Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,199 +1,149 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
library_name: transformers
|
| 3 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
---
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
-
#
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
-
|
| 9 |
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-
##
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-
|
| 21 |
-
-
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
|
| 25 |
-
|
| 26 |
-
-
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-
##
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-
- **
|
| 33 |
-
- **
|
| 34 |
-
- **
|
|
|
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-
##
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-
###
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-
|
| 43 |
-
|
| 44 |
-
|
| 45 |
-
|
| 46 |
-
### Downstream Use [optional]
|
| 47 |
-
|
| 48 |
-
<!-- This section is for the model use when fine-tuned for a task, or when plugged into a larger ecosystem/app -->
|
| 49 |
-
|
| 50 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 51 |
-
|
| 52 |
-
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 53 |
-
|
| 54 |
-
<!-- This section addresses misuse, malicious use, and uses that the model will not work well for. -->
|
| 55 |
-
|
| 56 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 57 |
-
|
| 58 |
-
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 59 |
-
|
| 60 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
|
| 61 |
-
|
| 62 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 63 |
-
|
| 64 |
-
### Recommendations
|
| 65 |
-
|
| 66 |
-
<!-- This section is meant to convey recommendations with respect to the bias, risk, and technical limitations. -->
|
| 67 |
-
|
| 68 |
-
Users (both direct and downstream) should be made aware of the risks, biases and limitations of the model. More information needed for further recommendations.
|
| 69 |
-
|
| 70 |
-
## How to Get Started with the Model
|
| 71 |
-
|
| 72 |
-
Use the code below to get started with the model.
|
| 73 |
-
|
| 74 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 75 |
-
|
| 76 |
-
## Training Details
|
| 77 |
-
|
| 78 |
-
### Training Data
|
| 79 |
-
|
| 80 |
-
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card, perhaps with a short stub of information on what the training data is all about as well as documentation related to data pre-processing or additional filtering. -->
|
| 81 |
-
|
| 82 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 83 |
-
|
| 84 |
-
### Training Procedure
|
| 85 |
-
|
| 86 |
-
<!-- This relates heavily to the Technical Specifications. Content here should link to that section when it is relevant to the training procedure. -->
|
| 87 |
-
|
| 88 |
-
#### Preprocessing [optional]
|
| 89 |
-
|
| 90 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 91 |
-
|
| 92 |
-
|
| 93 |
-
#### Training Hyperparameters
|
| 94 |
-
|
| 95 |
-
- **Training regime:** [More Information Needed] <!--fp32, fp16 mixed precision, bf16 mixed precision, bf16 non-mixed precision, fp16 non-mixed precision, fp8 mixed precision -->
|
| 96 |
-
|
| 97 |
-
#### Speeds, Sizes, Times [optional]
|
| 98 |
-
|
| 99 |
-
<!-- This section provides information about throughput, start/end time, checkpoint size if relevant, etc. -->
|
| 100 |
-
|
| 101 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 102 |
|
| 103 |
## Evaluation
|
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
-
|
| 106 |
-
|
| 107 |
-
### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
|
| 108 |
-
|
| 109 |
-
#### Testing Data
|
| 110 |
-
|
| 111 |
-
<!-- This should link to a Dataset Card if possible. -->
|
| 112 |
-
|
| 113 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 114 |
-
|
| 115 |
-
#### Factors
|
| 116 |
-
|
| 117 |
-
<!-- These are the things the evaluation is disaggregating by, e.g., subpopulations or domains. -->
|
| 118 |
-
|
| 119 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 120 |
-
|
| 121 |
-
#### Metrics
|
| 122 |
-
|
| 123 |
-
<!-- These are the evaluation metrics being used, ideally with a description of why. -->
|
| 124 |
-
|
| 125 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 126 |
-
|
| 127 |
-
### Results
|
| 128 |
-
|
| 129 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 130 |
-
|
| 131 |
-
#### Summary
|
| 132 |
-
|
| 133 |
-
|
| 134 |
-
|
| 135 |
-
## Model Examination [optional]
|
| 136 |
-
|
| 137 |
-
<!-- Relevant interpretability work for the model goes here -->
|
| 138 |
-
|
| 139 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 140 |
-
|
| 141 |
-
## Environmental Impact
|
| 142 |
-
|
| 143 |
-
<!-- Total emissions (in grams of CO2eq) and additional considerations, such as electricity usage, go here. Edit the suggested text below accordingly -->
|
| 144 |
-
|
| 145 |
-
Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator](https://mlco2.github.io/impact#compute) presented in [Lacoste et al. (2019)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09700).
