diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes index c7c3a05013479318cec4920e3d04eb0bf16e4cd1..a686ab475baa80ee991feceff34dc26157691c64 100644 --- a/.gitattributes +++ b/.gitattributes @@ -30567,3 +30567,95 @@ A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=l A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_0.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_1.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_2.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text +A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_0_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_0_r_0.json index 4f4973d80292a182b8cfd5a57246643b8802794e..4424b59d6d026a30cde2acc9bf43fc03a5e55cdb 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_0_r_0.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_0_r_0.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 7 - ], - "reasoning": "The image depicts a scene with two characters in a bathroom setting, which appears relatively natural in terms of composition and context. The lighting and shadows are consistent with indoor environments, and the characters' postures and actions seem plausible. However, there are some subtle inconsistencies in the details, such as slight blurring around the edges of the characters and minor distortions in the reflections in the mirrors. These factors slightly detract from the overall naturalness and introduce minor artifacts. Therefore, the naturalness score is 8, and the artifacts score is 7." - }, "SC": { "score": [ 8, - 7 + 9 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to have the woman adjust her outfit while looking into the mirror. In the second image, the woman's pose has been successfully altered to show her adjusting her outfit, which aligns well with the instruction. Her hand is now positioned near her neck/chest area, indicating she is making adjustments. The overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, maintaining the continuity of the scene. However, there is a slight overediting in terms of the positioning of her arms and hands, which could be more naturalistic. Overall, the editing is effective but slightly overdone in minor details." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the woman adjusting her outfit while looking into the mirror, which aligns with the editing instruction. There is no instance of the same character being generated multiple times in the image, indicating a successful edit. The changes are minimal but effective, maintaining the overall context and composition of the original image. Therefore, the editing success score is high, and the overediting score is also high since the changes are subtle yet impactful." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_0_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_0_r_1.json index b7a92070d23ed9e0492341890e53dcbba25b39cc..5db3ff6e044b379b9b2bc37c01e7d5bd34ed544b 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_0_r_1.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_0_r_1.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 7 - ], - "reasoning": "The image appears to be a well-composed scene with realistic elements, such as the characters' attire and the bathroom setting. The lighting and shadows seem consistent with a typical indoor environment, contributing to a natural feel. However, there are slight inconsistencies in the reflections and details, such as the hair texture and facial features, which suggest some AI-generated artifacts. Overall, while the scene is convincing, minor imperfections in detail and realism slightly detract from a perfect score." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 9 + 9, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to have the woman adjust her outfit while looking into the mirror. In the second image, the woman's posture has changed to reflect her adjusting her outfit, which aligns with the instruction. Her hands are now positioned near her shoulders, indicating she is making adjustments. The overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, showing minimal overediting. The changes are subtle but effective in conveying the intended action." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the woman adjusting her outfit while looking into the mirror, adhering to the editing instruction. There is no instance of the same character being generated multiple times, indicating a high level of editing success. The changes are minimal but effective, maintaining the overall context and composition of the original image, hence the scores reflect both the successful execution and minimal overediting." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_0_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_0_r_2.json index db02ef069a194d12746e4af5e8ea92a6183e5f1b..7a06ee16cdb3fe53a131f4c0e18dfbefe625ce7a 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_0_r_2.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_0_r_2.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 7 - ], - "reasoning": "The image appears to depict a realistic indoor scene with two characters in a bathroom setting. The naturalness is high due to the plausible environment, lighting, and positioning of objects like the mirror, sink, and door. However, there are slight inconsistencies in the reflections and details that suggest it might be AI-generated, such as minor distortions in the hair texture and subtle irregularities in the clothing folds. The artifacts are noticeable but not overwhelming; there are no major distortions or obvious watermarks, but some elements lack perfect sharpness or detail, which slightly detracts from the overall realism." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, + 5, 7 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to have the woman adjust her outfit while looking into the mirror. In the second image, the woman is indeed adjusting her outfit, which aligns with the instruction. However, the overall composition and setting remain consistent with the first image, indicating that the edit was minimal and focused specifically on the action of adjusting the outfit. The reflection in the mirror also shows the woman's new pose, reinforcing the adjustment. The degree of overediting is moderate since the change is noticeable but does not alter the core elements of the scene." + "reasoning": "The edited image shows the woman adjusting her outfit, which aligns with the editing instruction. However, the man's presence remains unchanged, and there is no indication of him interacting with the mirror or the woman's actions. This suggests partial success in editing but not a complete fulfillment of the instruction. The degree of overediting is moderate, as the core elements of the scene remain intact, but the focus on the woman's action could have been more pronounced." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_1_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_1_r_0.json index c12c49c229aebc76074b5603fd293befe10651e8..b874a3a6b37420b98e890390faed07e8fb2f65c9 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_1_r_0.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_1_r_0.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 9 - ], - "reasoning": "The image appears to be a well-composed scene with realistic elements such as clothing, lighting, and reflections in the mirror. The characters' postures and expressions seem natural, contributing to a believable interaction. However, there might be slight inconsistencies in the fine details of the background or subtle textures that could indicate AI generation. The overall lighting and shadows are consistent, and there are no obvious artifacts like blurring, distortion, or unnatural body parts. Therefore, the image scores high in both naturalness and lack of artifacts." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 9, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to have the man turn around and speak to the woman, while the woman listens intently. In the second image, the man has indeed turned around and appears to be gesturing as if speaking, which aligns with the instruction. The woman maintains her posture with arms crossed, suggesting she is listening. The overall scene change is minimal but effective, indicating successful execution of the instruction. However, there is a slight overedit in the man's facial expression and body language, which could be perceived as more pronounced than necessary, hence the slightly lower overediting score." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man turning around and speaking to the woman, while the woman appears to be listening intently. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, which adheres to the editing instruction. The changes are minimal but effective, maintaining the context and setting of the original image. The degree of overediting is low, as the overall scene remains consistent with the original, with only necessary adjustments made to reflect the new action." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_1_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_1_r_1.json index dee71b6a961f0d07bb50fddb58d0ea8d250c17a5..61cdd1fe59d8e8f000285399681490874820ce22 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_1_r_1.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_1_r_1.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 7 - ], - "reasoning": "The image appears to be a well-composed scene with realistic elements such as the characters' attire, the bathroom setting, and the overall lighting. The naturalness is high due to the coherent environment and plausible interactions between the characters. However, there are subtle signs of artificiality, such as slightly stiff postures and facial expressions that lack the fluidity seen in real-life photography. Regarding artifacts, while the image is mostly clear, there are minor inconsistencies in texture and detail, particularly around the edges of objects and clothing, which suggest some AI generation artifacts. Overall, the image is quite convincing but not entirely indistinguishable from a real photograph." - }, "SC": { "score": [ 8, 9 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to have the man turn around and speak to the woman, while the woman listens intently. In the second image, the man has indeed turned around and appears to be gesturing as if speaking, which aligns with the instruction. The woman maintains her posture, suggesting she is listening. The changes are subtle but effective, indicating successful execution of the instruction. The overall scene remains consistent with the original, showing minimal overediting." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man turning around and gesturing towards the woman, indicating he is speaking to her. The woman maintains her position, appearing to listen intently, which aligns with the editing instruction. There is no instance of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the first score is high. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall scene remains consistent with the original, with only the man's posture and gesture changed. Therefore, both scores reflect a successful and minimally invasive edit." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_1_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_1_r_2.json index 1dcb1d581c93228ae8de3ed2c0c5272415328fae..7d27bee8fc5559ec150bfa35a1460743b1e3d559 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_1_r_2.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_1_r_2.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 9 - ], - "reasoning": "The image appears to be highly detailed and realistic, with natural lighting and shadows that contribute to a believable setting. The characters' expressions and body language seem coherent with the scene, suggesting a natural interaction. However, there might be slight inconsistencies in texture or fine details that prevent it from scoring a perfect 10 for naturalness. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion, blurring, or unusual elements, indicating high quality and minimal artifacts." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 9, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to have the man turn around and speak to the woman, while she listens intently. In the second image, the man has indeed turned around and appears to be gesturing as if speaking, which aligns with the instruction. The woman maintains her posture, suggesting she is listening. The overall context and characters remain consistent with the original image, indicating minimal overediting. However, there is a slight change in the positioning and expression of both characters, which slightly deviates from the original but still effectively conveys the intended interaction." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man turning around and speaking to the woman, while the woman listens intently. There is no repetition of characters, indicating a successful edit. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall scene remains consistent with the original, with only the necessary changes made to reflect the new action." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_2_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_2_r_0.json index ce522e5a13610b7b3978b13127fbf474f3697dec..0dfc3638ffbc3b738af37d591c30c1cd53d86ab1 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_2_r_0.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_2_r_0.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 7 - ], - "reasoning": "The image appears to be a well-composed scene with realistic elements, such as the characters' attire, the setting, and the lighting. The naturalness is high due to the coherent environment and the characters' positioning, which suggests a plausible interaction. However, there are slight inconsistencies in the details, such as the reflections in the mirror and some minor distortions in the characters' features, which slightly detract from the overall naturalness. Regarding artifacts, while the image is mostly clear, there are subtle signs of AI generation, like minor blurring around the edges of objects and slight irregularities in the texture of clothing and hair, leading to a moderate artifact score." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 9, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to have the man turn to face the woman, initiating conversation. In the second image, the man has indeed turned his head towards the woman, indicating a shift in focus and engagement, which aligns with the instruction. This change effectively conveys the initiation of a conversation. However, the overall composition and setting remain largely unchanged, suggesting that the edit was minimal but successful. The degree of overediting is low, as the core elements of the scene, including the characters and environment, are preserved." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man turning to face the woman, which aligns with the instruction to initiate conversation. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the first score is high. The second score reflects that while the edit is noticeable, it maintains the overall context and setting of the original image, indicating minimal overediting." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_2_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_2_r_1.json index 55a85c1f1e79e66fff735e198c3cd8086abe533b..0dfc3638ffbc3b738af37d591c30c1cd53d86ab1 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_2_r_1.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_2_r_1.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 7 - ], - "reasoning": "The image appears to depict a realistic indoor scene with two characters in a bathroom setting. The naturalness is high due to the plausible environment, lighting, and positioning of the characters. However, there are slight inconsistencies in the reflections and details that suggest it might be AI-generated. The artifacts are minimal but noticeable upon close inspection, particularly in the texture of the clothing and some facial features, which appear slightly smoothed or less detailed compared to a real photograph." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 9, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to have the man turn to face the woman, initiating conversation. In the second image, the man has indeed turned to face the woman, which aligns with the instruction. His posture and gaze suggest he is engaging with her, indicating successful execution of the instruction. However, there is a slight overediting in terms of the man's facial expression and body language, which appear somewhat unnatural compared to the first image. Overall, the scene maintains its context while effectively showing the intended interaction." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man turning to face the woman, which aligns with the instruction to initiate conversation. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the first score is high. The second score reflects that while the edit is noticeable, it maintains the overall context and setting of the original image, indicating minimal overediting." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_2_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_2_r_2.json index 75dea446faeb636549ecfa9fe30ffde285a3a04b..2c0fdbff856880d8b40900e6f23e861ab20c762c 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_2_r_2.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000000_prompt_2_r_2.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 9 - ], - "reasoning": "The image appears to be a well-composed scene with realistic lighting and shadows, contributing to a natural feel. The characters' postures and expressions seem plausible for the setting, which enhances the naturalness. However, there might be slight inconsistencies in the fine details of the clothing texture or background elements that could be improved. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion, blurring, or unusual features, indicating high quality. The reflections in the mirror and the overall clarity suggest careful attention to detail, resulting in a low artifact score." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 9 + 9, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to have the man turn to face the woman, initiating conversation. In the second image, the man has indeed turned to face the woman, which aligns with the instruction. His posture and gaze suggest he is engaging with her, indicating successful execution of the instruction. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall scene remains consistent with the original, with only the man's orientation changed. Therefore, the scores reflect high success in executing the instruction and minimal overediting." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man turning to face the woman, initiating conversation, which aligns with the editing instruction. There is no instance of the same character being generated more than once, indicating a successful edit. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall scene remains consistent with the original image, maintaining the same setting and characters while only altering the man's position to face the woman." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_0_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_0_r_0.json index cf59a65495a1fe18c973087eb83c1dc11d47079a..65244c658bfa9d2cd54ff7a8c2b16d944acd421c 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_0_r_0.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_0_r_0.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 7 - ], - "reasoning": "The image depicts a romantic scene with two individuals embracing and kissing in what appears to be an airport setting at night. The naturalness score is high (8) because the overall composition, lighting, and emotional context feel plausible and relatable. However, there is a slight artificiality in the lighting and shadows, which slightly detracts from the realism. The artifacts score is moderate (7) as the image shows some minor inconsistencies, such as potential blurring around the edges of the figures and subtle distortions in the background details, but these are not overly distracting." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 9, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to zoom in on the couple's faces to highlight their emotional connection. In the second image, the camera has indeed zoomed in closer to focus on the couple's faces, effectively capturing the intimacy and emotional connection between them. This aligns well with the instruction. However, while the zoom is successful, there is a slight overemphasis on the close-up, which slightly detracts from the overall balance of the scene. The background details are less prominent, but the core elements of the original image are still recognizable, indicating that the overediting is minimal." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the intended effect of zooming in on the couple's faces, emphasizing their intimate moment without generating the same character multiple times. This aligns well with the editing instruction. However, while the focus is effectively shifted to their faces, some details from the background are lost, indicating a moderate level of overediting. The overall scene remains recognizable as a continuation of the original, maintaining context and continuity." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_0_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_0_r_1.json index 6db832df079f708247551f2d1b8ccf9bfd401d2d..ef2b813f04282c713a290ef1079c8ef092ac40a4 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_0_r_1.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_0_r_1.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 7 - ], - "reasoning": "The image depicts a romantic scene with two individuals sharing a kiss. The naturalness score is high (8) because the overall composition, lighting, and interaction between the characters appear quite realistic. The lighting is soft and focused, creating a warm and intimate atmosphere, which enhances the natural feel. However, there might be slight inconsistencies in the background details or shadows that prevent it from scoring a perfect 10.\n\nFor artifacts, the score is 7 because the image appears mostly clean with minimal visible distortions or unusual elements. The faces and bodies are well-defined, and there are no obvious signs of blurring or unnatural features. However, upon closer inspection, there could be minor imperfections in the texture or fine details that slightly detract from a perfect score." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 9, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The second image effectively captures the essence of the editing instruction by zooming in on the couple's faces, emphasizing their intimate kiss and emotional connection. The focus on their facial expressions and the close-up framing align well with the goal of highlighting their bond. However, while the zoom is successful, there is a slight overemphasis on the close-up, which slightly detracts from the overall balance between intimacy and context. The background remains recognizable, maintaining the connection to the original setting, but the tight framing could be seen as a minor overedit." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the intended effect of zooming in on the couple's faces, emphasizing their intimate moment without generating the same character multiple times. The emotional connection is effectively highlighted, adhering closely to the editing instruction. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the close-up, which slightly reduces the context from the original setting but still maintains recognizability." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_0_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_0_r_2.json index 26536168ce951c104f69f12281130b114c77759c..3c965c31bd9c35a03ebe9d55ffbfe8268f3574e5 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_0_r_2.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_0_r_2.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 9 - ], - "reasoning": "The image depicts a romantic scene with two individuals embracing and kissing in what appears to be a parking garage at night. The lighting, shadows, and overall composition contribute to a relatively natural feel, with realistic reflections on the cars and soft ambient lighting. However, there is a slight artificiality in the skin texture and facial details, which slightly detracts from the naturalness. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion, with clean lines and well-defined elements, though there might be some minor inconsistencies in the background details that could be considered artifacts." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 9, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction aimed to zoom in on the couple's faces to emphasize their emotional connection during the kiss. In the second image, the camera angle has indeed shifted closer to focus on their faces, effectively capturing the intimacy and emotional depth as intended. This aligns well with the instruction, earning a high score for editing success. However, while the zoom is successful, some elements of the background and overall composition have changed slightly more than necessary, indicating a moderate level of overediting. The transition maintains recognizable continuity with the original image but includes noticeable changes beyond just the zoom." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the intended effect of zooming in on the couple's faces, emphasizing their intimate moment without generating the same character multiple times. This aligns well with the editing instruction. However, while the focus is effectively shifted to their faces, some details around them are slightly less defined compared to the original, indicating a moderate level of overediting. Overall, the emotional connection is highlighted, and the scene remains recognizable as a minimal yet effective edit." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_0.json index 51d1bbd14a44999f35e9fe337c7cdfeebf383e26..33a8b796b1848348773874410f5eeb885fd06ec9 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_0.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_0.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 7, - 8 - ], - "reasoning": "The image depicts a scene inside a spacious hangar with cars, airplanes, and two people embracing under dramatic lighting. The overall composition feels somewhat natural due to the realistic lighting effects, shadows, and the placement of objects. However, there is a slight artificiality in the way the light beams and shadows interact, which slightly detracts from the naturalness. Regarding artifacts, the image appears relatively clean with minimal distortions or unusual elements. The details in the cars and the figures are mostly coherent, though some minor blurring or lack of sharpness can be observed in certain areas, particularly around the edges of objects and the figures." - }, "SC": { "score": [ 8, 7 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction aimed to enhance the romantic and dramatic atmosphere by emphasizing the bright spotlight illuminating the couple as they kiss passionately. In the second image, the spotlight effect is more pronounced, casting a brighter and more focused light on the couple, which aligns well with the instruction. The overall mood is enhanced, making the scene more intimate and dramatic. However, while the spotlight effect is improved, some elements of the background, such as the cars and the hangar structure, remain consistent with the original image, indicating that the editing was done with care to maintain the context. The scores reflect the successful execution of the instruction while keeping the image recognizable as a minimal yet effective edit." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the essence of the editing instruction by enhancing the brightness of the spotlight, which effectively illuminates the couple kissing passionately. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the editing success. However, the increased brightness slightly alters the overall mood and lighting balance compared to the original, indicating a moderate level of overediting. The core elements remain intact, but the dramatic lighting change is noticeable." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_1.json index f82dfb8ea8b1fb33159893652375d1474b860dbf..33111f0daeb9a256bf6880fb605b061e3b813c3e 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_1.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_1.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 7 - ], - "reasoning": "The image depicts a romantic scene with two people kissing under dramatic lighting in what appears to be a garage or workshop setting. The naturalness is high due to the realistic lighting effects, shadows, and composition, which create a moody and intimate atmosphere. However, there is a slight artificiality in the overall tone and some minor inconsistencies in the details, such as the sharpness of the light beams and the reflections on the cars. Regarding artifacts, while the image is mostly coherent, there are subtle signs of AI generation, such as slightly smoothed-out textures on the cars and minor distortions in the background elements like the windows and structural details. Overall, the image is quite convincing but not entirely free of typical AI-generated quirks." - }, "SC": { "score": [ 8, - 7 + 9 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction aimed to enhance the romantic and dramatic atmosphere by focusing on the passionate kiss between the man and woman under a bright spotlight. In the second image, the spotlight effect is more pronounced, casting a strong beam directly onto the couple, which effectively highlights their intimate moment. This aligns well with the instruction, making the scene more visually striking and emotionally impactful. However, while the spotlight addition is successful, there is a slight overemphasis on the light source, which slightly detracts from the overall balance of the image. The rest of the elements, including the cars and the hangar setting, remain consistent with the original, ensuring that the image retains its core identity despite the enhancements." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the essence of the editing instruction by showing the man and woman kissing passionately under a bright spotlight, which enhances the romantic atmosphere of the scene. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the editing success. The changes are minimal but effective, maintaining the overall composition and context of the original image while adding the desired lighting effect. The degree of overediting is low, as the core elements of the scene remain intact, making it easy to recognize as a minimal yet impactful edit." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2ad3adf87986aec0d15bf7419a913e39c7b37328 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_2.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 9 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the essence of the editing instruction by maintaining the passionate kiss between the man and woman under the bright spotlight. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the editing success. The scene remains consistent with the original image, with only minor adjustments to enhance the romantic atmosphere, indicating minimal overediting." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_2.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_2.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f29fe543508c1679cd0810622d18b9c7bc013265 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_2.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:db3900543df33c38c6de2bd31efc283bbbcfff634881ad8c5e9f3a940a8565cc +size 1512947 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..65633a30ef09aa73a85b47c1326ab80f5b590c03 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:dd77ef0dfe3772e13a609744b5b3c73d670810139c5780abe29d0eedde86d93e +size 1105340 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_2_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_2_r_0.json index ee8e49f7f0746f879d0974872bdb91f4d4c9bac9..92af7c6629b30910b60188e817ea5941e62a52a1 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_2_r_0.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_2_r_0.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 7 - ], - "reasoning": "The image depicts a romantic scene with two individuals kissing in front of an airport setting at night. The naturalness score is high (8) because the overall composition, lighting, and context feel plausible for a nighttime airport environment. The lighting from the street lamps and the airplane tail light contribute to a realistic ambiance. However, there is a slight artificiality in the way the characters' features and clothing details are rendered, which slightly detracts from full naturalness.\n\nFor artifacts, the score is 7 because while the image appears mostly coherent, there are subtle signs of AI generation, such as minor inconsistencies in texture and detail, particularly around the edges of objects and the characters' skin. These imperfections are noticeable upon close inspection but do not significantly disrupt the overall harmony of the scene." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 9, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The second image successfully captures the essence of the editing instruction by zooming in on the couple's faces, focusing on their passionate kiss under the soft glow of the hanging lamp. The intimacy and emotional connection are effectively conveyed, which aligns well with the instruction. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the close-up, which slightly detracts from the overall balance between the environment and the subjects. The background remains recognizable, maintaining the context of the original image, but the tight framing could be considered a minor overedit." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the essence of the editing instruction by zooming in on the couple's faces, focusing on their passionate kiss under the soft glow of the lamp. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the editing success. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, maintaining the recognition of the scene while effectively emphasizing the couple." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_2_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_2_r_1.json index bd9a2a3f2e543e982a4abacbe6afb8bd7132991a..e2f39d676fccfb37896080db32f1e6e737e87c74 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_2_r_1.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_2_r_1.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 7 - ], - "reasoning": "The image depicts a romantic scene with two individuals embracing and kissing under artificial lighting at night. The naturalness score is high (8) because the overall composition, lighting, and interaction between the characters appear plausible and emotionally engaging. However, there is a slight unnaturalness in the lighting reflections and shadows, which slightly detracts from the realism. The artifact score is moderate (7) as the image shows some minor distortions, particularly around the edges of the figures and the background elements, but these are not severe enough to significantly disrupt the overall harmony of the scene." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 9, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The second image successfully captures the essence of the editing instruction by zooming in on the couple's faces, focusing on their passionate kiss under the soft glow of the hanging lamp. The intimacy and emotional connection are effectively conveyed, which aligns well with the instruction. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the close-up, which slightly detracts from the overall balance between the environment and the subjects. The background remains recognizable, maintaining the context of the original image, but the focus is heavily shifted towards the couple, which is intentional but leans towards a more pronounced edit." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the essence of the editing instruction by zooming in on the couple's faces, focusing on their passionate kiss under the soft glow of the lamp. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the editing success. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, maintaining the continuity of the scene." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_2_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_2_r_2.json index 687c1048fe073e1148beaa089752a1e2971e5e9c..eb868660423371cdcf82f1551bfab5a0f73bdf31 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_2_r_2.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000001_prompt_2_r_2.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 7 - ], - "reasoning": "The image depicts a romantic scene with two individuals embracing and kissing in what appears to be a dimly lit garage setting. The naturalness is high due to the realistic lighting, shadows, and composition, which convey an intimate atmosphere. However, there is a slight artificiality in the details of the characters' features and clothing textures, which slightly detracts from the overall naturalness. Regarding artifacts, while the image is mostly clear, there are minor inconsistencies in the fine details of the characters' faces and clothing, as well as some blurring around the edges, indicating the presence of subtle AI-generated artifacts." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 9, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to zoom in on the couple's faces while they kiss under the soft glow of the hanging lamp. In the second image, the camera has indeed zoomed in closer to the couple, focusing more on their faces and the intimate moment, which aligns well with the instruction. The soft glow of the hanging lamp remains prominent, maintaining the romantic ambiance. However, the background details are less visible due to the zoom, which is expected but slightly reduces the context. The overall effect is successful, but there is a minor loss of environmental detail, indicating a slight overedit. Therefore, the scores reflect high execution of the instruction with a moderate level of overediting." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the intended effect of the camera zooming in on the couple's faces, focusing on their passionate kiss under the soft glow of the hanging lamp. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the editing success. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall scene remains consistent with the original image, maintaining the context and environment while effectively emphasizing the couple's intimate moment." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_0_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_0_r_0.json index a5f0a15948a55fd1a0f491e9711e980a3d67d077..87651488a1313445f42d9d0fc256a54f79cfc314 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_0_r_0.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_0_r_0.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 6, - 7 - ], - "reasoning": "The image depicts two characters wearing black masks with red eyes, which gives it a somewhat surreal and stylized appearance. The naturalness score is 6 because while the overall composition and lighting seem coherent, the context and setting feel slightly artificial due to the mask design and the lack of clear environmental details. The artifacts score is 7 because there are no obvious distortions, watermarks, or blurring, but the sharpness and detail in the background suggest some level of AI generation artifacts, particularly around the edges of objects." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 0, + 5 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction aimed to introduce another guest approaching the person in costume with their face partially obscured by a mask. In the second image, this goal is largely achieved as there is indeed another figure present, wearing a black mask that obscures their face. The positioning suggests they are approaching the person in costume, fulfilling the instruction effectively. However, the overediting score is slightly lower because while the addition is noticeable, it doesn't feel overly intrusive or excessive; the overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image." + "reasoning": "The edited image shows the same character (the person in costume) appearing twice in the frame, which violates the rule of not generating the same character multiple times within the same image. This results in a score of 0 for editing success. However, the overall context and setting appear consistent with the original image, indicating that the overediting score is moderate at 5, as the scene still maintains some resemblance to the original while introducing the duplicate character." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_0_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_0_r_1.json index 9f2827786f38f24a5496946aaf576d16533c18b1..f16194d960d07ea312383941af25f62b26e565e4 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_0_r_1.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_0_r_1.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 7, - 8 - ], - "reasoning": "The image appears to depict a scene with two characters, one in focus and another partially obscured by darkness. The naturalness score is 7 because while the overall composition and lighting seem plausible, there is a slight artificiality in the details of the characters' features and clothing, which may not fully align with real-world textures or proportions. The artifacts score is 8 because the image shows minimal distortion or unusual elements; however, there might be some minor blurring or lack of fine detail in the darker areas, which is typical for AI-generated images." - }, "SC": { "score": [ 8, 7 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to create a medium close-up of another guest approaching the person in costume, with their face partially obscured by a mask. In the second image, the new character is indeed present, and their face is partially obscured by a mask, which aligns well with the instruction. The setting appears consistent with the first image, maintaining the context of a costume event. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the darkness around the masked figure, which could be considered a minor overedit. Overall, the editing is successful but slightly overdone in terms of contrast and shadowing." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully introduces another character approaching the person in costume, adhering to the instruction of a medium close-up. The new character's face is partially obscured by a mask, which aligns with the editing goal. However, there is a slight overediting issue as the new character appears somewhat out of context compared to the original setting, but it does not generate the same character multiple times. The overall scene maintains recognizable elements from the original image while effectively incorporating the new character." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_0_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_0_r_2.json index 52fe717d55a2660b77036784afd2db5556ae963d..fdb4abec286ce1c4f007b2533b0d08c84ff6f815 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_0_r_2.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_0_r_2.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 7, - 8 - ], - "reasoning": "The image depicts two figures wearing dark hooded garments with one figure having visible face paint. The overall composition appears coherent, with a sense of depth and context, contributing to a relatively natural feel. However, there are slight inconsistencies in the lighting and shadows, particularly around the edges of the hoods, which slightly detract from the naturalness. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion or unusual elements, with clear details and well-defined features. The faces and clothing appear smooth without significant blurring or unnatural body parts, indicating a low level of artifacts." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 7, - 8 + 0, + 5 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction aimed to introduce a new character (another guest) into the scene, with their face partially obscured by a mask. In the second image, this has been achieved effectively, as there is now a second figure visible, wearing a costume and a mask that obscures part of their face. The overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, indicating minimal overediting. However, the addition of the new character slightly alters the composition but maintains the integrity of the original scene." + "reasoning": "The edited image fails the primary objective because it shows the same character (the person in costume) appearing twice within the same frame, which violates the rule of not generating the same character more than once. This results in a score of 0 for editing success. However, the image does attempt to introduce another character with a mask, indicating some effort towards the instruction, but the duplication overshadows this. For the degree of overediting, while the addition of another character is noticeable, the overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, earning a moderate score of 5." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_1_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_1_r_0.json index 71d68639e391ba70ea94104b1caaf21c7189d133..7b3d3bfd525ef41d4fd60003f26bd076dbdb5195 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_1_r_0.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_1_r_0.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 7, - 8 - ], - "reasoning": "The image appears to depict a person in a costume with a somewhat natural setting, including background elements like cups and decorations. The lighting and shadows seem consistent with indoor lighting, contributing to a reasonable sense of naturalness. However, there is a slight artificiality in the facial features and expression, which slightly detracts from the overall naturalness. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion or unusual elements, with clear details and well-defined features, indicating low artifact presence." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 9, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The editing appears to have successfully captured a close-up of the character's face, focusing on their determined expression as described in the instruction. The facial features and makeup details are prominent, emphasizing the character's intensity. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the facial details, which slightly detracts from the natural flow of the image. Overall, the editing is effective but could be slightly more subtle to avoid overediting." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully maintains the focus on the character's face with a close-up shot, capturing the intended determined expression. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times within the image, adhering to the editing instruction. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall composition and context remain consistent with the original image, with only slight adjustments to emphasize the facial expression." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_1_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_1_r_1.json index 881e5b38243da9dd06f2b3b6c2309483604b698a..133301004f0fc9b9995242d1f9bae4e448426355 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_1_r_1.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_1_r_1.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 7, - 8 - ], - "reasoning": "The image appears to be AI-generated with a relatively high level of detail and naturalness. The facial features and makeup are well-defined, and the lighting seems consistent with the environment. However, there is a slight artificiality in the skin texture and some minor inconsistencies in the background details, which slightly detract from the overall naturalness. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion or unusual elements, with clean lines and coherent composition, indicating a low presence of artifacts." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 9, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The editing appears to have successfully captured a close-up of the character's face, focusing on their determined expression as described in the instruction. The facial features and makeup details are prominent, emphasizing the character's intensity. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the lighting or shading around the eyes, which could be considered minor overediting. Overall, the edit effectively conveys the intended mood while maintaining recognition as a minimal yet impactful adjustment to the original image." + "reasoning": "The edited image does not generate the same character multiple times, adhering to the rule. The character's face remains in close-up with a determined expression, effectively capturing the intended mood. There is minimal overediting, as the overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, maintaining the continuity of the scene." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_1_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_1_r_2.json index 37a2b94e8edfec8f9438102d4c66aed28f48efe3..98b0e8c650c93cb59a8d89fb0ec18cc7893bfd1c 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_1_r_2.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_1_r_2.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 7, - 8 - ], - "reasoning": "The image appears to depict a person with detailed makeup and a costume, which looks relatively natural in terms of facial features and expression. However, there might be slight inconsistencies in the lighting and shadows around the face, which slightly detract from the overall naturalness. The artifacts are minimal, with no obvious distortions, watermarks, or blurring. The makeup application and costume details are well-executed, contributing to a high artifact score." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 9, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The editing appears to have successfully captured a close-up of the character's face, focusing on their determined expression as described in the instruction. The facial features and makeup details are prominent, emphasizing the character's intensity. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the facial details, which could be considered minor overediting. Overall, the editing aligns well with the instruction while maintaining recognizable continuity with the original image." + "reasoning": "The edited image does not generate the same character multiple times, adhering to the rule. The character's determined expression is effectively captured in a close-up, focusing on the facial details as instructed. The background remains consistent with the original, indicating minimal overediting while still enhancing the intended mood. However, there is a slight shift in the character's gaze and facial tension, which could be seen as a minor overedit but does not detract significantly from the overall effectiveness." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_2_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_2_r_0.json index 74c8ac698489ebcb4304ed09d72de31acd625890..175fa1a4715de392787b7f31c42d7ef0c3ed0ebf 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_2_r_0.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_2_r_0.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 7, - 8 - ], - "reasoning": "The image depicts a scene with two children dressed in costumes, one as a devil-like character and the other as a superhero. The naturalness is relatively high as the interaction between the characters appears plausible, with the child in the superhero costume offering a lollipop to the other. However, there is a slight artificiality in the facial expressions and details, which slightly detracts from the overall naturalness. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion or unusual elements, with clear and coherent details in the costumes and background. The lighting and shadows appear consistent, further supporting the lack of significant artifacts." - }, "SC": { "score": [ 8, 7 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to introduce another child in a different costume who is excitedly reaching out for a piece of candy. In the second image, this has been effectively achieved as a new child wearing a superhero costume is visible, holding a lollipop and appearing excited. The addition of the child aligns well with the instruction, indicating successful execution. However, the background and setting remain consistent with the first image, suggesting that the editing was done minimally while still achieving the desired effect. The slight shift in focus and the introduction of the new character do not feel overly intrusive, maintaining the context of the original scene." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully introduces a new character (a child in a different costume) without duplicating the original character, adhering to the editing instruction. The new character is clearly distinct in appearance and costume, indicating successful editing. However, the addition of the new character slightly alters the composition, but it does not deviate excessively from the original scene, maintaining recognizability." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_2_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_2_r_1.json index 6ef9410e56cdb068a0dd7b7c8ec4a1a949829519..0fdbb2a2d9667c61678a91ca46342c915721ae93 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_2_r_1.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_2_r_1.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 7 - ], - "reasoning": "The image depicts two children in costumes, one offering a lollipop to the other, which conveys a natural and relatable scene. The expressions and interactions appear genuine, contributing to the overall naturalness. However, there are slight inconsistencies in the details, such as the costume textures and facial features, which introduce minor artifacts. The lighting and shadows are mostly consistent but could be slightly more refined for a perfect natural look." - }, "SC": { "score": [ 8, 7 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to introduce another child in a different costume who is excitedly reaching out for a piece of candy. In the second image, this has been effectively achieved as a new child in a colorful costume is visible, holding out a lollipop with an excited expression. The transition between the two images suggests a panning motion, which aligns with the instruction. However, the background elements remain consistent, indicating that the focus was on adding the new character rather than altering the entire scene. The degree of overediting is moderate, as the addition of the new character is noticeable but does not drastically change the overall context or setting of the original image." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully introduces a new character without duplicating the existing one, adhering to the editing instruction. The addition of the second child in a different costume, reaching for candy, enhances the scene effectively. However, there is a slight overediting in terms of the positioning and interaction between the two characters, which could be more natural. Overall, the edit is successful but slightly overdone." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_2_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_2_r_2.json index 14e6be7578bfa74742d1e97fa5b54b465736491c..b10ce75e6f0d7bf8689214a6a2e357de916145f7 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_2_r_2.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000002_prompt_2_r_2.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 7, - 8 - ], - "reasoning": "The image depicts a child interacting with a lollipop, and the overall scene appears relatively natural. The expressions and actions of the child seem plausible, contributing to a sense of realism. However, there is a slight artificiality in the background character's appearance, which might affect the naturalness slightly. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion or unusual elements, with clear details and coherent composition. The lighting and shadows appear consistent, further supporting the lack of significant artifacts." - }, "SC": { "score": [ 8, 7 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to introduce another child in a different costume who is excitedly reaching out for a piece of candy. In the second image, a new child wearing a blue costume is visible, and they are indeed reaching out for a colorful lollipop with an expression of excitement. This effectively fulfills the instruction. However, the background and setting remain consistent with the first image, indicating that the edit was minimal and focused only on adding the new character and action. The overall context and environment are preserved, which helps maintain the connection between the two images. Therefore, the editing is successful but not overly aggressive." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully introduces a new character (a child in a different costume) without duplicating the original character, adhering to the editing instruction. The new character is clearly distinct and positioned appropriately, indicating a successful edit. However, the addition of the new character slightly alters the overall composition, but it does not deviate excessively from the original scene, maintaining recognizability." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_0.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..326eb2aee1e183a9f6c5d098f15002ea19bb71b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_0.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully focuses on the seated woman, capturing her as the central figure with others leaning in attentively, which aligns well with the editing instruction. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the first score is high. However, the framing has changed slightly, which could be seen as a minor overedit, hence the second score is slightly lower but still acceptable." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_0.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_0.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5730f942cb5534bcec24797e04b53f0bd70cc40c --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_0.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:88b9aae3dbb1bd43e5ba4489592f2d65f38ea3d0f6305ed8b42c56b6f4fefe83 +size 1772285 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eced688659b18d09fd9d8b01af7e80aca2af51cd --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4518cb58ba39d192ea0d1a94ea85efb8c09ba004b69a1011eddff366e6166243 +size 1103928 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a41949d62d4bbdd13846852a35a6fd63f53ede2c --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_1.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully focuses on the seated woman speaking, with others leaning in attentively, which aligns well with the editing instruction. There are no instances of the same character appearing multiple times, indicating successful editing. However, the framing has been adjusted slightly, which could be seen as a minor overedit, but it does not significantly alter the overall scene or context. Therefore, the editing is mostly effective with minimal overediting." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_1.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_1.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5730f942cb5534bcec24797e04b53f0bd70cc40c --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_1.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:88b9aae3dbb1bd43e5ba4489592f2d65f38ea3d0f6305ed8b42c56b6f4fefe83 +size 1772285 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e89ac453e71cddd24d4f36109aac51799bf19191 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ee214d187d7d0e6d4361c448e17cd890147a7f8b982d1c4fe5a760580feb5a62 +size 1070598 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e272052ef5aca67a7be6396fa626a5ad93c2b29f --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_2.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully focuses on the seated woman speaking, with others leaning in attentively, following the editing instruction effectively. There are no instances of the same character appearing multiple times, indicating no failure in this regard. However, while the focus is well-executed, there is a slight shift in composition compared to the original, which slightly increases the perception of overediting. Overall, the changes are minimal but noticeable." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_2.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_2.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5730f942cb5534bcec24797e04b53f0bd70cc40c --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_2.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:88b9aae3dbb1bd43e5ba4489592f2d65f38ea3d0f6305ed8b42c56b6f4fefe83 +size 1772285 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3dab5d5b75f7183bfcce0c4294c638fc86c886ea --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:983582b3103c83197c137efe8e907879f47f8c13f030f2c4978770c523281245 +size 1169886 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_1_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_1_r_0.json index 883143e6d08a8872f46279c5f6b9827e89e8a88c..15fa62313d97eb89175338b2293f8d70455f3f3f 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_1_r_0.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_1_r_0.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 7 - ], - "reasoning": "The image appears relatively natural with realistic lighting and shadows, contributing to a believable atmosphere. However, there are subtle inconsistencies in the details, such as slight blurring around the edges of the characters' clothing and minor distortions in the background elements like the curtains and plant. The overall composition is coherent, but these small imperfections slightly detract from the naturalness. The artifacts are minimal but noticeable upon close inspection, particularly in the finer details of the characters' attire and the background textures." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 10, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The second image successfully zooms in on the central figure seated at the table, focusing on her expression and body language, which aligns well with the editing instruction. The close-up effectively highlights her facial features and posture, making the editing successful. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the close-up, which slightly reduces the context of the surrounding environment compared to the original image. Overall, the editing is effective but leans towards a more focused view, indicating some overediting." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully zooms in on the central figure seated at the table, focusing on their expression and body language without generating the same character multiple times. This fulfills the editing instruction effectively. The degree of overediting is moderate, as the context and setting remain recognizable from the original image, but the focus has shifted significantly to highlight the central figure." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_1_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_1_r_1.json index 4023bf23157e1d65616456c3facb08b97967420f..01002ce6f190dfb77cf56bb45a090a682d507576 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_1_r_1.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_1_r_1.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 7 - ], - "reasoning": "The image appears to depict a realistic indoor setting with two individuals engaged in what seems like a serious conversation. The lighting is warm and consistent with indoor environments, contributing to a natural atmosphere. However, there are subtle signs of artificiality, such as slightly off proportions in the hands and minor inconsistencies in the texture of clothing and skin. The background elements, like the lamp and curtains, are well-integrated but show some minor blurring or lack of fine detail, which might indicate AI generation. Overall, while the image feels mostly natural, there are slight artifacts that detract from its perfection." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 10, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The second image successfully zooms in on the central figure seated at the table, focusing on her expression and body language, which aligns well with the editing instruction. This highlights her presence and details effectively. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the close-up, which slightly reduces the context of the surrounding environment compared to the original image. Overall, the editing is successful but leans towards a more focused view, which could be considered a minor overedit." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully zooms in on the central figure seated at the table, focusing on their expression and body language without generating the same character multiple times. This fulfills the editing instruction effectively. The degree of overediting is moderate, as the context and setting remain recognizable from the original image, but the perspective change is significant enough to alter the overall composition." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_1_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_1_r_2.json index 1bd4aa393c841c63cad5965b472ecc56adab68a1..d20bf427a5e070ef6cb292d32e3b16a5fef1cd0d 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_1_r_2.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_1_r_2.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 7 - ], - "reasoning": "The image appears to depict a formal setting with individuals engaged in a conversation, which seems plausible and contextually appropriate. The lighting and shadows are relatively consistent, contributing to a sense of naturalness. However, there are subtle inconsistencies in the details, such as slight blurring around the edges of some figures and minor distortions in the background elements, which slightly detract from the overall naturalness. The clothing and postures of the characters are generally well-rendered, but there are minor artifacts visible, particularly in the finer details like hair and fabric textures, which affect the artifact rating." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 9, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The second image successfully zooms in on the central figure seated at the table, focusing more closely on their expression and body language compared to the first image. This aligns well with the editing instruction. However, while the zoom is effective, some elements around the edges appear slightly distorted or less detailed, indicating a minor degree of overediting. Overall, the transition maintains the context of the original scene while emphasizing the intended subject." