Add files using upload-large-folder tool
Browse files- README.md +41 -3
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_264_i5.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_267_i1.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_269_i1.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_271_i1.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_272_i1.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_276_i3.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_276_i4.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_278_i3.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_281_i3.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_281_i4.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_284_i07.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_284_i09.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_285_i10.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_286_i11.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_287_i01.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_288_i07.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_288_i09.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_289_i10.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_290_i01.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_290_i06.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_290_i08.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_291_i11.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_292_i13.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_292_i14.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_293_i04.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_294_i01.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_294_i06.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_294_i08.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_295_i11.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_296_i13.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_296_i14.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_297_i03.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_297_i04.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_297_i09.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_298_i01.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_298_i06.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_298_i08.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_299_i11.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_300_i11.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_301_i01.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_301_i06.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_302_i03.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_302_i04.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_303_i13.jpg +3 -0
- images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_303_i14.jpg +3 -0
- metadata.jsonl +0 -0
- prepare_summary.json +24 -0
- question-4.original.json +0 -0
- question_taxonomy_summary.md +221 -0
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,41 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
---
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
pretty_name: ThinkGeoBench Question-4
|
| 3 |
+
license: other
|
| 4 |
+
task_categories:
|
| 5 |
+
- visual-question-answering
|
| 6 |
+
- image-classification
|
| 7 |
+
- tabular-classification
|
| 8 |
+
configs:
|
| 9 |
+
- config_name: default
|
| 10 |
+
data_files:
|
| 11 |
+
- split: test
|
| 12 |
+
path: metadata.jsonl
|
| 13 |
+
---
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
# ThinkGeoBench Question-4
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
This repository contains an upload-ready Hugging Face release folder for the `question-4` split of ThinkGeoBench.
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
## Included files
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
- `metadata.jsonl`: normalized table for Hugging Face Dataset Viewer
|
| 22 |
+
- `images/`: image assets referenced by `question-4`
|
| 23 |
+
- `assets/AppleSizeEstimate/`: depth `.npy` assets referenced by Apple size estimation samples
|
| 24 |
+
- `question-4.original.json`: original source question file
|
| 25 |
+
- `question_taxonomy_summary.md`: taxonomy and template notes
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
## Split
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
- `test`: 539 samples
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
## Schema notes
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
- `classification_labels` keeps the original multi-label information as a list.
|
| 34 |
+
- `primary_classification` is the first label, useful for filtering and faceting.
|
| 35 |
+
- `image1_file_name` to `image15_file_name` are relative paths to image assets in this repository.
|
| 36 |
+
- `depth1_path` is a relative path to a `.npy` depth asset when required.
|
| 37 |
+
- `focal_length_px` is present for Apple size estimation samples that require camera intrinsics.
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
## License note
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
The placeholder `license: other` should be replaced with the actual redistribution license before publishing publicly.
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_264_i5.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_267_i1.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_269_i1.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_271_i1.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_272_i1.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_276_i3.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_276_i4.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_278_i3.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_281_i3.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_281_i4.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_284_i07.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_284_i09.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_285_i10.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_286_i11.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_287_i01.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_288_i07.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_288_i09.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_289_i10.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_290_i01.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_290_i06.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_290_i08.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_291_i11.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_292_i13.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_292_i14.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_293_i04.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_294_i01.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_294_i06.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_294_i08.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_295_i11.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_296_i13.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_296_i14.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_297_i03.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_297_i04.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_297_i09.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_298_i01.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_298_i06.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_298_i08.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_299_i11.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_300_i11.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_301_i01.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_301_i06.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_302_i03.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_302_i04.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_303_i13.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
images/WeedPhenotyping/wp_303_i14.jpg
ADDED
|
Git LFS Details
|
metadata.jsonl
ADDED
|
The diff for this file is too large to render.
See raw diff
|
|
|
prepare_summary.json
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
{
|
| 2 |
+
"source_question_file": "/public/home/yezi/ThinkGeo/my_dataset_test/question-4.json",
|
| 3 |
+
"output_directory": "/public/home/yezi/ThinkGeo/hf_release_question4",
|
| 4 |
+
"sample_count": 539,
|
| 5 |
+
"referenced_file_count": 1137,
|
| 6 |
+
"referenced_total_bytes": 1027433225,
|
| 7 |
+
"referenced_total_gib": 0.957,
|
| 8 |
+
"included_optional_files": [
|
| 9 |
+
"question-4.original.json",
|
| 10 |
+
"question_taxonomy_summary.md",
|
| 11 |
+
"README.md",
|
| 12 |
+
"metadata.jsonl"
|
| 13 |
+
],
|
| 14 |
+
"excluded_large_or_non_dataset_dirs": [
|
| 15 |
+
"Evaluator",
|
| 16 |
+
"tmp",
|
| 17 |
+
"Statistics",
|
| 18 |
+
"models",
|
| 19 |
+
"code",
|
| 20 |
+
"Papers",
|
| 21 |
+
"answer_split",
|
| 22 |
+
"answer_split_v2"
|
| 23 |
+
]
|
| 24 |
+
}
|
question-4.original.json
ADDED
|
The diff for this file is too large to render.
