File size: 11,532 Bytes
73d296d | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 | ---
license: cc-by-nc-4.0
task_categories:
- tabular-classification
- tabular-regression
language:
- en
tags:
- synthetic
- oil-and-gas
- upstream
- core-analysis
- petrophysics
- rock-properties
- SCAL
- mineralogy
- geomechanics
- xpertsystems
pretty_name: "OIL-006 — Synthetic Core Sample Dataset (Sample)"
size_categories:
- 100K<n<1M
---
# OIL-006 — Synthetic Core Sample Dataset (Sample)
**SKU:** `OIL006-SAMPLE` · **Vertical:** Oil & Gas / Upstream Core Analysis & Petrophysics
**License:** CC-BY-NC-4.0 (sample) · **Schema version:** `oil006.v1`
**Generator version:** `1.0.0` · **Default seed:** `42`
A free, schema-identical preview of XpertSystems.ai's enterprise core-analysis
dataset for petrophysics, SCAL, mineralogy, and geomechanics ML.
The sample covers **500 cores** across **10 global hydrocarbon
basins** with **37,398 plug measurements** linked across **11 tables**.
---
## What's in the box
| File | Rows | Cols | Description |
|---|---:|---:|---|
| `cores_master.csv` | 500 | 12 | Core spine: basin, formation, depth, recovery, preservation |
| `plug_measurements.csv` | 37,398 | 10 | Plug-level rock physics: porosity, permeability, grain & bulk density, lithology |
| `routine_core_analysis.csv` | 37,398 | 10 | RCA: helium φ, Klinkenberg k, Dean-Stark Sw/So/Sg, net overburden |
| `special_core_analysis.csv` | 9,212 | 13 | SCAL: capillary pressure, relperm, Archie a/m/n, wettability, Swirr/Sor |
| `fluid_saturations.csv` | 68,642 | 9 | Multi-state saturations (native / restored / cleaned) per plug |
| `lithology_descriptions.csv` | 38,012 | 10 | Per-foot lithology: grain size, sorting, cement, bedding, mineralogy |
| `xrd_xrf_analysis.csv` | 26,153 | 13 | Mineralogy: quartz/feldspar/clay/carbonate, illite/smectite/kaolinite/chlorite, TOC, kerogen, Ro |
| `thin_section_petrography.csv` | 18,521 | 9 | Pore architecture: primary/secondary φ, throat radius, diagenesis, fabric |
| `mercury_injection.csv` | 12,992 | 8 | MICP: entry pressure, median throat, displacement pressure, Swanson parameter |
| `geomechanical_tests.csv` | 9,993 | 10 | Geomech: Young's modulus, Poisson, UCS, brittleness, tensile strength |
| `core_labels.csv` | 500 | 6 | ML labels: reservoir quality A/B/C/D, pay zone flag, net pay, HC type |
Total: **259,321 rows** across 11 CSVs, ~20.6 MB on disk.
---
## Calibration: industry-anchored, honestly reported
Validation uses a **10-metric scorecard** with targets sourced exclusively to
**named industry standards**: API RP-40 (Recommended Practices for Core
Analysis), Society of Core Analysts (SCA), SPWLA petrophysical conventions,
Archie (1942), Anderson (1986) wettability survey (JPT), Kozeny-Carman,
ASTM D934 (XRD), SPE Petroleum Engineering Handbook, SPE Geomechanics
Handbook, and Chang et al. (2006) on E-UCS empirical correlation.
