test_set.csv

prompt,completion
"Question: 
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s retail index . the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , and that any dividends have been reinvested . the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock . comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p retail index company/index december 31 , december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 2 , december 31 .

Table:
Company/Index      | December 31, 2011 | December 29, 2012 | December 28, 2013 | January 3, 2015 | January 2, 2016 | December 31, 2016
Advance Auto Parts | $100.00           | $102.87           | $158.46           | $228.88         | $217.49         | $244.64          
S&P 500 Index      | 100.00            | 114.07            | 152.98            | 174.56          | 177.01          | 198.18           
S&P Retail Index   | 100.00            | 122.23            | 178.55            | 196.06          | 245.31          | 256.69           

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the rate of return on an investment in advance auto parts from 2015 to 2016?
Choices: -0.04976, -11.39, -0.07188, -0.04437, -49764.06851
Steps to Follow 
 1. Find the value of the investment in advance auto parts on January 3, 2015. 2. Find the value of the investment in advance auto parts on January 2, 2016. 3. Find the rate of return on the investment in advance auto parts from 2015 to 2016. 4. Convert the rate of return to a percentage. 5. Round the percentage to two decimal places. 6. Compare the calculated rate of return to the given choices. 7. Select the choice that matches the calculated rate of return. 8. Provide the selected choice as the answer. 9. Provide the step-by-step process as the answer. 10. Repeat steps 1-9 for each choice. 11. Select the choice that matches the calculated rate of return. 12. Provide the selected choice as the answer. 13. Provide the step-by-step process as the answer. 14. Repeat steps 1-9 for each choice. 15. Select the choice that matches the calculated rate of return. 16. Provide the selected choice as the answer. 17. Provide the step-by-step process as the answer. 18. Repeat steps 1-9 for eachAnswer the question."," 

A: -0.04976"
"Question: 
The tax holidays represent a tax exemption period aimed to attract foreign technological investment in certain tax jurisdictions. The effect of the tax benefits, from tax holidays for countries which are profitable, on basic earnings per share was $0.14, $0.15 and $0.13 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. These agreements are present in various countries and include programs that reduce up to and including 100% of taxes in years affected by the agreements. The Company’s tax holidays expire at various dates through the year ending December 31, 2028. In certain countries, tax holidays can be renewed depending on the Company still meeting certain conditions at the date of expiration of the current tax holidays. In May 2019, Switzerland voted a tax reform which cancelled all favourable tax regimes and introduced a single tax rate for all companies, which triggered the revaluation of all deferred tax assets and liabilities. Enactment of this law occurred in third quarter of 2019, which resulted in a tax benefit of $20 million. The remeasurement of deferred taxes was reconciled in the fourth quarter of 2019 to include the current year activity, which did not have a material impact on the net remeasurement.

Table:
                                                          | Year ended December 31, 2019 | Year ended December 31, 2018 | Year ended December 31, 2017
Income tax benefit (expense) computed at statutory rate   | (297)                        | (353)                        | (238)                       
Non-deductible and non-taxable permanent differences, net | 4                            | 45                           | 17                          
Income (loss) on equity-method investments                | —                            | —                            | —                           
Valuation allowance adjustments                           | 2                            | 141                          | 92                          
Effect on deferred taxes of changes in enacted tax rates  | 14                           | (62)                         | (70)                        
Current year credits                                      | 50                           | 43                           | 40                          
Other tax and credits                                     | (51)                         | (20)                         | (36)                        
Benefits from tax holidays                                | 129                          | 135                          | 114                         
Net impact of changes to uncertain tax positions          | (5)                          | (16)                         | (43)                        
Earnings of subsidiaries taxed at different rates         | (2)                          | (9)                          | (19)                        
Income tax benefit (expense)                              | (156)                        | (96)                         | (143)                       



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase/ (decrease) in Benefits from tax holidays from December 31, 2018 to 2019?
Choices: 148, 264, -6, 149, -6000
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data you need to answer the question. 2. Calculate the difference between the two years. 3. Determine the increase or decrease. 4. Provide the answer. 5. Provide the answer. 6. Provide the answer. 7. Provide the answer. 8. Provide the answer. 9. Provide the answer. 10. Provide the answer. 11. Provide the answer. 12. Provide the answer. 13. Provide the answer. 14. Provide the answer. 15. Provide the answer. 16. Provide the answer. 17. Provide the answer. 18. Provide the answer. 19. Provide the answer. 20. Provide the answer. 21. Provide the answer. 22. Provide the answer. 23. Provide the answer. 24. Provide the answer. 25. Provide the answer. 26. Provide the answer. 27. Provide the answer. 28. Provide the answer. 29. Provide the answer. 30. Provide the answer. 31. Provide the answer. 32. Provide the answer. 33. Provide the answer. 34. Provide the answer. 35. Provide the answerAnswer the question."," 

A: -6"
"Question: 
17. Financial Information About Segments Our operations are divided into two reportable segments: Products and Licensing and Technology Development. The Products and Licensing segment develops and sells products or licenses technologies based on commercially viable concepts developed by the Technology Development segment. The Products and Licensing segment derives its revenue from product sales, funded product development and technology licenses. Our engineers and scientists collaborate with our network of government, academic and industry experts to identify technologies and ideas with promising market potential. We then compete to win fee-for-service contracts from government agencies and industrial customers who seek innovative solutions to practical problems that require new technology. The Technology Development segment derives its revenue primarily from services. The Technology Development segment provides applied research to customers in our areas of focus. Our President and Chief Executive Officer and his direct reports collectively represent our chief operating decision makers, and they evaluate segment performance based primarily on revenue and operating income or loss. Information about the results of operations for each segment is set forth in the table below. There were no significant inter-segment sales during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, 32% and 24%, respectively, of our total sales took place outside the United States. Customers in China represented 11% of total revenues in the year ended December 31, 2019, while no other single country, outside of the United States, represented more than 10% of total revenues in the year ended December 31, 2018.

Table:
                                         | Years ended December 31, |            
                                         | 2019                     | 2018       
Products and Licensing revenue           | $44,491,041              | $21,949,689
Technology Development revenue           | 26,024,674               | 20,967,556 
Total revenue                            | $70,515,715              | $42,917,245
Products and Licensing operating income  | $1,807,616               | $499,323   
Technology Development operating income  | 1,507,405                | 378,212    
Total operating income                   | $3,315,021               | $877,535   
Depreciation, Technology Development     | $397,296                 | $379,952   
Depreciation, Products and Licensing     | $552,285                 | $273,185   
Amortization, Technology Development     | $91,185                  | $130,765   
Amortization, Products and Licensing     | $1,462,525               | $418,349   



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in Products and Licensing revenue between December 31, 2018 and 2019?
Choices: 976564513236249, 0, 23523485, -22541352, 22541352
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the revenue for Products and Licensing for the year ended December 31, 2019. 2. Identify the revenue for Products and Licensing for the year ended December 31, 2018. 3. Subtract the revenue for Products and Licensing for the year ended December 31, 2018 from the revenue for Products and Licensing for the year ended December 31, 2019. 4. The result of the subtraction is the change in Products and Licensing revenue between December 31, 2018 and 2019. 5. The change in Products and Licensing revenue between December 31, 2018 and 2019 is $22,541,352. 6. The change in Products and Licensing revenue between December 31, 2018 and 2019 is $22,541,352. 7. The change in Products and Licensing revenue between December 31, 2018 and 2019 is $22,541,352. 8. The change in Products and Licensing revenue between December 31, 2018 and 2019 is $22,541,352. 9. The change in Products and Licensing revenue between December 31, 2018 and 2019 isAnswer the question."," 

A: 22541352"
"Question: 
royal caribbean cruises ltd . 79 notes to the consolidated financial statements in 2012 , we determined the implied fair value of good- will for the pullmantur reporting unit was $ 145.5 mil- lion and recognized an impairment charge of $ 319.2 million based on a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model further discussed below . this impair- ment charge was recognized in earnings during the fourth quarter of 2012 and is reported within impair- ment of pullmantur related assets within our consoli- dated statements of comprehensive income ( loss ) . during the fourth quarter of 2014 , we performed a qualitative assessment of whether it was more-likely- than-not that our royal caribbean international reporting unit 2019s fair value was less than its carrying amount before applying the two-step goodwill impair- ment test . the qualitative analysis included assessing the impact of certain factors such as general economic conditions , limitations on accessing capital , changes in forecasted operating results , changes in fuel prices and fluctuations in foreign exchange rates . based on our qualitative assessment , we concluded that it was more-likely-than-not that the estimated fair value of the royal caribbean international reporting unit exceeded its carrying value and thus , we did not pro- ceed to the two-step goodwill impairment test . no indicators of impairment exist primarily because the reporting unit 2019s fair value has consistently exceeded its carrying value by a significant margin , its financial performance has been solid in the face of mixed economic environments and forecasts of operating results generated by the reporting unit appear suffi- cient to support its carrying value . we also performed our annual impairment review of goodwill for pullmantur 2019s reporting unit during the fourth quarter of 2014 . we did not perform a quali- tative assessment but instead proceeded directly to the two-step goodwill impairment test . we estimated the fair value of the pullmantur reporting unit using a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model . the principal assumptions used in the discounted cash flow model are projected operating results , weighted- average cost of capital , and terminal value . signifi- cantly impacting these assumptions are the transfer of vessels from our other cruise brands to pullmantur . the discounted cash flow model used our 2015 pro- jected operating results as a base . to that base , we added future years 2019 cash flows assuming multiple rev- enue and expense scenarios that reflect the impact of different global economic environments beyond 2015 on pullmantur 2019s reporting unit . we assigned a probability to each revenue and expense scenario . we discounted the projected cash flows using rates specific to pullmantur 2019s reporting unit based on its weighted-average cost of capital . based on the probability-weighted discounted cash flows , we deter- mined the fair value of the pullmantur reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 52% ( 52 % ) resulting in no impairment to pullmantur 2019s goodwill . pullmantur is a brand targeted primarily at the spanish , portuguese and latin american markets , with an increasing focus on latin america . the persistent economic instability in these markets has created sig- nificant uncertainties in forecasting operating results and future cash flows used in our impairment analyses . we continue to monitor economic events in these markets for their potential impact on pullmantur 2019s business and valuation . further , the estimation of fair value utilizing discounted expected future cash flows includes numerous uncertainties which require our significant judgment when making assumptions of expected revenues , operating costs , marketing , sell- ing and administrative expenses , interest rates , ship additions and retirements as well as assumptions regarding the cruise vacation industry 2019s competitive environment and general economic and business conditions , among other factors . if there are changes to the projected future cash flows used in the impairment analyses , especially in net yields or if certain transfers of vessels from our other cruise brands to the pullmantur fleet do not take place , it is possible that an impairment charge of pullmantur 2019s reporting unit 2019s goodwill may be required . of these factors , the planned transfers of vessels to the pullmantur fleet is most significant to the projected future cash flows . if the transfers do not occur , we will likely fail step one of the impairment test . note 4 . intangible assets intangible assets are reported in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and consist of the follow- ing ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
                                                                       | 2014     | 2013    
Indefinite-life intangible asset—Pullmantur trademarks and trade names | $214,112 | $204,866
Foreign currency translation adjustment                                | (26,074) | 9,246   
Total                                                                  | $188,038 | $214,112

during the fourth quarter of 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we performed the annual impairment review of pullmantur 2019s trademarks and trade names using a discounted cash flow model and the relief-from-royalty method to compare the fair value of these indefinite-lived intan- gible assets to its carrying value . the royalty rate used is based on comparable royalty agreements in the tourism and hospitality industry . we used a dis- count rate comparable to the rate used in valuing the pullmantur reporting unit in our goodwill impairment test . based on the results of our testing , we did not .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in 2012 what was the percentage recognized impairment charge of
Choices: 0.17, -0.68689, 1.09691, 0.00215, 0.68689
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data needed to solve the problem. 2. Determine the formula or method to solve the problem. 3. Plug in the data into the formula. 4. Solve the problem. 5. Interpret the results. 6. Provide the answer. 7. Explain the answer. 8. Provide the final answer. 9. Explain the final answer. 10. Provide the final answer. 11. Explain the final answer. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Explain the final answer. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Explain the final answer. 16. Provide the final answer. 17. Explain the final answer. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Explain the final answer. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Explain the final answer. 22. Provide the final answer. 23. Explain the final answer. 24. Provide the final answer. 25. Explain the final answer. 26. Provide the final answer. 27. Explain the final answer. 28. Provide the final answer. 29. Explain the final answer. 30. Provide the final answer. 31. Explain the final answer.Answer the question."," 

A: 0.68689"
"Question: 
4) Professional Service and Other: Professional service and other revenues consist of revenues from consulting contracts and contracts to provide implementation, training and integration services (professional services). Other revenues consist of hardware revenues, which are grouped within the “Professional service and other” category because they are relatively immaterial to our service revenues. Professional services are typically performed after the purchase of new software licenses. Professional service and other revenues can vary from period to period based on the type of engagements as well as those implementations that are assumed by our partner network. Cost of professional service and other revenues consists primarily of the costs of providing integration, configuration and training with respect to our various software products. The most significant components of these costs are personnel-related expenses, travel costs and third party subcontracting. Professional service and other revenues decreased by $31.3 million or 9.9% during the year ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the prior fiscal year; down 7.4% after factoring the impact of $8.1 million of foreign exchange rate changes. Geographically, the overall change was attributable to a decrease in Americas of $19.0 million, a decrease in EMEA of $9.0 million and a decrease in Asia Pacific of $3.3 million. Cost of Professional service and other revenues decreased by $28.8 million during the year ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the prior fiscal year as a result of a decrease in labour-related costs of approximately $29.0 million resulting primarily from a reduction in the use of external labour resources, partially offset by an increase in other miscellaneous costs of $0.2 million. Overall, the gross margin percentage on Professional service and other revenues increased to approximately 21% from approximately 20%. This is the result of effectively executing our strategy of optimizing margins by being selective about the professional service engagements we accept. Professional service and other revenues under proforma Topic 605 were not materially different from those under Topic 606 as discussed above.

Table:
                                                         |          |                            | Year Ended June 30, |                            |         
(In thousands)                                           | 2019     | Change increase (decrease) | 2018                | Change increase (decrease) | 2017    
Professional Service and Other Revenues:                 |          |                            |                     |                            |         
Americas                                                 | $132,426 | $(19,045)                  | $151,471            | $39,872                    | $111,599
EMEA                                                     | 122,861  | (8,982)                    | 131,843             | 29,601                     | 102,242 
Asia Pacific                                             | 29,649   | (3,294)                    | 32,943              | 11,468                     | 21,475  
Total Professional Service and Other Revenues            | 284,936  | (31,321)                   | 316,257             | 80,941                     | 235,316 
Cost of Professional Service and Other Revenues          | 224,635  | (28,754)                   | 253,389             | 58,435                     | 194,954 
GAAP-based Professional Service and Other Gross Profit   | $60,301  | $(2,567)                   | $62,868             | $22,506                    | $40,362 
GAAP-based Professional Service and Other Gross Margin % | 21.2%    |                            | 19.9%               |                            | 17.2%   
% Professional Service and Other Revenues by             |          |                            |                     |                            |         
Geography:                                               |          |                            |                     |                            |         
Americas                                                 | 46.5%    |                            | 47.9%               |                            | 47.4%   
EMEA                                                     | 43.1%    |                            | 41.7%               |                            | 43.4%   
Asia Pacific                                             | 10.4%    |                            | 10.4%               |                            | 9.2%    



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average annual GAAP-based Professional Service and Other Gross Margin %?
Choices: 19.43, 386.72, 7.97, 14.58, 1
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the relevant data. 2. Calculate the average annual GAAP-based Professional Service and Other Gross Margin % by dividing the total GAAP-based Professional Service and Other Gross Profit by the total Professional Service and Other Revenues. 3. Divide the result by the number of years (2017, 2018, 2019) to get the average annual GAAP-based Professional Service and Other Gross Margin %. 4. Round the result to two decimal places. 5. Compare the result to the given choices and select the correct answer. 1. Identify the relevant data. 2. Calculate the average annual GAAP-based Professional Service and Other Gross Margin % by dividing the total GAAP-based Professional Service and Other Gross Profit by the total Professional Service and Other Revenues. 3. Divide the result by the number of years (2017, 2018, 2019) to get the average annual GAAP-based Professional Service and Other Gross Margin %. 4. Round the result to two decimal places. 5. Compare the result to the given choices and select the correct answer. 1. Identify the relevant data. 2. Calculate the average annual GAAP-based Professional Service and Other Gross Margin % by dividing the total GAAnswer the question."," 

A: 19.43"
"Question: 
the following table details the growth in the global and north american cruise markets in terms of cruise passengers and estimated weighted-average berths over the past five years : we compete with a number of cruise lines ; however , our principal competitors are carnival corporation & plc , which owns , among others , aida cruises , carnival cruise lines , costa cruises , cunard line , holland america line , iberocruceros , p&o cruises and princess cruises ; disney cruise line ; msc cruises ; norwegian cruise line and oceania cruises . cruise lines compete with other vacation alternatives such as land-based resort hotels and sightseeing destinations for consumers 2019 leisure time . demand for such activities is influenced by political and general economic conditions . companies within the vacation market are dependent on consumer discretionary spending . our ships operate worldwide and have itineraries that call on destinations in alaska , asia , australia , the bahamas , bermuda , california , canada , the caribbean , europe , the galapagos islands , hawaii , mexico , the middle east , new england , new zealand , the panama canal and south america . in an effort to penetrate untapped markets and diversify our customer base , we continue to seek opportunities to redeploy ships in our royal caribbean international , celebrity cruises and azamara club cruises brands to new markets and itineraries throughout the world . the portability of our ships and our investment in infrastructure allows us to expand into new markets and helps us reduce our dependency on any one market by allowing us to create 201chome ports 201d around the world . in addition , it allows us to readily redeploy our ships to meet demand within our existing cruise markets . the current economic environment has significantly deteriorated consumer confidence and discretionary spending . while there has been a decrease in the demand for cruises and a resulting drop in cruise prices , cruising has proven to be resilient as it offers consumers a good value when compared to other vacation alternatives . however , the projected increase in capacity within the cruise industry from new cruise ships currently on order could produce additional pricing pressures within the industry . see item 1a . risk factors . global cruise passengers ( 1 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally ( 1 ) north american cruise passengers ( 2 ) weighted-average supply of berths marketed in america ( 1 ) .

Table:
Year | Global Cruise  Passengers(1) | Weighted-Average  Supply of Berths  Marketed Globally(1) | North American Cruise Passengers(2) | Weighted-Average  Supply of Berths Marketed in North  America(1)
2005 | 14,818,000                   | 288,000                                                  | 9,909,000                           | 190,000                                                         
2006 | 15,309,000                   | 304,000                                                  | 10,080,000                          | 201,000                                                         
2007 | 16,586,000                   | 327,000                                                  | 10,330,000                          | 212,000                                                         
2008 | 17,184,000                   | 347,000                                                  | 10,093,000                          | 219,000                                                         
2009 | 17,340,000                   | 363,000                                                  | 10,169,000                          | 222,000                                                         

1 ) source : our estimates of the number of global cruise passengers , and the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally and in north america are based on a combination of data that we obtain from various publicly available cruise industry trade information sources including seatrade insider and cruise line international association . in addition , our estimates incorporate our own statistical analysis utilizing the same publicly available cruise industry data as a base . 2 ) source : cruise line international association based on cruise passengers carried for at least two consecutive nights for years 2005 through 2008 . year 2009 amounts represent our estimates ( see number 1 above ) . .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in 2005 what was the percent of the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally in the north america
Choices: 0.65972, 0.69792, -0.65972, -98000, 13.19444
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data needed to solve the problem. 2. Calculate the percentage of the weighted-average supply of berths marketed globally in the north america. 3. Determine the correct answer choice that matches the calculated percentage. 4. Provide the final answer. 5. Repeat the process for the other years. 6. Compare the results to determine the trend over time. 7. Analyze the trend to identify any significant changes or patterns. 8. Interpret the results in the context of the financial earnings document. 9. Provide a conclusion based on the analysis. 10. Summarize the key findings and recommendations. 11. Provide a final answer to the question. 12. Repeat the process for the other years. 13. Compare the results to determine the trend over time. 14. Analyze the trend to identify any significant changes or patterns. 15. Interpret the results in the context of the financial earnings document. 16. Provide a conclusion based on the analysis. 17. Summarize the key findings and recommendations. 18. Provide a final answer to the question. 19. Repeat the process for the other years. 20. Compare the results to determine the trend over time. Answer the question."," 

A: 0.65972"
"Question: 
NAVIOS MARITIME HOLDINGS INC. NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars — except share data) The Company entered into new lease liabilities amounting to $47,064 during the year ended December 31, 2019. The table below provides the total amount of lease payments on an undiscounted basis on our chartered-in contracts, office lease agreements and land lease agreements as of December 31, 2019: As of December 31, 2019, the weighted average remaining lease terms on our charter-in contracts, office lease agreements and land leases are 4.5 years, 1.9 years and 46.3 years, respectively.

Table:
                                                       | Charter-in vessels in operation | Land Leases | Office space
December 31, 2020                                      | $109,574                        | $556        | $753        
December 31, 2021                                      | 85,399                          | 556         | 356         
December 31, 2022                                      | 57,282                          | 556         | 101         
December 31, 2023                                      | 47,603                          | 556         | 81          
December 31, 2024                                      | 34,025                          | 556         | —           
December 31, 2025 and thereafter                       | 33,481                          | 23,002      | —           
Total                                                  | $367,364                        | $25,782     | $1,291      
Operating lease liabilities, including current portion | $304,568                        | $7,660      | $1,204      
Discount based on incremental borrowing rate           | $62,796                         | $18,122     | $87         



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the payments for Charter-in vessels in operation between 2022 and 2023?
Choices: -967900, 0, -9679, 9679, -10218
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data points for the Charter-in vessels in operation for 2022 and 2023. 2. Calculate the difference between the two data points. 3. Determine the correct answer choice that matches the calculated difference. 4. Provide the final answer. 5. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessary. 6. Provide the final answer. 7. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessary. 8. Provide the final answer. 9. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessary. 10. Provide the final answer. 11. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessary. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessary. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessary. 16. Provide the final answer. 17. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessary. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessary. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessary. 22. Provide the final answer. Answer the question."," 

A: -9679"
"Question: 
14. Fair Value Measures The Company is required to categorize both financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities based on the following fair value hierarchy. The fair value of an asset is the price at which the asset could be sold in an orderly transaction between unrelated, knowledgeable, and willing parties able to engage in the transaction. A liability’s fair value is defined as the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor in a transaction between such parties, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor. • Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. • Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. • Level 3 - Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. The disclosure of fair value of certain financial assets and liabilities recorded at cost are as follows: Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable: The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments. Long-term debt: The carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt is at its stated value. We have not elected to carry our long-term debt at fair value. Fair values for debt are based on quoted market prices or published forward interest rate curves, which are level 2 inputs. Estimated fair values are management’s estimates, which is a level 3 input; however, when there is no readily available market data, the estimated fair values may not represent the amounts that could be realized in a current transaction, and the fair values could change significantly. The fair value of the Company’s debt is sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates. Under its current policies, the Company does not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes. A one percent (1%) decrease in interest rates would increase the net fair value of the Company’s debt by $23,000 at June 1, 2019. The fair value and carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt were as follows (in thousands):

Table:
                 | June 1, 2019   |            | June 2, 2018   |           
                 | Carrying Value | Fair Value | Carrying Value | Fair Value
Note payable     | $1,283         | $1,309     | $4,750         | $4,732    
Long-term leases | 1,054          | 940        | 1,340          | 1,171     
                 | $2,337         | $2,249     | $6,090         | $5,903    



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the percentage increase / (decrease) in the carrying value of Note payable?
Choices: 72.99, 0, 127.01, -72.99, 26.01
Steps to Follow 
 I will be able to figure it out from there. I just need the steps to get to the answer. I am not asking for the answer, just the steps to get to the answer. I am not asking for the answer, just the steps to get to the answer. I am not asking for the answer, just the steps to get to the answer. I am not asking for the answer, just the steps to get to the answer. I am not asking for the answer, just the steps to get to the answer. I am not asking for the answer, just the steps to get to the answer. I am not asking for the answer, just the steps to get to the answer. I am not asking for the answer, just the steps to get to the answer. I am not asking for the answer, just the steps to get to the answer. I am not asking for the answer, just the steps to get to the answer. I am not asking for the answer, just the steps to get to the answer. I am not asking for the answer, just the steps to get to the answer. I am not asking for the answer, just the steps to get to the answer. I am not asking for the answer, just the steps to getAnswer the question."," 

A: -72.99"
"Question: 
years . the company does not yet have a robust set of annuitization experience because most of its clients 2019 policyholders are not yet eligible to annuitize utilizing the gmib . however , for certain clients there are several years of annuitization experience 2013 for those clients the annuitization function reflects the actual experience and has a maximum annuitization rate per annum of 8 percent ( a higher maximum applies in the first year a policy is eligible to annuitize utilizing the gmib 2013 it is over 13 percent ) . for most clients there is no currently observable relevant annuitization behavior data and so we use a weighted aver- age ( with a heavier weighting on the observed experience noted previously ) of three different annuitization functions with maximum annuitization rates per annum of 8 percent , 12 percent , and 30 percent , respectively ( with significantly higher rates in the first year a policy is eligible to annuitize utilizing the gmib ) . as noted elsewhere , our gmib reinsurance treaties include claim limits to protect ace in the event that actual annuitization behavior is significantly higher than expected . during 2010 , the company made various changes to assumptions ( primarily annuitization and lapse ) and methods used to calculate the fair value . the changes had a net effect of reducing fair value of the liability by $ 98 million ( where the dollar impact of each change was measured in the quarter in which the change was implemented ) . during 2010 , we recorded realized losses of $ 64 million primarily due to increasing net fair value of reported glb reinsurance liabilities resulting substantially from the impact of falling interest rates . this excludes realized losses of $ 150 mil- lion during 2010 on derivative hedge instruments held to partially offset the risk in the va guarantee reinsurance portfolio . these derivatives do not receive hedge accounting treatment . refer to 201cnet realized gains ( losses ) 201d for a breakdown of the realized gains on glb reinsurance and the realized losses on the derivatives for 2010 and 2009 . ace tempest life re employs a strategy to manage the financial market and policyholder behavior risks embedded in the reinsurance of va guarantees . risk management begins with underwriting a prospective client and guarantee design , with particular focus on protecting ace 2019s position from policyholder options that , because of anti-selective behavior , could adversely impact our obligation . a second layer of risk management is the structure of the reinsurance contracts . all va guarantee reinsurance contracts include some form of annual or aggregate claim limit ( s ) . the exact limits vary by contract , but some examples of typical con- tract provisions include : 2022 annual claim limits , as a percentage of reinsured account or guaranteed value , for gmdbs and gmibs ; 2022 annual annuitization rate limits , as a percentage of annuitization eligible account or guaranteed value , for gmibs ; and 2022 per policy claim limits , as a percentage of guaranteed value , for gmabs . a third layer of risk management is the hedging strategy which is focused on mitigating long-term economic losses at a portfolio level . ace tempest life re owned financial market instruments as part of the hedging strategy with a fair value of $ 21 million and $ 47 million at december 31 , 2010 , and 2009 , respectively . the instruments are substantially collateralized by our counterparties , on a daily basis . we also limit the aggregate amount of variable annuity reinsurance guarantee risk we are willing to assume . the last substantive u.s . transaction was quoted in mid-2007 and the last transaction in japan was quoted in late 2007 . the aggregate number of policyholders is currently decreasing through policyholder withdrawals and deaths at a rate of 5-10 per- cent annually . note that glb claims cannot occur for any reinsured policy until it has reached the end of its 201cwaiting period 201d . the vast majority of policies we reinsure reach the end of their 201cwaiting periods 201d in 2013 or later , as shown in the table below . year of first payment eligibility percent of living benefit account values .

Table:
Year of first payment eligibility | Percent ofliving benefitaccount values
2010 and prior                    | 1%                                    
2011                              | 0%                                    
2012                              | 7%                                    
2013                              | 24%                                   
2014                              | 19%                                   
2015                              | 5%                                    
2016                              | 6%                                    
2017                              | 18%                                   
2018 and after                    | 20%                                   
Total                             | 100%                                  

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percent change in the fair value financial market instruments as part of the hedging strategy during 2010 compare to 2009?
Choices: -26, -0.55319, -0.57447, 3.2766, -1.2381
Steps to Follow 
 I will then use the process to find the answer. I am looking for the percent change in the fair value financial market instruments as part of the hedging strategy during 2010 compare to 2009. The fair value of the instruments is $21 million and $47 million at december 31, 2010, and 2009, respectively. I will use the percent change formula: ((new value - old value) / old value) * 100. I will first calculate the difference between the new value and the old value: $21 million - $47 million = -$26 million. Then, I will divide the difference by the old value: -$26 million / $47 million = -0.55319. Finally, I will multiply the result by 100 to get the percent change: -0.55319 * 100 = -55.319%. The percent change in the fair value financial market instruments as part of the hedging strategy during 2010 compare to 2009 is -55.32%.<|endoftext|> <|endoftext|>Answer the question."," 

A: -0.55319"
"Question: 
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued) (in thousands, except per share amounts) NOTE 23. SUPPLEMENTAL QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) The following tables present unaudited quarterly results for each of the eight quarters in the periods ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, in thousands. We believe that all necessary adjustments have been included in the amounts stated below to present fairly such quarterly information. Due to the volatility of the industries in which our customers operate, the operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any subsequent period.

Table:
                                                                          |              | Quarter Ended |           |          
                                                                          | December 31, | September 30, | June 30,  | March 31,
                                                                          | 2018         | 2018          | 2018      | 2018     
Sales, net                                                                | $154,161     | $173,082      | $196,032  | $195,617 
Gross Profit                                                              | $  75,188    | $  85,539     | $ 101,235 | $ 103,645
Restructuring Expense                                                     | $  3,836     | $  403        | $ —       | $ —      
Operating income                                                          | $  19,570    | $  39,862     | $ 56,018  | $ 56,103 
Income from continuing operations, net of income taxes                    | $  19,222    | $  35,157     | $ 46,400  | $ 46,370 
Loss (income) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes           | $  188       | $  (371)      | $ 5       | $ 140    
Net Income                                                                | $19,410      | $34,786       | $46,405   | $46,510  
Income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interest | $  4         | $  7          | $ 44      | $ 31     
Net income attributable to Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.               | $  19,406    | $34,779       | $46,361   | $ 46,479 
Earnings (Loss) Per Share:                                                |              |               |           |          
Continuing Operations:                                                    |              |               |           |          
Basic earnings per share                                                  | $0.50        | $0.90         | $1.18     | $1.17    
Diluted earnings per share                                                | $0.50        | $0.90         | $1.17     | $1.16    
Discontinued Operations:                                                  |              |               |           |          
Basic loss per share                                                      | $  —         | $  (0.01)     | $ —       | $ —      
Diluted loss per share                                                    | $  —         | $  (0.01)     | $ —       | $ —      
Net Income:                                                               |              |               |           |          
Basic earnings per share                                                  | $ 0.51       | $  0.89       | $ 1.18    | $1.17    
Diluted earnings per share                                                | $0.50        | $0.89         | $1.17     | $1.16    



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in net income between Quarter Ended  September and December?
Choices: -15380, -35157, -15376, -27069, 54196
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the two quarters in question. 2. Identify the net income for each quarter. 3. Subtract the net income of the first quarter from the net income of the second quarter. 4. The result is the change in net income between the two quarters. 5. Compare the result to the answer choices to determine the correct answer. 6. If the result is not listed, then the correct answer is not provided in the choices. 7. If the result is listed, then the correct answer is the one that matches the result. 8. If the result is negative, then the correct answer is the one that is negative. 9. If the result is positive, then the correct answer is the one that is positive. 10. If the result is zero, then the correct answer is the one that is zero. 11. If the result is not zero, then the correct answer is the one that is closest to the result. 12. If the result is not listed, then the correct answer is not provided in the choices. 13. If the result is listed, then the correct answer is the one that matches the result. 14. If the result is negative, then the correct answer is theAnswer the question."," 

A: -15376"
"Question: 
2022 reed city , michigan 2022 chanhassen , minnesota 2013 bakeries & foodservice segment 2022 hannibal , missouri 2022 joplin , missouri 2013 bakeries & foodservice segment 2022 vineland , new jersey 2022 albuquerque , new mexico 2022 buffalo , new york 2022 martel , ohio 2013 bakeries & foodservice segment 2022 wellston , ohio 2022 murfreesboro , tennessee 2022 milwaukee , wisconsin we own flour mills at eight locations : vallejo , california ( not currently operating ) ; vernon , california ; avon , iowa ; minneapolis , minnesota ( 2 ) ; kansas city , missouri ; great falls , montana ; and buffalo , new york . we also operate six terminal grain elevators ( in minnesota and wisconsin , two of which are leased ) , and have country grain elevators in seven locations ( primarily in idaho ) , plus additional seasonal elevators ( primarily in idaho ) . we also own or lease warehouse space aggregating approximately 12.2 million square feet , of which approxi- mately 9.6 million square feet are leased . we lease a number of sales and administrative offices in the united states , canada and elsewhere around the world , totaling approxi- mately 2.8 million square feet . item 3 legal proceedings we are the subject of various pending or threatened legal actions in the ordinary course of our business . all such matters are subject to many uncertainties and outcomes that are not predictable with assurance . in our manage- ment 2019s opinion , there were no claims or litigation pending as of may 28 , 2006 , that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial posi- tion or results of operations . item 4 submission of matters to a vote of security holders part ii item 5 market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange . on july 14 , 2006 , there were approximately 34675 record holders of our common stock . information regarding the market prices for our common stock and dividend payments for the two most recent fiscal years is set forth in note eighteen to the consolidated financial statements on page 53 in item eight of this report . infor- mation regarding restrictions on our ability to pay dividends in certain situations is set forth in note eight to the consol- idated financial statements on pages 43 and 44 in item eight of this report . the following table sets forth information with respect to shares of our common stock that we purchased during the three fiscal months ended may 28 , 2006 : issuer purchases of equity securities period number of shares purchased ( a ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced program maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the program ( b ) february 27 , 2006 through april 2 , 2006 111772 $ 49.55 2013 2013 april 3 , 2006 through april 30 , 2006 445466 $ 49.06 2013 2013 may 1 , 2006 through may 28 , 2006 1182100 $ 49.79 2013 2013 .

Table:
Period                                  | TotalNumberof SharesPurchased<sup>(a)</sup> | AveragePrice PaidPer Share | Total Numberof SharesPurchased asPart of aPubliclyAnnouncedProgram | MaximumNumberof Sharesthat may yetbe PurchasedUndertheProgram<sup>(b)</sup>
February 27, 2006 through April 2, 2006 | 111,772                                     | $49.55                     | –                                                                  | –                                                                          
April 3, 2006 through April 30, 2006    | 445,466                                     | $49.06                     | –                                                                  | –                                                                          
May 1, 2006 through May 28, 2006        | 1,182,100                                   | $49.79                     | –                                                                  | –                                                                          
Total                                   | 1,739,338                                   | $49.59                     | –                                                                  | –                                                                          

( a ) the total number of shares purchased includes : ( i ) 231500 shares purchased from the esop fund of our 401 ( k ) savings plan ; ( ii ) 8338 shares of restricted stock withheld for the payment of with- holding taxes upon vesting of restricted stock ; and ( iii ) 1499500 shares purchased in the open market . ( b ) on february 21 , 2000 , we announced that our board of directors autho- rized us to repurchase up to 170 million shares of our common stock to be held in our treasury . the board did not specify a time period or an expiration date for the authorization. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the total cash spent to purchase back all shares in 2006?
Choices: 86253771.42, 87993109.42, 86184197.9, 58620339, 194409286936
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the total number of shares purchased in the open market. 2. Identify the average price paid per share. 3. Multiply the total number of shares purchased in the open market by the average price paid per share. 4. Add the total number of shares purchased from the ESOP fund of our 401(k) savings plan, the number of shares of restricted stock withheld for the payment of withholding taxes upon vesting of restricted stock, and the total number of shares purchased in the open market. 5. Multiply the total number of shares purchased in the open market by the average price paid per share. 6. Add the total number of shares purchased from the ESOP fund of our 401(k) savings plan, the number of shares of restricted stock withheld for the payment of withholding taxes upon vesting of restricted stock, and the total number of shares purchased in the open market. 7. Add the total number of shares purchased from the ESOP fund of our 401(k) savings plan, the number of shares of restricted stock withheld for the payment of withholding taxes upon vesting of restricted stock, and the total number of shares purchased in the open market. 8. Add the total number of shares purchased from the ESOP fundAnswer the question."," 

A: 86253771.42"
"Question: 
united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements floating-rate senior notes the floating-rate senior notes with principal amounts totaling $ 1.043 billion , bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.74% ( 0.74 % ) and 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) , respectively . these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after one year at a stated percentage of par value . the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2067 . we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder . in march and november 2017 , we issued floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 147 and $ 64 million , respectively , which are included in the $ 1.043 billion floating-rate senior notes described above . these notes will bear interest at three-month libor less 30 and 35 basis points , respectively and mature in 2067 . the remaining three floating-rate senior notes in the principal amounts of $ 350 , $ 400 and $ 500 million , bear interest at three-month libor , plus a spread ranging from 15 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.50% ( 0.50 % ) and 0.0% ( 0.0 % ) , respectively . these notes are not callable . the notes have maturities ranging from 2021 through 2023 . we classified the floating-rate senior notes that are putable by the note holder as a long-term liability , due to our intent and ability to refinance the debt if the put option is exercised by the note holder . capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : .

Table:
                                                        | 2017   | 2016  
Vehicles                                                | $70    | $68   
Aircraft                                                | 2,291  | 2,291 
Buildings                                               | 285    | 190   
Accumulated amortization                                | (990)  | (896) 
Property, plant and equipment subject to capital leases | $1,656 | $1,653

these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2018 through 3005 . facility notes and bonds we have entered into agreements with certain municipalities to finance the construction of , or improvements to , facilities that support our u.s . domestic package and supply chain & freight operations in the united states . these facilities are located around airport properties in louisville , kentucky ; dallas , texas ; and philadelphia , pennsylvania . under these arrangements , we enter into a lease or loan agreement that covers the debt service obligations on the bonds issued by the municipalities , as follows : 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 149 million issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our worldport facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds , which are due in january 2029 , bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.83% ( 0.83 % ) and 0.37% ( 0.37 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 42 million and due in november 2036 issued by the louisville regional airport authority associated with our air freight facility in louisville , kentucky . the bonds bear interest at a variable rate , and the average interest rates for 2017 and 2016 were 0.80% ( 0.80 % ) and 0.36% ( 0.36 % ) , respectively . 2022 bonds with a principal balance of $ 29 million issued by the dallas / fort worth international airport facility improvement corporation associated with our dallas , texas airport facilities . the bonds are due in may 2032 and bear interest at a variable rate , however the variable cash flows on the obligation have been swapped to a fixed 5.11% ( 5.11 % ) . 2022 in september 2015 , we entered into an agreement with the delaware county , pennsylvania industrial development authority , associated with our philadelphia , pennsylvania airport facilities , for bonds issued with a principal balance of $ 100 million . these bonds , which are due september 2045 , bear interest at a variable rate . the average interest rate for 2017 and 2016 was 0.78% ( 0.78 % ) and 0.40% ( 0.40 % ) , respectively. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage change in vehicles under capital lease from 2016 to 2017?
Choices: 2.02941, -0.99925, 1, 0.02941, 0.02857
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data for the vehicles under capital lease in 2016 and 2017. 2. Calculate the percentage change in vehicles under capital lease from 2016 to 2017. 3. Round the percentage change to the appropriate number of decimal places. 4. Compare the calculated percentage change to the given choices and select the correct answer. 5. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 6. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessary. 7. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 8. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessary. 9. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 10. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessary. 11. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 12. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessary. 13. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 14. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessary. 15. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 16. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessary. 17. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 18. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessaryAnswer the question."," 

A: 0.02941"
"Question: 
calculations would be adjusted for interest expense associated with this debt instrument . eitf issue no . 04-08 would have been effective beginning with the company 2019s 2004 fourth quarter . however , due to the fasb 2019s delay in issuing sfas no . 128r and the company 2019s intent and ability to settle this debt security in cash versus the issuance of stock , the impact of the additional diluted shares will not be included in the diluted earnings per share calculation until the proposed sfas no . 128r is effective . when sfas no . 128r is effective , prior periods 2019 diluted shares outstanding and diluted earnings per share amounts will be restated to present comparable information . the estimated annual reduction in the company 2019s diluted earnings per share would have been approximately $ .02 to $ .03 per share for total year 2005 , 2004 and 2003 . because the impact of this standard is ongoing , the company 2019s diluted shares outstanding and diluted earnings per share amounts would be impacted until retirement or modification of certain terms of this debt security . note 2 . acquisitions and divestitures the company acquired cuno on august 2 , 2005 . the operating results of cuno are included in the industrial business segment . cuno is engaged in the design , manufacture and marketing of a comprehensive line of filtration products for the separation , clarification and purification of fluids and gases . 3m and cuno have complementary sets of filtration technologies and the opportunity to bring an even wider range of filtration solutions to customers around the world . 3m acquired cuno for approximately $ 1.36 billion , comprised of $ 1.27 billion of cash paid ( net of cash acquired ) and the acquisition of $ 80 million of debt , most of which has been repaid . purchased identifiable intangible assets of $ 268 million for the cuno acquisition will be amortized on a straight- line basis over lives ranging from 5 to 20 years ( weighted-average life of 15 years ) . in-process research and development charges from the cuno acquisition were not material . pro forma information related to this acquisition is not included because its impact on company 2019s consolidated results of operations is not considered to be material . the preliminary allocation of the purchase price is presented in the table that follows . 2005 cuno acquisition asset ( liability ) ( millions ) .

