Hugging Face's logo

Datasets:
wxxy0719
/
PhysReason

Tasks:
Question Answering
Languages:
English
ArXiv:
Tags:
physics
License:
Dataset card Files
xet
 Community
wxxy0719 zhibei1204 commited on
Commit
4d1a96a
·
verified ·
0 Parent(s):

Duplicate from zhibei1204/PhysReason

Browse files

Co-authored-by: Zhibei <zhibei1204@users.noreply.huggingface.co>

Files changed (4) hide show
  1. .gitattributes +59 -0
  2. PhysReason-full.zip +3 -0
  3. PhysReason-mini.zip +3 -0
  4. README.md +172 -0
.gitattributes ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ *.7z filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
2
+ *.arrow filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
3
+ *.bin filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
4
+ *.bz2 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
5
+ *.ckpt filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
6
+ *.ftz filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
7
+ *.gz filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
8
+ *.h5 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
9
+ *.joblib filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
10
+ *.lfs.* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
11
+ *.lz4 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
12
+ *.mds filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
13
+ *.mlmodel filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
14
+ *.model filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
15
+ *.msgpack filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
16
+ *.npy filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
17
+ *.npz filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
18
+ *.onnx filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
19
+ *.ot filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
20
+ *.parquet filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
21
+ *.pb filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
22
+ *.pickle filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
23
+ *.pkl filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
24
+ *.pt filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
25
+ *.pth filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
26
+ *.rar filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
27
+ *.safetensors filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
28
+ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
29
+ *.tar.* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
30
+ *.tar filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
31
+ *.tflite filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
32
+ *.tgz filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
33
+ *.wasm filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
34
+ *.xz filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
35
+ *.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
36
+ *.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
37
+ *tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
38
+ # Audio files - uncompressed
39
+ *.pcm filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
40
+ *.sam filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
41
+ *.raw filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
42
+ # Audio files - compressed
43
+ *.aac filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
44
+ *.flac filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
45
+ *.mp3 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
46
+ *.ogg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
47
+ *.wav filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
48
+ # Image files - uncompressed
49
+ *.bmp filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
50
+ *.gif filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
51
+ *.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
52
+ *.tiff filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
53
+ # Image files - compressed
54
+ *.jpg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
55
+ *.jpeg filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
56
+ *.webp filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
57
+ # Video files - compressed
58
+ *.mp4 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
59
+ *.webm filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
PhysReason-full.zip ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
 
 
 
 
1
+ version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
2
+ oid sha256:3853148d740e3d18ead90a0edfcf2828acf9d9d3a2887476e2f45ea05c7748bb
3
+ size 27348121
PhysReason-mini.zip ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
 
 
 
