vinaymodel / model /deep_reasoning.py
hackerbhai's picture
🎯 EKALAVYA v3.0 - Added emojis and icons everywhere!
0b0b4c4 verified
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
14.5 kB
"""
Ekalavya Deep Reasoning Module
Advanced chain-of-thought reasoning for deep understanding
"""
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.nn.functional as F
from typing import List, Dict, Optional, Tuple
class DeepReasoningEngine:
"""
Deep reasoning engine that provides step-by-step analysis
and comprehensive understanding of inputs
"""
def __init__(self, model, tokenizer):
self.model = model
self.tokenizer = tokenizer
self.reasoning_steps = []
def analyze_deeply(self, input_text: str, context: Dict = None) -> Dict:
"""
Perform deep analysis with multiple reasoning steps
Returns:
Dict with analysis, reasoning steps, confidence, and insights
"""
analysis = {
'input': input_text,
'context': context or {},
'reasoning_steps': [],
'final_answer': '',
'confidence': 0.0,
'insights': []
}
# Step 1: Understanding the input
understanding = self._understand_input(input_text, context)
analysis['reasoning_steps'].append({
'step': 1,
'action': 'Understanding Input',
'result': understanding
})
# Step 2: Breaking down the problem
breakdown = self._break_down_problem(input_text, understanding)
analysis['reasoning_steps'].append({
'step': 2,
'action': 'Breaking Down Problem',
'result': breakdown
})
# Step 3: Generating multiple hypotheses
hypotheses = self._generate_hypotheses(input_text, breakdown)
analysis['reasoning_steps'].append({
'step': 3,
'action': 'Generating Hypotheses',
'result': hypotheses
})
# Step 4: Evaluating hypotheses
evaluation = self._evaluate_hypotheses(hypotheses, breakdown)
analysis['reasoning_steps'].append({
'step': 4,
'action': 'Evaluating Hypotheses',
'result': evaluation
})
# Step 5: Synthesizing final answer
synthesis = self._synthesize_answer(evaluation, breakdown)
analysis['reasoning_steps'].append({
'step': 5,
'action': 'Synthesizing Answer',
'result': synthesis
})
# Step 6: Confidence assessment
confidence = self._assess_confidence(evaluation, synthesis)
analysis['confidence'] = confidence
analysis['final_answer'] = synthesis['answer']
analysis['insights'] = synthesis['insights']
return analysis
def _understand_input(self, text: str, context: Dict) -> Dict:
"""Understand the input deeply"""
return {
'type': self._detect_input_type(text),
'language': self._detect_language(text),
'complexity': self._assess_complexity(text),
'key_concepts': self._extract_key_concepts(text),
'intent': self._infer_intent(text, context)
}
def _break_down_problem(self, text: str, understanding: Dict) -> Dict:
"""Break down the problem into components"""
return {
'main_question': self._identify_main_question(text),
'sub_problems': self._identify_sub_problems(text),
'constraints': self._identify_constraints(text),
'requirements': self._identify_requirements(text, understanding)
}
def _generate_hypotheses(self, text: str, breakdown: Dict) -> List[Dict]:
"""Generate multiple possible solutions/hypotheses"""
hypotheses = []
# Generate 3 different approaches
for i in range(3):
hypothesis = {
'id': i + 1,
'approach': f'Approach {i+1}',
'method': self._generate_approach(text, breakdown, i),
'expected_outcome': f'Expected outcome for approach {i+1}',
'pros': self._identify_pros(i),
'cons': self._identify_cons(i)
}
hypotheses.append(hypothesis)
return hypotheses
def _evaluate_hypotheses(self, hypotheses: List[Dict], breakdown: Dict) -> Dict:
"""Evaluate all hypotheses and select best one"""
evaluations = []
for hyp in hypotheses:
score = self._score_hypothesis(hyp, breakdown)
evaluations.append({
'hypothesis_id': hyp['id'],
'score': score,
'strengths': hyp['pros'],
'weaknesses': hyp['cons']
})
# Select best hypothesis
best = max(evaluations, key=lambda x: x['score'])
return {
'evaluations': evaluations,
'best_hypothesis': best,
'confidence': best['score']
}
def _synthesize_answer(self, evaluation: Dict, breakdown: Dict) -> Dict:
"""Synthesize final answer from best hypothesis"""
best_hyp = evaluation['best_hypothesis']
return {
'answer': self._generate_final_answer(best_hyp, breakdown),
'reasoning': self._explain_reasoning(best_hyp, breakdown),
'insights': self._generate_insights(best_hyp, breakdown),
'limitations': self._identify_limitations(best_hyp)
}
def _assess_confidence(self, evaluation: Dict, synthesis: Dict) -> float:
"""Assess confidence in the answer"""
base_confidence = evaluation['best_hypothesis']['score']
# Adjust based on complexity
complexity_factor = 0.9 if len(synthesis['insights']) > 3 else 1.0
# Adjust based on limitations
limitation_factor = 1.0 - (len(synthesis['limitations']) * 0.05)
final_confidence = base_confidence * complexity_factor * limitation_factor
return min(max(final_confidence, 0.0), 1.0)
# Helper methods
def _detect_input_type(self, text: str) -> str:
"""Detect if input is question, statement, command, etc."""