See raw diff
|
|
|
question_taxonomy_summary.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,221 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# Question Taxonomy Summary
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
Source file: [question-4.json](question-4.json)
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
Total questions: `539`
|
| 6 |
+
|
| 7 |
+
Unique question templates: `76`
|
| 8 |
+
|
| 9 |
+
Current template IDs present in [question-4.json](question-4.json): `1-76`
|
| 10 |
+
|
| 11 |
+
Missing template IDs in the current file: `None`
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
## Current 5-category taxonomy
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
This version follows the 5-way task taxonomy used for [question-4.json](question-4.json). It is intended for dataset organization, task routing, and template-level traceability. Mixed questions are allowed to belong to more than one category. The template system below is the deduplicated `76-template` version of `question-4`.
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
1. `识别与检索类 / Recognition & Retrieval`
|
| 18 |
+
Focus: identify pests, diseases, weeds, or plant taxa, then provide related biological or management information.
|
| 19 |
+
Typical tasks: pest recognition, crop disease recognition, taxonomic identification, native-range questions, treatment suggestions, causal or ecological relation questions.
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
2. `目标检测、计数与测量类 / Detection, Counting & Measurement`
|
| 22 |
+
Focus: detect objects or instances and perform counting, size estimation, diameter measurement, ranking, and coverage estimation at the object level.
|
| 23 |
+
Typical tasks: tree counting, tree diameter estimation, fruit counting, apple size estimation, wheat-ear counting, lesion counting, and local density comparison.
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
3. `变化检测类 / Change Detection`
|
| 26 |
+
Focus: compare two temporal images and identify land-cover or pond changes, changed areas, changed categories, and transition proportions.
|
| 27 |
+
Typical tasks: cultivated-to-non-cultivated conversion, farm-pond change detection, changed-region localization, and change percentage estimation.
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
4. `语义分割解译类 / Semantic Segmentation Interpretation`
|
| 30 |
+
Focus: interpret single-image dense prediction or segmentation-style outputs, including lesion area estimation, weed/crop area proportion, canopy threshold-based region analysis, and mask-based spatial description.
|
| 31 |
+
Typical tasks: lesion-area percentage, lesion-region localization, weed-vs-crop area interpretation, thresholded canopy coverage, and mask-based regional description.
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
5. `统计分析型任务 / Statistical Analysis`
|
| 34 |
+
Focus: perform structured comparison, metric aggregation, band-selection analysis, and curve or chart generation.
|
| 35 |
+
Typical tasks: multispectral band-combination comparison, grouped metric plots, weed growth curves, and derived summary statistics across options.
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
## Multi-label rule
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
The `classification` field in [question-4.json](question-4.json) supports:
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
- a single integer, such as `1`
|
| 42 |
+
- or an integer array for mixed tasks, such as `[1, 4]`
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
Use multiple labels when a question has two equally central task components and the answer depends on both.
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
## Category membership counts
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
Because multi-label questions are counted once in each category they belong to, the counts below are membership counts rather than a partition of `539`. Template counts here also follow category membership rather than question-4 block placement.
|
| 49 |
+
|
| 50 |
+
- `Class 1`: `180` memberships, `19` templates
|
| 51 |
+
- `Class 2`: `102` memberships, `22` templates
|
| 52 |
+
- `Class 3`: `103` memberships, `5` templates
|
| 53 |
+
- `Class 4`: `131` memberships, `10` templates
|
| 54 |
+
- `Class 5`: `77` memberships, `29` templates
|
| 55 |
+
|
| 56 |
+
Mixed-label samples: `54`
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
Mixed-label templates: `9`
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
Observed mixed-label combinations: `4`
|
| 61 |
+
|
| 62 |
+
## question-4.json 分类统计汇总
|
| 63 |
+
|
| 64 |
+
### 1. 按分类出现次数统计
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
这里按照“分类出现了多少次”统计。若某条样本是多标签,例如 `[1, 4]`,则会同时计入 `Class 1` 和 `Class 4`。
