indahl commited on
Commit
4414e85
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 9591797

YO v8, tried: no seed passes, YO v7 stays at work

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +4 -0
README.md CHANGED
@@ -77,6 +77,10 @@ YO v6 continued training YO v4 on young groups whose date falls on the previous
77
 
78
  YO v7 continued training YO v4 with YO v4's whole-window and band items restored beside the YO v6 kinds (PLAN_YO_V7). Of its first two seeds, 51 passed the plan rule and 52 did not (it found fewer stale qubits than YO v4), so a retest plan (PLAN_YO_V7S) retrained the same recipe with seeds 53, 54 and 55 and required all three to pass. All three did: on the older same-date items they found 1.000, 0.997 and 0.993 of 2,320 stale qubits, where YO v4 found 0.969, and none was shown to flag more young qubits or to find fewer stale ones. On the share of flags that are right they read 0.992 against YO v4's 0.999, and on the four-outcome verdict 0.960, 0.965 and 0.975 against 0.975, neither shown worse within the plan's bands. By the rule YO v7 seed 51 replaces YO v4 for the live reads from 1 November 2026. Every reading: https://indahl.ai/iris/lab and https://github.com/Heuremen-LLC/indahl.ai/tree/main/code/yo
79
 
 
 
 
 
80
  ## Live
81
 
82
  YO reads each new IBM calibration record as it is published, beside the code's answer, at https://indahl.ai/qia
 
77
 
78
  YO v7 continued training YO v4 with YO v4's whole-window and band items restored beside the YO v6 kinds (PLAN_YO_V7). Of its first two seeds, 51 passed the plan rule and 52 did not (it found fewer stale qubits than YO v4), so a retest plan (PLAN_YO_V7S) retrained the same recipe with seeds 53, 54 and 55 and required all three to pass. All three did: on the older same-date items they found 1.000, 0.997 and 0.993 of 2,320 stale qubits, where YO v4 found 0.969, and none was shown to flag more young qubits or to find fewer stale ones. On the share of flags that are right they read 0.992 against YO v4's 0.999, and on the four-outcome verdict 0.960, 0.965 and 0.975 against 0.975, neither shown worse within the plan's bands. By the rule YO v7 seed 51 replaces YO v4 for the live reads from 1 November 2026. Every reading: https://indahl.ai/iris/lab and https://github.com/Heuremen-LLC/indahl.ai/tree/main/code/yo
79
 
80
+ ## YO v8, tried
81
+
82
+ YO v8 continued training YO v7 seed 51 with 2,400 verdict items near the edges of the four-outcome rule (PLAN_YO_V8), with seeds 56, 57 and 58. On 800 new border items from held-out records it scored 0.769, 0.754 and 0.765 exact against YO v7's 0.729 (seed 57's band reaches zero). On borders inside the margin all three seeds scored lower than YO v7 (0.835, 0.880 and 0.890 against 0.940). The plan needed all three seeds to pass. Seed 56 found 0.852 of 2,320 older same-date stale qubits against YO v7's 1.000, and seeds 57 and 58 flagged more young qubits beside stale ones (0.027 and 0.048 against 0.001). No seed passed, so YO v7 stays at work. The largest miss is the same for every version: an interval that ends just outside the margin is answered CONSISTENT where the rule says CANNOT_TELL. Every reading: https://indahl.ai/iris/lab and https://github.com/Heuremen-LLC/indahl.ai/tree/main/code/yo
83
+
84
  ## Live
85
 
86
  YO reads each new IBM calibration record as it is published, beside the code's answer, at https://indahl.ai/qia