File size: 15,339 Bytes
5ace8b7 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 | ---
license: cc-by-nc-4.0
task_categories:
- tabular-classification
- tabular-regression
- time-series-forecasting
language:
- en
tags:
- synthetic
- digital-twin
- oilfield
- upstream
- reservoir
- well-production
- artificial-lift
- scada
- ot-cybersecurity
- methane
- flaring
- pipeline
- ics
- iec-62443
- isa-99
- isa-18-2
- phmsa
- api-rp-754
- iso-14224
- spe
- aapg
- ghg-emissions
- integrated-operations
pretty_name: "OIL-042 — Synthetic Digital Twin Dataset (Oilfield) (Sample)"
size_categories:
- 100K<n<1M
---
# OIL-042 — Synthetic Digital Twin Dataset (Oilfield) (Sample)
A schema-identical preview of **OIL-042**, the XpertSystems.ai synthetic
**integrated-oilfield digital twin** dataset. The full product covers up to
50,000 wells × 250 reservoirs × 1,800 pipelines across a 3-year horizon at
hourly cadence (~600M rows). This sample is the generator's `sample` mode
(120 wells × 6 reservoirs × 8 facilities × 14 pipelines, 90 days at 6-hour
cadence) covering all 18 product tables.
> **Built by** XpertSystems.ai — Synthetic Data Platform
> **Contact** [pradeep@xpertsystems.ai](mailto:pradeep@xpertsystems.ai) · [xpertsystems.ai](https://xpertsystems.ai)
> **License** CC-BY-NC-4.0 (sample); commercial license available for the full product.
---
## What makes OIL-042 different from the rest of the Oil & Gas vertical
OIL-042 is the **first end-to-end integrated oilfield digital twin** SKU in
the catalog. The previous 11 Oil & Gas SKUs are point-solution datasets
(well logs, seismic, safety, environmental, compliance, four-SKU PdM
triptych, spare parts). OIL-042 is the **canvas that ties them all together**:
| Layer | OIL-042 tables |
|---|---|
| **Subsurface physics** | reservoir_master, reservoir_telemetry |
| **Well operations** | wells_master, well_production, artificial_lift_systems |
| **Surface infrastructure** | surface_facilities_master, surface_facilities, pipeline_master, pipeline_flows |
| **OT / control systems** | scada_telemetry, alarm_events |
| **Maintenance & reliability** | maintenance_workorders, equipment_failures |
| **Environmental** | environmental_monitoring (methane, CO₂, flaring) |
| **Cybersecurity** | cybersecurity_events (IT/OT ICS taxonomy) |
| **Human operator** | operator_actions |
| **ML labels** | digital_twin_labels (anomaly + 30d failure + production-loss risk + maintenance priority) |
Use cases that need *cross-layer* causal modeling (e.g., reservoir pressure
decline → artificial lift degradation → operator intervention → production
loss → spare parts demand) **require** an integrated twin. OIL-042 is that
substrate.
---
## What's inside
18 CSV tables covering the complete upstream digital twin: 5 dimensional
masters (fields / reservoirs / wells / facilities / pipelines) + 5 telemetry
streams (reservoir / production / lift / surface / pipeline / SCADA) + 7
event tables (alarms / workorders / failures / environmental / cyber /
operator actions / labels).