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
- `Class 1`: `180`
|
| 69 |
+
- `Class 2`: `102`
|
| 70 |
+
- `Class 3`: `103`
|
| 71 |
+
- `Class 4`: `131`
|
| 72 |
+
- `Class 5`: `77`
|
| 73 |
+
|
| 74 |
+
总样本数: `539`
|
| 75 |
+
|
| 76 |
+
多标签样本数: `54`
|
| 77 |
+
|
| 78 |
+
### 2. 按单标签样本数统计
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
这里仅统计 `classification` 为单个整数的样本,不把多标签样本重复计入单类。
|
| 81 |
+
|
| 82 |
+
- `Class 1`: `145`
|
| 83 |
+
- `Class 2`: `90`
|
| 84 |
+
- `Class 3`: `103`
|
| 85 |
+
- `Class 4`: `80`
|
| 86 |
+
- `Class 5`: `67`
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
单标签样本总数: `485`
|
| 89 |
+
|
| 90 |
+
### 3. 多标签组合分布
|
| 91 |
+
|
| 92 |
+
- `[1, 2]`: `3`
|
| 93 |
+
- `[1, 4]`: `32`
|
| 94 |
+
- `[2, 4]`: `9`
|
| 95 |
+
- `[4, 5]`: `10`
|
| 96 |
+
|
| 97 |
+
### 4. question-4 排列规则与区间
|
| 98 |
+
|
| 99 |
+
question-4 按 5 个分类块排序,块内再按去重后的上一版 question-4 模板家族升序;混合标签模板按第一个分类标签归块。
|
| 100 |
+
|
| 101 |
+
- `[1, 4]` questions are placed in the `Class 1` block
|
| 102 |
+
- `[2, 4]` questions are placed in the `Class 2` block
|
| 103 |
+
- `[4, 5]` questions are placed in the `Class 4` block
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
- `Class 1` block: new templates `1-19`, sample_ids `1-180`, `180` questions, `19` block templates; previous question-4 template families `1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19`
|
| 106 |
+
- `Class 2` block: new templates `20-38`, sample_ids `181-279`, `99` questions, `19` block templates; previous question-4 template families `20, 21, 22/23/24/33/34/35/36, 25, 26, 27, 28/30, 29, 31, 32, 37/38, 39/40/41/42/43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50`
|
| 107 |
+
- `Class 3` block: new templates `39-43`, sample_ids `280-382`, `103` questions, `5` block templates; previous question-4 template families `51, 52, 53, 54/55, 56`
|
| 108 |
+
- `Class 4` block: new templates `44-48`, sample_ids `383-472`, `90` questions, `5` block templates; previous question-4 template families `57, 58, 59, 60, 61`
|
| 109 |
+
- `Class 5` block: new templates `49-76`, sample_ids `473-539`, `67` questions, `28` block templates; previous question-4 template families `62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89`
|
| 110 |
+
|
| 111 |
+
### 5. question-4 中的多标签模板位置
|
| 112 |
+
|
| 113 |
+
- `[1, 2]`: new templates `8, 9, 10`
|
| 114 |
+
- `[1, 4]`: new templates `11, 12, 13, 14`
|
| 115 |
+
- `[2, 4]`: new templates `38`
|
| 116 |
+
- `[4, 5]`: new templates `46`
|
| 117 |
+
|
| 118 |
+
## Template Catalog
|
| 119 |
+
|
| 120 |
+
Each table below follows the final question-4 block order. Multi-label templates appear in the block determined by the first classification label. The provenance columns show both the previous question-4 template family and the original question-3 source template(s).
|
| 121 |
+
|
| 122 |
+
### Class 1: 识别与检索类 / Recognition & Retrieval
|
| 123 |
+
|
| 124 |
+
| New template | Previous question-4 template(s) | Question-3 source template(s) | Count | Classification | Reference tool chain | Representative question |
|
| 125 |
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
| 126 |
+
| `1` | `1` | `1` | `13` | `1` | PestCropIdentification | What agricultural pest is shown in the image? |
|
| 127 |
+
| `2` | `2` | `2` | `12` | `1` | PestCropIdentification | What crop disease is shown in the image? |
|
| 128 |
+
| `3` | `3` | `3` | `15` | `1` | PestCropIdentification, AgriculturalWebSearch | What ecological relationship best describes the interaction between the pests in Image 1 and Image 2: predation, parasitism, competition, mutualism, commensalism, intraspecific cooperation, or none of the above relationships? |
|
| 129 |
+
| `4` | `4` | `4` | `15` | `1` | PestCropIdentification, PestCropIdentification, AgriculturalWebSearch | Is the pest shown in Image 1 a primary cause of the crop disease shown in Image 2? |
|
| 130 |
+
| `5` | `5` | `5` | `20` | `1` | PestCropIdentification, AgriculturalWebSearch | What pesticide is generally most effective against the pest shown in the image, and what control method should be used to manage it effectively? |
|
| 131 |
+
| `6` | `6` | `6` | `20` | `1` | PestCropIdentification, AgriculturalWebSearch | Where is the pest shown in the image currently most widely distributed in the world? |
|
| 132 |
+
| `7` | `7` | `7` | `20` | `1` | PestCropIdentification, AgriculturalWebSearch | Is the crop disease shown in the image infectious or non-infectious, and what is its main cause? |
|
| 133 |
+
| `8` | `8` | `8` | `1` | `[1, 2]` | ExtractMarkedRedBox, ObjectCounting, ImageRegionUnderstanding | How many trees are inside the red box in the picture? Based on the images, are these trees in a healthy growth state? |
|
| 134 |
+
