Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
license: cc-by-nc-nd-4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
---
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
# LaViDa-Pathgen
|
|
@@ -29,9 +33,4 @@ Also, for some reason for LLaVA based models, you need to use an old version of
|
|
| 29 |
* in the PathGen-LLaVA paper the reported accuracy is quite low (~60.1) but I got different results.
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
# Thanks
|
| 32 |
-
A huge shoutout to @jacklishufan et al for [LaViDa](https://github.com/jacklishufan/LaViDa/tree/main) and answering all my stupid questions, @superjamessyx et al for [PathGen](https://github.com/PathFoundation/PathGen-1.6M) and [PathMMU](https://github.com/PathMMU-Benchmark/PathMMU) and my Boss Anant for all the support and guidance.
|
| 33 |
-
|
| 34 |
-
|
| 35 |
-
|
| 36 |
-
|
| 37 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
license: cc-by-nc-nd-4.0
|
| 3 |
+
datasets:
|
| 4 |
+
- himanshunitrr/LaViDa-PathGen-Instruct-and-VQA
|
| 5 |
+
tags:
|
| 6 |
+
- medical
|
| 7 |
---
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
# LaViDa-Pathgen
|
|
|
|
| 33 |
* in the PathGen-LLaVA paper the reported accuracy is quite low (~60.1) but I got different results.
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
# Thanks
|
| 36 |
+
A huge shoutout to @jacklishufan et al for [LaViDa](https://github.com/jacklishufan/LaViDa/tree/main) and answering all my stupid questions, @superjamessyx et al for [PathGen](https://github.com/PathFoundation/PathGen-1.6M) and [PathMMU](https://github.com/PathMMU-Benchmark/PathMMU) and my Boss Anant for all the support and guidance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|