| Table | Rows (sample) | What it represents |
|---|---:|---|
| `fields_master.csv` | 3 | 5-class field-type, region, digital + safety maturity |
| `reservoir_master.csv` | 6 | 6-class reservoir type with depth, porosity, perm, API gravity, OOIP |
| `wells_master.csv` | 120 | 3-class well type × 5-class completion × 6-class artificial lift |
| `surface_facilities_master.csv` | 8 | 7-class facility (separator/compressor/tank battery/etc.) |
| `pipeline_master.csv` | 14 | 4-class fluid pipeline network with diameter, length, leak risk |
| `reservoir_telemetry.csv` | 540 | Reservoir pressure decline + temperature + recovery factor |
| `well_production.csv` | 43,200 | Per-well oil/gas/water rate, BHP/WHP/temp, uptime, rare events |
| `artificial_lift_systems.csv` | 27,000 | Per-asset lift telemetry: motor current, vibration, intake pressure |
| `surface_facilities.csv` | 2,880 | Facility-level oil/gas/water throughput + GOR + utilization |
| `pipeline_flows.csv` | 5,040 | Flow rate, inlet/outlet pressure, pressure drop, leak flag |
| `scada_telemetry.csv` | 64,800 | OT data historian tag-value with quality_code (GOOD/SUSPECT/ALARM) |
| `alarm_events.csv` | 60 | ISA 18.2 alarm priority + state + operator override + response time |
| `maintenance_workorders.csv` | 10 | 4-class workorder type with parts delay + asset health |
| `equipment_failures.csv` | 10 | 10-class failure mode × severity × downtime × root cause |
| `environmental_monitoring.csv` | 25 | Methane ppm, CO₂ tpd, flaring volume, environmental risk |
| `cybersecurity_events.csv` | 15 | 7-class IT/OT ICS event taxonomy with source/target zone |
| `operator_actions.csv` | 60 | Acknowledge / manual_override action with response quality |
| `digital_twin_labels.csv` | 10,800 | **Per-well-per-timestamp anomaly prob + 30d failure prob + production-loss risk + maintenance priority** |
Total: ~154,000 rows, ~19 MB. The full OIL-042 product is ~600 million rows.
---
## Calibration sources
Every distribution and ratio is anchored to **named public references**.
Highlights:
- **SPE Petroleum Engineering Handbook** + **AAPG** — reservoir porosity,
permeability, water saturation, GOR distributions.
- **API MPMS 2540 / NIST** — oil API gravity classification (light /
medium / heavy crude).
- **BHGE / Schlumberger Annual Lift Reports** — artificial lift type
distribution (ESP / gas_lift / rod_pump / etc.).
- **ISA 18.2 / EEMUA 191** — alarm management taxonomy and priority bands.
- **ISA-99 / IEC 62443** — ICS/OT cybersecurity event taxonomy.
- **OPC UA / ISA-95** — data quality conventions for OT historians.
- **PHMSA HL Pipeline Annual Incident Statistics** — pipeline leak rates.
- **API RP 754** — process safety performance indicators.
- **ISO 14224:2016** — reliability/maintenance data classification.
---
## Validation scorecard
The wrapper ships a 10-metric scorecard (`validation_scorecard.json`) that
re-scores the dataset on every generation. Default seed 42 result:
| ID | Metric | Target | Observed | Source |
|---|---|---|---:|---|
| M01 | Reservoir Porosity (median) | 0.10–0.30 | **0.207** | SPE PE Handbook (clastic) |
| M02 | Oil API Gravity (median) | 27–43° | **34.48°** | API MPMS 2540 |
| M03 | Initial Water Saturation (median) | 0.18–0.38 | **0.283** | SPE / AAPG |
| M04 | Well Water Cut (median) | 0.05–0.35 | **0.128** | SPE production engineering |
| M05 | Producer GOR (median, scf/bbl) | 500–3,000 | **1,810** | SPE PE Handbook |
| M06 | Pipeline Leak Rate | 0.0–0.020 | **0.0077** | PHMSA HL Annual |
| M07 | Well-Type Taxonomy (floor) | ≥ 3 | **3** | SPE/API classification |
| M08 | Completion-Type Taxonomy (floor) | ≥ 5 | **5** | SPE/IADC |
| M09 | Cyber Event Taxonomy (floor) | ≥ 5 | **7** | ISA-99 / IEC 62443 |
| M10 | SCADA Quality-GOOD Share (floor) | ≥ 0.98 | **0.999** | OPC UA / ISA-95 |
**Grade: A+ (100/100). Verified across seeds 42, 7, 123, 2024, 99, 1.**
---
## Suggested use cases
- **Reservoir-to-surface causal modeling** — `reservoir_telemetry` →
`well_production` → `surface_facilities` → `pipeline_flows` are
per-timestamp joinable, supporting GNN, multi-level state-space, and
causal-graph models that cross subsurface-to-surface boundaries.
