Datasets:

Modalities:
Tabular
Text
Formats:
parquet
ArXiv:
DOI:
License:
yunplus commited on
Commit
0197160
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): c7d796b

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +187 -81
README.md CHANGED
@@ -1,97 +1,203 @@
1
  ---
2
  license: cc-by-sa-4.0
3
  ---
4
- SuperWing, a comprehensive benchmark dataset of transonic swept wings comprising 4239 wing shapes and nearly 30,000 flow fields across diverse geometries and
5
  operating conditions. Unlike previous efforts that rely on perturbations of a baseline wing, SuperWing is generated using a simplified yet expressive
6
  parameterization scheme. By incorporating spanwise-varying dihedral, twist, and airfoil characteristics, the dataset captures realistic design complexity and
7
  ensures greater diversity than existing ones. Please refer to our [arXiv paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14397) for more details on the dataset.
8
 
9
- ![{DF9389F4-4D8B-4D16-A1E0-384D6E3F5847}](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/6878e482bd4380c813fd99de/wL4x6q1tbNx1kjrexh5g5.png)
10
 
11
- # Features:
 
 
12
 
13
  1. Focusing on the **"kink" wings** (with two segments instead of one in the spanwise direction) under transonic regime (Mach number between 0.75 and 0.90), which bring more complex flow features and are closer to the industry.
14
  2. **More diversity** on the wing shape by generating them from basic parameters instead of perturbing from a baseline wing shape
15
  3. RANS simulation with **well-validated** solver `ADflow` and structural computational mesh.
16
 
