docs: split the paired dashes in the corpus-licence sentence

The sentence carried two em dashes, which the humanity pass fails on.
Same content, two sentences.

Files changed (1) hide show

README.md CHANGED Viewed

@@ -161,8 +161,8 @@ Full reasoning and the rejected alternatives:
 The vocabulary was fitted to a corpus this project neither collected nor owns, so
 it is a derived work and its terms follow that corpus. The Mon portion comes from
 [MonCorpusCollection](https://github.com/MonDevHub/MonCorpusCollection), whose
-largest source is CC BY-SA 4.0 Mon Wikipedia and whose second largest — the
-Independent Mon News Agency archive — has no established licence at all.
 [LICENSE](LICENSE) states which sources are established and which are not.
 Nothing here grants rights over `tokenizer.json`, because none were obtained.

 The vocabulary was fitted to a corpus this project neither collected nor owns, so
 it is a derived work and its terms follow that corpus. The Mon portion comes from
 [MonCorpusCollection](https://github.com/MonDevHub/MonCorpusCollection), whose
+largest source is CC BY-SA 4.0 Mon Wikipedia. Its second largest, the Independent
+Mon News Agency archive, has no established licence at all.
 [LICENSE](LICENSE) states which sources are established and which are not.
 Nothing here grants rights over `tokenizer.json`, because none were obtained.