Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,121 +1,109 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
license: mit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
language:
|
| 4 |
- en
|
| 5 |
-
pretty_name: Lanternfly Image Classifier Training Dataset
|
| 6 |
-
datasets:
|
| 7 |
-
- rlogh/lanternfly-data
|
| 8 |
-
- rlogh/lanternfly_swatter_training
|
| 9 |
-
- rlogh/negativesirl
|
| 10 |
-
- uoft-cs/cifar100
|
| 11 |
-
- AI-Lab-Makerere/beans
|
| 12 |
-
- Francesco/insects-mytwu
|
| 13 |
---
|
| 14 |
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-
This
|
| 19 |
-
|
| 20 |
-
from nature, urban, and other insect datasets listed below.
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
|
|
|
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-
- **
|
| 30 |
-
- **
|
| 31 |
- **Language(s) (NLP):** English
|
| 32 |
- **License:** MIT
|
|
|
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-
|
| 37 |
-
rlogh/lanternfly-data: Original Lanternfly Dataset, 229 unmarked photos
|
| 38 |
-
rlogh/lanternfly_swatter_training: Dataset with geolocal data: 165 photos
|
| 39 |
-
|
| 40 |
-
Original Negative Datasets:
|
| 41 |
-
rlogh/negativesirl: Negatives dataset, images of outdoor environements and people with no lanternflies. 107 photos
|
| 42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-
|
| 47 |
-
uoft-cs/cifar100: General image classifier, no insect class
|
| 48 |
-
AI-Lab-Makerere/beans: Foliage with no insects
|
| 49 |
-
Francesco/insects-mytwu: Insect Images
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 52 |
|
|
|
|
| 53 |
|
|
|
|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
-
## Uses
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
-
These images were used to train the EfficientNetB1 model, ddecosmo/lanternfly_classifier, on how to classify images
|
| 58 |
-
as containing or not containing lanternflies.
|
| 59 |
|
|
|
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
-
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
-
The direct use is identifying photographs containing lanterflies so this could be used for tracking purposes.
|
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
-
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
-
## Dataset Structure
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
-
This dataset consists of two splits
|
| 73 |
-
An original split with 1.3k photos
|
| 74 |
-
An artificial split with 65.1k photos
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
-
|
| 77 |
-
1. Lanternflies, all original photos
|
| 78 |
-
2. Other Insect, all 3rd party datasets
|
| 79 |
-
3. No insect, original photos and 3rd party datasets
|
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
-
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
-
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
-
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
-
|
| 88 |
-
uoft-cs/cifar100
|
| 89 |
-
AI-Lab-Makerere/beans
|
| 90 |
-
Francesco/insects-mytwu
|
| 91 |
|
| 92 |
-
|
| 93 |
|
| 94 |
-
Original datasets were collected using the mobile phones of the authors.
|
| 95 |
|
| 96 |
-
|
| 97 |
-
uoft-cs/cifar100: This is a general image identifier with no insect class. Used for no insect for generalizability
|
| 98 |
-
AI-Lab-Makerere/beans: This dataset is focused on vegetation with and without disease, this is used to train the model to recognize
|
| 99 |
-
vegetation without insects/lanterflies.
|
| 100 |
-
Francesco/insects-mytwu: This is an object detection dataset used for identifying insects as subjects, not including lanterflies.
|
| 101 |
-
We are using it train a seperate non-lanternfly insect class.
|
| 102 |
|
| 103 |
-
#### Who are the source data producers?
|
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
-
Original data was produced by the authors.
|
| 106 |
|
| 107 |
-
|
| 108 |
-
uoft-cs/cifar100: Created by University of Toronto Computer Science
|
| 109 |
-
AI-Lab-Makerere/beans: Created by AI Lab Makere
|
| 110 |
-
Francesco/insects-mytwu: Created by Fanscesco Sovrano
|
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
-
|
| 113 |
|
| 114 |
-
|
| 115 |
-
Normally on concrete or asphalt. This severly limits the scope of the environments these creatures appear in.
|
| 116 |
-
Incorporating blob detection or YOLO into future models could mitigate this by focusing on the subject.
|
| 117 |
|
| 118 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 119 |
|
| 120 |
-
This is a large dataset, and has been shown to accurately classify lanternflies, but there are many edge cases when it does not work correctly.
|
| 121 |
-
In order to take this into account, using new types of models with subject detection can make use of the many images while improving model accuracy.
