File size: 5,943 Bytes
ba95758
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
bc48c15
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
a20593f
0d890a3
4b07a88
 
 
 
e36012f
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
---
license: mit
language:
- en
metrics:
- accuracy
- f1
- precision
- recall
base_model:
- google/vit-base-patch16-224-in21k
library_name: transformers
tags:
- deepfake detection
- fake-image detection
---
# ViT Deepfake Detection Model

## Model Description

This is a fine-tuned Vision Transformer (ViT) model for binary image classification to detect deepfake images. The model is based on `google/vit-base-patch16-224-in21k` and has been fine-tuned on the OpenForensics dataset to distinguish between real and fake (AI-generated/manipulated) images.

## Model Details

- **Model Type:** Vision Transformer (ViT) for Image Classification
- **Base Model:** google/vit-base-patch16-224-in21k
- **Task:** Binary Image Classification (Real vs Fake Detection)
- **Language:** N/A (Computer Vision)
- **License:** Apache 2.0

## Intended Use

### Primary Use Cases
- Detecting AI-generated or manipulated images
- Content moderation and verification
- Research in deepfake detection
- Media authenticity verification

### Out-of-Scope Use
- This model should not be used as the sole method for making critical decisions about content authenticity
- Not intended for surveillance or privacy-invasive applications
- May not generalize well to deepfake techniques not present in the training data

## Training Data

The model was trained on the **OpenForensics dataset** with the following distribution:

- **Training Set:** 16,000 images
- **Validation Set:** 2000 images
- **Test Set:** 2000 images

Images were preprocessed and transformed using ViTImageProcessor with standard normalization.

## Training Procedure

### Hyperparameters

```python
Training Arguments:
- Batch Size: 24 per device
- Gradient Accumulation Steps: 1
- Mixed Precision: FP16
- Number of Epochs: 10
- Learning Rate: 3e-5
- Weight Decay: 0.02
- Warmup Ratio: 0.08
- LR Scheduler: Cosine
- Label Smoothing: 0.05
- Optimizer: AdamW (default)
```

### Training Hardware
- GPU: Tesla T4
- Training Time: ~14 minutes for 10 epochs

### Data Augmentation
Standard ViT preprocessing with normalization applied via `ViTImageProcessor`.

## Performance

### Validation Set Results (Best Epoch - Epoch 5)

| Metric | Score |
|--------|-------|
| Accuracy | 96.22% |
| F1 Score | 96.22% |
| Precision | 96.30% |
| Recall | 96.22% |

### Test Set Results

| Metric | Score |
|--------|-------|
| Accuracy | **96.56%** |

### Training Progress

The model showed consistent improvement across epochs:

| Epoch | Training Loss | Validation Loss | Accuracy | F1 Score |
|-------|---------------|-----------------|----------|----------|
| 1 | 0.2259 | 0.2567 | 92.89% | 92.88% |
| 2 | 0.2002 | 0.2360 | 93.44% | 93.43% |
| 3 | 0.1388 | 0.1925 | 96.11% | 96.11% |
| 4 | 0.1322 | 0.2161 | 95.67% | 95.67% |
| 5 | 0.1182 | 0.2208 | **96.22%** | **96.22%** |
| 6-10 | 0.1170-0.1171 | 0.2132-0.2142 | 95.67-95.78% | 95.67-95.78% |

## Usage

### Loading the Model

```python
from transformers import ViTImageProcessor, ViTForImageClassification
from PIL import Image
import torch

# Load model and processor
model = ViTForImageClassification.from_pretrained("YOUR_USERNAME/vit-deepfake-detector")
processor = ViTImageProcessor.from_pretrained("YOUR_USERNAME/vit-deepfake-detector")

# Load and preprocess image
image = Image.open("path_to_image.jpg")
inputs = processor(images=image, return_tensors="pt")

# Make prediction
with torch.no_grad():
    outputs = model(**inputs)
    logits = outputs.logits
    predicted_class = logits.argmax(-1).item()

# Get label
labels = {0: "real", 1: "fake"}
print(f"Prediction: {labels[predicted_class]}")

# Get confidence scores
probabilities = torch.nn.functional.softmax(logits, dim=-1)
confidence = probabilities[0][predicted_class].item()
print(f"Confidence: {confidence:.2%}")
```

### Batch Prediction

```python
from transformers import pipeline

# Create classification pipeline
classifier = pipeline("image-classification", model="YOUR_USERNAME/vit-deepfake-detector")

# Predict on single image
result = classifier("path_to_image.jpg")
print(result)

# Predict on multiple images
images = ["image1.jpg", "image2.jpg", "image3.jpg"]
results = classifier(images)
for img, result in zip(images, results):
    print(f"{img}: {result}")
```

## Limitations and Biases

### Known Limitations
- **Dataset Bias:** The model was trained on the OpenForensics dataset, which may not represent all types of deepfakes or manipulation techniques
- **Generalization:** Performance may degrade on deepfake generation methods not present in the training data
- **Adversarial Robustness:** The model has not been explicitly tested against adversarial attacks
- **Resolution Dependency:** Best performance on images around 224x224 pixels (ViT input size)

### Potential Biases
- The model's performance may vary across different:
  - Image sources and quality levels
  - Demographic representations in images
  - Types of manipulation techniques
  - Content domains (faces, landscapes, objects, etc.)

## Ethical Considerations

- This model should be used responsibly and not for harassment or privacy invasion
- Decisions based on this model should involve human oversight, especially in high-stakes scenarios
- Users should be aware that deepfake detection is an evolving field, and no model is perfect
- False positives and false negatives can have real-world consequences

## Citation

If you use this model, please cite:

```bibtex
@misc{vit-deepfake-detector,
  author = {YOUR_NAME},
  title = {ViT Deepfake Detection Model},
  year = {2024},
  publisher = {HuggingFace},
  howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/YOUR_USERNAME/vit-deepfake-detector}}
}
```
## Author
- Dr. Lucy Liu
- Muhammad Hamza Sohail
- Ayaan Mohammed
- Shadab Karim
- kirti Dhir
## **Disclaimer:**
 his model is provided for research and educational purposes. Users are responsible for ensuring compliance with applicable laws and ethical guidelines when deploying this model.