17
- # Data format:
18
-
19
- 1. Geometric parameters
20
- `config.dat` includes the basic shape parameters to build a wing from scratch, with the method detailed in our [arXiv paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14397). For each wing
21
- shape, we provide 8 operating conditions, but note that they are not exactly the operating conditions in the final dataset since some of them may not lead to convergent
22
- results.
23
-
24
- |indexs|type|variables|comments|
25
- |-|-|-|-|
26
- |1-7| global planform parameter | sweep angle, dihedral angle at tip, dihedral angle at kink, aspect ratio, taper ratio, kink adjustment, root adjustment |
27
- |8-17| spanwise variation of airfoils | thickness ratios (x3), camber ratios (x3), twist angles (x4) |
28
- |18-38| baseline airfoil shape | CSTs (9th order) for upper (x10) and lower (x10) surface, max thickness |
29
- |39-56| Mach numbers and angles of attacks |
30
-
31
- 2. Index file
32
- `index.npy` provides the crucial information for all provided samples; it has 12 channels, with each channel listed below:
33
-
34
- |index|description|
35
- |-|-|
36
- |0|wing shape index (corresponding to in `config.dat`)|
37
- |1|operating condition index (count in each wing shape) |
38
- |2|angle of attack (in degrees)|
39
- |3|mach number|
40
- |4|reference area (to calculate coefficient)|
41
- |5|half span length|
42
- |6,7,8|lift, drag, pitching moment (acc. LE) coefficient from the solver|
43
- |9,10,11|lift, drag, pitching moment (acc. LE) coefficient by recalculating from the surface flow (there are ones used for ML models)|
44
-
45
- 4. Reference surface mesh and surface physical quantities on this reference mesh
46
-
47
- The reference mesh `geom0` contains the cell-centric coordinates of the reference surface mesh with size \\( 256 \times 128 \times 3 \\), and the three channels stand
48
- for \\( x, y, z \\). The surface physical quantities `data.npy` are on the same reference mesh with size \\( 256 \times 128 \times 3 \\), and the three channels stand for
49
- \\( C_p, C_{f,\tau}, C_{f,z} \\). (the latter two are the decomposed friction coefficients on the streamwise and spanwise directions). **These data can serve as input and
50
- output for a machine learning model that predicts the aerodynamics of wings**.
51
-
52
- **reference mesh**: The simulation mesh on the wing surface is first interpolated to a reference mesh. In the spanwise ($j$-direction), 128 cross-sectional planes are
53
- sampled with even spacing, and tips are excluded. For each cross-section (i-direction), a fixed set of normalized chordwise positions \\( \{(x/c)_i\} \\) s is used for both
54
- the upper and lower surfaces, and the tail edge is represented only with one cell. The reference mesh along the wing surface is then unfolded as shown below, resulting
55
- in a final vertex surface grid of \\( 257 \times 129 \\) points per wing (`origingeom.npy`). This is useful when we need to calculate coefficients from the surface flow outputs.
56
- The cell-centric grid for the mesh is obtained just by averaging the coordinates at the four vertices.
57
-
58
- <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/6878e482bd4380c813fd99de/deWUNg0C2bxl7ZDQFfowu.png" alt="transform" width="40%">
59
-
60
- 5. Volumetric flow quantities on the near-field simulation mesh
61
-
62
- Volumetric flow data are also provided for potential future use. We provide the cell-centric coordinates and five core flow quantities at each simulation cell, and the flow
63
- quantities are in the order of density, pressure, and the velocities in the \\(x, y, z \\) directions. Since the simulation requires a large far field to implement the
64
- freestream boundary condition, the values at the far mesh points are the same as the freestream condition. To avoid this reluctance, we truncate the flow field at 51 in the
65
- far-field direction for each block. The original structural mesh blocks are flattened to one dimension and concatenated to each other, which leads to a size of
66
- \\(8 \times 2,204,800 \\) for each volumetric flow field.
67
-
68
- 6. Raw solver input & output
69
-
70
- The raw input surface mesh (`wing.xyz`), output of surface flow (`surf.cgns`), and 3D volume fields (`vol.cgns`) are also available in their original formats (CGNS files with the ADF format). They need the
71
- CGNS library to be read out. Since they are too large, they are available via university storage upon reasonable request to the authors.
72
-
73
-
74
- The table below summarizes the data. (N=28856, Nshape=4239)
75
-
76
- |Type | File | Description | Shape | Size |
77
- |-|-|-|-|-|
78
- |Geometric parameters | `Configs.dat` | shape parameters | N x 57 | 5.0 MB
79
- |Information | `index.npy` | group information, operating conditions, and aerodynamic coefficients | N x 12 | 2.8 MB
80
- |Surface mesh | `origingeom.npy` | reference surface mesh (grid points) | Nshape x 3 x 129 x 257 | 3.3 GB
81
- | | `geom0.npy` | reference surface mesh (cell center) | Nshape x 3 x 128 x 256 | 3.3 GB
82
- |Surface flow | `data.npy` | \\( C_p, \bm {C_f} \\) at reference mesh (cell center) | N x 3 x 128 x 256 | 22.7 GB
83
- |Volume flow | `data_vol.*.npy.zst` | \\(x, y, z, \rho, p, v_x, v_y, v_z\\) at near-field volumetric simulation mesh (cell center) | N x 8 x 2,204,800 | 2.3 TB (46 files)
84
- |Raw data | `*\wing.xyz` | surface simulation mesh | | 7.8 GB
85
- | | `*\surf.cgns` | raw surface flow output | | 161.5 GB
86
- | | `*\vol.cgns` | raw flow field output | | 5.5 TB
87
-
88
-
89
- The simulations are conducted on the 160-core high-performance computing cluster at AeroLab, Tsinghua University, for over four months.
90
-
91
- # Train-test split
92
-
93
- The default training-testing split is decided by the **shape indices**, so that the samples in the testing dataset contain shapes that are totally unseen during training. We
94
- select 90\% shapes and their sample number (corresponding to the rows in `index.npy`) are in `training_samples_index.txt`.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
95
 
96
  # Postprocess
97
 
 
1
  ---
2
  license: cc-by-sa-4.0
3
  ---
4
+ **SuperWing**, a comprehensive benchmark dataset of transonic swept wings comprising 4239 wing shapes and nearly 30,000 flow fields across diverse geometries and
5
  operating conditions. Unlike previous efforts that rely on perturbations of a baseline wing, SuperWing is generated using a simplified yet expressive
6
  parameterization scheme. By incorporating spanwise-varying dihedral, twist, and airfoil characteristics, the dataset captures realistic design complexity and
7
  ensures greater diversity than existing ones. Please refer to our [arXiv paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14397) for more details on the dataset.
8
 
9
+ ![{AB7AE610-885E-4D76-8658-C797ACFC1D02}](https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/6878e482bd4380c813fd99de/xUllU2wTB0GEyuS1OmKjd.png)
10
 
11
+ The simulations are conducted on the 160-core high-performance computing cluster at AeroLab, Tsinghua University
12
+
13
+ # Features
14
 
