jackasda211233 commited on
Commit
e6bc1ab
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 71b8bb8

Upload PATCHCODE_TESTING_PROCESS.html with huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. PATCHCODE_TESTING_PROCESS.html +2 -2
PATCHCODE_TESTING_PROCESS.html CHANGED
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ li{margin:.25em 0}
51
  <li><code>imatrix</code>: importance-matrix-assisted quantization data. <code>reasoning-imatrix</code> = calibrated on reasoning/coding text (the kind that worked); <code>media-imatrix</code> = an earlier calibration kind that underperformed.</li>
52
  <li><code>ik-llama</code>: the custom runtime fork. The <code>qwen3_5</code> hybrid architecture does not load on stock <code>llama.cpp</code> / <code>vLLM</code>.</li>
53
  <li><code>KritaLite</code>: our hardened real-world discriminator build (a ~160k-token multi-file app, 15 binary verifier components). Single-shot coding gates saturate on this model family, so we stopped trusting them.</li>
54
- <li><code>discipline</code> / <code>fable_style</code>: a rubric measuring the distilled action-first style (no preamble, claim-requires-run, narrate→act→verify).</li>
55
  </ul>
56
  <h2>The short version</h2>
57
  <p>We started from the SignalLatch finetune and distilled a second, agentic-coder behaviour LoRA on top of it. The goal was not a new general chat model. The goal was to make the model a better coding agent: action-first execution, claims backed by an actual run, systematic diagnose→fix loops, stable multi-turn tool use, and fewer stalled runs.</p>
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ li{margin:.25em 0}
116
  <ul>
117
  <li>coding backbone: <code>43,075</code></li>
118
  <li>style slice oversampled ~2.2×</li>
119
- <li>blended training file: <code>58,576</code> (<code>blend_meda_fable</code>) ≈ <strong>~74% coding backbone / ~26% action-first style</strong></li>
120
  </ul>
121
  <p>The oversample ratio was chosen so the style shows up without overfitting the smaller slice; a held-out task type was used to check it generalises rather than parrots.</p>
122
  <h3>What the dataset is <em>not</em></h3>
 
51
  <li><code>imatrix</code>: importance-matrix-assisted quantization data. <code>reasoning-imatrix</code> = calibrated on reasoning/coding text (the kind that worked); <code>media-imatrix</code> = an earlier calibration kind that underperformed.</li>
52
  <li><code>ik-llama</code>: the custom runtime fork. The <code>qwen3_5</code> hybrid architecture does not load on stock <code>llama.cpp</code> / <code>vLLM</code>.</li>
53
  <li><code>KritaLite</code>: our hardened real-world discriminator build (a ~160k-token multi-file app, 15 binary verifier components). Single-shot coding gates saturate on this model family, so we stopped trusting them.</li>
54
+ <li><code>discipline</code> / <code>style_discipline</code>: a rubric measuring the distilled action-first style (no preamble, claim-requires-run, narrate→act→verify).</li>
55
  </ul>
56
  <h2>The short version</h2>
57
  <p>We started from the SignalLatch finetune and distilled a second, agentic-coder behaviour LoRA on top of it. The goal was not a new general chat model. The goal was to make the model a better coding agent: action-first execution, claims backed by an actual run, systematic diagnose→fix loops, stable multi-turn tool use, and fewer stalled runs.</p>
 
116
  <ul>
117
  <li>coding backbone: <code>43,075</code></li>
118
  <li>style slice oversampled ~2.2×</li>
119
+ <li>blended training file: <code>58,576</code> (<code>training_blend</code>) ≈ <strong>~74% coding backbone / ~26% action-first style</strong></li>
120
  </ul>
121
  <p>The oversample ratio was chosen so the style shows up without overfitting the smaller slice; a held-out task type was used to check it generalises rather than parrots.</p>
122
  <h3>What the dataset is <em>not</em></h3>