| `9` | `9` | `9` | `1` | `[1, 2]` | ExtractMarkedRedBox, ObjectCounting, ImageRegionUnderstanding | How many trees are inside the red box in the picture? Based on their characteristics in the picture, are they pine trees? |
|
| 135 |
+
| `10` | `10` | `10` | `1` | `[1, 2]` | ExtractMarkedRedBox, ObjectCounting, ImageRegionUnderstanding, AgriculturalWebSearch | How many trees are inside the red box in the picture? In what climatic regions does this type of tree typically grow? |
|
| 136 |
+
| `11` | `11` | `94` | `1` | `[1, 4]` | PestCropIdentification, PlantSegLesionAnalysis, Calculator | What is the condition of the fruit in the picture? Approximately what percentage of the area is infected with disease? |
|
| 137 |
+
| `12` | `12` | `95` | `11` | `[1, 4]` | PestCropIdentification, PlantSegLesionAnalysis, Calculator | What disease is shown in the picture? Approximately what percentage of the affected plant organ area is covered by visible disease lesions? |
|
| 138 |
+
| `13` | `13` | `96` | `10` | `[1, 4]` | PestCropIdentification, PlantSegLesionAnalysis, Calculator, AgriculturalWebSearch | Approximately what percentage of the affected plant organ area is covered by visible disease lesions? What medications or treatments should be used for this disease? |
|
| 139 |
+
| `14` | `14` | `98` | `10` | `[1, 4]` | PestCropIdentification, PlantSegLesionAnalysis, ImageRegionUnderstanding, AgriculturalWebSearch | What disease is shown in the image? Please determine whether it is indeed this disease based on the description of the lesion segmentation result image. |
|
| 140 |
+
| `15` | `15` | `99` | `5` | `1` | WeedSpeciesClassification, AgriculturalWebSearch | Among the three plants shown, exactly one belongs to the family Asteraceae. Which one is it? Respond with its accepted English common name only. |
|
| 141 |
+
| `16` | `16` | `100` | `5` | `1` | WeedSpeciesClassification, AgriculturalWebSearch | Among the three plants shown, exactly one belongs to the family Verbenaceae. Which one is it? Respond with its accepted English common name only. |
|
| 142 |
+
| `17` | `17` | `101` | `5` | `1` | WeedSpeciesClassification, AgriculturalWebSearch | Among the three plants shown, exactly one belongs to the family Fabaceae. Which one is it? Respond with its accepted English common name only. |
|
| 143 |
+
| `18` | `18` | `102` | `5` | `1` | WeedSpeciesClassification, AgriculturalWebSearch | Among the three plants shown, exactly one belongs to the family Rhamnaceae. Which one is it? Respond with its accepted English common name only. |
|
| 144 |
+
| `19` | `19` | `103` | `10` | `1` | WeedSpeciesClassification, AgriculturalWebSearch | What is the native range (natural region of origin) of the weed species shown in the image? Answer in one or two short English sentences. |
|
| 145 |
+
|
| 146 |
+
### Class 2: 目标检测、计数与测量类 / Detection, Counting & Measurement
|
| 147 |
+
|
| 148 |
+
| New template | Previous question-4 template(s) | Question-3 source template(s) | Count | Classification | Reference tool chain | Representative question |
|
| 149 |
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
| 150 |
+
| `20` | `20` | `11` | `2` | `2` | ExtractMarkedRedBox, ObjectCounting, Calculator | What is the diameter of the smallest tree in the red box? GSD 0.08m/pixel |
|
| 151 |
+
| `21` | `21` | `12` | `1` | `2` | ExtractMarkedRedBox, ObjectCounting, Calculator | What is the diameter of the biggest tree in the red box? GSD 0.08m/pixel |
|
| 152 |
+
| `22` | `22,23,24,33,34,35,36` | `13,14,15,24,25,26,27` | `7` | `2` | ExtractMarkedRedBox, ObjectCounting, Calculator | What is the average diameter of the trees in the red box in the picture? GSD 0.08m/pixel |
|
| 153 |
+
| `23` | `25` | `16` | `1` | `2` | ExtractMarkedRedBox, ObjectCounting (with ROI; coordinates do not need to be returned), ObjectCounting (whole image), Calculator | What percentage of the total number of trees in the image is represented by the trees framed in red? |
|
| 154 |
+
| `24` | `26` | `17` | `1` | `2` | ExtractMarkedRedBox, ObjectCounting, Calculator | What is the difference in diameter between the largest and smallest trees within the red box? GSD 0.08m/pixel |
|
| 155 |
+
| `25` | `27` | `18` | `1` | `2` | ExtractMarkedRedBox, ObjectCounting, Calculator | What is the standard deviation of the diameter of the trees in the red box in the picture? |
|
| 156 |
+
| `26` | `28,30` | `19,21` | `2` | `2` | ExtractMarkedRedBox, ObjectCounting | How many trees are inside the red box in the picture? |
|
| 157 |
+
| `27` | `29` | `20` | `15` | `2` | ExtractMarkedRedBox, ObjectCounting (ROI is the red-box region), ObjectCounting (pass in the inferred ROI for this column), Calculator | How many trees are in the red box in the picture? What percentage of the total number of trees in this column are represented? |
