# Sheikh-2.5-Coder Evaluation Framework ## Overview This comprehensive evaluation framework provides systematic testing and benchmarking for the Sheikh-2.5-Coder model across multiple dimensions including code generation quality, performance, web development capabilities, and regression detection. ## Components ### 1. Main Evaluation Orchestrator (`evaluate_model.py`) - **Purpose**: Coordinates all evaluation benchmarks and generates comprehensive reports - **Features**: - Integrates all evaluation components - Creates HTML dashboards and visualizations - Generates detailed markdown reports - Manages target achievement tracking ### 2. Benchmark Evaluations #### MMLU Code Evaluation (`mmlu_evaluation.py`) - **Target**: >60% accuracy on MMLU Code subset - **Dataset**: `lukaemon/mmlu` with code subset - **Metrics**: Accuracy, response time, confusion analysis - **Features**: - Multiple choice question answering - Programming concept understanding - Categorized performance analysis #### HumanEval Coding Tasks (`humaneval_evaluation.py`) - **Target**: >40% Pass@1 - **Dataset**: OpenAI HumanEval - **Metrics**: Pass@1, Pass@k, function correctness, syntax validity - **Features**: - Multi-completion generation for Pass@k calculation - Automated function testing - Code syntax validation #### Web Development Tests (`web_dev_tests.py`) - **Target**: 75% quality score across web technologies - **Coverage**: JavaScript/TypeScript, React, XML, MDX, CSS - **Features**: - Language-specific quality assessment - Best practices compliance checking - Component pattern recognition ### 3. Performance Benchmarking (`performance_benchmark.py`) - **Metrics**: Inference speed, memory usage, context scaling, multi-threading - **Features**: - Hardware utilization monitoring - Batch size optimization testing - Memory profiling across quantization levels - Context length scalability analysis ### 4. Code Quality Assessment (`code_quality_tests.py`) - **Targets**: >95% syntax validity, >0.65 CodeBLEU score - **Features**: - Multi-language syntax validation - Code complexity analysis - Best practices compliance - CodeBLEU score calculation ### 5. Regression Testing (`regression_testing.py`) - **Purpose**: Detect performance regressions against baselines - **Features**: - Statistical significance testing - Multi-baseline comparison - Automated regression reporting - Performance degradation detection ## Configuration ### Evaluation Configuration (`evaluation_config.yaml`) ```yaml evaluation: model_settings: device: "auto" dtype: "float16" max_new_tokens: 512 temperature: 0.7 targets: mmlu_code_accuracy: 0.60 humaneval_pass1: 0.40 codebleu_score: 0.65 syntax_validity: 0.95 web_dev_quality: 0.75 ``` ## Usage ### Quick Start ```bash # Run comprehensive evaluation python scripts/evaluate_model.py \ --model_path /path/to/model \ --config scripts/evaluation_config.yaml \ --output_path ./evaluation_results \ --run_id eval_$(date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S) ``` ### Individual Benchmark Runs ```bash # MMLU Code evaluation python scripts/mmlu_evaluation.py \ --model_path /path/to/model \ --config scripts/evaluation_config.yaml \ --output_path ./results/mmlu \ --run_id mmlu_eval # HumanEval evaluation python scripts/humaneval_evaluation.py \ --model_path /path/to/model \ --config scripts/evaluation_config.yaml \ --output_path ./results/humaneval \ --run_id humaneval_eval # Web development tests python scripts/web_dev_tests.py \ --model_path /path/to/model \ --config scripts/evaluation_config.yaml \ --output_path ./results/webdev \ --run_id webdev_eval # Performance benchmarking python scripts/performance_benchmark.py \ --model_path /path/to/model \ --config scripts/evaluation_config.yaml \ --output_path ./results/performance \ --run_id perf_eval # Code quality tests python scripts/code_quality_tests.py \ --model_path /path/to/model \ --config scripts/evaluation_config.yaml \ --output_path ./results/quality \ --run_id quality_eval # Regression testing python scripts/regression_testing.py \ --model_path /path/to/model \ --config scripts/evaluation_config.yaml \ --output_path ./results/regression \ --run_id regression_eval ``` ### Advanced Configuration ```bash # Custom targets and settings python scripts/evaluate_model.py \ --model_path /path/to/model \ --config