Instructions to use krogoldAI/QueryRefiner-0.5B-v0.1-GRPO with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- Transformers
How to use krogoldAI/QueryRefiner-0.5B-v0.1-GRPO with Transformers:
# Use a pipeline as a high-level helper from transformers import pipeline pipe = pipeline("text-generation", model="krogoldAI/QueryRefiner-0.5B-v0.1-GRPO") messages = [ {"role": "user", "content": "Who are you?"}, ] pipe(messages)# Load model directly from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("krogoldAI/QueryRefiner-0.5B-v0.1-GRPO") model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("krogoldAI/QueryRefiner-0.5B-v0.1-GRPO", device_map="auto") messages = [ {"role": "user", "content": "Who are you?"}, ] inputs = tokenizer.apply_chat_template( messages, add_generation_prompt=True, tokenize=True, return_dict=True, return_tensors="pt", ).to(model.device) outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=40) print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0][inputs["input_ids"].shape[-1]:])) - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
- Local Apps Settings
- vLLM
How to use krogoldAI/QueryRefiner-0.5B-v0.1-GRPO with vLLM:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install vLLM from pip: pip install vllm # Start the vLLM server: vllm serve "krogoldAI/QueryRefiner-0.5B-v0.1-GRPO" # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:8000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "krogoldAI/QueryRefiner-0.5B-v0.1-GRPO", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }'Use Docker
docker model run hf.co/krogoldAI/QueryRefiner-0.5B-v0.1-GRPO
- SGLang
How to use krogoldAI/QueryRefiner-0.5B-v0.1-GRPO with SGLang:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install SGLang from pip: pip install sglang # Start the SGLang server: python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "krogoldAI/QueryRefiner-0.5B-v0.1-GRPO" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "krogoldAI/QueryRefiner-0.5B-v0.1-GRPO", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }'Use Docker images
docker run --gpus all \ --shm-size 32g \ -p 30000:30000 \ -v ~/.cache/huggingface:/root/.cache/huggingface \ --env "HF_TOKEN=<secret>" \ --ipc=host \ lmsysorg/sglang:latest \ python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "krogoldAI/QueryRefiner-0.5B-v0.1-GRPO" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "krogoldAI/QueryRefiner-0.5B-v0.1-GRPO", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }' - Docker Model Runner
How to use krogoldAI/QueryRefiner-0.5B-v0.1-GRPO with Docker Model Runner:
docker model run hf.co/krogoldAI/QueryRefiner-0.5B-v0.1-GRPO
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ Domain and intent classification are essentially pattern recognition tasks where
|
|
| 478 |
|
| 479 |
Rephrasing quality, by contrast, requires the model to make nuanced judgments about when to intervene (versus preserving already-optimal queries), how to balance specificity against over-constraint, and whether to expand acronyms or add disambiguating context. These decisions demand deeper semantic understanding and generation capabilities that push the limits of a 0.5B model. The 90.33% score with 17.61% standard deviation represents strong performance on this challenging task, particularly given the diversity of the test set.
|
| 480 |
|
| 481 |
-
For production deployments, users should anticipate that the model will perform most reliably on structural conformance and classification tasks, while rephrasing decisions may occasionally require human review, particularly for edge cases or highly specialized domains underrepresented in the training data.
|
| 482 |
|
| 483 |
### Performance Considerations
|
| 484 |
|
|
|
|
| 478 |
|
| 479 |
Rephrasing quality, by contrast, requires the model to make nuanced judgments about when to intervene (versus preserving already-optimal queries), how to balance specificity against over-constraint, and whether to expand acronyms or add disambiguating context. These decisions demand deeper semantic understanding and generation capabilities that push the limits of a 0.5B model. The 90.33% score with 17.61% standard deviation represents strong performance on this challenging task, particularly given the diversity of the test set.
|
| 480 |
|
| 481 |
+
For production deployments, users should anticipate that the model will perform most reliably on structural conformance and classification tasks, while rephrasing decisions may occasionally require human review, particularly for edge cases or highly specialized domains underrepresented in the training data.-->
|
| 482 |
|
| 483 |
### Performance Considerations
|
| 484 |
|