Instructions;Responses
In the match Fluminense vs Botafogo, the team Fluminense had 50%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 50%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Botafogo, the team Botafogo had 50%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 50%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Bahia, the team Fortaleza had 37%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 37%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Bahia, the team Bahia had 63%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 63%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Atlético Mineiro had 50%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 50%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 50%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 50%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Palmeiras, the team Vasco had 55%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 55%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Palmeiras, the team Palmeiras had 45%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 45%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Cruzeiro, the team Cuiabá had 48%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 48%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Cruzeiro, the team Cruzeiro had 52%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 52%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Internacional, the team São Paulo had 61%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 18 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 61%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Internacional, the team Internacional had 39%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 39%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Flamengo, the team Grêmio had 44%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 6 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 44%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Flamengo, the team Flamengo had 56%% ball possession, 20 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 56%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Athletico, the team Criciúma had 62%% ball possession, 25 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 12 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 62%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Athletico, the team Athletico had 38%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 38%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Internacional, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 45%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 45%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Internacional, the team Internacional had 55%% ball possession, 24 total shots, 11 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 55%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 11 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Criciúma, the team Grêmio had 65%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 65%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Criciúma, the team Criciúma had 35%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 35%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Palmeiras had 43%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 43%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Atlético Mineiro had 57%% ball possession, 6 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 57%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Grêmio, the team Botafogo had 63%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 63%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Grêmio, the team Grêmio had 37%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 37%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Juventude had 52%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 52%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 48%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 48%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Cuiabá, the team Fortaleza had 54%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 18 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Cuiabá, the team Cuiabá had 46%% ball possession, 2 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Fluminense, the team Atlético Goianiense had 40%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 40%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Fluminense, the team Fluminense had 60%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 60%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Corinthians, the team São Paulo had 53%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 18 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Corinthians, the team Corinthians had 47%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Criciúma, the team Bahia had 54%% ball possession, 21 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Criciúma, the team Criciúma had 46%% ball possession, 2 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Vitória, the team Internacional had 54%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 26 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Vitória, the team Vitória had 46%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Vasco, the team Cruzeiro had 56%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 11 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 56%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Vasco, the team Vasco had 44%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 6 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 44%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Athletico, the team Flamengo had 70%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 70%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Athletico, the team Athletico had 30%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 30%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Criciúma had 47%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Atlético Goianiense had 53%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Cruzeiro, the team Fluminense had 47%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Cruzeiro, the team Cruzeiro had 53%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Fortaleza, the team Grêmio had 38%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 10 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 38%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Fortaleza, the team Fortaleza had 62%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 62%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Vitória, the team Atlético Mineiro had 56%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 56%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Vitória, the team Vitória had 44%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 44%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Botafogo, the team Athletico had 53%% ball possession, 26 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Botafogo, the team Botafogo had 47%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 20 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Palmeiras, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 41%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 41%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Palmeiras, the team Palmeiras had 59%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 59%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs São Paulo, the team Cuiabá had 22%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 22%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs São Paulo, the team São Paulo had 78%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 78%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Internacional, the team Corinthians had 54%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Internacional, the team Internacional had 46%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Flamengo, the team Bahia had 47%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 20 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Flamengo, the team Flamengo had 53%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Juventude, the team Vasco had 54%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Juventude, the team Juventude had 46%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Vitória, the team São Paulo had 58%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 58%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Vitória, the team Vitória had 42%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 42%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Cruzeiro, the team Internacional had 44%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 9 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 12 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 44%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 9 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Cruzeiro, the team Cruzeiro had 56%% ball possession, 5 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 56%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Flamengo had 56%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 56%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 44%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 10 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 44%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Athletico, the team Vasco had 46%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Athletico, the team Athletico had 54%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Criciúma had 49%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 49%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 51%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 51%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Internacional, the team Cruzeiro had 69%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 10 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 69%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Internacional, the team Internacional had 31%% ball possession, 1 total shots, 0 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 31%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 0 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Criciúma, the team Cuiabá had 45%% ball possession, 22 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 45%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Criciúma, the team Criciúma had 55%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 55%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Fortaleza, the team Botafogo had 64%% ball possession, 22 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 64%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Fortaleza, the team Fortaleza had 36%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 36%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Cruzeiro had 50%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 50%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Atlético Goianiense had 50%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 50%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Grêmio had 27%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 27%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Atlético Mineiro had 73%% ball possession, 27 total shots, 13 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 73%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 13 