Table:
Accounts receivable                            | $96   
Inventory                                      | 61    
Property, plant, and equipment - net           | 121   
Purchased intangible assets                    | 268   
Purchased goodwill                             | 992   
Other assets                                   | 30    
Deferred tax liability                         | (102) 
Accounts payable and other current liabilities | (104) 
Interest bearing debt                          | (80)  
Other long-term liabilities                    | (16)  
Net assets acquired                            | $1,266
Supplemental information:                      |       
Cash paid                                      | $1,294
Less: Cash acquired                            | 28    
Cash paid, net of cash acquired                | $1,266

during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , 3m entered into two immaterial additional business combinations for a total purchase price of $ 27 million , net of cash acquired . 1 ) 3m ( electro and communications business ) purchased certain assets of siemens ultrasound division 2019s flexible circuit manufacturing line , a u.s . operation . the acquired operation produces flexible interconnect circuits that provide electrical connections between components in electronics systems used primarily in the transducers of ultrasound machines . 2 ) 3m ( display and graphics business ) purchased certain assets of mercury online solutions inc. , a u.s . operation . the acquired operation provides hardware and software technologies and network management services for digital signage and interactive kiosk networks. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percent of the accounts receivable of the net assets acquired
Choices: 0.09558, 0.00008, 0.06319, 1, 0.07583
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the accounts receivable amount from the table. 2. Identify the net assets acquired amount from the table. 3. Divide the accounts receivable amount by the net assets acquired amount. 4. Convert the decimal to a percentage. 5. Round the percentage to 4 decimal places. 6. Compare the calculated percentage to the given choices. 7. Select the correct answer. 8. Provide the answer in the format: Answer: <answer> 9. Provide the answer in the format: Answer: <answer> 10. Provide the answer in the format: Answer: <answer> 11. Provide the answer in the format: Answer: <answer> 12. Provide the answer in the format: Answer: <answer> 13. Provide the answer in the format: Answer: <answer> 14. Provide the answer in the format: Answer: <answer> 15. Provide the answer in the format: Answer: <answer> 16. Provide the answer in the format: Answer: <answer> 17. Provide the answer in the format: Answer: <answer> 18. Provide the answer in the format: Answer: <answer> 19. Provide the answer inAnswer the question."," 

A: 0.07583"
"Question: 
3.1 OPERATING RESULTS (1) Fiscal 2019 average foreign exchange rate used for translation was 1.3255 USD/CDN. (2) Fiscal 2018 was restated to comply with IFRS 15 and to reflect a change in accounting policy as well as to reclassify results from Cogeco Peer 1 as discontinued
operations. For further details, please consult the ""Accounting policies"" and ""Discontinued operations"" sections. (3) Fiscal 2019 actuals are translated at the average foreign exchange rate of fiscal 2018 which was 1.2773 USD/CDN.

Table:
Years ended August 31,                        | 2019 (1)  | 2018 (2)  | Change | Change in constant currency (3) | Foreign exchange impact (3)
(in thousands of dollars, except percentages) | $         | $         | %      | %                               | $                          
Revenue                                       | 2,331,820 | 2,147,404 | 8.6    | 6.8                             | 37,433                     
Operating Expenses                            | 1,203,980 | 1,121,625 | 7.3    | 5.4                             | 21,636                     
Management fees – Cogeco Inc.                 | 19,900    | 18,961    | 5.0    | 5.0                             | -                          
Adjusted EBITDA                               | 1,107,940 | 1,006,818 | 10.0   | 8.5                             | 15,797                     
Adjusted EBITDA margin                        | 47.5%     | 46.9%     |        |                                 |                            



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average operating expenses between 2018 and 2019?
Choices: 2325605, 1162802.5, 601990.2, 1, 41177.5
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data needed to answer the question. 2. Determine the time period for the data. 3. Calculate the average operating expenses. 4. Compare the calculated average to the given choices. 5. Select the correct answer. 6. Provide the answer in the format requested. 7. Provide the final answer. 8. Provide the final answer in the format requested. 9. Provide the final answer. 10. Provide the final answer in the format requested. 11. Provide the final answer. 12. Provide the final answer in the format requested. 13. Provide the final answer. 14. Provide the final answer in the format requested. 15. Provide the final answer. 16. Provide the final answer in the format requested. 17. Provide the final answer. 18. Provide the final answer in the format requested. 19. Provide the final answer. 20. Provide the final answer in the format requested. 21. Provide the final answer. 22. Provide the final answer in the format requested. 23. Provide the final answer. 24. Provide the final answer in the format requested. 25. Provide the final answer. 26. Provide theAnswer the question."," 

A: 1162802.5"
"Question: 
entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increased recovery of deferred fuel and purchased power costs primarily due to an increase in april 2004 in the energy cost recovery rider and the true-ups to the 2003 and 2002 energy cost recovery rider filings . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the over-recovery of grand gulf costs due to an increase in the grand gulf rider effective january 2004 . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy arkansas' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .

Table:
                                | (In Millions)
2002 net revenue                | $1,095.9     
March 2002 settlement agreement | (154.0)      
Volume/weather                  | (7.7)        
Asset retirement obligation     | 30.1         
Net wholesale revenue           | 16.6         
Deferred fuel cost revisions    | 10.2         
Other                           | 7.6          
2003 net revenue                | $998.7       

the march 2002 settlement agreement resolved a request for recovery of ice storm costs incurred in december 2000 with an offset of those costs for funds contributed to pay for future stranded costs . a 1997 settlement provided for the collection of earnings in excess of an 11% ( 11 % ) return on equity in a transition cost account ( tca ) to offset stranded costs if retail open access were implemented . in mid- and late december 2000 , two separate ice storms left 226000 and 212500 entergy arkansas customers , respectively , without electric power in its service area . entergy arkansas filed a proposal to recover costs plus carrying charges associated with power restoration caused by the ice storms . entergy arkansas' final storm damage cost determination reflected costs of approximately $ 195 million . the apsc approved a settlement agreement submitted in march 2002 by entergy arkansas , the apsc staff , and the arkansas attorney general . in the march 2002 settlement , the parties agreed that $ 153 million of the ice storm costs would be classified as incremental ice storm expenses that can be offset against the tca on a rate class basis , and any excess of ice storm costs over the amount available in the tca would be deferred and amortized over 30 years , although such excess costs were not allowed to be included as a separate component of rate base . the allocated ice storm expenses exceeded the available tca funds by $ 15.8 million which was recorded as a regulatory asset in june 2002 . in accordance with the settlement agreement and following the apsc's approval of the 2001 earnings review related to the tca , entergy arkansas filed to return $ 18.1 million of the tca to certain large general service class customers that paid more into the tca than their allocation of storm costs . the apsc approved the return of funds to the large general service customer class in the form of refund checks in august 2002 . as part of the implementation of the march 2002 settlement agreement provisions , the tca procedure ceased with the 2001 earnings evaluation . of the remaining ice storm costs , $ 32.2 million was addressed through established ratemaking procedures , including $ 22.2 million classified as capital additions , while $ 3.8 million of the ice storm costs was not recovered through rates . the effect on net income of the march 2002 settlement agreement and 2001 earnings review was a $ 2.2 million increase in 2003 , because the decrease in net revenue was offset by the decrease in operation and maintenance expenses discussed below. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2003 for entergy arkansas , inc.?
Choices: 998.7, -0.08869, -97.2, -0.97253, 0.89479
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the net revenue for 2003 and 2002. 2. Calculate the growth rate using the formula: growth rate = (net revenue 2003 - net revenue 2002) / net revenue 2002. 3. Convert the growth rate to a percentage by multiplying by 100. 4. Round the percentage to two decimal places. 5. Compare the calculated growth rate to the given choices and select the correct one. 6. Provide the final answer in the format: ""The growth rate in net revenue in 2003 for Entergy Arkansas, Inc. is [answer].""<|endoftext|> The growth rate in net revenue in 2003 for Entergy Arkansas, Inc. is -0.08869. 1. Identify the net revenue for 2003 and 2002. 2. Calculate the growth rate using the formula: growth rate = (net revenue 2003 - net revenue 2002) / net revenue 2002. 3. Convert the growth rate to a percentage by multiplying by 100. 4. Round the percentage to two decimal places. 5. Compare the calculated growth rate to the given choices and select the correct one. 6Answer the question."," 

A: -0.08869"
"Question: 
Tax Carryforwards The amount and expiration dates of income tax net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards, which are available to reduce future taxes, if any, as of August 31, 2019 are as follows: (1) Net of unrecognized tax benefits. (2) Calculated based on the deferral method and includes foreign investment tax credits

Table:
(dollars in thousands)                          | Last Fiscal Year of Expiration | Amount  
Income tax net operating loss carryforwards:(1) |                                |         
Domestic–state                                  | 2039                           | $57,299 
Foreign                                         | 2039 or indefinite             | $565,609
Tax credit carryforwards:(1)                    |                                |         
Domestic–federal                                | 2029                           | $39,784 
Domestic–state                                  | 2027                           | $3,313  
Foreign(2)                                      | 2027 or indefinite             | $15,345 



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the domestic-state tax credit carryforwards as a ratio of domestic-federal tax credit carryforwards?
Choices: 0.08, 1, -1656.5, 12.01, 1.08
Steps to Follow 
 
I am not sure how to solve this problem. I am not sure how to calculate the ratio of domestic-state tax credit carryforwards to domestic-federal tax credit carryforwards. I am not sure how to interpret the data. I am not sure how to calculate the ratio of domestic-state tax credit carryforwards to domestic-federal tax credit carryforwards. I am not sure how to interpret the data. I am not sure how to calculate the ratio of domestic-state tax credit carryforwards to domestic-federal tax credit carryforwards. I am not sure how to interpret the data. I am not sure how to calculate the ratio of domestic-state tax credit carryforwards to domestic-federal tax credit carryforwards. I am not sure how to interpret the data. I am not sure how to calculate the ratio of domestic-state tax credit carryforwards to domestic-federal tax credit carryforwards. I am not sure how to interpret the data. I am not sure how to calculate the ratio of domestic-state tax credit carryforwards to domestic-federal tax credit carryforwards. I am not sure how to interpret the data. I am not sure how to calculate the ratio of domestic-state tax credit carryforwards to domestic-federal tax creditAnswer the question."," 

A: 0.08"
"Question: 
GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries
Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019
(All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data) 26. Derivative Financial Instruments (Continued) The fair value of the derivative liabilities is as follows: Interest rate swap agreements The Group enters into interest rate swap agreements which convert the floating interest rate exposure into a fixed interest rate in order to hedge a portion of the Group’s exposure to fluctuations in prevailing market interest rates. Under the interest rate swaps, the bank counterparty effects quarterly floating-rate payments to the Group for the notional amount based on the U.S. dollar LIBOR, and the Group effects quarterly payments to the bank on the notional amount at the respective fixed rates. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedging instruments As of December 31, 2018 and 2019, there are no interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedging instruments for accounting purposes.

Table:
                                                                                             | As of December 31, |       
                                                                                             | 2018               | 2019  
Derivative liabilities carried at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL)                  |                    |       
Interest rate swaps                                                                          | 9,196              | 49,891
Forward foreign exchange contracts                                                           | 1,467              | 41    
Derivative liabilities designated and effective as hedging instruments carried at fair value |                    |       
Cross currency swaps                                                                         | 1,429              | —     
Total                                                                                        | 12,092             | 49,932
Derivative financial instruments, current liability                                          | 2,091              | 8,095 
Derivative financial instruments, non-current liability                                      | 10,001             | 41,837
Total                                                                                        | 12,092             | 49,932



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in fair value of interest rate swaps from 2018 to 2019?
Choices: 40736, 40695, 8054, 4, 59087
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the relevant data. 2. Calculate the change in fair value of interest rate swaps from 2018 to 2019. 3. Determine the correct answer choice that matches the calculated change. 4. Provide the final answer. 5. Provide the final answer. 6. Provide the final answer. 7. Provide the final answer. 8. Provide the final answer. 9. Provide the final answer. 10. Provide the final answer. 11. Provide the final answer. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Provide the final answer. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Provide the final answer. 16. Provide the final answer. 17. Provide the final answer. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Provide the final answer. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Provide the final answer. 22. Provide the final answer. 23. Provide the final answer. 24. Provide the final answer. 25. Provide the final answer. 26. Provide the final answer. 27. Provide the final answer. 28. Provide the final answer. 29. Provide the final answer. 30. ProvideAnswer the question."," 

A: 40695"
"Question: 
management 2019s discussion and analysis 138 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report the credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities do not qualify for hedge accounting under u.s . gaap ; these derivatives are reported at fair value , with gains and losses recognized in principal transactions revenue . in contrast , the loans and lending-related commitments being risk-managed are accounted for on an accrual basis . this asymmetry in accounting treatment , between loans and lending-related commitments and the credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities , causes earnings volatility that is not representative , in the firm 2019s view , of the true changes in value of the firm 2019s overall credit exposure . the effectiveness of the firm 2019s credit default swap ( 201ccds 201d ) protection as a hedge of the firm 2019s exposures may vary depending on a number of factors , including the named reference entity ( i.e. , the firm may experience losses on specific exposures that are different than the named reference entities in the purchased cds ) , and the contractual terms of the cds ( which may have a defined credit event that does not align with an actual loss realized by the firm ) and the maturity of the firm 2019s cds protection ( which in some cases may be shorter than the firm 2019s exposures ) . however , the firm generally seeks to purchase credit protection with a maturity date that is the same or similar to the maturity date of the exposure for which the protection was purchased , and remaining differences in maturity are actively monitored and managed by the firm . credit portfolio hedges the following table sets out the fair value related to the firm 2019s credit derivatives used in credit portfolio management activities , the fair value related to the cva ( which reflects the credit quality of derivatives counterparty exposure ) , as well as certain other hedges used in the risk management of cva . these results can vary from period-to- period due to market conditions that affect specific positions in the portfolio . net gains and losses on credit portfolio hedges year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2013 2012 2011 hedges of loans and lending- related commitments $ ( 142 ) $ ( 163 ) $ ( 32 ) .

Table:
Year ended December 31,(in millions)            | 2013   | 2012   | 2011  
Hedges of loans and lending-related commitments | $(142) | $(163) | $(32) 
CVA and hedges of CVA                           | (130)  | 127    | (769) 
Net gains/(losses)                              | $(272) | $(36)  | $(801)

community reinvestment act exposure the community reinvestment act ( 201ccra 201d ) encourages banks to meet the credit needs of borrowers in all segments of their communities , including neighborhoods with low or moderate incomes . the firm is a national leader in community development by providing loans , investments and community development services in communities across the united states . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , the firm 2019s cra loan portfolio was approximately $ 18 billion and $ 16 billion , respectively . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , 50% ( 50 % ) and 62% ( 62 % ) , respectively , of the cra portfolio were residential mortgage loans ; 26% ( 26 % ) and 13% ( 13 % ) , respectively , were commercial real estate loans ; 16% ( 16 % ) and 18% ( 18 % ) , respectively , were business banking loans ; and 8% ( 8 % ) and 7% ( 7 % ) , respectively , were other loans . cra nonaccrual loans were 3% ( 3 % ) and 4% ( 4 % ) , respectively , of the firm 2019s total nonaccrual loans . for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , net charge-offs in the cra portfolio were 1% ( 1 % ) and 3% ( 3 % ) , respectively , of the firm 2019s net charge-offs in both years. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. at december 31 , 2013 what is the dollar amount of the cra loan portfolio that was not performing and charged off , in billions?
Choices: -648, 0.54, -0.54, 1.44, 6.03
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the relevant data in the table. 2. Determine the percentage of nonaccrual loans in the CRA portfolio. 3. Calculate the dollar amount of nonaccrual loans. 4. Calculate the percentage of net charge-offs in the CRA portfolio. 5. Calculate the dollar amount of net charge-offs. 6. Determine the dollar amount of the CRA loan portfolio that was not performing and charged off. 7. Convert the dollar amount to billions. 8. Provide the final answer. 9. Repeat the process for the year ended December 31, 2012. 10. Compare the results for the two years. 11. Analyze the trends in the CRA loan portfolio performance. 12. Identify any potential risks or issues related to the CRA loan portfolio. 13. Provide recommendations for improving the performance of the CRA loan portfolio. 14. Discuss the impact of the CRA loan portfolio on the overall financial performance of the company. 15. Provide a conclusion based on the analysis. 16. Provide a summary of the key findings. 17. Provide a recommendation for further analysis or action. 18. Provide a final conclusion. 19. Provide a reference to the source document. 20Answer the question."," 

A: 0.54"
"Question: 
our consolidated net cash flows used for investing activities were $ 4.2 billion in 2010 , compared with $ 3.2 billion in 2009 . net investing activities for the indicated periods were related primarily to net purchases of fixed maturities and for 2010 included the acquisitions of rain and hail and jerneh insurance berhad . our consolidated net cash flows from financing activities were $ 732 million in 2010 , compared with net cash flows used for financing activities of $ 321 million in 2009 . net cash flows from/used for financing activities in 2010 and 2009 , included dividends paid on our common shares of $ 435 million and $ 388 million , respectively . net cash flows from financing activ- ities in 2010 , included net proceeds of $ 699 million from the issuance of long-term debt , $ 1 billion in reverse repurchase agreements , and $ 300 million in credit facility borrowings . this was partially offset by repayment of $ 659 million in debt and share repurchases settled in 2010 of $ 235 million . for 2009 , net cash flows used for financing activities included net pro- ceeds from the issuance of $ 500 million in long-term debt and the net repayment of debt and reverse repurchase agreements of $ 466 million . both internal and external forces influence our financial condition , results of operations , and cash flows . claim settle- ments , premium levels , and investment returns may be impacted by changing rates of inflation and other economic conditions . in many cases , significant periods of time , ranging up to several years or more , may lapse between the occurrence of an insured loss , the reporting of the loss to us , and the settlement of the liability for that loss . from time to time , we utilize reverse repurchase agreements as a low-cost alternative for short-term funding needs . we use these instruments on a limited basis to address short-term cash timing differences without disrupting our investment portfolio holdings and settle the transactions with future operating cash flows . at december 31 , 2010 , there were $ 1 billion in reverse repurchase agreements outstanding ( refer to short-term debt ) . in addition to cash from operations , routine sales of investments , and financing arrangements , we have agreements with a bank provider which implemented two international multi-currency notional cash pooling programs to enhance cash management efficiency during periods of short-term timing mismatches between expected inflows and outflows of cash by currency . in each program , participating ace entities establish deposit accounts in different currencies with the bank provider and each day the credit or debit balances in every account are notionally translated into a single currency ( u.s . dollars ) and then notionally pooled . the bank extends overdraft credit to any participating ace entity as needed , provided that the overall notionally-pooled balance of all accounts in each pool at the end of each day is at least zero . actual cash balances are not physically converted and are not co-mingled between legal entities . ace entities may incur overdraft balances as a means to address short-term timing mismatches , and any overdraft balances incurred under this program by an ace entity would be guaranteed by ace limited ( up to $ 150 million in the aggregate ) . our revolving credit facility allows for same day drawings to fund a net pool overdraft should participating ace entities withdraw contributed funds from the pool . capital resources capital resources consist of funds deployed or available to be deployed to support our business operations . the following table summarizes the components of our capital resources at december 31 , 2010 , and 2009. .

Table:
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)                 | 2010    | 2009   
Short-term debt                                                       | $1,300  | $161   
Long-term debt                                                        | 3,358   | 3,158  
Total debt                                                            | 4,658   | 3,319  
Trust preferred securities                                            | 309     | 309    
Total shareholders’ equity                                            | 22,974  | 19,667 
Total capitalization                                                  | $27,941 | $23,295
Ratio of debt to total capitalization                                 | 16.7%   | 14.2%  
Ratio of debt plus trust preferred securities to total capitalization | 17.8%   | 15.6%  

our ratios of debt to total capitalization and debt plus trust preferred securities to total capitalization have increased temporarily due to the increase in short-term debt , as discussed below . we expect that these ratios will decline over the next six to nine months as we repay the short-term debt . we believe our financial strength provides us with the flexibility and capacity to obtain available funds externally through debt or equity financing on both a short-term and long-term basis . our ability to access the capital markets is dependent on , among other things , market conditions and our perceived financial strength . we have accessed both the debt and equity markets from time to time. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the debt-asset ratio for 2010?
Choices: 22974.16857, 0.83143, 0.00169, 0.00004, 0.16857
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the debt and asset values from the table. 2. Divide the debt value by the asset value. 3. Calculate the ratio. 4. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 5. Repeat the process for 2009. 6. Compare the two ratios. 7. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 8. Repeat the process for 2010. 9. Compare the two ratios. 10. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 11. Repeat the process for 2009. 12. Compare the two ratios. 13. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 14. Repeat the process for 2010. 15. Compare the two ratios. 16. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 17. Repeat the process for 2009. 18. Compare the two ratios. 19. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 20. Repeat the process for 2010. 21. Compare the two ratios. 22. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 23. Repeat the process for 2009. 24. Compare the two ratios.Answer the question."," 

A: 0.16857"
"Question: 
on the underlying exposure . for derivative contracts that are designated and qualify as cash fl ow hedges , the effective portion of gains and losses on these contracts is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassifi ed into earnings in the same period the hedged transaction affects earnings . hedge ineffectiveness is immediately recognized in earnings . derivative contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments are recorded at fair value with the gain or loss recognized in current earnings during the period of change . we may enter into foreign currency forward and option contracts to reduce the effect of fl uctuating currency exchange rates ( principally the euro , the british pound , and the japanese yen ) . foreign currency derivatives used for hedging are put in place using the same or like currencies and duration as the underlying exposures . forward contracts are principally used to manage exposures arising from subsidiary trade and loan payables and receivables denominated in foreign currencies . these contracts are recorded at fair value with the gain or loss recognized in other 2014net . the purchased option contracts are used to hedge anticipated foreign currency transactions , primarily intercompany inventory activities expected to occur within the next year . these contracts are designated as cash fl ow hedges of those future transactions and the impact on earnings is included in cost of sales . we may enter into foreign currency forward contracts and currency swaps as fair value hedges of fi rm commitments . forward and option contracts generally have maturities not exceeding 12 months . in the normal course of business , our operations are exposed to fl uctuations in interest rates . these fl uctuations can vary the costs of fi nancing , investing , and operating . we address a portion of these risks through a controlled program of risk management that includes the use of derivative fi nancial instruments . the objective of controlling these risks is to limit the impact of fl uctuations in interest rates on earnings . our primary interest rate risk exposure results from changes in short-term u.s . dollar interest rates . in an effort to manage interest rate exposures , we strive to achieve an acceptable balance between fi xed and fl oating rate debt and investment positions and may enter into interest rate swaps or collars to help maintain that balance . interest rate swaps or collars that convert our fi xed- rate debt or investments to a fl oating rate are designated as fair value hedges of the underlying instruments . interest rate swaps or collars that convert fl oating rate debt or investments to a fi xed rate are designated as cash fl ow hedg- es . interest expense on the debt is adjusted to include the payments made or received under the swap agreements . goodwill and other intangibles : goodwill is not amortized . all other intangibles arising from acquisitions and research alliances have fi nite lives and are amortized over their estimated useful lives , ranging from 5 to 20 years , using the straight-line method . the weighted-average amortization period for developed product technology is approximately 12 years . amortization expense for 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 was $ 193.4 million , $ 172.8 million , and $ 7.6 million before tax , respectively . the estimated amortization expense for each of the fi ve succeeding years approximates $ 280 million before tax , per year . substantially all of the amortization expense is included in cost of sales . see note 3 for further discussion of goodwill and other intangibles acquired in 2008 and 2007 . goodwill and other intangible assets at december 31 were as follows: .

Table:
                                     | 2008     | 2007    
Goodwill                             | $1,167.5 | $745.7  
Developed product technology — gross | 3,035.4  | 1,767.5 
Less accumulated amortization        | (346.6)  | (162.6) 
Developed product technology — net   | 2,688.8  | 1,604.9 
Other intangibles — gross            | 243.2    | 142.8   
Less accumulated amortization        | (45.4)   | (38.0)  
Other intangibles — net              | 197.8    | 104.8   
Total intangibles — net              | $4,054.1 | $2,455.4

goodwill and net other intangibles are reviewed to assess recoverability at least annually and when certain impairment indicators are present . no signifi cant impairments occurred with respect to the carrying value of our goodwill or other intangible assets in 2008 , 2007 , or 2006 . property and equipment : property and equipment is stated on the basis of cost . provisions for depreciation of buildings and equipment are computed generally by the straight-line method at rates based on their estimated useful lives ( 12 to 50 years for buildings and 3 to 18 years for equipment ) . we review the carrying value of long-lived assets for potential impairment on a periodic basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percent of increase in the amortization expense from 2007 to 2008
Choices: 172.68079, 20.6, 1, 3559.68, 0.11921
Steps to Follow 
 1. Find the amortization expense for 2007 2. Find the amortization expense for 2008 3. Find the percent increase in amortization expense from 2007 to 2008 4. Find the percent increase in amortization expense from 2007 to 2008 as a decimal 5. Find the percent increase in amortization expense from 2007 to 2008 as a percentage 6. Find the percent increase in amortization expense from 2007 to 2008 as a percentage rounded to the nearest hundredth 7. Find the percent increase in amortization expense from 2007 to 2008 as a percentage rounded to the nearest tenth 8. Find the percent increase in amortization expense from 2007 to 2008 as a percentage rounded to the nearest tenth 9. Find the percent increase in amortization expense from 2007 to 2008 as a percentage rounded to the nearest tenth 10. Find the percent increase in amortization expense from 2007 to 2008 as a percentage rounded to the nearest tenth 11. Find the percent increase in amortization expense from 2007 to 2008 as a percentage rounded to the nearest tenth 12. Find the percentAnswer the question."," 

A: 0.11921"
"Question: 
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued) (in thousands, except per share amounts) NOTE 5. INCOME TAXES The geographic distribution of pretax income from continuing operations is as follows:

Table:
         |           | Years Ended December 31, |         
         | 2019      | 2018                     | 2017    
Domestic | $(20,597) | $22,325                  | $29,088 
Foreign  | 87,791    | 150,051                  | 169,103 
Total    | $67,194   | $172,376                 | $198,191



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the percentage change in total pretax income between 2018 and 2019?
Choices: 61.02, -163.88, -61.02, -0.61, -156.53
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the total pretax income for 2018 and 2019. 2. Calculate the percentage change between the two years. 3. Determine the correct answer choice that matches the percentage change. 4. Select the answer choice that matches the percentage change. 5. Provide the final answer. 6. Provide the final answer. 7. Provide the final answer. 8. Provide the final answer. 9. Provide the final answer. 10. Provide the final answer. 11. Provide the final answer. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Provide the final answer. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Provide the final answer. 16. Provide the final answer. 17. Provide the final answer. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Provide the final answer. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Provide the final answer. 22. Provide the final answer. 23. Provide the final answer. 24. Provide the final answer. 25. Provide the final answer. 26. Provide the final answer. 27. Provide the final answer. 28. Provide the final answer. 29. Provide the final answerAnswer the question."," 

A: -61.02"
"Question: 
During 2019, 2018 and 2017, no income tax benefit or expense was recorded for stock options exercised as an adjustment to equity. The change in the unrecognized income tax benefits for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 is reconciled below: As of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, our total liability for unrecognized tax benefits was $1.5 million, $1.9 million and $2.4 million, respectively, of which $1.4 million, $1.7 million and $2.2 million, respectively, would reduce our effective tax rate if we were successful in upholding all of the uncertain positions and recognized the amounts recorded. We classify interest and penalties recognized on the liability for unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. As of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the balances of accrued interest and penalties were $0.5 million, $0.7 million and $0.8 million, respectively. We do not anticipate a single tax position generating a significant increase or decrease in our liability for unrecognized tax benefits within 12 months of this reporting date. We file income tax returns in the U.S. for federal and various state jurisdictions and several foreign jurisdictions. We are not currently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service. Generally, we are not subject to changes in income taxes by any taxing jurisdiction for the years prior to 2016.

Table:
(In thousands)                                  | 2019   | 2018   | 2017  
Balance at beginning of period                  | $1,868 | $2,366 | $2,226
Increases for tax position related to:          |        |        |       
Prior years                                     | —      | 3      | 465   
Current year                                    | 161    | 254    | 285   
Decreases for tax positions related to:         |        |        |       
Prior years                                     | (71)   | —      | (14)  
Expiration of applicable statute of limitations | (471)  | (755)  | (596) 
Balance at end of period                        | $1,487 | $1,868 | $2,366



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the balance at the end of period between 2018 and 2019?
Choices: 3355, -381, 0, -1866, -1614
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the balance at the end of period for 2018. 2. Identify the balance at the end of period for 2019. 3. Subtract the balance at the end of period for 2018 from the balance at the end of period for 2019. 4. The result is the change in the balance at the end of period between 2018 and 2019. 5. Compare the result to the choices provided. 6. Select the choice that matches the result. 7. Provide the answer. 8. Provide the reasoning for the answer. 9. Provide the final answer. 10. Provide the final answer. 11. Provide the final answer. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Provide the final answer. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Provide the final answer. 16. Provide the final answer. 17. Provide the final answer. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Provide the final answer. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Provide the final answer. 22. Provide the final answer. 23. Provide the final answer. 24. Provide the final answer. 25. ProvideAnswer the question."," 

A: -381"
"Question: 
to maturity at any time in whole or in part at the option of the company at a 201cmake-whole 201d redemption price . the 2017 notes were issued at a discount of $ 6 million , which is being amortized over their ten-year term . the company incurred approximately $ 4 million of debt issuance costs , which are being amortized over ten years . at december 31 , 2013 , $ 2 million of unamortized debt issuance costs was included in other assets on the consolidated statement of financial condition . 13 . commitments and contingencies operating lease commitments the company leases its primary office spaces under agreements that expire through 2035 . future minimum commitments under these operating leases are as follows : ( in millions ) .

Table:
Year       | Amount
2014       | $135  
2015       | 127   
2016       | 110   
2017       | 109   
2018       | 106   
Thereafter | 699   
Total      | $1,286

rent expense and certain office equipment expense under agreements amounted to $ 137 million , $ 133 million and $ 154 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . investment commitments . at december 31 , 2013 , the company had $ 216 million of various capital commitments to fund sponsored investment funds , including funds of private equity funds , real estate funds , infrastructure funds , opportunistic funds and distressed credit funds . this amount excludes additional commitments made by consolidated funds of funds to underlying third-party funds as third-party noncontrolling interest holders have the legal obligation to fund the respective commitments of such funds of funds . generally , the timing of the funding of these commitments is unknown and the commitments are callable on demand at any time prior to the expiration of the commitment . these unfunded commitments are not recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition . these commitments do not include potential future commitments approved by the company , but which are not yet legally binding . the company intends to make additional capital commitments from time to time to fund additional investment products for , and with , its clients . contingencies contingent payments . the company acts as the portfolio manager in a series of credit default swap transactions and has a maximum potential exposure of $ 17 million under a credit default swap between the company and counterparty . see note 7 , derivatives and hedging , for further discussion . contingent payments related to business acquisitions . in connection with the credit suisse etf transaction , blackrock is required to make contingent payments annually to credit suisse , subject to achieving specified thresholds during a seven-year period , subsequent to the acquisition date . in addition , blackrock is required to make contingent payments related to the mgpa transaction during a five-year period , subject to achieving specified thresholds , subsequent to the acquisition date . the fair value of the contingent payments at december 31 , 2013 is not significant to the consolidated statement of financial condition and is included in other liabilities . legal proceedings . from time to time , blackrock receives subpoenas or other requests for information from various u.s . federal , state governmental and domestic and international regulatory authorities in connection with certain industry-wide or other investigations or proceedings . it is blackrock 2019s policy to cooperate fully with such inquiries . the company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various legal actions , including arbitrations and other litigation arising in connection with blackrock 2019s activities . additionally , certain blackrock- sponsored investment funds that the company manages are subject to lawsuits , any of which potentially could harm the investment returns of the applicable fund or result in the company being liable to the funds for any resulting damages . management , after consultation with legal counsel , currently does not anticipate that the aggregate liability , if any , arising out of regulatory matters or lawsuits will have a material effect on blackrock 2019s results of operations , financial position , or cash flows . however , there is no assurance as to whether any such pending or threatened matters will have a material effect on blackrock 2019s results of operations , financial position or cash flows in any future reporting period . due to uncertainties surrounding the outcome of these matters , management cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss that may arise from these matters . indemnifications . in the ordinary course of business or in connection with certain acquisition agreements , blackrock enters into contracts pursuant to which it may agree to indemnify third parties in certain circumstances . the terms of these indemnities vary from contract to contract and the amount of indemnification liability , if any , cannot be determined or the likelihood of any liability is considered remote . consequently , no liability has been recorded on the consolidated statement of financial condition . in connection with securities lending transactions , blackrock has issued certain indemnifications to certain securities lending clients against potential loss resulting from a borrower 2019s failure to fulfill its obligations under the securities lending agreement should the value of the collateral pledged by the borrower at the time of default be insufficient to cover the borrower 2019s obligation under the securities lending agreement . at december 31 , 2013 , the company indemnified certain of its clients for their securities lending loan balances of approximately $ 118.3 billion . the company held as agent , cash and securities totaling $ 124.6 billion as collateral for indemnified securities on loan at december 31 , 2013 . the fair value of these indemnifications was not material at december 31 , 2013. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what are the future minimum commitments under the operating leases in 2014 as a percentage of the total future minimum commitments?
Choices: 0.10498, 0.08554, 0.09689, 0.19313, 0.10653
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the total future minimum commitments. 2. Identify the future minimum commitments for 2014. 3. Divide the future minimum commitments for 2014 by the total future minimum commitments. 4. Convert the decimal to a percentage. 5. Round the percentage to 5 decimal places. 6. Compare the result to the given choices. 7. Select the correct answer. 8. Provide the answer in the format specified. 9. Repeat the process for the other years if necessary. 10. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 11. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 12. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 13. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 14. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 15. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 16. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 17. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 18. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 19. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 20. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 21. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 22. Provide theAnswer the question."," 

A: 0.10498"
"Question: 
new term loan a facility , with the remaining unpaid principal amount of loans under the new term loan a facility due and payable in full at maturity on june 6 , 2021 . principal amounts outstanding under the new revolving loan facility are due and payable in full at maturity on june 6 , 2021 , subject to earlier repayment pursuant to the springing maturity date described above . in addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under the borrowings , we are obligated to pay a quarterly commitment fee at a rate determined by reference to a total leverage ratio , with a maximum commitment fee of 40% ( 40 % ) of the applicable margin for eurocurrency loans . in july 2016 , breakaway four , ltd. , as borrower , and nclc , as guarantor , entered into a supplemental agreement , which amended the breakaway four loan to , among other things , increase the aggregate principal amount of commitments under the multi-draw term loan credit facility from 20ac590.5 million to 20ac729.9 million . in june 2016 , we took delivery of seven seas explorer . to finance the payment due upon delivery , we had export credit financing in place for 80% ( 80 % ) of the contract price . the associated $ 373.6 million term loan bears interest at 3.43% ( 3.43 % ) with a maturity date of june 30 , 2028 . principal and interest payments shall be paid semiannually . in december 2016 , nclc issued $ 700.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) senior unsecured notes due december 2021 ( the 201cnotes 201d ) in a private offering ( the 201coffering 201d ) at par . nclc used the net proceeds from the offering , after deducting the initial purchasers 2019 discount and estimated fees and expenses , together with cash on hand , to purchase its outstanding 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) senior notes due 2019 having an aggregate outstanding principal amount of $ 680 million . the redemption of the 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) senior notes due 2019 was completed in january 2017 . nclc will pay interest on the notes at 4.750% ( 4.750 % ) per annum , semiannually on june 15 and december 15 of each year , commencing on june 15 , 2017 , to holders of record at the close of business on the immediately preceding june 1 and december 1 , respectively . nclc may redeem the notes , in whole or part , at any time prior to december 15 , 2018 , at a price equal to 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount of the notes redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but not including , the redemption date and a 201cmake-whole premium . 201d nclc may redeem the notes , in whole or in part , on or after december 15 , 2018 , at the redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the notes . at any time ( which may be more than once ) on or prior to december 15 , 2018 , nclc may choose to redeem up to 40% ( 40 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of the notes at a redemption price equal to 104.750% ( 104.750 % ) of the face amount thereof with an amount equal to the net proceeds of one or more equity offerings , so long as at least 60% ( 60 % ) of the aggregate principal amount of the notes issued remains outstanding following such redemption . the indenture governing the notes contains covenants that limit nclc 2019s ability ( and its restricted subsidiaries 2019 ability ) to , among other things : ( i ) incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred shares ; ( ii ) pay dividends and make certain other restricted payments ; ( iii ) create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other distributions to nclc from its restricted subsidiaries ; ( iv ) create liens on certain assets to secure debt ; ( v ) make certain investments ; ( vi ) engage in transactions with affiliates ; ( vii ) engage in sales of assets and subsidiary stock ; and ( viii ) transfer all or substantially all of its assets or enter into merger or consolidation transactions . the indenture governing the notes also provides for events of default , which , if any of them occurs , would permit or require the principal , premium ( if any ) , interest and other monetary obligations on all of the then-outstanding notes to become due and payable immediately . interest expense , net for the year ended december 31 , 2016 was $ 276.9 million which included $ 34.7 million of amortization of deferred financing fees and a $ 27.7 million loss on extinguishment of debt . interest expense , net for the year ended december 31 , 2015 was $ 221.9 million which included $ 36.7 million of amortization of deferred financing fees and a $ 12.7 million loss on extinguishment of debt . interest expense , net for the year ended december 31 , 2014 was $ 151.8 million which included $ 32.3 million of amortization of deferred financing fees and $ 15.4 million of expenses related to financing transactions in connection with the acquisition of prestige . certain of our debt agreements contain covenants that , among other things , require us to maintain a minimum level of liquidity , as well as limit our net funded debt-to-capital ratio , maintain certain other ratios and restrict our ability to pay dividends . substantially all of our ships and other property and equipment are pledged as collateral for certain of our debt . we believe we were in compliance with these covenants as of december 31 , 2016 . the following are scheduled principal repayments on long-term debt including capital lease obligations as of december 31 , 2016 for each of the next five years ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
Year       | Amount    
2017       | $560,193  
2018       | 554,846   
2019       | 561,687   
2020       | 1,153,733 
2021       | 2,193,823 
Thereafter | 1,490,322 
Total      | $6,514,604

we had an accrued interest liability of $ 32.5 million and $ 34.2 million as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in december 2016 the nclc issued senior unsecured notes due december 2021 , what is the payment they will receive on december 2021?
Choices: 1433.25, 15436.84, 701.32, 48.25, 733.25
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the key information in the question. 2. Identify the key information in the data. 3. Determine the relationship between the key information in the question and the key information in the data. 4. Calculate the answer using the relationship identified in step 3. 5. Provide the answer. 6. Provide the step by step process. 7. Provide the answer. 8. Provide the step by step process. 9. Provide the answer. 10. Provide the step by step process. 11. Provide the answer. 12. Provide the step by step process. 13. Provide the answer. 14. Provide the step by step process. 15. Provide the answer. 16. Provide the step by step process. 17. Provide the answer. 18. Provide the step by step process. 19. Provide the answer. 20. Provide the step by step process. 21. Provide the answer. 22. Provide the step by step process. 23. Provide the answer. 24. Provide the step by step process. 25. Provide the answer. 26. Provide the step by step process. 27. Provide the answer. 28. ProvideAnswer the question."," 

A: 733.25"
"Question: 
the following details the impairment charge resulting from our review ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
                        | Year Ended May 31, 2009
Goodwill                | $136,800               
Trademark               | 10,000                 
Other long-lived assets | 864                    
Total                   | $147,664               

net income attributable to noncontrolling interests , net of tax noncontrolling interest , net of tax increased $ 28.9 million from $ 8.1 million fiscal 2008 . the increase was primarily related to our acquisition of a 51% ( 51 % ) majority interest in hsbc merchant services , llp on june 30 , net income attributable to global payments and diluted earnings per share during fiscal 2009 we reported net income of $ 37.2 million ( $ 0.46 diluted earnings per share ) . liquidity and capital resources a significant portion of our liquidity comes from operating cash flows , which are generally sufficient to fund operations , planned capital expenditures , debt service and various strategic investments in our business . cash flow from operations is used to make planned capital investments in our business , to pursue acquisitions that meet our corporate objectives , to pay dividends , and to pay off debt and repurchase our shares at the discretion of our board of directors . accumulated cash balances are invested in high-quality and marketable short term instruments . our capital plan objectives are to support the company 2019s operational needs and strategic plan for long term growth while maintaining a low cost of capital . lines of credit are used in certain of our markets to fund settlement and as a source of working capital and , along with other bank financing , to fund acquisitions . we regularly evaluate our liquidity and capital position relative to cash requirements , and we may elect to raise additional funds in the future , either through the issuance of debt , equity or otherwise . at may 31 , 2010 , we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $ 769.9 million . of this amount , we consider $ 268.1 million to be available cash , which generally excludes settlement related and merchant reserve cash balances . settlement related cash balances represent surplus funds that we hold on behalf of our member sponsors when the incoming amount from the card networks precedes the member sponsors 2019 funding obligation to the merchant . merchant reserve cash balances represent funds collected from our merchants that serve as collateral ( 201cmerchant reserves 201d ) to minimize contingent liabilities associated with any losses that may occur under the merchant agreement . at may 31 , 2010 , our cash and cash equivalents included $ 199.4 million related to merchant reserves . while this cash is not restricted in its use , we believe that designating this cash to collateralize merchant reserves strengthens our fiduciary standing with our member sponsors and is in accordance with the guidelines set by the card networks . see cash and cash equivalents and settlement processing assets and obligations under note 1 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional details . net cash provided by operating activities increased $ 82.8 million to $ 465.8 million for fiscal 2010 from the prior year . income from continuing operations increased $ 16.0 million and we had cash provided by changes in working capital of $ 60.2 million . the working capital change was primarily due to the change in net settlement processing assets and obligations of $ 80.3 million and the change in accounts receivable of $ 13.4 million , partially offset by the change .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what portion of the impairment charge is related to goodwill?
Choices: 1, 1.07942, 0.00041, 0.00011, 0.92643
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the total impairment charge. 2. Identify the portion of the impairment charge related to goodwill. 3. Calculate the percentage of the impairment charge related to goodwill. 4. Compare the calculated percentage to the given choices and select the correct answer. 5. Provide the final answer. 6. Provide the final answer. 7. Provide the final answer. 8. Provide the final answer. 9. Provide the final answer. 10. Provide the final answer. 11. Provide the final answer. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Provide the final answer. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Provide the final answer. 16. Provide the final answer. 17. Provide the final answer. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Provide the final answer. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Provide the final answer. 22. Provide the final answer. 23. Provide the final answer. 24. Provide the final answer. 25. Provide the final answer. 26. Provide the final answer. 27. Provide the final answer. 28. Provide the final answer. 29. Provide the final answer. 30Answer the question."," 

A: 0.92643"
"Question: 
cgmhi also has substantial borrowing arrangements consisting of facilities that cgmhi has been advised are available , but where no contractual lending obligation exists . these arrangements are reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure flexibility in meeting cgmhi 2019s short-term requirements . the company issues both fixed and variable rate debt in a range of currencies . it uses derivative contracts , primarily interest rate swaps , to effectively convert a portion of its fixed rate debt to variable rate debt and variable rate debt to fixed rate debt . the maturity structure of the derivatives generally corresponds to the maturity structure of the debt being hedged . in addition , the company uses other derivative contracts to manage the foreign exchange impact of certain debt issuances . at december 31 , 2008 , the company 2019s overall weighted average interest rate for long-term debt was 3.83% ( 3.83 % ) on a contractual basis and 4.19% ( 4.19 % ) including the effects of derivative contracts . aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities are as follows : in millions of dollars 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 thereafter .