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully zooms in on the central figure seated at the table, focusing on their expression and body language without generating the same character multiple times. This fulfills the editing instruction effectively. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, maintaining recognition of the scene while achieving the intended zoom effect." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_2_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_2_r_0.json index 5aa2a91c3437323751a24ebec4e9754ef4bb3944..7adb5af6902664446def4778080c3334effb2048 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_2_r_0.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_2_r_0.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 9 - ], - "reasoning": "The image appears quite natural in terms of composition and lighting, with realistic facial expressions and body language that suggest a serious conversation. The environment, including the furniture and decor, contributes to a believable setting. However, there is a slight artificiality in the skin texture and hair details, which slightly detracts from the overall naturalness. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion, with clean lines and well-defined features, indicating high-quality generation. There are no visible watermarks, scratches, or unusual body parts, making it nearly artifact-free." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 9, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to emphasize the central figure seated at the table by panning the camera to focus on them. In the second image, the camera indeed zooms in or focuses more closely on the central figure, effectively highlighting their presence and importance compared to the broader group shot in the first image. This change aligns well with the instruction, making the central figure the clear focal point. However, while the focus shift is successful, there is a slight overemphasis, as the background details are now less visible, which could be seen as a minor overedit. Overall, the editing is effective but slightly leans towards overemphasizing the subject." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully focuses on the central figure seated at the table, effectively emphasizing their importance without generating the same character multiple times. This aligns well with the editing instruction. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, maintaining the continuity of the scene." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_2_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_2_r_1.json index 36ab06c33be2bba911d7ff5692bd437d3cbd46f0..7adb5af6902664446def4778080c3334effb2048 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_2_r_1.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_2_r_1.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 7 - ], - "reasoning": "The image appears to depict a formal setting with individuals seated around a table, suggesting a meeting or discussion. The lighting and shadows are consistent with indoor artificial light, contributing to a natural ambiance. However, there are slight inconsistencies in the facial details and clothing textures that hint at AI generation. The overall composition and environment feel plausible, but minor artifacts are noticeable, particularly in the finer details of the characters' appearances and the background elements." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 9, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to emphasize the central figure seated at the table by panning the camera to focus on them. In the second image, the camera indeed focuses closely on the central figure, isolating them from the surrounding group and drawing attention to their presence. This effectively highlights their importance in the gathering, achieving the intended emphasis. However, the transition between the two images suggests a slight overemphasis, as the second image removes much of the context provided by the surrounding individuals, which could be considered a minor overedit. Overall, the focus shift is successful but slightly overshadows the broader setting." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully focuses on the central figure seated at the table, effectively emphasizing their importance without generating the same character multiple times. This aligns well with the editing instruction. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, maintaining the continuity of the scene." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_2_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_2_r_2.json index 611d98b07651f312f0e783f1e4047312e5f617cd..9bf646c6cabf7e3910902b2451e2323d0d5a0b71 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_2_r_2.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000003_prompt_2_r_2.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 7 - ], - "reasoning": "The image appears to depict a formal setting with individuals engaged in a serious discussion around a table. The lighting, shadows, and overall composition contribute to a relatively natural feel, though there are subtle inconsistencies in the details of the characters' appearances and the environment that suggest it is AI-generated. The naturalness is high due to the realistic setting and interactions, but there are minor artifacts visible in the facial features and clothing textures, which slightly detract from the overall quality." - }, "SC": { "score": [ 8, 7 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction aimed to emphasize the central figure seated at the table by panning the camera to focus on them. In the second image, the camera angle has indeed shifted to highlight the central figure more prominently, effectively drawing attention to them. This change aligns well with the instruction, indicating successful execution. However, while the focus is achieved, some elements of the background and surrounding figures are still visible, suggesting that the transition was not overly dramatic or intrusive. Therefore, the editing is both successful and minimally invasive, resulting in scores of 8 for editing success and 7 for the degree of overediting." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully focuses on the central figure seated at the table, effectively emphasizing their importance as per the instruction. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the editing success. However, while the focus shift is clear, some elements of the background and other characters are still visible, suggesting that the edit is not overly aggressive. This balance indicates a moderate level of overediting, as the scene retains its context but with a clear emphasis on the central figure." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_0.json index abfc69f6d78ae4a3a5ab998399ca2a8778e0ddbe..83f85ac92815f89f250c91fa898a83fd2f5b2b97 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_0.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_0.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 9 - ], - "reasoning": "The image depicts a dog sniffing a flower in a field, which appears quite natural in terms of composition and context. The lighting and shadows are consistent with an outdoor setting, contributing to the natural feel. However, there is a slight softness in the details, particularly around the dog's fur and the flowers, which might indicate some AI generation characteristics but does not detract significantly from the overall naturalness. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion, with clean lines and no visible watermarks, scratches, or unusual features. The blending between the dog and the background is smooth, indicating high-quality generation." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 9, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to pan the camera slightly upward to reveal the dog's face while it sniffs a flower, capturing its curious expression. In the second image, the camera angle has indeed shifted upward, revealing more of the dog's face and its interaction with the flower, which aligns well with the instruction. The dog's curious expression is visible, indicating successful execution of the instruction. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the close-up of the dog's face, which could be considered minor overediting. Overall, the editing is effective but leans slightly towards overediting." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the dog's face as instructed, showing a gentle sniff of the flower and a curious expression. There is no repetition of the character within the image, indicating a successful edit. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall scene remains consistent with the original image, maintaining the natural setting and focus on the dog's interaction with the flower." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_1.json index dfd2157ab588344352998fefae9d8a53a8f38b12..8a3c1bdf80a2298b45249006421f89e7cd0b9621 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_1.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_1.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 9 - ], - "reasoning": "The image depicts a dog in a natural outdoor setting with flowers, which appears quite realistic and harmonious. The lighting and shadows are consistent with a natural environment, contributing to a high level of naturalness. However, there is a slight softness in the details, particularly around the fur texture and background, which might indicate some AI generation characteristics but does not detract significantly from the overall realism. Regarding artifacts, the image shows minimal distortion, with clean lines and no visible watermarks, scratches, or unusual features. The blending between the dog and the background is smooth, indicating low artifact presence." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 9, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to pan the camera slightly upward to reveal the dog's face while it sniffs a flower, capturing its curious expression. In the second image, the camera angle has indeed shifted upward, revealing more of the dog's face, including its eyes and nose, which aligns with the instruction. The dog's expression appears curious, and it is still interacting with the flower, maintaining the intended focus. However, there is a slight overemphasis on the dog's face, which could be considered a minor overedit. Overall, the editing is successful but leans slightly towards overediting." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully reveals the dog's face while maintaining the continuity of the scene, adhering to the instruction to pan slightly upward. The dog's curious expression is captured effectively without generating the same character multiple times, ensuring the editing success score is high. However, there is a slight shift in perspective and focus, which introduces a minor degree of overediting, hence the lower score for overediting." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_2.json index e6ebadcd9d9ce72e74c33ddba23bc09ff1ce467c..087fe84f45a1fd89ba5e7d804ca4ca16c4214e49 100644 --- a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_2.json +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_0_r_2.json @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ { - "PQ": { - "score": [ - 8, - 9 - ], - "reasoning": "The image depicts a dog interacting with flowers in a natural outdoor setting. The naturalness score is high (8) because the scene appears realistic, with appropriate lighting, shadows, and a harmonious composition. The dog's fur texture and the details of the flowers are well-rendered, contributing to the natural feel. However, there might be slight imperfections in the fine details that prevent it from scoring a perfect 10. The artifact score is also high (9) as there are minimal visible distortions, watermarks, or other anomalies. The overall image quality is smooth and coherent, indicating effective AI generation." - }, "SC": { "score": [ - 8, - 7 + 9, + 8 ], - "reasoning": "The editing instruction was to pan the camera slightly upward to reveal the dog's face while it sniffs a flower, capturing its curious expression. In the second image, the camera angle has indeed shifted upward, revealing more of the dog's face and its gentle interaction with the flower. This effectively captures the intended curious expression, indicating successful execution of the instruction. However, the transition between the two images is noticeable but not overly dramatic, suggesting that the editing was done with care to maintain the original context. Therefore, the editing is both successful and minimally overedited." + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the dog's face as instructed, showing its curious expression while sniffing the flower. There is no repetition of the character within the image, indicating a successful edit. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the scene remains consistent with the original image, maintaining the natural setting and focus on the dog's interaction with the flower." } } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_0.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..33413370681010831b78de9eef8265fd833d5b08 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_0.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully portrays the dog pausing and looking around, with its head tilted slightly, which aligns well with the editing instruction. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the first score is high. However, the transition from the original image to the edited one involves a significant change in perspective and focus, which slightly increases the degree of overediting, hence the second score is slightly lower but still acceptable." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_0.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_0.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f61a567a256f64d7ce7fce7195d453a595f293bc --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_0.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6bd713a820a057a167a98948cf094dfa2ea25d8da5c3aa1fcabd1f517a23d324 +size 1551566 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1f52dd7b3f815bc0fbc14cd60fbc4e9e5160ac4f --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f6c70062a37d1064d652751bca3cb504ad751b45587ec60b0eb7cf48b26f7900 +size 1335672 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e58fb1354807c15ac6c00214440647ae5781a722 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_1.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully portrays the dog pausing and looking around, with its head tilted slightly, which aligns well with the editing instruction. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the first score is high. However, the transition from the original image to the edited one involves a significant change in perspective and focus, which suggests a moderate level of overediting, hence the second score is slightly lower." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_1.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_1.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f61a567a256f64d7ce7fce7195d453a595f293bc --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_1.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6bd713a820a057a167a98948cf094dfa2ea25d8da5c3aa1fcabd1f517a23d324 +size 1551566 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f970c0e03e2391ed6441fd112812ec9316016b77 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5437f6b29da9eaf8672f5659231cd5c0541d1bcdc1abecb5c67df617fdd6b994 +size 1340281 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b325b7a54f859f6526a6552d19b3dc5ace424ca7 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_2.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the essence of the editing instruction, showing the dog pausing and looking around with a slightly tilted head. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the first score is high. However, the transition from the original image to the edited one involves a significant change in perspective and focus, which slightly increases the degree of overediting, hence the lower second score." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_2.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_2.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f61a567a256f64d7ce7fce7195d453a595f293bc --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_2.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6bd713a820a057a167a98948cf094dfa2ea25d8da5c3aa1fcabd1f517a23d324 +size 1551566 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3fee8e8c5bf8e6c417954987a15178f0b7a7b0d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a2e6a3a8f2c6008e934602373b7b885096b4f364444fdcd9785b67a41dc67f84 +size 1387278 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_0.