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Flamengo, the team Corinthians had 43%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 18 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 43%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Flamengo, the team Flamengo had 57%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 18 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 57%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Internacional, the team Juventude had 37%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 37%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Internacional, the team Internacional had 63%% ball possession, 18 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 63%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Bahia, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 30%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 30%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Bahia, the team Bahia had 70%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 10 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 70%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Vasco, the team Vitória had 47%% ball possession, 21 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 10 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Vasco, the team Vasco had 53%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs São Paulo, the team Fluminense had 44%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 44%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs São Paulo, the team São Paulo had 56%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 56%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Palmeiras, the team Athletico had 47%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 9 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 9 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Palmeiras, the team Palmeiras had 53%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 10 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 10 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Juventude, the team Cuiabá had 52%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 52%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Juventude, the team Juventude had 48%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 48%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Fortaleza, the team Internacional had 61%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 61%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Fortaleza, the team Fortaleza had 39%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 39%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Vitória, the team Atlético Goianiense had 64%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 64%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Vitória, the team Vitória had 36%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 36%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Fortaleza, the team Athletico had 55%% ball possession, 30 total shots, 9 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 13 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 55%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 9 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Fortaleza, the team Fortaleza had 45%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 45%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Corinthians, the team Botafogo had 57%% ball possession, 21 total shots, 10 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 57%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 10 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Corinthians, the team Corinthians had 43%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 43%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Grêmio, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 47%% ball possession, 23 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Grêmio, the team Grêmio had 53%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Fluminense, the team Juventude had 53%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Fluminense, the team Fluminense had 47%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Criciúma, the team Palmeiras had 53%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Criciúma, the team Criciúma had 47%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Bahia had 55%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 55%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Atlético Mineiro had 45%% ball possession, 5 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 45%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs São Paulo, the team Cruzeiro had 61%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 61%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs São Paulo, the team São Paulo had 39%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 39%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Vasco, the team Flamengo had 61%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 61%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Vasco, the team Vasco had 39%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 39%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Cuiabá, the team Internacional had 67%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 67%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Cuiabá, the team Cuiabá had 33%% ball possession, 2 total shots, 0 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 33%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 0 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Juventude, the team Vitória had 36%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 36%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Juventude, the team Juventude had 64%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 64%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Corinthians had 61%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 61%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Atlético Goianiense had 39%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 39%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Juventude, the team Corinthians had 64%% ball possession, 34 total shots, 10 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 11 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 64%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 10 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Juventude, the team Juventude had 36%% ball possession, 6 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 36%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Palmeiras, the team Internacional had 41%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 41%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Palmeiras, the team Palmeiras had 59%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 11 corner kicks and committed 6 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 59%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Fortaleza, the team Cruzeiro had 68%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 18 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 68%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Fortaleza, the team Fortaleza had 32%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 32%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Criciúma, the team Fortaleza had 50%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 50%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Criciúma, the team Criciúma had 50%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 50%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Grêmio, the team Cuiabá had 61%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 61%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Grêmio, the team Grêmio had 39%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 39%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Cruzeiro had 35%% ball possession, 6 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 35%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Atlético Mineiro had 65%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 65%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Fluminense, the team Vasco had 43%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 23 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 43%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Fluminense, the team Fluminense had 57%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 57%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Corinthians had 63%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 63%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 37%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 18 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 37%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Botafogo, the team Juventude had 37%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 37%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Botafogo, the team Botafogo had 63%% ball possession, 24 total shots, 10 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 12 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 63%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 10 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Vitória, the team Bahia had 57%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 57%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Vitória, the team Vitória had 43%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 43%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Atlético Goianiense, the team São Paulo had 45%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 45%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Atlético Goianiense had 55%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 55%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Palmeiras, the team Flamengo had 52%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 52%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Palmeiras, the team Palmeiras had 48%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 21 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 48%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Athletico, the team Internacional had 54%% ball possession, 23 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 18 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Athletico, the team Athletico had 46%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 0 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Juventude, the team Internacional had 48%% ball possession, 21 total shots, 10 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 48%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 10 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Juventude, the team Juventude had 52%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 52%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Cuiabá, the team Atlético Mineiro had 60%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 60%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Cuiabá, the team Cuiabá had 40%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 40%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Bahia, the team Grêmio had 40%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 40%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Bahia, the team Bahia had 60%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 60%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Fortaleza, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 