Table:
<i>In millions of dollars</i>          | 2009    | 2010    | 2011    | 2012    | 2013    | Thereafter
Citigroup parent company               | $13,463 | $17,500 | $19,864 | $21,135 | $17,525 | $102,794  
Other Citigroup subsidiaries           | 55,853  | 16,198  | 18,607  | 2,718   | 4,248   | 11,691    
Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. | 1,524   | 2,352   | 1,487   | 2,893   | 392     | 11,975    
Citigroup Funding Inc.                 | 17,632  | 5,381   | 2,154   | 1,253   | 3,790   | 7,164     
Total                                  | $88,472 | $41,431 | $42,112 | $27,999 | $25,955 | $133,624  

long-term debt at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 includes $ 24060 million and $ 23756 million , respectively , of junior subordinated debt . the company formed statutory business trusts under the laws of the state of delaware . the trusts exist for the exclusive purposes of ( i ) issuing trust securities representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the trust ; ( ii ) investing the gross proceeds of the trust securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures ( subordinated debentures ) of its parent ; and ( iii ) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto . upon approval from the federal reserve , citigroup has the right to redeem these securities . citigroup has contractually agreed not to redeem or purchase ( i ) the 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xv before september 15 , 2056 , ( ii ) the 6.45% ( 6.45 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xvi before december 31 , 2046 , ( iii ) the 6.35% ( 6.35 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xvii before march 15 , 2057 , ( iv ) the 6.829% ( 6.829 % ) fixed rate/floating rate enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xviii before june 28 , 2047 , ( v ) the 7.250% ( 7.250 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xix before august 15 , 2047 , ( vi ) the 7.875% ( 7.875 % ) enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xx before december 15 , 2067 , and ( vii ) the 8.300% ( 8.300 % ) fixed rate/floating rate enhanced trust preferred securities of citigroup capital xxi before december 21 , 2067 unless certain conditions , described in exhibit 4.03 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on september 18 , 2006 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on november 28 , 2006 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on march 8 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on july 2 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.02 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on august 17 , 2007 , in exhibit 4.2 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on november 27 , 2007 , and in exhibit 4.2 to citigroup 2019s current report on form 8-k filed on december 21 , 2007 , respectively , are met . these agreements are for the benefit of the holders of citigroup 2019s 6.00% ( 6.00 % ) junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures due 2034 . citigroup owns all of the voting securities of these subsidiary trusts . these subsidiary trusts have no assets , operations , revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance , administration and repayment of the subsidiary trusts and the subsidiary trusts 2019 common securities . these subsidiary trusts 2019 obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by citigroup. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percentage of total aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities due in 2009 are related to citigroup funding inc . ?
Choices: 5.0177, -0.19929, 0.19929, 0.00017, 296.35121
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the total aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities. 2. Identify the amount of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities due in 2009. 3. Calculate the percentage of total aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities due in 2009 related to citigroup funding inc. by dividing the amount of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities due in 2009 by the total aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt obligations ( based on final maturity dates ) including trust preferred securities and multiplying by 100. 4. Convert the percentage to a decimal and multiply by 100 to get the percentage. 5. Round the percentage to 4 decimal places. 6. Compare the calculated percentage to the given choices and select the closest match. 7. If the calculated percentage is not listed as a choice, select the closest choice. 8. If the calculated percentage is negative, select the closest negative choice. 9. If the calculated percentage is zero, select the closest zero choice. 10. If theAnswer the question."," 

A: 0.19929"
"Question: 
ADJUSTED NET EARNINGS AND ADJUSTED EPS The terms adjusted net earnings and adjusted EPS do not have any standardized meaning under IFRS. Therefore, they are unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. We define adjusted net earnings as net earnings attributable to common shareholders before severance, acquisition and other costs, net mark-to-market losses (gains) on derivatives used to economically hedge equity settled share-based compensation plans, net losses (gains) on investments, early debt redemption costs and impairment charges, net of tax and NCI. We define adjusted EPS as adjusted net earnings per BCE common share. We use adjusted net earnings and adjusted EPS, and we believe that certain investors and analysts use these measures, among other ones, to assess the performance of our businesses without the effects of severance, acquisition and other costs, net mark-to-market losses (gains) on derivatives used to economically hedge equity settled share-based compensation plans, net losses (gains) on investments, early debt redemption costs and impairment charges, net of tax and NCI. We exclude these items because they affect the comparability of our financial results and could potentially distort the analysis of trends in business performance. Excluding these items does not imply they are non-recurring The most comparable IFRS financial measures are net earnings attributable to common shareholders and EPS. The following table is a reconciliation of net earnings attributable to common shareholders and EPS to adjusted net earnings on a consolidated basis and per BCE common share (adjusted EPS), respectively.

Table:
                                                                                                                          | 2019  |           | 2018  |          
                                                                                                                          | TOTAL | PER SHARE | TOTAL | PER SHARE
Net earnings attributable to common shareholders                                                                          | 3,040 | 3.37      | 2,785 | 3.10     
Severance, acquisition and other costs                                                                                    | 83    | 0.10      | 100   | 0.11     
Net mark-to-market losses (gains) on derivatives used to economically hedge equity settled share-based compensation plans | (101) | (0.11)    | 58    | 0.07     
Net (gains) losses on investments                                                                                         | 44    | 0.05      | 47    | 0.05     
Early debt redemption costs                                                                                               | 13    | 0.01      | 15    | 0.02     
Impairment charges                                                                                                        | 74    | 0.08      | 146   | 0.16     
Adjusted net earnings                                                                                                     | 3,153 | 3.50      | 3,151 | 3.51     



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total early debt redemption costs in 2018 and 2019?
Choices: 195, 28, 111, 26, 18
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the total early debt redemption costs in 2018. 2. Identify the total early debt redemption costs in 2019. 3. Compare the two values to determine the correct answer. 4. Select the correct answer from the choices provided. 5. Provide the final answer. 6. Provide the final answer. 7. Provide the final answer. 8. Provide the final answer. 9. Provide the final answer. 10. Provide the final answer. 11. Provide the final answer. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Provide the final answer. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Provide the final answer. 16. Provide the final answer. 17. Provide the final answer. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Provide the final answer. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Provide the final answer. 22. Provide the final answer. 23. Provide the final answer. 24. Provide the final answer. 25. Provide the final answer. 26. Provide the final answer. 27. Provide the final answer. 28. Provide the final answer. 29. Provide the final answer. Answer the question."," 

A: 28"
"Question: 
Unearned Revenue Unearned revenue as of the periods presented consisted of the following (table in millions): Unearned subscription and SaaS revenue is generally recognized over time as customers consume the services or ratably over the term of the subscription, commencing upon provisioning of the service. Previously, unearned subscription and SaaS revenue was allocated between unearned license revenue and unearned software maintenance revenue in prior periods and has been reclassified to conform with current period presentation. Unearned software maintenance revenue is attributable to VMware’s maintenance contracts and is generally recognized over time on a ratable basis over the contract duration. The weighted-average remaining contractual term as of January 31, 2020 was approximately two years. Unearned professional services revenue results primarily from prepaid professional services and is generally recognized as the services are performed. Total billings and revenue recognized during the year ended January 31, 2020, were $8.1 billion and $6.4 billion, respectively, and did not include amounts for performance obligations that were fully satisfied upon delivery, such as on-premise licenses. During the year ended January 31, 2020, VMware assumed $154 million in unearned revenue in the acquisition of Carbon Black, Inc. (“Carbon Black”). Total billings and revenue recognized during the year ended February 1, 2019, were $6.9 billion and $5.5 billion, respectively, and did not include amounts for performance obligations that were fully satisfied upon delivery, such as on-premise licenses. Revenue recognized during the year ended February 2, 2018 was $4.8 billion and did not include amounts for performance obligations that were fully satisfied upon delivery, such as on-premise licenses.

Table:
                                       | January 31, 2020 | February 1, 2019
Unearned license revenue               | $19              | $15             
Unearned subscription and SaaS revenue | 1,534            | 916             
Unearned software maintenance revenue  | 6,700            | 5,741           
Unearned professional services revenue | 1,015            | 767             
Total unearned revenue                 | $9,268           | $7,439          



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in unearned license revenue between 2019 and 2020?
Choices: 1519, 4, 5726, 76, 139
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data for the two years. 2. Identify the specific data point to be analyzed. 3. Calculate the difference between the two data points. 4. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 5. Repeat the process for the other data points. 6. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 7. Repeat the process for the other data points. 8. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 9. Repeat the process for the other data points. 10. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 11. Repeat the process for the other data points. 12. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 13. Repeat the process for the other data points. 14. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 15. Repeat the process for the other data points. 16. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 17. Repeat the process for the other data points. 18. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 19. Repeat the process for the other data points. 20. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 21. Repeat the process for theAnswer the question."," 

A: 4"
"Question: 
Note 6. Property and Equipment, Net Furniture and fixtures, computer software and equipment, leasehold improvements and real property are recorded at cost and presented net of depreciation. We record land at historical cost. During the application development phase, we record capitalized development costs in our construction in progress account and then reclass the asset to internal-use software when the project is ready for its intended use, which is usually when the code goes into production. Furniture, fixtures and office equipment and computer software and hardware are depreciated on a straight-line basis over lives ranging from three to five years. Internal-use software is amortized on a straight-line basis over a three-year period. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the lease terms or the asset lives. Real property is amortized on a straightline basis over lives ranging from 15 to 39 years. The components of property and equipment, net are as follows (in thousands): Depreciation expense related to property and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $5.9 million, $5.7 million and $5.4 million, respectively. Amortization expense related to internal-use software of $1.9 million, $0.8 million and $0.4 million was included in those expenses for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. We had no disposals and write-offs of property and equipment that impacted the consolidated statements of operations during the year ended December 31, 2019. Within the Alarm.com segment, we disposed of and wrote off $1.4 million and $0.8 million of capitalized costs to research and development expenses within the consolidated statements of operations primarily related to the design of internal-use software that no longer met the requirements for capitalization during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. In December 2019, we purchased land and a commercial building located in Liberty Lake, Washington for $5.1 million. Once renovations are complete, this building will be used by OpenEye for sales and training, research and development, warehousing and administrative purposes.

Table:
                                         | December 31, |         
                                         | 2019         | 2018    
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment | $5,604       | $4,102  
Computer software and hardware           | 17,767       | 16,228  
Internal-use software                    | 8,949        | 5,072   
Construction in progress                 | 4,232        | 3,790   
Leasehold improvements                   | 23,223       | 18,338  
Real property                            | 4,917        | 707     
Land                                     | 1,398        | 508     
Total property and equipment             | 66,090       | 48,745  
Accumulated depreciation                 | (27,542)     | (20,988)



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in leasehold improvements between 2018 and 2019?
Choices: 41561, 425863374, 89581130, 4885, 5456
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data needed to answer the question. 2. Determine the formula to calculate the change. 3. Plug in the numbers into the formula. 4. Solve the equation. 5. Interpret the results. 6. Provide the answer in the format requested. 7. Repeat the process for the other questions. 8. Provide the final answer. 9. Provide the final answer. 10. Provide the final answer. 11. Provide the final answer. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Provide the final answer. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Provide the final answer. 16. Provide the final answer. 17. Provide the final answer. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Provide the final answer. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Provide the final answer. 22. Provide the final answer. 23. Provide the final answer. 24. Provide the final answer. 25. Provide the final answer. 26. Provide the final answer. 27. Provide the final answer. 28. Provide the final answer. 29. Provide the final answer. 30. Provide the final answer. 31Answer the question."," 

A: 4885"
"Question: 
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2012 and that all dividends were reinvested . the information below is historical in nature and is not necessarily indicative of future performance . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2017 , we repurchased 37122405 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 110.50 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2017 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] .

Table:
Period                 | Total Number of Shares Purchased [a] | Average Price Paid Per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of a Publicly AnnouncedPlan or Program [b] | Maximum Number of Shares Remaining Under the Plan or Program [b]
Oct. 1 through Oct. 31 | 3,831,636                            | $113.61                      | 3,800,000                                                                           | 89,078,662                                                      
Nov. 1 through Nov. 30 | 3,005,225                            | 117.07                       | 2,937,410                                                                           | 86,141,252                                                      
Dec. 1 through Dec. 31 | 2,718,319                            | 130.76                       | 2,494,100                                                                           | 83,647,152                                                      
Total                  | 9,555,180                            | $119.58                      | 9,231,510                                                                           | N/A                                                             

[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 323670 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2020 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percent of the total shares purchased during the fourth quarter of 2017 were purchased in november?
Choices: 22982.75467, 28715465815500, 351.33722, 1, 0.31451
Steps to Follow 
 1. Calculate the total number of shares purchased during the fourth quarter of 2017. 2. Calculate the number of shares purchased in November. 3. Divide the number of shares purchased in November by the total number of shares purchased during the fourth quarter of 2017. 4. Multiply the result by 100 to get the percentage. 5. Round the result to 5 decimal places. 6. Compare the result to the given choices and select the correct one. 7. Provide the answer in the format specified in the question. 8. Repeat the process for each choice to ensure accuracy. 9. Select the correct answer based on the calculations. 10. Provide the final answer in the format specified in the question. 11. Double-check the calculations and the final answer for accuracy. 12. Provide the final answer in the format specified in the question. 13. Repeat the process for each choice to ensure accuracy. 14. Select the correct answer based on the calculations. 15. Provide the final answer in the format specified in the question. 16. Double-check the calculations and the final answer for accuracy. 17. Provide the final answer in the format specified in the question. 18. RepeatAnswer the question."," 

A: 0.31451"
"Question: 
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations: For the year ended September 30, 2019, the Company granted 33,000 nonvested shares to certain key employees, 55,000 nonvested shares to certain officers including 35,000 shares granted to the Chief Executive Officer, and 20,000 nonvested shares
to its non-employee directors. For the year ended September 30, 2018, the Company granted 12,000 nonvested shares to certain key employees, 40,000 nonvested shares to certain officers including 30,000 to its Chief Executive Officer and 20,000 nonvested
shares to its non-employee directors. The Company measures the fair value of nonvested stock awards based upon the market price of its common stock as of the date of grant. The Company used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value stock options. The Black-Scholes model requires the use of a number of assumptions including volatility of the Company’s stock price, the weighted average risk-free interest rate and the weighted average expected life of the options, at the time of grant. The expected dividend yield is equal to the divided per share declared, divided by the closing share price on the date the options were granted. All equity compensation awards granted for the years ended September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018 were nonvested stock awards.

Table:
                                    | Years Ended            |                   
                                    | September 30, 2019     | September 30, 2018
                                    | (Amounts in thousands) |                   
Cost of sales                       | $7                     | $5                
Engineering and development         | 49                     | 32                
Selling, general and administrative | 736                    | 654               
Total                               | $792                   | $691              



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total stock based compensation expense on non-cost of sales related activities?
Choices: 0, 785, 787, 23, 799
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the non-cost of sales related activities. 2. Identify the stock based compensation expense for each non-cost of sales related activity. 3. Sum the stock based compensation expense for each non-cost of sales related activity. 4. The total stock based compensation expense on non-cost of sales related activities is the sum of the stock based compensation expense for each non-cost of sales related activity. 5. The total stock based compensation expense on non-cost of sales related activities is the sum of the stock based compensation expense for each non-cost of sales related activity. 6. The total stock based compensation expense on non-cost of sales related activities is the sum of the stock based compensation expense for each non-cost of sales related activity. 7. The total stock based compensation expense on non-cost of sales related activities is the sum of the stock based compensation expense for each non-cost of sales related activity. 8. The total stock based compensation expense on non-cost of sales related activities is the sum of the stock based compensation expense for each non-cost of sales related activity. 9. The total stock based compensation expense on non-cost of sales related activities is the sum of the stock based compensation expense for each non-cost of sales related activity. 10. TheAnswer the question."," 

A: 785"
"Question: 
part i item 1 entergy corporation , domestic utility companies , and system energy entergy louisiana holds non-exclusive franchises to provide electric service in approximately 116 incorporated louisiana municipalities . most of these franchises have 25-year terms , although six of these municipalities have granted 60-year franchises . entergy louisiana also supplies electric service in approximately 353 unincorporated communities , all of which are located in louisiana parishes in which it holds non-exclusive franchises . entergy mississippi has received from the mpsc certificates of public convenience and necessity to provide electric service to areas within 45 counties , including a number of municipalities , in western mississippi . under mississippi statutory law , such certificates are exclusive . entergy mississippi may continue to serve in such municipalities upon payment of a statutory franchise fee , regardless of whether an original municipal franchise is still in existence . entergy new orleans provides electric and gas service in the city of new orleans pursuant to city ordinances ( except electric service in algiers , which is provided by entergy louisiana ) . these ordinances contain a continuing option for the city of new orleans to purchase entergy new orleans' electric and gas utility properties . the business of system energy is limited to wholesale power sales . it has no distribution franchises . property and other generation resources generating stations the total capability of the generating stations owned and leased by the domestic utility companies and system energy as of december 31 , 2004 , is indicated below: .

Table:
                    | Owned and Leased Capability MW(1) |         |         |       |      
Company             | Total                             | Gas/Oil | Nuclear | Coal  | Hydro
Entergy Arkansas    | 4,709                             | 1,613   | 1,837   | 1,189 | 70   
Entergy Gulf States | 6,485                             | 4,890   | 968     | 627   | -    
Entergy Louisiana   | 5,363                             | 4,276   | 1,087   | -     | -    
Entergy Mississippi | 2,898                             | 2,490   | -       | 408   | -    
Entergy New Orleans | 915                               | 915     | -       | -     | -    
System Energy       | 1,143                             | -       | 1,143   | -     | -    
Total               | 21,513                            | 14,184  | 5,035   | 2,224 | 70   

( 1 ) ""owned and leased capability"" is the dependable load carrying capability as demonstrated under actual operating conditions based on the primary fuel ( assuming no curtailments ) that each station was designed to utilize . entergy's load and capacity projections are reviewed periodically to assess the need and timing for additional generating capacity and interconnections . these reviews consider existing and projected demand , the availability and price of power , the location of new loads , and economy . peak load in the u.s . utility service territory is typically around 21000 mw , with minimum load typically around 9000 mw . allowing for an adequate reserve margin , entergy has been short approximately 3000 mw during the summer peak load period . in addition to its net short position at summer peak , entergy considers its generation in three categories : ( 1 ) baseload ( e.g . coal and nuclear ) ; ( 2 ) load-following ( e.g . combined cycle gas-fired ) ; and ( 3 ) peaking . the relative supply and demand for these categories of generation vary by region of the entergy system . for example , the north end of its system has more baseload coal and nuclear generation than regional demand requires , but is short load-following or intermediate generation . in the south end of the entergy system , load would be more effectively served if gas- fired intermediate resources already in place were supplemented with additional solid fuel baseload generation. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what portion of total capability of entergy corporation is generated by entergy arkansas?
Choices: -16804, 0.21889, 67.27143, 0.33199, 5.14645
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the total capability of the generating stations owned and leased by the domestic utility companies and system energy. 2. Identify the capability of the generating stations owned and leased by entergy arkansas. 3. Divide the capability of the generating stations owned and leased by entergy arkansas by the total capability of the generating stations owned and leased by the domestic utility companies and system energy. 4. Convert the decimal to a percentage. 5. Round the percentage to three decimal places. 6. Compare the result to the given choices. 7. Select the choice that matches the result. 8. Provide the answer. 9. Repeat the process for each company. 10. Provide the final answer. 11. Provide the final answer. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Provide the final answer. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Provide the final answer. 16. Provide the final answer. 17. Provide the final answer. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Provide the final answer. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Provide the final answer. 22. Provide the final answer. 23. Provide the final answer. 24. ProvideAnswer the question."," 

A: 0.21889"
"Question: 
the company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the majority of these non-structured liabilities are a result of the company 2019s election of the fair-value option for liabilities associated with the citi-advised structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) , which were consolidated during the fourth quarter of 2007 . the change in fair values of the sivs 2019 liabilities reported in earnings was $ 2.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . for these non-structured liabilities the aggregate fair value is $ 263 million lower than the aggregate unpaid principal balance as of december 31 , 2008 . for all other non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 97 million as of december 31 , 2008 while the aggregate fair value exceeded the aggregate unpaid principal by $ 112 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the change in fair value of these non-structured liabilities reported a gain of $ 1.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for- sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . this election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased on or after september 1 , 2007 . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value : in millions of dollars december 31 , december 31 , carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 4273 $ 6392 aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance $ 138 $ 136 balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 9 $ 17 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 2 $ 2014 the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans is reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the year ended december 31 , 2008 due to instrument- specific credit risk resulted in a $ 32 million loss . the change in fair value during 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk was immaterial . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . items selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with sfas 155 and sfas 156 certain hybrid financial instruments the company has elected to apply fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for certain hybrid financial assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate , foreign exchange or inflation ( e.g. , equity , credit or commodity risks ) . in addition , the company has elected fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for residual interests retained from securitizing certain financial assets . the company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis . in addition , the accounting for these instruments is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivatives from the host contracts and accounting for each separately . the hybrid financial instruments are classified as trading account assets , loans , deposits , trading account liabilities ( for prepaid derivatives ) , short-term borrowings or long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form , while residual interests in certain securitizations are classified as trading account assets . for hybrid financial instruments for which fair-value accounting has been elected under sfas 155 and that are classified as long-term debt , the aggregate unpaid principal exceeds the aggregate fair value by $ 1.9 billion as of december 31 , 2008 , while the aggregate fair value exceeds the aggregate unpaid principal balance by $ 460 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the difference for those instruments classified as loans is immaterial . changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments , which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest , are recorded in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately from the change in fair value as interest revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value in accordance with sfas 156 . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward- purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 on page 175 for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 5.7 billion and $ 8.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income. .

Table:
<i>In millions of dollars</i>                                                                                       | December 31, 2008 | December 31, 2007
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet                                                          | $4,273            | $6,392           
Aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance                                                          | $138              | $136             
Balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due                                                    | $9                | $17              
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue | $2                | $—               

the company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings . the election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications . these positions are reported in short-term borrowings and long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet . the majority of these non-structured liabilities are a result of the company 2019s election of the fair-value option for liabilities associated with the citi-advised structured investment vehicles ( sivs ) , which were consolidated during the fourth quarter of 2007 . the change in fair values of the sivs 2019 liabilities reported in earnings was $ 2.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . for these non-structured liabilities the aggregate fair value is $ 263 million lower than the aggregate unpaid principal balance as of december 31 , 2008 . for all other non-structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 97 million as of december 31 , 2008 while the aggregate fair value exceeded the aggregate unpaid principal by $ 112 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the change in fair value of these non-structured liabilities reported a gain of $ 1.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain mortgage loans citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for- sale . these loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments . the company has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . the fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment , as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments . this election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased on or after september 1 , 2007 . the following table provides information about certain mortgage loans carried at fair value : in millions of dollars december 31 , december 31 , carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 4273 $ 6392 aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance $ 138 $ 136 balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 9 $ 17 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 2 $ 2014 the changes in fair values of these mortgage loans is reported in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . the changes in fair value during the year ended december 31 , 2008 due to instrument- specific credit risk resulted in a $ 32 million loss . the change in fair value during 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk was immaterial . related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . items selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with sfas 155 and sfas 156 certain hybrid financial instruments the company has elected to apply fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for certain hybrid financial assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate , foreign exchange or inflation ( e.g. , equity , credit or commodity risks ) . in addition , the company has elected fair-value accounting under sfas 155 for residual interests retained from securitizing certain financial assets . the company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis . in addition , the accounting for these instruments is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivatives from the host contracts and accounting for each separately . the hybrid financial instruments are classified as trading account assets , loans , deposits , trading account liabilities ( for prepaid derivatives ) , short-term borrowings or long-term debt on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form , while residual interests in certain securitizations are classified as trading account assets . for hybrid financial instruments for which fair-value accounting has been elected under sfas 155 and that are classified as long-term debt , the aggregate unpaid principal exceeds the aggregate fair value by $ 1.9 billion as of december 31 , 2008 , while the aggregate fair value exceeds the aggregate unpaid principal balance by $ 460 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the difference for those instruments classified as loans is immaterial . changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments , which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest , are recorded in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately from the change in fair value as interest revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . mortgage servicing rights the company accounts for mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value in accordance with sfas 156 . fair value for msrs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach . this approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates . the model assumptions used in the valuation of msrs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates . the fair value of msrs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates . in managing this risk , the company hedges a significant portion of the values of its msrs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts , forward- purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities , and purchased securities classified as trading . see note 23 on page 175 for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of msrs . these msrs , which totaled $ 5.7 billion and $ 8.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are classified as mortgage servicing rights on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of msrs are recorded in commissions and fees in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage change in the fair value of the msr from 2007 to 2008
Choices: -0.4959, -0.97872, -10.54229, -0.33151, -13.58333
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the fair value of the msr in 2007. 2. Identify the fair value of the msr in 2008. 3. Calculate the percentage change in fair value. 4. Determine the percentage change in fair value from 2007 to 2008. 5. Identify the correct answer from the choices provided. 6. Provide the final answer. 7. Repeat the process for the other questions. 8. Provide the final answer. 9. Repeat the process for the other questions. 10. Provide the final answer. 11. Repeat the process for the other questions. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Repeat the process for the other questions. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Repeat the process for the other questions. 16. Provide the final answer. 17. Repeat the process for the other questions. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Repeat the process for the other questions. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Repeat the process for the other questions. 22. Provide the final answer. 23. Repeat the process for the other questions. 24. Provide the final answer. 25.Answer the question."," 

A: -0.33151"
"Question: 
marketing we are a supplier of gasoline and distillates to resellers and consumers within our market area in the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states . in 2007 , our refined products sales volumes totaled 21.6 billion gallons , or 1.410 mmbpd . the average sales price of our refined products in aggregate was $ 86.53 per barrel for 2007 . the following table sets forth our refined products sales by product group and our average sales price for each of the last three years . refined product sales ( thousands of barrels per day ) 2007 2006 2005 .

Table:
<i>(Thousands of barrels per day)</i>           | 2007   | 2006   | 2005  
Gasoline                                        | 791    | 804    | 836   
Distillates                                     | 377    | 375    | 385   
Propane                                         | 23     | 23     | 22    
Feedstocks and Special Products                 | 103    | 106    | 96    
Heavy Fuel Oil                                  | 29     | 26     | 29    
Asphalt                                         | 87     | 91     | 87    
TOTAL<sup>(a)</sup>                             | 1,410  | 1,425  | 1,455 
<i>Average sales price (Dollars per barrel)</i> | $86.53 | $77.76 | $66.42

total ( a ) 1410 1425 1455 average sales price ( dollars per barrel ) $ 86.53 $ 77.76 $ 66.42 ( a ) includes matching buy/sell volumes of 24 mbpd and 77 mbpd in 2006 and 2005 . on april 1 , 2006 , we changed our accounting for matching buy/sell arrangements as a result of a new accounting standard . this change resulted in lower refined products sales volumes for 2007 and the remainder of 2006 than would have been reported under our previous accounting practices . see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements . the wholesale distribution of petroleum products to private brand marketers and to large commercial and industrial consumers and sales in the spot market accounted for 69 percent of our refined products sales volumes in 2007 . we sold 49 percent of our gasoline volumes and 89 percent of our distillates volumes on a wholesale or spot market basis . half of our propane is sold into the home heating market , with the balance being purchased by industrial consumers . propylene , cumene , aromatics , aliphatics and sulfur are domestically marketed to customers in the chemical industry . base lube oils , maleic anhydride , slack wax , extract and pitch are sold throughout the united states and canada , with pitch products also being exported worldwide . we market asphalt through owned and leased terminals throughout the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states . our customer base includes approximately 750 asphalt-paving contractors , government entities ( states , counties , cities and townships ) and asphalt roofing shingle manufacturers . we have blended ethanol with gasoline for over 15 years and increased our blending program in 2007 , in part due to renewable fuel mandates . we blended 41 mbpd of ethanol into gasoline in 2007 and 35 mbpd in both 2006 and 2005 . the future expansion or contraction of our ethanol blending program will be driven by the economics of the ethanol supply and changes in government regulations . we sell reformulated gasoline in parts of our marketing territory , primarily chicago , illinois ; louisville , kentucky ; northern kentucky ; milwaukee , wisconsin and hartford , illinois , and we sell low-vapor-pressure gasoline in nine states . we also sell biodiesel in minnesota , illinois and kentucky . as of december 31 , 2007 , we supplied petroleum products to about 4400 marathon branded-retail outlets located primarily in ohio , michigan , indiana , kentucky and illinois . branded retail outlets are also located in georgia , florida , minnesota , wisconsin , north carolina , tennessee , west virginia , virginia , south carolina , alabama , pennsylvania , and texas . sales to marathon-brand jobbers and dealers accounted for 16 percent of our refined product sales volumes in 2007 . speedway superamerica llc ( 201cssa 201d ) , our wholly-owned subsidiary , sells gasoline and diesel fuel primarily through retail outlets that we operate . sales of refined products through these ssa retail outlets accounted for 15 percent of our refined products sales volumes in 2007 . as of december 31 , 2007 , ssa had 1636 retail outlets in nine states that sold petroleum products and convenience store merchandise and services , primarily under the brand names 201cspeedway 201d and 201csuperamerica . 201d ssa 2019s revenues from the sale of non-petroleum merchandise totaled $ 2.796 billion in 2007 , compared with $ 2.706 billion in 2006 . profit levels from the sale of such merchandise and services tend to be less volatile than profit levels from the retail sale of gasoline and diesel fuel . ssa also operates 59 valvoline instant oil change retail outlets located in michigan and northwest ohio . pilot travel centers llc ( 201cptc 201d ) , our joint venture with pilot corporation ( 201cpilot 201d ) , is the largest operator of travel centers in the united states with 286 locations in 37 states and canada at december 31 , 2007 . the travel centers offer diesel fuel , gasoline and a variety of other services , including on-premises brand-name restaurants at many locations . pilot and marathon each own a 50 percent interest in ptc. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the decline in matching buy/sell volumes in mbpd between 2006 and 2005?
Choices: -1.5, -53.0, -5, -53.8, -62
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the matching buy/sell volumes for 2006 and 2005. 2. Subtract the 2005 matching buy/sell volumes from the 2006 matching buy/sell volumes. 3. Convert the result to mbpd. 4. Determine the decline in matching buy/sell volumes in mbpd between 2006 and 2005. 5. Select the correct answer from the choices provided. 6. Provide the final answer. 7. Provide the final answer. 8. Provide the final answer. 9. Provide the final answer. 10. Provide the final answer. 11. Provide the final answer. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Provide the final answer. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Provide the final answer. 16. Provide the final answer. 17. Provide the final answer. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Provide the final answer. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Provide the final answer. 22. Provide the final answer. 23. Provide the final answer. 24. Provide the final answer. 25. Provide the final answer. 26. Provide the final answerAnswer the question."," 

A: -53.0"
"Question: 
NOTE 7. INVENTORIES The following table details the components of inventories (in thousands).

Table:
               | December 31 |      
               | 2019        | 2018 
Finished goods | $698        | $853 
Raw materials  | 90          | 3    
Packaging      | 110         | 102  
Inventories    | $ 898       | $ 958



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average value of finished goods in 2018 and 2019?
Choices: 1, 517, -775.5, 1.7, 775.5
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the value of finished goods in 2018. 2. Identify the value of finished goods in 2019. 3. Add the two values together. 4. Divide the sum by 2. 5. The result is the average value of finished goods in 2018 and 2019. 6. Compare the result to the choices provided. 7. Select the correct answer. 8. Provide the answer in the format: ""The answer is (answer choice)."" 9. Provide the answer in the format: ""The answer is (answer choice)."" 10. Provide the answer in the format: ""The answer is (answer choice)."" 11. Provide the answer in the format: ""The answer is (answer choice)."" 12. Provide the answer in the format: ""The answer is (answer choice)."" 13. Provide the answer in the format: ""The answer is (answer choice)."" 14. Provide the answer in the format: ""The answer is (answer choice)."" 15. Provide the answer in the format: ""The answer is (answer choice)."" 16. Provide the answer in the format: ""The answer is (answer choice)."" 17. Provide the answer inAnswer the question."," 

A: 775.5"
"Question: 
Statement of financial position Guarantees entered into by the parent entity in relation to the debts of its subsidiaries Altium Limited has provided financial guarantees in respect of credit card facilities and office leases amounting to US$261,518 (2018: US$283,752). Contingent liabilities The parent entity had no contingent liabilities as at 30 June 2019 and 30 June 2018. Capital commitments - Property, plant and equipment The parent entity had no capital commitments for property, plant and equipment at as 30 June 2019 and 30 June 2018. The accounting policies of the parent entity are consistent with those of the Group, as disclosed in the relevant notes to the financial statements.

Table:
Parent                      |         |        
                            | 2019    | 2018   
                            | US$’000 | US$’000
Total current assets        | 121,041 | 73,202 
Total assets                | 383,665 | 336,032
Total current liabilities   | 154,619 | 90,392 
Total liabilities           | 155,521 | 92,364 
Equity                      |         |        
Contributed equity          | 126,058 | 125,635
Foreign currency reserve    | 2,607   | 2,783  
Equity compensation reserve | 19,561  | 12,570 
Retained profits            | 79,918  | 102,680
Total equity                | 228,144 | 243,668



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in current ratio from 2018 to 2019?
Choices: -0.45, -33578.81, -3421602.4, -2439.28, -0.03
Steps to Follow 
 1. Find the current ratio for 2019. 2. Find the current ratio for 2018. 3. Subtract the current ratio for 2018 from the current ratio for 2019. 4. Divide the result by the current ratio for 2018. 5. Interpret the result. 6. Choose the correct answer from the choices provided. 7. Provide the answer in the format specified. 8. Repeat the process for the other questions. 9. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 10. Repeat the process for the other questions. 11. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 12. Repeat the process for the other questions. 13. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 14. Repeat the process for the other questions. 15. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 16. Repeat the process for the other questions. 17. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 18. Repeat the process for the other questions. 19. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 20. Repeat the process for the other questions. 21. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 22. Repeat the processAnswer the question."," 

A: -0.03"
"Question: 
operating expenses millions 2013 2012 2011 % (  % ) change 2013 v 2012 % (  % ) change 2012 v 2011 .

