bhavnicksm commited on
Commit
c5d327c
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): bcc6361

Upload README.md with huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +17 -13
README.md CHANGED
@@ -34,26 +34,30 @@ It was trained in two stages:
34
 
35
  ## Results
36
 
37
- All BIRD-dev numbers measured on the full 1534-question set at temperature 0.7 with the
38
- agentic harness (execution-clustered majority vote = sample 8 candidates, group them by
39
- identical execution result set, return the largest cluster's query).
 
40
 
41
- | Benchmark | Metric | Score |
42
- |---|---|---|
43
- | BIRD-dev | pass@1 (avg over 8 samples) | **64.6%** EX |
44
- | BIRD-dev | vote-of-8 (execution-clustered) | **68.8%** EX |
45
- | Spider-test (2147) | pass@1 (pre-RL SFT checkpoint) | **80.3%** EX |
46
 
47
- Family comparison on identical seeds (pass@1 / vote@8):
48
  [sqrl-4b](https://huggingface.co/feyninc/sqrl-4b) 64.6 / 68.8 ·
49
  [sqrl-9b](https://huggingface.co/feyninc/sqrl-9b) 66.6 / 69.8 ·
50
  [sqrl-35b-a3b](https://huggingface.co/feyninc/sqrl-35b-a3b) 68.7 / 70.6.
51
 
52
  Notes from the measurement campaign:
53
- - Voting buys the 4B **+4.3 points** over single-pass the largest voting gain in the
54
- family (smaller models keep more sample diversity). vote-of-4 captures ~85% of that
55
- gain at half the cost.
56
- - Base Qwen3.5-4B scores ~52% on the same harness; the pre-RL SFT checkpoint ~63.6%.
 
 
 
 
57
  - Vote unanimity is a strong free confidence signal: when all 8 samples agree the answer
58
  is right ~87% of the time; narrow/tied votes are right ~19-43% — useful for routing
59
  or escalation.
 
34
 
35
  ## Results
36
 
37
+ All numbers measured with the agentic harness at temperature 0.7. BIRD-dev is the full
38
+ 1534-question set; Spider-test is 2147 questions. `pass@1` is the mean single-sample
39
+ exec-accuracy; `vote@k` is execution-clustered majority voting over k samples (group
40
+ candidates by identical execution result set, return the largest cluster's query).
41
 
42
+ | Benchmark | pass@1 | vote@8 | vote@16 | vote@32 |
43
+ |---|---|---|---|---|
44
+ | BIRD-dev (1534) | **64.6%** | **68.8%** | 69.4% | 69.2% |
45
+ | Spider-test (2147) | **84.0%** | **85.9%** | 85.9% | 86.1% |
 
46
 
47
+ Family comparison on identical seeds (BIRD-dev pass@1 / vote@8):
48
  [sqrl-4b](https://huggingface.co/feyninc/sqrl-4b) 64.6 / 68.8 ·
49
  [sqrl-9b](https://huggingface.co/feyninc/sqrl-9b) 66.6 / 69.8 ·
50
  [sqrl-35b-a3b](https://huggingface.co/feyninc/sqrl-35b-a3b) 68.7 / 70.6.
51
 
52
  Notes from the measurement campaign:
53
+ - Voting buys the 4B **+4.3 points** over single-pass on BIRD (the largest voting gain
54
+ in the family smaller models keep more sample diversity). vote-of-4 captures ~85% of
55
+ that gain at half the cost.
56
+ - **Voting saturates by k≈8–16.** Past that, more samples add nothing: BIRD peaks at
57
+ vote@16 (69.4) and Spider is flat from vote@8 onward (~86%). Extra test-time compute is
58
+ better spent on a smarter selector than on more votes.
59
+ - Base Qwen3.5-4B scores ~52% on the same harness; the pre-RL SFT checkpoint ~63.6% on
60
+ BIRD (80.3% on Spider-test — RL lifts Spider single-shot to 84.0%).
61
  - Vote unanimity is a strong free confidence signal: when all 8 samples agree the answer
62
  is right ~87% of the time; narrow/tied votes are right ~19-43% — useful for routing
63
  or escalation.