diff --git "a/parse/dev/0sEIBFb4cs/0sEIBFb4cs_middle.json" "b/parse/dev/0sEIBFb4cs/0sEIBFb4cs_middle.json"
new file mode 100644--- /dev/null
+++ "b/parse/dev/0sEIBFb4cs/0sEIBFb4cs_middle.json"
@@ -0,0 +1,47625 @@
+{
+ "pdf_info": [
+ {
+ "preproc_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 79,
+ 507,
+ 116
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 78,
+ 508,
+ 98
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 78,
+ 508,
+ 98
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "PRACTICAL ADVERSARIAL ATTACKS ON BRAIN–",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 98,
+ 289,
+ 117
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 98,
+ 289,
+ 117
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "COMPUTER INTERFACES",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 135,
+ 244,
+ 157
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 113,
+ 135,
+ 201,
+ 147
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 113,
+ 135,
+ 201,
+ 147
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Anonymous authors",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 111,
+ 146,
+ 245,
+ 158
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 111,
+ 146,
+ 245,
+ 158
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Paper under double-blind review",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 278,
+ 186,
+ 333,
+ 199
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 277,
+ 186,
+ 335,
+ 200
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 277,
+ 186,
+ 335,
+ 200
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "ABSTRACT",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 143,
+ 209,
+ 469,
+ 418
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 210,
+ 469,
+ 222
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 210,
+ 469,
+ 222
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Deep learning has been widely employed in brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) to",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 221,
+ 470,
+ 234
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 221,
+ 470,
+ 234
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "decode a subject’s intentions based on recorded brain activities enabling direct",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 232,
+ 469,
+ 244
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 232,
+ 469,
+ 244
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "interaction with computers and machines. BCI systems play a crucial role in",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 244,
+ 470,
+ 255
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 244,
+ 470,
+ 255
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "motor rehabilitation and have recently experienced a significant market boost as",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 254,
+ 470,
+ 266
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 254,
+ 470,
+ 266
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "consumer-grade products. Recent studies have shown that deep learning-based",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 265,
+ 469,
+ 277
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 265,
+ 469,
+ 277
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "BCIs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Failures in such systems might cause",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 276,
+ 470,
+ 288
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 276,
+ 470,
+ 288
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "medical misdiagnoses, physical harm, and financial damages, hence it is of utmost",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 288,
+ 469,
+ 299
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 288,
+ 469,
+ 299
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "importance to analyze and understand in-depth, potential malicious attacks to",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 298,
+ 469,
+ 310
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 298,
+ 469,
+ 310
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "develop countermeasures. In this work, we present the first study that analyzes",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 309,
+ 470,
+ 321
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 309,
+ 470,
+ 321
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and models adversarial attacks based on physical domain constraints in EEG-",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 320,
+ 469,
+ 332
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 320,
+ 469,
+ 332
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "based BCIs. Specifically, we assess the robustness of EEGNet which is the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 331,
+ 469,
+ 343
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 331,
+ 469,
+ 343
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "current state-of-the-art network for embedded BCIs. We propose new methods",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 342,
+ 469,
+ 354
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 342,
+ 469,
+ 354
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to induce denial-of-service attacks and incorporate domain-specific insights and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 353,
+ 470,
+ 365
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 353,
+ 470,
+ 365
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "constraints to accomplish two key goals: (i) create smooth adversarial attacks",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 364,
+ 470,
+ 375
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 364,
+ 470,
+ 375
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "that are physiologically plausible; (ii) consider the realistic case where the attack",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 375,
+ 470,
+ 387
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 375,
+ 470,
+ 387
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "happens at the origin of the signal acquisition and it propagates on the human head.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 385,
+ 470,
+ 398
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 385,
+ 470,
+ 398
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Our results show that EEGNet is significantly vulnerable to adversarial attacks",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 396,
+ 469,
+ 408
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 396,
+ 308,
+ 408
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with an attack success rate of more than",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 309,
+ 397,
+ 329,
+ 407
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "50 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 329,
+ 396,
+ 469,
+ 408
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". With our work, we want to raise",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 407,
+ 443,
+ 420
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 407,
+ 443,
+ 420
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "awareness and incentivize future developments of proper countermeasures.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 438,
+ 206,
+ 450
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 437,
+ 208,
+ 453
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 437,
+ 208,
+ 453
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "1 INTRODUCTION",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 463,
+ 505,
+ 616
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 461,
+ 505,
+ 476
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 461,
+ 505,
+ 476
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Recent work has shown that adversarial perturbations can cause state-of-the-art (SoA) deep learning",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 474,
+ 506,
+ 485
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 474,
+ 506,
+ 485
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "models to misbehave in various domains including vision (Szegedy et al., 2014; Goodfellow et al.,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 484,
+ 506,
+ 497
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 484,
+ 506,
+ 497
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2015), NLP (Li et al., 2019a; Zhang et al., 2020), speech (Qin et al., 2019; Li et al., 2019b), and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 495,
+ 505,
+ 508
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 495,
+ 505,
+ 508
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "biomedicine (Finlayson et al., 2019; Han et al., 2020). Neural networks have been applied in",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 506,
+ 506,
+ 519
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 506,
+ 506,
+ 519
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) achieving impressive results (Lawhern et al., 2018; Dose et al.,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 516,
+ 506,
+ 530
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 516,
+ 506,
+ 530
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2018). A BCI enables direct interactions with external devices based on brain activities, typically",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 528,
+ 505,
+ 541
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 528,
+ 505,
+ 541
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "recorded using electroencephalographic (EEG) systems. It can provide a communication pathway",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 539,
+ 505,
+ 552
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 539,
+ 505,
+ 552
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for severely paralyzed patients or assist in rehabilitation (Chaudhary et al., 2016). Besides medical",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 550,
+ 505,
+ 563
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 550,
+ 505,
+ 563
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "applications, recent developments in wearable devices have pushed BCIs towards consumer-grade",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 561,
+ 506,
+ 574
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 561,
+ 506,
+ 574
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "products to improve life quality (Aricò et al., 2020), e.g., the Interaxon Muse headband for stress",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 573,
+ 505,
+ 584
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 573,
+ 505,
+ 584
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "relief (Arsalan et al., 2019) or the Emotiv headset for controlling drones (Marin et al., 2020) and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 582,
+ 506,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 582,
+ 506,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "ground vehicles (Zhuang et al., 2021). Safety in BCI systems is paramount (Dutta, 2020; Bernal et al.,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 593,
+ 507,
+ 608
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 593,
+ 507,
+ 608
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2021), because a failure would cause misdiagnoses, user frustration, or even danger while driving a",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 604,
+ 406,
+ 618
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 604,
+ 406,
+ 618
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "wheelchair or controlling a drone, causing physical and financial damages.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 622,
+ 505,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 621,
+ 505,
+ 634
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 621,
+ 505,
+ 634
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Zhang & Wu (2019) were the first to show that EEG-based BCIs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 633,
+ 505,
+ 645
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 633,
+ 505,
+ 645
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "by proposing an unsupervised fast gradient sign method (FGSM) (Goodfellow et al., 2015). More",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 644,
+ 506,
+ 657
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 644,
+ 506,
+ 657
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "recent work has proposed a more practical attack where a universal adversarial perturbation (UAP)",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 654,
+ 505,
+ 668
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 654,
+ 505,
+ 668
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is computed once and can be applied to all EEG trials without learning it for every new input (Liu",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 664,
+ 507,
+ 680
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 664,
+ 507,
+ 680
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "et al., 2021). Both works assume that the acquired signals are sent to a remote compute engine, e.g.,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 676,
+ 506,
+ 691
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 676,
+ 506,
+ 691
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "a computer, and the attacker can alter the signals during the transmission by attaching a “jamming”",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 506,
+ 702
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 506,
+ 702
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "module between the signal preprocessing step and the classifier. Recent developments in smart edge",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 45
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 698,
+ 507,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 698,
+ 507,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "computing (Akmandor & Jha, 2018; Beach et al., 2021) eliminate the need for data transmission,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 46
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 710,
+ 506,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 710,
+ 506,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "making this attack scenario inapplicable. Novel BCI solutions (Kartsch et al., 2019; Wang et al.,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 47
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 720,
+ 506,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 720,
+ 506,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2020) embed the signal processing and classification directly at the sensor edge. A more practical",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 48
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "page_idx": 0,
+ "page_size": [
+ 612,
+ 792
+ ],
+ "discarded_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 27,
+ 308,
+ 37
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 26,
+ 308,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 26,
+ 308,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2022",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 302,
+ 751,
+ 308,
+ 760
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 302,
+ 751,
+ 308,
+ 761
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 302,
+ 751,
+ 308,
+ 761
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "1",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "para_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 79,
+ 507,
+ 116
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 78,
+ 508,
+ 98
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 78,
+ 508,
+ 98
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "PRACTICAL ADVERSARIAL ATTACKS ON BRAIN–",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 98,
+ 289,
+ 117
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 98,
+ 289,
+ 117
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "COMPUTER INTERFACES",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 135,
+ 244,
+ 157
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 113,
+ 135,
+ 201,
+ 147
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 113,
+ 135,
+ 201,
+ 147
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Anonymous authors",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 111,
+ 146,
+ 245,
+ 158
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 111,
+ 146,
+ 245,
+ 158
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Paper under double-blind review",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 111,
+ 135,
+ 245,
+ 158
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 278,
+ 186,
+ 333,
+ 199
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 277,
+ 186,
+ 335,
+ 200
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 277,
+ 186,
+ 335,
+ 200
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "ABSTRACT",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 143,
+ 209,
+ 469,
+ 418
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 210,
+ 469,
+ 222
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 210,
+ 469,
+ 222
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Deep learning has been widely employed in brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) to",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 221,
+ 470,
+ 234
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 221,
+ 470,
+ 234
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "decode a subject’s intentions based on recorded brain activities enabling direct",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 232,
+ 469,
+ 244
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 232,
+ 469,
+ 244
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "interaction with computers and machines. BCI systems play a crucial role in",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 244,
+ 470,
+ 255
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 244,
+ 470,
+ 255
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "motor rehabilitation and have recently experienced a significant market boost as",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 254,
+ 470,
+ 266
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 254,
+ 470,
+ 266
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "consumer-grade products. Recent studies have shown that deep learning-based",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 265,
+ 469,
+ 277
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 265,
+ 469,
+ 277
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "BCIs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks. Failures in such systems might cause",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 276,
+ 470,
+ 288
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 276,
+ 470,
+ 288
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "medical misdiagnoses, physical harm, and financial damages, hence it is of utmost",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 288,
+ 469,
+ 299
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 288,
+ 469,
+ 299
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "importance to analyze and understand in-depth, potential malicious attacks to",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 298,
+ 469,
+ 310
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 298,
+ 469,
+ 310
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "develop countermeasures. In this work, we present the first study that analyzes",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 309,
+ 470,
+ 321
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 309,
+ 470,
+ 321
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and models adversarial attacks based on physical domain constraints in EEG-",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 320,
+ 469,
+ 332
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 320,
+ 469,
+ 332
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "based BCIs. Specifically, we assess the robustness of EEGNet which is the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 331,
+ 469,
+ 343
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 331,
+ 469,
+ 343
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "current state-of-the-art network for embedded BCIs. We propose new methods",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 342,
+ 469,
+ 354
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 342,
+ 469,
+ 354
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to induce denial-of-service attacks and incorporate domain-specific insights and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 353,
+ 470,
+ 365
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 353,
+ 470,
+ 365
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "constraints to accomplish two key goals: (i) create smooth adversarial attacks",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 364,
+ 470,
+ 375
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 364,
+ 470,
+ 375
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "that are physiologically plausible; (ii) consider the realistic case where the attack",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 375,
+ 470,
+ 387
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 375,
+ 470,
+ 387
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "happens at the origin of the signal acquisition and it propagates on the human head.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 385,
+ 470,
+ 398
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 385,
+ 470,
+ 398
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Our results show that EEGNet is significantly vulnerable to adversarial attacks",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 396,
+ 469,
+ 408
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 396,
+ 308,
+ 408
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with an attack success rate of more than",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 309,
+ 397,
+ 329,
+ 407
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "50 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 329,
+ 396,
+ 469,
+ 408
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". With our work, we want to raise",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 407,
+ 443,
+ 420
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 407,
+ 443,
+ 420
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "awareness and incentivize future developments of proper countermeasures.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 141,
+ 210,
+ 470,
+ 420
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 438,
+ 206,
+ 450
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 437,
+ 208,
+ 453
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 437,
+ 208,
+ 453
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "1 INTRODUCTION",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 463,
+ 505,
+ 616
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 461,
+ 505,
+ 476
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 461,
+ 505,
+ 476
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Recent work has shown that adversarial perturbations can cause state-of-the-art (SoA) deep learning",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 474,
+ 506,
+ 485
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 474,
+ 506,
+ 485
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "models to misbehave in various domains including vision (Szegedy et al., 2014; Goodfellow et al.,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 484,
+ 506,
+ 497
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 484,
+ 506,
+ 497
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2015), NLP (Li et al., 2019a; Zhang et al., 2020), speech (Qin et al., 2019; Li et al., 2019b), and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 495,
+ 505,
+ 508
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 495,
+ 505,
+ 508
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "biomedicine (Finlayson et al., 2019; Han et al., 2020). Neural networks have been applied in",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 506,
+ 506,
+ 519
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 506,
+ 506,
+ 519
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) achieving impressive results (Lawhern et al., 2018; Dose et al.,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 516,
+ 506,
+ 530
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 516,
+ 506,
+ 530
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2018). A BCI enables direct interactions with external devices based on brain activities, typically",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 528,
+ 505,
+ 541
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 528,
+ 505,
+ 541
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "recorded using electroencephalographic (EEG) systems. It can provide a communication pathway",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 539,
+ 505,
+ 552
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 539,
+ 505,
+ 552
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for severely paralyzed patients or assist in rehabilitation (Chaudhary et al., 2016). Besides medical",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 550,
+ 505,
+ 563
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 550,
+ 505,
+ 563
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "applications, recent developments in wearable devices have pushed BCIs towards consumer-grade",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 561,
+ 506,
+ 574
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 561,
+ 506,
+ 574
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "products to improve life quality (Aricò et al., 2020), e.g., the Interaxon Muse headband for stress",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 573,
+ 505,
+ 584
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 573,
+ 505,
+ 584
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "relief (Arsalan et al., 2019) or the Emotiv headset for controlling drones (Marin et al., 2020) and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 582,
+ 506,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 582,
+ 506,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "ground vehicles (Zhuang et al., 2021). Safety in BCI systems is paramount (Dutta, 2020; Bernal et al.,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 593,
+ 507,
+ 608
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 593,
+ 507,
+ 608
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2021), because a failure would cause misdiagnoses, user frustration, or even danger while driving a",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 604,
+ 406,
+ 618
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 604,
+ 406,
+ 618
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "wheelchair or controlling a drone, causing physical and financial damages.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 104,
+ 461,
+ 507,
+ 618
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 622,
+ 505,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 621,
+ 505,
+ 634
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 621,
+ 505,
+ 634
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Zhang & Wu (2019) were the first to show that EEG-based BCIs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 633,
+ 505,
+ 645
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 633,
+ 505,
+ 645
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "by proposing an unsupervised fast gradient sign method (FGSM) (Goodfellow et al., 2015). More",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 644,
+ 506,
+ 657
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 644,
+ 506,
+ 657
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "recent work has proposed a more practical attack where a universal adversarial perturbation (UAP)",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 654,
+ 505,
+ 668
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 654,
+ 505,
+ 668
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is computed once and can be applied to all EEG trials without learning it for every new input (Liu",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 664,
+ 507,
+ 680
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 664,
+ 507,
+ 680
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "et al., 2021). Both works assume that the acquired signals are sent to a remote compute engine, e.g.,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 676,
+ 506,
+ 691
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 676,
+ 506,
+ 691
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "a computer, and the attacker can alter the signals during the transmission by attaching a “jamming”",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 506,
+ 702
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 506,
+ 702
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "module between the signal preprocessing step and the classifier. Recent developments in smart edge",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 45
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 698,
+ 507,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 698,
+ 507,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "computing (Akmandor & Jha, 2018; Beach et al., 2021) eliminate the need for data transmission,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 46
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 710,
+ 506,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 710,
+ 506,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "making this attack scenario inapplicable. Novel BCI solutions (Kartsch et al., 2019; Wang et al.,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 47
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 720,
+ 506,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 720,
+ 506,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2020) embed the signal processing and classification directly at the sensor edge. A more practical",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 48
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 83,
+ 505,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 83,
+ 505,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "adversarial example has been identified by Meng et al. (2021). It consists of a square-shaped signal",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 93,
+ 505,
+ 106
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 93,
+ 505,
+ 106
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "that can be added to EEG trials before the preprocessing step. However, the attack is proposed as",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 105,
+ 505,
+ 116
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 105,
+ 505,
+ 116
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "a backdoor key, which means that the attacker has direct access to the training dataset and pollutes",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 115,
+ 505,
+ 127
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 115,
+ 505,
+ 127
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "it with adversarial examples, which is improbable if the attacker is not directly involved in the data",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 127,
+ 505,
+ 138
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 127,
+ 505,
+ 138
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "acquisition or in the training of the classifier. Li et al. (2019b) have shown an attack scenario in the",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 138,
+ 505,
+ 150
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 138,
+ 505,
+ 150
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "audio domain by considering the on-board edge processing of a wake-word detection system, where",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 149,
+ 505,
+ 160
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 149,
+ 505,
+ 160
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "an adversarial audio trace is delivered to the environment causing denial-of-service (DoS). No similar",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 159,
+ 308,
+ 171
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 159,
+ 308,
+ 171
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "studies can be currently found in the BCI domain.",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 104,
+ 621,
+ 507,
+ 733
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "preproc_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 170
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 83,
+ 505,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 83,
+ 505,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "adversarial example has been identified by Meng et al. (2021). It consists of a square-shaped signal",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 93,
+ 505,
+ 106
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 93,
+ 505,
+ 106
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "that can be added to EEG trials before the preprocessing step. However, the attack is proposed as",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 105,
+ 505,
+ 116
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 105,
+ 505,
+ 116
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "a backdoor key, which means that the attacker has direct access to the training dataset and pollutes",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 115,
+ 505,
+ 127
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 115,
+ 505,
+ 127
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "it with adversarial examples, which is improbable if the attacker is not directly involved in the data",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 127,
+ 505,
+ 138
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 127,
+ 505,
+ 138
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "acquisition or in the training of the classifier. Li et al. (2019b) have shown an attack scenario in the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 138,
+ 505,
+ 150
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 138,
+ 505,
+ 150
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "audio domain by considering the on-board edge processing of a wake-word detection system, where",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 149,
+ 505,
+ 160
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 149,
+ 505,
+ 160
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "an adversarial audio trace is delivered to the environment causing denial-of-service (DoS). No similar",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 159,
+ 308,
+ 171
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 159,
+ 308,
+ 171
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "studies can be currently found in the BCI domain.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 176,
+ 505,
+ 308
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 175,
+ 506,
+ 189
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 175,
+ 506,
+ 189
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Challenges: Designing natural attacks and modeling its propagation. Unlike in audio",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 187,
+ 506,
+ 200
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 187,
+ 506,
+ 200
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "applications where the signal can simply propagate over-the-air and is sensed by a microphone, extra",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 198,
+ 505,
+ 210
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 198,
+ 505,
+ 210
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "modeling is required to evaluate the signal propagation in BCIs based on the physical properties of the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 208,
+ 506,
+ 223
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 208,
+ 506,
+ 223
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "biological tissues. In this work, rather than assuming a “jamming” module between the preprocessing",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 220,
+ 505,
+ 232
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 220,
+ 505,
+ 232
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and the classification steps as in related works, we consider a more realistic and practically applicable",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 231,
+ 506,
+ 243
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 231,
+ 506,
+ 243
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "attack scenario where the adversarial perturbations are introduced at the source of the data acquisition,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 243,
+ 505,
+ 254
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 243,
+ 505,
+ 254
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "as showcased in Figure 6 in Appendix A. This can be achieved, for example, via electromagnetic",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 253,
+ 505,
+ 264
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 253,
+ 505,
+ 264
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "waves delivered to the environment (Dutta, 2020) or via transcranial current stimulation with electrical",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 263,
+ 506,
+ 277
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 263,
+ 506,
+ 277
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "current delivered directly to the scalp (Bodranghien et al., 2017; Fertonani et al., 2015), by exploiting",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 274,
+ 506,
+ 287
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 274,
+ 506,
+ 287
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "wearable devices, such as smart glasses or over-ear headsets (Flowneuroscience, 2021; Marin et al.,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 286,
+ 506,
+ 299
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 286,
+ 506,
+ 299
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2020). The adversarial perturbations translate into electrical signals propagating over the scalp and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 297,
+ 345,
+ 309
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 297,
+ 345,
+ 309
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "are sensed by the electrodes in addition to the EEG signals.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 313,
+ 505,
+ 390
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 313,
+ 505,
+ 326
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 313,
+ 505,
+ 326
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "To guarantee the imperceptibility of the attacks, previous works in BCIs create perturbations that",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 325,
+ 505,
+ 336
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 325,
+ 505,
+ 336
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "are small in amplitude (Zhang & Wu, 2019; Jiang et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2021), limiting the attack",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 336,
+ 506,
+ 348
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 336,
+ 506,
+ 348
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "success rate (ASR). Increased perturbation’s amplitude yields higher ASR (Meng et al., 2021), but",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 347,
+ 506,
+ 359
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 347,
+ 506,
+ 359
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "makes the attack more easily detectable. Moreover, the generated perturbations are square-shaped,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 358,
+ 505,
+ 370
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 358,
+ 505,
+ 370
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "which is implausible for biosignals. Han et al. (2020) are the first to observe square-wave artifacts",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 367,
+ 506,
+ 382
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 367,
+ 506,
+ 382
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "in biosignals’ attacks and propose smooth perturbations for electrocardiograms (ECGs). No similar",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 380,
+ 243,
+ 391
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 380,
+ 243,
+ 391
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "works have been found for EEGs.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 396,
+ 505,
+ 517
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 395,
+ 505,
+ 409
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 395,
+ 505,
+ 409
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "This work: Practical attacks on BCI models. To address the above technical challenges, and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 407,
+ 505,
+ 420
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 407,
+ 505,
+ 420
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for analyzing the vulnerability of embedded BCI models in practical scenarios, we design a new",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 419,
+ 505,
+ 431
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 419,
+ 505,
+ 431
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "attack algorithm that generates smooth adversarial examples based on the signals’ first derivative and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 430,
+ 504,
+ 441
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 430,
+ 504,
+ 441
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "model its propagation over the scalp based on a realistic head model by taking into consideration the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 441,
+ 505,
+ 453
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 441,
+ 505,
+ 453
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "attack source and the electrical and physical properties of the conducting tissues. This enables the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 451,
+ 506,
+ 464
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 451,
+ 506,
+ 464
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "creation of practically effective perturbations, that can be delivered by an external device to attack",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 461,
+ 506,
+ 474
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 461,
+ 506,
+ 474
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "EEG-based BCIs at the source of signal acquisition. We attack the most energy-efficient network that",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 472,
+ 506,
+ 486
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 472,
+ 506,
+ 486
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "has been embedded on microcontrollers for smart wearable BCIs called EEGNet (Lawhern et al.,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 484,
+ 504,
+ 496
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 484,
+ 504,
+ 496
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2018; Schneider et al., 2020). It is a resource-friendly convolutional neural network (CNN) and is the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 495,
+ 506,
+ 509
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 495,
+ 506,
+ 509
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "SoA in terms of accuracy and energy-efficiency trade-off (Belwafi et al., 2018; Malekmohammadi",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 507,
+ 325,
+ 518
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 507,
+ 325,
+ 518
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2020; Schneider et al., 2020).",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 523,
+ 506,
+ 676
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 522,
+ 506,
+ 535
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 522,
+ 506,
+ 535
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "We evaluate our methods and show experimental results on BCIs based on the motor imagery (MI)",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 534,
+ 506,
+ 547
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 534,
+ 506,
+ 547
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "paradigm, which is of special interest among others because it can be asynchronously self-paced",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 543,
+ 507,
+ 559
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 543,
+ 507,
+ 559
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "without external stimuli (Freer & Yang, 2020). By imagining the movement of different body parts,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 555,
+ 506,
+ 569
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 555,
+ 506,
+ 569
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the decoded intention is translated into control signals. It is widely applied in several BCI applications,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 567,
+ 506,
+ 579
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 567,
+ 506,
+ 579
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "such as the control of wheelchairss (Yu et al., 2018), prosthetic armss (Elstob & Secco, 2016), ground",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 578,
+ 506,
+ 590
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 578,
+ 506,
+ 590
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "vehicles (Zhuang et al., 2021), and in communication (Brumberg et al., 2016). It has been proven",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 588,
+ 506,
+ 601
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 588,
+ 506,
+ 601
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to be the most difficult task to be attacked among the most common BCI paradigms (Zhang & Wu,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 599,
+ 506,
+ 612
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 599,
+ 506,
+ 612
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2019; Meng et al., 2021). We evaluate our methods by “fooling” the victim model to always predict",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 45
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 610,
+ 506,
+ 623
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 610,
+ 506,
+ 623
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "“rest” class. This essentially yields a DoS attack, because resting-state EEG signals are generally",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 46
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 621,
+ 506,
+ 633
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 621,
+ 506,
+ 633
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "interpreted as no subject’s intention decoded, i.e., no control action needs to be taken by the BCI",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 47
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 632,
+ 506,
+ 645
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 632,
+ 506,
+ 645
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "system (Yu et al., 2018). While for healthy subjects it might solely cause user frustration and financial",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 48
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 643,
+ 505,
+ 655
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 643,
+ 505,
+ 655
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "losses, for severely paralyzed patients it can lead to loss of communication and independence. We",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 49
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 654,
+ 506,
+ 667
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 654,
+ 506,
+ 667
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "generalize our methodology to an other MI task of BCI Competition IV-2a dataset and believe that it",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 50
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 665,
+ 293,
+ 678
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 665,
+ 293,
+ 678
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "can be easily adapted to other BCI paradigms.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 51
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 682,
+ 306,
+ 693
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 681,
+ 307,
+ 694
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 681,
+ 307,
+ 694
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Main contributions. Our main contributions are:",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 52
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 52
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 134,
+ 699,
+ 504,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 132,
+ 697,
+ 505,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 132,
+ 697,
+ 505,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "• We design a new method to generate smooth adversarial perturbations that are",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 53
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 709,
+ 392,
+ 725
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 709,
+ 392,
+ 725
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "physiologically plausible and imperceptible to the human eye.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 54
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 53.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "page_idx": 1,
+ "page_size": [
+ 612,
+ 792
+ ],
+ "discarded_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 27,
+ 308,
+ 37
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 25,
+ 309,
+ 39
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 25,
+ 309,
+ 39
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2022",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 302,
+ 752,
+ 309,
+ 760
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 301,
+ 750,
+ 310,
+ 763
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 301,
+ 750,
+ 310,
+ 763
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "",
+ "type": "text",
+ "height": 13,
+ "width": 9
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "para_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 170
+ ],
+ "lines": [],
+ "index": 3.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 83,
+ 505,
+ 171
+ ],
+ "lines_deleted": true
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 176,
+ 505,
+ 308
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 175,
+ 506,
+ 189
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 175,
+ 506,
+ 189
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Challenges: Designing natural attacks and modeling its propagation. Unlike in audio",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 187,
+ 506,
+ 200
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 187,
+ 506,
+ 200
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "applications where the signal can simply propagate over-the-air and is sensed by a microphone, extra",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 198,
+ 505,
+ 210
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 198,
+ 505,
+ 210
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "modeling is required to evaluate the signal propagation in BCIs based on the physical properties of the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 208,
+ 506,
+ 223
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 208,
+ 506,
+ 223
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "biological tissues. In this work, rather than assuming a “jamming” module between the preprocessing",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 220,
+ 505,
+ 232
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 220,
+ 505,
+ 232
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and the classification steps as in related works, we consider a more realistic and practically applicable",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 231,
+ 506,
+ 243
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 231,
+ 506,
+ 243
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "attack scenario where the adversarial perturbations are introduced at the source of the data acquisition,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 243,
+ 505,
+ 254
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 243,
+ 505,
+ 254
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "as showcased in Figure 6 in Appendix A. This can be achieved, for example, via electromagnetic",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 253,
+ 505,
+ 264
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 253,
+ 505,
+ 264
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "waves delivered to the environment (Dutta, 2020) or via transcranial current stimulation with electrical",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 263,
+ 506,
+ 277
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 263,
+ 506,
+ 277
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "current delivered directly to the scalp (Bodranghien et al., 2017; Fertonani et al., 2015), by exploiting",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 274,
+ 506,
+ 287
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 274,
+ 506,
+ 287
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "wearable devices, such as smart glasses or over-ear headsets (Flowneuroscience, 2021; Marin et al.,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 286,
+ 506,
+ 299
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 286,
+ 506,
+ 299
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2020). The adversarial perturbations translate into electrical signals propagating over the scalp and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 297,
+ 345,
+ 309
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 297,
+ 345,
+ 309
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "are sensed by the electrodes in addition to the EEG signals.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 175,
+ 506,
+ 309
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 313,
+ 505,
+ 390
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 313,
+ 505,
+ 326
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 313,
+ 505,
+ 326
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "To guarantee the imperceptibility of the attacks, previous works in BCIs create perturbations that",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 325,
+ 505,
+ 336
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 325,
+ 505,
+ 336
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "are small in amplitude (Zhang & Wu, 2019; Jiang et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2021), limiting the attack",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 336,
+ 506,
+ 348
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 336,
+ 506,
+ 348
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "success rate (ASR). Increased perturbation’s amplitude yields higher ASR (Meng et al., 2021), but",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 347,
+ 506,
+ 359
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 347,
+ 506,
+ 359
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "makes the attack more easily detectable. Moreover, the generated perturbations are square-shaped,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 358,
+ 505,
+ 370
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 358,
+ 505,
+ 370
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "which is implausible for biosignals. Han et al. (2020) are the first to observe square-wave artifacts",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 367,
+ 506,
+ 382
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 367,
+ 506,
+ 382
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "in biosignals’ attacks and propose smooth perturbations for electrocardiograms (ECGs). No similar",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 380,
+ 243,
+ 391
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 380,
+ 243,
+ 391
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "works have been found for EEGs.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 313,
+ 506,
+ 391
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 396,
+ 505,
+ 517
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 395,
+ 505,
+ 409
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 395,
+ 505,
+ 409
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "This work: Practical attacks on BCI models. To address the above technical challenges, and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 407,
+ 505,
+ 420
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 407,
+ 505,
+ 420
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for analyzing the vulnerability of embedded BCI models in practical scenarios, we design a new",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 419,
+ 505,
+ 431
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 419,
+ 505,
+ 431
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "attack algorithm that generates smooth adversarial examples based on the signals’ first derivative and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 430,
+ 504,
+ 441
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 430,
+ 504,
+ 441
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "model its propagation over the scalp based on a realistic head model by taking into consideration the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 441,
+ 505,
+ 453
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 441,
+ 505,
+ 453
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "attack source and the electrical and physical properties of the conducting tissues. This enables the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 451,
+ 506,
+ 464
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 451,
+ 506,
+ 464
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "creation of practically effective perturbations, that can be delivered by an external device to attack",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 461,
+ 506,
+ 474
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 461,
+ 506,
+ 474
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "EEG-based BCIs at the source of signal acquisition. We attack the most energy-efficient network that",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 472,
+ 506,
+ 486
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 472,
+ 506,
+ 486
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "has been embedded on microcontrollers for smart wearable BCIs called EEGNet (Lawhern et al.,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 484,
+ 504,
+ 496
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 484,
+ 504,
+ 496
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2018; Schneider et al., 2020). It is a resource-friendly convolutional neural network (CNN) and is the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 495,
+ 506,
+ 509
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 495,
+ 506,
+ 509
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "SoA in terms of accuracy and energy-efficiency trade-off (Belwafi et al., 2018; Malekmohammadi",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 507,
+ 325,
+ 518
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 507,
+ 325,
+ 518
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2020; Schneider et al., 2020).",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 395,
+ 506,
+ 518
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 523,
+ 506,
+ 676
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 522,
+ 506,
+ 535
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 522,
+ 506,
+ 535
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "We evaluate our methods and show experimental results on BCIs based on the motor imagery (MI)",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 534,
+ 506,
+ 547
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 534,
+ 506,
+ 547
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "paradigm, which is of special interest among others because it can be asynchronously self-paced",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 543,
+ 507,
+ 559
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 543,
+ 507,
+ 559
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "without external stimuli (Freer & Yang, 2020). By imagining the movement of different body parts,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 555,
+ 506,
+ 569
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 555,
+ 506,
+ 569
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the decoded intention is translated into control signals. It is widely applied in several BCI applications,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 567,
+ 506,
+ 579
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 567,
+ 506,
+ 579
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "such as the control of wheelchairss (Yu et al., 2018), prosthetic armss (Elstob & Secco, 2016), ground",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 578,
+ 506,
+ 590
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 578,
+ 506,
+ 590
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "vehicles (Zhuang et al., 2021), and in communication (Brumberg et al., 2016). It has been proven",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 588,
+ 506,
+ 601
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 588,
+ 506,
+ 601
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to be the most difficult task to be attacked among the most common BCI paradigms (Zhang & Wu,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 599,
+ 506,
+ 612
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 599,
+ 506,
+ 612
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2019; Meng et al., 2021). We evaluate our methods by “fooling” the victim model to always predict",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 45
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 610,
+ 506,
+ 623
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 610,
+ 506,
+ 623
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "“rest” class. This essentially yields a DoS attack, because resting-state EEG signals are generally",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 46
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 621,
+ 506,
+ 633
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 621,
+ 506,
+ 633
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "interpreted as no subject’s intention decoded, i.e., no control action needs to be taken by the BCI",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 47
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 632,
+ 506,
+ 645
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 632,
+ 506,
+ 645
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "system (Yu et al., 2018). While for healthy subjects it might solely cause user frustration and financial",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 48
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 643,
+ 505,
+ 655
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 643,
+ 505,
+ 655
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "losses, for severely paralyzed patients it can lead to loss of communication and independence. We",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 49
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 654,
+ 506,
+ 667
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 654,
+ 506,
+ 667
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "generalize our methodology to an other MI task of BCI Competition IV-2a dataset and believe that it",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 50
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 665,
+ 293,
+ 678
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 665,
+ 293,
+ 678
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "can be easily adapted to other BCI paradigms.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 51
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 104,
+ 522,
+ 507,
+ 678
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 682,
+ 306,
+ 693
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 681,
+ 307,
+ 694
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 681,
+ 307,
+ 694
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Main contributions. Our main contributions are:",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 52
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 52,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 681,
+ 307,
+ 694
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 134,
+ 699,
+ 504,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 132,
+ 697,
+ 505,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 132,
+ 697,
+ 505,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "• We design a new method to generate smooth adversarial perturbations that are",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 53
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 709,
+ 392,
+ 725
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 709,
+ 392,
+ 725
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "physiologically plausible and imperceptible to the human eye.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 54
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 53.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 132,
+ 697,
+ 505,
+ 725
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "preproc_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 133,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 152
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 133,
+ 82,
+ 506,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 133,
+ 82,
+ 506,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "• We consider a practical scenario where the perturbation is added at the signal acquisition",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 140,
+ 93,
+ 506,
+ 107
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 140,
+ 93,
+ 506,
+ 107
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "source and model its propagation constrained by the physical properties of the human scalp.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 132,
+ 107,
+ 506,
+ 120
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 132,
+ 107,
+ 506,
+ 120
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "• The first study of adversarial perturbations in BCI to consider the practical scenario of",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 119,
+ 506,
+ 130
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 119,
+ 506,
+ 130
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "smart edge computing and physical signal propagation. We create both local and global",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 129,
+ 506,
+ 141
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 129,
+ 461,
+ 141
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "perturbations and show that our attacks consistently achieve a success rate of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 462,
+ 129,
+ 493,
+ 140
+ ],
+ "score": 0.87,
+ "content": "> 5 0 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 493,
+ 129,
+ 506,
+ 141
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "in",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 141,
+ 498,
+ 153
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 141,
+ 498,
+ 153
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "different settings pointing to the significant vulnerability of the SoA embedded EEGNet.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 157,
+ 505,
+ 180
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 157,
+ 505,
+ 169
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 157,
+ 505,
+ 169
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "We hope that our work raises awareness for potential risks and motivates the future development of",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 169,
+ 226,
+ 180
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 169,
+ 226,
+ 180
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "appropriate countermeasures.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 194,
+ 201,
+ 208
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 193,
+ 201,
+ 210
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 193,
+ 201,
+ 210
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2 BACKGROUND",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 218,
+ 241,
+ 231
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 218,
+ 241,
+ 232
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 218,
+ 241,
+ 232
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2.1 CLASSIFICATION IN BCIS",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 239,
+ 505,
+ 286
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 238,
+ 505,
+ 253
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 238,
+ 505,
+ 253
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "We first describe the commonly used approach in BCIs for classification, consisting of a preprocessing",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 250,
+ 505,
+ 263
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 250,
+ 449,
+ 263
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "step and a classifier. The brain activity is recorded with an EEG device which samples",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 449,
+ 251,
+ 467,
+ 262
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "N _ { c h }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 467,
+ 250,
+ 505,
+ 263
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "channels",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 261,
+ 506,
+ 275
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 261,
+ 133,
+ 275
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "at rate",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 134,
+ 263,
+ 145,
+ 274
+ ],
+ "score": 0.87,
+ "content": "F _ { s }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 146,
+ 261,
+ 228,
+ 275
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". We define one trial",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 229,
+ 263,
+ 235,
+ 274
+ ],
+ "score": 0.8,
+ "content": "j",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 235,
+ 261,
+ 247,
+ 275
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "as",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 248,
+ 262,
+ 295,
+ 275
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "( \\mathbf { X } ^ { ( j ) } , y ^ { ( j ) } )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 295,
+ 261,
+ 326,
+ 275
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", where",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 326,
+ 261,
+ 429,
+ 275
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "y ^ { ( j ) } \\in \\{ 0 , 1 , . . . , N _ { c l } - 1 \\}",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 429,