**Sample run** (seed `42`, n_cores=500):
| # | Metric | Observed | Target | Tolerance | Status | Source |
|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---|---|
| 1 | avg helium porosity pct | 14.3748 | 14.0 | ±4.0 | ✓ PASS | API RP-40 + SCA protocols — global mean helium porosity, mixed unconventional/conventional basin portfolio |
| 2 | avg grain density gcc | 2.7035 | 2.68 | ±0.08 | ✓ PASS | SPWLA Petrophysical Properties Reference — mixed mineralogy grain density (2.65 SS, 2.71 LS, 2.85 dolo) blended portfolio |
| 3 | avg water saturation pct | 31.7136 | 32.5 | ±8.0 | ✓ PASS | API RP-40 + SCA — Dean-Stark global mean water saturation, mixed reservoir portfolio |
| 4 | saturation mass balance pct | 100.0000 | 100.0 | ±1.0 | ✓ PASS | SCA / RP-40 — Sw + So + Sg sums to 100% within Dean-Stark measurement tolerance |
| 5 | log perm porosity correlation | 0.8164 | 0.75 | ±0.2 | ✓ PASS | Kozeny-Carman + SPE Petroleum Engineering Handbook — log(k) vs φ correlation, mixed-lithology core sample sets |
| 6 | mineralogy mass balance rate | 1.0000 | 0.99 | ±0.05 | ✓ PASS | ASTM D934 + SPWLA XRD/XRF protocols — mineralogy fractions sum to 100% within measurement uncertainty |
| 7 | avg archie m | 1.9514 | 2.0 | ±0.3 | ✓ PASS | Archie (1942) + SPWLA — cementation exponent m, global core analysis literature (typically 1.8-2.2) |
| 8 | avg wettability index | -0.1025 | -0.1 | ±0.3 | ✓ PASS | Amott-Harvey wettability index + Anderson (1986) JPT survey — mixed-to-oil-wet global portfolio mean |
| 9 | youngs ucs correlation | 0.9804 | 0.92 | ±0.1 | ✓ PASS | SPE Geomechanics Handbook + Chang et al. (2006) — static Young's modulus vs UCS empirical correlation |
| 10 | lithology diversity entropy | 0.9046 | 0.85 | ±0.15 | ✓ PASS | Global core analysis literature — 6-class lithology diversity benchmark (clean SS, shaly SS, tight SS, shale, carbonate, dolomite), normalized Shannon entropy |
**Overall: 100.0/100 — Grade A+**
(10 PASS · 0 MARGINAL · 0 FAIL of 10 metrics)
---
## Schema highlights
**`plug_measurements.csv`** — the petrophysical spine, one row per plug.
Key columns: `plug_id`, `core_id`, `plug_depth_ft`, `lithology`
(6-class: clean_ss, shaly_ss, tight_ss, shale, carbonate, dolomite),
`porosity_pct`, `permeability_md`, `grain_density_gcc`, `bulk_density_gcc`.
**Porosity-permeability follows a Kozeny-Carman-style relation per basin:**
> log(k) ≈ log(k_basin_mean) + 6.0·(φ − φ_basin_mean) + ε
with basin priors calibrated to industry-typical values: Permian Wolfcamp
(φ̄ ≈ 8.5%, k̄ ≈ 0.08 mD), Marcellus (φ̄ ≈ 6.5%, k̄ ≈ 0.0003 mD),
North Sea Sandstone (φ̄ ≈ 22%, k̄ ≈ 350 mD), GoM Deepwater (φ̄ ≈ 26%, k̄ ≈ 800 mD),
Canadian Oil Sands (φ̄ ≈ 32%, k̄ ≈ 2500 mD), etc.
**`special_core_analysis.csv`** — Archie's law parameters per plug:
> F = a / φᵐ (formation resistivity factor)
with a/m/n drawn from industry-typical ranges (a ≈ 1.0, m ≈ 1.95, n ≈ 2.0)
matching the SPWLA conventions and the original Archie (1942) JPT paper.
**`xrd_xrf_analysis.csv`** — Dirichlet-sampled mineralogy guaranteeing
mass balance (quartz + feldspar + clay + carbonate = 100% per row), plus
clay sub-fractions (illite/smectite/kaolinite/chlorite), TOC, kerogen
type (I/II/II-S/III/IV), and vitrinite reflectance (oil window ~0.6-1.3%,
gas window >1.3%).
**`geomechanical_tests.csv`** — porosity-modulated elastic properties:
> E_static ≈ 8e6 · (1 − 2.5·φ) + ε (psi)
> UCS ≈ E_static / 250 + ε (psi)
matching the Chang et al. (2006) empirical correlation for sedimentary
rocks.
---
## Suggested use cases
1. **Porosity-permeability regression** — train ML estimators of permeability
from porosity + lithology + grain density using the 37,398-plug
spine.
2. **Reservoir quality classification** — multi-class classifier on
`reservoir_quality_grade` (A/B/C/D) from petrophysical features.
3. **Pay zone identification** — binary classification on `pay_zone_flag`
from RCA + lithology + mineralogy features.
4. **SCAL surrogate models** — predict Archie m/n, wettability index, and
relperm endpoints from petrophysical and mineralogical inputs (multi-
output regression).
5. **Hydrocarbon type prediction** — 7-class classifier on `hydrocarbon_type`
from basin, depth, and rock properties.