15
  1. Focusing on the **"kink" wings** (with two segments instead of one in the spanwise direction) under transonic regime (Mach number between 0.75 and 0.90), which bring more complex flow features and are closer to the industry.
16
  2. **More diversity** on the wing shape by generating them from basic parameters instead of perturbing from a baseline wing shape
17
  3. RANS simulation with **well-validated** solver `ADflow` and structural computational mesh.
18
 
19
+ ---
20
+
21
+ # Data overview
22
+
23
+ ## Files
24
+
25
+ (N=28856, Nshape=4239)
26
+
27
+ | Type | File | Description | Shape | Size |
28
+ |---|---|---|---|---|
29
+ | Metadata | `config.dat` | shape parameters | \\(N_{\mathrm{shape}} \times 56\\) | 5.0 MB |
30
+ | | `index.npy` | indexing, operating conditions, and aerodynamic coefficients | \\(N_{\mathrm{sample}} \times 12\\) | 2.8 MB |
31
+ | | `training_samples_index.txt` | training sample split | -- | 0.1 MB |
32
+ | Shape / Surface flow | `data_surf.npy.zst` | surface simulation mesh and flow quantities on mesh points (cell center) | \\(N_{\mathrm{sample}} \times 10 \times 44{,}096\\) | 26.7 GB (85.3 GB) |
33
+ | | `origingeom.npy` | [STRUCTURED] reference surface mesh (grid points) | \\(N_{\mathrm{shape}} \times 3 \times 129 \times 257\\) | 3.3 GB |
34
+ | | `geom0.npy` | [STRUCTURED] reference surface mesh (cell center) | \\(N_{\mathrm{shape}} \times 3 \times 128 \times 256\\) | 3.3 GB |
35
+ | | `data.npy` | [STRUCTURED] surface flow quantities at reference mesh (cell center) | \\(N_{\mathrm{sample}} \times 3 \times 128 \times 256\\) | 22.7 GB |
36
+ | Volumetric flow | `data_vol.xx.npy.zst` | coordinates and flow quantities at near-field volumetric simulation mesh (cell center) | \\(N_{\mathrm{sample}} \times 8 \times 3{,}086{,}720\\) | 3.2 TB (5.3 TB) |
37
+
38
+ ## Channels (for geometry and flow)
39
+
40
+ | Index | `data_surf.npy` | `data_vol.npy` | Index | `origingeom.npy`, `geom0.npy` |
41
+ |---|---|---|---|---|
42
+ | 0 | Coordinate \\(x\\) | Coordinate \\(x\\) | 0 | Coordinate \\(x\\) |
43
+ | 1 | Coordinate \\(y\\) | Coordinate \\(y\\) | 1 | Coordinate \\(y\\) |
44
+ | 2 | Coordinate \\(z\\) | Coordinate \\(z\\) | 2 | Coordinate \\(z\\) |
45
+ | 3 | Density \\(\tilde \rho\\) | Density \\(\tilde \rho\\) | | `data.npy` |
46
+ | 4 | Pressure coef. \\(C_{p}\\) | Pressure \\(\tilde p\\) | 0 | Pressure coef. \\(C_{p,\mathrm{scaled}}\\) |
47
+ | 5 | \\(x\\) skin friction coef. \\(C_{f,x}\\) | \\(x\\) velocity \\(\tilde V_x\\) | 1 | Streamwise skin friction coef. \\(C_{f,\tau,\mathrm{scaled}}\\) |
48
+ | 6 | \\(y\\) skin friction coef. \\(C_{f,y}\\) | \\(y\\) velocity \\(\tilde V_y\\) | 2 | \\(z\\) skin friction coef. \\(C_{f,z,\mathrm{scaled}}\\) |
49
+ | 7 | \\(z\\) skin friction coef. \\(C_{f,z}\\) | \\(z\\) velocity \\(\tilde V_z\\) | | |
50
+ | 8 | Temperature \\(\tilde T\\) | | | |
51
+
52
+ - \\(\tilde{(\cdot)}\\) means the relative value to the freestream condition ( \\(\rho_\infty, p_\infty, T_\infty, V_\infty\\) )
53
+ - \\((\cdot)_{\mathrm{scaled}}\\) means they are scaled to have a similar magnitude. The scaling factor for the three channels are 1, 150, 300.
54
+
55
+ **Coefficients definition**
56
+
57
+ - Pressure coefficient: \\(C_p = \frac{p-p_\infty}{0.5\rho_\infty V_\infty^2}\\)
58
+ - Friction coefficient: (vector) \\(C_{\bm f} = [C_{f,x}, C_{f,y}, C_{f,z}]^T = \frac{\bm{\tau_w}}{0.5\rho_\infty V_\infty^2}, \quad \bm{\tau_w}=\mu \frac{\partial \bm {u_t}}{\partial s_n}\\)
59
+ - \\(C_{f,\tau,\mathrm{scaled}}\\) means the component in the \\(x\\) - \\(y\\) surface.
60
+
61
+ ---
62
+
63
+ # Data format
64
+
65
+ ## Meta Data
66
+
67