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e041f60a1faff77d0bde9edf436601cb47e713d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_0.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 9, + 8 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the dog turning its head to look directly at the camera, with its ears perked up and curious eyes, following the editing instruction effectively. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, so the editing success score is high. The degree of overediting is moderate; while the focus has shifted to the dog's face, the overall context and background remain consistent with the original image, maintaining recognition as a minimal yet effective edit." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_0.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_0.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f61a567a256f64d7ce7fce7195d453a595f293bc --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_0.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6bd713a820a057a167a98948cf094dfa2ea25d8da5c3aa1fcabd1f517a23d324 +size 1551566 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..af57a2ce71b5766286c617815da980f96d66e3c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:dea30de5b48b7086a5e42e550d0bda4ee23f982eb07956289db5de2a4c194ee1 +size 1270793 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..29a733eaecc59a2f959150dbda39a20358f35ea1 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_1.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 9, + 8 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the dog turning its head to look directly at the camera, with its ears perked up and curious eyes, following the editing instruction effectively. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, so the editing success score is high. The degree of overediting is moderate; while the focus has shifted from the dog's paw to its face, the overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, maintaining recognition as a minimal yet effective edit." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_1.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_1.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f61a567a256f64d7ce7fce7195d453a595f293bc --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_1.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6bd713a820a057a167a98948cf094dfa2ea25d8da5c3aa1fcabd1f517a23d324 +size 1551566 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6ce9993bdf31845c19e9d548db70738c9a6aef63 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b153c329c329456a55aac379458431fa0d294c8f59c133d8107592b560fa6575 +size 1251922 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6b3d7781e48dcc7519d0bfb4ab6cf643b1a8d69c --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_2.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 9, + 8 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the dog turning its head to look directly at the camera, with its ears perked up and curious eyes, following the editing instruction effectively. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, so the editing success score is high. The degree of overediting is moderate; while the changes are noticeable and effective, the overall context and setting remain consistent with the original image, maintaining the natural feel of the scene." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_2.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_2.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f61a567a256f64d7ce7fce7195d453a595f293bc --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_2.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6bd713a820a057a167a98948cf094dfa2ea25d8da5c3aa1fcabd1f517a23d324 +size 1551566 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..db9fba7662d7bcc69a64b3684e0935de44d8716b --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000004_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2a978ebfbb50675aeb1faaa5c72df5449a571ca653c36c28d9cb2fa06e44047d +size 1277569 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_0.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..488b306b967b9dbdd060c4cc4dad32c52c57e1d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_0.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man sitting across from Captain O'Malley with his head nodded and arms crossed, following the editing instruction. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, so the editing is successful. However, the overall lighting and some details appear slightly altered, suggesting a moderate level of overediting. The scene remains recognizable as a minimal edit of the original." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_0.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_0.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d1db87ec64647534387ba235ab43988961402978 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_0.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:55ffb9c2605f3ac709496a21023213918b8c9f0e9fc074cabbd17e89aad0c91e +size 1325989 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ef40490e44a015cd9225fc033db435c291bdac9d --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a9d391f8633f3a36e11afe62d7bb16b29a724992a3fd9d65a174c982fcaf1f2c +size 1012038 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..488b306b967b9dbdd060c4cc4dad32c52c57e1d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_1.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man sitting across from Captain O'Malley with his head nodded and arms crossed, following the editing instruction. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, so the editing is successful. However, the overall lighting and some details appear slightly altered, suggesting a moderate level of overediting. The scene remains recognizable as a minimal edit of the original." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_1.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_1.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d1db87ec64647534387ba235ab43988961402978 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_1.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:55ffb9c2605f3ac709496a21023213918b8c9f0e9fc074cabbd17e89aad0c91e +size 1325989 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e8ff454c824aa5d481dc1b2b35cb13eed8df0ded --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f78b8e3b43039bc43176792212ae43933a8a667089541a6ebb2ef1a00d28055f +size 996585 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..68eedf50cfdca197bff97a890926a000217bc4b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_2.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man sitting across from Captain O'Malley with his head nodded and arms crossed, following the editing instruction. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, so the editing is successful. However, the overall lighting and contrast in the edited image appear darker, which might suggest some overediting, but it does not significantly alter the core elements of the scene. Therefore, the editing is mostly effective with minimal overediting." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_2.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_2.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d1db87ec64647534387ba235ab43988961402978 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_2.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:55ffb9c2605f3ac709496a21023213918b8c9f0e9fc074cabbd17e89aad0c91e +size 1325989 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5990e0dd019eaadfbd1add521822007a00e393c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:848d77a64eb3b34ff161696cbfe85e1ba6deadefb74c4ed3108fa6a840270084 +size 996999 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_0.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a67f9bb97140d7127b169038f77b8cf25aa6be3c --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_0.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the individual leaning forward and gesturing with their hands, which aligns with the editing instruction. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, so the editing is effective. However, the overall tone and lighting of the edited image appear slightly altered, suggesting some overediting. Despite this, the core elements of the scene remain intact, allowing the image to be recognizable as a minimal edit." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_0.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_0.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d1db87ec64647534387ba235ab43988961402978 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_0.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:55ffb9c2605f3ac709496a21023213918b8c9f0e9fc074cabbd17e89aad0c91e +size 1325989 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aa11b3cd380797452f1875baeb08c08a123a9f30 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9951479a77d5332ac1fb4066f2d5cde01564151af5e315cafd677e08d3a354e6 +size 1021304 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7217756abca07d0ae36dc8d60e572bb9a413c64b --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_1.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the individual leaning forward and gesturing with their hands, which aligns with the editing instruction. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, so the editing is effective. However, the overall lighting and some details appear slightly altered, suggesting a moderate level of overediting. The scene remains recognizable as a minimal edit of the original." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_1.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_1.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d1db87ec64647534387ba235ab43988961402978 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_1.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:55ffb9c2605f3ac709496a21023213918b8c9f0e9fc074cabbd17e89aad0c91e +size 1325989 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0dc199ffd26b49199928ea4db34fe23855c065b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2edfb62e42d3308bdcb5a14c7f8dbafaa09ff7dd6dcc81c55e55e245f5a756df +size 996599 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2b57d2823d78972167ed262641a5a4c849288a07 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_2.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the individual leaning forward and gesturing with their hands, which aligns with the editing instruction. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, so the editing is effective. However, the overall posture and expression of the individual appear slightly less dynamic compared to what might be expected for a strong lean and gesture, which slightly reduces the success score. The degree of overediting is moderate; while the changes are noticeable, the core elements of the scene remain consistent with the original, maintaining recognizability." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_2.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_2.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d1db87ec64647534387ba235ab43988961402978 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_2.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:55ffb9c2605f3ac709496a21023213918b8c9f0e9fc074cabbd17e89aad0c91e +size 1325989 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a91c5ac75536414b1582ed5c153ac2b9f18412fd --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:697aa8c84fe198d833062bb333a1d885ebe5f7c48531d70fcdb526758ce08531 +size 1029174 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_0.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..93b0bc226d2bf0b514797c11a69ebe3c0422b81e --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_0.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully portrays the visitor listening attentively with a slight nod, which aligns with the editing instruction. Captain O'Malley continues to gesture, maintaining the dynamic of the conversation. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the editing success. However, the overall lighting and contrast appear darker in the edited image, which might be considered a minor overedit, but it does not significantly alter the core elements of the scene." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_0.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_0.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d1db87ec64647534387ba235ab43988961402978 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_0.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:55ffb9c2605f3ac709496a21023213918b8c9f0e9fc074cabbd17e89aad0c91e +size 1325989 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d84e94ab6807157240842b6132fff3b93c62d364 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:845bb5f7954ac6ad21bb92e5fc532a6688f3b2642854cae40f534b8d567778d8 +size 1021988 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..894eb5b5d32d501805b07c7272b6d7352eaa5f2f --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_1.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully portrays the visitor listening attentively with a slight nod, which aligns with the editing instruction. Captain O'Malley continues to gesture, maintaining the dynamic of the conversation. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the editing success. However, the overall tone and lighting of the edited image appear darker, which might suggest some overediting, but it does not detract significantly from the original context. Therefore, the editing is mostly effective with minor overediting." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_1.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_1.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d1db87ec64647534387ba235ab43988961402978 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_1.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:55ffb9c2605f3ac709496a21023213918b8c9f0e9fc074cabbd17e89aad0c91e +size 1325989 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bfb13167e95873e42f368456c5252f6a58aa8915 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d951564f801d3c437242e637c4e546122ccaca4e6b0535db3cfdcfd4a88ac99b +size 1002403 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5669cddc3a12bc9ad8d20a20d8bb2d8002e0d3cc --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_2.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully portrays the visitor listening attentively with a slight nod, which aligns with the editing instruction. Captain O'Malley continues to gesture, maintaining the dynamic of the conversation. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the editing success. However, the overall lighting appears darker in the edited image, which might be considered a minor overedit, but it does not significantly alter the core elements of the scene." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_2.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_2.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d1db87ec64647534387ba235ab43988961402978 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_2.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:55ffb9c2605f3ac709496a21023213918b8c9f0e9fc074cabbd17e89aad0c91e +size 1325989 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6d1fec5f50020454fc33491592d93b7daa9859b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000005_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:36fa8db9024a53b3b9afa0d0c790fbcb025f6cc740880f354ea26ad5c8b7333b +size 1014399 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_0.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9da3cf80f7a99efdb7100547f9191bce61d2bf40 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_0.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the essence of the editing instruction by panning slightly to the right, revealing a dimly lit street through the wet car windshield. There are no instances of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the first score is high. However, while the edit is effective, it does introduce some noticeable changes in lighting and perspective, indicating a moderate level of overediting compared to the original image." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_0.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_0.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c245699fb5b8f5a02af350c8f108848ecbee585a --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_0.