61%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 9 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 61%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 9 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Fortaleza, the team Fortaleza had 39%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 39%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Corinthians, the team Fluminense had 56%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 56%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Corinthians, the team Corinthians had 44%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 44%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Internacional, the team Atlético Goianiense had 42%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 42%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Internacional, the team Internacional had 58%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 6 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 58%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Vasco, the team Criciúma had 51%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 51%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Vasco, the team Vasco had 49%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 10 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 49%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs São Paulo, the team Palmeiras had 53%% ball possession, 24 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs São Paulo, the team São Paulo had 47%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Juventude, the team Athletico had 60%% ball possession, 23 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 10 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 60%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Juventude, the team Juventude had 40%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 40%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Flamengo, the team Botafogo had 54%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 9 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 9 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Flamengo, the team Flamengo had 46%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Cruzeiro, the team Vitória had 30%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 30%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Cruzeiro, the team Cruzeiro had 70%% ball possession, 25 total shots, 12 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 70%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 12 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Juventude, the team Atlético Goianiense had 40%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 40%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Juventude, the team Juventude had 60%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 60%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Cuiabá, the team Palmeiras had 58%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 9 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 58%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 9 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Cuiabá, the team Cuiabá had 42%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 6 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 42%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Fluminense, the team Atlético Mineiro had 61%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 0 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 61%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 0 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Fluminense, the team Fluminense had 39%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 39%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Grêmio, the team Criciúma had 46%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Grêmio, the team Grêmio had 54%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Botafogo, the team Bahia had 53%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Botafogo, the team Botafogo had 47%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 21 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Corinthians, the team Fortaleza had 45%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 45%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Corinthians, the team Corinthians had 55%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 55%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs São Paulo, the team Juventude had 37%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 0 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 37%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 0 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs São Paulo, the team São Paulo had 63%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 63%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Fluminense, the team Cuiabá had 47%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Fluminense, the team Fluminense had 53%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 6 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Fortaleza, the team Criciúma had 48%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 48%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Fortaleza, the team Fortaleza had 52%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 52%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Juventude, the team Cruzeiro had 55%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 55%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Juventude, the team Juventude had 45%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 45%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Botafogo, the team São Paulo had 69%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 69%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Botafogo, the team Botafogo had 31%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 22 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 31%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Flamengo, the team Vitória had 43%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 43%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Flamengo, the team Flamengo had 57%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 57%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Bahia, the team Atlético Goianiense had 29%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 18 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 29%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Bahia, the team Bahia had 71%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 71%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Palmeiras, the team Fluminense had 50%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 50%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Palmeiras, the team Palmeiras had 50%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 50%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Grêmio, the team Corinthians had 64%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 21 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 64%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Grêmio, the team Grêmio had 36%% ball possession, 18 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 36%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Criciúma, the team Juventude had 58%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 58%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Criciúma, the team Criciúma had 42%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 18 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 42%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Vitória, the team Palmeiras had 71%% ball possession, 21 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 13 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 71%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Vitória, the team Vitória had 29%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 29%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Internacional, the team Bahia had 51%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 51%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Internacional, the team Internacional had 49%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 18 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 49%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Cruzeiro, the team Botafogo had 59%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 10 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 59%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 10 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Cruzeiro, the team Cruzeiro had 41%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 41%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs São Paulo, the team Fortaleza had 37%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 37%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs São Paulo, the team São Paulo had 63%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 10 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 63%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Fluminense, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 59%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 59%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Fluminense, the team Fluminense had 41%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 41%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Flamengo had 53%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Atlético Goianiense had 47%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Athletico, the team Cuiabá had 50%% ball possession, 21 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 12 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 50%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Athletico, the team Athletico had 50%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 50%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Vasco, the team Grêmio had 53%% ball possession, 20 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Vasco, the team Vasco had 47%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Corinthians, the team Atlético Mineiro had 68%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 68%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Corinthians, the team Corinthians had 32%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 32%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Cuiabá, the team Vitória had 47%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Cuiabá, the team Cuiabá had 53%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Vasco had 64%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 64%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 36%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 18 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 36%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Botafogo, the team Atlético Goianiense had 48%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 48%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Botafogo, the team Botafogo had 52%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 9 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 52%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 9 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Criciúma had 27%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 27%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Atlético