 
1
+ version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
2
+ oid sha256:ad85a7e2ec3aa48e1f01c025ac0323c7ee9ea1b4efcea4a1e12e2ea6f1cd0f8d
3
+ size 5062870
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ task_categories:
3
+ - question-answering
4
+ license: mit
5
+ language:
6
+ - en
7
+ tags:
8
+ - physics
9
+ ---
10
+
11
+ # PhysReason: A Comprehensive Benchmark towards Physics-Based Reasoning
12
+
13
+ [![arXiv](https://img.shields.io/badge/arXiv-2502.12054-b31b1b.svg)](https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12054)
14
+ [![Dataset](https://img.shields.io/badge/🤗%20Hugging%20Face-Dataset-yellow)](https://huggingface.co/datasets/zhibei1204/PhysReason)
15
+ [![Project Page](https://img.shields.io/badge/🌐%20Project-Page-blue)](https://dxzxy12138.github.io/PhysReason/)
16
+
17
+ > **PhysReason is accepted by ACL-2025-main**
18
+
19
+ ## 📋 Overview
20
+
21
+ PhysReason is a comprehensive physics-based reasoning benchmark consisting of **1,200 physics problems** spanning multiple domains, with a focus on both knowledge-based (25%) and reasoning-based (75%) questions. This benchmark addresses the critical gap in evaluating large language models' capabilities in physics-based reasoning, which requires applying physics theorems and constraints in complex problem-solving scenarios.
22
+
23
+ ## ✨ Key Features
24
+
25
+ - **📊 Dataset Size**: 1,200 carefully curated physics problems
26
+ - **🎯 Problem Types**: Strategic mix of knowledge-based (25%) and reasoning-based (75%) questions
27
+ - **📚 Theorem Coverage**: Comprehensive coverage of 147 physics theorems
28
+ - **🎨 Visual Content**: 81% of problems include diagrams and visual elements
29
+ - **📈 Difficulty Levels**: Four distinct levels - Knowledge, Easy, Medium, Hard
30
+ - **🔄 Step-by-step Solutions**: Average of 8.1 solution steps per problem (15.6 for hard problems)
31
+ - **🌍 Multi-modal**: Supports both text and image inputs
32
+
33
+ ## 🔧 Data Collection
34
+
35
+ Our rigorous data collection process ensures high-quality, challenging problems:
36
+
37
+ - **📖 Sources**: Global college entrance exams and international physics competitions
38
+ - **⚙️ Process**: Standardized using MinerU framework for consistent formatting
39
+ - **✅ Quality Control**: Two-phase translation process with expert verification
40
+ - **🔍 Filtering**: Systematically excluded easily searchable problems to prevent data leakage
41
+ - **📊 Classification**: Difficulty levels based on solving time and theorem complexity analysis
42
+
43
+ ## 📊 Benchmark Comparison
44
+
45
+ | Benchmark | Multi-modal | Size | Knowledge | Question Type | Avg. T | Step-by-step | Avg. T | Avg. S |
46
+ |----------------|-------------|------|-----------|---------------|--------|--------------|--------|--------|
47
+ | JEEBench | ❌ | 123 | CEE | OE,MC | 169.7 | - | - | - |
48
+ | MMLU-Pro | ❌ | 1299 | COL | MC | 52.1 | - | - | - |
49
+ | GPQA | ❌ | 227 | PH.D. | OE | 111.4 | ❌ | 197.2 | 3.6 |
50
+ | SciEval | ❌ | 1657 | - | OE,MC | 154.5 | - | - | - |
51
+ | SciBench | ✅ | 295 | COL | OE | 80.5 | ❌ | 315.9 | 2.8 |
52
+ | MMMU | ✅ | 443 | COL | OE,MC | 53.8 | - | - | - |
53
+ | ScienceQA | ✅ | 617 | K1-K12 | MC | 13.3 | ❌ | 63.0 | 2.4 |
54
+ | OlympiadBench | ✅ | 2334 | COMP | OE | 222.0 | ❌ | 199.8 | 3.7 |
55
+ | EMMA | ✅ | 156 | - | MC | 109.5 | - | - | - |