|
| 146 |
-
|
| 147 |
-
- **Hardware Type:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 148 |
-
- **Hours used:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 149 |
-
- **Cloud Provider:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 150 |
-
- **Compute Region:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 151 |
-
- **Carbon Emitted:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 152 |
-
|
| 153 |
-
## Technical Specifications [optional]
|
| 154 |
-
|
| 155 |
-
### Model Architecture and Objective
|
| 156 |
-
|
| 157 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 158 |
-
|
| 159 |
-
### Compute Infrastructure
|
| 160 |
-
|
| 161 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 162 |
-
|
| 163 |
-
#### Hardware
|
| 164 |
-
|
| 165 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 166 |
-
|
| 167 |
-
#### Software
|
| 168 |
-
|
| 169 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 170 |
-
|
| 171 |
-
## Citation [optional]
|
| 172 |
-
|
| 173 |
-
<!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the model, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
|
| 174 |
|
| 175 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 176 |
|
| 177 |
-
|
| 178 |
|
| 179 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 180 |
|
| 181 |
-
|
| 182 |
|
| 183 |
-
##
|
| 184 |
|
| 185 |
-
|
| 186 |
|
| 187 |
-
|
| 188 |
|
| 189 |
-
##
|
| 190 |
|
| 191 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 192 |
|
| 193 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 194 |
|
| 195 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 196 |
|
| 197 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 198 |
|
| 199 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
+
language:
|
| 3 |
+
- code
|
| 4 |
library_name: transformers
|
| 5 |
+
pipeline_tag: text-classification
|
| 6 |
+
tags:
|
| 7 |
+
- code-review
|
| 8 |
+
- bug-detection
|
| 9 |
+
- codebert
|
| 10 |
+
- python
|
| 11 |
+
- security
|
| 12 |
+
- static-analysis
|
| 13 |
+
datasets:
|
| 14 |
+
- code_search_net
|
| 15 |
+
base_model: microsoft/codebert-base
|
| 16 |
+
metrics:
|
| 17 |
+
- f1
|
| 18 |
+
- accuracy
|
| 19 |
+
- precision
|
| 20 |
+
- recall
|
| 21 |
+
model-index:
|
| 22 |
+
- name: codesheriff-bug-classifier
|
| 23 |
+
results:
|
| 24 |
+
- task:
|
| 25 |
+
type: text-classification
|
| 26 |
+
name: Code Bug Classification
|
| 27 |
+
dataset:
|
| 28 |
+
type: code_search_net
|
| 29 |
+
name: CodeSearchNet (Python split)
|
| 30 |
+
config: python
|
| 31 |
+
metrics:
|
| 32 |
+
- type: f1
|
| 33 |
+
value: 0.89
|
| 34 |
+
name: Macro F1
|
| 35 |
---
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
+
# 🛡️ CodeSheriff Bug Classifier
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
+
A fine-tuned **CodeBERT** model for automatic code bug classification in Python source code. Classifies code snippets into 5 categories to power AI-driven pull request reviews.
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
+
## Model Description
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
+
CodeSheriff Bug Classifier is a multi-class text classification model built on top of [microsoft/codebert-base](https://huggingface.co/microsoft/codebert-base). It takes a Python code snippet as input and predicts the type of bug present (or classifies it as clean).
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
+
- **Base model:** `microsoft/codebert-base` (125M parameters)
|
| 46 |
+
- **Task:** Multi-class code classification (5 classes)
|
| 47 |
+
- **Language:** Python
|
| 48 |
+
- **Framework:** PyTorch + HuggingFace Transformers
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
+
## Intended Uses
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
+
- **Primary use:** Backend classifier for the [CodeSheriff](https://github.com/jayansh21/CodeSheriff) automated PR review system.
|
| 53 |
+
- **General use:** Any system that needs to classify Python code snippets for potential bugs (security vulnerabilities, null references, type mismatches, logic flaws).
|
| 54 |
+
- **Out of scope:** This model is not designed for non-Python languages, natural language text, or code generation.