+ 261,
+ 506,
+ 275
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is the true label of",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 273,
+ 409,
+ 288
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 275,
+ 122,
+ 286
+ ],
+ "score": 0.87,
+ "content": "N _ { c l }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 123,
+ 273,
+ 180,
+ 288
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "MI tasks, and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 180,
+ 274,
+ 250,
+ 285
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { X } ^ { ( j ) } \\in \\mathbb { R } ^ { N _ { s } \\times N _ { c h } }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 250,
+ 273,
+ 409,
+ 288
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the multi-channel recording defined as",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 236,
+ 287,
+ 374,
+ 308
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 236,
+ 287,
+ 374,
+ 308
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 236,
+ 287,
+ 374,
+ 308
+ ],
+ "score": 0.94,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { X } ^ { ( j ) } : = \\left( \\mathbf { x } _ { 0 } ^ { ( j ) } , \\mathbf { x } _ { 1 } ^ { ( j ) } , . . . , \\mathbf { x } _ { N _ { c h } - 1 } ^ { ( j ) } \\right) ,",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "4adef2bd32024f0155b08bd021946820057f4e0a6d08b9b081db9e63f5cb922a.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 236,
+ 287,
+ 374,
+ 308
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 14
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 312,
+ 505,
+ 336
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 309,
+ 504,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 309,
+ 126,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 127,
+ 309,
+ 173,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "score": 0.93,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { x } _ { i } ^ { ( j ) } \\in \\mathbb { R } ^ { N _ { s } }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 174,
+ 309,
+ 326,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "corresponding to the recording of the",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 327,
+ 313,
+ 332,
+ 324
+ ],
+ "score": 0.82,
+ "content": "j",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 333,
+ 309,
+ 394,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "-th trial and the",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 395,
+ 313,
+ 399,
+ 322
+ ],
+ "score": 0.78,
+ "content": "i",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 400,
+ 309,
+ 490,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "-th channel containing",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 491,
+ 313,
+ 504,
+ 323
+ ],
+ "score": 0.85,
+ "content": "N _ { s }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 323,
+ 390,
+ 337
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 323,
+ 285,
+ 337
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "temporal samples. For simplicity, we denote",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 286,
+ 324,
+ 330,
+ 335
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { X } : = \\mathbf { X } ^ { ( j ) }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 330,
+ 323,
+ 349,
+ 337
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 349,
+ 324,
+ 387,
+ 336
+ ],
+ "score": 0.93,
+ "content": "y : = y ^ { ( j ) }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 387,
+ 323,
+ 390,
+ 337
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 341,
+ 503,
+ 364
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 341,
+ 505,
+ 354
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 341,
+ 505,
+ 354
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "The EEG recordings are often preprocessed with a band-pass filter, e.g., using a Fast Fourier Transform",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 351,
+ 344,
+ 366
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 351,
+ 154,
+ 366
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(FFT) filter",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 154,
+ 353,
+ 179,
+ 365
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "h _ { b p } ( \\cdot )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 179,
+ 351,
+ 344,
+ 366
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", before being fed to a classifier, yielding",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 191,
+ 365,
+ 420,
+ 379
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 191,
+ 365,
+ 420,
+ 379
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 191,
+ 365,
+ 420,
+ 379
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { X } _ { b p } = H _ { b p } ( \\mathbf { X } ) = \\left( h _ { b p } ( \\mathbf { x } _ { 0 } ) , h _ { b p } ( \\mathbf { x } _ { 1 } ) , . . . , h _ { b p } ( \\mathbf { x } _ { N _ { c h } - 1 } ) \\right) .",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "92578742fa44b8eb625a3c6e4e087ff7ad891f1315813fccd22129d3165cbf68.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 191,
+ 365,
+ 420,
+ 379
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 19
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 380,
+ 506,
+ 414
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 378,
+ 505,
+ 393
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 378,
+ 237,
+ 393
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Finally, the preprocessed signal",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 238,
+ 380,
+ 256,
+ 392
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { X } _ { b p }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 256,
+ 378,
+ 401,
+ 393
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is classified with a trainable model",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 402,
+ 380,
+ 409,
+ 391
+ ],
+ "score": 0.84,
+ "content": "f",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 409,
+ 378,
+ 482,
+ 393
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and is mapped to",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 482,
+ 381,
+ 505,
+ 392
+ ],
+ "score": 0.82,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { p } : =",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 390,
+ 506,
+ 405
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 391,
+ 142,
+ 404
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "f \\left( { \\bf { X } } _ { b p } \\right)",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 390,
+ 171,
+ 405
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", where",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 171,
+ 391,
+ 210,
+ 403
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { p } \\in \\mathbb { R } ^ { N _ { c l } }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 210,
+ 390,
+ 506,
+ 405
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "contains the output probabilities, e.g., originating from a softmax activation",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 402,
+ 494,
+ 416
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 402,
+ 187,
+ 416
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "as final operation in",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 188,
+ 403,
+ 195,
+ 414
+ ],
+ "score": 0.84,
+ "content": "f",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 195,
+ 402,
+ 314,
+ 416
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". The model’s final prediction",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 315,
+ 403,
+ 321,
+ 414
+ ],
+ "score": 0.85,
+ "content": "\\hat { y }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 321,
+ 402,
+ 482,
+ 416
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is the index with the maximum score in",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 482,
+ 404,
+ 489,
+ 414
+ ],
+ "score": 0.33,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { p }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 490,
+ 402,
+ 494,
+ 416
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ":",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 219,
+ 415,
+ 391,
+ 439
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 219,
+ 415,
+ 391,
+ 439
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 219,
+ 415,
+ 391,
+ 439
+ ],
+ "score": 0.93,
+ "content": "\\boldsymbol { \\hat { y } } = \\boldsymbol { \\hat { f } } \\left( \\mathbf { X } _ { b p } \\right) = \\underset { y \\in \\{ 0 , \\ldots , N _ { c l } - 1 \\} } { \\mathrm { a r g m a x } } ~ f \\left( \\mathbf { X } _ { b p } \\right) [ y ] .",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "090de2464ceebb19449b8aaa8df74dfb9fcbf1932b76ec9c09e0616b0fd63a0c.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 219,
+ 415,
+ 391,
+ 439
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 23
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 450,
+ 248,
+ 461
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 450,
+ 249,
+ 462
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 450,
+ 249,
+ 462
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2.2 INSTANCE-BASED ATTACKS",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 470,
+ 505,
+ 516
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 470,
+ 505,
+ 483
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 470,
+ 315,
+ 483
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Instance-based attacks try to fool an EEG classifier",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 315,
+ 471,
+ 322,
+ 482
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "f",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 322,
+ 470,
+ 442,
+ 483
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to misclassify an EEG signal",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 442,
+ 471,
+ 452,
+ 481
+ ],
+ "score": 0.58,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { X }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 452,
+ 470,
+ 505,
+ 483
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to a targeted",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 481,
+ 505,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 481,
+ 128,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "class",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 129,
+ 483,
+ 138,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 0.83,
+ "content": "y _ { t }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 138,
+ 481,
+ 398,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". In this section, we describe the attack directly on the classifier",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 398,
+ 482,
+ 405,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 0.85,
+ "content": "f",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 406,
+ 481,
+ 505,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "without considering the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 493,
+ 506,
+ 505
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 493,
+ 166,
+ 505
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "preprocessing",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 166,
+ 493,
+ 183,
+ 505
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "H _ { b p }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 184,
+ 493,
+ 506,
+ 505
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "; the inclusion of the preprocessing is described in Section 3.3. We define an",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 503,
+ 365,
+ 517
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 503,
+ 216,
+ 517
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "adversarial example as any",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 216,
+ 504,
+ 324,
+ 515
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { X } ^ { * } = \\mathbf { X } + \\mathbf { V } \\in \\mathbb { R } ^ { N _ { s } \\times N _ { c h } }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 324,
+ 503,
+ 365,
+ 517
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "such that",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 259,
+ 517,
+ 351,
+ 533
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 259,
+ 517,
+ 351,
+ 533
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 259,
+ 517,
+ 351,
+ 533
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\hat { f } \\left( \\mathbf { X } \\right) \\neq \\hat { f } \\left( \\mathbf { X } ^ { * } \\right) = y _ { t } .",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "ae96fbca25561b728f407743e94ef7daae4c068465648eca1989b79f54f18f8f.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 259,
+ 517,
+ 351,
+ 533
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 29
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 541,
+ 503,
+ 563
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 539,
+ 503,
+ 554
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 539,
+ 443,
+ 554
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "FGSM. The FGSM (Goodfellow et al., 2015) generates an adversarial perturbation",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 443,
+ 540,
+ 503,
+ 551
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { V } \\in \\mathbb { R } ^ { N _ { s } \\times N _ { c h } }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 551,
+ 437,
+ 565
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 551,
+ 162,
+ 565
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "of magnitude",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 162,
+ 554,
+ 167,
+ 562
+ ],
+ "score": 0.67,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 168,
+ 551,
+ 437,
+ 565
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "which points in the negative direction of a loss function’s gradient:",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 564,
+ 370,
+ 578
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 564,
+ 370,
+ 578
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 564,
+ 370,
+ 578
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { V } = - \\epsilon \\cdot \\mathrm { s i g n } \\left( \\nabla _ { \\mathbf { X } } \\cdot l \\left( \\mathbf { X } , y _ { t } \\right) \\right) ,",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "0d4290c3afb9da2ee94681d4b078c69233401f350f53f236fd055d34090accc5.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 564,
+ 370,
+ 578
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 32
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 578,
+ 347,
+ 590
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 577,
+ 345,
+ 592
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 577,
+ 345,
+ 592
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "where the loss function contains the negative log likelihood",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 212,
+ 591,
+ 398,
+ 604
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 212,
+ 591,
+ 398,
+ 604
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 212,
+ 591,
+ 398,
+ 604
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "l ( \\mathbf { X } , y _ { t } ) = - \\log \\left( { \\mathbf { p } } [ y _ { t } ] \\right) = - \\log \\left( f \\left( \\mathbf { X } \\right) [ y _ { t } ] \\right) .",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "76d960042d0c715217ff55097d0087d7852aed951636159758fb7c8f7d3fa671.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 212,
+ 591,
+ 398,
+ 604
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 34
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 606,
+ 504,
+ 628
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 605,
+ 505,
+ 619
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 605,
+ 119,
+ 619
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "As",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 119,
+ 607,
+ 127,
+ 617
+ ],
+ "score": 0.37,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { p }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 128,
+ 605,
+ 505,
+ 619
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is the output of the softmax activation function, equation 6 becomes a cross-entropy loss which",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 616,
+ 382,
+ 629
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 616,
+ 194,
+ 629
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "maximizes the output",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 195,
+ 616,
+ 216,
+ 628
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { p } [ y _ { t } ]",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 217,
+ 616,
+ 382,
+ 629
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "while minimizing the remaining outputs.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 638,
+ 505,
+ 694
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 638,
+ 506,
+ 652
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 638,
+ 506,
+ 652
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "PGD. The projected gradient descent (PGD) (Madry et al., 2018) is a variant of the basic iterative",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 650,
+ 506,
+ 662
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 650,
+ 506,
+ 662
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "method (Kurakin et al.), generally considered to be more effective than FGSM. PGD aims to find a",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 660,
+ 506,
+ 675
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 660,
+ 316,
+ 675
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "perturbation by iteratively taking small steps of size",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 316,
+ 663,
+ 324,
+ 671
+ ],
+ "score": 0.79,
+ "content": "\\alpha",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 325,
+ 660,
+ 506,
+ 675
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "in the gradient’s direction and projecting the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 672,
+ 505,
+ 684
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 672,
+ 505,
+ 684
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "resulting perturbation back to the sample’s neighborhood after each iteration. We randomly initialize",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 682,
+ 472,
+ 696
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 682,
+ 188,
+ 696
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the attack inside the",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 189,
+ 684,
+ 205,
+ 694
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "L _ { \\infty }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 205,
+ 682,
+ 261,
+ 696
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "ball of radius",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 261,
+ 685,
+ 267,
+ 693
+ ],
+ "score": 0.73,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 267,
+ 682,
+ 354,
+ 696
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and update the attack",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 355,
+ 683,
+ 378,
+ 695
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { V } _ { t + 1 }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 378,
+ 682,
+ 446,
+ 696
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for any iteration",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 446,
+ 684,
+ 451,
+ 693
+ ],
+ "score": 0.76,
+ "content": "t",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 451,
+ 682,
+ 472,
+ 696
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 200,
+ 696,
+ 408,
+ 709
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 200,
+ 696,
+ 408,
+ 709
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 200,
+ 696,
+ 408,
+ 709
+ ],
+ "score": 0.83,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { V } _ { t + 1 } = \\mathrm { c l i p } _ { \\epsilon } \\left( \\mathbf { V } _ { t } - \\alpha \\cdot \\mathrm { s i g n } \\left( \\nabla _ { \\mathbf { V } } l \\left( \\mathbf { X } + \\mathbf { V } _ { t } , y _ { t } \\right) \\right) \\right) ,",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "5018cbeb47f39276c0e84f65e695e567cca2809727b109293d37f372e63a064d.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 200,
+ 696,
+ 408,
+ 709
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 42
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 710,
+ 507,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 709,
+ 504,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 709,
+ 134,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "where",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 134,
+ 712,
+ 142,
+ 720
+ ],
+ "score": 0.78,
+ "content": "\\alpha",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 709,
+ 254,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is a step size smaller than",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 254,
+ 712,
+ 260,
+ 720
+ ],
+ "score": 0.68,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 260,
+ 709,
+ 504,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "which decays linearly with each iteration and the function",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 720,
+ 353,
+ 734
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 720,
+ 139,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 0.87,
+ "content": "\\mathrm { c l i p } _ { \\epsilon } \\left( \\cdot \\right)",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 139,
+ 720,
+ 343,
+ 734
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "clips the signal at the maximum desired amplitude",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 344,
+ 723,
+ 349,
+ 730
+ ],
+ "score": 0.72,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 349,
+ 720,
+ 353,
+ 734
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "page_idx": 2,
+ "page_size": [
+ 612,
+ 792
+ ],
+ "discarded_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 27,
+ 308,
+ 37
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 26,
+ 308,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 26,
+ 308,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2022",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 302,
+ 751,
+ 309,
+ 760
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 301,
+ 750,
+ 310,
+ 762
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 301,
+ 750,
+ 310,
+ 762
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "3",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "para_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 133,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 152
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 133,
+ 82,
+ 506,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 133,
+ 82,
+ 506,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "• We consider a practical scenario where the perturbation is added at the signal acquisition",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 140,
+ 93,
+ 506,
+ 107
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 140,
+ 93,
+ 506,
+ 107
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "source and model its propagation constrained by the physical properties of the human scalp.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 132,
+ 107,
+ 506,
+ 120
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 132,
+ 107,
+ 506,
+ 120
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "• The first study of adversarial perturbations in BCI to consider the practical scenario of",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 119,
+ 506,
+ 130
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 119,
+ 506,
+ 130
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "smart edge computing and physical signal propagation. We create both local and global",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 129,
+ 506,
+ 141
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 129,
+ 461,
+ 141
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "perturbations and show that our attacks consistently achieve a success rate of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 462,
+ 129,
+ 493,
+ 140
+ ],
+ "score": 0.87,
+ "content": "> 5 0 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 493,
+ 129,
+ 506,
+ 141
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "in",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 141,
+ 498,
+ 153
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 141,
+ 498,
+ 153
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "different settings pointing to the significant vulnerability of the SoA embedded EEGNet.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 132,
+ 82,
+ 506,
+ 153
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 157,
+ 505,
+ 180
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 157,
+ 505,
+ 169
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 157,
+ 505,
+ 169
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "We hope that our work raises awareness for potential risks and motivates the future development of",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 169,
+ 226,
+ 180
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 169,
+ 226,
+ 180
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "appropriate countermeasures.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 157,
+ 505,
+ 180
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 194,
+ 201,
+ 208
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 193,
+ 201,
+ 210
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 193,
+ 201,
+ 210
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2 BACKGROUND",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 218,
+ 241,
+ 231
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 218,
+ 241,
+ 232
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 218,
+ 241,
+ 232
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2.1 CLASSIFICATION IN BCIS",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 239,
+ 505,
+ 286
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 238,
+ 505,
+ 253
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 238,
+ 505,
+ 253
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "We first describe the commonly used approach in BCIs for classification, consisting of a preprocessing",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 250,
+ 505,
+ 263
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 250,
+ 449,
+ 263
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "step and a classifier. The brain activity is recorded with an EEG device which samples",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 449,
+ 251,
+ 467,
+ 262
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "N _ { c h }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 467,
+ 250,
+ 505,
+ 263
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "channels",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 261,
+ 506,
+ 275
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 261,
+ 133,
+ 275
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "at rate",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 134,
+ 263,
+ 145,
+ 274
+ ],
+ "score": 0.87,
+ "content": "F _ { s }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 146,
+ 261,
+ 228,
+ 275
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". We define one trial",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 229,
+ 263,
+ 235,
+ 274
+ ],
+ "score": 0.8,
+ "content": "j",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 235,
+ 261,
+ 247,
+ 275
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "as",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 248,
+ 262,
+ 295,
+ 275
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "( \\mathbf { X } ^ { ( j ) } , y ^ { ( j ) } )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 295,
+ 261,
+ 326,
+ 275
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", where",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 326,
+ 261,
+ 429,
+ 275
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "y ^ { ( j ) } \\in \\{ 0 , 1 , . . . , N _ { c l } - 1 \\}",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 429,
+ 261,
+ 506,
+ 275
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is the true label of",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 273,
+ 409,
+ 288
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 275,
+ 122,
+ 286
+ ],
+ "score": 0.87,
+ "content": "N _ { c l }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 123,
+ 273,
+ 180,
+ 288
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "MI tasks, and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 180,
+ 274,
+ 250,
+ 285
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { X } ^ { ( j ) } \\in \\mathbb { R } ^ { N _ { s } \\times N _ { c h } }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 250,
+ 273,
+ 409,
+ 288
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the multi-channel recording defined as",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 238,
+ 506,
+ 288
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 236,
+ 287,
+ 374,
+ 308
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 236,
+ 287,
+ 374,
+ 308
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 236,
+ 287,
+ 374,
+ 308
+ ],
+ "score": 0.94,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { X } ^ { ( j ) } : = \\left( \\mathbf { x } _ { 0 } ^ { ( j ) } , \\mathbf { x } _ { 1 } ^ { ( j ) } , . . . , \\mathbf { x } _ { N _ { c h } - 1 } ^ { ( j ) } \\right) ,",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "4adef2bd32024f0155b08bd021946820057f4e0a6d08b9b081db9e63f5cb922a.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 236,
+ 287,
+ 374,
+ 308
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 14
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 312,
+ 505,
+ 336
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 309,
+ 504,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 309,
+ 126,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 127,
+ 309,
+ 173,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "score": 0.93,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { x } _ { i } ^ { ( j ) } \\in \\mathbb { R } ^ { N _ { s } }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 174,
+ 309,
+ 326,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "corresponding to the recording of the",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 327,
+ 313,
+ 332,
+ 324
+ ],
+ "score": 0.82,
+ "content": "j",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 333,
+ 309,
+ 394,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "-th trial and the",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 395,
+ 313,
+ 399,
+ 322
+ ],
+ "score": 0.78,
+ "content": "i",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 400,
+ 309,
+ 490,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "-th channel containing",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 491,
+ 313,
+ 504,
+ 323
+ ],
+ "score": 0.85,
+ "content": "N _ { s }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 323,
+ 390,
+ 337
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 323,
+ 285,
+ 337
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "temporal samples. For simplicity, we denote",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 286,
+ 324,
+ 330,
+ 335
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { X } : = \\mathbf { X } ^ { ( j ) }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 330,
+ 323,
+ 349,
+ 337
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 349,
+ 324,
+ 387,
+ 336
+ ],
+ "score": 0.93,
+ "content": "y : = y ^ { ( j ) }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 387,
+ 323,
+ 390,
+ 337
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 107,
+ 309,
+ 504,
+ 337
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 341,
+ 503,
+ 364
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 341,
+ 505,
+ 354
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 341,
+ 505,
+ 354
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "The EEG recordings are often preprocessed with a band-pass filter, e.g., using a Fast Fourier Transform",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 351,
+ 344,
+ 366
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 351,
+ 154,
+ 366
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(FFT) filter",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 154,
+ 353,
+ 179,
+ 365
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "h _ { b p } ( \\cdot )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 179,
+ 351,
+ 344,
+ 366
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", before being fed to a classifier, yielding",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 341,
+ 505,
+ 366
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 191,
+ 365,
+ 420,
+ 379
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 191,
+ 365,
+ 420,
+ 379
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 191,
+ 365,
+ 420,
+ 379
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { X } _ { b p } = H _ { b p } ( \\mathbf { X } ) = \\left( h _ { b p } ( \\mathbf { x } _ { 0 } ) , h _ { b p } ( \\mathbf { x } _ { 1 } ) , . . . , h _ { b p } ( \\mathbf { x } _ { N _ { c h } - 1 } ) \\right) .",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "92578742fa44b8eb625a3c6e4e087ff7ad891f1315813fccd22129d3165cbf68.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 191,
+ 365,
+ 420,
+ 379
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 19
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 380,
+ 506,
+ 414
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 378,
+ 505,
+ 393
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 378,
+ 237,
+ 393
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Finally, the preprocessed signal",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 238,
+ 380,
+ 256,
+ 392
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { X } _ { b p }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 256,
+ 378,
+ 401,
+ 393
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is classified with a trainable model",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 402,
+ 380,
+ 409,
+ 391
+ ],
+ "score": 0.84,
+ "content": "f",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 409,
+ 378,
+ 482,
+ 393
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and is mapped to",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 482,
+ 381,
+ 505,
+ 392
+ ],
+ "score": 0.82,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { p } : =",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 390,
+ 506,
+ 405
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 391,
+ 142,
+ 404
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "f \\left( { \\bf { X } } _ { b p } \\right)",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 390,
+ 171,
+ 405
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", where",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 171,
+ 391,
+ 210,
+ 403
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { p } \\in \\mathbb { R } ^ { N _ { c l } }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 210,
+ 390,
+ 506,
+ 405
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "contains the output probabilities, e.g., originating from a softmax activation",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 402,
+ 494,
+ 416
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 402,
+ 187,
+ 416
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "as final operation in",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 188,
+ 403,
+ 195,
+ 414
+ ],
+ "score": 0.84,
+ "content": "f",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 195,
+ 402,
+ 314,
+ 416
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". The model’s final prediction",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 315,
+ 403,
+ 321,
+ 414
+ ],
+ "score": 0.85,
+ "content": "\\hat { y }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 321,
+ 402,
+ 482,
+ 416
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is the index with the maximum score in",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 482,
+ 404,
+ 489,
+ 414
+ ],
+ "score": 0.33,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { p }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 490,
+ 402,
+ 494,
+ 416
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ":",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 378,
+ 506,
+ 416
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 219,
+ 415,
+ 391,
+ 439
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 219,
+ 415,
+ 391,
+ 439
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 219,
+ 415,
+ 391,
+ 439
+ ],
+ "score": 0.93,
+ "content": "\\boldsymbol { \\hat { y } } = \\boldsymbol { \\hat { f } } \\left( \\mathbf { X } _ { b p } \\right) = \\underset { y \\in \\{ 0 , \\ldots , N _ { c l } - 1 \\} } { \\mathrm { a r g m a x } } ~ f \\left( \\mathbf { X } _ { b p } \\right) [ y ] .",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "090de2464ceebb19449b8aaa8df74dfb9fcbf1932b76ec9c09e0616b0fd63a0c.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 219,
+ 415,
+ 391,
+ 439
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 23
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 450,
+ 248,
+ 461
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 450,
+ 249,
+ 462
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 450,
+ 249,
+ 462
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2.2 INSTANCE-BASED ATTACKS",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 470,
+ 505,
+ 516
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 470,
+ 505,
+ 483
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 470,
+ 315,
+ 483
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Instance-based attacks try to fool an EEG classifier",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 315,
+ 471,
+ 322,
+ 482
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "f",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 322,
+ 470,
+ 442,
+ 483
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to misclassify an EEG signal",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 442,
+ 471,
+ 452,
+ 481
+ ],
+ "score": 0.58,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { X }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 452,
+ 470,
+ 505,
+ 483
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to a targeted",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 481,
+ 505,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 481,
+ 128,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "class",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 129,
+ 483,
+ 138,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 0.83,
+ "content": "y _ { t }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 138,
+ 481,
+ 398,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". In this section, we describe the attack directly on the classifier",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 398,
+ 482,
+ 405,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 0.85,
+ "content": "f",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 406,
+ 481,
+ 505,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "without considering the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 493,
+ 506,
+ 505
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 493,
+ 166,
+ 505
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "preprocessing",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 166,
+ 493,
+ 183,
+ 505
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "H _ { b p }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 184,
+ 493,
+ 506,
+ 505
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "; the inclusion of the preprocessing is described in Section 3.3. We define an",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 503,
+ 365,
+ 517
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 503,
+ 216,
+ 517
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "adversarial example as any",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 216,
+ 504,
+ 324,
+ 515
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { X } ^ { * } = \\mathbf { X } + \\mathbf { V } \\in \\mathbb { R } ^ { N _ { s } \\times N _ { c h } }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 324,
+ 503,
+ 365,
+ 517
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "such that",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 104,
+ 470,
+ 506,
+ 517
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 259,
+ 517,
+ 351,
+ 533
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 259,
+ 517,
+ 351,
+ 533
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 259,
+ 517,
+ 351,
+ 533
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\hat { f } \\left( \\mathbf { X } \\right) \\neq \\hat { f } \\left( \\mathbf { X } ^ { * } \\right) = y _ { t } .",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "ae96fbca25561b728f407743e94ef7daae4c068465648eca1989b79f54f18f8f.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 259,
+ 517,
+ 351,
+ 533
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 29
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 541,
+ 503,
+ 563
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 539,
+ 503,
+ 554
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 539,
+ 443,
+ 554
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "FGSM. The FGSM (Goodfellow et al., 2015) generates an adversarial perturbation",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 443,
+ 540,
+ 503,
+ 551
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { V } \\in \\mathbb { R } ^ { N _ { s } \\times N _ { c h } }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 551,
+ 437,
+ 565
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 551,
+ 162,
+ 565
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "of magnitude",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 162,
+ 554,
+ 167,
+ 562
+ ],
+ "score": 0.67,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 168,
+ 551,
+ 437,
+ 565
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "which points in the negative direction of a loss function’s gradient:",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 104,
+ 539,
+ 503,
+ 565
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 564,
+ 370,
+ 578
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 564,
+ 370,
+ 578
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 564,
+ 370,
+ 578
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { V } = - \\epsilon \\cdot \\mathrm { s i g n } \\left( \\nabla _ { \\mathbf { X } } \\cdot l \\left( \\mathbf { X } , y _ { t } \\right) \\right) ,",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "0d4290c3afb9da2ee94681d4b078c69233401f350f53f236fd055d34090accc5.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 564,
+ 370,
+ 578
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 32
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 578,
+ 347,
+ 590
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 577,
+ 345,
+ 592
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 577,
+ 345,
+ 592
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "where the loss function contains the negative log likelihood",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 577,
+ 345,
+ 592
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 212,
+ 591,
+ 398,
+ 604
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 212,
+ 591,
+ 398,
+ 604
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 212,
+ 591,
+ 398,
+ 604
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "l ( \\mathbf { X } , y _ { t } ) = - \\log \\left( { \\mathbf { p } } [ y _ { t } ] \\right) = - \\log \\left( f \\left( \\mathbf { X } \\right) [ y _ { t } ] \\right) .",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "76d960042d0c715217ff55097d0087d7852aed951636159758fb7c8f7d3fa671.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 212,
+ 591,
+ 398,
+ 604
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 34
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 606,
+ 504,
+ 628
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 605,
+ 505,
+ 619
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 605,
+ 119,
+ 619
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "As",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 119,
+ 607,
+ 127,
+ 617
+ ],
+ "score": 0.37,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { p }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 128,
+ 605,
+ 505,
+ 619
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is the output of the softmax activation function, equation 6 becomes a cross-entropy loss which",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 616,
+ 382,
+ 629
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 616,
+ 194,
+ 629
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "maximizes the output",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 195,
+ 616,
+ 216,
+ 628
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { p } [ y _ { t } ]",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 217,
+ 616,
+ 382,
+ 629
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "while minimizing the remaining outputs.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 605,
+ 505,
+ 629
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 638,
+ 505,
+ 694
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 638,
+ 506,
+ 652
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 638,
+ 506,
+ 652
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "PGD. The projected gradient descent (PGD) (Madry et al., 2018) is a variant of the basic iterative",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 650,
+ 506,
+ 662
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 650,
+ 506,
+ 662
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "method (Kurakin et al.), generally considered to be more effective than FGSM. PGD aims to find a",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 660,
+ 506,
+ 675
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 660,
+ 316,
+ 675
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "perturbation by iteratively taking small steps of size",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 316,
+ 663,
+ 324,
+ 671
+ ],
+ "score": 0.79,
+ "content": "\\alpha",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 325,
+ 660,
+ 506,
+ 675
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "in the gradient’s direction and projecting the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 672,
+ 505,
+ 684
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 672,
+ 505,
+ 684
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "resulting perturbation back to the sample’s neighborhood after each iteration. We randomly initialize",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 682,
+ 472,
+ 696
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 682,
+ 188,
+ 696
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the attack inside the",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 189,
+ 684,
+ 205,
+ 694
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "L _ { \\infty }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 205,
+ 682,
+ 261,
+ 696
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "ball of radius",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 261,
+ 685,
+ 267,
+ 693
+ ],
+ "score": 0.73,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 267,
+ 682,
+ 354,
+ 696
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and update the attack",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 355,
+ 683,
+ 378,
+ 695
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { V } _ { t + 1 }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 378,
+ 682,
+ 446,
+ 696
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for any iteration",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 446,
+ 684,
+ 451,
+ 693
+ ],
+ "score": 0.76,
+ "content": "t",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 451,
+ 682,
+ 472,
+ 696
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 638,
+ 506,
+ 696
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 200,
+ 696,
+ 408,
+ 709
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 200,
+ 696,
+ 408,
+ 709
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 200,
+ 696,
+ 408,
+ 709
+ ],
+ "score": 0.83,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { V } _ { t + 1 } = \\mathrm { c l i p } _ { \\epsilon } \\left( \\mathbf { V } _ { t } - \\alpha \\cdot \\mathrm { s i g n } \\left( \\nabla _ { \\mathbf { V } } l \\left( \\mathbf { X } + \\mathbf { V } _ { t } , y _ { t } \\right) \\right) \\right) ,",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "5018cbeb47f39276c0e84f65e695e567cca2809727b109293d37f372e63a064d.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 200,
+ 696,
+ 408,
+ 709
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 42
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 710,
+ 507,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 709,
+ 504,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 709,
+ 134,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "where",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 134,
+ 712,
+ 142,
+ 720
+ ],
+ "score": 0.78,
+ "content": "\\alpha",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 142,
+ 709,
+ 254,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is a step size smaller than",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 254,
+ 712,
+ 260,
+ 720
+ ],
+ "score": 0.68,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 260,
+ 709,
+ 504,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "which decays linearly with each iteration and the function",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 720,
+ 353,
+ 734
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 720,
+ 139,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 0.87,
+ "content": "\\mathrm { c l i p } _ { \\epsilon } \\left( \\cdot \\right)",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 139,
+ 720,
+ 343,
+ 734
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "clips the signal at the maximum desired amplitude",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 344,
+ 723,
+ 349,
+ 730
+ ],
+ "score": 0.72,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 349,
+ 720,
+ 353,
+ 734
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 709,
+ 504,
+ 734
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "preproc_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 82,
+ 223,
+ 93
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 82,
+ 225,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 82,
+ 225,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2.3 UNIVERSAL ATTACKS",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 102,
+ 506,
+ 136
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 101,
+ 506,
+ 117
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 101,
+ 506,
+ 117
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "UAPs have been introduced by Moosavi-Dezfooli et al. (2017) in the context of natural images,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 114,
+ 506,
+ 126
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 114,
+ 506,
+ 126
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "seeking to find an image-agnostic perturbation that fools the classifier on any input image. In the BCI",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 123,
+ 433,
+ 138
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 123,
+ 331,
+ 138
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "domain (Liu et al., 2021), we seek to find a perturbation",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 332,
+ 124,
+ 391,
+ 135
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { V } \\in \\mathbb { R } ^ { N _ { s } \\times N _ { c h } }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 392,
+ 123,
+ 433,
+ 138
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "such that",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 222,
+ 140,
+ 388,
+ 155
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 222,
+ 140,
+ 388,
+ 155
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 222,
+ 140,
+ 388,
+ 155
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\begin{array} { r } { \\hat { f } \\left( \\mathbf { X } + \\mathbf { V } \\right) \\neq \\hat { f } \\left( \\mathbf { X } \\right) \\mathrm { f o r } ^ { * } \\mathrm { m o s t } ^ { * } \\mathbf { X } \\sim D , } \\end{array}",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "831387fcf3fae8922d58bc63c66078fe603ae4b2c440daa59c8a14c9c37671c9.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 222,
+ 140,
+ 388,
+ 155
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 4
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 158,
+ 507,
+ 181
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 158,
+ 505,
+ 171
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 158,
+ 132,
+ 171
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "where",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 133,
+ 159,
+ 142,
+ 168
+ ],
+ "score": 0.83,
+ "content": "D",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 143,
+ 158,
+ 505,
+ 171
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is the distribution of the EEG data. The UAP can be determined by optimizing the negative",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 169,
+ 495,
+ 182
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 169,
+ 244,
+ 182
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "log-likelihood loss with respect to",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 245,
+ 169,
+ 255,
+ 180
+ ],
+ "score": 0.69,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 255,
+ 169,
+ 495,
+ 182
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "using batch gradient descent on the trials in the training set.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 196,
+ 333,
+ 209
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 195,
+ 334,
+ 210
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 195,
+ 334,
+ 210
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "3 MODELING PRACTICAL ATTACKS IN BCI",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 220,
+ 506,
+ 342
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 220,
+ 507,
+ 234
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 220,
+ 507,
+ 234
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "This section is the main contribution of the paper: we present a design of practical DoS attacks on MI-",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 231,
+ 505,
+ 245
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 231,
+ 505,
+ 245
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "BCIs that operates at the source of the signal acquisition. We propose a new method to eliminate the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 243,
+ 506,
+ 255
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 243,
+ 506,
+ 255
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "square wave artifacts to generate adversarial examples that are natural and physiologically plausible.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 253,
+ 505,
+ 267
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 253,
+ 505,
+ 267
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "The perturbation is emitted by a smart, adversarial device placed close to the ear, e.g., a smart glass or",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 265,
+ 505,
+ 278
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 265,
+ 505,
+ 278
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "in-ear headphones, and is propagated to the individual EEG electrodes over the scalp’s skin. As can",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 276,
+ 506,
+ 288
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 276,
+ 506,
+ 288
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "be experimentally observed on measured EEG traces (Merlet et al., 2013; Sazgar & Young, 2019),",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 287,
+ 506,
+ 300
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 287,
+ 506,
+ 300
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the same electrical source, e.g., electrocardiographic activities, is sensed by each EEG electrode with",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 298,
+ 506,
+ 311
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 298,
+ 506,
+ 311
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "different degrees of attenuation and delay. We present a practical propagation model that determines",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 309,
+ 505,
+ 320
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 309,
+ 505,
+ 320
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the magnitude and delay for every individual electrode based on the distance along the scalp to the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 320,
+ 506,
+ 333
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 320,
+ 506,
+ 333
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "adversarial device. The perturbation is trained end-to-end to fool the classifier to always output “rest,”",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 330,
+ 506,
+ 343
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 330,
+ 506,
+ 343
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "hence DoS, while respecting the spatial model and the amplitude constraints to remain imperceptible.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 354,
+ 437,
+ 367
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 354,
+ 438,
+ 368
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 354,
+ 438,
+ 368
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "3.1 DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT OF PHYSIOLOGICALLY PLAUSIBLE ATTACKS",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 375,
+ 506,
+ 454
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 375,
+ 506,
+ 388
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 375,
+ 506,
+ 388
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "PGD-designed attacks on EEG tend to form perturbation signals which resemble a square-wave",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 386,
+ 507,
+ 400
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 386,
+ 507,
+ 400
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "artifact (see Figure 2), an effect that has been observed on ECG data, too (Han et al., 2020). However,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 397,
+ 506,
+ 410
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 397,
+ 506,
+ 410
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "EEG signals are of random nature and can be modeled as frequency dependent stationary or non-",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 408,
+ 506,
+ 421
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 408,
+ 506,
+ 421
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "stationary random processes (Karlekar & Gupta, 2014). To this end, we introduce a new loss term in",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 420,
+ 505,
+ 432
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 420,
+ 505,
+ 432
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the PGD optimization such that the perturbation resembles the random nature of EEG signals, which",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 430,
+ 505,
+ 443
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 430,
+ 505,
+ 443
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "we achieve by promoting signal changes represented in the first order derivative. We estimate the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 103,
+ 439,
+ 505,
+ 456
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 103,
+ 439,
+ 197,
+ 456
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "per-channel derivative",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 197,
+ 441,
+ 365,
+ 455
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "\\begin{array} { r } { \\bar { { \\bf V } ^ { \\prime } } = ( { \\bf v } _ { 0 } ^ { \\prime } , { \\bf v } _ { 1 } ^ { \\prime } , . . . , { \\bf v } _ { N _ { c h } - 1 } ^ { \\prime } ) \\in \\mathbb { R } ^ { N _ { s } - 1 \\times N _ { c h } } } \\end{array}",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 365,
+ 439,
+ 505,
+ 456
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "using the sample-wise difference:",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 155,
+ 458,
+ 456,
+ 471
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 155,
+ 458,
+ 456,
+ 471
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 155,
+ 458,
+ 456,
+ 471
+ ],
+ "score": 0.83,
+ "content": "\\begin{array} { r } { \\mathbf { v } _ { c } ^ { \\prime } [ t ] : = \\mathbf { v } _ { c } [ t ] - \\mathbf { v } _ { c } [ t - 1 ] \\quad t \\in \\{ 1 , 2 , . . . , N _ { s } - 1 \\} , c \\in \\{ 0 , 1 , . . . , N _ { c h } - 1 \\} } \\end{array}",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "ce0c71c6986adead5a7ef4f07c8039c9cf9397e84e03cd7c9175ee0546e8ce8a.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 155,
+ 458,
+ 456,
+ 471
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 27
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 476,
+ 505,
+ 515
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 472,
+ 508,
+ 496
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 477,
+ 262,
+ 492
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "The additive loss term is determined by",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 262,
+ 475,
+ 370,
+ 491
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\begin{array} { r } { l _ { 1 } ( { \\bf V } ) = - \\frac { \\beta } { \\epsilon } \\sum _ { c = 1 } ^ { N _ { c h } } | | { \\bf v } _ { c } ^ { \\prime } | | _ { 1 } } \\end{array}",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 303,
+ 472,
+ 508,
+ 496
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "− β\u000f PNchc=1 ||v0c||1, where || · ||1 is the `1-norm, \u000f the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 489,
+ 505,
+ 502
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 489,
+ 260,
+ 502
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "maximum perturbation amplitude, and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 261,
+ 490,
+ 286,
+ 500
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\beta \\geq 0",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 286,
+ 489,
+ 505,
+ 502
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "a weighting factor. When designing a one-dimensional",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 500,
+ 347,
+ 515
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 500,
+ 271,
+ 515
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "perturbation, the derivative loss becomes",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 272,
+ 500,
+ 343,
+ 515
+ ],
+ "score": 0.94,
+ "content": "\\begin{array} { r } { l _ { 1 } ( \\mathbf { v } ) = - \\frac { \\beta } { \\epsilon } | | \\mathbf { v } ^ { \\prime } | | } \\end{array}",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 343,
+ 500,
+ 347,
+ 515
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 524,
+ 505,
+ 580
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 524,
+ 505,
+ 538
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 524,
+ 505,
+ 538
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Measuring the Plausibility of Attacks None of the previous works have given quantitative",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 536,
+ 505,
+ 548
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 536,
+ 505,
+ 548
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "measures to assess the physiological plausibility of an EEG adversarial attack. In this work, we",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 547,
+ 505,
+ 559
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 547,
+ 505,
+ 559
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "propose data-driven measures for quantifying the naturalism of an attack. We compute either the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 558,
+ 504,
+ 570
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 558,
+ 504,
+ 570
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "cross correlation, the Euclidian distance, or the cosine similarity between the attacked signal and the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 569,
+ 491,
+ 581
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 569,
+ 291,
+ 581
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "original EEG, and average the values over the",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 291,
+ 569,
+ 309,
+ 580
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "N _ { c h }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 309,
+ 569,
+ 491,
+ 581
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "channels and over the samples in the dataset.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 593,
+ 262,
+ 604
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 593,
+ 264,
+ 606
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 593,
+ 264,
+ 606
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "3.2 SPATIAL PROPAGATION MODEL",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 613,
+ 505,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 613,
+ 506,
+ 627
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 613,
+ 506,
+ 627
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "So far, a perturbation signal was designed for every individual channel. It is unrealistic for an attacker",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 624,
+ 505,
+ 637
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 624,
+ 505,
+ 637
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to perturb the signal for all individual channels simultaneously; hence, we consider a more practical",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 633,
+ 506,
+ 649
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 633,
+ 256,
+ 649
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "use case where the perturbation signal",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 257,
+ 635,
+ 293,
+ 646
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { v } \\in \\mathbb { R } ^ { N _ { s } }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 293,
+ 633,
+ 506,
+ 649
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is emitted from one location, e.g., from an adversarial",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 645,
+ 505,
+ 659
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 645,
+ 505,
+ 659
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "device placed on the left side of the subject or close to the left ear. More specifically, in this study, we",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 658,
+ 506,
+ 671
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 658,
+ 506,
+ 671
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "assume that the EEG electrode at the position T9 according to the international 10-10 system (Sch),",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 667,
+ 505,
+ 683
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 667,
+ 505,
+ 683
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "which is the closest to the left ear, senses the largest perturbation. The signal subsequently propagates",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 678,
+ 505,
+ 693
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 678,
+ 505,
+ 693
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "over the skin to each electrode, which results in an individual magnitude and delay depending on",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 690,
+ 506,
+ 703
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 690,
+ 506,
+ 703
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the distance between the adversarial device and the electrode. More formally, we model the sensed",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 702,
+ 290,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 702,
+ 201,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "perturbation at channel",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 201,
+ 702,
+ 205,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "score": 0.75,
+ "content": "i",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 206,
+ 702,
+ 273,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and time instant",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 273,
+ 703,
+ 278,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "score": 0.8,
+ "content": "t",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 278,
+ 702,
+ 290,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "as",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 45
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 204,
+ 716,
+ 406,
+ 730
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 204,
+ 716,
+ 406,
+ 730
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 204,
+ 716,
+ 406,
+ 730
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "h _ { i } ( \\mathbf { v } , \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } ) ( t ) : = m ( l _ { i } , \\lambda _ { m } ) \\cdot \\mathbf { v } \\left( t - d ( l _ { i } , \\lambda _ { d } ) \\right) ,",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "376c0312852c9f41d7a3778ae583d8e40b0cf5932a3541026cd26602e02373b7.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 46,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 204,
+ 716,
+ 406,
+ 730
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 46
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "page_idx": 3,
+ "page_size": [
+ 612,
+ 792
+ ],
+ "discarded_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 26,
+ 308,
+ 37
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 25,
+ 309,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 25,
+ 309,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2022",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 302,
+ 752,
+ 308,
+ 759
+ ],
+ "lines": []
+ }
+ ],
+ "para_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 82,
+ 223,
+ 93
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 82,
+ 225,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 82,
+ 225,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2.3 UNIVERSAL ATTACKS",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 102,
+ 506,
+ 136
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 101,
+ 506,
+ 117
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 101,
+ 506,
+ 117
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "UAPs have been introduced by Moosavi-Dezfooli et al. (2017) in the context of natural images,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 114,
+ 506,
+ 126
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 114,
+ 506,
+ 126
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "seeking to find an image-agnostic perturbation that fools the classifier on any input image. In the BCI",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 123,
+ 433,
+ 138
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 123,
+ 331,
+ 138
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "domain (Liu et al., 2021), we seek to find a perturbation",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 332,
+ 124,
+ 391,
+ 135
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { V } \\in \\mathbb { R } ^ { N _ { s } \\times N _ { c h } }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 392,
+ 123,
+ 433,
+ 138
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "such that",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 101,
+ 506,
+ 138
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 222,
+ 140,
+ 388,
+ 155
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 222,
+ 140,
+ 388,
+ 155
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 222,
+ 140,
+ 388,
+ 155
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\begin{array} { r } { \\hat { f } \\left( \\mathbf { X } + \\mathbf { V } \\right) \\neq \\hat { f } \\left( \\mathbf { X } \\right) \\mathrm { f o r } ^ { * } \\mathrm { m o s t } ^ { * } \\mathbf { X } \\sim D , } \\end{array}",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "831387fcf3fae8922d58bc63c66078fe603ae4b2c440daa59c8a14c9c37671c9.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 222,
+ 140,
+ 388,
+ 155
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 4
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 158,
+ 507,
+ 181
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 158,
+ 505,
+ 171
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 158,
+ 132,
+ 171
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "where",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 133,
+ 159,
+ 142,
+ 168
+ ],
+ "score": 0.83,
+ "content": "D",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 143,
+ 158,
+ 505,
+ 171
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is the distribution of the EEG data. The UAP can be determined by optimizing the negative",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 169,
+ 495,
+ 182
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 169,
+ 244,
+ 182
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "log-likelihood loss with respect to",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 245,
+ 169,
+ 255,
+ 180
+ ],
+ "score": 0.69,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 255,
+ 169,
+ 495,
+ 182
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "using batch gradient descent on the trials in the training set.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 158,
+ 505,
+ 182
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 196,
+ 333,
+ 209
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 195,
+ 334,
+ 210
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 195,
+ 334,
+ 210
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "3 MODELING PRACTICAL ATTACKS IN BCI",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 220,
+ 506,
+ 342
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 220,
+ 507,
+ 234
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 220,
+ 507,
+ 234
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "This section is the main contribution of the paper: we present a design of practical DoS attacks on MI-",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 231,
+ 505,
+ 245
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 231,
+ 505,
+ 245
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "BCIs that operates at the source of the signal acquisition. We propose a new method to eliminate the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 243,
+ 506,
+ 255
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 243,
+ 506,
+ 255
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "square wave artifacts to generate adversarial examples that are natural and physiologically plausible.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 253,
+ 505,
+ 267
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 253,
+ 505,
+ 267
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "The perturbation is emitted by a smart, adversarial device placed close to the ear, e.g., a smart glass or",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 265,
+ 505,
+ 278
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 265,
+ 505,
+ 278
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "in-ear headphones, and is propagated to the individual EEG electrodes over the scalp’s skin. As can",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 276,
+ 506,
+ 288
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 276,
+ 506,
+ 288
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "be experimentally observed on measured EEG traces (Merlet et al., 2013; Sazgar & Young, 2019),",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 287,
+ 506,
+ 300
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 287,
+ 506,
+ 300
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the same electrical source, e.g., electrocardiographic activities, is sensed by each EEG electrode with",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 298,
+ 506,
+ 311
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 298,
+ 506,
+ 311
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "different degrees of attenuation and delay. We present a practical propagation model that determines",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 309,
+ 505,
+ 320
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 309,
+ 505,
+ 320
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the magnitude and delay for every individual electrode based on the distance along the scalp to the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 320,
+ 506,
+ 333
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 320,
+ 506,
+ 333
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "adversarial device. The perturbation is trained end-to-end to fool the classifier to always output “rest,”",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 330,
+ 506,
+ 343
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 330,
+ 506,
+ 343
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "hence DoS, while respecting the spatial model and the amplitude constraints to remain imperceptible.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 220,
+ 507,
+ 343
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 354,
+ 437,
+ 367
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 354,
+ 438,
+ 368
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 354,
+ 438,
+ 368
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "3.1 DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT OF PHYSIOLOGICALLY PLAUSIBLE ATTACKS",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 375,
+ 506,
+ 454
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 375,
+ 506,
+ 388
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 375,
+ 506,
+ 388
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "PGD-designed attacks on EEG tend to form perturbation signals which resemble a square-wave",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 386,
+ 507,
+ 400
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 386,
+ 507,
+ 400
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "artifact (see Figure 2), an effect that has been observed on ECG data, too (Han et al., 2020). However,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 397,
+ 506,
+ 410
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 397,
+ 506,
+ 410
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "EEG signals are of random nature and can be modeled as frequency dependent stationary or non-",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 408,
+ 506,
+ 421
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 408,
+ 506,
+ 421
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "stationary random processes (Karlekar & Gupta, 2014). To this end, we introduce a new loss term in",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 420,
+ 505,
+ 432
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 420,
+ 505,
+ 432
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the PGD optimization such that the perturbation resembles the random nature of EEG signals, which",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 430,
+ 505,
+ 443
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 430,
+ 505,
+ 443
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "we achieve by promoting signal changes represented in the first order derivative. We estimate the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 103,
+ 439,
+ 505,
+ 456
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 103,
+ 439,
+ 197,
+ 456
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "per-channel derivative",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 197,
+ 441,
+ 365,
+ 455
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "\\begin{array} { r } { \\bar { { \\bf V } ^ { \\prime } } = ( { \\bf v } _ { 0 } ^ { \\prime } , { \\bf v } _ { 1 } ^ { \\prime } , . . . , { \\bf v } _ { N _ { c h } - 1 } ^ { \\prime } ) \\in \\mathbb { R } ^ { N _ { s } - 1 \\times N _ { c h } } } \\end{array}",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 365,
+ 439,
+ 505,
+ 456
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "using the sample-wise difference:",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 103,
+ 375,
+ 507,
+ 456
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 155,
+ 458,
+ 456,
+ 471
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 155,
+ 458,
+ 456,
+ 471
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 155,
+ 458,
+ 456,
+ 471
+ ],
+ "score": 0.83,
+ "content": "\\begin{array} { r } { \\mathbf { v } _ { c } ^ { \\prime } [ t ] : = \\mathbf { v } _ { c } [ t ] - \\mathbf { v } _ { c } [ t - 1 ] \\quad t \\in \\{ 1 , 2 , . . . , N _ { s } - 1 \\} , c \\in \\{ 0 , 1 , . . . , N _ { c h } - 1 \\} } \\end{array}",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "ce0c71c6986adead5a7ef4f07c8039c9cf9397e84e03cd7c9175ee0546e8ce8a.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 155,
+ 458,
+ 456,
+ 471
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 27
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 476,
+ 505,
+ 515
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 472,
+ 508,
+ 496
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 477,
+ 262,
+ 492
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "The additive loss term is determined by",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 262,
+ 475,
+ 370,
+ 491
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\begin{array} { r } { l _ { 1 } ( { \\bf V } ) = - \\frac { \\beta } { \\epsilon } \\sum _ { c = 1 } ^ { N _ { c h } } | | { \\bf v } _ { c } ^ { \\prime } | | _ { 1 } } \\end{array}",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 303,
+ 472,
+ 508,
+ 496
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "− β\u000f PNchc=1 ||v0c||1, where || · ||1 is the `1-norm, \u000f the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 489,
+ 505,
+ 502
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 489,
+ 260,
+ 502
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "maximum perturbation amplitude, and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 261,
+ 490,
+ 286,
+ 500
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\beta \\geq 0",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 286,
+ 489,
+ 505,
+ 502
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "a weighting factor. When designing a one-dimensional",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 500,
+ 347,
+ 515
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 500,
+ 271,
+ 515
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "perturbation, the derivative loss becomes",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 272,
+ 500,
+ 343,
+ 515
+ ],
+ "score": 0.94,
+ "content": "\\begin{array} { r } { l _ { 1 } ( \\mathbf { v } ) = - \\frac { \\beta } { \\epsilon } | | \\mathbf { v } ^ { \\prime } | | } \\end{array}",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 343,
+ 500,
+ 347,
+ 515
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 472,
+ 508,
+ 515
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 524,
+ 505,
+ 580
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 524,
+ 505,
+ 538
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 524,
+ 505,
+ 538
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Measuring the Plausibility of Attacks None of the previous works have given quantitative",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 536,
+ 505,
+ 548
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 536,
+ 505,
+ 548
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "measures to assess the physiological plausibility of an EEG adversarial attack. In this work, we",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 547,
+ 505,
+ 559
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 547,
+ 505,
+ 559
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "propose data-driven measures for quantifying the naturalism of an attack. We compute either the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 558,
+ 504,
+ 570
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 558,
+ 504,
+ 570
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "cross correlation, the Euclidian distance, or the cosine similarity between the attacked signal and the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 569,
+ 491,
+ 581
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 569,
+ 291,
+ 581
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "original EEG, and average the values over the",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 291,
+ 569,
+ 309,
+ 580
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "N _ { c h }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 309,
+ 569,
+ 491,
+ 581
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "channels and over the samples in the dataset.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 524,
+ 505,
+ 581
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 593,
+ 262,
+ 604
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 593,
+ 264,
+ 606
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 593,
+ 264,
+ 606
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "3.2 SPATIAL PROPAGATION MODEL",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 613,
+ 505,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 613,
+ 506,
+ 627
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 613,
+ 506,
+ 627
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "So far, a perturbation signal was designed for every individual channel. It is unrealistic for an attacker",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 624,
+ 505,
+ 637
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 624,
+ 505,
+ 637
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to perturb the signal for all individual channels simultaneously; hence, we consider a more practical",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 633,
+ 506,
+ 649
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 633,
+ 256,
+ 649
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "use case where the perturbation signal",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 257,
+ 635,
+ 293,
+ 646
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { v } \\in \\mathbb { R } ^ { N _ { s } }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 293,
+ 633,
+ 506,
+ 649
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is emitted from one location, e.g., from an adversarial",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 645,
+ 505,
+ 659
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 645,
+ 505,
+ 659
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "device placed on the left side of the subject or close to the left ear. More specifically, in this study, we",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 658,
+ 506,
+ 671
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 658,
+ 506,
+ 671
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "assume that the EEG electrode at the position T9 according to the international 10-10 system (Sch),",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 667,
+ 505,
+ 683
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 667,
+ 505,
+ 683
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "which is the closest to the left ear, senses the largest perturbation. The signal subsequently propagates",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 678,
+ 505,
+ 693
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 678,
+ 505,
+ 693
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "over the skin to each electrode, which results in an individual magnitude and delay depending on",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 690,
+ 506,
+ 703
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 690,
+ 506,
+ 703
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the distance between the adversarial device and the electrode. More formally, we model the sensed",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 702,
+ 290,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 702,
+ 201,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "perturbation at channel",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 201,
+ 702,
+ 205,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "score": 0.75,
+ "content": "i",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 206,
+ 702,
+ 273,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and time instant",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 273,
+ 703,
+ 278,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "score": 0.8,
+ "content": "t",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 278,
+ 702,
+ 290,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "as",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 45
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 104,
+ 613,
+ 506,
+ 713
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 204,
+ 716,
+ 406,
+ 730
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 204,
+ 716,
+ 406,
+ 730
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 204,
+ 716,
+ 406,
+ 730
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "h _ { i } ( \\mathbf { v } , \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } ) ( t ) : = m ( l _ { i } , \\lambda _ { m } ) \\cdot \\mathbf { v } \\left( t - d ( l _ { i } , \\lambda _ { d } ) \\right) ,",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "376c0312852c9f41d7a3778ae583d8e40b0cf5932a3541026cd26602e02373b7.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 46,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 204,
+ 716,
+ 406,
+ 730
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 46
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "preproc_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 116
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 82,
+ 133,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "where",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 134,
+ 82,
+ 175,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "m ( l _ { i } , \\lambda _ { m } )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 175,
+ 82,
+ 194,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 194,
+ 82,
+ 228,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "score": 0.94,
+ "content": "d ( l _ { i } , \\lambda _ { d } )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 229,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "are the magnitude and the delay respectively, both of which depend",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 94,
+ 504,
+ 105
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 94,
+ 168,
+ 105
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "on the distance",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 168,
+ 95,
+ 175,
+ 104
+ ],
+ "score": 0.85,
+ "content": "l _ { i }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 176,
+ 94,
+ 306,
+ 105
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and on characteristic parameters",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 306,
+ 94,
+ 321,
+ 105
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 321,
+ 94,
+ 338,
+ 105
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 339,
+ 94,
+ 350,
+ 105
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 351,
+ 94,
+ 504,
+ 105
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". We define the resulting multi-channel",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 101,
+ 430,
+ 118
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 101,
+ 158,
+ 118
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "perturbation",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 158,
+ 104,
+ 217,
+ 115
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { V } \\in \\mathbb { R } ^ { N _ { s } \\times N _ { c h } }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 218,
+ 101,
+ 430,
+ 118
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", which is added to the multi-channel EEG signal, as",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 118,
+ 121,
+ 476,
+ 135
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 118,
+ 121,
+ 476,
+ 135
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 118,
+ 121,
+ 476,
+ 135
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\begin{array} { r } { { \\bf V } ( \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } ) = H ( { \\bf v } , \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } ) : = \\left( h _ { 0 } ( { \\bf v } , \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } ) , h _ { 1 } ( { \\bf v } , \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } ) , . . . , h _ { N _ { c h } - 1 } ( { \\bf v } , \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } ) \\right) . } \\end{array}",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "de96e5a139b1fc23afd99dccaff6c949ce6e68096635c4b34caf36537f06be33.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 118,
+ 121,
+ 476,
+ 135
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 3
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 146,
+ 505,
+ 180
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 146,
+ 505,
+ 159
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 146,
+ 204,
+ 159
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "We estimate the distance",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 205,
+ 147,
+ 212,
+ 158
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "l _ { i }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 212,
+ 146,
+ 505,
+ 159
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "between the electrode at position T9 and the remaining, attacked positions",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 158,
+ 505,
+ 170
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 158,
+ 337,
+ 170
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "using the 10-10 system and a head model with a radius of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 338,
+ 158,
+ 365,
+ 168
+ ],
+ "score": 0.61,
+ "content": "8 . 7 \\mathrm { c m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 366,
+ 158,
+ 505,
+ 170
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(Algazi et al., 2001). We decouple",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 168,
+ 506,
+ 182
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 168,
+ 506,
+ 182
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the distance-dependent modeling of the magnitude and delay, explained in the following paragraphs.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 192,
+ 505,
+ 236
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 192,
+ 505,
+ 204
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 192,
+ 505,
+ 204
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Magnitude. For modeling the magnitude, we assume that the adversarial device injects or induces",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 203,
+ 505,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 203,
+ 144,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "a current",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 144,
+ 204,
+ 151,
+ 213
+ ],
+ "score": 0.73,
+ "content": "I",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 151,
+ 203,
+ 234,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", yielding a potential",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 235,
+ 204,
+ 244,
+ 213
+ ],
+ "score": 0.79,
+ "content": "V",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 244,
+ 203,
+ 505,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "measured near T9. The current propagates over the head surface",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 214,
+ 505,
+ 227
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 214,
+ 505,
+ 227
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "through the skin to each of the remaining attacked electrodes, which can be modeled as a cylindrical",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 224,
+ 201,
+ 237
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 224,
+ 201,
+ 237
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "resistor with resistance",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 282,
+ 239,
+ 327,
+ 264
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 282,
+ 239,
+ 327,
+ 264
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 282,
+ 239,
+ 327,
+ 264
+ ],
+ "score": 0.93,
+ "content": "R _ { i } = \\frac { l _ { i } } { \\sigma A } ,",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "df7117bdb4d5c93cccf2e90b25cc3c804499313daf11d78a2ed1cb0219bdb070.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 282,
+ 239,
+ 327,
+ 264
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 11
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 268,
+ 505,
+ 302
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 268,
+ 506,
+ 280
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 268,
+ 132,
+ 280
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "where",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 132,
+ 271,
+ 140,
+ 279
+ ],
+ "score": 0.78,
+ "content": "\\sigma",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 140,
+ 268,
+ 506,
+ 280
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is the conductivity of the skin which can be in the range of [0.28, 0.87] Siemens/m (Vorwerk",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 279,
+ 507,
+ 293
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 279,
+ 176,
+ 293
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "et al., 2019), and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 176,
+ 280,
+ 184,
+ 290
+ ],
+ "score": 0.81,
+ "content": "A",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 185,
+ 279,
+ 420,
+ 293
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is the area of the skin conductor. The potential at electrode",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 420,
+ 281,
+ 425,
+ 290
+ ],
+ "score": 0.77,
+ "content": "i",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 425,
+ 279,
+ 435,
+ 293
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 436,
+ 280,
+ 502,
+ 291
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "V _ { i } = V - I \\cdot R _ { i }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 502,
+ 279,
+ 507,
+ 293
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ",",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 291,
+ 288,
+ 303
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 291,
+ 288,
+ 303
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and hence the magnitude can be described as",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 196,
+ 307,
+ 414,
+ 332
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 196,
+ 307,
+ 414,
+ 332
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 196,
+ 307,
+ 414,
+ 332
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "m ( l _ { i } , \\lambda _ { m } ) = 1 - \\frac { V - V _ { i } } { V } = 1 - \\frac { I } { V \\sigma A } l _ { i } = 1 - \\lambda _ { m } l _ { i } ,",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "be06049f08f97d940ab4e03b5c05093432b85058b4a81d8046d097f375f7225f.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 196,
+ 307,
+ 414,
+ 332
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 15
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 335,
+ 506,
+ 426
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 335,
+ 504,
+ 350
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 335,
+ 223,
+ 350
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "where we further constrain",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 223,
+ 336,
+ 312,
+ 349
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "0 \\leq m ( l _ { i } , \\lambda _ { m } ) \\leq 1",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 312,
+ 335,
+ 489,
+ 350
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". The characteristic magnitude parameter",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 489,
+ 337,
+ 504,
+ 348
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 347,
+ 506,
+ 362
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 347,
+ 506,
+ 362
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "represents the complex interplay between input current, voltage, conductivity, and area, covering",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 358,
+ 506,
+ 371
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 358,
+ 450,
+ 371
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "various attack scenarios. We consider different characteristic magnitude parameters",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 450,
+ 358,
+ 502,
+ 370
+ ],
+ "score": 0.79,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m } \\in [ 1 , 1 5 ]",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 503,
+ 358,
+ 506,
+ 371
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 369,
+ 506,
+ 383
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 369,
+ 140,
+ 383
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "A large",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 140,
+ 370,
+ 154,
+ 381
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 155,
+ 369,
+ 506,
+ 383
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "represents cases with large attenuation and limited propagation, i.e., a limited set of",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 381,
+ 506,
+ 393
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 381,
+ 387,
+ 393
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "neighboring electrodes sense the perturbation. Conversely, a small",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 387,
+ 381,
+ 402,
+ 392
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 402,
+ 381,
+ 506,
+ 393
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "covers cases with lower",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 392,
+ 506,
+ 404
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 392,
+ 506,
+ 404
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "attenuation where the perturbation can propagate further and infects all electrodes. We consider also",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 402,
+ 507,
+ 415
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 402,
+ 468,
+ 415
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "an intermediate case where around half of the electrodes are affected by the attack with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 469,
+ 403,
+ 503,
+ 414
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m } = 5",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 503,
+ 402,
+ 507,
+ 415
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 414,
+ 486,
+ 426
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 414,
+ 486,
+ 426
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Appendix B provides examples of the magnitude of the spatial propagation on the head model.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 437,
+ 505,
+ 537
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 437,
+ 506,
+ 450
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 437,
+ 506,
+ 450
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Delay. The propagation of a signal on the head surface yields a position-dependent phase angle or",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 448,
+ 505,
+ 461
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 448,
+ 505,
+ 461
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "delay, as shown by experimental measurements of related studies (Plutchik & Hirsch, 1963; Qiao",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 460,
+ 506,
+ 471
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 460,
+ 506,
+ 471
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "et al., 1994). The delay stems from a combination of resistive and capacitive components that are",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 470,
+ 506,
+ 482
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 470,
+ 506,
+ 482
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "encountered during the propagation of the signal, which can be modeled as an RC-circuit with",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 481,
+ 506,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 482,
+ 149,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "resistance",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 149,
+ 482,
+ 158,
+ 491
+ ],
+ "score": 0.77,
+ "content": "R",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 158,
+ 482,
+ 198,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", capacity",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 198,
+ 482,
+ 207,
+ 491
+ ],
+ "score": 0.79,
+ "content": "C",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 207,
+ 482,
+ 285,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", and time constant",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 285,
+ 481,
+ 327,
+ 491
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\tau = R \\cdot C",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 328,
+ 482,
+ 506,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "that relates to the group delay. Specifically,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 492,
+ 506,
+ 505
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 492,
+ 506,
+ 505
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the contacts between the electrodes and the skin are predominantly capacitive whereas the skin itself",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 502,
+ 505,
+ 517
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 502,
+ 505,
+ 517
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is both resistive and capacitive (Kim et al., 2010). As explained in the previous part, an increasing",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 513,
+ 505,
+ 527
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 513,
+ 428,
+ 527
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "distance between the attacker and the target electrode yields a larger resistance",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 428,
+ 515,
+ 437,
+ 524
+ ],
+ "score": 0.57,
+ "content": "R",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 437,
+ 513,
+ 505,
+ 527
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". As a result, the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 525,
+ 279,
+ 537
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 525,
+ 162,
+ 537
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "time constant",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 162,
+ 527,
+ 169,
+ 535
+ ],
+ "score": 0.76,
+ "content": "\\tau",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 170,
+ 525,
+ 279,
+ 537
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and the delay increase too.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 541,
+ 506,
+ 619
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 542,
+ 506,
+ 554
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 542,
+ 506,
+ 554
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Here, we model a linear distance-delay relation. We rely on a study by Plutchik & Hirsch (1963),",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 552,
+ 506,
+ 566
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 552,
+ 506,
+ 566
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "which conducted human skin impedance and phase angle measurements by placing electrodes at",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 564,
+ 506,
+ 577
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 564,
+ 219,
+ 577
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "an approximate distance of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 219,
+ 564,
+ 245,
+ 574
+ ],
+ "score": 0.68,
+ "content": "1 0 \\mathrm { c m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 245,
+ 564,
+ 457,
+ 577
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and applying voltages with frequencies in the range",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 458,
+ 564,
+ 503,
+ 574
+ ],
+ "score": 0.78,
+ "content": "2 { \\mathrm { - } } 1 0 0 0 \\mathrm { { H z } }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 504,
+ 564,
+ 506,
+ 577
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 575,
+ 506,
+ 588
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 575,
+ 506,
+ 588
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "When assuming a linear frequency-phase relation in low-frequency region (Qiao et al., 1994), one",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 586,
+ 505,
+ 598
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 586,
+ 234,
+ 598
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "can derive the group delay to be",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 234,
+ 586,
+ 261,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "score": 0.43,
+ "content": "2 . 8 \\mathrm { m s }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 261,
+ 586,
+ 414,
+ 598
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "when considering a measured angle of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 414,
+ 586,
+ 429,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "1 0 ^ { \\circ }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 430,
+ 586,
+ 440,
+ 598
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "at",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 441,
+ 586,
+ 464,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "score": 0.72,
+ "content": "1 0 \\mathrm { H z }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 465,
+ 586,
+ 505,
+ 598
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". As those",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 596,
+ 506,
+ 611
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 596,
+ 506,
+ 611
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "measurements were conducted for only one distance, we extrapolate the delay for the remaining",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 609,
+ 267,
+ 620
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 609,
+ 267,
+ 620
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "distances using a rectified linear model:",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 171,
+ 624,
+ 438,
+ 639
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 171,
+ 624,
+ 438,
+ 639
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 171,
+ 624,
+ 438,
+ 639
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d } \\cdot ( l _ { i } - l _ { 0 } ) > 0 \\uparrow d ( l _ { i } , \\lambda _ { d } ) = \\lambda _ { d } \\cdot ( l _ { i } - l _ { 0 } ) + d _ { 0 } : d ( l _ { i } , \\lambda _ { d } ) = 0 ,",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "8c109f14baba8fdb3fa4ca00a590e185e17699666a46300fe54ae3c09558dc5d.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 171,
+ 624,
+ 438,
+ 639
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 40
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 643,
+ 506,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 643,
+ 507,
+ 657
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 643,
+ 133,
+ 657
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "where",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 133,
+ 644,
+ 183,
+ 655
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "d _ { 0 } = 2 . 8 \\mathrm { m s }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 184,
+ 643,
+ 277,
+ 657
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is the delay at distance",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 278,
+ 644,
+ 324,
+ 655
+ ],
+ "score": 0.93,
+ "content": "l _ { 0 } = 1 0 \\mathrm { c m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 324,
+ 643,
+ 507,
+ 657
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". The delay depends not only on the distance,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 655,
+ 505,
+ 667
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 655,
+ 505,
+ 667
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "but also on other parameters such as the electrode-to-skin contact, the humidity of the skin, etc. To",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 665,
+ 506,
+ 678
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 665,
+ 506,
+ 678
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "this end, we evaluate the propagation of the attack with different characteristic delay parameters",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 677,
+ 506,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 677,
+ 192,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d } \\in \\left[ 0 . 1 , 0 . 5 6 3 \\right] \\mathrm { s / m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 192,
+ 677,
+ 218,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". With",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 218,
+ 677,
+ 256,
+ 688
+ ],
+ "score": 0.93,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d } = 0 . 1",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 257,
+ 677,
+ 506,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "we cover the cases where very little delay happens, while the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 688,
+ 506,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 688,
+ 183,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "largest considered",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 183,
+ 688,
+ 249,
+ 699
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d } = 0 . 5 6 3 \\mathrm { s / m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 249,
+ 688,
+ 365,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "yields a maximum delay of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 365,
+ 688,
+ 385,
+ 698
+ ],
+ "score": 0.34,
+ "content": "0 . 1 \\mathrm { s }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 385,
+ 688,
+ 506,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "at the farthest electrode T10,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 45
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 698,
+ 507,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 698,
+ 507,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "which is in alignment with the observed EEG measurements (Merlet et al., 2013; Sazgar & Young,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 46
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 710,
+ 505,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 710,
+ 185,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2019). Similarly to",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 185,
+ 710,
+ 199,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 199,
+ 710,
+ 389,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", we showcase also for an intermediate value of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 389,
+ 710,
+ 427,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d } = 0 . 3",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 427,
+ 710,
+ 505,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "which corresponds",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 47
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 721,
+ 228,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 721,
+ 158,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to a delay of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 159,
+ 721,
+ 195,
+ 731
+ ],
+ "score": 0.27,
+ "content": "0 . 0 5 3 \\mathrm { m s }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 196,
+ 721,
+ 228,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "at T10.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 48
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "page_idx": 4,
+ "page_size": [
+ 612,
+ 792
+ ],
+ "discarded_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 26,
+ 308,
+ 37
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 25,
+ 309,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 25,
+ 309,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2022",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 302,
+ 751,
+ 308,
+ 760
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 302,
+ 750,
+ 309,
+ 763
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 302,
+ 750,
+ 309,
+ 763
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "5",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "para_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 116
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 82,
+ 133,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "where",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 134,
+ 82,
+ 175,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "m ( l _ { i } , \\lambda _ { m } )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 175,
+ 82,
+ 194,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 194,
+ 82,
+ 228,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "score": 0.94,
+ "content": "d ( l _ { i } , \\lambda _ { d } )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 229,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "are the magnitude and the delay respectively, both of which depend",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 94,
+ 504,
+ 105
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 94,
+ 168,
+ 105
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "on the distance",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 168,
+ 95,
+ 175,
+ 104
+ ],
+ "score": 0.85,
+ "content": "l _ { i }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 176,
+ 94,
+ 306,
+ 105
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and on characteristic parameters",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 306,
+ 94,
+ 321,
+ 105
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 321,
+ 94,
+ 338,
+ 105
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 339,
+ 94,
+ 350,
+ 105
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 351,
+ 94,
+ 504,
+ 105
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". We define the resulting multi-channel",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 101,
+ 430,
+ 118
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 101,
+ 158,
+ 118
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "perturbation",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 158,
+ 104,
+ 217,
+ 115
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { V } \\in \\mathbb { R } ^ { N _ { s } \\times N _ { c h } }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 218,
+ 101,
+ 430,
+ 118
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", which is added to the multi-channel EEG signal, as",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 104,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 118
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 118,
+ 121,
+ 476,
+ 135
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 118,
+ 121,
+ 476,
+ 135
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 118,
+ 121,
+ 476,
+ 135
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\begin{array} { r } { { \\bf V } ( \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } ) = H ( { \\bf v } , \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } ) : = \\left( h _ { 0 } ( { \\bf v } , \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } ) , h _ { 1 } ( { \\bf v } , \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } ) , . . . , h _ { N _ { c h } - 1 } ( { \\bf v } , \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } ) \\right) . } \\end{array}",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "de96e5a139b1fc23afd99dccaff6c949ce6e68096635c4b34caf36537f06be33.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 118,
+ 121,
+ 476,
+ 135
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 3
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 146,
+ 505,
+ 180
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 146,
+ 505,
+ 159
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 146,
+ 204,
+ 159
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "We estimate the distance",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 205,
+ 147,
+ 212,
+ 158
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "l _ { i }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 212,
+ 146,
+ 505,
+ 159
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "between the electrode at position T9 and the remaining, attacked positions",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 158,
+ 505,
+ 170
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 158,
+ 337,
+ 170
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "using the 10-10 system and a head model with a radius of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 338,
+ 158,
+ 365,
+ 168
+ ],
+ "score": 0.61,
+ "content": "8 . 7 \\mathrm { c m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 366,
+ 158,
+ 505,
+ 170
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(Algazi et al., 2001). We decouple",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 168,
+ 506,
+ 182
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 168,
+ 506,
+ 182
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the distance-dependent modeling of the magnitude and delay, explained in the following paragraphs.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 146,
+ 506,
+ 182
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 192,
+ 505,
+ 236
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 192,
+ 505,
+ 204
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 192,
+ 505,
+ 204
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Magnitude. For modeling the magnitude, we assume that the adversarial device injects or induces",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 203,
+ 505,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 203,
+ 144,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "a current",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 144,
+ 204,
+ 151,
+ 213
+ ],
+ "score": 0.73,
+ "content": "I",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 151,
+ 203,
+ 234,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", yielding a potential",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 235,
+ 204,
+ 244,
+ 213
+ ],
+ "score": 0.79,
+ "content": "V",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 244,
+ 203,
+ 505,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "measured near T9. The current propagates over the head surface",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 214,
+ 505,
+ 227
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 214,
+ 505,
+ 227
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "through the skin to each of the remaining attacked electrodes, which can be modeled as a cylindrical",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 224,
+ 201,
+ 237
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 224,
+ 201,
+ 237
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "resistor with resistance",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 192,
+ 505,
+ 237
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 282,
+ 239,
+ 327,
+ 264
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 282,
+ 239,
+ 327,
+ 264
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 282,
+ 239,
+ 327,
+ 264
+ ],
+ "score": 0.93,
+ "content": "R _ { i } = \\frac { l _ { i } } { \\sigma A } ,",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "df7117bdb4d5c93cccf2e90b25cc3c804499313daf11d78a2ed1cb0219bdb070.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 282,
+ 239,
+ 327,
+ 264
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 11
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 268,
+ 505,
+ 302
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 268,
+ 506,
+ 280
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 268,
+ 132,
+ 280
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "where",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 132,
+ 271,
+ 140,
+ 279
+ ],
+ "score": 0.78,
+ "content": "\\sigma",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 140,
+ 268,
+ 506,
+ 280
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is the conductivity of the skin which can be in the range of [0.28, 0.87] Siemens/m (Vorwerk",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 279,
+ 507,
+ 293
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 279,
+ 176,
+ 293
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "et al., 2019), and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 176,
+ 280,
+ 184,
+ 290
+ ],
+ "score": 0.81,
+ "content": "A",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 185,
+ 279,
+ 420,
+ 293
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is the area of the skin conductor. The potential at electrode",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 420,
+ 281,
+ 425,
+ 290
+ ],
+ "score": 0.77,
+ "content": "i",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 425,
+ 279,
+ 435,
+ 293
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 436,
+ 280,
+ 502,
+ 291
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "V _ { i } = V - I \\cdot R _ { i }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 502,
+ 279,
+ 507,
+ 293
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ",",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 291,
+ 288,
+ 303
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 291,
+ 288,
+ 303
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and hence the magnitude can be described as",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 268,
+ 507,
+ 303
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 196,
+ 307,
+ 414,
+ 332
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 196,
+ 307,
+ 414,
+ 332
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 196,
+ 307,
+ 414,
+ 332
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "m ( l _ { i } , \\lambda _ { m } ) = 1 - \\frac { V - V _ { i } } { V } = 1 - \\frac { I } { V \\sigma A } l _ { i } = 1 - \\lambda _ { m } l _ { i } ,",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "be06049f08f97d940ab4e03b5c05093432b85058b4a81d8046d097f375f7225f.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 196,
+ 307,
+ 414,
+ 332
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 15
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 335,
+ 506,
+ 426
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 335,
+ 504,
+ 350
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 335,
+ 223,
+ 350
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "where we further constrain",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 223,
+ 336,
+ 312,
+ 349
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "0 \\leq m ( l _ { i } , \\lambda _ { m } ) \\leq 1",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 312,
+ 335,
+ 489,
+ 350
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". The characteristic magnitude parameter",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 489,
+ 337,
+ 504,
+ 348
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 347,
+ 506,
+ 362
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 347,
+ 506,
+ 362
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "represents the complex interplay between input current, voltage, conductivity, and area, covering",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 358,
+ 506,
+ 371
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 358,
+ 450,
+ 371
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "various attack scenarios. We consider different characteristic magnitude parameters",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 450,
+ 358,
+ 502,
+ 370
+ ],
+ "score": 0.79,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m } \\in [ 1 , 1 5 ]",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 503,
+ 358,
+ 506,
+ 371
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 369,
+ 506,
+ 383
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 369,
+ 140,
+ 383
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "A large",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 140,
+ 370,
+ 154,
+ 381
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 155,
+ 369,
+ 506,
+ 383
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "represents cases with large attenuation and limited propagation, i.e., a limited set of",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 381,
+ 506,
+ 393
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 381,
+ 387,
+ 393
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "neighboring electrodes sense the perturbation. Conversely, a small",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 387,
+ 381,
+ 402,
+ 392
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 402,
+ 381,
+ 506,
+ 393
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "covers cases with lower",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 392,
+ 506,
+ 404
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 392,
+ 506,
+ 404
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "attenuation where the perturbation can propagate further and infects all electrodes. We consider also",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 402,
+ 507,
+ 415
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 402,
+ 468,
+ 415
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "an intermediate case where around half of the electrodes are affected by the attack with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 469,
+ 403,
+ 503,
+ 414
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m } = 5",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 503,
+ 402,
+ 507,
+ 415
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 414,
+ 486,
+ 426
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 414,
+ 486,
+ 426
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Appendix B provides examples of the magnitude of the spatial propagation on the head model.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 104,
+ 335,
+ 507,
+ 426
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 437,
+ 505,
+ 537
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 437,
+ 506,
+ 450
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 437,
+ 506,
+ 450
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Delay. The propagation of a signal on the head surface yields a position-dependent phase angle or",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 448,
+ 505,
+ 461
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 448,
+ 505,
+ 461
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "delay, as shown by experimental measurements of related studies (Plutchik & Hirsch, 1963; Qiao",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 460,
+ 506,
+ 471
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 460,
+ 506,
+ 471
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "et al., 1994). The delay stems from a combination of resistive and capacitive components that are",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 470,
+ 506,
+ 482
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 470,
+ 506,
+ 482
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "encountered during the propagation of the signal, which can be modeled as an RC-circuit with",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 481,
+ 506,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 482,
+ 149,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "resistance",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 149,
+ 482,
+ 158,
+ 491
+ ],
+ "score": 0.77,
+ "content": "R",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 158,
+ 482,
+ 198,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", capacity",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 198,
+ 482,
+ 207,
+ 491
+ ],
+ "score": 0.79,
+ "content": "C",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 207,
+ 482,
+ 285,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", and time constant",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 285,
+ 481,
+ 327,
+ 491
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\tau = R \\cdot C",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 328,
+ 482,
+ 506,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "that relates to the group delay. Specifically,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 492,
+ 506,
+ 505
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 492,
+ 506,
+ 505
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the contacts between the electrodes and the skin are predominantly capacitive whereas the skin itself",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 502,
+ 505,
+ 517
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 502,
+ 505,
+ 517
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is both resistive and capacitive (Kim et al., 2010). As explained in the previous part, an increasing",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 513,
+ 505,
+ 527
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 513,
+ 428,
+ 527
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "distance between the attacker and the target electrode yields a larger resistance",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 428,
+ 515,
+ 437,
+ 524
+ ],
+ "score": 0.57,
+ "content": "R",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 437,
+ 513,
+ 505,
+ 527
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". As a result, the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 525,
+ 279,
+ 537
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 525,
+ 162,
+ 537
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "time constant",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 162,
+ 527,
+ 169,
+ 535
+ ],
+ "score": 0.76,
+ "content": "\\tau",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 170,
+ 525,
+ 279,
+ 537
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and the delay increase too.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 104,
+ 437,
+ 506,
+ 537
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 541,
+ 506,
+ 619
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 542,
+ 506,
+ 554
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 542,
+ 506,
+ 554
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Here, we model a linear distance-delay relation. We rely on a study by Plutchik & Hirsch (1963),",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 552,
+ 506,
+ 566
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 552,
+ 506,
+ 566
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "which conducted human skin impedance and phase angle measurements by placing electrodes at",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 564,
+ 506,
+ 577
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 564,
+ 219,
+ 577
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "an approximate distance of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 219,
+ 564,
+ 245,
+ 574
+ ],
+ "score": 0.68,
+ "content": "1 0 \\mathrm { c m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 245,
+ 564,
+ 457,
+ 577
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and applying voltages with frequencies in the range",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 458,
+ 564,
+ 503,
+ 574
+ ],
+ "score": 0.78,
+ "content": "2 { \\mathrm { - } } 1 0 0 0 \\mathrm { { H z } }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 504,
+ 564,
+ 506,
+ 577
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 575,
+ 506,
+ 588
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 575,
+ 506,
+ 588
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "When assuming a linear frequency-phase relation in low-frequency region (Qiao et al., 1994), one",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 586,
+ 505,
+ 598
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 586,
+ 234,
+ 598
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "can derive the group delay to be",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 234,
+ 586,
+ 261,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "score": 0.43,
+ "content": "2 . 8 \\mathrm { m s }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 261,
+ 586,
+ 414,
+ 598
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "when considering a measured angle of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 414,
+ 586,
+ 429,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "1 0 ^ { \\circ }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 430,
+ 586,
+ 440,
+ 598
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "at",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 441,
+ 586,
+ 464,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "score": 0.72,
+ "content": "1 0 \\mathrm { H z }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 465,
+ 586,
+ 505,
+ 598
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". As those",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 596,
+ 506,
+ 611
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 596,
+ 506,
+ 611
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "measurements were conducted for only one distance, we extrapolate the delay for the remaining",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 609,
+ 267,
+ 620
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 609,
+ 267,
+ 620
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "distances using a rectified linear model:",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 104,
+ 542,
+ 506,
+ 620
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 171,
+ 624,
+ 438,
+ 639
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 171,
+ 624,
+ 438,
+ 639
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 171,
+ 624,
+ 438,
+ 639
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d } \\cdot ( l _ { i } - l _ { 0 } ) > 0 \\uparrow d ( l _ { i } , \\lambda _ { d } ) = \\lambda _ { d } \\cdot ( l _ { i } - l _ { 0 } ) + d _ { 0 } : d ( l _ { i } , \\lambda _ { d } ) = 0 ,",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "8c109f14baba8fdb3fa4ca00a590e185e17699666a46300fe54ae3c09558dc5d.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 171,
+ 624,
+ 438,
+ 639
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 40
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 643,
+ 506,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 643,
+ 507,
+ 657
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 643,
+ 133,
+ 657
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "where",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 133,
+ 644,
+ 183,
+ 655
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "d _ { 0 } = 2 . 8 \\mathrm { m s }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 184,
+ 643,
+ 277,
+ 657
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is the delay at distance",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 278,
+ 644,
+ 324,
+ 655
+ ],
+ "score": 0.93,
+ "content": "l _ { 0 } = 1 0 \\mathrm { c m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 324,
+ 643,
+ 507,
+ 657
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". The delay depends not only on the distance,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 655,
+ 505,
+ 667
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 655,
+ 505,
+ 667
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "but also on other parameters such as the electrode-to-skin contact, the humidity of the skin, etc. To",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 665,
+ 506,
+ 678
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 665,
+ 506,
+ 678
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "this end, we evaluate the propagation of the attack with different characteristic delay parameters",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 677,
+ 506,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 677,
+ 192,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d } \\in \\left[ 0 . 1 , 0 . 5 6 3 \\right] \\mathrm { s / m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 192,
+ 677,
+ 218,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". With",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 218,
+ 677,
+ 256,
+ 688
+ ],
+ "score": 0.93,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d } = 0 . 1",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 257,
+ 677,
+ 506,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "we cover the cases where very little delay happens, while the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 688,
+ 506,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 688,
+ 183,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "largest considered",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 183,
+ 688,
+ 249,
+ 699
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d } = 0 . 5 6 3 \\mathrm { s / m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 249,
+ 688,
+ 365,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "yields a maximum delay of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 365,
+ 688,
+ 385,
+ 698
+ ],
+ "score": 0.34,
+ "content": "0 . 1 \\mathrm { s }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 385,
+ 688,
+ 506,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "at the farthest electrode T10,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 45
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 698,
+ 507,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 698,
+ 507,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "which is in alignment with the observed EEG measurements (Merlet et al., 2013; Sazgar & Young,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 46
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 710,
+ 505,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 710,
+ 185,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2019). Similarly to",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 185,
+ 710,
+ 199,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 199,
+ 710,
+ 389,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", we showcase also for an intermediate value of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 389,
+ 710,
+ 427,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d } = 0 . 3",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 427,
+ 710,
+ 505,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "which corresponds",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 47
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 721,
+ 228,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 721,
+ 158,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to a delay of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 159,
+ 721,
+ 195,
+ 731
+ ],
+ "score": 0.27,
+ "content": "0 . 0 5 3 \\mathrm { m s }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 196,
+ 721,
+ 228,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "at T10.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 48
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 104,
+ 643,
+ 507,
+ 733
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "preproc_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 97,
+ 84,
+ 501,
+ 322
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 84,
+ 347,
+ 97
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 84,
+ 347,
+ 97
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Algorithm 1: Generation of physiologically plausible UAP.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 99,
+ 479,
+ 111
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 99,
+ 140,
+ 111
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "input :",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 99,
+ 169,
+ 110
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { X } _ { t r a i n }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 170,
+ 99,
+ 266,
+ 111
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", EEG training samples;",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 266,
+ 99,
+ 296,
+ 110
+ ],
+ "score": 0.83,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 296,
+ 99,
+ 427,
+ 111
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", spatial propagation parameters;",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 427,
+ 100,
+ 434,
+ 110
+ ],
+ "score": 0.79,
+ "content": "\\beta",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 435,
+ 99,
+ 479,
+ 111
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", weight of",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 139,
+ 109,
+ 491,
+ 122
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 139,
+ 109,
+ 370,
+ 122
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "derivative loss term; \u000f, maximum perturbation amplitude;",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 370,
+ 110,
+ 379,
+ 120
+ ],
+ "score": 0.78,
+ "content": "G",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 380,
+ 109,
+ 491,
+ 122
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", number of PGD iterations;",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 120,
+ 227,
+ 133
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 121,
+ 149,
+ 131
+ ],
+ "score": 0.66,
+ "content": "E",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 150,
+ 120,
+ 227,
+ 133
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", number of epochs",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 131,
+ 249,
+ 144
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 131,
+ 249,
+ 144
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "output :v, adversarial perturbation",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 96,
+ 146,
+ 490,
+ 159
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 96,
+ 146,
+ 106,
+ 159
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "1",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 146,
+ 197,
+ 159
+ ],
+ "score": 0.75,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { v } \\mathcal { U } ( - \\epsilon , \\epsilon ) \\in \\mathbb { R } ^ { N _ { s } } ;",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 198,
+ 146,
+ 200,
+ 159
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ";",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 395,
+ 147,
+ 490,
+ 159
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "// Initialisation",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 97,
+ 157,
+ 182,
+ 170
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 97,
+ 157,
+ 121,
+ 170
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2 for",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 122,
+ 160,
+ 148,
+ 169
+ ],
+ "score": 0.83,
+ "content": "e \\gets 1",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 148,
+ 157,
+ 159,
+ 170
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 160,
+ 160,
+ 168,
+ 168
+ ],
+ "score": 0.67,
+ "content": "E",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 168,
+ 157,
+ 182,
+ 170
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "do",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 98,
+ 167,
+ 187,
+ 183
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 98,
+ 172,
+ 105,
+ 180
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "3",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 120,
+ 167,
+ 153,
+ 183
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Shuffle",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 153,
+ 169,
+ 182,
+ 181
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { X } _ { t r a i n }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 182,
+ 167,
+ 187,
+ 183
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ";",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 178,
+ 249,
+ 193
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 183,
+ 104,
+ 190
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "4",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 120,
+ 178,
+ 185,
+ 193
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for each batch",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 185,
+ 181,
+ 235,
+ 191
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { B } \\in \\mathbf { X } _ { t r a i n }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 235,
+ 178,
+ 249,
+ 193
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "do",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 189,
+ 173,
+ 206
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 194,
+ 105,
+ 201
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "5",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 137,
+ 191,
+ 167,
+ 204
+ ],
+ "score": 0.84,
+ "content": "\\alpha \\frac \\epsilon 2",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 167,
+ 189,
+ 173,
+ 206
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ";",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 202,
+ 215,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 207,
+ 105,
+ 214
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "6",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 135,
+ 202,
+ 152,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 152,
+ 204,
+ 179,
+ 214
+ ],
+ "score": 0.8,
+ "content": "g \\gets 1",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 180,
+ 202,
+ 191,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 191,
+ 204,
+ 200,
+ 213
+ ],
+ "score": 0.67,
+ "content": "G",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 200,
+ 202,
+ 215,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "do",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 213,
+ 491,
+ 228
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 217,
+ 105,
+ 225
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "7",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 151,
+ 214,
+ 235,
+ 226
+ ],
+ "score": 0.3,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { \\bar { V } } H ( \\mathbf { v } , \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } ) ;",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 366,
+ 213,
+ 491,
+ 228
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "// Spatial propagation",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 222,
+ 491,
+ 238
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 228,
+ 106,
+ 236
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "8",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 150,
+ 222,
+ 243,
+ 237
+ ],
+ "score": 0.42,
+ "content": "\\begin{array} { r } { \\dot { \\mathbf { p } } f ( H _ { b p } ( \\mathbf { B } + \\mathbf { V } ) ) } \\end{array}",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 243,
+ 224,
+ 248,
+ 237
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ";",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 318,
+ 224,
+ 491,
+ 238
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "// Model pass with perturbation",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 237,
+ 491,
+ 257
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 244,
+ 106,
+ 252
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "9",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 151,
+ 237,
+ 351,
+ 257
+ ],
+ "score": 0.37,
+ "content": "\\begin{array} { r } { \\mathbf { v } \\mathbf { v } - \\alpha \\cdot \\mathrm { s i g n } ( \\nabla _ { \\mathbf { v } } ( l ( \\mathbf { p } , y _ { r e s t } ) - \\frac { \\beta } { \\epsilon } | | \\mathbf { v } ^ { \\prime } | | _ { 1 } ) ) } \\end{array}",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 351,
+ 237,
+ 491,
+ 256
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "; // Update w/derivative",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 96,
+ 253,
+ 490,
+ 269
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 96,
+ 258,
+ 106,
+ 267
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "10",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 150,
+ 253,
+ 216,
+ 269
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "v ← clip\u000f (v);",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 394,
+ 256,
+ 490,
+ 268
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "// PGD projection",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 96,
+ 267,
+ 490,
+ 287
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 96,
+ 273,
+ 105,
+ 283
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "11",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 153,
+ 268,
+ 231,
+ 284
+ ],
+ "score": 0.48,
+ "content": "\\alpha { \\frac { 0 . 1 - { \\frac { \\epsilon } { 2 } } } { G } } \\cdot g + { \\frac { \\epsilon } { 2 } }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 232,
+ 267,
+ 239,
+ 287
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ";",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 362,
+ 271,
+ 490,
+ 283
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "// Learning rate update",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 95,
+ 282,
+ 157,
+ 294
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 95,
+ 285,
+ 105,
+ 294
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "12",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 135,
+ 282,
+ 157,
+ 294
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "end",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 94,
+ 294,
+ 141,
+ 308
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 94,
+ 296,
+ 105,
+ 308
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "13",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 120,
+ 294,
+ 141,
+ 307
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "end",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 92,
+ 306,
+ 126,
+ 318
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 92,
+ 306,
+ 126,
+ 318
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "14 end",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 345,
+ 203,
+ 357
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 345,
+ 203,
+ 358
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 345,
+ 203,
+ 358
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "3.3 ATTACK DESIGN",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 366,
+ 506,
+ 410
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 366,
+ 506,
+ 378
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 366,
+ 506,
+ 378
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "We present practical DoS attacks in BCIs that respect domain constraints such as maximum amplitude,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 377,
+ 506,
+ 389
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 377,
+ 506,
+ 389
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "spectral distribution, physiological plausibility, and the spatial propagation of the perturbation. To this",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 388,
+ 505,
+ 401
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 388,
+ 505,
+ 401
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "end, we formulate a general objective function that contains the spatial propagation, the preprocessing",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 400,
+ 284,
+ 411
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 400,
+ 284,
+ 411
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "step, and the first order derivative loss term:",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 163,
+ 416,
+ 447,
+ 440
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 163,
+ 416,
+ 447,
+ 440
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 163,
+ 416,
+ 447,
+ 440
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\mathcal { L } _ { t o t } \\left( \\mathbf { X } , \\mathbf { v } , \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } \\right) = l \\left( H _ { b p } \\left( \\mathbf { X } + H ( \\mathbf { v } , \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } ) \\right) , y _ { r e s t } \\right) - \\frac { \\beta } { \\epsilon } | | \\mathbf { v } ^ { \\prime } | | _ { 1 } ,",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "fe16bc6e9801b89541c1b4b4d593a5597c8f9ad0f759f089214314544b703deb.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 163,
+ 416,
+ 447,
+ 440
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 24
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 445,
+ 505,
+ 468
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 445,
+ 506,
+ 458
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 445,
+ 134,
+ 458
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "where",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 134,
+ 445,
+ 156,
+ 457
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "l ( \\cdot , \\cdot )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 156,
+ 445,
+ 409,
+ 458
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is the negative log-likelihood loss defined in equation 6 and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 410,
+ 446,
+ 441,
+ 457
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\beta { = } 1 \\mathrm { e } { - } 6",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 441,
+ 445,
+ 506,
+ 458
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is a scalar that",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 456,
+ 471,
+ 468
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 456,
+ 471,
+ 468
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "weights the contribution of the derivative loss term. We compare different attack scenarios:",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 479,
+ 506,
+ 569
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 479,
+ 506,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 479,
+ 506,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Instance-based attacks. A perturbation is computed using either FGSM or PGD based on the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 490,
+ 506,
+ 504
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 490,
+ 309,
+ 504
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "knowledge of the currently attacked EEG signal",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 309,
+ 491,
+ 319,
+ 501
+ ],
+ "score": 0.27,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { X }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 319,
+ 490,
+ 506,
+ 504
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". FGSM computes the perturbation as stated",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 502,
+ 504,
+ 514
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 502,
+ 210,
+ 514
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "in equation 5, where the",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 210,
+ 504,
+ 216,
+ 512
+ ],
+ "score": 0.65,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 217,
+ 502,
+ 466,
+ 514
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "defines the perturbation amplitude which is varied between",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 466,
+ 502,
+ 504,
+ 513
+ ],
+ "score": 0.82,
+ "content": "1 { - } 5 0 \\mathrm { m V } .",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 513,
+ 506,
+ 525
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 513,
+ 351,
+ 525
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Alternatively, we compute the perturbation using PGD with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 351,
+ 513,
+ 376,
+ 523
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "G { = } 1 0",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 377,
+ 513,
+ 506,
+ 525
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "iterations, where each iteration",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 524,
+ 504,
+ 536
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 524,
+ 416,
+ 536
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "consists of a gradient-based update of the perturbation and a projection to the",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 416,
+ 524,
+ 433,
+ 535
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "L _ { \\infty }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 433,
+ 524,
+ 498,
+ 536
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "ball with radius",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 498,
+ 526,
+ 504,
+ 534
+ ],
+ "score": 0.66,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 534,
+ 506,
+ 547
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 535,
+ 239,
+ 547
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(see equation 7). The update rate",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 537,
+ 247,
+ 545
+ ],
+ "score": 0.8,
+ "content": "\\alpha",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 248,
+ 535,
+ 319,
+ 547
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is initialized with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 320,
+ 534,
+ 335,
+ 547
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\epsilon / 2",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 335,
+ 535,
+ 506,
+ 547
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and linearly decreased with each iteration,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 546,
+ 506,
+ 558
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 546,
+ 209,
+ 558
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "reaching a final value of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 209,
+ 546,
+ 241,
+ 556
+ ],
+ "score": 0.78,
+ "content": "0 . 1 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 241,
+ 546,
+ 506,
+ 558
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "at iteration 10. The PGD computation is restarted 5 times with",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 556,
+ 507,
+ 570
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 556,
+ 468,
+ 570
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "different initial perturbations, which are drawn from a uniform distribution within the range",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 469,
+ 556,
+ 503,
+ 569
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "[ - \\epsilon , + \\epsilon ]",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 503,
+ 556,
+ 507,
+ 570
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 580,
+ 504,
+ 603
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 580,
+ 505,
+ 593
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 580,
+ 505,
+ 593
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Universal attacks. A universal perturbation is computed for all the samples in the training data.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 591,
+ 270,
+ 604
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 591,
+ 270,
+ 604
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "We optimize the UAP objective function",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 207,
+ 608,
+ 404,
+ 626
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 207,
+ 608,
+ 404,
+ 626
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 207,
+ 608,
+ 404,
+ 626
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\operatorname* { m i n } _ { \\mathbf { v } } E _ { \\mathbf { X } \\sim D } \\mathcal { L } _ { t o t } \\left( \\mathbf { X } , \\mathbf { v } , \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } \\right) \\quad \\mathrm { ~ s . t . ~ } | | \\mathbf { v } | | _ { \\infty } \\leq \\epsilon",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "abca44dd6ab1e65427156e0254551c8079b96a3d17410266c428125a6fa67a74.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 207,
+ 608,
+ 404,
+ 626
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 37
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 631,
+ 505,
+ 676
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 632,
+ 505,
+ 644
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 632,
+ 505,
+ 644
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "using batched PGD. We pass a batch of 16 samples together with the current perturbation through",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 641,
+ 506,
+ 655
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 641,
+ 506,
+ 655
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the preprocessing and classifier, compute the loss function, and update the perturbation based on",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 653,
+ 506,
+ 666
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 653,
+ 329,
+ 666
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the negative gradient with consecutive projection to the",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 329,
+ 653,
+ 345,
+ 664
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "L _ { \\infty }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 345,
+ 653,
+ 411,
+ 666
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "ball with radius",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 411,
+ 655,
+ 417,
+ 663
+ ],
+ "score": 0.48,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 417,
+ 653,
+ 506,
+ 666
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". This step is repeated",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 663,
+ 475,
+ 676
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 664,
+ 131,
+ 675
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "G { = } 1 0",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 132,
+ 663,
+ 417,
+ 676
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "times before processing the next batch. Overall, the UAP is learned for",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 417,
+ 664,
+ 442,
+ 674
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "E { = } 1 0",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 443,
+ 663,
+ 475,
+ 676
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "epochs.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 687,
+ 505,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 506,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 506,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Propagation model. We distinguish between three use cases of spatial propagation model, where",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 698,
+ 506,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 698,
+ 506,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "in all cases either an instance-specific attack or a universal attack can be computed: Case 1) Ignore",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 709,
+ 506,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 709,
+ 324,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the propagation model: a multi-channel perturbation",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 324,
+ 710,
+ 334,
+ 720
+ ],
+ "score": 0.69,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 335,
+ 709,
+ 506,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is computed, which attacks each channel",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 721,
+ 506,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 721,
+ 235,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "individually, replacing the terms",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 235,
+ 721,
+ 292,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "score": 0.93,
+ "content": "H ( \\mathbf { v } , \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 292,
+ 721,
+ 306,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "by",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 306,
+ 721,
+ 316,
+ 731
+ ],
+ "score": 0.73,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 316,
+ 721,
+ 333,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 334,
+ 721,
+ 344,
+ 731
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { v } ^ { \\prime }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 344,
+ 721,
+ 357,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "by",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 357,
+ 721,
+ 370,
+ 731
+ ],
+ "score": 0.85,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { V } ^ { \\prime }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 370,
+ 721,
+ 506,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "in equation 15. Case 2) Consider",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 45
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "page_idx": 5,
+ "page_size": [
+ 612,
+ 792
+ ],
+ "discarded_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 27,
+ 308,
+ 37
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 26,
+ 308,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 26,
+ 308,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2022",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 302,
+ 751,
+ 309,
+ 760
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 302,
+ 750,
+ 310,
+ 761
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 302,
+ 750,
+ 310,
+ 761
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "6",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "para_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 97,
+ 84,
+ 501,
+ 322
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 84,
+ 347,
+ 97
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 84,
+ 347,
+ 97
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Algorithm 1: Generation of physiologically plausible UAP.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 99,
+ 479,
+ 111
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 99,
+ 140,
+ 111
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "input :",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 99,
+ 169,
+ 110
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { X } _ { t r a i n }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 170,
+ 99,
+ 266,
+ 111
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", EEG training samples;",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 266,
+ 99,
+ 296,
+ 110
+ ],
+ "score": 0.83,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 296,
+ 99,
+ 427,
+ 111
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", spatial propagation parameters;",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 427,
+ 100,
+ 434,
+ 110
+ ],
+ "score": 0.79,
+ "content": "\\beta",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 435,
+ 99,
+ 479,
+ 111
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", weight of",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 139,
+ 109,
+ 491,
+ 122
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 139,
+ 109,
+ 370,
+ 122
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "derivative loss term; \u000f, maximum perturbation amplitude;",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 370,
+ 110,
+ 379,
+ 120
+ ],
+ "score": 0.78,
+ "content": "G",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 380,
+ 109,
+ 491,
+ 122
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", number of PGD iterations;",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 120,
+ 227,
+ 133
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 141,
+ 121,
+ 149,
+ 131
+ ],
+ "score": 0.66,
+ "content": "E",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 150,
+ 120,
+ 227,
+ 133
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", number of epochs",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 131,
+ 249,
+ 144
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 131,
+ 249,
+ 144
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "output :v, adversarial perturbation",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 96,
+ 146,
+ 490,
+ 159
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 96,
+ 146,
+ 106,
+ 159
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "1",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 146,
+ 197,
+ 159
+ ],
+ "score": 0.75,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { v } \\mathcal { U } ( - \\epsilon , \\epsilon ) \\in \\mathbb { R } ^ { N _ { s } } ;",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 198,
+ 146,
+ 200,
+ 159
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ";",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 395,
+ 147,
+ 490,
+ 159
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "// Initialisation",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 97,
+ 157,
+ 182,
+ 170
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 97,
+ 157,
+ 121,
+ 170
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2 for",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 122,
+ 160,
+ 148,
+ 169
+ ],
+ "score": 0.83,
+ "content": "e \\gets 1",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 148,
+ 157,
+ 159,
+ 170
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 160,
+ 160,
+ 168,
+ 168
+ ],
+ "score": 0.67,
+ "content": "E",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 168,
+ 157,
+ 182,
+ 170
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "do",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 98,
+ 167,
+ 187,
+ 183
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 98,
+ 172,
+ 105,
+ 180
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "3",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 120,
+ 167,
+ 153,
+ 183
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Shuffle",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 153,
+ 169,
+ 182,
+ 181
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { X } _ { t r a i n }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 182,
+ 167,
+ 187,
+ 183
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ";",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 178,
+ 249,
+ 193
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 183,
+ 104,
+ 190
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "4",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 120,
+ 178,
+ 185,
+ 193
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for each batch",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 185,
+ 181,
+ 235,
+ 191
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { B } \\in \\mathbf { X } _ { t r a i n }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 235,
+ 178,
+ 249,
+ 193
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "do",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 189,
+ 173,
+ 206
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 194,
+ 105,
+ 201
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "5",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 137,
+ 191,
+ 167,
+ 204
+ ],
+ "score": 0.84,
+ "content": "\\alpha \\frac \\epsilon 2",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 167,
+ 189,
+ 173,
+ 206
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ";",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 202,
+ 215,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 207,
+ 105,
+ 214
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "6",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 135,
+ 202,
+ 152,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 152,
+ 204,
+ 179,
+ 214
+ ],
+ "score": 0.8,
+ "content": "g \\gets 1",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 180,
+ 202,
+ 191,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 191,
+ 204,
+ 200,
+ 213
+ ],
+ "score": 0.67,
+ "content": "G",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 200,
+ 202,
+ 215,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "do",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 213,
+ 491,
+ 228
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 217,
+ 105,
+ 225
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "7",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 151,
+ 214,
+ 235,
+ 226
+ ],
+ "score": 0.3,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { \\bar { V } } H ( \\mathbf { v } , \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } ) ;",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 366,
+ 213,
+ 491,
+ 228
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "// Spatial propagation",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 222,
+ 491,
+ 238
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 228,
+ 106,
+ 236
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "8",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 150,
+ 222,
+ 243,
+ 237
+ ],
+ "score": 0.42,
+ "content": "\\begin{array} { r } { \\dot { \\mathbf { p } } f ( H _ { b p } ( \\mathbf { B } + \\mathbf { V } ) ) } \\end{array}",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 243,
+ 224,
+ 248,
+ 237
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ";",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 318,
+ 224,
+ 491,
+ 238
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "// Model pass with perturbation",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 237,
+ 491,
+ 257
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 99,
+ 244,
+ 106,
+ 252
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "9",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 151,
+ 237,
+ 351,
+ 257
+ ],
+ "score": 0.37,
+ "content": "\\begin{array} { r } { \\mathbf { v } \\mathbf { v } - \\alpha \\cdot \\mathrm { s i g n } ( \\nabla _ { \\mathbf { v } } ( l ( \\mathbf { p } , y _ { r e s t } ) - \\frac { \\beta } { \\epsilon } | | \\mathbf { v } ^ { \\prime } | | _ { 1 } ) ) } \\end{array}",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 351,
+ 237,
+ 491,
+ 256
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "; // Update w/derivative",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 96,
+ 253,
+ 490,
+ 269
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 96,
+ 258,
+ 106,
+ 267
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "10",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 150,
+ 253,
+ 216,
+ 269
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "v ← clip\u000f (v);",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 394,
+ 256,
+ 490,
+ 268
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "// PGD projection",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 96,
+ 267,
+ 490,
+ 287
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 96,
+ 273,
+ 105,
+ 283
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "11",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 153,
+ 268,
+ 231,
+ 284
+ ],
+ "score": 0.48,
+ "content": "\\alpha { \\frac { 0 . 1 - { \\frac { \\epsilon } { 2 } } } { G } } \\cdot g + { \\frac { \\epsilon } { 2 } }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 232,
+ 267,
+ 239,
+ 287
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ";",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 362,
+ 271,
+ 490,
+ 283
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "// Learning rate update",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 95,
+ 282,
+ 157,
+ 294
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 95,
+ 285,
+ 105,
+ 294
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "12",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 135,
+ 282,
+ 157,
+ 294
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "end",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 94,
+ 294,
+ 141,
+ 308
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 94,
+ 296,
+ 105,
+ 308
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "13",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 120,
+ 294,
+ 141,
+ 307
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "end",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 92,
+ 306,
+ 126,
+ 318
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 92,
+ 306,
+ 126,
+ 318
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "14 end",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 92,
+ 84,
+ 491,
+ 318
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 345,
+ 203,
+ 357
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 345,
+ 203,
+ 358
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 345,
+ 203,
+ 358
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "3.3 ATTACK DESIGN",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 366,
+ 506,
+ 410
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 366,
+ 506,
+ 378
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 366,
+ 506,
+ 378
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "We present practical DoS attacks in BCIs that respect domain constraints such as maximum amplitude,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 377,
+ 506,
+ 389
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 377,
+ 506,
+ 389
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "spectral distribution, physiological plausibility, and the spatial propagation of the perturbation. To this",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 388,
+ 505,
+ 401
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 388,
+ 505,
+ 401
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "end, we formulate a general objective function that contains the spatial propagation, the preprocessing",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 400,
+ 284,
+ 411
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 400,
+ 284,
+ 411
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "step, and the first order derivative loss term:",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 366,
+ 506,
+ 411
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 163,
+ 416,
+ 447,
+ 440
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 163,
+ 416,
+ 447,
+ 440
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 163,
+ 416,
+ 447,
+ 440
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\mathcal { L } _ { t o t } \\left( \\mathbf { X } , \\mathbf { v } , \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } \\right) = l \\left( H _ { b p } \\left( \\mathbf { X } + H ( \\mathbf { v } , \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } ) \\right) , y _ { r e s t } \\right) - \\frac { \\beta } { \\epsilon } | | \\mathbf { v } ^ { \\prime } | | _ { 1 } ,",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "fe16bc6e9801b89541c1b4b4d593a5597c8f9ad0f759f089214314544b703deb.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 163,
+ 416,
+ 447,
+ 440
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 24
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 445,
+ 505,
+ 468
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 445,
+ 506,
+ 458
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 445,
+ 134,
+ 458
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "where",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 134,
+ 445,
+ 156,
+ 457
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "l ( \\cdot , \\cdot )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 156,
+ 445,
+ 409,
+ 458
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is the negative log-likelihood loss defined in equation 6 and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 410,
+ 446,
+ 441,
+ 457
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\beta { = } 1 \\mathrm { e } { - } 6",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 441,
+ 445,
+ 506,
+ 458
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is a scalar that",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 456,
+ 471,
+ 468
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 456,
+ 471,
+ 468
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "weights the contribution of the derivative loss term. We compare different attack scenarios:",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 445,
+ 506,
+ 468
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 479,
+ 506,
+ 569
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 479,
+ 506,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 479,
+ 506,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Instance-based attacks. A perturbation is computed using either FGSM or PGD based on the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 490,
+ 506,
+ 504
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 490,
+ 309,
+ 504
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "knowledge of the currently attacked EEG signal",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 309,
+ 491,
+ 319,
+ 501
+ ],
+ "score": 0.27,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { X }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 319,
+ 490,
+ 506,
+ 504
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". FGSM computes the perturbation as stated",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 502,
+ 504,
+ 514
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 502,
+ 210,
+ 514
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "in equation 5, where the",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 210,
+ 504,
+ 216,
+ 512
+ ],
+ "score": 0.65,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 217,
+ 502,
+ 466,
+ 514
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "defines the perturbation amplitude which is varied between",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 466,
+ 502,
+ 504,
+ 513
+ ],
+ "score": 0.82,
+ "content": "1 { - } 5 0 \\mathrm { m V } .",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 513,
+ 506,
+ 525
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 513,
+ 351,
+ 525
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Alternatively, we compute the perturbation using PGD with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 351,
+ 513,
+ 376,
+ 523
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "G { = } 1 0",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 377,
+ 513,
+ 506,
+ 525
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "iterations, where each iteration",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 524,
+ 504,
+ 536
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 524,
+ 416,
+ 536
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "consists of a gradient-based update of the perturbation and a projection to the",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 416,
+ 524,
+ 433,
+ 535
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "L _ { \\infty }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 433,
+ 524,
+ 498,
+ 536
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "ball with radius",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 498,
+ 526,
+ 504,
+ 534
+ ],
+ "score": 0.66,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 534,
+ 506,
+ 547
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 535,
+ 239,
+ 547
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(see equation 7). The update rate",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 537,
+ 247,
+ 545
+ ],
+ "score": 0.8,
+ "content": "\\alpha",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 248,
+ 535,
+ 319,
+ 547
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is initialized with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 320,
+ 534,
+ 335,
+ 547
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\epsilon / 2",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 335,
+ 535,
+ 506,
+ 547
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and linearly decreased with each iteration,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 546,
+ 506,
+ 558
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 546,
+ 209,
+ 558
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "reaching a final value of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 209,
+ 546,
+ 241,
+ 556
+ ],
+ "score": 0.78,
+ "content": "0 . 1 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 241,
+ 546,
+ 506,
+ 558
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "at iteration 10. The PGD computation is restarted 5 times with",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 556,
+ 507,
+ 570
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 556,
+ 468,
+ 570
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "different initial perturbations, which are drawn from a uniform distribution within the range",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 469,
+ 556,
+ 503,
+ 569
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "[ - \\epsilon , + \\epsilon ]",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 503,
+ 556,
+ 507,
+ 570
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 479,
+ 507,
+ 570
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 580,
+ 504,
+ 603
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 580,
+ 505,
+ 593
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 580,
+ 505,
+ 593
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Universal attacks. A universal perturbation is computed for all the samples in the training data.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 591,
+ 270,
+ 604
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 591,
+ 270,
+ 604
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "We optimize the UAP objective function",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 580,
+ 505,
+ 604
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "bbox": [
+ 207,
+ 608,
+ 404,
+ 626
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 207,
+ 608,
+ 404,
+ 626
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 207,
+ 608,
+ 404,
+ 626
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\operatorname* { m i n } _ { \\mathbf { v } } E _ { \\mathbf { X } \\sim D } \\mathcal { L } _ { t o t } \\left( \\mathbf { X } , \\mathbf { v } , \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } \\right) \\quad \\mathrm { ~ s . t . ~ } | | \\mathbf { v } | | _ { \\infty } \\leq \\epsilon",
+ "type": "interline_equation",
+ "image_path": "abca44dd6ab1e65427156e0254551c8079b96a3d17410266c428125a6fa67a74.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 207,
+ 608,
+ 404,
+ 626
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 37
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 631,
+ 505,
+ 676
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 632,
+ 505,
+ 644
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 632,
+ 505,
+ 644
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "using batched PGD. We pass a batch of 16 samples together with the current perturbation through",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 641,
+ 506,
+ 655
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 641,
+ 506,
+ 655
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the preprocessing and classifier, compute the loss function, and update the perturbation based on",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 653,
+ 506,
+ 666
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 653,
+ 329,
+ 666
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the negative gradient with consecutive projection to the",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 329,
+ 653,
+ 345,
+ 664
+ ],
+ "score": 0.92,
+ "content": "L _ { \\infty }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 345,
+ 653,
+ 411,
+ 666
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "ball with radius",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 411,
+ 655,
+ 417,
+ 663
+ ],
+ "score": 0.48,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 417,
+ 653,
+ 506,
+ 666
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". This step is repeated",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 663,
+ 475,
+ 676
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 664,
+ 131,
+ 675
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "G { = } 1 0",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 132,
+ 663,
+ 417,
+ 676
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "times before processing the next batch. Overall, the UAP is learned for",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 417,
+ 664,
+ 442,
+ 674
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "E { = } 1 0",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 443,
+ 663,
+ 475,
+ 676
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "epochs.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 632,
+ 506,
+ 676
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 687,
+ 505,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 506,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 506,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Propagation model. We distinguish between three use cases of spatial propagation model, where",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 698,
+ 506,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 698,
+ 506,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "in all cases either an instance-specific attack or a universal attack can be computed: Case 1) Ignore",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 709,
+ 506,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 709,
+ 324,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the propagation model: a multi-channel perturbation",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 324,
+ 710,
+ 334,
+ 720
+ ],
+ "score": 0.69,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 335,
+ 709,
+ 506,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "is computed, which attacks each channel",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 721,
+ 506,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 721,
+ 235,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "individually, replacing the terms",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 235,
+ 721,
+ 292,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "score": 0.93,
+ "content": "H ( \\mathbf { v } , \\lambda _ { m } , \\lambda _ { d } )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 292,
+ 721,
+ 306,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "by",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 306,
+ 721,
+ 316,
+ 731
+ ],
+ "score": 0.73,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 316,
+ 721,
+ 333,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 334,
+ 721,
+ 344,
+ 731
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { v } ^ { \\prime }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 344,
+ 721,
+ 357,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "by",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 357,
+ 721,
+ 370,
+ 731
+ ],
+ "score": 0.85,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { V } ^ { \\prime }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 370,
+ 721,
+ 506,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "in equation 15. Case 2) Consider",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 45
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 377,
+ 505,
+ 390
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 377,
+ 505,
+ 390
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the propagation model: a single-channel perturbation v is computed and tested with a specific",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 389,
+ 506,
+ 401
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 389,
+ 210,
+ 401
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "propagation configuration",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 210,
+ 389,
+ 225,
+ 400
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation",
+ "cross_page": true
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 225,
+ 389,
+ 243,
+ 401
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 243,
+ 389,
+ 254,
+ 400
+ ],
+ "score": 0.87,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d }",
+ "type": "inline_equation",
+ "cross_page": true
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 255,
+ 389,
+ 506,
+ 401
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". Case 3) Consider a use-case where the attacker does not know",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 399,
+ 506,
+ 412
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 399,
+ 380,
+ 412
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the spatial propagation model and computes the same perturbation",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 381,
+ 402,
+ 389,
+ 410
+ ],
+ "score": 0.32,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { v }",
+ "type": "inline_equation",
+ "cross_page": true
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 389,
+ 399,
+ 506,
+ 412
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for all channels. The actual",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 411,
+ 457,
+ 423
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 411,
+ 457,
+ 423
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "propagation model is applied during testing to model the real-world signal propagation.",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 506,
+ 733
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "preproc_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 82,
+ 293,
+ 208
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 82,
+ 293,
+ 208
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 82,
+ 293,
+ 208
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 82,
+ 293,
+ 208
+ ],
+ "score": 0.968,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "a1324eec3369ab8d3e852dd7a1f3de592be68aba36ad56c69f815c71827712f0.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4.5,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 82,
+ 293,
+ 94.6
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 94.6,
+ 293,
+ 107.19999999999999
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 107.19999999999999,
+ 293,
+ 119.79999999999998
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 2
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 119.79999999999998,
+ 293,
+ 132.39999999999998
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 132.39999999999998,
+ 293,
+ 144.99999999999997
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 144.99999999999997,
+ 293,
+ 157.59999999999997
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 157.59999999999997,
+ 293,
+ 170.19999999999996
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 170.19999999999996,
+ 293,
+ 182.79999999999995
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 182.79999999999995,
+ 293,
+ 195.39999999999995
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 195.39999999999995,
+ 293,
+ 207.99999999999994
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 9
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 214,
+ 303,
+ 234
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 214,
+ 304,
+ 225
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 214,
+ 304,
+ 225
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 1: Performance of random noise, FGSM, PGD,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 223,
+ 279,
+ 235
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 223,
+ 279,
+ 235
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and UAP with and without derivative loss term.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "table",
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 96,
+ 505,
+ 165
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "table_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 96,
+ 505,
+ 165
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 96,
+ 505,
+ 165
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 96,
+ 505,
+ 165
+ ],
+ "score": 0.97,
+ "html": " | n[10-3v2] | l2-norm [mV] | γ[%] |
| ε[mV] | (a) | (b) | (c) | (a) | (b) | (c) | (a) | (b) | （c） |
| 1 | 3.31 | 1.98 | 3.42 | 20.8 | 15.2 | 21.2 | 99.89 | 99.93 | 99.89 |
| 5 | 16.6 | 7.76 | 17.3 | 99.1 | 61.2 | 102 | 97.99 | 99.22 | 97.87 |
| 10 | 32.5 | 12.6 | 34.1 | 191 | 112 | 198 | 93.82 | 97.47 | 93.49 |
| 25 | 74.9 | 27.3 | 79.2 | 461 | 263 | 475 | 79.61 | 90.05 | 78.92 |
| 50 | 125 | 39.0 | 135 | 823 | 462 | 855 | 64.17 | 79.70 | 63.06 |
",
+ "type": "table",
+ "image_path": "e61df40a1bdb0c2d0c3c4f3479777943c9d67c63241455dde0304702d2c127b4.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 96,
+ 505,
+ 109.8
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 109.8,
+ 505,
+ 123.6
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 123.6,
+ 505,
+ 137.4
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 137.4,
+ 505,
+ 151.20000000000002
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 151.20000000000002,
+ 505,
+ 165.00000000000003
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 16
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "table_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 174,
+ 505,
+ 234
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 174,
+ 505,
+ 185
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 174,
+ 505,
+ 185
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Table 1: Plausibility metrics for PGD attack (a) without",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 184,
+ 505,
+ 195
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 184,
+ 505,
+ 195
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "derivative term, (b) with the derivative loss term, and (c)",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 194,
+ 505,
+ 204
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 194,
+ 505,
+ 204
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with a Gaussian kernel (Han et al., 2020). The smaller",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 204,
+ 506,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 204,
+ 385,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the cross correlation",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 386,
+ 206,
+ 392,
+ 214
+ ],
+ "score": 0.75,
+ "content": "\\eta",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 393,
+ 204,
+ 492,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and the Euclidian distance",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 493,
+ 204,
+ 502,
+ 214
+ ],
+ "score": 0.81,
+ "content": "\\ell _ { 2 }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 502,
+ 204,
+ 506,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "-",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 214,
+ 505,
+ 226
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 214,
+ 461,
+ 226
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "norm, and the higher the cosine similarity",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 461,
+ 216,
+ 468,
+ 225
+ ],
+ "score": 0.78,
+ "content": "\\gamma",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 468,
+ 214,
+ 505,
+ 226
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", the more",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 307,
+ 224,
+ 412,
+ 234
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 307,
+ 224,
+ 412,
+ 234
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "natural the generated attack.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16.75
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 247,
+ 504,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 247,
+ 504,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "group_id": 1,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 247,
+ 504,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 247,
+ 504,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "score": 0.964,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "0be065a5743b1cee7251d7d88da8df12f3001691d68088f221c3d7a7df59ba26.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 247,
+ 504,
+ 273.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 273.0,
+ 504,
+ 299.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 299.0,
+ 504,
+ 325.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 25
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 335,
+ 505,
+ 357
+ ],
+ "group_id": 1,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 335,
+ 505,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 335,
+ 404,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 2: A successful attack (a) without and (b) with derivative loss term (PGD,",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 404,
+ 336,
+ 437,
+ 345
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "\\scriptstyle \\epsilon = 1 0 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 438,
+ 335,
+ 505,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "). The background",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 345,
+ 329,
+ 357
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 345,
+ 329,
+ 357
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "traces show the original signal before the preprocessing filter.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25.25
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 377,
+ 505,
+ 422
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 377,
+ 505,
+ 390
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 377,
+ 505,
+ 390
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the propagation model: a single-channel perturbation v is computed and tested with a specific",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 389,
+ 506,
+ 401
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 389,
+ 210,
+ 401
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "propagation configuration",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 210,
+ 389,
+ 225,
+ 400
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 225,
+ 389,
+ 243,
+ 401
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 243,
+ 389,
+ 254,
+ 400
+ ],
+ "score": 0.87,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 255,
+ 389,
+ 506,
+ 401
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". Case 3) Consider a use-case where the attacker does not know",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 399,
+ 506,
+ 412
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 399,
+ 380,
+ 412
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the spatial propagation model and computes the same perturbation",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 381,
+ 402,
+ 389,
+ 410
+ ],
+ "score": 0.32,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { v }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 389,
+ 399,
+ 506,
+ 412
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for all channels. The actual",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 411,
+ 457,
+ 423
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 411,
+ 457,
+ 423
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "propagation model is applied during testing to model the real-world signal propagation.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 434,
+ 505,
+ 489
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 434,
+ 505,
+ 447
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 434,
+ 505,
+ 447
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "End-to-end algorithm. We illustrate the algorithmic procedure for designing a physiologically",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 445,
+ 505,
+ 457
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 445,
+ 505,
+ 457
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "plausible UAP in Algorithm 1. Analogously, the proposed methods of derivative loss term and model",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 456,
+ 506,
+ 469
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 456,
+ 332,
+ 469
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "propagation are applied with PGD. The hyperparameters",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 332,
+ 458,
+ 340,
+ 466
+ ],
+ "score": 0.58,
+ "content": "\\alpha",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 340,
+ 456,
+ 343,
+ 469
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ",",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 344,
+ 457,
+ 351,
+ 468
+ ],
+ "score": 0.72,
+ "content": "\\beta",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 352,
+ 456,
+ 506,
+ 469
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", the number of PGD iterations and the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 467,
+ 506,
+ 479
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 467,
+ 506,
+ 479
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "restarts, the batch size and the number of epochs in UAP are determined based on a cross-validated",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 478,
+ 229,
+ 491
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 478,
+ 229,
+ 491
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "grid search on the training set.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 506,
+ 272,
+ 518
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 505,
+ 275,
+ 520
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 505,
+ 275,
+ 520
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "4 EXPERIMENTS AND RESULTS",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 530,
+ 505,
+ 564
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 530,
+ 506,
+ 543
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 530,
+ 506,
+ 543
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "We evaluate our methods on the Physionet EEG Motor Movement/Imagery Dataset (Goldberger et al.,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 541,
+ 505,
+ 555
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 541,
+ 505,
+ 555
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2000; Sch) tackling inter-subject challenges, and generalize to subject-specific inter-session dataset",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 552,
+ 379,
+ 566
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 552,
+ 379,
+ 566
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "IV-2a of BCI Competition (Brunner et al., 2008) (See Appendix C).",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 576,
+ 505,
+ 653
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 577,
+ 506,
+ 589
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 577,
+ 506,
+ 589
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Dataset. The Physionet dataset contains valid EEG recordings of 105 subjects (Dose et al., 2018)",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 587,
+ 505,
+ 599
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 587,
+ 505,
+ 599
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and is publicly available under Open Data Commons Attribution License v1.0. We use the MI",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 598,
+ 506,
+ 610
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 598,
+ 405,
+ 610
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "recordings that contain tasks of the imagination of left against right fist for",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 405,
+ 599,
+ 417,
+ 609
+ ],
+ "score": 0.49,
+ "content": "3 \\mathrm { s }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 417,
+ 598,
+ 506,
+ 610
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". The EEG trials were",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 609,
+ 506,
+ 622
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 609,
+ 165,
+ 622
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "recorded with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 165,
+ 609,
+ 199,
+ 620
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "N _ { c h } { = } 6 4",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 200,
+ 609,
+ 284,
+ 622
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "channels sampled at",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 285,
+ 609,
+ 331,
+ 620
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "F _ { s } { = } 1 6 0 \\mathrm { H z }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 331,
+ 609,
+ 370,
+ 622
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", yielding",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 370,
+ 609,
+ 434,
+ 620
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "N _ { s } { = } 3 { \\cdot } 1 6 0 { = } 4 8 0",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 434,
+ 609,
+ 506,
+ 622
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "samples per trial.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 620,
+ 505,
+ 633
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 620,
+ 505,
+ 633
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Additional baseline runs provide resting-state data, where the subjects did not perform any tasks",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 45
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 631,
+ 507,
+ 644
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 631,
+ 380,
+ 644
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "while having eyes open. Overall, we get a total of 6615 trials with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 381,
+ 631,
+ 407,
+ 642
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "N _ { c l } { = } 3",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 408,
+ 631,
+ 507,
+ 644
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "balanced classes “left”,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 46
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 642,
+ 182,
+ 654
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 642,
+ 182,
+ 654
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "“right”, and “rest.”",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 47
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 665,
+ 505,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 665,
+ 505,
+ 678
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 665,
+ 505,
+ 678
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Training and validation. We train and validate both the classification models and the generated",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 48
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 676,
+ 506,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 676,
+ 506,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "adversarial examples with a 5-fold cross-validation, splitting the dataset into 84 subjects used for",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 49
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 506,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 506,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "training and 21 subjects used for validation to effectively test the model on inter-subject variability.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 50
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 698,
+ 506,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 698,
+ 506,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Similar to Wang et al. (2020), which achieved SoA performance on this dataset, the baseline model is",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 51
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 709,
+ 506,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 709,
+ 267,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "trained for 100 epochs using Adam with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 267,
+ 710,
+ 296,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "\\beta _ { 1 } { = } 0 . 9",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 297,
+ 709,
+ 300,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ",",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 300,
+ 710,
+ 339,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "score": 0.87,
+ "content": "\\beta _ { 2 } { = } 0 . 9 9 9",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 339,
+ 709,
+ 506,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", and batch size of 16. The learning rate is",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 52
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 721,
+ 506,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 721,
+ 471,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "0.01 and decreased by a factor of 10 at epochs 20 and 50, achieving an average accuracy of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 471,
+ 721,
+ 503,
+ 731
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "7 4 . 7 8 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 503,
+ 721,
+ 506,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 53
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 50.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "page_idx": 6,
+ "page_size": [
+ 612,
+ 792
+ ],
+ "discarded_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 302,
+ 751,
+ 308,
+ 759
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 302,
+ 750,
+ 309,
+ 762
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 302,
+ 750,
+ 309,
+ 762
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "7",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 27,
+ 308,
+ 37
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 26,
+ 308,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 26,
+ 308,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2022",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "para_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 82,
+ 293,
+ 208
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 82,
+ 293,
+ 208
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 82,
+ 293,
+ 208
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 82,
+ 293,
+ 208
+ ],
+ "score": 0.968,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "a1324eec3369ab8d3e852dd7a1f3de592be68aba36ad56c69f815c71827712f0.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4.5,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 82,
+ 293,
+ 94.6
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 94.6,
+ 293,
+ 107.19999999999999
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 107.19999999999999,
+ 293,
+ 119.79999999999998
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 2
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 119.79999999999998,
+ 293,
+ 132.39999999999998
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 132.39999999999998,
+ 293,
+ 144.99999999999997
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 144.99999999999997,
+ 293,
+ 157.59999999999997
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 157.59999999999997,
+ 293,
+ 170.19999999999996
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 170.19999999999996,
+ 293,
+ 182.79999999999995
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 182.79999999999995,
+ 293,
+ 195.39999999999995
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 112,
+ 195.39999999999995,
+ 293,
+ 207.99999999999994
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 9
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 214,
+ 303,
+ 234
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 214,
+ 304,
+ 225
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 214,
+ 304,
+ 225
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 1: Performance of random noise, FGSM, PGD,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 223,
+ 279,
+ 235
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 223,
+ 279,
+ 235
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and UAP with and without derivative loss term.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "table",
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 96,
+ 505,
+ 165
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "table_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 96,
+ 505,
+ 165
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 96,
+ 505,
+ 165
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 96,
+ 505,
+ 165
+ ],
+ "score": 0.97,
+ "html": " | n[10-3v2] | l2-norm [mV] | γ[%] |
| ε[mV] | (a) | (b) | (c) | (a) | (b) | (c) | (a) | (b) | （c） |
| 1 | 3.31 | 1.98 | 3.42 | 20.8 | 15.2 | 21.2 | 99.89 | 99.93 | 99.89 |
| 5 | 16.6 | 7.76 | 17.3 | 99.1 | 61.2 | 102 | 97.99 | 99.22 | 97.87 |
| 10 | 32.5 | 12.6 | 34.1 | 191 | 112 | 198 | 93.82 | 97.47 | 93.49 |
| 25 | 74.9 | 27.3 | 79.2 | 461 | 263 | 475 | 79.61 | 90.05 | 78.92 |
| 50 | 125 | 39.0 | 135 | 823 | 462 | 855 | 64.17 | 79.70 | 63.06 |
",
+ "type": "table",
+ "image_path": "e61df40a1bdb0c2d0c3c4f3479777943c9d67c63241455dde0304702d2c127b4.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 96,
+ 505,
+ 109.8
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 109.8,
+ 505,
+ 123.6
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 123.6,
+ 505,
+ 137.4
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 137.4,
+ 505,
+ 151.20000000000002
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 151.20000000000002,
+ 505,
+ 165.00000000000003
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 16
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "table_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 174,
+ 505,
+ 234
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 174,
+ 505,
+ 185
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 174,
+ 505,
+ 185
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Table 1: Plausibility metrics for PGD attack (a) without",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 184,
+ 505,
+ 195
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 184,
+ 505,
+ 195
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "derivative term, (b) with the derivative loss term, and (c)",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 194,
+ 505,
+ 204
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 194,
+ 505,
+ 204
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with a Gaussian kernel (Han et al., 2020). The smaller",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 204,
+ 506,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 204,
+ 385,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the cross correlation",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 386,
+ 206,
+ 392,
+ 214
+ ],
+ "score": 0.75,
+ "content": "\\eta",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 393,
+ 204,
+ 492,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and the Euclidian distance",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 493,
+ 204,
+ 502,
+ 214
+ ],
+ "score": 0.81,
+ "content": "\\ell _ { 2 }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 502,
+ 204,
+ 506,
+ 215
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "-",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 214,
+ 505,
+ 226
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 214,
+ 461,
+ 226
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "norm, and the higher the cosine similarity",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 461,
+ 216,
+ 468,
+ 225
+ ],
+ "score": 0.78,
+ "content": "\\gamma",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 468,
+ 214,
+ 505,
+ 226
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", the more",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 307,
+ 224,
+ 412,
+ 234
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 307,
+ 224,
+ 412,
+ 234
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "natural the generated attack.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16.75
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 247,
+ 504,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 247,
+ 504,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "group_id": 1,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 247,
+ 504,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 247,
+ 504,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "score": 0.964,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "0be065a5743b1cee7251d7d88da8df12f3001691d68088f221c3d7a7df59ba26.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 247,
+ 504,
+ 273.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 273.0,
+ 504,
+ 299.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 299.0,
+ 504,
+ 325.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 25
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 335,
+ 505,
+ 357
+ ],
+ "group_id": 1,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 335,
+ 505,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 335,
+ 404,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 2: A successful attack (a) without and (b) with derivative loss term (PGD,",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 404,
+ 336,
+ 437,
+ 345
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "\\scriptstyle \\epsilon = 1 0 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 438,
+ 335,
+ 505,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "). The background",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 345,
+ 329,
+ 357
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 345,
+ 329,
+ 357
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "traces show the original signal before the preprocessing filter.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25.25
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 377,
+ 505,
+ 422
+ ],
+ "lines": [],
+ "index": 29.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 377,
+ 506,
+ 423
+ ],
+ "lines_deleted": true
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 434,
+ 505,
+ 489
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 434,
+ 505,
+ 447
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 434,
+ 505,
+ 447
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "End-to-end algorithm. We illustrate the algorithmic procedure for designing a physiologically",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 445,
+ 505,
+ 457
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 445,
+ 505,
+ 457
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "plausible UAP in Algorithm 1. Analogously, the proposed methods of derivative loss term and model",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 456,
+ 506,
+ 469
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 456,
+ 332,
+ 469
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "propagation are applied with PGD. The hyperparameters",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 332,
+ 458,
+ 340,
+ 466
+ ],
+ "score": 0.58,
+ "content": "\\alpha",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 340,
+ 456,
+ 343,
+ 469
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ",",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 344,
+ 457,
+ 351,
+ 468
+ ],
+ "score": 0.72,
+ "content": "\\beta",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 352,
+ 456,
+ 506,
+ 469
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", the number of PGD iterations and the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 467,
+ 506,
+ 479
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 467,
+ 506,
+ 479
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "restarts, the batch size and the number of epochs in UAP are determined based on a cross-validated",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 478,
+ 229,
+ 491
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 478,
+ 229,
+ 491
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "grid search on the training set.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 434,
+ 506,
+ 491
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 506,
+ 272,
+ 518
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 505,
+ 275,
+ 520
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 505,
+ 275,
+ 520
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "4 EXPERIMENTS AND RESULTS",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 530,
+ 505,
+ 564
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 530,
+ 506,
+ 543
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 530,
+ 506,
+ 543
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "We evaluate our methods on the Physionet EEG Motor Movement/Imagery Dataset (Goldberger et al.,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 541,
+ 505,
+ 555
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 541,
+ 505,
+ 555
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2000; Sch) tackling inter-subject challenges, and generalize to subject-specific inter-session dataset",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 552,
+ 379,
+ 566
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 552,
+ 379,
+ 566
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "IV-2a of BCI Competition (Brunner et al., 2008) (See Appendix C).",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 530,
+ 506,
+ 566
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 576,
+ 505,
+ 653
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 577,
+ 506,
+ 589
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 577,
+ 506,
+ 589
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Dataset. The Physionet dataset contains valid EEG recordings of 105 subjects (Dose et al., 2018)",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 587,
+ 505,
+ 599
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 587,
+ 505,
+ 599
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and is publicly available under Open Data Commons Attribution License v1.0. We use the MI",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 598,
+ 506,
+ 610
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 598,
+ 405,
+ 610
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "recordings that contain tasks of the imagination of left against right fist for",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 405,
+ 599,
+ 417,
+ 609
+ ],
+ "score": 0.49,
+ "content": "3 \\mathrm { s }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 417,
+ 598,
+ 506,
+ 610
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". The EEG trials were",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 609,
+ 506,
+ 622
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 609,
+ 165,
+ 622
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "recorded with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 165,
+ 609,
+ 199,
+ 620
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "N _ { c h } { = } 6 4",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 200,
+ 609,
+ 284,
+ 622
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "channels sampled at",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 285,
+ 609,
+ 331,
+ 620
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "F _ { s } { = } 1 6 0 \\mathrm { H z }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 331,
+ 609,
+ 370,
+ 622
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", yielding",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 370,
+ 609,
+ 434,
+ 620
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "N _ { s } { = } 3 { \\cdot } 1 6 0 { = } 4 8 0",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 434,
+ 609,
+ 506,
+ 622
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "samples per trial.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 620,
+ 505,
+ 633
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 620,
+ 505,
+ 633
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Additional baseline runs provide resting-state data, where the subjects did not perform any tasks",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 45
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 631,
+ 507,
+ 644
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 631,
+ 380,
+ 644
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "while having eyes open. Overall, we get a total of 6615 trials with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 381,
+ 631,
+ 407,
+ 642
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "N _ { c l } { = } 3",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 408,
+ 631,
+ 507,
+ 644
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "balanced classes “left”,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 46
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 642,
+ 182,
+ 654
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 642,
+ 182,
+ 654
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "“right”, and “rest.”",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 47
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 104,
+ 577,
+ 507,
+ 654
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 665,
+ 505,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 665,
+ 505,
+ 678
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 665,
+ 505,
+ 678
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Training and validation. We train and validate both the classification models and the generated",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 48
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 676,
+ 506,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 676,
+ 506,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "adversarial examples with a 5-fold cross-validation, splitting the dataset into 84 subjects used for",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 49
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 506,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 506,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "training and 21 subjects used for validation to effectively test the model on inter-subject variability.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 50
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 698,
+ 506,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 698,
+ 506,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Similar to Wang et al. (2020), which achieved SoA performance on this dataset, the baseline model is",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 51
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 709,
+ 506,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 709,
+ 267,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "trained for 100 epochs using Adam with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 267,
+ 710,
+ 296,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "\\beta _ { 1 } { = } 0 . 9",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 297,
+ 709,
+ 300,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ",",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 300,
+ 710,
+ 339,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "score": 0.87,
+ "content": "\\beta _ { 2 } { = } 0 . 9 9 9",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 339,
+ 709,
+ 506,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", and batch size of 16. The learning rate is",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 52
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 721,
+ 506,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 721,
+ 471,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "0.01 and decreased by a factor of 10 at epochs 20 and 50, achieving an average accuracy of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 471,
+ 721,
+ 503,
+ 731
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "7 4 . 7 8 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 503,
+ 721,
+ 506,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 53
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 50.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 665,
+ 506,
+ 733
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "preproc_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 81,
+ 502,
+ 209
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 81,
+ 502,
+ 209
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 81,
+ 502,
+ 209
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 81,
+ 502,
+ 209
+ ],
+ "score": 0.961,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "61e50ae1624936e4724c0a3920f25f9cef6e945f75c78ede3ed08a1fb5c4512d.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 81,
+ 502,
+ 123.66666666666666
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 123.66666666666666,
+ 502,
+ 166.33333333333331
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 166.33333333333331,
+ 502,
+ 208.99999999999997
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 2
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 219,
+ 506,
+ 241
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 218,
+ 506,
+ 231
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 218,
+ 388,
+ 231
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 3: A successful attack with derivative loss term and spatial constraints",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 389,
+ 220,
+ 419,
+ 230
+ ],
+ "score": 0.93,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m } = 1",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 419,
+ 218,
+ 435,
+ 231
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 435,
+ 220,
+ 479,
+ 230
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d } = 0 . 5 6 3",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 480,
+ 218,
+ 506,
+ 231
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(PGD,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 230,
+ 428,
+ 241
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 230,
+ 139,
+ 240
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "\\scriptstyle \\epsilon = 5 0 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 140,
+ 230,
+ 428,
+ 241
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "). The background traces show the original signal before the preprocessing filter.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2.25
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 256,
+ 379,
+ 500
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 256,
+ 379,
+ 500
+ ],
+ "group_id": 1,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 256,
+ 379,
+ 500
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 256,
+ 379,
+ 500
+ ],
+ "score": 0.967,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "1523c7615753b90b2c8e0e94fb41fcac116f3a3069037a001618243cb754a843.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13.5,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 256,
+ 379,
+ 269.55555555555554
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 269.55555555555554,
+ 379,
+ 283.1111111111111
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 283.1111111111111,
+ 379,
+ 296.66666666666663
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 296.66666666666663,
+ 379,
+ 310.2222222222222
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 310.2222222222222,
+ 379,
+ 323.7777777777777
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 323.7777777777777,
+ 379,
+ 337.33333333333326
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 337.33333333333326,
+ 379,
+ 350.8888888888888
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 350.8888888888888,
+ 379,
+ 364.44444444444434
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 364.44444444444434,
+ 379,
+ 377.9999999999999
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 377.9999999999999,
+ 379,
+ 391.55555555555543
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 391.55555555555543,
+ 379,
+ 405.111111111111
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 405.111111111111,
+ 379,
+ 418.6666666666665
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 418.6666666666665,
+ 379,
+ 432.22222222222206
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 432.22222222222206,
+ 379,
+ 445.7777777777776
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 445.7777777777776,
+ 379,
+ 459.33333333333314
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 19
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 459.33333333333314,
+ 379,
+ 472.8888888888887
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 472.8888888888887,
+ 379,
+ 486.44444444444423
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 486.44444444444423,
+ 379,
+ 499.9999999999998
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 22
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 506,
+ 385,
+ 527
+ ],
+ "group_id": 1,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 506,
+ 387,
+ 518
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 506,
+ 387,
+ 518
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 4: ASR of PGD and UAP in Case 2), i.e., computed with head model",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 516,
+ 362,
+ 528
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 516,
+ 362,
+ 528
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(w/HM), and in Case 3), i.e., computed without head model (w/oHM).",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 395,
+ 258,
+ 500,
+ 478
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 395,
+ 258,
+ 500,
+ 478
+ ],
+ "group_id": 2,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 395,
+ 258,
+ 500,
+ 478
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 395,
+ 258,
+ 500,
+ 478
+ ],
+ "score": 0.954,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "2c2e639cc82a57badda6f507c714534618e64bf003ecf1957433ac239f2e7d18.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 395,
+ 258,
+ 500,
+ 478
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 25
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 391,
+ 486,
+ 505,
+ 527
+ ],
+ "group_id": 2,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 391,
+ 486,
+ 505,
+ 497
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 391,
+ 486,
+ 505,
+ 497
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 5: ASR with the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 390,
+ 495,
+ 506,
+ 508
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 390,
+ 495,
+ 506,
+ 508
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "PGD attack propagating from",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 391,
+ 506,
+ 505,
+ 516
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 391,
+ 506,
+ 505,
+ 516
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "different EEG channels with",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 390,
+ 515,
+ 503,
+ 528
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 390,
+ 515,
+ 411,
+ 528
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "fixed",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 412,
+ 516,
+ 439,
+ 526
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d } { = } 0 . 3",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 439,
+ 515,
+ 486,
+ 528
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and variable",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 486,
+ 516,
+ 499,
+ 526
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 500,
+ 515,
+ 503,
+ 528
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26.25
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 551,
+ 505,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 551,
+ 506,
+ 564
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 551,
+ 204,
+ 564
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "An FFT band-pass filter",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 204,
+ 552,
+ 219,
+ 563
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "h _ { b p }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 219,
+ 551,
+ 341,
+ 564
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with a customary passband of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 341,
+ 551,
+ 383,
+ 562
+ ],
+ "score": 0.8,
+ "content": "0 . 1 { - } 4 0 \\mathrm { H z }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 384,
+ 551,
+ 506,
+ 564
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(Lawhern et al., 2018) is used",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 563,
+ 505,
+ 574
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 563,
+ 505,
+ 574
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "as preprocessing step in both baseline and attack experiments.To determine the ASR, we compute the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 574,
+ 505,
+ 585
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 574,
+ 505,
+ 585
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "ratio between the successfully fooled trials, i.e., trials now classified as “rest”, and the total number",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 584,
+ 489,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 584,
+ 489,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "of attacked trials, where we only consider the ones initially correctly classified as “left”/“right”.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 610,
+ 505,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 609,
+ 506,
+ 624
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 609,
+ 506,
+ 624
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Physiologically plausible attacks. We first analyze the instance-based attacks without considering",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 622,
+ 505,
+ 634
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 622,
+ 505,
+ 634
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the propagation model (Case 1), depicted in Figure 1. We compare our methods against random",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 632,
+ 506,
+ 646
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 632,
+ 191,
+ 646
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "noise with amplitude",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 191,
+ 635,
+ 198,
+ 643
+ ],
+ "score": 0.43,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 198,
+ 632,
+ 506,
+ 646
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "as in (Zhang & Wu, 2019), FGSM that is the same as in (Zhang & Wu, 2019)",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 644,
+ 505,
+ 657
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 644,
+ 505,
+ 657
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with targeted scenario, and a UAP designed specifically for EEG (Liu et al., 2021). For both FGSM",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 654,
+ 506,
+ 668
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 654,
+ 390,
+ 668
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and PGD, the ASR increases together with the maximum amplitude",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 390,
+ 657,
+ 396,
+ 665
+ ],
+ "score": 0.65,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 397,
+ 654,
+ 506,
+ 668
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "of the perturbation. They",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 665,
+ 505,
+ 678
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 665,
+ 505,
+ 678
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "always outperform the random noise, with PGD performing slightly better than FGSM. They reach",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 677,
+ 505,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 677,
+ 194,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the maximum ASR of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 195,
+ 677,
+ 226,
+ 687
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "9 9 . 9 7 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 226,
+ 677,
+ 247,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 247,
+ 677,
+ 273,
+ 687
+ ],
+ "score": 0.59,
+ "content": "1 0 \\mathrm { m V } .",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 273,
+ 677,
+ 473,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "The post-attack classification accuracy drops from",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 473,
+ 677,
+ 505,
+ 687
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "7 4 . 7 8 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 505,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 116,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 117,
+ 688,
+ 136,
+ 698
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "48 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 136,
+ 687,
+ 259,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for a perturbation amplitude of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 260,
+ 688,
+ 283,
+ 698
+ ],
+ "score": 0.64,
+ "content": "2 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 283,
+ 687,
+ 310,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and to",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 310,
+ 688,
+ 329,
+ 698
+ ],
+ "score": 0.87,
+ "content": "33 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 330,
+ 687,
+ 344,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 345,
+ 688,
+ 372,
+ 698
+ ],
+ "score": 0.75,
+ "content": "1 0 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 372,
+ 687,
+ 505,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and higher amplitudes. Figure 2a",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 698,
+ 507,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 698,
+ 507,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "shows the signals of a successful attack using PGD. The adversarial perturbation has a square-",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 709,
+ 505,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 709,
+ 505,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "wave form which negatively affects the natural shape of the EEG signal. By adding the proposed",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 721,
+ 505,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 721,
+ 505,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "derivative term, the square-wave artifacts are significantly reduced (2b), making the perturbation more",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ }
+ ],
+ "page_idx": 7,
+ "page_size": [
+ 612,
+ 792
+ ],
+ "discarded_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 302,
+ 752,
+ 308,
+ 760
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 301,
+ 750,
+ 310,
+ 762
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 301,
+ 750,
+ 310,
+ 762
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "",
+ "type": "text",
+ "height": 12,
+ "width": 9
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 27,
+ 308,
+ 37
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 25,
+ 309,
+ 39
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 25,
+ 309,
+ 39
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2022",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "para_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 81,
+ 502,
+ 209
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 81,
+ 502,
+ 209
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 81,
+ 502,
+ 209
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 81,
+ 502,
+ 209
+ ],
+ "score": 0.961,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "61e50ae1624936e4724c0a3920f25f9cef6e945f75c78ede3ed08a1fb5c4512d.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 81,
+ 502,
+ 123.66666666666666
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 123.66666666666666,
+ 502,
+ 166.33333333333331
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 166.33333333333331,
+ 502,
+ 208.99999999999997
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 2
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 219,
+ 506,
+ 241
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 218,
+ 506,
+ 231
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 218,
+ 388,
+ 231
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 3: A successful attack with derivative loss term and spatial constraints",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 389,
+ 220,
+ 419,
+ 230
+ ],
+ "score": 0.93,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m } = 1",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 419,
+ 218,
+ 435,
+ 231
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 435,
+ 220,
+ 479,
+ 230
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d } = 0 . 5 6 3",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 480,
+ 218,
+ 506,
+ 231
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(PGD,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 230,
+ 428,
+ 241
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 230,
+ 139,
+ 240
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "\\scriptstyle \\epsilon = 5 0 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 140,
+ 230,
+ 428,
+ 241
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "). The background traces show the original signal before the preprocessing filter.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2.25
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 256,
+ 379,
+ 500
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 256,
+ 379,
+ 500
+ ],
+ "group_id": 1,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 256,
+ 379,
+ 500
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 256,
+ 379,
+ 500
+ ],
+ "score": 0.967,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "1523c7615753b90b2c8e0e94fb41fcac116f3a3069037a001618243cb754a843.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13.5,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 256,
+ 379,
+ 269.55555555555554
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 269.55555555555554,
+ 379,
+ 283.1111111111111
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 283.1111111111111,
+ 379,
+ 296.66666666666663
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 296.66666666666663,
+ 379,
+ 310.2222222222222
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 310.2222222222222,
+ 379,
+ 323.7777777777777
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 323.7777777777777,
+ 379,
+ 337.33333333333326
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 337.33333333333326,
+ 379,
+ 350.8888888888888
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 350.8888888888888,
+ 379,
+ 364.44444444444434
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 364.44444444444434,
+ 379,
+ 377.9999999999999
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 377.9999999999999,
+ 379,
+ 391.55555555555543
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 391.55555555555543,
+ 379,
+ 405.111111111111
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 405.111111111111,
+ 379,
+ 418.6666666666665
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 418.6666666666665,
+ 379,
+ 432.22222222222206
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 432.22222222222206,
+ 379,
+ 445.7777777777776
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 445.7777777777776,
+ 379,
+ 459.33333333333314
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 19
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 459.33333333333314,
+ 379,
+ 472.8888888888887
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 472.8888888888887,
+ 379,
+ 486.44444444444423
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 486.44444444444423,
+ 379,
+ 499.9999999999998
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 22
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 506,
+ 385,
+ 527
+ ],
+ "group_id": 1,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 506,
+ 387,
+ 518
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 506,
+ 387,
+ 518
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 4: ASR of PGD and UAP in Case 2), i.e., computed with head model",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 516,
+ 362,
+ 528
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 516,
+ 362,
+ 528
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(w/HM), and in Case 3), i.e., computed without head model (w/oHM).",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 395,
+ 258,
+ 500,
+ 478
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 395,
+ 258,
+ 500,
+ 478
+ ],
+ "group_id": 2,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 395,
+ 258,
+ 500,
+ 478
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 395,
+ 258,
+ 500,
+ 478
+ ],
+ "score": 0.954,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "2c2e639cc82a57badda6f507c714534618e64bf003ecf1957433ac239f2e7d18.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 395,
+ 258,
+ 500,
+ 478
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 25
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 391,
+ 486,
+ 505,
+ 527
+ ],
+ "group_id": 2,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 391,
+ 486,
+ 505,
+ 497
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 391,
+ 486,
+ 505,
+ 497
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 5: ASR with the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 390,
+ 495,
+ 506,
+ 508
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 390,
+ 495,
+ 506,
+ 508
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "PGD attack propagating from",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 391,
+ 506,
+ 505,
+ 516
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 391,
+ 506,
+ 505,
+ 516
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "different EEG channels with",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 390,
+ 515,
+ 503,
+ 528
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 390,
+ 515,
+ 411,
+ 528
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "fixed",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 412,
+ 516,
+ 439,
+ 526
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d } { = } 0 . 3",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 439,
+ 515,
+ 486,
+ 528
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and variable",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 486,
+ 516,
+ 499,
+ 526
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 500,
+ 515,
+ 503,
+ 528
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26.25
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 551,
+ 505,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 551,
+ 506,
+ 564
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 551,
+ 204,
+ 564
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "An FFT band-pass filter",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 204,
+ 552,
+ 219,
+ 563
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "h _ { b p }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 219,
+ 551,
+ 341,
+ 564
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with a customary passband of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 341,
+ 551,
+ 383,
+ 562
+ ],
+ "score": 0.8,
+ "content": "0 . 1 { - } 4 0 \\mathrm { H z }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 384,
+ 551,
+ 506,
+ 564
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(Lawhern et al., 2018) is used",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 563,
+ 505,
+ 574
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 563,
+ 505,
+ 574
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "as preprocessing step in both baseline and attack experiments.To determine the ASR, we compute the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 574,
+ 505,
+ 585
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 574,
+ 505,
+ 585
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "ratio between the successfully fooled trials, i.e., trials now classified as “rest”, and the total number",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 584,
+ 489,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 584,
+ 489,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "of attacked trials, where we only consider the ones initially correctly classified as “left”/“right”.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 551,
+ 506,
+ 596
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 610,
+ 505,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 609,
+ 506,
+ 624
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 609,
+ 506,
+ 624
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Physiologically plausible attacks. We first analyze the instance-based attacks without considering",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 622,
+ 505,
+ 634
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 622,
+ 505,
+ 634
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the propagation model (Case 1), depicted in Figure 1. We compare our methods against random",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 632,
+ 506,
+ 646
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 632,
+ 191,
+ 646
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "noise with amplitude",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 191,
+ 635,
+ 198,
+ 643
+ ],
+ "score": 0.43,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 198,
+ 632,
+ 506,
+ 646
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "as in (Zhang & Wu, 2019), FGSM that is the same as in (Zhang & Wu, 2019)",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 644,
+ 505,
+ 657
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 644,
+ 505,
+ 657
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with targeted scenario, and a UAP designed specifically for EEG (Liu et al., 2021). For both FGSM",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 654,
+ 506,
+ 668
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 654,
+ 390,
+ 668
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and PGD, the ASR increases together with the maximum amplitude",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 390,
+ 657,
+ 396,
+ 665
+ ],
+ "score": 0.65,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 397,
+ 654,
+ 506,
+ 668
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "of the perturbation. They",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 665,
+ 505,
+ 678
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 665,
+ 505,
+ 678
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "always outperform the random noise, with PGD performing slightly better than FGSM. They reach",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 677,
+ 505,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 677,
+ 194,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the maximum ASR of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 195,
+ 677,
+ 226,
+ 687
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "9 9 . 9 7 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 226,
+ 677,
+ 247,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 247,
+ 677,
+ 273,
+ 687
+ ],
+ "score": 0.59,
+ "content": "1 0 \\mathrm { m V } .",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 273,
+ 677,
+ 473,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "The post-attack classification accuracy drops from",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 473,
+ 677,
+ 505,
+ 687
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "7 4 . 7 8 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 505,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 116,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 117,
+ 688,
+ 136,
+ 698
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "48 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 136,
+ 687,
+ 259,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for a perturbation amplitude of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 260,
+ 688,
+ 283,
+ 698
+ ],
+ "score": 0.64,
+ "content": "2 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 283,
+ 687,
+ 310,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and to",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 310,
+ 688,
+ 329,
+ 698
+ ],
+ "score": 0.87,
+ "content": "33 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 330,
+ 687,
+ 344,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 345,
+ 688,
+ 372,
+ 698
+ ],
+ "score": 0.75,
+ "content": "1 0 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 372,
+ 687,
+ 505,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and higher amplitudes. Figure 2a",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 698,
+ 507,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 698,
+ 507,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "shows the signals of a successful attack using PGD. The adversarial perturbation has a square-",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 709,
+ 505,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 709,
+ 505,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "wave form which negatively affects the natural shape of the EEG signal. By adding the proposed",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 721,
+ 505,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 721,
+ 505,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "derivative term, the square-wave artifacts are significantly reduced (2b), making the perturbation more",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 83,
+ 505,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 83,
+ 505,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "physiologically plausible. When comparing the power spectral density of the original and attacked",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 93,
+ 506,
+ 107
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 93,
+ 506,
+ 107
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "signals, the attacked signal designed without derivative presents large components in low frequencies,",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 104,
+ 506,
+ 118
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 104,
+ 506,
+ 118
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "making it more easily detectable. Whereas the attack with derivative loss better resembles the power",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 115,
+ 506,
+ 128
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 115,
+ 506,
+ 128
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "spectral density of the original signal (see Appendix D). Moreover, the introduction of the derivative",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 126,
+ 505,
+ 139
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 126,
+ 505,
+ 139
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "term does not degrade the ASR (Figure 1). The quantitative measures between the original and the",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 137,
+ 506,
+ 150
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 137,
+ 506,
+ 150
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "adversarial samples in Table 1 demonstrate that our proposed method with derivative term generates",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 149,
+ 505,
+ 161
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 149,
+ 505,
+ 161
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "adversarial samples that are more similar to the original EEG, allowing them to remain imperceptible",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 159,
+ 506,
+ 172
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 159,
+ 168,
+ 172
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "even with high",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 168,
+ 161,
+ 174,
+ 169
+ ],
+ "score": 0.56,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation",
+ "cross_page": true
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 174,
+ 159,
+ 506,
+ 172
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(Appendix D). We reproduce the attacks using a Gaussian kernel as in (Han et al.,",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 169,
+ 506,
+ 184
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 169,
+ 506,
+ 184
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2020). After tuning the kernel size and variance of the Gaussian kernel, the method could not improve",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 181,
+ 506,
+ 194
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 181,
+ 506,
+ 194
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the plausibility metrics. The inferior performance of the Gaussian kernel could stem from the different",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 191,
+ 496,
+ 206
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 191,
+ 496,
+ 206
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "nature of the signal: it was originally designed for ECGs which have a pseudo-periodic structure.",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 609,
+ 507,
+ 733
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "preproc_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 203
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 83,
+ 505,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 83,
+ 505,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "physiologically plausible. When comparing the power spectral density of the original and attacked",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 93,
+ 506,
+ 107
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 93,
+ 506,
+ 107
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "signals, the attacked signal designed without derivative presents large components in low frequencies,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 104,
+ 506,
+ 118
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 104,
+ 506,
+ 118
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "making it more easily detectable. Whereas the attack with derivative loss better resembles the power",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 115,
+ 506,
+ 128
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 115,
+ 506,
+ 128
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "spectral density of the original signal (see Appendix D). Moreover, the introduction of the derivative",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 126,
+ 505,
+ 139
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 126,
+ 505,
+ 139
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "term does not degrade the ASR (Figure 1). The quantitative measures between the original and the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 137,
+ 506,
+ 150
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 137,
+ 506,
+ 150
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "adversarial samples in Table 1 demonstrate that our proposed method with derivative term generates",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 149,
+ 505,
+ 161
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 149,
+ 505,
+ 161
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "adversarial samples that are more similar to the original EEG, allowing them to remain imperceptible",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 159,
+ 506,
+ 172
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 159,
+ 168,
+ 172
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "even with high",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 168,
+ 161,
+ 174,
+ 169
+ ],
+ "score": 0.56,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 174,
+ 159,
+ 506,
+ 172
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(Appendix D). We reproduce the attacks using a Gaussian kernel as in (Han et al.,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 169,
+ 506,
+ 184
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 169,
+ 506,
+ 184
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2020). After tuning the kernel size and variance of the Gaussian kernel, the method could not improve",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 181,
+ 506,
+ 194
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 181,
+ 506,
+ 194
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the plausibility metrics. The inferior performance of the Gaussian kernel could stem from the different",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 191,
+ 496,
+ 206
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 191,
+ 496,
+ 206
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "nature of the signal: it was originally designed for ECGs which have a pseudo-periodic structure.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 209,
+ 505,
+ 275
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 209,
+ 505,
+ 221
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 209,
+ 505,
+ 221
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "We extend the application of the derivative term to the UAP attack, while still not considering the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 219,
+ 503,
+ 233
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 219,
+ 497,
+ 233
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "propagation model (Case 1). Figure 1 shows a comparison in performance for different values of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 498,
+ 222,
+ 503,
+ 230
+ ],
+ "score": 0.59,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 230,
+ 505,
+ 243
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 230,
+ 290,
+ 243
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "The saturation in ASR is reached with higher",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 290,
+ 233,
+ 296,
+ 241
+ ],
+ "score": 0.59,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 296,
+ 230,
+ 316,
+ 243
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", i.e.,",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 317,
+ 231,
+ 349,
+ 241
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "9 9 . 9 4 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 349,
+ 230,
+ 370,
+ 243
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 370,
+ 231,
+ 397,
+ 241
+ ],
+ "score": 0.64,
+ "content": "5 0 \\mathrm { m V } .",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 397,
+ 230,
+ 505,
+ 243
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". This is expected since the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 241,
+ 506,
+ 254
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 241,
+ 506,
+ 254
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "UAP is a more difficult attack where a single set of perturbations per EEG channel is generated for",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 252,
+ 506,
+ 265
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 252,
+ 506,
+ 265
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "all the test samples. Likewise in PGD, the ASR does not drop with the addition of the derivative term.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 263,
+ 500,
+ 276
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 263,
+ 500,
+ 276
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "We reproduce the UAP proposed by (Liu et al., 2021). Our UAP consistently reaches higher ASR.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 290,
+ 505,
+ 444
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 290,
+ 505,
+ 303
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 290,
+ 505,
+ 303
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Spatial Propagation. Finally, we introduce the spatial constraints in the signal propagation over the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 301,
+ 505,
+ 314
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 301,
+ 505,
+ 314
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "scalp (Case 2). We consider 9 different scenarios by combining 3 realistic attenuation configurations",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 309,
+ 506,
+ 327
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 312,
+ 177,
+ 324
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m } \\ \\in \\ \\{ 1 , 5 , 1 5 \\}",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 178,
+ 309,
+ 299,
+ 327
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with 3 delay configurations",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 299,
+ 312,
+ 395,
+ 324
+ ],
+ "score": 0.93,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d } \\ \\in \\ \\{ 0 . 1 , 0 . 3 , 0 . 5 6 3 \\}",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 396,
+ 309,
+ 506,
+ 327
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", which capture the range",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 322,
+ 505,
+ 336
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 322,
+ 505,
+ 336
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "described in Section 3.2. For evaluating the highest achievable attack efficiency, we test a scenario",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 334,
+ 506,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 334,
+ 506,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "where the attacker is assumed to know the propagation model: the adversarial perturbation is generated",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 344,
+ 505,
+ 358
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 344,
+ 272,
+ 358
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and evaluated on fixed spatial parameters",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 272,
+ 345,
+ 287,
+ 356
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 287,
+ 344,
+ 304,
+ 358
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 305,
+ 345,
+ 317,
+ 356
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 317,
+ 344,
+ 505,
+ 358
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", shown in Figure 4, where the ASR reaches up",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 355,
+ 506,
+ 368
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 355,
+ 116,
+ 368
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 117,
+ 356,
+ 143,
+ 366
+ ],
+ "score": 0.87,
+ "content": "6 9 . 2 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 144,
+ 355,
+ 202,
+ 368
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with PGD and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 202,
+ 356,
+ 228,
+ 366
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "4 5 . 6 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 229,
+ 355,
+ 280,
+ 368
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with UAP at",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 280,
+ 356,
+ 306,
+ 366
+ ],
+ "score": 0.61,
+ "content": "5 0 \\mathrm { m V } .",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 306,
+ 355,
+ 506,
+ 368
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 3 depicts an example of a successful attack",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 367,
+ 506,
+ 380
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 367,
+ 506,
+ 380
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with the highest perturbation amplitude. The introduction of the spatial constraints makes the attack",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 377,
+ 506,
+ 390
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 377,
+ 506,
+ 390
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "problem harder yielding seldom square distortions. However, the resulting EEG signals still resemble",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 388,
+ 506,
+ 403
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 388,
+ 506,
+ 403
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "physiological random processes typical of EEGs. Next, we ablate the spatial constraints during",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 399,
+ 506,
+ 413
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 399,
+ 506,
+ 413
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "generation and test the resulting perturbations on the 9 above-mentioned scenarios (Case 3). The",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 410,
+ 505,
+ 423
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 410,
+ 263,
+ 423
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "ASR drops significantly, especially for",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 264,
+ 411,
+ 289,
+ 422
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m } { = } 5",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 290,
+ 410,
+ 307,
+ 423
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 307,
+ 411,
+ 338,
+ 422
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m } { = } 1 5",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 338,
+ 410,
+ 505,
+ 423
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "where the attenuation of the perturbation",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 421,
+ 506,
+ 434
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 421,
+ 506,
+ 434
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "over the scalp is greater (see Figure 7), and with the global UAP attack, where the attacker does not",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 433,
+ 270,
+ 445
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 433,
+ 270,
+ 445
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "have access to the attacked EEG signals.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 450,
+ 505,
+ 538
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 450,
+ 506,
+ 462
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 450,
+ 506,
+ 462
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Our spatial propagation models allows us to identify the vulnerability of the individual EEG channels.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 460,
+ 505,
+ 473
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 460,
+ 505,
+ 473
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 5 shows the ASR when initiating an attack from a specific channel (T9, T10, etc.) and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 471,
+ 506,
+ 484
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 471,
+ 421,
+ 484
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "propagating it to the rest of the head. In the case with the greatest attenuation",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 421,
+ 472,
+ 455,
+ 483
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "\\left( \\lambda _ { m } = 1 5 \\right)",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 456,
+ 471,
+ 506,
+ 484
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "we find the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 482,
+ 505,
+ 495
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 482,
+ 235,
+ 495
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "maximum ASR at the electrode",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 235,
+ 483,
+ 248,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 0.6,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { C } \\mathbf { z }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 249,
+ 482,
+ 505,
+ 495
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "between the regions of the electrodes C3 and C4, which are the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 493,
+ 505,
+ 505
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 493,
+ 505,
+ 505
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "most relevant ones for MI of the left and right hand tasks (Pfurtscheller & Lopes da Silva, 1999). We",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 504,
+ 506,
+ 516
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 504,
+ 506,
+ 516
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "compute the pre- and post-attack confusion matrices for attacks from T9 and T10 (see Appendix E).",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 515,
+ 505,
+ 528
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 515,
+ 505,
+ 528
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "When the attack propagates from the left side (T9), more samples with ground-truth label “right” can",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 527,
+ 483,
+ 538
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 527,
+ 483,
+ 538
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "be fooled to “rest”, while the attacks from the right side (T10) are more effective “left” labels.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 543,
+ 505,
+ 587
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 542,
+ 505,
+ 556
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 542,
+ 505,
+ 556
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Overall, our methods successfully generates perturbations resembling natural noise in EEGs, that can",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 554,
+ 506,
+ 567
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 554,
+ 506,
+ 567
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "be added at the source of the signal acquisition and are propagated over the scalp, creating attacked",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 566,
+ 505,
+ 578
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 566,
+ 505,
+ 578
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "signals that are physiologically plausible. Similar results have been observed on the BCI Competition",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 576,
+ 255,
+ 587
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 576,
+ 255,
+ 587
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "IV-2a dataset, shown in Appendix C.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 606,
+ 195,
+ 619
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 605,
+ 197,
+ 622
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 605,
+ 197,
+ 622
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "5 CONCLUSION",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 632,
+ 506,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 633,
+ 505,
+ 645
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 633,
+ 505,
+ 645
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "With the incentive of improving security in BCIs, in this work, we demonstrated that DoS attacks",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 644,
+ 505,
+ 656
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 644,
+ 505,
+ 656
