Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -9,142 +9,108 @@ tags:
|
|
| 9 |
- Satellite_image
|
| 10 |
- Remote_sensing
|
| 11 |
size_categories:
|
| 12 |
-
-
|
| 13 |
---
|
| 14 |
-
# Dataset Card for Dataset Name
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-
<!-- Provide a quick summary of the dataset. -->
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-
## Dataset
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-
|
| 25 |
|
|
|
|
| 26 |
|
|
|
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
-
- **Funded by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 30 |
-
- **Shared by [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 31 |
-
- **Language(s) (NLP):** [More Information Needed]
|
| 32 |
-
- **License:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-
|
| 39 |
-
|
| 40 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-
##
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-
###
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
-
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
-
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
-
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
-
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
-
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
-
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
-
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
-
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
-
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
-
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
-
|
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
-
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
-
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
-
|
| 87 |
|
| 88 |
-
|
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
-
|
| 91 |
-
|
| 92 |
-
#### Annotation process
|
| 93 |
-
|
| 94 |
-
<!-- This section describes the annotation process such as annotation tools used in the process, the amount of data annotated, annotation guidelines provided to the annotators, interannotator statistics, annotation validation, etc. -->
|
| 95 |
-
|
| 96 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 97 |
-
|
| 98 |
-
#### Who are the annotators?
|
| 99 |
-
|
| 100 |
-
<!-- This section describes the people or systems who created the annotations. -->
|
| 101 |
-
|
| 102 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 103 |
-
|
| 104 |
-
#### Personal and Sensitive Information
|
| 105 |
-
|
| 106 |
-
<!-- State whether the dataset contains data that might be considered personal, sensitive, or private (e.g., data that reveals addresses, uniquely identifiable names or aliases, racial or ethnic origins, sexual orientations, religious beliefs, political opinions, financial or health data, etc.). If efforts were made to anonymize the data, describe the anonymization process. -->
|
| 107 |
-
|
| 108 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 109 |
-
|
| 110 |
-
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 111 |
-
|
| 112 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
|
| 113 |
-
|
| 114 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 115 |
-
|
| 116 |
-
### Recommendations
|
| 117 |
-
|
| 118 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
|
| 119 |
-
|
| 120 |
-
Users should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the dataset. More information needed for further recommendations.
|
| 121 |
-
|
| 122 |
-
## Citation [optional]
|
| 123 |
-
|
| 124 |
-
<!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the dataset, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
|
| 125 |
-
|
| 126 |
-
**BibTeX:**
|
| 127 |
-
|
| 128 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 129 |
-
|
| 130 |
-
**APA:**
|
| 131 |
-
|
| 132 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 133 |
-
|
| 134 |
-
## Glossary [optional]
|
| 135 |
-
|
| 136 |
-
<!-- If relevant, include terms and calculations in this section that can help readers understand the dataset or dataset card. -->
|
| 137 |
-
|
| 138 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 139 |
-
|
| 140 |
-
## More Information [optional]
|
| 141 |
-
|
| 142 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 143 |
-
|
| 144 |
-
## Dataset Card Authors [optional]
|
| 145 |
-
|
| 146 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 147 |
-
|
| 148 |
-
## Dataset Card Contact
|
| 149 |
-
|
| 150 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
- Satellite_image
|
| 10 |
- Remote_sensing
|
| 11 |
size_categories:
|
| 12 |
+
- n>1T
|
| 13 |
---
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
+
# Dataset Card for Sentinel Patch Imagery Dataset for Chinese Agricultural Land
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
+
## 1. Dataset Description
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
+
- **Dataset Name:** China Agri-Land Sentinel Patch Imagery Dataset
|
| 21 |
+
- **Version:** V1.0
|
| 22 |
+
- **Authors:** (To be filled by the dataset creator)
|
| 23 |
+
- **License:** (To be filled by the dataset creator, e.g., CC BY 4.0)
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
+
### 1.1. Overview
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
+
This dataset provides a curated collection of multi-sensor, multi-temporal image patches focusing exclusively on agricultural land across the People's Republic of China. It features Sentinel-1 (Synthetic Aperture Radar, SAR) and Sentinel-2 (Optical) imagery, standardized to a uniform pixel dimension ($\mathbf{264 \times 264}$) and a consistent Coordinate Reference System (CRS) for time-series analysis. The data acquisition is governed by a rigorous workflow designed to maximize geometric and temporal consistency across four key seasonal stages.
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
+
### 1.2. Data Sources
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
+
The raw data is sourced from the European Space Agency's (ESA) Copernicus Sentinel missions, accessed via the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
+
| Sensor | GEE Collection ID | Bands | Resolution (Raw) |
|
| 34 |
+
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
|
| 35 |
+
| **Sentinel-2** (Optical) | `COPERNICUS/S2_HARMONIZED` | 13 bands (B1-B12) | 10 meters |
|
| 36 |
+
| **Sentinel-1** (SAR) | `COPERNICUS/S1_GRD` | 2 bands (VV, VH) | 10 meters |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
+
### 1.3. Geographic and Temporal Coverage
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
+
* **Geographic Scope:** Agricultural areas across the entire territory of China.
|
| 41 |
+
* **Target Land Cover:** Each sample location is centered on agricultural land, ensuring a high proportion of agricultural land use (implied $\ge 80\%$).
|
| 42 |
+
* **Temporal Depth:** 4 distinct time steps (patches) are collected for each location and sensor, aligning with seasonal dates.
|
| 43 |
+
* **Acquisition Window:** $\pm 30$ days around four seasonal reference dates (e.g., Solstices and Equinoxes).