Table:
<i>Millions</i>                  | <i>2013</i> | <i>2012</i> | <i>2011</i> | <i>% Change 2013 v 2012</i> | <i>% Change 2012 v 2011</i>
Compensation and benefits        | $4,807      | $4,685      | $4,681      | 3 %                         | -%                         
Fuel                             | 3,534       | 3,608       | 3,581       | (2)                         | 1                          
Purchased services and materials | 2,315       | 2,143       | 2,005       | 8                           | 7                          
Depreciation                     | 1,777       | 1,760       | 1,617       | 1                           | 9                          
Equipment and other rents        | 1,235       | 1,197       | 1,167       | 3                           | 3                          
Other                            | 849         | 788         | 782         | 8                           | 1                          
Total                            | $14,517     | $14,181     | $13,833     | 2 %                         | 3%                         

operating expenses increased $ 336 million in 2013 versus 2012 . wage and benefit inflation , new logistics management fees and container costs for our automotive business , locomotive overhauls , property taxes and repairs on jointly owned property contributed to higher expenses during the year . lower fuel prices partially offset the cost increases . operating expenses increased $ 348 million in 2012 versus 2011 . depreciation , wage and benefit inflation , higher fuel prices and volume- related trucking services purchased by our logistics subsidiaries , contributed to higher expenses during the year . efficiency gains , volume related fuel savings ( 2% ( 2 % ) fewer gallons of fuel consumed ) and $ 38 million of weather related expenses in 2011 , which favorably affects the comparison , partially offset the cost increase . compensation and benefits 2013 compensation and benefits include wages , payroll taxes , health and welfare costs , pension costs , other postretirement benefits , and incentive costs . general wages and benefits inflation , higher work force levels and increased pension and other postretirement benefits drove the increases in 2013 versus 2012 . the impact of ongoing productivity initiatives partially offset these increases . expenses in 2012 were essentially flat versus 2011 as operational improvements and cost reductions offset general wage and benefit inflation and higher pension and other postretirement benefits . in addition , weather related costs increased these expenses in 2011 . fuel 2013 fuel includes locomotive fuel and gasoline for highway and non-highway vehicles and heavy equipment . lower locomotive diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 3.15 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2013 , compared to $ 3.22 in 2012 , decreased expenses by $ 75 million . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , decreased 1% ( 1 % ) while the fuel consumption rate , computed as gallons of fuel consumed divided by gross ton-miles , increased 2% ( 2 % ) compared to 2012 . declines in heavier , more fuel-efficient coal shipments drove the variances in gross-ton-miles and the fuel consumption rate . higher locomotive diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 3.22 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2012 , compared to $ 3.12 in 2011 , increased expenses by $ 105 million . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , decreased 2% ( 2 % ) in 2012 versus 2011 , driving expense down . the fuel consumption rate was flat year-over-year . purchased services and materials 2013 expense for purchased services and materials includes the costs of services purchased from outside contractors and other service providers ( including equipment maintenance and contract expenses incurred by our subsidiaries for external transportation services ) ; materials used to maintain the railroad 2019s lines , structures , and equipment ; costs of operating facilities jointly used by uprr and other railroads ; transportation and lodging for train crew employees ; trucking and contracting costs for intermodal containers ; leased automobile maintenance expenses ; and tools and 2013 operating expenses .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percentage of total operating expenses was fuel in 2012?
Choices: 0.25442, 120266.66667, 51165048, 0.24854, 3608.25442
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the total operating expenses for 2012. 2. Identify the fuel expenses for 2012. 3. Divide the fuel expenses by the total operating expenses. 4. Convert the decimal to a percentage. 5. Round the percentage to the nearest hundredth. 6. Compare the calculated percentage to the given choices. 7. Select the correct answer. 8. Provide the answer in the format specified. 9. Repeat the process for 2013. 10. Repeat the process for 2011. 11. Repeat the process for 2012. 12. Repeat the process for 2011. 13. Repeat the process for 2012. 14. Repeat the process for 2011. 15. Repeat the process for 2012. 16. Repeat the process for 2011. 17. Repeat the process for 2012. 18. Repeat the process for 2011. 19. Repeat the process for 2012. 20. Repeat the process for 2011. 21. Repeat the process for 2012. 22. Repeat the process for 2011. 23. Repeat the process for 2012.Answer the question."," 

A: 0.25442"
"Question: 
republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the activity in our gross unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended december 31: .

Table:
                                                                            | 2015   | 2014  | 2013  
Balance at beginning of year                                                | $70.1  | $72.0 | $84.7 
Additions based on tax positions related to current year                    | 0.2    | 0.8   | 0.3   
Additions for tax positions of prior years                                  | 1.4    | 5.0   | 11.4  
Reductions for tax positions of prior years                                 | (10.2) | (6.0) | (2.4) 
Reductions for tax positions resulting from lapse of statute of limitations | (0.6)  | (0.2) | (1.3) 
Settlements                                                                 | (13.9) | (1.5) | (20.7)
Balance at end of year                                                      | $47.0  | $70.1 | $72.0 

during 2015 , we settled tax matters in various states and puerto rico which reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 13.9 million . during 2014 , we settled tax matters in various jurisdictions and reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 1.5 million . during 2013 , we settled with the irs appeals division and the joint committee on taxation our 2009 and 2010 tax years . the resolution of these tax periods in addition to various state tax resolutions during the year reduced our gross unrecognized tax benefits by $ 20.7 million . included in our gross unrecognized tax benefits as of december 31 , 2015 and 2014 are $ 30.5 million and $ 45.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits ( net of the federal benefit on state matters ) that , if recognized , would affect our effective income tax rate in future periods . we recognize interest and penalties as incurred within the provision for income taxes in our consolidated statements of income . related to the unrecognized tax benefits previously noted , we recorded interest expense of approximately $ 1.2 million during 2015 and , in total as of december 31 , 2015 , have recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 10.3 million . during 2014 , we accrued interest of approximately $ 1.5 million and , in total as of december 31 , 2014 , had recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 18.7 million . during 2013 , we accrued interest of approximately $ 1.2 million and , in total as of december 31 , 2013 , had recognized a liability for penalties of $ 0.5 million and interest of $ 17.0 million . gross unrecognized benefits that we expect to settle in the following twelve months are in the range of $ 0 to $ 10 million ; however , it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits may either increase or decrease in the next twelve months . we are currently under examination or administrative review by state and local taxing authorities for various tax years . these state audits are ongoing . we believe the recorded liabilities for uncertain tax positions are adequate . however , a significant assessment against us in excess of the liabilities recorded could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. during 2013 , what was the ratio of the accrued interest $ 1.2 million to the recognized a interest liability interest of $ 17.0 million .
Choices: 14.16667, 0.01417, 8.33333, 15.58333, 0.82126
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the numerator and denominator of the ratio. 2. Divide the numerator by the denominator. 3. Calculate the ratio. 4. Provide the answer. 5. Repeat the process for the other choices. 6. Select the correct answer. 7. Provide the answer. 8. Repeat the process for the other choices. 9. Select the correct answer. 10. Provide the answer. 11. Repeat the process for the other choices. 12. Select the correct answer. 13. Provide the answer. 14. Repeat the process for the other choices. 15. Select the correct answer. 16. Provide the answer. 17. Repeat the process for the other choices. 18. Select the correct answer. 19. Provide the answer. 20. Repeat the process for the other choices. 21. Select the correct answer. 22. Provide the answer. 23. Repeat the process for the other choices. 24. Select the correct answer. 25. Provide the answer. 26. Repeat the process for the other choices. 27. Select the correct answer. 28. Provide the answer. 29. Repeat the process for the other choices. Answer the question."," 

A: 14.16667"
"Question: 
2018 Acquisition Wombat Security Technologies, Inc. On February 28, 2018 (the “Wombat Acquisition Date”), pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, the Company acquired all shares of Wombat Security Technologies, Inc. (“Wombat”), a leader for phishing simulation and security awareness computer-based training. By collecting data from Wombat’s PhishAlarm solution, the Company has access to data on phishing campaigns as seen by non-Company customers, providing broader visibility and insight to the Proofpoint Nexus platform. With this acquisition, the Company’s customers can leverage the industry’s first solution combining the Company’s advanced threat protection with Wombat’s phishing simulation and computer-based security awareness training. With the combined solutions, the Company’s customers can: use real detected phishing attacks for simulations, assessing users based on the threats that are actually targeting them; both investigate and take action on user-reporting phishing, leveraging orchestration and automation to find real attacks, quarantine emails in users’ inboxes, and lock user accounts to limit risk; and train users in the moment immediately after they click for both simulated and real phishing attacks. The Company also expects to achieve savings in corporate overhead costs for the combined entities. These factors, among others, contributed to a purchase price in excess of the estimated fair value of acquired net identifiable assets and, as a result, goodwill was recorded in connection with the acquisition. Proofpoint, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) (dollars and share amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) At the Wombat Acquisition Date, the consideration transferred was $225,366, net of cash acquired of $13,452. Per the terms of the merger agreement, unvested in-the-money stock options held by Wombat employees were canceled and paid off using the same amount per option as for the common share less applicable exercise price for each option. The fair value of $1,580 of these unvested options was attributed to pre-combination service and included in consideration transferred. The fair value of unvested options of $1,571 was allocated to post-combination services and expensed in the three months ended March 31, 2018. Also, as part of the merger agreement, 51 shares of the Company’s common stock were deferred for certain key employees with the total fair value of $5,458 (see Note 11 “Equity Award Plans”), which was not included in the purchase price. The deferred shares are subject to forfeiture if employment terminates prior to the lapse of the restrictions, and their fair value is expensed as stock-based compensation expense over the remaining service period. The following table summarizes the fair values of tangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed, intangible assets and goodwill:

Table:
                            | Fair value | Estimated Useful Life
                            |            | (in years)           
Current assets              | $23,344    | N/A                  
Fixed assets                | 954        | N/A                  
Customer relationships      | 37,800     | 7                    
Order backlog               | 6,800      | 2                    
Core/developed technology   | 35,200     | 4                    
Trade name                  | 2,400      | 4                    
Deferred revenue            | (14,700)   | N/A                  
Deferred tax liability, net | (14,725)   | N/A                  
Other liabilities           | (1,120)    | N/A                  
Goodwill                    | 162,865    | Indefinite           
                            | $238,818   |                      



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in estimated fair value between current assets and fixed assets?
Choices: 22270176, 0, 23293, 22390, -952
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the current assets and fixed assets from the table. 2. Determine the fair value of each. 3. Subtract the fair value of fixed assets from the fair value of current assets. 4. The difference is the answer. 5. The answer is 22,370,176. 6. The answer is 0. 7. The answer is 23,293. 8. The answer is 22,390. 9. The answer is -952. 10. The answer is 22,370,176. 11. The answer is 0. 12. The answer is 23,293. 13. The answer is 22,390. 14. The answer is -952. 15. The answer is 22,370,176. 16. The answer is 0. 17. The answer is 23,293. 18. The answer is 22,390. 19. The answer is -952. 20. The answer is 22,370,176. 21. The answer is 0. 22. The answer is 23,293. 23. The answer is 22,390. 24Answer the question."," 

A: 22390"
"Question: 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (in thousands, except for share and per share data) Following the enactment of the 2017 Tax Cut and Jobs Act and the associated one-time transition tax, in general, repatriation of foreign earnings to the US can be completed with no incremental US Tax. However, there are limited other taxes that continue to apply such as foreign withholding and certain state taxes. The company records a deferred tax liability for the estimated foreign earnings and state tax cost associated with the undistributed foreign earnings that are not permanently reinvested. The Tax Act also includes provisions for Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (“GILTI”) wherein taxes on foreign income are imposed in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets of foreign corporations. We elected to recognize the tax on GILTI as an expense in the period the tax is incurred. We recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position when it is more-likely-than-not, based on its technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not threshold is then measured to determine the amount of benefit to be recognized in the financial statements. As of December 31, 2019, we have approximately $5,016 of unrecognized tax benefits, which if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. We do not anticipate any significant changes in our unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending unrecognized tax benefits is provided below: Our continuing practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense. As of December 31, 2019, and 2018, $707 and $2,515, respectively, of interest and penalties were accrued. We are subject to taxation in the U.S., various states, and in non-U.S. jurisdictions. Our U.S. income tax returns are primarily subject to examination from 2016 through 2018; however, U.S. tax authorities also have the ability to review prior tax years to the extent loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards are utilized. The open years for the non-U.S. tax returns range from 2008 through 2018 based on local statutes.

Table:
                                                        | As of December 31, |        
                                                        | 2019               | 2018   
Balance at January 1                                    | $3,649             | $4,670 
Increase related to current year tax positions          | 2,834              | 55     
(Decrease) increase related to prior year tax positions | (10)               | 46     
Decrease related to lapse in statute of limitation      | (1,457)            | (1,076)
Decrease related to settlements with taxing authorities | —                  | (46)   
Balance at December 31                                  | $5,016             | $3,649 



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Increase related to current year tax positions between 2018 and 2019?
Choices: 2844, 0, -2182, 2889, 2779
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data that is relevant to the question. 2. Determine the change in the Increase related to current year tax positions between 2018 and 2019. 3. Calculate the difference between the two years. 4. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 5. Repeat the process for the other questions. 6. Provide the final answer. 7. Provide the final answer. 8. Provide the final answer. 9. Provide the final answer. 10. Provide the final answer. 11. Provide the final answer. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Provide the final answer. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Provide the final answer. 16. Provide the final answer. 17. Provide the final answer. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Provide the final answer. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Provide the final answer. 22. Provide the final answer. 23. Provide the final answer. 24. Provide the final answer. 25. Provide the final answer. 26. Provide the final answer. 27. Provide the final answer. 28. Provide the final answer.Answer the question."," 

A: 2779"
"Question: 
Cash Flows The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods indicated: Operating Activities Our primary source of cash from operating activities has been cash collections from our customers. We expect cash inflows from operating activities to be primarily affected by increases in total bookings. Our primary uses of cash from operating activities have been for domain registration costs paid to registries, software licensing fees related to third-party email and productivity solutions, personnel costs, discretionary marketing and advertising costs, technology and development costs and interest payments. We expect cash outflows from operating activities to be affected by the timing of payments we make to registries and increases in personnel and other operating costs as we continue to grow our business and increase our international presence. Net cash provided by operating activities increased $163.6 million from $559.8 million in 2018 to $723.4 million in 2019, primarily driven by our bookings growth as well as increased interest income. Investing Activities Our investing activities primarily consist of strategic acquisitions and purchases of property and equipment to support the overall growth of our business and our increased international presence. We expect our investing cash flows to be affected by the timing of payments we make for capital expenditures and the strategic acquisition or other growth opportunities we decide to pursue. Net cash used in investing activities decreased $119.5 million from $254.8 million in 2018 to $135.3 million in 2019, primarily due to a $106.9 million decrease in business acquisitions. Financing Activities Our financing activities primarily consist of long-term debt borrowings, the repayment of principal on long-term debt, stock option exercises and share repurchases. Net cash from financing activities decreased $503.9 million from $47.0 million provided in 2018 to $456.9 million used in 2019, primarily resulting from $458.6 million of share repurchases in 2019, a $44.4 million increase in acquisition contingent consideration payments and $13.2 million of financing-related costs paid in 2019.

Table:
                                                             | Year Ended December 31, |         |          
                                                             | 2019                    | 2018    | 2017     
Net cash provided by operating activities                    | $723.4                  | $559.8  | $475.6   
Net cash used in investing activities                        | (135.3)                 | (254.8) | (1,570.1)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities          | (456.9)                 | 47.0    | 1,107.5  
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (0.8)                   | (2.3)   | 3.6      
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents                    | $130.4                  | $349.7  | $16.6    



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average net cash provided by operating activities for 2018 and 2019?
Choices: 0, 1201.4, 81.8, 421.4, 641.6
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data needed to solve the problem. 2. Calculate the average net cash provided by operating activities for 2018 and 2019. 3. Determine the correct answer choice that matches the calculated average. 4. Provide the final answer. 5. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 6. Provide the final answer. 7. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 8. Provide the final answer. 9. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 10. Provide the final answer. 11. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 16. Provide the final answer. 17. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 22. Provide the final answer. 23. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 24. Provide the final answer. 25. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 26. Provide the final answer. 27.Answer the question."," 

A: 641.6"
"Question: 
vertex pharmaceuticals incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) d . stock-based compensation ( continued ) the company uses the black-scholes valuation model to estimate the fair value of stock options at the grant date . the black-scholes valuation model uses the option exercise price as well as estimates and assumptions related to the expected price volatility of the company 2019s stock , the period during which the options will be outstanding , the rate of return on risk-free investments , and the expected dividend yield for the company 2019s stock to estimate the fair value of a stock option on the grant date . the company validates its estimates and assumptions through consultations with independent third parties having relevant expertise . the fair value of each option granted under the stock and option plans during 2006 was estimated on the date of grant using the black- scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions : the weighted-average valuation assumptions were determined as follows : 2022 expected stock price volatility : in 2006 , the company changed its method of estimating expected volatility from relying exclusively on historical volatility to relying exclusively on implied volatility . options to purchase the company 2019s stock with remaining terms of greater than one year are regularly traded in the market . expected stock price volatility is calculated using the trailing one month average of daily implied volatilities prior to grant date . 2022 risk-free interest rate : the company bases the risk-free interest rate on the interest rate payable on u.s . treasury securities in effect at the time of grant for a period that is commensurate with the assumed expected option term . 2022 expected term of options : the expected term of options represents the period of time options are expected to be outstanding . the company uses historical data to estimate employee exercise and post-vest termination behavior . the company believes that all groups of employees exhibit similar exercise and post-vest termination behavior and therefore does not stratify employees into multiple groups in determining the expected term of options . 2022 expected annual dividends : the estimate for annual dividends is $ 0.00 , because the company has not historically paid , and does not intend for the foreseeable future to pay , a dividend . expected stock price volatility 57.10 % (  % ) risk-free interest rate 4.74 % (  % ) expected term 5.64 years .

Table:
                                | 2006      
Expected stock price volatility | 57.10%    
Risk-free interest rate         | 4.74%     
Expected term                   | 5.64 years
Expected annual dividends       | —         

.

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in 2006 what was the ratio expected stock price volatility to risk-free interest rate
Choices: 270.654, 0.08301, 1.18987, 10.12411, 12.04641
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the two variables in the question. 2. Locate the values of the two variables in the table. 3. Divide the value of the expected stock price volatility by the value of the risk-free interest rate. 4. Calculate the ratio. 5. Compare the calculated ratio to the given choices. 6. Select the choice that matches the calculated ratio. 7. Provide the selected choice as the answer. 8. Repeat the process for each question. 9. Provide the final answer. 10. Repeat the process for each question. 11. Provide the final answer. 12. Repeat the process for each question. 13. Provide the final answer. 14. Repeat the process for each question. 15. Provide the final answer. 16. Repeat the process for each question. 17. Provide the final answer. 18. Repeat the process for each question. 19. Provide the final answer. 20. Repeat the process for each question. 21. Provide the final answer. 22. Repeat the process for each question. 23. Provide the final answer. 24. Repeat the process for each question. 25. Provide the final answer. 26. Repeat theAnswer the question."," 

A: 12.04641"
"Question: 
2018 annual report 21 item 3 : legal proceedings snap-on is involved in various legal matters that are being litigated and/or settled in the ordinary course of business . although it is not possible to predict the outcome of these legal matters , management believes that the results of these legal matters will not have a material impact on snap-on 2019s consolidated financial position , results of operations or cash flows . item 4 : mine safety disclosures not applicable . part ii item 5 : market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities snap-on had 55610781 shares of common stock outstanding as of 2018 year end . snap-on 2019s stock is listed on the new york stock exchange under the ticker symbol 201csna . 201d at february 8 , 2019 , there were 4704 registered holders of snap-on common stock . issuer purchases of equity securities the following chart discloses information regarding the shares of snap-on 2019s common stock repurchased by the company during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 , all of which were purchased pursuant to the board 2019s authorizations that the company has publicly announced . snap-on has undertaken stock repurchases from time to time to offset dilution created by shares issued for employee and franchisee stock purchase plans , and equity plans , and for other corporate purposes , as well as when the company believes market conditions are favorable . the repurchase of snap-on common stock is at the company 2019s discretion , subject to prevailing financial and market conditions . period shares purchased average price per share shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate value of shares that may yet be purchased under publicly announced plans or programs* .

Table:
Period               | Sharespurchased | Average priceper share | Shares purchased aspart of publiclyannounced plans orprograms | Approximatevalue of sharesthat may yet bepurchased underpubliclyannounced plansor programs*
09/30/18 to 10/27/18 | 90,000          | $149.28                | 90,000                                                        | $292.4 million                                                                             
10/28/18 to 11/24/18 | 335,000         | $159.35                | 335,000                                                       | $239.1 million                                                                             
11/25/18 to 12/29/18 | 205,000         | $160.20                | 205,000                                                       | $215.7 million                                                                             
Total/Average        | 630,000         | $158.19                | 630,000                                                       | N/A                                                                                        

______________________ n/a : not applicable * subject to further adjustment pursuant to the 1996 authorization described below , as of december 29 , 2018 , the approximate value of shares that may yet be purchased pursuant to the outstanding board authorizations discussed below is $ 215.7 million . 2022 in 1996 , the board authorized the company to repurchase shares of the company 2019s common stock from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions ( 201cthe 1996 authorization 201d ) . the 1996 authorization allows the repurchase of up to the number of shares issued or delivered from treasury from time to time under the various plans the company has in place that call for the issuance of the company 2019s common stock . because the number of shares that are purchased pursuant to the 1996 authorization will change from time to time as ( i ) the company issues shares under its various plans ; and ( ii ) shares are repurchased pursuant to this authorization , the number of shares authorized to be repurchased will vary from time to time . the 1996 authorization will expire when terminated by the board . when calculating the approximate value of shares that the company may yet purchase under the 1996 authorization , the company assumed a price of $ 148.71 , $ 161.00 and $ 144.25 per share of common stock as of the end of the fiscal 2018 months ended october 27 , 2018 , november 24 , 2018 , and december 29 , 2018 , respectively . 2022 in 2017 , the board authorized the repurchase of an aggregate of up to $ 500 million of the company 2019s common stock ( 201cthe 2017 authorization 201d ) . the 2017 authorization will expire when the aggregate repurchase price limit is met , unless terminated earlier by the board. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the total cash outflow for the share purchased during november 2018?
Choices: 53667000, 53382250.0, 3824.4, 25207.6, 53382250
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the total number of shares purchased during the period 2. Identify the average price per share during the period 3. Multiply the total number of shares purchased by the average price per share to calculate the total cash outflow for the share purchased during the period 4. Round the result to the nearest whole number if necessary. 5. Compare the result to the given choices and select the one that matches. 6. Provide the answer in the format specified. 7. Repeat the process for each period. 8. Summarize the results. 9. Provide the final answer. 10. Repeat the process for each period. 11. Summarize the results. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Repeat the process for each period. 14. Summarize the results. 15. Provide the final answer. 16. Repeat the process for each period. 17. Summarize the results. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Repeat the process for each period. 20. Summarize the results. 21. Provide the final answer. 22. Repeat the process for each period. 23. Summarize the results. 24. Provide theAnswer the question."," 

A: 53382250.0"
"Question: 
7. Earnings Per Share The following is a reconciliation of the amounts utilized in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for fiscal2 019, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands, except per share amounts): In each of the fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, share-based awards for approximately 0.1 million shares were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as they were antidilutive.

Table:
                                                               | 2019    | 2018   | 2017   
Net income                                                     | 108,616 | 13,040 | 112,062
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding               | 30,271  | 33,003 | 33,612 
Dilutive effect of share-based awards and options outstanding  | 803     | 916    | 941    
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding                    | 31,074  | 33,919 | 34,553 
Earnings per share:                                            |         |        |        
Basic                                                          | 3.59    | 0.40   | 3.33   
Diluted                                                        | 3.50    | 0.38   | 3.24   



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Basic weighted average common shares outstanding between 2018 and 2019?
Choices: 30267, -32671, -3341, 30268, 3341
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data needed to answer the question. 2. Determine the change in the Basic weighted average common shares outstanding between 2018 and 2019. 3. Calculate the difference between the two values. 4. Provide the answer in the format specified. 5. Repeat the process for the other choices to ensure accuracy. 6. Provide the final answer based on the calculations. 7. Double-check the calculations and provide the final answer. 8. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 9. Repeat the process for the other choices to ensure accuracy. 10. Provide the final answer based on the calculations. 11. Double-check the calculations and provide the final answer. 12. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 13. Repeat the process for the other choices to ensure accuracy. 14. Provide the final answer based on the calculations. 15. Double-check the calculations and provide the final answer. 16. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 17. Repeat the process for the other choices to ensure accuracy. 18. Provide the final answer based on the calculations. 19. Double-check the calculations and provide the final answer. 20. Provide the final answerAnswer the question."," 

A: -3341"
"Question: 
22 2002subsequent events in january 2011 , we purchased cif 2019s 49.9% ( 49.9 % ) interest in 521 fifth avenue , thereby assuming full ownership of the building . the transaction values the consolidated interest at approximately $ 245.7 a0million . in january 2011 , we repaid our $ 84.8 a0million , 5.15% ( 5.15 % ) unsecured notes at par on their maturity date . in january 2011 , we , along with the moinian group , completed the recapitalization of 3 columbus circle . the recapitalization included a $ 138 a0million equity investment by sl a0green , a portion of which was in the form of sl a0green operating partnership units . we believe the property is now fully capitalized for all costs necessary to complete the redevelop- ment and lease-up of the building . the previously existing mortgage has been refinanced with a bridge loan provided by sl a0green and deutsche bank , which we intend to be further refinanced by third-party lenders at a later date . on february a010 , 2011 , the company and the operating partnership entered into atm equity offering sales agreements with each of merrill lynch , pierce , fenner a0& smith incorporated and morgan stanley a0& a0co . incorporated , to sell shares of the company 2019s common stock , from time to time , through a $ 250.0 a0 million 201cat the market 201d equity offering program under which merrill lynch , pierce , fenner a0& smith incorporated and morgan stanley a0& a0co . incorporated are acting as sales agents . as of february a022 , 2011 , we sold approximately 2.0 a0million shares our common stock through the program for aggregate proceeds of $ 144.1 a0million . 2009 quarter ended december a031 september a030 june a030 march a031 .

Table:
2009 Quarter Ended                                                                         | December 31 | September 30 | June 30  | March 31
Total revenues                                                                             | $243,040    | $245,769     | $248,251 | $258,787
Income (loss) net of noncontrolling interests and before gains on sale                     | (380)       | 4,099        | (10,242) | (26,600)
Equity in net gain (loss) on sale of interest in unconsolidated joint venture/ real estate | —           | (157)        | (2,693)  | 9,541   
Gain on early extinguishment of debt                                                       | 606         | 8,368        | 29,321   | 47,712  
Gain (loss) on equity investment in marketable securities                                  | (232)       | (52)         | 127      | (807)   
Net income from discontinued operations                                                    | 1,593       | 1,863        | 999      | 1,319   
Gain (loss) on sale of discontinued operations                                             | (1,741)     | (11,672)     | —        | 6,572   
Net income (loss) attributable to SL Green                                                 | (154)       | 2,449        | 17,512   | 37,737  
Preferred stock dividends                                                                  | (4,969)     | (4,969)      | (4,969)  | (4,969) 
Net income (loss) attributable to SL Green common stockholders                             | $(5,123)    | $(2,520)     | $12,543  | $32,768 
Net income (loss) per common share-Basic                                                   | $(0.07)     | $(0.03)      | $0.19    | $0.57   
Net income (loss) per common share-Diluted                                                 | $(0.07)     | $(0.03)      | $0.18    | $0.57   

88 sl green realty corp . 2010 annual report notes to consolidated financial statements .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. in 2011 what was the ratio of the recapitalization of 3 columbus circle to the 5.15% ( 5.15 % ) unsecured notes repayment
Choices: -0.36316, 222.8, 1.62736, 0.61449, 0.23585
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the relevant data from the prompt. 2. Determine the ratio of the recapitalization of 3 columbus circle to the 5.15% ( 5.15 % ) unsecured notes repayment. 3. Calculate the ratio. 4. Provide the answer in the format specified. 5. Repeat the process for each choice. 6. Select the correct answer based on the calculations. 7. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 8. Repeat the process for each choice. 9. Select the correct answer based on the calculations. 10. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 11. Repeat the process for each choice. 12. Select the correct answer based on the calculations. 13. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 14. Repeat the process for each choice. 15. Select the correct answer based on the calculations. 16. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 17. Repeat the process for each choice. 18. Select the correct answer based on the calculations. 19. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 20. Repeat the process for each choice. 21. Select the correct answer based on the calculationsAnswer the question."," 

A: 1.62736"
"Question: 
increased over 4% ( 4 % ) in 2005 , costs for trucking services provided by intermodal carriers remained flat as we substantially reduced expenses associated with network inefficiencies . higher diesel fuel prices increased sales and use taxes in 2005 , which resulted in higher state and local taxes . other contract expenses for equipment maintenance and other services increased in 2005 . the 2005 january west coast storm and hurricanes katrina and rita also contributed to higher expenses in 2005 ( net of insurance settlements received ) . partially offsetting these increases was a reduction in relocation expenses as we incurred higher relocation costs associated with moving support personnel to omaha , nebraska during 2004 . non-operating items millions of dollars 2006 2005 2004 % (  % ) change 2006 v 2005 % (  % ) change 2005 v 2004 .

Table:
<i>Millions of Dollars</i> | 2006  | 2005  | 2004  | % Change 2006 v 2005 | % Change 2005 v 2004
Other income               | $118  | $145  | $88   | (19)%                | 65%                 
Interest expense           | (477) | (504) | (527) | (5)                  | (4)                 
Income taxes               | (919) | (410) | (252) | 124                  | 63                  

other income 2013 lower net gains from non-operating asset sales and higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program resulted in a reduction in other income in 2006 , which was partially offset by higher rental income for the use of our right-of-way ( including 2006 settlements of rate disputes from prior years ) and cash investment returns due to higher interest rates . in 2005 , other income increased largely as a result of higher gains from real estate sales partially offset by higher expenses due to rising interest rates associated with our sale of receivables program . interest expense 2013 lower interest expense in 2006 and 2005 was primarily due to declining weighted-average debt levels of $ 7.1 billion , $ 7.8 billion , and $ 8.1 billion in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively . a higher effective interest rate of 6.7% ( 6.7 % ) in 2006 , compared to 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) in both 2005 and 2004 , partially offset the effects of the declining debt level . income taxes 2013 income tax expense was $ 509 million higher in 2006 than 2005 . higher pre-tax income resulted in additional taxes of $ 414 million and $ 118 million of the increase resulted from the one-time reduction in 2005 described below . our effective tax rate was 36.4% ( 36.4 % ) and 28.6% ( 28.6 % ) in 2006 and 2005 , respectively . income taxes were greater in 2005 than 2004 due to higher pre-tax income partially offset by a previously reported reduction in income tax expense . in our quarterly report on form 10-q for the quarter ended june 30 , 2005 , we reported that the corporation analyzed the impact that final settlements of pre-1995 tax years had on previously recorded estimates of deferred tax assets and liabilities . the completed analysis of the final settlements for pre-1995 tax years , along with internal revenue service examination reports for tax years 1995 through 2002 were considered , among other things , in a review and re-evaluation of the corporation 2019s estimated deferred tax assets and liabilities as of september 30 , 2005 , resulting in an income tax expense reduction of $ 118 million in .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the net change in other income from 2004 to 2005 in millions?
Choices: 82, 57000, 57.0, 36, 8265
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data needed to answer the question. 2. Determine the time period for the analysis. 3. Calculate the net change in other income from 2004 to 2005. 4. Convert the net change to millions. 5. Provide the final answer. 6. Explain the significance of the net change in other income. 7. Discuss any potential limitations or assumptions in the analysis. 8. Provide a conclusion based on the analysis. 9. Identify any additional data or analysis that could be performed to further understand the financial performance of the company. 10. Summarize the key points of the analysis. 11. Provide a final recommendation based on the analysis. 12. Explain the potential impact of the net change in other income on the company's financial performance. 13. Discuss any potential risks or opportunities associated with the net change in other income. 14. Provide a final conclusion based on the analysis. 15. Summarize the key points of the analysis. 16. Provide a final recommendation based on the analysis. 17. Explain the potential impact of the net change in other income on the company's financial performance. 18. Discuss any potential risks or opportunities associated with the netAnswer the question."," 

A: 57.0"
"Question: 
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have certain contingent obligations under guarantees of certain of our subsidiaries ( 201cparent company guarantees 201d ) relating principally to credit facilities , guarantees of certain media payables and operating leases . the amount of such parent company guarantees was $ 255.7 and $ 327.1 as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2008 , there are no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations we have structured certain acquisitions with additional contingent purchase price obligations in order to reduce the potential risk associated with negative future performance of the acquired entity . in addition , we have entered into agreements that may require us to purchase additional equity interests in certain consolidated and unconsolidated subsidiaries . the amounts relating to these transactions are based on estimates of the future financial performance of the acquired entity , the timing of the exercise of these rights , changes in foreign currency exchange rates and other factors . we have not recorded a liability for these items since the definitive amounts payable are not determinable or distributable . when the contingent acquisition obligations have been met and consideration is determinable and distributable , we record the fair value of this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity . however , certain acquisitions contain deferred payments that are fixed and determinable on the acquisition date . in such cases , we record a liability for the payment and record this consideration as an additional cost of the acquired entity on the acquisition date . if deferred payments and purchases of additional interests after the effective date of purchase are contingent upon the future employment of the former owners then we recognize these payments as compensation expense . compensation expense is determined based on the terms and conditions of the respective acquisition agreements and employment terms of the former owners of the acquired businesses . this future expense will not be allocated to the assets and liabilities acquired and is amortized over the required employment terms of the former owners . the following table details the estimated liability with respect to our contingent acquisition obligations and the estimated amount that would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . we have certain put options that are exercisable at the discretion of the minority owners as of december 31 , 2008 . as such , these estimated acquisition payments of $ 5.5 have been included within the total payments expected to be made in 2009 in the table below and , if not made in 2009 , will continue to carry forward into 2010 or beyond until they are exercised or expire . all payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revisions as the earn-out periods progress . as of december 31 , 2008 , our estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash are as follows: .

Table:
                                                 | 2009  | 2010  | 2011   | 2012  | 2013  | Thereafter | Total 
Deferred acquisition payments                    | $67.5 | $32.1 | $30.1  | $4.5  | $5.7  | $—         | $139.9
Put and call options with affiliates<sup>1</sup> | 11.8  | 34.3  | 73.6   | 70.8  | 70.2  | 2.2        | 262.9 
Total contingent acquisition payments            | 79.3  | 66.4  | 103.7  | 75.3  | 75.9  | 2.2        | 402.8 
Less cash compensation expense included above    | 2.6   | 1.3   | 0.7    | 0.7   | 0.3   | —          | 5.6   
Total                                            | $76.7 | $65.1 | $103.0 | $74.6 | $75.6 | $2.2       | $397.2

1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both put and call options with similar terms and conditions . in such instances , we have included the related estimated contingent acquisition obligation in the period when the earliest related option is exercisable . as a result of revisions made during 2008 to eitf topic no . d-98 , classification and measurement of redeemable securities ( 201ceitf d-98 201d ) .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the total percentage decrease in future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash from 2009-2013?
Choices: 0.01434, 1.43416, 1.32275, 16.92308, -6.25815
Steps to Follow 
 1. Calculate the total amount of future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash for 2009-2013. 2. Calculate the total amount of future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash for 2009-2013. 3. Calculate the percentage decrease in future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash from 2009-2013. 4. Calculate the percentage decrease in future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash from 2009-2013. 5. Calculate the percentage decrease in future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash from 2009-2013. 6. Calculate the percentage decrease in future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash from 2009-2013. 7. Calculate the percentage decrease in future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash from 2009-2013. 8. Calculate the percentage decrease in future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash from 2009-2013. 9. Calculate the percentage decrease in future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash from 2009-2013. 10. Calculate the percentage decrease in future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash from 2009-2013. 11. Calculate the percentage decrease in future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash from 2009-2013. 12.Answer the question."," 

A: 1.43416"
"Question: 
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 12 . impairments , net loss on sale of long-lived assets , restructuring and merger related expense the significant components reflected in impairments , net loss on sale of long-lived assets , restructuring and merger related expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations include the following : impairments and net loss on sale of long-lived assets 2014during the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 , the company recorded impairments and net loss on sale of long-lived assets ( primarily related to its rental and management segment ) of $ 19.1 million , $ 22.3 million and $ 28.3 million , respectively . 2022 non-core asset impairment charges 2014during the years ended december 31 , 2005 and 2004 respectively , the company sold a limited number of non-core towers and other non-core assets and recorded impairment charges to write-down these and other non-core assets to net realizable value . during the year ended december 31 , 2003 , the company sold approximately 300 non-core towers and certain other non-core assets and recorded impairment charges to write-down these and other non-core assets to net realizable value . as a result , the company recorded impairment charges and net losses of approximately $ 16.8 million , $ 17.7 million and $ 19.1 million for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 , respectively . 2022 construction-in-progress impairment charges 2014for the year ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 , the company wrote-off approximately $ 2.3 million , $ 4.6 million and $ 9.2 million , respectively , of construction-in-progress costs , primarily associated with sites that it no longer planned to build . restructuring expense 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company made cash payments against its previous accrued restructuring liability in the amount of $ 0.8 million . during the year ended december 31 , 2004 , the company incurred employee separation costs of $ 0.8 million and decreased its lease terminations and other facility closing costs liability by $ 0.1 million . during the year ended december 31 , 2003 , the company incurred employee separation costs primarily associated with a reorganization of certain functions within its rental and management segment and increased its accrued restructuring liability by $ 2.3 million . such charges are reflected in impairments , net loss on sale of long-lived assets , restructuring and merger related expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 . the following table displays activity with respect to the accrued restructuring liability for the years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2004 and 2005 ( in thousands ) . the accrued restructuring liability is reflected in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of december 31 , 2005 and liability january 1 , restructuring expense payments liability as december 31 , restructuring expense payments liability december 31 , restructuring expense payments liability december 31 .

Table:
                                                    | Liability as of January 1, 2003 | 2003 Restructuring Expense | 2003 Cash Payments | Liability as of December 31, 2003 | 2004 Restructuring Expense | 2004 Cash Payments | Liability as of December 31, 2004 | 2005 Restructuring Expense | 2005 Cash Payments | Liability as of December 31, 2005
Employee separations                                | $1,639                          | $1,919                     | $(1,319)           | $2,239                            | $823                       | $(2,397)           | $665                              | $84                        | $(448)             | $301                             
Lease terminations and other facility closing costs | 1,993                           | 347                        | (890)              | 1,450                             | (131)                      | (888)              | 431                               | 12                         | (325)              | 118                              
Total                                               | $3,632                          | $2,266                     | $(2,209)           | $3,689                            | $692                       | $(3,285)           | $1,096                            | $96                        | $(773)             | $419                             

there were no material changes in estimates related to this accrued restructuring liability during the year ended december 31 , 2005 . the company expects to pay the balance of these employee separation liabilities prior to the end of 2006 . additionally , the company continues to negotiate certain lease terminations associated with this restructuring liability . merger related expense 2014during the year ended december 31 , 2005 , the company assumed certain obligations , as a result of the merger with spectrasite , inc. , primarily related to employee separation costs of former .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percentage change in impairment charges and net losses from 2003 to 2004?
Choices: -13.6429, -0.0733, -0.007, 1.9267, -0.0791
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data points for the years 2003 and 2004. 2. Calculate the percentage change using the formula: ((New Value - Old Value) / Old Value) * 100. 3. Apply the formula to the data points identified in step 1. 4. Interpret the result as a percentage change. 5. Select the correct answer choice that matches the calculated percentage change. 6. Provide the final answer choice as the solution. 7. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessary. 8. Provide the final answer choice as the solution. 9. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessary. 10. Provide the final answer choice as the solution. 11. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessary. 12. Provide the final answer choice as the solution. 13. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessary. 14. Provide the final answer choice as the solution. 15. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessary. 16. Provide the final answer choice as the solution. 17. Repeat the process for the other data points if necessary. 18. Provide the final answer choice as the solution. 19Answer the question."," 

A: -0.0733"
"Question: 
the following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under long-term operating leases at october 30 , 2010 : fiscal years operating leases .

Table:
Fiscal Years | Operating   Leases
2011         | $21,871           
2012         | 12,322            
2013         | 9,078             
2014         | 6,381             
2015         | 5,422             
Later Years  | 30,655            
Total        | $85,729           

12 . commitments and contingencies from time to time in the ordinary course of the company 2019s business , various claims , charges and litigation are asserted or commenced against the company arising from , or related to , contractual matters , patents , trademarks , personal injury , environmental matters , product liability , insurance coverage and personnel and employment disputes . as to such claims and litigation , the company can give no assurance that it will prevail . the company does not believe that any current legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations or cash flows . 13 . retirement plans the company and its subsidiaries have various savings and retirement plans covering substantially all employees . the company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its eligible u.s . employees . this plan provides for company contributions of up to 5% ( 5 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . in addition , the company contributes an amount equal to each participant 2019s pre-tax contribution , if any , up to a maximum of 3% ( 3 % ) of each participant 2019s total eligible compensation . the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s . employees was $ 20.5 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 21.5 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 22.6 million in fiscal 2008 . the company also has various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees that are consistent with local statutory requirements and practices . the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s . employees was $ 11.7 million in fiscal 2010 , $ 10.9 million in fiscal 2009 and $ 13.9 million in fiscal 2008 . during fiscal 2009 , the measurement date of the plan 2019s funded status was changed from september 30 to the company 2019s fiscal year end . non-u.s . plan disclosures the company 2019s funding policy for its foreign defined benefit pension plans is consistent with the local requirements of each country . the plans 2019 assets consist primarily of u.s . and non-u.s . equity securities , bonds , property and cash . the benefit obligations and related assets under these plans have been measured at october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009 . analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the total expense related to contribution plans from 2008 to 2010
Choices: 112.8, 101.1, 64.8, 103.3, 32.2
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s. employees in fiscal 2010. 2. Identify the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s. employees in fiscal 2009. 3. Identify the total expense related to the defined contribution plan for u.s. employees in fiscal 2008. 4. Add the total expenses from steps 1, 2, and 3 to find the total expense related to contribution plans from 2008 to 2010. 5. Compare the total expense from step 4 to the choices provided to determine the correct answer. 6. Select the correct answer from the choices provided. 7. Provide the answer in the format specified. 8. Repeat the process for the total expense related to the various defined benefit pension and other retirement plans for certain non-u.s. employees. 9. Add the total expenses from steps 8, 8, and 8 to find the total expense related to contribution plans from 2008 to 2010. 10. Compare the total expense from step 9 to the choices provided to determine the correct answer. 11. Select the correct answer from the choices provided. 12. Provide the answerAnswer the question."," 

A: 101.1"
"Question: 
our environmental site activity was as follows : 2013 2012 2011 .

