Update README.md

README.md

@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ Now there are some notes that you must know about before using this. The creatio
 
 However it was very hard to decide the method on how the final processed image should look like. Should the final output be the same scene, but with the new pose? Or should the final composite be instead with the character "swapped in" with the other character, in the second image's scene? The first one sounds the most intuitive, yet it comes with some drawbacks such as hallucinated backdrops inpainted in. Yet the second option makes it a lot less useful if you just wanted to change the pose of the person in the current scene. It's just very unintuitive. So I tried to do both.
 
-In retrospect I don't think it was the best choice, as there are times where the person replaces the person doing the pose in the second image, inheriting its background, which is an unintended consequence; or elements of the previous scene crop into the current one. Many times though, it does keep the same scene. This doesn't sound good for a consistency point of view, however it existing brings major advantages, such as it will always fill in the missing areas.
+In retrospect I don't think it was the best choice, as there are times where the person replaces the person doing the pose in the second image, inheriting its background, which is an unintended consequence; or elements of the previous scene crop into the current one. Many times though, it does keep the same scene. This doesn't sound good for a consistency point of view, and it can be frustraiting no doubt, where it should "just work". The reality is that it is just very nuanced. Despite that, it existing brings major advantages, such as it will always fill in the missing areas.
 
 For example, if you want to pose a character who's full body is not shown, such as the lower half of their body, AnyPose will automatically fill in the 'unknown' areas of the image with a blend of the original image: