Upload ablation/ABLATION_REPORT.md with huggingface_hub
Browse files- ablation/ABLATION_REPORT.md +64 -0
ablation/ABLATION_REPORT.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
# Routing Ablation Experiment
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
**Date:** 2026-01-22T15:22:36.045048
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
## Purpose
|
| 6 |
+
|
| 7 |
+
Test if the routing breakthrough is genuine or an artifact of:
|
| 8 |
+
1. Readout alignment (τ-weighted write + τ-weighted read)
|
| 9 |
+
2. Noise-only interference (Gaussian vs structured)
|
| 10 |
+
|
| 11 |
+
## Part A: Readout Neutralization
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
### Question
|
| 14 |
+
Does C/D dominate B under UNIFORM readout (not just τ-weighted)?
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
### Results
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
**Basin Width Table (50% threshold)**
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
| Readout | A | B | C | D |
|
| 21 |
+
|---------|---|---|---|---|
|
| 22 |
+
| uniform | 0 | 2048 | 4096 | 4096 |
|
| 23 |
+
| slow_only | 0 | 1024 | 4096 | 4096 |
|
| 24 |
+
| tau_weighted | 0 | 1024 | 4096 | 4096 |
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
### Verdict: ROUTING_GENUINE
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
C/D dominate B even under UNIFORM readout:
|
| 29 |
+
B (uniform readout): 2048
|
| 30 |
+
C (uniform readout): 4096
|
| 31 |
+
D (uniform readout): 4096
|
| 32 |
+
→ Routing genuinely improves global retention, not just aligned readout.
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
## Part B: Structured Interference
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
### Question
|
| 37 |
+
Does routing hold against low-rank correlated and repeating interference?
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
### Results
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
**Basin Width Table (uniform readout, 50% threshold)**
|
| 42 |
+
|
| 43 |
+
| Interference | B | C | Delta |
|
| 44 |
+
|--------------|---|---|-------|
|
| 45 |
+
| gaussian | 2048 | 4096 | +2048 |
|
| 46 |
+
| low_rank | 512 | 1024 | +512 |
|
| 47 |
+
| repeating | 256 | 512 | +256 |
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
### Verdict: ROUTING_ROBUST
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
Routing advantage holds across ALL interference types.
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
## Overall Verdict
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
**ROUTING_CONFIRMED**
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
Routing is GENUINE and ROBUST:
|
| 58 |
+
- Holds under uniform readout (not alignment artifact)
|
| 59 |
+
- Holds under structured interference (not noise-specific)
|
| 60 |
+
→ Ready to integrate into FDRA training.
|
| 61 |
+
|
| 62 |
+
---
|
| 63 |
+
|
| 64 |
+
*Report generated by routing_ablation_experiment.py*
|