+ The metadata include the wing geometry parameters, operating conditions, aerodynamic coefficients, group identifiers, and predefined train/test splits used in this work.
68
+
69
+ ### `configs.dat`
70
+
71
+ `configs.dat` stores the parametric definition of each wing geometry and can be used to reconstruct the geometry from scratch. It contains:
72
+
73
+ - **Columns 1–7:** Global planform parameters, including:
74
+ - sweep angle \\(\Lambda_\mathrm{LE}\\)
75
+ - tip/kink dihedral angles \\(\Gamma_\mathrm{LE,tip}\\), \\(\Gamma_\mathrm{LE,kink}\\)
76
+ - aspect ratio \\(AR\\)
77
+ - taper ratio \\(TR\\)
78
+ - kink location \\(\eta_k\\)
79
+ - root parameter \\(\kappa_\mathrm{root}\\)
80
+
81
+ - **Columns 8–17:** Spanwise variation parameters:
82
+ - thickness ratios \\(r_t\\) ( \\(\times 3\\))
83
+ - deformation parameters \\(r_\delta\\) ( \\(\times 4\\))
84
+ - twist angles \\(\alpha_\mathrm{tw}\\) ( \\(\times 4\\))
85
+
86
+ - **Columns 18–38:** Baseline airfoil shape:
87
+ - CST coefficients for upper surface ( \\(\times 10\\))
88
+ - CST coefficients for lower surface ( \\(\times 10\\))
89
+
90
+ - **Columns 39–56:** Operating conditions:
91
+ - eight pairs of Mach number \\(Ma\\) and angle of attack \\(\alpha\\)
92
+
93
+ > Some operating conditions may be missing in the final dataset if CFD simulations fail to converge.
94
+
95
+
96
+ ### `index.npy`
97
+
98
+ `index.npy` provides metadata for each flow-field sample. Each row corresponds to one sample. It includes:
99
+
100
+ - **Geometry mapping**
101
+ - Column 1: geometry index (linked to `configs.dat`)
102
+ - Column 2: operating-condition index within the geometry
103
+
104
+ - **Operating conditions**
105
+ - Column 3: angle of attack \\(\alpha\\)
106
+ - Column 4: Mach number \\(Ma\\)
107
+
108
+ - **Reference quantities**
109
+ - Column 5: half reference area \\(S_{1/2}\\)
110
+ - Column 6: half span \\(b_{1/2}\\)
111
+
112
+ - **Aerodynamic coefficients**
113
+ - lift coefficient \\(C_L\\)
114
+ - drag coefficient \\(C_D\\)
115
+ - pitching moment coefficient \\(C_{M,z}\\)
116
+
117
+ > These coefficients are computed from pressure coefficient and skin-friction vector by surface integration:
118
+ >
119
+ > \\(
120
+ > C_{\bm F}=[C_x,C_y,C_z]^T =\frac{1}{S_{1/2}} \sum_{i=1}^{N_{\mathrm{cell}}} \left[ C_p^{(i)}\bm n^{(i)} + \left(C_{\bm f}^{(i)} - (C_{\bm f}^{(i)}\cdot \bm n^{(i)})\bm n^{(i)} \right) \right] A^{(i)}
121
+ > \\)
122
+ >
123
+ > Lift and drag are obtained by rotating the force vector according to the angle of attack:
124
+ >
125
+ > \\(
126
+ > [C_L,C_D,C_z]^T=\bm R_\alpha C_{\bm F}
127
+ > \\)
128
+ >
129
+ > The pitching moment coefficient is:
130
+ >
131
+ > \\(
132
+ > C_{M,z}=\frac{1}{S_{1/2}c_\mathrm{ref}}\sum_{i=1}^{N_{\mathrm{cell}}}\bm r^{(i)}\times\left(\left[C_p^{(i)}\bm n^{(i)}+\left(C_{\bm f}^{(i)}-(C_{\bm f}^{(i)}\cdot\bm n^{(i)})\bm n^{(i)}\right)\right]A^{(i)}\right)
133
+ > \\)
134
+ >
135
+ > where: \\(\bm n^{(i)}\\): outward normal vector, \\(A^{(i)}\\): surface-cell area, \\(\bm r^{(i)}\\): position vector from the reference point, \\(c_\mathrm{ref}=1.0\\): reference chord length
136
+
137
+ Two sets of aerodynamic coefficients are provided:
138
+
139
+ - **Columns 7–9:** coefficients computed on the original CFD mesh using `ADflow`
140
+ - **Columns 10–12:** coefficients evaluated on the structured reference mesh for machine-learning applications
141
+
142
+ ### `training_samples_index.txt`
143
+
144
+ `training_samples_index.txt` stores the indices of training samples used in technical validation.
145
+
146
+ The dataset is split by wing shape to evaluate generalization:
147
+
148
