diff --git a/.venv/.gitignore b/.venv/.gitignore new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f59ec20aabf5842d237244ece8c81ab184faeac1 --- /dev/null +++ b/.venv/.gitignore @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +* \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.venv/CACHEDIR.TAG b/.venv/CACHEDIR.TAG new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bc1ecb967a482524e7736038de0df6e08f9ee452 --- /dev/null +++ b/.venv/CACHEDIR.TAG @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Signature: 8a477f597d28d172789f06886806bc55 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/.venv/pyvenv.cfg b/.venv/pyvenv.cfg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ccc0080def45b20df268b3bbcceb24c39343fe09 --- /dev/null +++ b/.venv/pyvenv.cfg @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +home = /home/ubuntu/.local/share/uv/python/cpython-3.12.10-linux-x86_64-gnu/bin +implementation = CPython +uv = 0.7.3 +version_info = 3.12.10 +include-system-site-packages = false +prompt = QwenIllustrious diff --git a/arch/README.md b/arch/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f67e09342a9884d3e2323aa131ccd2e7cef4b2a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,278 @@ +# Qwen-SDXL Architecture Components + +本目录包含了 Qwen-SDXL 项目的解耦架构组件，便于训练和推理的模块化使用。 + +## 📁 组件结构 + +``` +arch/ +├── __init__.py # 组件导入和导出 +├── adapter.py # Qwen 嵌入适配器 +├── text_encoder.py # Qwen 文本编码器 +├── model_loader.py # 模型加载工具 +├── pipeline.py # 推理管道 +├── training.py # 训练工具和损失函数 +├── data_loader.py # 数据加载器 +├── example_train.py # 示例训练脚本 +└── README.md # 本文件 +``` + +## 🧩 核心组件 + +### 1. QwenEmbeddingAdapter (`adapter.py`) +将 Qwen3 的 1024 维嵌入投影到 SDXL 兼容的维度： +- 文本嵌入: 1024 → 2048 (用于 encoder_hidden_states) +- 池化嵌入: 1024 → 1280 (用于 text_embeds) + +```python +from arch import QwenEmbeddingAdapter + +adapter = QwenEmbeddingAdapter() +text_embeddings = adapter.forward_text_embeddings(qwen_embeddings) +pooled_embeddings = adapter.forward_pooled_embeddings(qwen_pooled) +``` + +### 2. QwenTextEncoder (`text_encoder.py`) +封装 Qwen3 模型的文本编码功能： + +```python +from arch import QwenTextEncoder + +text_encoder = QwenTextEncoder(model_path="path/to/qwen3") +text_emb, pooled_emb = text_encoder.encode_prompts( + ["a beautiful landscape"], + ["low quality"] +) +``` + +### 3. 模型加载器 (`model_loader.py`) +提供各种模型组件的加载功能： + +```python +from arch import load_unet_from_safetensors, load_vae_from_safetensors + +unet = load_unet_from_safetensors("unet.safetensors", "unet_config.json") +vae = load_vae_from_safetensors("vae.safetensors", "vae_config.json") +``` + +### 4. 推理管道 (`pipeline.py`) +完整的 Qwen-SDXL 推理管道： + +```python +from arch import QwenSDXLInference + +pipeline = QwenSDXLInference( + qwen_model_path="path/to/qwen3", + adapter_path="path/to/trained/adapter.safetensors" # 可选 +) + +images = pipeline.generate( + prompt="a beautiful landscape", + height=1024, + width=1024 +) +``` + +## 🎓 训练组件 + +### 1. DiffusionLoss (`training.py`) +扩散训练损失函数，支持多种损失类型和 SNR 加权： + +```python +from arch import DiffusionLoss + +loss_fn = DiffusionLoss( + noise_scheduler=scheduler, + loss_type="mse", + snr_gamma=5.0 # Min-SNR weighting +) +``` + +### 2. AdapterTrainingStep (`training.py`) +适配器训练步骤，自动处理前向传播和损失计算： + +```python +from arch import AdapterTrainingStep + +training_step = AdapterTrainingStep( + unet=unet, + vae=vae, + text_encoder=text_encoder, + adapter=adapter, + noise_scheduler=scheduler, + loss_fn=loss_fn +) + +result = training_step.training_step(images, prompts) +loss = result["loss"] +``` + +### 3. 数据加载器 (`data_loader.py`) + +#### 基础数据集 +```python +from arch import ImageCaptionDataset, create_dataloader + +dataset = ImageCaptionDataset( + data_root="/path/to/images", + annotations_file="captions.jsonl" +) + +dataloader = create_dataloader(dataset, batch_size=4) +``` + +#### 多长宽比数据集 +```python +from arch import MultiAspectDataset + +dataset = MultiAspectDataset( + data_root="/path/to/images", + annotations_file="captions.jsonl", + aspect_ratios=[(1024, 1024), (1152, 896), (896, 1152)] +) +``` + +## 🚀 使用示例 + +### 1. 快速推理 + +```python +from arch import QwenSDXLInference + +# 初始化管道 +pipeline = QwenSDXLInference() + +# 生成图像 +images = pipeline.generate( + prompt="a serene mountain landscape at sunset", + negative_prompt="low quality, blurry", + height=1024, + width=1024, + num_inference_steps=50, + guidance_scale=7.5 +) + +# 保存图像 +images[0].save("generated_image.png") +``` + +### 2. 训练适配器 + +参考 `example_train.py` 中的完整训练脚本： + +```bash +python arch/example_train.py \ + --data_root /path/to/images \ + --annotations_file /path/to/captions.jsonl \ + --batch_size 4 \ + --learning_rate 1e-4 \ + --num_epochs 10 \ + --output_dir ./checkpoints \ + --use_wandb +``` + +### 3. 使用训练好的适配器 + +```python +from arch import QwenSDXLInference + +# 加载带有训练好的适配器的管道 +pipeline = QwenSDXLInference( + adapter_path="checkpoints/adapter_epoch_10_step_5000.safetensors" +) + +images = pipeline.generate("your prompt here") +``` + +## 📊 训练配置 + +### 推荐的训练设置 + +- **学习率**: 1e-4 (AdamW) +- **批量大小**: 4-8 (根据 GPU 内存调整) +- **梯度累积**: 如果内存不足可使用 +- **损失函数**: MSE 或 Huber +- **SNR 加权**: gamma=5.0 (Min-SNR) +- **EMA**: decay=0.9999 +- **学习率调度**: 余弦退火 + 预热 + +### 数据格式 + +支持 JSON 和 JSONL 格式的标注文件： + +```jsonl +{"image": "image1.jpg", "caption": "A beautiful landscape"} +{"image": "image2.jpg", "caption": "A cute cat"} +``` + +## 🔧 自定义和扩展 + +### 1. 自定义适配器架构 + +修改 `adapter.py` 中的 `QwenEmbeddingAdapter` 类： + +```python +class CustomAdapter(QwenEmbeddingAdapter): + def __init__(self, qwen_dim=1024, sdxl_text_dim=2048, sdxl_pooled_dim=1280): + super().__init__(qwen_dim, sdxl_text_dim, sdxl_pooled_dim) + # 添加自定义层 + self.custom_layer = nn.Linear(sdxl_text_dim, sdxl_text_dim) +``` + +### 2. 自定义损失函数 + +继承 `DiffusionLoss` 类： + +```python +class CustomLoss(DiffusionLoss): + def forward(self, model_pred, target, timesteps, mask=None): + # 自定义损失计算 + base_loss = super().forward(model_pred, target, timesteps, mask) + # 添加额外的正则化项 + return base_loss + custom_regularization +``` + +### 3. 自定义数据加载 + +继承数据集类： + +```python +class CustomDataset(ImageCaptionDataset): + def __getitem__(self, idx): + sample = super().__getitem__(idx) + # 添加自定义数据增强或预处理 + return sample +``` + +## ⚠️ 注意事项 + +1. **内存管理**: 使用大模型时注意 GPU 内存使用 +2. **数据类型**: 推荐使用 bfloat16 以平衡性能和精度 +3. **检查点保存**: 定期保存检查点以防止训练中断 +4. **验证集**: 使用验证集监控训练进度 +5. **梯度裁剪**: 防止梯度爆炸 + +## 🐛 故障排除 + +### 常见问题 + +1. **CUDA 内存不足**: 减小批量大小或使用梯度累积 +2. **模型加载失败**: 检查模型路径和配置文件 +3. **生成图像质量差**: 调整学习率、损失函数或训练更多步数 +4. **训练不稳定**: 使用梯度裁剪和 EMA + +### 调试模式 + +可以在各个组件中启用调试输出： + +```python +# 启用详细日志 +import logging +logging.basicConfig(level=logging.DEBUG) +``` + +## 📚 参考资料 + +- [Stable Diffusion XL](https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.01952) +- [Qwen3 Embedding](https://github.com/QwenLM/Qwen) +- [Diffusers Library](https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers) diff --git a/arch/__init__.py b/arch/__init__.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a15500e216a1bd2a252ad498a6592e0b155bf0ba --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/__init__.py @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +""" +Architecture components for Qwen-SDXL +Qwen-SDXL 架构组件 +""" + +# Core components +from .adapter import QwenEmbeddingAdapter +from .text_encoder import QwenTextEncoder, encode_text_with_qwen +from .model_loader import ( + load_qwen_model, + load_unet_from_safetensors, + load_vae_from_safetensors, + create_scheduler, + save_model_components, + load_checkpoint +) +from .pipeline import QwenIllustriousInference + +# Training components +from .training import ( + DiffusionLoss, + AdapterTrainingStep, + get_cosine_schedule_with_warmup, + EMAModel +) + +# Data loading components +from .data_loader import ( + ImageCaptionDataset, + MultiAspectDataset, + collate_fn, + create_dataloader +) + +__all__ = [ + # Core components + "QwenEmbeddingAdapter", + "QwenTextEncoder", + "encode_text_with_qwen", + "load_qwen_model", + "load_unet_from_safetensors", + "load_vae_from_safetensors", + "create_scheduler", + "save_model_components", + "load_checkpoint", + "QwenIllustriousInference", + + # Training components + "DiffusionLoss", + "AdapterTrainingStep", + "get_cosine_schedule_with_warmup", + "EMAModel", + + # Data loading components + "ImageCaptionDataset", + "MultiAspectDataset", + "collate_fn", + "create_dataloader" +] diff --git a/arch/adapter.py b/arch/adapter.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6cac0a38392de52d3d5f9f3e236c8bbb38d0eff8 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/adapter.py @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +""" +Qwen Embedding Adapter +Qwen 嵌入适配器 - 将 Qwen3 嵌入维度投影到 SDXL 兼容维度 +""" + +import torch +import torch.nn as nn +import torch.nn.functional as F + + +class QwenEmbeddingAdapter(nn.Module): + """ + Adapter layer to project Qwen3 embeddings to SDXL-compatible dimensions + 将 Qwen3 嵌入维度投影到 SDXL 兼容维度 + - Text embeddings: 1024 -> 2048 (for encoder_hidden_states) + - Pooled embeddings: 1024 -> 1280 (for text_embeds in added_cond_kwargs) + """ + def __init__(self, qwen_dim=1024, sdxl_text_dim=2048, sdxl_pooled_dim=1280): + super().__init__() + self.qwen_dim = qwen_dim + self.sdxl_text_dim = sdxl_text_dim + self.sdxl_pooled_dim = sdxl_pooled_dim + + # Text embeddings projection (for encoder_hidden_states) + self.text_projection = nn.Linear(qwen_dim, sdxl_text_dim) + self.text_layer_norm = nn.LayerNorm(sdxl_text_dim) + self.text_activation = nn.GELU() + + # Pooled embeddings MLP (for text_embeds in added_cond_kwargs) + self.pooled_mlp = nn.Sequential( + nn.Linear(qwen_dim, qwen_dim * 2), + nn.GELU(), + nn.Dropout(0.1), + nn.Linear(qwen_dim * 2, sdxl_pooled_dim), + nn.LayerNorm(sdxl_pooled_dim) + ) + + # 初始化权重 + self._init_weights() + + def _init_weights(self): + """Initialize weights for better training stability""" + # Text projection initialization + nn.init.xavier_uniform_(self.text_projection.weight) + nn.init.zeros_(self.text_projection.bias) + + # Pooled MLP initialization + for module in self.pooled_mlp: + if isinstance(module, nn.Linear): + nn.init.xavier_uniform_(module.weight) + nn.init.zeros_(module.bias) + + def forward_text_embeddings(self, qwen_embeddings): + """ + Project text embeddings for encoder_hidden_states + Args: + qwen_embeddings: tensor of shape [batch_size, seq_len, 1024] + Returns: + text_embeddings: tensor of shape [batch_size, seq_len, 2048] + """ + projected = self.text_projection(qwen_embeddings) + projected = self.text_activation(projected) + return self.text_layer_norm(projected) + + def forward_pooled_embeddings(self, qwen_embeddings): + """ + Project pooled embeddings for text_embeds (using MLP) + Args: + qwen_embeddings: tensor of shape [batch_size, 1024] + Returns: + pooled_embeddings: tensor of shape [batch_size, 1280] + """ + return self.pooled_mlp(qwen_embeddings) + + def forward(self, text_embeddings, pooled_embeddings): + """ + Forward pass for both text and pooled embeddings + Args: + text_embeddings: tensor of shape [batch_size, seq_len, 1024] + pooled_embeddings: tensor of shape [batch_size, 1024] + Returns: + tuple: (projected_text_embeddings, projected_pooled_embeddings) + """ + projected_text = self.forward_text_embeddings(text_embeddings) + projected_pooled = self.forward_pooled_embeddings(pooled_embeddings) + return projected_text, projected_pooled diff --git a/arch/data_loader.py b/arch/data_loader.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5a447a778452d16ce4fe81b38287aaaf940dd3c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/data_loader.py @@ -0,0 +1,658 @@ +""" +Data Loading Utilities for QwenIllustrious +数据加载工具 - 处理训练数据的加载和预处理，支持预计算嵌入加速 +""" + +import os +import json +import torch +from torch.utils.data import Dataset +from PIL import Image +import torchvision.transforms as transforms +from pathlib import Path +from typing import Dict, List, Optional, Tuple +import pickle +from tqdm import tqdm + + +class QwenIllustriousDataset(Dataset): + """ + Dataset for QwenIllustrious training + 支持以下功能： + - 从 metadata.json 文件加载图像和标注 + - 图像预处理和增强 + - Qwen 文本编码缓存 + - VAE 潜在空间编码缓存 + - 训练时的预计算加速 + """ + + def __init__( + self, + dataset_path: str, + qwen_text_encoder=None, + vae=None, + image_size: int = 1024, + cache_dir: Optional[str] = None, + precompute_embeddings: bool = False + ): + self.dataset_path = Path(dataset_path) + self.qwen_text_encoder = qwen_text_encoder + self.vae = vae + self.image_size = image_size + self.cache_dir = Path(cache_dir) if cache_dir else None + self.precompute_embeddings = precompute_embeddings + + # Setup image transforms + self.image_transforms = transforms.Compose([ + transforms.Resize((image_size, image_size), interpolation=transforms.InterpolationMode.LANCZOS), + transforms.ToTensor(), + transforms.Normalize([0.5], [0.5]) # Normalize to [-1, 1] + ]) + + # Load metadata + self.metadata = self._load_metadata() + + # Setup cache directories + if self.cache_dir: + self.cache_dir.mkdir(exist_ok=True) + self.text_cache_dir = self.cache_dir / "text_embeddings" + self.vae_cache_dir = self.cache_dir / "vae_latents" + self.text_cache_dir.mkdir(exist_ok=True) + self.vae_cache_dir.mkdir(exist_ok=True) + + # Precomputed data storage + self.precomputed_data = {} + + def _load_metadata(self) -> List[Dict]: + """Load all metadata files""" + metadata_dir = self.dataset_path / "metadata" + if not metadata_dir.exists(): + raise ValueError(f"Metadata directory not found: {metadata_dir}") + + metadata_files = list(metadata_dir.glob("*.json")) + + metadata_list = [] + print(f"Loading metadata from {len(metadata_files)} files...") + + for file_path in tqdm(metadata_files, desc="Loading metadata"): + try: + with open(file_path, 'r', encoding='utf-8') as f: + data = json.load(f) + # Add file path info + data['metadata_file'] = str(file_path) + data['image_file'] = str(self.dataset_path / f"{data['filename_hash']}.png") + metadata_list.append(data) + except Exception as e: + print(f"Error loading {file_path}: {e}") + continue + + print(f"Successfully loaded {len(metadata_list)} metadata files") + return metadata_list + + def _get_text_cache_path(self, filename_hash: str) -> Path: + """Get path for cached text embeddings""" + return self.text_cache_dir / f"{filename_hash}_text.pt" + + def _get_vae_cache_path(self, filename_hash: str) -> Path: + """Get path for cached VAE latents""" + return self.vae_cache_dir / f"{filename_hash}_vae.pt" + + def _compute_text_embeddings(self, prompt: str, device='cpu') -> Dict[str, torch.Tensor]: + """Compute text embeddings using Qwen text encoder""" + if not self.qwen_text_encoder: + # Return dummy embeddings + return { + 'text_embeddings': torch.zeros(1, 2048), # SDXL text embedding size + 'pooled_embeddings': torch.zeros(1, 1280) # SDXL pooled embedding size + } + + with torch.no_grad(): + # Move to device temporarily for computation + original_device = next(self.qwen_text_encoder.parameters()).device + self.qwen_text_encoder.to(device) + + embeddings = self.qwen_text_encoder.encode_prompts([prompt]) + + # Move back to original device + self.qwen_text_encoder.to(original_device) + + return { + 'text_embeddings': embeddings[0].cpu(), + 'pooled_embeddings': embeddings[1].cpu() if len(embeddings) > 1 else embeddings[0].cpu() + } + + def _compute_vae_latents(self, image: torch.Tensor, device='cpu') -> torch.Tensor: + """Compute VAE latents for image""" + if not self.vae: + # Return dummy latents + return torch.zeros(1, 4, self.image_size // 8, self.image_size // 8) + + with torch.no_grad(): + # Move to device temporarily for computation + original_device = next(self.vae.parameters()).device + self.vae.to(device) + + # Add batch dimension if needed + if image.dim() == 3: + image = image.unsqueeze(0) + + image = image.to(device).to(self.vae.dtype) + latents = self.vae.encode(image).latent_dist.sample() + latents = latents * self.vae.config.scaling_factor + + # Move back to original device + self.vae.to(original_device) + + return latents.cpu() + + def _load_or_compute_text_embeddings(self, prompt: str, filename_hash: str, device='cpu') -> Dict[str, torch.Tensor]: + """Load cached text embeddings or compute new ones""" + if self.cache_dir: + cache_path = self._get_text_cache_path(filename_hash) + + # Try to load from cache + if cache_path.exists(): + try: + return torch.load(cache_path, map_location='cpu') + except Exception as e: + print(f"Error loading cached text embeddings {cache_path}: {e}") + + # Compute new embeddings + embeddings = self._compute_text_embeddings(prompt, device) + + # Cache the embeddings + if self.cache_dir: + try: + torch.save(embeddings, cache_path) + except Exception as e: + print(f"Error saving text embeddings cache {cache_path}: {e}") + + return embeddings + + def _load_or_compute_vae_latents(self, image_path: str, filename_hash: str, device='cpu') -> torch.Tensor: + """Load cached VAE latents or compute new ones""" + if self.cache_dir: + cache_path = self._get_vae_cache_path(filename_hash) + + # Try to load from cache + if cache_path.exists(): + try: + return torch.load(cache_path, map_location='cpu') + except Exception as e: + print(f"Error loading cached VAE latents {cache_path}: {e}") + + # Load and process image + try: + image = Image.open(image_path).convert('RGB') + image = self.image_transforms(image) + except Exception as e: + print(f"Error loading image {image_path}: {e}") + image = torch.zeros(3, self.image_size, self.image_size) + + # Compute latents + latents = self._compute_vae_latents(image, device) + + # Cache the latents + if self.cache_dir: + try: + torch.save(latents, cache_path) + except Exception as e: + print(f"Error saving VAE latents cache {cache_path}: {e}") + + return latents + + def precompute_all(self, device='cuda'): + """Precompute all embeddings and latents for faster training""" + print("Precomputing all embeddings and latents...") + + for idx in tqdm(range(len(self.metadata)), desc="Precomputing"): + metadata = self.metadata[idx] + filename_hash = metadata['filename_hash'] + + # Get prompt + prompt = metadata.get('natural_caption_data', {}).get('natural_caption', '') + if not prompt: + prompt = metadata.get('original_prompt_data', {}).get('positive_prompt', '') + + # Precompute text embeddings + text_embeddings = self._load_or_compute_text_embeddings(prompt, filename_hash, device) + + # Precompute VAE latents + vae_latents = self._load_or_compute_vae_latents(metadata['image_file'], filename_hash, device) + + # Store in memory for fast access + self.precomputed_data[filename_hash] = { + 'text_embeddings': text_embeddings['text_embeddings'].squeeze(0), + 'pooled_embeddings': text_embeddings['pooled_embeddings'].squeeze(0), + 'latents': vae_latents.squeeze(0), + 'prompt': prompt + } + + print(f"Precomputation completed for {len(self.precomputed_data)} items") + + def __len__(self): + return len(self.metadata) + + def __getitem__(self, idx) -> Dict[str, torch.Tensor]: + metadata = self.metadata[idx] + filename_hash = metadata['filename_hash'] + + if self.precompute_embeddings and filename_hash in self.precomputed_data: + # Use precomputed data + data = self.precomputed_data[filename_hash] + return { + 'text_embeddings': data['text_embeddings'], + 'pooled_embeddings': data['pooled_embeddings'], + 'latents': data['latents'], + 'prompts': data['prompt'], + 'filename_hash': filename_hash, + 'metadata': metadata + } + else: + # Load data on-the-fly + + # Load image + image_path = metadata['image_file'] + try: + image = Image.open(image_path).convert('RGB') + image = self.image_transforms(image) + except Exception as e: + print(f"Error loading image {image_path}: {e}") + image = torch.zeros(3, self.image_size, self.image_size) + + # Get prompt + prompt = metadata.get('natural_caption_data', {}).get('natural_caption', '') + if not prompt: + prompt = metadata.get('original_prompt_data', {}).get('positive_prompt', '') + + # Get text embeddings (will use cache if available) + text_embeddings = self._load_or_compute_text_embeddings(prompt, filename_hash) + + return { + 'images': image, + 'prompts': prompt, + 'text_embeddings': text_embeddings['text_embeddings'].squeeze(0), + 'pooled_embeddings': text_embeddings['pooled_embeddings'].squeeze(0), + 'filename_hash': filename_hash, + 'metadata': metadata + } + + +def collate_fn(examples: List[Dict]) -> Dict[str, torch.Tensor]: + """Custom collate function for DataLoader""" + batch = {} + + # Handle different data formats (precomputed vs on-the-fly) + if 'latents' in examples[0]: + # Precomputed format - embeddings and latents are already computed + batch['latents'] = torch.stack([example['latents'] for example in examples]) + batch['text_embeddings'] = torch.stack([example['text_embeddings'] for example in examples]) + batch['pooled_embeddings'] = torch.stack([example['pooled_embeddings'] for example in examples]) + else: + # On-the-fly format - need to handle images + batch['images'] = torch.stack([example['images'] for example in examples]) + batch['text_embeddings'] = torch.stack([example['text_embeddings'] for example in examples]) + batch['pooled_embeddings'] = torch.stack([example['pooled_embeddings'] for example in examples]) + + # Handle string fields + batch['prompts'] = [example['prompts'] for example in examples] + batch['filename_hash'] = [example['filename_hash'] for example in examples] + batch['metadata'] = [example['metadata'] for example in examples] + + return batch + +import torch +from torch.utils.data import Dataset, DataLoader +from PIL import Image +import json +import os +from typing import List, Dict, Any, Optional, Tuple, Union +import torchvision.transforms as transforms +import random + + +class ImageCaptionDataset(Dataset): + """ + Dataset for image-caption pairs + 图像-标题对数据集 + """ + + def __init__( + self, + data_root: str, + annotations_file: str, + image_size: int = 1024, + center_crop: bool = True, + random_flip: bool = True, + caption_column: str = "caption", + image_column: str = "image", + max_caption_length: int = 512 + ): + self.data_root = data_root + self.image_size = image_size + self.caption_column = caption_column + self.image_column = image_column + self.max_caption_length = max_caption_length + + # Load annotations + self.annotations = self._load_annotations(annotations_file) + + # Setup image transforms + self.image_transforms = self._setup_transforms(image_size, center_crop, random_flip) + + print(f"📚 数据集加载完成: {len(self.annotations)} 个样本") + + def _load_annotations(self, annotations_file: str) -> List[Dict]: + """Load annotations from file""" + if annotations_file.endswith('.json'): + with open(annotations_file, 'r', encoding='utf-8') as f: + data = json.load(f) + elif annotations_file.endswith('.jsonl'): + data = [] + with open(annotations_file, 'r', encoding='utf-8') as f: + for line in f: + if line.strip(): + data.append(json.loads(line)) + else: + raise ValueError(f"Unsupported annotation file format: {annotations_file}") + + # Filter valid samples + valid_data = [] + for item in data: + if self.caption_column in item and self.image_column in item: + if isinstance(item[self.caption_column], str) and item[self.caption_column].strip(): + valid_data.append(item) + + print(f"📋 有效样本数: {len(valid_data)} / {len(data)}") + return valid_data + + def _setup_transforms(self, size: int, center_crop: bool, random_flip: bool): + """Setup image preprocessing transforms""" + transform_list = [] + + # Resize + if center_crop: + transform_list.extend([ + transforms.Resize(size, interpolation=transforms.InterpolationMode.BILINEAR), + transforms.CenterCrop(size) + ]) + else: + transform_list.append( + transforms.Resize((size, size), interpolation=transforms.InterpolationMode.BILINEAR) + ) + + # Random horizontal flip + if random_flip: + transform_list.append(transforms.RandomHorizontalFlip(p=0.5)) + + # Convert to tensor and normalize + transform_list.extend([ + transforms.ToTensor(), + transforms.Normalize([0.5], [0.5]) # Scale to [-1, 1] + ]) + + return transforms.Compose(transform_list) + + def __len__(self): + return len(self.annotations) + + def __getitem__(self, idx: int) -> Dict[str, Any]: + """Get a single sample""" + annotation = self.annotations[idx] + + # Load image + image_path = os.path.join(self.data_root, annotation[self.image_column]) + try: + image = Image.open(image_path) + if image.mode != 'RGB': + image = image.convert('RGB') + except Exception as e: + print(f"⚠️ 加载图像失败 {image_path}: {e}") + # Return a black image as fallback + image = Image.new('RGB', (self.image_size, self.image_size), (0, 0, 0)) + + # Apply transforms + image = self.image_transforms(image) + + # Get caption + caption = annotation[self.caption_column] + if len(caption) > self.max_caption_length: + caption = caption[:self.max_caption_length] + + return { + "images": image, + "captions": caption, + "image_paths": image_path + } + + +class MultiAspectDataset(Dataset): + """ + Dataset that supports multiple aspect ratios + 支持多种长宽比的数据集 + """ + + def __init__( + self, + data_root: str, + annotations_file: str, + base_size: int = 1024, + aspect_ratios: List[Tuple[int, int]] = None, + bucket_tolerance: float = 0.1, + caption_column: str = "caption", + image_column: str = "image", + max_caption_length: int = 512 + ): + self.data_root = data_root + self.base_size = base_size + self.caption_column = caption_column + self.image_column = image_column + self.max_caption_length = max_caption_length + + # Default aspect ratios for SDXL + if aspect_ratios is None: + aspect_ratios = [ + (1024, 1024), # 1:1 + (1152, 896), # 9:7 + (896, 1152), # 7:9 + (1216, 832), # 3:2 + (832, 1216), # 2:3 + (1344, 768), # 7:4 + (768, 1344), # 4:7 + (1536, 640), # 12:5 + (640, 1536), # 5:12 + ] + + self.aspect_ratios = aspect_ratios + self.bucket_tolerance = bucket_tolerance + + # Load and bucket annotations + self.annotations = self._load_and_bucket_annotations(annotations_file) + + print(f"📚 多长宽比数据集加载完成: {len(self.annotations)} 个样本") + self._print_bucket_stats() + + def _load_and_bucket_annotations(self, annotations_file: str) -> List[Dict]: + """Load annotations and assign to aspect ratio buckets""" + # Load annotations + if annotations_file.endswith('.json'): + with open(annotations_file, 'r', encoding='utf-8') as f: + data = json.load(f) + elif annotations_file.endswith('.jsonl'): + data = [] + with open(annotations_file, 'r', encoding='utf-8') as f: + for line in f: + if line.strip(): + data.append(json.loads(line)) + + bucketed_data = [] + + for item in data: + if self.caption_column not in item or self.image_column not in item: + continue + + caption = item[self.caption_column] + if not isinstance(caption, str) or not caption.strip(): + continue + + # Try to get image dimensions to assign bucket + image_path = os.path.join(self.data_root, item[self.image_column]) + try: + with Image.open(image_path) as img: + width, height = img.size + aspect_ratio = width / height + + # Find best matching bucket + best_bucket = self._find_best_bucket(aspect_ratio) + + item_copy = item.copy() + item_copy['bucket_width'] = best_bucket[0] + item_copy['bucket_height'] = best_bucket[1] + item_copy['original_width'] = width + item_copy['original_height'] = height + + bucketed_data.append(item_copy) + + except Exception as e: + print(f"⚠️ 无法获取图像尺寸 {image_path}: {e}") + # Use default 1:1 bucket + item_copy = item.copy() + item_copy['bucket_width'] = 1024 + item_copy['bucket_height'] = 1024 + item_copy['original_width'] = 1024 + item_copy['original_height'] = 1024 + bucketed_data.append(item_copy) + + return bucketed_data + + def _find_best_bucket(self, aspect_ratio: float) -> Tuple[int, int]: + """Find the best matching aspect ratio bucket""" + best_bucket = self.aspect_ratios[0] + best_diff = float('inf') + + for bucket_w, bucket_h in self.aspect_ratios: + bucket_ratio = bucket_w / bucket_h + diff = abs(aspect_ratio - bucket_ratio) + + if diff < best_diff: + best_diff = diff + best_bucket = (bucket_w, bucket_h) + + return best_bucket + + def _print_bucket_stats(self): + """Print statistics about bucket distribution""" + bucket_counts = {} + for item in self.annotations: + bucket = (item['bucket_width'], item['bucket_height']) + bucket_counts[bucket] = bucket_counts.get(bucket, 0) + 1 + + print("📊 长宽比分布:") + for bucket, count in sorted(bucket_counts.items()): + ratio = bucket[0] / bucket[1] + print(f" {bucket[0]}×{bucket[1]} (比例 {ratio:.2f}): {count} 个样本") + + def _get_transforms(self, target_width: int, target_height: int): + """Get transforms for specific target size""" + return transforms.Compose([ + transforms.Resize((target_height, target_width), interpolation=transforms.InterpolationMode.BILINEAR), + transforms.RandomHorizontalFlip(p=0.5), + transforms.ToTensor(), + transforms.Normalize([0.5], [0.5]) + ]) + + def __len__(self): + return len(self.annotations) + + def __getitem__(self, idx: int) -> Dict[str, Any]: + """Get a single sample""" + annotation = self.annotations[idx] + + # Get target dimensions from bucket + target_width = annotation['bucket_width'] + target_height = annotation['bucket_height'] + + # Load and transform image + image_path = os.path.join(self.data_root, annotation[self.image_column]) + try: + image = Image.open(image_path) + if image.mode != 'RGB': + image = image.convert('RGB') + except Exception as e: + print(f"⚠️ 加载图像失败 {image_path}: {e}") + image = Image.new('RGB', (target_width, target_height), (0, 0, 0)) + + # Apply transforms + transforms_fn = self._get_transforms(target_width, target_height) + image = transforms_fn(image) + + # Get caption + caption = annotation[self.caption_column] + if len(caption) > self.max_caption_length: + caption = caption[:self.max_caption_length] + + return { + "images": image, + "captions": caption, + "image_paths": image_path, + "width": target_width, + "height": target_height + } + + +# def collate_fn(batch: List[Dict[str, Any]]) -> Dict[str, Any]: +# """ +# Custom collate function for batching +# 自定义批处理整理函数 +# """ +# # Check if all images have the same size +# sizes = [(item["images"].shape[-2], item["images"].shape[-1]) for item in batch] +# if len(set(sizes)) == 1: +# # All same size, can batch normally +# images = torch.stack([item["images"] for item in batch]) +# captions = [item["captions"] for item in batch] + +# result = { +# "images": images, +# "captions": captions, +# "image_paths": [item["image_paths"] for item in batch] +# } + +# # Add width/height if available +# if "width" in batch[0]: +# result["widths"] = [item["width"] for item in batch] +# result["heights"] = [item["height"] for item in batch] + +# return result +# else: +# # Different sizes, return as list +# return { +# "images": [item["images"] for item in batch], +# "captions": [item["captions"] for item in batch], +# "image_paths": [item["image_paths"] for item in batch], +# "widths": [item.get("width", item["images"].shape[-1]) for item in batch], +# "heights": [item.get("height", item["images"].shape[-2]) for item in batch] +# } + + +def create_dataloader( + dataset: Dataset, + batch_size: int = 4, + shuffle: bool = True, + num_workers: int = 4, + pin_memory: bool = True, + drop_last: bool = True +) -> DataLoader: + """ + Create dataloader with appropriate settings + 创建具有适当设置的数据加载器 + """ + return DataLoader( + dataset, + batch_size=batch_size, + shuffle=shuffle, + num_workers=num_workers, + pin_memory=pin_memory, + drop_last=drop_last, + collate_fn=collate_fn + ) diff --git a/arch/example_train.py b/arch/example_train.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b966c31d60d52d5be33bdbd9d5e4858dbc6bd1d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/example_train.py @@ -0,0 +1,377 @@ +""" +Example Training Script using Arch Components +使用架构组件的示例训练脚本 +""" + +import torch +import torch.optim as optim +from torch.utils.data import DataLoader +import os +import argparse +from tqdm import tqdm +import wandb +from typing import Optional + +# Import arch components +from arch import ( + QwenTextEncoder, + QwenEmbeddingAdapter, + load_unet_from_safetensors, + load_vae_from_safetensors, + create_scheduler, + DiffusionLoss, + AdapterTrainingStep, + get_cosine_schedule_with_warmup, + EMAModel, + ImageCaptionDataset, + MultiAspectDataset, + create_dataloader +) + + +def parse_args(): + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Train Qwen-SDXL Adapter") + + # Model paths + parser.add_argument("--qwen_model_path", type=str, default="models/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B") + parser.add_argument("--unet_path", type=str, default="models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_unet.safetensors") + parser.add_argument("--unet_config_path", type=str, default="models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_unet_config.json") + parser.add_argument("--vae_path", type=str, default="models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_vae.safetensors") + parser.add_argument("--vae_config_path", type=str, default="models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_vae_config.json") + + # Data + parser.add_argument("--data_root", type=str, required=True, help="Root directory of training images") + parser.add_argument("--annotations_file", type=str, required=True, help="Path to annotations file (JSON/JSONL)") + parser.add_argument("--caption_column", type=str, default="caption") + parser.add_argument("--image_column", type=str, default="image") + parser.add_argument("--use_multi_aspect", action="store_true", help="Use multi-aspect ratio dataset") + + # Training + parser.add_argument("--batch_size", type=int, default=4) + parser.add_argument("--learning_rate", type=float, default=1e-4) + parser.add_argument("--num_epochs", type=int, default=10) + parser.add_argument("--warmup_steps", type=int, default=500) + parser.add_argument("--gradient_accumulation_steps", type=int, default=1) + parser.add_argument("--max_grad_norm", type=float, default=1.0) + + # Loss + parser.add_argument("--loss_type", type=str, default="mse", choices=["mse", "l1", "huber"]) + parser.add_argument("--snr_gamma", type=float, default=None, help="SNR gamma for loss weighting") + parser.add_argument("--use_v_parameterization", action="store_true") + + # Optimization + parser.add_argument("--optimizer", type=str, default="adamw", choices=["adamw", "adam"]) + parser.add_argument("--weight_decay", type=float, default=0.01) + parser.add_argument("--use_ema", action="store_true", help="Use EMA for adapter") + parser.add_argument("--ema_decay", type=float, default=0.9999) + + # Checkpointing + parser.add_argument("--output_dir", type=str, default="./checkpoints") + parser.add_argument("--save_steps", type=int, default=1000) + parser.add_argument("--resume_from_checkpoint", type=str, default=None) + + # Logging + parser.add_argument("--logging_steps", type=int, default=50) + parser.add_argument("--use_wandb", action="store_true") + parser.add_argument("--wandb_project", type=str, default="qwen-sdxl-training") + parser.add_argument("--wandb_run_name", type=str, default=None) + + # Hardware + parser.add_argument("--device", type=str, default="cuda") + parser.add_argument("--dtype", type=str, default="bfloat16", choices=["float32", "float16", "bfloat16"]) + parser.add_argument("--num_workers", type=int, default=4) + + return parser.parse_args() + + +def setup_models(args): + """Setup all model components""" + print("🚀 设置模型组件...") + + # Convert dtype string to torch dtype + dtype_map = { + "float32": torch.float32, + "float16": torch.float16, + "bfloat16": torch.bfloat16 + } + dtype = dtype_map[args.dtype] + + # Load text encoder + print("📝 加载 Qwen 文本编码器...") + text_encoder = QwenTextEncoder( + model_path=args.qwen_model_path, + device=args.device, + freeze_encoder=True + ) + + # Initialize adapter + print("🔧 初始化适配器...") + adapter = QwenEmbeddingAdapter() + adapter.to(args.device, dtype) + + # Load UNet + print("🏗️ 加载 UNet...") + unet = load_unet_from_safetensors( + args.unet_path, + args.unet_config_path, + args.device, + dtype + ) + + # Load VAE + print("🎨 加载 VAE...") + vae = load_vae_from_safetensors( + args.vae_path, + args.vae_config_path, + args.device, + dtype + ) + + # Create scheduler + print("⏰ 创建调度器...") + noise_scheduler = create_scheduler("DDPM") + + return text_encoder, adapter, unet, vae, noise_scheduler, dtype + + +def setup_data(args): + """Setup data loaders""" + print("📚 设置数据加载器...") + + if args.use_multi_aspect: + dataset = MultiAspectDataset( + data_root=args.data_root, + annotations_file=args.annotations_file, + caption_column=args.caption_column, + image_column=args.image_column + ) + else: + dataset = ImageCaptionDataset( + data_root=args.data_root, + annotations_file=args.annotations_file, + caption_column=args.caption_column, + image_column=args.image_column + ) + + dataloader = create_dataloader( + dataset, + batch_size=args.batch_size, + shuffle=True, + num_workers=args.num_workers, + pin_memory=True, + drop_last=True + ) + + return dataloader + + +def setup_training(args, adapter, noise_scheduler): + """Setup training components""" + print("🎯 设置训练组件...") + + # Loss function + loss_fn = DiffusionLoss( + noise_scheduler=noise_scheduler, + loss_type=args.loss_type, + snr_gamma=args.snr_gamma, + use_v_parameterization=args.use_v_parameterization + ) + + # Optimizer + if args.optimizer == "adamw": + optimizer = optim.AdamW( + adapter.parameters(), + lr=args.learning_rate, + weight_decay=args.weight_decay, + betas=(0.9, 0.999) + ) + else: + optimizer = optim.Adam( + adapter.parameters(), + lr=args.learning_rate, + weight_decay=args.weight_decay + ) + + # EMA + ema = None + if args.use_ema: + ema = EMAModel(adapter, decay=args.ema_decay) + + return loss_fn, optimizer, ema + + +def train_step(training_step_fn, batch, optimizer, args, ema=None): + """Execute one training step""" + # Handle different batch formats + if isinstance(batch["images"], list): + # Multi-size batch, train one by one + total_loss = 0 + num_samples = 0 + + for i in range(len(batch["images"])): + images = batch["images"][i].unsqueeze(0) + captions = [batch["captions"][i]] + + step_output = training_step_fn.training_step(images, captions) + loss = step_output["loss"] / args.gradient_accumulation_steps + + loss.backward() + total_loss += loss.item() + num_samples += 1 + + avg_loss = total_loss / num_samples if num_samples > 0 else 0 + else: + # Regular batch + images = batch["images"] + captions = batch["captions"] + + step_output = training_step_fn.training_step(images, captions) + loss = step_output["loss"] / args.gradient_accumulation_steps + + loss.backward() + avg_loss = loss.item() + + # Gradient clipping and optimization step + torch.nn.utils.clip_grad_norm_(training_step_fn.adapter.parameters(), args.max_grad_norm) + optimizer.step() + optimizer.zero_grad() + + # Update EMA + if ema is not None: + ema.update() + + return avg_loss + + +def save_checkpoint(adapter, optimizer, ema, epoch, step, args): + """Save training checkpoint""" + os.makedirs(args.output_dir, exist_ok=True) + + # Save adapter + adapter_path = os.path.join(args.output_dir, f"adapter_epoch_{epoch}_step_{step}.safetensors") + if hasattr(adapter, 'save_adapter'): + adapter.save_adapter(adapter_path) + else: + import safetensors.torch + safetensors.torch.save_file(adapter.state_dict(), adapter_path) + + # Save EMA adapter if available + if ema is not None: + ema.apply_shadow() + ema_path = os.path.join(args.output_dir, f"adapter_ema_epoch_{epoch}_step_{step}.safetensors") + import safetensors.torch + safetensors.torch.save_file(adapter.state_dict(), ema_path) + ema.restore() + + # Save training state + state_path = os.path.join(args.output_dir, f"training_state_epoch_{epoch}_step_{step}.pt") + torch.save({ + "epoch": epoch, + "step": step, + "optimizer_state_dict": optimizer.state_dict(), + "args": args + }, state_path) + + print(f"💾 检查点已保存: epoch {epoch}, step {step}") + + +def main(): + args = parse_args() + + # Setup wandb + if args.use_wandb: + wandb.init( + project=args.wandb_project, + name=args.wandb_run_name, + config=vars(args) + ) + + # Setup models + text_encoder, adapter, unet, vae, noise_scheduler, dtype = setup_models(args) + + # Setup data + dataloader = setup_data(args) + + # Setup training + loss_fn, optimizer, ema = setup_training(args, adapter, noise_scheduler) + + # Create training step function + training_step_fn = AdapterTrainingStep( + unet=unet, + vae=vae, + text_encoder=text_encoder, + adapter=adapter, + noise_scheduler=noise_scheduler, + loss_fn=loss_fn, + device=args.device, + dtype=dtype + ) + + # Setup learning rate scheduler + total_steps = len(dataloader) * args.num_epochs // args.gradient_accumulation_steps + lr_scheduler = get_cosine_schedule_with_warmup( + optimizer, + num_warmup_steps=args.warmup_steps, + num_training_steps=total_steps + ) + + print(f"🎓 开始训练: {args.num_epochs} epochs, {len(dataloader)} steps/epoch") + print(f"📊 总训练步数: {total_steps}") + + # Training loop + global_step = 0 + + for epoch in range(args.num_epochs): + adapter.train() + epoch_loss = 0 + + progress_bar = tqdm(dataloader, desc=f"Epoch {epoch+1}/{args.num_epochs}") + + for step, batch in enumerate(progress_bar): + step_loss = train_step(training_step_fn, batch, optimizer, args, ema) + epoch_loss += step_loss + + # Update learning rate + lr_scheduler.step() + + global_step += 1 + + # Logging + if global_step % args.logging_steps == 0: + avg_loss = epoch_loss / (step + 1) + current_lr = lr_scheduler.get_last_lr()[0] + + progress_bar.set_postfix({ + "loss": f"{step_loss:.4f}", + "avg_loss": f"{avg_loss:.4f}", + "lr": f"{current_lr:.2e}" + }) + + if args.use_wandb: + wandb.log({ + "train/loss": step_loss, + "train/avg_loss": avg_loss, + "train/learning_rate": current_lr, + "train/epoch": epoch, + "train/step": global_step + }) + + # Save checkpoint + if global_step % args.save_steps == 0: + save_checkpoint(adapter, optimizer, ema, epoch, global_step, args) + + # End of epoch + avg_epoch_loss = epoch_loss / len(dataloader) + print(f"📈 Epoch {epoch+1} 完成，平均损失: {avg_epoch_loss:.4f}") + + # Save epoch checkpoint + save_checkpoint(adapter, optimizer, ema, epoch+1, global_step, args) + + print("🎉 训练完成！") + + if args.use_wandb: + wandb.finish() + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + main() diff --git a/arch/model_loader.py b/arch/model_loader.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..47e531fd641789b454481082c4657a9c529ccd26 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/model_loader.py @@ -0,0 +1,325 @@ +""" +Model Loader Utilities +模型加载工具 - 用于加载各种模型组件 +""" + +import torch +import json +import safetensors.torch +from typing import Optional + + +def load_unet_from_safetensors(unet_path: str, config_path: str, device: str = "cuda", dtype: torch.dtype = torch.bfloat16): + """ + Load UNet from safetensors file + 从 safetensors 文件加载 UNet + + Args: + unet_path: Path to UNet safetensors file + config_path: Path to UNet config JSON file + device: Device to load model on + dtype: Data type for model weights + + Returns: + UNet2DConditionModel or None if loading fails + """ + try: + from diffusers import UNet2DConditionModel + + # Load config + with open(config_path, 'r') as f: + unet_config = json.load(f) + + # Create UNet + unet = UNet2DConditionModel.from_config(unet_config) + + # Load weights + state_dict = safetensors.torch.load_file(unet_path) + unet.load_state_dict(state_dict) + unet.to(device, dtype) + + return unet + except Exception as e: + print(f"Error loading UNet: {e}") + return None + + +def load_vae_from_safetensors(vae_path: str, config_path: str, device: str = "cuda", dtype: torch.dtype = torch.bfloat16): + """ + Load VAE from safetensors file + 从 safetensors 文件加载 VAE + + Args: + vae_path: Path to VAE safetensors file + config_path: Path to VAE config JSON file + device: Device to load model on + dtype: Data type for model weights + + Returns: + AutoencoderKL or None if loading fails + """ + try: + from diffusers import AutoencoderKL + + # Load config + with open(config_path, 'r') as f: + vae_config = json.load(f) + + # Create VAE + vae = AutoencoderKL.from_config(vae_config) + + # Load weights + state_dict = safetensors.torch.load_file(vae_path) + vae.load_state_dict(state_dict) + vae.to(device, dtype) + + return vae + except Exception as e: + print(f"Error loading VAE: {e}") + return None + + +def create_scheduler(scheduler_type: str = "EulerAncestral", model_id: str = "stabilityai/stable-diffusion-xl-base-1.0"): + """ + Create scheduler for diffusion process + 创建扩散过程调度器 + + Args: + scheduler_type: Type of scheduler to create + model_id: Model ID to load scheduler config from + + Returns: + Scheduler object or None if creation fails + """ + try: + if scheduler_type == "DDPM": + from diffusers import DDPMScheduler + scheduler = DDPMScheduler.from_pretrained(model_id, subfolder="scheduler") + elif scheduler_type == "DDIM": + from diffusers import DDIMScheduler + scheduler = DDIMScheduler.from_pretrained(model_id, subfolder="scheduler") + elif scheduler_type == "DPMSolverMultistep": + from diffusers import DPMSolverMultistepScheduler + scheduler = DPMSolverMultistepScheduler.from_pretrained(model_id, subfolder="scheduler") + elif scheduler_type == "EulerAncestral": + from diffusers import EulerAncestralDiscreteScheduler + scheduler = EulerAncestralDiscreteScheduler.from_pretrained(model_id, subfolder="scheduler") + else: + print(f"Unsupported scheduler type: {scheduler_type}, using DDPM") + from diffusers import DDPMScheduler + scheduler = DDPMScheduler.from_pretrained(model_id, subfolder="scheduler") + + return scheduler + except Exception as e: + print(f"Error creating scheduler: {e}") + return None + + +def load_qwen_model(model_path: str, device: str = "cuda"): + """ + Load Qwen3 embedding model + 加载 Qwen3 嵌入模型 + + Args: + model_path: Path to Qwen model + device: Device to load model on + + Returns: + SentenceTransformer model or None if loading fails + """ + try: + from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer + model = SentenceTransformer(model_path) + model.to(device) + return model + except ImportError: + print("Warning: sentence-transformers not available. Using mock embeddings.") + return None + except Exception as e: + print(f"Error loading Qwen model: {e}") + return None + + +def save_model_components( + unet, + vae, + adapter, + text_encoder, + save_dir: str, + save_format: str = "safetensors" +): + """ + Save model components for training checkpoints + 保存模型组件用于训练检查点 + + Args: + unet: UNet model + vae: VAE model + adapter: Qwen embedding adapter + text_encoder: Qwen text encoder + save_dir: Directory to save components + save_format: Format to save in (safetensors or pt) + """ + import os + os.makedirs(save_dir, exist_ok=True) + + try: + if save_format == "safetensors": + # Save UNet + if unet is not None: + safetensors.torch.save_file( + unet.state_dict(), + os.path.join(save_dir, "unet.safetensors") + ) + + # Save VAE + if vae is not None: + safetensors.torch.save_file( + vae.state_dict(), + os.path.join(save_dir, "vae.safetensors") + ) + + # Save adapter + if adapter is not None: + safetensors.torch.save_file( + adapter.state_dict(), + os.path.join(save_dir, "adapter.safetensors") + ) + + else: # PyTorch format + if unet is not None: + torch.save(unet.state_dict(), os.path.join(save_dir, "unet.pt")) + if vae is not None: + torch.save(vae.state_dict(), os.path.join(save_dir, "vae.pt")) + if adapter is not None: + torch.save(adapter.state_dict(), os.path.join(save_dir, "adapter.pt")) + + print(f"Model components saved to {save_dir}") + + except Exception as e: + print(f"Error saving model components: {e}") + + +def load_unet_with_lora( + unet_path: str, + unet_config_path: str, + lora_weights_path: Optional[str] = None, + lora_config_path: Optional[str] = None, + device: str = "cuda", + dtype: torch.dtype = torch.bfloat16 +): + """ + Load UNet with optional LoRA weights + 加载带有可选LoRA权重的UNet + + Args: + base_unet_path: Path to base UNet (can be safetensors file or HF model path) + lora_weights_path: Optional path to LoRA weights (safetensors file) + lora_config_path: Optional path to LoRA config directory + device: Device to load model on + dtype: Data type for model weights + + Returns: + UNet model with LoRA applied if specified + """ + try: + from diffusers import UNet2DConditionModel + from peft import PeftModel, LoraConfig + + # Load base UNet + # if unet_path.endswith(".safetensors"): + # # Load from safetensors file (need config too) + # print("Loading UNet from safetensors format requires separate config file") + # return None + # else: + # Load from HuggingFace model path + # unet = UNet2DConditionModel.from_pretrained( + # base_unet_path, + # subfolder="unet" if "/" in base_unet_path and not base_unet_path.endswith("unet") else None, + # torch_dtype=dtype + # ) + unet = load_unet_from_safetensors(unet_path, unet_config_path, device, dtype) + + # Apply LoRA if provided + if lora_weights_path and lora_config_path: + print(f"Loading LoRA weights from {lora_weights_path}") + + # Load LoRA weights + if lora_weights_path.endswith(".safetensors"): + import safetensors.torch + lora_state_dict = safetensors.torch.load_file(lora_weights_path) + else: + lora_state_dict = torch.load(lora_weights_path, map_location=device) + + # Load LoRA config + lora_config = LoraConfig.from_pretrained(lora_config_path) + + # Apply LoRA to UNet + from peft import get_peft_model, set_peft_model_state_dict + unet = get_peft_model(unet, lora_config) + set_peft_model_state_dict(unet, lora_state_dict) + + print("LoRA weights applied to UNet") + + unet.to(device, dtype) + return unet + + except Exception as e: + print(f"Error loading UNet with LoRA: {e}") + return None + + +def load_fused_unet( + fused_unet_path: str, + device: str = "cuda", + dtype: torch.dtype = torch.bfloat16 +): + """ + Load UNet with fused LoRA weights + 加载融合了LoRA权重的UNet + + Args: + fused_unet_path: Path to fused UNet model directory + device: Device to load model on + dtype: Data type for model weights + + Returns: + UNet model with fused LoRA weights + """ + try: + from diffusers import UNet2DConditionModel + + unet = UNet2DConditionModel.from_pretrained( + fused_unet_path, + torch_dtype=dtype + ) + + unet.to(device, dtype) + print(f"Fused UNet loaded from {fused_unet_path}") + return unet + + except Exception as e: + print(f"Error loading fused UNet: {e}") + return None + + +def load_checkpoint(checkpoint_path: str, device: str = "cuda"): + """ + Load training checkpoint + 加载训练检查点 + + Args: + checkpoint_path: Path to checkpoint file + device: Device to load on + + Returns: + Dictionary containing checkpoint data + """ + try: + if checkpoint_path.endswith(".safetensors"): + return safetensors.torch.load_file(checkpoint_path, device=device) + else: + return torch.load(checkpoint_path, map_location=device) + except Exception as e: + print(f"Error loading checkpoint: {e}") + return None diff --git a/arch/pipeline.py b/arch/pipeline.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b4e5abf3c0ba76f5ea280555fe1ae5fae61d3273 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/pipeline.py @@ -0,0 +1,348 @@ +""" +Qwen-SDXL Inference Pipeline +Qwen-SDXL 推理管道 - 使用 Qwen3 嵌入模型替代 CLIP 文本编码器的 SDXL 推理管道 +""" + +import torch +import torch.nn as nn +import numpy as np +from PIL import Image +from typing import List, Optional, Union, Tuple + +from .adapter import QwenEmbeddingAdapter +from .text_encoder import QwenTextEncoder +from .model_loader import load_qwen_model, load_unet_from_safetensors, load_vae_from_safetensors, create_scheduler + + +class QwenIllustriousInference: + """ + Qwen-SDXL 推理管道 + 使用 Qwen3 嵌入模型替代 CLIP 文本编码器的 SDXL 推理管道 + """ + + def __init__( + self, + qwen_model_path: str = "models/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B", + unet_path: str = "models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_unet.safetensors", + unet_config_path: str = "models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_unet_config.json", + vae_path: str = "models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_vae.safetensors", + vae_config_path: str = "models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_vae_config.json", + adapter_path: Optional[str] = "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/qwen_illustrious_output/adapter/adapter.safetensors", + lora_weights_path: Optional[str] = "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/qwen_illustrious_output/lora_weights/lora_weights.safetensors", + lora_config_path: Optional[str] = "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/qwen_illustrious_output/lora_weights/adapter_config.json", + use_fused_unet: bool = False, + fused_unet_path: Optional[str] = None, + device: str = "cuda", + dtype: torch.dtype = torch.bfloat16, + scheduler_type: str = "DDPM" + ): + self.device = device + self.dtype = dtype + self.vae_scale_factor = 8 # SDXL default + + print("🚀 初始化 Qwen-SDXL 推理管道...") + + # Initialize text encoder + print("📝 初始化 Qwen 文本编码器...") + self.text_encoder = QwenTextEncoder( + model_path=qwen_model_path, + device=device, + freeze_encoder=True + ) + + # Initialize adapter layer + print("🔧 初始化适配器层...") + self.adapter = QwenEmbeddingAdapter() + self.adapter.to(device, dtype) + + # Load adapter weights if provided + if adapter_path is not None: + print(f"📥 加载适配器权重: {adapter_path}") + try: + if adapter_path.endswith(".safetensors"): + import safetensors.torch + adapter_state = safetensors.torch.load_file(adapter_path) + else: + adapter_state = torch.load(adapter_path, map_location=device) + self.adapter.load_state_dict(adapter_state) + except Exception as e: + print(f"⚠️ 加载适配器权重失败: {e}") + + # Load UNet (with LoRA support) + print("🏗️ 加载 UNet 模型...") + from .model_loader import load_unet_with_lora, load_fused_unet + + if use_fused_unet and fused_unet_path: + # Load fused UNet with merged LoRA weights + print("📦 使用融合LoRA权重的UNet...") + self.unet = load_fused_unet(fused_unet_path, device, dtype) + elif lora_weights_path and lora_config_path: + # Load UNet with separate LoRA weights + print("🔧 加载UNet并应用LoRA权重...") + # For this case, use the base SDXL model path instead of safetensors + # base_model_path = unet_path.replace("/unet.safetensors", "").replace("/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_unet.safetensors", "") + self.unet = load_unet_with_lora( + unet_path=unet_path, + unet_config_path=unet_config_path, + lora_weights_path=lora_weights_path, + lora_config_path=lora_config_path, + device=device, + dtype=dtype + ) + else: + # Load standard UNet from safetensors + self.unet = load_unet_from_safetensors(unet_path, unet_config_path, device, dtype) + + # Load VAE + print("🎨 加载 VAE 模型...") + self.vae = load_vae_from_safetensors(vae_path, vae_config_path, device, dtype) + + # Initialize scheduler + print(f"⏰ 创建调度器 ({scheduler_type})...") + self.scheduler = create_scheduler(scheduler_type) + + # Check if all components loaded successfully + self.is_ready = all([ + self.text_encoder is not None, + self.adapter is not None, + self.unet is not None, + self.vae is not None, + self.scheduler is not None + ]) + + if self.is_ready: + print("✅ 管道初始化完成！") + else: + print("❌ 管道初始化失败，某些组件加载失败") + + def encode_prompts( + self, + prompts: List[str], + negative_prompts: Optional[List[str]] = None, + do_classifier_free_guidance: bool = True + ) -> Tuple[torch.Tensor, torch.Tensor]: + """ + Encode prompts using Qwen3 + adapter + 使用 Qwen3 + 适配器编码提示词 + """ + # Get raw embeddings from Qwen + text_embeddings, pooled_embeddings = self.text_encoder.encode_prompts( + prompts, negative_prompts, do_classifier_free_guidance + ) + + batch_size = len(prompts) + if do_classifier_free_guidance: + batch_size *= 2 + + # Add sequence dimension for text embeddings (We uses 512 tokens for SDXL) + seq_len = 512 + text_embeddings_seq = text_embeddings.unsqueeze(1).expand(-1, seq_len, -1) # [B, 512, 1024] + + # Project to SDXL dimensions using adapter + prompt_embeds = self.adapter.forward_text_embeddings(text_embeddings_seq.to(self.dtype)) # [B, 512, 2048] + pooled_prompt_embeds = self.adapter.forward_pooled_embeddings(pooled_embeddings.to(self.dtype)) # [B, 1280] + + return prompt_embeds, pooled_prompt_embeds + + def prepare_latents( + self, + batch_size: int, + height: int, + width: int, + generator: Optional[torch.Generator] = None + ) -> torch.Tensor: + """ + Prepare initial latents + 准备初始潜在变量 + """ + if self.unet is None: + # Mock latents for testing + shape = (batch_size, 4, height // self.vae_scale_factor, width // self.vae_scale_factor) + return torch.randn(shape, device=self.device, dtype=self.dtype) + + shape = ( + batch_size, + self.unet.config.in_channels, + height // self.vae_scale_factor, + width // self.vae_scale_factor, + ) + + try: + from diffusers.utils import randn_tensor + latents = randn_tensor(shape, generator=generator, device=self.device, dtype=self.dtype) + except ImportError: + latents = torch.randn(shape, device=self.device, dtype=self.dtype, generator=generator) + + # Scale initial noise + if self.scheduler is not None: + latents = latents * self.scheduler.init_noise_sigma + + return latents + + def get_time_ids( + self, + height: int, + width: int, + original_size: Tuple[int, int], + crops_coords_top_left: Tuple[int, int] = (0, 0), + target_size: Optional[Tuple[int, int]] = None + ) -> torch.Tensor: + """ + Get SDXL time IDs for micro-conditioning + 获取 SDXL 时间 ID 用于微调节 + """ + if target_size is None: + target_size = (height, width) + + add_time_ids = list(original_size + crops_coords_top_left + target_size) + add_time_ids = torch.tensor([add_time_ids], dtype=self.dtype, device=self.device) + + return add_time_ids + + @torch.no_grad() + def generate( + self, + prompt: Union[str, List[str]], + negative_prompt: Optional[Union[str, List[str]]] = None, + height: int = 1024, + width: int = 1024, + num_inference_steps: int = 50, + guidance_scale: float = 7.5, + generator: Optional[torch.Generator] = None, + return_type: str = "pil" + ) -> List[Image.Image]: + """ + Generate images using Qwen-SDXL pipeline + 使用 Qwen-SDXL 管道生成图像 + """ + if not self.is_ready: + print("❌ 管道未准备就绪，无法生成图像") + return [] + + # Prepare prompts + if isinstance(prompt, str): + prompt = [prompt] + if isinstance(negative_prompt, str): + negative_prompt = [negative_prompt] + + batch_size = len(prompt) + do_classifier_free_guidance = guidance_scale > 1.0 + + print(f"🎯 开始生成 {batch_size} 张图像...") + print(f"📏 尺寸: {width}x{height}") + print(f"🔄 推理步数: {num_inference_steps}") + print(f"🎚️ 引导强度: {guidance_scale}") + + # 1. Encode prompts + print("📝 编码提示词...") + prompt_embeds, pooled_prompt_embeds = self.encode_prompts( + prompt, negative_prompt, do_classifier_free_guidance + ) + + # 2. Prepare timesteps + print("⏰ 准备时间步...") + if self.scheduler is not None: + self.scheduler.set_timesteps(num_inference_steps, device=self.device) + timesteps = self.scheduler.timesteps + else: + timesteps = torch.linspace(1000, 0, num_inference_steps, device=self.device) + + # 3. Prepare latents + print("🌀 准备潜在变量...") + latents = self.prepare_latents(batch_size, height, width, generator) + + # 4. Prepare time IDs + original_size = (height, width) + target_size = (height, width) + add_time_ids = self.get_time_ids(height, width, original_size, target_size=target_size) + + if do_classifier_free_guidance: + add_time_ids = add_time_ids.repeat(2, 1) + add_time_ids = add_time_ids.repeat(batch_size, 1) + + # 5. Denoising loop + print("🔄 开始去噪过程...") + for i, t in enumerate(timesteps): + # Expand latents for classifier-free guidance + latent_model_input = torch.cat([latents] * 2) if do_classifier_free_guidance else latents + + if self.scheduler is not None: + latent_model_input = self.scheduler.scale_model_input(latent_model_input, t) + + # Predict noise + if self.unet is not None: + added_cond_kwargs = { + "text_embeds": pooled_prompt_embeds, + "time_ids": add_time_ids + } + + noise_pred = self.unet( + latent_model_input, + t, + encoder_hidden_states=prompt_embeds, + added_cond_kwargs=added_cond_kwargs, + return_dict=False, + )[0] + + # Classifier-free guidance + if do_classifier_free_guidance: + noise_pred_uncond, noise_pred_text = noise_pred.chunk(2) + noise_pred = noise_pred_uncond + guidance_scale * (noise_pred_text - noise_pred_uncond) + + # Scheduler step + if self.scheduler is not None: + latents = self.scheduler.step(noise_pred, t, latents, return_dict=False)[0] + + if (i + 1) % 5 == 0: + print(f" 步骤 {i+1}/{len(timesteps)} 完成") + + # 6. Decode latents + print("🎨 解码生成图像...") + if self.vae is not None: + latents = latents / self.vae.config.scaling_factor + images = self.vae.decode(latents, return_dict=False)[0] + else: + # Mock image generation for testing + images = torch.randn(batch_size, 3, height, width, device=self.device) + + # 7. Convert to PIL images + images = (images / 2 + 0.5).clamp(0, 1) + images = images.cpu().permute(0, 2, 3, 1).float().numpy() + + if return_type == "pil": + images = [Image.fromarray((img * 255).astype(np.uint8)) for img in images] + + print("✅ 图像生成完成！") + return images + + def save_adapter(self, save_path: str): + """ + Save adapter weights + 保存适配器权重 + """ + try: + if save_path.endswith(".safetensors"): + import safetensors.torch + safetensors.torch.save_file(self.adapter.state_dict(), save_path) + else: + torch.save(self.adapter.state_dict(), save_path) + print(f"✅ 适配器权重已保存到: {save_path}") + except Exception as e: + print(f"❌ 保存适配器权重失败: {e}") + + def load_adapter(self, load_path: str): + """ + Load adapter weights + 加载适配器权重 + """ + try: + if load_path.endswith(".safetensors"): + import safetensors.torch + state_dict = safetensors.torch.load_file(load_path) + else: + state_dict = torch.load(load_path, map_location=self.device) + + self.adapter.load_state_dict(state_dict) + print(f"✅ 适配器权重已从 {load_path} 加载") + except Exception as e: + print(f"❌ 加载适配器权重失败: {e}") diff --git a/arch/text_encoder.py b/arch/text_encoder.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..75fa84fc7f2fb880b8eab01064edcdab3476db32 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/text_encoder.py @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@ +""" +Qwen Text Encoder +Qwen 文本编码器 - 使用 Qwen3 模型进行文本编码 +""" + +import torch +import torch.nn as nn +from typing import List, Optional, Union, Tuple + + +def load_qwen_model(model_path: str, device: str = "cuda"): + """ + Load Qwen3 embedding model + 加载 Qwen3 嵌入模型 + """ + try: + from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer + model = SentenceTransformer(model_path) + model.to(device) + return model + except ImportError: + print("Warning: sentence-transformers not available. Using mock embeddings.") + return None + + +def encode_text_with_qwen( + qwen_model, + texts: List[str], + device: str = "cuda", + max_length: int = 512, + use_query_mode: bool = False +) -> torch.Tensor: + """ + Encode text using Qwen3 model + 使用 Qwen3 模型编码文本 + Args: + qwen_model: Qwen3 embedding model + texts: List of text strings to encode + device: Device to run on + max_length: Maximum sequence length + use_query_mode: Whether to use query prompt for better understanding + """ + if qwen_model is None: + # Mock embeddings for testing when sentence-transformers is not available + batch_size = len(texts) + return torch.randn(batch_size, 1024, device=device, dtype=torch.float32) + + with torch.no_grad(): + # Use query prompt for better text understanding when specified + embeddings = qwen_model.encode( + texts, + prompt_name="query" if use_query_mode else None, + convert_to_tensor=True, + device=device, + max_seq_length=max_length, + output_value="token_embeddings" if not use_query_mode else "sentence_embedding" + ) + + return embeddings if use_query_mode else torch.stack(embeddings, dim=0) + + +class QwenTextEncoder(nn.Module): + """ + Qwen Text Encoder wrapper for training and inference + 用于训练和推理的 Qwen 文本编码器包装器 + """ + + def __init__( + self, + model_path: str = "models/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B", + device: str = "cuda", + max_length: int = 512, + freeze_encoder: bool = True + ): + super().__init__() + self.device = device + self.max_length = max_length + self.freeze_encoder = freeze_encoder + + # Load Qwen model + self.qwen_model = load_qwen_model(model_path, device) + + # Freeze parameters if specified + if self.freeze_encoder and self.qwen_model is not None: + for param in self.qwen_model.parameters(): + param.requires_grad = False + + def encode_prompts( + self, + prompts: List[str], + negative_prompts: Optional[List[str]] = None, + do_classifier_free_guidance: bool = False + ) -> Tuple[torch.Tensor, torch.Tensor]: + """ + Encode prompts using Qwen3 model + 使用 Qwen3 模型编码提示词 + + Returns: + tuple: (text_embeddings, pooled_embeddings) + - text_embeddings: [batch_size, 1024] for sequence embeddings + - pooled_embeddings: [batch_size, 1024] for pooled embeddings + """ + batch_size = len(prompts) + + # Encode positive prompts for text embeddings (normal mode) + text_embeddings = encode_text_with_qwen( + self.qwen_model, prompts, self.device, + max_length=self.max_length, use_query_mode=False + ) + + # Encode positive prompts for pooled embeddings (query mode) + pooled_embeddings = encode_text_with_qwen( + self.qwen_model, prompts, self.device, + max_length=self.max_length, use_query_mode=True + ) + + # Handle negative prompts + if do_classifier_free_guidance: + if negative_prompts is None: + negative_prompts = [""] * batch_size + + # Encode negative prompts + negative_text_embeddings = encode_text_with_qwen( + self.qwen_model, negative_prompts, self.device, + max_length=self.max_length, use_query_mode=False + ) + + negative_pooled_embeddings = encode_text_with_qwen( + self.qwen_model, negative_prompts, self.device, + max_length=self.max_length, use_query_mode=True + ) + + # Concatenate for classifier-free guidance + text_embeddings = torch.cat([negative_text_embeddings, text_embeddings], dim=0) + pooled_embeddings = torch.cat([negative_pooled_embeddings, pooled_embeddings], dim=0) + + return text_embeddings, pooled_embeddings + + def forward(self, prompts: List[str], negative_prompts: Optional[List[str]] = None): + """ + Forward pass for text encoding + Args: + prompts: List of text prompts + negative_prompts: Optional list of negative prompts + Returns: + tuple: (text_embeddings, pooled_embeddings) + """ + return self.encode_prompts(prompts, negative_prompts, do_classifier_free_guidance=(negative_prompts is not None)) + + def train(self, mode: bool = True): + """Override train mode to handle frozen encoder""" + super().train(mode) + if self.freeze_encoder and self.qwen_model is not None: + self.qwen_model.eval() # Keep encoder in eval mode + return self diff --git a/arch/training.py b/arch/training.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c958515b2a3c81c57df6dc8dcea283ef602f721f --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/training.py @@ -0,0 +1,307 @@ +""" +Training Utilities for Qwen-SDXL +Qwen-SDXL 训练工具 - 包含损失函数、训练步骤等 +""" + +import torch +import torch.nn as nn +import torch.nn.functional as F +from typing import Dict, Any, Optional, Tuple +import math + + +class DiffusionLoss(nn.Module): + """ + Diffusion training loss for SDXL with Qwen embeddings + 使用 Qwen 嵌入的 SDXL 扩散训练损失 + """ + + def __init__( + self, + noise_scheduler, + loss_type: str = "mse", + snr_gamma: Optional[float] = None, + use_v_parameterization: bool = False + ): + super().__init__() + self.noise_scheduler = noise_scheduler + self.loss_type = loss_type + self.snr_gamma = snr_gamma + self.use_v_parameterization = use_v_parameterization + + if loss_type == "mse": + self.loss_fn = nn.MSELoss(reduction="none") + elif loss_type == "l1": + self.loss_fn = nn.L1Loss(reduction="none") + elif loss_type == "huber": + self.loss_fn = nn.HuberLoss(reduction="none", delta=0.1) + else: + raise ValueError(f"Unsupported loss type: {loss_type}") + + def compute_snr(self, timesteps): + """ + Compute signal-to-noise ratio for loss weighting + 计算信噪比用于损失加权 + """ + alphas_cumprod = self.noise_scheduler.alphas_cumprod.to(timesteps.device)[timesteps] + sqrt_alphas_cumprod = alphas_cumprod**0.5 + sqrt_one_minus_alphas_cumprod = (1.0 - alphas_cumprod) ** 0.5 + + # SNR = signal^2 / noise^2 + snr = (sqrt_alphas_cumprod / sqrt_one_minus_alphas_cumprod) ** 2 + return snr + + def forward( + self, + model_pred: torch.Tensor, + target: torch.Tensor, + timesteps: torch.Tensor, + mask: Optional[torch.Tensor] = None + ) -> torch.Tensor: + """ + Compute diffusion loss + 计算扩散损失 + + Args: + model_pred: Model prediction (noise or v-parameterization) + target: Target (noise or v-parameterization) + timesteps: Diffusion timesteps + mask: Optional mask for selective loss computation + + Returns: + Loss tensor + """ + # Basic loss computation + loss = self.loss_fn(model_pred, target) + + # Apply mask if provided + if mask is not None: + loss = loss * mask + + # Reduce over spatial dimensions + loss = loss.mean(dim=list(range(1, len(loss.shape)))) + + # Apply SNR weighting if specified + if self.snr_gamma is not None: + snr = self.compute_snr(timesteps) + + if self.snr_gamma >= 1.0: + # Min-SNR weighting + snr_weight = torch.stack([snr, torch.full_like(snr, self.snr_gamma)], dim=1).min(dim=1)[0] + else: + # Standard SNR weighting + snr_weight = snr ** self.snr_gamma + + loss = loss * snr_weight + + return loss.mean() + + +class AdapterTrainingStep: + """ + Training step for adapter-only training + 仅训练适配器的训练步骤 + """ + + def __init__( + self, + unet, + vae, + text_encoder, + adapter, + noise_scheduler, + loss_fn: DiffusionLoss, + device: str = "cuda", + dtype: torch.dtype = torch.bfloat16 + ): + self.unet = unet + self.vae = vae + self.text_encoder = text_encoder + self.adapter = adapter + self.noise_scheduler = noise_scheduler + self.loss_fn = loss_fn + self.device = device + self.dtype = dtype + + # Freeze components except adapter + self._freeze_components() + + def _freeze_components(self): + """Freeze all components except adapter""" + if self.unet is not None: + for param in self.unet.parameters(): + param.requires_grad = False + + if self.vae is not None: + for param in self.vae.parameters(): + param.requires_grad = False + + # Text encoder is already frozen in QwenTextEncoder + # Only adapter parameters should be trainable + for param in self.adapter.parameters(): + param.requires_grad = True + + def prepare_inputs( + self, + images: torch.Tensor, + prompts: list, + negative_prompts: Optional[list] = None + ) -> Dict[str, torch.Tensor]: + """ + Prepare inputs for training step + 准备训练步骤的输入 + """ + batch_size = images.shape[0] + + # Encode images to latents + with torch.no_grad(): + latents = self.vae.encode(images.to(self.dtype)).latent_dist.sample() + latents = latents * self.vae.config.scaling_factor + + # Add noise to latents + noise = torch.randn_like(latents) + timesteps = torch.randint( + 0, self.noise_scheduler.config.num_train_timesteps, + (batch_size,), device=self.device + ).long() + + noisy_latents = self.noise_scheduler.add_noise(latents, noise, timesteps) + + # Encode text + text_embeddings, pooled_embeddings = self.text_encoder.encode_prompts( + prompts, negative_prompts, do_classifier_free_guidance=False + ) + + # Add sequence dimension and project through adapter + seq_len = 77 + text_embeddings_seq = text_embeddings.unsqueeze(1).expand(-1, seq_len, -1) + + encoder_hidden_states = self.adapter.forward_text_embeddings(text_embeddings_seq.to(self.dtype)) + pooled_prompt_embeds = self.adapter.forward_pooled_embeddings(pooled_embeddings.to(self.dtype)) + + # Prepare time IDs (simplified for training) + height, width = images.shape[-2:] + original_size = (height, width) + target_size = (height, width) + crops_coords_top_left = (0, 0) + + add_time_ids = list(original_size + crops_coords_top_left + target_size) + add_time_ids = torch.tensor([add_time_ids] * batch_size, dtype=self.dtype, device=self.device) + + return { + "noisy_latents": noisy_latents, + "timesteps": timesteps, + "encoder_hidden_states": encoder_hidden_states, + "pooled_prompt_embeds": pooled_prompt_embeds, + "add_time_ids": add_time_ids, + "noise": noise + } + + def training_step( + self, + images: torch.Tensor, + prompts: list, + negative_prompts: Optional[list] = None + ) -> Dict[str, Any]: + """ + Execute one training step + 执行一个训练步骤 + """ + # Prepare inputs + inputs = self.prepare_inputs(images, prompts, negative_prompts) + + # Forward pass through UNet + added_cond_kwargs = { + "text_embeds": inputs["pooled_prompt_embeds"], + "time_ids": inputs["add_time_ids"] + } + + model_pred = self.unet( + inputs["noisy_latents"], + inputs["timesteps"], + encoder_hidden_states=inputs["encoder_hidden_states"], + added_cond_kwargs=added_cond_kwargs, + return_dict=False, + )[0] + + # Compute loss + if self.loss_fn.use_v_parameterization: + # v-parameterization target + alphas_cumprod = self.noise_scheduler.alphas_cumprod[inputs["timesteps"]] + sqrt_alphas_cumprod = alphas_cumprod**0.5 + sqrt_one_minus_alphas_cumprod = (1.0 - alphas_cumprod) ** 0.5 + + target = sqrt_alphas_cumprod.view(-1, 1, 1, 1) * inputs["noise"] - \ + sqrt_one_minus_alphas_cumprod.view(-1, 1, 1, 1) * inputs["noisy_latents"] + else: + # Standard noise prediction + target = inputs["noise"] + + loss = self.loss_fn(model_pred, target, inputs["timesteps"]) + + return { + "loss": loss, + "model_pred": model_pred.detach(), + "target": target.detach(), + "timesteps": inputs["timesteps"] + } + + +def get_cosine_schedule_with_warmup( + optimizer, + num_warmup_steps: int, + num_training_steps: int, + num_cycles: float = 0.5, + last_epoch: int = -1, +): + """ + Cosine learning rate schedule with warmup + 带预热的余弦学习率调度 + """ + def lr_lambda(current_step): + if current_step < num_warmup_steps: + return float(current_step) / float(max(1, num_warmup_steps)) + + progress = float(current_step - num_warmup_steps) / float(max(1, num_training_steps - num_warmup_steps)) + return max(0.0, 0.5 * (1.0 + math.cos(math.pi * float(num_cycles) * 2.0 * progress))) + + from torch.optim.lr_scheduler import LambdaLR + return LambdaLR(optimizer, lr_lambda, last_epoch) + + +class EMAModel: + """ + Exponential Moving Average for model parameters + 模型参数的指数移动平均 + """ + + def __init__(self, model, decay: float = 0.9999): + self.model = model + self.decay = decay + self.shadow = {} + self.backup = {} + + # Initialize shadow parameters + for name, param in model.named_parameters(): + if param.requires_grad: + self.shadow[name] = param.data.clone() + + def update(self): + """Update EMA parameters""" + for name, param in self.model.named_parameters(): + if param.requires_grad and name in self.shadow: + self.shadow[name] = self.decay * self.shadow[name] + (1 - self.decay) * param.data + + def apply_shadow(self): + """Apply EMA parameters to model""" + for name, param in self.model.named_parameters(): + if param.requires_grad and name in self.shadow: + self.backup[name] = param.data.clone() + param.data = self.shadow[name] + + def restore(self): + """Restore original parameters""" + for name, param in self.model.named_parameters(): + if param.requires_grad and name in self.backup: + param.data = self.backup[name] + self.backup = {} diff --git a/diffusers/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md b/diffusers/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e4b2b45a4ecde200e65e3a2e16ac0cdb0b87d7c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +# What does this PR do? + + + + + +Fixes # (issue) + + +## Before submitting +- [ ] This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the other checks if that's the case). +- [ ] Did you read the [contributor guideline](https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)? +- [ ] Did you read our [philosophy doc](https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/blob/main/PHILOSOPHY.md) (important for complex PRs)? +- [ ] Was this discussed/approved via a GitHub issue or the [forum](https://discuss.huggingface.co/c/discussion-related-to-httpsgithubcomhuggingfacediffusers/63)? Please add a link to it if that's the case. +- [ ] Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? Here are the + [documentation guidelines](https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/tree/main/docs), and + [here are tips on formatting docstrings](https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/tree/main/docs#writing-source-documentation). +- [ ] Did you write any new necessary tests? + + +## Who can review? + +Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed. Feel free to tag +members/contributors who may be interested in your PR. + + diff --git a/diffusers/docs/README.md b/diffusers/docs/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f36b76fb07891cc556db8ac30633abcea01c4a41 --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/docs/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,268 @@ + + +# Generating the documentation + +To generate the documentation, you first have to build it. Several packages are necessary to build the doc, +you can install them with the following command, at the root of the code repository: + +```bash +pip install -e ".[docs]" +``` + +Then you need to install our open source documentation builder tool: + +```bash +pip install git+https://github.com/huggingface/doc-builder +``` + +--- +**NOTE** + +You only need to generate the documentation to inspect it locally (if you're planning changes and want to +check how they look before committing for instance). You don't have to commit the built documentation. + +--- + +## Previewing the documentation + +To preview the docs, first install the `watchdog` module with: + +```bash +pip install watchdog +``` + +Then run the following command: + +```bash +doc-builder preview {package_name} {path_to_docs} +``` + +For example: + +```bash +doc-builder preview diffusers docs/source/en +``` + +The docs will be viewable at [http://localhost:3000](http://localhost:3000). You can also preview the docs once you have opened a PR. You will see a bot add a comment to a link where the documentation with your changes lives. + +--- +**NOTE** + +The `preview` command only works with existing doc files. When you add a completely new file, you need to update `_toctree.yml` & restart `preview` command (`ctrl-c` to stop it & call `doc-builder preview ...` again). + +--- + +## Adding a new element to the navigation bar + +Accepted files are Markdown (.md). + +Create a file with its extension and put it in the source directory. You can then link it to the toc-tree by putting +the filename without the extension in the [`_toctree.yml`](https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/blob/main/docs/source/en/_toctree.yml) file. + +## Renaming section headers and moving sections + +It helps to keep the old links working when renaming the section header and/or moving sections from one document to another. This is because the old links are likely to be used in Issues, Forums, and Social media and it'd make for a much more superior user experience if users reading those months later could still easily navigate to the originally intended information. + +Therefore, we simply keep a little map of moved sections at the end of the document where the original section was. The key is to preserve the original anchor. + +So if you renamed a section from: "Section A" to "Section B", then you can add at the end of the file: + +```md +Sections that were moved: + +[ Section A ] +``` +and of course, if you moved it to another file, then: + +```md +Sections that were moved: + +[ Section A ] +``` + +Use the relative style to link to the new file so that the versioned docs continue to work. + +For an example of a rich moved section set please see the very end of [the transformers Trainer doc](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/main/docs/source/en/main_classes/trainer.md). + + +## Writing Documentation - Specification + +The `huggingface/diffusers` documentation follows the +[Google documentation](https://sphinxcontrib-napoleon.readthedocs.io/en/latest/example_google.html) style for docstrings, +although we can write them directly in Markdown. + +### Adding a new tutorial + +Adding a new tutorial or section is done in two steps: + +- Add a new Markdown (.md) file under `docs/source/`. +- Link that file in `docs/source//_toctree.yml` on the correct toc-tree. + +Make sure to put your new file under the proper section. It's unlikely to go in the first section (*Get Started*), so +depending on the intended targets (beginners, more advanced users, or researchers) it should go in sections two, three, or four. + +### Adding a new pipeline/scheduler + +When adding a new pipeline: + +- Create a file `xxx.md` under `docs/source//api/pipelines` (don't hesitate to copy an existing file as template). +- Link that file in (*Diffusers Summary*) section in `docs/source/api/pipelines/overview.md`, along with the link to the paper, and a colab notebook (if available). +- Write a short overview of the diffusion model: + - Overview with paper & authors + - Paper abstract + - Tips and tricks and how to use it best + - Possible an end-to-end example of how to use it +- Add all the pipeline classes that should be linked in the diffusion model. These classes should be added using our Markdown syntax. By default as follows: + +``` +[[autodoc]] XXXPipeline + - all + - __call__ +``` + +This will include every public method of the pipeline that is documented, as well as the `__call__` method that is not documented by default. If you just want to add additional methods that are not documented, you can put the list of all methods to add in a list that contains `all`. + +``` +[[autodoc]] XXXPipeline + - all + - __call__ + - enable_attention_slicing + - disable_attention_slicing + - enable_xformers_memory_efficient_attention + - disable_xformers_memory_efficient_attention +``` + +You can follow the same process to create a new scheduler under the `docs/source//api/schedulers` folder. + +### Writing source documentation + +Values that should be put in `code` should either be surrounded by backticks: \`like so\`. Note that argument names +and objects like True, None, or any strings should usually be put in `code`. + +When mentioning a class, function, or method, it is recommended to use our syntax for internal links so that our tool +adds a link to its documentation with this syntax: \[\`XXXClass\`\] or \[\`function\`\]. This requires the class or +function to be in the main package. + +If you want to create a link to some internal class or function, you need to +provide its path. For instance: \[\`pipelines.ImagePipelineOutput\`\]. This will be converted into a link with +`pipelines.ImagePipelineOutput` in the description. To get rid of the path and only keep the name of the object you are +linking to in the description, add a ~: \[\`~pipelines.ImagePipelineOutput\`\] will generate a link with `ImagePipelineOutput` in the description. + +The same works for methods so you can either use \[\`XXXClass.method\`\] or \[\`~XXXClass.method\`\]. + +#### Defining arguments in a method + +Arguments should be defined with the `Args:` (or `Arguments:` or `Parameters:`) prefix, followed by a line return and +an indentation. The argument should be followed by its type, with its shape if it is a tensor, a colon, and its +description: + +``` + Args: + n_layers (`int`): The number of layers of the model. +``` + +If the description is too long to fit in one line, another indentation is necessary before writing the description +after the argument. + +Here's an example showcasing everything so far: + +``` + Args: + input_ids (`torch.LongTensor` of shape `(batch_size, sequence_length)`): + Indices of input sequence tokens in the vocabulary. + + Indices can be obtained using [`AlbertTokenizer`]. See [`~PreTrainedTokenizer.encode`] and + [`~PreTrainedTokenizer.__call__`] for details. + + [What are input IDs?](../glossary#input-ids) +``` + +For optional arguments or arguments with defaults we follow the following syntax: imagine we have a function with the +following signature: + +```py +def my_function(x: str=None, a: float=3.14): +``` + +then its documentation should look like this: + +``` + Args: + x (`str`, *optional*): + This argument controls ... + a (`float`, *optional*, defaults to `3.14`): + This argument is used to ... +``` + +Note that we always omit the "defaults to \`None\`" when None is the default for any argument. Also note that even +if the first line describing your argument type and its default gets long, you can't break it on several lines. You can +however write as many lines as you want in the indented description (see the example above with `input_ids`). + +#### Writing a multi-line code block + +Multi-line code blocks can be useful for displaying examples. They are done between two lines of three backticks as usual in Markdown: + + +```` +``` +# first line of code +# second line +# etc +``` +```` + +#### Writing a return block + +The return block should be introduced with the `Returns:` prefix, followed by a line return and an indentation. +The first line should be the type of the return, followed by a line return. No need to indent further for the elements +building the return. + +Here's an example of a single value return: + +``` + Returns: + `List[int]`: A list of integers in the range [0, 1] --- 1 for a special token, 0 for a sequence token. +``` + +Here's an example of a tuple return, comprising several objects: + +``` + Returns: + `tuple(torch.Tensor)` comprising various elements depending on the configuration ([`BertConfig`]) and inputs: + - ** loss** (*optional*, returned when `masked_lm_labels` is provided) `torch.Tensor` of shape `(1,)` -- + Total loss is the sum of the masked language modeling loss and the next sequence prediction (classification) loss. + - **prediction_scores** (`torch.Tensor` of shape `(batch_size, sequence_length, config.vocab_size)`) -- + Prediction scores of the language modeling head (scores for each vocabulary token before SoftMax). +``` + +#### Adding an image + +Due to the rapidly growing repository, it is important to make sure that no files that would significantly weigh down the repository are added. This includes images, videos, and other non-text files. We prefer to leverage a hf.co hosted `dataset` like +the ones hosted on [`hf-internal-testing`](https://huggingface.co/hf-internal-testing) in which to place these files and reference +them by URL. We recommend putting them in the following dataset: [huggingface/documentation-images](https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggingface/documentation-images). +If an external contribution, feel free to add the images to your PR and ask a Hugging Face member to migrate your images +to this dataset. + +## Styling the docstring + +We have an automatic script running with the `make style` command that will make sure that: +- the docstrings fully take advantage of the line width +- all code examples are formatted using black, like the code of the Transformers library + +This script may have some weird failures if you made a syntax mistake or if you uncover a bug. Therefore, it's +recommended to commit your changes before running `make style`, so you can revert the changes done by that script +easily. diff --git a/diffusers/docs/TRANSLATING.md b/diffusers/docs/TRANSLATING.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7f8e49b2fea2f45c3ceb0ec79dfadec86003838f --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/docs/TRANSLATING.md @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ + + +### Translating the Diffusers documentation into your language + +As part of our mission to democratize machine learning, we'd love to make the Diffusers library available in many more languages! Follow the steps below if you want to help translate the documentation into your language 🙏. + +**🗞️ Open an issue** + +To get started, navigate to the [Issues](https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/issues) page of this repo and check if anyone else has opened an issue for your language. If not, open a new issue by selecting the "🌐 Translating a New Language?" from the "New issue" button. + +Once an issue exists, post a comment to indicate which chapters you'd like to work on, and we'll add your name to the list. + + +**🍴 Fork the repository** + +First, you'll need to [fork the Diffusers repo](https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/quickstart/fork-a-repo). You can do this by clicking on the **Fork** button on the top-right corner of this repo's page. + +Once you've forked the repo, you'll want to get the files on your local machine for editing. You can do that by cloning the fork with Git as follows: + +```bash +git clone https://github.com//diffusers.git +``` + +**📋 Copy-paste the English version with a new language code** + +The documentation files are in one leading directory: + +- [`docs/source`](https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/tree/main/docs/source): All the documentation materials are organized here by language. + +You'll only need to copy the files in the [`docs/source/en`](https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/tree/main/docs/source/en) directory, so first navigate to your fork of the repo and run the following: + +```bash +cd ~/path/to/diffusers/docs +cp -r source/en source/ +``` + +Here, `` should be one of the ISO 639-1 or ISO 639-2 language codes -- see [here](https://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php) for a handy table. + +**✍️ Start translating** + +The fun part comes - translating the text! + +The first thing we recommend is translating the part of the `_toctree.yml` file that corresponds to your doc chapter. This file is used to render the table of contents on the website. + +> 🙋 If the `_toctree.yml` file doesn't yet exist for your language, you can create one by copy-pasting from the English version and deleting the sections unrelated to your chapter. Just make sure it exists in the `docs/source//` directory! + +The fields you should add are `local` (with the name of the file containing the translation; e.g. `autoclass_tutorial`), and `title` (with the title of the doc in your language; e.g. `Load pretrained instances with an AutoClass`) -- as a reference, here is the `_toctree.yml` for [English](https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/blob/main/docs/source/en/_toctree.yml): + +```yaml +- sections: + - local: pipeline_tutorial # Do not change this! Use the same name for your .md file + title: Pipelines for inference # Translate this! + ... + title: Tutorials # Translate this! +``` + +Once you have translated the `_toctree.yml` file, you can start translating the [MDX](https://mdxjs.com/) files associated with your docs chapter. + +> 🙋 If you'd like others to help you with the translation, you should [open an issue](https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/issues) and tag @patrickvonplaten. diff --git a/diffusers/scripts/conversion_ldm_uncond.py b/diffusers/scripts/conversion_ldm_uncond.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8c22cc1ce8f2da514c1f096afaf67f1650e4df8a --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/scripts/conversion_ldm_uncond.py @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +import argparse + +import torch +import yaml + +from diffusers import DDIMScheduler, LDMPipeline, UNetLDMModel, VQModel + + +def convert_ldm_original(checkpoint_path, config_path, output_path): + config = yaml.safe_load(config_path) + state_dict = torch.load(checkpoint_path, map_location="cpu")["model"] + keys = list(state_dict.keys()) + + # extract state_dict for VQVAE + first_stage_dict = {} + first_stage_key = "first_stage_model." + for key in keys: + if key.startswith(first_stage_key): + first_stage_dict[key.replace(first_stage_key, "")] = state_dict[key] + + # extract state_dict for UNetLDM + unet_state_dict = {} + unet_key = "model.diffusion_model." + for key in keys: + if key.startswith(unet_key): + unet_state_dict[key.replace(unet_key, "")] = state_dict[key] + + vqvae_init_args = config["model"]["params"]["first_stage_config"]["params"] + unet_init_args = config["model"]["params"]["unet_config"]["params"] + + vqvae = VQModel(**vqvae_init_args).eval() + vqvae.load_state_dict(first_stage_dict) + + unet = UNetLDMModel(**unet_init_args).eval() + unet.load_state_dict(unet_state_dict) + + noise_scheduler = DDIMScheduler( + timesteps=config["model"]["params"]["timesteps"], + beta_schedule="scaled_linear", + beta_start=config["model"]["params"]["linear_start"], + beta_end=config["model"]["params"]["linear_end"], + clip_sample=False, + ) + + pipeline = LDMPipeline(vqvae, unet, noise_scheduler) + pipeline.save_pretrained(output_path) + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() + parser.add_argument("--checkpoint_path", type=str, required=True) + parser.add_argument("--config_path", type=str, required=True) + parser.add_argument("--output_path", type=str, required=True) + args = parser.parse_args() + + convert_ldm_original(args.checkpoint_path, args.config_path, args.output_path) diff --git a/diffusers/scripts/convert_animatediff_motion_lora_to_diffusers.py b/diffusers/scripts/convert_animatediff_motion_lora_to_diffusers.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..21567ffa9e7a95abd86c573761ca90d1648b8002 --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/scripts/convert_animatediff_motion_lora_to_diffusers.py @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +import argparse +import os + +import torch +from huggingface_hub import create_repo, upload_folder +from safetensors.torch import load_file, save_file + + +def convert_motion_module(original_state_dict): + converted_state_dict = {} + for k, v in original_state_dict.items(): + if "pos_encoder" in k: + continue + + else: + converted_state_dict[ + k.replace(".norms.0", ".norm1") + .replace(".norms.1", ".norm2") + .replace(".ff_norm", ".norm3") + .replace(".attention_blocks.0", ".attn1") + .replace(".attention_blocks.1", ".attn2") + .replace(".temporal_transformer", "") + ] = v + + return converted_state_dict + + +def get_args(): + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() + parser.add_argument("--ckpt_path", type=str, required=True, help="Path to checkpoint") + parser.add_argument("--output_path", type=str, required=True, help="Path to output directory") + parser.add_argument( + "--push_to_hub", + action="store_true", + default=False, + help="Whether to push the converted model to the HF or not", + ) + + return parser.parse_args() + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + args = get_args() + + if args.ckpt_path.endswith(".safetensors"): + state_dict = load_file(args.ckpt_path) + else: + state_dict = torch.load(args.ckpt_path, map_location="cpu") + + if "state_dict" in state_dict.keys(): + state_dict = state_dict["state_dict"] + + conv_state_dict = convert_motion_module(state_dict) + + # convert to new format + output_dict = {} + for module_name, params in conv_state_dict.items(): + if type(params) is not torch.Tensor: + continue + output_dict.update({f"unet.{module_name}": params}) + + os.makedirs(args.output_path, exist_ok=True) + + filepath = os.path.join(args.output_path, "diffusion_pytorch_model.safetensors") + save_file(output_dict, filepath) + + if args.push_to_hub: + repo_id = create_repo(args.output_path, exist_ok=True).repo_id + upload_folder(repo_id=repo_id, folder_path=args.output_path, repo_type="model") diff --git a/diffusers/scripts/convert_cogvideox_to_diffusers.py b/diffusers/scripts/convert_cogvideox_to_diffusers.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7eeed240c4de9c41cff826795b8d0a760953d2a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/scripts/convert_cogvideox_to_diffusers.py @@ -0,0 +1,346 @@ +import argparse +from typing import Any, Dict + +import torch +from transformers import T5EncoderModel, T5Tokenizer + +from diffusers import ( + AutoencoderKLCogVideoX, + CogVideoXDDIMScheduler, + CogVideoXImageToVideoPipeline, + CogVideoXPipeline, + CogVideoXTransformer3DModel, +) + + +def reassign_query_key_value_inplace(key: str, state_dict: Dict[str, Any]): + to_q_key = key.replace("query_key_value", "to_q") + to_k_key = key.replace("query_key_value", "to_k") + to_v_key = key.replace("query_key_value", "to_v") + to_q, to_k, to_v = torch.chunk(state_dict[key], chunks=3, dim=0) + state_dict[to_q_key] = to_q + state_dict[to_k_key] = to_k + state_dict[to_v_key] = to_v + state_dict.pop(key) + + +def reassign_query_key_layernorm_inplace(key: str, state_dict: Dict[str, Any]): + layer_id, weight_or_bias = key.split(".")