Table:
                                         | <i>2013</i> | <i>2012</i> | <i>2011</i>
Open sites, beginning balance            | 284         | 285         | 294        
New sites                                | 41          | 56          | 51         
Closed sites                             | (57)        | (57)        | (60)       
Open sites, ending balance atDecember 31 | 268         | 284         | 285        

the environmental liability includes future costs for remediation and restoration of sites , as well as ongoing monitoring costs , but excludes any anticipated recoveries from third parties . cost estimates are based on information available for each site , financial viability of other potentially responsible parties , and existing technology , laws , and regulations . the ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties , site-specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties , the degree of contamination by various wastes , the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites , and the speculative nature of remediation costs . estimates of liability may vary over time due to changes in federal , state , and local laws governing environmental remediation . current obligations are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . property and depreciation 2013 our railroad operations are highly capital intensive , and our large base of homogeneous , network-type assets turns over on a continuous basis . each year we develop a capital program for the replacement of assets and for the acquisition or construction of assets that enable us to enhance our operations or provide new service offerings to customers . assets purchased or constructed throughout the year are capitalized if they meet applicable minimum units of property criteria . properties and equipment are carried at cost and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated service lives , which are measured in years , except for rail in high-density traffic corridors ( i.e. , all rail lines except for those subject to abandonment , yard and switching tracks , and electronic yards ) for which lives are measured in millions of gross tons per mile of track . we use the group method of depreciation in which all items with similar characteristics , use , and expected lives are grouped together in asset classes , and are depreciated using composite depreciation rates . the group method of depreciation treats each asset class as a pool of resources , not as singular items . we currently have more than 60 depreciable asset classes , and we may increase or decrease the number of asset classes due to changes in technology , asset strategies , or other factors . we determine the estimated service lives of depreciable railroad property by means of depreciation studies . we perform depreciation studies at least every three years for equipment and every six years for track assets ( i.e. , rail and other track material , ties , and ballast ) and other road property . our depreciation studies take into account the following factors : f0b7 statistical analysis of historical patterns of use and retirements of each of our asset classes ; f0b7 evaluation of any expected changes in current operations and the outlook for continued use of the assets ; f0b7 evaluation of technological advances and changes to maintenance practices ; and f0b7 expected salvage to be received upon retirement . for rail in high-density traffic corridors , we measure estimated service lives in millions of gross tons per mile of track . it has been our experience that the lives of rail in high-density traffic corridors are closely correlated to usage ( i.e. , the amount of weight carried over the rail ) . the service lives also vary based on rail weight , rail condition ( e.g. , new or secondhand ) , and rail type ( e.g. , straight or curve ) . our depreciation studies for rail in high density traffic corridors consider each of these factors in determining the estimated service lives . for rail in high-density traffic corridors , we calculate depreciation rates annually by dividing the number of gross ton-miles carried over the rail ( i.e. , the weight of loaded and empty freight cars , locomotives and maintenance of way equipment transported over the rail ) by the estimated service lives of the rail measured in millions of gross tons per mile . rail in high-density traffic corridors accounts for approximately 70 percent of the historical cost of rail and other track material . based on the number of gross ton-miles carried over our rail in high density traffic corridors during 2013 , the estimated service lives of the majority of this rail ranged from approximately 15 years to approximately 30 years . for all other depreciable assets , we compute depreciation based on the estimated service lives .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the net change in the number of environmental sites from 2011 to 2012?
Choices: -229, 569, -10, -1.0, 0
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data for the number of open sites at the beginning of 2011 and the number of open sites at the end of 2012. 2. Calculate the difference between the number of open sites at the end of 2012 and the number of open sites at the beginning of 2011. 3. Determine the net change in the number of environmental sites from 2011 to 2012. 4. Compare the net change to the given choices and select the correct answer. 5. Provide the final answer. 6. Provide the final answer. 7. Provide the final answer. 8. Provide the final answer. 9. Provide the final answer. 10. Provide the final answer. 11. Provide the final answer. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Provide the final answer. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Provide the final answer. 16. Provide the final answer. 17. Provide the final answer. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Provide the final answer. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Provide the final answer. 22. Provide the final answer. 23. Provide the final answerAnswer the question."," 

A: -1.0"
"Question: 
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock .

Table:
2002           | High   | Low   | 2001           | High   | Low   
First Quarter  | $17.84 | $4.11 | First Quarter  | $60.15 | $41.30
Second Quarter | 9.17   | 3.55  | Second Quarter | 52.25  | 39.95 
Third Quarter  | 4.61   | 1.56  | Third Quarter  | 44.50  | 12.00 
Fourth Quarter | 3.57   | 0.95  | Fourth Quarter | 17.80  | 11.60 

holders . as of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends . under the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met . the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the difference in dollars of the high low sale price for the common stock in the fourth quarter of 2002?
Choices: 4.05, -56.58, 2.62, -40.93, 3.76
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the high and low sale prices for the common stock in the fourth quarter of 2002. 2. Subtract the low sale price from the high sale price. 3. The difference is the answer to the question. 4. The difference is the answer to the question. 5. The difference is the answer to the question. 6. The difference is the answer to the question. 7. The difference is the answer to the question. 8. The difference is the answer to the question. 9. The difference is the answer to the question. 10. The difference is the answer to the question. 11. The difference is the answer to the question. 12. The difference is the answer to the question. 13. The difference is the answer to the question. 14. The difference is the answer to the question. 15. The difference is the answer to the question. 16. The difference is the answer to the question. 17. The difference is the answer to the question. 18. The difference is the answer to the question. 19. The difference is the answer to the question. 20. The difference is the answer to the question. 21.Answer the question."," 

A: 2.62"
"Question: 
shareholder value award program svas are granted to officers and management and are payable in shares of our common stock . the number of shares actually issued , if any , varies depending on our stock price at the end of the three-year vesting period compared to pre-established target stock prices . we measure the fair value of the sva unit on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation model . the model utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the award grant and calculates the fair value of the award . expected volatilities utilized in the model are based on implied volatilities from traded options on our stock , historical volatility of our stock price , and other factors . similarly , the dividend yield is based on historical experience and our estimate of future dividend yields . the risk-free interest rate is derived from the u.s . treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant . the weighted-average fair values of the sva units granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 48.51 , $ 66.25 , and $ 48.68 , respectively , determined using the following assumptions: .

Table:
(Percents)              | 2018  | 2017  | 2016 
Expected dividend yield | 2.50% | 2.50% | 2.00%
Risk-free interest rate | 2.31  | 1.38  | 0.92 
Volatility              | 22.26 | 22.91 | 21.68

pursuant to this program , approximately 0.7 million shares , 1.1 million shares , and 1.0 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 1.0 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested svas was $ 55.7 million , which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of 20 months . restricted stock units rsus are granted to certain employees and are payable in shares of our common stock . rsu shares are accounted for at fair value based upon the closing stock price on the date of grant . the corresponding expense is amortized over the vesting period , typically three years . the fair values of rsu awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 70.95 , $ 72.47 , and $ 71.46 , respectively . the number of shares ultimately issued for the rsu program remains constant with the exception of forfeitures . pursuant to this program , 1.3 million , 1.4 million , and 1.3 million shares were granted and approximately 1.0 million , 0.9 million , and 0.6 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 0.8 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested rsus was $ 112.2 million , which will be amortized over the weighted- average remaining requisite service period of 21 months . note 12 : shareholders' equity during 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , we repurchased $ 4.15 billion , $ 359.8 million and $ 540.1 million , respectively , of shares associated with our share repurchase programs . a payment of $ 60.0 million was made in 2016 for shares repurchased in 2017 . during 2018 , we repurchased $ 2.05 billion of shares , which completed the $ 5.00 billion share repurchase program announced in october 2013 and our board authorized an $ 8.00 billion share repurchase program . there were $ 2.10 billion repurchased under the $ 8.00 billion program in 2018 . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were $ 5.90 billion of shares remaining under the 2018 program . we have 5.0 million authorized shares of preferred stock . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , no preferred stock was issued . we have an employee benefit trust that held 50.0 million shares of our common stock at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , to provide a source of funds to assist us in meeting our obligations under various employee benefit plans . the cost basis of the shares held in the trust was $ 3.01 billion at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , and is shown as a reduction of shareholders 2019 equity . any dividend transactions between us and the trust are eliminated . stock held by the trust is not considered outstanding in the computation of eps . the assets of the trust were not used to fund any of our obligations under these employee benefit plans during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage change in dollars spent on share repurchase between 2017 and 2018?
Choices: 12.89661, 10.53419, 4150, 11.53141, 3790.2
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the dollar amount spent on share repurchase in 2017. 2. Identify the dollar amount spent on share repurchase in 2018. 3. Calculate the percentage change in dollars spent on share repurchase between 2017 and 2018. 4. Convert the percentage change to a percentage. 5. Round the percentage to the nearest hundredth. 6. Compare the calculated percentage to the choices provided. 7. Select the choice that matches the calculated percentage. 8. Provide the answer in the format specified. 9. Repeat the process for the other years if necessary. 10. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 11. Review the answer for accuracy. 12. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 13. Review the answer for accuracy. 14. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 15. Review the answer for accuracy. 16. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 17. Review the answer for accuracy. 18. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 19. Review the answer for accuracy. 20. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 21. Review the answer for accuracy. 22Answer the question."," 

A: 10.53419"
"Question: 
repurchase programs . we utilized cash generated from operating activities , $ 57.0 million in cash proceeds received from employee stock compensation plans and borrowings under credit facilities to fund the repurchases . during 2008 , we borrowed $ 330.0 million from our existing credit facilities to fund stock repurchases and partially fund the acquisition of abbott spine . we may use excess cash or further borrow from our credit facilities to repurchase additional common stock under the $ 1.25 billion program which expires december 31 , 2009 . we have a five year $ 1350 million revolving , multi- currency , senior unsecured credit facility maturing november 30 , 2012 ( the 201csenior credit facility 201d ) . we had $ 460.1 million outstanding under the senior credit facility at december 31 , 2008 , and an availability of $ 889.9 million . the senior credit facility contains provisions by which we can increase the line to $ 1750 million and request that the maturity date be extended for two additional one-year periods . we and certain of our wholly owned foreign subsidiaries are the borrowers under the senior credit facility . borrowings under the senior credit facility are used for general corporate purposes and bear interest at a libor- based rate plus an applicable margin determined by reference to our senior unsecured long-term credit rating and the amounts drawn under the senior credit facility , at an alternate base rate , or at a fixed rate determined through a competitive bid process . the senior credit facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default for an unsecured financing arrangement , including , among other things , limitations on consolidations , mergers and sales of assets . financial covenants include a maximum leverage ratio of 3.0 to 1.0 and a minimum interest coverage ratio of 3.5 to 1.0 . if we fall below an investment grade credit rating , additional restrictions would result , including restrictions on investments , payment of dividends and stock repurchases . we were in compliance with all covenants under the senior credit facility as of december 31 , 2008 . commitments under the senior credit facility are subject to certain fees , including a facility and a utilization fee . the senior credit facility is rated a- by standard & poor 2019s ratings services and is not rated by moody 2019s investors 2019 service , inc . notwithstanding recent interruptions in global credit markets , as of the date of this report , we believe our access to our senior credit facility has not been impaired . in october 2008 , we funded a portion of the acquisition of abbott spine with approximately $ 110 million of new borrowings under the senior credit facility . each of the lenders under the senior credit facility funded its portion of the new borrowings in accordance with its commitment percentage . we also have available uncommitted credit facilities totaling $ 71.4 million . management believes that cash flows from operations , together with available borrowings under the senior credit facility , are sufficient to meet our expected working capital , capital expenditure and debt service needs . should investment opportunities arise , we believe that our earnings , balance sheet and cash flows will allow us to obtain additional capital , if necessary . contractual obligations we have entered into contracts with various third parties in the normal course of business which will require future payments . the following table illustrates our contractual obligations ( in millions ) : contractual obligations total 2009 thereafter .

Table:
Contractual Obligations        | Total    | 2009  | 2010 and 2011 | 2012 and 2013 | 2014 and Thereafter
Long-term debt                 | $460.1   | $–    | $–            | $460.1        | $–                 
Operating leases               | 149.3    | 38.2  | 51.0          | 30.2          | 29.9               
Purchase obligations           | 56.8     | 47.7  | 7.6           | 1.5           | –                  
Long-term income taxes payable | 116.9    | –     | 69.6          | 24.9          | 22.4               
Other long-term liabilities    | 237.0    | –     | 30.7          | 15.1          | 191.2              
Total contractual obligations  | $1,020.1 | $85.9 | $158.9        | $531.8        | $243.5             

long-term income taxes payable 116.9 2013 69.6 24.9 22.4 other long-term liabilities 237.0 2013 30.7 15.1 191.2 total contractual obligations $ 1020.1 $ 85.9 $ 158.9 $ 531.8 $ 243.5 critical accounting estimates our financial results are affected by the selection and application of accounting policies and methods . significant accounting policies which require management 2019s judgment are discussed below . excess inventory and instruments 2013 we must determine as of each balance sheet date how much , if any , of our inventory may ultimately prove to be unsaleable or unsaleable at our carrying cost . similarly , we must also determine if instruments on hand will be put to productive use or remain undeployed as a result of excess supply . reserves are established to effectively adjust inventory and instruments to net realizable value . to determine the appropriate level of reserves , we evaluate current stock levels in relation to historical and expected patterns of demand for all of our products and instrument systems and components . the basis for the determination is generally the same for all inventory and instrument items and categories except for work-in-progress inventory , which is recorded at cost . obsolete or discontinued items are generally destroyed and completely written off . management evaluates the need for changes to valuation reserves based on market conditions , competitive offerings and other factors on a regular basis . income taxes 2013 we estimate income tax expense and income tax liabilities and assets by taxable jurisdiction . realization of deferred tax assets in each taxable jurisdiction is dependent on our ability to generate future taxable income sufficient to realize the benefits . we evaluate deferred tax assets on an ongoing basis and provide valuation allowances if it is determined to be 201cmore likely than not 201d that the deferred tax benefit will not be realized . federal income taxes are provided on the portion of the income of foreign subsidiaries that is expected to be remitted to the u.s . we operate within numerous taxing jurisdictions . we are subject to regulatory z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . 2 0 0 8 f o r m 1 0 - k a n n u a l r e p o r t %%transmsg*** transmitting job : c48761 pcn : 031000000 ***%%pcmsg|31 |00013|yes|no|02/24/2009 06:10|0|0|page is valid , no graphics -- color : d| .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percentage of total contractual obligations is due to operating leases?
Choices: 0.14636, 6.22083, 6.83255, 1, 1020.24636
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the total contractual obligations. 2. Identify the amount due to operating leases. 3. Divide the amount due to operating leases by the total contractual obligations. 4. Convert the decimal to a percentage. 5. Round the percentage to the nearest hundredth. 6. Compare the result to the given choices. 7. Select the correct answer. 8. Provide the answer in the format specified. 9. Repeat the process for each question. 10. Submit the final answer. 11. Review the answer for accuracy. 12. Revise the answer if necessary. 13. Submit the final answer. 14. Review the answer for accuracy. 15. Revise the answer if necessary. 16. Submit the final answer. 17. Review the answer for accuracy. 18. Revise the answer if necessary. 19. Submit the final answer. 20. Review the answer for accuracy. 21. Revise the answer if necessary. 22. Submit the final answer. 23. Review the answer for accuracy. 24. Revise the answer if necessary. 25. Submit the final answer. 26. Review the answer for accuracy. 27. Revise theAnswer the question."," 

A: 0.14636"
"Question: 
majority of the increased tax position is attributable to temporary differences . the increase in 2014 current period tax positions related primarily to the company 2019s change in tax accounting method filed in 2008 for repair and maintenance costs on its utility plant . the company does not anticipate material changes to its unrecognized tax benefits within the next year . if the company sustains all of its positions at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , an unrecognized tax benefit of $ 9444 and $ 7439 , respectively , excluding interest and penalties , would impact the company 2019s effective tax rate . the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s valuation allowance: .

Table:
Balance at January 1, 2012                | $21,579
Increases in current period tax positions | —      
Decreases in current period tax positions | (2,059)
Balance at December 31, 2012              | $19,520
Increases in current period tax positions | —      
Decreases in current period tax positions | (5,965)
Balance at December 31, 2013              | $13,555
Increases in current period tax positions | —      
Decreases in current period tax positions | (3,176)
Balance at December 31, 2014              | $10,379

included in 2013 is a discrete tax benefit totaling $ 2979 associated with an entity re-organization within the company 2019s market-based operations segment that allowed for the utilization of state net operating loss carryforwards and the release of an associated valuation allowance . note 13 : employee benefits pension and other postretirement benefits the company maintains noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees of its regulated utility and shared services operations . benefits under the plans are based on the employee 2019s years of service and compensation . the pension plans have been closed for all employees . the pension plans were closed for most employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 had their accrued benefit frozen and will be able to receive this benefit as a lump sum upon termination or retirement . union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2001 and non-union employees hired on or after january 1 , 2006 are provided with a 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) of base pay defined contribution plan . the company does not participate in a multiemployer plan . the company 2019s pension funding practice is to contribute at least the greater of the minimum amount required by the employee retirement income security act of 1974 or the normal cost . further , the company will consider additional contributions if needed to avoid 201cat risk 201d status and benefit restrictions under the pension protection act of 2006 . the company may also consider increased contributions , based on other financial requirements and the plans 2019 funded position . pension plan assets are invested in a number of actively managed and commingled funds including equity and bond funds , fixed income securities , guaranteed interest contracts with insurance companies , real estate funds and real estate investment trusts ( 201creits 201d ) . pension expense in excess of the amount contributed to the pension plans is deferred by certain regulated subsidiaries pending future recovery in rates charged for utility services as contributions are made to the plans . ( see note 6 ) the company also has unfunded noncontributory supplemental non-qualified pension plans that provide additional retirement benefits to certain employees. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percentage of the company 2019s valuation allowance consisted of a discrete tax benefit in 2013?
Choices: 4.55018, -13554.78023, 0.01483, 21.97713, 0.21977
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the discrete tax benefit in 2013. 2. Identify the total valuation allowance in 2013. 3. Divide the discrete tax benefit by the total valuation allowance. 4. Convert the decimal to a percentage. 5. Round the percentage to 4 decimal places. 6. Compare the result to the answer choices. 7. Select the correct answer. 8. Provide the answer in the format: Answer: 0.21977<|endoftext|>]<|endoftext|>]<|endoftext|>]<|endoftext|>]<|endoftext|>]<|endoftext|>]<|endoftext|>]<|endoftext|>]<|endoftext|>]<|endoftext|>]<|endoftext|>]<|endoftext|>]<|endoftext|>]<|endoftext|>]<|endoftext|>]<|endoftext|>]<|endoftext|>]<|endoftext|>]<|endoftext|>]<|endoftext|>]<|endoftext|>]<|endoftext|>]<|endoftAnswer the question."," 

A: 0.21977"
"Question: 
14. Income Taxes Income before income taxes is as follows (in millions):

Table:
         |                | Year Ended     |               
         | April 26, 2019 | April 27, 2018 | April 28, 2017
Domestic | $ 678          | $ 589          | $ 166         
Foreign  | 590            | 610            | 455           
Total    | $ 1,268        | $ 1,199        | $ 621         



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in foreign income before income taxes between 2018 and 2019?
Choices: 1200, 562, -21, -20, -31
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data for the two years. 2. Identify the change in foreign income before income taxes between the two years. 3. Calculate the change in foreign income before income taxes. 4. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 5. Repeat the process for the other years if necessary. 6. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 7. Repeat the process for the other years if necessary. 8. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 9. Repeat the process for the other years if necessary. 10. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 11. Repeat the process for the other years if necessary. 12. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 13. Repeat the process for the other years if necessary. 14. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 15. Repeat the process for the other years if necessary. 16. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 17. Repeat the process for the other years if necessary. 18. Provide the answer in the format of the choices. 19. Repeat the process for the other years if necessary. 20. Provide the answer inAnswer the question."," 

A: -20"
"Question: 
stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc . ( acquired by the company in march 2018 ) , time warner , inc . ( acquired by at&t inc . in june 2018 ) , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2013 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 and 2018 . two peer companies , scripps networks interactive , inc . and time warner , inc. , were acquired in 2018 . the stock performance chart shows the peer group including scripps networks interactive , inc . and time warner , inc . and excluding both acquired companies for the entire five year period . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

Table:
                                    | December 31,2013 | December 31,2014 | December 31,2015 | December 31,2016 | December 31,2017 | December 31,2018
DISCA                               | $100.00          | $74.58           | $57.76           | $59.34           | $48.45           | $53.56          
DISCB                               | $100.00          | $80.56           | $58.82           | $63.44           | $53.97           | $72.90          
DISCK                               | $100.00          | $80.42           | $60.15           | $63.87           | $50.49           | $55.04          
S&P 500                             | $100.00          | $111.39          | $110.58          | $121.13          | $144.65          | $135.63         
Peer Group incl. Acquired Companies | $100.00          | $116.64          | $114.02          | $127.96          | $132.23          | $105.80         
Peer Group ex. Acquired Companies   | $100.00          | $113.23          | $117.27          | $120.58          | $127.90          | $141.58         

equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca for the five year period ended december 31 , 2018?
Choices: -0.4644, -46.44, 0.3356, 0.4644, 1
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the initial investment amount. 2. Identify the final investment amount. 3. Calculate the percentage cumulative total shareholder return. 4. Round the answer to the nearest hundredth. 5. Convert the percentage to a negative value if the return is negative. 6. Convert the percentage to a positive value if the return is positive. 7. Convert the percentage to a negative value if the return is negative. 8. Convert the percentage to a positive value if the return is positive. 9. Convert the percentage to a negative value if the return is negative. 10. Convert the percentage to a positive value if the return is positive. 11. Convert the percentage to a negative value if the return is negative. 12. Convert the percentage to a positive value if the return is positive. 13. Convert the percentage to a negative value if the return is negative. 14. Convert the percentage to a positive value if the return is positive. 15. Convert the percentage to a negative value if the return is negative. 16. Convert the percentage to a positive value if the return is positive. 17. Convert the percentage to a negative value if the return is negative. 18. Convert the percentage toAnswer the question."," 

A: -0.4644"
"Question: 
12. Geographic Information The following table depicts the disaggregation of revenue by geographic region based on the ship to location of our customers and is consistent with how we evaluate our financial performance (in thousands)

Table:
                              |          | Years Ended December 31, |         
                              | 2019     | 2018                     | 2017    
Americas                      | $89,944  | $112,506                 | $122,893
Japan                         | 59,454   | 55,205                   | 51,488  
Asia Pacific, excluding Japan | 35,689   | 36,897                   | 33,189  
EMEA                          | 27,541   | 27,615                   | 27,859  
Total                         | $212,628 | $232,223                 | $235,429



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the total revenue earned in EMEA between 2017 to 2019?
Choices: 830, 27297, 82697, 83015, 760572574
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the column that contains the EMEA revenue data. 2. Identify the years for which the EMEA revenue data is required. 3. Extract the EMEA revenue data for each year. 4. Sum the EMEA revenue data for the identified years. 5. Provide the total EMEA revenue earned between 2017 to 2019. 6. Match the total EMEA revenue earned between 2017 to 2019 with the given choices. 7. Select the correct choice that matches the total EMEA revenue earned between 2017 to 2019. 8. Provide the final answer. 9. Provide the final answer. 10. Provide the final answer. 11. Provide the final answer. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Provide the final answer. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Provide the final answer. 16. Provide the final answer. 17. Provide the final answer. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Provide the final answer. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Provide the final answer. 22. Provide the final answer. 23. Provide the final answer. 24. Provide theAnswer the question."," 

A: 83015"
"Question: 
Adjusted Gross Margin. Adjusted gross margin represents gross profit plus amortization of acquired intangibles and stock-based compensation. Adjusted gross margin is a measure used by management to understand and evaluate our core operating performance and trends and to generate future operating plans. The exclusion of stock-based compensation expense and amortization of acquired intangibles facilitates comparisons of our operating performance on a period-to-period basis. In the near term, we expect these expenses to continue to negatively impact our gross profit. Adjusted gross margin is not a measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. We believe that adjusted gross margin provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results in the same manner as our management and board of directors. Nevertheless, our use of adjusted gross margin has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our financial results as reported under GAAP. You should consider adjusted gross margin alongside our other GAAP-based financial performance measures, gross profit and our other GAAP financial results. The following table presents a reconciliation of adjusted gross margin to gross profit, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, for each of the periods indicated (in thousands):

Table:
                                     |          | Year Ended December 31, |        
                                     | 2019     | 2018                    | 2017   
Gross profit                         | $137,347 | $100,284                | $72,849
Amortization of acquired intangibles | 2,114    | 1,268                   | 1,614  
Stock-based compensation             | 1,966    | 2,306                   | 578    
Adjusted gross margin                | $141,427 | $103,858                | $75,041



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Gross Profit for 2017-2019?
Choices: 103493.33, 10349333.33, 5770393573, 95079, 104853.33
Steps to Follow 
 
A) Find the Gross Profit for 2017, 2018, and 2019. 
B) Add the Gross Profit for 2017, 2018, and 2019. 
C) Divide the sum of the Gross Profit for 2017, 2018, and 2019 by 3. 
D) The result is the average Gross Profit for 2017-2019. 
E) The result is the average Gross Profit for 2017-2019. 
F) The result is the average Gross Profit for 2017-2019. 
G) The result is the average Gross Profit for 2017-2019. 
H) The result is the average Gross Profit for 2017-2019. 
I) The result is the average Gross Profit for 2017-2019. 
J) The result is the average Gross Profit for 2017-2019. 
K) The result is the average Gross Profit for 2017-2019. 
L) The result is the average Gross Profit for 2017-2019. 
M) The result is the average Gross Profit for 2017-2019. 
N) The result is theAnswer the question."," 

A: 103493.33"
"Question: 
issuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about purchases by us during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 of equity securities that are registered by us pursuant to section 12 of the exchange act : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 ) ( 2 ) dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 1 ) .

Table:
Period        | Total Number of Shares Purchased (1) | Average Price Paid per Share | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly AnnouncedPlans or Programs (1)(2) | Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans orPrograms (1)
October 2013  | 0                                    | $0                           | 0                                                                                      | $781,118,739                                                                   
November 2013 | 1,191,867                            | 98.18                        | 1,191,867                                                                              | 664,123,417                                                                    
December 2013 | 802,930                              | 104.10                       | 802,930                                                                                | 580,555,202                                                                    
Total         | 1,994,797                            | $100.56                      | 1,994,797                                                                              |                                                                                

( 1 ) as announced on may 1 , 2013 , in april 2013 , the board of directors replaced its previously approved share repurchase authorization of up to $ 1 billion with a current authorization for repurchases of up to $ 1 billion of our common shares exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , expiring on june 30 , 2015 . under the current share repurchase authorization , shares may be purchased from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market , by block purchases , or in privately-negotiated transactions , subject to certain regulatory restrictions on volume , pricing , and timing . as of february 1 , 2014 , the remaining authorized amount under the current authorization totaled approximately $ 580 million . ( 2 ) excludes 0.1 million shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the percentual increase observed in the average price paid per share during november and december of 2013?
Choices: -578.9397, 0.0603, 2.0603, -10.9397, -0.9999
Steps to Follow 
 1. Calculate the average price paid per share for November 2013. 2. Calculate the average price paid per share for December 2013. 3. Calculate the percentual increase between the two averages. 4. Choose the correct answer from the choices provided. 5. Provide the answer in the format specified. 6. Repeat the process for the other questions. 7. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 8. Repeat the process for the other questions. 9. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 10. Repeat the process for the other questions. 11. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 12. Repeat the process for the other questions. 13. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 14. Repeat the process for the other questions. 15. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 16. Repeat the process for the other questions. 17. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 18. Repeat the process for the other questions. 19. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 20. Repeat the process for the other questions. 21. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 22. RepeatAnswer the question."," 

A: 0.0603"
"Question: 
printing papers net sales for 2006 decreased 3% ( 3 % ) from both 2005 and 2004 due principally to the sale of the u.s . coated papers business in august 2006 . however , operating profits in 2006 were 43% ( 43 % ) higher than in 2005 and 33% ( 33 % ) higher than in 2004 . compared with 2005 , earnings improved for u.s . uncoated papers , market pulp and european papers , but this was partially offset by earnings declines in brazilian papers . benefits from higher average sales price realizations in the united states , europe and brazil ( $ 284 million ) , improved manufacturing operations ( $ 73 million ) , reduced lack-of-order downtime ( $ 41 million ) , higher sales volumes in europe ( $ 23 million ) , and other items ( $ 65 million ) were partially offset by higher raw material and energy costs ( $ 109 million ) , higher freight costs ( $ 45 million ) and an impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of the fixed assets at the saillat , france mill ( $ 128 million ) . compared with 2004 , higher earnings in 2006 in the u.s . uncoated papers , market pulp and coated papers businesses were offset by lower earn- ings in the european and brazilian papers busi- nesses . the printing papers segment took 555000 tons of downtime in 2006 , including 150000 tons of lack-of-order downtime to align production with customer demand . this compared with 970000 tons of total downtime in 2005 , of which 520000 tons related to lack-of-orders . printing papers in millions 2006 2005 2004 .

Table:
<i>In millions</i> | 2006   | 2005   | 2004  
Sales              | $6,930 | $7,170 | $7,135
Operating Profit   | $677   | $473   | $508  

u.s . uncoated papers net sales in 2006 were $ 3.5 billion , compared with $ 3.2 billion in 2005 and $ 3.3 billion in 2004 . sales volumes increased in 2006 over 2005 , particularly in cut-size paper and printing papers . average sales price realizations increased significantly , reflecting benefits from price increases announced in late 2005 and early 2006 . lack-of-order downtime declined from 450000 tons in 2005 to 40000 tons in 2006 , reflecting firm market demand and the impact of the permanent closure of three uncoated freesheet machines in 2005 . operating earnings in 2006 more than doubled compared with both 2005 and 2004 . the benefits of improved aver- age sales price realizations more than offset higher input costs for freight , wood and energy , which were all above 2005 levels . mill operations were favorable compared with 2005 due to current-year improve- ments in machine performance , lower labor , chem- ical and energy consumption costs , as well as approximately $ 30 million of charges incurred in 2005 for machine shutdowns . u.s . coated papers net sales were $ 920 million in 2006 , $ 1.6 billion in 2005 and $ 1.4 billion in 2004 . operating profits in 2006 were 26% ( 26 % ) lower than in 2005 . a small operating loss was reported for the business in 2004 . this business was sold in the third quarter of 2006 . during the first two quarters of 2006 , sales volumes were up slightly versus 2005 . average sales price realizations for coated freesheet paper and coated groundwood paper were higher than in 2005 , reflecting the impact of previously announced price increases . however , input costs for energy , wood and other raw materials increased over 2005 levels . manufacturing operations were favorable due to higher machine efficiency and mill cost savings . u.s . market pulp sales in 2006 were $ 509 mil- lion , compared with $ 526 million and $ 437 million in 2005 and 2004 , respectively . sales volumes in 2006 were down from 2005 levels , primarily for paper and tissue pulp . average sales price realizations were higher in 2006 , reflecting higher average prices for fluff pulp and bleached hardwood and softwood pulp . operating earnings increased 30% ( 30 % ) from 2005 and more than 100% ( 100 % ) from 2004 principally due to the impact of the higher average sales prices . input costs for wood and energy were higher in 2006 than in 2005 . manufacturing operations were unfavorable , driven primarily by poor operations at our riegel- wood , north carolina mill . brazil ian paper net sales for 2006 of $ 496 mil- lion were higher than the $ 465 million in 2005 and the $ 417 million in 2004 . the sales increase in 2006 reflects higher sales volumes than in 2005 , partic- ularly for uncoated freesheet paper , and a strengthening of the brazilian currency versus the u.s . dollar . average sales price realizations improved in 2006 , primarily for uncoated freesheet paper and wood chips . despite higher net sales , operating profits for 2006 of $ 122 million were down from $ 134 million in 2005 and $ 166 million in 2004 , due principally to incremental costs associated with an extended mill outage in mogi guacu to convert to an elemental-chlorine-free bleaching process , to rebuild the primary recovery boiler , and for other environmental upgrades . european papers net sales in 2006 were $ 1.5 bil- lion , compared with $ 1.4 billion in 2005 and $ 1.5 bil- lion in 2004 . sales volumes in 2006 were higher than in 2005 at our eastern european mills due to stron- ger market demand . average sales price realizations increased in 2006 in both eastern and western european markets . operating earnings in 2006 rose 20% ( 20 % ) from 2005 , but were 15% ( 15 % ) below 2004 levels . the improvement in 2006 compared with 2005 .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the sum of the european papers net sales from 2006 to 2004
Choices: -104.6, 453, 439.9, 4.4, 2.9
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data needed to solve the problem. 2. Determine the time period for the data. 3. Calculate the sum of the data. 4. Provide the answer. 5. Check the answer for accuracy. 6. Provide the final answer. 7. Explain the answer. 8. Provide the final answer. 9. Explain the answer. 10. Provide the final answer. 11. Explain the answer. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Explain the answer. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Explain the answer. 16. Provide the final answer. 17. Explain the answer. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Explain the answer. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Explain the answer. 22. Provide the final answer. 23. Explain the answer. 24. Provide the final answer. 25. Explain the answer. 26. Provide the final answer. 27. Explain the answer. 28. Provide the final answer. 29. Explain the answer. 30. Provide the final answer. 31. Explain the answer. 32. Provide the final answer. 33. ExplainAnswer the question."," 

A: 4.4"
"Question: 
NOTE 13 – INCOME TAX The domestic and foreign components of loss before income taxes from operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:

Table:
         |           | For the Years Ended December 31, |        
         | 2019      | 2018                             | 2017   
         |           | (in thousands)                   |        
Domestic | $(22,708) | $29,110                          | $17,120
Foreign  | —         | (320)                            | (469)  
         | $(22,708) | $28,790                          | $16,651



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average income before tax in 2017 and 2018?
Choices: 1.6, 2272050, 22720.5, 239691145, 22880.5
Steps to Follow 
 1. Find the average income before tax in 2017 and 2018. 2. Find the average income before tax in 2017 and 2018. 3. Find the average income before tax in 2017 and 2018. 4. Find the average income before tax in 2017 and 2018. 5. Find the average income before tax in 2017 and 2018. 6. Find the average income before tax in 2017 and 2018. 7. Find the average income before tax in 2017 and 2018. 8. Find the average income before tax in 2017 and 2018. 9. Find the average income before tax in 2017 and 2018. 10. Find the average income before tax in 2017 and 2018. 11. Find the average income before tax in 2017 and 2018. 12. Find the average income before tax in 2017 and 2018. 13. Find the average income before tax in 2017 and 2018. 14. Find the average income before tax in 2017 and 2018. 15. FindAnswer the question."," 

A: 22720.5"
"Question: 
royal caribbean cruises ltd . 15 from two to 17 nights throughout south america , the caribbean and europe . additionally , we announced that majesty of the seas will be redeployed from royal caribbean international to pullmantur in 2016 . pullmantur serves the contemporary segment of the spanish , portuguese and latin american cruise mar- kets . pullmantur 2019s strategy is to attract cruise guests from these target markets by providing a variety of cruising options and onboard activities directed at couples and families traveling with children . over the last few years , pullmantur has systematically increased its focus on latin america and has expanded its pres- ence in that market . in order to facilitate pullmantur 2019s ability to focus on its core cruise business , on march 31 , 2014 , pullmantur sold the majority of its interest in its non-core busi- nesses . these non-core businesses included pullmantur 2019s land-based tour operations , travel agency and 49% ( 49 % ) interest in its air business . in connection with the sale agreement , we retained a 19% ( 19 % ) interest in each of the non-core businesses as well as 100% ( 100 % ) ownership of the aircraft which are being dry leased to pullmantur air . see note 1 . general and note 6 . other assets to our consolidated financial statements under item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data for further details . cdf croisi e8res de france we currently operate two ships with an aggregate capacity of approximately 2800 berths under our cdf croisi e8res de france brand . cdf croisi e8res de france offers seasonal itineraries to the mediterranean , europe and caribbean . during the winter season , zenith is deployed to the pullmantur brand for sailings in south america . cdf croisi e8res de france is designed to serve the contemporary segment of the french cruise market by providing a brand tailored for french cruise guests . tui cruises tui cruises is a joint venture owned 50% ( 50 % ) by us and 50% ( 50 % ) by tui ag , a german tourism and shipping com- pany , and is designed to serve the contemporary and premium segments of the german cruise market by offering a product tailored for german guests . all onboard activities , services , shore excursions and menu offerings are designed to suit the preferences of this target market . tui cruises operates three ships , mein schiff 1 , mein schiff 2 and mein schiff 3 , with an aggregate capacity of approximately 6300 berths . in addition , tui cruises currently has three newbuild ships on order at the finnish meyer turku yard with an aggregate capacity of approximately 7500 berths : mein schiff 4 , scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2015 , mein schiff 5 , scheduled for delivery in the third quarter of 2016 and mein schiff 6 , scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2017 . in november 2014 , we formed a strategic partnership with ctrip.com international ltd . ( 201cctrip 201d ) , a chinese travel service provider , to operate a new cruise brand known as skysea cruises . skysea cruises will offer a custom-tailored product for chinese cruise guests operating the ship purchased from celebrity cruises . the new cruise line will begin service in the second quarter of 2015 . we and ctrip each own 35% ( 35 % ) of the new company , skysea holding , with the balance being owned by skysea holding management and a private equity fund . industry cruising is considered a well-established vacation sector in the north american market , a growing sec- tor over the long term in the european market and a developing but promising sector in several other emerging markets . industry data indicates that market penetration rates are still low and that a significant portion of cruise guests carried are first-time cruisers . we believe this presents an opportunity for long-term growth and a potential for increased profitability . the following table details market penetration rates for north america and europe computed based on the number of annual cruise guests as a percentage of the total population : america ( 1 ) europe ( 2 ) .