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
+
'[object Object]': null
|
| 3 |
license: mit
|
| 4 |
+
datasets:
|
| 5 |
+
- ddecosmo/lanternfly_training_dataset
|
| 6 |
language:
|
| 7 |
- en
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
---
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
+
# Model Card for {{ model_id | default("Model ID", true) }}
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
+
<!-- Provide a quick summary of what the model is/does. -->
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
+
This is an off the shelf KDE model from SciPy. It is Kernel Density Estimator,
|
| 15 |
+
in this case it is used to track the relative density of lanternfly sightings in Pittsburgh.
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
+
## Model Details
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
+
### Model Description
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
+
This model is a KDE. This is an unsupervised model that
|
| 22 |
+
estimates the density of continuous values from discrete points.
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
+
This model is from the SciPy library and stored to allow for rapid access.
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
+
- **Developed by:** Devin DeCosmo
|
| 27 |
+
- **Model type:** Image Classifier
|
| 28 |
- **Language(s) (NLP):** English
|
| 29 |
- **License:** MIT
|
| 30 |
+
- **Finetuned from model:** SciPy Gaussian KDE
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
+
## Uses
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
+
<!-- Address questions around how the model is intended to be used, including the foreseeable users of the model and those affected by the model. -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
+
This model is used to estimate the density of values in proportion to each other.
|
| 37 |
+
From 0 - 1. In this case, it uses longitude and latitude as X,Y coordinates to perform this analysis.
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
+
### Direct Use
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
+
<!-- This section is for the model use without fine-tuning or plugging into a larger ecosystem/app. -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
+
The direct use is classifying our lanternfly sighting samples from our geolocal dataset.
|
| 44 |
+
As the Gaussian KDE is a generalized unsupervised learning model, this could be used
|
| 45 |
+
for other datsets with latitude/longitude coordinates.
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
+
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
+
<!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the model will not work well for. -->
|
| 50 |
|
|
|
|
| 51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
+
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
+
<!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
|
| 56 |
|
|
|
|
| 57 |
|
|
|
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
+
### Recommendations
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
<!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
|
|
|
|
| 64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
+
## Training Details
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
+
### Training Data
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
+
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card, perhaps with a short stub of information on what the training data is all about as well as documentation related to data pre-processing or additional filtering. -->
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
+
rlogh/lanternfly_swatter_training
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
+
### Training Procedure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
+
<!-- This relates heavily to the Technical Specifications. Content here should link to that section when it is relevant to the training procedure. -->
|
| 77 |
|
|
|
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
+
#### Training Hyperparameters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 80 |
|
|
|
|
| 81 |
|
|
|
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
+
## Evaluation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
+
<!-- This section describes the evaluation protocols and provides the results. -->
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
+
### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
+
#### Testing Data
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card if possible. -->
|
| 92 |
+
|
| 93 |
+
|
| 94 |
+
#### Factors
|
| 95 |
+
|
| 96 |
+
<!-- These are the things the evaluation is disaggregating by, e.g., subpopulations or domains. -->
|
| 97 |
+
|
| 98 |
+
|
| 99 |
+
#### Metrics
|
| 100 |
+
|
| 101 |
+
<!-- These are the evaluation metrics being used, ideally with a description of why. -->
|
| 102 |
+
|
| 103 |
+
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
### Results
|
| 106 |
+
|
| 107 |
+
|
| 108 |
+
#### Summary
|
| 109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|