[-2:] + + if "query" in key: + new_key = f"transformer_blocks.{layer_id}.attn1.norm_q.{weight_or_bias}" + elif "key" in key: + new_key = f"transformer_blocks.{layer_id}.attn1.norm_k.{weight_or_bias}" + + state_dict[new_key] = state_dict.pop(key) + + +def reassign_adaln_norm_inplace(key: str, state_dict: Dict[str, Any]): + layer_id, _, weight_or_bias = key.split(".")[-3:] + + weights_or_biases = state_dict[key].chunk(12, dim=0) + norm1_weights_or_biases = torch.cat(weights_or_biases[0:3] + weights_or_biases[6:9]) + norm2_weights_or_biases = torch.cat(weights_or_biases[3:6] + weights_or_biases[9:12]) + + norm1_key = f"transformer_blocks.{layer_id}.norm1.linear.{weight_or_bias}" + state_dict[norm1_key] = norm1_weights_or_biases + + norm2_key = f"transformer_blocks.{layer_id}.norm2.linear.{weight_or_bias}" + state_dict[norm2_key] = norm2_weights_or_biases + + state_dict.pop(key) + + +def remove_keys_inplace(key: str, state_dict: Dict[str, Any]): + state_dict.pop(key) + + +def replace_up_keys_inplace(key: str, state_dict: Dict[str, Any]): + key_split = key.split(".") + layer_index = int(key_split[2]) + replace_layer_index = 4 - 1 - layer_index + + key_split[1] = "up_blocks" + key_split[2] = str(replace_layer_index) + new_key = ".".join(key_split) + + state_dict[new_key] = state_dict.pop(key) + + +TRANSFORMER_KEYS_RENAME_DICT = { + "transformer.final_layernorm": "norm_final", + "transformer": "transformer_blocks", + "attention": "attn1", + "mlp": "ff.net", + "dense_h_to_4h": "0.proj", + "dense_4h_to_h": "2", + ".layers": "", + "dense": "to_out.0", + "input_layernorm": "norm1.norm", + "post_attn1_layernorm": "norm2.norm", + "time_embed.0": "time_embedding.linear_1", + "time_embed.2": "time_embedding.linear_2", + "ofs_embed.0": "ofs_embedding.linear_1", + "ofs_embed.2": "ofs_embedding.linear_2", + "mixins.patch_embed": "patch_embed", + "mixins.final_layer.norm_final": "norm_out.norm", + "mixins.final_layer.linear": "proj_out", + "mixins.final_layer.adaLN_modulation.1": "norm_out.linear", + "mixins.pos_embed.pos_embedding": "patch_embed.pos_embedding", # Specific to CogVideoX-5b-I2V +} + +TRANSFORMER_SPECIAL_KEYS_REMAP = { + "query_key_value": reassign_query_key_value_inplace, + "query_layernorm_list": reassign_query_key_layernorm_inplace, + "key_layernorm_list": reassign_query_key_layernorm_inplace, + "adaln_layer.adaLN_modulations": reassign_adaln_norm_inplace, + "embed_tokens": remove_keys_inplace, + "freqs_sin": remove_keys_inplace, + "freqs_cos": remove_keys_inplace, + "position_embedding": remove_keys_inplace, +} + +VAE_KEYS_RENAME_DICT = { + "block.": "resnets.", + "down.": "down_blocks.", + "downsample": "downsamplers.0", + "upsample": "upsamplers.0", + "nin_shortcut": "conv_shortcut", + "encoder.mid.block_1": "encoder.mid_block.resnets.0", + "encoder.mid.block_2": "encoder.mid_block.resnets.1", + "decoder.mid.block_1": "decoder.mid_block.resnets.0", + "decoder.mid.block_2": "decoder.mid_block.resnets.1", +} + +VAE_SPECIAL_KEYS_REMAP = { + "loss": remove_keys_inplace, + "up.": replace_up_keys_inplace, +} + +TOKENIZER_MAX_LENGTH = 226 + + +def get_state_dict(saved_dict: Dict[str, Any]) -> Dict[str, Any]: + state_dict = saved_dict + if "model" in saved_dict.keys(): + state_dict = state_dict["model"] + if "module" in saved_dict.keys(): + state_dict = state_dict["module"] + if "state_dict" in saved_dict.keys(): + state_dict = state_dict["state_dict"] + return state_dict + + +def update_state_dict_inplace(state_dict: Dict[str, Any], old_key: str, new_key: str) -> Dict[str, Any]: + state_dict[new_key] = state_dict.pop(old_key) + + +def convert_transformer( + ckpt_path: str, + num_layers: int, + num_attention_heads: int, + use_rotary_positional_embeddings: bool, + i2v: bool, + dtype: torch.dtype, + init_kwargs: Dict[str, Any], +): + PREFIX_KEY = "model.diffusion_model." + + original_state_dict = get_state_dict(torch.load(ckpt_path, map_location="cpu", mmap=True)) + transformer = CogVideoXTransformer3DModel( + in_channels=32 if i2v else 16, + num_layers=num_layers, + num_attention_heads=num_attention_heads, + use_rotary_positional_embeddings=use_rotary_positional_embeddings, + ofs_embed_dim=512 if (i2v and init_kwargs["patch_size_t"] is not None) else None, # CogVideoX1.5-5B-I2V + use_learned_positional_embeddings=i2v and init_kwargs["patch_size_t"] is None, # CogVideoX-5B-I2V + **init_kwargs, + ).to(dtype=dtype) + + for key in list(original_state_dict.keys()): + new_key = key[len(PREFIX_KEY) :] + for replace_key, rename_key in TRANSFORMER_KEYS_RENAME_DICT.items(): + new_key = new_key.replace(replace_key, rename_key) + update_state_dict_inplace(original_state_dict, key, new_key) + + for key in list(original_state_dict.keys()): + for special_key, handler_fn_inplace in TRANSFORMER_SPECIAL_KEYS_REMAP.items(): + if special_key not in key: + continue + handler_fn_inplace(key, original_state_dict) + + transformer.load_state_dict(original_state_dict, strict=True) + return transformer + + +def convert_vae(ckpt_path: str, scaling_factor: float, version: str, dtype: torch.dtype): + init_kwargs = {"scaling_factor": scaling_factor} + if version == "1.5": + init_kwargs.update({"invert_scale_latents": True}) + + original_state_dict = get_state_dict(torch.load(ckpt_path, map_location="cpu", mmap=True)) + vae = AutoencoderKLCogVideoX(**init_kwargs).to(dtype=dtype) + + for key in list(original_state_dict.keys()): + new_key = key[:] + for replace_key, rename_key in VAE_KEYS_RENAME_DICT.items(): + new_key = new_key.replace(replace_key, rename_key) + update_state_dict_inplace(original_state_dict, key, new_key) + + for key in list(original_state_dict.keys()): + for special_key, handler_fn_inplace in VAE_SPECIAL_KEYS_REMAP.items(): + if special_key not in key: + continue + handler_fn_inplace(key, original_state_dict) + + vae.load_state_dict(original_state_dict, strict=True) + return vae + + +def get_transformer_init_kwargs(version: str): + if version == "1.0": + vae_scale_factor_spatial = 8 + init_kwargs = { + "patch_size": 2, + "patch_size_t": None, + "patch_bias": True, + "sample_height": 480 // vae_scale_factor_spatial, + "sample_width": 720 // vae_scale_factor_spatial, + "sample_frames": 49, + } + + elif version == "1.5": + vae_scale_factor_spatial = 8 + init_kwargs = { + "patch_size": 2, + "patch_size_t": 2, + "patch_bias": False, + "sample_height": 300, + "sample_width": 300, + "sample_frames": 81, + } + else: + raise ValueError("Unsupported version of CogVideoX.") + + return init_kwargs + + +def get_args(): + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() + parser.add_argument( + "--transformer_ckpt_path", type=str, default=None, help="Path to original transformer checkpoint" + ) + parser.add_argument("--vae_ckpt_path", type=str, default=None, help="Path to original vae checkpoint") + parser.add_argument("--output_path", type=str, required=True, help="Path where converted model should be saved") + parser.add_argument("--fp16", action="store_true", default=False, help="Whether to save the model weights in fp16") + parser.add_argument("--bf16", action="store_true", default=False, help="Whether to save the model weights in bf16") + parser.add_argument( + "--push_to_hub", action="store_true", default=False, help="Whether to push to HF Hub after saving" + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--text_encoder_cache_dir", type=str, default=None, help="Path to text encoder cache directory" + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--typecast_text_encoder", + action="store_true", + default=False, + help="Whether or not to apply fp16/bf16 precision to text_encoder", + ) + # For CogVideoX-2B, num_layers is 30. For 5B, it is 42 + parser.add_argument("--num_layers", type=int, default=30, help="Number of transformer blocks") + # For CogVideoX-2B, num_attention_heads is 30. For 5B, it is 48 + parser.add_argument("--num_attention_heads", type=int, default=30, help="Number of attention heads") + # For CogVideoX-2B, use_rotary_positional_embeddings is False. For 5B, it is True + parser.add_argument( + "--use_rotary_positional_embeddings", action="store_true", default=False, help="Whether to use RoPE or not" + ) + # For CogVideoX-2B, scaling_factor is 1.15258426. For 5B, it is 0.7 + parser.add_argument("--scaling_factor", type=float, default=1.15258426, help="Scaling factor in the VAE") + # For CogVideoX-2B, snr_shift_scale is 3.0. For 5B, it is 1.0 + parser.add_argument("--snr_shift_scale", type=float, default=3.0, help="Scaling factor in the VAE") + parser.add_argument( + "--i2v", + action="store_true", + default=False, + help="Whether the model to be converted is the Image-to-Video version of CogVideoX.", + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--version", + choices=["1.0", "1.5"], + default="1.0", + help="Which version of CogVideoX to use for initializing default modeling parameters.", + ) + return parser.parse_args() + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + args = get_args() + + transformer = None + vae = None + + if args.fp16 and args.bf16: + raise ValueError("You cannot pass both --fp16 and --bf16 at the same time.") + + dtype = torch.float16 if args.fp16 else torch.bfloat16 if args.bf16 else torch.float32 + + if args.transformer_ckpt_path is not None: + init_kwargs = get_transformer_init_kwargs(args.version) + transformer = convert_transformer( + args.transformer_ckpt_path, + args.num_layers, + args.num_attention_heads, + args.use_rotary_positional_embeddings, + args.i2v, + dtype, + init_kwargs, + ) + if args.vae_ckpt_path is not None: + # Keep VAE in float32 for better quality + vae = convert_vae(args.vae_ckpt_path, args.scaling_factor, args.version, torch.float32) + + text_encoder_id = "google/t5-v1_1-xxl" + tokenizer = T5Tokenizer.from_pretrained(text_encoder_id, model_max_length=TOKENIZER_MAX_LENGTH) + text_encoder = T5EncoderModel.from_pretrained(text_encoder_id, cache_dir=args.text_encoder_cache_dir) + + if args.typecast_text_encoder: + text_encoder = text_encoder.to(dtype=dtype) + + # Apparently, the conversion does not work anymore without this :shrug: + for param in text_encoder.parameters(): + param.data = param.data.contiguous() + + scheduler = CogVideoXDDIMScheduler.from_config( + { + "snr_shift_scale": args.snr_shift_scale, + "beta_end": 0.012, + "beta_schedule": "scaled_linear", + "beta_start": 0.00085, + "clip_sample": False, + "num_train_timesteps": 1000, + "prediction_type": "v_prediction", + "rescale_betas_zero_snr": True, + "set_alpha_to_one": True, + "timestep_spacing": "trailing", + } + ) + if args.i2v: + pipeline_cls = CogVideoXImageToVideoPipeline + else: + pipeline_cls = CogVideoXPipeline + + pipe = pipeline_cls( + tokenizer=tokenizer, + text_encoder=text_encoder, + vae=vae, + transformer=transformer, + scheduler=scheduler, + ) + + # We don't use variant here because the model must be run in fp16 (2B) or bf16 (5B). It would be weird + # for users to specify variant when the default is not fp32 and they want to run with the correct default (which + # is either fp16/bf16 here). + + # This is necessary This is necessary for users with insufficient memory, + # such as those using Colab and notebooks, as it can save some memory used for model loading. + pipe.save_pretrained(args.output_path, safe_serialization=True, max_shard_size="5GB", push_to_hub=args.push_to_hub) diff --git a/diffusers/scripts/convert_consistency_decoder.py b/diffusers/scripts/convert_consistency_decoder.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..629c784c095a338535738a96b5fb12f89524ac0b --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/scripts/convert_consistency_decoder.py @@ -0,0 +1,1128 @@ +import math +import os +import urllib +import warnings +from argparse import ArgumentParser + +import torch +import torch.nn as nn +import torch.nn.functional as F +from huggingface_hub.utils import insecure_hashlib +from safetensors.torch import load_file as stl +from tqdm import tqdm + +from diffusers import AutoencoderKL, ConsistencyDecoderVAE, DiffusionPipeline, StableDiffusionPipeline, UNet2DModel +from diffusers.models.autoencoders.vae import Encoder +from diffusers.models.embeddings import TimestepEmbedding +from diffusers.models.unets.unet_2d_blocks import ResnetDownsampleBlock2D, ResnetUpsampleBlock2D, UNetMidBlock2D + + +args = ArgumentParser() +args.add_argument("--save_pretrained", required=False, default=None, type=str) +args.add_argument("--test_image", required=True, type=str) +args = args.parse_args() + + +def _extract_into_tensor(arr, timesteps, broadcast_shape): + # from: https://github.com/openai/guided-diffusion/blob/22e0df8183507e13a7813f8d38d51b072ca1e67c/guided_diffusion/gaussian_diffusion.py#L895 """ + res = arr[timesteps].float() + dims_to_append = len(broadcast_shape) - len(res.shape) + return res[(...,) + (None,) * dims_to_append] + + +def betas_for_alpha_bar(num_diffusion_timesteps, alpha_bar, max_beta=0.999): + # from: https://github.com/openai/guided-diffusion/blob/22e0df8183507e13a7813f8d38d51b072ca1e67c/guided_diffusion/gaussian_diffusion.py#L45 + betas = [] + for i in range(num_diffusion_timesteps): + t1 = i / num_diffusion_timesteps + t2 = (i + 1) / num_diffusion_timesteps + betas.append(min(1 - alpha_bar(t2) / alpha_bar(t1), max_beta)) + return torch.tensor(betas) + + +def _download(url: str, root: str): + os.makedirs(root, exist_ok=True) + filename = os.path.basename(url) + + expected_sha256 = url.split("/")[-2] + download_target = os.path.join(root, filename) + + if os.path.exists(download_target) and not os.path.isfile(download_target): + raise RuntimeError(f"{download_target} exists and is not a regular file") + + if os.path.isfile(download_target): + if insecure_hashlib.sha256(open(download_target, "rb").read()).hexdigest() == expected_sha256: + return download_target + else: + warnings.warn(f"{download_target} exists, but the SHA256 checksum does not match; re-downloading the file") + + with urllib.request.urlopen(url) as source, open(download_target, "wb") as output: + with tqdm( + total=int(source.info().get("Content-Length")), + ncols=80, + unit="iB", + unit_scale=True, + unit_divisor=1024, + ) as loop: + while True: + buffer = source.read(8192) + if not buffer: + break + + output.write(buffer) + loop.update(len(buffer)) + + if insecure_hashlib.sha256(open(download_target, "rb").read()).hexdigest() != expected_sha256: + raise RuntimeError("Model has been downloaded but the SHA256 checksum does not match") + + return download_target + + +class ConsistencyDecoder: + def __init__(self, device="cuda:0", download_root=os.path.expanduser("~/.cache/clip")): + self.n_distilled_steps = 64 + download_target = _download( + "https://openaipublic.azureedge.net/diff-vae/c9cebd3132dd9c42936d803e33424145a748843c8f716c0814838bdc8a2fe7cb/decoder.pt", + download_root, + ) + self.ckpt = torch.jit.load(download_target).to(device) + self.device = device + sigma_data = 0.5 + betas = betas_for_alpha_bar(1024, lambda t: math.cos((t + 0.008) / 1.008 * math.pi / 2) ** 2).to(device) + alphas = 1.0 - betas + alphas_cumprod = torch.cumprod(alphas, dim=0) + self.sqrt_alphas_cumprod = torch.sqrt(alphas_cumprod) + self.sqrt_one_minus_alphas_cumprod = torch.sqrt(1.0 - alphas_cumprod) + sqrt_recip_alphas_cumprod = torch.sqrt(1.0 / alphas_cumprod) + sigmas = torch.sqrt(1.0 / alphas_cumprod - 1) + self.c_skip = sqrt_recip_alphas_cumprod * sigma_data**2 / (sigmas**2 + sigma_data**2) + self.c_out = sigmas * sigma_data / (sigmas**2 + sigma_data**2) ** 0.5 + self.c_in = sqrt_recip_alphas_cumprod / (sigmas**2 + sigma_data**2) ** 0.5 + + @staticmethod + def round_timesteps(timesteps, total_timesteps, n_distilled_steps, truncate_start=True): + with torch.no_grad(): + space = torch.div(total_timesteps, n_distilled_steps, rounding_mode="floor") + rounded_timesteps = (torch.div(timesteps, space, rounding_mode="floor") + 1) * space + if truncate_start: + rounded_timesteps[rounded_timesteps == total_timesteps] -= space + else: + rounded_timesteps[rounded_timesteps == total_timesteps] -= space + rounded_timesteps[rounded_timesteps == 0] += space + return rounded_timesteps + + @staticmethod + def ldm_transform_latent(z, extra_scale_factor=1): + channel_means = [0.38862467, 0.02253063, 0.07381133, -0.0171294] + channel_stds = [0.9654121, 1.0440036, 0.76147926, 0.77022034] + + if len(z.shape) != 4: + raise ValueError() + + z = z * 0.18215 + channels = [z[:, i] for i in range(z.shape[1])] + + channels = [extra_scale_factor * (c - channel_means[i]) / channel_stds[i] for i, c in enumerate(channels)] + return torch.stack(channels, dim=1) + + @torch.no_grad() + def __call__( + self, + features: torch.Tensor, + schedule=[1.0, 0.5], + generator=None, + ): + features = self.ldm_transform_latent(features) + ts = self.round_timesteps( + torch.arange(0, 1024), + 1024, + self.n_distilled_steps, + truncate_start=False, + ) + shape = ( + features.size(0), + 3, + 8 * features.size(2), + 8 * features.size(3), + ) + x_start = torch.zeros(shape, device=features.device, dtype=features.dtype) + schedule_timesteps = [int((1024 - 1) * s) for s in schedule] + for i in schedule_timesteps: + t = ts[i].item() + t_ = torch.tensor([t] * features.shape[0]).to(self.device) + # noise = torch.randn_like(x_start) + noise = torch.randn(x_start.shape, dtype=x_start.dtype, generator=generator).to(device=x_start.device) + x_start = ( + _extract_into_tensor(self.sqrt_alphas_cumprod, t_, x_start.shape) * x_start + + _extract_into_tensor(self.sqrt_one_minus_alphas_cumprod, t_, x_start.shape) * noise + ) + c_in = _extract_into_tensor(self.c_in, t_, x_start.shape) + + import torch.nn.functional as F + + from diffusers import UNet2DModel + + if isinstance(self.ckpt, UNet2DModel): + input = torch.concat([c_in * x_start, F.upsample_nearest(features, scale_factor=8)], dim=1) + model_output = self.ckpt(input, t_).sample + else: + model_output = self.ckpt(c_in * x_start, t_, features=features) + + B, C = x_start.shape[:2] + model_output, _ = torch.split(model_output, C, dim=1) + pred_xstart = ( + _extract_into_tensor(self.c_out, t_, x_start.shape) * model_output + + _extract_into_tensor(self.c_skip, t_, x_start.shape) * x_start + ).clamp(-1, 1) + x_start = pred_xstart + return x_start + + +def save_image(image, name): + import numpy as np + from PIL import Image + + image = image[0].cpu().numpy() + image = (image + 1.0) * 127.5 + image = image.clip(0, 255).astype(np.uint8) + image = Image.fromarray(image.transpose(1, 2, 0)) + image.save(name) + + +def load_image(uri, size=None, center_crop=False): + import numpy as np + from PIL import Image + + image = Image.open(uri) + if center_crop: + image = image.crop( + ( + (image.width - min(image.width, image.height)) // 2, + (image.height - min(image.width, image.height)) // 2, + (image.width + min(image.width, image.height)) // 2, + (image.height + min(image.width, image.height)) // 2, + ) + ) + if size is not None: + image = image.resize(size) + image = torch.tensor(np.array(image).transpose(2, 0, 1)).unsqueeze(0).float() + image = image / 127.5 - 1.0 + return image + + +class TimestepEmbedding_(nn.Module): + def __init__(self, n_time=1024, n_emb=320, n_out=1280) -> None: + super().__init__() + self.emb = nn.Embedding(n_time, n_emb) + self.f_1 = nn.Linear(n_emb, n_out) + self.f_2 = nn.Linear(n_out, n_out) + + def forward(self, x) -> torch.Tensor: + x = self.emb(x) + x = self.f_1(x) + x = F.silu(x) + return self.f_2(x) + + +class ImageEmbedding(nn.Module): + def __init__(self, in_channels=7, out_channels=320) -> None: + super().__init__() + self.f = nn.Conv2d(in_channels, out_channels, kernel_size=3, padding=1) + + def forward(self, x) -> torch.Tensor: + return self.f(x) + + +class ImageUnembedding(nn.Module): + def __init__(self, in_channels=320, out_channels=6) -> None: + super().__init__() + self.gn = nn.GroupNorm(32, in_channels) + self.f = nn.Conv2d(in_channels, out_channels, kernel_size=3, padding=1) + + def forward(self, x) -> torch.Tensor: + return self.f(F.silu(self.gn(x))) + + +class ConvResblock(nn.Module): + def __init__(self, in_features=320, out_features=320) -> None: + super().__init__() + self.f_t = nn.Linear(1280, out_features * 2) + + self.gn_1 = nn.GroupNorm(32, in_features) + self.f_1 = nn.Conv2d(in_features, out_features, kernel_size=3, padding=1) + + self.gn_2 = nn.GroupNorm(32, out_features) + self.f_2 = nn.Conv2d(out_features, out_features, kernel_size=3, padding=1) + + skip_conv = in_features != out_features + self.f_s = nn.Conv2d(in_features, out_features, kernel_size=1, padding=0) if skip_conv else nn.Identity() + + def forward(self, x, t): + x_skip = x + t = self.f_t(F.silu(t)) + t = t.chunk(2, dim=1) + t_1 = t[0].unsqueeze(dim=2).unsqueeze(dim=3) + 1 + t_2 = t[1].unsqueeze(dim=2).unsqueeze(dim=3) + + gn_1 = F.silu(self.gn_1(x)) + f_1 = self.f_1(gn_1) + + gn_2 = self.gn_2(f_1) + + return self.f_s(x_skip) + self.f_2(F.silu(gn_2 * t_1 + t_2)) + + +# Also ConvResblock +class Downsample(nn.Module): + def __init__(self, in_channels=320) -> None: + super().__init__() + self.f_t = nn.Linear(1280, in_channels * 2) + + self.gn_1 = nn.GroupNorm(32, in_channels) + self.f_1 = nn.Conv2d(in_channels, in_channels, kernel_size=3, padding=1) + self.gn_2 = nn.GroupNorm(32, in_channels) + + self.f_2 = nn.Conv2d(in_channels, in_channels, kernel_size=3, padding=1) + + def forward(self, x, t) -> torch.Tensor: + x_skip = x + + t = self.f_t(F.silu(t)) + t_1, t_2 = t.chunk(2, dim=1) + t_1 = t_1.unsqueeze(2).unsqueeze(3) + 1 + t_2 = t_2.unsqueeze(2).unsqueeze(3) + + gn_1 = F.silu(self.gn_1(x)) + avg_pool2d = F.avg_pool2d(gn_1, kernel_size=(2, 2), stride=None) + + f_1 = self.f_1(avg_pool2d) + gn_2 = self.gn_2(f_1) + + f_2 = self.f_2(F.silu(t_2 + (t_1 * gn_2))) + + return f_2 + F.avg_pool2d(x_skip, kernel_size=(2, 2), stride=None) + + +# Also ConvResblock +class Upsample(nn.Module): + def __init__(self, in_channels=1024) -> None: + super().__init__() + self.f_t = nn.Linear(1280, in_channels * 2) + + self.gn_1 = nn.GroupNorm(32, in_channels) + self.f_1 = nn.Conv2d(in_channels, in_channels, kernel_size=3, padding=1) + self.gn_2 = nn.GroupNorm(32, in_channels) + + self.f_2 = nn.Conv2d(in_channels, in_channels, kernel_size=3, padding=1) + + def forward(self, x, t) -> torch.Tensor: + x_skip = x + + t = self.f_t(F.silu(t)) + t_1, t_2 = t.chunk(2, dim=1) + t_1 = t_1.unsqueeze(2).unsqueeze(3) + 1 + t_2 = t_2.unsqueeze(2).unsqueeze(3) + + gn_1 = F.silu(self.gn_1(x)) + upsample = F.upsample_nearest(gn_1, scale_factor=2) + f_1 = self.f_1(upsample) + gn_2 = self.gn_2(f_1) + + f_2 = self.f_2(F.silu(t_2 + (t_1 * gn_2))) + + return f_2 + F.upsample_nearest(x_skip, scale_factor=2) + + +class ConvUNetVAE(nn.Module): + def __init__(self) -> None: + super().__init__() + self.embed_image = ImageEmbedding() + self.embed_time = TimestepEmbedding_() + + down_0 = nn.ModuleList( + [ + ConvResblock(320, 320), + ConvResblock(320, 320), + ConvResblock(320, 320), + Downsample(320), + ] + ) + down_1 = nn.ModuleList( + [ + ConvResblock(320, 640), + ConvResblock(640, 640), + ConvResblock(640, 640), + Downsample(640), + ] + ) + down_2 = nn.ModuleList( + [ + ConvResblock(640, 1024), + ConvResblock(1024, 1024), + ConvResblock(1024, 1024), + Downsample(1024), + ] + ) + down_3 = nn.ModuleList( + [ + ConvResblock(1024, 1024), + ConvResblock(1024, 1024), + ConvResblock(1024, 1024), + ] + ) + self.down = nn.ModuleList( + [ + down_0, + down_1, + down_2, + down_3, + ] + ) + + self.mid = nn.ModuleList( + [ + ConvResblock(1024, 1024), + ConvResblock(1024, 1024), + ] + ) + + up_3 = nn.ModuleList( + [ + ConvResblock(1024 * 2, 1024), + ConvResblock(1024 * 2, 1024), + ConvResblock(1024 * 2, 1024), + ConvResblock(1024 * 2, 1024), + Upsample(1024), + ] + ) + up_2 = nn.ModuleList( + [ + ConvResblock(1024 * 2, 1024), + ConvResblock(1024 * 2, 1024), + ConvResblock(1024 * 2, 1024), + ConvResblock(1024 + 640, 1024), + Upsample(1024), + ] + ) + up_1 = nn.ModuleList( + [ + ConvResblock(1024 + 640, 640), + ConvResblock(640 * 2, 640), + ConvResblock(640 * 2, 640), + ConvResblock(320 + 640, 640), + Upsample(640), + ] + ) + up_0 = nn.ModuleList( + [ + ConvResblock(320 + 640, 320), + ConvResblock(320 * 2, 320), + ConvResblock(320 * 2, 320), + ConvResblock(320 * 2, 320), + ] + ) + self.up = nn.ModuleList( + [ + up_0, + up_1, + up_2, + up_3, + ] + ) + + self.output = ImageUnembedding() + + def forward(self, x, t, features) -> torch.Tensor: + converted = hasattr(self, "converted") and self.converted + + x = torch.cat([x, F.upsample_nearest(features, scale_factor=8)], dim=1) + + if converted: + t = self.time_embedding(self.time_proj(t)) + else: + t = self.embed_time(t) + + x = self.embed_image(x) + + skips = [x] + for i, down in enumerate(self.down): + if converted and i in [0, 1, 2, 3]: + x, skips_ = down(x, t) + for skip in skips_: + skips.append(skip) + else: + for block in down: + x = block(x, t) + skips.append(x) + print(x.float().abs().sum()) + + if converted: + x = self.mid(x, t) + else: + for i in range(2): + x = self.mid[i](x, t) + print(x.float().abs().sum()) + + for i, up in enumerate(self.up[::-1]): + if converted and i in [0, 1, 2, 3]: + skip_4 = skips.pop() + skip_3 = skips.pop() + skip_2 = skips.pop() + skip_1 = skips.pop() + skips_ = (skip_1, skip_2, skip_3, skip_4) + x = up(x, skips_, t) + else: + for block in up: + if isinstance(block, ConvResblock): + x = torch.concat([x, skips.pop()], dim=1) + x = block(x, t) + + return self.output(x) + + +def rename_state_dict_key(k): + k = k.replace("blocks.", "") + for i in range(5): + k = k.replace(f"down_{i}_", f"down.{i}.") + k = k.replace(f"conv_{i}.", f"{i}.") + k = k.replace(f"up_{i}_", f"up.{i}.") + k = k.replace(f"mid_{i}", f"mid.{i}") + k = k.replace("upsamp.", "4.") + k = k.replace("downsamp.", "3.") + k = k.replace("f_t.w", "f_t.weight").replace("f_t.b", "f_t.bias") + k = k.replace("f_1.w", "f_1.weight").replace("f_1.b", "f_1.bias") + k = k.replace("f_2.w", "f_2.weight").replace("f_2.b", "f_2.bias") + k = k.replace("f_s.w", "f_s.weight").replace("f_s.b", "f_s.bias") + k = k.replace("f.w", "f.weight").replace("f.b", "f.bias") + k = k.replace("gn_1.g", "gn_1.weight").replace("gn_1.b", "gn_1.bias") + k = k.replace("gn_2.g", "gn_2.weight").replace("gn_2.b", "gn_2.bias") + k = k.replace("gn.g", "gn.weight").replace("gn.b", "gn.bias") + return k + + +def rename_state_dict(sd, embedding): + sd = {rename_state_dict_key(k): v for k, v in sd.items()} + sd["embed_time.emb.weight"] = embedding["weight"] + return sd + + +# encode with stable diffusion vae +pipe = StableDiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained("runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5", torch_dtype=torch.float16) +pipe.vae.cuda() + +# construct original decoder with jitted model +decoder_consistency = ConsistencyDecoder(device="cuda:0") + +# construct UNet code, overwrite the decoder with conv_unet_vae +model = ConvUNetVAE() +model.load_state_dict( + rename_state_dict( + stl("consistency_decoder.safetensors"), + stl("embedding.safetensors"), + ) +) +model = model.cuda() + +decoder_consistency.ckpt = model + +image = load_image(args.test_image, size=(256, 256), center_crop=True) +latent = pipe.vae.encode(image.half().cuda()).latent_dist.sample() + +# decode with gan +sample_gan = pipe.vae.decode(latent).sample.detach() +save_image(sample_gan, "gan.png") + +# decode with conv_unet_vae +sample_consistency_orig = decoder_consistency(latent, generator=torch.Generator("cpu").manual_seed(0)) +save_image(sample_consistency_orig, "con_orig.png") + + +########### conversion + +print("CONVERSION") + +print("DOWN BLOCK ONE") + +block_one_sd_orig = model.down[0].state_dict() +block_one_sd_new = {} + +for i in range(3): + block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm1.weight"] = block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_1.weight") + block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm1.bias"] = block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_1.bias") + block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv1.weight"] = block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_1.weight") + block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv1.bias"] = block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_1.bias") + block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.time_emb_proj.weight"] = block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_t.weight") + block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.time_emb_proj.bias"] = block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_t.bias") + block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm2.weight"] = block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_2.weight") + block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm2.bias"] = block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_2.bias") + block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv2.weight"] = block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_2.weight") + block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv2.bias"] = block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_2.bias") + +block_one_sd_new["downsamplers.0.norm1.weight"] = block_one_sd_orig.pop("3.gn_1.weight") +block_one_sd_new["downsamplers.0.norm1.bias"] = block_one_sd_orig.pop("3.gn_1.bias") +block_one_sd_new["downsamplers.0.conv1.weight"] = block_one_sd_orig.pop("3.f_1.weight") +block_one_sd_new["downsamplers.0.conv1.bias"] = block_one_sd_orig.pop("3.f_1.bias") +block_one_sd_new["downsamplers.0.time_emb_proj.weight"] = block_one_sd_orig.pop("3.f_t.weight") +block_one_sd_new["downsamplers.0.time_emb_proj.bias"] = block_one_sd_orig.pop("3.f_t.bias") +block_one_sd_new["downsamplers.0.norm2.weight"] = block_one_sd_orig.pop("3.gn_2.weight") +block_one_sd_new["downsamplers.0.norm2.bias"] = block_one_sd_orig.pop("3.gn_2.bias") +block_one_sd_new["downsamplers.0.conv2.weight"] = block_one_sd_orig.pop("3.f_2.weight") +block_one_sd_new["downsamplers.0.conv2.bias"] = block_one_sd_orig.pop("3.f_2.bias") + +assert len(block_one_sd_orig) == 0 + +block_one = ResnetDownsampleBlock2D( + in_channels=320, + out_channels=320, + temb_channels=1280, + num_layers=3, + add_downsample=True, + resnet_time_scale_shift="scale_shift", + resnet_eps=1e-5, +) + +block_one.load_state_dict(block_one_sd_new) + +print("DOWN BLOCK TWO") + +block_two_sd_orig = model.down[1].state_dict() +block_two_sd_new = {} + +for i in range(3): + block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm1.weight"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_1.weight") + block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm1.bias"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_1.bias") + block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv1.weight"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_1.weight") + block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv1.bias"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_1.bias") + block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.time_emb_proj.weight"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_t.weight") + block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.time_emb_proj.bias"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_t.bias") + block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm2.weight"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_2.weight") + block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm2.bias"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_2.bias") + block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv2.weight"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_2.weight") + block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv2.bias"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_2.bias") + + if i == 0: + block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv_shortcut.weight"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_s.weight") + block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv_shortcut.bias"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_s.bias") + +block_two_sd_new["downsamplers.0.norm1.weight"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop("3.gn_1.weight") +block_two_sd_new["downsamplers.0.norm1.bias"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop("3.gn_1.bias") +block_two_sd_new["downsamplers.0.conv1.weight"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop("3.f_1.weight") +block_two_sd_new["downsamplers.0.conv1.bias"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop("3.f_1.bias") +block_two_sd_new["downsamplers.0.time_emb_proj.weight"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop("3.f_t.weight") +block_two_sd_new["downsamplers.0.time_emb_proj.bias"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop("3.f_t.bias") +block_two_sd_new["downsamplers.0.norm2.weight"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop("3.gn_2.weight") +block_two_sd_new["downsamplers.0.norm2.bias"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop("3.gn_2.bias") +block_two_sd_new["downsamplers.0.conv2.weight"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop("3.f_2.weight") +block_two_sd_new["downsamplers.0.conv2.bias"] = block_two_sd_orig.pop("3.f_2.bias") + +assert len(block_two_sd_orig) == 0 + +block_two = ResnetDownsampleBlock2D( + in_channels=320, + out_channels=640, + temb_channels=1280, + num_layers=3, + add_downsample=True, + resnet_time_scale_shift="scale_shift", + resnet_eps=1e-5, +) + +block_two.load_state_dict(block_two_sd_new) + +print("DOWN BLOCK THREE") + +block_three_sd_orig = model.down[2].state_dict() +block_three_sd_new = {} + +for i in range(3): + block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm1.weight"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_1.weight") + block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm1.bias"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_1.bias") + block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv1.weight"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_1.weight") + block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv1.bias"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_1.bias") + block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.time_emb_proj.weight"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_t.weight") + block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.time_emb_proj.bias"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_t.bias") + block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm2.weight"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_2.weight") + block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm2.bias"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_2.bias") + block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv2.weight"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_2.weight") + block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv2.bias"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_2.bias") + + if i == 0: + block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv_shortcut.weight"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_s.weight") + block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv_shortcut.bias"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_s.bias") + +block_three_sd_new["downsamplers.0.norm1.weight"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop("3.gn_1.weight") +block_three_sd_new["downsamplers.0.norm1.bias"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop("3.gn_1.bias") +block_three_sd_new["downsamplers.0.conv1.weight"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop("3.f_1.weight") +block_three_sd_new["downsamplers.0.conv1.bias"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop("3.f_1.bias") +block_three_sd_new["downsamplers.0.time_emb_proj.weight"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop("3.f_t.weight") +block_three_sd_new["downsamplers.0.time_emb_proj.bias"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop("3.f_t.bias") +block_three_sd_new["downsamplers.0.norm2.weight"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop("3.gn_2.weight") +block_three_sd_new["downsamplers.0.norm2.bias"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop("3.gn_2.bias") +block_three_sd_new["downsamplers.0.conv2.weight"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop("3.f_2.weight") +block_three_sd_new["downsamplers.0.conv2.bias"] = block_three_sd_orig.pop("3.f_2.bias") + +assert len(block_three_sd_orig) == 0 + +block_three = ResnetDownsampleBlock2D( + in_channels=640, + out_channels=1024, + temb_channels=1280, + num_layers=3, + add_downsample=True, + resnet_time_scale_shift="scale_shift", + resnet_eps=1e-5, +) + +block_three.load_state_dict(block_three_sd_new) + +print("DOWN BLOCK FOUR") + +block_four_sd_orig = model.down[3].state_dict() +block_four_sd_new = {} + +for i in range(3): + block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm1.weight"] = block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_1.weight") + block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm1.bias"] = block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_1.bias") + block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv1.weight"] = block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_1.weight") + block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv1.bias"] = block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_1.bias") + block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.time_emb_proj.weight"] = block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_t.weight") + block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.time_emb_proj.bias"] = block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_t.bias") + block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm2.weight"] = block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_2.weight") + block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm2.bias"] = block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_2.bias") + block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv2.weight"] = block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_2.weight") + block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv2.bias"] = block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_2.bias") + +assert len(block_four_sd_orig) == 0 + +block_four = ResnetDownsampleBlock2D( + in_channels=1024, + out_channels=1024, + temb_channels=1280, + num_layers=3, + add_downsample=False, + resnet_time_scale_shift="scale_shift", + resnet_eps=1e-5, +) + +block_four.load_state_dict(block_four_sd_new) + + +print("MID BLOCK 1") + +mid_block_one_sd_orig = model.mid.state_dict() +mid_block_one_sd_new = {} + +for i in range(2): + mid_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm1.weight"] = mid_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_1.weight") + mid_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm1.bias"] = mid_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_1.bias") + mid_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv1.weight"] = mid_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_1.weight") + mid_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv1.bias"] = mid_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_1.bias") + mid_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.time_emb_proj.weight"] = mid_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_t.weight") + mid_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.time_emb_proj.bias"] = mid_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_t.bias") + mid_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm2.weight"] = mid_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_2.weight") + mid_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm2.bias"] = mid_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_2.bias") + mid_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv2.weight"] = mid_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_2.weight") + mid_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv2.bias"] = mid_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_2.bias") + +assert len(mid_block_one_sd_orig) == 0 + +mid_block_one = UNetMidBlock2D( + in_channels=1024, + temb_channels=1280, + num_layers=1, + resnet_time_scale_shift="scale_shift", + resnet_eps=1e-5, + add_attention=False, +) + +mid_block_one.load_state_dict(mid_block_one_sd_new) + +print("UP BLOCK ONE") + +up_block_one_sd_orig = model.up[-1].state_dict() +up_block_one_sd_new = {} + +for i in range(4): + up_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm1.weight"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_1.weight") + up_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm1.bias"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_1.bias") + up_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv1.weight"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_1.weight") + up_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv1.bias"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_1.bias") + up_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.time_emb_proj.weight"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_t.weight") + up_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.time_emb_proj.bias"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_t.bias") + up_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm2.weight"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_2.weight") + up_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm2.bias"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_2.bias") + up_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv2.weight"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_2.weight") + up_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv2.bias"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_2.bias") + up_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv_shortcut.weight"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_s.weight") + up_block_one_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv_shortcut.bias"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_s.bias") + +up_block_one_sd_new["upsamplers.0.norm1.weight"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop("4.gn_1.weight") +up_block_one_sd_new["upsamplers.0.norm1.bias"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop("4.gn_1.bias") +up_block_one_sd_new["upsamplers.0.conv1.weight"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop("4.f_1.weight") +up_block_one_sd_new["upsamplers.0.conv1.bias"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop("4.f_1.bias") +up_block_one_sd_new["upsamplers.0.time_emb_proj.weight"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop("4.f_t.weight") +up_block_one_sd_new["upsamplers.0.time_emb_proj.bias"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop("4.f_t.bias") +up_block_one_sd_new["upsamplers.0.norm2.weight"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop("4.gn_2.weight") +up_block_one_sd_new["upsamplers.0.norm2.bias"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop("4.gn_2.bias") +up_block_one_sd_new["upsamplers.0.conv2.weight"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop("4.f_2.weight") +up_block_one_sd_new["upsamplers.0.conv2.bias"] = up_block_one_sd_orig.pop("4.f_2.bias") + +assert len(up_block_one_sd_orig) == 0 + +up_block_one = ResnetUpsampleBlock2D( + in_channels=1024, + prev_output_channel=1024, + out_channels=1024, + temb_channels=1280, + num_layers=4, + add_upsample=True, + resnet_time_scale_shift="scale_shift", + resnet_eps=1e-5, +) + +up_block_one.load_state_dict(up_block_one_sd_new) + +print("UP BLOCK TWO") + +up_block_two_sd_orig = model.up[-2].state_dict() +up_block_two_sd_new = {} + +for i in range(4): + up_block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm1.weight"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_1.weight") + up_block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm1.bias"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_1.bias") + up_block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv1.weight"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_1.weight") + up_block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv1.bias"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_1.bias") + up_block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.time_emb_proj.weight"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_t.weight") + up_block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.time_emb_proj.bias"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_t.bias") + up_block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm2.weight"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_2.weight") + up_block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm2.bias"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_2.bias") + up_block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv2.weight"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_2.weight") + up_block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv2.bias"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_2.bias") + up_block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv_shortcut.weight"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_s.weight") + up_block_two_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv_shortcut.bias"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_s.bias") + +up_block_two_sd_new["upsamplers.0.norm1.weight"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop("4.gn_1.weight") +up_block_two_sd_new["upsamplers.0.norm1.bias"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop("4.gn_1.bias") +up_block_two_sd_new["upsamplers.0.conv1.weight"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop("4.f_1.weight") +up_block_two_sd_new["upsamplers.0.conv1.bias"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop("4.f_1.bias") +up_block_two_sd_new["upsamplers.0.time_emb_proj.weight"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop("4.f_t.weight") +up_block_two_sd_new["upsamplers.0.time_emb_proj.bias"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop("4.f_t.bias") +up_block_two_sd_new["upsamplers.0.norm2.weight"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop("4.gn_2.weight") +up_block_two_sd_new["upsamplers.0.norm2.bias"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop("4.gn_2.bias") +up_block_two_sd_new["upsamplers.0.conv2.weight"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop("4.f_2.weight") +up_block_two_sd_new["upsamplers.0.conv2.bias"] = up_block_two_sd_orig.pop("4.f_2.bias") + +assert len(up_block_two_sd_orig) == 0 + +up_block_two = ResnetUpsampleBlock2D( + in_channels=640, + prev_output_channel=1024, + out_channels=1024, + temb_channels=1280, + num_layers=4, + add_upsample=True, + resnet_time_scale_shift="scale_shift", + resnet_eps=1e-5, +) + +up_block_two.load_state_dict(up_block_two_sd_new) + +print("UP BLOCK THREE") + +up_block_three_sd_orig = model.up[-3].state_dict() +up_block_three_sd_new = {} + +for i in range(4): + up_block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm1.weight"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_1.weight") + up_block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm1.bias"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_1.bias") + up_block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv1.weight"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_1.weight") + up_block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv1.bias"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_1.bias") + up_block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.time_emb_proj.weight"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_t.weight") + up_block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.time_emb_proj.bias"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_t.bias") + up_block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm2.weight"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_2.weight") + up_block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm2.bias"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_2.bias") + up_block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv2.weight"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_2.weight") + up_block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv2.bias"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_2.bias") + up_block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv_shortcut.weight"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_s.weight") + up_block_three_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv_shortcut.bias"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_s.bias") + +up_block_three_sd_new["upsamplers.0.norm1.weight"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop("4.gn_1.weight") +up_block_three_sd_new["upsamplers.0.norm1.bias"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop("4.gn_1.bias") +up_block_three_sd_new["upsamplers.0.conv1.weight"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop("4.f_1.weight") +up_block_three_sd_new["upsamplers.0.conv1.bias"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop("4.f_1.bias") +up_block_three_sd_new["upsamplers.0.time_emb_proj.weight"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop("4.f_t.weight") +up_block_three_sd_new["upsamplers.0.time_emb_proj.bias"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop("4.f_t.bias") +up_block_three_sd_new["upsamplers.0.norm2.weight"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop("4.gn_2.weight") +up_block_three_sd_new["upsamplers.0.norm2.bias"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop("4.gn_2.bias") +up_block_three_sd_new["upsamplers.0.conv2.weight"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop("4.f_2.weight") +up_block_three_sd_new["upsamplers.0.conv2.bias"] = up_block_three_sd_orig.pop("4.f_2.bias") + +assert len(up_block_three_sd_orig) == 0 + +up_block_three = ResnetUpsampleBlock2D( + in_channels=320, + prev_output_channel=1024, + out_channels=640, + temb_channels=1280, + num_layers=4, + add_upsample=True, + resnet_time_scale_shift="scale_shift", + resnet_eps=1e-5, +) + +up_block_three.load_state_dict(up_block_three_sd_new) + +print("UP BLOCK FOUR") + +up_block_four_sd_orig = model.up[-4].state_dict() +up_block_four_sd_new = {} + +for i in range(4): + up_block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm1.weight"] = up_block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_1.weight") + up_block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm1.bias"] = up_block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_1.bias") + up_block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv1.weight"] = up_block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_1.weight") + up_block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv1.bias"] = up_block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_1.bias") + up_block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.time_emb_proj.weight"] = up_block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_t.weight") + up_block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.time_emb_proj.bias"] = up_block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_t.bias") + up_block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm2.weight"] = up_block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_2.weight") + up_block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.norm2.bias"] = up_block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.gn_2.bias") + up_block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv2.weight"] = up_block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_2.weight") + up_block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv2.bias"] = up_block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_2.bias") + up_block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv_shortcut.weight"] = up_block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_s.weight") + up_block_four_sd_new[f"resnets.{i}.conv_shortcut.bias"] = up_block_four_sd_orig.pop(f"{i}.f_s.bias") + +assert len(up_block_four_sd_orig) == 0 + +up_block_four = ResnetUpsampleBlock2D( + in_channels=320, + prev_output_channel=640, + out_channels=320, + temb_channels=1280, + num_layers=4, + add_upsample=False, + resnet_time_scale_shift="scale_shift", + resnet_eps=1e-5, +) + +up_block_four.load_state_dict(up_block_four_sd_new) + +print("initial projection (conv_in)") + +conv_in_sd_orig = model.embed_image.state_dict() +conv_in_sd_new = {} + +conv_in_sd_new["weight"] = conv_in_sd_orig.pop("f.weight") +conv_in_sd_new["bias"] = conv_in_sd_orig.pop("f.bias") + +assert len(conv_in_sd_orig) == 0 + +block_out_channels = [320, 640, 1024, 1024] + +in_channels = 7 +conv_in_kernel = 3 +conv_in_padding = (conv_in_kernel - 1) // 2 +conv_in = nn.Conv2d(in_channels, block_out_channels[0], kernel_size=conv_in_kernel, padding=conv_in_padding) + +conv_in.load_state_dict(conv_in_sd_new) + +print("out projection (conv_out) (conv_norm_out)") +out_channels = 6 +norm_num_groups = 32 +norm_eps = 1e-5 +act_fn = "silu" +conv_out_kernel = 3 +conv_out_padding = (conv_out_kernel - 1) // 2 +conv_norm_out = nn.GroupNorm(num_channels=block_out_channels[0], num_groups=norm_num_groups, eps=norm_eps) +# uses torch.functional in orig +# conv_act = get_activation(act_fn) +conv_out = nn.Conv2d(block_out_channels[0], out_channels, kernel_size=conv_out_kernel, padding=conv_out_padding) + +conv_norm_out.load_state_dict(model.output.gn.state_dict()) +conv_out.load_state_dict(model.output.f.state_dict()) + +print("timestep projection (time_proj) (time_embedding)") + +f1_sd = model.embed_time.f_1.state_dict() +f2_sd = model.embed_time.f_2.state_dict() + +time_embedding_sd = { + "linear_1.weight": f1_sd.pop("weight"), + "linear_1.bias": f1_sd.pop("bias"), + "linear_2.weight": f2_sd.pop("weight"), + "linear_2.bias": f2_sd.pop("bias"), +} + +assert len(f1_sd) == 0 +assert len(f2_sd) == 0 + +time_embedding_type = "learned" +num_train_timesteps = 1024 +time_embedding_dim = 1280 + +time_proj = nn.Embedding(num_train_timesteps, block_out_channels[0]) +timestep_input_dim = block_out_channels[0] + +time_embedding = TimestepEmbedding(timestep_input_dim, time_embedding_dim) + +time_proj.load_state_dict(model.embed_time.emb.state_dict()) +time_embedding.load_state_dict(time_embedding_sd) + +print("CONVERT") + +time_embedding.to("cuda") +time_proj.to("cuda") +conv_in.to("cuda") + +block_one.to("cuda") +block_two.to("cuda") +block_three.to("cuda") +block_four.to("cuda") + +mid_block_one.to("cuda") + +up_block_one.to("cuda") +up_block_two.to("cuda") +up_block_three.to("cuda") +up_block_four.to("cuda") + +conv_norm_out.to("cuda") +conv_out.to("cuda") + +model.time_proj = time_proj +model.time_embedding = time_embedding +model.embed_image = conv_in + +model.down[0] = block_one +model.down[1] = block_two +model.down[2] = block_three +model.down[3] = block_four + +model.mid = mid_block_one + +model.up[-1] = up_block_one +model.up[-2] = up_block_two +model.up[-3] = up_block_three +model.up[-4] = up_block_four + +model.output.gn = conv_norm_out +model.output.f = conv_out + +model.converted = True + +sample_consistency_new = decoder_consistency(latent, generator=torch.Generator("cpu").manual_seed(0)) +save_image(sample_consistency_new, "con_new.png") + +assert (sample_consistency_orig == sample_consistency_new).all() + +print("making unet") + +unet = UNet2DModel( + in_channels=in_channels, + out_channels=out_channels, + down_block_types=( + "ResnetDownsampleBlock2D", + "ResnetDownsampleBlock2D", + "ResnetDownsampleBlock2D", + "ResnetDownsampleBlock2D", + ), + up_block_types=( + "ResnetUpsampleBlock2D", + "ResnetUpsampleBlock2D", + "ResnetUpsampleBlock2D", + "ResnetUpsampleBlock2D", + ), + block_out_channels=block_out_channels, + layers_per_block=3, + norm_num_groups=norm_num_groups, + norm_eps=norm_eps, + resnet_time_scale_shift="scale_shift", + time_embedding_type="learned", + num_train_timesteps=num_train_timesteps, + add_attention=False, +) + +unet_state_dict = {} + + +def add_state_dict(prefix, mod): + for k, v in mod.state_dict().items(): + unet_state_dict[f"{prefix}.{k}"] = v + + +add_state_dict("conv_in", conv_in) +add_state_dict("time_proj", time_proj) +add_state_dict("time_embedding", time_embedding) +add_state_dict("down_blocks.0", block_one) +add_state_dict("down_blocks.1", block_two) +add_state_dict("down_blocks.2", block_three) +add_state_dict("down_blocks.3", block_four) +add_state_dict("mid_block", mid_block_one) +add_state_dict("up_blocks.0", up_block_one) +add_state_dict("up_blocks.1", up_block_two) +add_state_dict("up_blocks.2", up_block_three) +add_state_dict("up_blocks.3", up_block_four) +add_state_dict("conv_norm_out", conv_norm_out) +add_state_dict("conv_out", conv_out) + +unet.load_state_dict(unet_state_dict) + +print("running with diffusers unet") + +unet.to("cuda") + +decoder_consistency.ckpt = unet + +sample_consistency_new_2 = decoder_consistency(latent, generator=torch.Generator("cpu").manual_seed(0)) +save_image(sample_consistency_new_2, "con_new_2.png") + +assert (sample_consistency_orig == sample_consistency_new_2).all() + +print("running with diffusers model") + +Encoder.old_constructor = Encoder.__init__ + + +def new_constructor(self, **kwargs): + self.old_constructor(**kwargs) + self.constructor_arguments = kwargs + + +Encoder.__init__ = new_constructor + + +vae = AutoencoderKL.from_pretrained("runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5", subfolder="vae") +consistency_vae = ConsistencyDecoderVAE( + encoder_args=vae.encoder.constructor_arguments, + decoder_args=unet.config, + scaling_factor=vae.config.scaling_factor, + block_out_channels=vae.config.block_out_channels, + latent_channels=vae.config.latent_channels, +) +consistency_vae.encoder.load_state_dict(vae.encoder.state_dict()) +consistency_vae.quant_conv.load_state_dict(vae.quant_conv.state_dict()) +consistency_vae.decoder_unet.load_state_dict(unet.state_dict()) + +consistency_vae.to(dtype=torch.float16, device="cuda") + +sample_consistency_new_3 = consistency_vae.decode( + 0.18215 * latent, generator=torch.Generator("cpu").manual_seed(0) +).sample + +print("max difference") +print((sample_consistency_orig - sample_consistency_new_3).abs().max()) +print("total difference") +print((sample_consistency_orig - sample_consistency_new_3).abs().sum()) +# assert (sample_consistency_orig == sample_consistency_new_3).all() + +print("running with diffusers pipeline") + +pipe = DiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained( + "runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5", vae=consistency_vae, torch_dtype=torch.float16 +) +pipe.to("cuda") + +pipe("horse", generator=torch.Generator("cpu").manual_seed(0)).images[0].save("horse.png") + + +if args.save_pretrained is not None: + consistency_vae.save_pretrained(args.save_pretrained) diff --git a/diffusers/scripts/convert_dance_diffusion_to_diffusers.py b/diffusers/scripts/convert_dance_diffusion_to_diffusers.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e269a49070cc00c1ff3f71bb2c21e57b0a5d5e70 --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/scripts/convert_dance_diffusion_to_diffusers.py @@ -0,0 +1,346 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python3 +import argparse +import math +import os +from copy import deepcopy + +import requests +import torch +from audio_diffusion.models import DiffusionAttnUnet1D +from diffusion import sampling +from torch import nn + +from diffusers import DanceDiffusionPipeline, IPNDMScheduler, UNet1DModel +from diffusers.utils.constants import DIFFUSERS_REQUEST_TIMEOUT + + +MODELS_MAP = { + "gwf-440k": { + "url": "https://model-server.zqevans2.workers.dev/gwf-440k.ckpt", + "sample_rate": 48000, + "sample_size": 65536, + }, + "jmann-small-190k": { + "url": "https://model-server.zqevans2.workers.dev/jmann-small-190k.ckpt", + "sample_rate": 48000, + "sample_size": 65536, + }, + "jmann-large-580k": { + "url": "https://model-server.zqevans2.workers.dev/jmann-large-580k.ckpt", + "sample_rate": 48000, + "sample_size": 131072, + }, + "maestro-uncond-150k": { + "url": "https://model-server.zqevans2.workers.dev/maestro-uncond-150k.ckpt", + "sample_rate": 16000, + "sample_size": 65536, + }, + "unlocked-uncond-250k": { + "url": "https://model-server.zqevans2.workers.dev/unlocked-uncond-250k.ckpt", + "sample_rate": 16000, + "sample_size": 65536, + }, + "honk-140k": { + "url": "https://model-server.zqevans2.workers.dev/honk-140k.ckpt", + "sample_rate": 16000, + "sample_size": 65536, + }, +} + + +def alpha_sigma_to_t(alpha, sigma): + """Returns a timestep, given the scaling factors for the clean image and for + the noise.""" + return torch.atan2(sigma, alpha) / math.pi * 2 + + +def get_crash_schedule(t): + sigma = torch.sin(t * math.pi / 2) ** 2 + alpha = (1 - sigma**2) ** 0.5 + return alpha_sigma_to_t(alpha, sigma) + + +class Object(object): + pass + + +class DiffusionUncond(nn.Module): + def __init__(self, global_args): + super().__init__() + + self.diffusion = DiffusionAttnUnet1D(global_args, n_attn_layers=4) + self.diffusion_ema = deepcopy(self.diffusion) + self.rng = torch.quasirandom.SobolEngine(1, scramble=True) + + +def download(model_name): + url = MODELS_MAP[model_name]["url"] + r = requests.get(url, stream=True, timeout=DIFFUSERS_REQUEST_TIMEOUT) + + local_filename = f"./{model_name}.ckpt" + with open(local_filename, "wb") as fp: + for chunk in r.iter_content(chunk_size=8192): + fp.write(chunk) + + return local_filename + + +DOWN_NUM_TO_LAYER = { + "1": "resnets.0", + "2": "attentions.0", + "3": "resnets.1", + "4": "attentions.1", + "5": "resnets.2", + "6": "attentions.2", +} +UP_NUM_TO_LAYER = { + "8": "resnets.0", + "9": "attentions.0", + "10": "resnets.1", + "11": "attentions.1", + "12": "resnets.2", + "13": "attentions.2", +} +MID_NUM_TO_LAYER = { + "1": "resnets.0", + "2": "attentions.0", + "3": "resnets.1", + "4": "attentions.1", + "5": "resnets.2", + "6": "attentions.2", + "8": "resnets.3", + "9": "attentions.3", + "10": "resnets.4", + "11": "attentions.4", + "12": "resnets.5", + "13": "attentions.5", +} +DEPTH_0_TO_LAYER = { + "0": "resnets.0", + "1": "resnets.1", + "2": "resnets.2", + "4": "resnets.0", + "5": "resnets.1", + "6": "resnets.2", +} + +RES_CONV_MAP = { + "skip": "conv_skip", + "main.0": "conv_1", + "main.1": "group_norm_1", + "main.3": "conv_2", + "main.4": "group_norm_2", +} + +ATTN_MAP = { + "norm": "group_norm", + "qkv_proj": ["query", "key", "value"], + "out_proj": ["proj_attn"], +} + + +def convert_resconv_naming(name): + if name.startswith("skip"): + return name.replace("skip", RES_CONV_MAP["skip"]) + + # name has to be of format main.{digit} + if not name.startswith("main."): + raise ValueError(f"ResConvBlock error with {name}") + + return name.replace(name[:6], RES_CONV_MAP[name[:6]]) + + +def convert_attn_naming(name): + for key, value in ATTN_MAP.items(): + if name.startswith(key) and not isinstance(value, list): + return name.replace(key, value) + elif name.startswith(key): + return [name.replace(key, v) for v in value] + raise ValueError(f"Attn error with {name}") + + +def rename(input_string, max_depth=13): + string = input_string + + if string.split(".")[0] == "timestep_embed": + return string.replace("timestep_embed", "time_proj") + + depth = 0 + if string.startswith("net.3."): + depth += 1 + string = string[6:] + elif string.startswith("net."): + string = string[4:] + + while string.startswith("main.7."): + depth += 1 + string = string[7:] + + if string.startswith("main."): + string = string[5:] + + # mid block + if string[:2].isdigit(): + layer_num = string[:2] + string_left = string[2:] + else: + layer_num = string[0] + string_left = string[1:] + + if depth == max_depth: + new_layer = MID_NUM_TO_LAYER[layer_num] + prefix = "mid_block" + elif depth > 0 and int(layer_num) < 7: + new_layer = DOWN_NUM_TO_LAYER[layer_num] + prefix = f"down_blocks.{depth}" + elif depth > 0 and int(layer_num) > 7: + new_layer = UP_NUM_TO_LAYER[layer_num] + prefix = f"up_blocks.{max_depth - depth - 1}" + elif depth == 0: + new_layer = DEPTH_0_TO_LAYER[layer_num] + prefix = f"up_blocks.{max_depth - 1}" if int(layer_num) > 3 else "down_blocks.0" + + if not string_left.startswith("."): + raise ValueError(f"Naming error with {input_string} and string_left: {string_left}.") + + string_left = string_left[1:] + + if "resnets" in new_layer: + string_left = convert_resconv_naming(string_left) + elif "attentions" in new_layer: + new_string_left = convert_attn_naming(string_left) + string_left = new_string_left + + if not isinstance(string_left, list): + new_string = prefix + "." + new_layer + "." + string_left + else: + new_string = [prefix + "." + new_layer + "." + s for s in string_left] + return new_string + + +def rename_orig_weights(state_dict): + new_state_dict = {} + for k, v in state_dict.items(): + if k.endswith("kernel"): + # up- and downsample layers, don't have trainable weights + continue + + new_k = rename(k) + + # check if we need to transform from Conv => Linear for attention + if isinstance(new_k, list): + new_state_dict = transform_conv_attns(new_state_dict, new_k, v) + else: + new_state_dict[new_k] = v + + return new_state_dict + + +def transform_conv_attns(new_state_dict, new_k, v): + if len(new_k) == 1: + if len(v.shape) == 3: + # weight + new_state_dict[new_k[0]] = v[:, :, 0] + else: + # bias + new_state_dict[new_k[0]] = v + else: + # qkv matrices + trippled_shape = v.shape[0] + single_shape = trippled_shape // 3 + for i in range(3): + if len(v.shape) == 3: + new_state_dict[new_k[i]] = v[i * single_shape : (i + 1) * single_shape, :, 0] + else: + new_state_dict[new_k[i]] = v[i * single_shape : (i + 1) * single_shape] + return new_state_dict + + +def main(args): + device = torch.device("cuda" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu") + + model_name = args.model_path.split("/")[-1].split(".")[0] + if not os.path.isfile(args.model_path): + assert model_name == args.model_path, ( + f"Make sure to provide one of the official model names {MODELS_MAP.keys()}" + ) + args.model_path = download(model_name) + + sample_rate = MODELS_MAP[model_name]["sample_rate"] + sample_size = MODELS_MAP[model_name]["sample_size"] + + config = Object() + config.sample_size = sample_size + config.sample_rate = sample_rate + config.latent_dim = 0 + + diffusers_model = UNet1DModel(sample_size=sample_size, sample_rate=sample_rate) + diffusers_state_dict = diffusers_model.state_dict() + + orig_model = DiffusionUncond(config) + orig_model.load_state_dict(torch.load(args.model_path, map_location=device)["state_dict"]) + orig_model = orig_model.diffusion_ema.eval() + orig_model_state_dict = orig_model.state_dict() + renamed_state_dict = rename_orig_weights(orig_model_state_dict) + + renamed_minus_diffusers = set(renamed_state_dict.keys()) - set(diffusers_state_dict.keys()) + diffusers_minus_renamed = set(diffusers_state_dict.keys()) - set(renamed_state_dict.keys()) + + assert len(renamed_minus_diffusers) == 0, f"Problem with {renamed_minus_diffusers}" + assert all(k.endswith("kernel") for k in list(diffusers_minus_renamed)), f"Problem with {diffusers_minus_renamed}" + + for key, value in renamed_state_dict.items(): + assert diffusers_state_dict[key].squeeze().shape == value.squeeze().shape, ( + f"Shape for {key} doesn't match. Diffusers: {diffusers_state_dict[key].shape} vs. {value.shape}" + ) + if key == "time_proj.weight": + value = value.squeeze() + + diffusers_state_dict[key] = value + + diffusers_model.load_state_dict(diffusers_state_dict) + + steps = 100 + seed = 33 + + diffusers_scheduler = IPNDMScheduler(num_train_timesteps=steps) + + generator = torch.manual_seed(seed) + noise = torch.randn([1, 2, config.sample_size], generator=generator).to(device) + + t = torch.linspace(1, 0, steps + 1, device=device)[:-1] + step_list = get_crash_schedule(t) + + pipe = DanceDiffusionPipeline(unet=diffusers_model, scheduler=diffusers_scheduler) + + generator = torch.manual_seed(33) + audio = pipe(num_inference_steps=steps, generator=generator).audios + + generated = sampling.iplms_sample(orig_model, noise, step_list, {}) + generated = generated.clamp(-1, 1) + + diff_sum = (generated - audio).abs().sum() + diff_max = (generated - audio).abs().max() + + if args.save: + pipe.save_pretrained(args.checkpoint_path) + + print("Diff sum", diff_sum) + print("Diff max", diff_max) + + assert diff_max < 1e-3, f"Diff max: {diff_max} is too much :-/" + + print(f"Conversion for {model_name} successful!") + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() + + parser.add_argument("--model_path", default=None, type=str, required=True, help="Path to the model to convert.") + parser.add_argument( + "--save", default=True, type=bool, required=False, help="Whether to save the converted model or not." + ) + parser.add_argument("--checkpoint_path", default=None, type=str, required=True, help="Path to the output model.") + args = parser.parse_args() + + main(args) diff --git a/diffusers/scripts/convert_dcae_to_diffusers.py b/diffusers/scripts/convert_dcae_to_diffusers.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..15f79a8154e6dc3eb010f69cba630da32b98dc22 --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/scripts/convert_dcae_to_diffusers.py @@ -0,0 +1,323 @@ +import argparse +from typing import Any, Dict + +import torch +from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download +from safetensors.torch import load_file + +from diffusers import AutoencoderDC + + +def remap_qkv_(key: str, state_dict: Dict[str, Any]): + qkv = state_dict.pop(key) + q, k, v = torch.chunk(qkv, 3, dim=0) + parent_module, _, _ = key.rpartition(".qkv.conv.weight") + state_dict[f"{parent_module}.to_q.weight"] = q.squeeze() + state_dict[f"{parent_module}.to_k.weight"] = k.squeeze() + state_dict[f"{parent_module}.to_v.weight"] = v.squeeze() + + +def remap_proj_conv_(key: str, state_dict: Dict[str, Any]): + parent_module, _, _ = key.rpartition(".proj.conv.weight") + state_dict[f"{parent_module}.to_out.weight"] = state_dict.pop(key).squeeze() + + +AE_KEYS_RENAME_DICT = { + # common + "main.": "", + "op_list.": "", + "context_module": "attn", + "local_module": "conv_out", + # NOTE: The below two lines work because scales in the available configs only have a tuple length of 1 + # If there were more scales, there would be more layers, so a loop would be better to handle this + "aggreg.0.0": "to_qkv_multiscale.0.proj_in", + "aggreg.0.1": "to_qkv_multiscale.0.proj_out", + "depth_conv.conv": "conv_depth", + "inverted_conv.conv": "conv_inverted", + "point_conv.conv": "conv_point", + "point_conv.norm": "norm", + "conv.conv.": "conv.", + "conv1.conv": "conv1", + "conv2.conv": "conv2", + "conv2.norm": "norm", + "proj.norm": "norm_out", + # encoder + "encoder.project_in.conv": "encoder.conv_in", + "encoder.project_out.0.conv": "encoder.conv_out", + "encoder.stages": "encoder.down_blocks", + # decoder + "decoder.project_in.conv": "decoder.conv_in", + "decoder.project_out.0": "decoder.norm_out", + "decoder.project_out.2.conv": "decoder.conv_out", + "decoder.stages": "decoder.up_blocks", +} + +AE_F32C32_KEYS = { + # encoder + "encoder.project_in.conv": "encoder.conv_in.conv", + # decoder + "decoder.project_out.2.conv": "decoder.conv_out.conv", +} + +AE_F64C128_KEYS = { + # encoder + "encoder.project_in.conv": "encoder.conv_in.conv", + # decoder + "decoder.project_out.2.conv": "decoder.conv_out.conv", +} + +AE_F128C512_KEYS = { + # encoder + "encoder.project_in.conv": "encoder.conv_in.conv", + # decoder + "decoder.project_out.2.conv": "decoder.conv_out.conv", +} + +AE_SPECIAL_KEYS_REMAP = { + "qkv.conv.weight": remap_qkv_, + "proj.conv.weight": remap_proj_conv_, +} + + +def get_state_dict(saved_dict: Dict[str, Any]) -> Dict[str, Any]: + state_dict = saved_dict + if "model" in saved_dict.keys(): + state_dict = state_dict["model"] + if "module" in saved_dict.keys(): + state_dict = state_dict["module"] + if "state_dict" in saved_dict.keys(): + state_dict = state_dict["state_dict"] + return state_dict + + +def update_state_dict_(state_dict: Dict[str, Any], old_key: str, new_key: str) -> Dict[str, Any]: + state_dict[new_key] = state_dict.pop(old_key) + + +def convert_ae(config_name: str, dtype: torch.dtype): + config = get_ae_config(config_name) + hub_id = f"mit-han-lab/{config_name}" + ckpt_path = hf_hub_download(hub_id, "model.safetensors") + original_state_dict = get_state_dict(load_file(ckpt_path)) + + ae = AutoencoderDC(**config).to(dtype=dtype) + + for key in list(original_state_dict.keys()): + new_key = key[:] + for replace_key, rename_key in AE_KEYS_RENAME_DICT.items(): + new_key = new_key.replace(replace_key, rename_key) + update_state_dict_(original_state_dict, key, new_key) + + for key in list(original_state_dict.keys()): + for special_key, handler_fn_inplace in AE_SPECIAL_KEYS_REMAP.items(): + if special_key not in key: + continue + handler_fn_inplace(key, original_state_dict) + + ae.load_state_dict(original_state_dict, strict=True) + return ae + + +def get_ae_config(name: str): + if name in ["dc-ae-f32c32-sana-1.0"]: + config = { + "latent_channels": 32, + "encoder_block_types": ( + "ResBlock", + "ResBlock", + "ResBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + ), + "decoder_block_types": ( + "ResBlock", + "ResBlock", + "ResBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + ), + "encoder_block_out_channels": (128, 256, 512, 512, 1024, 1024), + "decoder_block_out_channels": (128, 256, 512, 512, 1024, 1024), + "encoder_qkv_multiscales": ((), (), (), (5,), (5,), (5,)), + "decoder_qkv_multiscales": ((), (), (), (5,), (5,), (5,)), + "encoder_layers_per_block": (2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3), + "decoder_layers_per_block": [3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3], + "downsample_block_type": "conv", + "upsample_block_type": "interpolate", + "decoder_norm_types": "rms_norm", + "decoder_act_fns": "silu", + "scaling_factor": 0.41407, + } + elif name in ["dc-ae-f32c32-in-1.0", "dc-ae-f32c32-mix-1.0"]: + AE_KEYS_RENAME_DICT.update(AE_F32C32_KEYS) + config = { + "latent_channels": 32, + "encoder_block_types": [ + "ResBlock", + "ResBlock", + "ResBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + ], + "decoder_block_types": [ + "ResBlock", + "ResBlock", + "ResBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + ], + "encoder_block_out_channels": [128, 256, 512, 512, 1024, 1024], + "decoder_block_out_channels": [128, 256, 512, 512, 1024, 1024], + "encoder_layers_per_block": [0, 4, 8, 2, 2, 2], + "decoder_layers_per_block": [0, 5, 10, 2, 2, 2], + "encoder_qkv_multiscales": ((), (), (), (), (), ()), + "decoder_qkv_multiscales": ((), (), (), (), (), ()), + "decoder_norm_types": ["batch_norm", "batch_norm", "batch_norm", "rms_norm", "rms_norm", "rms_norm"], + "decoder_act_fns": ["relu", "relu", "relu", "silu", "silu", "silu"], + } + if name == "dc-ae-f32c32-in-1.0": + config["scaling_factor"] = 0.3189 + elif name == "dc-ae-f32c32-mix-1.0": + config["scaling_factor"] = 0.4552 + elif name in ["dc-ae-f64c128-in-1.0", "dc-ae-f64c128-mix-1.0"]: + AE_KEYS_RENAME_DICT.update(AE_F64C128_KEYS) + config = { + "latent_channels": 128, + "encoder_block_types": [ + "ResBlock", + "ResBlock", + "ResBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + ], + "decoder_block_types": [ + "ResBlock", + "ResBlock", + "ResBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + ], + "encoder_block_out_channels": [128, 256, 512, 512, 1024, 1024, 2048], + "decoder_block_out_channels": [128, 256, 512, 512, 1024, 1024, 2048], + "encoder_layers_per_block": [0, 4, 8, 2, 2, 2, 2], + "decoder_layers_per_block": [0, 5, 10, 2, 2, 2, 2], + "encoder_qkv_multiscales": ((), (), (), (), (), (), ()), + "decoder_qkv_multiscales": ((), (), (), (), (), (), ()), + "decoder_norm_types": [ + "batch_norm", + "batch_norm", + "batch_norm", + "rms_norm", + "rms_norm", + "rms_norm", + "rms_norm", + ], + "decoder_act_fns": ["relu", "relu", "relu", "silu", "silu", "silu", "silu"], + } + if name == "dc-ae-f64c128-in-1.0": + config["scaling_factor"] = 0.2889 + elif name == "dc-ae-f64c128-mix-1.0": + config["scaling_factor"] = 0.4538 + elif name in ["dc-ae-f128c512-in-1.0", "dc-ae-f128c512-mix-1.0"]: + AE_KEYS_RENAME_DICT.update(AE_F128C512_KEYS) + config = { + "latent_channels": 512, + "encoder_block_types": [ + "ResBlock", + "ResBlock", + "ResBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + ], + "decoder_block_types": [ + "ResBlock", + "ResBlock", + "ResBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + "EfficientViTBlock", + ], + "encoder_block_out_channels": [128, 256, 512, 512, 1024, 1024, 2048, 2048], + "decoder_block_out_channels": [128, 256, 512, 512, 1024, 1024, 2048, 2048], + "encoder_layers_per_block": [0, 4, 8, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2], + "decoder_layers_per_block": [0, 5, 10, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2], + "encoder_qkv_multiscales": ((), (), (), (), (), (), (), ()), + "decoder_qkv_multiscales": ((), (), (), (), (), (), (), ()), + "decoder_norm_types": [ + "batch_norm", + "batch_norm", + "batch_norm", + "rms_norm", + "rms_norm", + "rms_norm", + "rms_norm", + "rms_norm", + ], + "decoder_act_fns": ["relu", "relu", "relu", "silu", "silu", "silu", "silu", "silu"], + } + if name == "dc-ae-f128c512-in-1.0": + config["scaling_factor"] = 0.4883 + elif name == "dc-ae-f128c512-mix-1.0": + config["scaling_factor"] = 0.3620 + else: + raise ValueError("Invalid config name provided.") + + return config + + +def get_args(): + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() + parser.add_argument( + "--config_name", + type=str, + default="dc-ae-f32c32-sana-1.0", + choices=[ + "dc-ae-f32c32-sana-1.0", + "dc-ae-f32c32-in-1.0", + "dc-ae-f32c32-mix-1.0", + "dc-ae-f64c128-in-1.0", + "dc-ae-f64c128-mix-1.0", + "dc-ae-f128c512-in-1.0", + "dc-ae-f128c512-mix-1.0", + ], + help="The DCAE checkpoint to convert", + ) + parser.add_argument("--output_path", type=str, required=True, help="Path where converted model should be saved") + parser.add_argument("--dtype", default="fp32", help="Torch dtype to save the model in.") + return parser.parse_args() + + +DTYPE_MAPPING = { + "fp32": torch.float32, + "fp16": torch.float16, + "bf16": torch.bfloat16, +} + +VARIANT_MAPPING = { + "fp32": None, + "fp16": "fp16", + "bf16": "bf16", +} + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + args = get_args() + + dtype = DTYPE_MAPPING[args.dtype] + variant = VARIANT_MAPPING[args.dtype] + + ae = convert_ae(args.config_name, dtype) + ae.save_pretrained(args.output_path, safe_serialization=True, max_shard_size="5GB", variant=variant) diff --git a/diffusers/scripts/convert_diffusers_sdxl_lora_to_webui.py b/diffusers/scripts/convert_diffusers_sdxl_lora_to_webui.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dfb3871275cbc68809379596a9209e08f377936c --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/scripts/convert_diffusers_sdxl_lora_to_webui.py @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +# Script for converting a Hugging Face Diffusers trained SDXL LoRAs to Kohya format +# This means that you can input your diffusers-trained LoRAs and +# Get the output to work with WebUIs such as AUTOMATIC1111, ComfyUI, SD.Next and others. + +# To get started you can find some cool `diffusers` trained LoRAs such as this cute Corgy +# https://huggingface.co/ignasbud/corgy_dog_LoRA/, download its `pytorch_lora_weights.safetensors` file +# and run the script: +# python convert_diffusers_sdxl_lora_to_webui.py --input_lora pytorch_lora_weights.safetensors --output_lora corgy.safetensors +# now you can use corgy.safetensors in your WebUI of choice! + +# To train your own, here are some diffusers training scripts and utils that you can use and then convert: +# LoRA Ease - no code SDXL Dreambooth LoRA trainer: https://huggingface.co/spaces/multimodalart/lora-ease +# Dreambooth Advanced Training Script - state of the art techniques such as pivotal tuning and prodigy optimizer: +# - Script: https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/blob/main/examples/advanced_diffusion_training/train_dreambooth_lora_sdxl_advanced.py +# - Colab (only on Pro): https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/notebooks/blob/main/diffusers/SDXL_Dreambooth_LoRA_advanced_example.ipynb +# Canonical diffusers training scripts: +# - Script: https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/blob/main/examples/dreambooth/train_dreambooth_lora_sdxl.py +# - Colab (runs on free tier): https://colab.research.google.com/github/huggingface/notebooks/blob/main/diffusers/SDXL_DreamBooth_LoRA_.ipynb + +import argparse +import os + +from safetensors.torch import load_file, save_file + +from diffusers.utils import convert_all_state_dict_to_peft, convert_state_dict_to_kohya + + +def convert_and_save(input_lora, output_lora=None): + if output_lora is None: + base_name = os.path.splitext(input_lora)[0] + output_lora = f"{base_name}_webui.safetensors" + + diffusers_state_dict = load_file(input_lora) + peft_state_dict = convert_all_state_dict_to_peft(diffusers_state_dict) + kohya_state_dict = convert_state_dict_to_kohya(peft_state_dict) + save_file(kohya_state_dict, output_lora) + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Convert LoRA model to PEFT and then to Kohya format.") + parser.add_argument( + "--input_lora", + type=str, + required=True, + help="Path to the input LoRA model file in the diffusers format.", + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--output_lora", + type=str, + required=False, + help="Path for the converted LoRA (safetensors format for AUTOMATIC1111, ComfyUI, etc.). Optional, defaults to input name with a _webui suffix.", + ) + + args = parser.parse_args() + + convert_and_save(args.input_lora, args.output_lora) diff --git a/diffusers/scripts/convert_flux_xlabs_ipadapter_to_diffusers.py b/diffusers/scripts/convert_flux_xlabs_ipadapter_to_diffusers.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b701b7fb40b1b9f115ece6bf0dddee6d4ca7052a --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/scripts/convert_flux_xlabs_ipadapter_to_diffusers.py @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +import argparse +from contextlib import nullcontext + +import safetensors.torch +from accelerate import init_empty_weights +from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download + +from diffusers.utils.import_utils import is_accelerate_available, is_transformers_available + + +if is_transformers_available(): + from transformers import CLIPVisionModelWithProjection + + vision = True +else: + vision = False + +""" +python scripts/convert_flux_xlabs_ipadapter_to_diffusers.py \ +--original_state_dict_repo_id "XLabs-AI/flux-ip-adapter" \ +--filename "flux-ip-adapter.safetensors" +--output_path "flux-ip-adapter-hf/" +""" + + +CTX = init_empty_weights if is_accelerate_available else nullcontext + +parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() +parser.add_argument("--original_state_dict_repo_id", default=None, type=str) +parser.add_argument("--filename", default="flux.safetensors", type=str) +parser.add_argument("--checkpoint_path", default=None, type=str) +parser.add_argument("--output_path", type=str) +parser.add_argument("--vision_pretrained_or_path", default="openai/clip-vit-large-patch14", type=str) + +args = parser.parse_args() + + +def load_original_checkpoint(args): + if args.original_state_dict_repo_id is not None: + ckpt_path = hf_hub_download(repo_id=args.original_state_dict_repo_id, filename=args.filename) + elif args.checkpoint_path is not None: + ckpt_path = args.checkpoint_path + else: + raise ValueError(" please provide either `original_state_dict_repo_id` or a local `checkpoint_path`") + + original_state_dict = safetensors.torch.load_file(ckpt_path) + return original_state_dict + + +def convert_flux_ipadapter_checkpoint_to_diffusers(original_state_dict, num_layers): + converted_state_dict = {} + + # image_proj + ## norm + converted_state_dict["image_proj.norm.weight"] = original_state_dict.pop("ip_adapter_proj_model.norm.weight") + converted_state_dict["image_proj.norm.bias"] = original_state_dict.pop("ip_adapter_proj_model.norm.bias") + ## proj + converted_state_dict["image_proj.proj.weight"] = original_state_dict.pop("ip_adapter_proj_model.norm.weight") + converted_state_dict["image_proj.proj.bias"] = original_state_dict.pop("ip_adapter_proj_model.norm.bias") + + # double transformer blocks + for i in range(num_layers): + block_prefix = f"ip_adapter.{i}." + # to_k_ip + converted_state_dict[f"{block_prefix}to_k_ip.bias"] = original_state_dict.pop( + f"double_blocks.{i}.processor.ip_adapter_double_stream_k_proj.bias" + ) + converted_state_dict[f"{block_prefix}to_k_ip.weight"] = original_state_dict.pop( + f"double_blocks.{i}.processor.ip_adapter_double_stream_k_proj.weight" + ) + # to_v_ip + converted_state_dict[f"{block_prefix}to_v_ip.bias"] = original_state_dict.pop( + f"double_blocks.{i}.processor.ip_adapter_double_stream_v_proj.bias" + ) + converted_state_dict[f"{block_prefix}to_k_ip.weight"] = original_state_dict.pop( + f"double_blocks.{i}.processor.ip_adapter_double_stream_v_proj.weight" + ) + + return converted_state_dict + + +def main(args): + original_ckpt = load_original_checkpoint(args) + + num_layers = 19 + converted_ip_adapter_state_dict = convert_flux_ipadapter_checkpoint_to_diffusers(original_ckpt, num_layers) + + print("Saving Flux IP-Adapter in Diffusers format.") + safetensors.torch.save_file(converted_ip_adapter_state_dict, f"{args.output_path}/model.safetensors") + + if vision: + model = CLIPVisionModelWithProjection.from_pretrained(args.vision_pretrained_or_path) + model.save_pretrained(f"{args.output_path}/image_encoder") + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + main(args) diff --git a/diffusers/scripts/convert_hunyuandit_controlnet_to_diffusers.py b/diffusers/scripts/convert_hunyuandit_controlnet_to_diffusers.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5cef46c989833adc2cee1b36575653c66f28434c --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/scripts/convert_hunyuandit_controlnet_to_diffusers.py @@ -0,0 +1,241 @@ +import argparse + +import torch + +from diffusers import HunyuanDiT2DControlNetModel + + +def main(args): + state_dict = torch.load(args.pt_checkpoint_path, map_location="cpu") + + if args.load_key != "none": + try: + state_dict = state_dict[args.load_key] + except KeyError: + raise KeyError( + f"{args.load_key} not found in the checkpoint." + "Please load from the following keys:{state_dict.keys()}" + ) + device = "cuda" + + model_config = HunyuanDiT2DControlNetModel.load_config( + "Tencent-Hunyuan/HunyuanDiT-v1.2-Diffusers", subfolder="transformer" + ) + model_config["use_style_cond_and_image_meta_size"] = ( + args.use_style_cond_and_image_meta_size + ) ### version <= v1.1: True; version >= v1.2: False + print(model_config) + + for key in state_dict: + print("local:", key) + + model = HunyuanDiT2DControlNetModel.from_config(model_config).to(device) + + for key in model.state_dict(): + print("diffusers:", key) + + num_layers = 19 + for i in range(num_layers): + # attn1 + # Wkqv -> to_q, to_k, to_v + q, k, v = torch.chunk(state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn1.Wqkv.weight"], 3, dim=0) + q_bias, k_bias, v_bias = torch.chunk(state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn1.Wqkv.bias"], 3, dim=0) + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn1.to_q.weight"] = q + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn1.to_q.bias"] = q_bias + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn1.to_k.weight"] = k + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn1.to_k.bias"] = k_bias + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn1.to_v.weight"] = v + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn1.to_v.bias"] = v_bias + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.attn1.Wqkv.weight") + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.attn1.Wqkv.bias") + + # q_norm, k_norm -> norm_q, norm_k + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn1.norm_q.weight"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn1.q_norm.weight"] + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn1.norm_q.bias"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn1.q_norm.bias"] + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn1.norm_k.weight"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn1.k_norm.weight"] + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn1.norm_k.bias"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn1.k_norm.bias"] + + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.attn1.q_norm.weight") + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.attn1.q_norm.bias") + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.attn1.k_norm.weight") + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.attn1.k_norm.bias") + + # out_proj -> to_out + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn1.to_out.0.weight"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn1.out_proj.weight"] + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn1.to_out.0.bias"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn1.out_proj.bias"] + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.attn1.out_proj.weight") + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.attn1.out_proj.bias") + + # attn2 + # kq_proj -> to_k, to_v + k, v = torch.chunk(state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.kv_proj.weight"], 2, dim=0) + k_bias, v_bias = torch.chunk(state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.kv_proj.bias"], 2, dim=0) + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.to_k.weight"] = k + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.to_k.bias"] = k_bias + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.to_v.weight"] = v + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.to_v.bias"] = v_bias + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.attn2.kv_proj.weight") + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.attn2.kv_proj.bias") + + # q_proj -> to_q + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.to_q.weight"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.q_proj.weight"] + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.to_q.bias"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.q_proj.bias"] + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.attn2.q_proj.weight") + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.attn2.q_proj.bias") + + # q_norm, k_norm -> norm_q, norm_k + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.norm_q.weight"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.q_norm.weight"] + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.norm_q.bias"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.q_norm.bias"] + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.norm_k.weight"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.k_norm.weight"] + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.norm_k.bias"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.k_norm.bias"] + + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.attn2.q_norm.weight") + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.attn2.q_norm.bias") + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.attn2.k_norm.weight") + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.attn2.k_norm.bias") + + # out_proj -> to_out + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.to_out.0.weight"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.out_proj.weight"] + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.to_out.0.bias"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.attn2.out_proj.bias"] + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.attn2.out_proj.weight") + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.attn2.out_proj.bias") + + # switch norm 2 and norm 3 + norm2_weight = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.norm2.weight"] + norm2_bias = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.norm2.bias"] + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.norm2.weight"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.norm3.weight"] + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.norm2.bias"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.norm3.bias"] + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.norm3.weight"] = norm2_weight + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.norm3.bias"] = norm2_bias + + # norm1 -> norm1.norm + # default_modulation.1 -> norm1.linear + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.norm1.norm.weight"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.norm1.weight"] + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.norm1.norm.bias"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.norm1.bias"] + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.norm1.linear.weight"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.default_modulation.1.weight"] + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.norm1.linear.bias"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.default_modulation.1.bias"] + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.norm1.weight") + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.norm1.bias") + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.default_modulation.1.weight") + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.default_modulation.1.bias") + + # mlp.fc1 -> ff.net.0, mlp.fc2 -> ff.net.2 + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.ff.net.0.proj.weight"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.mlp.fc1.weight"] + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.ff.net.0.proj.bias"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.mlp.fc1.bias"] + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.ff.net.2.weight"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.mlp.fc2.weight"] + state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.ff.net.2.bias"] = state_dict[f"blocks.{i}.mlp.fc2.bias"] + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.mlp.fc1.weight") + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.mlp.fc1.bias") + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.mlp.fc2.weight") + state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{i}.mlp.fc2.bias") + + # after_proj_list -> controlnet_blocks + state_dict[f"controlnet_blocks.{i}.weight"] = state_dict[f"after_proj_list.{i}.weight"] + state_dict[f"controlnet_blocks.{i}.bias"] = state_dict[f"after_proj_list.{i}.bias"] + state_dict.pop(f"after_proj_list.{i}.weight") + state_dict.pop(f"after_proj_list.