Mineiro had 73%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 73%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Flamengo, the team São Paulo had 59%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 59%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Flamengo, the team Flamengo had 41%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 0 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 41%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 0 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Grêmio, the team Athletico had 75%% ball possession, 18 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 75%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Grêmio, the team Grêmio had 25%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 0 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 25%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Bahia, the team Fluminense had 49%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 49%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Bahia, the team Bahia had 51%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 51%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Bahia, the team Palmeiras had 44%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 44%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Bahia, the team Bahia had 56%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 56%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Botafogo had 57%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 57%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Atlético Mineiro had 43%% ball possession, 6 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 43%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Cruzeiro, the team Grêmio had 45%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 45%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Cruzeiro, the team Cruzeiro had 55%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 55%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Bahia, the team Athletico had 52%% ball possession, 22 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 52%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Bahia, the team Bahia had 48%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 48%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Corinthians, the team Vasco had 50%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 50%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Corinthians, the team Corinthians had 50%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 50%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Palmeiras had 64%% ball possession, 23 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 64%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Atlético Goianiense had 36%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 36%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Fluminense, the team Criciúma had 40%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 40%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Fluminense, the team Fluminense had 60%% ball possession, 18 total shots, 10 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 60%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 10 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Fortaleza, the team Flamengo had 70%% ball possession, 21 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 70%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Fortaleza, the team Fortaleza had 30%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 30%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Botafogo, the team Vitória had 46%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Botafogo, the team Botafogo had 54%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 24 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs São Paulo, the team Atlético Mineiro had 62%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 62%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs São Paulo, the team São Paulo had 38%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 38%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Cuiabá, the team Bahia had 64%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 4 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 64%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Cuiabá, the team Cuiabá had 36%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 36%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Cruzeiro had 53%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 47%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Juventude had 27%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 27%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Atlético Mineiro had 73%% ball possession, 20 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 73%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Criciúma, the team Corinthians had 54%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Criciúma, the team Criciúma had 46%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Vasco, the team Atlético Goianiense had 52%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 52%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Vasco, the team Vasco had 48%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 48%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Grêmio, the team São Paulo had 55%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 55%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Grêmio, the team Grêmio had 45%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 45%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Vitória, the team Fortaleza had 48%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 48%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Vitória, the team Vitória had 52%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 52%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Palmeiras, the team Botafogo had 43%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 20 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 43%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Palmeiras, the team Palmeiras had 57%% ball possession, 18 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 57%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Criciúma, the team Flamengo had 63%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 63%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Criciúma, the team Criciúma had 37%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 21 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 37%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Internacional, the team Botafogo had 48%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 48%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Internacional, the team Internacional had 52%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 52%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Cruzeiro, the team Palmeiras had 43%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 43%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Cruzeiro, the team Cruzeiro had 57%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 57%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Vitória, the team Grêmio had 59%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 59%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Vitória, the team Vitória had 41%% ball possession, 5 total shots, 0 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 20 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 41%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 0 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Vasco, the team Atlético Mineiro had 54%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Vasco, the team Vasco had 46%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 6 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Corinthians, the team Bahia had 65%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 65%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Corinthians, the team Corinthians had 35%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 18 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 35%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Fortaleza had 60%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 60%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Atlético Goianiense had 40%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 40%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Athletico, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 35%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 6 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 35%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Athletico, the team Athletico had 65%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 11 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 65%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Vitória, the team Fluminense had 64%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 64%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Vitória, the team Vitória had 36%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 36%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Criciúma, the team São Paulo had 62%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 62%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Criciúma, the team Criciúma had 38%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 22 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 38%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Cuiabá had 34%% ball possession, 5 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 34%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 66%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 11 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 66%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Botafogo, the team Vasco had 54%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 0 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Botafogo, the team Botafogo had 46%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 23 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Atlético Mineiro had 68%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 68%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Atlético Goianiense had 32%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 32%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Juventude, the team Fortaleza had 38%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 22 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 38%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Juventude, the team Juventude had 62%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 62%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Fluminense, the team Grêmio had 47%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 9 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 9 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Fluminense, the team Fluminense had 53%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Bahia, the team São Paulo had 41%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 41%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Bahia, the team Bahia had 59%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 59%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Athletico, the team Vitória had 59%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 59%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Athletico, the team Athletico