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7ce100ef21bfcc95e8788b3c2f09a34b21eb9e08d8d0f47e043beb7fd05ca428 +size 1907931 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e866d7aae8064a8f9751935a3f5d9177b1493fab --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:df17489bdeb31a97b5b9592962491b7891ba6c27c20e0f0447e1ac9c5be9e31f +size 1371394 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2c4e66cc8bd94b83ae22d8667655e176963d5844 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_1.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 9, + 8 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the essence of the editing instruction by panning slightly to the right, revealing a dimly lit street through the wet car windshield. There are no instances of the same character appearing multiple times, ensuring the editing success. The overall scene remains consistent with the original image, maintaining recognizable elements like the raindrops on the windshield and the interior mirror, indicating minimal overediting. However, there is a slight shift in perspective and lighting, which adds to the dynamic feel but does not stray too far from the original composition." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_1.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_1.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c245699fb5b8f5a02af350c8f108848ecbee585a --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_1.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7ce100ef21bfcc95e8788b3c2f09a34b21eb9e08d8d0f47e043beb7fd05ca428 +size 1907931 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dab377515eeb8e144728ddd1581ec6d76439d644 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3ef6b63c49965b5d9e83f70e57259168807c7078adce2f6bbe776913eea09be6 +size 1292690 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4b1de74c332809d144cb87d7a6ad7a532818e811 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_2.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 9, + 8 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures the essence of the editing instruction by panning slightly to the right, revealing a dimly lit street through the wet car windshield. There are no instances of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the editing success. The overall scene remains consistent with the original image, maintaining recognizable elements like the raindrops on the windshield and the interior mirror, indicating minimal overediting. However, there is a slight shift in perspective and lighting, which adds to the dynamic feel but does not drastically alter the core composition." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_2.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_2.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c245699fb5b8f5a02af350c8f108848ecbee585a --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_2.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7ce100ef21bfcc95e8788b3c2f09a34b21eb9e08d8d0f47e043beb7fd05ca428 +size 1907931 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b255f404c4fd1cc42291a7660ae82145db5f8236 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f228872150edd721b2e26045d2054e4af6b2cc909db3d06ad1eeb169feb0ee8f +size 1270037 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_0.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..018a02eaef3741eb67f02585dc4212f819117948 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_0.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 9, + 8 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully introduces a character with a pensive expression looking through the rain-streaked windshield, adhering closely to the editing instruction. There is no repetition of the character within the image, ensuring the first score is high. The second score reflects that while the addition of the character is significant, it maintains the core elements of the original scene, such as the rain and the windshield, indicating minimal overediting." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_0.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_0.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c245699fb5b8f5a02af350c8f108848ecbee585a --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_0.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7ce100ef21bfcc95e8788b3c2f09a34b21eb9e08d8d0f47e043beb7fd05ca428 +size 1907931 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..be60b7f5fc060bc73027f7ddceb9c467c16c0954 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:9907a3451f72e82c9a125e3e4f583386d114a05a9ae12edf9160bd32527252d5 +size 1286516 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2762f8126c39f69582422236bbf1ef8f3af0e1e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_1.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 9, + 8 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures a close-up of the character's face with a pensive expression, adhering to the editing instruction. There is no repetition of the character within the image, ensuring the first score is high. The second score reflects that while the edit is significant enough to focus on the character's face, it still maintains the context of the rain-streaked windshield, indicating minimal overediting." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_1.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_1.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c245699fb5b8f5a02af350c8f108848ecbee585a --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_1.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7ce100ef21bfcc95e8788b3c2f09a34b21eb9e08d8d0f47e043beb7fd05ca428 +size 1907931 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..acef0715250be9eb7b17d5783d2fbc1f5839da54 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:28dc23201d374ed3e7b2c7fc79bc4687e627476787d07dba9945f38c4f54a1a5 +size 1258825 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..471e8953d4af16a337399fd20105a7f1ba17ef80 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_2.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 9, + 8 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully introduces a character with a pensive expression looking through the rain-streaked windshield, adhering to the editing instruction without generating the same character multiple times. The character is added naturally, maintaining the context of the original scene. However, the addition of the character does alter the composition slightly, indicating a moderate level of editing, but it remains recognizable as a minimal yet effective edit." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_2.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_2.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c245699fb5b8f5a02af350c8f108848ecbee585a --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_2.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7ce100ef21bfcc95e8788b3c2f09a34b21eb9e08d8d0f47e043beb7fd05ca428 +size 1907931 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6e650336bc43273ec665e5147e0ca7ec0bebf734 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:95d9a7cb3222394d76aaa27647bcea346114a816084c1c775c746181908edc6e +size 1360489 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_0.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e1d53dc28b69802d049f59255361a9bd93b91dad --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_0.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 9 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the windshield wiper blade moving, which aligns with the editing instruction. There is no indication of any characters being generated multiple times, so the editing is not a complete failure. The changes are minimal but effective, maintaining the overall scene while achieving the intended effect. The degree of overediting is low, as the core elements of the scene remain consistent with the original image." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_0.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_0.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c245699fb5b8f5a02af350c8f108848ecbee585a --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_0.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7ce100ef21bfcc95e8788b3c2f09a34b21eb9e08d8d0f47e043beb7fd05ca428 +size 1907931 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..171b3abfd4c4f77e357ff2455a69bf97740b4693 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ac3b2c10dd6cb9decde06b0191a756decf8c3d3d4da34906d1c8f7773a2977d5 +size 1336034 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a7439a4c4a35f4555e75d763e313d73a8154e338 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_1.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the windshield wiper blade moving, which aligns with the editing instruction. There is no indication of any characters being generated multiple times, so the editing is not a complete failure. However, the movement of the wiper is subtle, and the overall scene remains largely unchanged, indicating minimal overediting. The changes are effective while maintaining the integrity of the original image." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_1.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_1.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c245699fb5b8f5a02af350c8f108848ecbee585a --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_1.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7ce100ef21bfcc95e8788b3c2f09a34b21eb9e08d8d0f47e043beb7fd05ca428 +size 1907931 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..288683d677cd4c5f570f3fb6c63ac654931b16ad --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b360a5d248f5bf449c5beaa6ce2cf4fa9753b3f7c80395ad7a3a73c430626700 +size 1333406 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f39c58bd2fa15da26487fbf9ddd23cc28ad23a68 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_2.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the windshield wiper blade moving, which aligns with the editing instruction. There is no indication of any characters being generated multiple times, so the editing is not a complete failure. However, the movement of the wiper appears somewhat static and lacks dynamic detail, which slightly reduces the effectiveness. The overall scene remains recognizable as a minimal edit of the original, maintaining the rainy atmosphere and interior details, but there is a slight overemphasis on the wiper's position, indicating some overediting." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_2.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_2.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c245699fb5b8f5a02af350c8f108848ecbee585a --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_2.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7ce100ef21bfcc95e8788b3c2f09a34b21eb9e08d8d0f47e043beb7fd05ca428 +size 1907931 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dd903a027694ed5bc2cbe4e800a32ab99256f13b --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000006_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:22ad32efa440e6156dd712c6ba9840c2aa94f64a59522025a74a9c0d94902fed +size 1337488 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_0.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..00fe5a774fa82a934fdd70201e956a9a65076ddf --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_0.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 9, + 8 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man stepping closer to the woman and leaning slightly forward, adhering to the editing instruction without generating the same character multiple times. This indicates a high level of editing success. The degree of overediting is moderate, as the overall scene remains consistent with the original while effectively implementing the changes." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_0.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_0.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..03a2fe3e48473616d0cfbd974050cd9d4235e7a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_0.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f12e90b69ef067a698fe13743df788399b013ddda155e8409887e05566f622f4 +size 1890242 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7810005ec31156ab7c1d65360b3fe7ed742db818 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c01b90b0a49d0acdde11b016422cacdb5ccf48da7848cbee605bbe8392006079 +size 964493 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d5e2df7b3bb1ea4d86ad0b81106e405c2fd77e5a --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_1.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 9, + 8 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man stepping closer to the woman and leaning slightly forward, adhering to the editing instruction without generating the same character multiple times. This indicates a high level of editing success. The degree of overediting is minimal, as the overall scene remains consistent with the original image, maintaining the same setting and characters while effectively implementing the requested changes." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_1.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_1.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..03a2fe3e48473616d0cfbd974050cd9d4235e7a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_1.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f12e90b69ef067a698fe13743df788399b013ddda155e8409887e05566f622f4 +size 1890242 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bfbd5aae6ab661641586515d3d854c9e711bd45c --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6aabbc64f347070d424e9aa869b7fe031c65501644ad5e73d77c00e11355052c +size 1095835 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..817adb099794bade2212730bd4174cb0bbe5a6d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_2.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man stepping closer to the woman and leaning slightly forward, which aligns with the editing instruction. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the first score is high. However, the change is noticeable but not overly dramatic, suggesting a moderate level of editing rather than minimal, hence the second score is slightly lower." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_2.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_2.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..03a2fe3e48473616d0cfbd974050cd9d4235e7a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_2.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f12e90b69ef067a698fe13743df788399b013ddda155e8409887e05566f622f4 +size 1890242 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce5e714936f0c7a3f47f99961a5130de2a4053d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:370c6ba5dd76026803bdaa995fdb254a1b3a9f7177133a01b9e1d35cf598049a +size 1124347 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_0.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3bb29ff07661e5693657ef0bf29c35c4fd8ae91f --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_0.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man stepping forward slightly, maintaining the same character without duplicating him, which fulfills the editing instruction. The overall scene remains consistent with the original, indicating minimal overediting. However, there might be slight variations in lighting or positioning that could be perceived as overediting, hence the scores." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_0.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_0.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..03a2fe3e48473616d0cfbd974050cd9d4235e7a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_0.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f12e90b69ef067a698fe13743df788399b013ddda155e8409887e05566f622f4 +size 1890242 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2700b605a65e9a7bcddf884583617db47cdf3161 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:732b83628ee3c6316c57689416187ef97f25327b96559ac607ed4b62161638e0 +size 951099 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3bb29ff07661e5693657ef0bf29c35c4fd8ae91f --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_1.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man stepping forward slightly, maintaining the same character without duplicating him, which fulfills the editing instruction. The overall scene remains consistent with the original, indicating minimal overediting. However, there might be slight variations in lighting or positioning that could be perceived as overediting, hence the scores." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_1.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_1.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..03a2fe3e48473616d0cfbd974050cd9d4235e7a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_1.