{i}.bias") + + # before_proj -> input_block + state_dict["input_block.weight"] = state_dict["before_proj.weight"] + state_dict["input_block.bias"] = state_dict["before_proj.bias"] + state_dict.pop("before_proj.weight") + state_dict.pop("before_proj.bias") + + # pooler -> time_extra_emb + state_dict["time_extra_emb.pooler.positional_embedding"] = state_dict["pooler.positional_embedding"] + state_dict["time_extra_emb.pooler.k_proj.weight"] = state_dict["pooler.k_proj.weight"] + state_dict["time_extra_emb.pooler.k_proj.bias"] = state_dict["pooler.k_proj.bias"] + state_dict["time_extra_emb.pooler.q_proj.weight"] = state_dict["pooler.q_proj.weight"] + state_dict["time_extra_emb.pooler.q_proj.bias"] = state_dict["pooler.q_proj.bias"] + state_dict["time_extra_emb.pooler.v_proj.weight"] = state_dict["pooler.v_proj.weight"] + state_dict["time_extra_emb.pooler.v_proj.bias"] = state_dict["pooler.v_proj.bias"] + state_dict["time_extra_emb.pooler.c_proj.weight"] = state_dict["pooler.c_proj.weight"] + state_dict["time_extra_emb.pooler.c_proj.bias"] = state_dict["pooler.c_proj.bias"] + state_dict.pop("pooler.k_proj.weight") + state_dict.pop("pooler.k_proj.bias") + state_dict.pop("pooler.q_proj.weight") + state_dict.pop("pooler.q_proj.bias") + state_dict.pop("pooler.v_proj.weight") + state_dict.pop("pooler.v_proj.bias") + state_dict.pop("pooler.c_proj.weight") + state_dict.pop("pooler.c_proj.bias") + state_dict.pop("pooler.positional_embedding") + + # t_embedder -> time_embedding (`TimestepEmbedding`) + state_dict["time_extra_emb.timestep_embedder.linear_1.bias"] = state_dict["t_embedder.mlp.0.bias"] + state_dict["time_extra_emb.timestep_embedder.linear_1.weight"] = state_dict["t_embedder.mlp.0.weight"] + state_dict["time_extra_emb.timestep_embedder.linear_2.bias"] = state_dict["t_embedder.mlp.2.bias"] + state_dict["time_extra_emb.timestep_embedder.linear_2.weight"] = state_dict["t_embedder.mlp.2.weight"] + + state_dict.pop("t_embedder.mlp.0.bias") + state_dict.pop("t_embedder.mlp.0.weight") + state_dict.pop("t_embedder.mlp.2.bias") + state_dict.pop("t_embedder.mlp.2.weight") + + # x_embedder -> pos_embd (`PatchEmbed`) + state_dict["pos_embed.proj.weight"] = state_dict["x_embedder.proj.weight"] + state_dict["pos_embed.proj.bias"] = state_dict["x_embedder.proj.bias"] + state_dict.pop("x_embedder.proj.weight") + state_dict.pop("x_embedder.proj.bias") + + # mlp_t5 -> text_embedder + state_dict["text_embedder.linear_1.bias"] = state_dict["mlp_t5.0.bias"] + state_dict["text_embedder.linear_1.weight"] = state_dict["mlp_t5.0.weight"] + state_dict["text_embedder.linear_2.bias"] = state_dict["mlp_t5.2.bias"] + state_dict["text_embedder.linear_2.weight"] = state_dict["mlp_t5.2.weight"] + state_dict.pop("mlp_t5.0.bias") + state_dict.pop("mlp_t5.0.weight") + state_dict.pop("mlp_t5.2.bias") + state_dict.pop("mlp_t5.2.weight") + + # extra_embedder -> extra_embedder + state_dict["time_extra_emb.extra_embedder.linear_1.bias"] = state_dict["extra_embedder.0.bias"] + state_dict["time_extra_emb.extra_embedder.linear_1.weight"] = state_dict["extra_embedder.0.weight"] + state_dict["time_extra_emb.extra_embedder.linear_2.bias"] = state_dict["extra_embedder.2.bias"] + state_dict["time_extra_emb.extra_embedder.linear_2.weight"] = state_dict["extra_embedder.2.weight"] + state_dict.pop("extra_embedder.0.bias") + state_dict.pop("extra_embedder.0.weight") + state_dict.pop("extra_embedder.2.bias") + state_dict.pop("extra_embedder.2.weight") + + # style_embedder + if model_config["use_style_cond_and_image_meta_size"]: + print(state_dict["style_embedder.weight"]) + print(state_dict["style_embedder.weight"].shape) + state_dict["time_extra_emb.style_embedder.weight"] = state_dict["style_embedder.weight"][0:1] + state_dict.pop("style_embedder.weight") + + model.load_state_dict(state_dict) + + if args.save: + model.save_pretrained(args.output_checkpoint_path) + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() + + parser.add_argument( + "--save", default=True, type=bool, required=False, help="Whether to save the converted pipeline or not." + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--pt_checkpoint_path", default=None, type=str, required=True, help="Path to the .pt pretrained model." + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--output_checkpoint_path", + default=None, + type=str, + required=False, + help="Path to the output converted diffusers pipeline.", + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--load_key", default="none", type=str, required=False, help="The key to load from the pretrained .pt file" + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--use_style_cond_and_image_meta_size", + type=bool, + default=False, + help="version <= v1.1: True; version >= v1.2: False", + ) + + args = parser.parse_args() + main(args) diff --git a/diffusers/scripts/convert_i2vgen_to_diffusers.py b/diffusers/scripts/convert_i2vgen_to_diffusers.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..643780caac2d46b3f377719d7c05eedcf116dc5d --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/scripts/convert_i2vgen_to_diffusers.py @@ -0,0 +1,510 @@ +# coding=utf-8 +# Copyright 2025 The HuggingFace Inc. team. +# +# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); +# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. +# You may obtain a copy of the License at +# +# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 +# +# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software +# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, +# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. +# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and +# limitations under the License. +"""Conversion script for the LDM checkpoints.""" + +import argparse + +import torch +from transformers import CLIPImageProcessor, CLIPTextModel, CLIPTokenizer, CLIPVisionModelWithProjection + +from diffusers import DDIMScheduler, I2VGenXLPipeline, I2VGenXLUNet, StableDiffusionPipeline + + +CLIP_ID = "laion/CLIP-ViT-H-14-laion2B-s32B-b79K" + + +def assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, checkpoint, old_checkpoint, attention_paths_to_split=None, additional_replacements=None, config=None +): + """ + This does the final conversion step: take locally converted weights and apply a global renaming to them. It splits + attention layers, and takes into account additional replacements that may arise. + + Assigns the weights to the new checkpoint. + """ + assert isinstance(paths, list), "Paths should be a list of dicts containing 'old' and 'new' keys." + + # Splits the attention layers into three variables. + if attention_paths_to_split is not None: + for path, path_map in attention_paths_to_split.items(): + old_tensor = old_checkpoint[path] + channels = old_tensor.shape[0] // 3 + + target_shape = (-1, channels) if len(old_tensor.shape) == 3 else (-1) + + num_heads = old_tensor.shape[0] // config["num_head_channels"] // 3 + + old_tensor = old_tensor.reshape((num_heads, 3 * channels // num_heads) + old_tensor.shape[1:]) + query, key, value = old_tensor.split(channels // num_heads, dim=1) + + checkpoint[path_map["query"]] = query.reshape(target_shape) + checkpoint[path_map["key"]] = key.reshape(target_shape) + checkpoint[path_map["value"]] = value.reshape(target_shape) + + for path in paths: + new_path = path["new"] + + # These have already been assigned + if attention_paths_to_split is not None and new_path in attention_paths_to_split: + continue + + if additional_replacements is not None: + for replacement in additional_replacements: + new_path = new_path.replace(replacement["old"], replacement["new"]) + + # proj_attn.weight has to be converted from conv 1D to linear + weight = old_checkpoint[path["old"]] + names = ["proj_attn.weight"] + names_2 = ["proj_out.weight", "proj_in.weight"] + if any(k in new_path for k in names): + checkpoint[new_path] = weight[:, :, 0] + elif any(k in new_path for k in names_2) and len(weight.shape) > 2 and ".attentions." not in new_path: + checkpoint[new_path] = weight[:, :, 0] + else: + checkpoint[new_path] = weight + + +def renew_attention_paths(old_list, n_shave_prefix_segments=0): + """ + Updates paths inside attentions to the new naming scheme (local renaming) + """ + mapping = [] + for old_item in old_list: + new_item = old_item + mapping.append({"old": old_item, "new": new_item}) + + return mapping + + +def shave_segments(path, n_shave_prefix_segments=1): + """ + Removes segments. Positive values shave the first segments, negative shave the last segments. + """ + if n_shave_prefix_segments >= 0: + return ".".join(path.split(".")[n_shave_prefix_segments:]) + else: + return ".".join(path.split(".")[:n_shave_prefix_segments]) + + +def renew_temp_conv_paths(old_list, n_shave_prefix_segments=0): + """ + Updates paths inside resnets to the new naming scheme (local renaming) + """ + mapping = [] + for old_item in old_list: + mapping.append({"old": old_item, "new": old_item}) + + return mapping + + +def renew_resnet_paths(old_list, n_shave_prefix_segments=0): + """ + Updates paths inside resnets to the new naming scheme (local renaming) + """ + mapping = [] + for old_item in old_list: + new_item = old_item.replace("in_layers.0", "norm1") + new_item = new_item.replace("in_layers.2", "conv1") + + new_item = new_item.replace("out_layers.0", "norm2") + new_item = new_item.replace("out_layers.3", "conv2") + + new_item = new_item.replace("emb_layers.1", "time_emb_proj") + new_item = new_item.replace("skip_connection", "conv_shortcut") + + new_item = shave_segments(new_item, n_shave_prefix_segments=n_shave_prefix_segments) + + if "temopral_conv" not in old_item: + mapping.append({"old": old_item, "new": new_item}) + + return mapping + + +def convert_ldm_unet_checkpoint(checkpoint, config, path=None, extract_ema=False): + """ + Takes a state dict and a config, and returns a converted checkpoint. + """ + + # extract state_dict for UNet + unet_state_dict = {} + keys = list(checkpoint.keys()) + + unet_key = "model.diffusion_model." + + # at least a 100 parameters have to start with `model_ema` in order for the checkpoint to be EMA + if sum(k.startswith("model_ema") for k in keys) > 100 and extract_ema: + print(f"Checkpoint {path} has both EMA and non-EMA weights.") + print( + "In this conversion only the EMA weights are extracted. If you want to instead extract the non-EMA" + " weights (useful to continue fine-tuning), please make sure to remove the `--extract_ema` flag." + ) + for key in keys: + if key.startswith("model.diffusion_model"): + flat_ema_key = "model_ema." + "".join(key.split(".")[1:]) + unet_state_dict[key.replace(unet_key, "")] = checkpoint.pop(flat_ema_key) + else: + if sum(k.startswith("model_ema") for k in keys) > 100: + print( + "In this conversion only the non-EMA weights are extracted. If you want to instead extract the EMA" + " weights (usually better for inference), please make sure to add the `--extract_ema` flag." + ) + + for key in keys: + unet_state_dict[key.replace(unet_key, "")] = checkpoint.pop(key) + + new_checkpoint = {} + + new_checkpoint["time_embedding.linear_1.weight"] = unet_state_dict["time_embed.0.weight"] + new_checkpoint["time_embedding.linear_1.bias"] = unet_state_dict["time_embed.0.bias"] + new_checkpoint["time_embedding.linear_2.weight"] = unet_state_dict["time_embed.2.weight"] + new_checkpoint["time_embedding.linear_2.bias"] = unet_state_dict["time_embed.2.bias"] + + additional_embedding_substrings = [ + "local_image_concat", + "context_embedding", + "local_image_embedding", + "fps_embedding", + ] + for k in unet_state_dict: + if any(substring in k for substring in additional_embedding_substrings): + diffusers_key = k.replace("local_image_concat", "image_latents_proj_in").replace( + "local_image_embedding", "image_latents_context_embedding" + ) + new_checkpoint[diffusers_key] = unet_state_dict[k] + + # temporal encoder. + new_checkpoint["image_latents_temporal_encoder.norm1.weight"] = unet_state_dict[ + "local_temporal_encoder.layers.0.0.norm.weight" + ] + new_checkpoint["image_latents_temporal_encoder.norm1.bias"] = unet_state_dict[ + "local_temporal_encoder.layers.0.0.norm.bias" + ] + + # attention + qkv = unet_state_dict["local_temporal_encoder.layers.0.0.fn.to_qkv.weight"] + q, k, v = torch.chunk(qkv, 3, dim=0) + new_checkpoint["image_latents_temporal_encoder.attn1.to_q.weight"] = q + new_checkpoint["image_latents_temporal_encoder.attn1.to_k.weight"] = k + new_checkpoint["image_latents_temporal_encoder.attn1.to_v.weight"] = v + new_checkpoint["image_latents_temporal_encoder.attn1.to_out.0.weight"] = unet_state_dict[ + "local_temporal_encoder.layers.0.0.fn.to_out.0.weight" + ] + new_checkpoint["image_latents_temporal_encoder.attn1.to_out.0.bias"] = unet_state_dict[ + "local_temporal_encoder.layers.0.0.fn.to_out.0.bias" + ] + + # feedforward + new_checkpoint["image_latents_temporal_encoder.ff.net.0.proj.weight"] = unet_state_dict[ + "local_temporal_encoder.layers.0.1.net.0.0.weight" + ] + new_checkpoint["image_latents_temporal_encoder.ff.net.0.proj.bias"] = unet_state_dict[ + "local_temporal_encoder.layers.0.1.net.0.0.bias" + ] + new_checkpoint["image_latents_temporal_encoder.ff.net.2.weight"] = unet_state_dict[ + "local_temporal_encoder.layers.0.1.net.2.weight" + ] + new_checkpoint["image_latents_temporal_encoder.ff.net.2.bias"] = unet_state_dict[ + "local_temporal_encoder.layers.0.1.net.2.bias" + ] + + if "class_embed_type" in config: + if config["class_embed_type"] is None: + # No parameters to port + ... + elif config["class_embed_type"] == "timestep" or config["class_embed_type"] == "projection": + new_checkpoint["class_embedding.linear_1.weight"] = unet_state_dict["label_emb.0.0.weight"] + new_checkpoint["class_embedding.linear_1.bias"] = unet_state_dict["label_emb.0.0.bias"] + new_checkpoint["class_embedding.linear_2.weight"] = unet_state_dict["label_emb.0.2.weight"] + new_checkpoint["class_embedding.linear_2.bias"] = unet_state_dict["label_emb.0.2.bias"] + else: + raise NotImplementedError(f"Not implemented `class_embed_type`: {config['class_embed_type']}") + + new_checkpoint["conv_in.weight"] = unet_state_dict["input_blocks.0.0.weight"] + new_checkpoint["conv_in.bias"] = unet_state_dict["input_blocks.0.0.bias"] + + first_temp_attention = [v for v in unet_state_dict if v.startswith("input_blocks.0.1")] + paths = renew_attention_paths(first_temp_attention) + meta_path = {"old": "input_blocks.0.1", "new": "transformer_in"} + assign_to_checkpoint(paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config) + + new_checkpoint["conv_norm_out.weight"] = unet_state_dict["out.0.weight"] + new_checkpoint["conv_norm_out.bias"] = unet_state_dict["out.0.bias"] + new_checkpoint["conv_out.weight"] = unet_state_dict["out.2.weight"] + new_checkpoint["conv_out.bias"] = unet_state_dict["out.2.bias"] + + # Retrieves the keys for the input blocks only + num_input_blocks = len({".".join(layer.split(".")[:2]) for layer in unet_state_dict if "input_blocks" in layer}) + input_blocks = { + layer_id: [key for key in unet_state_dict if f"input_blocks.{layer_id}" in key] + for layer_id in range(num_input_blocks) + } + + # Retrieves the keys for the middle blocks only + num_middle_blocks = len({".".join(layer.split(".")[:2]) for layer in unet_state_dict if "middle_block" in layer}) + middle_blocks = { + layer_id: [key for key in unet_state_dict if f"middle_block.{layer_id}" in key] + for layer_id in range(num_middle_blocks) + } + + # Retrieves the keys for the output blocks only + num_output_blocks = len({".".join(layer.split(".")[:2]) for layer in unet_state_dict if "output_blocks" in layer}) + output_blocks = { + layer_id: [key for key in unet_state_dict if f"output_blocks.{layer_id}" in key] + for layer_id in range(num_output_blocks) + } + + for i in range(1, num_input_blocks): + block_id = (i - 1) // (config["layers_per_block"] + 1) + layer_in_block_id = (i - 1) % (config["layers_per_block"] + 1) + + resnets = [ + key for key in input_blocks[i] if f"input_blocks.{i}.0" in key and f"input_blocks.{i}.0.op" not in key + ] + attentions = [key for key in input_blocks[i] if f"input_blocks.{i}.1" in key] + temp_attentions = [key for key in input_blocks[i] if f"input_blocks.{i}.2" in key] + + if f"input_blocks.{i}.op.weight" in unet_state_dict: + new_checkpoint[f"down_blocks.{block_id}.downsamplers.0.conv.weight"] = unet_state_dict.pop( + f"input_blocks.{i}.op.weight" + ) + new_checkpoint[f"down_blocks.{block_id}.downsamplers.0.conv.bias"] = unet_state_dict.pop( + f"input_blocks.{i}.op.bias" + ) + + paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnets) + meta_path = {"old": f"input_blocks.{i}.0", "new": f"down_blocks.{block_id}.resnets.{layer_in_block_id}"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + temporal_convs = [key for key in resnets if "temopral_conv" in key] + paths = renew_temp_conv_paths(temporal_convs) + meta_path = { + "old": f"input_blocks.{i}.0.temopral_conv", + "new": f"down_blocks.{block_id}.temp_convs.{layer_in_block_id}", + } + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + if len(attentions): + paths = renew_attention_paths(attentions) + meta_path = {"old": f"input_blocks.{i}.1", "new": f"down_blocks.{block_id}.attentions.{layer_in_block_id}"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + if len(temp_attentions): + paths = renew_attention_paths(temp_attentions) + meta_path = { + "old": f"input_blocks.{i}.2", + "new": f"down_blocks.{block_id}.temp_attentions.{layer_in_block_id}", + } + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + resnet_0 = middle_blocks[0] + temporal_convs_0 = [key for key in resnet_0 if "temopral_conv" in key] + attentions = middle_blocks[1] + temp_attentions = middle_blocks[2] + resnet_1 = middle_blocks[3] + temporal_convs_1 = [key for key in resnet_1 if "temopral_conv" in key] + + resnet_0_paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnet_0) + meta_path = {"old": "middle_block.0", "new": "mid_block.resnets.0"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + resnet_0_paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, config=config, additional_replacements=[meta_path] + ) + + temp_conv_0_paths = renew_temp_conv_paths(temporal_convs_0) + meta_path = {"old": "middle_block.0.temopral_conv", "new": "mid_block.temp_convs.0"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + temp_conv_0_paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, config=config, additional_replacements=[meta_path] + ) + + resnet_1_paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnet_1) + meta_path = {"old": "middle_block.3", "new": "mid_block.resnets.1"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + resnet_1_paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, config=config, additional_replacements=[meta_path] + ) + + temp_conv_1_paths = renew_temp_conv_paths(temporal_convs_1) + meta_path = {"old": "middle_block.3.temopral_conv", "new": "mid_block.temp_convs.1"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + temp_conv_1_paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, config=config, additional_replacements=[meta_path] + ) + + attentions_paths = renew_attention_paths(attentions) + meta_path = {"old": "middle_block.1", "new": "mid_block.attentions.0"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + attentions_paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + temp_attentions_paths = renew_attention_paths(temp_attentions) + meta_path = {"old": "middle_block.2", "new": "mid_block.temp_attentions.0"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + temp_attentions_paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + for i in range(num_output_blocks): + block_id = i // (config["layers_per_block"] + 1) + layer_in_block_id = i % (config["layers_per_block"] + 1) + output_block_layers = [shave_segments(name, 2) for name in output_blocks[i]] + output_block_list = {} + + for layer in output_block_layers: + layer_id, layer_name = layer.split(".")[0], shave_segments(layer, 1) + if layer_id in output_block_list: + output_block_list[layer_id].append(layer_name) + else: + output_block_list[layer_id] = [layer_name] + + if len(output_block_list) > 1: + resnets = [key for key in output_blocks[i] if f"output_blocks.{i}.0" in key] + attentions = [key for key in output_blocks[i] if f"output_blocks.{i}.1" in key] + temp_attentions = [key for key in output_blocks[i] if f"output_blocks.{i}.2" in key] + + resnet_0_paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnets) + paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnets) + + meta_path = {"old": f"output_blocks.{i}.0", "new": f"up_blocks.{block_id}.resnets.{layer_in_block_id}"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + temporal_convs = [key for key in resnets if "temopral_conv" in key] + paths = renew_temp_conv_paths(temporal_convs) + meta_path = { + "old": f"output_blocks.{i}.0.temopral_conv", + "new": f"up_blocks.{block_id}.temp_convs.{layer_in_block_id}", + } + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + output_block_list = {k: sorted(v) for k, v in output_block_list.items()} + if ["conv.bias", "conv.weight"] in output_block_list.values(): + index = list(output_block_list.values()).index(["conv.bias", "conv.weight"]) + new_checkpoint[f"up_blocks.{block_id}.upsamplers.0.conv.weight"] = unet_state_dict[ + f"output_blocks.{i}.{index}.conv.weight" + ] + new_checkpoint[f"up_blocks.{block_id}.upsamplers.0.conv.bias"] = unet_state_dict[ + f"output_blocks.{i}.{index}.conv.bias" + ] + + # Clear attentions as they have been attributed above. + if len(attentions) == 2: + attentions = [] + + if len(attentions): + paths = renew_attention_paths(attentions) + meta_path = { + "old": f"output_blocks.{i}.1", + "new": f"up_blocks.{block_id}.attentions.{layer_in_block_id}", + } + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + if len(temp_attentions): + paths = renew_attention_paths(temp_attentions) + meta_path = { + "old": f"output_blocks.{i}.2", + "new": f"up_blocks.{block_id}.temp_attentions.{layer_in_block_id}", + } + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + else: + resnet_0_paths = renew_resnet_paths(output_block_layers, n_shave_prefix_segments=1) + for path in resnet_0_paths: + old_path = ".".join(["output_blocks", str(i), path["old"]]) + new_path = ".".join(["up_blocks", str(block_id), "resnets", str(layer_in_block_id), path["new"]]) + new_checkpoint[new_path] = unet_state_dict[old_path] + + temopral_conv_paths = [l for l in output_block_layers if "temopral_conv" in l] + for path in temopral_conv_paths: + pruned_path = path.split("temopral_conv.")[-1] + old_path = ".".join(["output_blocks", str(i), str(block_id), "temopral_conv", pruned_path]) + new_path = ".".join(["up_blocks", str(block_id), "temp_convs", str(layer_in_block_id), pruned_path]) + new_checkpoint[new_path] = unet_state_dict[old_path] + + return new_checkpoint + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() + + parser.add_argument( + "--unet_checkpoint_path", default=None, type=str, required=True, help="Path to the checkpoint to convert." + ) + parser.add_argument("--dump_path", default=None, type=str, required=True, help="Path to the output model.") + parser.add_argument("--push_to_hub", action="store_true") + args = parser.parse_args() + + # UNet + unet_checkpoint = torch.load(args.unet_checkpoint_path, map_location="cpu") + unet_checkpoint = unet_checkpoint["state_dict"] + unet = I2VGenXLUNet(sample_size=32) + + converted_ckpt = convert_ldm_unet_checkpoint(unet_checkpoint, unet.config) + + diff_0 = set(unet.state_dict().keys()) - set(converted_ckpt.keys()) + diff_1 = set(converted_ckpt.keys()) - set(unet.state_dict().keys()) + + assert len(diff_0) == len(diff_1) == 0, "Converted weights don't match" + + unet.load_state_dict(converted_ckpt, strict=True) + + # vae + temp_pipe = StableDiffusionPipeline.from_single_file( + "https://huggingface.co/ali-vilab/i2vgen-xl/blob/main/models/v2-1_512-ema-pruned.ckpt" + ) + vae = temp_pipe.vae + del temp_pipe + + # text encoder and tokenizer + text_encoder = CLIPTextModel.from_pretrained(CLIP_ID) + tokenizer = CLIPTokenizer.from_pretrained(CLIP_ID) + + # image encoder and feature extractor + image_encoder = CLIPVisionModelWithProjection.from_pretrained(CLIP_ID) + feature_extractor = CLIPImageProcessor.from_pretrained(CLIP_ID) + + # scheduler + # https://github.com/ali-vilab/i2vgen-xl/blob/main/configs/i2vgen_xl_train.yaml + scheduler = DDIMScheduler( + beta_schedule="squaredcos_cap_v2", + rescale_betas_zero_snr=True, + set_alpha_to_one=True, + clip_sample=False, + steps_offset=1, + timestep_spacing="leading", + prediction_type="v_prediction", + ) + + # final + pipeline = I2VGenXLPipeline( + unet=unet, + vae=vae, + image_encoder=image_encoder, + feature_extractor=feature_extractor, + text_encoder=text_encoder, + tokenizer=tokenizer, + scheduler=scheduler, + ) + + pipeline.save_pretrained(args.dump_path, push_to_hub=args.push_to_hub) diff --git a/diffusers/scripts/convert_if.py b/diffusers/scripts/convert_if.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..85c739ca92f04bd2e1fefdaca3ff15b59f75c66e --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/scripts/convert_if.py @@ -0,0 +1,1250 @@ +import argparse +import inspect +import os + +import numpy as np +import torch +import yaml +from torch.nn import functional as F +from transformers import CLIPConfig, CLIPImageProcessor, CLIPVisionModelWithProjection, T5EncoderModel, T5Tokenizer + +from diffusers import DDPMScheduler, IFPipeline, IFSuperResolutionPipeline, UNet2DConditionModel +from diffusers.pipelines.deepfloyd_if.safety_checker import IFSafetyChecker + + +def parse_args(): + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() + + parser.add_argument("--dump_path", required=False, default=None, type=str) + + parser.add_argument("--dump_path_stage_2", required=False, default=None, type=str) + + parser.add_argument("--dump_path_stage_3", required=False, default=None, type=str) + + parser.add_argument("--unet_config", required=False, default=None, type=str, help="Path to unet config file") + + parser.add_argument( + "--unet_checkpoint_path", required=False, default=None, type=str, help="Path to unet checkpoint file" + ) + + parser.add_argument( + "--unet_checkpoint_path_stage_2", + required=False, + default=None, + type=str, + help="Path to stage 2 unet checkpoint file", + ) + + parser.add_argument( + "--unet_checkpoint_path_stage_3", + required=False, + default=None, + type=str, + help="Path to stage 3 unet checkpoint file", + ) + + parser.add_argument("--p_head_path", type=str, required=True) + + parser.add_argument("--w_head_path", type=str, required=True) + + args = parser.parse_args() + + return args + + +def main(args): + tokenizer = T5Tokenizer.from_pretrained("google/t5-v1_1-xxl") + text_encoder = T5EncoderModel.from_pretrained("google/t5-v1_1-xxl") + + feature_extractor = CLIPImageProcessor.from_pretrained("openai/clip-vit-large-patch14") + safety_checker = convert_safety_checker(p_head_path=args.p_head_path, w_head_path=args.w_head_path) + + if args.unet_config is not None and args.unet_checkpoint_path is not None and args.dump_path is not None: + convert_stage_1_pipeline(tokenizer, text_encoder, feature_extractor, safety_checker, args) + + if args.unet_checkpoint_path_stage_2 is not None and args.dump_path_stage_2 is not None: + convert_super_res_pipeline(tokenizer, text_encoder, feature_extractor, safety_checker, args, stage=2) + + if args.unet_checkpoint_path_stage_3 is not None and args.dump_path_stage_3 is not None: + convert_super_res_pipeline(tokenizer, text_encoder, feature_extractor, safety_checker, args, stage=3) + + +def convert_stage_1_pipeline(tokenizer, text_encoder, feature_extractor, safety_checker, args): + unet = get_stage_1_unet(args.unet_config, args.unet_checkpoint_path) + + scheduler = DDPMScheduler( + variance_type="learned_range", + beta_schedule="squaredcos_cap_v2", + prediction_type="epsilon", + thresholding=True, + dynamic_thresholding_ratio=0.95, + sample_max_value=1.5, + ) + + pipe = IFPipeline( + tokenizer=tokenizer, + text_encoder=text_encoder, + unet=unet, + scheduler=scheduler, + safety_checker=safety_checker, + feature_extractor=feature_extractor, + requires_safety_checker=True, + ) + + pipe.save_pretrained(args.dump_path) + + +def convert_super_res_pipeline(tokenizer, text_encoder, feature_extractor, safety_checker, args, stage): + if stage == 2: + unet_checkpoint_path = args.unet_checkpoint_path_stage_2 + sample_size = None + dump_path = args.dump_path_stage_2 + elif stage == 3: + unet_checkpoint_path = args.unet_checkpoint_path_stage_3 + sample_size = 1024 + dump_path = args.dump_path_stage_3 + else: + assert False + + unet = get_super_res_unet(unet_checkpoint_path, verify_param_count=False, sample_size=sample_size) + + image_noising_scheduler = DDPMScheduler( + beta_schedule="squaredcos_cap_v2", + ) + + scheduler = DDPMScheduler( + variance_type="learned_range", + beta_schedule="squaredcos_cap_v2", + prediction_type="epsilon", + thresholding=True, + dynamic_thresholding_ratio=0.95, + sample_max_value=1.0, + ) + + pipe = IFSuperResolutionPipeline( + tokenizer=tokenizer, + text_encoder=text_encoder, + unet=unet, + scheduler=scheduler, + image_noising_scheduler=image_noising_scheduler, + safety_checker=safety_checker, + feature_extractor=feature_extractor, + requires_safety_checker=True, + ) + + pipe.save_pretrained(dump_path) + + +def get_stage_1_unet(unet_config, unet_checkpoint_path): + original_unet_config = yaml.safe_load(unet_config) + original_unet_config = original_unet_config["params"] + + unet_diffusers_config = create_unet_diffusers_config(original_unet_config) + + unet = UNet2DConditionModel(**unet_diffusers_config) + + device = "cuda" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu" + unet_checkpoint = torch.load(unet_checkpoint_path, map_location=device) + + converted_unet_checkpoint = convert_ldm_unet_checkpoint( + unet_checkpoint, unet_diffusers_config, path=unet_checkpoint_path + ) + + unet.load_state_dict(converted_unet_checkpoint) + + return unet + + +def convert_safety_checker(p_head_path, w_head_path): + state_dict = {} + + # p head + + p_head = np.load(p_head_path) + + p_head_weights = p_head["weights"] + p_head_weights = torch.from_numpy(p_head_weights) + p_head_weights = p_head_weights.unsqueeze(0) + + p_head_biases = p_head["biases"] + p_head_biases = torch.from_numpy(p_head_biases) + p_head_biases = p_head_biases.unsqueeze(0) + + state_dict["p_head.weight"] = p_head_weights + state_dict["p_head.bias"] = p_head_biases + + # w head + + w_head = np.load(w_head_path) + + w_head_weights = w_head["weights"] + w_head_weights = torch.from_numpy(w_head_weights) + w_head_weights = w_head_weights.unsqueeze(0) + + w_head_biases = w_head["biases"] + w_head_biases = torch.from_numpy(w_head_biases) + w_head_biases = w_head_biases.unsqueeze(0) + + state_dict["w_head.weight"] = w_head_weights + state_dict["w_head.bias"] = w_head_biases + + # vision model + + vision_model = CLIPVisionModelWithProjection.from_pretrained("openai/clip-vit-large-patch14") + vision_model_state_dict = vision_model.state_dict() + + for key, value in vision_model_state_dict.items(): + key = f"vision_model.{key}" + state_dict[key] = value + + # full model + + config = CLIPConfig.from_pretrained("openai/clip-vit-large-patch14") + safety_checker = IFSafetyChecker(config) + + safety_checker.load_state_dict(state_dict) + + return safety_checker + + +def create_unet_diffusers_config(original_unet_config, class_embed_type=None): + attention_resolutions = parse_list(original_unet_config["attention_resolutions"]) + attention_resolutions = [original_unet_config["image_size"] // int(res) for res in attention_resolutions] + + channel_mult = parse_list(original_unet_config["channel_mult"]) + block_out_channels = [original_unet_config["model_channels"] * mult for mult in channel_mult] + + down_block_types = [] + resolution = 1 + + for i in range(len(block_out_channels)): + if resolution in attention_resolutions: + block_type = "SimpleCrossAttnDownBlock2D" + elif original_unet_config["resblock_updown"]: + block_type = "ResnetDownsampleBlock2D" + else: + block_type = "DownBlock2D" + + down_block_types.append(block_type) + + if i != len(block_out_channels) - 1: + resolution *= 2 + + up_block_types = [] + for i in range(len(block_out_channels)): + if resolution in attention_resolutions: + block_type = "SimpleCrossAttnUpBlock2D" + elif original_unet_config["resblock_updown"]: + block_type = "ResnetUpsampleBlock2D" + else: + block_type = "UpBlock2D" + up_block_types.append(block_type) + resolution //= 2 + + head_dim = original_unet_config["num_head_channels"] + + use_linear_projection = ( + original_unet_config["use_linear_in_transformer"] + if "use_linear_in_transformer" in original_unet_config + else False + ) + if use_linear_projection: + # stable diffusion 2-base-512 and 2-768 + if head_dim is None: + head_dim = [5, 10, 20, 20] + + projection_class_embeddings_input_dim = None + + if class_embed_type is None: + if "num_classes" in original_unet_config: + if original_unet_config["num_classes"] == "sequential": + class_embed_type = "projection" + assert "adm_in_channels" in original_unet_config + projection_class_embeddings_input_dim = original_unet_config["adm_in_channels"] + else: + raise NotImplementedError( + f"Unknown conditional unet num_classes config: {original_unet_config['num_classes']}" + ) + + config = { + "sample_size": original_unet_config["image_size"], + "in_channels": original_unet_config["in_channels"], + "down_block_types": tuple(down_block_types), + "block_out_channels": tuple(block_out_channels), + "layers_per_block": original_unet_config["num_res_blocks"], + "cross_attention_dim": original_unet_config["encoder_channels"], + "attention_head_dim": head_dim, + "use_linear_projection": use_linear_projection, + "class_embed_type": class_embed_type, + "projection_class_embeddings_input_dim": projection_class_embeddings_input_dim, + "out_channels": original_unet_config["out_channels"], + "up_block_types": tuple(up_block_types), + "upcast_attention": False, # TODO: guessing + "cross_attention_norm": "group_norm", + "mid_block_type": "UNetMidBlock2DSimpleCrossAttn", + "addition_embed_type": "text", + "act_fn": "gelu", + } + + if original_unet_config["use_scale_shift_norm"]: + config["resnet_time_scale_shift"] = "scale_shift" + + if "encoder_dim" in original_unet_config: + config["encoder_hid_dim"] = original_unet_config["encoder_dim"] + + return config + + +def convert_ldm_unet_checkpoint(unet_state_dict, config, path=None): + """ + Takes a state dict and a config, and returns a converted checkpoint. + """ + new_checkpoint = {} + + new_checkpoint["time_embedding.linear_1.weight"] = unet_state_dict["time_embed.0.weight"] + new_checkpoint["time_embedding.linear_1.bias"] = unet_state_dict["time_embed.0.bias"] + new_checkpoint["time_embedding.linear_2.weight"] = unet_state_dict["time_embed.2.weight"] + new_checkpoint["time_embedding.linear_2.bias"] = unet_state_dict["time_embed.2.bias"] + + if config["class_embed_type"] in [None, "identity"]: + # No parameters to port + ... + elif config["class_embed_type"] == "timestep" or config["class_embed_type"] == "projection": + new_checkpoint["class_embedding.linear_1.weight"] = unet_state_dict["label_emb.0.0.weight"] + new_checkpoint["class_embedding.linear_1.bias"] = unet_state_dict["label_emb.0.0.bias"] + new_checkpoint["class_embedding.linear_2.weight"] = unet_state_dict["label_emb.0.2.weight"] + new_checkpoint["class_embedding.linear_2.bias"] = unet_state_dict["label_emb.0.2.bias"] + else: + raise NotImplementedError(f"Not implemented `class_embed_type`: {config['class_embed_type']}") + + new_checkpoint["conv_in.weight"] = unet_state_dict["input_blocks.0.0.weight"] + new_checkpoint["conv_in.bias"] = unet_state_dict["input_blocks.0.0.bias"] + + new_checkpoint["conv_norm_out.weight"] = unet_state_dict["out.0.weight"] + new_checkpoint["conv_norm_out.bias"] = unet_state_dict["out.0.bias"] + new_checkpoint["conv_out.weight"] = unet_state_dict["out.2.weight"] + new_checkpoint["conv_out.bias"] = unet_state_dict["out.2.bias"] + + # Retrieves the keys for the input blocks only + num_input_blocks = len({".".join(layer.split(".")[:2]) for layer in unet_state_dict if "input_blocks" in layer}) + input_blocks = { + layer_id: [key for key in unet_state_dict if f"input_blocks.{layer_id}." in key] + for layer_id in range(num_input_blocks) + } + + # Retrieves the keys for the middle blocks only + num_middle_blocks = len({".".join(layer.split(".")[:2]) for layer in unet_state_dict if "middle_block" in layer}) + middle_blocks = { + layer_id: [key for key in unet_state_dict if f"middle_block.{layer_id}" in key] + for layer_id in range(num_middle_blocks) + } + + # Retrieves the keys for the output blocks only + num_output_blocks = len({".".join(layer.split(".")[:2]) for layer in unet_state_dict if "output_blocks" in layer}) + output_blocks = { + layer_id: [key for key in unet_state_dict if f"output_blocks.{layer_id}." in key] + for layer_id in range(num_output_blocks) + } + + for i in range(1, num_input_blocks): + block_id = (i - 1) // (config["layers_per_block"] + 1) + layer_in_block_id = (i - 1) % (config["layers_per_block"] + 1) + + resnets = [ + key for key in input_blocks[i] if f"input_blocks.{i}.0" in key and f"input_blocks.{i}.0.op" not in key + ] + attentions = [key for key in input_blocks[i] if f"input_blocks.{i}.1" in key] + + if f"input_blocks.{i}.0.op.weight" in unet_state_dict: + new_checkpoint[f"down_blocks.{block_id}.downsamplers.0.conv.weight"] = unet_state_dict.pop( + f"input_blocks.{i}.0.op.weight" + ) + new_checkpoint[f"down_blocks.{block_id}.downsamplers.0.conv.bias"] = unet_state_dict.pop( + f"input_blocks.{i}.0.op.bias" + ) + + paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnets) + + # TODO need better check than i in [4, 8, 12, 16] + block_type = config["down_block_types"][block_id] + if (block_type == "ResnetDownsampleBlock2D" or block_type == "SimpleCrossAttnDownBlock2D") and i in [ + 4, + 8, + 12, + 16, + ]: + meta_path = {"old": f"input_blocks.{i}.0", "new": f"down_blocks.{block_id}.downsamplers.0"} + else: + meta_path = {"old": f"input_blocks.{i}.0", "new": f"down_blocks.{block_id}.resnets.{layer_in_block_id}"} + + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + if len(attentions): + old_path = f"input_blocks.{i}.1" + new_path = f"down_blocks.{block_id}.attentions.{layer_in_block_id}" + + assign_attention_to_checkpoint( + new_checkpoint=new_checkpoint, + unet_state_dict=unet_state_dict, + old_path=old_path, + new_path=new_path, + config=config, + ) + + paths = renew_attention_paths(attentions) + meta_path = {"old": old_path, "new": new_path} + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, + new_checkpoint, + unet_state_dict, + additional_replacements=[meta_path], + config=config, + ) + + resnet_0 = middle_blocks[0] + attentions = middle_blocks[1] + resnet_1 = middle_blocks[2] + + resnet_0_paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnet_0) + assign_to_checkpoint(resnet_0_paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, config=config) + + resnet_1_paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnet_1) + assign_to_checkpoint(resnet_1_paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, config=config) + + old_path = "middle_block.1" + new_path = "mid_block.attentions.0" + + assign_attention_to_checkpoint( + new_checkpoint=new_checkpoint, + unet_state_dict=unet_state_dict, + old_path=old_path, + new_path=new_path, + config=config, + ) + + attentions_paths = renew_attention_paths(attentions) + meta_path = {"old": "middle_block.1", "new": "mid_block.attentions.0"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + attentions_paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + for i in range(num_output_blocks): + block_id = i // (config["layers_per_block"] + 1) + layer_in_block_id = i % (config["layers_per_block"] + 1) + output_block_layers = [shave_segments(name, 2) for name in output_blocks[i]] + output_block_list = {} + + for layer in output_block_layers: + layer_id, layer_name = layer.split(".")[0], shave_segments(layer, 1) + if layer_id in output_block_list: + output_block_list[layer_id].append(layer_name) + else: + output_block_list[layer_id] = [layer_name] + + # len(output_block_list) == 1 -> resnet + # len(output_block_list) == 2 -> resnet, attention + # len(output_block_list) == 3 -> resnet, attention, upscale resnet + + if len(output_block_list) > 1: + resnets = [key for key in output_blocks[i] if f"output_blocks.{i}.0" in key] + attentions = [key for key in output_blocks[i] if f"output_blocks.{i}.1" in key] + + paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnets) + + meta_path = {"old": f"output_blocks.{i}.0", "new": f"up_blocks.{block_id}.resnets.{layer_in_block_id}"} + + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + output_block_list = {k: sorted(v) for k, v in output_block_list.items()} + if ["conv.bias", "conv.weight"] in output_block_list.values(): + index = list(output_block_list.values()).index(["conv.bias", "conv.weight"]) + new_checkpoint[f"up_blocks.{block_id}.upsamplers.0.conv.weight"] = unet_state_dict[ + f"output_blocks.{i}.{index}.conv.weight" + ] + new_checkpoint[f"up_blocks.{block_id}.upsamplers.0.conv.bias"] = unet_state_dict[ + f"output_blocks.{i}.{index}.conv.bias" + ] + + # Clear attentions as they have been attributed above. + if len(attentions) == 2: + attentions = [] + + if len(attentions): + old_path = f"output_blocks.{i}.1" + new_path = f"up_blocks.{block_id}.attentions.{layer_in_block_id}" + + assign_attention_to_checkpoint( + new_checkpoint=new_checkpoint, + unet_state_dict=unet_state_dict, + old_path=old_path, + new_path=new_path, + config=config, + ) + + paths = renew_attention_paths(attentions) + meta_path = { + "old": old_path, + "new": new_path, + } + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + if len(output_block_list) == 3: + resnets = [key for key in output_blocks[i] if f"output_blocks.{i}.2" in key] + paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnets) + meta_path = {"old": f"output_blocks.{i}.2", "new": f"up_blocks.{block_id}.upsamplers.0"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + else: + resnet_0_paths = renew_resnet_paths(output_block_layers, n_shave_prefix_segments=1) + for path in resnet_0_paths: + old_path = ".".join(["output_blocks", str(i), path["old"]]) + new_path = ".".join(["up_blocks", str(block_id), "resnets", str(layer_in_block_id), path["new"]]) + + new_checkpoint[new_path] = unet_state_dict[old_path] + + if "encoder_proj.weight" in unet_state_dict: + new_checkpoint["encoder_hid_proj.weight"] = unet_state_dict.pop("encoder_proj.weight") + new_checkpoint["encoder_hid_proj.bias"] = unet_state_dict.pop("encoder_proj.bias") + + if "encoder_pooling.0.weight" in unet_state_dict: + new_checkpoint["add_embedding.norm1.weight"] = unet_state_dict.pop("encoder_pooling.0.weight") + new_checkpoint["add_embedding.norm1.bias"] = unet_state_dict.pop("encoder_pooling.0.bias") + + new_checkpoint["add_embedding.pool.positional_embedding"] = unet_state_dict.pop( + "encoder_pooling.1.positional_embedding" + ) + new_checkpoint["add_embedding.pool.k_proj.weight"] = unet_state_dict.pop("encoder_pooling.1.k_proj.weight") + new_checkpoint["add_embedding.pool.k_proj.bias"] = unet_state_dict.pop("encoder_pooling.1.k_proj.bias") + new_checkpoint["add_embedding.pool.q_proj.weight"] = unet_state_dict.pop("encoder_pooling.1.q_proj.weight") + new_checkpoint["add_embedding.pool.q_proj.bias"] = unet_state_dict.pop("encoder_pooling.1.q_proj.bias") + new_checkpoint["add_embedding.pool.v_proj.weight"] = unet_state_dict.pop("encoder_pooling.1.v_proj.weight") + new_checkpoint["add_embedding.pool.v_proj.bias"] = unet_state_dict.pop("encoder_pooling.1.v_proj.bias") + + new_checkpoint["add_embedding.proj.weight"] = unet_state_dict.pop("encoder_pooling.2.weight") + new_checkpoint["add_embedding.proj.bias"] = unet_state_dict.pop("encoder_pooling.2.bias") + + new_checkpoint["add_embedding.norm2.weight"] = unet_state_dict.pop("encoder_pooling.3.weight") + new_checkpoint["add_embedding.norm2.bias"] = unet_state_dict.pop("encoder_pooling.3.bias") + + return new_checkpoint + + +def shave_segments(path, n_shave_prefix_segments=1): + """ + Removes segments. Positive values shave the first segments, negative shave the last segments. + """ + if n_shave_prefix_segments >= 0: + return ".".join(path.split(".")[n_shave_prefix_segments:]) + else: + return ".".join(path.split(".")[:n_shave_prefix_segments]) + + +def renew_resnet_paths(old_list, n_shave_prefix_segments=0): + """ + Updates paths inside resnets to the new naming scheme (local renaming) + """ + mapping = [] + for old_item in old_list: + new_item = old_item.replace("in_layers.0", "norm1") + new_item = new_item.replace("in_layers.2", "conv1") + + new_item = new_item.replace("out_layers.0", "norm2") + new_item = new_item.replace("out_layers.3", "conv2") + + new_item = new_item.replace("emb_layers.1", "time_emb_proj") + new_item = new_item.replace("skip_connection", "conv_shortcut") + + new_item = shave_segments(new_item, n_shave_prefix_segments=n_shave_prefix_segments) + + mapping.append({"old": old_item, "new": new_item}) + + return mapping + + +def renew_attention_paths(old_list, n_shave_prefix_segments=0): + """ + Updates paths inside attentions to the new naming scheme (local renaming) + """ + mapping = [] + for old_item in old_list: + new_item = old_item + + if "qkv" in new_item: + continue + + if "encoder_kv" in new_item: + continue + + new_item = new_item.replace("norm.weight", "group_norm.weight") + new_item = new_item.replace("norm.bias", "group_norm.bias") + + new_item = new_item.replace("proj_out.weight", "to_out.0.weight") + new_item = new_item.replace("proj_out.bias", "to_out.0.bias") + + new_item = new_item.replace("norm_encoder.weight", "norm_cross.weight") + new_item = new_item.replace("norm_encoder.bias", "norm_cross.bias") + + new_item = shave_segments(new_item, n_shave_prefix_segments=n_shave_prefix_segments) + + mapping.append({"old": old_item, "new": new_item}) + + return mapping + + +def assign_attention_to_checkpoint(new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, old_path, new_path, config): + qkv_weight = unet_state_dict.pop(f"{old_path}.qkv.weight") + qkv_weight = qkv_weight[:, :, 0] + + qkv_bias = unet_state_dict.pop(f"{old_path}.qkv.bias") + + is_cross_attn_only = "only_cross_attention" in config and config["only_cross_attention"] + + split = 1 if is_cross_attn_only else 3 + + weights, bias = split_attentions( + weight=qkv_weight, + bias=qkv_bias, + split=split, + chunk_size=config["attention_head_dim"], + ) + + if is_cross_attn_only: + query_weight, q_bias = weights, bias + new_checkpoint[f"{new_path}.to_q.weight"] = query_weight[0] + new_checkpoint[f"{new_path}.to_q.bias"] = q_bias[0] + else: + [query_weight, key_weight, value_weight], [q_bias, k_bias, v_bias] = weights, bias + new_checkpoint[f"{new_path}.to_q.weight"] = query_weight + new_checkpoint[f"{new_path}.to_q.bias"] = q_bias + new_checkpoint[f"{new_path}.to_k.weight"] = key_weight + new_checkpoint[f"{new_path}.to_k.bias"] = k_bias + new_checkpoint[f"{new_path}.to_v.weight"] = value_weight + new_checkpoint[f"{new_path}.to_v.bias"] = v_bias + + encoder_kv_weight = unet_state_dict.pop(f"{old_path}.encoder_kv.weight") + encoder_kv_weight = encoder_kv_weight[:, :, 0] + + encoder_kv_bias = unet_state_dict.pop(f"{old_path}.encoder_kv.bias") + + [encoder_k_weight, encoder_v_weight], [encoder_k_bias, encoder_v_bias] = split_attentions( + weight=encoder_kv_weight, + bias=encoder_kv_bias, + split=2, + chunk_size=config["attention_head_dim"], + ) + + new_checkpoint[f"{new_path}.add_k_proj.weight"] = encoder_k_weight + new_checkpoint[f"{new_path}.add_k_proj.bias"] = encoder_k_bias + new_checkpoint[f"{new_path}.add_v_proj.weight"] = encoder_v_weight + new_checkpoint[f"{new_path}.add_v_proj.bias"] = encoder_v_bias + + +def assign_to_checkpoint(paths, checkpoint, old_checkpoint, additional_replacements=None, config=None): + """ + This does the final conversion step: take locally converted weights and apply a global renaming to them. It splits + attention layers, and takes into account additional replacements that may arise. + + Assigns the weights to the new checkpoint. + """ + assert isinstance(paths, list), "Paths should be a list of dicts containing 'old' and 'new' keys." + + for path in paths: + new_path = path["new"] + + # Global renaming happens here + new_path = new_path.replace("middle_block.0", "mid_block.resnets.0") + new_path = new_path.replace("middle_block.1", "mid_block.attentions.0") + new_path = new_path.replace("middle_block.2", "mid_block.resnets.1") + + if additional_replacements is not None: + for replacement in additional_replacements: + new_path = new_path.replace(replacement["old"], replacement["new"]) + + # proj_attn.weight has to be converted from conv 1D to linear + if "proj_attn.weight" in new_path or "to_out.0.weight" in new_path: + checkpoint[new_path] = old_checkpoint[path["old"]][:, :, 0] + else: + checkpoint[new_path] = old_checkpoint[path["old"]] + + +# TODO maybe document and/or can do more efficiently (build indices in for loop and extract once for each split?) +def split_attentions(*, weight, bias, split, chunk_size): + weights = [None] * split + biases = [None] * split + + weights_biases_idx = 0 + + for starting_row_index in range(0, weight.shape[0], chunk_size): + row_indices = torch.arange(starting_row_index, starting_row_index + chunk_size) + + weight_rows = weight[row_indices, :] + bias_rows = bias[row_indices] + + if weights[weights_biases_idx] is None: + weights[weights_biases_idx] = weight_rows + biases[weights_biases_idx] = bias_rows + else: + assert weights[weights_biases_idx] is not None + weights[weights_biases_idx] = torch.concat([weights[weights_biases_idx], weight_rows]) + biases[weights_biases_idx] = torch.concat([biases[weights_biases_idx], bias_rows]) + + weights_biases_idx = (weights_biases_idx + 1) % split + + return weights, biases + + +def parse_list(value): + if isinstance(value, str): + value = value.split(",") + value = [int(v) for v in value] + elif isinstance(value, list): + pass + else: + raise ValueError(f"Can't parse list for type: {type(value)}") + + return value + + +# below is copy and pasted from original convert_if_stage_2.py script + + +def get_super_res_unet(unet_checkpoint_path, verify_param_count=True, sample_size=None): + orig_path = unet_checkpoint_path + + original_unet_config = yaml.safe_load(os.path.join(orig_path, "config.yml")) + original_unet_config = original_unet_config["params"] + + unet_diffusers_config = superres_create_unet_diffusers_config(original_unet_config) + unet_diffusers_config["time_embedding_dim"] = original_unet_config["model_channels"] * int( + original_unet_config["channel_mult"].split(",")[-1] + ) + if original_unet_config["encoder_dim"] != original_unet_config["encoder_channels"]: + unet_diffusers_config["encoder_hid_dim"] = original_unet_config["encoder_dim"] + unet_diffusers_config["class_embed_type"] = "timestep" + unet_diffusers_config["addition_embed_type"] = "text" + + unet_diffusers_config["time_embedding_act_fn"] = "gelu" + unet_diffusers_config["resnet_skip_time_act"] = True + unet_diffusers_config["resnet_out_scale_factor"] = 1 / 0.7071 + unet_diffusers_config["mid_block_scale_factor"] = 1 / 0.7071 + unet_diffusers_config["only_cross_attention"] = ( + bool(original_unet_config["disable_self_attentions"]) + if ( + "disable_self_attentions" in original_unet_config + and isinstance(original_unet_config["disable_self_attentions"], int) + ) + else True + ) + + if sample_size is None: + unet_diffusers_config["sample_size"] = original_unet_config["image_size"] + else: + # The second upscaler unet's sample size is incorrectly specified + # in the config and is instead hardcoded in source + unet_diffusers_config["sample_size"] = sample_size + + unet_checkpoint = torch.load(os.path.join(unet_checkpoint_path, "pytorch_model.bin"), map_location="cpu") + + if verify_param_count: + # check that architecture matches - is a bit slow + verify_param_count(orig_path, unet_diffusers_config) + + converted_unet_checkpoint = superres_convert_ldm_unet_checkpoint( + unet_checkpoint, unet_diffusers_config, path=unet_checkpoint_path + ) + converted_keys = converted_unet_checkpoint.keys() + + model = UNet2DConditionModel(**unet_diffusers_config) + expected_weights = model.state_dict().keys() + + diff_c_e = set(converted_keys) - set(expected_weights) + diff_e_c = set(expected_weights) - set(converted_keys) + + assert len(diff_e_c) == 0, f"Expected, but not converted: {diff_e_c}" + assert len(diff_c_e) == 0, f"Converted, but not expected: {diff_c_e}" + + model.load_state_dict(converted_unet_checkpoint) + + return model + + +def superres_create_unet_diffusers_config(original_unet_config): + attention_resolutions = parse_list(original_unet_config["attention_resolutions"]) + attention_resolutions = [original_unet_config["image_size"] // int(res) for res in attention_resolutions] + + channel_mult = parse_list(original_unet_config["channel_mult"]) + block_out_channels = [original_unet_config["model_channels"] * mult for mult in channel_mult] + + down_block_types = [] + resolution = 1 + + for i in range(len(block_out_channels)): + if resolution in attention_resolutions: + block_type = "SimpleCrossAttnDownBlock2D" + elif original_unet_config["resblock_updown"]: + block_type = "ResnetDownsampleBlock2D" + else: + block_type = "DownBlock2D" + + down_block_types.append(block_type) + + if i != len(block_out_channels) - 1: + resolution *= 2 + + up_block_types = [] + for i in range(len(block_out_channels)): + if resolution in attention_resolutions: + block_type = "SimpleCrossAttnUpBlock2D" + elif original_unet_config["resblock_updown"]: + block_type = "ResnetUpsampleBlock2D" + else: + block_type = "UpBlock2D" + up_block_types.append(block_type) + resolution //= 2 + + head_dim = original_unet_config["num_head_channels"] + use_linear_projection = ( + original_unet_config["use_linear_in_transformer"] + if "use_linear_in_transformer" in original_unet_config + else False + ) + if use_linear_projection: + # stable diffusion 2-base-512 and 2-768 + if head_dim is None: + head_dim = [5, 10, 20, 20] + + class_embed_type = None + projection_class_embeddings_input_dim = None + + if "num_classes" in original_unet_config: + if original_unet_config["num_classes"] == "sequential": + class_embed_type = "projection" + assert "adm_in_channels" in original_unet_config + projection_class_embeddings_input_dim = original_unet_config["adm_in_channels"] + else: + raise NotImplementedError( + f"Unknown conditional unet num_classes config: {original_unet_config['num_classes']}" + ) + + config = { + "in_channels": original_unet_config["in_channels"], + "down_block_types": tuple(down_block_types), + "block_out_channels": tuple(block_out_channels), + "layers_per_block": tuple(original_unet_config["num_res_blocks"]), + "cross_attention_dim": original_unet_config["encoder_channels"], + "attention_head_dim": head_dim, + "use_linear_projection": use_linear_projection, + "class_embed_type": class_embed_type, + "projection_class_embeddings_input_dim": projection_class_embeddings_input_dim, + "out_channels": original_unet_config["out_channels"], + "up_block_types": tuple(up_block_types), + "upcast_attention": False, # TODO: guessing + "cross_attention_norm": "group_norm", + "mid_block_type": "UNetMidBlock2DSimpleCrossAttn", + "act_fn": "gelu", + } + + if original_unet_config["use_scale_shift_norm"]: + config["resnet_time_scale_shift"] = "scale_shift" + + return config + + +def superres_convert_ldm_unet_checkpoint(unet_state_dict, config, path=None, extract_ema=False): + """ + Takes a state dict and a config, and returns a converted checkpoint. + """ + new_checkpoint = {} + + new_checkpoint["time_embedding.linear_1.weight"] = unet_state_dict["time_embed.0.weight"] + new_checkpoint["time_embedding.linear_1.bias"] = unet_state_dict["time_embed.0.bias"] + new_checkpoint["time_embedding.linear_2.weight"] = unet_state_dict["time_embed.2.weight"] + new_checkpoint["time_embedding.linear_2.bias"] = unet_state_dict["time_embed.2.bias"] + + if config["class_embed_type"] is None: + # No parameters to port + ... + elif config["class_embed_type"] == "timestep" or config["class_embed_type"] == "projection": + new_checkpoint["class_embedding.linear_1.weight"] = unet_state_dict["aug_proj.0.weight"] + new_checkpoint["class_embedding.linear_1.bias"] = unet_state_dict["aug_proj.0.bias"] + new_checkpoint["class_embedding.linear_2.weight"] = unet_state_dict["aug_proj.2.weight"] + new_checkpoint["class_embedding.linear_2.bias"] = unet_state_dict["aug_proj.2.bias"] + else: + raise NotImplementedError(f"Not implemented `class_embed_type`: {config['class_embed_type']}") + + if "encoder_proj.weight" in unet_state_dict: + new_checkpoint["encoder_hid_proj.weight"] = unet_state_dict["encoder_proj.weight"] + new_checkpoint["encoder_hid_proj.bias"] = unet_state_dict["encoder_proj.bias"] + + if "encoder_pooling.0.weight" in unet_state_dict: + mapping = { + "encoder_pooling.0": "add_embedding.norm1", + "encoder_pooling.1": "add_embedding.pool", + "encoder_pooling.2": "add_embedding.proj", + "encoder_pooling.3": "add_embedding.norm2", + } + for key in unet_state_dict.keys(): + if key.startswith("encoder_pooling"): + prefix = key[: len("encoder_pooling.0")] + new_key = key.replace(prefix, mapping[prefix]) + new_checkpoint[new_key] = unet_state_dict[key] + + new_checkpoint["conv_in.weight"] = unet_state_dict["input_blocks.0.0.weight"] + new_checkpoint["conv_in.bias"] = unet_state_dict["input_blocks.0.0.bias"] + + new_checkpoint["conv_norm_out.weight"] = unet_state_dict["out.0.weight"] + new_checkpoint["conv_norm_out.bias"] = unet_state_dict["out.0.bias"] + new_checkpoint["conv_out.weight"] = unet_state_dict["out.2.weight"] + new_checkpoint["conv_out.bias"] = unet_state_dict["out.2.bias"] + + # Retrieves the keys for the input blocks only + num_input_blocks = len({".".join(layer.split(".")[:2]) for layer in unet_state_dict if "input_blocks" in layer}) + input_blocks = { + layer_id: [key for key in unet_state_dict if f"input_blocks.{layer_id}." in key] + for layer_id in range(num_input_blocks) + } + + # Retrieves the keys for the middle blocks only + num_middle_blocks = len({".".join(layer.split(".")[:2]) for layer in unet_state_dict if "middle_block" in layer}) + middle_blocks = { + layer_id: [key for key in unet_state_dict if f"middle_block.{layer_id}" in key] + for layer_id in range(num_middle_blocks) + } + + # Retrieves the keys for the output blocks only + num_output_blocks = len({".".join(layer.split(".")[:2]) for layer in unet_state_dict if "output_blocks" in layer}) + output_blocks = { + layer_id: [key for key in unet_state_dict if f"output_blocks.{layer_id}." in key] + for layer_id in range(num_output_blocks) + } + if not isinstance(config["layers_per_block"], int): + layers_per_block_list = [e + 1 for e in config["layers_per_block"]] + layers_per_block_cumsum = list(np.cumsum(layers_per_block_list)) + downsampler_ids = layers_per_block_cumsum + else: + # TODO need better check than i in [4, 8, 12, 16] + downsampler_ids = [4, 8, 12, 16] + + for i in range(1, num_input_blocks): + if isinstance(config["layers_per_block"], int): + layers_per_block = config["layers_per_block"] + block_id = (i - 1) // (layers_per_block + 1) + layer_in_block_id = (i - 1) % (layers_per_block + 1) + else: + block_id = next(k for k, n in enumerate(layers_per_block_cumsum) if (i - 1) < n) + passed_blocks = layers_per_block_cumsum[block_id - 1] if block_id > 0 else 0 + layer_in_block_id = (i - 1) - passed_blocks + + resnets = [ + key for key in input_blocks[i] if f"input_blocks.{i}.0" in key and f"input_blocks.{i}.0.op" not in key + ] + attentions = [key for key in input_blocks[i] if f"input_blocks.{i}.1" in key] + + if f"input_blocks.{i}.0.op.weight" in unet_state_dict: + new_checkpoint[f"down_blocks.{block_id}.downsamplers.0.conv.weight"] = unet_state_dict.pop( + f"input_blocks.{i}.0.op.weight" + ) + new_checkpoint[f"down_blocks.{block_id}.downsamplers.0.conv.bias"] = unet_state_dict.pop( + f"input_blocks.{i}.0.op.bias" + ) + + paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnets) + + block_type = config["down_block_types"][block_id] + if ( + block_type == "ResnetDownsampleBlock2D" or block_type == "SimpleCrossAttnDownBlock2D" + ) and i in downsampler_ids: + meta_path = {"old": f"input_blocks.{i}.0", "new": f"down_blocks.{block_id}.downsamplers.0"} + else: + meta_path = {"old": f"input_blocks.{i}.0", "new": f"down_blocks.{block_id}.resnets.{layer_in_block_id}"} + + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + if len(attentions): + old_path = f"input_blocks.{i}.1" + new_path = f"down_blocks.{block_id}.attentions.{layer_in_block_id}" + + assign_attention_to_checkpoint( + new_checkpoint=new_checkpoint, + unet_state_dict=unet_state_dict, + old_path=old_path, + new_path=new_path, + config=config, + ) + + paths = renew_attention_paths(attentions) + meta_path = {"old": old_path, "new": new_path} + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, + new_checkpoint, + unet_state_dict, + additional_replacements=[meta_path], + config=config, + ) + + resnet_0 = middle_blocks[0] + attentions = middle_blocks[1] + resnet_1 = middle_blocks[2] + + resnet_0_paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnet_0) + assign_to_checkpoint(resnet_0_paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, config=config) + + resnet_1_paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnet_1) + assign_to_checkpoint(resnet_1_paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, config=config) + + old_path = "middle_block.1" + new_path = "mid_block.attentions.0" + + assign_attention_to_checkpoint( + new_checkpoint=new_checkpoint, + unet_state_dict=unet_state_dict, + old_path=old_path, + new_path=new_path, + config=config, + ) + + attentions_paths = renew_attention_paths(attentions) + meta_path = {"old": "middle_block.1", "new": "mid_block.attentions.0"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + attentions_paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + if not isinstance(config["layers_per_block"], int): + layers_per_block_list = list(reversed([e + 1 for e in config["layers_per_block"]])) + layers_per_block_cumsum = list(np.cumsum(layers_per_block_list)) + + for i in range(num_output_blocks): + if isinstance(config["layers_per_block"], int): + layers_per_block = config["layers_per_block"] + block_id = i // (layers_per_block + 1) + layer_in_block_id = i % (layers_per_block + 1) + else: + block_id = next(k for k, n in enumerate(layers_per_block_cumsum) if i < n) + passed_blocks = layers_per_block_cumsum[block_id - 1] if block_id > 0 else 0 + layer_in_block_id = i - passed_blocks + + output_block_layers = [shave_segments(name, 2) for name in output_blocks[i]] + output_block_list = {} + + for layer in output_block_layers: + layer_id, layer_name = layer.split(".")[0], shave_segments(layer, 1) + if layer_id in output_block_list: + output_block_list[layer_id].append(layer_name) + else: + output_block_list[layer_id] = [layer_name] + + # len(output_block_list) == 1 -> resnet + # len(output_block_list) == 2 -> resnet, attention or resnet, upscale resnet + # len(output_block_list) == 3 -> resnet, attention, upscale resnet + + if len(output_block_list) > 1: + resnets = [key for key in output_blocks[i] if f"output_blocks.{i}.0" in key] + + has_attention = True + if len(output_block_list) == 2 and any("in_layers" in k for k in output_block_list["1"]): + has_attention = False + + maybe_attentions = [key for key in output_blocks[i] if f"output_blocks.{i}.1" in key] + + paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnets) + + meta_path = {"old": f"output_blocks.{i}.0", "new": f"up_blocks.{block_id}.resnets.{layer_in_block_id}"} + + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + output_block_list = {k: sorted(v) for k, v in output_block_list.items()} + if ["conv.bias", "conv.weight"] in output_block_list.values(): + index = list(output_block_list.values()).index(["conv.bias", "conv.weight"]) + new_checkpoint[f"up_blocks.{block_id}.upsamplers.0.conv.weight"] = unet_state_dict[ + f"output_blocks.{i}.{index}.conv.weight" + ] + new_checkpoint[f"up_blocks.{block_id}.upsamplers.0.conv.bias"] = unet_state_dict[ + f"output_blocks.{i}.{index}.conv.bias" + ] + + # this layer was no attention + has_attention = False + maybe_attentions = [] + + if has_attention: + old_path = f"output_blocks.{i}.1" + new_path = f"up_blocks.{block_id}.attentions.{layer_in_block_id}" + + assign_attention_to_checkpoint( + new_checkpoint=new_checkpoint, + unet_state_dict=unet_state_dict, + old_path=old_path, + new_path=new_path, + config=config, + ) + + paths = renew_attention_paths(maybe_attentions) + meta_path = { + "old": old_path, + "new": new_path, + } + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + if len(output_block_list) == 3 or (not has_attention and len(maybe_attentions) > 0): + layer_id = len(output_block_list) - 1 + resnets = [key for key in output_blocks[i] if f"output_blocks.{i}.{layer_id}" in key] + paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnets) + meta_path = {"old": f"output_blocks.{i}.{layer_id}", "new": f"up_blocks.{block_id}.upsamplers.0"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + else: + resnet_0_paths = renew_resnet_paths(output_block_layers, n_shave_prefix_segments=1) + for path in resnet_0_paths: + old_path = ".".join(["output_blocks", str(i), path["old"]]) + new_path = ".".join(["up_blocks", str(block_id), "resnets", str(layer_in_block_id), path["new"]]) + + new_checkpoint[new_path] = unet_state_dict[old_path] + + return new_checkpoint + + +def verify_param_count(orig_path, unet_diffusers_config): + if "-II-" in orig_path: + from deepfloyd_if.modules import IFStageII + + if_II = IFStageII(device="cpu", dir_or_name=orig_path) + elif "-III-" in orig_path: + from deepfloyd_if.modules import IFStageIII + + if_II = IFStageIII(device="cpu", dir_or_name=orig_path) + else: + assert f"Weird name. Should have -II- or -III- in path: {orig_path}" + + unet = UNet2DConditionModel(**unet_diffusers_config) + + # in params + assert_param_count(unet.time_embedding, if_II.model.time_embed) + assert_param_count(unet.conv_in, if_II.model.input_blocks[:1]) + + # downblocks + assert_param_count(unet.down_blocks[0], if_II.model.input_blocks[1:4]) + assert_param_count(unet.down_blocks[1], if_II.model.input_blocks[4:7]) + assert_param_count(unet.down_blocks[2], if_II.model.input_blocks[7:11]) + + if "-II-" in orig_path: + assert_param_count(unet.down_blocks[3], if_II.model.input_blocks[11:17]) + assert_param_count(unet.down_blocks[4], if_II.model.input_blocks[17:]) + if "-III-" in orig_path: + assert_param_count(unet.down_blocks[3], if_II.model.input_blocks[11:15]) + assert_param_count(unet.down_blocks[4], if_II.model.input_blocks[15:20]) + assert_param_count(unet.down_blocks[5], if_II.model.input_blocks[20:]) + + # mid block + assert_param_count(unet.mid_block, if_II.model.middle_block) + + # up block + if "-II-" in orig_path: + assert_param_count(unet.up_blocks[0], if_II.model.output_blocks[:6]) + assert_param_count(unet.up_blocks[1], if_II.model.output_blocks[6:12]) + assert_param_count(unet.up_blocks[2], if_II.model.output_blocks[12:16]) + assert_param_count(unet.up_blocks[3], if_II.model.output_blocks[16:19]) + assert_param_count(unet.up_blocks[4], if_II.model.output_blocks[19:]) + if "-III-" in orig_path: + assert_param_count(unet.up_blocks[0], if_II.model.output_blocks[:5]) + assert_param_count(unet.up_blocks[1], if_II.model.output_blocks[5:10]) + assert_param_count(unet.up_blocks[2], if_II.model.output_blocks[10:14]) + assert_param_count(unet.up_blocks[3], if_II.model.output_blocks[14:18]) + assert_param_count(unet.up_blocks[4], if_II.model.output_blocks[18:21]) + assert_param_count(unet.up_blocks[5], if_II.model.output_blocks[21:24]) + + # out params + assert_param_count(unet.conv_norm_out, if_II.model.out[0]) + assert_param_count(unet.conv_out, if_II.model.out[2]) + + # make sure all model architecture has same param count + assert_param_count(unet, if_II.model) + + +def assert_param_count(model_1, model_2): + count_1 = sum(p.numel() for p in model_1.parameters()) + count_2 = sum(p.numel() for p in model_2.parameters()) + assert count_1 == count_2, f"{model_1.__class__}: {count_1} != {model_2.__class__}: {count_2}" + + +def superres_check_against_original(dump_path, unet_checkpoint_path): + model_path = dump_path + model = UNet2DConditionModel.from_pretrained(model_path) + model.to("cuda") + orig_path = unet_checkpoint_path + + if "-II-" in orig_path: + from deepfloyd_if.modules import IFStageII + + if_II_model = IFStageII(device="cuda", dir_or_name=orig_path, model_kwargs={"precision": "fp32"}).model + elif "-III-" in orig_path: + from deepfloyd_if.modules import IFStageIII + + if_II_model = IFStageIII(device="cuda", dir_or_name=orig_path, model_kwargs={"precision": "fp32"}).model + + batch_size = 1 + channels = model.config.in_channels // 2 + height = model.config.sample_size + width = model.config.sample_size + height = 1024 + width = 1024 + + torch.manual_seed(0) + + latents = torch.randn((batch_size, channels, height, width), device=model.device) + image_small = torch.randn((batch_size, channels, height // 4, width // 4), device=model.device) + + interpolate_antialias = {} + if "antialias" in inspect.signature(F.interpolate).parameters: + interpolate_antialias["antialias"] = True + image_upscaled = F.interpolate( + image_small, size=[height, width], mode="bicubic", align_corners=False, **interpolate_antialias + ) + + latent_model_input = torch.cat([latents, image_upscaled], dim=1).to(model.dtype) + t = torch.tensor([5], device=model.device).to(model.dtype) + + seq_len = 64 + encoder_hidden_states = torch.randn((batch_size, seq_len, model.config.encoder_hid_dim), device=model.device).to( + model.dtype + ) + + fake_class_labels = torch.tensor([t], device=model.device).to(model.dtype) + + with torch.no_grad(): + out = if_II_model(latent_model_input, t, aug_steps=fake_class_labels, text_emb=encoder_hidden_states) + + if_II_model.to("cpu") + del if_II_model + import gc + + torch.cuda.empty_cache() + gc.collect() + print(50 * "=") + + with torch.no_grad(): + noise_pred = model( + sample=latent_model_input, + encoder_hidden_states=encoder_hidden_states, + class_labels=fake_class_labels, + timestep=t, + ).sample + + print("Out shape", noise_pred.shape) + print("Diff", (out - noise_pred).abs().sum()) + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + main(parse_args()) diff --git a/diffusers/scripts/convert_lora_safetensor_to_diffusers.py b/diffusers/scripts/convert_lora_safetensor_to_diffusers.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4237452e2ed16a82ef53199651f8a48c60b051a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/scripts/convert_lora_safetensor_to_diffusers.py @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +# coding=utf-8 +# Copyright 2024, Haofan Wang, Qixun Wang, All rights reserved. +# +# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); +# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. +# You may obtain a copy of the License at +# +# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 +# +# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software +# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, +# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. +# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and +# limitations under the License. + +"""Conversion script for the LoRA's safetensors checkpoints.""" + +import argparse + +import torch +from safetensors.torch import load_file + +from diffusers import StableDiffusionPipeline + + +def convert(base_model_path, checkpoint_path, LORA_PREFIX_UNET, LORA_PREFIX_TEXT_ENCODER, alpha): + # load base model + pipeline = StableDiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained(base_model_path, torch_dtype=torch.float32) + + # load LoRA weight from .safetensors + state_dict = load_file(checkpoint_path) + + visited = [] + + # directly update weight in diffusers model + for key in state_dict: + # it is suggested to print out the key, it usually will be something like below + # "lora_te_text_model_encoder_layers_0_self_attn_k_proj.lora_down.weight" + + # as we have set the alpha beforehand, so just skip + if ".alpha" in key or key in visited: + continue + + if "text" in key: + layer_infos = key.split(".")[0].split(LORA_PREFIX_TEXT_ENCODER + "_")[-1].split("_") + curr_layer = pipeline.text_encoder + else: + layer_infos = key.split(".")[0].split(LORA_PREFIX_UNET + "_")[-1].split("_") + curr_layer = pipeline.unet + + # find the target layer + temp_name = layer_infos.pop(0) + while len(layer_infos) > -1: + try: + curr_layer = curr_layer.__getattr__(temp_name) + if len(layer_infos) > 0: + temp_name = layer_infos.pop(0) + elif len(layer_infos) == 0: + break + except Exception: + if len(temp_name) > 0: + temp_name += "_" + layer_infos.pop(0) + else: + temp_name = layer_infos.pop(0) + + pair_keys = [] + if "lora_down" in key: + pair_keys.append(key.replace("lora_down", "lora_up")) + pair_keys.append(key) + else: + pair_keys.append(key) + pair_keys.append(key.replace("lora_up", "lora_down")) + + # update weight + if len(state_dict[pair_keys[0]].shape) == 4: + weight_up = state_dict[pair_keys[0]].squeeze(3).squeeze(2).to(torch.float32) + weight_down = state_dict[pair_keys[1]].squeeze(3).squeeze(2).to(torch.float32) + curr_layer.weight.data += alpha * torch.mm(weight_up, weight_down).unsqueeze(2).unsqueeze(3) + else: + weight_up = state_dict[pair_keys[0]].to(torch.float32) + weight_down = state_dict[pair_keys[1]].to(torch.float32) + curr_layer.weight.data += alpha * torch.mm(weight_up, weight_down) + + # update visited list + for item in pair_keys: + visited.append(item) + + return pipeline + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() + + parser.add_argument( + "--base_model_path", default=None, type=str, required=True, help="Path to the base model in diffusers format." + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--checkpoint_path", default=None, type=str, required=True, help="Path to the checkpoint to convert." + ) + parser.add_argument("--dump_path", default=None, type=str, required=True, help="Path to the output model.") + parser.add_argument( + "--lora_prefix_unet", default="lora_unet", type=str, help="The prefix of UNet weight in safetensors" + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--lora_prefix_text_encoder", + default="lora_te", + type=str, + help="The prefix of text encoder weight in safetensors", + ) + parser.add_argument("--alpha", default=0.75, type=float, help="The merging ratio in W = W0 + alpha * deltaW") + parser.add_argument( + "--to_safetensors", action="store_true", help="Whether to store pipeline in safetensors format or not." + ) + parser.add_argument("--device", type=str, help="Device to use (e.g. cpu, cuda:0, cuda:1, etc.)") + + args = parser.parse_args() + + base_model_path = args.base_model_path + checkpoint_path = args.checkpoint_path + dump_path = args.dump_path + lora_prefix_unet = args.lora_prefix_unet + lora_prefix_text_encoder = args.lora_prefix_text_encoder + alpha = args.alpha + + pipe = convert(base_model_path, checkpoint_path, lora_prefix_unet, lora_prefix_text_encoder, alpha) + + pipe = pipe.to(args.device) + pipe.save_pretrained(args.dump_path, safe_serialization=args.to_safetensors) diff --git a/diffusers/scripts/convert_ncsnpp_original_checkpoint_to_diffusers.py b/diffusers/scripts/convert_ncsnpp_original_checkpoint_to_diffusers.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bcab90e2a3dbdd7b755ed86cd84f6bf2f1147dac --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/scripts/convert_ncsnpp_original_checkpoint_to_diffusers.py @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@ +# coding=utf-8 +# Copyright 2025 The HuggingFace Inc. team. +# +# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); +# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. +# You may obtain a copy of the License at +# +# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 +# +# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software +# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, +# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. +# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and +# limitations under the License. +"""Conversion script for the NCSNPP checkpoints.""" + +import argparse +import json + +import torch + +from diffusers import ScoreSdeVePipeline, ScoreSdeVeScheduler, UNet2DModel + + +def convert_ncsnpp_checkpoint(checkpoint, config): + """ + Takes a state dict and the path to + """ + new_model_architecture = UNet2DModel(**config) + new_model_architecture.time_proj.W.data = checkpoint["all_modules.0.W"].data + new_model_architecture.time_proj.weight.data = checkpoint["all_modules.0.W"].data + new_model_architecture.time_embedding.linear_1.weight.data = checkpoint["all_modules.1.weight"].data + new_model_architecture.time_embedding.linear_1.bias.data = checkpoint["all_modules.1.bias"].data + + new_model_architecture.time_embedding.linear_2.weight.data = checkpoint["all_modules.2.weight"].data + new_model_architecture.time_embedding.linear_2.bias.data = checkpoint["all_modules.2.bias"].data + + new_model_architecture.conv_in.weight.data = checkpoint["all_modules.3.weight"].data + new_model_architecture.conv_in.bias.data = checkpoint["all_modules.3.bias"].data + + new_model_architecture.conv_norm_out.weight.data = checkpoint[list(checkpoint.keys())[-4]].data + new_model_architecture.conv_norm_out.bias.data = checkpoint[list(checkpoint.keys())[-3]].data + new_model_architecture.conv_out.weight.data = checkpoint[list(checkpoint.keys())[-2]].data + new_model_architecture.conv_out.bias.data = checkpoint[list(checkpoint.keys())[-1]].data + + module_index = 4 + + def set_attention_weights(new_layer, old_checkpoint, index): + new_layer.query.weight.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.NIN_0.W"].data.T + new_layer.key.weight.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.NIN_1.W"].data.T + new_layer.value.weight.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.NIN_2.W"].data.T + + new_layer.query.bias.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.NIN_0.b"].data + new_layer.key.bias.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.NIN_1.b"].data + new_layer.value.bias.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.NIN_2.b"].data + + new_layer.proj_attn.weight.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.NIN_3.W"].data.T + new_layer.proj_attn.bias.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.NIN_3.b"].data + + new_layer.group_norm.weight.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.GroupNorm_0.weight"].data + new_layer.group_norm.bias.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.GroupNorm_0.bias"].data + + def set_resnet_weights(new_layer, old_checkpoint, index): + new_layer.conv1.weight.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.Conv_0.weight"].data + new_layer.conv1.bias.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.Conv_0.bias"].data + new_layer.norm1.weight.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.GroupNorm_0.weight"].data + new_layer.norm1.bias.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.GroupNorm_0.bias"].data + + new_layer.conv2.weight.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.Conv_1.weight"].data + new_layer.conv2.bias.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.Conv_1.bias"].data + new_layer.norm2.weight.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.GroupNorm_1.weight"].data + new_layer.norm2.bias.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.GroupNorm_1.bias"].data + + new_layer.time_emb_proj.weight.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.Dense_0.weight"].data + new_layer.time_emb_proj.bias.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.Dense_0.bias"].data + + if new_layer.in_channels != new_layer.out_channels or new_layer.up or new_layer.down: + new_layer.conv_shortcut.weight.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.Conv_2.weight"].data + new_layer.conv_shortcut.bias.data = old_checkpoint[f"all_modules.{index}.Conv_2.bias"].data + + for i, block in enumerate(new_model_architecture.downsample_blocks): + has_attentions = hasattr(block, "attentions") + for j in range(len(block.resnets)): + set_resnet_weights(block.resnets[j], checkpoint, module_index) + module_index += 1 + if has_attentions: + set_attention_weights(block.attentions[j], checkpoint, module_index) + module_index += 1 + + if hasattr(block, "downsamplers") and block.downsamplers is not None: + set_resnet_weights(block.resnet_down, checkpoint, module_index) + module_index += 1 + block.skip_conv.weight.data = checkpoint[f"all_modules.{module_index}.Conv_0.weight"].data + block.skip_conv.bias.data = checkpoint[f"all_modules.{module_index}.Conv_0.bias"].data + module_index += 1 + + set_resnet_weights(new_model_architecture.mid_block.resnets[0], checkpoint, module_index) + module_index += 1 + set_attention_weights(new_model_architecture.mid_block.attentions[0], checkpoint, module_index) + module_index += 1 + set_resnet_weights(new_model_architecture.mid_block.resnets[1], checkpoint, module_index) + module_index += 1 + + for i, block in enumerate(new_model_architecture.up_blocks): + has_attentions = hasattr(block, "attentions") + for j in range(len(block.resnets)): + set_resnet_weights(block.resnets[j], checkpoint, module_index) + module_index += 1 + if has_attentions: + set_attention_weights( + block.attentions[0], checkpoint, module_index + ) # why can there only be a single attention layer for up? + module_index += 1 + + if hasattr(block, "resnet_up") and block.resnet_up is not None: + block.skip_norm.weight.data = checkpoint[f"all_modules.{module_index}.weight"].data + block.skip_norm.bias.data = checkpoint[f"all_modules.{module_index}.bias"].data + module_index += 1 + block.skip_conv.weight.data = checkpoint[f"all_modules.{module_index}.weight"].data + block.skip_conv.bias.data = checkpoint[f"all_modules.{module_index}.bias"].data + module_index += 1 + set_resnet_weights(block.resnet_up, checkpoint, module_index) + module_index += 1 + + new_model_architecture.conv_norm_out.weight.data = checkpoint[f"all_modules.{module_index}.weight"].data + new_model_architecture.conv_norm_out.bias.data = checkpoint[f"all_modules.{module_index}.bias"].data + module_index += 1 + new_model_architecture.conv_out.weight.data = checkpoint[f"all_modules.{module_index}.weight"].data + new_model_architecture.conv_out.bias.data = checkpoint[f"all_modules.{module_index}.bias"].data + + return new_model_architecture.state_dict() + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() + + parser.add_argument( + "--checkpoint_path", + default="/Users/arthurzucker/Work/diffusers/ArthurZ/diffusion_pytorch_model.bin", + type=str, + required=False, + help="Path to the checkpoint to convert.", + ) + + parser.add_argument( + "--config_file", + default="/Users/arthurzucker/Work/diffusers/ArthurZ/config.json", + type=str, + required=False, + help="The config json file corresponding to the architecture.", + ) + + parser.add_argument( + "--dump_path", + default="/Users/arthurzucker/Work/diffusers/ArthurZ/diffusion_model_new.pt", + type=str, + required=False, + help="Path to the output model.", + ) + + args = parser.parse_args() + + checkpoint = torch.load(args.checkpoint_path, map_location="cpu") + + with open(args.config_file) as f: + config = json.loads(f.read()) + + converted_checkpoint = convert_ncsnpp_checkpoint( + checkpoint, + config, + ) + + if "sde" in config: + del config["sde"] + + model = UNet2DModel(**config) + model.load_state_dict(converted_checkpoint) + + try: + scheduler = ScoreSdeVeScheduler.from_config("/".join(args.checkpoint_path.split("/")[:-1])) + + pipe = ScoreSdeVePipeline(unet=model, scheduler=scheduler) + pipe.save_pretrained(args.dump_path) + except: # noqa: E722 + model.save_pretrained(args.dump_path) diff --git a/diffusers/scripts/convert_omnigen_to_diffusers.py b/diffusers/scripts/convert_omnigen_to_diffusers.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..96bc935633f0df54a2871329e7132b36fc7ee72a --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/scripts/convert_omnigen_to_diffusers.py @@ -0,0 +1,203 @@ +import argparse +import os + +import torch +from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download +from safetensors.torch import load_file +from transformers import AutoTokenizer + +from diffusers import AutoencoderKL, FlowMatchEulerDiscreteScheduler, OmniGenPipeline, OmniGenTransformer2DModel + + +def main(args): + # checkpoint from https://huggingface.co/Shitao/OmniGen-v1 + + if not os.path.exists(args.origin_ckpt_path): + print("Model not found, downloading...") + cache_folder = os.getenv("HF_HUB_CACHE") + args.origin_ckpt_path = snapshot_download( + repo_id=args.origin_ckpt_path, + cache_dir=cache_folder, + ignore_patterns=["flax_model.msgpack", "rust_model.ot", "tf_model.h5", "model.pt"], + ) + print(f"Downloaded model to {args.origin_ckpt_path}") + + ckpt = os.path.join(args.origin_ckpt_path, "model.safetensors") + ckpt = load_file(ckpt, device="cpu") + + mapping_dict = { + "pos_embed": "patch_embedding.pos_embed", + "x_embedder.proj.weight": "patch_embedding.output_image_proj.weight", + "x_embedder.proj.bias": "patch_embedding.output_image_proj.bias", + "input_x_embedder.proj.weight": "patch_embedding.input_image_proj.weight", + "input_x_embedder.proj.bias": "patch_embedding.input_image_proj.bias", + "final_layer.adaLN_modulation.1.weight": "norm_out.linear.weight", + "final_layer.adaLN_modulation.1.bias": "norm_out.linear.bias", + "final_layer.linear.weight": "proj_out.weight", + "final_layer.linear.bias": "proj_out.bias", + "time_token.mlp.0.weight": "time_token.linear_1.weight", + "time_token.mlp.0.bias": "time_token.linear_1.bias", + "time_token.mlp.2.weight": "time_token.linear_2.weight", + "time_token.mlp.2.bias": "time_token.linear_2.bias", + "t_embedder.mlp.0.weight": "t_embedder.linear_1.weight", + "t_embedder.mlp.0.bias": "t_embedder.linear_1.bias", + "t_embedder.mlp.2.weight": "t_embedder.linear_2.weight", + "t_embedder.mlp.2.bias": "t_embedder.linear_2.bias", + "llm.embed_tokens.weight": "embed_tokens.weight", + } + + converted_state_dict = {} + for k, v in ckpt.items(): + if k in mapping_dict: + converted_state_dict[mapping_dict[k]] = v + elif "qkv" in k: + to_q, to_k, to_v = v.chunk(3) + converted_state_dict[f"layers.{k.split('.')[2]}.self_attn.to_q.weight"] = to_q + converted_state_dict[f"layers.{k.split('.')[2]}.self_attn.to_k.weight"] = to_k + converted_state_dict[f"layers.{k.split('.')[2]}.self_attn.to_v.weight"] = to_v + elif "o_proj" in k: + converted_state_dict[f"layers.{k.split('.')[2]}.self_attn.to_out.0.weight"] = v + else: + converted_state_dict[k[4:]] = v + + transformer = OmniGenTransformer2DModel( + rope_scaling={ + "long_factor": [ + 1.0299999713897705, + 1.0499999523162842, + 1.0499999523162842, + 1.0799999237060547, + 1.2299998998641968, + 1.2299998998641968, + 1.2999999523162842, + 1.4499999284744263, + 1.5999999046325684, + 1.6499998569488525, + 1.8999998569488525, + 2.859999895095825, + 3.68999981880188, + 5.419999599456787, + 5.489999771118164, + 5.489999771118164, + 9.09000015258789, + 11.579999923706055, + 15.65999984741211, + 15.769999504089355, + 15.789999961853027, + 18.360000610351562, + 21.989999771118164, + 23.079999923706055, + 30.009998321533203, + 32.35000228881836, + 32.590003967285156, + 35.56000518798828, + 39.95000457763672, + 53.840003967285156, + 56.20000457763672, + 57.95000457763672, + 59.29000473022461, + 59.77000427246094, + 59.920005798339844, + 61.190006256103516, + 61.96000671386719, + 62.50000762939453, + 63.3700065612793, + 63.48000717163086, + 63.48000717163086, + 63.66000747680664, + 63.850006103515625, + 64.08000946044922, + 64.760009765625, + 64.80001068115234, + 64.81001281738281, + 64.81001281738281, + ], + "short_factor": [ + 1.05, + 1.05, + 1.05, + 1.1, + 1.1, + 1.1, + 1.2500000000000002, + 1.2500000000000002, + 1.4000000000000004, + 1.4500000000000004, + 1.5500000000000005, + 1.8500000000000008, + 1.9000000000000008, + 2.000000000000001, + 2.000000000000001, + 2.000000000000001, + 2.000000000000001, + 2.000000000000001, + 2.000000000000001, + 2.000000000000001, + 2.000000000000001, + 2.000000000000001, + 2.000000000000001, + 2.000000000000001, + 2.000000000000001, + 2.000000000000001, + 2.000000000000001, + 2.000000000000001, + 2.000000000000001, + 2.000000000000001, + 2.000000000000001, + 2.000000000000001, + 2.1000000000000005, + 2.1000000000000005, + 2.2, + 2.3499999999999996, + 2.3499999999999996, + 2.3499999999999996, + 2.3499999999999996, + 2.3999999999999995, + 2.3999999999999995, + 2.6499999999999986, + 2.6999999999999984, + 2.8999999999999977, + 2.9499999999999975, + 3.049999999999997, + 3.049999999999997, + 3.049999999999997, + ], + "type": "su", + }, + patch_size=2, + in_channels=4, + pos_embed_max_size=192, + ) + transformer.load_state_dict(converted_state_dict, strict=True) + transformer.to(torch.bfloat16) + + num_model_params = sum(p.numel() for p in transformer.parameters()) + print(f"Total number of transformer parameters: {num_model_params}") + + scheduler = FlowMatchEulerDiscreteScheduler(invert_sigmas=True, num_train_timesteps=1) + + vae = AutoencoderKL.from_pretrained(os.path.join(args.origin_ckpt_path, "vae"), torch_dtype=torch.float32) + + tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(args.origin_ckpt_path) + + pipeline = OmniGenPipeline(tokenizer=tokenizer, transformer=transformer, vae=vae, scheduler=scheduler) + pipeline.save_pretrained(args.dump_path) + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() + + parser.add_argument( + "--origin_ckpt_path", + default="Shitao/OmniGen-v1", + type=str, + required=False, + help="Path to the checkpoint to convert.", + ) + + parser.add_argument( + "--dump_path", default="OmniGen-v1-diffusers", type=str, required=False, help="Path to the output pipeline." + ) + + args = parser.parse_args() + main(args) diff --git a/diffusers/scripts/convert_original_audioldm2_to_diffusers.py b/diffusers/scripts/convert_original_audioldm2_to_diffusers.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2c0695ce55953aceaa2c7dfa32a92892d8e59150 --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/scripts/convert_original_audioldm2_to_diffusers.py @@ -0,0 +1,1135 @@ +# coding=utf-8 +# Copyright 2025 The HuggingFace Inc. team. +# +# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); +# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. +# You may obtain a copy of the License at +# +# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 +# +# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software +# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, +# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. +# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and +# limitations under the License. +"""Conversion script for the AudioLDM2 checkpoints.""" + +import argparse +import re +from typing import List, Union + +import torch +import yaml +from transformers import ( + AutoFeatureExtractor, + AutoTokenizer, + ClapConfig, + ClapModel, + GPT2Config, + GPT2Model, + SpeechT5HifiGan, + SpeechT5HifiGanConfig, + T5Config, + T5EncoderModel, +) + +from diffusers import ( + AudioLDM2Pipeline, + AudioLDM2ProjectionModel, + AudioLDM2UNet2DConditionModel, + AutoencoderKL, + DDIMScheduler, + DPMSolverMultistepScheduler, + EulerAncestralDiscreteScheduler, + EulerDiscreteScheduler, + HeunDiscreteScheduler, + LMSDiscreteScheduler, + PNDMScheduler, +) +from diffusers.utils import is_safetensors_available +from diffusers.utils.import_utils import BACKENDS_MAPPING + + +# Copied from diffusers.pipelines.stable_diffusion.convert_from_ckpt.shave_segments +def shave_segments(path, n_shave_prefix_segments=1): + """ + Removes segments. Positive values shave the first segments, negative shave the last segments. + """ + if n_shave_prefix_segments >= 0: + return ".".join(path.split(".")[n_shave_prefix_segments:]) + else: + return ".".join(path.split(".")[:n_shave_prefix_segments]) + + +# Copied from diffusers.pipelines.stable_diffusion.convert_from_ckpt.renew_resnet_paths +def renew_resnet_paths(old_list, n_shave_prefix_segments=0): + """ + Updates paths inside resnets to the new naming scheme (local renaming) + """ + mapping = [] + for old_item in old_list: + new_item = old_item.replace("in_layers.0", "norm1") + new_item = new_item.replace("in_layers.2", "conv1") + + new_item = new_item.replace("out_layers.0", "norm2") + new_item = new_item.replace("out_layers.3", "conv2") + + new_item = new_item.replace("emb_layers.1", "time_emb_proj") + new_item = new_item.replace("skip_connection", "conv_shortcut") + + new_item = shave_segments(new_item, n_shave_prefix_segments=n_shave_prefix_segments) + + mapping.append({"old": old_item, "new": new_item}) + + return mapping + + +# Copied from diffusers.pipelines.stable_diffusion.convert_from_ckpt.renew_vae_resnet_paths +def renew_vae_resnet_paths(old_list, n_shave_prefix_segments=0): + """ + Updates paths inside resnets to the new naming scheme (local renaming) + """ + mapping = [] + for old_item in old_list: + new_item = old_item + + new_item = new_item.replace("nin_shortcut", "conv_shortcut") + new_item = shave_segments(new_item, n_shave_prefix_segments=n_shave_prefix_segments) + + mapping.append({"old": old_item, "new": new_item}) + + return mapping + + +# Copied from diffusers.pipelines.stable_diffusion.convert_from_ckpt.renew_attention_paths +def renew_attention_paths(old_list): + """ + Updates paths inside attentions to the new naming scheme (local renaming) + """ + mapping = [] + for old_item in old_list: + new_item = old_item + + # new_item = new_item.replace('norm.weight', 'group_norm.weight') + # new_item = new_item.replace('norm.bias', 'group_norm.bias') + + # new_item = new_item.replace('proj_out.weight', 'proj_attn.weight') + # new_item = new_item.replace('proj_out.bias', 'proj_attn.bias') + + # new_item = shave_segments(new_item, n_shave_prefix_segments=n_shave_prefix_segments) + + mapping.append({"old": old_item, "new": new_item}) + + return mapping + + +def renew_vae_attention_paths(old_list, n_shave_prefix_segments=0): + """ + Updates paths inside attentions to the new naming scheme (local renaming) + """ + mapping = [] + for old_item in old_list: + new_item = old_item + + new_item = new_item.replace("norm.weight", "group_norm.weight") + new_item = new_item.replace("norm.bias", "group_norm.bias") + + new_item = new_item.replace("q.weight", "to_q.weight") + new_item = new_item.replace("q.bias", "to_q.bias") + + new_item = new_item.replace("k.weight", "to_k.weight") + new_item = new_item.replace("k.bias", "to_k.bias") + + new_item = new_item.replace("v.weight", "to_v.weight") + new_item = new_item.replace("v.bias", "to_v.bias") + + new_item = new_item.replace("proj_out.weight", "to_out.0.weight") + new_item = new_item.replace("proj_out.bias", "to_out.0.bias") + + new_item = shave_segments(new_item, n_shave_prefix_segments=n_shave_prefix_segments) + + mapping.append({"old": old_item, "new": new_item}) + + return mapping + + +def assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, checkpoint, old_checkpoint, attention_paths_to_split=None, additional_replacements=None, config=None +): + """ + This does the final conversion step: take locally converted weights and apply a global renaming to them. It splits + attention layers, and takes into account additional replacements that may arise. + + Assigns the weights to the new checkpoint. + """ + assert isinstance(paths, list), "Paths should be a list of dicts containing 'old' and 'new' keys." + + # Splits the attention layers into three variables. + if attention_paths_to_split is not None: + for path, path_map in attention_paths_to_split.items(): + old_tensor = old_checkpoint[path] + channels = old_tensor.shape[0] // 3 + + target_shape = (-1, channels) if len(old_tensor.shape) == 3 else (-1) + + num_heads = old_tensor.shape[0] // config["num_head_channels"] // 3 + + old_tensor = old_tensor.reshape((num_heads, 3 * channels // num_heads) + old_tensor.shape[1:]) + query, key, value = old_tensor.split(channels // num_heads, dim=1) + + checkpoint[path_map["query"]] = query.reshape(target_shape) + checkpoint[path_map["key"]] = key.reshape(target_shape) + checkpoint[path_map["value"]] = value.reshape(target_shape) + + for path in paths: + new_path = path["new"] + + # These have already been assigned + if attention_paths_to_split is not None and new_path in attention_paths_to_split: + continue + + if additional_replacements is not None: + for replacement in additional_replacements: + new_path = new_path.replace(replacement["old"], replacement["new"]) + + # proj_attn.weight has to be converted from conv 1D to linear + if "proj_attn.weight" in new_path: + checkpoint[new_path] = old_checkpoint[path["old"]][:, :, 0] + else: + checkpoint[new_path] = old_checkpoint[path["old"]] + + +def conv_attn_to_linear(checkpoint): + keys = list(checkpoint.keys()) + attn_keys = ["to_q.weight", "to_k.weight", "to_v.weight"] + proj_key = "to_out.0.weight" + for key in keys: + if ".".join(key.split(".")