had 41%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 41%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Internacional, the team Criciúma had 46%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Internacional, the team Internacional had 54%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Cruzeiro, the team Flamengo had 46%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 5 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Cruzeiro, the team Cruzeiro had 54%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Corinthians, the team Palmeiras had 49%% ball possession, 20 total shots, 10 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 18 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 49%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 10 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Corinthians, the team Corinthians had 51%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 51%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Botafogo, the team Cuiabá had 51%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 51%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Botafogo, the team Botafogo had 49%% ball possession, 6 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 49%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Cruzeiro, the team Criciúma had 35%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 35%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Cruzeiro, the team Cruzeiro had 65%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 10 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 65%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Fortaleza, the team Vasco had 59%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 9 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 21 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 59%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 9 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Fortaleza, the team Fortaleza had 41%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 41%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 52%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 52%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Atlético Goianiense had 48%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 48%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs São Paulo, the team Athletico had 45%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 45%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs São Paulo, the team São Paulo had 55%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 55%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Flamengo, the team Atlético Mineiro had 52%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 52%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Flamengo, the team Flamengo had 48%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 48%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Juventude, the team Bahia had 57%% ball possession, 22 total shots, 9 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 57%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 9 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Juventude, the team Juventude had 43%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 43%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Palmeiras, the team Grêmio had 40%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 40%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Palmeiras, the team Palmeiras had 60%% ball possession, 21 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 10 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 60%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Internacional, the team Fluminense had 55%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 55%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Internacional, the team Internacional had 45%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 45%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Vitória, the team Corinthians had 44%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 44%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Vitória, the team Vitória had 56%% ball possession, 18 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 56%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team São Paulo had 60%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 60%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 40%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 40%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Cuiabá, the team Flamengo had 66%% ball possession, 20 total shots, 10 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 66%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 10 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Cuiabá, the team Cuiabá had 34%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 0 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 34%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Grêmio, the team Juventude had 49%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 49%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Grêmio, the team Grêmio had 51%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 51%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Fluminense, the team Fortaleza had 42%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 12 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 42%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Fluminense, the team Fluminense had 58%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 58%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Corinthians, the team Cruzeiro had 47%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 22 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Corinthians, the team Corinthians had 53%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Vasco, the team Internacional had 65%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 65%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Vasco, the team Vasco had 35%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 35%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Criciúma, the team Vitória had 45%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 45%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Criciúma, the team Criciúma had 55%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 18 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 55%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Athletico, the team Atlético Goianiense had 43%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 43%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Athletico, the team Athletico had 57%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 11 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 57%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Botafogo, the team Grêmio had 45%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 45%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Botafogo, the team Botafogo had 55%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 55%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Palmeiras, the team Atlético Mineiro had 52%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 52%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Palmeiras, the team Palmeiras had 48%% ball possession, 22 total shots, 9 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 48%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 9 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Criciúma, the team Atlético Goianiense had 50%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 50%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Criciúma, the team Criciúma had 50%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 50%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Athletico, the team Botafogo had 62%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 62%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Athletico, the team Athletico had 38%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 38%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Vasco, the team Juventude had 55%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 55%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Vasco, the team Vasco had 45%% ball possession, 6 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 18 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 45%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Grêmio, the team Fortaleza had 52%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 52%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Grêmio, the team Grêmio had 48%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 48%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Cuiabá, the team São Paulo had 66%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 5 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 66%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Cuiabá, the team Cuiabá had 34%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 34%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Fluminense, the team Cruzeiro had 35%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 35%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Fluminense, the team Fluminense had 65%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 65%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Corinthians, the team Internacional had 47%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Corinthians, the team Corinthians had 53%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Vitória had 39%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 39%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Atlético Mineiro had 61%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 61%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Bahia, the team Flamengo had 35%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 35%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Bahia, the team Bahia had 65%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 65%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Palmeiras had 41%% ball possession, 24 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 10 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 41%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 59%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 59%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Botafogo, the team Criciúma had 38%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 38%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Botafogo, the team Botafogo had 62%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 62%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Internacional, the team Grêmio had 58%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 58%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Internacional, the team Internacional had 42%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 42%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Cuiabá had 53%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Atlético Goianiense had 47%% ball possession, 18 total shots, 9 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 9 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs São Paulo, the team Vasco had 41%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 41%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs São Paulo, the team São Paulo had 59%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 