|
| 158 |
+
| `28` | `31` | `22` | `1` | `2` | ExtractMarkedRedBox, ObjectCounting, Calculator | What are the diameters of the trees within the red box? GSD 0.08m/pixel |
|
| 159 |
+
| `29` | `32` | `23` | `1` | `2` | ExtractMarkedRedBox, Calculator (compute the red-box area), ObjectCounting (obtain tree coordinates), Calculator (compute the total tree area), Calculator (compute the percentage) | What is the area within the red box in the image? Approximately what percentage is covered by trees? |
|
| 160 |
+
| `30` | `37,38` | `28,29` | `14` | `2` | ExtractMarkedRedBox, AppleSizeEstimate (pass the red-box region as ROI), AppleSizeEstimate (whole image) | Where does the diameter of the apple within the red box rank among the total size of all apples in the image? How big is it? |
|
| 161 |
+
| `31` | `39,40,41,42,43` | `30,31,32,33,34` | `15` | `2` | ExtractMarkedRedBox, AppleSizeEstimate (pass the red-box region as ROI), AppleSizeEstimate (whole image) | Is the apple in the red box the largest apple in the whole picture? How big is it? |
|
| 162 |
+
| `32` | `44` | `35` | `11` | `2` | AppleSizeEstimate (whole image), Calculator | What is the average size of the apples in the picture? |
|
| 163 |
+
| `33` | `45` | `36` | `8` | `2` | ObjectCounting (whole image; correctly crop the image into a 3x3 grid before calling) | Divide the image into 9 equal squares, with the top left square being the first and the bottom right square being the ninth. Which square has the most oranges? How many exactly? |
|
| 164 |
+
| `34` | `46` | `37` | `3` | `2` | ObjectCounting (Image 1), ObjectCounting (Image 2) | Which picture contains more blueberries? By how much? |
|
| 165 |
+
| `35` | `47` | `39` | `3` | `2` | ObjectCounting | How many wheat ears are there in the picture? |
|
| 166 |
+
| `36` | `48` | `40` | `3` | `2` | ObjectCounting (whole image; correctly crop the image into a 3x3 grid before calling) | Divide the image into 9 equal squares, with the top left square being the first and the bottom right square being the ninth. Which square has the most wheat ears? How many exactly? |
|
| 167 |
+
| `37` | `49` | `41` | `1` | `2` | ObjectCounting (Image 1), ObjectCounting (Image 2) | Which picture contains more wheat ears? By how much? |
|
| 168 |
+
| `38` | `50` | `97` | `9` | `[2, 4]` | PlantSegLesionAnalysis, ImageRegionUnderstanding | How many lesions are there in the crop shown in the picture? Please describe where the most severe lesion areas are concentrated based on the segmented lesion images. |
|
| 169 |
+
|
| 170 |
+
### Class 3: 变化检测类 / Change Detection
|
| 171 |
+
|
| 172 |
+
| New template | Previous question-4 template(s) | Question-3 source template(s) | Count | Classification | Reference tool chain | Representative question |
|
| 173 |
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
| 174 |
+
| `39` | `51` | `42` | `59` | `3` | ChangeDetection, Calculator | From Figure 1 to Figure 2, what percentage of the total area of the map is converted from cultivated land to non-cultivated land? |
|
| 175 |
+
| `40` | `52` | `43` | `10` | `3` | ExtractMarkedRedBox, ChangeDetection, Calculator | Has any farmland in the area marked by the red box in the map been converted to non-farmland? If so, what percentage of the total area of the map does it represent? |
|
| 176 |
+
| `41` | `53` | `44` | `19` | `3` | ChangeDetection, Calculator | How many types of farm pond changes occurred from Figure 1 to Figure 2? What are their respective proportions of the total area in the images? |
|
| 177 |
+
| `42` | `54,55` | `45,46` | `7` | `3` | ChangeDetection, ImageRegionUnderstanding | Based on the final masked image, describe the location of the changed pond types in the image (if the image is divided into nine grids, where are they located?). |
|
| 178 |
+
| `43` | `56` | `47` | `8` | `3` | ChangeDetection, Calculator | Are there any changes to farm ponds in the two images? What percentage of the entire image represents the changes? |
|
| 179 |
+
|
| 180 |
+
### Class 4: 语义分割解译类 / Semantic Segmentation Interpretation
|
| 181 |
+
|
| 182 |
+
| New template | Previous question-4 template(s) | Question-3 source template(s) | Count | Classification | Reference tool chain | Representative question |
|
| 183 |
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
| 184 |
+
| `44` | `57` | `48` | `10` | `4` | CanopyHeightEstimate (pass in 2 m), Calculator | If vegetation in the diagram that is taller than 2m is considered to be trees, what is the tree coverage rate in the diagram? |
|
| 185 |
+
| `45` | `58` | `49` | `20` | `4` | CanopyHeightEstimate (4 m), CanopyHeightEstimate (2 m), Calculator (compute pixels below 2 m), Calculator (compute the difference) | Is the proportion of vegetation areas with a height greater than 4m larger or smaller than that of vegetation areas with a height less than 2m in the overall map? Specifically, by how much? |