[-2:]) in attn_keys or ".".join(key.split(".")[-3:]) == proj_key: + if checkpoint[key].ndim > 2: + checkpoint[key] = checkpoint[key].squeeze() + + +def create_unet_diffusers_config(original_config, image_size: int): + """ + Creates a UNet config for diffusers based on the config of the original AudioLDM2 model. + """ + unet_params = original_config["model"]["params"]["unet_config"]["params"] + vae_params = original_config["model"]["params"]["first_stage_config"]["params"]["ddconfig"] + + block_out_channels = [unet_params["model_channels"] * mult for mult in unet_params["channel_mult"]] + + down_block_types = [] + resolution = 1 + for i in range(len(block_out_channels)): + block_type = "CrossAttnDownBlock2D" if resolution in unet_params["attention_resolutions"] else "DownBlock2D" + down_block_types.append(block_type) + if i != len(block_out_channels) - 1: + resolution *= 2 + + up_block_types = [] + for i in range(len(block_out_channels)): + block_type = "CrossAttnUpBlock2D" if resolution in unet_params["attention_resolutions"] else "UpBlock2D" + up_block_types.append(block_type) + resolution //= 2 + + vae_scale_factor = 2 ** (len(vae_params["ch_mult"]) - 1) + + cross_attention_dim = list(unet_params["context_dim"]) if "context_dim" in unet_params else block_out_channels + if len(cross_attention_dim) > 1: + # require two or more cross-attention layers per-block, each of different dimension + cross_attention_dim = [cross_attention_dim for _ in range(len(block_out_channels))] + + config = { + "sample_size": image_size // vae_scale_factor, + "in_channels": unet_params["in_channels"], + "out_channels": unet_params["out_channels"], + "down_block_types": tuple(down_block_types), + "up_block_types": tuple(up_block_types), + "block_out_channels": tuple(block_out_channels), + "layers_per_block": unet_params["num_res_blocks"], + "transformer_layers_per_block": unet_params["transformer_depth"], + "cross_attention_dim": tuple(cross_attention_dim), + } + + return config + + +# Adapted from diffusers.pipelines.stable_diffusion.convert_from_ckpt.create_vae_diffusers_config +def create_vae_diffusers_config(original_config, checkpoint, image_size: int): + """ + Creates a VAE config for diffusers based on the config of the original AudioLDM2 model. Compared to the original + Stable Diffusion conversion, this function passes a *learnt* VAE scaling factor to the diffusers VAE. + """ + vae_params = original_config["model"]["params"]["first_stage_config"]["params"]["ddconfig"] + _ = original_config["model"]["params"]["first_stage_config"]["params"]["embed_dim"] + + block_out_channels = [vae_params["ch"] * mult for mult in vae_params["ch_mult"]] + down_block_types = ["DownEncoderBlock2D"] * len(block_out_channels) + up_block_types = ["UpDecoderBlock2D"] * len(block_out_channels) + + scaling_factor = checkpoint["scale_factor"] if "scale_by_std" in original_config["model"]["params"] else 0.18215 + + config = { + "sample_size": image_size, + "in_channels": vae_params["in_channels"], + "out_channels": vae_params["out_ch"], + "down_block_types": tuple(down_block_types), + "up_block_types": tuple(up_block_types), + "block_out_channels": tuple(block_out_channels), + "latent_channels": vae_params["z_channels"], + "layers_per_block": vae_params["num_res_blocks"], + "scaling_factor": float(scaling_factor), + } + return config + + +# Copied from diffusers.pipelines.stable_diffusion.convert_from_ckpt.create_diffusers_schedular +def create_diffusers_schedular(original_config): + schedular = DDIMScheduler( + num_train_timesteps=original_config["model"]["params"]["timesteps"], + beta_start=original_config["model"]["params"]["linear_start"], + beta_end=original_config["model"]["params"]["linear_end"], + beta_schedule="scaled_linear", + ) + return schedular + + +def convert_ldm_unet_checkpoint(checkpoint, config, path=None, extract_ema=False): + """ + Takes a state dict and a config, and returns a converted UNet checkpoint. + """ + + # extract state_dict for UNet + unet_state_dict = {} + keys = list(checkpoint.keys()) + + unet_key = "model.diffusion_model." + # at least a 100 parameters have to start with `model_ema` in order for the checkpoint to be EMA + if sum(k.startswith("model_ema") for k in keys) > 100 and extract_ema: + print(f"Checkpoint {path} has both EMA and non-EMA weights.") + print( + "In this conversion only the EMA weights are extracted. If you want to instead extract the non-EMA" + " weights (useful to continue fine-tuning), please make sure to remove the `--extract_ema` flag." + ) + for key in keys: + if key.startswith("model.diffusion_model"): + flat_ema_key = "model_ema." + "".join(key.split(".")[1:]) + unet_state_dict[key.replace(unet_key, "")] = checkpoint.pop(flat_ema_key) + else: + if sum(k.startswith("model_ema") for k in keys) > 100: + print( + "In this conversion only the non-EMA weights are extracted. If you want to instead extract the EMA" + " weights (usually better for inference), please make sure to add the `--extract_ema` flag." + ) + + # strip the unet prefix from the weight names + for key in keys: + if key.startswith(unet_key): + unet_state_dict[key.replace(unet_key, "")] = checkpoint.pop(key) + + new_checkpoint = {} + + new_checkpoint["time_embedding.linear_1.weight"] = unet_state_dict["time_embed.0.weight"] + new_checkpoint["time_embedding.linear_1.bias"] = unet_state_dict["time_embed.0.bias"] + new_checkpoint["time_embedding.linear_2.weight"] = unet_state_dict["time_embed.2.weight"] + new_checkpoint["time_embedding.linear_2.bias"] = unet_state_dict["time_embed.2.bias"] + + new_checkpoint["conv_in.weight"] = unet_state_dict["input_blocks.0.0.weight"] + new_checkpoint["conv_in.bias"] = unet_state_dict["input_blocks.0.0.bias"] + + new_checkpoint["conv_norm_out.weight"] = unet_state_dict["out.0.weight"] + new_checkpoint["conv_norm_out.bias"] = unet_state_dict["out.0.bias"] + new_checkpoint["conv_out.weight"] = unet_state_dict["out.2.weight"] + new_checkpoint["conv_out.bias"] = unet_state_dict["out.2.bias"] + + # Retrieves the keys for the input blocks only + num_input_blocks = len({".".join(layer.split(".")[:2]) for layer in unet_state_dict if "input_blocks" in layer}) + input_blocks = { + layer_id: [key for key in unet_state_dict if f"input_blocks.{layer_id}." in key] + for layer_id in range(num_input_blocks) + } + + # Retrieves the keys for the middle blocks only + num_middle_blocks = len({".".join(layer.split(".")[:2]) for layer in unet_state_dict if "middle_block" in layer}) + middle_blocks = { + layer_id: [key for key in unet_state_dict if f"middle_block.{layer_id}." in key] + for layer_id in range(num_middle_blocks) + } + + # Retrieves the keys for the output blocks only + num_output_blocks = len({".".join(layer.split(".")[:2]) for layer in unet_state_dict if "output_blocks" in layer}) + output_blocks = { + layer_id: [key for key in unet_state_dict if f"output_blocks.{layer_id}." in key] + for layer_id in range(num_output_blocks) + } + + # Check how many Transformer blocks we have per layer + if isinstance(config.get("cross_attention_dim"), (list, tuple)): + if isinstance(config["cross_attention_dim"][0], (list, tuple)): + # in this case we have multiple cross-attention layers per-block + num_attention_layers = len(config.get("cross_attention_dim")[0]) + else: + num_attention_layers = 1 + + if config.get("extra_self_attn_layer"): + num_attention_layers += 1 + + for i in range(1, num_input_blocks): + block_id = (i - 1) // (config["layers_per_block"] + 1) + layer_in_block_id = (i - 1) % (config["layers_per_block"] + 1) + + resnets = [ + key for key in input_blocks[i] if f"input_blocks.{i}.0" in key and f"input_blocks.{i}.0.op" not in key + ] + attentions = [key for key in input_blocks[i] if f"input_blocks.{i}.0" not in key] + + if f"input_blocks.{i}.0.op.weight" in unet_state_dict: + new_checkpoint[f"down_blocks.{block_id}.downsamplers.0.conv.weight"] = unet_state_dict.pop( + f"input_blocks.{i}.0.op.weight" + ) + new_checkpoint[f"down_blocks.{block_id}.downsamplers.0.conv.bias"] = unet_state_dict.pop( + f"input_blocks.{i}.0.op.bias" + ) + + paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnets) + meta_path = {"old": f"input_blocks.{i}.0", "new": f"down_blocks.{block_id}.resnets.{layer_in_block_id}"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + if len(attentions): + paths = renew_attention_paths(attentions) + meta_path = [ + { + "old": f"input_blocks.{i}.{1 + layer_id}", + "new": f"down_blocks.{block_id}.attentions.{layer_in_block_id * num_attention_layers + layer_id}", + } + for layer_id in range(num_attention_layers) + ] + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=meta_path, config=config + ) + + resnet_0 = middle_blocks[0] + resnet_1 = middle_blocks[num_middle_blocks - 1] + + resnet_0_paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnet_0) + meta_path = {"old": "middle_block.0", "new": "mid_block.resnets.0"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + resnet_0_paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + resnet_1_paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnet_1) + meta_path = {"old": f"middle_block.{len(middle_blocks) - 1}", "new": "mid_block.resnets.1"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + resnet_1_paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + for i in range(1, num_middle_blocks - 1): + attentions = middle_blocks[i] + attentions_paths = renew_attention_paths(attentions) + meta_path = {"old": f"middle_block.{i}", "new": f"mid_block.attentions.{i - 1}"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + attentions_paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + for i in range(num_output_blocks): + block_id = i // (config["layers_per_block"] + 1) + layer_in_block_id = i % (config["layers_per_block"] + 1) + output_block_layers = [shave_segments(name, 2) for name in output_blocks[i]] + output_block_list = {} + + for layer in output_block_layers: + layer_id, layer_name = layer.split(".")[0], shave_segments(layer, 1) + if layer_id in output_block_list: + output_block_list[layer_id].append(layer_name) + else: + output_block_list[layer_id] = [layer_name] + + if len(output_block_list) > 1: + resnets = [key for key in output_blocks[i] if f"output_blocks.{i}.0" in key] + attentions = [key for key in output_blocks[i] if f"output_blocks.{i}.0" not in key] + + paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnets) + + meta_path = {"old": f"output_blocks.{i}.0", "new": f"up_blocks.{block_id}.resnets.{layer_in_block_id}"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + output_block_list = {k: sorted(v) for k, v in output_block_list.items()} + if ["conv.bias", "conv.weight"] in output_block_list.values(): + index = list(output_block_list.values()).index(["conv.bias", "conv.weight"]) + new_checkpoint[f"up_blocks.{block_id}.upsamplers.0.conv.weight"] = unet_state_dict[ + f"output_blocks.{i}.{index}.conv.weight" + ] + new_checkpoint[f"up_blocks.{block_id}.upsamplers.0.conv.bias"] = unet_state_dict[ + f"output_blocks.{i}.{index}.conv.bias" + ] + + attentions.remove(f"output_blocks.{i}.{index}.conv.bias") + attentions.remove(f"output_blocks.{i}.{index}.conv.weight") + + # Clear attentions as they have been attributed above. + if len(attentions) == 2: + attentions = [] + + if len(attentions): + paths = renew_attention_paths(attentions) + meta_path = [ + { + "old": f"output_blocks.{i}.{1 + layer_id}", + "new": f"up_blocks.{block_id}.attentions.{layer_in_block_id * num_attention_layers + layer_id}", + } + for layer_id in range(num_attention_layers) + ] + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=meta_path, config=config + ) + else: + resnet_0_paths = renew_resnet_paths(output_block_layers, n_shave_prefix_segments=1) + for path in resnet_0_paths: + old_path = ".".join(["output_blocks", str(i), path["old"]]) + new_path = ".".join(["up_blocks", str(block_id), "resnets", str(layer_in_block_id), path["new"]]) + + new_checkpoint[new_path] = unet_state_dict[old_path] + + return new_checkpoint + + +def convert_ldm_vae_checkpoint(checkpoint, config): + # extract state dict for VAE + vae_state_dict = {} + vae_key = "first_stage_model." + keys = list(checkpoint.keys()) + for key in keys: + if key.startswith(vae_key): + vae_state_dict[key.replace(vae_key, "")] = checkpoint.get(key) + + new_checkpoint = {} + + new_checkpoint["encoder.conv_in.weight"] = vae_state_dict["encoder.conv_in.weight"] + new_checkpoint["encoder.conv_in.bias"] = vae_state_dict["encoder.conv_in.bias"] + new_checkpoint["encoder.conv_out.weight"] = vae_state_dict["encoder.conv_out.weight"] + new_checkpoint["encoder.conv_out.bias"] = vae_state_dict["encoder.conv_out.bias"] + new_checkpoint["encoder.conv_norm_out.weight"] = vae_state_dict["encoder.norm_out.weight"] + new_checkpoint["encoder.conv_norm_out.bias"] = vae_state_dict["encoder.norm_out.bias"] + + new_checkpoint["decoder.conv_in.weight"] = vae_state_dict["decoder.conv_in.weight"] + new_checkpoint["decoder.conv_in.bias"] = vae_state_dict["decoder.conv_in.bias"] + new_checkpoint["decoder.conv_out.weight"] = vae_state_dict["decoder.conv_out.weight"] + new_checkpoint["decoder.conv_out.bias"] = vae_state_dict["decoder.conv_out.bias"] + new_checkpoint["decoder.conv_norm_out.weight"] = vae_state_dict["decoder.norm_out.weight"] + new_checkpoint["decoder.conv_norm_out.bias"] = vae_state_dict["decoder.norm_out.bias"] + + new_checkpoint["quant_conv.weight"] = vae_state_dict["quant_conv.weight"] + new_checkpoint["quant_conv.bias"] = vae_state_dict["quant_conv.bias"] + new_checkpoint["post_quant_conv.weight"] = vae_state_dict["post_quant_conv.weight"] + new_checkpoint["post_quant_conv.bias"] = vae_state_dict["post_quant_conv.bias"] + + # Retrieves the keys for the encoder down blocks only + num_down_blocks = len({".".join(layer.split(".")[:3]) for layer in vae_state_dict if "encoder.down" in layer}) + down_blocks = { + layer_id: [key for key in vae_state_dict if f"down.{layer_id}" in key] for layer_id in range(num_down_blocks) + } + + # Retrieves the keys for the decoder up blocks only + num_up_blocks = len({".".join(layer.split(".")[:3]) for layer in vae_state_dict if "decoder.up" in layer}) + up_blocks = { + layer_id: [key for key in vae_state_dict if f"up.{layer_id}" in key] for layer_id in range(num_up_blocks) + } + + for i in range(num_down_blocks): + resnets = [key for key in down_blocks[i] if f"down.{i}" in key and f"down.{i}.downsample" not in key] + + if f"encoder.down.{i}.downsample.conv.weight" in vae_state_dict: + new_checkpoint[f"encoder.down_blocks.{i}.downsamplers.0.conv.weight"] = vae_state_dict.pop( + f"encoder.down.{i}.downsample.conv.weight" + ) + new_checkpoint[f"encoder.down_blocks.{i}.downsamplers.0.conv.bias"] = vae_state_dict.pop( + f"encoder.down.{i}.downsample.conv.bias" + ) + + paths = renew_vae_resnet_paths(resnets) + meta_path = {"old": f"down.{i}.block", "new": f"down_blocks.{i}.resnets"} + assign_to_checkpoint(paths, new_checkpoint, vae_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config) + + mid_resnets = [key for key in vae_state_dict if "encoder.mid.block" in key] + num_mid_res_blocks = 2 + for i in range(1, num_mid_res_blocks + 1): + resnets = [key for key in mid_resnets if f"encoder.mid.block_{i}" in key] + + paths = renew_vae_resnet_paths(resnets) + meta_path = {"old": f"mid.block_{i}", "new": f"mid_block.resnets.{i - 1}"} + assign_to_checkpoint(paths, new_checkpoint, vae_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config) + + mid_attentions = [key for key in vae_state_dict if "encoder.mid.attn" in key] + paths = renew_vae_attention_paths(mid_attentions) + meta_path = {"old": "mid.attn_1", "new": "mid_block.attentions.0"} + assign_to_checkpoint(paths, new_checkpoint, vae_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config) + conv_attn_to_linear(new_checkpoint) + + for i in range(num_up_blocks): + block_id = num_up_blocks - 1 - i + resnets = [ + key for key in up_blocks[block_id] if f"up.{block_id}" in key and f"up.{block_id}.upsample" not in key + ] + + if f"decoder.up.{block_id}.upsample.conv.weight" in vae_state_dict: + new_checkpoint[f"decoder.up_blocks.{i}.upsamplers.0.conv.weight"] = vae_state_dict[ + f"decoder.up.{block_id}.upsample.conv.weight" + ] + new_checkpoint[f"decoder.up_blocks.{i}.upsamplers.0.conv.bias"] = vae_state_dict[ + f"decoder.up.{block_id}.upsample.conv.bias" + ] + + paths = renew_vae_resnet_paths(resnets) + meta_path = {"old": f"up.{block_id}.block", "new": f"up_blocks.{i}.resnets"} + assign_to_checkpoint(paths, new_checkpoint, vae_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config) + + mid_resnets = [key for key in vae_state_dict if "decoder.mid.block" in key] + num_mid_res_blocks = 2 + for i in range(1, num_mid_res_blocks + 1): + resnets = [key for key in mid_resnets if f"decoder.mid.block_{i}" in key] + + paths = renew_vae_resnet_paths(resnets) + meta_path = {"old": f"mid.block_{i}", "new": f"mid_block.resnets.{i - 1}"} + assign_to_checkpoint(paths, new_checkpoint, vae_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config) + + mid_attentions = [key for key in vae_state_dict if "decoder.mid.attn" in key] + paths = renew_vae_attention_paths(mid_attentions) + meta_path = {"old": "mid.attn_1", "new": "mid_block.attentions.0"} + assign_to_checkpoint(paths, new_checkpoint, vae_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config) + conv_attn_to_linear(new_checkpoint) + return new_checkpoint + + +CLAP_KEYS_TO_MODIFY_MAPPING = { + "text_branch": "text_model", + "audio_branch": "audio_model.audio_encoder", + "attn": "attention.self", + "self.proj": "output.dense", + "attention.self_mask": "attn_mask", + "mlp.fc1": "intermediate.dense", + "mlp.fc2": "output.dense", + "norm1": "layernorm_before", + "norm2": "layernorm_after", + "bn0": "batch_norm", +} + +CLAP_KEYS_TO_IGNORE = [ + "text_transform", + "audio_transform", + "stft", + "logmel_extractor", + "tscam_conv", + "head", + "attn_mask", +] + +CLAP_EXPECTED_MISSING_KEYS = ["text_model.embeddings.token_type_ids"] + + +def convert_open_clap_checkpoint(checkpoint): + """ + Takes a state dict and returns a converted CLAP checkpoint. + """ + # extract state dict for CLAP text embedding model, discarding the audio component + model_state_dict = {} + model_key = "clap.model." + keys = list(checkpoint.keys()) + for key in keys: + if key.startswith(model_key): + model_state_dict[key.replace(model_key, "")] = checkpoint.get(key) + + new_checkpoint = {} + + sequential_layers_pattern = r".*sequential.(\d+).*" + text_projection_pattern = r".*_projection.(\d+).*" + + for key, value in model_state_dict.items(): + # check if key should be ignored in mapping - if so map it to a key name that we'll filter out at the end + for key_to_ignore in CLAP_KEYS_TO_IGNORE: + if key_to_ignore in key: + key = "spectrogram" + + # check if any key needs to be modified + for key_to_modify, new_key in CLAP_KEYS_TO_MODIFY_MAPPING.items(): + if key_to_modify in key: + key = key.replace(key_to_modify, new_key) + + if re.match(sequential_layers_pattern, key): + # replace sequential layers with list + sequential_layer = re.match(sequential_layers_pattern, key).group(1) + + key = key.replace(f"sequential.{sequential_layer}.", f"layers.{int(sequential_layer) // 3}.linear.") + elif re.match(text_projection_pattern, key): + projecton_layer = int(re.match(text_projection_pattern, key).group(1)) + + # Because in CLAP they use `nn.Sequential`... + transformers_projection_layer = 1 if projecton_layer == 0 else 2 + + key = key.replace(f"_projection.{projecton_layer}.", f"_projection.linear{transformers_projection_layer}.") + + if "audio" and "qkv" in key: + # split qkv into query key and value + mixed_qkv = value + qkv_dim = mixed_qkv.size(0) // 3 + + query_layer = mixed_qkv[:qkv_dim] + key_layer = mixed_qkv[qkv_dim : qkv_dim * 2] + value_layer = mixed_qkv[qkv_dim * 2 :] + + new_checkpoint[key.replace("qkv", "query")] = query_layer + new_checkpoint[key.replace("qkv", "key")] = key_layer + new_checkpoint[key.replace("qkv", "value")] = value_layer + elif key != "spectrogram": + new_checkpoint[key] = value + + return new_checkpoint + + +def create_transformers_vocoder_config(original_config): + """ + Creates a config for transformers SpeechT5HifiGan based on the config of the vocoder model. + """ + vocoder_params = original_config["model"]["params"]["vocoder_config"]["params"] + + config = { + "model_in_dim": vocoder_params["num_mels"], + "sampling_rate": vocoder_params["sampling_rate"], + "upsample_initial_channel": vocoder_params["upsample_initial_channel"], + "upsample_rates": list(vocoder_params["upsample_rates"]), + "upsample_kernel_sizes": list(vocoder_params["upsample_kernel_sizes"]), + "resblock_kernel_sizes": list(vocoder_params["resblock_kernel_sizes"]), + "resblock_dilation_sizes": [ + list(resblock_dilation) for resblock_dilation in vocoder_params["resblock_dilation_sizes"] + ], + "normalize_before": False, + } + + return config + + +def extract_sub_model(checkpoint, key_prefix): + """ + Takes a state dict and returns the state dict for a particular sub-model. + """ + + sub_model_state_dict = {} + keys = list(checkpoint.keys()) + for key in keys: + if key.startswith(key_prefix): + sub_model_state_dict[key.replace(key_prefix, "")] = checkpoint.get(key) + + return sub_model_state_dict + + +def convert_hifigan_checkpoint(checkpoint, config): + """ + Takes a state dict and config, and returns a converted HiFiGAN vocoder checkpoint. + """ + # extract state dict for vocoder + vocoder_state_dict = extract_sub_model(checkpoint, key_prefix="first_stage_model.vocoder.") + + # fix upsampler keys, everything else is correct already + for i in range(len(config.upsample_rates)): + vocoder_state_dict[f"upsampler.{i}.weight"] = vocoder_state_dict.pop(f"ups.{i}.weight") + vocoder_state_dict[f"upsampler.{i}.bias"] = vocoder_state_dict.pop(f"ups.{i}.bias") + + if not config.normalize_before: + # if we don't set normalize_before then these variables are unused, so we set them to their initialised values + vocoder_state_dict["mean"] = torch.zeros(config.model_in_dim) + vocoder_state_dict["scale"] = torch.ones(config.model_in_dim) + + return vocoder_state_dict + + +def convert_projection_checkpoint(checkpoint): + projection_state_dict = {} + conditioner_state_dict = extract_sub_model(checkpoint, key_prefix="cond_stage_models.0.") + + projection_state_dict["sos_embed"] = conditioner_state_dict["start_of_sequence_tokens.weight"][0] + projection_state_dict["sos_embed_1"] = conditioner_state_dict["start_of_sequence_tokens.weight"][1] + + projection_state_dict["eos_embed"] = conditioner_state_dict["end_of_sequence_tokens.weight"][0] + projection_state_dict["eos_embed_1"] = conditioner_state_dict["end_of_sequence_tokens.weight"][1] + + projection_state_dict["projection.weight"] = conditioner_state_dict["input_sequence_embed_linear.0.weight"] + projection_state_dict["projection.bias"] = conditioner_state_dict["input_sequence_embed_linear.0.bias"] + + projection_state_dict["projection_1.weight"] = conditioner_state_dict["input_sequence_embed_linear.1.weight"] + projection_state_dict["projection_1.bias"] = conditioner_state_dict["input_sequence_embed_linear.1.bias"] + + return projection_state_dict + + +# Adapted from https://github.com/haoheliu/AudioLDM2/blob/81ad2c6ce015c1310387695e2dae975a7d2ed6fd/audioldm2/utils.py#L143 +DEFAULT_CONFIG = { + "model": { + "params": { + "linear_start": 0.0015, + "linear_end": 0.0195, + "timesteps": 1000, + "channels": 8, + "scale_by_std": True, + "unet_config": { + "target": "audioldm2.latent_diffusion.openaimodel.UNetModel", + "params": { + "context_dim": [None, 768, 1024], + "in_channels": 8, + "out_channels": 8, + "model_channels": 128, + "attention_resolutions": [8, 4, 2], + "num_res_blocks": 2, + "channel_mult": [1, 2, 3, 5], + "num_head_channels": 32, + "transformer_depth": 1, + }, + }, + "first_stage_config": { + "target": "audioldm2.variational_autoencoder.autoencoder.AutoencoderKL", + "params": { + "embed_dim": 8, + "ddconfig": { + "z_channels": 8, + "resolution": 256, + "in_channels": 1, + "out_ch": 1, + "ch": 128, + "ch_mult": [1, 2, 4], + "num_res_blocks": 2, + }, + }, + }, + "cond_stage_config": { + "crossattn_audiomae_generated": { + "target": "audioldm2.latent_diffusion.modules.encoders.modules.SequenceGenAudioMAECond", + "params": { + "sequence_gen_length": 8, + "sequence_input_embed_dim": [512, 1024], + }, + } + }, + "vocoder_config": { + "target": "audioldm2.first_stage_model.vocoder", + "params": { + "upsample_rates": [5, 4, 2, 2, 2], + "upsample_kernel_sizes": [16, 16, 8, 4, 4], + "upsample_initial_channel": 1024, + "resblock_kernel_sizes": [3, 7, 11], + "resblock_dilation_sizes": [[1, 3, 5], [1, 3, 5], [1, 3, 5]], + "num_mels": 64, + "sampling_rate": 16000, + }, + }, + }, + }, +} + + +def load_pipeline_from_original_AudioLDM2_ckpt( + checkpoint_path: str, + original_config_file: str = None, + image_size: int = 1024, + prediction_type: str = None, + extract_ema: bool = False, + scheduler_type: str = "ddim", + cross_attention_dim: Union[List, List[List]] = None, + transformer_layers_per_block: int = None, + device: str = None, + from_safetensors: bool = False, +) -> AudioLDM2Pipeline: + """ + Load an AudioLDM2 pipeline object from a `.ckpt`/`.safetensors` file and (ideally) a `.yaml` config file. + + Although many of the arguments can be automatically inferred, some of these rely on brittle checks against the + global step count, which will likely fail for models that have undergone further fine-tuning. Therefore, it is + recommended that you override the default values and/or supply an `original_config_file` wherever possible. + + Args: + checkpoint_path (`str`): Path to `.ckpt` file. + original_config_file (`str`): + Path to `.yaml` config file corresponding to the original architecture. If `None`, will be automatically + set to the AudioLDM2 base config. + image_size (`int`, *optional*, defaults to 1024): + The image size that the model was trained on. + prediction_type (`str`, *optional*): + The prediction type that the model was trained on. If `None`, will be automatically + inferred by looking for a key in the config. For the default config, the prediction type is `'epsilon'`. + scheduler_type (`str`, *optional*, defaults to 'ddim'): + Type of scheduler to use. Should be one of `["pndm", "lms", "heun", "euler", "euler-ancestral", "dpm", + "ddim"]`. + cross_attention_dim (`list`, *optional*, defaults to `None`): + The dimension of the cross-attention layers. If `None`, the cross-attention dimension will be + automatically inferred. Set to `[768, 1024]` for the base model, or `[768, 1024, None]` for the large model. + transformer_layers_per_block (`int`, *optional*, defaults to `None`): + The number of transformer layers in each transformer block. If `None`, number of layers will be " + "automatically inferred. Set to `1` for the base model, or `2` for the large model. + extract_ema (`bool`, *optional*, defaults to `False`): Only relevant for + checkpoints that have both EMA and non-EMA weights. Whether to extract the EMA weights or not. Defaults to + `False`. Pass `True` to extract the EMA weights. EMA weights usually yield higher quality images for + inference. Non-EMA weights are usually better to continue fine-tuning. + device (`str`, *optional*, defaults to `None`): + The device to use. Pass `None` to determine automatically. + from_safetensors (`str`, *optional*, defaults to `False`): + If `checkpoint_path` is in `safetensors` format, load checkpoint with safetensors instead of PyTorch. + return: An AudioLDM2Pipeline object representing the passed-in `.ckpt`/`.safetensors` file. + """ + + if from_safetensors: + if not is_safetensors_available(): + raise ValueError(BACKENDS_MAPPING["safetensors"][1]) + + from safetensors import safe_open + + checkpoint = {} + with safe_open(checkpoint_path, framework="pt", device="cpu") as f: + for key in f.keys(): + checkpoint[key] = f.get_tensor(key) + else: + if device is None: + device = "cuda" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu" + checkpoint = torch.load(checkpoint_path, map_location=device) + else: + checkpoint = torch.load(checkpoint_path, map_location=device) + + if "state_dict" in checkpoint: + checkpoint = checkpoint["state_dict"] + + if original_config_file is None: + original_config = DEFAULT_CONFIG + else: + original_config = yaml.safe_load(original_config_file) + + if image_size is not None: + original_config["model"]["params"]["unet_config"]["params"]["image_size"] = image_size + + if cross_attention_dim is not None: + original_config["model"]["params"]["unet_config"]["params"]["context_dim"] = cross_attention_dim + + if transformer_layers_per_block is not None: + original_config["model"]["params"]["unet_config"]["params"]["transformer_depth"] = transformer_layers_per_block + + if ( + "parameterization" in original_config["model"]["params"] + and original_config["model"]["params"]["parameterization"] == "v" + ): + if prediction_type is None: + prediction_type = "v_prediction" + else: + if prediction_type is None: + prediction_type = "epsilon" + + num_train_timesteps = original_config["model"]["params"]["timesteps"] + beta_start = original_config["model"]["params"]["linear_start"] + beta_end = original_config["model"]["params"]["linear_end"] + + scheduler = DDIMScheduler( + beta_end=beta_end, + beta_schedule="scaled_linear", + beta_start=beta_start, + num_train_timesteps=num_train_timesteps, + steps_offset=1, + clip_sample=False, + set_alpha_to_one=False, + prediction_type=prediction_type, + ) + # make sure scheduler works correctly with DDIM + scheduler.register_to_config(clip_sample=False) + + if scheduler_type == "pndm": + config = dict(scheduler.config) + config["skip_prk_steps"] = True + scheduler = PNDMScheduler.from_config(config) + elif scheduler_type == "lms": + scheduler = LMSDiscreteScheduler.from_config(scheduler.config) + elif scheduler_type == "heun": + scheduler = HeunDiscreteScheduler.from_config(scheduler.config) + elif scheduler_type == "euler": + scheduler = EulerDiscreteScheduler.from_config(scheduler.config) + elif scheduler_type == "euler-ancestral": + scheduler = EulerAncestralDiscreteScheduler.from_config(scheduler.config) + elif scheduler_type == "dpm": + scheduler = DPMSolverMultistepScheduler.from_config(scheduler.config) + elif scheduler_type == "ddim": + scheduler = scheduler + else: + raise ValueError(f"Scheduler of type {scheduler_type} doesn't exist!") + + # Convert the UNet2DModel + unet_config = create_unet_diffusers_config(original_config, image_size=image_size) + unet = AudioLDM2UNet2DConditionModel(**unet_config) + + converted_unet_checkpoint = convert_ldm_unet_checkpoint( + checkpoint, unet_config, path=checkpoint_path, extract_ema=extract_ema + ) + + unet.load_state_dict(converted_unet_checkpoint) + + # Convert the VAE model + vae_config = create_vae_diffusers_config(original_config, checkpoint=checkpoint, image_size=image_size) + converted_vae_checkpoint = convert_ldm_vae_checkpoint(checkpoint, vae_config) + + vae = AutoencoderKL(**vae_config) + vae.load_state_dict(converted_vae_checkpoint) + + # Convert the joint audio-text encoding model + clap_config = ClapConfig.from_pretrained("laion/clap-htsat-unfused") + clap_config.audio_config.update( + { + "patch_embeds_hidden_size": 128, + "hidden_size": 1024, + "depths": [2, 2, 12, 2], + } + ) + # AudioLDM2 uses the same tokenizer and feature extractor as the original CLAP model + clap_tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("laion/clap-htsat-unfused") + clap_feature_extractor = AutoFeatureExtractor.from_pretrained("laion/clap-htsat-unfused") + + converted_clap_model = convert_open_clap_checkpoint(checkpoint) + clap_model = ClapModel(clap_config) + + missing_keys, unexpected_keys = clap_model.load_state_dict(converted_clap_model, strict=False) + # we expect not to have token_type_ids in our original state dict so let's ignore them + missing_keys = list(set(missing_keys) - set(CLAP_EXPECTED_MISSING_KEYS)) + + if len(unexpected_keys) > 0: + raise ValueError(f"Unexpected keys when loading CLAP model: {unexpected_keys}") + + if len(missing_keys) > 0: + raise ValueError(f"Missing keys when loading CLAP model: {missing_keys}") + + # Convert the vocoder model + vocoder_config = create_transformers_vocoder_config(original_config) + vocoder_config = SpeechT5HifiGanConfig(**vocoder_config) + converted_vocoder_checkpoint = convert_hifigan_checkpoint(checkpoint, vocoder_config) + + vocoder = SpeechT5HifiGan(vocoder_config) + vocoder.load_state_dict(converted_vocoder_checkpoint) + + # Convert the Flan-T5 encoder model: AudioLDM2 uses the same configuration and tokenizer as the original Flan-T5 large model + t5_config = T5Config.from_pretrained("google/flan-t5-large") + converted_t5_checkpoint = extract_sub_model(checkpoint, key_prefix="cond_stage_models.1.model.") + + t5_tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("google/flan-t5-large") + # hard-coded in the original implementation (i.e. not retrievable from the config) + t5_tokenizer.model_max_length = 128 + t5_model = T5EncoderModel(t5_config) + t5_model.load_state_dict(converted_t5_checkpoint) + + # Convert the GPT2 encoder model: AudioLDM2 uses the same configuration as the original GPT2 base model + gpt2_config = GPT2Config.from_pretrained("gpt2") + gpt2_model = GPT2Model(gpt2_config) + gpt2_model.config.max_new_tokens = original_config["model"]["params"]["cond_stage_config"][ + "crossattn_audiomae_generated" + ]["params"]["sequence_gen_length"] + + converted_gpt2_checkpoint = extract_sub_model(checkpoint, key_prefix="cond_stage_models.0.model.") + gpt2_model.load_state_dict(converted_gpt2_checkpoint) + + # Convert the extra embedding / projection layers + projection_model = AudioLDM2ProjectionModel(clap_config.projection_dim, t5_config.d_model, gpt2_config.n_embd) + + converted_projection_checkpoint = convert_projection_checkpoint(checkpoint) + projection_model.load_state_dict(converted_projection_checkpoint) + + # Instantiate the diffusers pipeline + pipe = AudioLDM2Pipeline( + vae=vae, + text_encoder=clap_model, + text_encoder_2=t5_model, + projection_model=projection_model, + language_model=gpt2_model, + tokenizer=clap_tokenizer, + tokenizer_2=t5_tokenizer, + feature_extractor=clap_feature_extractor, + unet=unet, + scheduler=scheduler, + vocoder=vocoder, + ) + + return pipe + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() + + parser.add_argument( + "--checkpoint_path", default=None, type=str, required=True, help="Path to the checkpoint to convert." + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--original_config_file", + default=None, + type=str, + help="The YAML config file corresponding to the original architecture.", + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--cross_attention_dim", + default=None, + type=int, + nargs="+", + help="The dimension of the cross-attention layers. If `None`, the cross-attention dimension will be " + "automatically inferred. Set to `768+1024` for the base model, or `768+1024+640` for the large model", + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--transformer_layers_per_block", + default=None, + type=int, + help="The number of transformer layers in each transformer block. If `None`, number of layers will be " + "automatically inferred. Set to `1` for the base model, or `2` for the large model.", + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--scheduler_type", + default="ddim", + type=str, + help="Type of scheduler to use. Should be one of ['pndm', 'lms', 'ddim', 'euler', 'euler-ancestral', 'dpm']", + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--image_size", + default=1048, + type=int, + help="The image size that the model was trained on.", + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--prediction_type", + default=None, + type=str, + help=("The prediction type that the model was trained on."), + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--extract_ema", + action="store_true", + help=( + "Only relevant for checkpoints that have both EMA and non-EMA weights. Whether to extract the EMA weights" + " or not. Defaults to `False`. Add `--extract_ema` to extract the EMA weights. EMA weights usually yield" + " higher quality images for inference. Non-EMA weights are usually better to continue fine-tuning." + ), + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--from_safetensors", + action="store_true", + help="If `--checkpoint_path` is in `safetensors` format, load checkpoint with safetensors instead of PyTorch.", + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--to_safetensors", + action="store_true", + help="Whether to store pipeline in safetensors format or not.", + ) + parser.add_argument("--dump_path", default=None, type=str, required=True, help="Path to the output model.") + parser.add_argument("--device", type=str, help="Device to use (e.g. cpu, cuda:0, cuda:1, etc.)") + args = parser.parse_args() + + pipe = load_pipeline_from_original_AudioLDM2_ckpt( + checkpoint_path=args.checkpoint_path, + original_config_file=args.original_config_file, + image_size=args.image_size, + prediction_type=args.prediction_type, + extract_ema=args.extract_ema, + scheduler_type=args.scheduler_type, + cross_attention_dim=args.cross_attention_dim, + transformer_layers_per_block=args.transformer_layers_per_block, + from_safetensors=args.from_safetensors, + device=args.device, + ) + pipe.save_pretrained(args.dump_path, safe_serialization=args.to_safetensors) diff --git a/diffusers/scripts/convert_original_musicldm_to_diffusers.py b/diffusers/scripts/convert_original_musicldm_to_diffusers.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..00836fde2592126ade0ee95918e1fd38cf138b0e --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/scripts/convert_original_musicldm_to_diffusers.py @@ -0,0 +1,1056 @@ +# coding=utf-8 +# Copyright 2025 The HuggingFace Inc. team. +# +# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); +# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. +# You may obtain a copy of the License at +# +# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 +# +# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software +# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, +# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. +# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and +# limitations under the License. +"""Conversion script for the MusicLDM checkpoints.""" + +import argparse +import re + +import torch +import yaml +from transformers import ( + AutoFeatureExtractor, + AutoTokenizer, + ClapConfig, + ClapModel, + SpeechT5HifiGan, + SpeechT5HifiGanConfig, +) + +from diffusers import ( + AutoencoderKL, + DDIMScheduler, + DPMSolverMultistepScheduler, + EulerAncestralDiscreteScheduler, + EulerDiscreteScheduler, + HeunDiscreteScheduler, + LMSDiscreteScheduler, + MusicLDMPipeline, + PNDMScheduler, + UNet2DConditionModel, +) + + +# Copied from diffusers.pipelines.stable_diffusion.convert_from_ckpt.shave_segments +def shave_segments(path, n_shave_prefix_segments=1): + """ + Removes segments. Positive values shave the first segments, negative shave the last segments. + """ + if n_shave_prefix_segments >= 0: + return ".".join(path.split(".")[n_shave_prefix_segments:]) + else: + return ".".join(path.split(".")[:n_shave_prefix_segments]) + + +# Copied from diffusers.pipelines.stable_diffusion.convert_from_ckpt.renew_resnet_paths +def renew_resnet_paths(old_list, n_shave_prefix_segments=0): + """ + Updates paths inside resnets to the new naming scheme (local renaming) + """ + mapping = [] + for old_item in old_list: + new_item = old_item.replace("in_layers.0", "norm1") + new_item = new_item.replace("in_layers.2", "conv1") + + new_item = new_item.replace("out_layers.0", "norm2") + new_item = new_item.replace("out_layers.3", "conv2") + + new_item = new_item.replace("emb_layers.1", "time_emb_proj") + new_item = new_item.replace("skip_connection", "conv_shortcut") + + new_item = shave_segments(new_item, n_shave_prefix_segments=n_shave_prefix_segments) + + mapping.append({"old": old_item, "new": new_item}) + + return mapping + + +# Copied from diffusers.pipelines.stable_diffusion.convert_from_ckpt.renew_vae_resnet_paths +def renew_vae_resnet_paths(old_list, n_shave_prefix_segments=0): + """ + Updates paths inside resnets to the new naming scheme (local renaming) + """ + mapping = [] + for old_item in old_list: + new_item = old_item + + new_item = new_item.replace("nin_shortcut", "conv_shortcut") + new_item = shave_segments(new_item, n_shave_prefix_segments=n_shave_prefix_segments) + + mapping.append({"old": old_item, "new": new_item}) + + return mapping + + +# Copied from diffusers.pipelines.stable_diffusion.convert_from_ckpt.renew_attention_paths +def renew_attention_paths(old_list): + """ + Updates paths inside attentions to the new naming scheme (local renaming) + """ + mapping = [] + for old_item in old_list: + new_item = old_item + + # new_item = new_item.replace('norm.weight', 'group_norm.weight') + # new_item = new_item.replace('norm.bias', 'group_norm.bias') + + # new_item = new_item.replace('proj_out.weight', 'proj_attn.weight') + # new_item = new_item.replace('proj_out.bias', 'proj_attn.bias') + + # new_item = shave_segments(new_item, n_shave_prefix_segments=n_shave_prefix_segments) + + mapping.append({"old": old_item, "new": new_item}) + + return mapping + + +def renew_vae_attention_paths(old_list, n_shave_prefix_segments=0): + """ + Updates paths inside attentions to the new naming scheme (local renaming) + """ + mapping = [] + for old_item in old_list: + new_item = old_item + + new_item = new_item.replace("norm.weight", "group_norm.weight") + new_item = new_item.replace("norm.bias", "group_norm.bias") + + new_item = new_item.replace("q.weight", "to_q.weight") + new_item = new_item.replace("q.bias", "to_q.bias") + + new_item = new_item.replace("k.weight", "to_k.weight") + new_item = new_item.replace("k.bias", "to_k.bias") + + new_item = new_item.replace("v.weight", "to_v.weight") + new_item = new_item.replace("v.bias", "to_v.bias") + + new_item = new_item.replace("proj_out.weight", "to_out.0.weight") + new_item = new_item.replace("proj_out.bias", "to_out.0.bias") + + new_item = shave_segments(new_item, n_shave_prefix_segments=n_shave_prefix_segments) + + mapping.append({"old": old_item, "new": new_item}) + + return mapping + + +# Copied from diffusers.pipelines.stable_diffusion.convert_from_ckpt.assign_to_checkpoint +def assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, checkpoint, old_checkpoint, attention_paths_to_split=None, additional_replacements=None, config=None +): + """ + This does the final conversion step: take locally converted weights and apply a global renaming to them. It splits + attention layers, and takes into account additional replacements that may arise. + + Assigns the weights to the new checkpoint. + """ + assert isinstance(paths, list), "Paths should be a list of dicts containing 'old' and 'new' keys." + + # Splits the attention layers into three variables. + if attention_paths_to_split is not None: + for path, path_map in attention_paths_to_split.items(): + old_tensor = old_checkpoint[path] + channels = old_tensor.shape[0] // 3 + + target_shape = (-1, channels) if len(old_tensor.shape) == 3 else (-1) + + num_heads = old_tensor.shape[0] // config["num_head_channels"] // 3 + + old_tensor = old_tensor.reshape((num_heads, 3 * channels // num_heads) + old_tensor.shape[1:]) + query, key, value = old_tensor.split(channels // num_heads, dim=1) + + checkpoint[path_map["query"]] = query.reshape(target_shape) + checkpoint[path_map["key"]] = key.reshape(target_shape) + checkpoint[path_map["value"]] = value.reshape(target_shape) + + for path in paths: + new_path = path["new"] + + # These have already been assigned + if attention_paths_to_split is not None and new_path in attention_paths_to_split: + continue + + # Global renaming happens here + new_path = new_path.replace("middle_block.0", "mid_block.resnets.0") + new_path = new_path.replace("middle_block.1", "mid_block.attentions.0") + new_path = new_path.replace("middle_block.2", "mid_block.resnets.1") + + if additional_replacements is not None: + for replacement in additional_replacements: + new_path = new_path.replace(replacement["old"], replacement["new"]) + + # proj_attn.weight has to be converted from conv 1D to linear + if "proj_attn.weight" in new_path: + checkpoint[new_path] = old_checkpoint[path["old"]][:, :, 0] + else: + checkpoint[new_path] = old_checkpoint[path["old"]] + + +def conv_attn_to_linear(checkpoint): + keys = list(checkpoint.keys()) + attn_keys = ["to_q.weight", "to_k.weight", "to_v.weight"] + proj_key = "to_out.0.weight" + for key in keys: + if ".".join(key.split(".")[-2:]) in attn_keys or ".".join(key.split(".")[-3:]) == proj_key: + if checkpoint[key].ndim > 2: + checkpoint[key] = checkpoint[key].squeeze() + + +def create_unet_diffusers_config(original_config, image_size: int): + """ + Creates a UNet config for diffusers based on the config of the original MusicLDM model. + """ + unet_params = original_config["model"]["params"]["unet_config"]["params"] + vae_params = original_config["model"]["params"]["first_stage_config"]["params"]["ddconfig"] + + block_out_channels = [unet_params["model_channels"] * mult for mult in unet_params["channel_mult"]] + + down_block_types = [] + resolution = 1 + for i in range(len(block_out_channels)): + block_type = "CrossAttnDownBlock2D" if resolution in unet_params["attention_resolutions"] else "DownBlock2D" + down_block_types.append(block_type) + if i != len(block_out_channels) - 1: + resolution *= 2 + + up_block_types = [] + for i in range(len(block_out_channels)): + block_type = "CrossAttnUpBlock2D" if resolution in unet_params["attention_resolutions"] else "UpBlock2D" + up_block_types.append(block_type) + resolution //= 2 + + vae_scale_factor = 2 ** (len(vae_params["ch_mult"]) - 1) + + cross_attention_dim = ( + unet_params["cross_attention_dim"] if "cross_attention_dim" in unet_params else block_out_channels + ) + + class_embed_type = "simple_projection" if "extra_film_condition_dim" in unet_params else None + projection_class_embeddings_input_dim = ( + unet_params["extra_film_condition_dim"] if "extra_film_condition_dim" in unet_params else None + ) + class_embeddings_concat = unet_params["extra_film_use_concat"] if "extra_film_use_concat" in unet_params else None + + config = { + "sample_size": image_size // vae_scale_factor, + "in_channels": unet_params["in_channels"], + "out_channels": unet_params["out_channels"], + "down_block_types": tuple(down_block_types), + "up_block_types": tuple(up_block_types), + "block_out_channels": tuple(block_out_channels), + "layers_per_block": unet_params["num_res_blocks"], + "cross_attention_dim": cross_attention_dim, + "class_embed_type": class_embed_type, + "projection_class_embeddings_input_dim": projection_class_embeddings_input_dim, + "class_embeddings_concat": class_embeddings_concat, + } + + return config + + +# Adapted from diffusers.pipelines.stable_diffusion.convert_from_ckpt.create_vae_diffusers_config +def create_vae_diffusers_config(original_config, checkpoint, image_size: int): + """ + Creates a VAE config for diffusers based on the config of the original MusicLDM model. Compared to the original + Stable Diffusion conversion, this function passes a *learnt* VAE scaling factor to the diffusers VAE. + """ + vae_params = original_config["model"]["params"]["first_stage_config"]["params"]["ddconfig"] + _ = original_config["model"]["params"]["first_stage_config"]["params"]["embed_dim"] + + block_out_channels = [vae_params["ch"] * mult for mult in vae_params["ch_mult"]] + down_block_types = ["DownEncoderBlock2D"] * len(block_out_channels) + up_block_types = ["UpDecoderBlock2D"] * len(block_out_channels) + + scaling_factor = checkpoint["scale_factor"] if "scale_by_std" in original_config["model"]["params"] else 0.18215 + + config = { + "sample_size": image_size, + "in_channels": vae_params["in_channels"], + "out_channels": vae_params["out_ch"], + "down_block_types": tuple(down_block_types), + "up_block_types": tuple(up_block_types), + "block_out_channels": tuple(block_out_channels), + "latent_channels": vae_params["z_channels"], + "layers_per_block": vae_params["num_res_blocks"], + "scaling_factor": float(scaling_factor), + } + return config + + +# Copied from diffusers.pipelines.stable_diffusion.convert_from_ckpt.create_diffusers_schedular +def create_diffusers_schedular(original_config): + schedular = DDIMScheduler( + num_train_timesteps=original_config["model"]["params"]["timesteps"], + beta_start=original_config["model"]["params"]["linear_start"], + beta_end=original_config["model"]["params"]["linear_end"], + beta_schedule="scaled_linear", + ) + return schedular + + +def convert_ldm_unet_checkpoint(checkpoint, config, path=None, extract_ema=False): + """ + Takes a state dict and a config, and returns a converted checkpoint. Compared to the original Stable Diffusion + conversion, this function additionally converts the learnt film embedding linear layer. + """ + + # extract state_dict for UNet + unet_state_dict = {} + keys = list(checkpoint.keys()) + + unet_key = "model.diffusion_model." + # at least a 100 parameters have to start with `model_ema` in order for the checkpoint to be EMA + if sum(k.startswith("model_ema") for k in keys) > 100 and extract_ema: + print(f"Checkpoint {path} has both EMA and non-EMA weights.") + print( + "In this conversion only the EMA weights are extracted. If you want to instead extract the non-EMA" + " weights (useful to continue fine-tuning), please make sure to remove the `--extract_ema` flag." + ) + for key in keys: + if key.startswith("model.diffusion_model"): + flat_ema_key = "model_ema." + "".join(key.split(".")[1:]) + unet_state_dict[key.replace(unet_key, "")] = checkpoint.pop(flat_ema_key) + else: + if sum(k.startswith("model_ema") for k in keys) > 100: + print( + "In this conversion only the non-EMA weights are extracted. If you want to instead extract the EMA" + " weights (usually better for inference), please make sure to add the `--extract_ema` flag." + ) + + for key in keys: + if key.startswith(unet_key): + unet_state_dict[key.replace(unet_key, "")] = checkpoint.pop(key) + + new_checkpoint = {} + + new_checkpoint["time_embedding.linear_1.weight"] = unet_state_dict["time_embed.0.weight"] + new_checkpoint["time_embedding.linear_1.bias"] = unet_state_dict["time_embed.0.bias"] + new_checkpoint["time_embedding.linear_2.weight"] = unet_state_dict["time_embed.2.weight"] + new_checkpoint["time_embedding.linear_2.bias"] = unet_state_dict["time_embed.2.bias"] + + new_checkpoint["class_embedding.weight"] = unet_state_dict["film_emb.weight"] + new_checkpoint["class_embedding.bias"] = unet_state_dict["film_emb.bias"] + + new_checkpoint["conv_in.weight"] = unet_state_dict["input_blocks.0.0.weight"] + new_checkpoint["conv_in.bias"] = unet_state_dict["input_blocks.0.0.bias"] + + new_checkpoint["conv_norm_out.weight"] = unet_state_dict["out.0.weight"] + new_checkpoint["conv_norm_out.bias"] = unet_state_dict["out.0.bias"] + new_checkpoint["conv_out.weight"] = unet_state_dict["out.2.weight"] + new_checkpoint["conv_out.bias"] = unet_state_dict["out.2.bias"] + + # Retrieves the keys for the input blocks only + num_input_blocks = len({".".join(layer.split(".")[:2]) for layer in unet_state_dict if "input_blocks" in layer}) + input_blocks = { + layer_id: [key for key in unet_state_dict if f"input_blocks.{layer_id}" in key] + for layer_id in range(num_input_blocks) + } + + # Retrieves the keys for the middle blocks only + num_middle_blocks = len({".".join(layer.split(".")[:2]) for layer in unet_state_dict if "middle_block" in layer}) + middle_blocks = { + layer_id: [key for key in unet_state_dict if f"middle_block.{layer_id}" in key] + for layer_id in range(num_middle_blocks) + } + + # Retrieves the keys for the output blocks only + num_output_blocks = len({".".join(layer.split(".")[:2]) for layer in unet_state_dict if "output_blocks" in layer}) + output_blocks = { + layer_id: [key for key in unet_state_dict if f"output_blocks.{layer_id}" in key] + for layer_id in range(num_output_blocks) + } + + for i in range(1, num_input_blocks): + block_id = (i - 1) // (config["layers_per_block"] + 1) + layer_in_block_id = (i - 1) % (config["layers_per_block"] + 1) + + resnets = [ + key for key in input_blocks[i] if f"input_blocks.{i}.0" in key and f"input_blocks.{i}.0.op" not in key + ] + attentions = [key for key in input_blocks[i] if f"input_blocks.{i}.1" in key] + + if f"input_blocks.{i}.0.op.weight" in unet_state_dict: + new_checkpoint[f"down_blocks.{block_id}.downsamplers.0.conv.weight"] = unet_state_dict.pop( + f"input_blocks.{i}.0.op.weight" + ) + new_checkpoint[f"down_blocks.{block_id}.downsamplers.0.conv.bias"] = unet_state_dict.pop( + f"input_blocks.{i}.0.op.bias" + ) + + paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnets) + meta_path = {"old": f"input_blocks.{i}.0", "new": f"down_blocks.{block_id}.resnets.{layer_in_block_id}"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + if len(attentions): + paths = renew_attention_paths(attentions) + meta_path = {"old": f"input_blocks.{i}.1", "new": f"down_blocks.{block_id}.attentions.{layer_in_block_id}"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + resnet_0 = middle_blocks[0] + attentions = middle_blocks[1] + resnet_1 = middle_blocks[2] + + resnet_0_paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnet_0) + assign_to_checkpoint(resnet_0_paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, config=config) + + resnet_1_paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnet_1) + assign_to_checkpoint(resnet_1_paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, config=config) + + attentions_paths = renew_attention_paths(attentions) + meta_path = {"old": "middle_block.1", "new": "mid_block.attentions.0"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + attentions_paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + for i in range(num_output_blocks): + block_id = i // (config["layers_per_block"] + 1) + layer_in_block_id = i % (config["layers_per_block"] + 1) + output_block_layers = [shave_segments(name, 2) for name in output_blocks[i]] + output_block_list = {} + + for layer in output_block_layers: + layer_id, layer_name = layer.split(".")[0], shave_segments(layer, 1) + if layer_id in output_block_list: + output_block_list[layer_id].append(layer_name) + else: + output_block_list[layer_id] = [layer_name] + + if len(output_block_list) > 1: + resnets = [key for key in output_blocks[i] if f"output_blocks.{i}.0" in key] + attentions = [key for key in output_blocks[i] if f"output_blocks.{i}.1" in key] + + resnet_0_paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnets) + paths = renew_resnet_paths(resnets) + + meta_path = {"old": f"output_blocks.{i}.0", "new": f"up_blocks.{block_id}.resnets.{layer_in_block_id}"} + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + + output_block_list = {k: sorted(v) for k, v in output_block_list.items()} + if ["conv.bias", "conv.weight"] in output_block_list.values(): + index = list(output_block_list.values()).index(["conv.bias", "conv.weight"]) + new_checkpoint[f"up_blocks.{block_id}.upsamplers.0.conv.weight"] = unet_state_dict[ + f"output_blocks.{i}.{index}.conv.weight" + ] + new_checkpoint[f"up_blocks.{block_id}.upsamplers.0.conv.bias"] = unet_state_dict[ + f"output_blocks.{i}.{index}.conv.bias" + ] + + # Clear attentions as they have been attributed above. + if len(attentions) == 2: + attentions = [] + + if len(attentions): + paths = renew_attention_paths(attentions) + meta_path = { + "old": f"output_blocks.{i}.1", + "new": f"up_blocks.{block_id}.attentions.{layer_in_block_id}", + } + assign_to_checkpoint( + paths, new_checkpoint, unet_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config + ) + else: + resnet_0_paths = renew_resnet_paths(output_block_layers, n_shave_prefix_segments=1) + for path in resnet_0_paths: + old_path = ".".join(["output_blocks", str(i), path["old"]]) + new_path = ".".join(["up_blocks", str(block_id), "resnets", str(layer_in_block_id), path["new"]]) + + new_checkpoint[new_path] = unet_state_dict[old_path] + + return new_checkpoint + + +# Copied from diffusers.pipelines.stable_diffusion.convert_from_ckpt.convert_ldm_vae_checkpoint +def convert_ldm_vae_checkpoint(checkpoint, config): + # extract state dict for VAE + vae_state_dict = {} + vae_key = "first_stage_model." + keys = list(checkpoint.keys()) + for key in keys: + if key.startswith(vae_key): + vae_state_dict[key.replace(vae_key, "")] = checkpoint.get(key) + + new_checkpoint = {} + + new_checkpoint["encoder.conv_in.weight"] = vae_state_dict["encoder.conv_in.weight"] + new_checkpoint["encoder.conv_in.bias"] = vae_state_dict["encoder.conv_in.bias"] + new_checkpoint["encoder.conv_out.weight"] = vae_state_dict["encoder.conv_out.weight"] + new_checkpoint["encoder.conv_out.bias"] = vae_state_dict["encoder.conv_out.bias"] + new_checkpoint["encoder.conv_norm_out.weight"] = vae_state_dict["encoder.norm_out.weight"] + new_checkpoint["encoder.conv_norm_out.bias"] = vae_state_dict["encoder.norm_out.bias"] + + new_checkpoint["decoder.conv_in.weight"] = vae_state_dict["decoder.conv_in.weight"] + new_checkpoint["decoder.conv_in.bias"] = vae_state_dict["decoder.conv_in.bias"] + new_checkpoint["decoder.conv_out.weight"] = vae_state_dict["decoder.conv_out.weight"] + new_checkpoint["decoder.conv_out.bias"] = vae_state_dict["decoder.conv_out.bias"] + new_checkpoint["decoder.conv_norm_out.weight"] = vae_state_dict["decoder.norm_out.weight"] + new_checkpoint["decoder.conv_norm_out.bias"] = vae_state_dict["decoder.norm_out.bias"] + + new_checkpoint["quant_conv.weight"] = vae_state_dict["quant_conv.weight"] + new_checkpoint["quant_conv.bias"] = vae_state_dict["quant_conv.bias"] + new_checkpoint["post_quant_conv.weight"] = vae_state_dict["post_quant_conv.weight"] + new_checkpoint["post_quant_conv.bias"] = vae_state_dict["post_quant_conv.bias"] + + # Retrieves the keys for the encoder down blocks only + num_down_blocks = len({".".join(layer.split(".")[:3]) for layer in vae_state_dict if "encoder.down" in layer}) + down_blocks = { + layer_id: [key for key in vae_state_dict if f"down.{layer_id}" in key] for layer_id in range(num_down_blocks) + } + + # Retrieves the keys for the decoder up blocks only + num_up_blocks = len({".".join(layer.split(".")[:3]) for layer in vae_state_dict if "decoder.up" in layer}) + up_blocks = { + layer_id: [key for key in vae_state_dict if f"up.{layer_id}" in key] for layer_id in range(num_up_blocks) + } + + for i in range(num_down_blocks): + resnets = [key for key in down_blocks[i] if f"down.{i}" in key and f"down.{i}.downsample" not in key] + + if f"encoder.down.{i}.downsample.conv.weight" in vae_state_dict: + new_checkpoint[f"encoder.down_blocks.{i}.downsamplers.0.conv.weight"] = vae_state_dict.pop( + f"encoder.down.{i}.downsample.conv.weight" + ) + new_checkpoint[f"encoder.down_blocks.{i}.downsamplers.0.conv.bias"] = vae_state_dict.pop( + f"encoder.down.{i}.downsample.conv.bias" + ) + + paths = renew_vae_resnet_paths(resnets) + meta_path = {"old": f"down.{i}.block", "new": f"down_blocks.{i}.resnets"} + assign_to_checkpoint(paths, new_checkpoint, vae_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config) + + mid_resnets = [key for key in vae_state_dict if "encoder.mid.block" in key] + num_mid_res_blocks = 2 + for i in range(1, num_mid_res_blocks + 1): + resnets = [key for key in mid_resnets if f"encoder.mid.block_{i}" in key] + + paths = renew_vae_resnet_paths(resnets) + meta_path = {"old": f"mid.block_{i}", "new": f"mid_block.resnets.{i - 1}"} + assign_to_checkpoint(paths, new_checkpoint, vae_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config) + + mid_attentions = [key for key in vae_state_dict if "encoder.mid.attn" in key] + paths = renew_vae_attention_paths(mid_attentions) + meta_path = {"old": "mid.attn_1", "new": "mid_block.attentions.0"} + assign_to_checkpoint(paths, new_checkpoint, vae_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config) + conv_attn_to_linear(new_checkpoint) + + for i in range(num_up_blocks): + block_id = num_up_blocks - 1 - i + resnets = [ + key for key in up_blocks[block_id] if f"up.{block_id}" in key and f"up.{block_id}.upsample" not in key + ] + + if f"decoder.up.{block_id}.upsample.conv.weight" in vae_state_dict: + new_checkpoint[f"decoder.up_blocks.{i}.upsamplers.0.conv.weight"] = vae_state_dict[ + f"decoder.up.{block_id}.upsample.conv.weight" + ] + new_checkpoint[f"decoder.up_blocks.{i}.upsamplers.0.conv.bias"] = vae_state_dict[ + f"decoder.up.{block_id}.upsample.conv.bias" + ] + + paths = renew_vae_resnet_paths(resnets) + meta_path = {"old": f"up.{block_id}.block", "new": f"up_blocks.{i}.resnets"} + assign_to_checkpoint(paths, new_checkpoint, vae_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config) + + mid_resnets = [key for key in vae_state_dict if "decoder.mid.block" in key] + num_mid_res_blocks = 2 + for i in range(1, num_mid_res_blocks + 1): + resnets = [key for key in mid_resnets if f"decoder.mid.block_{i}" in key] + + paths = renew_vae_resnet_paths(resnets) + meta_path = {"old": f"mid.block_{i}", "new": f"mid_block.resnets.{i - 1}"} + assign_to_checkpoint(paths, new_checkpoint, vae_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config) + + mid_attentions = [key for key in vae_state_dict if "decoder.mid.attn" in key] + paths = renew_vae_attention_paths(mid_attentions) + meta_path = {"old": "mid.attn_1", "new": "mid_block.attentions.0"} + assign_to_checkpoint(paths, new_checkpoint, vae_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config) + conv_attn_to_linear(new_checkpoint) + return new_checkpoint + + +CLAP_KEYS_TO_MODIFY_MAPPING = { + "text_branch": "text_model", + "audio_branch": "audio_model.audio_encoder", + "attn": "attention.self", + "self.proj": "output.dense", + "attention.self_mask": "attn_mask", + "mlp.fc1": "intermediate.dense", + "mlp.fc2": "output.dense", + "norm1": "layernorm_before", + "norm2": "layernorm_after", + "bn0": "batch_norm", +} + +CLAP_KEYS_TO_IGNORE = [ + "text_transform", + "audio_transform", + "stft", + "logmel_extractor", + "tscam_conv", + "head", + "attn_mask", +] + +CLAP_EXPECTED_MISSING_KEYS = ["text_model.embeddings.token_type_ids"] + + +def convert_open_clap_checkpoint(checkpoint): + """ + Takes a state dict and returns a converted CLAP checkpoint. + """ + # extract state dict for CLAP text embedding model, discarding the audio component + model_state_dict = {} + model_key = "cond_stage_model.model." + keys = list(checkpoint.keys()) + for key in keys: + if key.startswith(model_key): + model_state_dict[key.replace(model_key, "")] = checkpoint.get(key) + + new_checkpoint = {} + + sequential_layers_pattern = r".*sequential.(\d+).*" + text_projection_pattern = r".*_projection.(\d+).*" + + for key, value in model_state_dict.items(): + # check if key should be ignored in mapping - if so map it to a key name that we'll filter out at the end + for key_to_ignore in CLAP_KEYS_TO_IGNORE: + if key_to_ignore in key: + key = "spectrogram" + + # check if any key needs to be modified + for key_to_modify, new_key in CLAP_KEYS_TO_MODIFY_MAPPING.items(): + if key_to_modify in key: + key = key.replace(key_to_modify, new_key) + + if re.match(sequential_layers_pattern, key): + # replace sequential layers with list + sequential_layer = re.match(sequential_layers_pattern, key).group(1) + + key = key.replace(f"sequential.{sequential_layer}.", f"layers.{int(sequential_layer) // 3}.linear.") + elif re.match(text_projection_pattern, key): + projecton_layer = int(re.match(text_projection_pattern, key).group(1)) + + # Because in CLAP they use `nn.Sequential`... + transformers_projection_layer = 1 if projecton_layer == 0 else 2 + + key = key.replace(f"_projection.{projecton_layer}.", f"_projection.linear{transformers_projection_layer}.") + + if "audio" and "qkv" in key: + # split qkv into query key and value + mixed_qkv = value + qkv_dim = mixed_qkv.size(0) // 3 + + query_layer = mixed_qkv[:qkv_dim] + key_layer = mixed_qkv[qkv_dim : qkv_dim * 2] + value_layer = mixed_qkv[qkv_dim * 2 :] + + new_checkpoint[key.replace("qkv", "query")] = query_layer + new_checkpoint[key.replace("qkv", "key")] = key_layer + new_checkpoint[key.replace("qkv", "value")] = value_layer + elif key != "spectrogram": + new_checkpoint[key] = value + + return new_checkpoint + + +def create_transformers_vocoder_config(original_config): + """ + Creates a config for transformers SpeechT5HifiGan based on the config of the vocoder model. + """ + vocoder_params = original_config["model"]["params"]["vocoder_config"]["params"] + + config = { + "model_in_dim": vocoder_params["num_mels"], + "sampling_rate": vocoder_params["sampling_rate"], + "upsample_initial_channel": vocoder_params["upsample_initial_channel"], + "upsample_rates": list(vocoder_params["upsample_rates"]), + "upsample_kernel_sizes": list(vocoder_params["upsample_kernel_sizes"]), + "resblock_kernel_sizes": list(vocoder_params["resblock_kernel_sizes"]), + "resblock_dilation_sizes": [ + list(resblock_dilation) for resblock_dilation in vocoder_params["resblock_dilation_sizes"] + ], + "normalize_before": False, + } + + return config + + +def convert_hifigan_checkpoint(checkpoint, config): + """ + Takes a state dict and config, and returns a converted HiFiGAN vocoder checkpoint. + """ + # extract state dict for vocoder + vocoder_state_dict = {} + vocoder_key = "first_stage_model.vocoder." + keys = list(checkpoint.keys()) + for key in keys: + if key.startswith(vocoder_key): + vocoder_state_dict[key.replace(vocoder_key, "")] = checkpoint.get(key) + + # fix upsampler keys, everything else is correct already + for i in range(len(config.upsample_rates)): + vocoder_state_dict[f"upsampler.{i}.weight"] = vocoder_state_dict.pop(f"ups.{i}.weight") + vocoder_state_dict[f"upsampler.{i}.bias"] = vocoder_state_dict.pop(f"ups.{i}.bias") + + if not config.normalize_before: + # if we don't set normalize_before then these variables are unused, so we set them to their initialised values + vocoder_state_dict["mean"] = torch.zeros(config.model_in_dim) + vocoder_state_dict["scale"] = torch.ones(config.model_in_dim) + + return vocoder_state_dict + + +# Adapted from https://huggingface.co/spaces/haoheliu/MusicLDM-text-to-audio-generation/blob/84a0384742a22bd80c44e903e241f0623e874f1d/MusicLDM/utils.py#L72-L73 +DEFAULT_CONFIG = { + "model": { + "params": { + "linear_start": 0.0015, + "linear_end": 0.0195, + "timesteps": 1000, + "channels": 8, + "scale_by_std": True, + "unet_config": { + "target": "MusicLDM.latent_diffusion.openaimodel.UNetModel", + "params": { + "extra_film_condition_dim": 512, + "extra_film_use_concat": True, + "in_channels": 8, + "out_channels": 8, + "model_channels": 128, + "attention_resolutions": [8, 4, 2], + "num_res_blocks": 2, + "channel_mult": [1, 2, 3, 5], + "num_head_channels": 32, + }, + }, + "first_stage_config": { + "target": "MusicLDM.variational_autoencoder.autoencoder.AutoencoderKL", + "params": { + "embed_dim": 8, + "ddconfig": { + "z_channels": 8, + "resolution": 256, + "in_channels": 1, + "out_ch": 1, + "ch": 128, + "ch_mult": [1, 2, 4], + "num_res_blocks": 2, + }, + }, + }, + "vocoder_config": { + "target": "MusicLDM.first_stage_model.vocoder", + "params": { + "upsample_rates": [5, 4, 2, 2, 2], + "upsample_kernel_sizes": [16, 16, 8, 4, 4], + "upsample_initial_channel": 1024, + "resblock_kernel_sizes": [3, 7, 11], + "resblock_dilation_sizes": [[1, 3, 5], [1, 3, 5], [1, 3, 5]], + "num_mels": 64, + "sampling_rate": 16000, + }, + }, + }, + }, +} + + +def load_pipeline_from_original_MusicLDM_ckpt( + checkpoint_path: str, + original_config_file: str = None, + image_size: int = 1024, + prediction_type: str = None, + extract_ema: bool = False, + scheduler_type: str = "ddim", + num_in_channels: int = None, + model_channels: int = None, + num_head_channels: int = None, + device: str = None, + from_safetensors: bool = False, +) -> MusicLDMPipeline: + """ + Load an MusicLDM pipeline object from a `.ckpt`/`.safetensors` file and (ideally) a `.yaml` config file. + + Although many of the arguments can be automatically inferred, some of these rely on brittle checks against the + global step count, which will likely fail for models that have undergone further fine-tuning. Therefore, it is + recommended that you override the default values and/or supply an `original_config_file` wherever possible. + + Args: + checkpoint_path (`str`): Path to `.ckpt` file. + original_config_file (`str`): + Path to `.yaml` config file corresponding to the original architecture. If `None`, will be automatically + set to the MusicLDM-s-full-v2 config. + image_size (`int`, *optional*, defaults to 1024): + The image size that the model was trained on. + prediction_type (`str`, *optional*): + The prediction type that the model was trained on. If `None`, will be automatically + inferred by looking for a key in the config. For the default config, the prediction type is `'epsilon'`. + num_in_channels (`int`, *optional*, defaults to None): + The number of UNet input channels. If `None`, it will be automatically inferred from the config. + model_channels (`int`, *optional*, defaults to None): + The number of UNet model channels. If `None`, it will be automatically inferred from the config. Override + to 128 for the small checkpoints, 192 for the medium checkpoints and 256 for the large. + num_head_channels (`int`, *optional*, defaults to None): + The number of UNet head channels. If `None`, it will be automatically inferred from the config. Override + to 32 for the small and medium checkpoints, and 64 for the large. + scheduler_type (`str`, *optional*, defaults to 'pndm'): + Type of scheduler to use. Should be one of `["pndm", "lms", "heun", "euler", "euler-ancestral", "dpm", + "ddim"]`. + extract_ema (`bool`, *optional*, defaults to `False`): Only relevant for + checkpoints that have both EMA and non-EMA weights. Whether to extract the EMA weights or not. Defaults to + `False`. Pass `True` to extract the EMA weights. EMA weights usually yield higher quality images for + inference. Non-EMA weights are usually better to continue fine-tuning. + device (`str`, *optional*, defaults to `None`): + The device to use. Pass `None` to determine automatically. + from_safetensors (`str`, *optional*, defaults to `False`): + If `checkpoint_path` is in `safetensors` format, load checkpoint with safetensors instead of PyTorch. + return: An MusicLDMPipeline object representing the passed-in `.ckpt`/`.safetensors` file. + """ + if from_safetensors: + from safetensors import safe_open + + checkpoint = {} + with safe_open(checkpoint_path, framework="pt", device="cpu") as f: + for key in f.keys(): + checkpoint[key] = f.get_tensor(key) + else: + if device is None: + device = "cuda" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu" + checkpoint = torch.load(checkpoint_path, map_location=device) + else: + checkpoint = torch.load(checkpoint_path, map_location=device) + + if "state_dict" in checkpoint: + checkpoint = checkpoint["state_dict"] + + if original_config_file is None: + original_config = DEFAULT_CONFIG + else: + original_config = yaml.safe_load(original_config_file) + + if num_in_channels is not None: + original_config["model"]["params"]["unet_config"]["params"]["in_channels"] = num_in_channels + + if model_channels is not None: + original_config["model"]["params"]["unet_config"]["params"]["model_channels"] = model_channels + + if num_head_channels is not None: + original_config["model"]["params"]["unet_config"]["params"]["num_head_channels"] = num_head_channels + + if ( + "parameterization" in original_config["model"]["params"] + and original_config["model"]["params"]["parameterization"] == "v" + ): + if prediction_type is None: + prediction_type = "v_prediction" + else: + if prediction_type is None: + prediction_type = "epsilon" + + if image_size is None: + image_size = 512 + + num_train_timesteps = original_config["model"]["params"]["timesteps"] + beta_start = original_config["model"]["params"]["linear_start"] + beta_end = original_config["model"]["params"]["linear_end"] + + scheduler = DDIMScheduler( + beta_end=beta_end, + beta_schedule="scaled_linear", + beta_start=beta_start, + num_train_timesteps=num_train_timesteps, + steps_offset=1, + clip_sample=False, + set_alpha_to_one=False, + prediction_type=prediction_type, + ) + # make sure scheduler works correctly with DDIM + scheduler.register_to_config(clip_sample=False) + + if scheduler_type == "pndm": + config = dict(scheduler.config) + config["skip_prk_steps"] = True + scheduler = PNDMScheduler.from_config(config) + elif scheduler_type == "lms": + scheduler = LMSDiscreteScheduler.from_config(scheduler.config) + elif scheduler_type == "heun": + scheduler = HeunDiscreteScheduler.from_config(scheduler.config) + elif scheduler_type == "euler": + scheduler = EulerDiscreteScheduler.from_config(scheduler.config) + elif scheduler_type == "euler-ancestral": + scheduler = EulerAncestralDiscreteScheduler.from_config(scheduler.config) + elif scheduler_type == "dpm": + scheduler = DPMSolverMultistepScheduler.from_config(scheduler.config) + elif scheduler_type == "ddim": + scheduler = scheduler + else: + raise ValueError(f"Scheduler of type {scheduler_type} doesn't exist!") + + # Convert the UNet2DModel + unet_config = create_unet_diffusers_config(original_config, image_size=image_size) + unet = UNet2DConditionModel(**unet_config) + + converted_unet_checkpoint = convert_ldm_unet_checkpoint( + checkpoint, unet_config, path=checkpoint_path, extract_ema=extract_ema + ) + + unet.load_state_dict(converted_unet_checkpoint) + + # Convert the VAE model + vae_config = create_vae_diffusers_config(original_config, checkpoint=checkpoint, image_size=image_size) + converted_vae_checkpoint = convert_ldm_vae_checkpoint(checkpoint, vae_config) + + vae = AutoencoderKL(**vae_config) + vae.load_state_dict(converted_vae_checkpoint) + + # Convert the text model + # MusicLDM uses the same tokenizer as the original CLAP model, but a slightly different configuration + config = ClapConfig.from_pretrained("laion/clap-htsat-unfused") + config.audio_config.update( + { + "patch_embeds_hidden_size": 128, + "hidden_size": 1024, + "depths": [2, 2, 12, 2], + } + ) + tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("laion/clap-htsat-unfused") + feature_extractor = AutoFeatureExtractor.from_pretrained("laion/clap-htsat-unfused") + + converted_text_model = convert_open_clap_checkpoint(checkpoint) + text_model = ClapModel(config) + + missing_keys, unexpected_keys = text_model.load_state_dict(converted_text_model, strict=False) + # we expect not to have token_type_ids in our original state dict so let's ignore them + missing_keys = list(set(missing_keys) - set(CLAP_EXPECTED_MISSING_KEYS)) + + if len(unexpected_keys) > 0: + raise ValueError(f"Unexpected keys when loading CLAP model: {unexpected_keys}") + + if len(missing_keys) > 0: + raise ValueError(f"Missing keys when loading CLAP model: {missing_keys}") + + # Convert the vocoder model + vocoder_config = create_transformers_vocoder_config(original_config) + vocoder_config = SpeechT5HifiGanConfig(**vocoder_config) + converted_vocoder_checkpoint = convert_hifigan_checkpoint(checkpoint, vocoder_config) + + vocoder = SpeechT5HifiGan(vocoder_config) + vocoder.load_state_dict(converted_vocoder_checkpoint) + + # Instantiate the diffusers pipeline + pipe = MusicLDMPipeline( + vae=vae, + text_encoder=text_model, + tokenizer=tokenizer, + unet=unet, + scheduler=scheduler, + vocoder=vocoder, + feature_extractor=feature_extractor, + ) + + return pipe + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() + + parser.add_argument( + "--checkpoint_path", default=None, type=str, required=True, help="Path to the checkpoint to convert." + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--original_config_file", + default=None, + type=str, + help="The YAML config file corresponding to the original architecture.", + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--num_in_channels", + default=None, + type=int, + help="The number of input channels. If `None` number of input channels will be automatically inferred.", + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--model_channels", + default=None, + type=int, + help="The number of UNet model channels. If `None`, it will be automatically inferred from the config. Override" + " to 128 for the small checkpoints, 192 for the medium checkpoints and 256 for the large.", + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--num_head_channels", + default=None, + type=int, + help="The number of UNet head channels. If `None`, it will be automatically inferred from the config. Override" + " to 32 for the small and medium checkpoints, and 64 for the large.", + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--scheduler_type", + default="ddim", + type=str, + help="Type of scheduler to use. Should be one of ['pndm', 'lms', 'ddim', 'euler', 'euler-ancestral', 'dpm']", + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--image_size", + default=None, + type=int, + help=("The image size that the model was trained on."), + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--prediction_type", + default=None, + type=str, + help=("The prediction type that the model was trained on."), + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--extract_ema", + action="store_true", + help=( + "Only relevant for checkpoints that have both EMA and non-EMA weights. Whether to extract the EMA weights" + " or not. Defaults to `False`. Add `--extract_ema` to extract the EMA weights. EMA weights usually yield" + " higher quality images for inference. Non-EMA weights are usually better to continue fine-tuning." + ), + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--from_safetensors", + action="store_true", + help="If `--checkpoint_path` is in `safetensors` format, load checkpoint with safetensors instead of PyTorch.", + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--to_safetensors", + action="store_true", + help="Whether to store pipeline in safetensors format or not.", + ) + parser.add_argument("--dump_path", default=None, type=str, required=True, help="Path to the output model.") + parser.add_argument("--device", type=str, help="Device to use (e.g. cpu, cuda:0, cuda:1, etc.)") + args = parser.parse_args() + + pipe = load_pipeline_from_original_MusicLDM_ckpt( + checkpoint_path=args.checkpoint_path, + original_config_file=args.original_config_file, + image_size=args.image_size, + prediction_type=args.prediction_type, + extract_ema=args.extract_ema, + scheduler_type=args.scheduler_type, + num_in_channels=args.num_in_channels, + model_channels=args.model_channels, + num_head_channels=args.num_head_channels, + from_safetensors=args.from_safetensors, + device=args.device, + ) + pipe.save_pretrained(args.dump_path, safe_serialization=args.to_safetensors) diff --git a/diffusers/scripts/convert_pixart_sigma_to_diffusers.py b/diffusers/scripts/convert_pixart_sigma_to_diffusers.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9572a83c06441b36221ccbc88b343182f082dcf2 --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/scripts/convert_pixart_sigma_to_diffusers.py @@ -0,0 +1,223 @@ +import argparse +import os + +import torch +from transformers import T5EncoderModel, T5Tokenizer + +from diffusers import AutoencoderKL, DPMSolverMultistepScheduler, PixArtSigmaPipeline, Transformer2DModel + + +ckpt_id = "PixArt-alpha" +# https://github.com/PixArt-alpha/PixArt-sigma/blob/dd087141864e30ec44f12cb7448dd654be065e88/scripts/inference.py#L158 +interpolation_scale = {256: 0.5, 512: 1, 1024: 2, 2048: 4} + + +def main(args): + all_state_dict = torch.load(args.orig_ckpt_path) + state_dict = all_state_dict.pop("state_dict") + converted_state_dict = {} + + # Patch embeddings. + converted_state_dict["pos_embed.proj.weight"] = state_dict.pop("x_embedder.proj.weight") + converted_state_dict["pos_embed.proj.bias"] = state_dict.pop("x_embedder.proj.bias") + + # Caption projection. + converted_state_dict["caption_projection.linear_1.weight"] = state_dict.pop("y_embedder.y_proj.fc1.weight") + converted_state_dict["caption_projection.linear_1.bias"] = state_dict.pop("y_embedder.y_proj.fc1.bias") + converted_state_dict["caption_projection.linear_2.weight"] = state_dict.pop("y_embedder.y_proj.fc2.weight") + converted_state_dict["caption_projection.linear_2.bias"] = state_dict.pop("y_embedder.y_proj.fc2.bias") + + # AdaLN-single LN + converted_state_dict["adaln_single.emb.timestep_embedder.linear_1.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + "t_embedder.mlp.0.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict["adaln_single.emb.timestep_embedder.linear_1.bias"] = state_dict.pop("t_embedder.mlp.0.bias") + converted_state_dict["adaln_single.emb.timestep_embedder.linear_2.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + "t_embedder.mlp.2.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict["adaln_single.emb.timestep_embedder.linear_2.bias"] = state_dict.pop("t_embedder.mlp.2.bias") + + if args.micro_condition: + # Resolution. + converted_state_dict["adaln_single.emb.resolution_embedder.linear_1.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + "csize_embedder.mlp.0.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict["adaln_single.emb.resolution_embedder.linear_1.bias"] = state_dict.pop( + "csize_embedder.mlp.0.bias" + ) + converted_state_dict["adaln_single.emb.resolution_embedder.linear_2.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + "csize_embedder.mlp.2.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict["adaln_single.emb.resolution_embedder.linear_2.bias"] = state_dict.pop( + "csize_embedder.mlp.2.bias" + ) + # Aspect ratio. + converted_state_dict["adaln_single.emb.aspect_ratio_embedder.linear_1.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + "ar_embedder.mlp.0.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict["adaln_single.emb.aspect_ratio_embedder.linear_1.bias"] = state_dict.pop( + "ar_embedder.mlp.0.bias" + ) + converted_state_dict["adaln_single.emb.aspect_ratio_embedder.linear_2.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + "ar_embedder.mlp.2.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict["adaln_single.emb.aspect_ratio_embedder.linear_2.bias"] = state_dict.pop( + "ar_embedder.mlp.2.bias" + ) + # Shared norm. + converted_state_dict["adaln_single.linear.weight"] = state_dict.pop("t_block.1.weight") + converted_state_dict["adaln_single.linear.bias"] = state_dict.pop("t_block.1.bias") + + for depth in range(28): + # Transformer blocks. + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.scale_shift_table"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.scale_shift_table" + ) + # Attention is all you need 🤘 + + # Self attention. + q, k, v = torch.chunk(state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{depth}.attn.qkv.weight"), 3, dim=0) + q_bias, k_bias, v_bias = torch.chunk(state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{depth}.attn.qkv.bias"), 3, dim=0) + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn1.to_q.weight"] = q + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn1.to_q.bias"] = q_bias + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn1.to_k.weight"] = k + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn1.to_k.bias"] = k_bias + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn1.to_v.weight"] = v + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn1.to_v.bias"] = v_bias + # Projection. + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn1.to_out.0.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.attn.proj.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn1.to_out.0.bias"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.attn.proj.bias" + ) + if args.qk_norm: + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn1.q_norm.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.attn.q_norm.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn1.q_norm.bias"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.attn.q_norm.bias" + ) + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn1.k_norm.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.attn.k_norm.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn1.k_norm.bias"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.attn.k_norm.bias" + ) + + # Feed-forward. + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.ff.net.0.proj.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.mlp.fc1.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.ff.net.0.proj.bias"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.mlp.fc1.bias" + ) + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.ff.net.2.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.mlp.fc2.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.ff.net.2.bias"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.mlp.fc2.bias" + ) + + # Cross-attention. + q = state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{depth}.cross_attn.q_linear.weight") + q_bias = state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{depth}.cross_attn.q_linear.bias") + k, v = torch.chunk(state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{depth}.cross_attn.kv_linear.weight"), 2, dim=0) + k_bias, v_bias = torch.chunk(state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{depth}.cross_attn.kv_linear.bias"), 2, dim=0) + + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn2.to_q.weight"] = q + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn2.to_q.bias"] = q_bias + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn2.to_k.weight"] = k + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn2.to_k.bias"] = k_bias + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn2.to_v.weight"] = v + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn2.to_v.bias"] = v_bias + + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn2.to_out.0.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.cross_attn.proj.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn2.to_out.0.bias"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.cross_attn.proj.bias" + ) + + # Final block. + converted_state_dict["proj_out.weight"] = state_dict.pop("final_layer.linear.weight") + converted_state_dict["proj_out.bias"] = state_dict.pop("final_layer.linear.bias") + converted_state_dict["scale_shift_table"] = state_dict.pop("final_layer.scale_shift_table") + + # PixArt XL/2 + transformer = Transformer2DModel( + sample_size=args.image_size // 8, + num_layers=28, + attention_head_dim=72, + in_channels=4, + out_channels=8, + patch_size=2, + attention_bias=True, + num_attention_heads=16, + cross_attention_dim=1152, + activation_fn="gelu-approximate", + num_embeds_ada_norm=1000, + norm_type="ada_norm_single", + norm_elementwise_affine=False, + norm_eps=1e-6, + caption_channels=4096, + interpolation_scale=interpolation_scale[args.image_size], + use_additional_conditions=args.micro_condition, + ) + transformer.load_state_dict(converted_state_dict, strict=True) + + assert transformer.pos_embed.pos_embed is not None + try: + state_dict.pop("y_embedder.y_embedding") + state_dict.pop("pos_embed") + except Exception as e: + print(f"Skipping {str(e)}") + pass + assert len(state_dict) == 0, f"State dict is not empty, {state_dict.keys()}" + + num_model_params = sum(p.numel() for p in transformer.parameters()) + print(f"Total number of transformer parameters: {num_model_params}") + + if args.only_transformer: + transformer.save_pretrained(os.path.join(args.dump_path, "transformer")) + else: + # pixart-Sigma vae link: https://huggingface.co/PixArt-alpha/pixart_sigma_sdxlvae_T5_diffusers/tree/main/vae + vae = AutoencoderKL.from_pretrained(f"{ckpt_id}/pixart_sigma_sdxlvae_T5_diffusers", subfolder="vae") + + scheduler = DPMSolverMultistepScheduler() + + tokenizer = T5Tokenizer.from_pretrained(f"{ckpt_id}/pixart_sigma_sdxlvae_T5_diffusers", subfolder="tokenizer") + text_encoder = T5EncoderModel.from_pretrained( + f"{ckpt_id}/pixart_sigma_sdxlvae_T5_diffusers", subfolder="text_encoder" + ) + + pipeline = PixArtSigmaPipeline( + tokenizer=tokenizer, text_encoder=text_encoder, transformer=transformer, vae=vae, scheduler=scheduler + ) + + pipeline.save_pretrained(args.dump_path) + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() + + parser.add_argument( + "--micro_condition", action="store_true", help="If use Micro-condition in PixArtMS structure during training." + ) + parser.add_argument("--qk_norm", action="store_true", help="If use qk norm during training.") + parser.add_argument( + "--orig_ckpt_path", default=None, type=str, required=False, help="Path to the checkpoint to convert." + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--image_size", + default=1024, + type=int, + choices=[256, 512, 1024, 2048], + required=False, + help="Image size of pretrained model, 256, 512, 1024, or 2048.", + ) + parser.add_argument("--dump_path", default=None, type=str, required=True, help="Path to the output pipeline.") + parser.add_argument("--only_transformer", default=True, type=bool, required=True) + + args = parser.parse_args() + main(args) diff --git a/diffusers/scripts/convert_sana_to_diffusers.py b/diffusers/scripts/convert_sana_to_diffusers.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..959a647e0a5eb6c596642426a01922ea9b91f634 --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/scripts/convert_sana_to_diffusers.py @@ -0,0 +1,456 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python +from __future__ import annotations + +import argparse +import os +from contextlib import nullcontext + +import torch +from accelerate import init_empty_weights +from huggingface_hub import hf_hub_download, snapshot_download +from termcolor import colored +from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer + +from diffusers import ( + AutoencoderDC, + DPMSolverMultistepScheduler, + FlowMatchEulerDiscreteScheduler, + SanaPipeline, + SanaSprintPipeline, + SanaTransformer2DModel, + SCMScheduler, +) +from diffusers.models.modeling_utils import load_model_dict_into_meta +from diffusers.utils.import_utils import is_accelerate_available + + +CTX = init_empty_weights if is_accelerate_available else nullcontext + +ckpt_ids = [ + "Efficient-Large-Model/Sana_Sprint_0.6B_1024px/checkpoints/Sana_Sprint_0.6B_1024px.pth" + "Efficient-Large-Model/Sana_Sprint_1.6B_1024px/checkpoints/Sana_Sprint_1.6B_1024px.pth" + "Efficient-Large-Model/SANA1.5_4.8B_1024px/checkpoints/SANA1.5_4.8B_1024px.pth", + "Efficient-Large-Model/SANA1.5_1.6B_1024px/checkpoints/SANA1.5_1.6B_1024px.pth", + "Efficient-Large-Model/Sana_1600M_4Kpx_BF16/checkpoints/Sana_1600M_4Kpx_BF16.pth", + "Efficient-Large-Model/Sana_1600M_2Kpx_BF16/checkpoints/Sana_1600M_2Kpx_BF16.pth", + "Efficient-Large-Model/Sana_1600M_1024px_MultiLing/checkpoints/Sana_1600M_1024px_MultiLing.pth", + "Efficient-Large-Model/Sana_1600M_1024px_BF16/checkpoints/Sana_1600M_1024px_BF16.pth", + "Efficient-Large-Model/Sana_1600M_512px_MultiLing/checkpoints/Sana_1600M_512px_MultiLing.pth", + "Efficient-Large-Model/Sana_1600M_1024px/checkpoints/Sana_1600M_1024px.pth", + "Efficient-Large-Model/Sana_1600M_512px/checkpoints/Sana_1600M_512px.pth", + "Efficient-Large-Model/Sana_600M_1024px/checkpoints/Sana_600M_1024px_MultiLing.pth", + "Efficient-Large-Model/Sana_600M_512px/checkpoints/Sana_600M_512px_MultiLing.pth", +] +# https://github.com/NVlabs/Sana/blob/main/scripts/inference.py + + +def main(args): + cache_dir_path = os.path.expanduser("~/.cache/huggingface/hub") + + if args.orig_ckpt_path is None or args.orig_ckpt_path in ckpt_ids: + ckpt_id = args.orig_ckpt_path or ckpt_ids[0] + snapshot_download( + repo_id=f"{'/'.join(ckpt_id.split('/')[:2])}", + cache_dir=cache_dir_path, + repo_type="model", + ) + file_path = hf_hub_download( + repo_id=f"{'/'.join(ckpt_id.split('/')[:2])}", + filename=f"{'/'.join(ckpt_id.split('/')[2:])}", + cache_dir=cache_dir_path, + repo_type="model", + ) + else: + file_path = args.orig_ckpt_path + + print(colored(f"Loading checkpoint from {file_path}", "green", attrs=["bold"])) + all_state_dict = torch.load(file_path, weights_only=True) + state_dict = all_state_dict.pop("state_dict") + converted_state_dict = {} + + # Patch embeddings. + converted_state_dict["patch_embed.proj.weight"] = state_dict.pop("x_embedder.proj.weight") + converted_state_dict["patch_embed.proj.bias"] = state_dict.pop("x_embedder.proj.bias") + + # Caption projection. + converted_state_dict["caption_projection.linear_1.weight"] = state_dict.pop("y_embedder.y_proj.fc1.weight") + converted_state_dict["caption_projection.linear_1.bias"] = state_dict.pop("y_embedder.y_proj.fc1.bias") + converted_state_dict["caption_projection.linear_2.weight"] = state_dict.pop("y_embedder.y_proj.fc2.weight") + converted_state_dict["caption_projection.linear_2.bias"] = state_dict.pop("y_embedder.y_proj.fc2.bias") + + # Handle different time embedding structure based on model type + + if args.model_type in ["SanaSprint_1600M_P1_D20", "SanaSprint_600M_P1_D28"]: + # For Sana Sprint, the time embedding structure is different + converted_state_dict["time_embed.timestep_embedder.linear_1.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + "t_embedder.mlp.0.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict["time_embed.timestep_embedder.linear_1.bias"] = state_dict.pop("t_embedder.mlp.0.bias") + converted_state_dict["time_embed.timestep_embedder.linear_2.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + "t_embedder.mlp.2.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict["time_embed.timestep_embedder.linear_2.bias"] = state_dict.pop("t_embedder.mlp.2.bias") + + # Guidance embedder for Sana Sprint + converted_state_dict["time_embed.guidance_embedder.linear_1.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + "cfg_embedder.mlp.0.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict["time_embed.guidance_embedder.linear_1.bias"] = state_dict.pop("cfg_embedder.mlp.0.bias") + converted_state_dict["time_embed.guidance_embedder.linear_2.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + "cfg_embedder.mlp.2.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict["time_embed.guidance_embedder.linear_2.bias"] = state_dict.pop("cfg_embedder.mlp.2.bias") + else: + # Original Sana time embedding structure + converted_state_dict["time_embed.emb.timestep_embedder.linear_1.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + "t_embedder.mlp.0.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict["time_embed.emb.timestep_embedder.linear_1.bias"] = state_dict.pop( + "t_embedder.mlp.0.bias" + ) + converted_state_dict["time_embed.emb.timestep_embedder.linear_2.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + "t_embedder.mlp.2.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict["time_embed.emb.timestep_embedder.linear_2.bias"] = state_dict.pop( + "t_embedder.mlp.2.bias" + ) + + # Shared norm. + converted_state_dict["time_embed.linear.weight"] = state_dict.pop("t_block.1.weight") + converted_state_dict["time_embed.linear.bias"] = state_dict.pop("t_block.1.bias") + + # y norm + converted_state_dict["caption_norm.weight"] = state_dict.pop("attention_y_norm.weight") + + # scheduler + if args.image_size == 4096: + flow_shift = 6.0 + else: + flow_shift = 3.0 + + # model config + if args.model_type in ["SanaMS_1600M_P1_D20", "SanaSprint_1600M_P1_D20", "SanaMS1.5_1600M_P1_D20"]: + layer_num = 20 + elif args.model_type in ["SanaMS_600M_P1_D28", "SanaSprint_600M_P1_D28"]: + layer_num = 28 + elif args.model_type == "SanaMS_4800M_P1_D60": + layer_num = 60 + else: + raise ValueError(f"{args.model_type} is not supported.") + # Positional embedding interpolation scale. + interpolation_scale = {512: None, 1024: None, 2048: 1.0, 4096: 2.0} + qk_norm = ( + "rms_norm_across_heads" + if args.model_type + in ["SanaMS1.5_1600M_P1_D20", "SanaMS1.5_4800M_P1_D60", "SanaSprint_600M_P1_D28", "SanaSprint_1600M_P1_D20"] + else None + ) + + for depth in range(layer_num): + # Transformer blocks. + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.scale_shift_table"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.scale_shift_table" + ) + + # Linear Attention is all you need 🤘 + # Self attention. + q, k, v = torch.chunk(state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{depth}.attn.qkv.weight"), 3, dim=0) + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn1.to_q.weight"] = q + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn1.to_k.weight"] = k + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn1.to_v.weight"] = v + if qk_norm is not None: + # Add Q/K normalization for self-attention (attn1) - needed for Sana-Sprint and Sana-1.5 + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn1.norm_q.