59%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Cruzeiro, the team Bahia had 64%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 6 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 64%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Cruzeiro, the team Cruzeiro had 36%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 36%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Corinthians, the team Athletico had 54%% ball possession, 20 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 11 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Corinthians, the team Corinthians had 46%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Flamengo, the team Fluminense had 54%% ball possession, 2 total shots, 0 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 0 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Flamengo, the team Flamengo had 46%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Vitória, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 64%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 64%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Vitória, the team Vitória had 36%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 36%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Fortaleza, the team Atlético Mineiro had 67%% ball possession, 21 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 67%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Fortaleza, the team Fortaleza had 33%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 33%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Juventude, the team Palmeiras had 57%% ball possession, 28 total shots, 10 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 10 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 57%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 10 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Juventude, the team Juventude had 43%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 43%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Athletico, the team Cruzeiro had 49%% ball possession, 22 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 49%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Athletico, the team Athletico had 51%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 12 corner kicks and committed 6 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 51%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Botafogo had 49%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 49%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 51%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 51%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Grêmio, the team Atlético Goianiense had 49%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 49%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Grêmio, the team Grêmio had 51%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 51%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Cuiabá, the team Corinthians had 66%% ball possession, 24 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 13 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 66%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Cuiabá, the team Cuiabá had 34%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 34%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Flamengo, the team Juventude had 53%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Flamengo, the team Flamengo had 47%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Internacional had 46%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Atlético Mineiro had 54%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Vasco, the team Bahia had 63%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 63%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Vasco, the team Vasco had 37%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 0 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 37%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Palmeiras, the team Fortaleza had 32%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 32%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Palmeiras, the team Palmeiras had 68%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 68%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Grêmio had 44%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 44%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 56%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 0 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 56%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Internacional, the team Cuiabá had 36%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 0 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 36%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Internacional, the team Internacional had 64%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 21 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 64%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Juventude, the team Fluminense had 62%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 62%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Juventude, the team Juventude had 38%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 38%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Botafogo, the team Corinthians had 53%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Botafogo, the team Botafogo had 47%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Bahia, the team Atlético Mineiro had 64%% ball possession, 21 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 64%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Bahia, the team Bahia had 36%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 36%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Palmeiras, the team Criciúma had 39%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 39%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Palmeiras, the team Palmeiras had 61%% ball possession, 23 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 61%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Flamengo, the team Vasco had 27%% ball possession, 2 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 18 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 27%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Flamengo, the team Flamengo had 73%% ball possession, 30 total shots, 18 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 6 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 73%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 18 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Athletico, the team Fortaleza had 52%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 52%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Athletico, the team Athletico had 48%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 48%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Cruzeiro, the team São Paulo had 56%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 18 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 56%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Cruzeiro, the team Cruzeiro had 44%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 44%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Juventude had 42%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 42%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Atlético Goianiense had 58%% ball possession, 22 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 58%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Vitória, the team Cuiabá had 54%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 0 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 0 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Vitória, the team Vitória had 46%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Cuiabá, the team Criciúma had 62%% ball possession, 23 total shots, 9 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 62%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 9 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Cuiabá, the team Cuiabá had 38%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 38%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Vitória, the team Juventude had 60%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 60%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Vitória, the team Vitória had 40%% ball possession, 18 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 40%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Corinthians, the team Atlético Goianiense had 73%% ball possession, 22 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 73%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Corinthians, the team Corinthians had 27%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 27%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Fluminense, the team Botafogo had 44%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 14 corner kicks and committed 22 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 44%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Fluminense, the team Fluminense had 56%% ball possession, 6 total shots, 0 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 56%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 0 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 55%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 55%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Atlético Mineiro had 45%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 18 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 45%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Cuiabá, the team Cruzeiro had 51%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 51%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Cuiabá, the team Cuiabá had 49%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 49%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Criciúma, the team Athletico had 57%% ball possession, 23 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 57%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Criciúma, the team Criciúma had 43%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 43%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs São Paulo, the team Internacional had 54%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 0 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 0 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs São Paulo, the team São Paulo had 46%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 18 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Grêmio, the team Flamengo had 42%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 42%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Grêmio, the team Grêmio had 58%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 58%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Fortaleza, the team Bahia had 54%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Fortaleza, the team Fortaleza had 46%% ball possession, 21 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Vasco, the team Palmeiras had 57%% ball possession, 28 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 10 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 57%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Vasco, the team Vasco had 43%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 43%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Juventude, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 36%% ball possession, 6 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 36%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Juventude, the team