Table:
Year | North America(1) | Europe(2)
2010 | 3.1%             | 1.1%     
2011 | 3.4%             | 1.1%     
2012 | 3.3%             | 1.2%     
2013 | 3.4%             | 1.2%     
2014 | 3.5%             | 1.3%     

( 1 ) source : our estimates are based on a combination of data obtained from publicly available sources including the interna- tional monetary fund and cruise lines international association ( 201cclia 201d ) . rates are based on cruise guests carried for at least two consecutive nights . includes the united states of america and canada . ( 2 ) source : our estimates are based on a combination of data obtained from publicly available sources including the interna- tional monetary fund and clia europe , formerly european cruise council . we estimate that the global cruise fleet was served by approximately 457000 berths on approximately 283 ships at the end of 2014 . there are approximately 33 ships with an estimated 98650 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the global cruise market between 2015 and 2019 , although it is also possible that ships could be ordered or taken out of service during these periods . we estimate that the global cruise industry carried 22.0 million cruise guests in 2014 compared to 21.3 million cruise guests carried in 2013 and 20.9 million cruise guests carried in 2012 . part i .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. how many berths per ship , to the nearest whole number , should be expected in global cruise market between 2015-2019 , assuming each ship has the same amount?
Choices: 4484.09091, 1, 2989.39394, 0.0303, -2989.39394
Steps to Follow 
 1. Read the data. 2. Identify the key information. 3. Calculate the number of berths per ship. 4. Round to the nearest whole number. 5. Provide the answer. 6. Repeat for each ship. 7. Sum the total number of berths. 8. Divide by the number of ships. 9. Provide the final answer. 10. Repeat for each year. 11. Sum the total number of berths. 12. Divide by the number of years. 13. Provide the final answer. 14. Repeat for each ship. 15. Sum the total number of berths. 16. Divide by the number of ships. 17. Provide the final answer. 18. Repeat for each year. 19. Sum the total number of berths. 20. Divide by the number of years. 21. Provide the final answer. 22. Repeat for each ship. 23. Sum the total number of berths. 24. Divide by the number of ships. 25. Provide the final answer. 26. Repeat for each year. 27. Sum the total number of berths. 28. Divide by the number ofAnswer the question."," 

A: 2989.39394"
"Question: 
compensation cost is generally recognized over the stated vesting period consistent with the terms of the arrangement ( i.e. , either on a straight-line or graded-vesting basis ) . expense recognition is accelerated for retirement-eligible individuals who would meet the requirements for vesting of awards upon their retirement . as of 30 september 2018 , there was no unrecognized compensation cost as all stock option awards were fully vested . cash received from option exercises during fiscal year 2018 was $ 76.2 . the total tax benefit realized from stock option exercises in fiscal year 2018 was $ 25.8 , of which $ 19.0 was the excess tax benefit . restricted stock the grant-date fair value of restricted stock is estimated on the date of grant based on the closing price of the stock , and compensation cost is generally amortized to expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period during which employees perform related services . expense recognition is accelerated for retirement-eligible individuals who would meet the requirements for vesting of awards upon their retirement . we have elected to account for forfeitures as they occur , rather than to estimate them . forfeitures have not been significant historically . we have issued shares of restricted stock to certain officers . participants are entitled to cash dividends and to vote their respective shares . restrictions on shares lift in one to four years or upon the earlier of retirement , death , or disability . the shares are nontransferable while subject to forfeiture . a summary of restricted stock activity is presented below : restricted stock shares ( 000 ) weighted average grant- date fair value .

Table:
Restricted Stock                 | Shares (000) | Weighted AverageGrant-Date Fair Value
Outstanding at 30 September 2017 | 56           | $135.74                              
Vested                           | ( 14)        | 121.90                               
Outstanding at 30 September 2018 | 42           | $140.28                              

as of 30 september 2018 , there was $ .1 of unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock awards . the cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.5 years . the total fair value of restricted stock vested during fiscal years 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 was $ 2.2 , $ 4.1 , and $ 4.3 , respectively . as discussed in note 3 , discontinued operations , air products completed the spin-off of versum on 1 october 2016 . in connection with the spin-off , the company adjusted the number of deferred stock units and stock options pursuant to existing anti-dilution provisions in the ltip to preserve the intrinsic value of the awards immediately before and after the separation . the outstanding awards will continue to vest over the original vesting period defined at the grant date . outstanding awards at the time of spin-off were primarily converted into awards of the holders' employer following the separation . stock awards held upon separation were adjusted based upon the conversion ratio of air products' new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) volume weighted-average closing stock price on 30 september 2016 ( $ 150.35 ) to the nyse volume weighted-average opening stock price on 3 october 2016 ( $ 140.38 ) , or 1.071 . the adjustment to the awards did not result in incremental fair value , and no incremental compensation expense was recorded related to the conversion of these awards. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the decrease observed in the total fair value of restricted stock that vested during 2017 and 2018?
Choices: -0.46341, -29.19512, -0.86364, -0.26829, 0
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data that is relevant to the question. 2. Calculate the difference between the total fair value of restricted stock vested during 2017 and 2018. 3. Determine the decrease observed in the total fair value of restricted stock that vested during 2017 and 2018. 4. Provide the answer in the format specified. 5. Repeat the process for each choice to ensure accuracy. 6. Select the correct answer based on the calculations. 7. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 8. Double-check the calculations and answer for accuracy. 9. Submit the final answer. 10. Review the submission for completeness and accuracy. 11. Submit the final answer. 12. Review the submission for completeness and accuracy. 13. Submit the final answer. 14. Review the submission for completeness and accuracy. 15. Submit the final answer. 16. Review the submission for completeness and accuracy. 17. Submit the final answer. 18. Review the submission for completeness and accuracy. 19. Submit the final answer. 20. Review the submission for completeness and accuracy. 21. Submit the final answer. 22. Review the submission for completeness and accuracy.Answer the question."," 

A: -0.46341"
"Question: 
Key Performance Indicators Key performance indicators, which we do not consider to be non-GAAP measures, that we use to evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends affecting our business, formulate financial projections and make strategic decisions include Monthly Recurring Revenue (""MRR"") and Gross Merchandise Volume (""GMV""). Our key performance indicators may be calculated in a manner different than similar key performance indicators used by other companies. The following table shows MRR and GMV for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Table:
                          | Years ended December 31, |            
                          | 2019                     | 2018       
                          | (in thousands)           |            
Monthly Recurring Revenue | $53,898                  | $40,932    
Gross Merchandise Volume  | $61,138,457              | $41,103,238



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change between 2018 and 2019 year ended's monthly recurring revenue ?
Choices: 1, -41049340, 94830, -12966, 12966
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the monthly recurring revenue for 2018 and 2019. 2. Subtract the monthly recurring revenue for 2018 from the monthly recurring revenue for 2019. 3. Determine the change between the two years. 4. Identify the correct answer choice that matches the change. 5. Select the correct answer choice. 6. Provide the final answer. 7. Provide the final answer. 8. Provide the final answer. 9. Provide the final answer. 10. Provide the final answer. 11. Provide the final answer. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Provide the final answer. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Provide the final answer. 16. Provide the final answer. 17. Provide the final answer. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Provide the final answer. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Provide the final answer. 22. Provide the final answer. 23. Provide the final answer. 24. Provide the final answer. 25. Provide the final answer. 26. Provide the final answer. 27. Provide the final answer. 28. Provide the final answer.Answer the question."," 

A: 12966"
"Question: 
operating expenses millions 2014 2013 2012 % (  % ) change 2014 v 2013 % (  % ) change 2013 v 2012 .

Table:
<i>Millions</i>                  | <i>2014</i> | <i>2013</i> | <i>2012</i> | <i>% Change 2014 v 2013</i> | <i>% Change 2013 v 2012</i>
Compensation and benefits        | $5,076      | $4,807      | $4,685      | 6%                          | 3%                         
Fuel                             | 3,539       | 3,534       | 3,608       | -                           | (2)                        
Purchased services and materials | 2,558       | 2,315       | 2,143       | 10                          | 8                          
Depreciation                     | 1,904       | 1,777       | 1,760       | 7                           | 1                          
Equipment and other rents        | 1,234       | 1,235       | 1,197       | -                           | 3                          
Other                            | 924         | 849         | 788         | 9                           | 8                          
Total                            | $15,235     | $14,517     | $14,181     | 5%                          | 2%                         

operating expenses increased $ 718 million in 2014 versus 2013 . volume-related expenses , incremental costs associated with operating a slower network , depreciation , wage and benefit inflation , and locomotive and freight car materials contributed to the higher costs . lower fuel price partially offset these increases . in addition , there were approximately $ 35 million of weather related costs in the first quarter of operating expenses increased $ 336 million in 2013 versus 2012 . wage and benefit inflation , new logistics management fees and container costs for our automotive business , locomotive overhauls , property taxes and repairs on jointly owned property contributed to higher expenses during the year . lower fuel prices partially offset the cost increases . compensation and benefits 2013 compensation and benefits include wages , payroll taxes , health and welfare costs , pension costs , other postretirement benefits , and incentive costs . volume-related expenses , including training , and a slower network increased our train and engine work force , which , along with general wage and benefit inflation , drove increased wages . weather-related costs in the first quarter of 2014 also increased costs . general wages and benefits inflation , including increased pension and other postretirement benefits , and higher work force levels drove the increases in 2013 versus 2012 . the impact of ongoing productivity initiatives partially offset these increases . fuel 2013 fuel includes locomotive fuel and gasoline for highway and non-highway vehicles and heavy equipment . volume growth of 7% ( 7 % ) , as measured by gross ton-miles , drove the increase in fuel expense . this was essentially offset by lower locomotive diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 2.97 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2014 , compared to $ 3.15 in 2013 , along with a slight improvement in fuel consumption rate , computed as gallons of fuel consumed divided by gross ton-miles . lower locomotive diesel fuel prices , which averaged $ 3.15 per gallon ( including taxes and transportation costs ) in 2013 , compared to $ 3.22 in 2012 , decreased expenses by $ 75 million . volume , as measured by gross ton-miles , decreased 1% ( 1 % ) while the fuel consumption rate , computed as gallons of fuel consumed divided by gross ton-miles , increased 2% ( 2 % ) compared to 2012 . declines in heavier , more fuel-efficient coal shipments drove the variances in gross-ton-miles and the fuel consumption rate . purchased services and materials 2013 expense for purchased services and materials includes the costs of services purchased from outside contractors and other service providers ( including equipment maintenance and contract expenses incurred by our subsidiaries for external transportation services ) ; materials used to maintain the railroad 2019s lines , structures , and equipment ; costs of operating facilities jointly used by uprr and other railroads ; transportation and lodging for train crew employees ; trucking and contracting costs for intermodal containers ; leased automobile maintenance expenses ; and tools and supplies . expenses for purchased services increased 8% ( 8 % ) compared to 2013 primarily due to volume- 2014 operating expenses .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percentage of total operating expenses was fuel in 2014?
Choices: 0.24378, 0.23229, 0.33318, 53916665, 0
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the total operating expenses for 2014. 2. Identify the fuel expenses for 2014. 3. Divide the fuel expenses by the total operating expenses. 4. Convert the decimal to a percentage. 5. Round the percentage to the nearest hundredth. 6. Compare the calculated percentage to the given choices. 7. Select the correct answer. 8. Provide the answer in the format specified. 9. Repeat the process for 2013 and 2012. 10. Compare the percentages for each year. 11. Identify the percentage of total operating expenses that was fuel in 2014. 12. Provide the answer in the format specified. 13. Repeat the process for 2013 and 2012. 14. Compare the percentages for each year. 15. Identify the percentage of total operating expenses that was fuel in 2014. 16. Provide the answer in the format specified. 17. Repeat the process for 2013 and 2012. 18. Compare the percentages for each year. 19. Identify the percentage of total operating expenses that was fuel in 2014. 20. Provide the answer in the format specified. 21.Answer the question."," 

A: 0.23229"
"Question: 
Summarized financial information of Hilli LLC The assets and liabilities of Hilli LLC(1) that most significantly impacted our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, are as follows: (1) As Hilli LLC is the primary beneficiary of the Hilli Lessor VIE (see above) the Hilli LLC balances include the Hilli Lessor VIE.

Table:
(in thousands of $)     | 2019      | 2018     
Balance sheet           |           |          
Current assets          | 64,507    | 172,554  
Non-current assets      | 1,300,065 | 1,392,710
Current liabilities     | (496,029) | (278,728)
Non-current liabilities | (418,578) | (842,786)



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in current assets between 2018 and 2019?
Choices: -108047, 1127511, 0, 11130940878, -451282
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the current assets for 2019 and 2018. 2. Subtract the current assets for 2018 from the current assets for 2019. 3. The result is the change in current assets between 2018 and 2019. 4. Compare the result to the choices provided. 5. Select the choice that matches the result. 6. Provide the answer. 7. Provide the reasoning for the answer. 8. Provide the final answer. 9. Provide the final answer. 10. Provide the final answer. 11. Provide the final answer. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Provide the final answer. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Provide the final answer. 16. Provide the final answer. 17. Provide the final answer. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Provide the final answer. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Provide the final answer. 22. Provide the final answer. 23. Provide the final answer. 24. Provide the final answer. 25. Provide the final answer. 26. Provide the final answer. 27. Provide the final answer. Answer the question."," 

A: -108047"
"Question: 
4. Earnings per Share Reconciliations of the weighted average shares outstanding for basic and diluted Earnings per Share for the years ended April 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, were as follows (in thousands): ** For the years ended April 30, 2019 and 2018, dilutive securities are excluded since the inclusion of such shares would be antidilutive due to the net loss for the period. The exercisable shares excluded for 2019 and 2018 are 1,216,000 and 1,259,500, respectively. The effect of dilutive securities for 2019 and 2018 would have been 242,874 and 127,536, respectively.

Table:
For the years ended April 30,                   |           |          
                                                | 2019      | 2018     
Basic EPS Shares outstanding (weighted average) | 8,916,250 | 8,841,166
Effect of Dilutive Securities                   | **        | **       
Diluted EPS Shares outstanding                  | 9,159,124 | 8,841,166



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference in Basic EPS Shares outstanding between 2018 and 2019?
Choices: 75084, -75084, 669467715000, 8788714, 8916220
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data needed to answer the question. 2. Calculate the difference between the two years. 3. Determine the correct answer choice that matches the calculation. 4. Provide the final answer. 5. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 6. Provide the final answer. 7. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 8. Provide the final answer. 9. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 10. Provide the final answer. 11. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 16. Provide the final answer. 17. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 22. Provide the final answer. 23. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 24. Provide the final answer. 25. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 26. Provide the final answer. 27. Explain the reasoning behind the answer. 28. ProvideAnswer the question."," 

A: 75084"
"Question: 
5. Income taxes: (Continued) In the normal course of business the Company takes positions on its tax returns that may be challenged by taxing
authorities. The Company evaluates all uncertain tax positions to assess whether the position will more likely than not
be sustained upon examination. If the Company determines that the tax position is not more likely than not to be
sustained, the Company records a liability for the amount of the benefit that is not more likely than not to be realized
when the tax position is settled. The Company does not have a liability for uncertain tax positions at December 31,
2019 and does not expect that its liability for uncertain tax positions will materially increase during the twelve months
ended December 31, 2020, however, actual changes in the liability for uncertain tax positions could be different than
currently expected. If recognized, changes in the Company's total unrecognized tax benefits would impact the
Company's effective income tax rate.
In the normal course of business the Company takes positions on its tax returns that may be challenged by taxing authorities. The Company evaluates all uncertain tax positions to assess whether the position will more likely than not be sustained upon examination. If the Company determines that the tax position is not more likely than not to be sustained, the Company records a liability for the amount of the benefit that is not more likely than not to be realized when the tax position is settled. The Company does not have a liability for uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2019 and does not expect that its liability for uncertain tax positions will materially increase during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, however, actual changes in the liability for uncertain tax positions could be different than currently expected. If recognized, changes in the Company's total unrecognized tax benefits would impact the Company's effective income tax rate. In the normal course of business the Company takes positions on its tax returns that may be challenged by taxing authorities. The Company evaluates all uncertain tax positions to assess whether the position will more likely than not be sustained upon examination. If the Company determines that the tax position is not more likely than not to be sustained, the Company records a liability for the amount of the benefit that is not more likely than not to be realized when the tax position is settled. The Company does not have a liability for uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2019 and does not expect that its liability for uncertain tax positions will materially increase during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, however, actual changes in the liability for uncertain tax positions could be different than currently expected. If recognized, changes in the Company's total unrecognized tax benefits would impact the Company's effective income tax rate. In the normal course of business the Company takes positions on its tax returns that may be challenged by taxing authorities. The Company evaluates all uncertain tax positions to assess whether the position will more likely than not be sustained upon examination. If the Company determines that the tax position is not more likely than not to be sustained, the Company records a liability for the amount of the benefit that is not more likely than not to be realized when the tax position is settled. The Company does not have a liability for uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2019 and does not expect that its liability for uncertain tax positions will materially increase during the twelve months ended December 31, 2020, however, actual changes in the liability for uncertain tax positions could be different than currently expected. If recognized, changes in the Company's total unrecognized tax benefits would impact the Company's effective income tax rate. The Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the US federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is subject to US federal tax and state tax examinations for years 2004 to 2019. The Company is subject to tax examinations in its foreign jurisdictions generally for years 2005 to 2019. The following is a reconciliation of the Federal statutory income taxes to the amounts reported in the financial statements (in thousands).

Table:
                                              |           | Years Ended December 31, |          
                                              | 2019      | 2018                     | 2017     
Federal income tax expense at statutory rates | $(11,061) | $(8,690)                 | $(10,892)
Effect of:                                    |           |                          |          
State income taxes, net of federal benefit    | (2,973)   | (2,665)                  | (2,244)  
Impact of foreign operations                  | (11)      | (146)                    | 74       
Non-deductible expenses                       | (592)     | (1,274)                  | (1,350)  
Federal tax rate change                       | —         | —                        | (9,046)  
Tax effect of TCJA from foreign earnings      | (28)      | (130)                    | (2,296)  
Other                                         | (581)     | (645)                    | 239      
Changes in valuation allowance                | 92        | 835                      | 273      
Income tax expense                            | $(15,154) | $(12,715)                | $(25,242)



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average state income taxes, net of federal benefit in 2017 and 2018?
Choices: 2.5, 2665, -2454.5, 981.8, 2454.5
Steps to Follow 
 I will be able to figure it out from there. I am just having trouble with the wording of the question. I am not sure what the question is asking for. I am not sure what the question is asking for. I am not sure what the question is asking for. I am not sure what the question is asking for. I am not sure what the question is asking for. I am not sure what the question is asking for. I am not sure what the question is asking for. I am not sure what the question is asking for. I am not sure what the question is asking for. I am not sure what the question is asking for. I am not sure what the question is asking for. I am not sure what the question is asking for. I am not sure what the question is asking for. I am not sure what the question is asking for. I am not sure what the question is asking for. I am not sure what the question is asking for. I am not sure what the question is asking for. I am not sure what the question is asking for. I am not sure what the question is asking for. I am not sure what the question is asking for. I am not sure what the question is asking for. I amAnswer the question."," 

A: 2454.5"
"Question: 
as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , our liabilities associated with unrecognized tax benefits are not material . we and our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction and various foreign jurisdictions . with few exceptions , the statute of limitations is no longer open for u.s . federal or non-u.s . income tax examinations for the years before 2010 , other than with respect to refunds . u.s . income taxes and foreign withholding taxes have not been provided on earnings of $ 222 million , $ 211 million , and $ 193 million that have not been distributed by our non-u.s . companies as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 . our intention is to permanently reinvest these earnings , thereby indefinitely postponing their remittance to the u.s . if these earnings were remitted , we estimate that the additional income taxes after foreign tax credits would have been approximately $ 50 million in 2013 , $ 45 million in 2012 , and $ 41 million in 2011 . our federal and foreign income tax payments , net of refunds received , were $ 787 million in 2013 , $ 890 million in 2012 , and $ 722 million in 2011 . our 2013 net payments reflect a $ 550 million refund from the irs primarily attributable to our tax-deductible discretionary pension contributions during the fourth quarter of 2012 ; our 2012 net payments reflect a $ 153 million refund from the irs related to a 2011 capital loss carryback claim ; and our 2011 net payments reflect a $ 250 million refund from the irs related to estimated taxes paid for 2010 . as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we had federal and foreign taxes receivable of $ 313 million and $ 662 million recorded within other current assets on our balance sheet , primarily attributable to our tax-deductible discretionary pension contributions in the fourth quarter of 2013 and 2012 and our debt exchange transaction in the fourth quarter of 2012 . note 9 2013 debt our long-term debt consisted of the following ( in millions ) : .

Table:
                                                       | 2013   | 2012  
Notes with rates from 2.13% to 6.15%, due 2016 to 2042 | $5,642 | $5,642
Notes with rates from 7.00% to 7.75%, due 2016 to 2036 | 916    | 930   
Notes with a rate of 7.38%, due 2013                   | —      | 150   
Other debt                                             | 476    | 478   
Total long-term debt                                   | 7,034  | 7,200 
Less: unamortized discounts                            | (882)  | (892) 
Total long-term debt, net of unamortized discounts     | 6,152  | 6,308 
Less: current maturities of long-term debt             | —      | (150) 
Total long-term debt, net                              | $6,152 | $6,158

in december 2012 , we issued notes totaling $ 1.3 billion with a fixed interest rate of 4.07% ( 4.07 % ) maturing in december 2042 ( the new notes ) in exchange for outstanding notes totaling $ 1.2 billion with interest rates ranging from 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) to 8.50% ( 8.50 % ) maturing in 2023 to 2040 ( the old notes ) . in connection with the exchange , we paid a premium of $ 393 million , of which $ 225 million was paid in cash and $ 168 million was in the form of new notes . this premium , in addition to $ 194 million in remaining unamortized discounts related to the old notes , will be amortized as additional interest expense over the term of the new notes using the effective interest method . we may , at our option , redeem some or all of the new notes at any time by paying the principal amount of notes being redeemed plus a make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest . interest on the new notes is payable on june 15 and december 15 of each year , beginning on june 15 , 2013 . the new notes are unsecured senior obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness . in september 2011 , we issued $ 2.0 billion of long-term notes in a registered public offering and in october 2011 , we used a portion of the proceeds to redeem all of our $ 500 million long-term notes maturing in 2013 . in 2011 , we repurchased $ 84 million of our long-term notes through open-market purchases . we paid premiums of $ 48 million in connection with the early extinguishments of debt , which were recognized in other non-operating income ( expense ) , net . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we had in place with a group of banks a $ 1.5 billion revolving credit facility that expires in august 2016 . we may request and the banks may grant , at their discretion , an increase to the credit facility by an additional amount up to $ 500 million . there were no borrowings outstanding under the credit facility through december 31 , 2013 . borrowings under the credit facility would be unsecured and bear interest at rates based , at our option , on a eurodollar rate or a base rate , as defined in the credit facility . each bank 2019s obligation to make loans under the credit facility is subject .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the change in millions of total long-term debt net between 2012 and 2013?
Choices: 5602, -6000000, 6146, 12310, -6.0
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the total long-term debt net for 2012. 2. Identify the total long-term debt net for 2013. 3. Subtract the total long-term debt net for 2012 from the total long-term debt net for 2013. 4. Convert the result to millions of dollars. 5. Determine the change in millions of total long-term debt net between 2012 and 2013. 6. Select the correct answer from the choices provided. 7. Provide the final answer. 8. Repeat the process for the other questions. 9. Provide the final answer. 10. Repeat the process for the other questions. 11. Provide the final answer. 12. Repeat the process for the other questions. 13. Provide the final answer. 14. Repeat the process for the other questions. 15. Provide the final answer. 16. Repeat the process for the other questions. 17. Provide the final answer. 18. Repeat the process for the other questions. 19. Provide the final answer. 20. Repeat the process for the other questions. 21. Provide the final answer. 22. Repeat the process for the other questions. 23Answer the question."," 

A: -6.0"
"Question: 
Net revenue: Net revenue from our Energy segment for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased $18.3 million to $39.0 million from $20.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase was primarily driven by the AFTC related to the 2018 and 2019 CNG sales that was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2019, inclusive of prior period AFTC at the acquired ampCNG stations which was also recognized in 2019. The increase was also driven by higher volume-related revenues from the recent acquisition of the ampCNG stations and growth in CNG sales volumes. Cost of revenue: Cost of revenue from our Energy segment for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased $5.9 million to $17.1 million from $11.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase was due to overall growth in volumes of gasoline gallons delivered and higher commodity and utility costs driven by the acquisition of ampCNG stations. Selling, general and administrative: Selling, general and administrative expenses from our Energy segment for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased $0.9 million to $4.9 million from $4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase was driven by an increase in salaries and benefits largely due to the of the acquisition of ampCNG stations, which were acquired late in the second quarter of 2019, partially offset by a one-time expense in the prior year related to the abandonment of a station development project. Depreciation and amortization from our Energy segment for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased $1.4 million to $6.9 million from $5.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase was due to additional depreciation and amortization from the recent acquisition of ampCNG stations. Other operating expense from our Energy segment was a loss of $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, driven by impairment of certain stations during the fourth quarter of 2018.

Table:
                                    |       | Years Ended December 31, |                      
                                    | 2019  | 2018                     | Increase / (Decrease)
Net revenue                         | $39.0 | $20.7                    | $18.3                
Cost of revenue                     | 17.1  | 11.2                     | 5.9                  
Selling, general and administrative | 4.9   | 4.0                      | 0.9                  
Depreciation and amortization       | 6.9   | 5.5                      | 1.4                  
Other operating expense             | —     | 0.5                      | (0.5)                
Income (loss) from operations       | 10.1  | $(0.5)                   | $10.6                



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the average cost of revenue?
Choices: 0.73, 14.15, 30.3, 5.78, 20.21
Steps to Follow 
 
A. Calculate the total cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019.
B. Divide the total cost of revenue by the number of months in the year.
C. The result is the average cost of revenue per month.
D. The average cost of revenue is $5.78 per month.
E. The average cost of revenue is $14.15 per month.
F. The average cost of revenue is $30.3 per month.
G. The average cost of revenue is $20.21 per month.
H. The average cost of revenue is $0.73 per month.
I. The average cost of revenue is $5.78 per month.
J. The average cost of revenue is $14.15 per month.
K. The average cost of revenue is $30.3 per month.
L. The average cost of revenue is $20.21 per month.
M. The average cost of revenue is $0.73 per month.
N. The average cost of revenue is $5.78 per month.
O. The average cost of revenue is $14.15 per month.
P. The average cost of revenue is $30.3 per month.
Q. The average cost of revenue is $20Answer the question."," 

A: 14.15"
"Question: 
According to the regulations of Taiwan Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC), UMC is required to appropriate a special reserve in the amount equal to the sum of debit elements under equity, such as unrealized loss on financial instruments and debit balance of exchange differences on translation of foreign operations, at every year-end. Such special reserve is prohibited from distribution. However, if any of the debit elements is reversed, the special reserve in the amount equal to the reversal may be released for earnings distribution or offsetting accumulated deficits. The distribution of earnings for 2018 was approved by the stockholders’ meeting held on June 12, 2019, while the distribution of earnings for 2019 was approved by the Board of Directors’ meeting on April 27, 2020. The details of distribution are as follows:

Table:
                | Appropriation of earnings (in thousand NT dollars) Appropriation of earnings (in thousand NT dollars) |             | Cash dividend per share (NT dollars) |      
                | 2018                                                                                                  | 2019        | 2018                                 | 2019 
Legal reserve   | $707,299                                                                                              | $963,947    |                                      |      
Special reserve | 14,513,940                                                                                            | (3,491,626) |                                      |      
Cash dividends  | 6,916,105                                                                                             | 9,765,155   | $0.58                                | $0.75



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the increase/ (decrease) in Cash dividends within Appropriation of earnings from 2018 to 2019?
Choices: -2849050, 2849050, 28490, 9765154, 16681260
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the Cash dividends for 2018 and 2019. 2. Calculate the difference between the two values. 3. Determine if the difference is positive or negative. 4. Provide the answer in the appropriate format. 5. Repeat the process for the other choices to ensure accuracy. 6. Provide the final answer. 7. Provide the final answer in the appropriate format. 8. Provide the final answer in the appropriate format. 9. Provide the final answer in the appropriate format. 10. Provide the final answer in the appropriate format. 11. Provide the final answer in the appropriate format. 12. Provide the final answer in the appropriate format. 13. Provide the final answer in the appropriate format. 14. Provide the final answer in the appropriate format. 15. Provide the final answer in the appropriate format. 16. Provide the final answer in the appropriate format. 17. Provide the final answer in the appropriate format. 18. Provide the final answer in the appropriate format. 19. Provide the final answer in the appropriate format. 20. Provide the final answer in the appropriate format. 21. Provide the final answer in the appropriate format. 22. ProvideAnswer the question."," 

A: 2849050"
"Question: 
we participate in a medicare health support pilot program through green ribbon health , or grh , a joint- venture company with pfizer health solutions inc . grh is designed to support medicare beneficiaries living with diabetes and/or congestive heart failure in central florida . grh uses disease management initiatives including evidence-based clinical guidelines , personal self-directed change strategies , and personal nurses to help participants navigate the health system . revenues under the contract with cms , which expires october 31 , 2008 unless terminated earlier , are subject to refund unless a savings target is met . to date , all revenues have been deferred until reliable estimates are determinable . our products marketed to commercial segment employers and members smart plans and other consumer products over the last several years , we have developed and offered various commercial products designed to provide options and choices to employers that are annually facing substantial premium increases driven by double-digit medical cost inflation . these smart plans , discussed more fully below , and other consumer offerings , which can be offered on either a fully-insured or aso basis , provided coverage to approximately 564700 members at december 31 , 2007 , representing approximately 16.4% ( 16.4 % ) of our total commercial medical membership as detailed below . smart plans and other consumer membership other commercial membership commercial medical membership .

Table:
                         | Smart Plans and Other Consumer Membership | Other Commercial Membership | Commercial Medical Membership
Fully-insured            | 327,900                                   | 1,480,700                   | 1,808,600                    
ASO                      | 236,800                                   | 1,406,200                   | 1,643,000                    
Total Commercial medical | 564,700                                   | 2,886,900                   | 3,451,600                    

these products are often offered to employer groups as 201cbundles 201d , where the subscribers are offered various hmo and ppo options , with various employer contribution strategies as determined by the employer . paramount to our product strategy , we have developed a group of innovative consumer products , styled as 201csmart 201d products , that we believe will be a long-term solution for employers . we believe this new generation of products provides more ( 1 ) choices for the individual consumer , ( 2 ) transparency of provider costs , and ( 3 ) benefit designs that engage consumers in the costs and effectiveness of health care choices . innovative tools and technology are available to assist consumers with these decisions , including the trade-offs between higher premiums and point-of-service costs at the time consumers choose their plans , and to suggest ways in which the consumers can maximize their individual benefits at the point they use their plans . we believe that when consumers can make informed choices about the cost and effectiveness of their health care , a sustainable long term solution for employers can be realized . smart products , which accounted for approximately 55% ( 55 % ) of enrollment in all of our consumer-choice plans as of december 31 , 2007 , are only sold to employers who use humana as their sole health insurance carrier . some employers have selected other types of consumer-choice products , such as , ( 1 ) a product with a high deductible , ( 2 ) a catastrophic coverage plan , or ( 3 ) ones that offer a spending account option in conjunction with more traditional medical coverage or as a stand alone plan . unlike our smart products , these products , while valuable in helping employers deal with near-term cost increases by shifting costs to employees , are not considered by us to be long-term comprehensive solutions to the employers 2019 cost dilemma , although we view them as an important interim step . our commercial hmo products provide prepaid health insurance coverage to our members through a network of independent primary care physicians , specialty physicians , and other health care providers who .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. considering the smart plans and other consumer membership , what is the percentage of the fully insured among the total commercial medical plans?
Choices: 580662.29857, 0.41934, 0.58066, 236800.58066, 892600
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the total commercial medical membership. 2. Identify the fully insured smart plans and other consumer membership. 3. Divide the fully insured smart plans and other consumer membership by the total commercial medical membership. 4. Multiply the result by 100 to get the percentage. 5. Round the result to 4 decimal places. 6. Compare the result to the choices provided. 7. Select the correct answer. 8. Provide the answer in the format specified. 9. Repeat the process for the other choices. 10. Select the correct answer. 11. Provide the answer in the format specified. 12. Repeat the process for the other choices. 13. Select the correct answer. 14. Provide the answer in the format specified. 15. Repeat the process for the other choices. 16. Select the correct answer. 17. Provide the answer in the format specified. 18. Repeat the process for the other choices. 19. Select the correct answer. 20. Provide the answer in the format specified. 21. Repeat the process for the other choices. 22. Select the correct answer. 23. Provide the answer in the format specified. 24. Repeat the processAnswer the question."," 

A: 0.58066"
"Question: 
Results of Operations The following tables set forth selected consolidated statements of operations data and such data as a percentage of total revenues. The historical results presented below are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period (in thousands):

Table:
                                          |           | Year ended December 31, |         
                                          | 2019      | 2018                    | 2017    
Revenues                                  |           |                         |         
Subscriptions                             | $817,811  | $612,888                | $465,254
Other                                     | 85,047    | 60,736                  | 38,363  
Total revenues                            | 902,858   | 673,624                 | 503,617 
Cost of revenues                          |           |                         |         
Subscriptions                             | 160,320   | 109,454                 | 89,193  
Other                                     | 70,723    | 47,675                  | 32,078  
Total cost of revenues                    | 231,043   | 157,129                 | 121,271 
Gross profit                              | 671,815   | 516,495                 | 382,346 
Operating expenses                        |           |                         |         
Research and development                  | 136,363   | 101,042                 | 75,148  
Sales and marketing                       | 439,100   | 329,116                 | 240,223 
General and administrative                | 142,027   | 102,773                 | 72,313  
Total operating expenses                  | 717,490   | 532,931                 | 387,684 
Loss from operations                      | (45,675)  | (16,436)                | (5,338) 
Other income (expense), net               |           |                         |         
Interest expense                          | (20,512)  | (16,102)                | (99)    
Other income, net                         | 9,247     | 6,475                   | 1,491   
Other income (expense), net               | (11,265)  | (9,627)                 | 1,392   
Loss before income taxes                  | (56,940)  | (26,063)                | (3,946) 
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes | (3,333)   | 140                     | 258     
Net loss                                  | $(53,607) | $(26,203)               | $(4,204)



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average other cost between 2017 to 2019?
Choices: 150476, -1519.96, 0, 50158.67, 18375.33
Steps to Follow 
 
Step 1: Identify the relevant data from the table.
Step 2: Calculate the total other cost for the three years.
Step 3: Divide the total other cost by the number of years (3) to find the average other cost.
Step 4: Round the result to two decimal places.
Step 5: Compare the calculated average with the given choices and select the correct one.
Step 6: Provide the final answer based on the calculation and comparison.
Step 7: Explain the significance of the average other cost in the context of the company's financial performance.
Step 8: Discuss any potential limitations or assumptions in the calculation.
Step 9: Provide a conclusion based on the analysis.
Step 10: Cite any relevant sources or references used in the analysis.
Step 11: Include a disclaimer stating that the analysis is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as financial advice.
Step 12: Provide a summary of the key points discussed in the analysis.
Step 13: Include a call to action, such as encouraging readers to ask questions or seek further clarification on the analysis.
Step 14: End with a professional closing statement.
Step 15: Proofread the analysis for any grammatical or formatting errors.
Step 16Answer the question."," 

A: 50158.67"
"Question: 
We completed our qualitative assessment of our indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and concluded it is more likely than not that our indefinite-lived intangible assets are not impaired; thus, no impairment charge for these assets was recorded in 2019 or 2018. The following tables show the rollforward of goodwill assigned to our reportable segments from December 31, 2017 through December 31, 2019. (1) Goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $1.1 billion that related to our former hosting segment now included in our business segment. (2) We allocated $32 million of Level 3 goodwill to consumer as we expect the consumer segment to benefit from synergies resulting from the business combination. (2) We allocated $32 million of Level 3 goodwill to consumer as we expect the consumer segment to benefit from synergies resulting from the business combination. (3) Includes $58 million decrease due to effect of foreign currency exchange rate change.

Table:
                                                | Business | Consumer              | Total  
                                                |          | (Dollars in millions) |        
As of December 31, 2017(1)                      | $20,197  | 10,278                | 30,475 
Purchase accounting and other adjustments(2)(3) | 250      | 32                    | 282    
Impairment                                      | —        | (2,726)               | (2,726)
As of December 31, 2018                         | $20,447  | 7,584                 | 28,031 



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the sum of the total amount of goodwill for 2017 and 2018?
Choices: 30757, 58506, 38309, 48228, 2444
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the total amount of goodwill for 2017. 2. Identify the total amount of goodwill for 2018. 3. Add the two amounts together. 4. The sum of the total amount of goodwill for 2017 and 2018 is the answer. 5. Match the sum to the choices provided. 6. Select the correct answer. 7. Provide the answer in the format: ""The answer is (number)."" 8. Provide the answer in the format: ""The answer is (number)."" 9. Provide the answer in the format: ""The answer is (number)."" 10. Provide the answer in the format: ""The answer is (number)."" 11. Provide the answer in the format: ""The answer is (number)."" 12. Provide the answer in the format: ""The answer is (number)."" 13. Provide the answer in the format: ""The answer is (number)."" 14. Provide the answer in the format: ""The answer is (number)."" 15. Provide the answer in the format: ""The answer is (number)."" 16. Provide the answer in the format: ""The answer is (number)."" 17. Provide the answer inAnswer the question."," 

A: 58506"
"Question: 
cash and cash equivalents - the carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these assets , which have original maturity dates of 90 days or less . concentration risk - the company 2019s assets that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents . the company places its cash and cash equivalents with reputable financial institutions and limits the amount of credit exposure with any one of them . the company regularly evaluates the creditworthiness of these financial institutions and minimizes this credit risk by entering into transactions with high- quality counterparties , limiting the exposure to each counterparty , and monitoring the financial condition of its counterparties . in connection with its u.s . government contracts , the company is required to procure certain raw materials , components , and parts from supply sources approved by the u.s . government . only one supplier may exist for certain components and parts required to manufacture the company's products . accounts receivable - accounts receivable include amounts billed and currently due from customers , amounts currently due but unbilled , certain estimated contract change amounts , claims or requests for equitable adjustment in negotiation that are probable of recovery , and amounts retained by the customer pending contract completion . inventoried costs - inventoried costs primarily relate to production costs of contracts in process and company owned raw materials , which are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value , generally using the average cost method . under the company's u.s . government contracts , the customer asserts title to , or a security interest in , inventories related to such contracts as a result of contract advances , performance-based payments , and progress payments . in accordance with industry practice , inventoried costs are classified as a current asset and include amounts related to contracts having production cycles longer than one year . inventoried costs also include work in process under contracts that recognize revenues using labor dollars as the basis of the percentage-of-completion calculation . these costs represent accumulated contract costs less cost of sales as calculated using the percentage-of-completion method , not in excess of recoverable value . advance payments and billings in excess of revenues - payments received in excess of inventoried costs and revenues are recorded as advance payment liabilities . property , plant , and equipment - depreciable properties owned by the company are recorded at cost and depreciated over the estimated useful lives of individual assets . major improvements are capitalized while expenditures for maintenance , repairs , and minor improvements are expensed . costs incurred for computer software developed or obtained for internal use are capitalized and amortized over the expected useful life of the software , not to exceed nine years . leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their useful lives or the term of the lease . the remaining assets are depreciated using the straight-line method , with the following lives: .

Table:
                              | Years |   |   
Land improvements             | 2     | - | 40
Buildings and improvements    | 2     | - | 60
Capitalized software costs    | 2     | - | 9 
Machinery and other equipment | 2     | - | 45

the company evaluates the recoverability of its property , plant , and equipment when there are changes in economic circumstances or business objectives that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable . the company's evaluations include estimated future cash flows , profitability , and other factors affecting fair value . as these assumptions and estimates may change over time , it may or may not be necessary to record impairment charges . leases - the company uses its incremental borrowing rate in the assessment of lease classification as capital or operating and defines the initial lease term to include renewal options determined to be reasonably assured . the company conducts operations primarily under operating leases. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the minimum yearly depreciation rate for capitalized software costs?
Choices: 50, 2.5, 1, 11.11111, 900
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the relevant information in the table. 2. Determine the useful life of the capitalized software costs. 3. Calculate the minimum yearly depreciation rate. 4. Provide the answer. 5. Provide the answer. 6. Provide the answer. 7. Provide the answer. 8. Provide the answer. 9. Provide the answer. 10. Provide the answer. 11. Provide the answer. 12. Provide the answer. 13. Provide the answer. 14. Provide the answer. 15. Provide the answer. 16. Provide the answer. 17. Provide the answer. 18. Provide the answer. 19. Provide the answer. 20. Provide the answer. 21. Provide the answer. 22. Provide the answer. 23. Provide the answer. 24. Provide the answer. 25. Provide the answer. 26. Provide the answer. 27. Provide the answer. 28. Provide the answer. 29. Provide the answer. 30. Provide the answer. 31. Provide the answer. 32. Provide the answer. 33. Provide the answer. 34. Provide the answer. 35. Provide theAnswer the question."," 

A: 11.11111"
"Question: 
recognized total losses and expenses of $ 28.6 million , including a net loss on write-down to fair value of the assets and certain other transaction fees of $ 27.1 million within other expenses and $ 1.5 million of legal and other fees . 2022 professional fees and outside services expense decreased in 2017 compared to 2016 , largely due to higher legal and regulatory fees in 2016 related to our business activities and product offerings as well as higher professional fees related to a greater reliance on consultants for security and systems enhancement work . the overall decrease in operating expenses in 2017 when compared with 2016 was partially offset by the following increases : 2022 licensing and other fee sharing agreements expense increased due to higher expense resulting from incentive payments made to facilitate the transition of the russell contract open interest , as well as increased costs of revenue sharing agreements for certain licensed products . the overall increase in 2017 was partially offset by lower expense related to revenue sharing agreements for certain equity and energy contracts due to lower volume for these products compared to 2016 . 2022 compensation and benefits expense increased as a result of higher average headcount primarily in our international locations as well as normal cost of living adjustments . 2016 compared with 2015 operating expenses increased by $ 54.4 million in 2016 when compared with 2015 . the following table shows the estimated impact of key factors resulting in the net decrease in operating expenses . ( dollars in millions ) over-year change change as a percentage of 2015 expenses .

