krogoldAI commited on
Commit
bb68da4
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 9fb6e6c

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +1 -0
README.md CHANGED
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ The model was trained on the [krogoldAI/Query_rephraser_SFT](https://huggingface
23
  - [rag-datasets/rag-mini-wikipedia](https://huggingface.co/datasets/rag-datasets/rag-mini-wikipedia)
24
  - [razbit96/Ambiguity-Handling-in-User-Queries](https://huggingface.co/datasets/razbit96/Ambiguity-Handling-in-User-Queries)
25
  - [glaiveai/RAG-v1](https://huggingface.co/datasets/glaiveai/RAG-v1).
 
26
  Approximately 20% of the training examples include queries with systematically introduced ambiguity at varying levels to ensure the model can handle realistic user inputs across the ambiguity spectrum.
27
 
28
  The training data underwent rigorous quality assurance through a dual evaluation framework. Each example was validated for strict XML schema conformance and semantically evaluated using an LLM-as-a-judge protocol with six quality dimensions. Only examples achieving both perfect structural validity and high semantic quality scores were included in the final dataset, ensuring the model was trained exclusively on gold-standard examples.
 
23
  - [rag-datasets/rag-mini-wikipedia](https://huggingface.co/datasets/rag-datasets/rag-mini-wikipedia)
24
  - [razbit96/Ambiguity-Handling-in-User-Queries](https://huggingface.co/datasets/razbit96/Ambiguity-Handling-in-User-Queries)
25
  - [glaiveai/RAG-v1](https://huggingface.co/datasets/glaiveai/RAG-v1).
26
+
27
  Approximately 20% of the training examples include queries with systematically introduced ambiguity at varying levels to ensure the model can handle realistic user inputs across the ambiguity spectrum.
28
 
29
  The training data underwent rigorous quality assurance through a dual evaluation framework. Each example was validated for strict XML schema conformance and semantically evaluated using an LLM-as-a-judge protocol with six quality dimensions. Only examples achieving both perfect structural validity and high semantic quality scores were included in the final dataset, ensuring the model was trained exclusively on gold-standard examples.