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "are feasible and effective despite physical domain constraints. Experimental results reveal potential",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 45
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 655,
+ 506,
+ 667
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 655,
+ 506,
+ 667
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "risks of realistic attacks on smart wearable BCIs and incentivize the need for future development of",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 46
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 665,
+ 506,
+ 678
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 665,
+ 506,
+ 678
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "defense mechanisms while designing deep learning models to be embedded in smart wearable BCIs.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 47
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 676,
+ 506,
+ 690
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 676,
+ 506,
+ 690
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Our detailed analysis on each EEG channel shows that special attention has to be paid, combined",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 48
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 688,
+ 506,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 688,
+ 506,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with the findings in neuroscience, to the brain regions that are found responsible for a specific task.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 49
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 699,
+ 506,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 699,
+ 506,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "In future work, the proposed attacks can cover uncertainty in the propagation model and the timing of",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 50
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 710,
+ 505,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 710,
+ 505,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the MI activity. Moreover, hardware implementations of such attacks can be created to evaluate the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 51
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 721,
+ 494,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 721,
+ 494,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "proposed methods in real-world, with the ultimate goal of developing effective countermeasures.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 52
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 48
+ }
+ ],
+ "page_idx": 8,
+ "page_size": [
+ 612,
+ 792
+ ],
+ "discarded_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 27,
+ 308,
+ 37
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 25,
+ 309,
+ 39
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 25,
+ 309,
+ 39
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2022",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 302,
+ 751,
+ 308,
+ 759
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 302,
+ 751,
+ 309,
+ 762
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 302,
+ 751,
+ 309,
+ 762
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "9",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "para_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 203
+ ],
+ "lines": [],
+ "index": 5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 83,
+ 506,
+ 206
+ ],
+ "lines_deleted": true
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 209,
+ 505,
+ 275
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 209,
+ 505,
+ 221
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 209,
+ 505,
+ 221
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "We extend the application of the derivative term to the UAP attack, while still not considering the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 219,
+ 503,
+ 233
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 219,
+ 497,
+ 233
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "propagation model (Case 1). Figure 1 shows a comparison in performance for different values of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 498,
+ 222,
+ 503,
+ 230
+ ],
+ "score": 0.59,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 230,
+ 505,
+ 243
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 230,
+ 290,
+ 243
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "The saturation in ASR is reached with higher",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 290,
+ 233,
+ 296,
+ 241
+ ],
+ "score": 0.59,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 296,
+ 230,
+ 316,
+ 243
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", i.e.,",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 317,
+ 231,
+ 349,
+ 241
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "9 9 . 9 4 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 349,
+ 230,
+ 370,
+ 243
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 370,
+ 231,
+ 397,
+ 241
+ ],
+ "score": 0.64,
+ "content": "5 0 \\mathrm { m V } .",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 397,
+ 230,
+ 505,
+ 243
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". This is expected since the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 241,
+ 506,
+ 254
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 241,
+ 506,
+ 254
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "UAP is a more difficult attack where a single set of perturbations per EEG channel is generated for",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 252,
+ 506,
+ 265
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 252,
+ 506,
+ 265
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "all the test samples. Likewise in PGD, the ASR does not drop with the addition of the derivative term.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 263,
+ 500,
+ 276
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 263,
+ 500,
+ 276
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "We reproduce the UAP proposed by (Liu et al., 2021). Our UAP consistently reaches higher ASR.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 104,
+ 209,
+ 506,
+ 276
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 290,
+ 505,
+ 444
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 290,
+ 505,
+ 303
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 290,
+ 505,
+ 303
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Spatial Propagation. Finally, we introduce the spatial constraints in the signal propagation over the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 301,
+ 505,
+ 314
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 301,
+ 505,
+ 314
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "scalp (Case 2). We consider 9 different scenarios by combining 3 realistic attenuation configurations",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 309,
+ 506,
+ 327
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 312,
+ 177,
+ 324
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m } \\ \\in \\ \\{ 1 , 5 , 1 5 \\}",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 178,
+ 309,
+ 299,
+ 327
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with 3 delay configurations",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 299,
+ 312,
+ 395,
+ 324
+ ],
+ "score": 0.93,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d } \\ \\in \\ \\{ 0 . 1 , 0 . 3 , 0 . 5 6 3 \\}",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 396,
+ 309,
+ 506,
+ 327
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", which capture the range",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 322,
+ 505,
+ 336
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 322,
+ 505,
+ 336
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "described in Section 3.2. For evaluating the highest achievable attack efficiency, we test a scenario",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 334,
+ 506,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 334,
+ 506,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "where the attacker is assumed to know the propagation model: the adversarial perturbation is generated",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 344,
+ 505,
+ 358
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 344,
+ 272,
+ 358
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and evaluated on fixed spatial parameters",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 272,
+ 345,
+ 287,
+ 356
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 287,
+ 344,
+ 304,
+ 358
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 305,
+ 345,
+ 317,
+ 356
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 317,
+ 344,
+ 505,
+ 358
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", shown in Figure 4, where the ASR reaches up",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 355,
+ 506,
+ 368
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 355,
+ 116,
+ 368
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 117,
+ 356,
+ 143,
+ 366
+ ],
+ "score": 0.87,
+ "content": "6 9 . 2 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 144,
+ 355,
+ 202,
+ 368
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with PGD and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 202,
+ 356,
+ 228,
+ 366
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "4 5 . 6 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 229,
+ 355,
+ 280,
+ 368
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with UAP at",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 280,
+ 356,
+ 306,
+ 366
+ ],
+ "score": 0.61,
+ "content": "5 0 \\mathrm { m V } .",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 306,
+ 355,
+ 506,
+ 368
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 3 depicts an example of a successful attack",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 367,
+ 506,
+ 380
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 367,
+ 506,
+ 380
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with the highest perturbation amplitude. The introduction of the spatial constraints makes the attack",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 377,
+ 506,
+ 390
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 377,
+ 506,
+ 390
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "problem harder yielding seldom square distortions. However, the resulting EEG signals still resemble",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 388,
+ 506,
+ 403
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 388,
+ 506,
+ 403
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "physiological random processes typical of EEGs. Next, we ablate the spatial constraints during",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 399,
+ 506,
+ 413
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 399,
+ 506,
+ 413
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "generation and test the resulting perturbations on the 9 above-mentioned scenarios (Case 3). The",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 410,
+ 505,
+ 423
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 410,
+ 263,
+ 423
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "ASR drops significantly, especially for",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 264,
+ 411,
+ 289,
+ 422
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m } { = } 5",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 290,
+ 410,
+ 307,
+ 423
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 307,
+ 411,
+ 338,
+ 422
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m } { = } 1 5",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 338,
+ 410,
+ 505,
+ 423
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "where the attenuation of the perturbation",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 421,
+ 506,
+ 434
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 421,
+ 506,
+ 434
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "over the scalp is greater (see Figure 7), and with the global UAP attack, where the attacker does not",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 433,
+ 270,
+ 445
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 433,
+ 270,
+ 445
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "have access to the attacked EEG signals.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 290,
+ 506,
+ 445
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 450,
+ 505,
+ 538
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 450,
+ 506,
+ 462
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 450,
+ 506,
+ 462
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Our spatial propagation models allows us to identify the vulnerability of the individual EEG channels.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 460,
+ 505,
+ 473
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 460,
+ 505,
+ 473
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 5 shows the ASR when initiating an attack from a specific channel (T9, T10, etc.) and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 471,
+ 506,
+ 484
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 471,
+ 421,
+ 484
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "propagating it to the rest of the head. In the case with the greatest attenuation",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 421,
+ 472,
+ 455,
+ 483
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "\\left( \\lambda _ { m } = 1 5 \\right)",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 456,
+ 471,
+ 506,
+ 484
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "we find the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 482,
+ 505,
+ 495
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 482,
+ 235,
+ 495
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "maximum ASR at the electrode",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 235,
+ 483,
+ 248,
+ 493
+ ],
+ "score": 0.6,
+ "content": "\\mathbf { C } \\mathbf { z }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 249,
+ 482,
+ 505,
+ 495
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "between the regions of the electrodes C3 and C4, which are the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 493,
+ 505,
+ 505
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 493,
+ 505,
+ 505
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "most relevant ones for MI of the left and right hand tasks (Pfurtscheller & Lopes da Silva, 1999). We",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 504,
+ 506,
+ 516
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 504,
+ 506,
+ 516
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "compute the pre- and post-attack confusion matrices for attacks from T9 and T10 (see Appendix E).",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 515,
+ 505,
+ 528
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 515,
+ 505,
+ 528
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "When the attack propagates from the left side (T9), more samples with ground-truth label “right” can",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 527,
+ 483,
+ 538
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 527,
+ 483,
+ 538
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "be fooled to “rest”, while the attacks from the right side (T10) are more effective “left” labels.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 450,
+ 506,
+ 538
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 543,
+ 505,
+ 587
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 542,
+ 505,
+ 556
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 542,
+ 505,
+ 556
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Overall, our methods successfully generates perturbations resembling natural noise in EEGs, that can",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 554,
+ 506,
+ 567
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 554,
+ 506,
+ 567
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "be added at the source of the signal acquisition and are propagated over the scalp, creating attacked",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 566,
+ 505,
+ 578
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 566,
+ 505,
+ 578
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "signals that are physiologically plausible. Similar results have been observed on the BCI Competition",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 576,
+ 255,
+ 587
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 576,
+ 255,
+ 587
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "IV-2a dataset, shown in Appendix C.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 542,
+ 506,
+ 587
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 606,
+ 195,
+ 619
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 605,
+ 197,
+ 622
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 605,
+ 197,
+ 622
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "5 CONCLUSION",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 632,
+ 506,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 633,
+ 505,
+ 645
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 633,
+ 505,
+ 645
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "With the incentive of improving security in BCIs, in this work, we demonstrated that DoS attacks",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 644,
+ 505,
+ 656
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 644,
+ 505,
+ 656
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "are feasible and effective despite physical domain constraints. Experimental results reveal potential",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 45
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 655,
+ 506,
+ 667
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 655,
+ 506,
+ 667
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "risks of realistic attacks on smart wearable BCIs and incentivize the need for future development of",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 46
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 665,
+ 506,
+ 678
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 665,
+ 506,
+ 678
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "defense mechanisms while designing deep learning models to be embedded in smart wearable BCIs.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 47
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 676,
+ 506,
+ 690
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 676,
+ 506,
+ 690
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Our detailed analysis on each EEG channel shows that special attention has to be paid, combined",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 48
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 688,
+ 506,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 688,
+ 506,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with the findings in neuroscience, to the brain regions that are found responsible for a specific task.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 49
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 699,
+ 506,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 699,
+ 506,
+ 712
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "In future work, the proposed attacks can cover uncertainty in the propagation model and the timing of",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 50
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 710,
+ 505,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 710,
+ 505,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the MI activity. Moreover, hardware implementations of such attacks can be created to evaluate the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 51
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 721,
+ 494,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 721,
+ 494,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "proposed methods in real-world, with the ultimate goal of developing effective countermeasures.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 52
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 48,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 633,
+ 506,
+ 733
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "preproc_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 82,
+ 194,
+ 93
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 82,
+ 195,
+ 94
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 82,
+ 195,
+ 94
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "ETHICS STATEMENT",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 102,
+ 505,
+ 201
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 101,
+ 506,
+ 115
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 101,
+ 506,
+ 115
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "The sore goal of this work is to raise awareness of potential adversarial attacks in BCIs and incentivize",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 113,
+ 505,
+ 125
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 113,
+ 505,
+ 125
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the development of coutermeasures, especially in the current moment when the BCIs are facing an",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 124,
+ 505,
+ 136
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 124,
+ 505,
+ 136
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "increasing growth in applications of everyday life. The active development of smart wearable BCIs is",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 135,
+ 507,
+ 147
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 135,
+ 507,
+ 147
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "introducing a paradigm shift where the processing algorithms are embedded near the data acquisition.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 146,
+ 506,
+ 159
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 146,
+ 506,
+ 159
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "While this improves the system security to a certain extend, with this work we have shown that it is",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 156,
+ 506,
+ 169
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 156,
+ 506,
+ 169
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "not the only and ultimate way to a safe and reliable BCI, since we have shown that BCI systems are",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 168,
+ 505,
+ 180
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 168,
+ 505,
+ 180
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "vulnerable also to attacks at the signals’ source. We hope that our work sheds light on the fact that",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 178,
+ 506,
+ 191
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 178,
+ 506,
+ 191
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "practical BCI systems are vulnerable, despite the physical constraints, and motivates the design and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 190,
+ 325,
+ 203
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 190,
+ 325,
+ 203
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "development of more reliable and robust BCI systems.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 214,
+ 184,
+ 225
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 214,
+ 185,
+ 226
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 214,
+ 185,
+ 226
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "REPRODUCIBLITY",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 233,
+ 504,
+ 255
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 231,
+ 506,
+ 248
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 231,
+ 506,
+ 248
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "A link to a anonymous downloadable source code of this work is submitted as supplementary",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 244,
+ 149,
+ 256
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 244,
+ 149,
+ 256
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "materials.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 272,
+ 175,
+ 285
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 272,
+ 176,
+ 286
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 272,
+ 176,
+ 286
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "REFERENCES",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 292,
+ 384,
+ 303
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 290,
+ 385,
+ 306
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 290,
+ 385,
+ 306
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "BCI2000: A general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 312,
+ 505,
+ 334
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 311,
+ 506,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 311,
+ 506,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Ayten Ozge Akmandor and Niraj K. Jha. Smart health care: An edge-side computing perspective.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 322,
+ 349,
+ 335
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 322,
+ 349,
+ 335
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 7(1):29–37, 2018.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 342,
+ 504,
+ 366
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 342,
+ 504,
+ 355
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 342,
+ 504,
+ 355
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Ralph Algazi, Carlos Avendano, and Richard O Duda. Estimation of a spherical-head model from",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 353,
+ 293,
+ 366
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 353,
+ 293,
+ 366
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "anthropometry. J. Aud. Eng. Soc., 49, 2001.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 373,
+ 503,
+ 396
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 373,
+ 505,
+ 386
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 373,
+ 505,
+ 386
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Pietro Aricò, Nicolina Sciaraffa, and Fabio Babiloni. Brain–computer interfaces: Toward a daily life",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 385,
+ 288,
+ 397
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 385,
+ 288,
+ 397
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "employment. Brain Sciences, 10(3), 2020.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 404,
+ 506,
+ 439
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 405,
+ 505,
+ 417
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 405,
+ 505,
+ 417
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Aamir Arsalan, Muhammad Majid, Amna Rauf Butt, and Syed Muhammad Anwar. Classification",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 415,
+ 506,
+ 429
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 415,
+ 506,
+ 429
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "of perceived mental stress using a commercially available EEG headband. IEEE Journal of",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 427,
+ 361,
+ 439
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 427,
+ 361,
+ 439
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Biomedical and Health Informatics, 23(6):2257–2264, 2019.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 446,
+ 505,
+ 481
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 446,
+ 505,
+ 459
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 446,
+ 505,
+ 459
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Christopher Beach, Ertan Balaban, and Alexander J. Casson. Chapter 14 - edge algorithms for",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 458,
+ 505,
+ 470
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 458,
+ 505,
+ 470
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "wearables: an overview of a truly multi-disciplinary problem. In Edward Sazonov (ed.), Wearable",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 469,
+ 497,
+ 481
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 469,
+ 497,
+ 481
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Sensors (Second Edition), pp. 379–414. Academic Press, Oxford, second edition edition, 2021.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 488,
+ 504,
+ 523
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 488,
+ 505,
+ 501
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 488,
+ 505,
+ 501
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Kais Belwafi, Olivier Romain, Sofien Gannouni, Fakhreddine Ghaffari, Ridha Djemal, and Bouraoui",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 500,
+ 506,
+ 513
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 500,
+ 506,
+ 513
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Ouni. An embedded implementation based on adaptive filter bank for brain–computer interface",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 511,
+ 318,
+ 523
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 511,
+ 318,
+ 523
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "systems. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2018.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 530,
+ 506,
+ 564
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 529,
+ 506,
+ 544
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 529,
+ 506,
+ 544
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Sergio López Bernal, Alberto Huertas Celdrán, Gregorio Martínez Pérez, Michael Taynnan Barros,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 542,
+ 506,
+ 554
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 542,
+ 506,
+ 554
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and Sasitharan Balasubramaniam. Security in brain-computer interfaces: State-of-the-art,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 552,
+ 436,
+ 565
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 552,
+ 436,
+ 565
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "opportunities, and future challenges. ACM Comput. Surv., 54(1), January 2021.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 572,
+ 506,
+ 617
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 572,
+ 506,
+ 585
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 572,
+ 506,
+ 585
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Florian C. A. A. Bodranghien, Margot Langlois Mahe, Serge Clément, and Mario U. Manto. A pilot",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 582,
+ 506,
+ 597
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 582,
+ 506,
+ 597
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "study on the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on brain rhythms and entropy during",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 595,
+ 507,
+ 608
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 595,
+ 507,
+ 608
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "self-paced finger movement using the Epoc helmet. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11:201,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 604,
+ 143,
+ 617
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 604,
+ 143,
+ 617
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2017.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 625,
+ 506,
+ 670
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 626,
+ 506,
+ 639
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 626,
+ 506,
+ 639
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Jonathan S. Brumberg, Jeremy D. Burnison, and Kevin M. Pitt. Using motor imagery to control",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 636,
+ 506,
+ 649
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 636,
+ 506,
+ 649
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "brain-computer interfaces for communication. In Dylan D. Schmorrow and Cali M. Fidopiastis",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 647,
+ 507,
+ 662
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 647,
+ 507,
+ 662
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(eds.), Foundations of Augmented Cognition: Neuroergonomics and Operational Neuroscience, pp.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 658,
+ 337,
+ 672
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 658,
+ 337,
+ 672
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "14–25, Cham, 2016. Springer International Publishing.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 678,
+ 505,
+ 701
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 678,
+ 505,
+ 691
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 678,
+ 505,
+ 691
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "C Brunner, R Leeb, G R Müller-Putz, A Schlögl, and G Pfurtscheller. BCI competition 2008 - Graz",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 688,
+ 492,
+ 702
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 688,
+ 492,
+ 702
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "data set A, 2008. URL http://bnci-horizon-2020.eu/database/data-sets.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 709,
+ 504,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 709,
+ 505,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 709,
+ 505,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Ujwal Chaudhary, Niels Birbaumer, and Ander Ramos-Murguialday. Brain–computer interfaces for",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 720,
+ 420,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 720,
+ 420,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "communication and rehabilitation. Nature Reviews Neurology, 12, 08 2016.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "page_idx": 9,
+ "page_size": [
+ 612,
+ 792
+ ],
+ "discarded_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 27,
+ 308,
+ 37
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 25,
+ 308,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 25,
+ 308,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2022",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 300,
+ 751,
+ 311,
+ 760
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 299,
+ 750,
+ 312,
+ 764
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 299,
+ 750,
+ 312,
+ 764
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "10",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "para_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 82,
+ 194,
+ 93
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 82,
+ 195,
+ 94
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 82,
+ 195,
+ 94
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "ETHICS STATEMENT",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 102,
+ 505,
+ 201
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 101,
+ 506,
+ 115
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 101,
+ 506,
+ 115
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "The sore goal of this work is to raise awareness of potential adversarial attacks in BCIs and incentivize",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 113,
+ 505,
+ 125
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 113,
+ 505,
+ 125
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the development of coutermeasures, especially in the current moment when the BCIs are facing an",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 124,
+ 505,
+ 136
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 124,
+ 505,
+ 136
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "increasing growth in applications of everyday life. The active development of smart wearable BCIs is",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 135,
+ 507,
+ 147
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 135,
+ 507,
+ 147
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "introducing a paradigm shift where the processing algorithms are embedded near the data acquisition.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 146,
+ 506,
+ 159
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 146,
+ 506,
+ 159
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "While this improves the system security to a certain extend, with this work we have shown that it is",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 156,
+ 506,
+ 169
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 156,
+ 506,
+ 169
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "not the only and ultimate way to a safe and reliable BCI, since we have shown that BCI systems are",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 168,
+ 505,
+ 180
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 168,
+ 505,
+ 180
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "vulnerable also to attacks at the signals’ source. We hope that our work sheds light on the fact that",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 178,
+ 506,
+ 191
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 178,
+ 506,
+ 191
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "practical BCI systems are vulnerable, despite the physical constraints, and motivates the design and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 190,
+ 325,
+ 203
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 190,
+ 325,
+ 203
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "development of more reliable and robust BCI systems.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 101,
+ 507,
+ 203
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 214,
+ 184,
+ 225
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 214,
+ 185,
+ 226
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 214,
+ 185,
+ 226
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "REPRODUCIBLITY",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 233,
+ 504,
+ 255
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 231,
+ 506,
+ 248
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 231,
+ 506,
+ 248
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "A link to a anonymous downloadable source code of this work is submitted as supplementary",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 244,
+ 149,
+ 256
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 244,
+ 149,
+ 256
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "materials.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 104,
+ 231,
+ 506,
+ 256
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 272,
+ 175,
+ 285
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 272,
+ 176,
+ 286
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 272,
+ 176,
+ 286
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "REFERENCES",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 292,
+ 384,
+ 303
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 290,
+ 385,
+ 306
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 290,
+ 385,
+ 306
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "BCI2000: A general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 290,
+ 385,
+ 306
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 312,
+ 505,
+ 334
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 311,
+ 506,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 311,
+ 506,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Ayten Ozge Akmandor and Niraj K. Jha. Smart health care: An edge-side computing perspective.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 322,
+ 349,
+ 335
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 322,
+ 349,
+ 335
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 7(1):29–37, 2018.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 311,
+ 506,
+ 335
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 342,
+ 504,
+ 366
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 342,
+ 504,
+ 355
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 342,
+ 504,
+ 355
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Ralph Algazi, Carlos Avendano, and Richard O Duda. Estimation of a spherical-head model from",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 353,
+ 293,
+ 366
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 353,
+ 293,
+ 366
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "anthropometry. J. Aud. Eng. Soc., 49, 2001.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 342,
+ 504,
+ 366
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 373,
+ 503,
+ 396
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 373,
+ 505,
+ 386
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 373,
+ 505,
+ 386
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Pietro Aricò, Nicolina Sciaraffa, and Fabio Babiloni. Brain–computer interfaces: Toward a daily life",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 385,
+ 288,
+ 397
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 385,
+ 288,
+ 397
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "employment. Brain Sciences, 10(3), 2020.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 373,
+ 505,
+ 397
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 404,
+ 506,
+ 439
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 405,
+ 505,
+ 417
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 405,
+ 505,
+ 417
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Aamir Arsalan, Muhammad Majid, Amna Rauf Butt, and Syed Muhammad Anwar. Classification",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 415,
+ 506,
+ 429
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 415,
+ 506,
+ 429
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "of perceived mental stress using a commercially available EEG headband. IEEE Journal of",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 427,
+ 361,
+ 439
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 427,
+ 361,
+ 439
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Biomedical and Health Informatics, 23(6):2257–2264, 2019.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 405,
+ 506,
+ 439
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 446,
+ 505,
+ 481
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 446,
+ 505,
+ 459
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 446,
+ 505,
+ 459
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Christopher Beach, Ertan Balaban, and Alexander J. Casson. Chapter 14 - edge algorithms for",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 458,
+ 505,
+ 470
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 458,
+ 505,
+ 470
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "wearables: an overview of a truly multi-disciplinary problem. In Edward Sazonov (ed.), Wearable",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 469,
+ 497,
+ 481
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 469,
+ 497,
+ 481
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Sensors (Second Edition), pp. 379–414. Academic Press, Oxford, second edition edition, 2021.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 446,
+ 505,
+ 481
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 488,
+ 504,
+ 523
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 488,
+ 505,
+ 501
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 488,
+ 505,
+ 501
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Kais Belwafi, Olivier Romain, Sofien Gannouni, Fakhreddine Ghaffari, Ridha Djemal, and Bouraoui",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 500,
+ 506,
+ 513
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 500,
+ 506,
+ 513
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Ouni. An embedded implementation based on adaptive filter bank for brain–computer interface",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 511,
+ 318,
+ 523
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 511,
+ 318,
+ 523
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "systems. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2018.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 488,
+ 506,
+ 523
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 530,
+ 506,
+ 564
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 529,
+ 506,
+ 544
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 529,
+ 506,
+ 544
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Sergio López Bernal, Alberto Huertas Celdrán, Gregorio Martínez Pérez, Michael Taynnan Barros,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 542,
+ 506,
+ 554
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 542,
+ 506,
+ 554
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and Sasitharan Balasubramaniam. Security in brain-computer interfaces: State-of-the-art,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 552,
+ 436,
+ 565
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 552,
+ 436,
+ 565
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "opportunities, and future challenges. ACM Comput. Surv., 54(1), January 2021.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 529,
+ 506,
+ 565
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 572,
+ 506,
+ 617
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 572,
+ 506,
+ 585
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 572,
+ 506,
+ 585
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Florian C. A. A. Bodranghien, Margot Langlois Mahe, Serge Clément, and Mario U. Manto. A pilot",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 582,
+ 506,
+ 597
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 582,
+ 506,
+ 597
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "study on the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on brain rhythms and entropy during",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 595,
+ 507,
+ 608
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 595,
+ 507,
+ 608
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "self-paced finger movement using the Epoc helmet. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11:201,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 604,
+ 143,
+ 617
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 604,
+ 143,
+ 617
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2017.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 572,
+ 507,
+ 617
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 625,
+ 506,
+ 670
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 626,
+ 506,
+ 639
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 626,
+ 506,
+ 639
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Jonathan S. Brumberg, Jeremy D. Burnison, and Kevin M. Pitt. Using motor imagery to control",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 636,
+ 506,
+ 649
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 636,
+ 506,
+ 649
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "brain-computer interfaces for communication. In Dylan D. Schmorrow and Cali M. Fidopiastis",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 647,
+ 507,
+ 662
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 647,
+ 507,
+ 662
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(eds.), Foundations of Augmented Cognition: Neuroergonomics and Operational Neuroscience, pp.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 658,
+ 337,
+ 672
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 658,
+ 337,
+ 672
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "14–25, Cham, 2016. Springer International Publishing.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 626,
+ 507,
+ 672
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 678,
+ 505,
+ 701
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 678,
+ 505,
+ 691
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 678,
+ 505,
+ 691
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "C Brunner, R Leeb, G R Müller-Putz, A Schlögl, and G Pfurtscheller. BCI competition 2008 - Graz",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 688,
+ 492,
+ 702
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 688,
+ 492,
+ 702
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "data set A, 2008. URL http://bnci-horizon-2020.eu/database/data-sets.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 678,
+ 505,
+ 702
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 709,
+ 504,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 709,
+ 505,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 709,
+ 505,
+ 722
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Ujwal Chaudhary, Niels Birbaumer, and Ander Ramos-Murguialday. Brain–computer interfaces for",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 720,
+ 420,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 720,
+ 420,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "communication and rehabilitation. Nature Reviews Neurology, 12, 08 2016.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 709,
+ 505,
+ 733
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "preproc_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 82,
+ 504,
+ 116
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 80,
+ 505,
+ 97
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 80,
+ 505,
+ 97
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Hauke Dose, Jakob S. Moller, Sadasivan Puthusserypady, and Helle K. Iversen. A deep learning",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 92,
+ 505,
+ 107
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 92,
+ 505,
+ 107
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "MI - EEG classification model for BCIs. In 2018 26th European Signal Processing Conference",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 104,
+ 285,
+ 117
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 104,
+ 285,
+ 117
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(EUSIPCO), pp. 1676–1679. IEEE, 2018.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 122,
+ 504,
+ 145
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 122,
+ 506,
+ 135
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 122,
+ 506,
+ 135
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Anirban Dutta. Brain–computer interface spellers for communication: Why we need to address their",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 134,
+ 354,
+ 146
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 134,
+ 354,
+ 146
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "security and authenticity. Brain Sciences, 10:139, 03 2020.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 151,
+ 504,
+ 175
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 149,
+ 507,
+ 166
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 149,
+ 507,
+ 166
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Daniel Elstob and Emanuele Secco. A low cost EEG based BCI prosthetic using motor imagery.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 162,
+ 498,
+ 175
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 162,
+ 498,
+ 175
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "International Journal of Information Technology Convergence and Services, 6:23–36, 02 2016.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 180,
+ 504,
+ 214
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 180,
+ 505,
+ 193
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 180,
+ 505,
+ 193
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Anna Fertonani, Clarissa Ferrari, and Carlo Miniussi. What do you feel if I apply transcranial electric",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 191,
+ 506,
+ 205
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 191,
+ 506,
+ 205
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "stimulation? Safety, sensations and secondary induced effects. Clinical Neurophysiology, 126(11):",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 203,
+ 191,
+ 214
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 203,
+ 191,
+ 214
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2181–2188, 2015.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 220,
+ 505,
+ 244
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 221,
+ 506,
+ 233
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 221,
+ 506,
+ 233
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Samuel G. Finlayson, John D. Bowers, Joichi Ito, Jonathan L. Zittrain, Andrew L. Beam, and Isaac S.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 232,
+ 506,
+ 244
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 232,
+ 506,
+ 244
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Kohane. Adversarial attacks on medical machine learning. Science, 363(6433):1287–1289, 2019.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 250,
+ 505,
+ 273
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 250,
+ 506,
+ 263
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 250,
+ 506,
+ 263
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Flowneuroscience. Flow tDCS device. https://flowneuroscience.com/, 2021. Accessed:",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 260,
+ 169,
+ 272
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 260,
+ 169,
+ 272
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2021-05-27.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 279,
+ 505,
+ 302
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 279,
+ 505,
+ 293
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 279,
+ 505,
+ 293
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Daniel Freer and Guang-Zhong Yang. Data augmentation for self-paced motor imagery classification",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 290,
+ 359,
+ 303
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 290,
+ 359,
+ 303
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with C-LSTM. Journal of Neural Engineering, 17, 01 2020.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 307,
+ 505,
+ 353
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 309,
+ 505,
+ 321
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 309,
+ 505,
+ 321
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Ary L Goldberger, Luis A N Amaral, Leon Glass, Jeffrey M Hausdorff, Plamen Ch Ivanov, Roger G",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 318,
+ 507,
+ 332
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 318,
+ 507,
+ 332
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Mark, Joseph E Mietus, George B Moody, Chung-Kang Peng, and H Eugene Stanley. PhysioBank,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 330,
+ 505,
+ 344
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 330,
+ 505,
+ 344
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 341,
+ 307,
+ 354
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 341,
+ 307,
+ 354
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "signals. circulation, 101(23):e215–e220, 2000.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 359,
+ 504,
+ 383
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 358,
+ 505,
+ 372
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 358,
+ 505,
+ 372
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Ian J. Goodfellow, Jonathon Shlens, and Christian Szegedy. Explaining and harnessing adversarial",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 370,
+ 470,
+ 383
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 370,
+ 470,
+ 383
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "examples. In Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR, 2015.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 388,
+ 505,
+ 422
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 387,
+ 505,
+ 402
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 387,
+ 505,
+ 402
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Xintian Han, Yuxuan Hu, Luca Foschini, Larry Chinitz, Lior Jankelson, and Rajesh Ranganath. Deep",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 399,
+ 505,
+ 411
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 399,
+ 505,
+ 411
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "learning models for electrocardiograms are susceptible to adversarial attack. Nature medicine, 26",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 410,
+ 195,
+ 422
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 410,
+ 195,
+ 422
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(3):360–363, 2020.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 428,
+ 504,
+ 462
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 428,
+ 506,
+ 442
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 428,
+ 506,
+ 442
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Xue Jiang, Xiao Zhang, and Dongrui Wu. Active learning for black-box adversarial attacks in EEG-",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 440,
+ 505,
+ 452
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 440,
+ 505,
+ 452
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "based brain-computer interfaces. In 2019 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 451,
+ 227,
+ 463
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 451,
+ 227,
+ 463
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(SSCI), pp. 361–368, 2019.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 468,
+ 505,
+ 492
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 468,
+ 505,
+ 481
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 468,
+ 505,
+ 481
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Mandar Karlekar and Anubha Gupta. Stochastic modeling of EEG rhythms with fractional gaussian",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 480,
+ 506,
+ 492
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 480,
+ 506,
+ 492
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "noise. In 2014 22nd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), pp. 2520–2524, 2014.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 497,
+ 505,
+ 542
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 498,
+ 505,
+ 510
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 498,
+ 505,
+ 510
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Victor Kartsch, Giuseppe Tagliavini, Marco Guermandi, Simone Benatti, Davide Rossi, and Luca",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 509,
+ 506,
+ 522
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 509,
+ 506,
+ 522
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Benini. Biowolf: A sub-10-mW 8-channel advanced brain–computer interface platform with a",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 520,
+ 506,
+ 532
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 520,
+ 506,
+ 532
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "nine-core processor and BLE connectivity. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 531,
+ 205,
+ 543
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 531,
+ 205,
+ 543
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "13(5):893–906, 2019.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 548,
+ 505,
+ 583
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 548,
+ 506,
+ 562
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 548,
+ 506,
+ 562
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Min Kim, Youngchang Cho, Suk-Tae Seo, Chang-Sik Son, Hee-Joon Park, and Yoon-Nyun Kim.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 560,
+ 504,
+ 573
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 560,
+ 504,
+ 573
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "A new method for non-invasive measurement of skin in the low frequency range. Healthcare",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 571,
+ 283,
+ 583
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 571,
+ 283,
+ 583
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "informatics research, 16:143–8, 09 2010.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 588,
+ 505,
+ 612
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 588,
+ 506,
+ 601
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 588,
+ 506,
+ 601
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Alexey Kurakin, Ian J. Goodfellow, and Samy Bengio. Adversarial examples in the physical world.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 600,
+ 213,
+ 611
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 600,
+ 213,
+ 611
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "CoRR, abs/1607.02533.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 618,
+ 505,
+ 653
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 618,
+ 505,
+ 631
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 618,
+ 505,
+ 631
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Vernon J Lawhern, Amelia J Solon, Nicholas R Waytowich, Stephen M Gordon, Chou P Hung, and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 629,
+ 505,
+ 642
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 629,
+ 505,
+ 642
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Brent J Lance. EEGNet: a compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain–computer",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 640,
+ 381,
+ 653
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 640,
+ 381,
+ 653
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "interfaces. Journal of Neural Engineering, 15(5):056013, 7 2018.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 658,
+ 504,
+ 692
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 658,
+ 505,
+ 671
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 658,
+ 505,
+ 671
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Jinfeng Li, Shouling Ji, Tianyu Du, Bo Li, and Ting Wang. Textbugger: Generating adversarial text",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 669,
+ 506,
+ 683
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 669,
+ 506,
+ 683
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "against real-world applications. In Proc. Network and Distributed System Security Symposium,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 681,
+ 260,
+ 693
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 681,
+ 260,
+ 693
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "NDSS. The Internet Society, 2019a.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 698,
+ 505,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 699,
+ 505,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 699,
+ 505,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Juncheng Li, Shuhui Qu, Xinjian Li, Joseph Szurley, J. Zico Kolter, and Florian Metze. Adversarial",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 45
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 117,
+ 710,
+ 504,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 117,
+ 710,
+ 504,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "music: Real world audio adversary against wake-word detection system. In Proc. Neural",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 46
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 720,
+ 398,
+ 734
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 720,
+ 398,
+ 734
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), pp. 11908–11918, 2019b.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 47
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 46
+ }
+ ],
+ "page_idx": 10,
+ "page_size": [
+ 612,
+ 792
+ ],
+ "discarded_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 300,
+ 751,
+ 310,
+ 760
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 299,
+ 750,
+ 312,
+ 765
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 299,
+ 750,
+ 312,
+ 765
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "",
+ "type": "text",
+ "height": 15,
+ "width": 13
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 27,
+ 308,
+ 37
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 26,
+ 308,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 26,
+ 308,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2022",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "para_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 82,
+ 504,
+ 116
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 80,
+ 505,
+ 97
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 80,
+ 505,
+ 97
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Hauke Dose, Jakob S. Moller, Sadasivan Puthusserypady, and Helle K. Iversen. A deep learning",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 92,
+ 505,
+ 107
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 92,
+ 505,
+ 107
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "MI - EEG classification model for BCIs. In 2018 26th European Signal Processing Conference",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 104,
+ 285,
+ 117
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 104,
+ 285,
+ 117
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(EUSIPCO), pp. 1676–1679. IEEE, 2018.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 104,
+ 80,
+ 505,
+ 117
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 122,
+ 504,
+ 145
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 122,
+ 506,
+ 135
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 122,
+ 506,
+ 135
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Anirban Dutta. Brain–computer interface spellers for communication: Why we need to address their",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 134,
+ 354,
+ 146
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 134,
+ 354,
+ 146
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "security and authenticity. Brain Sciences, 10:139, 03 2020.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 122,
+ 506,
+ 146
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 151,
+ 504,
+ 175
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 149,
+ 507,
+ 166
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 149,
+ 507,
+ 166
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Daniel Elstob and Emanuele Secco. A low cost EEG based BCI prosthetic using motor imagery.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 162,
+ 498,
+ 175
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 162,
+ 498,
+ 175
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "International Journal of Information Technology Convergence and Services, 6:23–36, 02 2016.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 149,
+ 507,
+ 175
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 180,
+ 504,
+ 214
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 180,
+ 505,
+ 193
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 180,
+ 505,
+ 193
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Anna Fertonani, Clarissa Ferrari, and Carlo Miniussi. What do you feel if I apply transcranial electric",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 191,
+ 506,
+ 205
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 191,
+ 506,
+ 205
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "stimulation? Safety, sensations and secondary induced effects. Clinical Neurophysiology, 126(11):",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 203,
+ 191,
+ 214
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 203,
+ 191,
+ 214
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2181–2188, 2015.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 180,
+ 506,
+ 214
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 220,
+ 505,
+ 244
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 221,
+ 506,
+ 233
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 221,
+ 506,
+ 233
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Samuel G. Finlayson, John D. Bowers, Joichi Ito, Jonathan L. Zittrain, Andrew L. Beam, and Isaac S.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 232,
+ 506,
+ 244
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 232,
+ 506,
+ 244
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Kohane. Adversarial attacks on medical machine learning. Science, 363(6433):1287–1289, 2019.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 221,
+ 506,
+ 244
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 250,
+ 505,
+ 273
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 250,
+ 506,
+ 263
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 250,
+ 506,
+ 263
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Flowneuroscience. Flow tDCS device. https://flowneuroscience.com/, 2021. Accessed:",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 260,
+ 169,
+ 272
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 260,
+ 169,
+ 272
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2021-05-27.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 250,
+ 506,
+ 272
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 279,
+ 505,
+ 302
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 279,
+ 505,
+ 293
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 279,
+ 505,
+ 293
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Daniel Freer and Guang-Zhong Yang. Data augmentation for self-paced motor imagery classification",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 290,
+ 359,
+ 303
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 290,
+ 359,
+ 303
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with C-LSTM. Journal of Neural Engineering, 17, 01 2020.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 279,
+ 505,
+ 303
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 307,
+ 505,
+ 353
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 309,
+ 505,
+ 321
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 309,
+ 505,
+ 321
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Ary L Goldberger, Luis A N Amaral, Leon Glass, Jeffrey M Hausdorff, Plamen Ch Ivanov, Roger G",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 318,
+ 507,
+ 332
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 318,
+ 507,
+ 332
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Mark, Joseph E Mietus, George B Moody, Chung-Kang Peng, and H Eugene Stanley. PhysioBank,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 330,
+ 505,
+ 344
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 330,
+ 505,
+ 344
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 341,
+ 307,
+ 354
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 341,
+ 307,
+ 354
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "signals. circulation, 101(23):e215–e220, 2000.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 309,
+ 507,
+ 354
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 359,
+ 504,
+ 383
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 358,
+ 505,
+ 372
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 358,
+ 505,
+ 372
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Ian J. Goodfellow, Jonathon Shlens, and Christian Szegedy. Explaining and harnessing adversarial",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 370,
+ 470,
+ 383
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 370,
+ 470,
+ 383
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "examples. In Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR, 2015.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 358,
+ 505,
+ 383
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 388,
+ 505,
+ 422
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 387,
+ 505,
+ 402
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 387,
+ 505,
+ 402
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Xintian Han, Yuxuan Hu, Luca Foschini, Larry Chinitz, Lior Jankelson, and Rajesh Ranganath. Deep",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 399,