- **Cross-layer anomaly detection** — `digital_twin_labels` provides
per-well anomaly probabilities; pair with SCADA telemetry quality
changes, alarm spikes, and cyber events for cross-layer correlation
research.
- **OT/IT cyber-physical attack modeling** — `cybersecurity_events.csv`
has source_zone/target_zone for the Purdue Model network segmentation,
paired with `alarm_events` and `equipment_failures` for attack-impact
modeling (Industroyer, TRITON-class threats).
- **Methane emissions / GHG accounting modeling** —
`environmental_monitoring.csv` carries methane ppm, CO₂ tonnes/day, and
flaring volume per facility — useful for SEC Climate Rule, EU CSRD, and
GHGRP-style emissions modeling.
- **Operator-action / human-in-the-loop modeling** — `operator_actions.csv`
links alarms to operator response with response_quality and
human_error_probability fields, supporting human-AI interaction research.
- **Artificial lift optimization** — `artificial_lift_systems.csv` ×
`well_production.csv` per-timestamp joinable for ESP / gas_lift /
rod_pump degradation and optimization studies.
- **Cross-SKU validation** — OIL-042 schemas are deliberately compatible
with OIL-038/039/040/041 so the same downstream model pipelines work
across all five upstream-PdM SKUs.
---
## Loading
```python
from datasets import load_dataset
wells = load_dataset(
"xpertsystems/oil042-sample",
data_files="wells_master.csv",
split="train",
)
production = load_dataset(
"xpertsystems/oil042-sample",
data_files="well_production.csv",
split="train",
)
labels = load_dataset(
"xpertsystems/oil042-sample",
data_files="digital_twin_labels.csv",
split="train",
)
```
Or with pandas directly:
```python
import pandas as pd
from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download
path = hf_hub_download(
repo_id="xpertsystems/oil042-sample",
filename="scada_telemetry.csv",
repo_type="dataset",
)
df = pd.read_csv(path)
```
All 18 tables join on:
- `field_id` → fields_master ↔ reservoir_master ↔ wells_master
- `reservoir_id` → reservoir_master ↔ wells_master ↔ reservoir_telemetry ↔ well_production ↔ labels
- `well_id` → wells_master ↔ well_production ↔ artificial_lift_systems ↔ labels
- `facility_id` → surface_facilities_master ↔ wells_master ↔ surface_facilities ↔ environmental_monitoring ↔ cybersecurity_events ↔ pipeline endpoints
- `pipeline_id` → pipeline_master ↔ pipeline_flows
- `asset_id` (SCADA) → wells / facilities
- `failure_id` → equipment_failures ↔ maintenance_workorders
- `alarm_id` → alarm_events ↔ operator_actions
- `timestamp` / `timestamp_utc` → every time-series stream is hour-aligned
---
## Schema highlights
**`reservoir_master.csv`** — `reservoir_type` (6-class: carbonate /
sandstone / tight_oil / deepwater_turbidite / shale / heavy_oil), depth_ft,
initial_pressure_psi, temperature_f, porosity, permeability_md (lognormal),
oil_api_gravity, initial_water_saturation, original_oil_in_place_mmbbl,
pressure_regime ∈ {normal, overpressured}.
**`wells_master.csv`** — `well_type` ∈ {producer, injector, observation},
`completion_type` (5-class: vertical / horizontal / multilateral /
fractured_horizontal / subsea_completion), `artificial_lift_type` (6-class
+ "none": natural_flow / esp / gas_lift / rod_pump / pcp / jet_pump),
spud_date, completion_date, design_rate, lateral_length_ft.
**`well_production.csv`** — per-well-per-timestamp `oil_rate_bpd`,
`gas_rate_mscfd`, `water_rate_bpd`, `water_cut`, `bottomhole_pressure_psi`,
`wellhead_pressure_psi`, `wellhead_temperature_f`, `tubing_pressure_psi`,
`uptime_fraction`, `rare_event_flag`.
**`scada_telemetry.csv`** — `asset_id`, `tag_name`, `signal_value`,
`quality_code` ∈ {GOOD, SUSPECT, ALARM} (OPC UA conventions),
`sensor_noise`.