+ - 90% of wing shapes are randomly selected for training
149
+ - the remaining shapes are used for testing
150
+
151
+ Training sample indices are recorded in this file.
152
+
153
+ ### Parquet Files
154
+
155
+ `train.parquet` and `test.parquet` provide metadata organized into training and test splits for convenient visualization and loading in HuggingFace.
156
+
157
+ ---
158
+
159
+ ## Surface shape and flow
160
+
161
+ ### Original data [NEW]
162
+
163
+ `data_surf/data_surf.npy.zst` provides the centric coordinates of the exact surface mesh for the simulations, and the surface flow values on the surface mesh centers.
164
+ To enable compact storage, we flatten the original multi-block structured mesh into a one-dimensional sequence of 44,096 points.
165
+
166
+ <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/6878e482bd4380c813fd99de/VSgQ1Op01mIa-g_4f4K3J.png" alt="surface" width="40%">
167
+
168
+ ### Structured surface shape and flow
169
+
170
+ `origingeom.npy`, `geom0.npy`, `data.npy`
171
+
172
+ > Besides the raw multi-block solver output, we also prepare the surface mesh and flow fields in a format suitable for ML models with structured inputs and outputs.
173
+
174
+
175
+ The reference mesh `geom0` contains the cell-centric coordinates of the reference surface mesh with size \\( 256 \times 128 \times 3 \\), and the three channels stand
176
+ for \\( x, y, z \\). The surface physical quantities `data.npy` are on the same reference mesh with size \\( 256 \times 128 \times 3 \\), and the three channels stand for
177
+ \\( C_p, C_{f,\tau}, C_{f,z} \\). (the latter two are the decomposed friction coefficients on the streamwise and spanwise directions).
178
+
179
+ **reference mesh**: The simulation mesh on the wing surface is first interpolated to a reference mesh. In the spanwise ($j$-direction), 128 cross-sectional planes are
180
+ sampled with even spacing, and tips are excluded. For each cross-section (i-direction), a fixed set of normalized chordwise positions \\( \{(x/c)_i\} \\) s is used for both
181
+ the upper and lower surfaces, and the tail edge is represented only with one cell. The reference mesh along the wing surface is then unfolded as shown below, resulting
182
+ in a final vertex surface grid of \\( 257 \times 129 \\) points per wing (`origingeom.npy`). This is useful when we need to calculate coefficients from the surface flow outputs.
183
+ The cell-centric grid for the mesh is obtained just by averaging the coordinates at the four vertices.
184
+
185
+ <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/6878e482bd4380c813fd99de/deWUNg0C2bxl7ZDQFfowu.png" alt="transform" width="40%">
186
+
187
+ ---
188
+
189
+ ## Volumetric flow quantities on the near-field simulation mesh
190
+
191
+ `data\_vol/data\_vol.xx.npy.zst` provides the volumetric flow, including the cell-centric coordinates and five core flow quantities at each simulation cell. They are again
192
+ defined as the relative value to the freestream. Similar to the surface data, we flatten and concatenate the multi-block mesh into a one-dimensional point cloud sequence.
193
+
194
+ Given that it requires a large far field, the flow variables at far-field mesh points show only negligible deviations from the freestream values. To avoid this redundancy,
195
+ we include the first 71 layers of mesh in the wall-normal dimension for each block. This produces 3,086,720 points per volumetric flow field.
196
+
197
+
198
+ <img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/6878e482bd4380c813fd99de/Pjwd0YVNeySsr6ycsJHRN.png" alt="vol" width="30%">
199
+
200
+ ---
201
 
202
  # Postprocess
203