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
+
## Labels
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
+
| ID | Label | Description |
|
| 59 |
+
|----|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|
| 60 |
+
| 0 | Clean | Well-formed code with no detected issues |
|
| 61 |
+
| 1 | Null Reference Risk | Potential `NoneType` access without null checks |
|
| 62 |
+
| 2 | Type Mismatch | Incompatible type operations (e.g., `str + int`) |
|
| 63 |
+
| 3 | Security Vulnerability | SQL injection, command injection, `eval()`, etc. |
|
| 64 |
+
| 4 | Logic Flaw | Off-by-one errors, division by zero, wrong logic |
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
+
## Training
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
+
### Dataset
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
+
- **Source:** [CodeSearchNet](https://huggingface.co/datasets/code_search_net) (Python split)
|
| 71 |
+
- **Labelling:** Heuristic rules applied to raw functions, augmented with 5,600 hand-crafted seed examples across all 5 classes (Clean: 3,000, Null Reference: 800, Type Mismatch: 500, Security: 500, Logic Flaw: 800)
|
| 72 |
+
- **Preprocessing:** Function-level tokenization, max sequence length 512 tokens
|
| 73 |
+
- **Split:** 80% train / 10% validation / 10% test (stratified, seed=42)
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
+
### Hyperparameters
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
+
| Parameter | Value |
|
| 78 |
+
|----------------------------|---------|
|
| 79 |
+
| Base model | `microsoft/codebert-base` |
|
| 80 |
+
| Max token length | 512 |
|
| 81 |
+
| Batch size | 8 |
|
| 82 |
+
| Gradient accumulation steps| 2 |
|
| 83 |
+
| Effective batch size | 16 |
|
| 84 |
+
| Learning rate | 2e-5 |
|
| 85 |
+
| Epochs | 4 |
|
| 86 |
+
| Optimizer | AdamW |
|
| 87 |
+
| Scheduler | Linear warmup + decay |
|
| 88 |
+
| Weight decay | 0.01 |
|
| 89 |
+
| Seed | 42 |
|
| 90 |
|
| 91 |
+
### Training Infrastructure
|
| 92 |
|
| 93 |
+
- **GPU:** NVIDIA RTX 3050 (4GB VRAM)
|
| 94 |
+
- **Python:** 3.11.9
|
| 95 |
+
- **PyTorch:** 2.x with CUDA
|
| 96 |
+
- **Transformers:** 4.35+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 97 |
|
| 98 |
## Evaluation
|
| 99 |
|
| 100 |
+
### Metrics (Test Set)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 101 |
|
| 102 |
+
| Metric | Score |
|
| 103 |
+
|-----------|-------|
|
| 104 |
+
| **Macro F1** | **0.89** |
|
| 105 |
+
| Accuracy | 0.91 |
|
| 106 |
|
| 107 |
+
### Per-Class Performance
|
| 108 |
|
| 109 |
+
| Label | Precision | Recall | F1-Score |
|
| 110 |
+
|------------------------|-----------|--------|----------|
|
| 111 |
+
| Clean | 0.92 | 0.95 | 0.93 |
|
| 112 |
+
| Null Reference Risk | 0.85 | 0.82 | 0.83 |
|
| 113 |
+
| Type Mismatch | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.82 |
|
| 114 |
+
| Security Vulnerability | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.97 |
|
| 115 |
+
| Logic Flaw | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.87 |
|
| 116 |
|
| 117 |
+
> Security Vulnerability achieves the highest F1 due to strong lexical signals (`os.system`, `eval`, SQL concatenation).
|
| 118 |
|
| 119 |
+
## Confidence Gate
|
| 120 |
|
| 121 |
+
In production, predictions below **60% confidence** are automatically downgraded to "Code Quality" (a generic low-priority label) to reduce false positives. Multi-label probabilities (`all_probs`) are also returned for downstream use.
|
| 122 |
|
| 123 |
+
## How to Use
|
| 124 |
|
| 125 |
+
### With Transformers
|
| 126 |
|
| 127 |
+
```python
|
| 128 |
+
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForSequenceClassification
|
| 129 |
+
import torch
|
| 130 |
|
| 131 |
+
model_name = "jayansh21/codesheriff-bug-classifier"
|
| 132 |
+
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
|
| 133 |
+
model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained(model_name)
|
| 134 |
|
| 135 |
+
code = """
|
| 136 |
+
def get_user(uid):
|
| 137 |
+
query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id=" + uid
|
| 138 |
+
return db.execute(query)
|
| 139 |
+
"""
|
| 140 |
|
| 141 |
+
inputs = tokenizer(code, return_tensors="pt", truncation=True, max_length=512)
|
| 142 |
+
with torch.no_grad():
|
| 143 |
+
logits = model(**inputs).logits
|
| 144 |
|
| 145 |
+
predicted_class = logits.argmax(dim=-1).item()
|
| 146 |
+
labels = {0: "Clean", 1: "Null Reference Risk", 2: "Type Mismatch",
|
| 147 |
+
3: "Security Vulnerability", 4: "Logic Flaw"}
|
| 148 |
+
print(f"Prediction: {labels[predicted_class]}")
|
| 149 |
+
# Output: Prediction: Security Vulnerability
|