Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -10,14 +10,12 @@ tags:
|
|
| 10 |
This repository contains model checkpoints and artifacts for the paper **How Well Does Generative Recommendation Generalize?**.
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
<a href="https://huggingface.co/papers/2603.19809"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Paper-ArXiv-red"></a>
|
| 13 |
-
<a href="https://github.com/Jamesding000/MemGen-GR"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Code-GitHub-
|
| 14 |
<a href="https://huggingface.co/datasets/jamesding0302/memgen-annotations"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Data-Hugging%20Face-yellow"></a>
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
## Overview
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-
A widely held hypothesis for why generative recommendation (GR) models outperform conventional item ID-based models is that they generalize better. This work provides a systematic way to verify this hypothesis by categorizing data instances into those requiring **memorization** (reusing item transition patterns observed during training) and those requiring **generalization** (composing known patterns to predict unseen item transitions).
|
| 19 |
-
|
| 20 |
-
The study shows that GR models perform better on instances that require generalization, whereas item ID-based models perform better when memorization is more important. The authors propose a simple memorization-aware indicator that adaptively combines both paradigms to improve overall performance.
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
## Folder Structure
|
| 23 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
This repository contains model checkpoints and artifacts for the paper **How Well Does Generative Recommendation Generalize?**.
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
<a href="https://huggingface.co/papers/2603.19809"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Paper-ArXiv-red"></a>
|
| 13 |
+
<a href="https://github.com/Jamesding000/MemGen-GR"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Code-GitHub-green"></a>
|
| 14 |
<a href="https://huggingface.co/datasets/jamesding0302/memgen-annotations"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Data-Hugging%20Face-yellow"></a>
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
## Overview
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
+
A widely held hypothesis for why generative recommendation (GR) models outperform conventional item ID-based models is that they generalize better. This work provides a systematic way to verify this hypothesis by categorizing data instances into those requiring **memorization** (reusing item transition patterns observed during training) and those requiring **generalization** (composing known patterns to predict unseen item transitions). Our study shows that GR models perform better on instances that require generalization, whereas item ID-based models perform better when memorization is more important.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
## Folder Structure
|
| 21 |
|