random Field", fontsize=24)
# Plot the original high-resolution data
im1 = axs[0].imshow(high_res_data.squeeze().cpu().numpy(), cmap="viridis", vmin=0, vmax=1)
axs[0].set_title(f"High-Res Data ({high_res}x{high_res})", fontsize=16, fontweight="bold")
cbar1 = fig.colorbar(im1, ax=axs[0], fraction=0.046, pad=0.04, ticks=[0, 0.5, 1])
cbar1.ax.tick_params(labelsize=14)
# Plot the downsampled data
im2 = axs[1].imshow(downsampled_data.squeeze().cpu().numpy(), cmap="viridis", vmin=0, vmax=1)
axs[1].set_title(f"Downsampled (x{downsample_factor}) ({low_res}x{low_res})", fontsize=16, fontweight="bold")
cbar2 = fig.colorbar(im2, ax=axs[1], fraction=0.046, pad=0.04, ticks=[0, 0.5, 1])
cbar2.ax.tick_params(labelsize=14)
# Plot the upsampled data
im3 = axs[2].imshow(upsampled_data.squeeze().cpu().numpy(), cmap="viridis", vmin=0, vmax=1)
axs[2].set_title(f"Upsampled Back (x{upsample_factor:.0f}) ({high_res}x{high_res})", fontsize=16, fontweight="bold")
cbar3 = fig.colorbar(im3, ax=axs[2], fraction=0.046, pad=0.04, ticks=[0, 0.5, 1])
cbar3.ax.tick_params(labelsize=14)
# Hide axis ticks for a cleaner look
for ax in axs.flat:
ax.set_xticks([])
ax.set_yticks([])
plt.tight_layout(rect=[0, 0.03, 1, 1.08])
plt.show()
# %%
# .. raw:: html
#
# <div style="margin-top: 3em;"></div>
#
# The ``resample`` function effectively changes the resolution of the data.
# Notice that the upsampled image on the right is a faithful, if slightly blurrier,
# reconstruction of the original. This is because the downsampling step is lossy;
# high-frequency details are lost and cannot be perfectly recovered.
|