File size: 4,907 Bytes
6be0a07 a0a5a66 6be0a07 6594b52 a4bb35a 6c1507f 06498a5 6c1507f 06498a5 6be0a07 13f52e0 6594b52 13f52e0 a0a5a66 13f52e0 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 |
---
title: Iterative Development Workflow for HMP
description: 'This file describes the iterative procedure for evolving the HyperCortex
Mesh Protocol (HMP) in a structured, traceable, and collaborative manner. --- ##
🔄 Version Naming Convention - `000N` — curr...'
type: Article
tags:
- CogSync
- MeshConsensus
- EGP
- JSON
- Ethics
- Mesh
- Agent
- HMP
---
# Iterative Development Workflow for HMP
This file describes the iterative procedure for evolving the HyperCortex Mesh Protocol (HMP) in a structured, traceable, and collaborative manner.
---
## 🔄 Version Naming Convention
- `000N` — current specification version
- `000K` — next version (`000N + 1`)
Example:
```
HMP-0003.md ← current spec
HMP-0003-audit.txt ← feedback for current spec
HMP-0004.md ← next draft spec
HMP-0004-audit.txt ← feedback for next spec
```
---
## 📑 Iteration Steps
| № | Step Description | Artifacts Modified |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| 1 | Extract and categorize feedback from `HMP-000N-audit.txt` and past discussions | Structured list of proposed changes |
| 2 | Draft TOC changes (add/merge/split sections as needed) | TOC diff, optionally in `notes.md` |
| 3 | Create draft `HMP-000K.md` with new TOC | `HMP-000K.md` |
| 4 | Sequentially update sections based on audit feedback and structural changes | `HMP-000K.md` |
| 5 | Full-spec review, cleanup, refinement | `HMP-000K.md` |
| 6 | Collect reviews from external AIs and ChatGPT; log them to audit | `HMP-000K-audit.txt` |
| 7 | Update `README.md`, `changelog.txt`, and JSON Schemas (if needed) | Various |
---
## 📘 Version Control Guidelines
- Commit messages should follow the pattern:
```
\[HMP-000K\:iteration#X] Short description of change
```
- For clarifications or editorial decisions, create:
```
clarifications/HMP-000K-notes.md
````
- At least **one external AI review** and **one ChatGPT review** is recommended before finalizing the version.
---
## 🧠 ChatGPT Prompt (for future use)
```markdown
You are acting as a cognitive agent evolving the HMP (HyperCortex Mesh Protocol).
Use input files `HMP-0003.md` and `HMP-0003-audit.txt`.
Instructions:
- Add pseudocode or JSON examples for EGP functions (ethical voting, principle resolution).
- Expand the MHP section with APIs like Explainability and Consent Requests.
- Ensure consistency with `HMP-Ethics.md` and EGP principles.
- Add a Changelog with attributions (Grok, ChatGPT, User).
- Use Mesh-style terminology: CogSync, MeshConsensus, Cognitive Diary.
Your output should be a Markdown file: `HMP-0004.md`
````
---
## 🧠 Audit Consolidation Format
When feedback is collected from multiple sources (e.g. humans, ChatGPT, other AIs), it can be aggregated into a **consolidated audit** to compare ideas and track alternative proposals.
Use the following structure to create such a consolidated view:
```
[filename] - [unique suggestion, idea or issue]
[author 1]: [specific detail, variation, or comment]
[author 2]: [alternative phrasing or counterpoint]
```
Example:
```
HMP-0004.md - Allow DAG concepts to have time-bounded validity
Gleb: Could support temporary beliefs for "unstable facts"
ChatGPT: Better to model as edge property instead of node tag
```
This format encourages comparison and evolution of competing ideas across contributors.
You may optionally track this using a semantic format:
- [`AuditEntry.json`](audits/AuditEntry.json)
- [`semantic_repo.json`](audits/semantic_repo.json)
---
## 🧩 Purpose
This workflow enables a gradual, traceable, and collaborative evolution of the HMP specification through a clear audit-specify-review cycle with minimal disruption.
It also lays the foundation for future automation through `AuditEntry.json` and semantic logs.
---
## 📌 TODO & Notes
* [ ] Consider adding a table-based format to audit files for easier parsing.
* [ ] Maintain `semantic_repo.json` in sync with each new spec version.
* [ ] Support exporting changelog entries as structured JSON/YAML for future changelog tooling.
---
> ⚡ [AI friendly version docs (structured_md)](index.md)
```json
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Article",
"name": "Iterative Development Workflow for HMP",
"description": "# Iterative Development Workflow for HMP This file describes the iterative procedure for evolving t..."
}
```
|