File size: 9,075 Bytes
ee377a6
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
# Sheikh-2.5-Coder Evaluation Framework

## Overview

This comprehensive evaluation framework provides systematic testing and benchmarking for the Sheikh-2.5-Coder model across multiple dimensions including code generation quality, performance, web development capabilities, and regression detection.

## Components

### 1. Main Evaluation Orchestrator (`evaluate_model.py`)
- **Purpose**: Coordinates all evaluation benchmarks and generates comprehensive reports
- **Features**: 
  - Integrates all evaluation components
  - Creates HTML dashboards and visualizations
  - Generates detailed markdown reports
  - Manages target achievement tracking

### 2. Benchmark Evaluations

#### MMLU Code Evaluation (`mmlu_evaluation.py`)
- **Target**: >60% accuracy on MMLU Code subset
- **Dataset**: `lukaemon/mmlu` with code subset
- **Metrics**: Accuracy, response time, confusion analysis
- **Features**:
  - Multiple choice question answering
  - Programming concept understanding
  - Categorized performance analysis

#### HumanEval Coding Tasks (`humaneval_evaluation.py`)
- **Target**: >40% Pass@1
- **Dataset**: OpenAI HumanEval
- **Metrics**: Pass@1, Pass@k, function correctness, syntax validity
- **Features**:
  - Multi-completion generation for Pass@k calculation
  - Automated function testing
  - Code syntax validation

#### Web Development Tests (`web_dev_tests.py`)
- **Target**: 75% quality score across web technologies
- **Coverage**: JavaScript/TypeScript, React, XML, MDX, CSS
- **Features**:
  - Language-specific quality assessment
  - Best practices compliance checking
  - Component pattern recognition

### 3. Performance Benchmarking (`performance_benchmark.py`)
- **Metrics**: Inference speed, memory usage, context scaling, multi-threading
- **Features**:
  - Hardware utilization monitoring
  - Batch size optimization testing
  - Memory profiling across quantization levels
  - Context length scalability analysis

### 4. Code Quality Assessment (`code_quality_tests.py`)
- **Targets**: >95% syntax validity, >0.65 CodeBLEU score
- **Features**:
  - Multi-language syntax validation
  - Code complexity analysis
  - Best practices compliance
  - CodeBLEU score calculation

### 5. Regression Testing (`regression_testing.py`)
- **Purpose**: Detect performance regressions against baselines
- **Features**:
  - Statistical significance testing
  - Multi-baseline comparison
  - Automated regression reporting
  - Performance degradation detection

## Configuration

### Evaluation Configuration (`evaluation_config.yaml`)
```yaml
evaluation:
  model_settings:
    device: "auto"
    dtype: "float16"
    max_new_tokens: 512
    temperature: 0.7
    
  targets:
    mmlu_code_accuracy: 0.60
    humaneval_pass1: 0.40
    codebleu_score: 0.65
    syntax_validity: 0.95
    web_dev_quality: 0.75
```

## Usage

### Quick Start
```bash
# Run comprehensive evaluation
python scripts/evaluate_model.py \
    --model_path /path/to/model \
    --config scripts/evaluation_config.yaml \
    --output_path ./evaluation_results \
    --run_id eval_$(date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S)
```

### Individual Benchmark Runs
```bash
# MMLU Code evaluation
python scripts/mmlu_evaluation.py \
    --model_path /path/to/model \
    --config scripts/evaluation_config.yaml \
    --output_path ./results/mmlu \
    --run_id mmlu_eval

# HumanEval evaluation
python scripts/humaneval_evaluation.py \
    --model_path /path/to/model \
    --config scripts/evaluation_config.yaml \
    --output_path ./results/humaneval \
    --run_id humaneval_eval

# Web development tests
python scripts/web_dev_tests.py \
    --model_path /path/to/model \
    --config scripts/evaluation_config.yaml \
    --output_path ./results/webdev \
    --run_id webdev_eval

# Performance benchmarking
python scripts/performance_benchmark.py \
    --model_path /path/to/model \
    --config scripts/evaluation_config.yaml \
    --output_path ./results/performance \
    --run_id perf_eval

# Code quality tests
python scripts/code_quality_tests.py \
    --model_path /path/to/model \
    --config scripts/evaluation_config.yaml \
    --output_path ./results/quality \
    --run_id quality_eval

# Regression testing
python scripts/regression_testing.py \
    --model_path /path/to/model \
    --config scripts/evaluation_config.yaml \
    --output_path ./results/regression \
    --run_id regression_eval
```

### Advanced Configuration
```bash
# Custom targets and settings
python scripts/evaluate_model.py \
    --model_path /path/to/model \
    --config scripts/evaluation_config.yaml \
    --output_path ./evaluation_results \
    --run_id custom_eval \
    --skip_load  # Dry run without model loading
```