|
| 186 |
+
| `46` | `59` | `50` | `20` | `[4, 5]` | CanopyHeightEstimate (0 m to inspect all image pixels and the maximum height), Calculator (compute the threshold by taking 10% down from the maximum vegetation height), CanopyHeightEstimate (using the threshold from the previous step), Calculator (compute the percentage) | Among all vegetation on the map, what percentage of the total map area is occupied by regions with vegetation height in the top 10%? |
|
| 187 |
+
| `47` | `60` | `52` | `35` | `4` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, Calculator (compute the weed/crop proportions over the whole image), Calculator (compute the weed/crop proportions among all non-background pixels) | In this image, do weeds or crops occupy a larger proportion of the whole image, and by how much? Among all non-background pixels, what percentage is weeds and what percentage is crops? |
|
| 188 |
+
| `48` | `61` | `104` | `5` | `4` | CanopyHeightEstimate (2 m), CanopyHeightEstimate (4 m), CanopyHeightEstimate (6 m), Calculator (compute the 2-4 m percentage over the whole image), Calculator (compute the 4-6 m percentage over the whole image) | Among all image pixels, what percentage of the total image area is occupied by vegetation with heights between 2 m and 4 m, and what percentage is occupied by vegetation with heights between 4 m and 6 m? |
|
| 189 |
+
|
| 190 |
+
### Class 5: 统计分析型任务 / Statistical Analysis
|
| 191 |
+
|
| 192 |
+
| New template | Previous question-4 template(s) | Question-3 source template(s) | Count | Classification | Reference tool chain | Representative question |
|
| 193 |
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
| 194 |
+
| `49` | `62` | `51` | `40` | `5` | WeedPhenotypingAnalysis, Plot (follow the requirements in the question) | Plot the weed height curves from the images above: put week on the horizontal axis and height (cm) on the vertical axis, and draw one colored polyline per species. It also needs to include a legend, horizontal and vertical axis scales, and names. |
|
| 195 |
+
| `50` | `63` | `54` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis | Among the three multispectral band-combination options below, which one achieves the **highest mean IoU (averaged across classes)** on this tile?<br><br>- **A**: [RGB]<br>- **B**: [NIR,RGB]<br>- **C**: [NDVI] |
|
| 196 |
+
| `51` | `64` | `55` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis | Among the three multispectral band-combination options below, which one achieves the **highest weed IoU** on this tile?<br><br>- **A**: [RGB]<br>- **B**: [G,NIR,R,RGB]<br>- **C**: [NDVI] |
|
| 197 |
+
| `52` | `65` | `56` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis | Among the three multispectral band-combination options below, which one achieves the **highest crop IoU** on this tile?<br><br>- **A**: [NIR]<br>- **B**: [B,G,NIR,R,RE,RGB]<br>- **C**: [B,CIR,G,NIR,R,RE,RGB] |
|
| 198 |
+
| `53` | `66` | `57` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis | Among the three multispectral band-combination options below, which one achieves the **highest overall accuracy** on this tile?<br><br>- **A**: [RGB]<br>- **B**: [NDVI]<br>- **C**: [NIR] |
|
| 199 |
+
| `54` | `67` | `58` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis | Among the three multispectral band-combination options below, which one achieves the **highest weed F1 score** on this tile?<br><br>- **A**: [NIR,RGB]<br>- **B**: [RGB]<br>- **C**: [NDVI] |
|
| 200 |
+
| `55` | `68` | `59` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis | Among the three multispectral band-combination options below, which one achieves the **highest mean F1 score** on this tile?<br><br>- **A**: [B,CIR,G,NDVI,NIR,R,RE,RGB]<br>- **B**: [RGB]<br>- **C**: [NDVI] |
|
| 201 |
+
| `56` | `69` | `60` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis | Among the three multispectral band-combination options below, which one achieves the **highest mean PR-AUC** on this tile?<br><br>- **A**: [B,CIR,G,NDVI,NIR,R,RE,RGB]<br>- **B**: [RGB]<br>- **C**: [NIR,RGB] |
|
| 202 |
+
| `57` | `70` | `61` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis | Among the three multispectral band-combination options below, which one achieves the **highest crop F1 score** on this tile?<br><br>- **A**: [RGB]<br>- **B**: [NDVI]<br>- **C**: [B,G,NDVI,NIR,R,RE,RGB] |
|
| 203 |
+
| `58` | `71` | `62` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis | Among the three multispectral band-combination options below, which one achieves the **highest frequency-weighted IoU** on this tile?<br><br>- **A**: [RGB]<br>- **B**: [NDVI]<br>- **C**: [NIR,RGB] |