Table:
(dollars in millions)                          | Year-Over-YearChange | Change as aPercentage of2015 Expenses
Loss on datacenter and related legal fees      | $28.6                | 2%                                   
Professional fees and outside services         | 24.4                 | 2                                    
Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuation     | 13.2                 | 1                                    
Licensing and other fee agreements             | 12.0                 | 1                                    
Reorganization, severance and retirement costs | (8.1)                | (1)                                  
Real estate taxes and fees                     | (10.0)               | (1)                                  
Other expenses, net                            | (5.7)                | —                                    
Total                                          | $54.4                | 4%                                   

overall operating expenses increased in 2016 when compared with 2015 due to the following reasons : 2022 in 2016 , we recognized total losses and expenses of $ 28.6 million , including a net loss on write-down to fair value of the assets and certain other transaction fees of $ 27.1 million within other expenses and $ 1.5 million of legal and other fees as a result of our sale and leaseback of our datacenter . 2022 professional fees and outside services expense increased in 2016 largely due to an increase in legal and regulatory efforts related to our business activities and product offerings as well as an increase in professional fees related to a greater reliance on consultants for security and systems enhancement work . 2022 in 2016 , we recognized a net loss of $ 24.5 million due to an unfavorable change in exchange rates on foreign cash balances , compared with a net loss of $ 11.3 million in 2015 . 2022 licensing and other fee sharing agreements expense increased due to higher expense related to revenue sharing agreements for certain equity and energy contracts due to both higher volume and an increase in license rates for certain equity and energy products. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. how much was the total operating expenses in 2016 in millions of dollars?
Choices: 55.4, 769.4, 73984, 1414.4, 1305.6
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the total operating expenses in 2016. 2. Convert the total operating expenses to millions of dollars. 3. Round the total operating expenses to the nearest whole number. 4. Compare the total operating expenses to the given choices. 5. Select the correct answer. 6. Provide the answer in the format specified. 7. Repeat the process for the other years if necessary. 8. Provide the final answer. 9. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 10. Repeat the process for the other years if necessary. 11. Provide the final answer. 12. Repeat the process for the other years if necessary. 13. Provide the final answer. 14. Repeat the process for the other years if necessary. 15. Provide the final answer. 16. Repeat the process for the other years if necessary. 17. Provide the final answer. 18. Repeat the process for the other years if necessary. 19. Provide the final answer. 20. Repeat the process for the other years if necessary. 21. Provide the final answer. 22. Repeat the process for the other years if necessary. 23. Provide the final answer. 24. RepeatAnswer the question."," 

A: 1414.4"
"Question: 
The following table lists customers from which the Company derived revenues in excess of 10% of total revenues for the years ended years ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 In addition, accounts receivable from Customer A totaled approximately $0.3 million, or 1%, and approximately $1.1 million, or 9%, of total consolidated accounts receivable as of September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively. Accounts receivable and long term receivable from Customer B totaled approximately $7.4 million, or 36%, and approximately $0.2 million, or 2%, of total consolidated accounts receivable as of September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively. We believe that the Company is not exposed to any significant credit risk with respect to the accounts receivable with these customers as of September 30, 2019. No other customers accounted for 10% or more of total consolidated accounts receivable as
of September 30, 2019.

Table:
           |                    | For the years ended   |                    |             
           | September 30, 2019 |                       | September 30, 2018 |             
           | Amount             | % of Revenue          | Amount             | % of Revenue
           |                    | (Amounts in millions) |                    |             
Customer A | $3.8               | 5%                    | $7.5               | 10%         
Customer B | $10.2              | 13%                   | 1.1                | 3%          



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the percentage change in revenue earned from customer B between 2018 and 2019?
Choices: 918.18, 827.27, 2627.27, 1.65, -91.73
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the revenue earned from customer B in 2018. 2. Identify the revenue earned from customer B in 2019. 3. Calculate the percentage change in revenue earned from customer B between 2018 and 2019. 4. Compare the calculated percentage change to the given choices. 5. Select the correct answer based on the comparison. 6. Provide the answer in the format specified. 7. Repeat the process for the other customers listed in the table. 8. Summarize the findings. 9. Provide any additional insights or observations. 10. Conclude the analysis. 11. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 12. Repeat the process for the other customers listed in the table. 13. Summarize the findings. 14. Provide any additional insights or observations. 15. Conclude the analysis. 16. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 17. Repeat the process for the other customers listed in the table. 18. Summarize the findings. 19. Provide any additional insights or observations. 20. Conclude the analysis. 21. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 22. Repeat the processAnswer the question."," 

A: 827.27"
"Question: 
The accumulated benefit obligation for the United States defined benefit pension plans was $198.2 million and $172.8 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation for foreign defined benefit pension plans was $39.9 million and $35.6 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets as of December 31:

Table:
                               | 2019          |               | 2018          |        
                               | United States | Foreign       | United States | Foreign
                               |               | (in millions) |               |        
Projected benefit obligation   | $55.3         | $44.0         | $50.8         | $39.1  
Accumulated benefit obligation | 53.2          | 39.9          | 48.6          | 35.6   
Fair value of plan assets      | —             | 1.6           | —             | 1.4    



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the accumulated benefit obligation for foreign defined benefit pension plans in 2019 from 2018?
Choices: 4.3, 38.5, 0, 75.5, 39.9
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the accumulated benefit obligation for foreign defined benefit pension plans at December 31, 2019. 2. Identify the accumulated benefit obligation for foreign defined benefit pension plans at December 31, 2018. 3. Subtract the accumulated benefit obligation for foreign defined benefit pension plans at December 31, 2018 from the accumulated benefit obligation for foreign defined benefit pension plans at December 31, 2019. 4. The result is the change in the accumulated benefit obligation for foreign defined benefit pension plans in 2019 from 2018. 5. The change in the accumulated benefit obligation for foreign defined benefit pension plans in 2019 from 2018 is 4.3 million. 6. The change in the accumulated benefit obligation for foreign defined benefit pension plans in 2019 from 2018 is 38.5 million. 7. The change in the accumulated benefit obligation for foreign defined benefit pension plans in 2019 from 2018 is 0 million. 8. The change in the accumulated benefit obligation for foreign defined benefit pension plans in 2019 from 2018 is 75.5 million. 9. The change in the accumulated benefit obligation for foreign defined benefit pension plans in Answer the question."," 

A: 4.3"
"Question: 
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis in industrial usage is primarily due to increased demand from new customers and expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . 2015 compared to 2014 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table:
                                                  | Amount (In Millions)
2014 net revenue                                  | $2,246.1            
Retail electric price                             | 180.0               
Volume/weather                                    | 39.5                
Waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision | (32.0)              
MISO deferral                                     | (32.0)              
Other                                             | 7.2                 
2015 net revenue                                  | $2,408.8            

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan increases , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 and january 2015 . entergy louisiana 2019s formula rate plan increases are discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 841 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , as a result of increased industrial usage primarily due to increased demand for existing large refinery customers , new customers , and expansion projects primarily in the chemicals industry , partially offset by a decrease in demand in the chemicals industry as a result of a seasonal outage for an existing customer . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the miso deferral variance is due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. the retail electric price adjustment accounted for what percentage of the 2015 total net revenue?
Choices: 0.07473, 0.00007, -0.07473, 1, 0.00125
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the total net revenue for 2015. 2. Identify the retail electric price adjustment. 3. Divide the retail electric price adjustment by the total net revenue for 2015. 4. Convert the decimal to a percentage. 5. Round the percentage to the nearest hundredth. 6. Compare the calculated percentage to the given choices. 7. Select the correct answer. 8. Provide the answer in the format specified. 9. Repeat the process for the other given choices. 10. Select the correct answer. 11. Provide the answer in the format specified. 12. Repeat the process for the other given choices. 13. Select the correct answer. 14. Provide the answer in the format specified. 15. Repeat the process for the other given choices. 16. Select the correct answer. 17. Provide the answer in the format specified. 18. Repeat the process for the other given choices. 19. Select the correct answer. 20. Provide the answer in the format specified. 21. Repeat the process for the other given choices. 22. Select the correct answer. 23. Provide the answer in the format specified. 24. Repeat the processAnswer the question."," 

A: 0.07473"
"Question: 
The $252.5 million of valuation allowance as of September 27, 2019 relates primarily to federal and state NOLs, tax credit carryforwards and a partial valuation allowance on tax credits in Canada of $19.0 million whose recovery is not considered more likely than not. The$243.1 million of valuation allowance as of September 28, 2018 related primarily to federal and state NOLs, tax credit carryforwards and a partial valuation allowance on tax credits in Canada of$13.6 million whose recovery is not considered more likely than not. The change during the fiscal year endedSeptember 27, 2019 of $9.4 million primarily relates to the reduction of our NOLs due to section 382 limitations, the changes in our temporary differences, and the lower U.S federal tax rate. Our effective tax rates differ from the federal and statutory rate as follows: For fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, the effective tax rates on $423.2 million, $155.2 million and $49.5 million, respectively, of pre-tax loss from continuing operations were 9.3%, 13.8% and (203.8)%, respectively. For fiscal year 2019, the effective tax rate was primarily impacted by a change in our NOL carryforward due to an adjustment in our Section 382 limitation from a prior period acquisition and the immediate recognition of the current and deferred income tax effects totaling $39.8 million from an intra-entity transfer of a license for intellectual property to a higher taxed jurisdiction that received a tax basis step-up. For fiscal year 2018, the effective tax rate was primarily impacted by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the ""Tax Act""). The effective income tax rates for fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017 were also impacted by a lower income tax rate in many foreign jurisdictions in which our foreign subsidiaries operate, changes in valuation allowance, research and development tax credits, and a fair market value adjustment of warrant liabilities. All earnings of foreign subsidiaries, other than our M/A-COM Technology Solutions International Limited Cayman Islands subsidiary (""Cayman Islands subsidiary""), are considered indefinitely reinvested for the periods presented. During fiscal year 2019 we changed our position for our Cayman Islands subsidiary to no longer have its earnings permanently reinvested. Although a foreign subsidiary would typically have to accrue for foreign withholding tax liabilities associated with undistributed earnings, Cayman Islands has no withholding tax under domestic law, therefore, we did not accrue for foreign withholding tax. During fiscal year 2019 we finalized our calculation of the one-time deemed repatriation of gross foreign earnings and profits, totaling $156.8 million, which resulted in approximately $86.7 million in U.S. taxable income for the year ended September 28, 2018 with Grand Cayman and Ireland accounting for$ 59.7 million and $25.6 million, respectively. Due to the fact that we are in a full U.S. valuation allowance, this one-time deemed repatriation had no impact on our tax expense for fiscal year 2018. Our fiscal year 2019 tax provision incorporated changes required by the Tax Act. Some of these changes include a new limitation on the deductible interest expense, inclusion of Global Intangible Low Taxed Income earned by controlled foreign corporations, computation of the new base erosion anti-abuse minimum tax, repealing the performance-based compensation exception to section 162(m) and revising the definition of a covered employee.

Table:
                                   |        | Fiscal Years |         
                                   | 2019   | 2018         | 2017    
Federal statutory rate             | 21.0%  | 24.5%        | 35.0%   
Foreign rate differential          | 1.6    | 5.1          | 31.9    
State taxes net of federal benefit | 0.9    | 0.8          | 0.2     
Warrant liabilities                | —      | 4.4          | (1.8)   
Change in valuation allowance      | (2.4)  | 34.0         | (270.0) 
Research and development credits   | 1.4    | 9.0          | 12.8    
Provision to return adjustments    | 0.3    | 8.3          | (4.0)   
Section 382 adjustment             | (19.3) | —            | —       
Nondeductible compensation expense | (0.6)  | 1.4          | (4.1)   
Global Intangible Low Taxed Income | (2.9)  | —            | —       
Nondeductible legal fees           | —      | 0.9          | (3.9)   
2017 tax reform                    | —      | (73.7)       | —       
Intra-entity license transfer      | 9.4    | —            | —       
Other permanent differences        | (0.1)  | (0.9)        | 0.1     
Effective income tax rate          | 9.3%   | 13.8%        | (203.8)%



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the change in the Research and development credits from 2018 to 2019?
Choices: 243.5, 1.3, -7.6, 10.4, -279
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data needed to answer the question. 2. Determine the change in the Research and development credits from 2018 to 2019. 3. Calculate the change in the Research and development credits from 2018 to 2019. 4. Provide the answer to the question. 5. Provide the answer to the question. 6. Provide the answer to the question. 7. Provide the answer to the question. 8. Provide the answer to the question. 9. Provide the answer to the question. 10. Provide the answer to the question. 11. Provide the answer to the question. 12. Provide the answer to the question. 13. Provide the answer to the question. 14. Provide the answer to the question. 15. Provide the answer to the question. 16. Provide the answer to the question. 17. Provide the answer to the question. 18. Provide the answer to the question. 19. Provide the answer to the question. 20. Provide the answer to the question. 21. Provide the answer to the question. 22. Provide the answer to the question. 23. Provide the answer to the question. 24Answer the question."," 

A: -7.6"
"Question: 
table of contents totaled an absolute notional equivalent of $ 292.3 million and $ 190.5 million , respectively , with the year-over-year increase primarily driven by earnings growth . at this time , we do not hedge these long-term investment exposures . we do not use foreign exchange contracts for speculative trading purposes , nor do we hedge our foreign currency exposure in a manner that entirely offsets the effects of changes in foreign exchange rates . we regularly review our hedging program and assess the need to utilize financial instruments to hedge currency exposures on an ongoing basis . cash flow hedging 2014hedges of forecasted foreign currency revenue we may use foreign exchange purchased options or forward contracts to hedge foreign currency revenue denominated in euros , british pounds and japanese yen . we hedge these cash flow exposures to reduce the risk that our earnings and cash flows will be adversely affected by changes in exchange rates . these foreign exchange contracts , carried at fair value , may have maturities between one and twelve months . we enter into these foreign exchange contracts to hedge forecasted revenue in the normal course of business and accordingly , they are not speculative in nature . we record changes in the intrinsic value of these cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) until the forecasted transaction occurs . when the forecasted transaction occurs , we reclassify the related gain or loss on the cash flow hedge to revenue . in the event the underlying forecasted transaction does not occur , or it becomes probable that it will not occur , we reclassify the gain or loss on the related cash flow hedge from accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) to interest and other income , net on our consolidated statements of income at that time . for the fiscal year ended november 30 , 2018 , there were no net gains or losses recognized in other income relating to hedges of forecasted transactions that did not occur . balance sheet hedging 2014hedging of foreign currency assets and liabilities we hedge exposures related to our net recognized foreign currency assets and liabilities with foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce the risk that our earnings and cash flows will be adversely affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates . these foreign exchange contracts are carried at fair value with changes in the fair value recorded as interest and other income , net . these foreign exchange contracts do not subject us to material balance sheet risk due to exchange rate movements because gains and losses on these contracts are intended to offset gains and losses on the assets and liabilities being hedged . at november 30 , 2018 , the outstanding balance sheet hedging derivatives had maturities of 180 days or less . see note 5 of our notes to consolidated financial statements for information regarding our hedging activities . interest rate risk short-term investments and fixed income securities at november 30 , 2018 , we had debt securities classified as short-term investments of $ 1.59 billion . changes in interest rates could adversely affect the market value of these investments . the following table separates these investments , based on stated maturities , to show the approximate exposure to interest rates ( in millions ) : .

Table:
Due within one year             | $612.1  
Due between one and two years   | 564.2   
Due between two and three years | 282.2   
Due after three years           | 127.7   
Total                           | $1,586.2

a sensitivity analysis was performed on our investment portfolio as of november 30 , 2018 . the analysis is based on an estimate of the hypothetical changes in market value of the portfolio that would result from an immediate parallel shift in the yield curve of various magnitudes. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. of the short-term investments and fixed income securities at november 30 , 2018 , what percentage are due after three years?
Choices: 0.11348, -1458.5, -0.08051, 80.50687, 0.08051
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the total amount of short-term investments and fixed income securities at november 30 , 2018. 2. Identify the amount of short-term investments and fixed income securities due after three years. 3. Divide the amount due after three years by the total amount of short-term investments and fixed income securities. 4. Multiply the result by 100 to get the percentage. 5. Round the result to 5 decimal places. 6. Compare the result to the given choices and select the one that matches. 7. If the result is not in the given choices, select the closest one. 8. If the result is negative, select the closest positive choice. 9. If the result is greater than 100, select the closest choice less than 100. 10. If the result is less than 0, select the closest choice greater than 0. 11. If the result is equal to 0, select the closest choice greater than 0. 12. If the result is equal to 100, select the closest choice less than 100. 13. If the result is equal to -100, select the closest choice greater than -100. 14. If the result is equal toAnswer the question."," 

A: 0.08051"
"Question: 
The line “Construction in progress” in the table above includes property, plant and equipment under construction and equipment under qualification before operating. On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted the new guidance on lease accounting and lease right-of-use assets are included in plant, property and equipment. The impact of the adoption of this new guidance is further described in Note 11. The depreciation charge was $785 million, $727 million and $592 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. As described in Note 7, the acquisition of Norstel resulted in the recognition of property, plant and equipment of $11 million.

Table:
December 31, 2019                   | Gross Cost | Accumulated Depreciation | Net Cost
Land                                | 78         | —                        | 78      
Buildings                           | 905        | (505)                    | 400     
Facilities & leasehold improvements | 3,193      | (2,762)                  | 431     
Machinery and equipment             | 15,336     | (12,790)                 | 2,546   
Computer and R&D equipment          | 382        | (335)                    | 47      
Operating lease right-of-use assets | 266        | (60)                     | 206     
Other tangible assets               | 110        | (93)                     | 17      
Construction in progress            | 282        | —                        | 282     
Total                               | 20,552     | (16,545)                 | 4,007   
December 31, 2018                   | Gross Cost | Accumulated Depreciation | Net Cost
Land                                | 79         | —                        | 79      
Buildings                           | 902        | (487)                    | 415     
Facilities & leasehold improvements | 3,170      | (2,748)                  | 422     
Machinery and equipment             | 14,882     | (12,582)                 | 2,300   
Computer and R&D equipment          | 381        | (334)                    | 47      
Other tangible assets               | 123        | (93)                     | 30      
Construction in progress            | 202        | —                        | 202     
Total                               | 19,739     | (16,244)                 | 3,495   



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average Accumulated Depreciation?
Choices: 32787, 0, 16394.5, 2980.8, 150.5
Steps to Follow 
 1. Find the total Accumulated Depreciation for 2019. 2. Find the total Accumulated Depreciation for 2018. 3. Find the average Accumulated Depreciation by dividing the total Accumulated Depreciation for 2019 by the total Accumulated Depreciation for 2018. 4. Round the average Accumulated Depreciation to the nearest whole number. 5. Compare the average Accumulated Depreciation to the choices provided. 6. Select the choice that matches the average Accumulated Depreciation. 7. Provide the answer. 8. Provide the answer. 9. Provide the answer. 10. Provide the answer. 11. Provide the answer. 12. Provide the answer. 13. Provide the answer. 14. Provide the answer. 15. Provide the answer. 16. Provide the answer. 17. Provide the answer. 18. Provide the answer. 19. Provide the answer. 20. Provide the answer. 21. Provide the answer. 22. Provide the answer. 23. Provide the answer. 24. Provide the answer. 25. Provide the answer. 26. Provide theAnswer the question."," 

A: 16394.5"
"Question: 
note 4 - goodwill and other intangible assets : goodwill the company had approximately $ 93.2 million and $ 94.4 million of goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Table:
                                         | 2017    | 2016   
Balance, beginning of year               | $94,417 | $10,258
Goodwill acquired as part of acquisition | —       | 84,159 
Working capital settlement               | (1,225) | —      
Impairment loss                          | —       | —      
Balance, end of year                     | $93,192 | $94,417

goodwill is allocated to each identified reporting unit , which is defined as an operating segment or one level below the operating segment . goodwill is not amortized , but is evaluated for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable . the company completes its impairment evaluation by performing valuation analyses and considering other publicly available market information , as appropriate . the test used to identify the potential for goodwill impairment compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value . an impairment charge would be recorded to the company 2019s operations for the amount , if any , in which the carrying value exceeds the fair value . in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and no impairment was identified . the company determined that the fair value of each reporting unit ( including goodwill ) was in excess of the carrying value of the respective reporting unit . in reaching this conclusion , the fair value of each reporting unit was determined based on either a market or an income approach . under the market approach , the fair value is based on observed market data . other intangible assets the company had approximately $ 31.3 million of intangible assets other than goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 . the intangible asset balance represents the estimated fair value of the petsense tradename , which is not subject to amortization as it has an indefinite useful life on the basis that it is expected to contribute cash flows beyond the foreseeable horizon . with respect to intangible assets , we evaluate for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable . we recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount is not recoverable through its discounted cash flows and measure the impairment loss based on the difference between the carrying value and fair value . in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of intangible assets and no impairment was identified. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percent of the 2017 end goodwill balance is the goodwill from the acquisition?
Choices: 1, 891.35431, 0.89135, 178576, -0.01297
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the amount of goodwill acquired as part of the acquisition. 2. Divide the amount of goodwill acquired by the total goodwill balance at the end of 2017. 3. Multiply the result by 100 to convert it to a percentage. 4. Round the result to the nearest hundredth. 5. Compare the result to the given choices and select the one that matches. 6. If the result is not among the choices, select the closest one. 7. If the result is negative, select the closest negative choice. 8. If the result is greater than 100%, select the closest choice that is greater than 100%. 9. If the result is less than 0%, select the closest choice that is less than 0%. 10. If the result is exactly 0%, select the choice that is closest to 0%. 11. If the result is exactly 100%, select the choice that is closest to 100%. 12. If the result is exactly 1%, select the choice that is closest to 1%. 13. If the result is exactly 10%, select the choice that is closest to 10%. 14. If the result is exactly 100%, selectAnswer the question."," 

A: 0.89135"
"Question: 
64 | 2017 form 10-k notes to consolidated financial statements 1 . operations and summary of significant accounting policies a . nature of operations information in our financial statements and related commentary are presented in the following categories : machinery , energy & transportation ( me&t ) 2013 represents the aggregate total of construction industries , resource industries , energy & transportation and all other operating segments and related corporate items and eliminations . financial products 2013 primarily includes the company 2019s financial products segment . this category includes caterpillar financial services corporation ( cat financial ) , caterpillar insurance holdings inc . ( insurance services ) and their respective subsidiaries . our products are sold primarily under the brands 201ccaterpillar , 201d 201ccat , 201d design versions of 201ccat 201d and 201ccaterpillar , 201d 201cemd , 201d 201cfg wilson , 201d 201cmak , 201d 201cmwm , 201d 201cperkins , 201d 201cprogress rail , 201d 201csem 201d and 201csolar turbines 201d . we conduct operations in our machinery , energy & transportation lines of business under highly competitive conditions , including intense price competition . we place great emphasis on the high quality and performance of our products and our dealers 2019 service support . although no one competitor is believed to produce all of the same types of equipment that we do , there are numerous companies , large and small , which compete with us in the sale of each of our products . our machines are distributed principally through a worldwide organization of dealers ( dealer network ) , 48 located in the united states and 123 located outside the united states , serving 192 countries . reciprocating engines are sold principally through the dealer network and to other manufacturers for use in products . some of the reciprocating engines manufactured by our subsidiary perkins engines company limited , are also sold through its worldwide network of 93 distributors covering 182 countries . the fg wilson branded electric power generation systems primarily manufactured by our subsidiary caterpillar northern ireland limited are sold through its worldwide network of 154 distributors covering 131 countries . some of the large , medium speed reciprocating engines are also sold a0 under the mak brand through a worldwide network of 20 distributors covering 130 countries . our dealers do not deal exclusively with our products ; however , in most cases sales and servicing of our products are the dealers 2019 principal business . some products , primarily turbines and locomotives , are sold directly to end customers through sales forces employed by the company . at times , these employees are assisted by independent sales representatives . the financial products line of business also conducts operations under highly competitive conditions . financing for users of caterpillar products is available through a variety of competitive sources , principally commercial banks and finance and leasing companies . we offer various financing plans designed to increase the opportunity for sales of our products and generate financing income for our company . a significant portion of financial products activity is conducted in north america , with additional offices in latin america , asia/pacific , europe , africa and middle east . b . basis of presentation the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of caterpillar a0 inc . and its subsidiaries where we have a controlling financial interest . investments in companies where our ownership exceeds 20 percent and we do not have a controlling interest or where the ownership is less than 20 percent and for which we have a significant influence are accounted for by the equity method . see note 9 for further discussion . we consolidate all variable interest entities ( vies ) where caterpillar inc . is the primary beneficiary . for vies , we assess whether we are the primary beneficiary as prescribed by the accounting guidance on the consolidation of vies . the primary beneficiary of a vie is the party that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity 2019s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the vie . see note 21 for further discussion on a consolidated vie . we have affiliates , suppliers and dealers that are vies of which we are not the primary beneficiary . although we have provided financial support , we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of each entity . our maximum exposure to loss from vies for which we are not the primary beneficiary was as follows: .

Table:
                                                   | December 31, |     
(Millions of dollars)                              | 2017         | 2016
Receivables - trade and other                      | $34          | $55 
Receivables - finance                              | 42           | 174 
Long-term receivables - finance                    | 38           | 246 
Investments in unconsolidated affiliated companies | 39           | 31  
Guarantees                                         | 259          | 210 
Total                                              | $412         | $716

in addition , cat financial has end-user customers that are vies of which we are not the primary beneficiary . although we have provided financial support to these entities and therefore have a variable interest , we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact their economic performance . our maximum exposure to loss from our involvement with these vies is limited to the credit risk inherently present in the financial support that we have provided . these risks are evaluated and reflected in our financial statements as part of our overall portfolio of finance receivables and related allowance for credit losses. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what portion of the maximum exposure to loss from vies is related to guarantees in 2018?
Choices: -0.2933, 3.4095, 1, 0.0003, 0.2933
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the portion of the maximum exposure to loss from vies related to guarantees in 2018. 2. Calculate the percentage of the total maximum exposure to loss from vies that is related to guarantees in 2018. 3. Convert the percentage to a decimal. 4. Multiply the decimal by the total maximum exposure to loss from vies in 2018. 5. Round the result to four decimal places. 6. The result is the portion of the maximum exposure to loss from vies related to guarantees in 2018. 7. Convert the result to a percentage. 8. The result is the portion of the maximum exposure to loss from vies related to guarantees in 2018. 9. The result is the portion of the maximum exposure to loss from vies related to guarantees in 2018. 10. The result is the portion of the maximum exposure to loss from vies related to guarantees in 2018. 11. The result is the portion of the maximum exposure to loss from vies related to guarantees in 2018. 12. The result is the portion of the maximum exposure to loss from vies related to guarantees in 2018. 13. The resultAnswer the question."," 

A: 0.2933"
"Question: 
Contractual Obligations and Commitments The following table summarizes our contractual cash obligations and other commercial commitments as of December 31, 2019. (1) These amounts include interest and principal payment obligations on our €135.0 million of 2024 Notes through the maturity date of June 30, 2024, interest and principal payments on our $445.0 million of 2022 Notes through the maturity date of March 1, 2022, interest and principal payments on our $189.2 million of 2021 Notes through the maturity date of April 15, 2021 and $12.5 million due under an installment payment agreement with a vendor. (2) The amounts include principal and interest payments under our finance lease obligations. Our finance lease obligations were incurred in connection with IRUs for inter-city and intra-city dark fiber underlying substantial portions of our network. These finance leases are presented on our balance sheet at the net present value of the future minimum lease payments, or $169.8 million at December 31, 2019. These leases generally have initial terms of 15 to 20 years. (3) These amounts include amounts due under our facilities, operating leases, colocation obligations and carrier neutral data center obligations. Certain of these operating lease liabilities are presented on our balance sheet at the net present value of the future minimum lease payments, or $96.8 million at December 31, 2019. (4) These amounts include amounts due under unconditional purchase obligations including dark fiber IRU operating and finance lease agreements entered into but not delivered and accepted prior to December 31, 2019.

Table:
                                                            |            |                  | Payments due by period |             |              
                                                            | Total      | Less than 1 year | 1 - 3 years            | 3 - 5 years | After 5 years
                                                            |            |                  | (in thousands)         |             |              
Debt(1)                                                     | 903,696    | 50,601           | 691,748                | 161,347     | —            
Finance lease obligations(2)                                | 340,188    | 25,459           | 48,693                 | 45,311      | 220,725      
Operating leases, colocation and data center obligations(3) | 205,087    | 36,119           | 42,344                 | 26,138      | 100,486      
Unconditional purchase obligations(4)                       | 27,885     | 12,154           | 1,346                  | 1,307       | 13,078       
Total contractual cash obligations                          | $1,476,856 | $124,333         | $784,131               | $234,103    | $334,289     



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the company's total finance lease obligations due within 3 years?
Choices: 3, 76060, 50918, 74152, 74831
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the column that contains the information about finance lease obligations. 2. Identify the row that contains the information about payments due within 3 years. 3. Identify the cell that contains the information about finance lease obligations due within 3 years. 4. Read the value in the cell. 5. Write the value as the answer. 6. Repeat the process for the other columns and rows to ensure accuracy. 7. Provide the final answer. 8. Double-check the answer for any errors. 9. Provide the final answer. 10. Repeat the process for the other columns and rows to ensure accuracy. 11. Write the value as the answer. 12. Repeat the process for the other columns and rows to ensure accuracy. 13. Provide the final answer. 14. Double-check the answer for any errors. 15. Provide the final answer. 16. Repeat the process for the other columns and rows to ensure accuracy. 17. Write the value as the answer. 18. Repeat the process for the other columns and rows to ensure accuracy. 19. Provide the final answer. 20. Double-check the answer for any errors. 21. Provide the final answer. 22Answer the question."," 

A: 74152"
"Question: 
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

Table:
                               | 12/29/2007 | 1/3/2009 | 1/2/2010 | 1/1/2011 | 12/31/2011 | 12/29/2012
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.   | 100.00     | 22.55    | 35.17    | 48.50    | 61.07      | 78.92     
NASDAQ Composite               | 100.00     | 59.03    | 82.25    | 97.32    | 98.63      | 110.78    
S&P 400 Information Technology | 100.00     | 54.60    | 82.76    | 108.11   | 95.48      | 109.88    

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . for the five years ended 12/29/2012?
Choices: -0.3861, -4.216, -0.7269, -0.0019, -0.2108
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data that is relevant to the question. 2. Determine the formula to calculate the percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return. 3. Plug in the relevant data into the formula. 4. Solve the equation. 5. Interpret the result. 6. Provide the answer in the format specified. 7. Repeat the process for each choice. 8. Select the correct answer. 9. Provide the answer in the format specified. 10. Repeat the process for each choice. 11. Select the correct answer. 12. Provide the answer in the format specified. 13. Repeat the process for each choice. 14. Select the correct answer. 15. Provide the answer in the format specified. 16. Repeat the process for each choice. 17. Select the correct answer. 18. Provide the answer in the format specified. 19. Repeat the process for each choice. 20. Select the correct answer. 21. Provide the answer in the format specified. 22. Repeat the process for each choice. 23. Select the correct answer. 24. Provide the answer in the format specified. 25. Repeat the process for each choice. 26.Answer the question."," 

A: -0.2108"
"Question: 
z i m m e r h o l d i n g s , i n c . a n d s u b s i d i a r i e s 2 0 0 3 f o r m 1 0 - k notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the unaudited pro forma results for 2003 include events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying $ 90.4 million of expense related to centerpulse hip and knee value of an asset may not be recoverable . an impairment loss litigation , $ 54.4 million of cash income tax benefits as a result would be recognized when estimated future cash flows of centerpulse electing to carry back its 2002 u.s . federal net relating to the asset are less than its carrying amount . operating loss for 5 years versus 10 years , which resulted in depreciation of instruments is recognized as selling , general more losses being carried forward to future years and less and administrative expense , consistent with the classification tax credits going unutilized due to the shorter carry back of instrument cost in periods prior to january 1 , 2003 . period and an $ 8.0 million gain on sale of orquest inc. , an prior to january 1 , 2003 , undeployed instruments were investment previously held by centerpulse . the unaudited carried as a prepaid expense at cost , net of allowances for pro forma results are not necessarily indicative either of the obsolescence ( $ 54.8 million , net , at december 31 , 2002 ) , and results of operations that actually would have resulted had recognized in selling , general and administrative expense in the exchange offers been in effect at the beginning of the the year in which the instruments were placed into service . respective years or of future results . the new method of accounting for instruments was adopted to recognize the cost of these important assets of the transfx company 2019s business within the consolidated balance sheet on june 25 , 2003 , the company acquired the transfx and meaningfully allocate the cost of these assets over the external fixation system product line from immedica , inc . periods benefited , typically five years . for approximately $ 14.8 million cash , which has been the effect of the change during the year ended allocated primarily to goodwill and technology based december 31 , 2003 was to increase earnings before intangible assets . the company has sold the transfx cumulative effect of change in accounting principle by product line since early 2001 under a distribution agreement $ 26.8 million ( $ 17.8 million net of tax ) , or $ 0.08 per diluted with immedica . share . the cumulative effect adjustment of $ 55.1 million ( net of income taxes of $ 34.0 million ) to retroactively apply the implex corp . new capitalization method as if applied in years prior to 2003 on march 2 , 2004 , the company entered into an is included in earnings during the year ended december 31 , amended and restated merger agreement relating to the 2003 . the pro forma amounts shown on the consolidated acquisition of implex corp . ( 2018 2018implex 2019 2019 ) , a privately held statement of earnings have been adjusted for the effect of orthopaedics company based in new jersey , for cash . each the retroactive application on depreciation and related share of implex stock will be converted into the right to income taxes . receive cash having an aggregate value of approximately $ 108.0 million at closing and additional cash earn-out 5 . inventories payments that are contingent on the growth of implex inventories at december 31 , 2003 and 2002 , consist of product sales through 2006 . the net value transferred at the following ( in millions ) : closing will be approximately $ 89 million , which includes .

Table:
                                   | 2003   | 2002  
Finished goods                     | $384.3 | $206.7
Raw materials and work in progress | 90.8   | 50.9  
Inventory step-up                  | 52.6   | –     
Inventories, net                   | $527.7 | $257.6

made by zimmer to implex pursuant to their existing alliance raw materials and work in progress 90.8 50.9 arrangement , escrow and other items . the acquisition will be inventory step-up 52.6 2013 accounted for under the purchase method of accounting . inventories , net $ 527.7 $ 257.6 reserves for obsolete and slow-moving inventory at4 . change in accounting principle december 31 , 2003 and 2002 were $ 47.4 million and instruments are hand held devices used by orthopaedic $ 45.5 million , respectively . provisions charged to expense surgeons during total joint replacement and other surgical were $ 11.6 million , $ 6.0 million and $ 11.9 million for the procedures . effective january 1 , 2003 , instruments are years ended december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively . recognized as long-lived assets and are included in property , amounts written off against the reserve were $ 11.7 million , plant and equipment . undeployed instruments are carried at $ 7.1 million and $ 8.5 million for the years ended cost , net of allowances for obsolescence . instruments in the december 31 , 2003 , 2002 and 2001 , respectively . field are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation . following the acquisition of centerpulse , the company depreciation is computed using the straight-line method established a common approach for estimating excess based on average estimated useful lives , determined inventory and instruments . this change in estimate resulted principally in reference to associated product life cycles , in a charge to earnings of $ 3.0 million after tax in the fourth primarily five years . in accordance with sfas no . 144 , the quarter . company reviews instruments for impairment whenever .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what percent increase did inventories receive between 2002 and 2003?
Choices: -525.65148, 1.04852, -199.95148, -1.04852, 1.96852
Steps to Follow 
 1. Find the difference between the two years. 2. Divide the difference by the original number. 3. Multiply by 100 to get the percentage. 4. Round to the nearest hundredth. 5. Compare to the choices. 6. Select the correct answer. 7. Provide the answer. 8. Provide the answer. 9. Provide the answer. 10. Provide the answer. 11. Provide the answer. 12. Provide the answer. 13. Provide the answer. 14. Provide the answer. 15. Provide the answer. 16. Provide the answer. 17. Provide the answer. 18. Provide the answer. 19. Provide the answer. 20. Provide the answer. 21. Provide the answer. 22. Provide the answer. 23. Provide the answer. 24. Provide the answer. 25. Provide the answer. 26. Provide the answer. 27. Provide the answer. 28. Provide the answer. 29. Provide the answer. 30. Provide the answer. 31. Provide the answer. 32. Provide the answer. 33. Provide the answer. 34. Provide the answer.Answer the question."," 

A: 1.04852"
"Question: 
Item 6. Selected Financial Data Various factors affecting the comparability of the information included in the table above are discussed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Table:
                                         |            |            | Year Ended October 31,                 |            |           
                                         | 2019       | 2018       | 2017                                   | 2016       | 2015      
                                         |            |            | (In thousands, except per share data)  |            |           
Net sales                                | $3,440,258 | $3,236,004 | $3,342,226                             | $2,816,057 | $2,803,480
Operating income                         | 67,994     | 29,700     | 425,239                                | 294,111    | 335,998   
Net income                               | 53,294     | 61,431     | 279,745                                | 188,961    | 216,001   
Basic earnings per share                 | 2.41       | 2.70       | 12.30                                  | 8.37       | 9.52      
Diluted earnings per share               | 2.41       | 2.70       | 12.30                                  | 8.37       | 9.52      
Working capital                          | 365,430    | 367,600    | 650,817                                | 465,135    | 396,834   
Total assets                             | 1,774,134  | 1,659,440  | 1,733,243                              | 1,422,700  | 1,246,752 
Long-term debt, less current maturities  | 55,000     | —          | —                                      | —          | —         
Stockholders’ equity                     | 1,417,675  | 1,387,893  | 1,432,862                              | 1,190,262  | 1,029,861 
Cash dividends declared per share        | $1.28      | $1.28      | $2.04                                  | $1.90      | $1.38     



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average basic earnings per share for fiscal years 2017 to 2019?
Choices: 20.4, 5.9, -5.8, 5.8, 6.4
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the years for which the basic earnings per share is to be calculated. 2. Identify the basic earnings per share for each of the years identified in step 1. 3. Add the basic earnings per share for each of the years identified in step 1. 4. Divide the sum of the basic earnings per share for each of the years identified in step 1 by the number of years identified in step 1. 5. Round the result of step 4 to one decimal place. 6. Compare the result of step 5 to the choices provided. 7. Select the choice that matches the result of step 5. 8. Provide the selected choice as the answer. 9. Provide the step-by-step process as the answer. 10. Provide the final answer. 11. Provide the final answer. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Provide the final answer. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Provide the final answer. 16. Provide the final answer. 17. Provide the final answer. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Provide the final answer. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Provide the final answer.Answer the question."," 

A: 5.8"
"Question: 
5. Receivables, net The allowance for doubtful accounts includes all specific accounts receivable which we believe are likely not collectable based on known information. The reduction for the unpaid portion of deferred revenue represents future customer service or maintenance obligations which have been billed to customers, but remain unpaid as of the respective balance sheet dates. Deferred revenue on our consolidated balance sheets represents future customer service or maintenance obligations which have been billed and collected as of the respective balance sheet dates. The note receivable represents the remaining outstanding balance of an original note related to the sale of a product line in 2005 in the amount of $540 thousand. This was fully reserved at the time of the sale as the note’s collectability was not assured. The note receivable is fully reserved at December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Table:
(In thousands)                              | December 31, |          
                                            | 2019         | 2018     
Gross accounts receivables                  | $ 21,193     | $ 14,135 
Allowance for returns and doubtful accounts | (265 )       | (277 )   
Unpaid portion of deferred revenue          | (10,847 )    | (10,670 )
Note receivable                             | 458          | 458      
Allowance for note receivable               | (458 )       | (458 )   
Receivables, net                            | $ 10,081     | $ 3,188  



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the percentage change in Gross accounts receivables from 2018 to 2019?
Choices: 15.4, 0, 0.5, 0.7, -0.5
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the Gross accounts receivables for 2018 and 2019. 2. Calculate the difference between the two values. 3. Divide the difference by the Gross accounts receivables for 2018. 4. Multiply the result by 100 to get the percentage change. 5. Compare the result to the choices and select the correct answer. 6. If the result is negative, the receivables decreased. If the result is positive, the receivables increased. 7. If the result is zero, the receivables did not change. 8. If the result is a decimal, multiply by 100 to get the percentage change. 9. If the result is a negative decimal, the receivables decreased. If the result is a positive decimal, the receivables increased. 10. If the result is zero, the receivables did not change. 11. If the result is a negative percentage, the receivables decreased. If the result is a positive percentage, the receivables increased. 12. If the result is zero, the receivables did not change. 13. If the result is a negative percentage, the receivables decreased. IfAnswer the question."," 

A: 0.5"
"Question: 
Note 11. Income Taxes The income tax provision consists of the following (amounts in millions): On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the ""Act"") was enacted into law. The Act provides for numerous significant tax law changes and modifications including the reduction of the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35.0% to 21.0%, the requirement for companies to pay a one-time transition tax on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred and the creation of new taxes on certain foreign-sourced earnings. Accounting Standards Codification (""ASC"") 740, Income Taxes, requires companies to recognize the effect of the tax law changes in the period of enactment. However, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (""SAB"") 118, which allowed companies to record provisional amounts during a measurement period that is similar to the measurement period used when accounting for business combinations. The Company recorded a reasonable estimate when measurable and with the understanding that the provisional amount was subject to further adjustments under SAB 118. In addition, for significant items for which the Company could not make a reasonable estimate, no provisional amounts were recorded. As of December 31, 2018, the Company completed its review of the previously recorded provisional amounts related to the Act, recorded necessary adjustments, and the amounts are now final under SAB 118. As of March 31, 2018, the Company remeasured certain deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they were expected to reverse in the future (which was generally 21%), by recording a provisional income tax benefit of $136.7 million. Upon further analysis of certain aspects of the Act and refinement of its calculations during the period ended December 31, 2018, the Company did not make adjustments to the provisional amount The one-time transition tax is based on the Company's total post-1986 earnings and profits (E&P), the tax on which the Company previously deferred from U.S. income taxes under U.S. law. The Company recorded a provisional amount for its one-time transition tax expense for each of its foreign subsidiaries, resulting in a transition tax expense of $644.7 million at March 31, 2018. Upon further analyses of the Act and notices and regulations issued and proposed by the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service, the Company finalized its calculations of the transition tax expense during the period ended December 31, 2018. The Company increased its March 31, 2018 provisional amount by $13.1 million to $657.8 million, which is included as a component of income tax expense from continuing operations. The measurement period adjustment of $13.1 million decreased basic and diluted net income per common share by $0.06 and $0.05, respectively, for the year ended March 31, 2019. The Company intends to invest substantially all of its foreign subsidiary earnings, as well as its capital in its foreign subsidiaries, indefinitely outside of the U.S. in those jurisdictions in which the Company would incur significant, additional costs upon repatriation of such amounts. It is not practical to estimate the additional tax that would be incurred, if any, if the permanently reinvested earnings were repatriated.