scripts/evaluation_config.yaml \ --output_path ./evaluation_results \ --run_id custom_eval \ --skip_load # Dry run without model loading ``` ## Output Files ### Generated Reports - `comprehensive_report_{run_id}.md` - Main evaluation report - `evaluation_results_{run_id}.json` - Detailed JSON results - `evaluation_summary_{run_id}.csv` - CSV summary - `performance_metrics_{run_id}.json` - Performance metrics ### Individual Benchmark Outputs Each benchmark generates: - `{benchmark}_results_{run_id}.json` - Detailed results - `{benchmark}_detailed_{run_id}.csv` - Sample-level data - `{benchmark}_{run_id}.log` - Execution logs ## Target Achievement The framework tracks the following performance targets: | Benchmark | Target | Metric | |-----------|--------|--------| | MMLU Code | >60% | Accuracy | | HumanEval | >40% | Pass@1 | | Web Development | >75% | Quality Score | | Code Quality | >95% | Syntax Validity | | Code Quality | >0.65 | CodeBLEU Score | ## Performance Expectations ### Inference Speed - **Excellent**: >50 tokens/second - **Good**: 30-50 tokens/second - **Acceptable**: 20-30 tokens/second - **Poor**: <20 tokens/second ### Memory Usage - **Efficient**: <8GB model size - **Standard**: 8-12GB model size - **Large**: 12-20GB model size ## Integration ### Continuous Integration ```yaml # .github/workflows/evaluation.yml name: Model Evaluation on: [push, pull_request] jobs: evaluate: runs-on: [self-hosted, gpu] steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v2 - name: Run Evaluation run: | python scripts/evaluate_model.py \ --model_path ${{ github.workspace }} \ --config scripts/evaluation_config.yaml \ --output_path ./results \ --run_id ci_${{ github.sha }} ``` ### Automated Reporting The framework integrates with: - **HuggingFace Evaluate Library**: Standard metrics - **MLflow**: Experiment tracking - **Weights & Biases**: Visualization dashboards - **GitHub Actions**: CI/CD integration ## Troubleshooting ### Common Issues 1. **Model Loading Failures** ```bash # Check model path and permissions ls -la /path/to/model # Verify CUDA availability python -c "import torch; print(torch.cuda.is_available())" ``` 2. **Memory Issues** ```yaml # Reduce batch sizes in config evaluation: model_settings: device_map: "cpu" # Use CPU instead of GPU ``` 3. **Dataset Access** ```bash # Login to HuggingFace huggingface-cli login # Or disable remote code loading ``` ### Performance Optimization 1. **GPU Memory Optimization** - Use `device_map="auto"` for automatic placement - Enable gradient checkpointing for memory efficiency - Use quantization (int8, int4) for larger models 2. **Speed Optimization** - Increase batch sizes for throughput - Use faster attention implementations - Enable TensorRT optimization ## Customization ### Adding New Benchmarks 1. Create new evaluation script following existing patterns 2. Add to `evaluate_model.py` orchestrator 3. Update `evaluation_config.yaml` with new settings 4. Implement result saving and target tracking ### Modifying Targets Edit `evaluation_config.yaml`: ```yaml targets: mmlu_code_accuracy: 0.65 # Increased target humaneval_pass1: 0.45 # Increased target custom_metric: 0.80 # New metric ``` ### Custom Quality Metrics Extend existing evaluation classes: ```python def evaluate_custom_metric(self, code_samples): # Implement custom quality assessment return custom_score ``` ## Support ### Logging and Debugging - All scripts generate detailed logs in output directories - Enable debug mode in configuration: ```yaml logging: level: "DEBUG" debug_mode: true ``` ### Resource Requirements - **Minimum**: 8GB RAM, 1 GPU (4GB VRAM) - **Recommended**: 16GB RAM, 1 GPU (8GB VRAM) - **Optimal**: 32GB RAM, 2+ GPUs (16GB+ VRAM each) ### Best Practices 1. **Baseline Comparisons**: Always maintain baseline results for regression detection 2. **Incremental Testing**: Run individual benchmarks during development 3. **Regular Evaluation**: Schedule periodic comprehensive evaluations 4. **Result Archiving**: Save evaluation results for historical analysis ## License This evaluation framework is part of the Sheikh-2.5-Coder project. See the main repository for license information. --- **Note**: This framework is designed for systematic model evaluation and should be integrated into continuous development workflows for best results.