--- tags: - ColBERT - PyLate - sentence-transformers - sentence-similarity - feature-extraction pipeline_tag: sentence-similarity library_name: PyLate license: apache-2.0 language: - en ---
[](https://lighton.ai)
[](https://www.linkedin.com/company/lighton/)
[](https://x.com/LightOnIO)
📚 [Collection](https://huggingface.co/collections/lightonai/denseon-and-lateon) | 📝 [Blog](https://huggingface.co/blog/lightonai/denseon-lateon)
DenseOn | LateOn | PyLate | FastPLAID
--- ## About the LateOn / DenseOn Family State-of-the-art retrieval is increasingly dominated by closed models, either hidden behind APIs or trained on undisclosed data. This blocks reproducibility, prevents study of possible data leakage, and gatekeeps progress to a handful of private labs. We thus decided to gather and curate a large amount of data and explore various mixtures. We release all the data used in our explorations: - [Gathered pre-training data](https://huggingface.co/datasets/lightonai/embeddings-pre-training), 1.4B query-documents pairs alongside annotations used for non-destructive filtering (structural filtering, deduplication, cross-encoder pair relevancy) - [Best pre-training mixture](https://huggingface.co/datasets/lightonai/embeddings-pre-training-curated) found with already applied filters - [Fine-tuning datasets](https://huggingface.co/datasets/lightonai/embeddings-fine-tuning) with query, positive and 2048 mined documents alongside their scores for 1.88M samples. Based on our findings, we trained LateOn (multi-vector/ColBERT) and DenseOn (single vector/dense) models on a proprietary Apache 2.0-compatible training dataset and release those models as well. Both are built on the [ModernBERT](https://huggingface.co/answerdotai/ModernBERT-base) backbone at 149M parameters, a size we believe sits at the sweet spot: large enough to handle real-world queries and documents, small enough to serve at high throughput in latency-sensitive production systems. For more information, please read our [blogpost](https://huggingface.co/blog/lightonai/denseon-lateon). ## LateOn **LateOn** is a ColBERT (multi-vector) retrieval model built on ModernBERT (149M parameters), trained by [LightOn](https://lighton.ai) using [PyLate](https://github.com/lightonai/pylate). This is the supervised version, fine-tuned with hard-negative contrastive training. The unsupervised version can be found [here](https://huggingface.co/lightonai/LateOn-unsupervised) Notably it: - **Beats every existing ColBERT model**, including those 4× its size (Jina ColBERT v2 at 559M, Arctic Embed L v2 at 568M). - **Holds up under decontamination**: when training-overlap samples are stripped from the BEIR corpora, LateOn climbs to **60.36 nDCG@10** on the 12-dataset decontaminated split — first place overall. - **Uses fully open data** for both pre-training and fine-tuning, with all signals released as metadata so you can rebuild, extend, or replace any filter. This release was focused on contrastive data exploration. We did not run a knowledge distillation phase nor use asymmetric prompts (both shown to help in our [ColBERT-Zero](https://huggingface.co/lightonai/ColBERT-Zero) study). We believe even stronger results are within reach by adding these — stay tuned. LateOn achieves **57.22** average NDCG@10 on BEIR (14 datasets) and **60.36** on decontaminated BEIR (12 datasets), leading all ColBERT models. See our [blog post](https://huggingface.co/blog/lightonai/denseon-lateon) for full results and analysis. Alongside LateOn, we also trained [DenseOn](https://huggingface.co/lightonai/DenseOn), a dense (single vector) variant, trained on the same setup. This variant is easier and cheaper to use, albeit with slightly weaker results (achieving a score of 56.20 on BEIR, it is still stronger than any dense base-sized model). It may also suffer from some limitations compared to LateOn, such as in terms of generalisation and long context. ## Results ### BEIR (14 datasets, NDCG@10) | Model | Average | Size (M) | Embed dim | ArguAna | CQADupstackRetrieval | ClimateFEVER | DBPedia | FEVER | FiQA2018 | HotpotQA | MSMARCO | NFCorpus | NQ | QuoraRetrieval | SCIDOCS | SciFact | TRECCOVID | Touche2020 | |---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| | [ColBERTv2](https://huggingface.co/colbert-ir/colbertv2.0) | 48.63 | 110 | 128 | 46.50 | *38.30* | 17.60 | 45.20 | 78.50 | 35.40 | 