Juventude had 64%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 64%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Fluminense had 56%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 56%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Atlético Goianiense had 44%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 44%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Internacional, the team Vitória had 39%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 6 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 39%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Internacional, the team Internacional had 61%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 61%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs São Paulo, the team Corinthians had 40%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 40%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs São Paulo, the team São Paulo had 60%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 60%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Flamengo, the team Athletico had 48%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 48%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Flamengo, the team Flamengo had 52%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 52%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Fortaleza, the team Cuiabá had 55%% ball possession, 21 total shots, 13 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 55%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 13 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Fortaleza, the team Fortaleza had 45%% ball possession, 2 total shots, 0 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 6 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 45%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 0 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Bahia, the team Criciúma had 32%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 32%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Bahia, the team Bahia had 68%% ball possession, 22 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 68%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Cruzeiro, the team Vasco had 50%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 50%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Cruzeiro, the team Cruzeiro had 50%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 50%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Bahia, the team Vitória had 42%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 42%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Bahia, the team Bahia had 58%% ball possession, 20 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 58%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Flamengo, the team Palmeiras had 49%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 23 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 49%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Flamengo, the team Flamengo had 51%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 51%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Juventude, the team Botafogo had 56%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 22 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 56%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Juventude, the team Juventude had 44%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 44%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs São Paulo, the team Atlético Goianiense had 35%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 35%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs São Paulo, the team São Paulo had 65%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 65%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Criciúma, the team Vasco had 58%% ball possession, 21 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 58%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Criciúma, the team Criciúma had 42%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 10 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 42%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 10 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Cuiabá had 33%% ball possession, 4 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 33%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Atlético Mineiro had 67%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 10 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 67%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Grêmio, the team Bahia had 60%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 60%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Grêmio, the team Grêmio had 40%% ball possession, 3 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 0 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 40%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Botafogo, the team Flamengo had 60%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 0 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 60%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 0 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Botafogo, the team Botafogo had 40%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 40%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Vitória, the team Cruzeiro had 54%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 10 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Vitória, the team Vitória had 46%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 6 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Fluminense, the team Corinthians had 31%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 31%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Fluminense, the team Fluminense had 69%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 69%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Athletico, the team Juventude had 55%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 55%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Athletico, the team Athletico had 45%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 45%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Fortaleza had 44%% ball possession, 22 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 12 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 44%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 56%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 6 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 56%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Internacional had 72%% ball possession, 22 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 13 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 72%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Atlético Goianiense had 28%% ball possession, 4 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 0 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 28%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Palmeiras, the team São Paulo had 57%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 57%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Palmeiras, the team Palmeiras had 43%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 20 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 43%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Fluminense had 43%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 43%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Atlético Mineiro had 57%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 10 corner kicks and committed 18 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 57%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Flamengo, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 43%% ball possession, 18 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 43%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Flamengo, the team Flamengo had 57%% ball possession, 19 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 57%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Fortaleza, the team Corinthians had 65%% ball possession, 18 total shots, 9 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 65%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 9 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Fortaleza, the team Fortaleza had 35%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 35%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Vasco, the team Athletico had 56%% ball possession, 26 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 56%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Vasco, the team Vasco had 44%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 44%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs São Paulo, the team Vitória had 33%% ball possession, 6 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 33%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs São Paulo, the team São Paulo had 67%% ball possession, 20 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 67%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Bahia, the team Botafogo had 55%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 55%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Bahia, the team Bahia had 45%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 5 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 45%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Palmeiras, the team Cuiabá had 45%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 45%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cuiabá vs Palmeiras, the team Palmeiras had 55%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 55%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Corinthians, the team Flamengo had 58%% ball possession, 18 total shots, 9 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 13 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 58%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 9 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs Corinthians, the team Corinthians had 42%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 42%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Cruzeiro, the team Atlético Goianiense had 46%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 46%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Cruzeiro, the team Cruzeiro had 54%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 54%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Botafogo, the team Fortaleza had 43%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 43%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Botafogo, the team Botafogo had 57%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 57%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Athletico, the team Palmeiras had 63%% ball possession, 23 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 63%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Athletico, the team Athletico had 37%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 37%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Bahia had 50%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 50%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 50%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 50%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Vitória, the team Vasco had 57%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 57%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Vitória, the team Vitória had 43%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 43%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Fluminense, the