Reference training curves in model card
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -58,6 +58,15 @@ Top-1 validation accuracy on the held-out HMDB51 split: **~32.7%** (best
|
|
| 58 |
checkpoint). This is a short 5-epoch run on a small batch size and should be
|
| 59 |
treated as a starting point rather than a competitive HMDB51 number.
|
| 60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 61 |
## Usage
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
```python
|
|
|
|
| 58 |
checkpoint). This is a short 5-epoch run on a small batch size and should be
|
| 59 |
treated as a starting point rather than a competitive HMDB51 number.
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
+
### Training curves
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+

|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
Validation accuracy climbs roughly linearly from ~13% (epoch 1) to ~32.7%
|
| 66 |
+
(epoch 5). Training accuracy reaches ~45% by epoch 5, and validation loss
|
| 67 |
+
tracks training loss closely after epoch 2 — the run was still improving when
|
| 68 |
+
training stopped, so additional epochs would likely help.
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
## Usage
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
```python
|