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.attn.q_norm.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn1.norm_k.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.attn.k_norm.weight" + ) + # Projection. + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn1.to_out.0.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.attn.proj.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn1.to_out.0.bias"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.attn.proj.bias" + ) + + # Feed-forward. + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.ff.conv_inverted.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.mlp.inverted_conv.conv.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.ff.conv_inverted.bias"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.mlp.inverted_conv.conv.bias" + ) + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.ff.conv_depth.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.mlp.depth_conv.conv.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.ff.conv_depth.bias"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.mlp.depth_conv.conv.bias" + ) + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.ff.conv_point.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.mlp.point_conv.conv.weight" + ) + + # Cross-attention. + q = state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{depth}.cross_attn.q_linear.weight") + q_bias = state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{depth}.cross_attn.q_linear.bias") + k, v = torch.chunk(state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{depth}.cross_attn.kv_linear.weight"), 2, dim=0) + k_bias, v_bias = torch.chunk(state_dict.pop(f"blocks.{depth}.cross_attn.kv_linear.bias"), 2, dim=0) + + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn2.to_q.weight"] = q + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn2.to_q.bias"] = q_bias + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn2.to_k.weight"] = k + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn2.to_k.bias"] = k_bias + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn2.to_v.weight"] = v + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn2.to_v.bias"] = v_bias + if qk_norm is not None: + # Add Q/K normalization for cross-attention (attn2) - needed for Sana-Sprint and Sana-1.5 + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn2.norm_q.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.cross_attn.q_norm.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn2.norm_k.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.cross_attn.k_norm.weight" + ) + + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn2.to_out.0.weight"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.cross_attn.proj.weight" + ) + converted_state_dict[f"transformer_blocks.{depth}.attn2.to_out.0.bias"] = state_dict.pop( + f"blocks.{depth}.cross_attn.proj.bias" + ) + + # Final block. + converted_state_dict["proj_out.weight"] = state_dict.pop("final_layer.linear.weight") + converted_state_dict["proj_out.bias"] = state_dict.pop("final_layer.linear.bias") + converted_state_dict["scale_shift_table"] = state_dict.pop("final_layer.scale_shift_table") + + # Transformer + with CTX(): + transformer_kwargs = { + "in_channels": 32, + "out_channels": 32, + "num_attention_heads": model_kwargs[args.model_type]["num_attention_heads"], + "attention_head_dim": model_kwargs[args.model_type]["attention_head_dim"], + "num_layers": model_kwargs[args.model_type]["num_layers"], + "num_cross_attention_heads": model_kwargs[args.model_type]["num_cross_attention_heads"], + "cross_attention_head_dim": model_kwargs[args.model_type]["cross_attention_head_dim"], + "cross_attention_dim": model_kwargs[args.model_type]["cross_attention_dim"], + "caption_channels": 2304, + "mlp_ratio": 2.5, + "attention_bias": False, + "sample_size": args.image_size // 32, + "patch_size": 1, + "norm_elementwise_affine": False, + "norm_eps": 1e-6, + "interpolation_scale": interpolation_scale[args.image_size], + } + + # Add qk_norm parameter for Sana Sprint + if args.model_type in [ + "SanaMS1.5_1600M_P1_D20", + "SanaMS1.5_4800M_P1_D60", + "SanaSprint_600M_P1_D28", + "SanaSprint_1600M_P1_D20", + ]: + transformer_kwargs["qk_norm"] = "rms_norm_across_heads" + if args.model_type in ["SanaSprint_1600M_P1_D20", "SanaSprint_600M_P1_D28"]: + transformer_kwargs["guidance_embeds"] = True + + transformer = SanaTransformer2DModel(**transformer_kwargs) + + if is_accelerate_available(): + load_model_dict_into_meta(transformer, converted_state_dict) + else: + transformer.load_state_dict(converted_state_dict, strict=True, assign=True) + + try: + state_dict.pop("y_embedder.y_embedding") + state_dict.pop("pos_embed") + state_dict.pop("logvar_linear.weight") + state_dict.pop("logvar_linear.bias") + except KeyError: + print("y_embedder.y_embedding or pos_embed not found in the state_dict") + + assert len(state_dict) == 0, f"State dict is not empty, {state_dict.keys()}" + + num_model_params = sum(p.numel() for p in transformer.parameters()) + print(f"Total number of transformer parameters: {num_model_params}") + + transformer = transformer.to(weight_dtype) + + if not args.save_full_pipeline: + print( + colored( + f"Only saving transformer model of {args.model_type}. " + f"Set --save_full_pipeline to save the whole Pipeline", + "green", + attrs=["bold"], + ) + ) + transformer.save_pretrained( + os.path.join(args.dump_path, "transformer"), safe_serialization=True, max_shard_size="5GB" + ) + else: + print(colored(f"Saving the whole Pipeline containing {args.model_type}", "green", attrs=["bold"])) + # VAE + ae = AutoencoderDC.from_pretrained("mit-han-lab/dc-ae-f32c32-sana-1.1-diffusers", torch_dtype=torch.float32) + + # Text Encoder + text_encoder_model_path = "Efficient-Large-Model/gemma-2-2b-it" + tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(text_encoder_model_path) + tokenizer.padding_side = "right" + text_encoder = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained( + text_encoder_model_path, torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16 + ).get_decoder() + + # Choose the appropriate pipeline and scheduler based on model type + if args.model_type in ["SanaSprint_1600M_P1_D20", "SanaSprint_600M_P1_D28"]: + # Force SCM Scheduler for Sana Sprint regardless of scheduler_type + if args.scheduler_type != "scm": + print( + colored( + f"Warning: Overriding scheduler_type '{args.scheduler_type}' to 'scm' for SanaSprint model", + "yellow", + attrs=["bold"], + ) + ) + + # SCM Scheduler for Sana Sprint + scheduler_config = { + "prediction_type": "trigflow", + "sigma_data": 0.5, + } + scheduler = SCMScheduler(**scheduler_config) + pipe = SanaSprintPipeline( + tokenizer=tokenizer, + text_encoder=text_encoder, + transformer=transformer, + vae=ae, + scheduler=scheduler, + ) + else: + # Original Sana scheduler + if args.scheduler_type == "flow-dpm_solver": + scheduler = DPMSolverMultistepScheduler( + flow_shift=flow_shift, + use_flow_sigmas=True, + prediction_type="flow_prediction", + ) + elif args.scheduler_type == "flow-euler": + scheduler = FlowMatchEulerDiscreteScheduler(shift=flow_shift) + else: + raise ValueError(f"Scheduler type {args.scheduler_type} is not supported") + + pipe = SanaPipeline( + tokenizer=tokenizer, + text_encoder=text_encoder, + transformer=transformer, + vae=ae, + scheduler=scheduler, + ) + + pipe.save_pretrained(args.dump_path, safe_serialization=True, max_shard_size="5GB") + + +DTYPE_MAPPING = { + "fp32": torch.float32, + "fp16": torch.float16, + "bf16": torch.bfloat16, +} + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() + + parser.add_argument( + "--orig_ckpt_path", default=None, type=str, required=False, help="Path to the checkpoint to convert." + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--image_size", + default=1024, + type=int, + choices=[512, 1024, 2048, 4096], + required=False, + help="Image size of pretrained model, 512, 1024, 2048 or 4096.", + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--model_type", + default="SanaMS_1600M_P1_D20", + type=str, + choices=[ + "SanaMS_1600M_P1_D20", + "SanaMS_600M_P1_D28", + "SanaMS1.5_1600M_P1_D20", + "SanaMS1.5_4800M_P1_D60", + "SanaSprint_1600M_P1_D20", + "SanaSprint_600M_P1_D28", + ], + ) + parser.add_argument( + "--scheduler_type", + default="flow-dpm_solver", + type=str, + choices=["flow-dpm_solver", "flow-euler", "scm"], + help="Scheduler type to use. Use 'scm' for Sana Sprint models.", + ) + parser.add_argument("--dump_path", default=None, type=str, required=True, help="Path to the output pipeline.") + parser.add_argument("--save_full_pipeline", action="store_true", help="save all the pipeline elements in one.") + parser.add_argument("--dtype", default="fp32", type=str, choices=["fp32", "fp16", "bf16"], help="Weight dtype.") + + args = parser.parse_args() + + model_kwargs = { + "SanaMS_1600M_P1_D20": { + "num_attention_heads": 70, + "attention_head_dim": 32, + "num_cross_attention_heads": 20, + "cross_attention_head_dim": 112, + "cross_attention_dim": 2240, + "num_layers": 20, + }, + "SanaMS_600M_P1_D28": { + "num_attention_heads": 36, + "attention_head_dim": 32, + "num_cross_attention_heads": 16, + "cross_attention_head_dim": 72, + "cross_attention_dim": 1152, + "num_layers": 28, + }, + "SanaMS1.5_1600M_P1_D20": { + "num_attention_heads": 70, + "attention_head_dim": 32, + "num_cross_attention_heads": 20, + "cross_attention_head_dim": 112, + "cross_attention_dim": 2240, + "num_layers": 20, + }, + "SanaMS1.5_4800M_P1_D60": { + "num_attention_heads": 70, + "attention_head_dim": 32, + "num_cross_attention_heads": 20, + "cross_attention_head_dim": 112, + "cross_attention_dim": 2240, + "num_layers": 60, + }, + "SanaSprint_600M_P1_D28": { + "num_attention_heads": 36, + "attention_head_dim": 32, + "num_cross_attention_heads": 16, + "cross_attention_head_dim": 72, + "cross_attention_dim": 1152, + "num_layers": 28, + }, + "SanaSprint_1600M_P1_D20": { + "num_attention_heads": 70, + "attention_head_dim": 32, + "num_cross_attention_heads": 20, + "cross_attention_head_dim": 112, + "cross_attention_dim": 2240, + "num_layers": 20, + }, + } + + device = "cuda" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu" + weight_dtype = DTYPE_MAPPING[args.dtype] + + main(args) diff --git a/diffusers/scripts/convert_stable_cascade.py b/diffusers/scripts/convert_stable_cascade.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce10970b0b6ae33dcd83922c22779ba0a19a5517 --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/scripts/convert_stable_cascade.py @@ -0,0 +1,218 @@ +# Run this script to convert the Stable Cascade model weights to a diffusers pipeline. +import argparse +from contextlib import nullcontext + +import torch +from safetensors.torch import load_file +from transformers import ( + AutoTokenizer, + CLIPConfig, + CLIPImageProcessor, + CLIPTextModelWithProjection, + CLIPVisionModelWithProjection, +) + +from diffusers import ( + DDPMWuerstchenScheduler, + StableCascadeCombinedPipeline, + StableCascadeDecoderPipeline, + StableCascadePriorPipeline, +) +from diffusers.loaders.single_file_utils import convert_stable_cascade_unet_single_file_to_diffusers +from diffusers.models import StableCascadeUNet +from diffusers.models.modeling_utils import load_model_dict_into_meta +from diffusers.pipelines.wuerstchen import PaellaVQModel +from diffusers.utils import is_accelerate_available + + +if is_accelerate_available(): + from accelerate import init_empty_weights + +parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Convert Stable Cascade model weights to a diffusers pipeline") +parser.add_argument("--model_path", type=str, help="Location of Stable Cascade weights") +parser.add_argument("--stage_c_name", type=str, default="stage_c.safetensors", help="Name of stage c checkpoint file") +parser.add_argument("--stage_b_name", type=str, default="stage_b.safetensors", help="Name of stage b checkpoint file") +parser.add_argument("--skip_stage_c", action="store_true", help="Skip converting stage c") +parser.add_argument("--skip_stage_b", action="store_true", help="Skip converting stage b") +parser.add_argument("--use_safetensors", action="store_true", help="Use SafeTensors for conversion") +parser.add_argument( + "--prior_output_path", default="stable-cascade-prior", type=str, help="Hub organization to save the pipelines to" +) +parser.add_argument( + "--decoder_output_path", + type=str, + default="stable-cascade-decoder", + help="Hub organization to save the pipelines to", +) +parser.add_argument( + "--combined_output_path", + type=str, + default="stable-cascade-combined", + help="Hub organization to save the pipelines to", +) +parser.add_argument("--save_combined", action="store_true") +parser.add_argument("--push_to_hub", action="store_true", help="Push to hub") +parser.add_argument("--variant", type=str, help="Set to bf16 to save bfloat16 weights") + +args = parser.parse_args() + +if args.skip_stage_b and args.skip_stage_c: + raise ValueError("At least one stage should be converted") +if (args.skip_stage_b or args.skip_stage_c) and args.save_combined: + raise ValueError("Cannot skip stages when creating a combined pipeline") + +model_path = args.model_path + +device = "cpu" +if args.variant == "bf16": + dtype = torch.bfloat16 +else: + dtype = torch.float32 + +# set paths to model weights +prior_checkpoint_path = f"{model_path}/{args.stage_c_name}" +decoder_checkpoint_path = f"{model_path}/{args.stage_b_name}" + +# Clip Text encoder and tokenizer +config = CLIPConfig.from_pretrained("laion/CLIP-ViT-bigG-14-laion2B-39B-b160k") +config.text_config.projection_dim = config.projection_dim +text_encoder = CLIPTextModelWithProjection.from_pretrained( + "laion/CLIP-ViT-bigG-14-laion2B-39B-b160k", config=config.text_config +) +tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("laion/CLIP-ViT-bigG-14-laion2B-39B-b160k") + +# image processor +feature_extractor = CLIPImageProcessor() +image_encoder = CLIPVisionModelWithProjection.from_pretrained("openai/clip-vit-large-patch14") + +# scheduler for prior and decoder +scheduler = DDPMWuerstchenScheduler() +ctx = init_empty_weights if is_accelerate_available() else nullcontext + +if not args.skip_stage_c: + # Prior + if args.use_safetensors: + prior_orig_state_dict = load_file(prior_checkpoint_path, device=device) + else: + prior_orig_state_dict = torch.load(prior_checkpoint_path, map_location=device) + + prior_state_dict = convert_stable_cascade_unet_single_file_to_diffusers(prior_orig_state_dict) + + with ctx(): + prior_model = StableCascadeUNet( + in_channels=16, + out_channels=16, + timestep_ratio_embedding_dim=64, + patch_size=1, + conditioning_dim=2048, + block_out_channels=[2048, 2048], + num_attention_heads=[32, 32], + down_num_layers_per_block=[8, 24], + up_num_layers_per_block=[24, 8], + down_blocks_repeat_mappers=[1, 1], + up_blocks_repeat_mappers=[1, 1], + block_types_per_layer=[ + ["SDCascadeResBlock", "SDCascadeTimestepBlock", "SDCascadeAttnBlock"], + ["SDCascadeResBlock", "SDCascadeTimestepBlock", "SDCascadeAttnBlock"], + ], + clip_text_in_channels=1280, + clip_text_pooled_in_channels=1280, + clip_image_in_channels=768, + clip_seq=4, + kernel_size=3, + dropout=[0.1, 0.1], + self_attn=True, + timestep_conditioning_type=["sca", "crp"], + switch_level=[False], + ) + if is_accelerate_available(): + load_model_dict_into_meta(prior_model, prior_state_dict) + else: + prior_model.load_state_dict(prior_state_dict) + + # Prior pipeline + prior_pipeline = StableCascadePriorPipeline( + prior=prior_model, + tokenizer=tokenizer, + text_encoder=text_encoder, + image_encoder=image_encoder, + scheduler=scheduler, + feature_extractor=feature_extractor, + ) + prior_pipeline.to(dtype).save_pretrained( + args.prior_output_path, push_to_hub=args.push_to_hub, variant=args.variant + ) + +if not args.skip_stage_b: + # Decoder + if args.use_safetensors: + decoder_orig_state_dict = load_file(decoder_checkpoint_path, device=device) + else: + decoder_orig_state_dict = torch.load(decoder_checkpoint_path, map_location=device) + + decoder_state_dict = convert_stable_cascade_unet_single_file_to_diffusers(decoder_orig_state_dict) + with ctx(): + decoder = StableCascadeUNet( + in_channels=4, + out_channels=4, + timestep_ratio_embedding_dim=64, + patch_size=2, + conditioning_dim=1280, + block_out_channels=[320, 640, 1280, 1280], + down_num_layers_per_block=[2, 6, 28, 6], + up_num_layers_per_block=[6, 28, 6, 2], + down_blocks_repeat_mappers=[1, 1, 1, 1], + up_blocks_repeat_mappers=[3, 3, 2, 2], + num_attention_heads=[0, 0, 20, 20], + block_types_per_layer=[ + ["SDCascadeResBlock", "SDCascadeTimestepBlock"], + ["SDCascadeResBlock", "SDCascadeTimestepBlock"], + ["SDCascadeResBlock", "SDCascadeTimestepBlock", "SDCascadeAttnBlock"], + ["SDCascadeResBlock", "SDCascadeTimestepBlock", "SDCascadeAttnBlock"], + ], + clip_text_pooled_in_channels=1280, + clip_seq=4, + effnet_in_channels=16, + pixel_mapper_in_channels=3, + kernel_size=3, + dropout=[0, 0, 0.1, 0.1], + self_attn=True, + timestep_conditioning_type=["sca"], + ) + + if is_accelerate_available(): + load_model_dict_into_meta(decoder, decoder_state_dict) + else: + decoder.load_state_dict(decoder_state_dict) + + # VQGAN from Wuerstchen-V2 + vqmodel = PaellaVQModel.from_pretrained("warp-ai/wuerstchen", subfolder="vqgan") + + # Decoder pipeline + decoder_pipeline = StableCascadeDecoderPipeline( + decoder=decoder, text_encoder=text_encoder, tokenizer=tokenizer, vqgan=vqmodel, scheduler=scheduler + ) + decoder_pipeline.to(dtype).save_pretrained( + args.decoder_output_path, push_to_hub=args.push_to_hub, variant=args.variant + ) + +if args.save_combined: + # Stable Cascade combined pipeline + stable_cascade_pipeline = StableCascadeCombinedPipeline( + # Decoder + text_encoder=text_encoder, + tokenizer=tokenizer, + decoder=decoder, + scheduler=scheduler, + vqgan=vqmodel, + # Prior + prior_text_encoder=text_encoder, + prior_tokenizer=tokenizer, + prior_prior=prior_model, + prior_scheduler=scheduler, + prior_image_encoder=image_encoder, + prior_feature_extractor=feature_extractor, + ) + stable_cascade_pipeline.to(dtype).save_pretrained( + args.combined_output_path, push_to_hub=args.push_to_hub, variant=args.variant + ) diff --git a/diffusers/scripts/convert_vae_pt_to_diffusers.py b/diffusers/scripts/convert_vae_pt_to_diffusers.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8c7dc71ddfd82dc6e6aa584850ea7f9e9a31e813 --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/scripts/convert_vae_pt_to_diffusers.py @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@ +import argparse +import io + +import requests +import torch +import yaml + +from diffusers import AutoencoderKL +from diffusers.pipelines.stable_diffusion.convert_from_ckpt import ( + assign_to_checkpoint, + conv_attn_to_linear, + create_vae_diffusers_config, + renew_vae_attention_paths, + renew_vae_resnet_paths, +) +from diffusers.utils.constants import DIFFUSERS_REQUEST_TIMEOUT + + +def custom_convert_ldm_vae_checkpoint(checkpoint, config): + vae_state_dict = checkpoint + + new_checkpoint = {} + + new_checkpoint["encoder.conv_in.weight"] = vae_state_dict["encoder.conv_in.weight"] + new_checkpoint["encoder.conv_in.bias"] = vae_state_dict["encoder.conv_in.bias"] + new_checkpoint["encoder.conv_out.weight"] = vae_state_dict["encoder.conv_out.weight"] + new_checkpoint["encoder.conv_out.bias"] = vae_state_dict["encoder.conv_out.bias"] + new_checkpoint["encoder.conv_norm_out.weight"] = vae_state_dict["encoder.norm_out.weight"] + new_checkpoint["encoder.conv_norm_out.bias"] = vae_state_dict["encoder.norm_out.bias"] + + new_checkpoint["decoder.conv_in.weight"] = vae_state_dict["decoder.conv_in.weight"] + new_checkpoint["decoder.conv_in.bias"] = vae_state_dict["decoder.conv_in.bias"] + new_checkpoint["decoder.conv_out.weight"] = vae_state_dict["decoder.conv_out.weight"] + new_checkpoint["decoder.conv_out.bias"] = vae_state_dict["decoder.conv_out.bias"] + new_checkpoint["decoder.conv_norm_out.weight"] = vae_state_dict["decoder.norm_out.weight"] + new_checkpoint["decoder.conv_norm_out.bias"] = vae_state_dict["decoder.norm_out.bias"] + + new_checkpoint["quant_conv.weight"] = vae_state_dict["quant_conv.weight"] + new_checkpoint["quant_conv.bias"] = vae_state_dict["quant_conv.bias"] + new_checkpoint["post_quant_conv.weight"] = vae_state_dict["post_quant_conv.weight"] + new_checkpoint["post_quant_conv.bias"] = vae_state_dict["post_quant_conv.bias"] + + # Retrieves the keys for the encoder down blocks only + num_down_blocks = len({".".join(layer.split(".")[:3]) for layer in vae_state_dict if "encoder.down" in layer}) + down_blocks = { + layer_id: [key for key in vae_state_dict if f"down.{layer_id}" in key] for layer_id in range(num_down_blocks) + } + + # Retrieves the keys for the decoder up blocks only + num_up_blocks = len({".".join(layer.split(".")[:3]) for layer in vae_state_dict if "decoder.up" in layer}) + up_blocks = { + layer_id: [key for key in vae_state_dict if f"up.{layer_id}" in key] for layer_id in range(num_up_blocks) + } + + for i in range(num_down_blocks): + resnets = [ + key + for key in down_blocks[i] + if f"down.{i}" in key and f"down.{i}.downsample" not in key and "attn" not in key + ] + attentions = [key for key in down_blocks[i] if f"down.{i}.attn" in key] + + if f"encoder.down.{i}.downsample.conv.weight" in vae_state_dict: + new_checkpoint[f"encoder.down_blocks.{i}.downsamplers.0.conv.weight"] = vae_state_dict.pop( + f"encoder.down.{i}.downsample.conv.weight" + ) + new_checkpoint[f"encoder.down_blocks.{i}.downsamplers.0.conv.bias"] = vae_state_dict.pop( + f"encoder.down.{i}.downsample.conv.bias" + ) + + paths = renew_vae_resnet_paths(resnets) + meta_path = {"old": f"down.{i}.block", "new": f"down_blocks.{i}.resnets"} + assign_to_checkpoint(paths, new_checkpoint, vae_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config) + + paths = renew_vae_attention_paths(attentions) + meta_path = {"old": f"down.{i}.attn", "new": f"down_blocks.{i}.attentions"} + assign_to_checkpoint(paths, new_checkpoint, vae_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config) + + mid_resnets = [key for key in vae_state_dict if "encoder.mid.block" in key] + num_mid_res_blocks = 2 + for i in range(1, num_mid_res_blocks + 1): + resnets = [key for key in mid_resnets if f"encoder.mid.block_{i}" in key] + + paths = renew_vae_resnet_paths(resnets) + meta_path = {"old": f"mid.block_{i}", "new": f"mid_block.resnets.{i - 1}"} + assign_to_checkpoint(paths, new_checkpoint, vae_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config) + + mid_attentions = [key for key in vae_state_dict if "encoder.mid.attn" in key] + paths = renew_vae_attention_paths(mid_attentions) + meta_path = {"old": "mid.attn_1", "new": "mid_block.attentions.0"} + assign_to_checkpoint(paths, new_checkpoint, vae_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config) + conv_attn_to_linear(new_checkpoint) + + for i in range(num_up_blocks): + block_id = num_up_blocks - 1 - i + resnets = [ + key + for key in up_blocks[block_id] + if f"up.{block_id}" in key and f"up.{block_id}.upsample" not in key and "attn" not in key + ] + attentions = [key for key in up_blocks[block_id] if f"up.{block_id}.attn" in key] + + if f"decoder.up.{block_id}.upsample.conv.weight" in vae_state_dict: + new_checkpoint[f"decoder.up_blocks.{i}.upsamplers.0.conv.weight"] = vae_state_dict[ + f"decoder.up.{block_id}.upsample.conv.weight" + ] + new_checkpoint[f"decoder.up_blocks.{i}.upsamplers.0.conv.bias"] = vae_state_dict[ + f"decoder.up.{block_id}.upsample.conv.bias" + ] + + paths = renew_vae_resnet_paths(resnets) + meta_path = {"old": f"up.{block_id}.block", "new": f"up_blocks.{i}.resnets"} + assign_to_checkpoint(paths, new_checkpoint, vae_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config) + + paths = renew_vae_attention_paths(attentions) + meta_path = {"old": f"up.{block_id}.attn", "new": f"up_blocks.{i}.attentions"} + assign_to_checkpoint(paths, new_checkpoint, vae_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config) + + mid_resnets = [key for key in vae_state_dict if "decoder.mid.block" in key] + num_mid_res_blocks = 2 + for i in range(1, num_mid_res_blocks + 1): + resnets = [key for key in mid_resnets if f"decoder.mid.block_{i}" in key] + + paths = renew_vae_resnet_paths(resnets) + meta_path = {"old": f"mid.block_{i}", "new": f"mid_block.resnets.{i - 1}"} + assign_to_checkpoint(paths, new_checkpoint, vae_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config) + + mid_attentions = [key for key in vae_state_dict if "decoder.mid.attn" in key] + paths = renew_vae_attention_paths(mid_attentions) + meta_path = {"old": "mid.attn_1", "new": "mid_block.attentions.0"} + assign_to_checkpoint(paths, new_checkpoint, vae_state_dict, additional_replacements=[meta_path], config=config) + conv_attn_to_linear(new_checkpoint) + return new_checkpoint + + +def vae_pt_to_vae_diffuser( + checkpoint_path: str, + output_path: str, +): + # Only support V1 + r = requests.get( + " https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CompVis/stable-diffusion/main/configs/stable-diffusion/v1-inference.yaml", + timeout=DIFFUSERS_REQUEST_TIMEOUT, + ) + io_obj = io.BytesIO(r.content) + + original_config = yaml.safe_load(io_obj) + image_size = 512 + device = "cuda" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu" + if checkpoint_path.endswith("safetensors"): + from safetensors import safe_open + + checkpoint = {} + with safe_open(checkpoint_path, framework="pt", device="cpu") as f: + for key in f.keys(): + checkpoint[key] = f.get_tensor(key) + else: + checkpoint = torch.load(checkpoint_path, map_location=device)["state_dict"] + + # Convert the VAE model. + vae_config = create_vae_diffusers_config(original_config, image_size=image_size) + converted_vae_checkpoint = custom_convert_ldm_vae_checkpoint(checkpoint, vae_config) + + vae = AutoencoderKL(**vae_config) + vae.load_state_dict(converted_vae_checkpoint) + vae.save_pretrained(output_path) + + +if __name__ == "__main__": + parser = argparse.ArgumentParser() + + parser.add_argument("--vae_pt_path", default=None, type=str, required=True, help="Path to the VAE.pt to convert.") + parser.add_argument("--dump_path", default=None, type=str, required=True, help="Path to the VAE.pt to convert.") + + args = parser.parse_args() + + vae_pt_to_vae_diffuser(args.vae_pt_path, args.dump_path) diff --git a/diffusers/scripts/convert_wuerstchen.py b/diffusers/scripts/convert_wuerstchen.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..826b9b20818154852a11709d9b2b207a5aa24ffc --- /dev/null +++ b/diffusers/scripts/convert_wuerstchen.py @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ +# Run inside root directory of official source code: https://github.com/dome272/wuerstchen/ +import os + +import torch +from transformers import AutoTokenizer, CLIPTextModel +from vqgan import VQModel + +from diffusers import ( + DDPMWuerstchenScheduler, + WuerstchenCombinedPipeline, + WuerstchenDecoderPipeline, + WuerstchenPriorPipeline, +) +from diffusers.pipelines.wuerstchen import PaellaVQModel, WuerstchenDiffNeXt, WuerstchenPrior + + +model_path = "models/" +device = "cpu" + +paella_vqmodel = VQModel() +state_dict = torch.load(os.path.join(model_path, "vqgan_f4_v1_500k.pt"), map_location=device)["state_dict"] +paella_vqmodel.load_state_dict(state_dict) + +state_dict["vquantizer.embedding.weight"] = state_dict["vquantizer.codebook.weight"] +state_dict.pop("vquantizer.codebook.weight") +vqmodel = PaellaVQModel(num_vq_embeddings=paella_vqmodel.codebook_size, latent_channels=paella_vqmodel.c_latent) +vqmodel.load_state_dict(state_dict) + +# Clip Text encoder and tokenizer +text_encoder = CLIPTextModel.from_pretrained("laion/CLIP-ViT-bigG-14-laion2B-39B-b160k") +tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("laion/CLIP-ViT-bigG-14-laion2B-39B-b160k") + +# Generator +gen_text_encoder = CLIPTextModel.from_pretrained("laion/CLIP-ViT-H-14-laion2B-s32B-b79K").to("cpu") +gen_tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("laion/CLIP-ViT-H-14-laion2B-s32B-b79K") + +orig_state_dict = torch.load(os.path.join(model_path, "model_v2_stage_b.pt"), map_location=device)["state_dict"] +state_dict = {} +for key in orig_state_dict.keys(): + if key.endswith("in_proj_weight"): + weights = orig_state_dict[key].chunk(3, 0) + state_dict[key.replace("attn.in_proj_weight", "to_q.weight")] = weights[0] + state_dict[key.replace("attn.in_proj_weight", "to_k.weight")] = weights[1] + state_dict[key.replace("attn.in_proj_weight", "to_v.weight")] = weights[2] + elif key.endswith("in_proj_bias"): + weights = orig_state_dict[key].chunk(3, 0) + state_dict[key.replace("attn.in_proj_bias", "to_q.bias")] = weights[0] + state_dict[key.replace("attn.in_proj_bias", "to_k.bias")] = weights[1] + state_dict[key.replace("attn.in_proj_bias", "to_v.bias")] = weights[2] + elif key.endswith("out_proj.weight"): + weights = orig_state_dict[key] + state_dict[key.replace("attn.out_proj.weight", "to_out.0.weight")] = weights + elif key.endswith("out_proj.bias"): + weights = orig_state_dict[key] + state_dict[key.replace("attn.out_proj.bias", "to_out.0.bias")] = weights + else: + state_dict[key] = orig_state_dict[key] +decoder = WuerstchenDiffNeXt() +decoder.load_state_dict(state_dict) + +# Prior +orig_state_dict = torch.load(os.path.join(model_path, "model_v3_stage_c.pt"), map_location=device)["ema_state_dict"] +state_dict = {} +for key in orig_state_dict.keys(): + if key.endswith("in_proj_weight"): + weights = orig_state_dict[key].chunk(3, 0) + state_dict[key.replace("attn.in_proj_weight", "to_q.weight")] = weights[0] + state_dict[key.replace("attn.in_proj_weight", "to_k.weight")] = weights[1] + state_dict[key.replace("attn.in_proj_weight", "to_v.weight")] = weights[2] + elif key.endswith("in_proj_bias"): + weights = orig_state_dict[key].chunk(3, 0) + state_dict[key.replace("attn.in_proj_bias", "to_q.bias")] = weights[0] + state_dict[key.replace("attn.in_proj_bias", "to_k.bias")] = weights[1] + state_dict[key.replace("attn.in_proj_bias", "to_v.bias")] = weights[2] + elif key.endswith("out_proj.weight"): + weights = orig_state_dict[key] + state_dict[key.replace("attn.out_proj.weight", "to_out.0.weight")] = weights + elif key.endswith("out_proj.bias"): + weights = orig_state_dict[key] + state_dict[key.replace("attn.out_proj.bias", "to_out.0.bias")] = weights + else: + state_dict[key] = orig_state_dict[key] +prior_model = WuerstchenPrior(c_in=16, c=1536, c_cond=1280, c_r=64, depth=32, nhead=24).to(device) +prior_model.load_state_dict(state_dict) + +# scheduler +scheduler = DDPMWuerstchenScheduler() + +# Prior pipeline +prior_pipeline = WuerstchenPriorPipeline( + prior=prior_model, text_encoder=text_encoder, tokenizer=tokenizer, scheduler=scheduler +) + +prior_pipeline.save_pretrained("warp-ai/wuerstchen-prior") + +decoder_pipeline = WuerstchenDecoderPipeline( + text_encoder=gen_text_encoder, tokenizer=gen_tokenizer, vqgan=vqmodel, decoder=decoder, scheduler=scheduler +) +decoder_pipeline.save_pretrained("warp-ai/wuerstchen") + +# Wuerstchen pipeline +wuerstchen_pipeline = WuerstchenCombinedPipeline( + # Decoder + text_encoder=gen_text_encoder, + tokenizer=gen_tokenizer, + decoder=decoder, + scheduler=scheduler, + vqgan=vqmodel, + # Prior + prior_tokenizer=tokenizer, + prior_text_encoder=text_encoder, + prior=prior_model, + prior_scheduler=scheduler, +) +wuerstchen_pipeline.save_pretrained("warp-ai/WuerstchenCombinedPipeline") diff --git a/illustrious_generated/low_quality_images.json b/illustrious_generated/low_quality_images.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f2c80123a59b6cf6ebb4eb559d3154972de56365 --- /dev/null +++ b/illustrious_generated/low_quality_images.json @@ -0,0 +1,6887 @@ +[ + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d337c665d640.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/d337c665d640.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "d337c665d640", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, 8K, CG, illustration, 1boy, muscular, detailed large cock, wearing black bikini, sunbathing, detailed skin, tanned, sunglasses, wet hair, close-up, side view, high detail, sharp shading, centered composition, soft shadows, ambient light, anime coloring, artist:tokyo_arts, usnr, licking, tongue out, wet, twitching, close up, detailed soles, stretched, feet in stockings, ass, nipples, medium breasts, shocked, nervous, penis awe, beach setting, sun, waves, bikini, towel, sunglasses, wet hair, detailed skin, detailed soles, stretched, feet in stockings, ass, nipples, medium breasts, shocked, nervous, penis awe", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, worst detail, sketch, censor, blurry eyes, poor anatomy, lowres, jpeg artifacts, bad hands, multiple views, watermark, logo, title, 4koma, monochrome, missing fingers, extra fingers, signature, waterprints", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 8896, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, detailed setting, detailed background, 1girl, yunyun (ko...", + "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, anime coloring, ambient light, soft light, Yak...", + "1girl,large breasts, white thong,kicking,one leg up,anime screencap, masterpiece, best quality, hand..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + }, + "quality_evaluation": { + "is_acceptable": false, + "explanation": "```json", + "evaluation_timestamp": 1753673428.1530797, + "improved": false, + "improvement_attempt": 0 + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not show any facial features as it is focused on the torso.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present in the image.\n- The absence of facial features makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered and balanced, focusing on the torso area.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the muscular texture and skin folds.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the content shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks facial features, which is the primary focus for high-end customers, it cannot be evaluated properly for face quality. However, the overall image quality is good, and the technical aspects are satisfactory. For a complete evaluation, the image should include a face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d337c665d640.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753684601.2500398 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/4360dd6c5fe6.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/4360dd6c5fe6.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "4360dd6c5fe6", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-detailed, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, 8k, 2girls, playful interaction, close proximity, laughing, shared moment, soft focus background, warm golden hour, textured carpet, vintage sofa, floral patterns, delicate jewelry, subtle blush, natural skin tones, dynamic composition, interactive pose, emotional connection, subtle eye contact, playful teasing, flowing hair, loose clothing, casual attire, intimate setting, soft shadows, ambient lighting, depth of field, detailed textures, realistic fabrics, high quality, best quality, artistic, vibrant colors, natural lighting, dynamic angle, masterpiece, ultra-detailed, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, 8k", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, bad anatomy, lowres, jpeg artifacts, blurry, watermark, text, logo, signature, anime, loli, cartoonish, distorted faces, extra limbs, missing fingers, unrealistic proportions, over-saturated colors, poor lighting, flat shading, unrealistic skin, text, watermark, bad hands, deformed features, censored, nsfw, inappropriate content", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 10445, + "sample_sources": [ + "Hype4realistic, masterpiece, best quality,ultra_detailed, very_aesthetic,amazing_quality,absurdres,v...", + "1girl, breasts, animal ears, rabbit ears, solo, meme attire, reverse outfit, reverse bunnysuit, past...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism (1.5), high detail, depth o..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show any facial features as it is focused on the lower legs and feet. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features means that the face quality cannot be assessed at all.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show any facial features as it is focused on the lower legs and feet. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features means that the face quality cannot be assessed at all.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and clear contrasts.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered around the feet, which is appropriate for the subject matter, but the lack of facial elements makes it difficult to assess the overall composition.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the background and floor patterns.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks facial features, the face quality cannot be evaluated. However, the overall image quality is good, and the technical aspects are satisfactory. Given the focus on the lower legs and feet, the image could benefit from additional context or a different angle to include more of the character's body, allowing for a more comprehensive evaluation of the image quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/4360dd6c5fe6.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753684665.4889214 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a6bb9c91d34f.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/a6bb9c91d34f.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "a6bb9c91d34f", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, high detail, depth of field, (blurred background), (dramatic lighting), masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, 8k, fantasy creature, glowing scales, iridescent wings, mystical forest, glowing mushrooms, twilight atmosphere, ethereal glow, (dynamic pose), (flowing hair), (sparkling eyes), (magic aura), intricate jewelry, ancient runes, mystical symbols, detailed textures, soft focus, vibrant colors, fantasy art, surreal landscape, glowing rivers, magical creatures, (enchanted forest), (celestial patterns), (soft shadows), (dramatic clouds), (enchanted glow), (magical ambiance), (dreamlike scene), (ethereal beauty), (fantasy masterpiece)", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, displeasing, text, watermark, bad anatomy, extra digits, missing fingers, shiny skin, child, deformed hands, low res, bad lighting, unnatural colors, distorted proportions, blurry details, poor composition, flat shading, monochrome, greyscale, (blurry background), (over-saturated colors), (incorrect perspective), (poorly rendered textures), (unrealistic lighting), (distorted features), (low detail), (low resolution), (poor quality), (inaccurate anatomy), (text artifacts), (watermark), (low contrast), (low clarity)", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 4241, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism (1.5), high detail, depth o...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, uncensored, blonde braid, smooth skin, bent over, innie ...", + "dark purple eyes, symbol shaped eyes, naked, pussy, cute:1.4, smiling, shy expression, (1girl), larg..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's scales and the forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the absence of a face makes it difficult to assess the facial quality comprehensively. If the face were included, the score could potentially be higher.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not present, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a face to ensure a complete evaluation of the facial quality. This will allow for a more accurate assessment and a higher overall score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a6bb9c91d34f.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753685411.9726853 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0f049a4bf8e6.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/0f049a4bf8e6.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "0f049a4bf8e6", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, 2girls, solo, intimate, touching, kissing, nudity, soft lighting, dramatic shadows, close-up, emotional connection, passionate embrace, trembling, blush, sparkling eyes, heart-shaped shadows, romantic atmosphere, warm tones, volumetric lighting, realistic textures, natural skin tones, detailed anatomy, soft focus, depth of field, dynamic composition", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, bad quality, worst quality, bad anatomy, sketch, jpeg artifacts, ugly, poorly drawn, censor, blurry, watermark, old, outdated, text, text bubble, multiple views, artist name, signature, patreon username, patreon logo, choker, bad lighting, flat colors, lack of detail, unrealistic proportions, distorted faces, unnatural poses", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 3100, + "sample_sources": [ + "anime, masterpiece, best quality, 8k, 1girl, hatsune miku ,closed mouth, cum in mouth, cheek bulge, ...", + "Smooth Quality, 1girl, solo, cat girl, classroom, >_<, holding drawing of chibi cat girl with >_< ex...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,mavuika, 1girl, deep penetration, nipples, sex, fertilizati..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible as it is obscured by the character's hair.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The absence of facial features makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack detail due to the lack of facial features.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted, which might be intentional for artistic effect, but they do not stand out strongly.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on the lower part of the body, which is unusual for a character portrait.\n- Level of detail richness: The image lacks detail, especially in the areas where facial features would typically be located.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are apparent.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears adequate for the content shown.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image should be regenerated with a focus on including the character's face, ensuring that facial details, symmetry, and natural proportions are accurately depicted. The composition could also benefit from a more balanced approach to include the upper body or face if that aligns with the intended style.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0f049a4bf8e6.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753685570.4538996 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/4a928e27008c.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/4a928e27008c.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "4a928e27008c", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, cinematic lighting, volumetric lighting, 1girl, ethereal being, floating in a mystical forest, glowing runes, magical aura, detailed clothing with intricate patterns, flowing robes, celestial motifs, glowing eyes, soft focus, depth of field, dynamic pose, floating petals, enchanted forest, glowing mushrooms, soft light from above, dramatic shadows, intricate jewelry, glowing amulet, detailed facial features, serene expression, intricate hair with glowing strands, soft gradients, vibrant colors, painterly style, high contrast, rich textures, fantasy art style, detailed background with ancient trees and glowing elements, HDR, sharp focus, digital art, photorealistic, oil painting style, rich color palette, deep blues, golds, and teal-green, elegant, rich, intriguing scene", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, blurry, watermark, glitch, extra limbs, deformed, ugly, flat, dull, poorly drawn face, bad proportions, extra hands, mutated hands, lazyhand, easynegative, score_3_up, score_2_up, boring, flat, lazyneg, unappealing, generic, unrealistic, low detail, over-saturated, under-exposed, over-exposed, poor lighting, unflattering pose, cluttered background, lack of depth, low resolution, grainy, artifacts, signature, censored, bar_censor, simple background, outdated style, cartoonish, unrealistic proportions, incorrect anatomy, missing limbs, extra eyes, wrong number of limbs, distorted features, poor lighting, unbalanced composition, low contrast, over-saturated colors, under-saturated colors, poor color palette, lack of detail, poor texture, low quality, bad quality, lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, sketch, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, old, oldest, censored, bar_censor, (pregnant), chibi, loli, simple background, conjoined", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 986, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, scenery, 1girl, hatsu...", + "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, stylized, newest, depth of field, HDR, high co...", + "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, score_6_up, Expressiveh, pretty face, long blonde hair, detailed fa..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 2048, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the glowing effect surrounding it.\n- The lack of facial features makes it difficult to assess the clarity and definition of facial details.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhances the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background adding depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate patterns on the circle and the forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a high overall quality with excellent composition and rich details. However, the absence of the character's face prevents a thorough assessment of the face quality. Since the primary focus is on the character, regenerating the image with a clearer view of the face would be beneficial to fully evaluate the facial quality and ensure customer satisfaction.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/4a928e27008c.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753685681.8624327 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9c961fbe1f6c.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/9c961fbe1f6c.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "9c961fbe1f6c", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "2girls, 1boy, enchanted forest, glowing runes, flowing robes, bioluminescent plants, misty atmosphere, close-up, dramatic lighting, high detail, cinematic, ultra-HD, masterpiece, intimate embrace, soft touch, glowing eyes, dynamic angle, detailed background, subtle glow, natural skin tones, realistic textures, smooth skin, soft lighting, soft focus, depth of field, (blurred background), (dramatic lighting), very aesthetic, 8k, best quality, light particles, nsfw", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, worst detail, censor, missing fingers, extra fingers, blurry eyes, poorly drawn eyes, skewed eyes, bad anatomy, lowres, jpeg artifacts, bad hands, multiple views, censored, signature, watermark, waterprints, title, cropped image, unnatural lighting, distorted perspective, text, over-saturated colors", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 10634, + "sample_sources": [ + "penis, fellatio, 1boy, oral, hetero, nude, breasts, nipples, threesome, 2girls, multiple girls, ffm ...", + "1girl, Angel, halo, feather Wings, head flower, breasts, bouncing breast, opened White Robe, see-thr...", + "1girl, solo, medium breasts, narrow waist, chel \\(the road to el dorado\\), nipples, BREAK , indoors,..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face at all, which is the primary focus. Without seeing the face, it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face makes it difficult to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face at all, which is the primary focus. Without seeing the face, it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face makes it difficult to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, especially in the background elements like the glowing plants.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition seems to be focused on the lower part of the body, but without the face, it's hard to comment on the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a good level of detail in the fabric and the glowing elements in the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No visible artifacts or noise are present.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors that can be identified from the provided image.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is missing (the character's face), it cannot be evaluated properly. For high-end customers, it is crucial to have a complete and clear image to meet their expectations. Therefore, I recommend regenerating the image to include the character's face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9c961fbe1f6c.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753685695.497072 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9917f32d22ba.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/9917f32d22ba.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "9917f32d22ba", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "A close-up of a male character's crotch, with his legs spread wide apart. He is wearing a red shirt that is lifted up, revealing his wet groin. His groin is glistening with fluids, and there is a puddle of liquid on the ground below him. The image is taken from a low angle, with his thighs and groin taking up most of the frame. The background is blurry, with a stone wall and some shadows visible. The character's face is not visible, and the focus is entirely on his crotch. masterwork, masterpiece, best quality, detailed, depth of field, high detail, very aesthetic, 8k, dynamic pose, depth of field, dynamic angle, adult, aged up", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, low quality, bad anatomy, bad hands, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, text, logo, artist name, extra digits, censored, patreon username, loli", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 8640, + "sample_sources": [ + "A close-up view of a woman's crotch, with her legs spread wide apart. She is wearing a blue shirt th...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,absurdres, BREAK darkness \\(konosuba\\), 1boy, 1girl, abs, a...", + "dutch angle, two-finger, upper body, perspective, chess piece, reaching, abstract chess piece, expre..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 4, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 4/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not show a face at all, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details.\n- The composition is focused on the lower part of the body, which is not typical for a character portrait.\n- There are no facial features present to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat jagged and not very smooth, indicating potential issues with the generation process.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted, and the contrast is low, making the image less visually appealing.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is off as it focuses on the lower body rather than a complete character.\n- Level of detail richness: While there is some detail in the skin texture, the overall richness of detail is lacking due to the focus on the lower body.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are visible artifacts around the edges, particularly in the red fabric area, which suggests a generation error.\n- Obvious generation errors: The lack of a face and the focus on the lower body indicate significant generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears adequate but is not high enough to fully appreciate the finer details.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nThe image fails to meet the required standards for a high-quality illustration due to its lack of a face, poor composition, and technical errors. It would benefit from a complete regeneration focusing on a full character portrait with proper facial features and a more appropriate composition.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9917f32d22ba.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753685734.4968274 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ee4940943b83.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/ee4940943b83.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "ee4940943b83", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-realistic, absurdres, 8K, magical forest, glowing runes, ethereal glow, detailed facial features, sparkling eyes, flowing robes, enchanted atmosphere, soft ambient light, centered composition, low angle, wide shot, fantasy art, intricate details, glowing elements, mystical aura, intricate patterns, soft shadows, natural lighting, high detail, sharp shading, fantasy style, artist:elizabeth_larson, wondrous scene, score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, score_6_up", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, worst detail, sketch, censorship, watermarks, logos, text, blur, lowres, jpeg artifacts, poor anatomy, extra limbs, missing fingers, poorly drawn eyes, skewed perspective, signature, artist name, watermark, censored, title, logo, waterprints", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 3757, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 8K, depth of field, focu...", + "ultra realistic, masterpiece, high detailed skin, best quality, high res, very aesthetic, absurdres,...", + "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, anime coloring, ambient light, soft light, Yak..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents a proper evaluation of the facial quality.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents a proper evaluation of the facial quality.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally smooth and well-defined, especially around the intricate ceiling design.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, making the image visually appealing.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the character positioned at the bottom and the ceiling design dominating the upper part of the image. The proportions of the architectural elements are harmonious.\n- Level of detail richness: The image is rich in detail, particularly in the ceiling design and the swirling energy effect.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors in the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the character's face is not present in the image, it is not possible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the facial quality. However, based on the other aspects evaluated, the image has good line clarity, color saturation, and detail richness. It would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a visible character face to ensure that the facial quality meets the high standards expected by the customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ee4940943b83.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753686195.009307 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e51750b3db46.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/e51750b3db46.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "e51750b3db46", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "Fantasy Forest Scene, 2 characters: young girl with glowing orb, elder wizard in robes, magical glowing mushrooms, enchanted stream, soft golden light, dynamic interaction, detailed textures, high resolution, ultra high quality, rich colors, dramatic shadows, intricate patterns on robes, glowing runes, naturalistic lighting, vibrant atmosphere, emotional connection, close-up perspective, intricate background elements, soft focus on foreground, cinematic composition", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, sketch, error, bad anatomy, bad hands, watermark, ugly, distorted, censored, blurry, lowres, signature, 3D, flat, cartoon, unnatural poses, excessive details, over-saturated colors, unrealistic lighting, poor composition, grainy, artifacts, low contrast, muted colors, lack of depth, unbalanced framing", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 5607, + "sample_sources": [ + "Scandinavian Style Palette, ( impressionism:1.7 ), realistic body, 1girl, sitting in grass, tall gra...", + "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, score_6_up, Expressiveh, pretty face, long blonde hair, detailed fa...", + "lust_(fma), woman, dark eyes, red lips, dark purple, long hair, large breasts, (lace dark bra), blac..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is completely obscured by a dark hood, making it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, eye definition, nose shape, mouth, and facial contours. There are no facial features visible at all.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is completely obscured by a dark hood, making it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, eye definition, nose shape, mouth, and facial contours. There are no facial features visible at all.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and sharp edges.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant yellow tones and strong contrast against the darker background.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is visually striking, with the character centered and the intricate background drawing the viewer's eye towards the central light source.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with detailed patterns in the background and a rich color palette.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe primary focus should be on the character's face, which is currently not visible due to the hood. This significantly impacts the overall quality assessment, especially when considering the primary focus of the image.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e51750b3db46.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753686647.7932076 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/039a77bc12d4.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/039a77bc12d4.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "039a77bc12d4", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "celestial dragon, iridescent scales, starry eyes, glowing patterns, nebula background, galactic elements, light rays, mid-flight, soaring through cosmos, sleek body, delicate wings, detailed scales, bioluminescent glow, anime style, masterpiece, high quality, 8k resolution, detailed textures, starry backdrop, dynamic pose, glowing aura, celestial motifs, intricate patterns, ethereal atmosphere, vivid colors, soft lighting, dramatic shadows, cinematic composition, ultra-detailed, fantasy art, vibrant hues, magical ambiance, intricate designs, glowing veins, celestial symbols, glowing eyes, perfect proportions, smooth gradients, high contrast, vivid details, ultra-realistic, fantasy scene, cosmic elements, radiant light, celestial dragon, detailed wings, glowing patterns, starry eyes, nebula backdrop, cinematic lighting, ultra-detailed, masterpiece, highres, absurdres, Flatline, Flat vector illustration, vfaix", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, bad quality, lowres, bad anatomy, sketch, jpeg artifacts, ugly, poorly drawn, censor, blurry, watermark, old, text, text bubble, 3d render, unnatural lighting, inaccurate proportions, extra limbs, art style inconsistencies, grainy, pixelated, distorted features, incorrect color palette, lack of detail, flat shading, unrealistic textures, poor composition, over-saturated colors, under-exposed, overly contrasted, incorrect perspective, missing elements, low detail, poor lighting, text overlay, watermark, bad hands, bad fingers, bad toes, extra digits, bad teeth, bad eyes, bad mouth, bad hair, bad skin, bad body, bad clothing, bad background, bad environment, bad atmosphere, bad mood, bad expression, bad pose, bad lighting, bad shadows, bad highlights, bad reflections, bad depth of field, bad focus, bad clarity, bad resolution", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 631, + "sample_sources": [ + "dark red eyes, symbol shaped eyes, naked, pussy, looking at viewer, cute:1.4, smiling, shy expressio...", + "nu humans, animals, tabby cat, green eyes, split-color cat, white fur, black fur, yellow eyes, detai...", + "anime, masterpiece, best quality, detailed background, 8k, 1girl, 1boy, standing 69, upside down, fe..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 2048, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The dragon's face lacks detailed facial features such as eyes, nose, and mouth. The proportions seem off, and the facial contour appears unnatural due to the stylized nature of the artwork. The eyes are not symmetrical, and the overall facial structure does not look realistic.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The dragon's face lacks detailed facial features such as eyes, nose, and mouth. The proportions seem off, and the facial contour appears unnatural due to the stylized nature of the artwork. The eyes are not symmetrical, and the overall facial structure does not look realistic.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the cosmic background.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic, with the dragon positioned at the bottom against a stunning space backdrop. However, the proportions of the dragon itself could be improved for better balance.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the dragon's wings and the cosmic background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has good technical quality but suffers from issues with the dragon's facial features and proportions. While the overall composition and color scheme are impressive, the lack of detail in the face detracts from the overall quality. Therefore, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with more defined facial features and a more balanced proportion for the dragon.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/039a77bc12d4.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753686655.297723 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cd4f7da85fec.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/cd4f7da85fec.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "cd4f7da85fec", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, score_9, score_8_up, dynamic pose, dramatic lighting, sunset, beach, 2people, romantic, soft focus, detailed textures, flowing hair, emotional expression, high contrast, vibrant colors, intricate details, cinematic, depth of field, golden hour, waves, sand, foot focus, expressive face, blurred background, natural lighting, realistic, lineless, high detail, 8k, cinematic lighting, volumetric shadows, detailed clothing, intricate patterns, natural environment, vibrant colors, soft focus, dynamic angle, emotional connection, realistic skin tones, detailed eyes, expressive gestures, naturalistic, cinematic composition, detailed background, high resolution, vivid colors, dramatic atmosphere, absurdres", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, blurry, text, watermark, censored, sketch, flat colors, lack of detail, unnatural poses, overexposed, underexposed, poor lighting, distorted features, low contrast, plain background, missing elements, bad hands, bad eyes, unattractive, disproportionate, unrealistic, low detail, grainy, artifacts, lossy compression, incorrect colors, poor composition, lack of depth, flat lighting, unappealing, bland, uninteresting, unoriginal, generic, unrefined, low aesthetic, unprofessional, amateurish, unskilled, messy, chaotic, cluttered, over-saturated, under-saturated, poor focus, soft focus, unsharp, out of focus, low resolution, low quality, bad quality, worst quality", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 5101, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, uncensored, dynamic angle, from above, 1girl, 1boy, sex,...", + "(score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up), white theme, masterwork, masterpiece, best quality, dynamic pose,...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, 1girl, messy bed, half-naked, tou..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not include a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents a comprehensive assessment of the character's facial features.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not include a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents a comprehensive assessment of the character's facial features.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth transitions and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the sunset scene.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the feet and the sunset, which creates a serene and aesthetically pleasing image.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the waves, sand, and the sunset sky.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No visible artifacts or noise.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, providing a clear and detailed image.\n\nSince the image lacks a face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall image quality is very good, and the technical aspects are excellent. The absence of a face is the only significant issue, but it does not affect the technical quality of the image itself.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cd4f7da85fec.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753686905.56053 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/95a03676700c.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/95a03676700c.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "95a03676700c", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, mystical underwater realm, bioluminescent coral, glowing fish, soft focus, ethereal lighting, dynamic pose, flowing robes, intricate details, cinematic lighting, high detail, depth of field, (dreamy ambiance), (magical_realism), (underwater_vibe), 8k, light particles, scenic, rim light, s1_mystic, dynamic angle", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, lowres, text, watermark, bad anatomy, deformed features, missing fingers, shiny skin, unnatural colors, poor composition, blurry, jpeg artifacts, (censor), (low detail), (poor lighting), (distorted perspective)", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 6435, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl, girl lying, on back,on bed,1boy, boy kneeling, erection,male masturbation, cumshot,projectile...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, bleached, 1girl,frieren, sousou no frieren,1girl, green ey...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, girl, cute, solo, upp..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and lighting, making it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a clear view of the face prevents a thorough evaluation.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and lighting, making it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a clear view of the face prevents a thorough evaluation.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the underwater scene.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with the character positioned centrally and the composition balanced between the underwater environment and the character's flowing hair.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the coral, fish, and the character's flowing garment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of visibility of the character's face, which is the primary focus, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall image quality and technical aspects are strong, warranting a high score. A regeneration would be necessary to address the missing facial details.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/95a03676700c.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753686986.3022914 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ee934c327ef4.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/ee934c327ef4.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "ee934c327ef4", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, 2girls, close interaction, sensual, intimate, playful, (blonde hair, long hair, blue eyes, cat ears, choker, frills, elbow gloves, micro bikini, large breasts), (black hair, long hair, brown eyes, cat ears, choker, frills, elbow gloves, micro bikini, large breasts), bedroom, soft lighting, warm tones, volumetric lighting, intricate details, blurred background, depth of field, holding hands, eye contact, playful expressions, seductive smile, leaning close, fabric textures, close-up, detailed skin, anatomically correct, natural lighting, luxurious bedding, floating hearts, romantic atmosphere, high contrast, cinematic composition, dynamic angles, realistic shadows, smooth edges, vibrant colors, ultra-high resolution, 8k, sharp focus, detailed eyes, perfect lighting, exquisite textures, elegant setting", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, bad anatomy, extra limbs, extra fingers, missing fingers, watermark, censored, blurred, blurry, plain background, plain simple background, out of focus, cropped, distorted proportions, monochrome, greyscale, bad lighting, flat colors, low resolution, poor texture, unnatural skin, extra ears, extra eyes, extra mouth, bad hands, bad feet, signature, text, watermark, lowres, bad quality, lowres, extra digits, unaesthetic, asymmetrical, distorted perspective, cartoonish, anime style, bad proportions, unrealistic anatomy, poor details, grainy, noise, artifacts", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 4088, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, 1girl, lisa \\(genshin impact\\), h...", + "beautiful girl, pink hair, bow, blue eyes, idol, long hair, jewelry, star-shaped pupils, long eyelas...", + "masterpiece, score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, EasyNegative_v2, best quality,ultra-detailed, high res..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The facial details are somewhat lacking in definition, especially around the eyes and mouth.\n- The eyes appear slightly asymmetrical, which can be distracting.\n- The nose and mouth proportions seem a bit off, contributing to the overall lack of detail.\n- There are some blurry areas around the edges of the faces, particularly noticeable on the hair and clothing.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are decent but not exceptional.\n- Color saturation is good, with vibrant hues that stand out.\n- The composition is somewhat tight, focusing closely on the characters' upper bodies, which might be too close for comfort.\n- The level of detail richness is moderate, with some areas appearing a bit flat.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears adequate for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nGiven the average face quality and the need for more defined facial features, it would be beneficial to regenerate this image. The overall quality is passable but could be improved with better facial detail and symmetry.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ee934c327ef4.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753687410.675098 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e775a7d63dd7.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/e775a7d63dd7.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "e775a7d63dd7", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, dynamic lighting, volumetric lighting, ambient light, soft light, line art, 1girl, 25 years old, silver hair, glowing eyes, magical robe, intricate patterns, glowing orb, mystical forest, glowing mushrooms, soft shadows, high detail, sharp shading, centered composition, long legs, thigh highs, silver pendant, from behind, looking back, seductive smile, come hither, glowing vines, magical atmosphere, outdoors, natural lighting, intricate details, glowing textures, elegant pose, enchanted environment", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, lowres, jpeg artifacts, bad anatomy, bad hands, multiple views, signature, watermark, censored, blurry, distorted, ugly, unrealistic, incorrect proportions", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 10021, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,tape, 1girl, breasts, lanyard, solo, high heels, blush, bla...", + "masterpiece, best quality, anime coloring, dynamic lighting, volumetric lighting, ambient light, sof...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, p0nyd1sney1ncasev1x0n2:1.5, 1girl, 25 years old, perfect..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 2048, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest elements framing the scene effectively.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the forest, glowing mushrooms, and the mystical circle.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe main issue is the lack of visibility of the character's face, which prevents a thorough assessment of facial quality. However, the rest of the image is of high quality, making a regeneration necessary to address this specific aspect.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e775a7d63dd7.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753687709.581996 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/26af3cd61cd0.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/26af3cd61cd0.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "26af3cd61cd0", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "ultra realistic, masterpiece, high detailed skin, best quality, high res, very aesthetic, absurdres, anime style, studio anime, (finely detailed face), petite body, (segment: cyberpunk hair style v2, 0.5, 0.7), 1girl, 2boys, MMF-threesome, detailed skin, footworship, ((anal sex))), massive penis, ((Hime)), ((lips)), ((pink lipstick)), arched back, nude, ((purple hair)), earrings, long hair, bare shoulders, collarbone, metallic bodysuit, short sleeves, off shoulder, off-shoulder bodysuit, cybernetic enhancements, thighs, tight-fitting bodysuit, ((breast grab)), ((nude large breast)), pussy juice, stockings-feet, thigh-highs, nipple, ((head back)), on back, suck large penis, fellatio, spread pussy, foreshortening, feet, feet focus, detailed feet, from high up, perspective, foreshortening, leaning to the side, round ass, legs up, top view, from above, neon lights, digital circuit patterns, glowing tech elements", + "negative_prompt": "score_6, score_5, score_4, embedding:negativeXL_D, skinny, anorexic, furry, halo, worst quality, low quality, sketch, error, bad anatomy, bad hands, watermark, ugly, distorted, censored, lowres, abstract, signature, standing, text, blurry, low score, bad score, ugly, hooded eyes, yellow liquid, penis", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 7303, + "sample_sources": [ + "ultra realistic, masterpiece, high detailed skin, best quality, high res, very aesthetic, absurdres,...", + "1boy sitting, chair, 1girl, deepthroat, kneeling, implied fellatio, from side, office lady, office, ...", + "safe_pos, ((1girl)), gorgeous girl , kawaii girl , (blue hair, pink inner hair, two toned hair), cut..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n1. The facial details are somewhat clear but not as sharp as they could be.\n2. The eyes are symmetrical but lack some depth and detail, especially around the irises.\n3. The proportions of the nose and mouth appear slightly off, particularly the nose which seems a bit too large.\n4. The facial contour is generally natural but lacks some refinement in certain areas, such as the jawline and cheekbones.\n5. There are no significant blurry or distorted areas, but the overall facial quality is not exceptional.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n1. Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally clean but not extremely sharp, which affects the overall crispness.\n2. Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant but not overly saturated, providing a good balance that enhances the visual appeal.\n3. Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic but somewhat cluttered due to the multiple characters and their poses. The proportions of the characters seem mostly correct, though the perspective can make some parts look slightly off.\n4. Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich enough to be visually engaging but not overly detailed, which might be a preference depending on the target audience.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n1. No apparent artifacts or noise are present.\n2. There are no obvious generation errors, although the image does contain explicit content which may not be suitable for all audiences.\n3. The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown, but it could benefit from higher resolution for a more polished look.\n\nRecommendation:\nGiven the average face quality and the somewhat cluttered composition, the image could benefit from a regeneration to improve facial details and refine the overall composition. This would enhance the visual appeal and meet the high standards expected by high-end customers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/26af3cd61cd0.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753689130.9463384 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2b66accf6405.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/2b66accf6405.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "2b66accf6405", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "ultra realistic, masterpiece, high detailed skin, best quality, high res, very aesthetic, absurdres, 2girls, intimate interaction, soft lighting, bedroom setting, lace teddy, thigh highs, satin robe, playful pose, one girl adjusting lace teddy while the other leans in, close-up, dynamic angle, subtle touch, blurred background, depth of field, dramatic lighting, intricate details, soft shadows, sensual atmosphere, natural skin tones, realistic hair texture, close-up eyes, emotional connection, warm tones, elegant composition, masterwork, best quality, detailed, depth of field, dynamic pose, adult, aged up", + "negative_prompt": "score_6, score_5, score_4, embedding:negativeXL_D, skinny, anorexic, furry, halo, worst quality, low quality, sketch, error, bad anatomy, bad hands, watermark, ugly, distorted, censored, lowres, abstract, signature, blur, extra digits, loli, unnatural proportions, text, logo, artist name, patreon username", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 9506, + "sample_sources": [ + "The image is a close-up of a woman's lower body, showcasing her thighs and buttocks. She is wearing ...", + "ultra realistic, masterpiece, high detailed skin, best quality, high res, very aesthetic, absurdres,...", + "1girl, nude, ass, breasts, sitting, towel around neck, towel, solo, from behind, black hair, nudist,..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The image appears to be focused on the lower body, which means there are no facial features to evaluate.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack fine detail, especially in the areas that should have more intricate textures.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted, and the contrast is low, making the image appear flat.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered around the lower body, which is unusual for a full-body image. The proportions seem off due to the focus on the lower part of the body.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a lack of detail in the areas that should have more texture, such as the fabric and skin.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no apparent artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present, but the image seems to be focused on the lower body rather than a complete character, which might be a design choice but is not typical for a full-body image.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, the image has issues with composition, detail, and color, which affect its overall quality. Given these factors, I would recommend regeneration to ensure a complete and high-quality image that includes the face and adheres to typical character design standards.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2b66accf6405.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753689163.857276 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/31de51d585f2.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/31de51d585f2.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "31de51d585f2", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "1girl, fantasy, mystical forest, glowing runes, magical staff, ethereal glow, flowing robes, intricate patterns, glowing eyes, soft light, ambient lighting, detailed textures, high detail, sharp focus, vibrant colors, masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, newest, very aesthetic, ultra-detailed, dynamic composition, cinematic lighting, subtle mist, glowing flora, intricate jewelry, delicate facial features, natural hair, soft shadows, depth of field, intricate background, fantasy elements, serene expression, magical aura", + "negative_prompt": "low quality, worst quality, bad anatomy, bad hands, jpeg artifacts, watermark, text, signature, outdated, blurry, simple background, comic, frames, artist name, patreon, censored, distorted proportions, lowres, ugly, poorly drawn, displeasing, deformed limbs, bad lighting, flat colors, lack of detail, cartoonish, unrealistic colors, grainy, over-saturated, underexposed, overexposed", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 2036, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl, annora, goth girl, solo, bangs over eyes, short hair, goth clothes, choker, high shoes, fishn...", + "masterpiece, best quality, anime coloring, dynamic lighting, ambient light, soft light, (ultra-detai...", + "anime, masterpiece, best quality, detailed background, 8k, 1girl, 1boy, multiple views, vaginal, dee..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face lacks clear details, making it difficult to discern facial features such as the eyes, nose, and mouth. The proportions appear somewhat off, and the facial contour is not very natural. There are no obvious blurry or distorted areas, but the lack of detail makes the face less engaging.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face lacks clear details, making it difficult to discern facial features such as the eyes, nose, and mouth. The proportions appear somewhat off, and the facial contour is not very natural. There are no obvious blurry or distorted areas, but the lack of detail makes the face less engaging.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background adding depth. However, the proportions of the character's body seem slightly off, which affects the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the character's clothing and the forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, while the image has good technical qualities and a visually appealing color palette, the lack of facial detail significantly impacts the character's presence. This could be improved by refining the facial features and ensuring better proportionality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/31de51d585f2.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753690358.9813094 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d69279355007.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/d69279355007.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "d69279355007", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "score_9, score_8_up, masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, 2girls, dynamic interaction, forest setting, magical aura, one wearing a warrior outfit with a sword, another in a mage robe casting a spell, intertwined hands, emotional connection, vibrant colors, natural lighting, intricate details, fantasy world, detailed textures, cinematic composition, dramatic lighting, expressive faces, close-up shot, lush environment, glowing runes, enchanted forest, mystical atmosphere", + "negative_prompt": "score_5, score_4, score_3, worst quality, bad anatomy, low resolution, text, logo, signed, blurry, distorted, unrealistic proportions, extra limbs, floating objects, poor lighting, flat colors, lack of detail, unappealing composition, over-saturated colors, unnatural poses, incorrect perspective, low contrast, grainy, artifacts, watermarks, bad hands, loli, child, nsfw", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 4361, + "sample_sources": [ + "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, incoth, incase, dynamic,...", + "masterpiece, amazing quality, very aesthetic, 1girl, solo, slender, naked, tentacles penetrating, ex...", + "lazypos, 1girl, smile, looking at viewer, standing split, leg lift, long hair, aqua hair, hair betwe..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 2048, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of facial features also prevents a proper evaluation of the overall image quality and technical issues.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of facial features also prevents a proper evaluation of the overall image quality and technical issues.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image should be regenerated with the character's face exposed so that facial details can be evaluated. Additionally, the composition could be improved by ensuring that the characters' faces are included in the frame to provide a more complete and balanced image.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d69279355007.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753690739.8876383 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/474456d7edb4.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/474456d7edb4.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "474456d7edb4", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, fantasy, enchanted forest, bioluminescent fungi, glowing mist, mystical creature, ethereal light, soft focus, dreamy atmosphere, intricate patterns, magical glow, serene expression, flowing robes, intricate jewelry, glowing eyes, ambient shadows, volumetric lighting, dynamic composition, high contrast, fantasy art style, artist:celestial_arts, 8K, ultra-realistic, magical ambiance, glowing vines, mystical aura, detailed textures, soft gradients, ethereal glow", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, blurry, text, watermark, signature, censored, extra limbs, missing fingers, poor lighting, distorted perspective, low detail, artifacts, over-saturated colors, flat shading, unrealistic proportions, cartoonish, low contrast, grainy, dark circles, unattractive, unappealing, distorted faces, poor composition, low resolution, bad quality, watermark, logo", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 1829, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, scenery, Hatsune Miku...", + "BREAK, (best quality), (ultra-detailed), (masterpiece), (perfect anatomy), (masterpiece), best quali...", + "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, anime coloring, ambient light, soft light, Yak..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluating the clarity and definition of facial features.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluating the clarity and definition of facial features.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear clean and well-defined, especially around the edges of the spiky structure and the glowing mushroom.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant, with a good contrast between the blue tones of the mushroom and the darker background.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is balanced, with the spiky structure framing the glowing mushroom effectively. The proportions seem appropriate for the overall design.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a good level of detail, particularly in the texture of the spiky structure and the glowing effect on the mushroom.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No noticeable artifacts or noise are present in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors in the image.\n\nGiven that the primary focus of the image is the character's face, which is not present, the overall quality is still quite high due to the other positive aspects mentioned. However, the absence of the face significantly impacts the ability to evaluate the image comprehensively. Therefore, regeneration is recommended to include a face for a more complete assessment.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/474456d7edb4.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753691019.0057063 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/522ca374b245.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/522ca374b245.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "522ca374b245", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, 8k, cyberpunk cityscape, neon lights, glowing eyes, mechanical arms, high-tech bodysuit, rain, reflections, dark atmosphere, dramatic lighting, intricate details, volumetric lighting, ambient occlusion, futuristic city, skyscrapers, night, urban setting, dynamic composition, high contrast, cinematic, ultra-detailed textures, glowing neon signs, rain effects, mist, city lights, detailed architecture, depth of field, sharp focus, intricate background elements", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, blurry, watermark, signature, plain background, bad anatomy, distorted features, unrealistic proportions, low contrast, over-saturated colors, lack of detail, flat lighting, unappealing colors, generic background, unsharp, grainy, artifacts, low resolution, poor composition, unbalanced elements, missing textures, incorrect lighting, unrealistic shadows, low detail, poor depth of field, overexposed, underexposed, unnatural colors, distorted perspective", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 9537, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl, ginger, full lips, choker, small round breasts, puffy areola...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, Irisviel von Einzbern, 1girl, lus...", + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, newest, highres, absurdres, volumetric lighting,gradient co..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face lacks clear details, making it difficult to discern facial features.\n- The eyes appear somewhat generic and lack depth.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem slightly off, contributing to an unnatural look.\n- There are no significant blurriness or distortion, but the lack of detail makes the face less engaging.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, with clean edges on the character and buildings.\n- Color saturation is high, with vibrant neon lights that enhance the futuristic atmosphere.\n- Composition is strong, with the character centered and the cityscape providing a dynamic background.\n- Detail richness is high, especially in the reflections and lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No noticeable artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a good overall quality with strong composition and vibrant colors. However, the lack of facial detail significantly impacts the character's presence. While the technical aspects are sound, the character's face could be improved to make the image more compelling. Therefore, I would recommend regeneration to address the facial quality issues.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/522ca374b245.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753691422.8655124 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1fc1ad8ea4ec.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/1fc1ad8ea4ec.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "1fc1ad8ea4ec", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,very aesthetic,absurdres,newest,8K,depth of field,focused subject,1girl,solo,neon-lit,high-tech corset,glowing circuit patterns,transparent bodysuit,exposed shoulders,cybernetic arm,glowing eyes,standing on metallic platform,reflections in floor,low-angle shot,dramatic lighting,cyberpunk style,artist:neon_kaze,detailed textures,vibrant colors,dynamic pose,futuristic cityscape in background,electric blue and red accents,light beam from above,side profile,shadow play,ultra-detailed,hyper-realistic", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality,worst quality,worst detail,sketch,censor,watermarks,text,low resolution,grainy,blurry,over-saturated,under-saturated,unnatural colors,low contrast,high contrast,poor lighting,bad anatomy,distorted proportions,unrealistic features,low definition,score_6,score_5,score_4", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 6739, + "sample_sources": [ + "1boy sitting, chair, 1girl, deepthroat, kneeling, implied fellatio, from side, office lady, office, ...", + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 8K, depth of field, focu...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,very aesthetic, 1girl, solo, fat ass, upskirt, cameltoe, an..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and reflections on the metallic surface.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant blue tones and good contrast that highlights the character's form.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the lower half of the character, which is visually striking.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the suit and boots.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nGiven the lack of a visible face, the image cannot be fully evaluated for facial quality. However, the technical aspects and overall composition are strong, warranting a high score despite the missing face.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1fc1ad8ea4ec.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753691820.68929 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6b24f5350391.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/6b24f5350391.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "6b24f5350391", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, high resolution, absurdres, realistic shading, amazing quality. A dynamic scene of two girls in a romantic embrace, one on top of the other in a passionate kiss. They are in a dimly lit bedroom with soft lighting, surrounded by floral patterns and a canopy bed. Both are wearing lace underwear, one is wearing a sheer dress while the other is barefoot. They have dramatic expressions, with one girl looking into the other's eyes and the other gently touching her face. The scene includes motion blur, soft focus, and a warm color palette. 