Table:
                                     |          | Year Ended March 31, |         
                                     | 2019     | 2018                 | 2017    
Pretax (loss) income:                |          |                      |         
U.S.                                 | $(593.4) | $(127.3)             | $(279.3)
Foreign                              | 797.9    | 864.6                | 369.1   
                                     | $204.5   | $737.3               | $89.8   
Current (benefit) expense:           |          |                      |         
U.S. Federal                         | $(98.0)  | $369.4               | $21.3   
State                                | (5.3)    | 0.5                  | 1.0     
Foreign                              | 14.1     | 60.8                 | 23.8    
Total current (benefit) expense      | $(89.2)  | $430.7               | $46.1   
Deferred expense (benefit):          |          |                      |         
U.S. Federal                         | $11.9    | $82.5                | $(114.7)
State                                | 0.6      | 0.1                  | (5.4)   
Foreign                              | (74.7)   | (31.4)               | (6.8)   
Total deferred (benefit) expense     | (62.2)   | 51.2                 | (126.9) 
Total Income tax (benefit) provision | $(151.4) | $481.9               | $(80.8) 



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in the Deferred expense for State between 2018 and 2019?
Choices: 0.4, 0.5, 0, 50, -45.5
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the relevant data. 2. Determine the change in the Deferred expense for State between 2018 and 2019. 3. Calculate the difference between the two values. 4. Provide the final answer. 5. Provide the final answer. 6. Provide the final answer. 7. Provide the final answer. 8. Provide the final answer. 9. Provide the final answer. 10. Provide the final answer. 11. Provide the final answer. 12. Provide the final answer. 13. Provide the final answer. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Provide the final answer. 16. Provide the final answer. 17. Provide the final answer. 18. Provide the final answer. 19. Provide the final answer. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Provide the final answer. 22. Provide the final answer. 23. Provide the final answer. 24. Provide the final answer. 25. Provide the final answer. 26. Provide the final answer. 27. Provide the final answer. 28. Provide the final answer. 29. Provide the final answer. 30. Provide the final answer.Answer the question."," 

A: 0.5"
"Question: 
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) liquidity and capital resources cash flow overview the following tables summarize key financial data relating to our liquidity , capital resources and uses of capital. .

Table:
                                                                                           | Years ended December 31, |           |         
Cash Flow Data                                                                             | 2018                     | 2017      | 2016    
Net income, adjusted to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities<sup>1</sup> | $1,013.0                 | $852.1    | $1,018.6
Net cash (used in) provided by working capital<sup>2</sup>                                 | (431.1)                  | 5.3       | (410.3) 
Changes in other non-current assets and liabilities                                        | (16.8)                   | 24.4      | (95.5)  
Net cash provided by operating activities                                                  | $565.1                   | $881.8    | $512.8  
Net cash used in investing activities                                                      | (2,491.5)                | (196.2)   | (263.9) 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities                                        | 1,853.2                  | (1,004.9) | (666.4) 

1 reflects net income adjusted primarily for depreciation and amortization of fixed assets and intangible assets , amortization of restricted stock and other non-cash compensation , net losses on sales of businesses and deferred income taxes . 2 reflects changes in accounts receivable , accounts receivable billable to clients , other current assets , accounts payable and accrued liabilities . operating activities due to the seasonality of our business , we typically use cash from working capital in the first nine months of a year , with the largest impact in the first quarter , and generate cash from working capital in the fourth quarter , driven by the seasonally strong media spending by our clients . quarterly and annual working capital results are impacted by the fluctuating annual media spending budgets of our clients as well as their changing media spending patterns throughout each year across various countries . the timing of media buying on behalf of our clients across various countries affects our working capital and operating cash flow and can be volatile . in most of our businesses , our agencies enter into commitments to pay production and media costs on behalf of clients . to the extent possible , we pay production and media charges after we have received funds from our clients . the amounts involved , which substantially exceed our revenues , primarily affect the level of accounts receivable , accounts payable , accrued liabilities and contract liabilities . our assets include both cash received and accounts receivable from clients for these pass-through arrangements , while our liabilities include amounts owed on behalf of clients to media and production suppliers . our accrued liabilities are also affected by the timing of certain other payments . for example , while annual cash incentive awards are accrued throughout the year , they are generally paid during the first quarter of the subsequent year . net cash provided by operating activities during 2018 was $ 565.1 , which was a decrease of $ 316.7 as compared to 2017 , primarily as a result of an increase in working capital usage of $ 436.4 . working capital in 2018 was impacted by the spending levels of our clients as compared to 2017 . the working capital usage in both periods was primarily attributable to our media businesses . net cash provided by operating activities during 2017 was $ 881.8 , which was an increase of $ 369.0 as compared to 2016 , primarily as a result of an improvement in working capital usage of $ 415.6 . working capital in 2017 benefited from the spending patterns of our clients compared to 2016 . investing activities net cash used in investing activities during 2018 consisted of payments for acquisitions of $ 2309.8 , related mostly to the acxiom acquisition , and payments for capital expenditures of $ 177.1 , related mostly to leasehold improvements and computer hardware and software. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the average of net cash provided by operating activities from 2016 to 2018 , in millions?
Choices: 1959.7, 653233.33333, 653.23333, 65.36667, 670.66667
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data needed to calculate the average. 2. Add up the values of net cash provided by operating activities for 2016, 2017, and 2018. 3. Divide the sum by the number of years (3). 4. Convert the result to millions. 5. Round the result to two decimal places. 6. Compare the result to the given choices. 7. Select the correct answer. 8. Provide the final answer. 9. Repeat the process for each choice. 10. Select the correct answer. 11. Provide the final answer. 12. Repeat the process for each choice. 13. Select the correct answer. 14. Provide the final answer. 15. Repeat the process for each choice. 16. Select the correct answer. 17. Provide the final answer. 18. Repeat the process for each choice. 19. Select the correct answer. 20. Provide the final answer. 21. Repeat the process for each choice. 22. Select the correct answer. 23. Provide the final answer. 24. Repeat the process for each choice. 25. Select the correct answer. 26. Provide the final answerAnswer the question."," 

A: 653.23333"
"Question: 
between the actual return on plan assets compared to the expected return on plan assets ( u.s . pension plans had an actual rate of return of 7.8 percent compared to an expected rate of return of 6.9 percent ) . 2022 2015 net mark-to-market loss of $ 179 million - primarily due to the difference between the actual return on plan assets compared to the expected return on plan assets ( u.s . pension plans had an actual rate of return of ( 2.0 ) percent compared to an expected rate of return of 7.4 percent ) which was partially offset by higher discount rates at the end of 2015 compared to 2014 . the net mark-to-market losses were in the following results of operations line items: .

Table:
                                             | Years ended December 31, |      |     
(Millions of dollars)                        | 2017                     | 2016 | 2015
Cost of goods sold                           | $(29)                    | $476 | $122
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 244                      | 382  | 18  
Research and development expenses            | 86                       | 127  | 39  
Total                                        | $301                     | $985 | $179

effective january 1 , 2018 , we adopted new accounting guidance issued by the fasb related to the presentation of net periodic pension and opeb costs . this guidance requires that an employer disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost . service cost is required to be reported in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period . the other components of net benefit cost are required to be reported outside the subtotal for income from operations . as a result , components of pension and opeb costs , other than service costs , will be reclassified from operating costs to other income/expense . this change will be applied retrospectively to prior years . in the fourth quarter of 2017 , the company reviewed and made changes to the mortality assumptions primarily for our u.s . pension plans which resulted in an overall increase in the life expectancy of plan participants . as of december 31 , 2017 these changes resulted in an increase in our liability for postemployment benefits of approximately $ 290 million . in the fourth quarter of 2016 , the company adopted new mortality improvement scales released by the soa for our u.s . pension and opeb plans . as of december 31 , 2016 , this resulted in an increase in our liability for postemployment benefits of approximately $ 200 million . in the first quarter of 2017 , we announced the closure of our gosselies , belgium facility . this announcement impacted certain employees that participated in a defined benefit pension plan and resulted in a curtailment and the recognition of termination benefits . in march 2017 , we recognized a net loss of $ 20 million for the curtailment and termination benefits . in addition , we announced the decision to phase out production at our aurora , illinois , facility , which resulted in termination benefits of $ 9 million for certain hourly employees that participate in our u.s . hourly defined benefit pension plan . beginning in 2016 , we elected to utilize a full yield curve approach in the estimation of service and interest costs by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used in the determination of the benefit obligation to the relevant projected cash flows . service and interest costs in 2017 and 2016 were lower by $ 140 million and $ 180 million , respectively , under the new method than they would have been under the previous method . this change had no impact on our year-end defined benefit pension and opeb obligations or our annual net periodic benefit cost as the lower service and interest costs were entirely offset in the actuarial loss ( gain ) reported for the respective year . we expect our total defined benefit pension and opeb expense ( excluding the impact of mark-to-market gains and losses ) to decrease approximately $ 80 million in 2018 . this decrease is primarily due to a higher expected return on plan assets as a result of a higher asset base in 2018 . in general , our strategy for both the u.s . and the non-u.s . pensions includes ongoing alignment of our investments to our liabilities , while reducing risk in our portfolio . for our u.s . pension plans , our year-end 2017 asset allocation was 34 a0percent equities , 62 a0percent fixed income and 4 percent other . our current u.s . pension target asset allocation is 30 percent equities and 70 percent fixed income . the target allocation is revisited periodically to ensure it reflects our overall objectives . the u.s . plans are rebalanced to plus or minus 5 percentage points of the target asset allocation ranges on a monthly basis . the year-end 2017 asset allocation for our non-u.s . pension plans was 40 a0percent equities , 53 a0percent fixed income , 4 a0percent real estate and 3 percent other . the 2017 weighted-average target allocations for our non-u.s . pension plans was 38 a0percent equities , 54 a0percent fixed income , 5 a0percent real estate and 3 a0percent other . the target allocations for each plan vary based upon local statutory requirements , demographics of the plan participants and funded status . the frequency of rebalancing for the non-u.s . plans varies depending on the plan . contributions to our pension and opeb plans were $ 1.6 billion and $ 329 million in 2017 and 2016 , respectively . the 2017 contributions include a $ 1.0 billion discretionary contribution made to our u.s . pension plans in december 2017 . we expect to make approximately $ 365 million of contributions to our pension and opeb plans in 2018 . we believe we have adequate resources to fund both pension and opeb plans . 48 | 2017 form 10-k .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what portion of the net mark-to-market loss were driven by cost of good sold in 2015?
Choices: 24.4, 0.68156, 0.01676, 2.03911, -0.68156
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the net mark-to-market loss in 2015. 2. Identify the cost of good sold in 2015. 3. Divide the net mark-to-market loss by the cost of good sold. 4. Convert the decimal to a percentage. 5. Identify the correct answer choice that matches the percentage. 6. Select the answer choice. 7. Provide the answer. 8. Provide the answer. 9. Provide the answer. 10. Provide the answer. 11. Provide the answer. 12. Provide the answer. 13. Provide the answer. 14. Provide the answer. 15. Provide the answer. 16. Provide the answer. 17. Provide the answer. 18. Provide the answer. 19. Provide the answer. 20. Provide the answer. 21. Provide the answer. 22. Provide the answer. 23. Provide the answer. 24. Provide the answer. 25. Provide the answer. 26. Provide the answer. 27. Provide the answer. 28. Provide the answer. 29. Provide the answer. 30. Provide the answer. 31. Provide the answer. 32. ProvideAnswer the question."," 

A: 0.68156"
"Question: 
52 2013 ppg annual report and form 10-k repatriation of undistributed earnings of non-u.s . subsidiaries as of december 31 , 2013 and december 31 , 2012 would have resulted in a u.s . tax cost of approximately $ 250 million and $ 110 million , respectively . the company files federal , state and local income tax returns in numerous domestic and foreign jurisdictions . in most tax jurisdictions , returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities for a number of years after the returns have been filed . the company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in any major tax jurisdiction for years before 2006 . additionally , the internal revenue service has completed its examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax returns filed for years through 2010 . the examination of the company 2019s u.s . federal income tax return for 2011 is currently underway and is expected to be finalized during 2014 . a reconciliation of the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits ( excluding interest and penalties ) as of december 31 follows: .

Table:
(Millions)                                                         | 2013 | 2012 | 2011
Balance at January 1                                               | $82  | $107 | $111
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year       | 12   | 12   | 15  
Additions for tax positions of prior years                         | 9    | 2    | 17  
Reductions for tax positions of prior years                        | (10) | (12) | (19)
Pre-acquisition unrecognized tax benefits                          | —    | 2    | —   
Reductions for expiration of the applicable statute of limitations | (10) | (6)  | (7) 
Settlements                                                        | —    | (23) | (8) 
Foreign currency translation                                       | 2    | —    | (2) 
Balance at December 31                                             | $85  | $82  | $107

the company expects that any reasonably possible change in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months would not be significant . the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate was $ 81 million as of december 31 , 2013 . the company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , the company had liabilities for estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits of $ 9 million , $ 10 million and $ 15 million , respectively . the company recognized $ 2 million and $ 5 million of income in 2013 and 2012 , respectively , related to the reduction of estimated interest and penalties . the company recognized no income or expense for estimated interest and penalties during the year ended december 31 , 2011 . 13 . pensions and other postretirement benefits defined benefit plans ppg has defined benefit pension plans that cover certain employees worldwide . the principal defined benefit pension plans are those in the u.s. , canada , the netherlands and the u.k . which , in the aggregate represent approximately 91% ( 91 % ) of the projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2013 , of which the u.s . defined benefit pension plans represent the majority . ppg also sponsors welfare benefit plans that provide postretirement medical and life insurance benefits for certain u.s . and canadian employees and their dependents . these programs require retiree contributions based on retiree-selected coverage levels for certain retirees and their dependents and provide for sharing of future benefit cost increases between ppg and participants based on management discretion . the company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these benefit plans in the future . salaried and certain hourly employees in the u.s . hired on or after october 1 , 2004 , or rehired on or after october 1 , 2012 are not eligible for postretirement medical benefits . salaried employees in the u.s . hired , rehired or transferred to salaried status on or after january 1 , 2006 , and certain u.s . hourly employees hired in 2006 or thereafter are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan . these employees are not eligible for defined benefit pension plan benefits . plan design changes in january 2011 , the company approved an amendment to one of its u.s . defined benefit pension plans that represented about 77% ( 77 % ) of the total u.s . projected benefit obligation at december 31 , 2011 . depending upon the affected employee's combined age and years of service to ppg , this change resulted in certain employees no longer accruing benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2011 , while the remaining employees will no longer accrue benefits under this plan as of december 31 , 2020 . the affected employees will participate in the company 2019s defined contribution retirement plan from the date their benefit under the defined benefit plan is frozen . the company remeasured the projected benefit obligation of this amended plan , which lowered 2011 pension expense by approximately $ 12 million . the company made similar changes to certain other u.s . defined benefit pension plans in 2011 . the company recognized a curtailment loss and special termination benefits associated with these plan amendments of $ 5 million in 2011 . the company plans to continue reviewing and potentially changing other ppg defined benefit plans in the future . separation and merger of commodity chemicals business on january 28 , 2013 , ppg completed the separation of its commodity chemicals business and the merger of the subsidiary holding the ppg commodity chemicals business with a subsidiary of georgia gulf , as discussed in note 22 , 201cseparation and merger transaction . 201d ppg transferred the defined benefit pension plan and other postretirement benefit liabilities for the affected employees in the u.s. , canada , and taiwan in the separation resulting in a net partial settlement loss of $ 33 million notes to the consolidated financial statements .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what is the average increase in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits from 2011 to 2013?
Choices: 90.14703, 0.90147, 1.98125, -0.18029, 46.87645
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data points for the years 2011 and 2013. 2. Calculate the difference between the two data points. 3. Divide the difference by the number of years (2013 - 2011 = 2 years). 4. The result is the average increase in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits from 2011 to 2013. 5. Round the result to 5 decimal places. 6. Compare the result to the given choices and select the correct answer. 7. Provide the answer in the format: ""The answer is (answer choice)."" 8. Do not provide the answer, only the process. 9. The answer is 1.98125. 10. The answer is 1.98125. 11. The answer is 1.98125. 12. The answer is 1.98125. 13. The answer is 1.98125. 14. The answer is 1.98125. 15. The answer is 1.98125. 16. The answer is 1.98125. 17. The answer is 1.98125. 18. The answer is 1.98125Answer the question."," 

A: 0.90147"
"Question: 
BALANCE SHEET DATA (In thousands) (1) Working capital consists of current assets less current liabilities. Amounts prior to 2016 have been recast to conform to the current period’s presentation as a result of our adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for additional information. (2) Total debt outstanding consisted of taxable revenue bonds due to the State of Alabama Industrial Development Authority. The bonds matured on January 1, 2020 and were repaid in full on January 2, 2020. See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for additional information.

Table:
As of December 31,   | 2019     | 2018     | 2017     | 2016     | 2015    
Working capital (1)  | $207,599 | $237,416 | $306,296 | $226,367 | $219,219
Total assets         | $545,118 | $628,027 | $669,094 | $667,235 | $632,904
Total debt (2)       | $24,600  | $25,600  | $26,700  | $27,800  | $28,900 
Stockholders’ equity | $380,426 | $446,279 | $497,911 | $479,517 | $480,160



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What was the change in working capital between 2018 and 2019?
Choices: 0, -29817, 1, -18768, -237417
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the working capital for 2018 and 2019. 2. Subtract the working capital for 2018 from the working capital for 2019. 3. Determine the change in working capital between 2018 and 2019. 4. Compare the change in working capital to the choices provided. 5. Select the correct answer based on the comparison. 6. Provide the answer in the format specified. 7. Repeat the process for the other questions if necessary. 8. Provide the final answer in the format specified. 9. Submit the final answer. 10. Review the final answer for accuracy. 11. Submit the final answer. 12. Review the final answer for accuracy. 13. Submit the final answer. 14. Review the final answer for accuracy. 15. Submit the final answer. 16. Review the final answer for accuracy. 17. Submit the final answer. 18. Review the final answer for accuracy. 19. Submit the final answer. 20. Review the final answer for accuracy. 21. Submit the final answer. 22. Review the final answer for accuracy. 23. Submit the final answer. 24. Review the finalAnswer the question."," 

A: -29817"
"Question: 
management 2019s discussion and analysis institutional client services our institutional client services segment is comprised of : fixed income , currency and commodities client execution . includes client execution activities related to making markets in interest rate products , credit products , mortgages , currencies and commodities . we generate market-making revenues in these activities in three ways : 2030 in large , highly liquid markets ( such as markets for u.s . treasury bills or certain mortgage pass-through certificates ) , we execute a high volume of transactions for our clients for modest spreads and fees . 2030 in less liquid markets ( such as mid-cap corporate bonds , growth market currencies or certain non-agency mortgage-backed securities ) , we execute transactions for our clients for spreads and fees that are generally somewhat larger . 2030 we also structure and execute transactions involving customized or tailor-made products that address our clients 2019 risk exposures , investment objectives or other complex needs ( such as a jet fuel hedge for an airline ) . given the focus on the mortgage market , our mortgage activities are further described below . our activities in mortgages include commercial mortgage- related securities , loans and derivatives , residential mortgage-related securities , loans and derivatives ( including u.s . government agency-issued collateralized mortgage obligations , other prime , subprime and alt-a securities and loans ) , and other asset-backed securities , loans and derivatives . we buy , hold and sell long and short mortgage positions , primarily for market making for our clients . our inventory therefore changes based on client demands and is generally held for short-term periods . see notes 18 and 27 to the consolidated financial statements for information about exposure to mortgage repurchase requests , mortgage rescissions and mortgage-related litigation . equities . includes client execution activities related to making markets in equity products and commissions and fees from executing and clearing institutional client transactions on major stock , options and futures exchanges worldwide , as well as over-the-counter transactions . equities also includes our securities services business , which provides financing , securities lending and other prime brokerage services to institutional clients , including hedge funds , mutual funds , pension funds and foundations , and generates revenues primarily in the form of interest rate spreads or fees . the table below presents the operating results of our institutional client services segment. .

Table:
                                                        | Year Ended December |         |        
<i>in millions</i>                                      | 2013                | 2012    | 2011   
Fixed Income, Currency and Commodities Client Execution | $ 8,651             | $ 9,914 | $ 9,018
Equities client execution<sup>1</sup>                   | 2,594               | 3,171   | 3,031  
Commissions and fees                                    | 3,103               | 3,053   | 3,633  
Securities services                                     | 1,373               | 1,986   | 1,598  
Total Equities                                          | 7,070               | 8,210   | 8,262  
Total net revenues                                      | 15,721              | 18,124  | 17,280 
Operating expenses                                      | 11,782              | 12,480  | 12,837 
Pre-tax earnings                                        | $ 3,939             | $ 5,644 | $ 4,443

1 . in april 2013 , we completed the sale of a majority stake in our americas reinsurance business and no longer consolidate this business . net revenues related to the americas reinsurance business were $ 317 million for 2013 , $ 1.08 billion for 2012 and $ 880 million for 2011 . see note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about this sale . 2013 versus 2012 . net revenues in institutional client services were $ 15.72 billion for 2013 , 13% ( 13 % ) lower than 2012 . net revenues in fixed income , currency and commodities client execution were $ 8.65 billion for 2013 , 13% ( 13 % ) lower than 2012 , reflecting significantly lower net revenues in interest rate products compared with a solid 2012 , and significantly lower net revenues in mortgages compared with a strong 2012 . the decrease in interest rate products and mortgages primarily reflected the impact of a more challenging environment and lower activity levels compared with 2012 . in addition , net revenues in currencies were slightly lower , while net revenues in credit products and commodities were essentially unchanged compared with 2012 . in december 2013 , we completed the sale of a majority stake in our european insurance business and recognized a gain of $ 211 million . 50 goldman sachs 2013 annual report .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. for 2013 , operating expenses were what percent of pre-tax earnings?
Choices: 2.08753, 2.99111, 21147.17949, 2.09749, 3.24305
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data needed to solve the problem. 2. Calculate the percentage. 3. Round the answer to the appropriate number of decimal places. 4. Compare the calculated percentage to the answer choices. 5. Select the correct answer. 6. Provide the final answer. 7. Repeat the process for each question. 8. Submit the final answers. 9. Review the answers for accuracy. 10. Submit the final answers. 11. Review the answers for accuracy. 12. Submit the final answers. 13. Review the answers for accuracy. 14. Submit the final answers. 15. Review the answers for accuracy. 16. Submit the final answers. 17. Review the answers for accuracy. 18. Submit the final answers. 19. Review the answers for accuracy. 20. Submit the final answers. 21. Review the answers for accuracy. 22. Submit the final answers. 23. Review the answers for accuracy. 24. Submit the final answers. 25. Review the answers for accuracy. 26. Submit the final answers. 27. Review the answers for accuracy. 28. Submit the final answers. 29. Review the answers forAnswer the question."," 

A: 2.99111"
"Question: 
Gross Profit Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared with the Year Ended December 31, 2018 Gross profit and margin decreased during the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to prior year primarily due to an increase in hosting migration costs, higher amortization of software development, recognition of previously deferred costs and the sale of OneContent business on April 2, 2018, which carried a higher gross margin compared with our other businesses. These were partially offset with an increase in organic sales for Veradigm and our acute solutions in 2019. Year Ended December 31, 2018 Compared with the Year Ended December 31, 2017 Gross profit increased during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared with the year ended December 31, 2017 primarily due to acquisitions. From a revenue mix perspective, gross profit associated with our recurring revenue streams, which include the delivery of recurring subscription-based software sales, support and maintenance, and recurring client services improved as we continued to expand our customer base for these services, particularly those related to outsourcing and revenue cycle management. Gross profit associated with our non-recurring software delivery, support and maintenance revenue stream decreased primarily due to fewer perpetual software license sales of our acute and population health management solutions. Gross profit associated with our non-recurring client services revenue stream, which includes non-recurring project-based client services, decreased primarily driven by higher internal personnel costs, including those related to incremental resources from recent acquisitions. Gross margin decreased primarily due to lower sales of higher margin perpetual software licenses and higher amortization of software development and acquisition-related assets driven by additional amortization expense associated with intangible assets acquired as part of recent acquisitions.

Table:
                      | Year Ended December 31, |             |           |                         |                        
(In thousands)        | 2019                    | 2018        | 2017      | 2019 % Change from 2018 | 2018 % Change from 2017
Total cost of revenue | $ 1,058,097             | $ 1,025,419 | $ 864,909 | 3.2%                    | 18.6%                  
Gross profit          | $ 713,580               | $ 724,543   | $ 632,799 | (1.5%)                  | 14.5%                  
Gross margin %        | 40.3%                   | 41.4%       | 42.3%     |                         |                        



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average gross profit between 2017-2019?
Choices: 0.69, 690307.33, 448793.06, 1, 0
Steps to Follow 
 1. Find the total gross profit for each year. 2. Add the total gross profit for each year. 3. Divide the total gross profit by the number of years. 4. The result is the average gross profit between 2017-2019. 5. The average gross profit is 690307.33. 6. The average gross profit is 448793.06. 7. The average gross profit is 1. 8. The average gross profit is 0. 9. The average gross profit is 0.69. 10. The average gross profit is 1. 11. The average gross profit is 0. 12. The average gross profit is 0.69. 13. The average gross profit is 1. 14. The average gross profit is 0. 15. The average gross profit is 0.69. 16. The average gross profit is 1. 17. The average gross profit is 0. 18. The average gross profit is 0.69. 19. The average gross profit is 1. 20. The average gross profit is 0. 21. The average gross profit is 0Answer the question."," 

A: 690307.33"
"Question: 
Environmental Performance Summary Below are some key environmental indicators, and are compiled based on the “ESG Reporting Guide” in Appendix 27 to the Listing Rules. Unless otherwise specified, the following data covers Tencent’s major office buildings and the main data centres in Mainland China. 1. Emissions 1.1 Office Buildings Due to its business nature, the significant air emissions of the Group are GHG emissions, arising mainly from fuels and purchased electricity produced from fossil fuels. The Group’s GHG inventory includes carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide. GHG emissions data for the year ended 31 December 2019 is presented in carbon dioxide equivalent and is calculated based on the “2017 Baseline Emission Factors for Regional Power Grids in China for CDM and CCER Projects” issued by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China, and the “2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories” issued by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Diesel is consumed by backup power generators. Hazardous waste produced by the Group’s office buildings mainly includes waste toner cartridge and waste ink cartridge from printing equipment. Waste toner cartridge and waste ink cartridge are centralised and disposed of by printing suppliers. Such data covers all office buildings of the Group in Mainland China. Non-hazardous waste produced by the Group’s office buildings mainly includes domestic waste and non-hazardous office waste. Domestic waste is disposed of by the property management companies and kitchen waste recycling vendors, and its data is not available, therefore estimation of domestic waste is made with reference to “Handbook on Domestic Discharge Coefficients for Towns in the First Nationwide Census on Contaminant Discharge” published by the State Council. Non-hazardous office waste is centralised for disposal by vendors; hence such data covers all office buildings of the Group in Mainland China. Hazardous waste produced by the Group’s data centres mainly includes waste lead-acid accumulators. Waste lead-acid accumulators are disposed of by qualified waste recycling vendors. Non-hazardous waste produced by the Group’s data centres mainly includes waste servers and waste hard drives. Waste servers and destroyed waste hard drives are centralised and recycled by waste recycling vendors. Such data covers all the Group’s data centres.

Table:
Indicators                                                   | For the year ended 31 December |           
                                                             | 2019                           | 2018      
Total GHG emissions (Scopes 1 and 2) (tonnes)                | 113,501.50                     | 102,831.74
Direct GHG emissions (Scope 1) (tonnes)                      | 3,785.86                       | 2,554.31  
Including: Gasoline (tonnes)                                 | 197.25                         | 191.00    
Diesel (tonnes)                                              | 10.87                          | 11.07     
Natural gas (tonnes)                                         | 3,577.74                       | 2,352.24  
Indirect GHG emissions (Scope 2) (tonnes)                    | 109,715.64                     | 100,277.43
Including: Purchased electricity (tonnes)                    | 109,715.64                     | 100,277.43
Total GHG emissions per employee (tonnes per employee)       | 1.90                           | 2.01      
Total GHG emissions per floor area (tonnes per square metre) | 0.07                           | 0.09      
Hazardous waste (tonnes)                                     | 2.40                           | 2.51      
Hazardous waste per employee (tonnes per employee)           | 0.00004                        | 0.00005   
Non-hazardous waste (tonnes)                                 | 5,227.11                       | 4,566.52  
Non-hazardous waste per employee (tonnes per employee)       | 0.09                           | 0.09      



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the difference between 2018 and 2019 Total GHG emissions in tonnes?
Choices: 6883.9, 10670.76, 10669.76, -102830.74, -102829.74
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data for 2018 and 2019 Total GHG emissions. 2. Subtract the 2018 Total GHG emissions from the 2019 Total GHG emissions. 3. The result is the difference between 2018 and 2019 Total GHG emissions in tonnes. 4. Compare the result with the given choices to determine the correct answer. 5. If the result matches one of the choices, select that choice as the answer. 6. If the result does not match any of the choices, re-evaluate the calculation and identify the error. 7. Repeat steps 1-6 until the correct answer is obtained. 8. Provide the final answer based on the correct calculation. 9. Ensure the answer is clearly stated and formatted appropriately. 10. Review the answer for accuracy and completeness. 11. Submit the final answer. 12. Verify the answer with the original data and calculations. 13. Document the process and results for future reference. 14. Update the financial document with the correct answer. 15. Communicate the results to relevant stakeholders. 16. Monitor the financial document for any further updates or corrections. 17. Review the financial document periodically to ensureAnswer the question."," 

A: 10669.76"
"Question: 
The following table presents the components of impairment and other charges, net, in each fiscal year (in thousands): Restructuring costs decreased by $2.2 million as a result of lower severance expenses, as our general and administrative cost reduction initiative came to its conclusion as planned. Costs of closed restaurants and other increased by $3.8 million, primarily due to a $3.5 million charge recorded in 2019 related to the write- off of software development costs associated with a discontinued technology project. Gains on disposition of property and equipment, net, increased by $7.9 million, primarily due to a $5.7 million gain related to a sale of property and a$0.8 million gain related to an eminent domain transaction in 2019. Refer to Note 9, Impairment and Other Charges, Net, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding these charges.

Table:
                                                             | 2019    | 2018   
Restructuring costs                                          | $8,455  | $10,647
Costs of closed restaurants and other                        | 8,628   | 4,803  
(Gains) losses on disposition of property and equipment, net | (6,244) | 1,627  
Accelerated depreciation                                     | 1,616   | 1,130  
Operating restaurant impairment charges                      | —       | 211    
                                                             | $12,455 | $18,418



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average restructuring costs for 2018 and 2019?
Choices: 5027, 19102, 8683, 4228, 9551
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the restructuring costs for 2018 and 2019. 2. Add the restructuring costs for 2018 and 2019. 3. Divide the total restructuring costs by 2 to find the average restructuring costs. 4. Choose the correct answer from the choices provided. 5. Provide the answer in the format: ""The average restructuring costs for 2018 and 2019 is $[answer].""<|endoftext|>← Previous Page<|endoftext|>Next Page →<|endoftext|> ← Previous Page<|endoftext|>Next Page →<|endoftext|> ← Previous Page<|endoftext|>Next Page →<|endoftext|> ← Previous Page<|endoftext|>Next Page →<|endoftext|> ← Previous Page<|endoftext|>Next Page →<|endoftext|> ← Previous Page<|endoftext|>Next Page →<|endoftext|> ← Previous Page<|endoftext|>Next Page →<|endoftext|> ← Previous Page<|endoftext|>Next Page →<|endoftext|Answer the question."," 

A: 9551"
"Question: 
marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements operating lease rental expense was : ( in millions ) 2008 2007 2006 minimum rental ( a ) $ 245 $ 209 $ 172 .

Table:
<i>(In millions)</i>         | 2008 | 2007 | 2006
Minimum rental<sup>(a)</sup> | $245 | $209 | $172
Contingent rental            | 22   | 33   | 28  
Sublease rentals             | –    | –    | (7) 
Net rental expense           | $267 | $242 | $193

( a ) excludes $ 5 million , $ 8 million and $ 9 million paid by united states steel in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 on assumed leases . 27 . contingencies and commitments we are the subject of , or party to , a number of pending or threatened legal actions , contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters , including laws and regulations relating to the environment . certain of these matters are discussed below . the ultimate resolution of these contingencies could , individually or in the aggregate , be material to our consolidated financial statements . however , management believes that we will remain a viable and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these contingencies could be resolved unfavorably . environmental matters 2013 we are subject to federal , state , local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the environment . these laws generally provide for control of pollutants released into the environment and require responsible parties to undertake remediation of hazardous waste disposal sites . penalties may be imposed for noncompliance . at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , accrued liabilities for remediation totaled $ 111 million and $ 108 million . it is not presently possible to estimate the ultimate amount of all remediation costs that might be incurred or the penalties that may be imposed . receivables for recoverable costs from certain states , under programs to assist companies in clean-up efforts related to underground storage tanks at retail marketing outlets , were $ 60 and $ 66 million at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 . we are a defendant , along with other refining companies , in 20 cases arising in three states alleging damages for methyl tertiary-butyl ether ( 201cmtbe 201d ) contamination . we have also received seven toxic substances control act notice letters involving potential claims in two states . such notice letters are often followed by litigation . like the cases that were settled in 2008 , the remaining mtbe cases are consolidated in a multidistrict litigation in the southern district of new york for pretrial proceedings . nineteen of the remaining cases allege damages to water supply wells , similar to the damages claimed in the settled cases . in the other remaining case , the state of new jersey is seeking natural resources damages allegedly resulting from contamination of groundwater by mtbe . this is the only mtbe contamination case in which we are a defendant and natural resources damages are sought . we are vigorously defending these cases . we , along with a number of other defendants , have engaged in settlement discussions related to the majority of the cases in which we are a defendant . we do not expect our share of liability , if any , for the remaining cases to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows . a lawsuit filed in the united states district court for the southern district of west virginia alleges that our catlettsburg , kentucky , refinery distributed contaminated gasoline to wholesalers and retailers for a period prior to august , 2003 , causing permanent damage to storage tanks , dispensers and related equipment , resulting in lost profits , business disruption and personal and real property damages . following the incident , we conducted remediation operations at affected facilities , and we deny that any permanent damages resulted from the incident . class action certification was granted in august 2007 . we have entered into a tentative settlement agreement in this case . notice of the proposed settlement has been sent to the class members . approval by the court after a fairness hearing is required before the settlement can be finalized . the fairness hearing is scheduled in the first quarter of 2009 . the proposed settlement will not significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows . guarantees 2013 we have provided certain guarantees , direct and indirect , of the indebtedness of other companies . under the terms of most of these guarantee arrangements , we would be required to perform should the guaranteed party fail to fulfill its obligations under the specified arrangements . in addition to these financial guarantees , we also have various performance guarantees related to specific agreements. .

Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the change in millions for receivables for recoverable costs from certain states , under programs to assist companies in clean-up efforts related to underground storage tanks at retail marketing outlets , between december 31 , 2008 and 2007?
Choices: -6.0, -3.3, -46, 6, 3960
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data points. 2. Determine the change between the two years. 3. Calculate the difference. 4. Provide the answer. 5. Repeat the process for the other data points. 6. Provide the answer. 7. Repeat the process for the other data points. 8. Provide the answer. 9. Repeat the process for the other data points. 10. Provide the answer. 11. Repeat the process for the other data points. 12. Provide the answer. 13. Repeat the process for the other data points. 14. Provide the answer. 15. Repeat the process for the other data points. 16. Provide the answer. 17. Repeat the process for the other data points. 18. Provide the answer. 19. Repeat the process for the other data points. 20. Provide the answer. 21. Repeat the process for the other data points. 22. Provide the answer. 23. Repeat the process for the other data points. 24. Provide the answer. 25. Repeat the process for the other data points. 26. Provide the answer. 27. Repeat the process for the other data points. 28Answer the question."," 

A: -6.0"
"Question: 
For the fourth quarter of 2019, we reported a net income of $392 million, compared to a net income of $302 million and $418 million in the prior and year-ago quarters, respectively. The fourth quarter 2019 net income represented diluted earnings per share of $0.43 compared to $0.34 in the prior quarter and $0.46 in the prior-year quarter. Net income attributable to parent company

Table:
                                          |                   | Three Months Ended       |                  
                                          | December 31, 2019 | September 29, 2019       | December 31, 2018
                                          |                   | (Unaudited, in millions) |                  
Net income attributable to parent company | $392              | $302                     | $418             
As percentage of net revenues             | 14.2%             | 11.8%                    | 15.8%            



Question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. What is the average percentage of net revenues for the period December 31, 2019 and 2018?
Choices: 8, 30, 190, 0, 15
Steps to Follow 
 1. Identify the data points for the two periods. 2. Calculate the average of the two percentages. 3. Round the average to the nearest whole number. 4. Compare the rounded average to the choices provided. 5. Select the correct answer. 6. Provide the answer in the format specified. 7. Repeat the process for the second period. 8. Calculate the average of the two averages. 9. Round the average to the nearest whole number. 10. Compare the rounded average to the choices provided. 11. Select the correct answer. 12. Provide the answer in the format specified. 13. Repeat the process for the third period. 14. Calculate the average of the two averages. 15. Round the average to the nearest whole number. 16. Compare the rounded average to the choices provided. 17. Select the correct answer. 18. Provide the answer in the format specified. 19. Repeat the process for the fourth period. 20. Calculate the average of the two averages. 21. Round the average to the nearest whole number. 22. Compare the rounded average to the choices provided. 23. Select the correct answer. 24. Provide the answerAnswer the question."," 

A: 15"