Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,12 +1,20 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
license: apache-2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
---
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
# CapDec - NoiseLevel: 0.015
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
-
This
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
-
Their method aims to train CLIP with only text samples. Therefore they are injecting zero-mean Gaussian Noise
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
In their words:
|
| 12 |
*Specifically, we assume that the visual embedding corresponding to a text embedding
|
|
@@ -20,3 +28,7 @@ The "Noise Level" of 0.015 is equivalent to the Noise Variance which is the squa
|
|
| 20 |
The reported metrics are results of a model with a Noise Variance of 0.016, which the authors unfortunately do not provide in their repository.
|
| 21 |
This model with a Noise Variance 0.015 is the closest available pre-trained model to their best model.
|
| 22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
license: apache-2.0
|
| 3 |
+
language:
|
| 4 |
+
- en
|
| 5 |
+
pipeline_tag: image-to-text
|
| 6 |
+
datasets:
|
| 7 |
+
- MS-COCO
|
| 8 |
+
- Flickr30k
|
| 9 |
+
tags:
|
| 10 |
+
- Image Captioning
|
| 11 |
---
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
# CapDec - NoiseLevel: 0.015
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
+
This are model weights originally provided by the authors of the paper [Text-Only Training for Image Captioning using Noise-Injected CLIP](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2211.00575.pdf).
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
+
Their method aims to train CLIP with only text samples. Therefore they are injecting zero-mean Gaussian Noise into the text embeddings before decoding.
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
In their words:
|
| 20 |
*Specifically, we assume that the visual embedding corresponding to a text embedding
|
|
|
|
| 28 |
The reported metrics are results of a model with a Noise Variance of 0.016, which the authors unfortunately do not provide in their repository.
|
| 29 |
This model with a Noise Variance 0.015 is the closest available pre-trained model to their best model.
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
## Performance
|
| 33 |
+
The authors don't explicitly report the performance for this NoiseLevel but it can be estimated from the following figure from the original paper:
|
| 34 |
+
|