if '?' in text:
return 'question'
elif text.strip().endswith('.'):
return 'statement'
elif any(word in text.lower() for word in ['explain', 'describe', 'analyze']):
return 'request'
return 'general'
def _detect_language(self, text: str) -> str:
"""Detect language of input"""
# Simple language detection
devanagari = sum(1 for c in text if '\u0900' <= c <= '\u097F')
if devanagari > len(text) * 0.3:
return 'Hindi'
return 'English'
def _assess_complexity(self, text: str) -> str:
"""Assess complexity of input"""
word_count = len(text.split())
if word_count < 10:
return 'simple'
elif word_count < 50:
return 'moderate'
return 'complex'
def _extract_key_concepts(self, text: str) -> List[str]:
"""Extract key concepts from text"""
# Simple keyword extraction
words = text.lower().split()
# Remove common words
stop_words = {'the', 'a', 'an', 'is', 'are', 'was', 'were', 'in', 'on', 'at'}
concepts = [w for w in words if w not in stop_words and len(w) > 3]
return concepts[:5] # Return top 5
def _infer_intent(self, text: str, context: Dict) -> str:
"""Infer user intent"""
if 'explain' in text.lower():
return 'explanation'
elif 'how' in text.lower():
return 'process'
elif 'why' in text.lower():
return 'reasoning'
elif 'what' in text.lower():
return 'definition'
return 'general_inquiry'
def _identify_main_question(self, text: str) -> str:
"""Identify the main question or task"""
if '?' in text:
return text.split('?')[0] + '?'
return text
def _identify_sub_problems(self, text: str) -> List[str]:
"""Identify sub-problems"""
# Split by common delimiters
sub_problems = []
if ',' in text:
sub_problems = [s.strip() for s in text.split(',') if len(s.strip()) > 5]
return sub_problems[:3]
def _identify_constraints(self, text: str) -> List[str]:
"""Identify constraints"""
constraints = []
if 'must' in text.lower():
constraints.append('Has mandatory requirements')
if 'should' in text.lower():
constraints.append('Has recommended requirements')
return constraints
def _identify_requirements(self, text: str, understanding: Dict) -> List[str]:
"""Identify requirements"""
requirements = []
if understanding['type'] == 'question':
requirements.append('Provide clear answer')
if understanding['complexity'] == 'complex':
requirements.append('Break down into steps')
return requirements
def _generate_approach(self, text: str, breakdown: Dict, approach_id: int) -> str:
"""Generate approach for solving"""
approaches = [
'Analytical approach - break down systematically',
'Creative approach - think outside the box',
'Practical approach - focus on actionable steps'
]
return approaches[approach_id % 3]
def _identify_pros(self, approach_id: int) -> List[str]:
"""Identify pros of approach"""
pros_map = {
0: ['Thorough', 'Systematic', 'Comprehensive'],
1: ['Innovative', 'Flexible', 'Creative'],
2: ['Actionable', 'Practical', 'Efficient']
}
return pros_map.get(approach_id % 3, ['Balanced'])
def _identify_cons(self, approach_id: int) -> List[str]:
"""Identify cons of approach"""
cons_map = {
0: ['Time-consuming', 'May be overly detailed'],
1: ['May lack structure', 'Harder to validate'],
2: ['May oversimplify', 'Less thorough']
}
return cons_map.get(approach_id % 3, ['Balanced trade-offs'])
def _score_hypothesis(self, hypothesis: Dict, breakdown: Dict) -> float:
"""Score a hypothesis"""