2girls, intimate, emotional connection, close-up, cinematic lighting, high detail, ultra hd, 8k, depth of field, dramatic angle, soft shadows, sensual atmosphere", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad quality, bad anatomy, jpeg artifacts, bad composition, extra limbs, poorly drawn hands, fused fingers, distorted legs, cropped body, monochrome, bad proportions, multiple legs, text, watermark, censored, man, penis, unrealistic skin, blurry, over-saturated colors, flat lighting, lack of depth", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 5155, + "sample_sources": [ + "usnr, masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, ultra hd, very aesthetic, 8k, high detail, score 9...", + "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, high resolution, absurdres, realistic shading, amazing qu...", + "masterpiece, by piaki, best quality, very detailed, 1 girl, dawn \\(pokemon\\), beenie, pink skirt, st..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The lack of a face makes it difficult to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack fine detail, which is typical for anime-style illustrations.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered on the back of the character, which is effective for showcasing the body shape. However, the absence of the face affects the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich in the body and fabric textures, but lacks detail in the areas that would typically be present in a full-body anime illustration.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No obvious artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no apparent generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the style of the image.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, the overall image quality is satisfactory, especially considering the style. The absence of the face might be intentional for certain artistic purposes, but it does affect the completeness of the image. If the face were included, the score could potentially be higher.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No (if the face is intentionally omitted), Yes (if the face should be included).", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6b24f5350391.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753692096.746602 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/c4287d9021bf.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/c4287d9021bf.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "c4287d9021bf", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, futuristic, cyborg knight, glowing armor, stormy sky, dynamic pose, light trails, energy waves, intricate patterns, glowing sword, celestial motifs, dramatic shadows, 1girl, cybernetic enhancements, neon accents, detailed textures, motion blur, cinematic composition, high contrast, atmospheric perspective, glowing eyes, intricate jewelry, layered clothing, dramatic expression, futuristic cityscape, glowing circuitry, celestial background, cinematic depth of field", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, text, watermark, jpeg artifacts, signature, artist name, blurry, low detail, cartoonish, oversaturated, unrealistic colors, deformed features, missing textures, low contrast, flat lighting, unrealistic proportions, extra limbs, distorted perspective, grainy, pixelation, unsharp mask, low resolution, bad hands, floating objects, artifacts, low quality", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 4949, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, rosalina, cyborg, bodysuit, headgear, mask, sunset, horizon, looking at v...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism , high detail, depth of fie...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, uncensored, blonde braid, pastel colors, smooth skin, sh..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, giving the image a vibrant yet realistic look.\n- Composition and proportions are excellent, with the character positioned prominently against the dynamic background.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's armor and the glowing effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the absence of a face makes it difficult to assess the facial quality comprehensively. If the face were included, the score could potentially be higher.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not present, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a face to ensure a complete evaluation of the facial quality. This will allow for a more accurate assessment and a higher overall score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/c4287d9021bf.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753692103.6795404 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/73555a2c0f75.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/73555a2c0f75.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "73555a2c0f75", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, volumetric lighting, cinematic, dynamic composition, intricate details, soft lighting, glowing effects, particles, gradient colors, dark forest background, mystical atmosphere, 3 elves, 1 warrior with glowing sword, 1 archer with enchanted bow, 1 mage casting light magic, intense battle scene, dynamic poses, detailed armor, intricate patterns, glowing runes, magical energy, vibrant colors, cinematic lighting, depth of field, high detail, zPDXL3, detailxl, Score_PnyReal, (Elven Warrior with silver armor and glowing sword), (Archmage of the Grove with swirling light magic), (Shadow Archer with black feathers and enchanted bow), dramatic shadows, glowing particles, magical aura, cinematic background, intricate environment, detailed textures, realistic lighting, dramatic composition, multiple character interactions, intense action, fantasy setting, high detail, ultra-realistic, 8k resolution", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad quality, bad anatomy, old, bad hands, bad fingers, low quality eyes, bad eyes, sketch, watermark, username, text, glitch, deformed, mutated, ugly, disfigured, long body, cropped, jpeg artifacts, simple background, low contrast, over-saturated, under-saturated, grainy, blurry, low detail, bad proportions, extra limbs, missing limbs, floating objects, poor lighting, flat colors, unrealistic colors, cartoonish, low resolution, blurry faces, distorted faces, bad perspective, incorrect perspective, low quality textures, poor quality textures, low quality environment, bad environment, low quality lighting, poor lighting, low quality shadows, bad shadows, low quality depth, poor depth, low quality composition, bad composition", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 8979, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, volumetric lighting, ...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, DISNEY_ANIMATION, incoth, incase, female...", + "masterpiece, high_quality, highres, flat_colors, gradient, woman, hair_bun, braided, twin_tails, flu..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the helmet covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of a visible face also prevents evaluation of facial clarity and definition.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the helmet covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of a visible face also prevents evaluation of facial clarity and definition.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with the character positioned centrally and the background adding depth without distracting from the main subject.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate armor details and dynamic lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the absence of a visible face, which is the primary focus for character quality, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall composition, color, and technical aspects are strong. A regeneration would be necessary to include a visible face for a comprehensive assessment.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/73555a2c0f75.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753692207.9243402 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a0346017052e.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/a0346017052e.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "a0346017052e", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "Close-up of a woman's legs in a sheer blouse and fishnet stockings, dramatic spotlight, cinematic lighting, blurred bedroom background with velvet curtains, dynamic angle, textured skin, natural lighting, soft shadows, volumetric lighting, high resolution, masterpiece, best quality, detailed, depth of field, high detail, 8k, dynamic pose, adult, aged up", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, bad hands, watermarks, text, artist name, signature, censored, extra digits, blurry, low quality, displeasing, neon signs, distorted perspective, cartoonish, unrealistic proportions", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 5595, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, absurdres, calvin klein, 1girl, ass, underwear only, adjus...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism (1.5), high detail, depth o...", + "A close-up view of a woman's crotch, with her legs spread wide apart. She is wearing a blue shirt th..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face at all, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality and appeal of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face at all, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality and appeal of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on the legs, which are proportionally well-rendered, but the lack of a face affects the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: The texture of the fishnet stockings is rich and detailed, contributing positively to the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, as the details are sharp and clear.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks a face, which is typically the primary focus in many anime-style illustrations, the overall quality is impacted. The absence of facial features makes it difficult to assess the image comprehensively. Therefore, I would recommend regeneration to include a face, ensuring that the character's identity and expression are clearly defined.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a0346017052e.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753692221.784852 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/3cc7f3366f7a.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/3cc7f3366f7a.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "3cc7f3366f7a", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, 2girls, 1boy, sunset, garden, floral dress, denim jacket, holding hands, soft lighting, volumetric lighting, high contrast, detailed background, blushing, smiling, close-up, emotional interaction, natural shadows, depth of field, intricate details, warm tones, scenic view, outdoor, romantic atmosphere, sitting on bench, flowers in hair, gentle gaze, layered textures, dynamic composition, cinematic lighting, rich colors, subtle reflections", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, bad quality, worst quality, sketch, watermark, text, blur, plain background, plain simple, bad anatomy, ugly, poorly drawn, censored, flat lighting, overexposed, underexposed, lack of detail, unnatural colors, cartoonish, unrealistic proportions, distorted features, low resolution, artifacts, grainy, noise, bad perspective, incorrect shadows, excessive contrast, muted tones", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 6476, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, d \\(killer wife\\) \\(nikke\\), d \\(nikke\\), 1boy, 1girl, ass...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, 1girl, messy bed, half-naked, tou...", + "anime, masterpiece, best quality, detailed background, 8k, 1girl, choke hold, 1boy,tatsumaki , ohoga..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show the faces of the characters, so it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportion, and naturalness of the facial features. However, the hands and legs are depicted with good detail and natural proportions.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show the faces of the characters, so it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportion, and naturalness of the facial features. However, the hands and legs are depicted with good detail and natural proportions.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast that enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the hands and legs, which are the main subjects. The proportions of the limbs appear natural and well-proportioned.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the clothing textures and skin tones.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face quality cannot be assessed due to the absence of facial features, the overall score is slightly lower than perfect. However, the image is still of high quality in terms of line clarity, color, composition, and detail. Given the lack of facial detail, the recommendation would be to regenerate the image with the faces included if possible, to ensure a comprehensive assessment of the character's facial quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/3cc7f3366f7a.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753692960.7516916 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/94898c3fab73.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/94898c3fab73.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "94898c3fab73", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, 2girls, solo, cyberpunk duo, neon-lit alley, holographic interface, data transfer, leader with glowing circuit patterns, follower with data cable, dynamic pose, eye contact, intricate details, glass structures, digital glow, futuristic cityscape, cinematic lighting, detailed textures, high contrast, vibrant colors, intimate interaction, advanced tech, glowing accents, depth of field, blurred background, stylish outfits, cyberpunk aesthetics", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, lowres, jpeg artifacts, bad anatomy, bad hands, multiple views, signature, watermark, censored, simple background, transparent background, blank eyes, messy hair, unnatural poses, plain background, low detail", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 5428, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, 1girl, solo, turquoise hair, high...", + "masterpiece, best quality, (anime coloring), minimalism, solo, 1girl, mysterious woman, white hair, ...", + "1girl, solo, medium breasts, narrow waist, chel \\(the road to el dorado\\), nipples, BREAK , indoors,..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the character's pose.\n- The lack of facial features makes it impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the futuristic setting.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the background providing depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the environment and character design.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the character's face is not visible, it is challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the overall image quality and technical aspects, the image is already quite good. If the goal is to have a fully visible and detailed character face, the image would need to be regenerated with a different pose or angle that includes the face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/94898c3fab73.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753693827.4984896 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d58ed1d832c2.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/d58ed1d832c2.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "d58ed1d832c2", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, highres, very awa, cyberpunk cityscape, neon lights, rain, 1girl, cybernetic enhancements, glowing red eyes, mechanical arms, holographic tattoos, sleek black trench coat, glowing circuit patterns, rain droplets, urban environment, futuristic skyscrapers, reflections in wet pavement, dramatic lighting, deep focus, intricate details, ultra sharp, cinematic composition, 8k resolution, digital art, 3D render, vivid colors, high contrast, neon glow, atmospheric perspective, depth of field, dynamic pose, leaning against building, looking at viewer with a smirk, cybernetic interface on wrist, glowing data streams, advanced tech, urban fantasy, night scene, rain-soaked streets, glowing signs, cyberpunk aesthetic", + "negative_prompt": "low quality, worst quality, bad anatomy, watermark, signature, censorship, blurry, plain background, unrealistic proportions, distorted features, extra limbs, cartoonish, low resolution, artifacts, over-saturated colors, grainy, outdated style, poor lighting, flat colors, lack of depth, unrealistic textures, bad perspective, low contrast, unsharp, artifacts, low detail, censored, child, loli, explicit content, nudity, inappropriate elements", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 9604, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl, ring, solo, twintails, jewelry, tongue, looking at viewer, blush, long hair, heart, holding p...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, nsfw, explicit, from below, monster girl, 1girl, solo, p...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,newest,absurdres,highres, newest,very awa, scenery, anime,l..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face at all, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face at all, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nTo improve the image, the character should be shown from a perspective that includes their face. This would allow for a proper evaluation of facial features and overall image quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d58ed1d832c2.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753693928.780513 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6bd77e496c29.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/6bd77e496c29.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "6bd77e496c29", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, 2girls, mage and elf, mystical forest, glowing runes, spellcasting, magical energy, dynamic interaction, glowing eyes, ethereal glow, flowing robes, intricate jewelry, vibrant colors, soft focus, dramatic lighting, twilight atmosphere, magical creatures, glowing plants, cinematic composition, depth of field, fantasy art, intricate details, high contrast, vivid colors, magical aura, dynamic pose, interaction, spell collision, glowing particles, mystical ambiance, fantasy photography, ultra-detailed, sharp focus, vibrant lighting, intricate patterns, magical effects, glowing hands, spellcasting gesture, emotional connection, mystical atmosphere", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, bad hands, bad eyes, missing limbs, extra limbs, distorted faces, text, watermark, censorship, scan artifacts, scanlines, jpeg artifacts, poor lighting, flat colors, low contrast, blurry, out of focus, unrealistic proportions, incorrect anatomy, bad composition, over-saturated colors, under-saturated colors, unrealistic lighting, lack of detail, poor quality, bad resolution, artifacts, low quality, bad art style, wrong perspective, incorrect perspective, wrong angle, wrong lighting, wrong colors, wrong composition", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 3827, + "sample_sources": [ + "safe_pos, safe_pos, safe_pos, safe_pos, masterpiece, absurdres, masterpiece, best_quality, ultra-det...", + "artist:Konya Karasue, masterpiece,amazing quality, 1girl, megumin, brown hair, windy, witch hat, hol...", + "masterpiece, best quality, (anime coloring), minimalism, solo, 1girl, mysterious woman, white hair, ..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluating the clarity and definition of facial features.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluating the clarity and definition of facial features.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is strong, especially in the glowing elements like the star and fireworks.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is visually appealing, with the glowing star and fireworks creating a focal point, and the character positioned at the bottom adds depth.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a good level of detail in the background, such as the forest and the glowing elements, but the character lacks detail due to their absence from the frame.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, allowing for clear details in the background.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the character's face is not visible, it is impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the other aspects evaluated, the image has a high overall quality. The recommendation would be to regenerate the image to include a visible character face for a more complete evaluation. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6bd77e496c29.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753695515.3428354 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/8efe19b2d993.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/8efe19b2d993.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "8efe19b2d993", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, high detail, depth of field, (soft focus background), (dramatic lighting), masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, 8k, usnr, 2 girls, romantic interaction, flower garden, soft lighting, dynamic pose, flowing dresses, floral patterns, holding hands, facing each other, shallow depth of field, wide shot, (emotional connection), (natural light), (detailed textures), (vibrant colors), (dramatic shadows), (soft background blur), (artistic composition), (interplay of light and shadow), (emotional expression), (close-up of hands), (wide-angle perspective), (naturalistic setting), (detailed environment), (realistic skin tones), (soft gradients), (atmospheric perspective), (artistic lighting), (dynamic interaction)", + "negative_prompt": "score_6, score_5, score_4, bad anatomy, sketch, censorship, text, watermark, artist name, signature, low quality, worst quality, poor lighting, over-saturated colors, grainy, low contrast, bad composition, artifacts, low detail, missing elements, deformed features, unnatural proportions, blurred faces, excessive shadows, low resolution, text in image, unnatural colors, distorted perspective, incorrect anatomy, poor texture, low clarity, over-processed, unrealistic lighting", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 3405, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism (1.5), high detail, depth o...", + "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, (((masterpiece,amazing quality,best quality,ul...", + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 8K, depth of field, focu..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, with vibrant blue flowers adding visual interest.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the characters positioned centrally and the background architecture providing a nice backdrop.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the flowers and the architectural elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. The only minor issue is that the faces are not shown, which prevents a more comprehensive assessment of face quality. However, given the high standards set by high-end customers, the absence of facial details might be a concern for some.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the faces are not shown, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with the faces included to fully assess the face quality. This will ensure that all aspects of the image meet the high standards expected by high-end customers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/8efe19b2d993.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753695983.575804 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b1ec440aa847.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/b1ec440aa847.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "b1ec440aa847", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, mystical forest, 1girl, ethereal glow, glowing runes, magical staff, long silver hair, glowing eyes, wearing a cloak with glowing patterns, standing by a glowing lake, reflection, dappled moonlight, outdoors, wide shot, close-up, depth of field, dramatic lighting, high detail, intricate details, magical atmosphere, fantasy, enchanted forest, glowing mushrooms, ethereal aura, masterwork, best quality, dynamic pose, realistic, lineless, detailed, aged up, adult, depth of field, dynamic lighting, blurry, cheekbones", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, low quality, bad anatomy, bad hands, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, text, logo, artist name, censored, anime, loli, big_mouth, wide_lips, unnatural colors, glitch effects, distorted perspective, over-saturated colors, blurry, lowres, bad lighting", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 7955, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl, swimsuit, one-piece swimsuit, long hair, full body, brown hair, sky, blue one-piece swimsuit,...", + "masterpiece, best quality, 1girl, solo, purple hair, long hair, blunt bangs, underwear only, indoors...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism (1.5), high detail, depth o..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with a balanced use of light and shadow that enhances the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Excellent, with a well-balanced composition that draws the viewer's eye towards the central figure and the glowing orb.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the forest, water reflections, and the character's attire.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe image excels in its overall composition, color palette, and technical execution, but the lack of visible facial features prevents a comprehensive assessment of the character's design. For high-end customers, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a visible face to ensure complete satisfaction.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b1ec440aa847.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753696111.4101553 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/8eb475d3a84e.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/8eb475d3a84e.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "8eb475d3a84e", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, high detail, depth of field, (blurred background), (dramatic lighting), masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, 8k, digital art, oil painting style, soft gradients, vibrant colors, celestial armor, glowing runes, floating islands, mystical aura, soft lighting from above, (detailed background design), (celestial warrior), 1girl, solo, dynamic pose, facing viewer, intricate armor with celestial patterns, glowing light particles, expression of determination, detailed facial features, sharp focus, high contrast, rich color palette, emerald and gold tones, detailed textures, intricate jewelry with celestial motifs, flowing hair with glowing strands, dramatic shadows, center frame, (environment with floating islands and glowing flora), (soft atmospheric perspective), (detailed clothing with metallic sheen), (magical energy effects), (dramatic composition focusing on hands and face), painterly style with emphasis on detail and soft blending, photorealistic, cinematic lighting, rich textures, glowing teal and gold hues, elegant and intricate scene.", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, blurry, bad anatomy, lowres, glitch, watermark, dull, painting, extra fingers, mutated hands, poorly drawn hands, bad eyes, deformed, ugly, bad proportions, extra limbs, cloned face, skinny, glitchy, double torso, extra arms, extra hand, lazyneg, lazyhand, easynegative, score_4, score_3_up, score_2_up, boring, flat, lazyneg, jpeg artifacts, scanlines, adversarial noise, lossy-lossless, disembodied, missing, signature, censored, logo, waterprints, title, civit_nsfw, safe_neg, bad hands, bad fingers, puffy sleeves, puffy shoulders, missing fingers, multiple views", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 1766, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, stylized, newest, depth of field, HDR, high co...", + "(score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up), white theme, masterwork, masterpiece, best quality, dynamic pose,...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism (1.5), high detail, depth o..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 2048, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, giving the image a vibrant appearance.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the main subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's armor and wings.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the absence of a face makes it difficult to assess the facial quality comprehensively. If the face were included, the score could potentially be higher.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not present, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a face to ensure a complete evaluation of the facial quality. This will allow for a more accurate assessment and a higher overall score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/8eb475d3a84e.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753696214.0349298 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5d6152ac7c7b.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/5d6152ac7c7b.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "5d6152ac7c7b", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "1girl, fantasy, ethereal, glowing eyes, flowing robes, standing in a mystical forest, glowing mushrooms, starry sky, moonlight, magical aura, detailed textures, high contrast, volumetric lighting, intricate details, depth of field, masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, high resolution, newest, stunning, artistic, vibrant colors, intricate patterns, magical elements, glowing plants, serene atmosphere, looking at viewer, natural lighting, soft shadows, realistic textures, detailed facial features, elegant posture", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, sketch, watermark, signature, blurry, plain background, censored, artifacts, lowres, jpeg artifacts, low quality, unfinished, displeasing, chromatic aberration, extra digits, artistic error, username, scan, abstract, text, error, fewer, extra, missing, bad anatomy, bad hands, logo", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 10622, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl, chinese girl, slim, ponytail, beautiful face, reclining, leaning back, spread legs, female ma...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, Irisviel von Einzbern, 1girl, lus...", + "safe_pos, masterpiece, newest, absurdres, safe, masterpiece, best quality, newest, highres, absurdre..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 2048, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluating any potential blurriness, distortion, or unnatural areas.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluating any potential blurriness, distortion, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the mushrooms creating a visually appealing focal point.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the mushrooms and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is the character's face, and it is not visible, the image cannot be fully evaluated based on the given criteria. However, if the intention was to showcase the magical forest scene without a character, the image is of high quality. If a character is intended to be part of the image, it should be regenerated to include a face for a more comprehensive evaluation. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5d6152ac7c7b.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753696753.466017 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/398cf47de37d.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/398cf47de37d.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "398cf47de37d", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, absurdres, ethereal glow, mystical forest, glowing runes, 1creature, fantasy style, magical aura, soft light, ambient fog, ancient tree, glowing mushrooms, twilight, vibrant colors, intricate patterns, centered composition, dynamic pose, flowing robes, glowing eyes, intricate details, high contrast, cinematic lighting, fantasy art, artist:xyz, surreal atmosphere, dramatic shadows, depth of field, wide shot, natural textures, glowing particles, soft focus, mystical atmosphere", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad quality, bad anatomy, missing fingers, extra fingers, blurry eyes, poorly drawn eyes, skewed eyes, bad hands, multiple views, jpeg artifacts, watermarks, logos, censored, signature, title, cropped image, low detail, distorted proportions, unnatural colors, over-saturated, under-exposed, over-exposed, grainy, noise, bad lighting, flat shading, lack of depth, poor composition, unbalanced elements", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 5698, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very awa, newest, highres, absurdres, 1girl, solo, dress, s...", + "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, ambient light, soft light, incoth, incase, Sag...", + "masterpiece, absurdres, masterpiece, best_quality, ultra-detailed, newest, sharp focus, best quality..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, as it is obscured by the dark cloak. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, as it is obscured by the dark cloak. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the tree and the glowing path creating a strong focal point.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the tree, mushrooms, and the glowing elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- No obvious generation errors are visible.\n- The resolution appears to be high, contributing to the overall quality.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the character's face is not visible, it is impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of its quality. However, the rest of the image is of high quality. Given the lack of information about the character's face, I would suggest regenerating the image to include a visible character face for a more complete evaluation.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/398cf47de37d.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753697720.4326513 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/993fee05a4b0.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/993fee05a4b0.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "993fee05a4b0", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "1creature, fantasy, phoenix, burning wings, mystical desert, glowing embers, sunset, golden hour, wide shot, close-up, detailed feathers, dynamic pose, highres, absurdres, anime style, flat color, depth of field, bokeh, volumetric light, magical atmosphere, glowing eyes, fire trail, desert backdrop, sandstorm, cinematic lighting, masterwork, masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, 8k, dynamic angle, adult, aged up", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, bad hands, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, text, logo, artist name, extra digits, censored, loli, child, multiple colors hair, symbol-shaped pupils, wet, blurry, out of focus", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 1775, + "sample_sources": [ + "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, dynamic, 2girls, plamix,...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,newest,absurdres,highres, newest,very awa, anime,flat color...", + "1girl, hetero, 1boy, oral, breasts, fellatio, large penis, nipples, nude, kneeling, medium breasts, ..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 2048, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by the wings and body of the phoenix. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by the wings and body of the phoenix. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant orange and yellow tones that stand out against the muted background.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the phoenix centered and the landscape providing a good backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate feather details and dynamic lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of visible facial features due to the character's positioning, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall composition, color, and technical aspects are strong, warranting a high score. A regeneration would be necessary to include a clear view of the character's face.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/993fee05a4b0.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753698563.625249 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/25142a3e9507.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/25142a3e9507.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "25142a3e9507", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, realistic skin, photorealistic, intricate details, highres, 2girls, 1boy, romantic interaction, emotional connection, (soft lighting, warm tones), (long hair, flowing hair), (dresses, flowing skirts), (tender embrace, close-up), (soft smile, gentle touch), (background: sunset, garden, flowers), (dynamic composition, multiple perspectives), (interacting hands, eye contact), (clothes slightly moving, natural movement), (soft shadows, ambient lighting), (emotional atmosphere, heartfelt moment), (multiple characters, group interaction, natural poses), (detailed facial expressions, subtle emotions), (high quality, no artifacts, no blur)", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, low quality, bad anatomy, bad hands, jpeg artifacts, text, watermark, logo, artist name, extra digits, censored, loli, cartoon, 3d, anime, unrealistic proportions, blurry, deformed, overexposed, underexposed, poor lighting, unnatural colors, distorted perspective", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 6137, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, newest, absurdres, highres, 1girl, hellhound_(monster_girl_encyclopedia),...", + "penis, fellatio, 1boy, oral, hetero, nude, breasts, nipples, threesome, 2girls, multiple girls, ffm ...", + "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, realistic skin, photorea..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The faces are not visible as they are obscured by the characters' arms and dresses. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the faces.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The faces are not visible as they are obscured by the characters' arms and dresses. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the faces.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, with the hands forming a heart shape which adds emotional depth. However, the lack of visible faces affects the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich textures in the dresses and hair.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of visible faces, which are crucial for assessing facial quality, the image cannot be fully evaluated. For a high-end customer, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with visible faces to ensure the character design meets the required standards.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/25142a3e9507.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753698755.2874653 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2940d7df0593.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/2940d7df0593.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "2940d7df0593", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, 2girls, 1girl, 1girl, sensual embrace, close-up, passionate kiss, intertwined hands, wet lips, swollen clit, erect nipples, lace underwear, red lips, glossy skin, soft lighting, garden backdrop, blooming roses, vibrant colors, lush greenery, intimate setting, dramatic shadows, high contrast, detailed textures, natural lighting, emotional connection, mutual gaze, subtle blush, intricate details, dynamic composition, soft focus background, volumetric lighting, intimate moment, romantic atmosphere, sensual interaction, exposed thighs, cleavage, seductive pose, eye contact, detailed facial expressions, close proximity, skin texture, soft focus, dramatic lighting, lush background, garden elements, flowers, natural scenery, high detail, realistic", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, sketch, censored, watermark, signature, blurry, plain background, low resolution, lack of detail, incorrect anatomy, unrealistic lighting, poor perspective, unflattering angles, generic elements, lack of depth, flat colors, unappealing colors, low quality", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 326, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, Irisviel von Einzbern, 1girl, lus...", + "cute college woman, large breasts, athletic, athletic build, ((slim fit)), 1girl, light rays, lookin...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, absurdres, micro panties, 1girl, breasts, solo, jewelry, s..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no noticeable blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are good, though the focus seems to be on the upper body rather than the face.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the textures of the clothing and skin.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good technical execution. However, the focus on the upper body might not fully meet the expectations of customers who are primarily interested in facial details. If the primary focus is on the character's face, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a more balanced composition that includes the face prominently.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2940d7df0593.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753699445.3677783 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b884338c9e7d.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/b884338c9e7d.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "b884338c9e7d", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, volumetric lighting, ambient occlusion, cinematic composition, 4 characters, 2 girls and 2 boys, playful interaction, laughing, holding hands, magical forest, glowing runes, enchanted trees, vibrant colors, detailed textures, realistic lighting, soft shadows, atmospheric perspective, dynamic poses, expressive faces, emotional connection, group interaction, dynamic composition, balanced framing, high detail, sharp focus, clean lines, artistic style, fantasy elements, magical atmosphere, forest clearing, sunset, glowing flowers, sparkling water, detailed clothing, intricate patterns, flowing robes, ornate accessories, glowing jewelry, natural lighting, soft shadows, detailed background, intricate details, expressive characters, emotional engagement, vibrant environment, magical ambiance", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad quality, low quality, blurry, text, ugly, bad anatomy, bad proportions, extra limbs, missing limbs, disfigured, deformed, gross, mutated, distorted, bad lighting, overexposed, underexposed, grainy, noisy, artifacts, watermark, signature, username, nsfw, explicit, inappropriate, vulgar, pornographic, sexual, nudity, genitalia, breasts, ass, butt, feces, blood, gore, violence, horror, scary, creepy, disturbing, unsettling, bad taste, bad art, low effort, bad composition, off-center, cluttered, messy, unbalanced, poor perspective, poor lighting, poor shading, poor texture, poor detail, poor resolution, poor contrast, poor color, poor saturation, poor brightness, poor gamma, poor white balance, poor exposure, poor focus, poor depth of field, poor bokeh, poor sharpness, poor clarity, poor definition, poor resolution, poor quality, bad quality, worst quality", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 8085, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, DISNEY_ANIMATION, incoth, incase, female...", + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 8K, dramatic lighting, m...", + "Artist : Tsuaii, volumetric lighting, ambient occlusion, girl (Power from Chainsaw man), luminescent..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\n- The facial details are somewhat clear but not highly defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical but lack fine detail.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no noticeable blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, though slightly soft.\n- Color saturation is vibrant, with a nice contrast between the night sky and the forest.\n- The composition is well-balanced, with the couple centered and the trees framing the scene effectively.\n- The level of detail is rich, especially in the forest and the glowing path.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality anime style with good color and composition. However, the facial details could be improved for higher satisfaction among customers. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image could benefit from more detailed facial features, particularly in the eyes and finer details on the faces. This would enhance the overall quality and appeal to high-end customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b884338c9e7d.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753699666.5132287 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f94934f2b2a9.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/f94934f2b2a9.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "f94934f2b2a9", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-detailed, surreal, magical, 1creature, glowing eyes, ethereal wings, enchanted armor, floating islands, bioluminescent forest, twilight, soft focus, glowing aura, glowing runes, side view, dynamic pose, flowing robes, intricate patterns, glowing hands, holding a crystal, starry sky, lens flare, dramatic lighting, cinematic composition, artist:elizabethmcfarland, lazypos, lazyneg, fantasy, mystical, glowing elements, intricate details, vibrant colors, depth of field, ultra high quality, sharp focus, cinematic, vibrant, vivid, surreal, dreamlike, magical atmosphere", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, lowres, blurry, poorly drawn, bad anatomy, bad hands, extra limbs, missing limbs, artifacts, watermarks, logos, censored, signature, text, 3d render, render, low detail, over-saturated, under-saturated, flat colors, unrealistic, unrealistic proportions, distorted perspective, grainy, pixelated, cartoonish, low resolution, low detail, bad lighting, darkened areas, overexposed, underexposed, lack of depth, shallow depth, poor composition, cluttered, messy, unorganized, unclear, unclear details, missing elements, incomplete, distorted, stretched, compressed, poor contrast, poor clarity, poor sharpness, poor focus, poor lighting, poor shadows, poor highlights, poor textures, poor details, poor resolution, poor definition, poor clarity, poor sharpness, poor focus", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 79, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, absurdres, masterpiece, best_quality, ultra-detailed, newest, sharp focus, best quality...", + "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, 1woman, incoth, incase, ...", + "high detail, detailed, masterpiece, masterwork, super cute style, 1girl, pink and white striped sock..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with a harmonious arrangement of elements such as the character, the glowing crystal, the bats, and the landscape.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the wings, the crystal, and the background elements like the mountains and the sky.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present in the image.\n\nGiven the lack of visible facial features, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall composition, color, and technical aspects are of high quality. A regeneration would be necessary to include a visible face for a comprehensive assessment.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f94934f2b2a9.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753699734.4312346 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/04c3e87bfb16.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/04c3e87bfb16.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "04c3e87bfb16", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, 8K, high detail, dynamic composition, 2girls interacting, playful scene, anime style, pastel colors, detailed faces, expressive eyes, sunset background, garden setting, floral elements, dynamic pose, soft lighting, cinematic background, intricate details, ultra-detailed, depth of field, vibrant colors, emotional connection, friendship, joyful atmosphere, BREAK, (laughing, playful expressions), (flower petals falling), (interactive props), (dynamic movement), (soft shadows), (warm tones), (artistic lighting), (detailed clothing), (natural textures), (environmental elements), (atmospheric perspective)", + "negative_prompt": "safe_neg, lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, blurry, text, logo, signature, censor, extra limbs, deformed features, distorted proportions, ugly face, bad hands, extra fingers, old, ugly, watermark, earring, jewelry, patreon, name, letters, graffiti, bad lighting, flat color, no depth, low contrast, over-saturated, under-saturated, distorted perspective, broken elements, unnatural colors, poor composition, lack of detail, low resolution, bad quality, low score, score_6, score_5, score_4, mutated hands, deformed, bad feet, extra legs, revealing clothes, distorted tubes, broken cables", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 2006, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, very aesthetic, 8K, high detail, depth of field, score_9, score_8_up, BREAK d...", + "1girl, solo, pillowdear1st, clothing cutout, beret, jacket, salmon-pink hair, pink eyes, freckles, b...", + "safe_pos, ((1girl)), gorgeous girl , kawaii girl , (blue hair, pink inner hair, two toned hair), cut..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and distance from which the image is taken. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and distance from which the image is taken. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are smooth and well-defined, contributing to a clean and polished look.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is well-balanced, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is balanced, with the horizon line dividing the sky and ground evenly. The trees and flowers add depth and interest to the scene.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a rich level of detail, especially in the clouds, trees, and flowers, which adds to the overall beauty of the scene.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, as the details are sharp and clear.\n\nGiven that the primary focus should be on the character's face, but it is not visible in this image, the overall quality is still quite good. However, the lack of facial detail prevents a higher score.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/04c3e87bfb16.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753699777.6512153 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/20e3a336a2c2.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/20e3a336a2c2.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "20e3a336a2c2", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, 8K, absurdres, 2girls, (young women), (flirty interaction), (soft smiles), (glancing at each other), (casual pose), (mid-length hair), (curved legs), (matching outfits), (interlocked hands), (warm lighting), (indoor café), (wooden table), (steaming mugs), (dramatic shadows), (depth of field), (cinematic lighting), (vivid colors), (realistic textures), (soft focus background), (front-facing composition), (emotional connection), (sensual atmosphere), (high contrast), (detailed eyes), (natural skin tones), (smooth fabrics), (gentle lighting), (atmospheric perspective), (ultra-realistic), (professional lighting), (source_real), (score_9_up), (BREAK), (solo), (1girl), (1boy), (romantic tension), (subtle gestures), (close-up focus), (detailed facial expressions), (soft glow), (warm tones), (artistic lighting), (dramatic composition), (dynamic interaction), (emotional depth), (realistic skin details), (soft shadows), (atmospheric effects), (ultra-detailed-eyes), (detailed hair), (natural lighting), (soft focus), (volumetric lighting)", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, bad anatomy, text, watermark, lowres, signature, extra limbs, missing limbs, unnatural face, skewed eyes, imperfect eyes, ugly, blurry, cartoonish, unrealistic lighting, over-saturated colors, poor composition, text, artist name, multiple girls, 2girls, bad hands, distorted proportions, error, bad details, low contrast, flat colors, unnatural skin tones, unrealistic textures, unprofessional lighting, source_pony, score_6, score_5, score_4", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 3841, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, (((masterpiece,amazing quality,best quality,ul...", + "incase, masterpiece, best quality,high quality, newest, highres,8K,HDR,absurdres,1girl, depth of fie...", + "2girls, long blonde hair, short red hair, pale skin, large breasts, slim waist, expressive BREAK top..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 2048, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The faces are not visible as they are cut off at the top of the image.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present since the faces are not shown.\n- The proportions and contours cannot be evaluated due to the lack of facial features.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with soft and harmonious colors.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered on the lower body, which is appropriate for the subject matter.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with detailed clothing textures and skin tones.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- No obvious generation errors are detected.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the faces are not visible, it is impossible to assess the face quality properly. However, the rest of the image is of good quality. If the faces were included, the overall score could potentially be higher.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/20e3a336a2c2.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753699977.341518 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0b5a37024724.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/0b5a37024724.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "0b5a37024724", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, 1boy, 1girl, enchanted forest, glowing mushrooms, mystical creatures, detailed textures, intricate patterns, magical atmosphere, cinematic lighting, dramatic shadows, highres, ultra detailed, fantasy, glowing eyes, flowing robes, enchanted staff, glowing runes, serene expression, standing on hill, sunset, golden light, magical aura, intricate background", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, lowres, cartoon, anime, unrealistic, blurry, low detail, watermark, artist signature, censored, sketch", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 8007, + "sample_sources": [ + "1boy sitting, chair, 1girl, deepthroat, kneeling, implied fellatio, from side, office lady, office, ...", + "cinematic, McFarlane style, dark medieval fantasy, incredibly absurdres, highres, masterpiece, newes...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, d \\(killer wife\\) \\(nikke\\), d \\(nikke\\), 1boy, 1girl, ass..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 2048, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background providing a good sense of depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the forest, mushrooms, and magical elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe primary issue is the lack of visible facial features, which prevents a thorough assessment of the character's face quality. However, the rest of the image is of high quality, making a regeneration necessary to address this specific aspect.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0b5a37024724.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753700926.769431 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/fbaa6ecaa36b.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/fbaa6ecaa36b.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "fbaa6ecaa36b", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, high detail, depth of field, (blurred background), (dramatic lighting), masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, 8k, light particles, glow, nsfw, 2girls, 18 years old, petite, narrow waist, small hips, gorgeous girls, kawai girls, glitter makeup, oiled bodies, sweaty, black hair, white highlights, short hair, ponytail, red scrunchies, cute faces, cute girls, intimate moment, emotional connection, (pink see-through revealing their bellies and abdomen curtain style dresses), exposed breasts, exposed pussies, huge natural breasts, (slim fit), candid, bedroom, black walls, ethereal, rating_explicit, dynamic angle, dark background, kneeling, doggy, doggystyle, penis, a massive penis, motion lines, motion blur, (girl1 looking at girl2 with longing), (girl2 holding girl1's hand tightly), (soft focus on their intertwined legs), (glowing eyes with tears), (dramatic shadows casting across the room), (soft ambient lighting highlighting their skin tones)", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, displeasing, text, watermark, bad anatomy, text, artist name, signature, deformed hands, missing finger, shiny skin, child, children, extra digits, (extra fingers), (bad hands), missing fingers, unaestheticXL2v10, 2 girls, loli, (watermark), censored, pubic hair, sagging breasts, lowres, jpeg artifacts, bad anatomy, bad hands, multiple views, censored, signature, watermark, censored, logo, waterprints, title, cropped image, blurry eyes, poorly drawn eyes, skewed eyes, unrealistic proportions, unnatural poses, over-saturated colors, under-exposed, over-exposed, grainy, noise, artifacts, distorted faces, incorrect lighting, flat colors, lack of depth, unsharp, pixelation, bad perspective", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 3604, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism , high detail, depth of fie...", + "beautiful girl, pink hair, bow, blue eyes, idol, long hair, jewelry, star-shaped pupils, long eyelas...", + "1girl, Angel, halo, feather Wings, head flower, breasts, bouncing breast, opened White Robe, see-thr..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not include any facial features as it is focused on the lower body. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features is a significant issue for an image that is intended to be a full character portrait.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not include any facial features as it is focused on the lower body. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features is a significant issue for an image that is intended to be a full character portrait.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, which enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered and balanced, focusing on the lower body.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the skin texture and lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, providing a clear and detailed view of the subject.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks facial features, which are typically the primary focus in a character portrait, it is not suitable for high-end customers who expect a complete character representation. Therefore, I recommend regeneration to include the face and ensure the image meets the expected standards for a full character portrait.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/fbaa6ecaa36b.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753701028.1634243 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9a74b719047c.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/9a74b719047c.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "9a74b719047c", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, highres, mystical forest, glowing eyes, antlered head, intricate runes, flowing robes, dynamic pose, magical atmosphere, soft lighting, depth of field, detailed textures, vibrant colors, fantasy creature, elegant stance, surrounded by glowing flora, soft shadows, high detail, sharp shading, centered composition, ethereal glow, natural lighting, intricate patterns, magical aura", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, jpeg artifacts, watermark, text, logo, extra digits, censored, simple background, low quality, bad hands, multiple views", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 2338, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, anime coloring, dynamic lighting, ambient light, soft light, (ultra-detai...", + "The image depicts a nude, blue-painted woman with curly orange hair, kneeling on one knee while hold...", + "(masterpiece, best quality, highres, very aesthetic, very awa), blue background, gradient background..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 2048, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not clearly defined, and the eyes appear distorted and lack symmetry. The proportions of the nose and mouth seem off, and the facial contour does not look natural. There are also some blurry areas around the face that detract from the overall quality.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not clearly defined, and the eyes appear distorted and lack symmetry. The proportions of the nose and mouth seem off, and the facial contour does not look natural. There are also some blurry areas around the face that detract from the overall quality.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are somewhat clear but not perfectly sharp.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and saturated, which enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, with the character dominating the frame, and the proportions are generally well-balanced.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the flowing hair and dress, but the face lacks detail.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high enough to support the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation: While the image has some strengths, particularly in color and composition, the poor quality of the face significantly impacts the overall quality. Regeneration would help improve the facial features and ensure they meet the high standards expected by high-end customers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9a74b719047c.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753701072.3783758 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d59ed7440292.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/d59ed7440292.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "d59ed7440292", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, high detail, depth of field, (blurred background), (dramatic lighting), 8k, 2girls, intimate embrace, passionate kiss, sensual touch, soft lighting, dramatic shadows, closeup, moaning, wet lips, saliva string, hair entwined, eye contact, slow motion, romantic atmosphere, bedroom setting, silk sheets, velvet curtains, warm golden hour, soft focus, creamy skin, natural breasts, toned legs, hipbone, narrow waist, (dynamic angle), (dramatic composition), (intimate interaction), (emotional connection), (soft focus background), (realistic textures), (high contrast), (cinematic framing), (romantic mood), (skin tones), (natural lighting), (detailed facial expressions), (ultra-realistic), (best quality), (very aesthetic), (nsfw), (soft focus), (dramatic lighting), (romantic ambiance)", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, displeasing, text, watermark, bad anatomy, deformed hands, missing finger, shiny skin, child, children, unrealistic proportions, flat lighting, cartoonish, low resolution, grainy, blurry, plain background, blank eyes, distorted faces, excessive shadows, over-saturated colors, unnatural skin tones, text artifacts, artist signature, low detail, poor composition, unflattering angles, unrealistic proportions, synthetic textures, low contrast, lack of depth, overly bright, overly dark, unrealistic lighting, poor focus, unattractive features, distorted perspective, unnatural poses, lack of realism, low quality, blurry, cartoonish, low resolution", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 7896, + "sample_sources": [ + "2girls, blonde hair, bob cut, large natural breasts, apron, standing against kitchen counter, legs a...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, high detail, depth of field, (blurred bac...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, dark elf, 1girl, white hair, long..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 4, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 4/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The facial details are not clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear distorted and lack symmetry.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem off, particularly the nose which looks too large and disproportionate.\n- The facial contour is unnatural, especially around the mouth area.\n- There are blurry and distorted areas, particularly around the mouth and nose.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are low, making it difficult to discern finer details.\n- Color saturation and contrast are adequate but not vibrant enough to enhance the image's appeal.\n- Composition and proportions are off, contributing to the overall poor quality.\n- The level of detail richness is lacking due to the aforementioned issues.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are visible artifacts and noise, especially around the edges of the facial features.\n- There are obvious generation errors, such as the distorted eyes and the unnatural proportions.\n- The resolution appears insufficient, as the image lacks fine detail and clarity.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nThe image fails to meet the high standards required by high-end customers due to its poor facial quality, technical issues, and overall low image quality. A regeneration would be necessary to address these problems and create a more visually appealing and technically sound image.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d59ed7440292.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753701826.287476 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/c732e204ea24.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/c732e204ea24.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "c732e204ea24", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, nsfw, explicit, 3 girls, 2 in red dresses, 1 in blue, sunset beach, hugging, laughing, dynamic angles, cinematic lighting, vibrant colors, detailed background, volumetric lighting, intricate details, lush environment, crashing waves, golden hour, dramatic shadows, high contrast, expressive faces, close-up interactions, intimate gestures, soft focus, depth of field, 8k resolution, ultra-detailed, artistic style, surreal atmosphere, natural lighting, realistic textures, smooth skin, glossy hair, realistic eyes, emotional connection, group dynamic, lively energy, natural poses, scenic backdrop, warm tones, rich color palette, cinematic composition, dramatic lighting, detailed clothing, intricate accessories, realistic fabric, realistic hair flow, expressive emotions, detailed facial expressions, high quality, absurdres, ultra-high resolution", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, bad quality, lowres, bad anatomy, sketch, censor, watermark, blurry, plain background, blank eyes, floating hair, messy hair, hydrokinesis, unrealistic proportions, distorted faces, extra limbs, deformed features, low detail, grainy, pixelated, cartoonish, unrealistic lighting, flat colors, lack of depth, poor composition, distorted perspective, low resolution, bad hands, bad feet, extra fingers, missing fingers, deformed toes, missing toes, unnatural poses, overly saturated colors, unrealistic skin texture, poor texturing, lack of realism, low fidelity, bad lighting, flat lighting, lack of shadows, plain background, simple environment", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 2850, + "sample_sources": [ + "(1 girl,2 male),(meme_(me!me!me!),me!me!me!,blue hair,Hime cut,nude,purple thigh highs,purple elbow ...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, dark elf, 1girl, white hair, long...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, nsfw, explicit, from below, monster girl, 1girl, solo, p..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 2048, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours.\n- The image appears to be focused on intimate scenes rather than character faces, which makes it difficult to evaluate facial quality.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are somewhat clear but not very sharp, especially around the edges.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant, but the contrast seems a bit low, making some details less distinct.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is artistic and suggestive, but it doesn't provide enough information to assess proportions effectively.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a good level of detail in the intimate areas, but the lack of facial features limits the overall richness of the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No obvious artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no apparent generation errors.\n- The resolution appears to be adequate for the content shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image does not contain any facial features, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the lack of facial details significantly impacts the overall quality assessment. Given that the image is focused on intimate scenes, it might be more appropriate to regenerate an image that includes a character's face for a more comprehensive evaluation.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/c732e204ea24.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753702249.5457783 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6bbbb27d6ed7.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/6bbbb27d6ed7.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "6bbbb27d6ed7", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, 2girls, best quality, best detailed, best lighting, 18+ content, close-up, intimate moment, (cuddling, embracing, soft touch), (blush, shy smile, gentle gaze), (flowing hair, floral dress, lace details), (curvy figure, natural curves, smooth skin), (soft lighting, golden hour, warm tones), (background: garden, blooming flowers, greenery), (dynamic composition, diagonal framing, emotional connection), (realistic textures, glossy skin, subtle shadows), (romantic atmosphere, tender interaction, heartfelt moment), (high detail, photorealistic, cinematic quality), (soft focus background, shallow depth of field)", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, lowres, blurry, distorted faces, extra limbs, cartoonish, text, watermark, signature, anime style, unrealistic proportions, bad anatomy, low detail, over-saturated colors, grainy, noise, artifacts, poor lighting, flat colors", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 7827, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, 1girl, ((1girl, perrault \\(last origin\\), last origin)),...", + "masterpiece, best quality, 1girl,princess peach,alternate costume,blue eyes,black lips,black hair,bl...", + "(masterpiece, best quality, high quality, good quality), 1girl, solo, petite, twintails, raincoat, b..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of a face suggests that the primary focus might be on other elements of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of a face suggests that the primary focus might be on other elements of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition seems intentional, but without a face, it's hard to comment on the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the visible parts of the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not present in the image, it's challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the visible parts of the image, the overall quality is good. The absence of a face makes it difficult to determine if the image meets the high standards expected by high-end customers. Therefore, I would recommend regenerating the image with a clear face to ensure that all aspects of the image meet the required quality standards.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6bbbb27d6ed7.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753702561.0309339 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f3da45229d74.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/f3da45229d74.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "f3da45229d74", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, cyberpunk, neon lights, 1boy, mechanized knight, glowing circuitry, high-tech armor, dynamic pose, urban environment, rainy night, neon reflections, detailed mechanical wings, glowing eyes, futuristic cityscape, rain effects, dramatic shadows, ultra-detailed, highres, vibrant colors, intricate patterns, glowing tech, cinematic angle, dramatic lighting, best quality, ultra-realistic, 8k, intricate design, glowing runes, futuristic weapons, cybernetic enhancements, detailed facial expressions, metallic textures, advanced technology, futuristic gear, glowing circuit patterns, dynamic movement, high contrast, vivid colors, cinematic composition", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, lowres, blurry, bad anatomy, text, watermark, artist name, signature, deformed hands, missing fingers, unrealistic, cartoon, anime, excessive details, over-saturated colors, poor lighting, grainy, low contrast, distorted perspective, unsharp, low detail, bad proportions, incorrect anatomy, text overlay, watermark, blurry, lowres, bad quality, unrealistic proportions", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 9608, + "sample_sources": [ + "cinematic, McFarlane style, dark medieval fantasy, incredibly absurdres, highres, masterpiece, newes...", + "1girl , Nessa from pokemon, nude, wide hips , big butt , colorful , vibrant , paint splatter , head ...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism (1.5), high detail, depth o..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 2048, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The character lacks a face, which is the primary focus of the image.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The absence of a face makes it impossible to assess symmetry, detail, proportion, or natural contour.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nThe image does not meet the criteria for a high-quality illustration because it fails to provide the primary focus of a character's face. Without a face, the image cannot be evaluated based on the specified face quality aspects. A regeneration is necessary to include a face that can be analyzed for clarity, detail, and natural proportions.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f3da45229d74.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753702576.9309528 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f580a1655651.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/f580a1655651.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "f580a1655651", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, fantasy, mystical forest, glowing mushrooms, ethereal glow, 1 girl, age 20, long silver hair, glowing eyes, white dress with silver patterns, standing, arms outstretched, glowing aura, soft focus background, twilight, mist, vibrant colors, detailed textures, high detail, 8k, (dynamic pose), (glowing elements), (mystical ambiance), (soft focus), (dramatic lighting)", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, bad anatomy, blurry, over-saturated, text, watermark, artist signature, distorted features, deformed limbs, cartoonish, low resolution, poor lighting, unbalanced colors, unrealistic proportions, missing details, grainy, artifacts", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 8006, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl, chinese girl, slim, ponytail, beautiful face, reclining, leaning back, spread legs, female ma...", + "masterpiece, high_quality, highres, in the style of Jeda,vibrant colors, CivChan, purple eyes, pink ...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism , high detail, depth of fie..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face appears to be missing or obscured by the character's hair, which is a design choice but can be seen as a limitation.\n- The eyes are not visible due to the hair, so it's difficult to assess their symmetry and detail.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth are not clearly defined due to the lack of visibility.\n- The facial contour is somewhat abstracted by the hair, making it less natural compared to a fully visible face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the character's attire and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a high-quality composition and rich details, but the absence of a visible face affects the overall facial quality. Since the face is a primary focus for many viewers, it might be beneficial to regenerate the image with a more visible face if possible, while maintaining the artistic style and magical atmosphere. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f580a1655651.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753702722.6478796 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a7155196b415.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/a7155196b415.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "a7155196b415", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, high detail, depth of field, (blurred background), (dramatic lighting), masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, 8k, light particles, nsfw, flat color, playful composition, vibrant colors, warm_colors, soft focus, high contrast, ((violet parr)), 2girls, entangled, passionate embrace, flushed cheeks, wet hair, lace underwear, matching outfits, intertwined legs, close-up, (moisture droplets), (sparkles), (slow motion), (heart-shaped bubbles), (sweat droplets), (tongue flicks), (lip lock), (lingerie details), (skin tones), (blush), (pupillary dilation), (fingertip touch), (shared breath), (kissing), (tongue in mouth), (nude skin), (thighs), (intimate contact), (pov), (sensual atmosphere), (romantic setting), (soft lighting), (dramatic shadows), (emotional connection)", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, displeasing, text, watermark, bad anatomy, text, artist name, signature, deformed hands, missing finger, shiny skin, child, children, blurry eyes, poorly drawn eyes, skewed eyes, bad anatomy, lowres, jpeg artifacts, bad anatomy, bad hands, multiple views, censored, signature, watermark, censored, logo, waterprints, title, cropped image", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 7553, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism , high detail, depth of fie...", + "1girl, Angel, halo, feather Wings, head flower, breasts, bouncing breast, opened White Robe, see-thr...", + "anime, masterpiece, best quality, 8k, 1girl, hatsune miku , 1boy, lifted by penis, suspended on peni..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The absence of the face makes it difficult to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic, with the character's back and the flowing lines creating a sense of movement and energy.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the clothing and background elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the visible parts of the image, the overall quality is quite high. The absence of the face makes it challenging to give a complete evaluation, but the technical aspects suggest that the image could be improved by including the face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a7155196b415.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753703518.2797854 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0a6177185c32.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/0a6177185c32.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "0a6177185c32", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, 2girls, 1boy, romantic scene, garden setting, soft lighting, holding hands, intimate pose, detailed facial expressions, flowing dresses, floral patterns, close-up interaction, emotional connection, dynamic composition, background blur, subtle shadows, natural colors, cinematic lighting, detailed textures, realistic skin, vibrant flowers, soft focus, emotional atmosphere, romantic ambiance, detailed hair, intricate jewelry, gentle breeze, subtle movement, cinematic angle, depth of field, artistic lighting, high detail, 8k resolution", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, lowres, watermark, signature, censor, sketch, blurry, artifacts, low detail, extra limbs, missing elements, distorted faces, unrealistic proportions, over-saturated colors, grainy, noise, text, error, incomplete, abstract, cartoonish, unrealistic lighting, poor composition, low contrast, overexposed, underexposed, incorrect perspective, low resolution, artifacts, jpeg artifacts, scan, unfinished, displeasing, unappealing, low quality, bad anatomy, wrong proportions, wrong colors, wrong lighting, wrong composition, wrong perspective", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 941, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, artist: melkor, artist: incase, long hair, fair skin, sl...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, absurdres, upshorts, 1girl, aqua panties, arched back, arm...", + "safe_pos, masterpiece, newest, absurdres, safe, masterpiece, best quality, newest, highres, absurdre..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 2048, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show any facial features as it only focuses on hands. Therefore, it cannot be evaluated based on facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show any facial features as it only focuses on hands. Therefore, it cannot be evaluated based on facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with soft pastel colors that create a pleasant visual effect.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered around the hands, which is effective for the intended focus. However, the lack of facial elements makes it difficult to assess overall composition and proportions.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the hands and dress fabric.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image is focused solely on hands without any facial features, it cannot be evaluated for face quality. However, the overall image quality is good, with high line clarity, color saturation, and detail richness. The lack of facial elements means it may not meet the expectations of customers looking for character-focused illustrations. If the intention is to create a character illustration, this image would need to be regenerated to include the face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0a6177185c32.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753703753.8746252 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/406fc344a732.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/406fc344a732.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "406fc344a732", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, high quality, 1girl, cyberpunk, neon lights, glowing circuit patterns, sleek black jacket, holographic skirt, silver hair, glowing eyes, futuristic cityscape, night, rain, reflections, high contrast, dynamic pose, mid-air, holding a glowing orb, vibrant colors, intricate details, atmospheric perspective, depth of field, volumetric lighting, detailed background, cybernetic enhancements, glowing tattoos, intense expression, mysterious ambiance, advanced technology, urban decay, glowing signs, digital rain, futuristic architecture, detailed textures, sharp focus, cinematic lighting", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, low quality, worst quality, sketch, censorship, watermark, flat pose, poor lighting, lowres, blurry, plain background, bad anatomy, bad hands, bad feet, outdated technology, static elements, lack of detail, grainy, artifacts, signature, artist name, over-saturated, under-exposed, unbalanced colors, unrealistic proportions, nsfw, explicit, nudity, boring background, overly simple, lack of depth, flat lighting", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 10575, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, dark elf, 1girl, white hair, long...", + "(masterpiece, best quality, high quality, good quality), 1girl, solo, petite, twintails, raincoat, b...", + "1girl, solo, 21yo, adult woman,medium breast, oval-shaped face, cute girl, expressive look, slightly..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The lack of a visible face prevents a thorough evaluation of facial quality.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant neon colors that stand out against the darker background.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the cityscape providing a dynamic backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the character's outfit and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is the character's face, which is not visible, the overall score is slightly lower due to the inability to evaluate the facial quality. However, the rest of the image is of high quality. If the goal is to create a high-quality image with a visible face, the regeneration would be necessary to address the missing facial features.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/406fc344a732.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753703797.1146529 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/dff4866593b3.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/dff4866593b3.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "dff4866593b3", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "1girl, 1boy, embracing, sunset, golden hour, on a beach, lying on sand, close-up, ((emotional expression)), soft focus, vibrant colors, warm tones, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, high detail, depth of field, (blurred background), (dramatic shadows), masterpiece, best quality, ultra-HD, 8k, dynamic angle, ((romantic atmosphere)), light particles, nsfw, natural lighting, skin texture, realistic, impressionism, soft focus, high contrast, ((dramatic lighting)), romantic, emotional, ((soft glow)), masterwork, detailed, cinematic, natural, dramatic, warm lighting, ((emotional connection))", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, displeasing, text, watermark, bad anatomy, artist name, signature, deformed hands, missing finger, shiny skin, child, children, lowres, bad hands, jpeg artifacts, extra digits, censored, patreon username, loli, unnatural colors, blurry, overexposed, underexposed, grainy, distorted, low detail, poor lighting, flat color, unattractive, unrealistic, unappealing", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 8673, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl, girl lying, on back,on bed,1boy, boy kneeling, erection,male masturbation, cumshot,projectile...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism , high detail, depth of fie...", + "1girl, hetero, 1boy, oral, breasts, fellatio, large penis, nipples, nude, kneeling, medium breasts, ..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not include a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents a comprehensive assessment of the character's facial features.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not include a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents a comprehensive assessment of the character's facial features.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the sunset and water creating a harmonious background.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the texture of the skin and the reflections on the water.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors; the image appears to be a high-quality rendering.\n- Resolution: The resolution seems adequate for the level of detail present.\n\nSince the image lacks a face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall image quality is good, and the technical aspects are satisfactory. The absence of a face is the primary reason for the lower score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/dff4866593b3.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753703859.1088347 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e47689760c0d.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/e47689760c0d.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "e47689760c0d", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, anime style, mystical female, silver hair, glowing eyes, magical aura, flowing robe with star patterns, glowing runes, staff with crystal, standing in enchanted forest, dramatic pose, soft focus, high contrast, textured surfaces, depth of field, golden hour lighting, dramatic shadows, rich details, nature-inspired color palette, playful composition, (slim figure, hourglass waist), tall, elegant, (sparkling jewelry), (magic glow), (fairy wings), (enchanted flowers), (dramatic lighting), (soft focus), (high detail), (art by midjourney), (8k resolution), 1girl, solo, (magic sparkle), (mystical atmosphere), (detailed textures), (vibrant colors), (dynamic composition)", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, low resolution, blurry, extra digits, bad anatomy, watermark, censored, child, busty, distorted features, low contrast, overly saturated, unrealistic proportions, grainy, artifacts, low detail, cartoonish, flat colors, untextured, lack of depth, poor lighting, unrealistic shadows, low quality, extra limbs, missing limbs, distorted perspective, low resolution, bad proportions", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 617, + "sample_sources": [ + "beautiful girl, pink hair, bow, blue eyes, idol, long hair, jewelry, star-shaped pupils, long eyelas...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, newest, mole near mouth 1girl, solo, nyo...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, DISNEY_ANIMATION, incoth, incase, female..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face lacks clear facial details, making it difficult to discern features like the eyes, nose, and mouth. The eyes appear somewhat symmetrical but lack detail, and the proportions seem off due to the lack of visible facial structure. The facial contour is not natural, and the overall design appears more abstract than realistic.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face lacks clear facial details, making it difficult to discern features like the eyes, nose, and mouth. The eyes appear somewhat symmetrical but lack detail, and the proportions seem off due to the lack of visible facial structure. The facial contour is not natural, and the overall design appears more abstract than realistic.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally smooth but could be sharper.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and well-saturated, with good contrast that enhances the glowing elements.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, with the character centered and the glowing elements adding depth. However, the proportions of the character's body and the staff could be more balanced.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a good level of detail in the glowing elements and the staff, but the character's clothing and face lack fine details.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No noticeable artifacts or noise are present.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has potential but needs refinement in the facial details and proportions. The character's face should have clearer features and a more natural contour to improve the overall quality. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e47689760c0d.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753704069.706223 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f6d7789ebf35.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/f6d7789ebf35.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "f6d7789ebf35", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "Close-up of a woman's legs, detailed fishnet stockings with a repeating geometric pattern, wearing a tight crop top with a lace trim, small silver rings on fingers, dynamic angle, high detail, 8k, realistic skin texture, glossy lips, focused on legs and pattern, masterwork, best quality, depth of field, dynamic pose, neon lighting, abstract background, (sparkling effects), (glossy finish), (slight blur on edges), artist:originalstyle", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, watermark, text, logo, censored, extra digits, distorted, ugly, sketch, error, 3D, multiple views, signature, patreon username, low quality, bad hands, jpeg artifacts, displeasing, comic, frames", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 269, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl, huge breasts, wide hips,thick thighs,yaoyorozu momo, tube top,cutoffs,micro shorts,unaligned ...", + "The image is a close-up of a woman's lower body, showcasing her thighs and buttocks. She is wearing ...", + "HDR, 8K, high contrast, depth of field, focused subject, dynamic angle, dynamic pose, best quality, ..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image lacks a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality and appeal of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image lacks a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality and appeal of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual impact.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic and engaging, but the lack of a face prevents a full assessment of proportions.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the clothing and accessories.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks a face, which is typically the primary focus in anime-style illustrations, the overall quality is impacted. The absence of facial features makes it difficult to assess the image comprehensively. Therefore, I would recommend regeneration to include a face, ensuring that all aspects of the image can be evaluated properly.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f6d7789ebf35.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753704254.2967885 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a505a32fc79e.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/a505a32fc79e.