## Output Files

### Generated Reports
- `comprehensive_report_{run_id}.md` - Main evaluation report
- `evaluation_results_{run_id}.json` - Detailed JSON results
- `evaluation_summary_{run_id}.csv` - CSV summary
- `performance_metrics_{run_id}.json` - Performance metrics

### Individual Benchmark Outputs
Each benchmark generates:
- `{benchmark}_results_{run_id}.json` - Detailed results
- `{benchmark}_detailed_{run_id}.csv` - Sample-level data
- `{benchmark}_{run_id}.log` - Execution logs

## Target Achievement

The framework tracks the following performance targets:

| Benchmark | Target | Metric |
|-----------|--------|--------|
| MMLU Code | >60% | Accuracy |
| HumanEval | >40% | Pass@1 |
| Web Development | >75% | Quality Score |
| Code Quality | >95% | Syntax Validity |
| Code Quality | >0.65 | CodeBLEU Score |

## Performance Expectations

### Inference Speed
- **Excellent**: >50 tokens/second
- **Good**: 30-50 tokens/second  
- **Acceptable**: 20-30 tokens/second
- **Poor**: <20 tokens/second

### Memory Usage
- **Efficient**: <8GB model size
- **Standard**: 8-12GB model size
- **Large**: 12-20GB model size

## Integration

### Continuous Integration
```yaml
# .github/workflows/evaluation.yml
name: Model Evaluation
on: [push, pull_request]

jobs:
  evaluate:
    runs-on: [self-hosted, gpu]
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v2
      - name: Run Evaluation
        run: |
          python scripts/evaluate_model.py \
            --model_path ${{ github.workspace }} \
            --config scripts/evaluation_config.yaml \
            --output_path ./results \
            --run_id ci_${{ github.sha }}
```

### Automated Reporting
The framework integrates with:
- **HuggingFace Evaluate Library**: Standard metrics
- **MLflow**: Experiment tracking
- **Weights & Biases**: Visualization dashboards
- **GitHub Actions**: CI/CD integration

## Troubleshooting

### Common Issues

1. **Model Loading Failures**
   ```bash
   # Check model path and permissions
   ls -la /path/to/model
   # Verify CUDA availability
   python -c "import torch; print(torch.cuda.is_available())"
   ```

2. **Memory Issues**
   ```yaml
   # Reduce batch sizes in config
   evaluation:
     model_settings:
       device_map: "cpu"  # Use CPU instead of GPU
   ```

3. **Dataset Access**
   ```bash
   # Login to HuggingFace
   huggingface-cli login
   # Or disable remote code loading
   ```

### Performance Optimization

1. **GPU Memory Optimization**
   - Use `device_map="auto"` for automatic placement
   - Enable gradient checkpointing for memory efficiency
   - Use quantization (int8, int4) for larger models

2. **Speed Optimization**
   - Increase batch sizes for throughput
   - Use faster attention implementations
   - Enable TensorRT optimization

## Customization

### Adding New Benchmarks
1. Create new evaluation script following existing patterns
2. Add to `evaluate_model.py` orchestrator
3. Update `evaluation_config.yaml` with new settings
4. Implement result saving and target tracking

### Modifying Targets
Edit `evaluation_config.yaml`:
```yaml
targets:
  mmlu_code_accuracy: 0.65  # Increased target
  humaneval_pass1: 0.45     # Increased target
  custom_metric: 0.80       # New metric
```

### Custom Quality Metrics
Extend existing evaluation classes:
```python
def evaluate_custom_metric(self, code_samples):
    # Implement custom quality assessment
    return custom_score
```

## Support

### Logging and Debugging
- All scripts generate detailed logs in output directories
- Enable debug mode in configuration:
  ```yaml
  logging:
    level: "DEBUG"
    debug_mode: true
  ```

### Resource Requirements
- **Minimum**: 8GB RAM, 1 GPU (4GB VRAM)
- **Recommended**: 16GB RAM, 1 GPU (8GB VRAM)
- **Optimal**: 32GB RAM, 2+ GPUs (16GB+ VRAM each)

### Best Practices
1. **Baseline Comparisons**: Always maintain baseline results for regression detection
2. **Incremental Testing**: Run individual benchmarks during development
3. **Regular Evaluation**: Schedule periodic comprehensive evaluations
4. **Result Archiving**: Save evaluation results for historical analysis

## License

This evaluation framework is part of the Sheikh-2.5-Coder project. See the main repository for license information.

---

**Note**: This framework is designed for systematic model evaluation and should be integrated into continuous development workflows for best results.