6. **Multi-table relational ML** — entity-resolution and graph-based
learning across the 11 joinable tables via `core_id` / `plug_id`.
7. **Mineralogy → petrophysics ML** — predict porosity and permeability
from XRD/XRF mineralogy (quartz/clay/carbonate/feldspar fractions).
8. **Geomechanical surrogates** — predict Young's modulus, UCS, and
brittleness from porosity + lithology for unconventional completion
design.
---
## Loading
```python
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("xpertsystems/oil006-sample", data_files="plug_measurements.csv")
print(ds["train"][0])
```
Or with pandas:
```python
import pandas as pd
cores = pd.read_csv("hf://datasets/xpertsystems/oil006-sample/cores_master.csv")
plugs = pd.read_csv("hf://datasets/xpertsystems/oil006-sample/plug_measurements.csv")
rca = pd.read_csv("hf://datasets/xpertsystems/oil006-sample/routine_core_analysis.csv")
scal = pd.read_csv("hf://datasets/xpertsystems/oil006-sample/special_core_analysis.csv")
joined = plugs.merge(rca, on="plug_id").merge(cores, on="core_id")
```
---
## Reproducibility
All generation is deterministic via the integer `seed` parameter. The ID
conventions (`CORE_{i:06d}`, `PLUG_{i:08d}`, `RCA_{i:08d}`, etc.)
guarantee schema-stable joins across runs.
A seed sweep across `[42, 7, 123, 2024, 99, 1]` confirms Grade A+ on every
seed in this sample.
---
## Honest disclosure of sample-scale limitations
This is a **sample** product calibrated for ML prototyping and core-analysis
research, not for live drilling or completion decisions. A few notes:
1. **Permeability is heavy-tailed.** The lognormal Kozeny-Carman model
produces realistic but right-skewed permeability distributions
(sample p90 ≈ 1100 mD, median ≈ 0.3 mD). Use log-transformed permeability
for statistical work and `np.log10(permeability_md + 1e-5)` for
correlation analyses to match the φ-k coefficient reported in the
scorecard.
2. **Basin / lithology coverage at sample scale** — at 500 cores, each
basin has 29-79 cores. All 6 lithologies are present but tight_ss and
dolomite are under-represented (~10% and ~6% of plugs respectively).
Full product (25,000 cores) gives 2,000-4,000 cores per basin and
converges all lithology distributions.
3. **2.8% controlled anomaly injection** is present in `plug_measurements`
(`anomaly_flag` column) and `routine_core_analysis` (`anomaly_flag` column).
This simulates stress-relief microfractures inflating permeability
(plug level, 2-10× multipliers) and measurement repeatability artifacts
(RCA helium porosity, ±1.5% noise). Use these flags as QC training
targets or filter them out for clean regression baselines.
4. **Wettability index** is sampled with a global mean of -0.10 (mixed-to-
slightly-oil-wet), not stratified by basin wettability prior. The
v1.1 generator will introduce basin-stratified wettability sampling
for tighter calibration.
---
## Full product
The **full OIL-006 dataset** ships at **25,000 cores** with **~3.5M plug
measurements**, full per-basin wettability stratification, basin-conditioned
TOC sampling, and complete petrophysics-SCAL-mineralogy-geomechanics
relational schema — licensed commercially. Contact XpertSystems.ai for
licensing terms.
📧 **pradeep@xpertsystems.ai**
🌐 **https://xpertsystems.ai**
---
## Citation
```bibtex
@dataset{xpertsystems_oil006_sample_2026,
title = {OIL-006: Synthetic Core Sample Dataset (Sample)},
author = {XpertSystems.ai},
year = {2026},
url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/xpertsystems/oil006-sample}
}
```
## Generation details
- Generator version : 1.0.0
- Sample version : 1.0.0
- Random seed : 42
- Generated : 2026-05-21 22:43:24 UTC
- Cores : 500
- Plugs : 37,398
- Basins : 10 (Permian Wolfcamp, Eagle Ford, Bakken, Marcellus,
North Sea Sandstone, GoM Deepwater, Middle East Carbonate,
Canadian Oil Sands, Pre-Salt Brazil, North Africa Carbonate)
- Lithologies : 6 (clean SS, shaly SS, tight SS, shale, carbonate, dolomite)
- Calibration basis : API RP-40, SCA, SPWLA, Archie (1942), Anderson (1986),
Kozeny-Carman, Chang et al. (2006), SPE PEH
- Overall validation: 100.0/100 — Grade A+
|