56
+ | **Ours-Knowledge** | ✅ | 300 | CEE+COMP | OE | 163.7 | ✅ | 196.5 | 3.3 |
57
+ | **Ours-Easy** | ✅ | 300 | CEE+COMP | OE | 171.2 | ✅ | 241.5 | 5.0 |
58
+ | **Ours-Medium** | ✅ | 300 | CEE+COMP | OE | 229.2 | ✅ | 391.3 | 8.4 |
59
+ | **Ours-Hard** | ✅ | 300 | CEE+COMP | OE | 340.9 | ✅ | 936.1 | 15.6 |
60
+ | **Ours-Full** | ✅ | 1200 | CEE+COMP | OE | 226.3 | ✅ | 441.3 | 8.1 |
61
+
62
+ ## 🔍 Evaluation Framework
63
+
64
+ We introduce the **Physics Solution Auto Scoring (PSAS)** framework with two complementary evaluation approaches:
65
+
66
+ ### PSAS-A (Answer Level Evaluation)
67
+ - **Sub-question Assessment**: Evaluates answers for each sub-question independently
68
+ - **LLM-based Extraction**: Uses advanced language models for answer extraction
69
+ - **Semantic Verification**: Ensures semantic consistency between extracted and ground truth answers
70
+ - **Weighted Scoring**: Considers solution step lengths as weights for different sub-questions
71
+
72
+ ### PSAS-S (Step Level Evaluation)
73
+ Provides detailed step-by-step assessment through four phases:
74
+ 1. **Data Extraction**: Parses model responses and reference solutions
75
+ 2. **Scoring**: Evaluates correctness of each reasoning step
76
+ 3. **First Error Detection**: Identifies where models first deviate from correct reasoning
77
+ 4. **Error Analysis**: Classifies error types into four key bottlenecks:
78
+ - Physics Theorem Application
79
+ - Physics Process Understanding
80
+ - Calculation
81
+ - Physics Condition Analysis
82
+
83
+ ## 🚀 Usage
84
+
85
+ ### Core Evaluation Files
86
+ - `answer_evaluation_with_ds_ch_prompt.py`: Answer-level evaluation using Chinese prompts
87
+ - `answer_evaluation_with_ds_en_prompt.py`: Answer-level evaluation using English prompts
88
+ - `format_result_ds.py`: Optimizes unstable outputs into stable, consistent formats
89
+ - `step_evaluation_with_ds_ch_prompt.py`: Step-level evaluation using Chinese prompts
90
+ - `step_evaluation_with_ds_en_prompt.py`: Step-level evaluation using English prompts
91
+
92
+ ## 📈 Experimental Results
93
+
94
+ ### Non-O-like Models Performance
95
+
96
+ | Model | Input | Knowledge | Easy | Medium | Hard | Avg. |
97
+ |-------------------|-------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
98
+ | Qwen2VL-72B | Q, I | 41.92/62.47 | 24.04/45.26 | 15.97/36.13 | 4.83/24.23 | 16.96/42.88 |
99
+ | InternVL2.5-78B | Q, I | 28.34/64.71 | 24.16/50.69 | 17.72/38.56 | 9.71/25.95 | 19.98/45.89 |
100
+ | GPT-4o | Q, I | 50.71/65.82 | 33.87/51.98 | 22.73/42.36 | 11.03/24.71 | 29.58/47.23 |
101
+ | Deepseek-V3-671B | Q, IC | 55.86/66.14 | 40.06/52.77 | 26.63/44.02 | 13.73/26.87 | 34.07/48.42 |
102
+ | Claude-3.5-Sonnet | Q, I | 54.14/66.45 | 41.35/55.85 | 28.14/44.86 | 15.11/28.51 | 34.69/49.88 |
103
+ | Gemini-2.0-Flash | Q, I | 65.08/75.04 | 54.84/68.60 | 39.79/55.67 | 21.99/38.39 | 45.20/60.40 |
104
+ | Gemini-2.0-Pro | Q, I | 67.99/79.01 | 55.43/71.47 | 44.29/57.74 | 23.81/42.66 | 47.88/62.74 |
105
+
106
+ ### O-like Models Performance
107
+
108
+ | Model | Input | Knowledge | Easy | Medium | Hard | Avg. |
109
+ |------------------------------------|-------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
110
+ | o1-mini | Q, IC | 53.90/65.74 | 35.21/52.26 | 22.24/40.19 | 10.61/26.80 | 30.49/47.18 |
111