67.50 | *46.00* | 33.70 | 52.40 | 85.50 | 15.40 | 68.90 | 72.60 | 26.00 | | [Jina-ColBERT-v2](https://huggingface.co/jinaai/jina-colbert-v2) | 51.85 | 600 | 128 | 36.60 | *40.80* | 23.90 | 47.10 | 80.50 | 40.80 | 76.60 | **46.90** | 34.60 | **64.00** | 88.70 | 18.60 | 67.80 | 83.40 | 27.40 | | [ColBERT-small](https://huggingface.co/answerdotai/answerai-colbert-small-v1) | 53.79 | 33 | 96 | 50.09 | 38.75 | 33.07 | 45.58 | 90.96 | 41.15 | 76.11 | 43.50 | 37.30 | 59.10 | 87.72 | 18.42 | 74.77 | 84.59 | 25.69 | | [GTE-ModernColBERT-v1](https://huggingface.co/lightonai/GTE-ModernColBERT-v1) | 54.75 | 149 | 128 | 47.52 | 41.08 | 31.33 | 47.56 | 87.67 | 45.25 | 77.48 | 45.60 | 37.83 | 61.62 | 86.71 | 19.22 | 76.33 | **84.84** | 31.25 | | [ColBERT-Zero](https://huggingface.co/lightonai/ColBERT-Zero) | 55.39 | 149 | 128 | **52.82** | 41.41 | 35.90 | 47.43 | 90.52 | 42.50 | 79.45 | 45.95 | 37.21 | 61.82 | 85.19 | 19.84 | 76.33 | 78.27 | **36.24** | | [LateOn-unsupervised](https://huggingface.co/lightonai/LateOn-unsupervised) | 50.11 | 149 | 128 | 43.12 | **47.71** | 18.76 | 43.36 | 65.74 | 51.94 | 68.17 | 37.51 | 37.15 | 58.41 | 89.48 | 21.13 | **76.89** | 69.81 | 22.53 | | [LateOn](https://huggingface.co/lightonai/LateOn) | **57.22** | 149 | 128 | 50.52 | 47.36 | **39.67** | 45.99 | **92.02** | **53.12** | **79.98** | 45.67 | 37.79 | 63.91 | **89.67** | **21.90** | 76.61 | 83.60 | 30.52 | LateOn achieves 57.22 average NDCG@10, becoming the first ColBERT (and sub 150M parameter) model to break the 57 mark on BEIR by surpassing the previous best ColBERT model (ColBERT-Zero at 55.32) by almost two points and exceeding GTE-ModernColBERT-v1 by two point and a half, despite sharing the same backbone. It is worth noting that we achieve this performance only with contrastive data and without the use of the prompt (which has been shown to be beneficial in the ColBERT-Zero study but makes it harder and more expensive to use). This work was focused on an exploration of contrastive data, but we believe we can achieve much stronger results through a KD phase and the addition of prompts to serve as query expansion. Given such strong performances, one fair concern would be overfitting to BEIR. As highlighted in the decontaminated BEIR experiments, our models stay very strong on benches curated from any possible data leakage, especially in the multi-vector case and contrary to some other models. ### Decontaminated BEIR (12 datasets, NDCG@10) Standard benchmarks risk overestimating model quality when training data overlaps with evaluation corpora. This is a non-negligible risk in our case, as our mixture explorations are mostly built on BEIR evaluation. To quantify this and ensure that our model has not memorized possible leakage, we built decontaminated versions of the BEIR datasets by removing samples found in both the mGTE training dataset and in our internal training datasets. Since many retrieval models draw from similar public sources (Wikipedia, MS MARCO, Common Crawl, academic corpora), we expect significant overlap across models and believe the decontaminated benchmarks provide a meaningful, if imperfect, stress test. The decontaminated datasets are publicly available on HuggingFace. Despite being in the toughest position (as the decontamination is based on our data), LateOn and DenseOn stay consistent under decontamination. LateOn keeps its #1 position and DenseOn stays in the top four (only falling behind our other strong multi-vector model, ColBERT-Zero). Neither model flinches, which is direct evidence of generalization rather than overfitting. More broadly, ColBERT models seems to generalize better under decontamination: all three ColBERT models hold or improve their ranking, and they take 2 of the top 3 decontaminated positions. Although DenseOn holds strong, some dense models are hit harder, for example `GTE-ModernBERT`, dropping from 8th to last, which is particularly interesting considering our base mixture is derived from theirs. This highlights the strength of our curation methodology. While other models such as `Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B` also drop some ranks, hinting at an overlap with the BEIR evaluation, it is worth noting that newer models, such as the new `jina-embeddings-v5` and `pplx-embed-v1-0.6b` seems to exhibit stronger evidence of generalization rather than overfitting.