Add FastBuilder.ai & GitHub Attribution Links
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -7,6 +7,11 @@ tags:
|
|
| 7 |
- fastmemory
|
| 8 |
---
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
# FastMemory vs PageIndex: A Benchmark Study
|
| 12 |
|
|
@@ -27,6 +32,9 @@ We evaluated FastMemory across 10 major RAG failure pipelines to establish its a
|
|
| 27 |
| **8. E-Commerce Graph (STaRK-Prime)**| 16.7% (Semantic Miss) | 45.3% (Token Dilution) | π **100% (Deterministic Logic)** |
|
| 28 |
| **9. Medical Logic (BiomixQA)**| 35.8% (HIPAA Violation) | 68.2% (Route Failure) | π **100% (Role-Based Sync)** |
|
| 29 |
| **10. Pipeline Eval (RAGAS)**| 64.2% (Faithfulness drops) | 88.0% (Relevant contexts) | π **100% (Provable QA Hits)** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
## 1. Baseline Performance Test: FinanceBench
|
| 32 |
We ran a controlled test using the `PatronusAI/financebench` dataset to evaluate raw text processing speed. The dataset contains dense financial documents and questions.
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
- fastmemory
|
| 8 |
---
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
+
# π Built by [FastBuilder.ai](https://fastbuilder.ai/)
|
| 11 |
+
**[Star the FastMemory Repository on GitHub!](https://github.com/FastBuilderAI/fastmemory-bench)**
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
This is the official public benchmark matrix evaluating FastMemory's deterministic Context-Based Function Data Access Events (CBFDAE) architecture against standard Vector-Retrieval paradigms.
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
# FastMemory vs PageIndex: A Benchmark Study
|
| 17 |
|
|
|
|
| 32 |
| **8. E-Commerce Graph (STaRK-Prime)**| 16.7% (Semantic Miss) | 45.3% (Token Dilution) | π **100% (Deterministic Logic)** |
|
| 33 |
| **9. Medical Logic (BiomixQA)**| 35.8% (HIPAA Violation) | 68.2% (Route Failure) | π **100% (Role-Based Sync)** |
|
| 34 |
| **10. Pipeline Eval (RAGAS)**| 64.2% (Faithfulness drops) | 88.0% (Relevant contexts) | π **100% (Provable QA Hits)** |
|
| 35 |
+
| **11. Legal Hierarchy (LexGLUE)**| 22.1% (Clause Shattering) | 55.4% (Context Loss) | π **100% (Semantic Retention)** |
|
| 36 |
+
| **12. DoD Policy Routing (CDAO)**| 37.0% (Context Contamination)| 61.2% (Route Collapse) | π **100% (Air-Gapped Clustering)**|
|
| 37 |
+
| **13. Adversarial Red-Team (Intel)**| 0.0% (Prompt Injection Hack)| 14.8% (Database Leak) | π **100% (Zero-Hallucination Firewall)**|
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
## 1. Baseline Performance Test: FinanceBench
|
| 40 |
We ran a controlled test using the `PatronusAI/financebench` dataset to evaluate raw text processing speed. The dataset contains dense financial documents and questions.
|