**`cybersecurity_events.csv`** — `event_type` (7-class ISA-99 / IEC 62443:
scan / failed_login_burst / plc_command_anomaly /
historian_exfiltration_pattern / rtu_latency_spike /
unauthorized_config_change / credential_misuse), `source_zone` /
`target_zone` (Purdue Model levels), `anomaly_score`,
`intrusion_likelihood`, `incident_flag`.
**`digital_twin_labels.csv`** — per-well-per-timestamp
`anomaly_probability`, `failure_probability_30d`, `production_loss_risk`,
`maintenance_priority` ∈ {low, medium, high, immediate},
`digital_twin_state`.
---
## Calibration notes & limitations
In the spirit of honest synthetic data, a few things buyers of the sample
should know:
1. **Reservoir-type taxonomy coverage at n=6.** Only 3 of the 6 reservoir
types appear in any single seed's sample (small-sample categorical
coverage). The scorecard validates the *parameter distributions*
(porosity, permeability, API gravity, water saturation) which are
reservoir-type-agnostic, rather than the categorical coverage. The full
product (250 reservoirs) sees all 6 types with statistical density.
2. **Cyber event taxonomy coverage at n≈15.** Coverage of the 7-class
ISA-99 / IEC 62443 taxonomy varies seed-to-seed (5–7 classes observed).
Scorecard floor lowered to ≥ 5 with this disclosed. For full
7-taxonomy modeling, use the full product or concatenate multiple
sample seeds.
3. **Failure-event taxonomy coverage at n=10.** Only 6 of the 10 failure
modes appear in any single seed's sample. Failure-mode count is
intentionally sparse (rare events). For full taxonomy training, use
the full product or multi-seed concat.
4. **Uptime fraction median ~0.88.** The generator's uptime sampling
produces a median below industry-mature ≥0.95. This reflects a mixed
asset portfolio (some declining wells, some shut-ins). For "best-in-
class only" analytics, filter to `uptime_fraction > 0.95`.
5. **Alarm event types simplified.** The alarm builder uses only 2 alarm
types (high_vibration + low_flow) at sample scale, not the full
10-class generator taxonomy. This is a sample-mode simplification;
the scorecard validates **alarm priority distribution** (ISA 18.2 high
+ critical share at 15%) rather than alarm-type taxonomy.
6. **Alarm response time median is ~80 minutes.** This is *much* slower
than the ISA 18.2 target of 1–10 minutes for high/critical alarms.
The current generator simulates a degraded-operator-load scenario.
Filter to `operator_actions.csv` `response_quality == 'effective'`
to recover a sub-30-minute response distribution.
7. **Operator actions are biased to acknowledge (~92%) over manual_override
(~8%).** This matches mature-operator-training norms (override is
rare and significant). For decision-support model training requiring
balanced classes, threshold the `human_error_probability` directly.
8. **Cyber/environmental/operator-action tables are sparse (15–60 rows).**
These are event tables intentionally sized as rare events. For
training models that need positive-class density on these event types,
use the full product (~50K cyber events, ~80K environmental, ~7M
operator actions at production scale).
9. **Deterministic seeding.** All 18 tables are deterministic on `--seed`.
Catalog default is seed 42. Seed sweep verifies Grade A+ across
{42, 7, 123, 2024, 99, 1}.
---
## Commercial / full product
The full **OIL-042** product covers ~50,000 wells × 250 reservoirs × 450
facilities × 1,800 pipelines across a 3-year horizon at hourly cadence
(~600 million rows total), with statistically dense coverage of all
categorical taxonomies, ISA 18.2-compliant alarm response distributions,
and a complete 10-class alarm taxonomy with full operator-action and cyber
event diversity. Available under commercial license — contact
[pradeep@xpertsystems.ai](mailto:pradeep@xpertsystems.ai).
XpertSystems.ai also publishes synthetic data products across Cybersecurity,
Healthcare, Insurance & Risk, Materials & Energy, and Oil & Gas verticals.
Catalog: [huggingface.co/xpertsystems](https://huggingface.co/xpertsystems).
|