Animal testing should be banned!
Humans and animals have different dnas. It has been proven that over 95%of drugs that claim to pass the animals test, fail when tested on humans. One bit of dna looks much like another but an obvious difference at a larger scale is the number of chromsomes. Humans have 23 pair which is middling kind of number, some animals have more are dogs with 39 pair and shrimp with 43-46 pair.
Over i.4 million animals die each year from animal testing. It is estimated that more than 100 million animals fall prey to animal testing every year.Stop animal testing
Animal testing should be banned because is unreliable and consequently dangerous for humans as well as it's immoral and cruel . All species present fundamental differences among them and it's impossible and inconceivable to apply the same principles and standards to all living organisms! For this reason I hope that this unnecessary and outdated method will be banned and replaced with others not using animal models
Right to live
We are all part of nature dominating others does not bind us to the world but destroys the whole community a time will then also come when we will be dominated by others and we will have no power to overcome this
lets see all living things with due respect to live a fruitful worldYes animal testing should be banned, It shouldn't of existed in the first place:
Animal life's are just as important as human life's, Animals are equal and to say that animal testing isn't wrong is saying that their lives and feelings don't matter that only human life matters, Animal testing is wrong and we shouldn't be exploiting them it's disgusting that we take advantage of them like this they are vulnerable beings that need us to protect them, Not use them or abuse them, Some humans make me sick.
Testing should be banned!
Animal testing is not okay. There are about 100 million animals killed every year from animal testing. 100 million! That's just not right! Most of the time there are flaws in the tests and those poor animals lives are just wasted anyway. And plus, Since they have a different immune system and stuff, The results won't really show what will happen to a human.
Animal testing Should be Banned
Animal testing is cruel and inhumane. There are many other alternatives that are cheaper and more accurate. There are cell cultures, Computer models and sometimes human volunteers. Animal testing is sometimes not necessary like in testing beauty products. On top of that, Only 5% of animals tested are under the Animal Welfare act in the U. S. People say that the animals are treated well. How will we know if only 5% are under law? Also people say that since they don't really have rights they can do whatever they want. Why don't animals have rights anyway? They are living things. Just because they can't talk and aren't as smart doesn't mean that they shouldn't have rights. There are some pretty mean people in this world that have rights. Why shouldn't innocent animals have some? Besides, Most of the tests don't benefit them anyway and since they have different DNA the tests are likely inaccurate on a human. They don't get anything out of it but traumatic experiences and maybe death. There have been statistics saying that 90% of animal researchers said that animal testing is good. Well that's not very accurate because it's their job to research and test animals!
Animal testing should be banned
Because animals don't live to be tested on, They just want to live their lives as normal animals around the world. Animal testing is killing a lot of animals such as cats, Dogs, Rabbits, Birds, And so much more. I get why they test animals but like come on, Don't you think it is a bit cruel to test animals?
Ban animal testing
People are killing animals when they shouldn't be killed. Most of the diseases humans get animals don't ever get. They are being treated very badly and cant speak for themselves and don't deserve. Animals get deformations from the drugs. 90% to 95% of the tests that work on animals wont work on humans so whats the point of putting them through that pain and suffering.
Banned animal testing
We should banned animal testing because animals get through a lot of pain and even kill them even making a lot of animal instinct from the hole world even giving drugs to animals and instead of helping them you kill them so animal testing should be banned from those very reasons.
Why do we need to kill animals to have a more luxurious life?
Animal testing is basically like bullying. You are taking advantage of a weaker, inferior being. You wouldn't push a kid off the slide, or punch a girl in the face, so why would you think that testing then killing an innocent, defenseless animal would be alright? We all enjoy the benefits of the results of animal testing but at what price? Shouldn't we, as the more advanced race be more responsible and humble?
If we can use them for everything else in society, why not this?
The uses gained from animals are innumerable; we eat them, we use their furs, we test them and we are even legally allowed to sacrifice them (as long as it is not in a sadistic manner). Yet, people are going to complain that we should not test on them? Doesn't make much sense to me, but people can think what they want of course. As long as it is not painful then I have no problem with those tests.
Human testing is worse
There are some or many experiments that are unethical to conduct on humans. Currently there are experiments with chemicals in our environment that help us to determine the effects of chemicals. Take BPA, food additives, and potential carcinogens. We cant take humans and use elevated levels of these chemical to see if they will inevitably cause disease or damages. With animals, we can see if there are potential correlations between certain chemical, tasks, or things and the resulting dysfunctions. To wait for this data to be apparent in a human population would be ignorant and dangerous as well as unlikely to provide statistically useful data (due to the vast interactions of many different environmental factors that cant be singled out).
Animal testing should not be banned
Do you want to be tested on?We have no choice and animals also benefit because we find animal diseases vaccine through the process and we people need to survive and this is our chance it helped some diseases and It will help others some time soon. God bless the U.S.A
I support animal testing
Whenever you try to see if you are for or against a certain issue, you have to analyze if the benefits outweigh the costs. As it pertains to animal testing, it is quite clear - they do. Numerous advances in the treatments of diseases and illnesses that were once death sentences have been linked to animal testing of medical treatments. Here, the good of the human species outweighs the good of animals.
Animal testing should not be banned.
Animal testing is an important way for scientists to advance their research. It is important to use legitimate research methods to find medical breakthroughs. Although it is not always ethical to cause animal suffering, if testing animals can lead to the cures for human diseases, we should pursue these methods.
Animal testing helps the greater good
No, animal testing should not be banned. It should however be regulated so that the animals are treated humanly. Animal testing not only finds cures and solutions to the human population, it also provides the same information in the animal population. How else would be able develop vaccines for humans and animals alike?
No it is okay sometimes
I think animal testing is okay in some instances. If the testing is not harming the animal and the animal is being treated well I see no problem with testing on animals. Once there is a risk of harm or mistreatment though that should be banned. We need to be respectful of animals.
Animal Testing Necessary
Unfortunately, animal testing is necessary these days for product testing and other endeavors. The fact of the matter is that testing on animals is far less dangerous than testing on humans. Federal law prohibits animal testing that puts the animal in tangible danger after all, and these laws are adequate enough.
Animals are animals.
Animals are here for our benefit. We eat them, we wear them, we use them for labour and nobody bats an eye. But mention that you want to inject some rats with a vaccine before you vaccinate infants and suddenly everyone is up in arms? Ridiculous.
As for the people saying test on criminals because we have a seemingly infinite supply of rapists and paedophiles, while I am morally opposed to this I would instead like to point out that we do not in fact have anywhere close to enough human bodies to substitute human testing for animal testing. Once an animal has been tested on, it is done. Period. You kill it regardless of the effect after simply because it is useless; once being tested on once it can not be tested on again even if it survives because we do not know how he previous chemical will interact with the new testing product on a cellular level.