|
| 204 |
+
| `59` | `72` | `63` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis | Among the three multispectral band-combination options below, which one achieves the **highest mean accuracy** on this tile?<br><br>- **A**: [G,NIR,R,RGB]<br>- **B**: [RGB]<br>- **C**: [NDVI] |
|
| 205 |
+
| `60` | `73` | `64` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis | Among the three multispectral band-combination options below, which one achieves the **highest crop precision** on this tile?<br><br>- **A**: [B,CIR,G,NDVI,NIR,R,RE]<br>- **B**: [RGB]<br>- **C**: [NIR,RGB] |
|
| 206 |
+
| `61` | `74` | `65` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis | Among the three multispectral band-combination options below, which one achieves the **highest weed precision** on this tile?<br><br>- **A**: [RGB]<br>- **B**: [NIR]<br>- **C**: [NDVI] |
|
| 207 |
+
| `62` | `75` | `66` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis | Among the three multispectral band-combination options below, which one achieves the **highest mean average precision (MAP)** on this tile?<br><br>- **A**: [RGB]<br>- **B**: [NDVI]<br>- **C**: [B,G,NIR,R,RE,RGB] |
|
| 208 |
+
| `63` | `76` | `67` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis | Among the three multispectral band-combination options below, which one achieves the **highest crop accuracy** on this tile?<br><br>- **A**: [NIR,RGB]<br>- **B**: [RGB]<br>- **C**: [G,NIR,R,RGB] |
|
| 209 |
+
| `64` | `77` | `68` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis, WeedSegmentationAnalysis | Among the three multispectral band-combination options below, which one achieves the **highest weed accuracy** on this tile?<br><br>- **A**: [RGB]<br>- **B**: [NDVI]<br>- **C**: [B,G,NDVI,NIR,R,RE,RGB] |
|
| 210 |
+
| `65` | `78` | `69` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, Plot | The RGB preview of one field tile is shown. Three **candidate band-combination presets** are:<br><br>- **A**: [RGB]<br>- **B**: [NIR,RGB]<br>- **C**: [B,CIR,G,NIR,R,RE,RGB]<br><br>For each preset, quantify **mean accuracy**, **mean precision**, **mean F1**, and **mean IoU** on this tile. Present all **four** metrics **in one figure**: a **grouped bar chart** where the **four metrics** share one axis and **values** lie on the other; use **distinct colors** for presets A, B, and C, include a **legend**, and give both axes **clear titles and tick marks**. |
|
| 211 |
+
| `66` | `79` | `70` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, Plot | The RGB preview of one field tile is shown. Three **candidate band-combination presets** are:<br><br>- **A**: [NDVI]<br>- **B**: [RGB]<br>- **C**: [B,G,NIR,R,RE,RGB]<br><br>For each preset, quantify **mean accuracy**, **mean precision**, **mean F1**, and **mean IoU** on this tile. Present all **four** metrics **in one figure**: a **grouped bar chart** where the **four metrics** share one axis and **values** lie on the other; use **distinct colors** for presets A, B, and C, include a **legend**, and give both axes **clear titles and tick marks**. |
|
| 212 |
+
| `67` | `80` | `71` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, Plot | The RGB preview of one field tile is shown. Three **candidate band-combination presets** are:<br><br>- **A**: [B,CIR,G,NDVI,NIR,R,RE,RGB]<br>- **B**: [RGB]<br>- **C**: [G,NIR,R,RGB]<br><br>For each preset, quantify **mean accuracy**, **mean precision**, **mean F1**, and **mean IoU** on this tile. Present all **four** metrics **in one figure**: a **grouped bar chart** where the **four metrics** share one axis and **values** lie on the other; use **distinct colors** for presets A, B, and C, include a **legend**, and give both axes **clear titles and tick marks**. |
|
| 213 |
+
| `68` | `81` | `72` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, Plot | The RGB preview of one field tile is shown. Three **candidate band-combination presets** are:<br><br>- **A**: [RGB]<br>- **B**: [NDVI]<br>- **C**: [NIR]<br><br>For each preset, quantify **mean accuracy**, **mean precision**, **mean F1**, and **mean IoU** on this tile. Present all **four** metrics **in one figure**: a **grouped bar chart** where the **four metrics** share one axis and **values** lie on the other; use **distinct colors** for presets A, B, and C, include a **legend**, and give both axes **clear titles and tick marks**. |
|
| 214 |
+
| `69` | `82` | `73` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, Plot | The RGB preview of one field tile is shown. Three **candidate band-combination presets** are:<br><br>- **A**: [NIR,RGB]<br>- **B**: [RGB]<br>- **C**: [B,G,NDVI,NIR,R,RE,RGB]<br><br>For each preset, quantify **crop** accuracy, **crop** precision, **crop** F1, and **crop** IoU on this tile. Present all **four** metrics **in one figure**: a **grouped bar chart** where the **four metrics** share one axis and **values** lie on the other; use **distinct colors** for presets A, B, and C, include a **legend**, and give both axes **clear titles and tick marks**. |