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "a505a32fc79e", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, dynamic composition, 2 characters, medieval knight in silver armor, elven sorceress in flowing robes, magical duel, glowing runes, lightning effects, stormy castle courtyard, dramatic lighting, intense eye contact, expressive faces, intricate armor details, enchanted staff, swirling magic, cinematic angle, high contrast, vibrant colors, cinematic lighting, dramatic shadows, epic atmosphere, detailed textures, sharp focus, ultra HD, 8k resolution, vivid colors, glowing particles, magical energy, dynamic interaction, intense confrontation, dramatic pose, intricate background, ancient castle walls, stormy sky, lightning flashes, cinematic lighting, detailed facial expressions, glowing magic aura, vibrant colors, high detail, realistic textures, cinematic depth of field, dramatic lighting, epic scale, magical elements, detailed clothing, intricate accessories, glowing runes, enchanted artifacts, dynamic movement, intense interaction, vivid atmosphere, cinematic composition, ultra-realistic, high quality", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, jpeg artifacts, bad composition, text, watermark, monochrome, grayscale, blurry, poorly drawn, extra limbs, mutated hands, bad proportions, deformed, missing fingers, error, mutation, anatomical nonsense, low quality, signature, 3d, cartoon, furry, censored, (censor), ugly, extra digits, disfigured, bad lighting, flat colors, lack of detail, unrealistic proportions, poorly rendered textures, over-saturated colors, dull tones, grainy, artifacts, soft focus, motion blur, incorrect perspective, distorted faces, unrealistic eyes, poorly defined edges, low contrast, muted colors, lack of depth, unbalanced composition, generic background, unrealistic shadows, incorrect lighting, unrealistic colors, lack of sharpness, poor resolution, unprofessional art, distorted anatomy, incorrect proportions, poorly drawn hands, missing limbs, duplicated elements, unnatural poses, unrealistic clothing, incorrect textures, lack of detail in hair, unconvincing expressions, poorly defined features, low detail, blurry faces, unclear outlines, bad quality, worst detail", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 421, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, by piaki, best quality, very detailed, 1 girl, dawn \\(pokemon\\), beenie, pink skirt, st...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, uncensored, dynamic angle, from above, 1girl, 1boy, sex,...", + "safe_pos, source_anime, high res image, masterpiece, best quality, very awa, absurdres, perfect qual..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\n- The character's face is not fully visible due to the silhouette, so it's difficult to assess facial details.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical but lack detail as they are not clearly defined.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth are not discernible due to the silhouette.\n- The facial contour seems natural from what can be seen, but the lack of detail makes it hard to confirm.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the dramatic effect.\n- Composition and proportions: Strong, with a dynamic composition that draws the viewer's eye to the central building.\n- Level of detail richness: Moderate, with rich details in the castle and the sky, but the silhouette limits the visibility of finer details on the character.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a high-quality overall composition and color scheme, which is impressive. However, the lack of visible facial details prevents a higher score. Since the primary focus should be on the character's face, especially in high-end customer satisfaction, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with more detailed facial features.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a505a32fc79e.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753704369.7451062 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cfeb6456c837.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/cfeb6456c837.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "cfeb6456c837", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, 1girl, ethereal, glowing runes, flowing silver cloak, intricate jewelry, mystical aura, standing on stone arch, arms outstretched, cinematic composition, enchanted forest backdrop, volumetric fog, soft golden light, dramatic shadows, high contrast, cinematic lighting, intricate textures, glowing eyes, delicate facial features, slender figure, curvaceous, soft curves, detailed hair, magical glow, fantasy art, anime style, 8k resolution, depth of field, blurred background, intricate patterns, enchanted atmosphere", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, lowres, jpeg artifacts, blurry, censored, watermark, signature, plain background, blank eyes, asymmetrical features, extra limbs, poor anatomy, low detail, overly dark, overexposed, unnatural colors, distorted perspective, flat shading, lack of depth, unrealistic proportions, cartoonish, low contrast, grainy, motion blur, artifacts, incorrect lighting, unrealistic textures, incorrect color palette", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 7920, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl, ginger, full lips, choker, small round breasts, puffy areola...", + "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, anime coloring, ambient light, soft light, Yak...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, 1girl, lisa \\(genshin impact\\), h..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of facial features significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of facial features significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with warm, inviting colors that enhance the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the architectural elements framing the scene effectively.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the character's attire and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the absence of facial details, which are crucial for assessing the primary focus of character quality, the image cannot be fully evaluated. Therefore, regeneration is recommended to include a visible face for a comprehensive analysis.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cfeb6456c837.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753704517.4506087 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1629bc02c847.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/1629bc02c847.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "1629bc02c847", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, absurdres, 2girls 1boy, intimate moment, close-up, soft lighting, dramatic shadows, ((skin texture)), ((wet lips)), ((moisture)), ((nipple piercings)), ((tongue out)), ((breath fog)), ((hair strands)), ((eyeliner)), ((lipstick)), ((blush)), ((necklace)), ((earrings)), ((collar)), ((tight sweater)), ((slippery skin)), ((slow motion)), ((eye contact)), ((kneeling)), ((head down)), ((hand on thigh)), ((leg around waist)), ((intimate positioning)), ((sweat droplets)), ((dramatic composition)), ((dynamic pose)), ((emotional tension)), ((soft focus)), ((depth of field)), ((artistic lighting)), ((volumetric lighting)), ((high contrast))", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, lowres, blurry, censored, deformed anatomy, extra limbs, simple background, watermark, text, logo, signature, low detail, bad proportions, monochrome, cgi, 3d, anime style, comic, sketch, poorly drawn, ugly, displeasing, distorted faces, bad hands, bad feet, extra fingers, floating objects, artifacts, noise, grainy, over-saturated, underexposed, overexposed, incorrect colors, wrong lighting, unrealistic shadows", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 8558, + "sample_sources": [ + "safe_pos, masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, ultra-detailed, detailed skin, footworship, 1girl, 2...", + "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, anime coloring, ambient light, soft light, Yak...", + "(masterpiece, newest, high quality, best quality, very awa, very aesthetic, ultra detailed, realisti..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible as it is cut off at the top of the image.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The proportions and contours are not applicable since the face is not shown.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack detail due to the absence of facial features.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant, but the lack of facial details makes it difficult to assess the overall impact.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is focused on the lower part of the body, which is unusual and does not provide a complete picture.\n- Level of detail richness: The image lacks detail, especially in the areas where facial features would be located.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are apparent.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the parts that are visible.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image should be regenerated to include the character's face, ensuring that facial details, symmetry, and proportions are correctly depicted. The focus should be on creating a complete and balanced image that showcases the character's features clearly.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1629bc02c847.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753706203.598788 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cd4ea1e23a65.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/cd4ea1e23a65.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "cd4ea1e23a65", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, high detailed, 2girls, emotional embrace, intimate moment, dimly lit bedroom, soft lighting, dramatic shadows, intricate details, dynamic pose, cinematic composition, (text:\"LOVE\":1.5), (text:\"ETERNAL\":1.3), romantic connection, close-up, from side, emotional expression, volumetric lighting, soft glow, background with floral patterns, elegant decor, subtle textures, depth of field, intricate background details, soft focus on faces, dynamic angle, emotional interaction, mutual gaze, tender touch, lace nightgowns, delicate necklaces, intimate atmosphere, romantic ambiance, high contrast, masterpiece, intricate details, cinematic lighting, soft ambient glow, dramatic scenery, intricate background, elegant furniture, vintage decor, warm tones, glowing light sources, soft focus on hands, detailed fabric textures, realistic skin tones, expressive eyes, subtle blush, dynamic composition, layered depth, emotional storytelling, cinematic framing, dramatic lighting effects, soft shadows, intricate patterns, detailed jewelry, soft lighting reflections, realistic textures, high quality, ultra detailed, masterpiece", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, sketch, watermark, signature, blurry, plain background, censored, distorted, abstract, error, bad hands, ugly, over-saturated, low contrast, plain simple background, blank eyes, watermark, signature, out of frame, unrealistic proportions, extra limbs, cartoonish, unrealistic colors, grainy, noise, artifacts, low detail, poor lighting, flat colors, lack of depth, unattractive, distorted faces, incorrect anatomy, low resolution, blurry edges, incorrect perspective, overexposed, underexposed, unnatural lighting, unflattering angles, poor composition, lack of detail, generic background, uncreative elements, low quality, bad quality, worst quality", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 1073, + "sample_sources": [ + "safe_pos, safe_pos, score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, anime, best quality, 1girl, female, huge breast...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, dark elf, 1girl, white hair, long...", + "ultra realistic, masterpiece, high detailed skin, best quality, high res, very aesthetic, anime styl..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the provided image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The hands are the primary focus, but they lack fine details that would typically be present in a high-quality anime-style illustration.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined, indicating good quality.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is appropriate, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered on the hands, which is effective for the intended focus, but lacks the complexity needed for a full character illustration.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich enough for the hands, but the absence of facial features limits the overall richness.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise in the image.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the content shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the image. However, based on the visible elements, the image quality is satisfactory. If the goal is to create a high-end anime-style illustration with a full character, the image needs to include the face and more intricate details. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nTo improve the overall quality, regenerate the image with a full character, including the face, and ensure that all facial features are clear, well-defined, and proportionate.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cd4ea1e23a65.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753706727.489093 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5da8a2df8f1f.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/5da8a2df8f1f.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "5da8a2df8f1f", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, high detail, depth of field, dramatic lighting, dynamic composition, 8k, vivid colors, warm tones, soft focus, high contrast, (vibrant colors), (dramatic shadows), (motion lines), (speedlines), 2 characters, intense interaction, emotional tension, close-up, Dutch angle, from above, (complex background), (detailed textures), (realistic skin tones), (natural lighting), (soft focus on faces), (sharp focus on hands), (emotional expressions), (dynamic poses), (interacting hands), (eye contact), (subtle background blur), (atmospheric perspective), (volumetric lighting), (artistic lighting effects), (dramatic chiaroscuro), (highly detailed environment), (realistic clothing textures), (natural hair flow), (emotional atmosphere), (cinematic framing), (engaging composition), (multiple character interaction), (dynamic movement), (realistic shadows), (soft ambient lighting), (detailed facial expressions), (realistic eye details), (dramatic lighting effects), (highly detailed textures), (natural skin tones), (realistic hair details), (emotional depth), (detailed environment), (realistic lighting), (dramatic composition), (highly detailed scene)", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, lowres, bad anatomy, text, watermark, signature, artist name, blurry, out of focus, distorted, deformed, unnatural colors, flat color, cartoonish, unrealistic proportions, missing limbs, extra limbs, disfigured, blurry background, over-saturated, under-saturated, grainy, noise, artifacts, low contrast, over-exposed, under-exposed, incorrect lighting, poor composition, unbalanced framing, text in image, copyright, nsfw, explicit content, inappropriate content, inappropriate nudity, inappropriate sexual content, inappropriate violence, inappropriate language, inappropriate symbols, inappropriate gestures, inappropriate expressions, inappropriate clothing, inappropriate background, inappropriate lighting, inappropriate color scheme, inappropriate atmosphere, inappropriate mood, inappropriate tone, inappropriate style, inappropriate subject, inappropriate context, inappropriate setting, inappropriate time, inappropriate place, inappropriate action", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 8506, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, scenery, 1girl, toga ...", + "girl, black hair, black eyes, close-up, deepthroat, freckles, gigantic penis, pale face, pink glasse...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism , high detail, depth of fie..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible due to the angle and lighting, making it impossible to assess facial details.\n- The lack of a visible face prevents evaluation of symmetry, detail, proportions, and natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth but lack definition due to the lack of a visible face.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are warm and have good contrast, but the lack of a visible face limits color assessment.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition seems abstract, but without a visible face, proportions cannot be evaluated.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a rich texture, but again, the lack of a visible face limits detail assessment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise are visible.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the abstract nature of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the face is not visible, the image cannot be evaluated properly. It would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a visible face to ensure that all facial qualities meet the required standards.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5da8a2df8f1f.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753706853.6162288 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ae51a444a779.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/ae51a444a779.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "ae51a444a779", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, 2girls, interacting, emotional connection, dramatic lighting, forest, sunlight, flowy dresses, floral accessories, expressive faces, one reaching out, the other startled, dynamic composition, realistic details, intricate hair, soft shadows, natural poses, close-up interaction, intimate moment, vibrant colors, detailed textures, cinematic framing, emotional depth, 8k resolution, ultra-detailed", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality,worst quality,worst detail,sketch,censored,watermark,text,logo,artist name,signature,unnatural poses,low resolution,blurry,extra limbs, distorted faces,overexposed,underexposed,artifacts,low contrast,high contrast,grainy,noise,poor lighting,flat colors,unrealistic proportions,cartoonish,low detail,incorrect anatomy,wrong proportions,wrong anatomy", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 10574, + "sample_sources": [ + "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, incoth, incase, dynamic,...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, 1girl, solo, long hair, breasts, looking at viewer, blush,...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, frieren, 1girl, ass, bad feet, barefoot, breasts, closed m..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 2048, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not fully visible, which makes it difficult to assess facial details.\n- The eyes appear somewhat simplified and lack intricate detailing.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem slightly off, particularly the nose, which appears too small relative to the face.\n- The facial contour is generally natural but lacks the fine detailing that would make it more lifelike.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, with clean edges and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a pleasant visual experience.\n- Composition and proportions are decent, though the focus on hands might detract from the overall balance if the face were fully visible.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the hands and clothing textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a good overall quality, but the lack of a fully visible face prevents a higher score. If the goal is to satisfy high-end customers who value facial detail, regenerating the image with a more detailed face would be beneficial. However, the current image is still suitable for many purposes and can be used as-is for other aspects of the artwork.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ae51a444a779.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753708166.360725 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/177ba7c1c9b6.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/177ba7c1c9b6.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "177ba7c1c9b6", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, high detail, depth of field, (blurred background), (dramatic lighting), best quality, very aesthetic, 8k, multiple characters interacting, dynamic composition, 3 characters in a vibrant city square, a young woman in a flowing dress, a man with a camera, and a child playing with a balloon, all engaged in a lively conversation, the woman gesturing passionately, the man capturing the moment, the child laughing, the background features a bustling street with colorful buildings, street performers, and a sunset sky, cinematic lighting highlighting the interactions, ultra-detailed textures, realistic expressions, vibrant colors, high contrast, dramatic shadows, natural lighting, high resolution, 8k, score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, score_6_up, perfect composition, dynamic angles, realistic lighting, cinematic atmosphere, detailed environment, high quality", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, displeasing, text, watermark, bad anatomy, artist name, signature, deformed hands, missing finger, shiny skin, children, censored, sketch, low resolution, blurry, grainy, over-saturated, under-saturated, poor lighting, bad perspective, distorted proportions, unrealistic colors, low detail, poor composition", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 7873, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism (1.5), high detail, depth o...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,1girl, nude, breasts, 1boy, animal ears, sex from behind, s...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, absurdres, newest, highly detailed, intricate details, c..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The facial details are somewhat lacking in definition, especially around the eyes and mouth.\n- The eyes appear slightly asymmetrical.\n- The nose and mouth proportions seem a bit off, particularly the size and placement.\n- There are minor areas where the facial contours are not entirely natural, such as the cheeks and jawline.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, though there could be slight improvements in edge definition.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a vibrant yet realistic cityscape.\n- The composition is strong, with a good balance between the characters and the urban background.\n- The level of detail is rich, especially in the cityscape and signage.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the intended use.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a good overall quality but could benefit from more refined facial details. The character faces could be improved by enhancing the eye definition, ensuring symmetry, and adjusting the proportions of the nose and mouth. These refinements would make the faces more lifelike and appealing to high-end customers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/177ba7c1c9b6.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753708349.7308884 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1eec3eb36e76.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/1eec3eb36e76.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "1eec3eb36e76", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra detailed, cinematic lighting, absurdres, 8k, dynamic composition, 2girls, best quality, highres, intricate details, lush forest background, magical aura, glowing runes, enchanted forest, mystical atmosphere, interacting, hand-holding, emotional connection, close-up, soft focus background, depth of field, natural lighting, vibrant colors, flowing hair, floral crowns, ornate jewelry, glowing eyes, serene expression, gentle smile, magical staff, glowing wand, mystical creatures, ethereal glow, detailed textures, fantasy art, surreal, digital painting, high definition, detailed background, intricate patterns, soft shadows, dynamic pose, emotional interaction, magical energy, enchanted flowers, glowing particles, masterful artistry, beautiful atmosphere", + "negative_prompt": "low quality, worst quality, blurry, poorly drawn, sketch, watermark, signature, artifacts, distorted faces, bad anatomy, extra limbs, deformed features, asymmetrical eyes, flat colors, lack of detail, lowres, unnatural colors, over-saturated, under-exposed, grainy, motion blur artifacts, text, error, duplicated elements, incorrect proportions, cartoonish, unrealistic lighting, plain background, lack of depth, overly simplistic, bad composition, unbalanced framing", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 2148, + "sample_sources": [ + "lazypos, best quality, refined detailed, high quality, highres, cinematic lighting, absurdres, 8k, d...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, Irisviel von Einzbern, 1girl, lus...", + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very awa, newest, highres, absurdres, Tohsaka Rin \\(fate/st..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The hands are the primary focus of the image, so the absence of facial details does not significantly impact the overall quality. However, the hands appear slightly blurry, which affects the sharpness and detail. The lighting on the hands also seems uneven, creating some shadows that could be improved for better definition.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The hands are the primary focus of the image, so the absence of facial details does not significantly impact the overall quality. However, the hands appear slightly blurry, which affects the sharpness and detail. The lighting on the hands also seems uneven, creating some shadows that could be improved for better definition.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally clear but have some softness, especially around the edges of the hands.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and well-saturated, particularly the green hues in the background, which add depth to the image.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is balanced, with the hands positioned centrally and the forest background providing a good contrast.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the hands and the glowing symbol, which adds a magical element to the scene.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, as the details in the hands and the background are quite sharp.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a good balance of color and composition, but the slight blurriness in the hands could be improved. Since the hands are the main focus, enhancing their sharpness would significantly improve the overall quality. Therefore, I recommend regenerating the image with a sharper focus on the hands.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1eec3eb36e76.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753708881.291658 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/85e1bf5db755.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/85e1bf5db755.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "85e1bf5db755", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "2girls, long dark hair, braided crown, lace underwear, sitting on bed, legs intertwined, mutual masturbation, fingers inside, moaning, wet lips, closeup, cinematic lighting, dramatic shadows, high detail, ultra-HD, 8k, textured fabrics, soft focus, depth of field, (blurred background), (warm lighting), masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, dynamic composition, intimate atmosphere, sensual expressions, realistic skin textures, natural lighting, golden hour tones, rich colors, nsfw, s1_dram, (dramatic lighting), (soft focus), (textured surfaces), (high contrast), (detailed anatomy), (realistic skin), (artistic lighting), (cinematic composition)", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, bad anatomy, distorted features, text, watermark, censored, blurry, low resolution, unnatural colors, flat shading, cartoonish, unrealistic proportions, over-saturated, grainy, artifacts, low detail, poor lighting, unattractive, distorted perspective, extra limbs, missing body parts, 3D render, low contrast, muted colors, lack of depth, poor composition, low aesthetic, low quality, bad hands, low resolution", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 2966, + "sample_sources": [ + "2girls, blonde hair, bob cut, large natural breasts, apron, standing against kitchen counter, legs a...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, newest, 1girl, solo, 28 year old girl, c...", + "mcht2,j0t44b, masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, highres, very awa, sketch,..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 2048, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image appears to be focused on the lower body, so it's difficult to assess the facial quality directly. However, the absence of a face means we cannot evaluate facial details such as symmetry, proportion, or natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image appears to be focused on the lower body, so it's difficult to assess the facial quality directly. However, the absence of a face means we cannot evaluate facial details such as symmetry, proportion, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with a warm color palette that enhances the skin tones.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is effective, focusing on the curves and details of the lower body, which is appropriate for the subject matter.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the skin texture and shading.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image is focused on the lower body and lacks a face, the overall quality is still quite good. However, if the intention was to include a face, the lack of facial details significantly impacts the quality. For high-end customers who might expect a complete character, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a face included.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/85e1bf5db755.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753709139.738949 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/c75c52e68a51.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/c75c52e68a51.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "c75c52e68a51", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, 8k, 1girl, ethereal, glowing aura, mystical forest, magical cloak, silver hair, glowing eyes, holding a glowing crystal, dynamic pose, cinematic lighting, high contrast, surreal atmosphere, detailed background, forest elements, glowing particles, ethereal light, soft focus, depth of field, dramatic shadows, vibrant colors, rich details, nature-inspired palette, dynamic composition, ((wide shot)), ((Ultra HD)), ((Masterpiece)), digital art, fantasy, magical realism", + "negative_prompt": "low quality, worst quality, bad anatomy, sketch, jpeg artifacts, watermark, censorship, distorted face, extra limbs, deformed, bad proportions, out of focus, cloned face, mutated hands, disfigured, extra eyes, glitched eyes, cross-eye, rough sketch, discolored, lazyneg, lazyhand", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 10315, + "sample_sources": [ + "lazypos, best quality, refined detailed, high quality, highres, cinematic lighting, absurdres, 8k, d...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, newest, 1girl, solo, 28 year old girl, c...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, scenery, 1girl, hatsu..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and motion blur, making it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a clear view of the face prevents a thorough evaluation.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and motion blur, making it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a clear view of the face prevents a thorough evaluation.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally smooth and well-defined, especially around the character's body and clothing.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is strong, creating a striking visual effect.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic and engaging, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background adding depth.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, particularly in the character's hair and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n\nGiven that the primary focus should be on the character's face, which is not visible in this image, a regeneration is recommended to ensure the face is properly rendered and evaluated.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/c75c52e68a51.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753709225.2780154 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/372f2310d690.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/372f2310d690.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "372f2310d690", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, high resolution, absurdres, dramatic lighting, soft shadows, golden hour, 2girls, close-up, dynamic angle, interacting, playful embrace, flower garden, vibrant flowers, sunset background, one girl in a flowing red dress, another in a white blouse and skirt, entwined hands, leaning towards each other, smiling, natural lighting, depth of field, cinematic composition, detailed eyes, realistic skin, intricate hair, dynamic pose, soft focus background, artistic style, 8k, high detail, best quality, detailed, realistic, vibrant colors, natural lighting, cinematic, artistic, masterwork", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, extra limbs, poor lighting, text, watermark, signature, censored, blurred, distorted, uneven shadows, cropped faces, overexposed, underexposed, low contrast, bad proportions, extra digits, fused fingers, unnatural poses, monochrome, flat colors, low detail, artifacts, error, watermark, logo, artist name, patreon username", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 8586, + "sample_sources": [ + "8K, depth of field, dynamic angle, sexy pose, best quality, detailed eyes, perfect eyes, realistic e...", + "aysmm, brown hair, brown eyes, medium hair, earrings, jewlery, black choker, large breasts, 1girl, b...", + "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, high resolution, absurdres, realistic shading, amazing qu..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show the characters' faces, so we cannot evaluate facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features is a significant drawback for character-focused analysis.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show the characters' faces, so we cannot evaluate facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features is a significant drawback for character-focused analysis.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with a balanced focus on the characters' lower bodies and a beautiful background.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich textures in the clothing and flowers, as well as a detailed background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of facial details, which are crucial for character quality assessment, the image would benefit from regeneration to include the faces of the characters. This would allow for a more comprehensive evaluation of the image's quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/372f2310d690.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753709333.8633924 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/04cf5061cdbf.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/04cf5061cdbf.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "04cf5061cdbf", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, 1 knight, elaborate armor, dragon motifs, glowing runes, enchanted forest, dramatic lighting, dynamic pose, sword in hand, heroic stance, detailed textures, magical aura, intricate patterns, glowing eyes, high detail, absurdres, newest, very aesthetic, fantasy setting, vibrant colors, intricate details, glowing embers, mystical atmosphere, dramatic shadows, intricate armor design, glowing symbols, enchanted forest background, dynamic movement, mystical creatures, glowing light effects, vivid colors, detailed textures, magical energy, high resolution, ultra detailed, absurdres, newest, very aesthetic", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad quality, poor details, blurry, disfigured limbs, bad anatomy, poorly drawn, low quality, watermark, signature, censored, sketch, comic, old, deformed, unrealistic proportions, low resolution, bad lighting, over-saturated colors, incorrect perspective, distorted features, low detail, blurry edges, artifacts, noise, low contrast, washed out colors", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 255, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 8K, dramatic lighting, m...", + "1girl, nami, one piece, white fur, cat ears, cat pose, one eye closed, tongue, big breasts, thick th...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,hatsune miku, brazilian miku, 1girl, animal print, aqua eye..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 2048, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the helmet and armor covering it completely. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the helmet and armor covering it completely. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual impact.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the composition effectively conveying movement and action.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the armor and weapon, as well as the dynamic background elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of visible facial features, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall quality of the image is strong, and the technical aspects are excellent. The absence of the face prevents a full assessment, which is why a regeneration is recommended.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/04cf5061cdbf.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753709459.792937 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9f72b168b3f8.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/9f72b168b3f8.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "9f72b168b3f8", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "Fantasy characters: 1 unicorn (silver mane, glowing horn), 1 dragon (crimson scales, wings), 1 fairy (translucent wings, glowing aura), interacting in a magical forest. Dynamic pose, mid-action, glowing elements, vibrant colors, detailed textures, high resolution, cinematic lighting, depth of field, (soft focus background), (dramatic lighting), masterpiece, ultra-HD, 8k, rich colors, intricate details, nsfw, (magical aura), (enchanted forest setting), ((size difference)), ((volumetric lighting)), ((dynamic composition)), ((stunning appearance))", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, blurry, distorted, extra limbs, bad anatomy, watermarked, text, signature, lowres, 5 fingers, 3D, cartoonish, over-saturated, grainy, unsharp, poor lighting, missing details, unnatural colors, flat, lack of depth, simple background, plain colors, ((simple background)), ((white background)), ((deformed)), ((extra legs)), ((extra arms)), ((extra tails)), ((thick black lines)), ((clothes)), ((extra big eyes))", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 10039, + "sample_sources": [ + "Sweetie Belle_(Mlp), duo, sex, vaginal penetration, female,Grayish mulberry Hair with pale, slender ...", + "1girl, 1boy, female focus, cute face, short blonde hair, heavy freckles, kawai girl, lick testicles,...", + "lust_(fma), woman, dark eyes, red lips, dark purple, long hair, large breasts, (lace dark bra), blac..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and dynamic.\n- The level of detail richness is good, especially in the wings and the character's outfit.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and vibrant colors. However, the absence of facial features (eyes, nose, mouth) makes it difficult to assess the face quality comprehensively. If the character's face were included, the face quality would be even better.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face quality cannot be fully assessed due to the lack of facial features, I would suggest regenerating the image with a more detailed face to ensure the highest quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9f72b168b3f8.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753709979.1607103 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/791aba7167ea.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/791aba7167ea.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "791aba7167ea", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-HD, cyberpunk cityscape, neon lights, 1girl, cybernetic enhancements, glowing circuit patterns, low angle shot, dramatic lighting, depth of field, blurred background, neon reflections, high contrast, intricate details, surrealism, stippling, cinematic lighting, futuristic skyscrapers, rain effects, dynamic angle, glowing eyes, urban atmosphere, vibrant colors, photorealistic, high detail, 8k, light particles, nsfw, cinematic, s1_cyberpunk", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, text, watermark, bad anatomy, deformed hands, blurry, disproportionate, simplistic background, plain eyes, excessive details, over-saturated colors, low contrast, cartoonish, grainy, artifacts, noise, incorrect lighting, unrealistic proportions, bad composition, low resolution, poor texture, missing details, unbalanced colors, harsh shadows, flat lighting, unattractive, unappealing, low detail, low sharpness", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 10561, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl, girl lying, on back,on bed,1boy, boy kneeling, erection,male masturbation, cumshot,projectile...", + "(masterpiece), best quality, amazing quality, flat color, no lineart, cowboy shot, from side, flat p...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, 1girl, (fischl \\(genshin impact\\):1.1), completel..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible as it is obscured by the character's body.\n- The lack of facial features makes it impossible to assess the symmetry, detail, proportion, and natural contour.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the futuristic theme.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with the character positioned dynamically against the urban backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the character's suit and the background elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it is challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, the overall image quality is high, and the technical aspects are sound. If the goal is to focus on the character's appearance, regenerating the image with a visible face would be beneficial.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/791aba7167ea.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753710010.6629114 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f16810634939.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/f16810634939.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "f16810634939", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "A close-up view of a man's crotch, with his legs spread wide apart. He is wearing a black shirt that is lifted up, revealing his wet groin. His groin is glistening with fluids, and there is a puddle of liquid on the ground below him. The image is taken from a low angle, with his thighs and groin taking up most of the frame. The background is blurry, with a tiled floor and some furniture visible. The man's face is not visible, and the focus is entirely on his crotch. masterwork, masterpiece, best quality, detailed, depth of field, high detail, very aesthetic, 8k, dynamic pose, dynamic angle, adult, aged up", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad quality, low quality, bad anatomy, bad perspective, bad proportions, (bad hands, extra fingers, extra digits), jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, text, logo, artist name, censor, blurry, outdated, poorly drawn, 3d, extra legs, extra arms, extra navel, extra breasts, extra hands", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 3595, + "sample_sources": [ + "A close-up view of a woman's crotch, with her legs spread wide apart. She is wearing a blue shirt th...", + "masterpiece, absurdres,amazing quality, best quality, detailed background, 1girl, purple hair, steal...", + "masterpiece, newest, absurdres, incredibly absurdres, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic,..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours.\n- The image appears to be focused on the lower body, which means there are no facial features to evaluate.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack fine detail, especially in the areas that should have more definition.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted, and the contrast is low, making the image less vibrant.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition seems to focus on the lower body, which is unusual for a character portrait. The proportions of the lower body parts look somewhat exaggerated.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a lack of fine detail, particularly in the skin texture and clothing folds.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No obvious artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no apparent generation errors.\n- The resolution appears adequate for the content shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image does not contain any facial features, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, based on the other aspects, the image could benefit from more detail and better color vibrancy. It might be useful to regenerate the image with a focus on the upper body or face if that is the intended subject matter.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f16810634939.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753710193.913055 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1ee1f7f74cc3.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/1ee1f7f74cc3.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "1ee1f7f74cc3", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, 8k, fantasy, 1girl, ethereal, glowing aura, flowing robes, celestial patterns, floating in mid-air, surrounded by stars, dynamic pose, cosmic background, intricate details, glowing particles, dramatic lighting, high contrast, vibrant colors, intricate designs, detailed textures, cinematic composition, depth of field, artistic style of digital painting, vibrant colors, celestial elements, masterwork, very aesthetic", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, bad hands, jpeg artifacts, watermark, text, logo, signature, extra digits, censored, blurry, old, outdated, grainy, poor lighting, unrealistic shadows, low detail, poorly drawn, nsfw, inappropriate content, artist name, patreon, loli", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 9334, + "sample_sources": [ + "anime, masterpiece, best quality, 8k, 1girl, hatsune miku , 1boy, lifted by penis, suspended on peni...", + "1girl, sci-fi aesthetic, cyberpunk, samurai, huge ponytail, black and white kimono, DS-Illu, off sho...", + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 8K, depth of field, focu..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the glowing effect, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a visible face prevents a thorough evaluation.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the glowing effect, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a visible face prevents a thorough evaluation.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the composition drawing the viewer's eye upwards towards the glowing effect.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the background and the glowing effect adding depth to the scene.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the absence of a visible face, the image cannot be fully evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall composition and technical aspects are strong, warranting a high score despite the missing face assessment.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1ee1f7f74cc3.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753711345.8086777 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/fa545a1f0cf9.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/fa545a1f0cf9.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "fa545a1f0cf9", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra hd, 8k, high detail, vibrant colors, fantasy style, 1girl, nude, small breasts, petite, glowing skin, soft light, dramatic lighting, dynamic pose, spread legs, from behind, butt, anal insertion, lube, clenched teeth, ((huge anal beads)), anal beads pull, anus grip, innie pussy, pussy juice, motion blur, lot of cum, cum bridges, artist: [name], style: [specific style], glowing eyes, flowing hair, intricate patterns, magical aura, serene expression, detailed textures, high contrast, retro aesthetic, 1man, faceless bald man, shiny skin, dropping 1 pantie, man arms on ground, ahegao, dynamic pose, dramatic angle, breath, lotion bottle, girl looking back, huge balls, upside down face, 1 white pantie around leg, pussy:0.5, dropped clothes, lot of cum, cum bridges", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, (bad), text, error, fewer, extra, missing, worst quality, normal quality, jpeg artifacts, low quality, watermark, unfinished, displeasing, oldest, early, chromatic aberration, signature, extra digits, artistic error, username, scan, abstract, censored, mosaic censoring, logo, artist name, company name, name, bad anatomy, cartoon, 3d (artwork), 3d, on knees, fire, bad composition, bad perspective, bad proportions, bad link, bad source, bad link, bad link", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 10656, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, newest, highres, absurdres, 1girl, small breasts, petite, Holo /spice and...", + "usnr, masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, ultra hd, very aesthetic, 8k, high detail, score 9...", + "halftone, realistic, high contrast, retro aesthetic, 748cmstyle, artist:moriimee, in the style of ck..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not fully visible, which makes it difficult to assess facial details.\n- The eyes appear somewhat symmetrical but lack fine detail.\n- The nose and mouth proportions seem slightly off, particularly the mouth area.\n- There are some blurry areas around the hair and facial features, which detract from the overall clarity.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are decent but could be improved.\n- Color saturation is good, but there is a slight lack of contrast in certain areas.\n- Composition seems off due to the partial view of the character and the focus on the lower body.\n- Detail richness is moderate, but the lack of facial detail affects the overall richness.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nThe image has potential but suffers from a lack of facial detail and proportion accuracy. A full face view would allow for a more thorough assessment of the character's features. Additionally, refining the composition and ensuring better line clarity and contrast would enhance the overall quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/fa545a1f0cf9.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753711476.0124545 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e790e4cd5137.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/e790e4cd5137.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "e790e4cd5137", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, (group of 3 characters: 1woman, 1man, 1woman), intimate interaction, 1woman on top, 1man below, 1woman watching, sensual, detailed skin, close-up, dynamic composition, glowing lights, soft focus, dramatic lighting, realistic, high detail, vibrant, dynamic, (multiple perspectives), (characters in various poses), (explicit interaction), (multiple body parts exposed), (detailed facial expressions), (intense atmosphere), (complex relationships), (dramatic lighting), (realistic textures), (detailed clothing), (multiple layers of interaction), (intimate moments), (emotional connection), (explicit content), (detailed anatomy), (highly detailed environment), (complex interactions), (detailed body language), (dynamic movement), (intense gaze), (explicit sexual acts), (multiple characters involved), (detailed environment), (realistic lighting), (highly detailed textures), (intense atmosphere), (explicit content), (detailed interactions)", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, displeasing, text, watermark, bad anatomy, text, artist name, signature, hearts, deformed hands, missing finger, shiny skin, child, children", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 1722, + "sample_sources": [ + "office woman, solo focus, shirt opened to reveal naked medium breasts, erect nipples, skirt hitched ...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, d \\(killer wife\\) \\(nikke\\), d \\(nikke\\), 1boy, 1girl, ass...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism (1.5), high detail, depth o..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours.\n- The image appears to be focused on the lower part of the body, which does not provide enough information to evaluate the face quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image should be regenerated with a focus on including the face to allow for a proper assessment of the character's facial features and overall quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e790e4cd5137.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753711580.9579809 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/342c8fb3d05d.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/342c8fb3d05d.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "342c8fb3d05d", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, cinematic, absurdres, ultra-detailed, 8K, 2 characters, medieval fantasy, knight in silver armor, longsword, battle stance, sorceress in blue robes, magical staff, glowing runes, dynamic composition, intense eye contact, mid-battle, sparks flying, dramatic lighting, shadowy background, high contrast, dramatic clouds, epic scale, (knight with scarred face), (sorceress with glowing eyes), (detailed armor textures), (magic effects), (dynamic action pose), (emotional tension), (mid-air clash), (dramatic lighting), (cinematic angle), (high detail), (realistic lighting), (photorealistic), (source_real), (8k resolution), (sharp focus), (dramatic atmosphere), (epic battle scene)", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, lowres, cartoon, anime, unrealistic, blurry, low detail, poor composition, distorted anatomy, extra limbs, floating objects, inconsistent lighting, over-saturated colors, grainy, artifacts, low contrast, flat colors, unrealistic proportions, 2koma, 4koma, comic style, signature, text, watermark", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 3927, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, (((masterpiece,amazing quality,best quality,ul...", + "masterpiece, by piaki, best quality, very detailed, 1 girl, dawn \\(pokemon\\), beenie, pink skirt, st...", + "cinematic, McFarlane style, dark medieval fantasy, incredibly absurdres, highres, masterpiece, newes..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is mostly obscured by the hood, making it difficult to assess facial details.\n- The eyes are visible but lack depth and detail, appearing somewhat flat.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth are not clearly defined due to the hood and the angle of the face.\n- The facial contour is somewhat natural but lacks the sharpness and definition that would be expected in a high-quality illustration.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and good contrast between characters and the background.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the dramatic effect.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with both characters positioned effectively against the dynamic sky backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with detailed armor and weapons, as well as a richly textured background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a good overall quality with strong composition and vibrant colors. However, the lack of clear facial details and the obscured face make it challenging to fully appreciate the character design. For high-end customers, it might be beneficial to regenerate the image with more emphasis on facial details and a clearer view of the character's face to ensure a more engaging and polished final product.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/342c8fb3d05d.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753711631.9375665 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2e8a5e7eb83c.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/2e8a5e7eb83c.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "2e8a5e7eb83c", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, ethereal glow, bioluminescent forest, mystical creature, glowing eyes, translucent wings, soft lighting, atmospheric perspective, digital painting, intricate details, magical aura, flowing robes, glowing runes, enchanted forest, glowing mushrooms, starry sky, dynamic composition, fantasy art, high detail, cinematic lighting, vibrant colors, depth of field, (multiple angles), (dreamy atmosphere), (soft focus background), (glowing particles), (magical effects), (detailed textures), (ethereal lighting)", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, lowres, blurry, text, watermark, bad anatomy, extra limbs, distorted features, low detail, poor lighting, unrealistic colors, over-saturated, under-saturated, grainy, noise, artifacts, low contrast, high contrast, bad composition, unbalanced elements, incorrect perspective, missing elements, extra elements, distorted perspective", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 5796, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism (1.5), high detail, depth o...", + "masterpiece, best quality, newest, absurdres, highres, 1girl, purple hair, purple eyes, hair ornamen...", + "masterpiece, high_quality, highres, flat_colors, gradient, woman, hair_bun, braided, twin_tails, flu..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the wings, dress, and mushrooms.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the lack of facial features (eyes, nose, mouth) makes it difficult to assess the face quality fully. If the character's face were more detailed, the score could be even higher.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face quality is not fully evaluated due to the absence of facial features, I would suggest regenerating the image with a more detailed face to ensure the highest possible quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2e8a5e7eb83c.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753711711.1658688 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/79d461b22644.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/79d461b22644.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "79d461b22644", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, 8k, cinematic lighting, multiple characters, enchanted forest, sorceress with glowing runes, elves chanting, wizard casting spell, magical energy, volumetric fog, dynamic composition, spellbook open, glowing eyes, flowing robes, enchanted artifacts, intricate details, depth of field, dramatic shadows, vibrant colors, mystical atmosphere, interactive spellcasting, close-up of hands weaving magic, background with ancient trees, aurora borealis, hyper-realistic, digital painting style, intricate textures, magical creatures in the distance", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, bad quality, worst quality, sketch, watermark, text, glitch, deformed, mutated, disfigured, unnatural proportions, distorted faces, inconsistent shading, blurry, over-saturated, under-saturated, bad anatomy, extra limbs, missing fingers, cropped, simple background, flat colors, grainy, artifacts, low contrast, high contrast, bad lighting, dark circles, red eyes, cartoonish, unrealistic proportions, bad perspective", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 5088, + "sample_sources": [ + "anime, masterpiece, best quality, 8k, 1girl, hatsune miku , 1boy, lifted by penis, suspended on peni...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, DISNEY_ANIMATION, incoth, incase, female...", + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 8K, depth of field, focu..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face lacks clear facial details, making it difficult to discern features like the eyes, nose, and mouth. The eyes appear symmetrical but lack detail, and the proportions seem off due to the lack of visible facial features. The facial contour is not natural as the face appears flat without depth.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face lacks clear facial details, making it difficult to discern features like the eyes, nose, and mouth. The eyes appear symmetrical but lack detail, and the proportions seem off due to the lack of visible facial features. The facial contour is not natural as the face appears flat without depth.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical elements.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with the character centered and the forest background providing a good balance.\n- Level of detail richness: Rich, with detailed magical symbols and a well-rendered book.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation: While the image has good overall quality, the lack of facial details significantly impacts the character's presence. Regeneration could improve the facial features to make the character more engaging and detailed. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/79d461b22644.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753711797.8919163 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e70a91d3214b.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/e70a91d3214b.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "e70a91d3214b", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, absurdres, highly detailed, 2girls, close-up, passionate embrace, mutual masturbation, exposed breasts, perky nipples, wet pussy, slick, trembling, moaning, lips locked, tongue intertwined, glowing eyes, intimate setting, velvet couch, dim lighting, soft shadows, romantic atmosphere, sensual, erotic, intricate details, creamy skin, realistic textures, smooth skin, natural lighting, depth of field, blurred background, cinematic lighting, dramatic composition", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, bad quality, worst quality, sketch, censored, watermark, blurry, plain background, bad anatomy, distorted limbs, extra limbs, text, logo, poor lighting, overexposed, underexposed, unnatural colors, cartoonish, flat, lack of detail, unflattering angles, out of frame, bad proportions, low contrast, extra eyes, extra mouths, extra hands, extra fingers, extra toes, 3d, anime style, grotesque, unrealistic proportions, blurry faces, pixelated, artifacts, noise, grainy, low resolution, distorted faces, bad hands, bad feet, bad eyes, bad teeth, bad lips, bad skin, bad hair, bad clothing, bad posture, bad perspective, bad lighting, bad shadows, bad color, bad composition, bad framing, bad focus, bad depth of field, bad blur, bad sharpness, bad clarity, bad definition, bad detail, bad texture, bad lighting, bad shadows, bad color grading, bad color balance, bad color contrast, bad color saturation, bad color vibrancy, bad color tone", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 2878, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, absurdres,amazing quality, best quality, detailed background, 1girl, purple hair, steal...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, Irisviel von Einzbern, 1girl, lus...", + "1girl, chinese girl, slim, ponytail, beautiful face, reclining, leaning back, spread legs, female ma..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 2048, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image appears to be focused on a different part of the body rather than a character's face.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present in the image.\n- The proportions and contours of the body parts depicted are somewhat natural but lack the detail and refinement typically expected in a high-quality illustration.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are somewhat smooth but not particularly sharp or defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted and lack vibrancy.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition seems to focus on anatomical details rather than a complete figure, which is unusual for a typical anime-style illustration.\n- Level of detail richness: While the details are present, they are not rich enough to be considered high-quality.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No obvious artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no generation errors that are immediately apparent.\n- The resolution appears to be adequate for the level of detail shown.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nThe image does not meet the high standards expected for a professional illustration, especially when it comes to facial quality and overall composition. A regeneration focusing on a complete character with proper facial features would be necessary to achieve a higher score.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e70a91d3214b.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753711812.148034 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5d601a9b10ae.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/5d601a9b10ae.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "5d601a9b10ae", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, 8k, cyberpunk, neon, vibrant colors, dutch angle, wide shot, dynamic angle, futuristic city, rain-soaked streets, glowing neon signs, holographic advertisements, volumetric light, depth of field, cinematic lighting, rain effects, reflections, detailed architecture, lone figure in raincoat, glowing eyes, cybernetic implant, looking at viewer, dynamic pose, high detail, intricate patterns, glowing circuitry, dark atmosphere, city lights, motion blur, lens flare, bokeh, high contrast, intricate textures", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, scan artifacts, scanlines, adversarial noise, lossy-lossless, censorship, watermark, extra limbs, bad hands, bad fingers, puffy sleeves, puffy shoulders, old, early, bad lighting, dull colors, lack of detail, poor composition, unflattering angles, flat shading, unrealistic proportions, text, copyright name, artist name, signature", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 9512, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 8K, depth of field, focu...", + "(score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up), white theme, masterwork, masterpiece, best quality, dynamic pose,...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,newest,absurdres,highres, newest,very awa, scenery, anime,f..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by a hood, making it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The lack of a visible face prevents a thorough evaluation of these aspects.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by a hood, making it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The lack of a visible face prevents a thorough evaluation of these aspects.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the futuristic cityscape.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with a strong sense of depth and perspective leading the viewer's eye into the city.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the buildings, neon signs, and reflections in the wet streets.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe main issue is the absence of a visible face, which prevents a comprehensive assessment of the character's facial features. However, the overall image quality is strong, and the technical aspects are well-executed. A regeneration would be beneficial to include a fully visible character face for a more complete evaluation.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5d601a9b10ae.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753712035.7224152 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/c63b13a7c3f9.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/c63b13a7c3f9.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "c63b13a7c3f9", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "2girls, masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, intimate garden scene, soft lighting, flowing dresses, floral patterns, lace gloves, holding hands, loving gaze, blooming roses, fountain, gentle breeze, detailed textures, rich colors, high resolution, ultra high quality, In the style of Studio Ghibli, fantasy, tender atmosphere, soft shadows, natural lighting, close-up, emotional connection, subtle smiles, floral backdrop, intricate details, warm tones, dynamic composition, eye contact, romantic interaction, delicate fabrics, petal drift, golden hour, cinematic lighting, emotional depth, layered composition, masterful artistry", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, sketch, bad anatomy, blurry, watermark, censored, extra limbs, distorted, lowres, bad hands, normal quality, bad proportions, ugly, text, artifacts, monochrome, face bad, multiple views, signature, 3D, poor lighting, overexposed, underexposed, unnatural colors, flat, lack of detail, low contrast, grainy, noise, artifacts, incorrect perspective, stretched, compressed, unrealistic proportions, incorrect anatomy, unflattering angles, low resolution, pixelation, low detail, blurry faces, poor composition, unnatural lighting, over-saturated colors, under-saturated colors, incorrect color balance, lack of depth, flat textures, low fidelity, low quality, bad quality", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 2017, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl,masterpiece,black hair,single hair bun,pearl earring, pearl necklace,black shirt, lace shirt, ...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,absurdres, BREAK 1girl, baseball cap, black hat, blue sky, ...", + "lust_(fma), woman, dark eyes, red lips, dark purple, long hair, large breasts, (lace dark bra), blac..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show the faces of the characters, so it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the facial features. However, the absence of facial details does not affect the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show the faces of the characters, so it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the facial features. However, the absence of facial details does not affect the overall quality assessment.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High. The lines are smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent. The colors are vibrant and the contrast is well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions: Good. The composition is balanced, and the proportions of the dresses and the background elements are well-matched.\n- Level of detail richness: High. There is a rich level of detail in the fabrics, flowers, and water fountain.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation: Since the image lacks facial details, which are crucial for character face quality, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with the faces included to ensure that the facial features meet the high standards expected by the customer. This will allow for a more comprehensive evaluation of the face quality and overall image quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/c63b13a7c3f9.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753712445.695007 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6536909c97a8.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/6536909c97a8.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "6536909c97a8", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "Two people in a neon-lit dance club, mid-dance, wearing matching black studded leather outfits with silver accents. The woman has a tight crop top with a heart-shaped neckline, while the man wears a sleeveless vest with a diagonal zipper. Their bodies are close, with the woman's hands on his shoulders and his hands around her waist. The scene is dynamic, with glowing lights reflecting off their shiny skin. The focus is on their intertwined poses and the intricate studded details. masterwork, best quality, detailed, depth of field, high detail, very aesthetic, 8k, dynamic pose, depth of field, dynamic angle, adult, aged up", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, low quality, bad anatomy, bad hands, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, text, logo, artist name, extra digits, censored, patreon username, loli", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 6115, + "sample_sources": [ + "The image is a close-up of a woman's lower body, showcasing her thighs and buttocks. She is wearing ...", + "1girl, grabbing another's hair, 1boy, hetero, sex, nipples, breasts, sex from behind, doggystyle, th...", + "masterpiece, best quality, 2girls, fitting room, cowboy shot, (futanari), rating_explicit, realistic..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The image lacks facial details as the face is not visible.\n- There are no eyes, nose, or mouth present, which makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportion, or natural contour.\n- The absence of facial features prevents a thorough evaluation of facial quality.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that make the image visually striking.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered and balanced, focusing on the upper body and hands.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the clothing and accessories.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are apparent.\n- No obvious generation errors are detected.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks facial details, which are crucial for assessing facial quality, the overall score is slightly lower than perfect. However, the technical aspects of the image are excellent. Given the importance of facial details in character design, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a visible face to ensure comprehensive quality assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6536909c97a8.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753712766.8525298 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cabd58b5185a.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/cabd58b5185a.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "cabd58b5185a", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "BREAK, masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, 8K, HDR, absurdres, 1girl, glowing eyes, silver hair, long hair, flowing, ethereal, floating, magical, glowing orb, starry background, volumetric lighting, soft focus, dreamy atmosphere, wearing a cloak, intricate patterns, glowing runes, standing on a cliff, sunset, golden light, reflective surface, detailed face, perfect anatomy, expressive eyes, looking at viewer, delicate features, glowing fingertips, magical aura, fantasy, surreal, intricate details, BREAK, highres, realistic, cinematic, ambient occlusion, raytracing, gradient colors, soft shadows, glowing particles, elegant pose, serene expression, magical energy, intricate jewelry, detailed clothing, flowing fabric, glowing accents, enchanted forest, distant mountains, magical creatures, mystical atmosphere", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, text, watermark, bad anatomy, blurry, ugly, disfigured, extra limbs, floating limbs, multiple faces, poorly drawn, low contrast, overexposed, underexposed, artifacts, grainy, noise, bad lighting, flat colors, lack of detail, unappealing, unrealistic proportions, distorted features, cartoonish, low detail, poor resolution, signature, artist name, logo, watermark, 3D render, render, kid, loli, child, monitor, screen, earth", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 4516, + "sample_sources": [ + "BREAK, (best quality), (ultra-detailed), (masterpiece), (perfect anatomy), (masterpiece), best quali...", + "incase, masterpiece, best quality,high quality, newest, highres,8K,HDR,absurdres,1girl, depth of fie...", + "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, incoth, incase, dynamic,..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the flowing hair covering it. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the flowing hair covering it. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast between the sky and the character's silhouette.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, with the character positioned prominently against the dramatic sky and mountains.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a rich level of detail, especially in the sky and the distant landscape.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears to be high, as the details in the sky and the distant landscape are clear.\n\nGiven that the primary focus of the image is on the character's face, which is not visible due to the artistic choice of framing, the overall quality is still quite high. However, the lack of facial detail prevents a perfect score.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cabd58b5185a.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753712935.6584837 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5e8a80e3a402.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/5e8a80e3a402.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "5e8a80e3a402", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, enchanted forest, 1girl, silver hair, glowing eyes, magical aura, flowing robes, glowing runes, standing under moonlight, volumetric fog, soft focus background, dramatic shadows, intricate details, cinematic lighting, ethereal glow, looking at viewer, fantasy style, high contrast, magical elements, intricate patterns, glowing particles", + "negative_prompt": "low quality, worst quality, text, watermark, bad anatomy, extra limbs, distorted features, blurry, plain background, incorrect proportions, low resolution, artifacts, over-saturated colors, unrealistic lighting, poor composition", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 10254, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece,8k ultra-HD, high detail, depth of field, (blurred background), (dramatic lighting),mast...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,absurdres, BREAK lucy heartfilia, 1girl, armpits, bare arms...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, Irisviel von Einzbern, 1girl, lus..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 2048, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to evaluate. The lack of facial features makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to evaluate. The lack of facial features makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Moderate, with a cool color palette that fits the forest setting.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, with the character centered and the trees creating a sense of depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the forest and the glowing effects around the character.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe primary focus should be on revealing the character's face to provide a complete evaluation of the face quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5e8a80e3a402.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753713485.9740822 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/953a2c82efc7.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/953a2c82efc7.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "953a2c82efc7", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "3 characters in a dynamic, intimate scene, two women and one man, engaged in a playful, flirtatious interaction during a late-night gathering. The women are wearing revealing outfits with lace details, one in a black crop top and short shorts, the other in a see-through blouse and high-waisted skirt. The man is in a fitted shirt and jeans, his hands resting on the woman's hips as she leans against him. The setting is a dimly lit bedroom with soft lighting casting shadows, vibrant colors, and a cozy atmosphere. The woman's expression is sultry, her lips parted, while the man's gaze is intense. The scene includes subtle details like a half-open window, a plush rug, and a framed photo on the wall. Dynamic angles, realistic textures, detailed skin, and lifelike lighting. Rating: explicit, masterwork, best quality, 8k, ultra-detailed, cinematic composition, natural lighting, emotional depth, intricate fabrics, realistic hair, close-up, intimate, soft focus, depth of field, realistic eyes, expressive faces, detailed anatomy, high resolution, artistic lighting, advanced rendering, photorealistic, layered details, vivid colors, cinematic framing, dynamic movement, emotional connection, sensual atmosphere, soft shadows, textured surfaces, intricate patterns, realistic skin tones, detailed clothing, natural poses, realistic expressions, advanced shading, high contrast, detailed background, immersive environment, emotional intensity, realistic lighting, cinematic depth, artistic composition, advanced textures, detailed skin, realistic hair, natural lighting, dynamic angles, emotional depth, intricate fabrics, realistic eyes, expressive faces, detailed anatomy, high resolution, artistic lighting, advanced rendering, photorealistic, layered details, vivid colors, cinematic framing, dynamic movement, emotional connection, sensual atmosphere, soft shadows, textured surfaces, intricate patterns, realistic skin tones, detailed clothing, natural poses, realistic expressions, advanced shading, high contrast, detailed background, immersive environment, emotional intensity, realistic lighting, cinematic depth, artistic composition, advanced textures.", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, distorted proportions, extra limbs, missing fingers, deformed faces, poor lighting, unrealistic colors, text, watermark, blurry, low contrast, oversaturated, grainy, scan artifacts, cartoonish, unrealistic skin, bad eyes, bad teeth, poor composition, shallow depth of field, unrealistic perspective, unnatural shadows, low detail, blurry background, distorted perspective, unrealistic textures, low resolution, poor quality, bad lighting, excessive noise, overexposed, underexposed, unattractive, unnatural colors, low definition, poor focus, bad anatomy, distorted features, missing limbs, extra eyes, wrong proportions, unnatural expressions, unrealistic lighting, low quality, bad hands, bad feet, bad fingers, bad toes, poor texture, low detail, bad shading, wrong perspective, unrealistic depth, low contrast, over-saturated, grainy, scanlines, artifacts, low resolution, poor quality, bad lighting, poor composition, shallow depth of field, unrealistic perspective, unnatural shadows, low detail, blurry background, distorted perspective, unrealistic textures, low resolution, poor quality, bad lighting, poor composition, shallow depth of field, unrealistic perspective, unnatural shadows, low detail, blurry background, distorted perspective, unrealistic textures, low resolution, poor quality, bad lighting, poor composition, shallow depth of field, unrealistic perspective, unnatural shadows, low detail, blurry background, distorted perspective, unrealistic textures", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 6397, + "sample_sources": [ + "anime, masterpiece, best quality, detailed background, 8k, 1girl, 1boy, multiple views, vaginal, dee...", + "breasts, 1girl, nipples, blonde hair, thighhighs, freckles, hairband, large breasts, white thighhigh...", + "1girl, detailed eyes, slender, lean, fit, athletic, rating_explicit, rating_nsfw, ((sexy)), defined ..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The eyes are not symmetrical; one eye appears slightly larger than the other.\n- The facial contour is somewhat unnatural, especially around the jawline and cheek area.\n- There are some blurry areas, particularly around the hair and facial features.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are decent but could be improved.\n- Color saturation is good, but there's a slight lack of contrast in certain areas.\n- Composition and proportions are generally correct, though the close-up nature of the image makes it challenging to assess fully.\n- The level of detail richness is moderate, with some areas appearing a bit flat.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution seems adequate for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has potential but requires some refinement in facial symmetry and contouring. The eyes need to be made more symmetrical, and the facial features should be adjusted to appear more natural. Given these issues, I would recommend regeneration to improve the overall quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/953a2c82efc7.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753713571.8989222 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b9bdb92b1252.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/b9bdb92b1252.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "b9bdb92b1252", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, 2girls, 1boy, magical duel, glowing runes, sparkling energy, dynamic poses, intense expressions, forest clearing, ancient tree, glowing mushrooms, ambient light, volumetric lighting, intricate details, soft shadows, dramatic lighting, detailed textures, high contrast, cinematic composition, magical sparks, glowing swords, enchanted forest, mystical atmosphere, vibrant colors, dynamic interaction, emotional connection, (beautiful faces), (expressive eyes), (detailed clothing), (magical effects), (dynamic angles), (intricate background)", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad quality, blurry, text, watermark, ugly, distorted faces, bad anatomy, plain background, flat colors, lack of detail, excessive shadows, over-saturated colors, unnatural lighting, poor composition, low contrast, grainy, artifacts, (deformed), (censored), (inappropriate elements)", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 97, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, 1girl, lisa \\(genshin impact\\), h...", + "((1girl)), gorgeous girl , kawaii girl , cute face, masterpiece, best quality, very awa, absurdres, ...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, BREAK, 1girl, 25 years old, dark hair, short hair, long ..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible due to the long hair covering it.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The absence of facial features makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and good contrast between the character and the background.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Black and white, which is appropriate for the style but lacks color information.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, with the character centered and the forest background providing depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the character's clothing and weapons.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- No obvious generation errors are visible.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the character's face is not visible, it is impossible to provide a meaningful assessment of the face quality. However, the overall image quality is quite good, and the technical aspects are satisfactory. Given that the primary focus should be on the character's face, regeneration would be necessary to include a visible face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b9bdb92b1252.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753713653.7859771 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/8c88770b9e1e.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/8c88770b9e1e.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "8c88770b9e1e", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "2girls, long wavy hair, pale skin, large breasts, curvy figures, (intimate embrace), dimly lit room, velvet curtains, soft lighting, (close-up view), (slow motion), (soft focus), (dramatic shadows), (romantic atmosphere), (sensual touch), (lingerie details), (high detail), ultra-detailed, 8K, vivid colors, cinematic lighting, rich textures, high contrast, soft glow, sharp outlines, detailed anatomy, realistic, masterpiece, absurdres", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, sketch, error, bad anatomy, bad hands, watermark, ugly, distorted, censored, multiple views, signature, 3D, full coverage, modesty, tattoo, necklace, lowres, bad eyes, unnatural face, extra limbs, missing limbs, painting by bad-artist, man beneath character, boots, shoes, text, scan artifacts, scanlines, adversarial noise, lossy-lossless, disembodied, missing, extra, bad hands, bad fingers, puffy sleeves, puffy shoulders", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 4767, + "sample_sources": [ + "lust_(fma), woman, dark eyes, red lips, dark purple, long hair, large breasts, (lace dark bra), blac...", + "2girls, long blonde hair, short red hair, pale skin, large breasts, slim waist, expressive BREAK top...", + "safe_pos, safe_pos, safe_pos, safe_pos, masterpiece, absurdres, masterpiece, best_quality, ultra-det..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The absence of the face makes it difficult to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the upper body and arms of the characters.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the clothing and accessories.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears to be sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the visible parts of the image, the overall quality is good. The absence of the face makes it difficult to determine if the image meets the high standards expected by high-end customers. Therefore, I would recommend regenerating the image to include the faces of the characters.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/8c88770b9e1e.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753713713.817812 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0bd0f6537508.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/0bd0f6537508.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "0bd0f6537508", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "(masterpiece, newest, high quality, best quality, very aesthetic, ultra detailed, realistic), hyperrealistic, from front, (UHD quality details), 1girl, cybernetic enhancements, glowing circuitry, standing in neon-drenched alleyway, rain effects, reflective surfaces, intricate tattoos, glossy skin, volumetric lighting, cinematic focus, 8k uhd, absurdres, detailed environment, futuristic architecture, depth of field, professional illustration, dramatic shadows, neon glow, vibrant colors, dynamic pose, mid-motion, intricate patterns, metallic armor, glowing eyes, sharp focus, intricate details, ultra-realistic, best quality, masterpiece", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, oldest, bad quality, amateur art, simple background, censored, lowres, low detail, blurry, monochrome, bad anatomy, bad proportions, deformed, deformed anatomy, deformed fingers, (text, logo, watermark, artist name, caption), 3d, cgi, grainy, over-saturated, underexposed, poor lighting, unrealistic colors, low contrast, flat shading, cartoonish, unrealistic proportions, blurry background, low resolution, artifacts, noise, distortion", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 462, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl, chinese girl, slim, ponytail, beautiful face, reclining, leaning back, spread legs, female ma...", + "(masterpiece, newest, high quality, best quality, very awa, very aesthetic, ultra detailed, realisti...", + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 8K, depth of field, focu..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 2048, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not contain a character's face; therefore, it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents a comprehensive assessment of the character's features.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not contain a character's face; therefore, it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents a comprehensive assessment of the character's features.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant neon colors that create a striking cyberpunk atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with a strong focus on the character's legs and the urban environment.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the character's suit and the cityscape.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks a character's face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall image quality is high, and the technical aspects are sound. Given the absence of a face, the image may not meet the expectations of customers looking for a complete character design. Therefore, I would recommend regenerating the image to include a character's face while maintaining the current aesthetic and technical quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0bd0f6537508.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753713923.390847 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ab6efa59cf2b.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/ab6efa59cf2b.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "ab6efa59cf2b", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, 8k, cyberpunk fantasy, bioluminescent forest, glowing eyes, metallic textures, flowing robes, dynamic lighting, volumetric light, ambient glow, 1creature, ethereal, translucent wings, neon aura, mid-leap, interacting with glowing flora, detailed background, intricate patterns, futuristic cityscape in the distance, soft shadows, sharp focus, centered composition, cinematic, high detail, vibrant colors, surreal atmosphere", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, bad quality, worst quality, bad anatomy, sketch, text, watermark, censored, blurry, jpeg artifacts, poor lighting, multiple views, signature, outdated, low detail, distorted proportions, grainy, over-saturated, incorrect colors", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 9324, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 8K, depth of field, focu...", + "anime, masterpiece, best quality, detailed background, 8k, 1girl, 1boy, standing 69, upside down, fe...", + "masterpiece, best quality, anime coloring, dynamic lighting, volumetric lighting, ambient light, sof..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the large wings covering it, making it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and contour. The lack of a visible face prevents a thorough evaluation of these aspects.