flashvenom commited on
Commit
c1b42be
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 3852c07

Upload folder using huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +4 -4
README.md CHANGED
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ model-index:
71
  **A 48M-parameter tool-calling model that beats [Needle 2](https://cactuscompute.com/needle)
72
  on 3 of its 5 published benchmarks — including the one it's named after — with 150× less training data.**
73
 
74
- [**GitHub (code, evals, full experimental record)**](https://github.com/nikshepsvn/tiny-toolcall) · MIT · 48.12M params · 11.5MB at 2-bit · $260 total build cost
75
 
76
  ![Results](results.png)
77
 
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ Two things to know before quoting the table: the Seal-in margin (+0.5 on 700
94
  rows) is within sampling noise and we say so, and the pre-registered model
95
  selector actually picked a sibling checkpoint that scored worse — the failure is
96
  diagnosed, both models' results are published, and the full story is in
97
- [RESULTS.md](https://github.com/nikshepsvn/tiny-toolcall/blob/master/RESULTS.md).
98
 
99
  ## Why a thimble beats a needle
100
 
@@ -153,8 +153,8 @@ The most reusable part of the project. Each idea was killed by an A/B, not an ar
153
  The guarantees live in the decoding harness, so inference goes through the repo:
154
 
155
  ```bash
156
- git clone https://github.com/nikshepsvn/tiny-toolcall
157
- cd tiny-toolcall && uv venv && uv pip install -e .
158
  # put thimble-v6.pt in checkpoints/, tokenizer.json in data/
159
  python scripts/final_eval.py --ckpt thimble-v6 --suite seal-tools-in
160
  ```
 
71
  **A 48M-parameter tool-calling model that beats [Needle 2](https://cactuscompute.com/needle)
72
  on 3 of its 5 published benchmarks — including the one it's named after — with 150× less training data.**
73
 
74
+ [**GitHub (code, evals, full experimental record)**](https://github.com/nikshepsvn/thimble) · MIT · 48.12M params · 11.5MB at 2-bit · $260 total build cost
75
 
76
  ![Results](results.png)
77
 
 
94
  rows) is within sampling noise and we say so, and the pre-registered model
95
  selector actually picked a sibling checkpoint that scored worse — the failure is
96
  diagnosed, both models' results are published, and the full story is in
97
+ [RESULTS.md](https://github.com/nikshepsvn/thimble/blob/master/RESULTS.md).
98
 
99
  ## Why a thimble beats a needle
100
 
 
153
  The guarantees live in the decoding harness, so inference goes through the repo:
154
 
155
  ```bash
156
+ git clone https://github.com/nikshepsvn/thimble
157
+ cd thimble && uv venv && uv pip install -e .
158
  # put thimble-v6.pt in checkpoints/, tokenizer.json in data/
159
  python scripts/final_eval.py --ckpt thimble-v6 --suite seal-tools-in
160
  ```