|
| 215 |
+
| `70` | `83` | `74` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, Plot | The RGB preview of one field tile is shown. Three **candidate band-combination presets** are:<br><br>- **A**: [B,CIR,G,NIR,R,RE,RGB]<br>- **B**: [RGB]<br>- **C**: [NDVI]<br><br>For each preset, quantify **crop** accuracy, **crop** precision, **crop** F1, and **crop** IoU on this tile. Present all **four** metrics **in one figure**: a **grouped bar chart** where the **four metrics** share one axis and **values** lie on the other; use **distinct colors** for presets A, B, and C, include a **legend**, and give both axes **clear titles and tick marks**. |
|
| 216 |
+
| `71` | `84` | `75` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, Plot | The RGB preview of one field tile is shown. Three **candidate band-combination presets** are:<br><br>- **A**: [RGB]<br>- **B**: [B,CIR,G,NDVI,NIR,R,RE]<br>- **C**: [G,NIR,R,RGB]<br><br>For each preset, quantify **crop** accuracy, **crop** precision, **crop** F1, and **crop** IoU on this tile. Present all **four** metrics **in one figure**: a **grouped bar chart** where the **four metrics** share one axis and **values** lie on the other; use **distinct colors** for presets A, B, and C, include a **legend**, and give both axes **clear titles and tick marks**. |
|
| 217 |
+
| `72` | `85` | `76` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, Plot | The RGB preview of one field tile is shown. Three **candidate band-combination presets** are:<br><br>- **A**: [B,CIR,G,NDVI,NIR,R,RE,RGB]<br>- **B**: [NIR]<br>- **C**: [RGB]<br><br>For each preset, quantify **crop** accuracy, **crop** precision, **crop** F1, and **crop** IoU on this tile. Present all **four** metrics **in one figure**: a **grouped bar chart** where the **four metrics** share one axis and **values** lie on the other; use **distinct colors** for presets A, B, and C, include a **legend**, and give both axes **clear titles and tick marks**. |
|
| 218 |
+
| `73` | `86` | `77` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, Plot | The RGB preview of one field tile is shown. Three **candidate band-combination presets** are:<br><br>- **A**: [RGB]<br>- **B**: [NDVI]<br>- **C**: [G,NIR,R,RGB]<br><br>For each preset, quantify **weed** accuracy, **weed** precision, **weed** F1, and **weed** IoU on this tile. Present all **four** metrics **in one figure**: a **grouped bar chart** where the **four metrics** share one axis and **values** lie on the other; use **distinct colors** for presets A, B, and C, include a **legend**, and give both axes **clear titles and tick marks**. |
|
| 219 |
+
| `74` | `87` | `78` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, Plot | The RGB preview of one field tile is shown. Three **candidate band-combination presets** are:<br><br>- **A**: [NIR]<br>- **B**: [RGB]<br>- **C**: [NIR,RGB]<br><br>For each preset, quantify **weed** accuracy, **weed** precision, **weed** F1, and **weed** IoU on this tile. Present all **four** metrics **in one figure**: a **grouped bar chart** where the **four metrics** share one axis and **values** lie on the other; use **distinct colors** for presets A, B, and C, include a **legend**, and give both axes **clear titles and tick marks**. |
|
| 220 |
+
| `75` | `88` | `79` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, Plot | The RGB preview of one field tile is shown. Three **candidate band-combination presets** are:<br><br>- **A**: [NDVI]<br>- **B**: [RGB]<br>- **C**: [B,CIR,G,NIR,R,RE,RGB]<br><br>For each preset, quantify **weed** accuracy, **weed** precision, **weed** F1, and **weed** IoU on this tile. Present all **four** metrics **in one figure**: a **grouped bar chart** where the **four metrics** share one axis and **values** lie on the other; use **distinct colors** for presets A, B, and C, include a **legend**, and give both axes **clear titles and tick marks**. |
|
| 221 |
+
| `76` | `89` | `80` | `1` | `5` | WeedSegmentationAnalysis, Plot | The RGB preview of one field tile is shown. Three **candidate band-combination presets** are:<br><br>- **A**: [RGB]<br>- **B**: [B,G,NDVI,NIR,R,RE,RGB]<br>- **C**: [NIR,RGB]<br><br>For each preset, quantify **weed** accuracy, **weed** precision, **weed** F1, and **weed** IoU on this tile. Present all **four** metrics **in one figure**: a **grouped bar chart** where the **four metrics** share one axis and **values** lie on the other; use **distinct colors** for presets A, B, and C, include a **legend**, and give both axes **clear titles and tick marks**. |
|