+ | QvQ-72B | Q, I | 62.44/70.92 | 53.74/64.65 | 28.18/54.88 | 14.30/36.47 | 32.67/57.66 |
112
+ | Gemini-2.0-Flash-Thinking-1206 | Q, I | 65.35/77.20 | 51.89/67.49 | 44.43/58.95 | 27.14/45.48 | 47.20/63.07 |
113
+ | QwQ-32B | Q, IC | 62.03/76.28 | 54.92/71.08 | 43.64/62.14 | 22.99/42.19 | 45.89/63.87 |
114
+ | GLM-Zero | Q, IC | 64.95/80.36 | 54.11/71.54 | 41.32/63.67 | 23.04/47.46 | 46.52/65.76 |
115
+ | o3-mini-high | Q, IC | 70.67/83.61 | 67.20/81.95 | 45.31/64.57 | 30.12/47.23 | 53.32/69.34 |
116
+ | Gemini-2.0-Flash-Thinking-0121 | Q, I | 73.44/84.15 | 63.17/75.94 | 50.41/66.60 | 31.90/48.47 | 54.73/69.73 |
117
+ | **Deepseek-R1** | Q, IC | **75.11/85.91** | **65.08/79.81** | **54.84/72.02** | **31.95/51.50** | **56.75/73.26** |
118
+
119
+ ### PhysReason-mini Results
120
+
121
+ | Model | K. | E. | M. | H. | Avg. |
122
+ |------------------------------------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|
123
+ | o1-mini | 54.80 | 30.33 | 15.41 | 7.92 | 27.11 |
124
+ | QvQ-72B | 51.17 | 37.10 | 29.83 | 22.13 | 35.06 |
125
+ | QwQ-32B | 64.40 | 50.07 | 38.88 | 27.45 | 45.20 |
126
+ | Gemini-2.0-Flash-Thinking-1206 | 71.47 | 49.97 | 36.83 | 22.97 | 45.42 |
127
+ | GLM-Zero | 72.70 | 50.17 | 43.42 | 24.70 | 47.75 |
128
+ | o1 | 72.47 | 53.37 | 49.31 | 25.32 | 50.12 |
129
+ | o3-mini-high | 71.10 | 63.20 | 47.02 | 31.93 | 53.31 |
130
+ | Gemini-2.0-Flash-Thinking-0121 | 76.33 | 56.87 | 51.85 | 32.61 | 54.42 |
131
+ | **Deepseek-R1** | **85.17** | **60.77** | **47.24** | **33.23** | **56.60** |
132
+
133
+ ## 🔑 Key Findings
134
+
135
+ - **Performance Gap**: Even top-performing models achieve less than 60% on answer-level evaluation
136
+ - **Difficulty Scaling**: Performance drops significantly from knowledge questions (75.11%) to hard problems (31.95%)
137
+ - **O-like Model Advantage**: Models with enhanced reasoning capabilities show superior performance
138
+ - **Multi-modal Benefits**: Visual content significantly enhances model understanding and performance
139
+ - **Four Critical Bottlenecks** identified through step-level evaluation:
140
+ 1. **Physics Theorem Application**
141
+ 2. **Physics Process Understanding**
142
+ 3. **Calculation Accuracy**
143
+ 4. **Physics Condition Analysis**
144
+
145
+ ## 📝 Citation
146
+
147
+ If you find PhysReason useful in your research, please cite our paper:
148
+
149
+ ```bibtex
150
+ @article{zhang2025physreason,
151
+ title={Physreason: A comprehensive benchmark towards physics-based reasoning},
152
+ author={Zhang, Xinyu and Dong, Yuxuan and Wu, Yanrui and Huang, Jiaxing and Jia, Chengyou and Fernando, Basura and Shou, Mike Zheng and Zhang, Lingling and Liu, Jun},
153
+ journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.12054},
154
+ year={2025}
155
+ }
156
+ ```
157
+
158
+ ## 📄 License
159
+
160
+ This project is licensed under the MIT License - see the [LICENSE](LICENSE) file for details.
161
+
162
+ ## 📧 Contact
163
+
164
+ We welcome contributions to PhysReason! Please contact us for more details.
165
+
166
+ ---
167
+
168
+ **🔗 Quick Links:**
169
+ - [📄 Paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12054)
170
+ - [🤗 Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/zhibei1204/PhysReason)
171
+ - [🌐 Project Page](https://dxzxy12138.github.io/PhysReason/)
172
+ - [💻 GitHub Repository](https://github.com/dxzxy12138/PhysReason)