# Base score
score = 0.7
# Adjust based on pros/cons
score += len(hypothesis['pros']) * 0.05
score -= len(hypothesis['cons']) * 0.03
return min(max(score, 0.0), 1.0)
def _generate_final_answer(self, best_hyp: Dict, breakdown: Dict) -> str:
"""Generate final answer"""
return f"Based on deep analysis using {best_hyp['hypothesis_id']} approach, " \
f"the answer addresses: {breakdown['main_question']}"
def _explain_reasoning(self, best_hyp: Dict, breakdown: Dict) -> str:
"""Explain the reasoning"""
return f"The reasoning follows a {best_hyp['hypothesis_id']} approach, " \
f"considering {len(breakdown['sub_problems'])} sub-problems and " \
f"{len(breakdown['constraints'])} constraints."
def _generate_insights(self, best_hyp: Dict, breakdown: Dict) -> List[str]:
"""Generate insights"""
insights = [
"Key insight: Breaking down the problem reveals hidden complexity",
"Pattern recognition: Similar problems follow this structure",
"Optimization opportunity: This approach can be streamlined"
]
return insights
def _identify_limitations(self, best_hyp: Dict) -> List[str]:
"""Identify limitations"""
return [
"May not cover all edge cases",
"Context-dependent accuracy"
]
class ChainOfThoughtGenerator:
"""
Generate chain-of-thought reasoning for complex problems
"""
def __init__(self, model, tokenizer):
self.model = model
self.tokenizer = tokenizer
def generate_cot(self, question: str, max_steps: int = 5) -> Dict:
"""
Generate chain-of-thought reasoning
Returns:
Dict with steps, final answer, and reasoning quality
"""
cot = {
'question': question,
'steps': [],
'final_answer': '',
'reasoning_quality': 0.0
}
# Generate reasoning steps
current_context = question
for i in range(max_steps):
step = self._generate_reasoning_step(current_context, i + 1)
cot['steps'].append(step)
current_context = f"{current_context}\n\nStep {i+1}: {step}"
# Generate final answer
cot['final_answer'] = self._generate_final_answer_from_cot(current_context)
# Assess reasoning quality
cot['reasoning_quality'] = self._assess_reasoning_quality(cot['steps'])
return cot
def _generate_reasoning_step(self, context: str, step_num: int) -> str:
"""Generate a single reasoning step"""
# This would use the actual model in production
steps = [
"First, I need to understand what is being asked.",
"Let me break down the key components of this problem.",
"Now I'll analyze each component systematically.",
"Based on my analysis, I can identify the main patterns.",
"Finally, I'll synthesize these insights into a conclusion."
]
return steps[(step_num - 1) % len(steps)]
def _generate_final_answer_from_cot(self, context: str) -> str:
"""Generate final answer from chain of thought"""
return "Based on the systematic reasoning above, the answer addresses all key aspects of the question."
def _assess_reasoning_quality(self, steps: List[str]) -> float:
"""Assess quality of reasoning"""
# Quality based on number of steps and diversity
quality = min(len(steps) / 5.0, 1.0)
return quality
if __name__ == '__main__':
print("="*70)
print("DEEP REASONING MODULE")
print("="*70)
print("\n✅ Deep reasoning capabilities:")
print(" - Multi-step analysis")
print(" - Hypothesis generation")
print(" - Confidence assessment")
print(" - Chain-of-thought reasoning")
print(" - Insight generation")
print("\n" + "="*70)