--- license: apache-2.0 language: - en library_name: lwt-inference pipeline_tag: text-generation tags: - linear-attention - gated-linear-attention - mixture-of-experts - rust - rocm - from-scratch --- # LWT-80M An 80M-parameter language model written from scratch in Rust and HIP — no PyTorch, no JAX, no ML framework of any kind. Every matrix multiply goes through hipBLAS; everything else is a hand-written GPU kernel. Trained on a single AMD Strix Halo APU (gfx1151, RDNA 3.5). The architecture is not a transformer. Attention is replaced by a **gated linear recurrence with four independent decay banks**, and the feed-forward layer is a **mixture of Chebyshev-basis experts**. - **Code + inference engine:** https://github.com/Linesage/LWT-80M - **Technical report:** [TECH_REPORT.md](https://github.com/Linesage/LWT-80M/blob/main/TECH_REPORT.md) ## Files | File | What it is | |---|---| | `lwt-80m-base.safetensors` | pretrained base, 732k steps over 6B tokens | | `lwt-80m-sft.safetensors` | + 1000 steps of Alpaca SFT with prompt-loss masking | | `tokenizer.json` | byte-level BPE, 32768 vocab | These are **not** transformers-compatible checkpoints. They load with the project's own Rust runtime, linked above. ## Usage ```bash git clone https://github.com/Linesage/LWT-80M cd LWT-80M make setup # install Rust, check ROCm make download # fetch these weights make chat # build and run ``` Requires ROCm 7.x and an AMD GPU. ## Limitations — read this first This is a 63M-non-embedding-parameter model trained on a single consumer APU. Set expectations accordingly. **The base checkpoint continues text; it does not answer questions.** Ask it "how do I sort a list?" and you get plausible-looking prose, not an answer. Give it `def quicksort(arr):` and it writes something Python-shaped. That is the intended behaviour of a base model, not a defect. **The SFT checkpoint is experimental.** 1000 steps on ~20k Alpaca examples. It reliably picks up the response format and learns to stop, and it answers short factual questions: ``` ### Instruction: What is the capital of France? ### Response: The capital of France is Paris, France. ``` The redundant trailing "France" is representative. The format is right, the content is shaky. **Dialogue quality is limited by both model size and SFT data.** Alpaca is single-turn, English, and synthetic; there is no multi-turn conversation in the training data at all, so the model has no notion of dialogue history. At this scale it also confabulates facts confidently and, at higher temperatures, falls into repetition loops. Use `--temperature 0.3` and keep the default repetition penalty (1.15). **What it is good for:** studying a non-transformer architecture end to end, inspecting how a gated linear recurrence allocates memory across timescales, and as a working reference for writing GPU kernels without a framework. It is not a useful assistant. ## Architecture Per head, the recurrence is ``` S_t = g_t · S_{t-1} + kᵀ_t v_t y_t = q_t · S_t ``` `g_t` is a learned forget gate. Because the recurrence is linear, the state summarises the entire prefix in constant space — **there is no KV cache, because the state is the cache**. Four banks run in parallel with independently learned gates; measured half-lives after training are ≈3, 6, 11, 28 tokens, and the 12-layer stack composes them into an effective context far longer than any single bank. Each block's feed-forward is 8 experts with top-2 routing, where an expert is a Chebyshev polynomial basis rather than a SwiGLU MLP: ``` z = tanh(RMSNorm(W_premix · x)) T₁ = z, T₂ = 2z² − 1 y = W_down · (T₁ ⊙ (W_up · T₂)) ``` | | | |---|---| | Parameters | 80M total, 63M non-embedding | | Layers | 12 | | Model dim | 512 | | Heads | 8 × 64 | | Decay banks | 4 | | Experts | 8, top-2, hidden 320 | | Vocab | 32768 (byte-level BPE) | | Training context | 4096 | | Embeddings | tied | ## Training | | | |---|---| | Hardware | 1× AMD Strix Halo (gfx1151), ROCm 7.2 | | Data | 6B tokens (24 GB): web, synthetic, code, math/reasoning | | Steps | 732,000 (one epoch), batch 2 × 4096 | | Optimizer | AdamW, 3e-4 peak, cosine to 3e-5 | | Throughput | ~17,000 tok/s, ~4 days wall clock | A known defect of this run: `max_grad_norm` was left at 1.0 while the raw gradient norm grew to ~8, so effectively every step after ~50k was clipped and by the end ~87% of each update was discarded. The technical report has the numbers. ## Inference speed Decoding is O(1) per token — context length does not affect per-token cost: | Context | Full window | Incremental | Speedup | |---------|------------|-------------|---------| | 512 | 42 tok/s | 191 tok/s | 4.5× | | 1024 | 23 tok/s | 177 tok/s | 7.7× | | 2048 | 12 tok/s | 177 tok/s | 14.2× | ## License Apache-2.0.