Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -12,6 +12,23 @@ BLING models are fine-tuned with distilled high-quality custom instruct datasets
|
|
| 12 |
the objective of providing a high-quality Instruct model that is 'inference-ready' on a CPU laptop even
|
| 13 |
without using any advanced quantization optimizations.
|
| 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
### Model Description
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
<!-- Provide a longer summary of what this model is. -->
|
|
@@ -49,22 +66,6 @@ The first BLING models have been trained for common RAG scenarios, specifically:
|
|
| 49 |
without the need for a lot of complex instruction verbiage - provide a text passage context, ask questions, and get clear fact-based responses.
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
-
### Benchmark Tests
|
| 53 |
-
|
| 54 |
-
Evaluated against the benchmark test: [RAG-Instruct-Benchmark-Tester](https://www.huggingface.co/llmware/rag_instruct_benchmark_tester)
|
| 55 |
-
Average of 2 Test Runs with 1 point for correct answer, 0.5 point for partial correct or blank / NF, 0.0 points for incorrect, and -1 points for hallucinations.
|
| 56 |
-
|
| 57 |
-
--**Accuracy Score**: **73.25** correct out of 100
|
| 58 |
-
--Not Found Classification: 17.5%
|
| 59 |
-
--Boolean: 29%
|
| 60 |
-
--Math/Logic: 0%
|
| 61 |
-
--Complex Questions (1-5): 1 (Low)
|
| 62 |
-
--Summarization Quality (1-5): 1 (Coherent, extractive)
|
| 63 |
-
--Hallucinations: No hallucinations observed in test runs.
|
| 64 |
-
|
| 65 |
-
For test run results, please see the files ("core_rag_test" and "answer_sheet" in the repo).
|
| 66 |
-
|
| 67 |
-
|
| 68 |
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
<!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
the objective of providing a high-quality Instruct model that is 'inference-ready' on a CPU laptop even
|
| 13 |
without using any advanced quantization optimizations.
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
### Benchmark Tests
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
+
Evaluated against the benchmark test: [RAG-Instruct-Benchmark-Tester](https://www.huggingface.co/datasets/llmware/rag_instruct_benchmark_tester)
|
| 19 |
+
Average of 2 Test Runs with 1 point for correct answer, 0.5 point for partial correct or blank / NF, 0.0 points for incorrect, and -1 points for hallucinations.
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
--**Accuracy Score**: **73.25** correct out of 100
|
| 22 |
+
--Not Found Classification: 17.5%
|
| 23 |
+
--Boolean: 29%
|
| 24 |
+
--Math/Logic: 0%
|
| 25 |
+
--Complex Questions (1-5): 1 (Low)
|
| 26 |
+
--Summarization Quality (1-5): 1 (Coherent, extractive)
|
| 27 |
+
--Hallucinations: No hallucinations observed in test runs.
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
For test run results, please see the files ("core_rag_test" and "answer_sheet" in the repo).
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
### Model Description
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
<!-- Provide a longer summary of what this model is. -->
|
|
|
|
| 66 |
without the need for a lot of complex instruction verbiage - provide a text passage context, ask questions, and get clear fact-based responses.
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 69 |
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
<!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
|