+ 505,
+ 411
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 399,
+ 505,
+ 411
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "learning models for electrocardiograms are susceptible to adversarial attack. Nature medicine, 26",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 410,
+ 195,
+ 422
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 410,
+ 195,
+ 422
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(3):360–363, 2020.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 387,
+ 505,
+ 422
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 428,
+ 504,
+ 462
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 428,
+ 506,
+ 442
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 428,
+ 506,
+ 442
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Xue Jiang, Xiao Zhang, and Dongrui Wu. Active learning for black-box adversarial attacks in EEG-",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 440,
+ 505,
+ 452
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 440,
+ 505,
+ 452
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "based brain-computer interfaces. In 2019 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 451,
+ 227,
+ 463
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 451,
+ 227,
+ 463
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(SSCI), pp. 361–368, 2019.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 428,
+ 506,
+ 463
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 468,
+ 505,
+ 492
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 468,
+ 505,
+ 481
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 468,
+ 505,
+ 481
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Mandar Karlekar and Anubha Gupta. Stochastic modeling of EEG rhythms with fractional gaussian",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 480,
+ 506,
+ 492
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 480,
+ 506,
+ 492
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "noise. In 2014 22nd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), pp. 2520–2524, 2014.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 468,
+ 506,
+ 492
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 497,
+ 505,
+ 542
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 498,
+ 505,
+ 510
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 498,
+ 505,
+ 510
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Victor Kartsch, Giuseppe Tagliavini, Marco Guermandi, Simone Benatti, Davide Rossi, and Luca",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 509,
+ 506,
+ 522
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 509,
+ 506,
+ 522
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Benini. Biowolf: A sub-10-mW 8-channel advanced brain–computer interface platform with a",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 520,
+ 506,
+ 532
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 520,
+ 506,
+ 532
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "nine-core processor and BLE connectivity. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 531,
+ 205,
+ 543
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 531,
+ 205,
+ 543
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "13(5):893–906, 2019.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 498,
+ 506,
+ 543
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 548,
+ 505,
+ 583
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 548,
+ 506,
+ 562
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 548,
+ 506,
+ 562
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Min Kim, Youngchang Cho, Suk-Tae Seo, Chang-Sik Son, Hee-Joon Park, and Yoon-Nyun Kim.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 560,
+ 504,
+ 573
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 560,
+ 504,
+ 573
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "A new method for non-invasive measurement of skin in the low frequency range. Healthcare",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 571,
+ 283,
+ 583
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 571,
+ 283,
+ 583
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "informatics research, 16:143–8, 09 2010.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 548,
+ 506,
+ 583
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 588,
+ 505,
+ 612
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 588,
+ 506,
+ 601
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 588,
+ 506,
+ 601
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Alexey Kurakin, Ian J. Goodfellow, and Samy Bengio. Adversarial examples in the physical world.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 600,
+ 213,
+ 611
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 600,
+ 213,
+ 611
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "CoRR, abs/1607.02533.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 588,
+ 506,
+ 611
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 618,
+ 505,
+ 653
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 618,
+ 505,
+ 631
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 618,
+ 505,
+ 631
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Vernon J Lawhern, Amelia J Solon, Nicholas R Waytowich, Stephen M Gordon, Chou P Hung, and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 629,
+ 505,
+ 642
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 629,
+ 505,
+ 642
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Brent J Lance. EEGNet: a compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain–computer",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 640,
+ 381,
+ 653
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 640,
+ 381,
+ 653
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "interfaces. Journal of Neural Engineering, 15(5):056013, 7 2018.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 618,
+ 505,
+ 653
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 658,
+ 504,
+ 692
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 658,
+ 505,
+ 671
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 658,
+ 505,
+ 671
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Jinfeng Li, Shouling Ji, Tianyu Du, Bo Li, and Ting Wang. Textbugger: Generating adversarial text",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 669,
+ 506,
+ 683
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 669,
+ 506,
+ 683
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "against real-world applications. In Proc. Network and Distributed System Security Symposium,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 681,
+ 260,
+ 693
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 681,
+ 260,
+ 693
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "NDSS. The Internet Society, 2019a.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 658,
+ 506,
+ 693
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 698,
+ 505,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 699,
+ 505,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 699,
+ 505,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Juncheng Li, Shuhui Qu, Xinjian Li, Joseph Szurley, J. Zico Kolter, and Florian Metze. Adversarial",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 45
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 117,
+ 710,
+ 504,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 117,
+ 710,
+ 504,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "music: Real world audio adversary against wake-word detection system. In Proc. Neural",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 46
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 720,
+ 398,
+ 734
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 720,
+ 398,
+ 734
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), pp. 11908–11918, 2019b.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 47
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 46,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 699,
+ 505,
+ 734
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "preproc_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 82,
+ 504,
+ 105
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Zihan Liu, Lubin Meng, Xiao Zhang, Weili Fang, and Dongrui Wu. Universal adversarial",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 93,
+ 360,
+ 106
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 93,
+ 360,
+ 106
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "perturbations for CNN classifiers in EEG-based BCIs, 2021.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 113,
+ 504,
+ 147
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 113,
+ 505,
+ 126
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 113,
+ 505,
+ 126
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Aleksander Madry, Aleksandar Makelov, Ludwig Schmidt, Dimitris Tsipras, and Adrian Vladu.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 124,
+ 505,
+ 137
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 124,
+ 505,
+ 137
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Towards deep learning models resistant to adversarial attacks. In Proc. International Conference",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 136,
+ 293,
+ 147
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 136,
+ 293,
+ 147
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2018.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 155,
+ 506,
+ 189
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 155,
+ 505,
+ 167
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 155,
+ 505,
+ 167
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Alireza Malekmohammadi, Hoda Mohammadzade, Alireza Chamanzar, Mahdi Shabany, and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 166,
+ 505,
+ 178
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 166,
+ 505,
+ 178
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Benyamin Ghojogh. An efficient hardware implementation for a motor imagery brain computer",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 177,
+ 324,
+ 189
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 177,
+ 324,
+ 189
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "interface system. Scientia Iranica, 26:72–94, 2019.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 196,
+ 506,
+ 231
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 196,
+ 505,
+ 210
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 196,
+ 505,
+ 210
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Iuliana Marin, Myssar Jabbar Hammood Al-Battbootti, and Nicolae Goga. Drone control based on",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 207,
+ 506,
+ 221
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 207,
+ 506,
+ 221
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "mental commands and facial expressions. In 2020 12th International Conference on Electronics,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 218,
+ 360,
+ 232
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 218,
+ 360,
+ 232
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), pp. 1–4, 2020.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 238,
+ 505,
+ 272
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 237,
+ 506,
+ 252
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 237,
+ 506,
+ 252
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Lubin Meng, Jian Huang, Zhigang Zeng, Xue Jiang, Shan Yu, Tzyy-Ping Jung, Chin-Teng Lin,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 250,
+ 505,
+ 262
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 250,
+ 505,
+ 262
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Ricardo Chavarriaga, and Dongrui Wu. EEG-based brain-computer interfaces are vulnerable to",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 117,
+ 261,
+ 214,
+ 273
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 117,
+ 261,
+ 214,
+ 273
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "backdoor attacks, 2021.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 280,
+ 506,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 279,
+ 507,
+ 293
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 279,
+ 507,
+ 293
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Isabelle Merlet, Gwénaël Birot, Ricardo Salvador, Behnam Molaee-Ardekani, Abeye Mekonnen,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 290,
+ 506,
+ 305
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 290,
+ 506,
+ 305
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Aureli Soria-Frish, Giulio Ruffini, Pedro C. Miranda, and Fabrice Wendling. From oscillatory",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 302,
+ 506,
+ 316
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 302,
+ 506,
+ 316
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "transcranial current stimulation to scalp EEG changes: A biophysical and physiological modeling",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 117,
+ 314,
+ 265,
+ 326
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 117,
+ 314,
+ 265,
+ 326
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "study. PLOS ONE, 8:1–12, 02 2013.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 333,
+ 505,
+ 367
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 333,
+ 505,
+ 345
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 333,
+ 505,
+ 345
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Seyed-Mohsen Moosavi-Dezfooli, Alhussein Fawzi, Omar Fawzi, and Pascal Frossard. Universal",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 344,
+ 505,
+ 357
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 344,
+ 505,
+ 357
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "adversarial perturbations. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 355,
+ 248,
+ 369
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 355,
+ 248,
+ 369
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Recognition (CVPR), July 2017.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 374,
+ 504,
+ 398
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 375,
+ 505,
+ 387
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 375,
+ 505,
+ 387
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "G. Pfurtscheller and F.H. Lopes da Silva. Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 385,
+ 492,
+ 398
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 385,
+ 492,
+ 398
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "desynchronization: basic principles. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110(11):1842–1857, 11 1999.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 406,
+ 505,
+ 428
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 405,
+ 505,
+ 419
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 405,
+ 505,
+ 419
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Robert Plutchik and Henry R Hirsch. Skin impedance and phase angle as a function of frequency and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 417,
+ 295,
+ 428
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 417,
+ 295,
+ 428
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "current. Science, 141(3584):927–928, 1963.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 436,
+ 505,
+ 471
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 435,
+ 505,
+ 450
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 435,
+ 505,
+ 450
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "ZG Qiao, L Mørkrid, and NK Vøllestad. Characteristics of phase angle, extrapolated conductance",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 117,
+ 449,
+ 505,
+ 460
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 117,
+ 449,
+ 505,
+ 460
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and ion relaxation time in the low-frequency admittance locus plot of human palmar skin. Medical",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 459,
+ 385,
+ 471
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 459,
+ 385,
+ 471
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and Biological Engineering and Computing, 32(2):161–167, 1994.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 478,
+ 505,
+ 512
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 477,
+ 506,
+ 491
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 477,
+ 506,
+ 491
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Yao Qin, Nicholas Carlini, Ian J. Goodfellow, Garrison W. Cottrell, and Colin Raffel. Imperceptible,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 489,
+ 507,
+ 502
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 489,
+ 507,
+ 502
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "robust, and targeted adversarial examples for automatic speech recognition. CoRR, abs/1903.10346,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 498,
+ 143,
+ 513
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 498,
+ 143,
+ 513
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2019.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 520,
+ 505,
+ 543
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 518,
+ 507,
+ 535
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 518,
+ 507,
+ 535
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Mona Sazgar and Michael G. Young. EEG Artifacts, pp. 149–162. Springer International Publishing,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 530,
+ 171,
+ 544
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 530,
+ 171,
+ 544
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Cham, 2019.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 550,
+ 506,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 551,
+ 506,
+ 564
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 551,
+ 506,
+ 564
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Tibor Schneider, Xiaying Wang, Michael Hersche, Lukas Cavigelli, and Luca Benini. Q-EEGNet: an",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 562,
+ 506,
+ 575
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 562,
+ 506,
+ 575
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "energy-efficient 8-bit quantized parallel EEGNet implementation for edge motor-imagery brain-",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 574,
+ 507,
+ 586
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 574,
+ 507,
+ 586
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "machine interfaces. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP),",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 585,
+ 196,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 585,
+ 196,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "pp. 284–289, 2020.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 604,
+ 506,
+ 638
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 603,
+ 506,
+ 617
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 603,
+ 506,
+ 617
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Christian Szegedy, Wojciech Zaremba, Ilya Sutskever, Joan Bruna, Dumitru Erhan, Ian J. Goodfellow,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 614,
+ 506,
+ 628
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 614,
+ 506,
+ 628
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and Rob Fergus. Intriguing properties of neural networks. In Proc. International Conference on",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 626,
+ 276,
+ 638
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 626,
+ 276,
+ 638
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Learning Representations, ICLR, 2014.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 645,
+ 505,
+ 679
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 645,
+ 505,
+ 658
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 645,
+ 505,
+ 658
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Johannes Vorwerk, Ümit Aydin, Carsten H Wolters, and Christopher R Butson. Influence of head",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 657,
+ 507,
+ 669
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 657,
+ 507,
+ 669
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "tissue conductivity uncertainties on EEG dipole reconstruction. Frontiers in neuroscience, 13:531,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 667,
+ 143,
+ 680
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 667,
+ 143,
+ 680
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2019.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 687,
+ 505,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 687,
+ 505,
+ 699
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 687,
+ 505,
+ 699
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Xiaying Wang, Michael Hersche, Batuhan Tömekce, Burak Kaya, Michele Magno, and Luca",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 699,
+ 505,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 699,
+ 505,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Benini. An accurate EEGNet-based motor-imagery brain–computer interface for low-power edge",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 709,
+ 505,
+ 723
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 709,
+ 505,
+ 723
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "computing. In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 45
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 720,
+ 219,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 720,
+ 219,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(MeMeA), pp. 1–6, 2020.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 46
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "page_idx": 11,
+ "page_size": [
+ 612,
+ 792
+ ],
+ "discarded_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 300,
+ 751,
+ 310,
+ 760
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 299,
+ 750,
+ 312,
+ 764
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 299,
+ 750,
+ 312,
+ 764
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "",
+ "type": "text",
+ "height": 14,
+ "width": 13
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 27,
+ 308,
+ 37
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 26,
+ 308,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 26,
+ 308,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2022",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "para_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 82,
+ 504,
+ 105
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 95
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Zihan Liu, Lubin Meng, Xiao Zhang, Weili Fang, and Dongrui Wu. Universal adversarial",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 93,
+ 360,
+ 106
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 93,
+ 360,
+ 106
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "perturbations for CNN classifiers in EEG-based BCIs, 2021.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 106
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 113,
+ 504,
+ 147
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 113,
+ 505,
+ 126
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 113,
+ 505,
+ 126
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Aleksander Madry, Aleksandar Makelov, Ludwig Schmidt, Dimitris Tsipras, and Adrian Vladu.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 124,
+ 505,
+ 137
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 124,
+ 505,
+ 137
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Towards deep learning models resistant to adversarial attacks. In Proc. International Conference",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 136,
+ 293,
+ 147
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 136,
+ 293,
+ 147
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2018.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 113,
+ 505,
+ 147
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 155,
+ 506,
+ 189
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 155,
+ 505,
+ 167
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 155,
+ 505,
+ 167
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Alireza Malekmohammadi, Hoda Mohammadzade, Alireza Chamanzar, Mahdi Shabany, and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 166,
+ 505,
+ 178
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 166,
+ 505,
+ 178
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Benyamin Ghojogh. An efficient hardware implementation for a motor imagery brain computer",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 177,
+ 324,
+ 189
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 177,
+ 324,
+ 189
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "interface system. Scientia Iranica, 26:72–94, 2019.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 155,
+ 505,
+ 189
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 196,
+ 506,
+ 231
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 196,
+ 505,
+ 210
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 196,
+ 505,
+ 210
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Iuliana Marin, Myssar Jabbar Hammood Al-Battbootti, and Nicolae Goga. Drone control based on",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 207,
+ 506,
+ 221
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 207,
+ 506,
+ 221
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "mental commands and facial expressions. In 2020 12th International Conference on Electronics,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 218,
+ 360,
+ 232
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 218,
+ 360,
+ 232
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), pp. 1–4, 2020.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 196,
+ 506,
+ 232
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 238,
+ 505,
+ 272
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 237,
+ 506,
+ 252
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 237,
+ 506,
+ 252
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Lubin Meng, Jian Huang, Zhigang Zeng, Xue Jiang, Shan Yu, Tzyy-Ping Jung, Chin-Teng Lin,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 250,
+ 505,
+ 262
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 250,
+ 505,
+ 262
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Ricardo Chavarriaga, and Dongrui Wu. EEG-based brain-computer interfaces are vulnerable to",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 117,
+ 261,
+ 214,
+ 273
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 117,
+ 261,
+ 214,
+ 273
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "backdoor attacks, 2021.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 237,
+ 506,
+ 273
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 280,
+ 506,
+ 325
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 279,
+ 507,
+ 293
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 279,
+ 507,
+ 293
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Isabelle Merlet, Gwénaël Birot, Ricardo Salvador, Behnam Molaee-Ardekani, Abeye Mekonnen,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 290,
+ 506,
+ 305
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 290,
+ 506,
+ 305
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Aureli Soria-Frish, Giulio Ruffini, Pedro C. Miranda, and Fabrice Wendling. From oscillatory",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 302,
+ 506,
+ 316
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 302,
+ 506,
+ 316
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "transcranial current stimulation to scalp EEG changes: A biophysical and physiological modeling",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 117,
+ 314,
+ 265,
+ 326
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 117,
+ 314,
+ 265,
+ 326
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "study. PLOS ONE, 8:1–12, 02 2013.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 279,
+ 507,
+ 326
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 333,
+ 505,
+ 367
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 333,
+ 505,
+ 345
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 333,
+ 505,
+ 345
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Seyed-Mohsen Moosavi-Dezfooli, Alhussein Fawzi, Omar Fawzi, and Pascal Frossard. Universal",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 344,
+ 505,
+ 357
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 344,
+ 505,
+ 357
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "adversarial perturbations. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 355,
+ 248,
+ 369
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 355,
+ 248,
+ 369
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Recognition (CVPR), July 2017.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 333,
+ 505,
+ 369
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 374,
+ 504,
+ 398
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 375,
+ 505,
+ 387
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 375,
+ 505,
+ 387
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "G. Pfurtscheller and F.H. Lopes da Silva. Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 385,
+ 492,
+ 398
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 385,
+ 492,
+ 398
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "desynchronization: basic principles. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110(11):1842–1857, 11 1999.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 375,
+ 505,
+ 398
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 406,
+ 505,
+ 428
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 405,
+ 505,
+ 419
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 405,
+ 505,
+ 419
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Robert Plutchik and Henry R Hirsch. Skin impedance and phase angle as a function of frequency and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 417,
+ 295,
+ 428
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 417,
+ 295,
+ 428
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "current. Science, 141(3584):927–928, 1963.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 405,
+ 505,
+ 428
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 436,
+ 505,
+ 471
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 435,
+ 505,
+ 450
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 435,
+ 505,
+ 450
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "ZG Qiao, L Mørkrid, and NK Vøllestad. Characteristics of phase angle, extrapolated conductance",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 117,
+ 449,
+ 505,
+ 460
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 117,
+ 449,
+ 505,
+ 460
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and ion relaxation time in the low-frequency admittance locus plot of human palmar skin. Medical",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 459,
+ 385,
+ 471
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 459,
+ 385,
+ 471
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and Biological Engineering and Computing, 32(2):161–167, 1994.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 435,
+ 505,
+ 471
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 478,
+ 505,
+ 512
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 477,
+ 506,
+ 491
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 477,
+ 506,
+ 491
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Yao Qin, Nicholas Carlini, Ian J. Goodfellow, Garrison W. Cottrell, and Colin Raffel. Imperceptible,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 489,
+ 507,
+ 502
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 489,
+ 507,
+ 502
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "robust, and targeted adversarial examples for automatic speech recognition. CoRR, abs/1903.10346,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 498,
+ 143,
+ 513
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 498,
+ 143,
+ 513
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2019.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 477,
+ 507,
+ 513
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 520,
+ 505,
+ 543
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 518,
+ 507,
+ 535
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 518,
+ 507,
+ 535
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Mona Sazgar and Michael G. Young. EEG Artifacts, pp. 149–162. Springer International Publishing,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 530,
+ 171,
+ 544
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 530,
+ 171,
+ 544
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Cham, 2019.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 518,
+ 507,
+ 544
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 550,
+ 506,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 551,
+ 506,
+ 564
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 551,
+ 506,
+ 564
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Tibor Schneider, Xiaying Wang, Michael Hersche, Lukas Cavigelli, and Luca Benini. Q-EEGNet: an",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 562,
+ 506,
+ 575
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 562,
+ 506,
+ 575
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "energy-efficient 8-bit quantized parallel EEGNet implementation for edge motor-imagery brain-",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 574,
+ 507,
+ 586
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 574,
+ 507,
+ 586
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "machine interfaces. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP),",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 585,
+ 196,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 585,
+ 196,
+ 596
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "pp. 284–289, 2020.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 551,
+ 507,
+ 596
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 604,
+ 506,
+ 638
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 603,
+ 506,
+ 617
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 603,
+ 506,
+ 617
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Christian Szegedy, Wojciech Zaremba, Ilya Sutskever, Joan Bruna, Dumitru Erhan, Ian J. Goodfellow,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 614,
+ 506,
+ 628
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 614,
+ 506,
+ 628
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and Rob Fergus. Intriguing properties of neural networks. In Proc. International Conference on",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 626,
+ 276,
+ 638
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 626,
+ 276,
+ 638
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Learning Representations, ICLR, 2014.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 603,
+ 506,
+ 638
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 645,
+ 505,
+ 679
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 645,
+ 505,
+ 658
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 645,
+ 505,
+ 658
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Johannes Vorwerk, Ümit Aydin, Carsten H Wolters, and Christopher R Butson. Influence of head",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 657,
+ 507,
+ 669
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 657,
+ 507,
+ 669
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "tissue conductivity uncertainties on EEG dipole reconstruction. Frontiers in neuroscience, 13:531,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 667,
+ 143,
+ 680
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 667,
+ 143,
+ 680
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "2019.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 645,
+ 507,
+ 680
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 687,
+ 505,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 687,
+ 505,
+ 699
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 687,
+ 505,
+ 699
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Xiaying Wang, Michael Hersche, Batuhan Tömekce, Burak Kaya, Michele Magno, and Luca",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 699,
+ 505,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 699,
+ 505,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Benini. An accurate EEGNet-based motor-imagery brain–computer interface for low-power edge",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 709,
+ 505,
+ 723
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 709,
+ 505,
+ 723
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "computing. In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 45
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 720,
+ 219,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 720,
+ 219,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(MeMeA), pp. 1–6, 2020.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 46
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 44.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 687,
+ 505,
+ 733
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "preproc_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 82,
+ 504,
+ 116
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 96
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 96
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Yang Yu, Yadong Liu, Jun Jiang, Erwei Yin, Zongtan Zhou, and Dewen Hu. An asynchronous control",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 93,
+ 506,
+ 106
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 93,
+ 506,
+ 106
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "paradigm based on sequential motor imagery and its application in wheelchair navigation. IEEE",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 104,
+ 482,
+ 117
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 104,
+ 482,
+ 117
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 26(12):2367–2375, 2018.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 123,
+ 504,
+ 156
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 123,
+ 505,
+ 136
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 123,
+ 505,
+ 136
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Wei Emma Zhang, Quan Z. Sheng, Ahoud Abdulrahmn F. Alhazmi, and Chenliang Li. Adversarial",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 133,
+ 506,
+ 147
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 133,
+ 506,
+ 147
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "attacks on deep-learning models in natural language processing: A survey. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 145,
+ 253,
+ 156
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 145,
+ 253,
+ 156
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Technol., 11(3):24:1–24:41, 2020.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 163,
+ 505,
+ 186
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 164,
+ 506,
+ 177
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 164,
+ 506,
+ 177
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Xiao Zhang and Dongrui Wu. On the vulnerability of CNN classifiers in EEG-based BCIs. IEEE",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 175,
+ 466,
+ 187
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 175,
+ 466,
+ 187
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 27(5):814–825, 2019.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 194,
+ 506,
+ 227
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 193,
+ 505,
+ 207
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 193,
+ 505,
+ 207
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Jiayu Zhuang, Keke Geng, and Guodong Yin. Ensemble learning based brain–computer interface",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 204,
+ 507,
+ 218
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 204,
+ 507,
+ 218
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "system for ground vehicle control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 216,
+ 216,
+ 228
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 216,
+ 216,
+ 228
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "51(9):5392–5404, 2021.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ }
+ ],
+ "page_idx": 12,
+ "page_size": [
+ 612,
+ 792
+ ],
+ "discarded_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 300,
+ 751,
+ 310,
+ 760
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 299,
+ 750,
+ 312,
+ 764
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 299,
+ 750,
+ 312,
+ 764
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "",
+ "type": "text",
+ "height": 14,
+ "width": 13
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 27,
+ 308,
+ 37
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 26,
+ 308,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 26,
+ 308,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2022",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "para_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 82,
+ 504,
+ 116
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 96
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 82,
+ 505,
+ 96
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Yang Yu, Yadong Liu, Jun Jiang, Erwei Yin, Zongtan Zhou, and Dewen Hu. An asynchronous control",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 93,
+ 506,
+ 106
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 93,
+ 506,
+ 106
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "paradigm based on sequential motor imagery and its application in wheelchair navigation. IEEE",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 104,
+ 482,
+ 117
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 104,
+ 482,
+ 117
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 26(12):2367–2375, 2018.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 82,
+ 506,
+ 117
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 123,
+ 504,
+ 156
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 123,
+ 505,
+ 136
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 123,
+ 505,
+ 136
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Wei Emma Zhang, Quan Z. Sheng, Ahoud Abdulrahmn F. Alhazmi, and Chenliang Li. Adversarial",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 133,
+ 506,
+ 147
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 133,
+ 506,
+ 147
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "attacks on deep-learning models in natural language processing: A survey. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 145,
+ 253,
+ 156
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 145,
+ 253,
+ 156
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Technol., 11(3):24:1–24:41, 2020.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 107,
+ 123,
+ 506,
+ 156
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 163,
+ 505,
+ 186
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 164,
+ 506,
+ 177
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 164,
+ 506,
+ 177
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Xiao Zhang and Dongrui Wu. On the vulnerability of CNN classifiers in EEG-based BCIs. IEEE",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 175,
+ 466,
+ 187
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 175,
+ 466,
+ 187
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 27(5):814–825, 2019.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 164,
+ 506,
+ 187
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 194,
+ 506,
+ 227
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 193,
+ 505,
+ 207
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 193,
+ 505,
+ 207
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Jiayu Zhuang, Keke Geng, and Guodong Yin. Ensemble learning based brain–computer interface",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 204,
+ 507,
+ 218
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 115,
+ 204,
+ 507,
+ 218
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "system for ground vehicle control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 216,
+ 216,
+ 228
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 116,
+ 216,
+ 216,
+ 228
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "51(9):5392–5404, 2021.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 106,
+ 193,
+ 507,
+ 228
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "preproc_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 89,
+ 499,
+ 148
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 89,
+ 499,
+ 148
+ ],
+ "group_id": 1,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 89,
+ 499,
+ 148
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 89,
+ 499,
+ 148
+ ],
+ "score": 0.935,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "673d5d9efd092b4cc8e800ff6a5738b2621fff65b3be06e0ef50d295cf6a25a4.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 89,
+ 499,
+ 108.66666666666667
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 108.66666666666667,
+ 499,
+ 128.33333333333334
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 128.33333333333334,
+ 499,
+ 148.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 2
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 165,
+ 504,
+ 186
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 165,
+ 505,
+ 177
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 165,
+ 505,
+ 177
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 6: Practical adversarial attack scenario in BCIs: a smart device close to the ear emits a perturbation",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 175,
+ 357,
+ 186
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 175,
+ 357,
+ 186
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "signal which propagates over the head surface to the EEG electrodes.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 199,
+ 504,
+ 277
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 199,
+ 504,
+ 277
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 199,
+ 504,
+ 277
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 199,
+ 504,
+ 277
+ ],
+ "score": 0.959,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "38b8a7e8b4be2758df986c7eb0277e6018207129bd99c18ee2f96bd9341afb7e.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 199,
+ 504,
+ 225.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 225.0,
+ 504,
+ 251.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 251.0,
+ 504,
+ 277.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 7
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 288,
+ 505,
+ 339
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 287,
+ 506,
+ 300
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 287,
+ 324,
+ 300
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 7: Magnitude of the spatial propagation for different",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 324,
+ 289,
+ 338,
+ 298
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 338,
+ 287,
+ 506,
+ 300
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". The perturbation is emitted from the left side",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 298,
+ 506,
+ 309
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 298,
+ 506,
+ 309
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "of the head and propagates over the head surface. The leftmost electrode senses the highest magnitude (red),",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 308,
+ 506,
+ 320
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 308,
+ 410,
+ 320
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "which linearly decreases towards zero (white) with growing propagation distance and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 410,
+ 309,
+ 423,
+ 318
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 423,
+ 308,
+ 506,
+ 320
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". The electrodes which",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 318,
+ 506,
+ 330
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 318,
+ 244,
+ 330
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "sense the perturbations, i.e., magnitude",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 245,
+ 319,
+ 256,
+ 328
+ ],
+ "score": 0.8,
+ "content": "{ > } 0",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 256,
+ 318,
+ 506,
+ 330
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", are marked with dots. The electrodes T9, C3, C4, and T10 are labeled",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 327,
+ 157,
+ 340
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 327,
+ 157,
+ 340
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for reference.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8.0
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 359,
+ 383,
+ 371
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 358,
+ 383,
+ 374
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 358,
+ 383,
+ 374
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "A ATTACK AT THE SOURCE OF SIGNAL ACQUISITION",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 383,
+ 504,
+ 406
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 383,
+ 505,
+ 396
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 383,
+ 505,
+ 396
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Fig. 6 illustrates the new attack scenario where the perturbation is delivered to the human scalp and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 394,
+ 406,
+ 407
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 394,
+ 406,
+ 407
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "propagates to the sensing electrodes at the source of the signal acquisition.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 421,
+ 291,
+ 434
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 420,
+ 293,
+ 435
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 420,
+ 293,
+ 435
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "B SPATIAL PROPAGATION MODELS",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 446,
+ 505,
+ 490
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 445,
+ 505,
+ 459
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 445,
+ 478,
+ 459
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Fig. 7 illustrates the magnitude of signal propagation using different propagation parameters",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 479,
+ 446,
+ 505,
+ 457
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m } =",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 457,
+ 506,
+ 470
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 457,
+ 146,
+ 469
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\{ 1 , 5 , 1 5 \\}",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 146,
+ 457,
+ 183,
+ 470
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". A large",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 183,
+ 457,
+ 198,
+ 468
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 198,
+ 457,
+ 506,
+ 470
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "represents cases with large attenuation and limited propagation (e.g., attack",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 468,
+ 505,
+ 481
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 468,
+ 202,
+ 481
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "over the air) and a small",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 202,
+ 469,
+ 217,
+ 479
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 217,
+ 468,
+ 505,
+ 481
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "covers cases with lower attenuation where the perturbation can propagate",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 478,
+ 218,
+ 491
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 478,
+ 218,
+ 491
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "farther (e.g., a smart glass).",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 506,
+ 355,
+ 519
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 506,
+ 356,
+ 520
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 506,
+ 356,
+ 520
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "C EXPERIMENTS ON BCI COMPETITION IV-2A",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 531,
+ 505,
+ 597
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 531,
+ 505,
+ 543
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 531,
+ 505,
+ 543
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Dataset. The IV-2a dataset of the BCI Competition contains recordings from nine different subjects",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 543,
+ 505,
+ 554
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 543,
+ 505,
+ 554
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and distinguishes between four classes of imagined movements: left and right hand, both feet, and the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 553,
+ 506,
+ 565
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 553,
+ 357,
+ 565
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "tongue. 22 different EEG channels were recorded, sampled at",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 357,
+ 553,
+ 387,
+ 564
+ ],
+ "score": 0.68,
+ "content": "2 5 0 \\mathrm { H z }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 387,
+ 553,
+ 506,
+ 565
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". The data was pre-processed",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 564,
+ 505,
+ 577
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 564,
+ 260,
+ 577
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with a bandpass filter between 0.1 and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 261,
+ 564,
+ 285,
+ 574
+ ],
+ "score": 0.76,
+ "content": "4 0 \\mathrm { H z }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 286,
+ 564,
+ 505,
+ 577
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". Each subject completed two recording session on two",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 574,
+ 506,
+ 587
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 574,
+ 506,
+ 587
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "different days, where the first session is used for training and the second for testing as per the rules of",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 586,
+ 306,
+ 597
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 586,
+ 306,
+ 597
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the competition. Each session contains 288 trials.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 609,
+ 505,
+ 675
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 609,
+ 506,
+ 622
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 609,
+ 506,
+ 622
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Training and validation. We train a separate baseline model per subject using Adam optimizer",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 619,
+ 506,
+ 634
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 619,
+ 126,
+ 634
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 126,
+ 621,
+ 156,
+ 632
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\beta _ { 1 } { = } 0 . 9",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 156,
+ 619,
+ 173,
+ 634
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 174,
+ 621,
+ 213,
+ 632
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\beta _ { 2 } { = } 0 . 9 9 9",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 213,
+ 619,
+ 506,
+ 634
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", a batch size of 32, and 500 epochs. The learning rate is 0.001 achieving",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 631,
+ 505,
+ 644
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 631,
+ 199,
+ 644
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "an average accuracy of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 200,
+ 632,
+ 231,
+ 642
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "7 1 . 7 9 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 231,
+ 631,
+ 505,
+ 644
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". This dataset does not contain the rest class. We choose to design an",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 642,
+ 506,
+ 655
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 642,
+ 506,
+ 655
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "attack that aims to fool the classifier to always predict “tongue.” Moreover, we apply a maximum",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 653,
+ 506,
+ 666
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 653,
+ 213,
+ 666
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "perturbation amplitude of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 213,
+ 653,
+ 285,
+ 665
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\epsilon \\in [ 0 . 0 1 , 1 0 ] \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 286,
+ 653,
+ 506,
+ 666
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "due to the lower signal amplitude encountered in this",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 663,
+ 140,
+ 677
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 663,
+ 140,
+ 677
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "dataset.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 687,
+ 504,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 505,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 505,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Results. Fig. 8 compares the ASR of different attacks without considering the propagation model",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 699,
+ 505,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 699,
+ 338,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(Case 1). Generally, a minimal perturbation amplitude of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 339,
+ 699,
+ 361,
+ 709
+ ],
+ "score": 0.65,
+ "content": "1 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 362,
+ 699,
+ 379,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 379,
+ 699,
+ 403,
+ 709
+ ],
+ "score": 0.69,
+ "content": "2 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 403,
+ 699,
+ 480,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "suffices to achieve",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 480,
+ 699,
+ 505,
+ 709
+ ],
+ "score": 0.85,
+ "content": "100 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 709,
+ 506,
+ 723
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 709,
+ 506,
+ 723
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "ASR with PGD and UAP, respectively. The addition of the derivative loss term does not give any",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 720,
+ 506,
+ 734
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 720,
+ 506,
+ 734
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "performance degradation in terms of the ASR. The average post-attack classification accuracy drops",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "page_idx": 13,
+ "page_size": [
+ 612,
+ 792
+ ],
+ "discarded_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 27,
+ 308,
+ 37
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 25,
+ 309,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 25,
+ 309,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2022",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 300,
+ 751,
+ 310,
+ 760
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 299,
+ 750,
+ 312,
+ 764
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 299,
+ 750,
+ 312,
+ 764
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "",
+ "type": "text",
+ "height": 14,
+ "width": 13
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "para_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 89,
+ 499,
+ 148
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 89,
+ 499,
+ 148
+ ],
+ "group_id": 1,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 89,
+ 499,
+ 148
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 89,
+ 499,
+ 148
+ ],
+ "score": 0.935,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "673d5d9efd092b4cc8e800ff6a5738b2621fff65b3be06e0ef50d295cf6a25a4.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 89,
+ 499,
+ 108.66666666666667
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 108.66666666666667,
+ 499,
+ 128.33333333333334
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 110,
+ 128.33333333333334,
+ 499,
+ 148.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 2
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 165,
+ 504,
+ 186
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 165,
+ 505,
+ 177
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 165,
+ 505,
+ 177
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 6: Practical adversarial attack scenario in BCIs: a smart device close to the ear emits a perturbation",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 175,
+ 357,
+ 186
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 175,
+ 357,
+ 186
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "signal which propagates over the head surface to the EEG electrodes.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 165,
+ 505,
+ 186
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 199,
+ 504,
+ 277
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 199,
+ 504,
+ 277
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 199,
+ 504,
+ 277
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 199,
+ 504,
+ 277
+ ],
+ "score": 0.959,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "38b8a7e8b4be2758df986c7eb0277e6018207129bd99c18ee2f96bd9341afb7e.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 199,
+ 504,
+ 225.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 225.0,
+ 504,
+ 251.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 251.0,
+ 504,
+ 277.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 7
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 288,
+ 505,
+ 339
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 287,
+ 506,
+ 300
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 287,
+ 324,
+ 300
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 7: Magnitude of the spatial propagation for different",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 324,
+ 289,
+ 338,
+ 298
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 338,
+ 287,
+ 506,
+ 300
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". The perturbation is emitted from the left side",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 298,
+ 506,
+ 309
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 298,
+ 506,
+ 309
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "of the head and propagates over the head surface. The leftmost electrode senses the highest magnitude (red),",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 308,
+ 506,
+ 320
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 308,
+ 410,
+ 320
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "which linearly decreases towards zero (white) with growing propagation distance and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 410,
+ 309,
+ 423,
+ 318
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 423,
+ 308,
+ 506,
+ 320
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". The electrodes which",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 318,
+ 506,
+ 330
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 318,
+ 244,
+ 330
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "sense the perturbations, i.e., magnitude",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 245,
+ 319,
+ 256,
+ 328
+ ],
+ "score": 0.8,
+ "content": "{ > } 0",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 256,
+ 318,
+ 506,
+ 330
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", are marked with dots. The electrodes T9, C3, C4, and T10 are labeled",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 327,
+ 157,
+ 340
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 327,
+ 157,
+ 340
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for reference.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8.0
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 359,
+ 383,
+ 371
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 358,
+ 383,
+ 374
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 358,
+ 383,
+ 374
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "A ATTACK AT THE SOURCE OF SIGNAL ACQUISITION",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 383,
+ 504,
+ 406
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 383,
+ 505,
+ 396
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 383,
+ 505,
+ 396
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Fig. 6 illustrates the new attack scenario where the perturbation is delivered to the human scalp and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 394,
+ 406,
+ 407
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 394,
+ 406,
+ 407
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "propagates to the sensing electrodes at the source of the signal acquisition.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 383,
+ 505,
+ 407
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 421,
+ 291,
+ 434
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 420,
+ 293,
+ 435
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 420,
+ 293,
+ 435
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "B SPATIAL PROPAGATION MODELS",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 446,
+ 505,
+ 490
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 445,
+ 505,
+ 459
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 445,
+ 478,
+ 459
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Fig. 7 illustrates the magnitude of signal propagation using different propagation parameters",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 479,
+ 446,
+ 505,
+ 457
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m } =",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 457,
+ 506,
+ 470
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 457,
+ 146,
+ 469
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\{ 1 , 5 , 1 5 \\}",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 146,
+ 457,
+ 183,
+ 470
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". A large",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 183,
+ 457,
+ 198,
+ 468
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 198,
+ 457,
+ 506,
+ 470
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "represents cases with large attenuation and limited propagation (e.g., attack",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 468,
+ 505,
+ 481
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 468,
+ 202,
+ 481
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "over the air) and a small",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 202,
+ 469,
+ 217,
+ 479
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 217,
+ 468,
+ 505,
+ 481
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "covers cases with lower attenuation where the perturbation can propagate",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 478,
+ 218,
+ 491
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 478,
+ 218,
+ 491
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "farther (e.g., a smart glass).",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 445,
+ 506,
+ 491
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 506,
+ 355,
+ 519
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 506,
+ 356,
+ 520
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 506,
+ 356,
+ 520
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "C EXPERIMENTS ON BCI COMPETITION IV-2A",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 531,
+ 505,
+ 597
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 531,
+ 505,
+ 543
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 531,
+ 505,
+ 543
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Dataset. The IV-2a dataset of the BCI Competition contains recordings from nine different subjects",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 543,
+ 505,
+ 554
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 543,
+ 505,
+ 554
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and distinguishes between four classes of imagined movements: left and right hand, both feet, and the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 553,
+ 506,
+ 565
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 553,
+ 357,
+ 565
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "tongue. 22 different EEG channels were recorded, sampled at",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 357,
+ 553,
+ 387,
+ 564
+ ],
+ "score": 0.68,
+ "content": "2 5 0 \\mathrm { H z }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 387,
+ 553,
+ 506,
+ 565
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". The data was pre-processed",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 564,
+ 505,
+ 577
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 564,
+ 260,
+ 577
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with a bandpass filter between 0.1 and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 261,
+ 564,
+ 285,
+ 574
+ ],
+ "score": 0.76,
+ "content": "4 0 \\mathrm { H z }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 286,
+ 564,
+ 505,
+ 577
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". Each subject completed two recording session on two",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 574,
+ 506,
+ 587
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 574,
+ 506,
+ 587
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "different days, where the first session is used for training and the second for testing as per the rules of",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 586,
+ 306,
+ 597
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 586,
+ 306,
+ 597
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the competition. Each session contains 288 trials.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 531,
+ 506,
+ 597
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 609,
+ 505,
+ 675
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 609,
+ 506,
+ 622
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 609,
+ 506,
+ 622
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Training and validation. We train a separate baseline model per subject using Adam optimizer",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 619,
+ 506,
+ 634
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 619,
+ 126,
+ 634
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 126,
+ 621,
+ 156,
+ 632
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\beta _ { 1 } { = } 0 . 9",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 156,
+ 619,
+ 173,
+ 634
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 174,
+ 621,
+ 213,
+ 632
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\beta _ { 2 } { = } 0 . 9 9 9",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 213,
+ 619,
+ 506,
+ 634
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", a batch size of 32, and 500 epochs. The learning rate is 0.001 achieving",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 631,
+ 505,
+ 644
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 631,
+ 199,
+ 644
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "an average accuracy of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 200,
+ 632,
+ 231,
+ 642
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "7 1 . 7 9 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 231,
+ 631,
+ 505,
+ 644
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". This dataset does not contain the rest class. We choose to design an",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 642,
+ 506,
+ 655
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 642,
+ 506,
+ 655
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "attack that aims to fool the classifier to always predict “tongue.” Moreover, we apply a maximum",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 653,
+ 506,
+ 666
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 653,
+ 213,
+ 666
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "perturbation amplitude of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 213,
+ 653,
+ 285,
+ 665
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\epsilon \\in [ 0 . 0 1 , 1 0 ] \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 286,
+ 653,
+ 506,
+ 666
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "due to the lower signal amplitude encountered in this",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 663,
+ 140,
+ 677
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 663,
+ 140,
+ 677
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "dataset.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 609,
+ 506,
+ 677
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 687,
+ 504,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 505,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 505,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Results. Fig. 8 compares the ASR of different attacks without considering the propagation model",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 699,
+ 505,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 699,
+ 338,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(Case 1). Generally, a minimal perturbation amplitude of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 339,
+ 699,
+ 361,
+ 709
+ ],
+ "score": 0.65,
+ "content": "1 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 362,
+ 699,
+ 379,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 379,
+ 699,
+ 403,
+ 709
+ ],
+ "score": 0.69,
+ "content": "2 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 403,
+ 699,
+ 480,
+ 711
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "suffices to achieve",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 480,
+ 699,
+ 505,
+ 709
+ ],
+ "score": 0.85,
+ "content": "100 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 709,
+ 506,
+ 723
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 709,
+ 506,
+ 723
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "ASR with PGD and UAP, respectively. The addition of the derivative loss term does not give any",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 720,
+ 506,
+ 734
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 720,
+ 506,
+ 734
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "performance degradation in terms of the ASR. The average post-attack classification accuracy drops",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 332,
+ 504,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 332,
+ 129,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "from",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 129,
+ 334,
+ 162,
+ 344
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "7 1 . 7 9 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation",
+ "cross_page": true
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 162,
+ 332,
+ 174,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 174,
+ 334,
+ 195,
+ 344
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "50 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation",
+ "cross_page": true
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 195,
+ 332,
+ 326,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for a perturbation amplitude of",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 327,
+ 334,
+ 363,
+ 344
+ ],
+ "score": 0.8,
+ "content": "0 . 1 5 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation",
+ "cross_page": true
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 363,
+ 332,
+ 382,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 382,
+ 334,
+ 410,
+ 344
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "2 4 . 7 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation",
+ "cross_page": true
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 410,
+ 332,
+ 426,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 426,
+ 334,
+ 457,
+ 344
+ ],
+ "score": 0.82,
+ "content": "0 . 6 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation",
+ "cross_page": true
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 458,
+ 332,
+ 504,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and higher",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 344,
+ 295,
+ 357
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 344,
+ 295,
+ 357
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "amplitudes, when PGD with derivative is used.",
+ "type": "text",
+ "cross_page": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 687,
+ 506,
+ 734
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "preproc_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 111,
+ 80,
+ 495,
+ 262
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 111,
+ 80,
+ 495,
+ 262
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 111,
+ 80,
+ 495,
+ 262
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 111,
+ 80,
+ 495,
+ 262
+ ],
+ "score": 0.784,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "2754d89a4671045e54c9d9a042e28c5bfceebb00058d60cea27bd8868f79baae.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 111,
+ 80,
+ 495,
+ 140.66666666666666
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 111,
+ 140.66666666666666,
+ 495,
+ 201.33333333333331
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 111,
+ 201.33333333333331,
+ 495,
+ 262.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 2
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 273,
+ 504,
+ 295
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 273,
+ 506,
+ 285
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 273,
+ 506,
+ 285
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 8: ASR on BCI Competition IV-2a with random noise, FGSM, PGD, and UAP with and without",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 283,
+ 181,
+ 295
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 283,
+ 181,
+ 295
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "derivative loss term.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2.25
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 333,
+ 502,
+ 356
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 332,
+ 504,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 332,
+ 129,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "from",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 129,
+ 334,
+ 162,
+ 344
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "7 1 . 7 9 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 162,
+ 332,
+ 174,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 174,
+ 334,
+ 195,
+ 344
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "50 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 195,
+ 332,
+ 326,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for a perturbation amplitude of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 327,
+ 334,
+ 363,
+ 344
+ ],
+ "score": 0.8,
+ "content": "0 . 1 5 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 363,
+ 332,
+ 382,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 382,
+ 334,
+ 410,
+ 344
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "2 4 . 7 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 410,
+ 332,
+ 426,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "for",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 426,
+ 334,
+ 457,
+ 344
+ ],
+ "score": 0.82,
+ "content": "0 . 6 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 458,
+ 332,
+ 504,
+ 347
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and higher",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 344,
+ 295,
+ 357
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 344,
+ 295,
+ 357
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "amplitudes, when PGD with derivative is used.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 361,
+ 505,
+ 405
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 361,
+ 505,
+ 374
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 361,
+ 345,
+ 374
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Fig. 9 shows the ASR for different propagation parameters",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 345,
+ 362,
+ 360,
+ 372
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 361,
+ 361,
+ 378,
+ 374
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 378,
+ 362,
+ 390,
+ 372
+ ],
+ "score": 0.84,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d , }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 391,
+ 361,
+ 505,
+ 374
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ") and maximum perturbation",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 372,
+ 505,
+ 384
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 372,
+ 151,
+ 384
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "amplitudes",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 151,
+ 374,
+ 157,
+ 382
+ ],
+ "score": 0.53,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 158,
+ 372,
+ 505,
+ 384
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". When considering the head model during the design of the attack (Case 2, w/HM), both",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 383,
+ 505,
+ 396
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 383,
+ 505,
+ 396
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "PGD and UAP reach significantly higher ASR compared to attacks designed without the consideration",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 394,
+ 255,
+ 406
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 394,
+ 255,
+ 406
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "of the head model (Case 3, w/oHM).",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 442,
+ 266,
+ 454
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 441,
+ 268,
+ 456
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 441,
+ 268,
+ 456
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "D PLAUSIBILITY OF ATTACKS",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 478,
+ 505,
+ 567
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 478,
+ 505,
+ 492
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 478,
+ 505,
+ 492
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "This section provides power spectral density plots of original signals and attacked signals with and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 489,
+ 505,
+ 501
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 489,
+ 505,
+ 501
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "without the derivative loss term, shown in Figure 10. The power spectral density is determined",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 501,
+ 505,
+ 513
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 501,
+ 505,
+ 513
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "by computing the magnitude squared Fast Fourier Transform of the signals that were illustrated in",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 511,
+ 505,
+ 524
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 511,
+ 505,
+ 524
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 2. The attack designed with the derivative loss term has a similar distribution as the original",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 523,
+ 505,
+ 535
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 523,
+ 505,
+ 535
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "signal, where as the attack without derivative shows large contributions in the low frequency domain",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 533,
+ 505,
+ 546
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 533,
+ 139,
+ 545
+ ],
+ "score": 0.85,
+ "content": "( < 5 \\mathrm { H z } )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 139,
+ 533,
+ 505,
+ 546
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", which were not present in the original signal. These low-frequency components stem from",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 545,
+ 506,
+ 557
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 545,
+ 506,
+ 557
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the square-wave shaped attack and can be used as a way to detect the attack; hence, this attack cannot",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 556,
+ 224,
+ 568
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 556,
+ 224,
+ 568
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "be considered imperceptible.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15.5
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 572,
+ 505,
+ 671
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 572,
+ 505,
+ 584
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 572,
+ 505,
+ 584
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Moreover, Figure 13 shows the attacks with and without derivative loss term with increasing maximum",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 582,
+ 505,
+ 595
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 582,
+ 309,
+ 595
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "amplitude \u000f. We can see that for low amplitudes (",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 309,
+ 583,
+ 333,
+ 594
+ ],
+ "score": 0.56,
+ "content": "\\mathrm { 1 m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 333,
+ 582,
+ 351,
+ 595
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 351,
+ 583,
+ 375,
+ 594
+ ],
+ "score": 0.47,
+ "content": "5 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 375,
+ 582,
+ 505,
+ 595
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ") the generated attacks with and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 593,
+ 505,
+ 607
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 593,
+ 280,
+ 607
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "without derivative still look like EEGs. At",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 280,
+ 594,
+ 307,
+ 605
+ ],
+ "score": 0.7,
+ "content": "1 0 \\mathrm { m V } ,",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 593,
+ 505,
+ 607
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the attack generated without derivative presents",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 604,
+ 506,
+ 618
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 604,
+ 457,
+ 618
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "minor square-wave artifacts, which could be still imperceptible to a non-expert. With",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 458,
+ 605,
+ 487,
+ 615
+ ],
+ "score": 0.73,
+ "content": "2 5 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 487,
+ 604,
+ 506,
+ 618
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 615,
+ 506,
+ 629
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 616,
+ 134,
+ 627
+ ],
+ "score": 0.7,
+ "content": "5 0 \\mathrm { m V } ,",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 134,
+ 615,
+ 506,
+ 629
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", the ones generated without derivative have strong and perceptible square-wave displacements,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 627,
+ 505,
+ 639
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 627,
+ 505,
+ 639
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "while the ones generated with our proposed method can still be mistaken as real EEG signals. While",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 638,
+ 504,
+ 650
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 638,
+ 382,
+ 650
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with the instance-based attacks, it is not necessary to have more than",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 382,
+ 638,
+ 410,
+ 648
+ ],
+ "score": 0.75,
+ "content": "1 0 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 410,
+ 638,
+ 504,
+ 650
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to get a very high ASR",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 647,
+ 506,
+ 663
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 647,
+ 506,
+ 663
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(see Figure 1), with the universal attacks and physical constraints, the ASR increases with increasing",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 660,
+ 260,
+ 673
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 660,
+ 260,
+ 673
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "perturbation amplitude (see Figure 4).",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 677,
+ 505,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 677,
+ 505,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 677,
+ 505,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "The same observations can be drawn from the plausibility metrics, which have been proposed for the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 688,
+ 505,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 688,
+ 505,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "first time in this paper to assess quantitatively the EEG attacks. For example, looking at the cosine",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 697,
+ 507,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 697,
+ 147,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "similarity",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 147,
+ 699,
+ 160,
+ 710
+ ],
+ "score": 0.8,
+ "content": "( \\gamma )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 161,
+ 697,
+ 335,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "in Table 1, without the derivative loss term,",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 335,
+ 700,
+ 343,
+ 710
+ ],
+ "score": 0.8,
+ "content": "\\gamma",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 343,
+ 697,
+ 378,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "drops to",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 378,
+ 699,
+ 410,
+ 709
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "9 7 . 9 9 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 411,
+ 697,
+ 431,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 432,
+ 699,
+ 466,
+ 709
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\epsilon = 5 \\mathrm { m V } ,",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 466,
+ 697,
+ 507,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", whereas,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 708,
+ 505,
+ 723
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 708,
+ 184,
+ 723
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with the derivative,",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 185,
+ 711,
+ 192,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "score": 0.8,
+ "content": "\\gamma",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 192,
+ 708,
+ 324,
+ 723
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "drops to about the same value of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 325,
+ 710,
+ 357,
+ 720
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "9 7 . 4 7 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 357,
+ 708,
+ 378,
+ 723
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 378,
+ 710,
+ 420,
+ 720
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\epsilon = 1 0 \\mathrm { m V } ,",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 421,
+ 708,
+ 505,
+ 723
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "yielding an increase",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 720,
+ 398,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 720,
+ 160,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "in ASR from",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 160,
+ 721,
+ 180,
+ 731
+ ],
+ "score": 0.82,
+ "content": "85 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 180,
+ 720,
+ 184,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 0.0,
+ "content": "",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 184,
+ 721,
+ 209,
+ 731
+ ],
+ "score": 0.41,
+ "content": "\\mathrm { 5 m V ) }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 210,
+ 720,
+ 222,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 222,
+ 721,
+ 242,
+ 731
+ ],
+ "score": 0.83,
+ "content": "9 9 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 242,
+ 720,
+ 246,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 0.0,
+ "content": "",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 246,
+ 721,
+ 276,
+ 731
+ ],
+ "score": 0.62,
+ "content": "\\mathrm { 1 0 m V ) }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 276,
+ 720,
+ 398,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "shown in Figure 1 with PGD.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ }
+ ],
+ "page_idx": 14,
+ "page_size": [
+ 612,
+ 792
+ ],
+ "discarded_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 27,
+ 308,
+ 37
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 26,
+ 309,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 26,
+ 309,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2022",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 300,
+ 751,
+ 310,
+ 760
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 299,
+ 750,
+ 312,
+ 764
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 299,
+ 750,
+ 312,
+ 764
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "",
+ "type": "text",
+ "height": 14,
+ "width": 13
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "para_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 111,
+ 80,
+ 495,
+ 262
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 111,
+ 80,
+ 495,
+ 262
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 111,
+ 80,
+ 495,
+ 262
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 111,
+ 80,
+ 495,
+ 262
+ ],
+ "score": 0.784,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "2754d89a4671045e54c9d9a042e28c5bfceebb00058d60cea27bd8868f79baae.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 111,
+ 80,
+ 495,
+ 140.66666666666666
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 111,
+ 140.66666666666666,
+ 495,
+ 201.33333333333331
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 111,
+ 201.33333333333331,
+ 495,
+ 262.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 2
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 273,
+ 504,
+ 295
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 273,
+ 506,
+ 285
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 273,
+ 506,
+ 285
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 8: ASR on BCI Competition IV-2a with random noise, FGSM, PGD, and UAP with and without",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 283,
+ 181,
+ 295
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 283,
+ 181,
+ 295
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "derivative loss term.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2.25
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 333,
+ 502,
+ 356
+ ],
+ "lines": [],
+ "index": 5.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 332,
+ 504,
+ 357
+ ],
+ "lines_deleted": true
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 361,
+ 505,
+ 405
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 361,
+ 505,
+ 374
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 361,
+ 345,
+ 374
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Fig. 9 shows the ASR for different propagation parameters",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 345,
+ 362,
+ 360,
+ 372
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 361,
+ 361,
+ 378,
+ 374
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 378,
+ 362,
+ 390,
+ 372
+ ],
+ "score": 0.84,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d , }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 391,
+ 361,
+ 505,
+ 374
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ") and maximum perturbation",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 372,
+ 505,
+ 384
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 372,
+ 151,
+ 384
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "amplitudes",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 151,
+ 374,
+ 157,
+ 382
+ ],
+ "score": 0.53,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 158,
+ 372,
+ 505,
+ 384
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". When considering the head model during the design of the attack (Case 2, w/HM), both",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 383,
+ 505,
+ 396
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 383,
+ 505,
+ 396
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "PGD and UAP reach significantly higher ASR compared to attacks designed without the consideration",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 394,
+ 255,
+ 406
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 394,
+ 255,
+ 406
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "of the head model (Case 3, w/oHM).",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 10
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 361,
+ 505,
+ 406
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 108,
+ 442,
+ 266,
+ 454
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 441,
+ 268,
+ 456
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 441,
+ 268,
+ 456
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "D PLAUSIBILITY OF ATTACKS",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 478,
+ 505,
+ 567
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 478,
+ 505,
+ 492
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 478,
+ 505,
+ 492
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "This section provides power spectral density plots of original signals and attacked signals with and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 489,
+ 505,
+ 501
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 489,
+ 505,
+ 501
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "without the derivative loss term, shown in Figure 10. The power spectral density is determined",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 501,
+ 505,
+ 513
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 501,
+ 505,
+ 513
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "by computing the magnitude squared Fast Fourier Transform of the signals that were illustrated in",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 511,
+ 505,
+ 524
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 511,
+ 505,
+ 524
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 2. The attack designed with the derivative loss term has a similar distribution as the original",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 523,
+ 505,
+ 535
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 523,
+ 505,
+ 535
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "signal, where as the attack without derivative shows large contributions in the low frequency domain",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 533,
+ 505,
+ 546
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 533,
+ 139,
+ 545
+ ],
+ "score": 0.85,
+ "content": "( < 5 \\mathrm { H z } )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 139,
+ 533,
+ 505,
+ 546
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", which were not present in the original signal. These low-frequency components stem from",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 545,
+ 506,
+ 557
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 545,
+ 506,
+ 557
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the square-wave shaped attack and can be used as a way to detect the attack; hence, this attack cannot",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 556,
+ 224,
+ 568
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 556,
+ 224,
+ 568
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "be considered imperceptible.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 19
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 478,
+ 506,
+ 568
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 572,
+ 505,
+ 671
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 572,
+ 505,
+ 584
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 572,
+ 505,
+ 584
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Moreover, Figure 13 shows the attacks with and without derivative loss term with increasing maximum",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 582,
+ 505,
+ 595
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 582,
+ 309,
+ 595
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "amplitude \u000f. We can see that for low amplitudes (",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 309,
+ 583,
+ 333,
+ 594
+ ],
+ "score": 0.56,
+ "content": "\\mathrm { 1 m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 333,
+ 582,
+ 351,
+ 595
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 351,
+ 583,
+ 375,
+ 594
+ ],
+ "score": 0.47,
+ "content": "5 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 375,
+ 582,
+ 505,
+ 595
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ") the generated attacks with and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 593,
+ 505,
+ 607
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 593,
+ 280,
+ 607
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "without derivative still look like EEGs. At",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 280,
+ 594,
+ 307,
+ 605
+ ],
+ "score": 0.7,
+ "content": "1 0 \\mathrm { m V } ,",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 308,
+ 593,
+ 505,
+ 607
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "the attack generated without derivative presents",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 604,
+ 506,
+ 618
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 604,
+ 457,
+ 618
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "minor square-wave artifacts, which could be still imperceptible to a non-expert. With",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 458,
+ 605,
+ 487,
+ 615
+ ],
+ "score": 0.73,
+ "content": "2 5 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 487,
+ 604,
+ 506,
+ 618
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 615,
+ 506,
+ 629
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 616,
+ 134,
+ 627
+ ],
+ "score": 0.7,
+ "content": "5 0 \\mathrm { m V } ,",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 134,
+ 615,
+ 506,
+ 629
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", the ones generated without derivative have strong and perceptible square-wave displacements,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 627,
+ 505,
+ 639
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 627,
+ 505,
+ 639
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "while the ones generated with our proposed method can still be mistaken as real EEG signals. While",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 638,
+ 504,
+ 650
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 638,
+ 382,
+ 650
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with the instance-based attacks, it is not necessary to have more than",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 382,
+ 638,
+ 410,
+ 648
+ ],
+ "score": 0.75,
+ "content": "1 0 \\mathrm { m V }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 410,
+ 638,
+ 504,
+ 650
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to get a very high ASR",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 647,
+ 506,
+ 663
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 647,
+ 506,
+ 663
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(see Figure 1), with the universal attacks and physical constraints, the ASR increases with increasing",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 660,
+ 260,
+ 673
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 660,
+ 260,
+ 673
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "perturbation amplitude (see Figure 4).",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 28
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 24,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 104,
+ 572,
+ 506,
+ 673
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 677,
+ 505,
+ 732
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 677,
+ 505,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 677,
+ 505,
+ 689
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "The same observations can be drawn from the plausibility metrics, which have been proposed for the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 688,
+ 505,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 688,
+ 505,
+ 700
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "first time in this paper to assess quantitatively the EEG attacks. For example, looking at the cosine",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 697,
+ 507,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 697,
+ 147,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "similarity",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 147,
+ 699,
+ 160,
+ 710
+ ],
+ "score": 0.8,
+ "content": "( \\gamma )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 161,
+ 697,
+ 335,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "in Table 1, without the derivative loss term,",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 335,
+ 700,
+ 343,
+ 710
+ ],
+ "score": 0.8,
+ "content": "\\gamma",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 343,
+ 697,
+ 378,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "drops to",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 378,
+ 699,
+ 410,
+ 709
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "9 7 . 9 9 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 411,
+ 697,
+ 431,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 432,
+ 699,
+ 466,
+ 709
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\epsilon = 5 \\mathrm { m V } ,",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 466,
+ 697,
+ 507,
+ 713
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ", whereas,",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 708,
+ 505,
+ 723
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 708,
+ 184,
+ 723
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with the derivative,",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 185,
+ 711,
+ 192,
+ 721
+ ],
+ "score": 0.8,
+ "content": "\\gamma",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 192,
+ 708,
+ 324,
+ 723
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "drops to about the same value of",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 325,
+ 710,
+ 357,
+ 720
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "9 7 . 4 7 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 357,
+ 708,
+ 378,
+ 723
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 378,
+ 710,
+ 420,
+ 720
+ ],
+ "score": 0.89,
+ "content": "\\epsilon = 1 0 \\mathrm { m V } ,",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 421,
+ 708,
+ 505,
+ 723
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "yielding an increase",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 32
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 720,
+ 398,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 720,
+ 160,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "in ASR from",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 160,
+ 721,
+ 180,
+ 731
+ ],
+ "score": 0.82,
+ "content": "85 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 180,
+ 720,
+ 184,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 0.0,
+ "content": "",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 184,
+ 721,
+ 209,
+ 731
+ ],
+ "score": 0.41,
+ "content": "\\mathrm { 5 m V ) }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 210,
+ 720,
+ 222,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "to",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 222,
+ 721,
+ 242,
+ 731
+ ],
+ "score": 0.83,
+ "content": "9 9 \\%",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 242,
+ 720,
+ 246,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 0.0,
+ "content": "",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 246,
+ 721,
+ 276,
+ 731
+ ],
+ "score": 0.62,
+ "content": "\\mathrm { 1 0 m V ) }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 276,
+ 720,
+ 398,
+ 733
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "shown in Figure 1 with PGD.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 31,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 105,
+ 677,
+ 507,
+ 733
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "preproc_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 82,
+ 442,
+ 329
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 82,
+ 442,
+ 329
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 82,
+ 442,
+ 329
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 82,
+ 442,
+ 329
+ ],
+ "score": 0.976,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "ce3b790a23a18be77d8726d791255034fbb41f1cf3028b470ccdc8576c9d615a.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9.5,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 82,
+ 442,
+ 94.35
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 94.35,
+ 442,
+ 106.69999999999999
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 106.69999999999999,
+ 442,
+ 119.04999999999998
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 2
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 119.04999999999998,
+ 442,
+ 131.39999999999998
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 131.39999999999998,
+ 442,
+ 143.74999999999997
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 143.74999999999997,
+ 442,
+ 156.09999999999997
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 156.09999999999997,
+ 442,
+ 168.44999999999996
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 168.44999999999996,
+ 442,
+ 180.79999999999995
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 180.79999999999995,
+ 442,
+ 193.14999999999995
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 193.14999999999995,
+ 442,
+ 205.49999999999994
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 205.49999999999994,
+ 442,
+ 217.84999999999994
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 217.84999999999994,
+ 442,
+ 230.19999999999993
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 230.19999999999993,
+ 442,
+ 242.54999999999993
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 242.54999999999993,
+ 442,
+ 254.89999999999992
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 254.89999999999992,
+ 442,
+ 267.24999999999994
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 267.24999999999994,
+ 442,
+ 279.59999999999997
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 279.59999999999997,
+ 442,
+ 291.95
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 291.95,
+ 442,
+ 304.3
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 304.3,
+ 442,
+ 316.65000000000003
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 316.65000000000003,
+ 442,
+ 329.00000000000006
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 19
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 340,
+ 503,
+ 361
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 339,
+ 505,
+ 352
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 339,
+ 505,
+ 352
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 9: Results on BCI Competition IV-2a. ASR of PGD and UAP in Case 2), i.e., computed with head model",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 351,
+ 361,
+ 362
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 351,
+ 361,
+ 362
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(w/HM); and in Case 3), i.e., computed without head model (w/oHM).",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15.0
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 374,
+ 424,
+ 509
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 374,
+ 424,
+ 509
+ ],
+ "group_id": 1,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 374,
+ 424,
+ 509
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 374,
+ 424,
+ 509
+ ],
+ "score": 0.97,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "24bbf9586d061f5fa7fa0a1b21aa8350f5c5b44b459c9cb84b74008f7c705ba6.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 374,
+ 424,
+ 386.27272727272725
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 386.27272727272725,
+ 424,
+ 398.5454545454545
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 398.5454545454545,
+ 424,
+ 410.81818181818176
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 410.81818181818176,
+ 424,
+ 423.090909090909
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 423.090909090909,
+ 424,
+ 435.36363636363626
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 435.36363636363626,
+ 424,
+ 447.6363636363635
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 27
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 447.6363636363635,
+ 424,
+ 459.90909090909076
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 459.90909090909076,
+ 424,
+ 472.181818181818
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 472.181818181818,
+ 424,
+ 484.45454545454527
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 484.45454545454527,
+ 424,
+ 496.7272727272725
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 496.7272727272725,
+ 424,
+ 508.9999999999998
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 32
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 519,
+ 504,
+ 540
+ ],
+ "group_id": 1,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 518,
+ 505,
+ 530
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 518,
+ 505,
+ 530
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 10: Power spectral density comparison of the attack with and without derivative loss term, as well as the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 529,
+ 230,
+ 540
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 529,
+ 230,
+ 540
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "original signal shown in Figure 2.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30.25
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 559,
+ 335,
+ 573
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 558,
+ 336,
+ 575
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 558,
+ 336,
+ 575
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "E CLASSIFICATION CONFUSION MATRICES",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 585,
+ 505,
+ 673
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 585,
+ 504,
+ 597
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 585,
+ 504,
+ 597
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "We analyze the confusion matrices before and after the proposed attack. Fig. 11 shows the confusion",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 596,
+ 504,
+ 607
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 596,
+ 504,
+ 607
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "matrix of EEGNet on the Physionet dataset before the attack, where all classes can be classified with",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 607,
+ 505,
+ 619
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 607,
+ 174,
+ 619
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "similar accuracy",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 174,
+ 607,
+ 234,
+ 617
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "( 7 2 . 8 \\% - 7 3 . 5 \\% )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 235,
+ 607,
+ 505,
+ 619
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". Fig. 12 shows the confusion matrices for three different propagation",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 618,
+ 506,
+ 630
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 618,
+ 153,
+ 630
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "parameters",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 154,
+ 618,
+ 223,
+ 630
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "( \\lambda _ { m } \\in \\{ 1 , 5 , 1 5 \\} )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 223,
+ 618,
+ 506,
+ 630
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and two attack positions (T9 and T10) which correspond to the left and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 628,
+ 506,
+ 641
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 628,
+ 506,
+ 641
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "right side of the head. When considering the attacks from the left side, shown in Fig. 12a–12c, more",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 640,
+ 505,
+ 652
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 640,
+ 505,
+ 652
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "samples with ground-truth label “right” can be fooled to “rest”. This is particularly articulated in",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 651,
+ 505,
+ 663
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 651,
+ 259,
+ 663
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "largely attenuated propagation model",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 259,
+ 651,
+ 292,
+ 662
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m } { = } 1 5 )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 292,
+ 651,
+ 505,
+ 663
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". In a similar vein, attacks coming from the right side",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 661,
+ 466,
+ 674
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 661,
+ 466,
+ 674
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "of the head (T10) are more effective on data with ground-truth label “left” (Fig. 12d–12f).",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "page_idx": 15,
+ "page_size": [
+ 612,
+ 792
+ ],
+ "discarded_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 27,
+ 308,
+ 37
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 26,
+ 309,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 26,
+ 309,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2022",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 300,
+ 752,
+ 311,
+ 760
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 299,
+ 750,
+ 312,
+ 764
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 299,
+ 750,
+ 312,
+ 764
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "",
+ "type": "text",
+ "height": 14,
+ "width": 13
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "para_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 82,
+ 442,
+ 329
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 82,
+ 442,
+ 329
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 82,
+ 442,
+ 329
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 82,
+ 442,
+ 329
+ ],
+ "score": 0.976,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "ce3b790a23a18be77d8726d791255034fbb41f1cf3028b470ccdc8576c9d615a.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9.5,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 82,
+ 442,
+ 94.35
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 94.35,
+ 442,
+ 106.69999999999999
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 106.69999999999999,
+ 442,
+ 119.04999999999998
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 2
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 119.04999999999998,
+ 442,
+ 131.39999999999998
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 131.39999999999998,
+ 442,
+ 143.74999999999997
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 143.74999999999997,
+ 442,
+ 156.09999999999997
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 5
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 156.09999999999997,
+ 442,
+ 168.44999999999996
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 168.44999999999996,
+ 442,
+ 180.79999999999995
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 180.79999999999995,
+ 442,
+ 193.14999999999995
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 193.14999999999995,
+ 442,
+ 205.49999999999994
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 9
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 205.49999999999994,
+ 442,
+ 217.84999999999994
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 10
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 217.84999999999994,
+ 442,
+ 230.19999999999993
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 11
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 230.19999999999993,
+ 442,
+ 242.54999999999993
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 12
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 242.54999999999993,
+ 442,
+ 254.89999999999992
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 13
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 254.89999999999992,
+ 442,
+ 267.24999999999994
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 14
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 267.24999999999994,
+ 442,
+ 279.59999999999997
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 15
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 279.59999999999997,
+ 442,
+ 291.95
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 16
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 291.95,
+ 442,
+ 304.3
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 17
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 304.3,
+ 442,
+ 316.65000000000003
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 18
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 169,
+ 316.65000000000003,
+ 442,
+ 329.00000000000006
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 19
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 340,
+ 503,
+ 361
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 339,
+ 505,
+ 352
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 339,
+ 505,
+ 352
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 9: Results on BCI Competition IV-2a. ASR of PGD and UAP in Case 2), i.e., computed with head model",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 351,
+ 361,
+ 362
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 351,
+ 361,
+ 362
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(w/HM); and in Case 3), i.e., computed without head model (w/oHM).",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 21
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 20.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 15.0
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 374,
+ 424,
+ 509
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 374,
+ 424,
+ 509
+ ],
+ "group_id": 1,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 374,
+ 424,
+ 509
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 374,
+ 424,
+ 509
+ ],
+ "score": 0.97,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "24bbf9586d061f5fa7fa0a1b21aa8350f5c5b44b459c9cb84b74008f7c705ba6.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 27,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 374,
+ 424,
+ 386.27272727272725
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 22
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 386.27272727272725,
+ 424,
+ 398.5454545454545
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 23
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 398.5454545454545,
+ 424,
+ 410.81818181818176
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 24
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 410.81818181818176,
+ 424,
+ 423.090909090909
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 25
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 423.090909090909,
+ 424,
+ 435.36363636363626
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 26
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 435.36363636363626,
+ 424,
+ 447.6363636363635
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 27
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 447.6363636363635,
+ 424,
+ 459.90909090909076
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 28
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 459.90909090909076,
+ 424,
+ 472.181818181818
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 29
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 472.181818181818,
+ 424,
+ 484.45454545454527
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 30
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 484.45454545454527,
+ 424,
+ 496.7272727272725
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 31
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 187,
+ 496.7272727272725,
+ 424,
+ 508.9999999999998
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 32
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 519,
+ 504,
+ 540
+ ],
+ "group_id": 1,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 518,
+ 505,
+ 530
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 518,
+ 505,
+ 530
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 10: Power spectral density comparison of the attack with and without derivative loss term, as well as the",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 529,
+ 230,
+ 540
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 529,
+ 230,
+ 540
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "original signal shown in Figure 2.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 34
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 33.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 30.25
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "title",
+ "bbox": [
+ 107,
+ 559,
+ 335,
+ 573
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 558,
+ 336,
+ 575
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 558,
+ 336,
+ 575
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "E CLASSIFICATION CONFUSION MATRICES",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 35
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "text",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 585,
+ 505,
+ 673
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 585,
+ 504,
+ 597
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 585,
+ 504,
+ 597
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "We analyze the confusion matrices before and after the proposed attack. Fig. 11 shows the confusion",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 36
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 596,
+ 504,
+ 607
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 596,
+ 504,
+ 607
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "matrix of EEGNet on the Physionet dataset before the attack, where all classes can be classified with",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 37
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 607,
+ 505,
+ 619
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 607,
+ 174,
+ 619
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "similar accuracy",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 174,
+ 607,
+ 234,
+ 617
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "( 7 2 . 8 \\% - 7 3 . 5 \\% )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 235,
+ 607,
+ 505,
+ 619
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". Fig. 12 shows the confusion matrices for three different propagation",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 38
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 618,
+ 506,
+ 630
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 104,
+ 618,
+ 153,
+ 630
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "parameters",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 154,
+ 618,
+ 223,
+ 630
+ ],
+ "score": 0.9,
+ "content": "( \\lambda _ { m } \\in \\{ 1 , 5 , 1 5 \\} )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 223,
+ 618,
+ 506,
+ 630
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and two attack positions (T9 and T10) which correspond to the left and",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 628,
+ 506,
+ 641
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 628,
+ 506,
+ 641
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "right side of the head. When considering the attacks from the left side, shown in Fig. 12a–12c, more",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 40
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 640,
+ 505,
+ 652
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 640,
+ 505,
+ 652
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "samples with ground-truth label “right” can be fooled to “rest”. This is particularly articulated in",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 41
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 651,
+ 505,
+ 663
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 651,
+ 259,
+ 663
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "largely attenuated propagation model",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 259,
+ 651,
+ 292,
+ 662
+ ],
+ "score": 0.86,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m } { = } 1 5 )",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 292,
+ 651,
+ 505,
+ 663
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ". In a similar vein, attacks coming from the right side",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 42
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 661,
+ 466,
+ 674
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 661,
+ 466,
+ 674
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "of the head (T10) are more effective on data with ground-truth label “left” (Fig. 12d–12f).",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 43
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 39.5,
+ "bbox_fs": [
+ 104,
+ 585,
+ 506,
+ 674
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "preproc_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 127,
+ 371,
+ 249
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 127,
+ 371,
+ 249
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 127,
+ 371,
+ 249
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 127,
+ 371,
+ 249
+ ],
+ "score": 0.932,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "1ea1613670bc55b7d890555d5cc7a5add225bf73d62460f527b51eaf42cf5122.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0.5,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 127,
+ 371,
+ 188.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 188.0,
+ 371,
+ 249.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 1
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 166,
+ 259,
+ 444,
+ 270
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 165,
+ 257,
+ 445,
+ 273
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 165,
+ 257,
+ 445,
+ 273
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 11: Confusion matrix original EEG predictions on Physionet dataset.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1.25
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 368,
+ 491,
+ 635
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 368,
+ 491,
+ 635
+ ],
+ "group_id": 1,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 368,
+ 491,
+ 635
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 368,
+ 491,
+ 635
+ ],
+ "score": 0.974,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "f736298343192e93d83223443cacb3b79a8f52cbc4fc153ebd24626308f0133e.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 368,
+ 491,
+ 457.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 457.0,
+ 491,
+ 546.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 546.0,
+ 491,
+ 635.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 5
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 642,
+ 506,
+ 684
+ ],
+ "group_id": 1,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 643,
+ 506,
+ 655
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 643,
+ 506,
+ 655
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 12: Confusion matrices for the Physionet dataset after attacking EEGNet with the proposed PGD attack",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 653,
+ 505,
+ 664
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 653,
+ 505,
+ 664
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with derivative and considering the spatial propagation. The attack is either performed from the left electrode",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 663,
+ 506,
+ 675
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 663,
+ 467,
+ 675
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(T9) or from the right electrode (T10). We consider different magnitude propagation parameters",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 467,
+ 663,
+ 481,
+ 673
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 481,
+ 663,
+ 506,
+ 675
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and a",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 673,
+ 229,
+ 684
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 673,
+ 198,
+ 684
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "constant delay parameter",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 199,
+ 673,
+ 225,
+ 683
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d } { = } 0 . 3",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 226,
+ 673,
+ 229,
+ 684
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5.75
+ }
+ ],
+ "page_idx": 16,
+ "page_size": [
+ 612,
+ 792
+ ],
+ "discarded_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 27,
+ 308,
+ 37
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 26,
+ 308,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 26,
+ 308,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2022",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 300,
+ 751,
+ 310,
+ 760
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 299,
+ 750,
+ 312,
+ 764
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 299,
+ 750,
+ 312,
+ 764
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "",
+ "type": "text",
+ "height": 14,
+ "width": 13
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "para_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 127,
+ 371,
+ 249
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 127,
+ 371,
+ 249
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 127,
+ 371,
+ 249
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 127,
+ 371,
+ 249
+ ],
+ "score": 0.932,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "1ea1613670bc55b7d890555d5cc7a5add225bf73d62460f527b51eaf42cf5122.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 0.5,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 127,
+ 371,
+ 188.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 239,
+ 188.0,
+ 371,
+ 249.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 1
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 166,
+ 259,
+ 444,
+ 270
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 165,
+ 257,
+ 445,
+ 273
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 165,
+ 257,
+ 445,
+ 273
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 11: Confusion matrix original EEG predictions on Physionet dataset.",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1.25
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 368,
+ 491,
+ 635
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 368,
+ 491,
+ 635
+ ],
+ "group_id": 1,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 368,
+ 491,
+ 635
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 368,
+ 491,
+ 635
+ ],
+ "score": 0.974,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "f736298343192e93d83223443cacb3b79a8f52cbc4fc153ebd24626308f0133e.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 368,
+ 491,
+ 457.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 457.0,
+ 491,
+ 546.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 4
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 114,
+ 546.0,
+ 491,
+ 635.0
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 5
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 642,
+ 506,
+ 684
+ ],
+ "group_id": 1,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 643,
+ 506,
+ 655
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 643,
+ 506,
+ 655
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 12: Confusion matrices for the Physionet dataset after attacking EEGNet with the proposed PGD attack",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 6
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 653,
+ 505,
+ 664
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 653,
+ 505,
+ 664
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "with derivative and considering the spatial propagation. The attack is either performed from the left electrode",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 663,
+ 506,
+ 675
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 663,
+ 467,
+ 675
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "(T9) or from the right electrode (T10). We consider different magnitude propagation parameters",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 467,
+ 663,
+ 481,
+ 673
+ ],
+ "score": 0.91,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { m }",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 481,
+ 663,
+ 506,
+ 675
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "and a",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 8
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 673,
+ 229,
+ 684
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 105,
+ 673,
+ 198,
+ 684
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "constant delay parameter",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 199,
+ 673,
+ 225,
+ 683
+ ],
+ "score": 0.88,
+ "content": "\\lambda _ { d } { = } 0 . 3",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 226,
+ 673,
+ 229,
+ 684
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 9
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 7.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 5.75
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "preproc_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 142,
+ 504,
+ 632
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 142,
+ 504,
+ 632
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 142,
+ 504,
+ 632
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 142,
+ 504,
+ 632
+ ],
+ "score": 0.966,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "6345909357cc6d546532e1d948e55cd4d914328dd323e1190fe1921adc19c884.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 142,
+ 504,
+ 305.33333333333337
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 305.33333333333337,
+ 504,
+ 468.66666666666674
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 468.66666666666674,
+ 504,
+ 632.0000000000001
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 2
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 640,
+ 505,
+ 662
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 640,
+ 505,
+ 651
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 640,
+ 505,
+ 651
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 13: A successful PGD attack on Physionet dataset (i) without and (ii) with derivative with different",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 651,
+ 227,
+ 662
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 651,
+ 217,
+ 662
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "values of maximum amplitude",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 218,
+ 653,
+ 223,
+ 660
+ ],
+ "score": 0.45,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 223,
+ 651,
+ 227,
+ 662
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2.25
+ }
+ ],
+ "page_idx": 17,
+ "page_size": [
+ 612,
+ 792
+ ],
+ "discarded_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 27,
+ 308,
+ 37
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 26,
+ 308,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 26,
+ 308,
+ 38
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2022",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "discarded",
+ "bbox": [
+ 300,
+ 751,
+ 311,
+ 760
+ ],
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 299,
+ 750,
+ 312,
+ 763
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 299,
+ 750,
+ 312,
+ 763
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "18",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "para_blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image",
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 142,
+ 504,
+ 632
+ ],
+ "blocks": [
+ {
+ "type": "image_body",
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 142,
+ 504,
+ 632
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 142,
+ 504,
+ 632
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 142,
+ 504,
+ 632
+ ],
+ "score": 0.966,
+ "type": "image",
+ "image_path": "6345909357cc6d546532e1d948e55cd4d914328dd323e1190fe1921adc19c884.jpg"
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 1,
+ "virtual_lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 142,
+ 504,
+ 305.33333333333337
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 305.33333333333337,
+ 504,
+ 468.66666666666674
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 109,
+ 468.66666666666674,
+ 504,
+ 632.0000000000001
+ ],
+ "spans": [],
+ "index": 2
+ }
+ ]
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "image_caption",
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 640,
+ 505,
+ 662
+ ],
+ "group_id": 0,
+ "lines": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 640,
+ 505,
+ 651
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 640,
+ 505,
+ 651
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "Figure 13: A successful PGD attack on Physionet dataset (i) without and (ii) with derivative with different",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 651,
+ 227,
+ 662
+ ],
+ "spans": [
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 106,
+ 651,
+ 217,
+ 662
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": "values of maximum amplitude",
+ "type": "text"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 218,
+ 653,
+ 223,
+ 660
+ ],
+ "score": 0.45,
+ "content": "\\epsilon",
+ "type": "inline_equation"
+ },
+ {
+ "bbox": [
+ 223,
+ 651,
+ 227,
+ 662
+ ],
+ "score": 1.0,
+ "content": ".",
+ "type": "text"
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 4
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 3.5
+ }
+ ],
+ "index": 2.25
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ ],
+ "_backend": "pipeline",
+ "_version_name": "2.2.2"
+}
\ No newline at end of file