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f12e90b69ef067a698fe13743df788399b013ddda155e8409887e05566f622f4 +size 1890242 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad5d25e2155d04970b012471a1acaab9179e66aa --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:70c51b3b54fc37313bf023c432f2602d6c75e9b325f5b19caaa6e4cac59b72a6 +size 1080644 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d76335510ac4979675642f3b14ab8df92ab567c9 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_2.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man stepping forward slightly, maintaining the same character without duplicating him, which fulfills the editing instruction effectively. The overall scene remains consistent with the original, indicating minimal overediting. However, there might be slight variations in lighting or positioning that could be perceived as minor overedits." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_2.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_2.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..03a2fe3e48473616d0cfbd974050cd9d4235e7a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_2.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f12e90b69ef067a698fe13743df788399b013ddda155e8409887e05566f622f4 +size 1890242 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b713773c89da78ce7ec277abceb4472c84cb0011 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:52be574e76c39d8cecdd13a5db7e85a33d8c0eb599825139db1cabfa4293f96a +size 1089899 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_0.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c92186c73ec543be09cd41ef973033642e0bf7cf --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_0.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man in the background turning slightly to address someone off-screen, indicating that the editing instruction was followed. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, so the editing is successful. However, the degree of overediting is moderate; while the change is noticeable, it does not drastically alter the overall scene or introduce unnecessary elements." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_0.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_0.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..03a2fe3e48473616d0cfbd974050cd9d4235e7a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_0.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f12e90b69ef067a698fe13743df788399b013ddda155e8409887e05566f622f4 +size 1890242 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e56ec5b9c21cd8832ef69ab42c3f31f2a2cf7a91 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:81dadc37f0bc6e7d12b9607746041cd2275f2aef915f469d8cc6a90da4abae3c +size 940903 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c92186c73ec543be09cd41ef973033642e0bf7cf --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_1.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man in the background turning slightly to address someone off-screen, indicating that the editing instruction was followed. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, so the editing is successful. However, the degree of overediting is moderate; while the change is noticeable, it does not drastically alter the overall scene or introduce unnecessary elements." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_1.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_1.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..03a2fe3e48473616d0cfbd974050cd9d4235e7a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_1.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f12e90b69ef067a698fe13743df788399b013ddda155e8409887e05566f622f4 +size 1890242 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3d9188322ac156575af4814e303e248f80290bae --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:c7497f577c5702d7cbab8691953e0919f62db7ae75c92299ce5502e5ed83ff0b +size 1081684 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c92186c73ec543be09cd41ef973033642e0bf7cf --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_2.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows the man in the background turning slightly to address someone off-screen, indicating that the editing instruction was followed. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, so the editing is successful. However, the degree of overediting is moderate; while the change is noticeable, it does not drastically alter the overall scene or introduce unnecessary elements." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_2.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_2.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..03a2fe3e48473616d0cfbd974050cd9d4235e7a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_2.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f12e90b69ef067a698fe13743df788399b013ddda155e8409887e05566f622f4 +size 1890242 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..95c482f7f91f75fdde93743fedbec8c9a18c3fb2 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000007_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a30f1b653deb14d450254e1dc126894a06b5e981f77ca47a5352664bbed2eb10 +size 1092146 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_0.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0a329862b08971f6c2883b418c45cfe6db91ed40 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_0.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows a wider view of the farmyard with more people approaching the fenced area, adhering to the editing instruction. There are no instances of the same character appearing multiple times, indicating successful editing. However, the addition of multiple new people slightly alters the composition, but it does not deviate significantly from the original context, maintaining recognizability." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_0.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_0.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..76c5bfe0af0e115997443a517f71539b5a365f69 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_0.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:08b80f694278d653ab0fe06d3c421de524f480fbff15ffef5b71c13c49255f33 +size 5826201 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6357d0b4a04c14f8c2cf523d9f27b522f7268c28 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_0_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:a29e7dcfdb7c37bee6de116e5420d73db4df338150daacf5a6ddbb58e027b8c3 +size 1686023 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5a923bdedca945a01cd81d94555d47c4fef26adf --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_1.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows a wider view of the farmyard, revealing more people approaching the fenced area, which aligns with the editing instruction. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the first score is high. However, the transition from the close-up interaction with the horse to a broader scene introduces some changes in perspective and composition, which slightly increases the degree of overediting but still maintains recognizability of the original setting." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_1.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_1.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..76c5bfe0af0e115997443a517f71539b5a365f69 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_1.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:08b80f694278d653ab0fe06d3c421de524f480fbff15ffef5b71c13c49255f33 +size 5826201 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..37079a0da8d8359c4ebb3e6cb50d4e6c2115638d --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_1_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:efb93f01e2aba61d61b91823b79339545c2a854e367975f93d5f0ad794f98676 +size 1628934 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0a0cfe15e37bd2aa1f02cce98360f089fc8a56ae --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_2.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully shows a wider view of the farmyard, revealing more people approaching the fenced area, which aligns with the editing instruction. There is no indication of the same character being generated multiple times, ensuring the first score is high. However, the transition from the close-up interaction with the horse to the wider farmyard scene introduces significant changes, indicating a moderate level of overediting, hence the second score is slightly lower." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_2.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_2.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..76c5bfe0af0e115997443a517f71539b5a365f69 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_2.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:08b80f694278d653ab0fe06d3c421de524f480fbff15ffef5b71c13c49255f33 +size 5826201 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3e1fcb186d9c76563d4482207f53ce1834754de5 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_0_r_2_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ec7d1172ed586e27ad32cf607fd000b46883d618507a63bbcc50ee38e19c834d +size 1536034 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_0.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c940780016f64ceaa96df011d3506fde8a53ec93 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_0.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 9 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully depicts the woman petting the horse's head and the child standing behind her with a smile, adhering to the editing instruction. There is no repetition of characters, indicating a successful edit. The changes are minimal but effective, maintaining the overall context and setting of the original image." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_0.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_0.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..76c5bfe0af0e115997443a517f71539b5a365f69 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_0.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:08b80f694278d653ab0fe06d3c421de524f480fbff15ffef5b71c13c49255f33 +size 5826201 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..00714c2fc1437418ca075d8be35d48eb94460fc2 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_0_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:be7a6090f6beef340219fea9a995fd95d8e0e1bdc8b00192b38693c318a8bfdc +size 1616000 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a9f19c18815b79647a38016c3604c12714cfe42e --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_1.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully depicts the woman petting the horse's head and the child standing behind her with a smile, adhering to the editing instruction. There is no repetition of characters, indicating a successful edit. However, the overall composition has been slightly altered compared to the original, particularly in the positioning of the individuals and the framing, which suggests a moderate level of overediting." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_1.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_1.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..76c5bfe0af0e115997443a517f71539b5a365f69 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_1.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:08b80f694278d653ab0fe06d3c421de524f480fbff15ffef5b71c13c49255f33 +size 5826201 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0329ad7c1291fa7da143882620ca12d69c146a26 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_1_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:7aaf4fd6f2d0dbc2532d88eb2df755cb09d6f2902a1b889e60c1e16fe398a549 +size 1491254 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3d81775d14348df66628230df4e91f1cb7e0526c --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_2.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 9 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully portrays the woman petting the horse's head and the child standing behind her with a smile, adhering to the editing instruction. There is no repetition of characters, indicating a successful edit. The changes are minimal but effective, maintaining the overall context and setting of the original image." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_2.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_2.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..76c5bfe0af0e115997443a517f71539b5a365f69 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_2.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:08b80f694278d653ab0fe06d3c421de524f480fbff15ffef5b71c13c49255f33 +size 5826201 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1ef2d77b7785061ee31e3fcdb8f06392e7be3b7b --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_1_r_2_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:dcc51764be63f13568b86864e2992faff895633ef4b98e2c988a8df89c9eefff +size 1598856 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_0.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_0.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bbe7d1712b728af1da7780f8bab1fb8122f1ebdf --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_0.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully captures a close-up view of the horses' faces interacting with the visitors, adhering to the editing instruction. There is no repetition of characters, ensuring the first score is high. However, the change in perspective and focus on the horses' faces introduces a noticeable shift from the original scene, slightly reducing the second score due to the degree of overediting." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_0.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_0.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..76c5bfe0af0e115997443a517f71539b5a365f69 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_0.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:08b80f694278d653ab0fe06d3c421de524f480fbff15ffef5b71c13c49255f33 +size 5826201 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9031e08ed2a6011eb7c964760322d10a1f07c6f6 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_0_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1cabb2dbe1347e0a51fc6b38d5df467c57fa4e93d5e731e9c208c2150797b988 +size 1357035 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_1.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..52a825a20babdd78039e91bc75f91a7276d27862 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_1.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully focuses on the horses' faces, providing a close-up view as instructed. There is no repetition of characters, and the interaction between the horses and visitors is clearly depicted. However, the background shows a slight change in the setting, with different people and a more simplified environment compared to the original image. This indicates some overediting but still maintains the essence of the original scene." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_1.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_1.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..76c5bfe0af0e115997443a517f71539b5a365f69 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_1.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:08b80f694278d653ab0fe06d3c421de524f480fbff15ffef5b71c13c49255f33 +size 5826201 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e7e3f2338c3c18ede0fff7e3b532bf6e7170d4c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_1_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:3b1b95f1b31a875bcf5d585103afeb5065634a7087288bc474d6d00c0712f2ee +size 1264664 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_2.json b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d389d71b90155400f6cc798dba5a3956383eb8e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_2.json @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +{ + "SC": { + "score": [ + 8, + 7 + ], + "reasoning": "The edited image successfully focuses on the close-up of the horses' faces interacting with the visitors, adhering to the editing instruction. There is no repetition of characters, ensuring the first score is high. However, the change in perspective and focus does alter the overall composition significantly, indicating a moderate level of overediting compared to the original image." + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_2.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_2.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..76c5bfe0af0e115997443a517f71539b5a365f69 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_2.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:08b80f694278d653ab0fe06d3c421de524f480fbff15ffef5b71c13c49255f33 +size 5826201 diff --git a/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d76db6f5edd71654feb78d3b46bc39aca67a9de0 --- /dev/null +++ b/A_qwen_image_edit_plus_data_Sep27/id_00000008_prompt_2_r_2_edited.png @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:453ae03be179d73ad687bd3c37f39cfa5275ccccb89829c68becb14d866f37e0 +size 1343780