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
+
## 2. Dataset Structure and Data Fields
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
+
The dataset is organized hierarchically, reflecting the grid location, unique sample ID, and temporal patches. The core data is composed of GeoTIFF files.
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
+
### 2.1. File Naming Convention (Post-Processed)
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
+
The final data structure is organized as:
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
+
`{base_output_dir}/{grid_code}_{grid_center_lon}_{grid_center_lat}/{point_id}/{gee_id}.tif`
|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
+
* **`point\_id`:** Unique identifier combining the grid code and CSV file line index (e.g., `44RPQ_123`).
|
| 56 |
+
* **`gee\_id`:** The original GEE system index, which encodes the acquisition date and MGRS tile information (e.g., `20210621T030519_20210621T051147_T44RPQ`).
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
+
### 2.2. Standardized Patch Properties
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
+
All patches, regardless of the sensor, have been harmonized during post-processing to the following properties:
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
+
| Property | Value |
|
| 63 |
+
| :--- | :--- |
|
| 64 |
+
| **Pixel Dimensions (Height x Width)** | $\mathbf{264 \times 264}$ |
|
| 65 |
+
| **Final Spatial Extent** | 2,640m x 2,640m ($264 \text{ pixels} \times 10 \text{m/pixel}$) |
|
| 66 |
+
| **Data Type** | **Float32** ($\text{np.float32}$) |
|
| 67 |
+
| **Coordinate Reference System (CRS)** | Harmonized to the **Majority CRS** (e.g., UTM) of the raw time series stack |
|
| 68 |
+
| **File Format** | GeoTIFF (.tif) |
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
+
## 3. Pre-processing and Standardization Workflow
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
+
The data preparation involves two major phases: GEE Acquisition and Local Post-Processing.
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
+
### 3.1. GEE Acquisition Filters
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
+
| Sensor | Acquisition Logic & Filters | Source |
|
| 77 |
+
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
|
| 78 |
+
| **S2** | **Cloud Filter:** Max $\text{CLOUDY\_PIXEL\_PERCENTAGE} \le 20\%$ (default). | |
|
| 79 |
+
| | **Geometric Consistency:** Requires all 4 selected images for a location to share the **identical MGRS tile code**. | |
|
| 80 |
+
| **S1** | **Orbit Priority:** Prioritizes **DESCENDING** orbit images; falls back to **ASCENDING** if no valid DESCENDING image is found. | |
|
| 81 |
+
| | **Data Filters:** $\text{instrumentMode} = \text{'IW'}$, $\text{resolution\_meters} = 10$, $\text{transmitterReceiverPolarisation} = \text{['VV', 'VH']}$. | |
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
+
### 3.2. Local Post-Processing (Harmonization)
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
+
The `post_processing_S1_V4.py` script applies the following steps to the raw downloaded GeoTIFFs:
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
+
1. **Reference Center Calculation:** The geographic coordinates ($\text{lon}$, $\text{lat}$) of the center pixel of the **first image** in the raw sequence are used as the consistent cropping reference point.
|
| 88 |
+
2. **CRS and Transform Alignment:**
|
| 89 |
+
* The **majority CRS** and its corresponding Affine Transform (`majority\_transform`) are identified for the time series stack.
|
| 90 |
+
* Any image with a non-matching CRS/Transform is **reprojected** to the majority standard.
|
| 91 |
+
* **Resampling Method:** Nearest Neighbor.
|
| 92 |
+
3. **Cropping:** All images are cropped to the $\mathbf{264 \times 264}$ pixel size centered on the calculated reference point.
|
| 93 |
+
4. **Data Type Conversion:** Final conversion to **Float32**.
|
| 94 |
|
| 95 |
+
## 4. Intended Uses and Limitations
|
| 96 |
|
| 97 |
+
### 4.1. Intended Uses
|
| 98 |
|
| 99 |
+
* **Multi-Modal Remote Sensing:** Training and benchmarking models that fuse SAR (S1) and Optical (S2) data for robust land cover classification and monitoring.
|
| 100 |
+
* **Time-Series Analysis:** Developing and validating spatio-temporal models (e.g., RNNs, 3D CNNs) for crop type identification and phenology monitoring based on consistent seasonal time steps.
|
| 101 |
+
* **Agricultural Intelligence:** Supporting research on agricultural classification, yield prediction, and land use mapping in China.
|
| 102 |
|
| 103 |
+
### 4.2. Limitations and Caveats
|
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
+
* **Temporal Gaps:** The data relies on a $\pm 30$ day window around seasonal peaks. The actual acquisition date can vary widely within this 60-day window, leading to some temporal jitter.
|
| 106 |
+
* **Resampling Method:** The use of Nearest Neighbor resampling for reprojection preserves original pixel values but may lead to minor geometric imperfections or stair-step effects on boundaries, especially if the raw image CRS significantly differed from the final majority CRS.
|
| 107 |
+
* **Cloud Cover (S2):** Although filtered, the S2 data can still contain up to $20\%$ cloud cover or shadow pixels. Further masking or cloud removal may be necessary for some applications.
|
| 108 |
+
* **S1 Orbit Mix:** While the S1 workflow prioritizes DESCENDING, some time steps may rely on ASCENDING images. Users should account for the potential change in look angle and its effect on SAR backscatter signatures.
|
| 109 |
|
| 110 |
+
## 5. Citing This Dataset
|
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
+
(To be filled by the dataset creator)
|
| 113 |
|
| 114 |
+
## 6. Maintenance
|
| 115 |
|
| 116 |
+
(To be filled by the dataset creator, e.g., Contact information, Update frequency)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|