team São Paulo had 49%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 49%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Fluminense, the team Fluminense had 51%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 51%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Vitória had 33%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 33%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Atlético Goianiense had 67%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 67%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Juventude, the team Criciúma had 47%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 0 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Criciúma vs Juventude, the team Juventude had 53%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Bahia, the team Internacional had 53%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 9 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 21 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 9 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Internacional vs Bahia, the team Bahia had 47%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Fluminense had 69%% ball possession, 26 total shots, 11 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 13 corner kicks and committed 8 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 69%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 11 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Red Bull Bragantino, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 31%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 31%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Fortaleza, the team São Paulo had 72%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 11 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 72%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match São Paulo vs Fortaleza, the team Fortaleza had 28%% ball possession, 6 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 28%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Cuiabá, the team Athletico had 62%% ball possession, 20 total shots, 9 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 62%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 9 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Athletico vs Cuiabá, the team Cuiabá had 38%% ball possession, 1 total shots, 0 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 0 corner kicks and committed 9 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 38%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 0 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Grêmio, the team Vasco had 47%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vasco vs Grêmio, the team Grêmio had 53%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Corinthians had 48%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 48%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Corinthians vs Atlético Mineiro, the team Atlético Mineiro had 52%% ball possession, 8 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 52%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Flamengo, the team Atlético Goianiense had 32%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 32%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Goianiense vs Flamengo, the team Flamengo had 68%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 68%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Botafogo, the team Cruzeiro had 56%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 56%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Cruzeiro vs Botafogo, the team Botafogo had 44%% ball possession, 6 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 44%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Palmeiras, the team Vitória had 56%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vitória had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 56%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Vitória vs Palmeiras, the team Palmeiras had 44%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 44%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Fluminense, the team Bahia had 40%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Bahia had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 40%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Bahia vs Fluminense, the team Fluminense had 60%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 23 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 60%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Athletico, the team Grêmio had 48%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 7 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 7 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 48%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 7 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Athletico, the team Athletico had 52%% ball possession, 4 total shots, 0 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Athletico had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 52%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 0 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Vasco, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 40%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 14 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 40%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Vasco, the team Vasco had 60%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 60%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Criciúma, the team Atlético Mineiro had 68%% ball possession, 22 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 12 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 68%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Criciúma, the team Criciúma had 32%% ball possession, 5 total shots, 1 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Criciúma had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 32%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 1 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Cruzeiro, the team Fortaleza had 39%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fortaleza had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 39%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fortaleza vs Cruzeiro, the team Cruzeiro had 61%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 5 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 61%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Corinthians, the team Juventude had 45%% ball possession, 16 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Juventude had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 45%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Juventude vs Corinthians, the team Corinthians had 55%% ball possession, 17 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 55%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Internacional, the team Palmeiras had 64%% ball possession, 18 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 6 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Palmeiras had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 64%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Palmeiras vs Internacional, the team Internacional had 36%% ball possession, 5 total shots, 2 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 21 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Internacional had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 36%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 2 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs São Paulo, the team Flamengo had 47%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 6 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 9 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Flamengo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 6 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Flamengo vs São Paulo, the team São Paulo had 53%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 1 corner kicks and committed 19 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The São Paulo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Botafogo had 53%% ball possession, 13 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 13 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Botafogo had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 53%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Botafogo vs Atlético Goianiense, the team Atlético Goianiense had 47%% ball possession, 12 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 8 corner kicks and committed 11 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Goianiense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 47%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Vasco, the team Fluminense had 58%% ball possession, 11 total shots, 8 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 2 corner kicks and committed 16 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Fluminense had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 58%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 8 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Fluminense vs Vasco, the team Vasco had 42%% ball possession, 21 total shots, 5 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 7 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Vasco had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 42%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 5 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Cuiabá, the team Grêmio had 57%% ball possession, 7 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Grêmio had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 57%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Grêmio vs Cuiabá, the team Cuiabá had 43%% ball possession, 14 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 5 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cuiabá had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 43%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Corinthians, the team Red Bull Bragantino had 35%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 3 corner kicks and committed 21 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Red Bull Bragantino had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 35%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Red Bull Bragantino vs Corinthians, the team Corinthians had 65%% ball possession, 15 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 10 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Corinthians had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 65%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Cruzeiro, the team Atlético Mineiro had 56%% ball possession, 9 total shots, 4 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 15 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Atlético Mineiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 56%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 4 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.
In the match Atlético Mineiro vs Cruzeiro, the team Cruzeiro had 44%% ball possession, 10 total shots, 3 shots on target, pass accuracy of 0%%, 4 corner kicks and committed 17 fouls. How was the team's overall performance?;The Cruzeiro had a below-expected performance, with limited ball possession of only 44%%. The team created few goal opportunities, reflected in the 3 shots on target, and faced difficulties in maintaining pass accuracy with 0%%. These factors contributed to an unsatisfactory performance in the match.