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the large wings covering it, making it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and contour. The lack of a visible face prevents a thorough evaluation of these aspects.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with a harmonious arrangement of elements and a good sense of depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the flora, cityscape, and character's attire.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe primary issue is the absence of the character's face, which is crucial for evaluating facial quality. Since the face cannot be assessed, the overall score is slightly reduced from a perfect 10. However, the rest of the image is of high quality, and regeneration would likely improve the face quality significantly.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ab6efa59cf2b.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753714065.527897 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0fa9614c4d0d.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/0fa9614c4d0d.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "0fa9614c4d0d", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, ultra high resolution, surreal fantasy, 1girl, ethereal glow, flowing silver cloak, glowing runes on hands, moonlit forest, twisted trees, glowing mushrooms, (from low angle), (wide shot), soft volumetric lighting, high contrast, intricate details, (detailed textures), (magical aura), (sparkling particles), (depth of field), (dreamy atmosphere), (colorful gradients), (abstract background), (artistic lighting), (fog effects), (cinematic composition)", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, sketch, watermark, bad anatomy, distorted proportions, ugly colors, plain background, blurry, oversaturated, grainy, cartoonish, 3D render, flat lighting, censored, signature, multiple views, low detail, simple composition, unappealing, distorted perspective", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 10331, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, scenery, 1girl, toga ...", + "lust_(fma), woman, dark eyes, red lips, dark purple, long hair, large breasts, (lace dark bra), blac...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, Irisviel von Einzbern, 1girl, lus..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood, which prevents any assessment of facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of a visible face makes it impossible to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood, which prevents any assessment of facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of a visible face makes it impossible to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with a balanced use of light and shadow that enhances the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background providing a strong sense of depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate patterns on the robe and glowing mushrooms adding to the visual interest.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is the character, and the face is not visible, the overall quality is still quite good. However, the lack of facial details significantly impacts the ability to assess the image comprehensively. For high-end customers who might be interested in the character's appearance, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a visible face to ensure satisfaction.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0fa9614c4d0d.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753714171.228555 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/fb49c32e6158.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/fb49c32e6158.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "fb49c32e6158", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, high detail, depth of field, (blurred background), (dramatic lighting), masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, 8k, light particles, nsfw, flat color, playful composition, vibrant colors, warm_colors, soft focus, high contrast, ((violet parr)), 2girls, close interaction, playful conversation, dynamic composition, flowy dresses, sparkling accessories, playful expressions, sunlit park, dappled light, flowers, one reaching out, the other smiling, soft shadows, volumetric light, bokeh, cinematic angle, dutch angle, dynamic angle, detailed faces, glossy lips, intricate hair, glowing aura, emotional connection, intimate moment, warm tones, gradient colors, ambient light, soft focus, (sparkling particles), (natural lighting), (realistic skin tones), (detailed eyes), (expressive gestures)", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, displeasing, text, watermark, bad anatomy, text, artist name, signature, hearts, deformed hands, missing finger, shiny skin, child, children, extra limbs, anatomically incorrect hands, lowres, blurry, bad anatomy, jpeg artifacts, bad hands, error, mutation, missing fingers, poorly drawn hands, poorly drawn face, monochrome, extra digit, fewer digits, extra fingers, mutated hands, extra legs, extra arms, bad proportions, easynegative, fused fingers, missing arms, duplicate, mutated, missing legs, too many fingers, mutilated, malformed limbs, gross proportions, cloned face, bad art, grayscale, bad quality, lowres, 3d, cartoon, censored, (censor), anatomical nonsense, outdated, ugly, disfigured", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 833, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism , high detail, depth of fie...", + "safe_pos, source_anime, high res image, masterpiece, best quality, very awa, absurdres, perfect qual...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,newest,absurdres,highres, newest,very awa, scenery,anime, (..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 2048, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 4, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 4/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image appears to be missing a face entirely, which is a significant issue for a character-focused image.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The proportions and contours that would typically define a face are not visible.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness cannot be assessed as there is no face to evaluate.\n- Color saturation and contrast are not applicable since there is no face to observe.\n- Composition and proportions cannot be evaluated due to the absence of a face.\n- Detail richness is non-existent because there is no face to assess.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no artifacts or noise present in the image.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution seems adequate for the content provided, but it is insufficient for a detailed face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nThe image does not meet the requirements for a high-quality character illustration due to the complete absence of a face. A regeneration is necessary to include a properly rendered face with clear details and proper proportions.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/fb49c32e6158.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753714271.0512912 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5fb14eedec34.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/5fb14eedec34.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "5fb14eedec34", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "1girl, summer dress, beach, sunset, golden hour, soft lighting, detailed skin, natural look, high quality, ambient occlusion, raytracing, glossy skin, shimmering waves, distant palm trees, solo, (close shot of legs:1.3), toned legs, smooth skin, slight tan, soft shadows, relaxed posture, (from below), beach towel, ocean breeze, vibrant colors, bokeh background, masterpiece, best quality, (slim waist), (slender body), (soft abs), (long legs), (detailed jewelry), (sparkling water)", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad quality, low quality, bad anatomy, bad hands, bad eyes, long body, blurry, extra limbs, distorted perspective, over-saturated colors, unnatural lighting, poor composition, grainy, artifacts, low contrast, monochrome, incorrect proportions, unrealistic skin, poor texture, low detail, bad proportions, deformed features", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 8389, + "sample_sources": [ + "Masterpiece, natural look, best quality, amazing quality, realistic skin,highly detailed skin, 18 ye...", + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very awa, newest, highres, absurdres, 1girl, solo, long hai...", + "1girl,large breasts, white thong,kicking,one leg up,anime screencap, masterpiece, best quality, hand..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face at all, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. The absence of a face makes it impossible to assess these aspects.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face at all, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. The absence of a face makes it impossible to assess these aspects.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is appropriate for the sunset scene.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is visually appealing, with the flowing fabric and sunset creating a dynamic and engaging scene.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail in the fabric and the sunset is rich and adds to the overall quality of the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors; the image appears to be a high-quality illustration.\n- Resolution: The resolution seems adequate for the level of detail present in the image.\n\nSince the image lacks a face, which is typically the primary focus in character illustrations, the overall quality is still quite good due to the other positive aspects mentioned. However, if the intention was to showcase a character's face, this image would need to be regenerated to include one.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5fb14eedec34.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753714346.2678993 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ed01802379ee.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/ed01802379ee.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "ed01802379ee", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-detailed, 3girls, fantasy, magical forest, fairy lights, dynamic interaction, emotional connection, one casting spell, another reaching out, third observing, intricate clothing, glowing runes, soft expressions, vibrant colors, enchanted background, high contrast, detailed textures, perfect anatomy, natural poses, cinematic lighting, dramatic composition, vibrant atmosphere, exquisite art, best quality, absurdres, official art, fine art, exquisite details, intricate details, elegant, mystical, engaging, lively, creative, unique, artistic, imaginative, storytelling, immersive, captivating, enchanting", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, lowres, blurry, text, watermark, bad anatomy, extra digits, bad hands, scan artifacts, jpeg artifacts, low contrast, poor composition, unnatural poses, distorted faces, unattractive, unappealing, generic, dull, lifeless, flat, unoriginal, over-saturated, under-saturated, poor lighting, lack of details, low quality, bad quality, displeasing, very displeasing, displeasing composition, displeasing colors, displeasing elements", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 111, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, high_quality, highres, in the style of Jeda,vibrant colors, CivChan, purple eyes, pink ...", + "safe_pos, artist:Yanje, Guweiz,(Han \\(jackpot\\):0.6), Juubaori Mashumaro, au \\(d elete\\), 96yottea, ...", + "BREAK, (best quality), (ultra-detailed), (masterpiece), (perfect anatomy), (masterpiece), best quali..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the character's pose, which obscures the face entirely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the character's pose, which obscures the face entirely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is visually striking, with a strong central focus on the glowing center and the character's dynamic pose.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate patterns and a richly detailed background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of visibility of the character's face, which is crucial for assessing facial quality, the image cannot be rated fully without this information. Therefore, regeneration is recommended to ensure the character's face is clearly visible and can be evaluated properly.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ed01802379ee.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753714455.4497602 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/eebee8d0c522.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/eebee8d0c522.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "eebee8d0c522", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "ultra realistic, masterpiece, high detailed skin, best quality, high res, dramatic lighting, sunset garden, two girls, 1girl, 1woman, detailed faces, long hair, floral dresses, soft focus, depth of field, intimate interaction, hand-holding, emotional connection, vibrant colors, soft pastel tones, blurred background, bokeh, dynamic composition, cinematic angle, natural lighting, subtle shadows, intricate details, realistic textures, smooth skin, elegant posture, romantic atmosphere, emotional expression, close-up, soft lighting, warm hues, detailed eyes, lashes, natural hair, flowing fabrics, gentle breeze, background with flowers, soft focus, depth of field, cinematic quality", + "negative_prompt": "score_6, score_5, score_4, embedding:negativeXL_D, worst quality, low quality, sketch, error, bad anatomy, bad hands, watermark, ugly, distorted, censored, lowres, abstract, signature, standing, plain background, flat colors, lack of detail, unrealistic proportions, unflattering pose, harsh lighting, overexposed, underexposed, grainy, motion blur, poor composition, unbalanced framing, lack of depth, unrealistic skin texture, unnatural colors, incorrect lighting, incorrect shadows, incorrect reflections, incorrect textures, incorrect materials, incorrect colors, incorrect tones, incorrect contrast, incorrect brightness, incorrect sharpness, incorrect focus, incorrect depth of field, incorrect composition, incorrect framing, incorrect perspective, incorrect proportions, incorrect anatomy, incorrect facial features, incorrect expressions", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 3861, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, 1girl, blonde hair, medium hair, ...", + "ultra realistic, masterpiece, high detailed skin, best quality, high res, very aesthetic, anime styl...", + "ultra realistic, masterpiece, high detailed skin, best quality, high res, very aesthetic, absurdres,..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image lacks facial details, making it difficult to assess the symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face. The hands and clothing details are more prominent than the faces, which are partially obscured by the arms.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image lacks facial details, making it difficult to assess the symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face. The hands and clothing details are more prominent than the faces, which are partially obscured by the arms.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with warm, vibrant colors that enhance the sunset background.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the hands and dresses, but the faces are not fully visible.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich textures in the dresses and hands.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation: While the image has good technical qualities and a pleasing composition, the lack of facial details significantly impacts the overall quality. Regenerating the image with clearer facial features would improve the score and meet higher customer expectations.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/eebee8d0c522.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753715564.888887 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/039c11b44940.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/039c11b44940.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "039c11b44940", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "A phoenix in mid-flight, surrounded by glowing celestial orbs and swirling galaxies. Its feathers radiate vibrant neon hues, with dynamic motion lines and a kaleidoscopic background. The phoenix's wings spread wide, creating a dramatic angle, while its eyes glow with intense light. The scene features intricate patterns, fractal designs, and a triadic color scheme. The image has film grain, spot colors, and a surreal atmosphere. Masterpiece, best quality, 8k, detailed, high resolution, dynamic pose, vivid colors, surreal, fantasy, absurdres, SP-Illu", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, bad hands, extra fingers, jpeg artifacts, text, signature, watermark, logo, censored, loli, child, old, oldest, blurry, out of focus, poor lighting, low detail, over-saturated, under-saturated, unrealistic colors", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 7228, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl, goddess of sin and vice, sexy, seductive, sexy pose, dynamic pose, inverted background, flat ...", + "girl, black hair, black eyes, close-up, deepthroat, freckles, gigantic penis, pale face, pink glasse...", + "A close-up view of a woman's crotch, with her legs spread wide apart. She is wearing a blue shirt th..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with a strong central focus on the character.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the wings and the background elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent detail and vibrant colors. However, the absence of facial features (eyes, nose, mouth) makes it difficult to assess the face quality comprehensively. If the face were included, the score could potentially be higher.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not present, I would suggest regenerating the image with a more complete face to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of the face quality. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/039c11b44940.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753716481.984637 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/286c82ae3341.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/286c82ae3341.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "286c82ae3341", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-HD, volumetric lighting, dynamic composition, 4 characters in a dramatic confrontation, intense expressions, detailed clothing, intricate patterns, vibrant colors, dynamic poses, realistic textures, dramatic lighting, chiaroscuro, high contrast, cinematic, cinematic framing, depth of field, focused on interaction, emotional tension, complex relationships, intricate background, detailed environment, realistic shadows, high detail, 8k resolution, artistic style, cinematic lighting, dramatic atmosphere, 2girls 1boy 1man, group interaction, layered dialogue, expressive faces, varied poses, natural lighting, soft shadows, detailed textures, realistic skin tones, high resolution, artistic composition, directional moonlight, reflective surfaces, intricate details, layered depth, subtle gradients, cinematic framing, dramatic perspective, emotional connection, dynamic movement, realistic interactions, vivid colors, detailed expressions, intricate background elements, atmospheric lighting, high-quality rendering, artistic style, cinematic storytelling", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, lowres, bad anatomy, text, watermark, blur, low quality, scan artifacts, scanlines, adversarial noise, lossy-lossless, extra limbs, missing fingers, bad hands, bad eyes, displeasing, missing, disembodied, bad lighting, unrealistic shadows, poor composition, low detail, over-saturated, under-saturated, grainy, noise, artifacts, bad perspective, distorted proportions, low contrast, flat colors, unappealing, uncreative, generic, unoriginal, text, artist name, signature, lowres, bad anatomy, extra limbs, missing fingers, bad hands, bad eyes, displeasing, missing, disembodied, bad lighting, unrealistic shadows, poor composition, low detail, over-saturated, under-saturated, grainy, noise, artifacts, bad perspective, distorted proportions, low contrast, flat colors", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 4101, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 8K, depth of field, focu...", + "(score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up), white theme, masterwork, masterpiece, best quality, dynamic pose,...", + "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-HD, volumetric lighting, masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, lowl..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not contain any facial features as it appears to be an abstract design.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The absence of facial elements makes it impossible to assess the symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are somewhat clear but lack definition due to the abstract nature of the image.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and have good contrast, which enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is visually striking with a strong central focus, but the lack of recognizable elements makes it difficult to comment on proportions.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a high level of detail in the abstract patterns, but this detail is not related to facial features.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be adequate for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks any facial features, it cannot be evaluated based on face quality. However, the abstract design is visually appealing and rich in detail. Given that the primary focus was on character face quality, the score reflects the absence of facial elements. If the intention was to create an abstract piece without faces, the current score is appropriate. If faces were intended, regeneration would be necessary.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/286c82ae3341.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753716616.904181 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6163d09d0e0d.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/6163d09d0e0d.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "6163d09d0e0d", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "1girl, ethereal, silver hair with blue streaks, wearing a flowing white gown with glowing runes, standing in a mystical forest with bioluminescent plants, holding a glowing staff, dramatic lighting, soft shadows, cinematic composition, depth of field, masterwork, best quality, ultra-HD, 8k, detailed textures, glowing particles, magical atmosphere, dynamic pose, looking towards the viewer, (dramatic lighting), (soft focus on face), (sharp details on staff), (environmental effects), (magical glow), (fantasy setting), (ethereal aura), (highly detailed), (realistic lighting), (volumetric lighting), (absurdres), (cinematic lighting), (adult), (mature female), (very aesthetic), (smooth image), (detailed face and eyes), (mesmerizing gaze), (motion lines), (action lines), (sharp focus)", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, low quality, bad anatomy, bad hands, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, text, logo, artist name, extra digits, censored, patreon username, loli, displeasing, ugly, poorly drawn, oldest, deformed limbs, bad anatomy, pixels, clone, bad fingers, extra fingers, anime face, forehead jewel, bare back, finger dismis, film grain, extra limbs, ugly teeth", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 4391, + "sample_sources": [ + "shenhe \\(genshin impact\\), 1girl, bouncy, ragged wool dress, slipping, ankle shackles, tears streami...", + "A blonde woman with blue eyes and a hair bun lies on her stomach on a bed, wearing black thigh-highs...", + "1girl, slim, short hair bob cut, pink and orange gradient hair, (lick testicles), penis, cum ooze on..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- The character's face is not fully visible due to the angle and the long hair covering most of it.\n- However, the visible parts of the face (nose and mouth area) appear proportionate and natural.\n- The eyes are not clearly defined as they are obscured by the hair.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with a strong blue tone that enhances the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background adding depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the forest and the character's attire.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a high-quality composition and rich details, but the lack of visible facial features prevents a perfect score. Since the primary focus is on the character, regenerating the image to ensure the face is more visible would be beneficial.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6163d09d0e0d.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753717297.9918697 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e1f59a6f3f55.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/e1f59a6f3f55.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "e1f59a6f3f55", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, 1boy, dark hair, glowing eyes, mystical robes, intricate runes, glowing aura, standing in enchanted forest, bioluminescent plants, soft focus background, dramatic lighting, high contrast, volumetric lighting, intricate details, depth of field, cinematic composition, magical ambiance, ethereal atmosphere, glowing mist, forest clearing, twilight, fantasy, detailed textures, realistic skin, glowing runes on arms, looking at viewer, masterpiece, best quality", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, text, watermark, bad anatomy, blurry, plain background, blank eyes, deformed features, loli, hydrokinesis, bad composition, low detail, over-saturated colors, unrealistic lighting, cartoonish, unrealistic proportions, signature, artist name, censored, nsfw, explicit", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 10065, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism (1.5), high detail, depth o...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, dark elf, 1girl, white hair, long...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, Irisviel von Einzbern, 1girl, lus..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to assess their clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to assess their clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are somewhat clear but lack sharpness, especially around the edges of the trees and plants.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are muted, with a predominantly blue and gray tone, which gives a calm but somewhat dull atmosphere. The contrast is low, making the scene appear less vibrant.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest extending symmetrically on both sides. However, the proportions of the trees and plants could be more varied to add depth and interest.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich in the background elements like the trees and plants, but the foreground lacks fine details that would make it more engaging.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present, but the lack of facial details makes it difficult to assess the overall quality comprehensively.\n\nGiven the absence of facial details, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall composition and background details are strong points, which contribute to the image's quality. The lack of facial features and the need for more detail in the foreground suggest that regeneration might improve the image significantly.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e1f59a6f3f55.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753717729.3256795 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/79b521cc0776.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/79b521cc0776.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "79b521cc0776", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, 1girl, cyberpunk cityscape, neon lights, rain, glowing pendant, asymmetrical hair, high boots, circuit patterns, in the style of Syd Mead, depth of field, futuristic tech, reflection in puddle, dramatic shadows, 8K, ultra-detailed, cinematic lighting, wide shot, urban environment, metallic textures, vibrant colors, motion blur, cyberpunk aesthetic, trench coat, wrist-mounted device, nighttime, volumetric lighting, surreal elements", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, lowres, bad anatomy, distorted features, text, watermark, artist name, blurry, grainy, low detail, disproportionate, censorship, simple background, comic style, frames, patreon, ugly, score_6, score_5, score_4", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 3125, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, newest, absurdres, highres, 1girl, whiteboard \\(medium\\), marker \\(medium...", + "1girl, annora, goth girl, solo, bangs over eyes, short hair, goth clothes, choker, high shoes, fishn...", + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 8K, depth of field, in t..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 2048, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\n- The character's face is not fully visible due to the angle and reflection, making it difficult to assess facial details.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical but lack fine detail.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct based on the visible parts.\n- The facial contour looks natural from what can be seen.\n- There are no noticeable blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, especially in the reflections and neon lights.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant, enhancing the futuristic cityscape.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the character centered and the reflections adding depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, particularly in the neon signs and wet street reflections.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality aesthetic with strong visual appeal. However, the lack of a full view of the character's face prevents a higher score. The recommendation would be to regenerate the image with a clearer view of the character's face to ensure facial quality meets the high standards expected by the customer.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/79b521cc0776.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753717793.3358765 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/df1a1e763130.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/df1a1e763130.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "df1a1e763130", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, 2girls, playful interaction, laughing, sharing a moment, soft lighting, warm tones, detailed textures, high resolution, absurdres, close-up, eye contact, touching hands, intimate pose, floral backdrop, flowing fabrics, natural lighting, dynamic composition, balanced framing, subtle shadows, vibrant colors, realistic, detailed facial expressions, emotional connection, subtle blush, soft focus background, elegant setting, luxurious atmosphere", + "negative_prompt": "low quality, worst quality, bad anatomy, bad hands, watermark, signature, logo, text, censor, jpeg artifacts, lowres, blurry, extra limbs, distorted features, unnatural poses, poor lighting, flat colors, lack of detail, over-saturated, grainy, cartoonish, 3d, unrealistic, poor composition, unbalanced framing, harsh shadows, overly dark, overly bright, text in image, copyright, artist name, watermark", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 7954, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, 2girls, fitting room, cowboy shot, (futanari), rating_explicit, realistic...", + "1girl, chinese girl, slim, ponytail, beautiful face, reclining, leaning back, spread legs, female ma...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,newest,absurdres,highres, newest,very awa, anime, dutch ang..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The lack of a visible face means we cannot determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition seems intentional, focusing on the hands and the background elements, which adds depth to the image.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the background flowers and the texture of the hands.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the content shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the visible parts of the image, the overall quality is good. The recommendation would be to regenerate the image to include a visible face for a more accurate evaluation.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/df1a1e763130.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753717977.2056954 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b4b8600d10b4.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/b4b8600d10b4.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "b4b8600d10b4", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, high detail, depth of field, (blurred background), (dramatic lighting), masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, 8k, dynamic composition, 2girls, 1boy, anime style, vibrant colors, fantasy art style, mystical aura, (interacting in a magical forest), (enchanted glowing plants), (soft sunlight filtering through trees), 1girl with flowing silver hair and glowing eyes, wearing a mystical blue robe with celestial patterns, 1girl with fiery red hair and a crown of thorns, wearing a crimson battle armor, 1boy with a staff emitting green energy, standing between them, (dynamic pose), (emotional connection), (collaborative action), detailed facial expressions, intricate clothing textures, glowing magical effects, soft lighting from above, (detailed background design), (layered atmosphere), (soft gradients), (rich color palette), (painterly style), (digital art), (sharp focus on characters), (dramatic shadows), (perspective angled for depth), (composition focused on interaction), (detailed accessories), (intricate jewelry), (sparkling particles), (light trails), (mystical ambiance), (ethereal atmosphere)", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, displeasing, text, watermark, bad anatomy, text, artist name, signature, hearts, deformed hands, missing finger, shiny skin, child, children, bad proportions, extra limbs, mutated limbs, cloned face, skinny, glitchy, double torso, extra arms, extra hand, lazyneg, lazyhand, easynegative, score_4, score_3_up, score_2_up, boring, flat, lazyneg, unrealistic lighting, over-saturated colors, low contrast, blurry, out of focus, distorted perspective, poor composition, lack of detail, unnatural poses, inconsistent shading, text in image, low resolution, artifacts, noise, grainy, cartoonish, unrealistic proportions, poorly drawn faces, extra fingers, mutated hands, deformed, ugly, dull, flat, unappealing", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 841, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, stylized, newest, depth of field, HDR, high co...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism , high detail, depth of fie...", + "usnr, masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, ultra hd, very aesthetic, 8k, high detail, score 9..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluating the clarity and sharpness of lines, color saturation, and composition.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluating the clarity and sharpness of lines, color saturation, and composition.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image should be regenerated to include a visible face for a comprehensive analysis of the character's facial features and overall quality. Additionally, the regenerate should ensure that the character's face is well-defined, symmetrical, and proportionate to maintain the high standards expected by high-end customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b4b8600d10b4.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753718114.0138042 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/3f71ac08ff35.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/3f71ac08ff35.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "3f71ac08ff35", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "HDR, 8K, high contrast, masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, absurdres, 1girl, ethereal, celestial, silver hair, glowing eyes, starry aura, flowing robes with constellations, holding a glowing orb, standing atop a floating island, dramatic chiaroscuro, volumetric lighting, misty atmosphere, glowing flora, dark nebula background, dynamic pose, cinematic lighting, intricate jewelry, detailed facial features, soft focus background, hyper-realistic textures, magical energy, surreal, photorealistic, intricate patterns, dramatic shadows, cinematic composition, ultra-high detail, 8k resolution, depth of field, masterwork", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, low quality, bad anatomy, jpeg artifacts, text, watermark, signature, artist name, extra digits, censored, displeasing, simple background, flat shading, low detail, blurry, cartoonish, over-saturated, unrealistic colors, poor lighting, unflattering angles, distortion, artifacts, low resolution, grainy, noise, low contrast", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 6695, + "sample_sources": [ + "The image depicts a nude, blue-painted woman with curly orange hair, kneeling on one knee while hold...", + "HDR, 8K, high contrast, masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, high resolution,...", + "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-HD, volumetric lighting, masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, lowl..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and distance from which the image was taken. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and distance from which the image was taken. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Strong, with a balanced composition that draws the viewer's eye to the central floating island and the glowing orb.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the floating island, the glowing orb, and the characters' garments.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of visibility of the character's face, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall composition, color, and technical aspects are of high quality, warranting a score of 8/10. For a complete evaluation, the image should be regenerated with a clearer view of the character's face.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/3f71ac08ff35.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753719028.4437144 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/42325e41f00f.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/42325e41f00f.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "42325e41f00f", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, high detail, depth of field, (blurred background), (dramatic lighting), masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, 8k, ethereal being, translucent wings, glowing eyes, bioluminescent plants, mystical forest, glowing runes, misty atmosphere, soft lighting, volumetric lighting, ambient occlusion, dynamic angle, low angle, side view, flowing robes, glowing aura, mystical forest, glowing runes, mist swirling, dramatic sky, masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, realistic, score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, score_6_up, 1 creature, (solo), ethereal, glowing, mystical, serene, glowing runes, soft focus, glowing mist, dynamic lighting, ultra-HD, absurdres, cinematic composition, detailed environment, intricate details, magical atmosphere", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, displeasing, text, watermark, bad anatomy, deformed hands, extra fingers, anime style, film grain, sketch, censored, artist name, signature, long fingers, speech bubble, clone, ugly, poorly drawn, oldest, deformed limbs, bad anatomy, pixels, clone, bad fingers, extra limbs, ugly teeth, displeasing, unappealing, low resolution, blurry, over-saturated, under-saturated", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 506, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism (1.5), high detail, depth o...", + "shenhe \\(genshin impact\\), 1girl, bouncy, ragged wool dress, slipping, ankle shackles, tears streami...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism , high detail, depth of fie..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character lacks a face, which is the primary focus of the image. Without a face, it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. The absence of a face also affects the overall composition and detail richness.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character lacks a face, which is the primary focus of the image. Without a face, it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. The absence of a face also affects the overall composition and detail richness.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image should be regenerated with a face included to meet the high standards expected by high-end customers. This will allow for a comprehensive analysis of the character's facial features and overall image quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/42325e41f00f.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753719614.0265973 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a675002aa9e0.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/a675002aa9e0.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "a675002aa9e0", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, dynamic composition, 2 characters, knight in armor, mage with glowing staff, intense battle scene, mid-action, dramatic lighting, castle courtyard, detailed textures, realistic, high detail, ultra sharp focus, cinematic lighting, intricate background, fantasy elements, magical effects, interaction between characters, strategic positioning, emotional tension, vivid colors, 8k uhd, absurdres, volumetric lighting, professional illustration", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, lowres, blurry, jpeg artifacts, text, watermark, low detail, bad anatomy, deformed, simple background, censored, 3d, cgi, flat colors, poor lighting, unsharp, over-saturated, grainy, artifacts, low contrast", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 9612, + "sample_sources": [ + "(masterpiece, newest, high quality, best quality, very awa, very aesthetic, ultra detailed, realisti...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, girl, cute, solo, upp...", + "masterpiece, best quality, side_view_two_character, 1girl, long hair, milf, mature female, blonde ha..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 2048, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by armor.\n- The lack of facial features makes it difficult to assess the clarity and definition of facial details.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and well-defined architectural details.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with warm tones that enhance the dramatic lighting.\n- Composition and proportions: Strong, with a balanced composition that draws the eye towards the central figure and the distant castle.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate architectural details and dynamic lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible due to the character's armor, the overall quality is still quite high. However, if the goal is to showcase the character's face clearly, the image would benefit from a redesign where the face is more prominently featured or the armor is adjusted to reveal the face. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a675002aa9e0.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753719694.4729433 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f4f1e71114db.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/f4f1e71114db.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "f4f1e71114db", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "2girls, dark hair, long hair, braided hair, leather corset, stockings, garter belt, standing, facing each other, hands on hips, intense gaze, moaning, saliva, wet lips, closeup, rim light, dramatic shadows, cinematic lighting, high detail, depth of field, (blurred background), (dramatic lighting), masterpiece, ultra-HD, 8k, dynamic pose, sensual, bondage, leather accessories, intricate details, realistic textures, natural lighting, soft focus, dramatic atmosphere, best quality, very aesthetic, s1_dram", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, bad anatomy, deformed hands, missing fingers, text, watermark, artist name, signature, censored, lowres, blurry, extra digits, shiny skin, displeasing, jpeg artifacts, unflattering angles, poor lighting, over-saturated colors, unnatural colors, low contrast, grainy, noise, artifacts, poor composition, off-center, unbalanced, lack of detail, poor focus, soft focus, blur, motion blur, out of focus, low resolution, low detail, low clarity, low sharpness, low definition, low fidelity", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 8053, + "sample_sources": [ + "2girls, blonde hair, bob cut, large natural breasts, apron, standing against kitchen counter, legs a...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, bleached, 1girl,frieren, sousou no frieren,1girl, green ey...", + "1girl, ball gag, saliva, dress, viewer holding leash, collar, blonde hair, gag, leash, breasts, solo..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 2048, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not show any facial features as it is cropped above the shoulders.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present in the image.\n- The absence of facial features makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on the lower body parts, which is appropriate for the content shown.\n- Level of detail richness: The details in the clothing and skin texture are rich and well-executed.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the content shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks facial features, which are typically the primary focus in character illustrations, the overall quality score is reduced due to the absence of the main subject's face. However, the technical execution of the lower body parts is commendable.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nTo improve the image, regenerate it with a full-body view that includes the faces of the characters. This will allow for a more comprehensive assessment of the facial quality and overall image quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f4f1e71114db.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753719958.6229532 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/3dd7eb70959f.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/3dd7eb70959f.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "3dd7eb70959f", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "2girls, dancing in a neon-lit club, close-up, dynamic pose, red sequined dress, black leather jacket, high contrast, HDR, 8K, glowing lights, neon reflections, wet hair, glowing eyes, intense gaze, interlocked hands, synchronized movement, vibrant colors, motion blur, cinematic lighting, dramatic shadows, masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, ultra-detailed, soft shadows, vibrant atmosphere, 2024, studio lighting, cinematic composition, emotional connection, close interaction, glowing particles, dynamic flow, artistic lighting, ultra-realistic textures, detailed facial expressions, high resolution, artistic style: digital painting, vibrant palette, dramatic lighting, emotional intensity", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, lowres, bad anatomy, bad hands, missing fingers, extra digits, blurry eyes, poorly drawn eyes, skewed eyes, jpeg artifacts, watermark, signature, censored, logo, watermarks, title, cropped, multiple views, distorted proportions, unnatural poses, over-saturated colors, lack of detail, poor lighting, flat shading, unrealistic textures, unrealistic proportions, distorted faces, low detail, grainy, blurry, out of focus, unappealing, dull colors, bland atmosphere, overly dark, overly bright, unnatural skin tones, incorrect perspective, inconsistent lighting, poor composition", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 9928, + "sample_sources": [ + "HDR,8K,high contrast,masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,very aesthetic,high resolution,absurdr...", + "1girl, Angel, halo, feather Wings, head flower, breasts, bouncing breast, opened White Robe, see-thr...", + "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, anime coloring, ambient light, soft light, Yak..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, as it is obscured by the hands.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present in the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and clear edges.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic, but the lack of a visible face affects the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich details in the hands and background elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- No obvious generation errors are visible.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, the image cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall image quality is good, with high clarity, color saturation, and detail. The dynamic composition adds to its appeal. Given that the primary focus should be on the character's face, regeneration would be necessary to include a visible face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/3dd7eb70959f.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753720188.685077 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/439ab4e8d5fc.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/439ab4e8d5fc.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "439ab4e8d5fc", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, 2girls, mystical ritual, glowing runes, ethereal light, dynamic pose, emotional connection, intricate details, magical glow, flowing robes, celestial patterns, glowing eyes, interactive scene, hand holding, intimate moment, mystical atmosphere, enchanted forest, glowing flora, soft lighting, volumetric lighting, high contrast, chromatic aberration, detailed facial expressions, vibrant colors, intricate background, celestial elements, glowing particles, magical aura, emotional depth, soft shadows, ambient occlusion, cinematic composition, fantasy, fantasy art, highly detailed, uncensored, natural lighting, glowing hands, mystical symbols, enchanted objects, magical interaction, glowing vines, ethereal glow, mystical energy, soft focus, depth of field, intricate textures, detailed clothing, celestial motifs, glowing patterns, magical ambiance, mystical atmosphere, emotional connection, dynamic interaction, soft lighting, glowing effects, detailed background, enchanted forest, glowing flora, celestial elements, magical aura, mystical energy, soft shadows, ambient occlusion, cinematic composition, fantasy art, highly detailed, uncensored, natural lighting, glowing hands, mystical symbols, enchanted objects, magical interaction, glowing vines, ethereal glow, mystical energy", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality,worst quality,worst detail,sketch,censor,low resolution, distorted anatomy, blurry, artifacts, low contrast, over-saturated, grainy, low definition, poor lighting, incorrect proportions, unrealistic proportions, bad composition, lack of detail, low resolution, distorted features, incorrect anatomy, poor lighting, over-saturated colors, grainy texture, low definition, poor focus, incorrect perspective, unrealistic proportions, bad anatomy, low quality, bad lighting, poor detail, incorrect proportions, unrealistic features, distorted perspective, low resolution, poor composition, incorrect lighting, over-saturated, grainy, low definition", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 1880, + "sample_sources": [ + "simple background, (perspective) , (depth_of_field ), abstract, high contrast, chromatic aberration ...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, 1girl, solo, looking at viewer, simple background, long sl...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, xilonen , 1girl, :d, :q, animal ears, anus, arm strap, bla..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The characters' faces are mostly obscured by shadows, making it difficult to assess facial details. The eyes appear somewhat symmetrical but lack detail due to the shadowing. The nose and mouth proportions seem correct, but the lack of visible features makes it hard to confirm. The facial contours are somewhat natural, but the overall lack of detail in the face area affects the assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The characters' faces are mostly obscured by shadows, making it difficult to assess facial details. The eyes appear somewhat symmetrical but lack detail due to the shadowing. The nose and mouth proportions seem correct, but the lack of visible features makes it hard to confirm. The facial contours are somewhat natural, but the overall lack of detail in the face area affects the assessment.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with a balanced use of light and dark tones that enhance the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Strong, with a balanced composition that draws the viewer's eye to the central figures and the glowing figure in the background.\n- Level of detail richness: Moderate, with rich details in the forest setting and the glowing figure, but the characters themselves have limited detail.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image has a strong composition and good color balance, but the lack of visible facial details on the characters significantly impacts the overall quality. The score is slightly lower due to the inability to fully evaluate the character faces.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/439ab4e8d5fc.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753720644.5166216 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b10d34990ca6.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/b10d34990ca6.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "b10d34990ca6", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, high detail, depth of field, (dramatic lighting), 2girls, close-up interaction, emotional connection, dynamic composition, (soft focus background), (natural lighting), long flowing hair, red dress, blue outfit, hand-holding, intimate gesture, (smiling faces), (glowing eyes), (subtle blush), (soft shadows), (volumetric lighting), (artistic composition), (dramatic pose), (emotional expression), (natural skin texture), (realistic clothing folds), (detailed facial features), (soft background blur), (cinematic atmosphere), (artistic lighting), (detailed environment)", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, displeasing, text, watermark, bad anatomy, deformed features, artist name, signature, cartoonish, low resolution, blurry, distorted proportions, unnatural colors, over-saturated, under-saturated, poor lighting, flat colors, sketch, censored, explicit content, inappropriate elements", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 6427, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism (1.5), high detail, depth o...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, bursting breasts, 1girl, niijima makoto, crown braid, brow...", + "Artist : Tsuaii, Artist : Incase, flat colors, high detailed, high quality, masterpiece, 1girl, long..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image lacks facial details, making it difficult to assess the symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face. The focus seems to be on the hands rather than the faces, which is understandable given the composition.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image lacks facial details, making it difficult to assess the symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face. The focus seems to be on the hands rather than the faces, which is understandable given the composition.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast that enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is effective, focusing on the hands and creating a sense of connection between the two characters.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the hands and clothing textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation: While the image has good technical qualities and a strong composition, the lack of facial details makes it challenging to fully appreciate the character design. If the primary focus is on the interaction between the characters, perhaps the faces could be blurred or removed to emphasize the hands more prominently. However, if the goal is to showcase the character design, regenerating the image with clearer facial features would be beneficial.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b10d34990ca6.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753720651.5424438 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ba13bdfd48f5.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/ba13bdfd48f5.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "ba13bdfd48f5", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra detailed, 2girls, anime style, studio anime, ((ecchi)), ((nsfw)), dynamic interaction, soft lighting, vibrant colors, (dutch angle), (focus on faces), (dynamic pose), (mid-shot), (eye contact), (smiling), (blush), (fluffy hair), (long hair), (curly hair), (bangs), (flowing fabric), (folding arms), (playful expression), (teasing gesture), (sparkling eyes), (sparkle effect), (dramatic shadows), (soft focus background), (volumetric light), (depth of field), (artistic composition), (intricate details), (high res), (absurdres), (studio lighting), (soft ambient glow), (romantic vibe), (flirty atmosphere), (cute and seductive), (solo but interacting), (body markings), (tattoo), (clothing details), (fabric texture), (multiple perspectives), (dramatic scenery), (soft focus background), (artistic lighting), (detailed eyes), (expressive faces), (natural poses), (interactive moment), (playful dynamic), (soft focus background), (dramatic lighting), (artistic composition)", + "negative_prompt": "low quality, worst quality, bad anatomy, watermark, signature, artist name, copyright, blurry background, lowres, sketch, error, distorted, censored, bad hands, bad fingers, jpeg artifacts, over-saturated, under-saturated, unnatural colors, flat lighting, lack of depth, poor composition, unflattering angles, unrealistic proportions, generic background, lack of detail, placeholder elements, low contrast, high contrast, grainy, pixelation, artifacts, bad lighting, unappealing colors, bland atmosphere, lack of vibrancy, unoriginal composition, poor perspective, unrealistic textures, overexposed, underexposed, unnatural shadows, lack of depth of field, poor focus, distorted perspective, unrealistic proportions, unnatural expressions", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 10054, + "sample_sources": [ + "ultra realistic, masterpiece, high detailed skin, best quality, high res, very aesthetic, absurdres,...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,newest,absurdres,highres, newest,very awa, scenery, anime,f...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, xilonen , 1girl, :d, :q, animal ears, anus, arm strap, bla..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate for the subject matter.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the hair and skin textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good character design and detail. However, the content depicted is inappropriate for a professional illustration aimed at high-end customers. Therefore, while the technical quality is excellent, the content itself does not align with the intended audience.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image should be regenerated with more suitable content that aligns with the target audience's expectations for high-end illustrations.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ba13bdfd48f5.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753720987.8316329 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9b078c08ef31.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/9b078c08ef31.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "9b078c08ef31", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "1girl, ethereal, glowing eyes, bioluminescent flora, flowing silver robe, mystical forest, moonlit, dramatic lighting, cinematic, ultra-detailed, high contrast, surrealism, 8k, masterpiece, best quality, glowing aura, intricate patterns, detailed skin, soft focus background, magical mist, (wide angle), (dramatic shadows), (surreal atmosphere), (artistic lighting), (magical elements), (high resolution), (absurdres), (best quality s1_dram)", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, bad anatomy, watermarks, text, signature, distorted, blurry, unnatural colors, poor lighting, inconsistent shading, low quality, worst quality, deformed, mutated, extra limbs, missing fingers, jpeg artifacts, simple background, unappealing, displeasing, bad hands, (non-magical elements), (inconsistent details)", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 10238, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl, 1boy, female focus, cute face, short blonde hair, heavy freckles, kawai girl, lick testicles,...", + "1girl, petite,round medium breasts, bent over, from below, nipple slip, t-shirt, hand in own hair, s...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, 1girl, ((1girl, perrault \\(last origin\\), last origin)),..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 2048, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to evaluate.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to evaluate.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and sharp edges.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Moderate, with a cool color palette that enhances the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Excellent, with a balanced composition and well-proportioned architectural elements.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the columns and the tree.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe primary focus should be on the character's face, but since it is not visible, the overall quality is still quite good, especially considering the rich details and atmospheric composition. However, the lack of facial features significantly impacts the evaluation of the face quality aspect.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9b078c08ef31.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753721107.1529093 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5a1be3ad1e5a.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/5a1be3ad1e5a.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "5a1be3ad1e5a", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-detailed, 8k, cinematic lighting, fantasy scene, ethereal glow, glowing runes, intricate patterns, magical atmosphere, 1girl, ethereal beauty, translucent wings, glowing eyes, flowing hair, detailed textures, soft focus background, dramatic shadows, vibrant colors, dynamic composition, mystical forest, glowing flowers, starry sky, magical aura, delicate features, subtle blush, intricate jewelry, glowing particles, fantasy elements, high detail, ultra-realistic, best quality, vivid colors, masterful artistry, fantasy art, detailed background, depth of field, dramatic lighting, light flares, magical effects, enchanting atmosphere", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, lowres, text, watermark, bad anatomy, extra digits, missing fingers, shiny skin, child, children, rope, sex swing, blur, overexposed, underexposed, color cast, distorted perspective, chromatic aberration, artifacts, low quality, unfinished, displeasing, scan, abstract, comics, username, signature, artist name, poor lighting, incorrect shadows, poor composition, low detail, grainy, noise, poor textures, incorrect proportions, unrealistic colors, flat colors, lack of depth, unbalanced colors, poor contrast, incorrect perspective, poor lighting, poor shadows, poor composition, poor detail, poor textures", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 1647, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism , high detail, depth of fie...", + "Artist : Tsuaii, Artist : Incase, flat colors, high detailed, high quality, masterpiece, 1girl, long...", + "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic,amazing quality,ultra-detailed,8K,illustration, absurdres,..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 2048, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the long hair obscuring it. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the long hair obscuring it. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with a strong focal point on the character and wings against the night sky.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the wings and the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe main issue is the lack of visibility of the character's face, which prevents a thorough assessment of facial quality. Since the face is not discernible, the overall score is slightly reduced. A regeneration focusing on revealing the character's face would be beneficial.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5a1be3ad1e5a.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753721306.6971736 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d6c844ddd07a.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/d6c844ddd07a.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "d6c844ddd07a", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, 8k, cyberpunk cityscape, neon lights, holographic billboards, glowing neon signs, dynamic angle, low angle, reflective surfaces, rain effects, glowing eyes, cybernetic enhancements, sleek vehicles, vibrant colors, high contrast, dramatic lighting, cinematic composition, intricate details, depth of field, focused on city skyline, bustling streets, futuristic pedestrians, glowing tech interfaces, ultra-detailed textures, cinematic lighting, ultra-realistic, intricate city design, sci-fi, futuristic", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, lowres, bad anatomy, scan artifacts, scanlines, adversarial noise, lossy-lossless, text, blur, bokeh, missing elements, extra limbs, deformed limbs, poor lighting, flat colors, low contrast, simple background, unrealistic proportions, bad hands, bad eyes, low detail, displeasing, censored, censorship, furry, window, headphones, green hair, outdated design, low quality, worst aesthetic, bad quality, simple background, text, bad anatomy", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 162, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 8K, depth of field, focu...", + "(score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up), white theme, masterwork, masterpiece, best quality, dynamic pose,...", + "safe_pos, masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, ultra-detailed, detailed skin, footworship, 1girl, 2..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluation of any blurriness, distortion, or unnatural areas.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluation of any blurriness, distortion, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and have good contrast, especially the neon signs which stand out vividly against the darker background.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic, with the character standing in the middle of the street leading towards the towering buildings, creating a sense of depth and perspective. The proportions of the buildings and the street are well-balanced.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a rich level of detail, particularly in the neon signs and the reflections on the wet street.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, as the details in the neon signs and reflections are sharp.\n\nGiven that the primary focus of the image is the character's face, which is not present, the overall score is slightly reduced. However, the technical aspects of the image are strong, and the composition and color work well.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the character's face is not visible, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a visible face to properly assess the face quality. Additionally, ensuring the face is in focus and has clear details will enhance the overall quality of the image.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d6c844ddd07a.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753721450.2768567 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/7f4888b3c6ae.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/7f4888b3c6ae.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "7f4888b3c6ae", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, highres, detailed, cinematic lighting, two characters, a young woman in a flowing red robe and a tall man in a dark cloak, standing on a cliff overlooking a stormy sea, the woman pointing toward the horizon while the man gestures passionately, dynamic composition, dramatic shadows, rain-soaked rocks, blurred background, depth of field, high detail, realistic textures, emotional interaction, natural lighting, vibrant colors, atmospheric perspective, 8k, intricate details, realistic skin tones, authentic expressions, dynamic angle, emotional connection, realistic environment, realistic clothing, authentic atmosphere", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, lowres, bad anatomy, extra digits, blurry, distorted faces, poor lighting, bad hands, jpeg artifacts, watermark, signature, logo, artist name, censored, extra limbs, unnatural colors, poor composition, over-saturated, underexposed, grainy, low contrast", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 1251, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, newest, absurdres, highres, 1girl, whiteboard \\(medium\\), marker \\(medium...", + "masterpiece, high_quality, highres, sharp_focus, detailed_eyes, sundress, age_24, choker_with_gem, l...", + "A close-up view of a woman's crotch, with her legs spread wide apart. She is wearing a blue shirt th..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The faces of both characters are not fully visible due to their backs facing the viewer. The lack of facial features makes it difficult to assess the clarity and detail of the faces. However, the proportions and contours appear natural.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The faces of both characters are not fully visible due to their backs facing the viewer. The lack of facial features makes it difficult to assess the clarity and detail of the faces. However, the proportions and contours appear natural.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with a balanced color palette that enhances the mood of the scene.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, with the two figures positioned well on the cliff edge, creating a sense of depth and perspective.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a rich level of detail, especially in the rain and the clothing textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation: Since the faces are not visible, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with the characters facing forward to allow for a more thorough assessment of the face quality. This will help in providing a more accurate score and feedback.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/7f4888b3c6ae.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753721784.322441 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/dae2a8467a47.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/dae2a8467a47.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "dae2a8467a47", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "2girls, 1girl in red dress, 1girl in white blouse, intimate moment, soft focus, dramatic lighting, sunset backdrop, emotional connection, close-up interaction, ultra-detailed, 8K, absurdres, vivid colors, depth of field, cinematic lighting, high contrast, soft glow, sharp outlines, rich details, ((romantic atmosphere)), ((emotional expression)), ((dynamic composition)), ((dutch angle)), ((low angle)), ((focus on hands entwined)), ((blurred background)), ((dramatic sky)), ((soft ambient glow)), ((natural lighting)), ((realistic skin texture)), ((expressive eyes)), ((soft smile)), ((intimate pose)), ((artistic lighting)), ((masterpiece))", + "negative_prompt": "score_6, score_5, score_4, worst quality, low quality, lowres, bad anatomy, bad hands, watermark, ugly, distorted, censored, abstract, signature, text, artist name, extra limb, missing limbs, painting by bad-artist, error, sketch, unnatural face, skewed eyes, imperfect eyes, shiny skin, child, children, unrealistic proportions, blurry background, over-saturated colors, lack of detail, flat lighting, unflattering angle", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 4682, + "sample_sources": [ + "ultra realistic, masterpiece, high detailed skin, best quality, high res, very aesthetic, absurdres,...", + "2girls, long blonde hair, short red hair, pale skin, large breasts, slim waist, expressive BREAK top...", + "1girl, girl lying, on back,on bed,1boy, boy kneeling, erection,male masturbation, cumshot,projectile..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show any faces, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the lack of facial features suggests that the primary focus might be on the clothing rather than the characters themselves.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show any faces, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the lack of facial features suggests that the primary focus might be on the clothing rather than the characters themselves.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant, with a strong contrast between the red and white fabrics and the warm background.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is interesting, with the folds of fabric creating a dynamic visual effect. The proportions of the fabric seem well-balanced.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail in the fabric textures is rich and adds depth to the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors; the image appears to be a high-quality rendering.\n- Resolution: The resolution seems adequate for the level of detail present.\n\nSince the image lacks facial details, which are typically the primary focus in character-based illustrations, the overall quality is still quite good. However, if the intention was to showcase the characters' faces, this image would need to be regenerated to include them.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: If the goal is to create an anime-style image with clear facial details, regenerate the image to include the characters' faces and ensure they are well-defined, symmetrical, and proportionate.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/dae2a8467a47.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753721992.0521688 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/94e9515ff05d.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/94e9515ff05d.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "94e9515ff05d", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, 2girls, close-up, hugging, intimate, soft lighting, bedroom, lace underwear, matching crop tops, short skirts, red lips, blushing, eye contact, sensual, seductive, exposed skin, thigh-highs, delicate jewelry, finger touch, slow motion, dynamic composition, blurred background, volumetric lighting, intricate details, natural shadows, high contrast, explicit, nsfw, sensual interaction, emotional connection, romantic, close proximity, subtle gestures, soft focus, detailed textures, realistic skin tones, ambient lighting, warm tones, intimate setting, (kissing:1.3), (touching hands:1.2), (eye contact:1.5)", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, lowres, simple background, watermark, signature, loli, child, bad anatomy, missing limb, blurry, plain simple background, blank eyes, excessive details, low contrast, unrealistic skin tones, over-saturated colors, cartoonish, furry, anthro, bkub, chibi, 2koma, 4koma, censored, sketch, low quality, bad lighting", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 3671, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, 1girl, solo, long hair, breasts, looking at viewer, blush,...", + "highres, very detailed, amazing quality, masterpiece, very aesthetic, vibrant colors, particle effec...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, Irisviel von Einzbern, 1girl, lus..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The image appears to be focused on the lower body, which means there are no facial features to evaluate.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack fine detail, especially in the areas that should have more intricate textures like lace.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted, and the contrast is low, making the image appear flat.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered around the lower body, which is acceptable, but the absence of a face makes it difficult to judge overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a lack of detail in the areas that should have intricate textures, such as the lace.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are apparent in the visible parts of the image.\n- There are no obvious generation errors in the visible parts of the image.\n- The resolution seems adequate for the content shown, but the lack of facial details prevents a full assessment of the image quality.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the image. However, based on the visible lower body, the image could benefit from more detailed textures and sharper lines. The color saturation and contrast could also be improved to make the image more vibrant and dynamic.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/94e9515ff05d.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753722475.3352315 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d9a81450e6fe.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/d9a81450e6fe.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "d9a81450e6fe", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra detailed, 2girls, anime style, studio anime, ((ecchi)), ((nsfw)), ((blush)), ((sparkling eyes)), ((soft glow)), ((fluffy hair)), ((long lashes)), ((heart-shaped face)), ((petite frame)), ((pastel outfit)), ((flowing skirt)), ((matching accessories)), ((interacting hands)), ((emotional connection)), ((dramatic lighting)), ((golden hour)), ((soft shadows)), ((depth of field)), ((dynamic composition)), ((fairy tale atmosphere)), ((enchanted forest)), ((magical aura)), ((sparkling particles)), ((floating petals)), ((kawaii aesthetic)), ((vibrant colors)), ((delicate details)), ((blush pink cheeks)), ((glossy lips)), ((sparkling eyes)), ((cheerful expression)), ((interactive pose)), ((arm around shoulder)), ((soft smile)), ((enchanted glade)), ((dappled sunlight)), ((gentle breeze)), ((fairy wings)), ((sparkling fairy dust)), ((dreamy background)), ((soft focus)), ((artistic lighting)), ((dramatic scenery)), ((intricate details)), ((warm and inviting atmosphere))", + "negative_prompt": "score_6, score_5, score_4, embedding:negativeXL_D, lowres, worst quality, bad quality, sketch, text, logo, watermark, bad anatomy, extra digits, extra fingers, mutated hands, poorly drawn face, bad proportions, extra limbs, floating limbs, disconnected limbs, cloned face, disfigured, gross proportions, malformed limbs, missing arms, missing legs, extra arms, extra legs, fused fingers, too many fingers, long neck, blurry, dark lines, artifacts, signature, over-saturated, under-saturated, bad coloring, wrong colors, low contrast, high contrast, cut off, distorted face, chromatic aberration, glares, halos, motion blur, cartoonish, ugly, blurry face, bad eyes, censored, nsfw, nudity", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 1857, + "sample_sources": [ + "ultra realistic, masterpiece, high detailed skin, best quality, high res, very aesthetic, absurdres,...", + "monster_hunter_wilds_alma, mnstrhntrwldslm, monster hunter \\(series\\), monster hunter \\(character\\),...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, uncensored, ass folds, pink panties, black long black so..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image is missing the character's face, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of the face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image is missing the character's face, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of the face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, making the image visually appealing.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition seems balanced, but without the face, it's difficult to comment on the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: The details in the clothing and background are rich and well-executed.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, as the details in the clothing and background are sharp.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks the character's face, which is the primary focus, the overall quality cannot be fully assessed. For high-end customers, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with the character's face included to ensure that all aspects of the image meet the desired quality standards. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d9a81450e6fe.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753722784.984292 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e30df7fc4706.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/e30df7fc4706.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "e30df7fc4706", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, high detail, depth of field, (blurred background), (dramatic lighting), 2girls, best quality, very aesthetic, 8k, light particles, nsfw, petite, cute face, kawai girl, slim, beautiful, 23 years old, busty, translucent bikini, large soft breasts, nipples, on all fours, nice ass, anus, pussy, thicc ass, curvy, detailed background, beach, sunset, seducing, seductive, flirty, tender, loving, playful, Close up, cowboy shot, dynamic angle, depth of field, flirty expression, pinup girl pose, glow", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad quality, simple background, text, watermark, bad anatomy, artist name, signature, deformed hands, missing finger, shiny skin, child, children, furry, anthro, chibi, loli, bkub, unrealistic proportions", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 9387, + "sample_sources": [ + "highres, very detailed, amazing quality, masterpiece, very aesthetic, particle effect, (((3girls))),...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism , high detail, depth of fie...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,mavuika, 1girl, deep penetration, nipples, sex, fertilizati..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image lacks facial details as it only shows the upper torso and breasts. The absence of facial features makes it impossible to assess the symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face. The lack of facial details also prevents a proper evaluation of the eyes, nose, and mouth.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image lacks facial details as it only shows the upper torso and breasts. The absence of facial features makes it impossible to assess the symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face. The lack of facial details also prevents a proper evaluation of the eyes, nose, and mouth.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on the upper body, which is appropriate for the subject matter, but the absence of facial details limits the overall assessment.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the skin texture and the design of the bra.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, providing a clear view of the subject.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks facial details, which are crucial for assessing the overall quality, it is recommended that the image be regenerated to include the faces of the characters.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e30df7fc4706.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753722816.4370172 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5f6a860a1a06.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/5f6a860a1a06.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "5f6a860a1a06", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, score_9, score_8_up, (detailed lighting, intricate details, magical aura), 1girl, Elara, dark fantasy, 18 years old, silver hair, glowing eyes, glowing runes, mystical forest, night, bioluminescent plants, moonlight, ethereal glow, dynamic pose, casting spell, glowing hands, magical effects, mysterious expression, intricate clothing, dark fantasy art, 8k resolution, vivid colors, high detail, enchanted atmosphere, magical elements, glowing background, cinematic lighting, fantasy style, detailed textures, vibrant colors, surreal environment, solo focus, female focus, dynamic angle", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad quality, low quality, bad anatomy, old", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 1298, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very awa, newest, highres, absurdres, Tohsaka Rin \\(fate/st...", + "score_9,score_8_up, masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, (det...", + "extreme sex, 1girl, 20 years old, black hair, fit, slim, medium breasts, straight hair, blunt bangs,..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 2048, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible as it is turned away from the viewer.\n- The lack of facial features makes it difficult to assess the clarity and definition of facial details.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background providing depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the plant and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the character's face is not visible, it is challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, the overall image quality is strong, with excellent color saturation, composition, and detail. Given the lack of facial details, the image could benefit from a regeneration to include a more detailed and recognizable character face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5f6a860a1a06.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753723139.2806716 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2efb4459c0f4.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/2efb4459c0f4.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "2efb4459c0f4", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, glowing eyes, ethereal glow, celestial background, 1girl, long flowing silver hair, intricate necklaces, pale skin, glowing runes, celestial patterns, soft light, magical atmosphere, standing pose, hand on hip, glowing amulet, forest backdrop, volumetric lighting, soft shadows, vibrant colors, fantasy art, (detailed facial expressions), (sparkling particles), (glowing aura), (starry sky), (floating petals)", + "negative_prompt": "low quality, worst quality, blurry, bad anatomy, distorted, cartoon, 3d, anime, watermark, lowres, jpeg artifacts, poor lighting, extra limbs, signature, censored, unnatural colors, flat colors, monochrome, unrealistic proportions, low detail, grainy, over-saturated, underexposed", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 198, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, high_quality, highres, flat_colors, gradient, glowing colors, digital art, anime, skinn...", + "masterpiece, best quality, anime coloring, dynamic lighting, ambient light, soft light, (ultra-detai...", + "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, realistic skin, intricate details, highres, 1girl, pretty..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the main subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's attire and the intricate design of the circular structure behind her.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the lack of facial features (eyes, nose, mouth) makes it difficult to assess the face quality comprehensively. If the character's face were more detailed, the score could be even higher.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face quality is not fully evaluated due to the absence of facial features, I would suggest regenerating the image to include a detailed face for a more comprehensive assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2efb4459c0f4.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753723549.963005 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ae3772f563d0.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/ae3772f563d0.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "ae3772f563d0", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "Fantasy Style, Masterpiece, Ultra-HD, Cinematic Lighting, Photorealistic, Two Elven Characters, One in Silver Robe, the Other in Green Tunic, Mystical Forest, Glowing Mushrooms, Soft Lighting, Dramatic Shadows, Friendly Discussion, Magical Aura, Detailed Textures, Natural Background, Dynamic Composition, Ethereal Atmosphere, High Detail, 8K, Realistic, Surreal Elements, Depth of Field, Blurred Background, Elven Features, Friendly Expression, Magical Glowing Elements, Interaction Between Characters, Dynamic Pose, Natural Lighting, Mystical Forest Environment", + "negative_prompt": "Lowres, Bad Anatomy, Deformed Face, Watermark, Logo, Text, Displeasing, Poor Lighting, Blurry, Artistic Style, Inappropriate Content, Censored, Low Detail, Poor Composition, Unnatural Colors, Bad Proportions, Missing Elements, Excessive Artifacts, Poor Textures, Unnatural Lighting, Unfocused, Low Resolution, Artistic Style, Unwanted Elements, Poor Quality", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 1900, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, bursting breasts, 1girl, niijima makoto, crown braid, brow...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism (1.5), high detail, depth o...", + "Fantasy Style, Grunge, masterpiece, high_quality, highres, woman, portrait, monochromatic color, bla..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible due to the silhouette effect, making it impossible to assess facial details.\n- The lack of facial features prevents a thorough evaluation of symmetry, proportion, and natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the large mushroom and the character positioned effectively to draw the viewer's eye.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the mushroom and surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the character's face is not visible, it is challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the other aspects, the image is of high quality. If the goal is to include a detailed character face, the image would need to be regenerated with a visible face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ae3772f563d0.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753723765.5827334 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b5dbaff23782.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/b5dbaff23782.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "b5dbaff23782", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, detailed background, 8k, 1girl, mystical ritual, glowing amulet, ancient altar, candlelight, shadowy forest, flowing robes, intricate patterns, glowing hands, ethereal glow, dramatic lighting, intense focus, sacred symbols, wind swirling, full body, side view, cinematic, vibrant colors, (animated, fantasy, high detail)", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, bad quality, worst quality, bad anatomy, sketch, jpeg artifacts, ugly, poorly drawn, censor, blurry, watermark, text, text bubble, multiple views, school uniform, patreon logo, out of frame, (deformed), (bad proportions), (low detail), (blurry face), (ugly face), (mutated hands), (bad eyes)", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 8093, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, uncensored, ass folds, pink panties, black long black so...", + "anime, masterpiece, best quality, detailed background, 8k, 1girl, choke hold, 1boy,tatsumaki , ohoga...", + "extreme sex, 1girl, 20 years old, black hair, fit, slim, medium breasts, straight hair, blunt bangs,..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. Without seeing the face, it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of facial features makes it difficult to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. Without seeing the face, it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of facial features makes it difficult to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the composition filled with intricate details and elements.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich textures on the character's cloak, candles, and background elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is the character, and the face is not visible, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with the character's face exposed. This will allow for a more comprehensive assessment of the face quality and ensure that the overall image meets the high standards expected by the customer.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b5dbaff23782.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753724212.1908264 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/307d563a0cfc.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/307d563a0cfc.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "307d563a0cfc", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, 2girls, dynamic interaction, magical duel, sparkling energy, flowing robes, emotional expression, dramatic lighting, soft light, ultra-detailed, 8K, illustration, CG, 1girl, solo, head out of frame, long dark hair, sexy, tan skin, perfect body, large perky breasts, underboob, smooth skin, laying on ground, hands covering nipples, skindentation, soft breast, deformed breast, tanline, wet skin, front view, close up, centered view, view from the belly, low angle, view from below, breast focus, blurry blue sky background, high detail, sharp shading, centered composition, soft shadows, glitch art, chromatic aberration, hdr, disintegration effect, polarized, blurry, masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad quality, bad anatomy, bad hands, missing fingers, extra fingers, sketch, jpeg artifacts, text, signature, watermark, old, oldest, censored, logo, waterprints, title, distorted tubes, broken cables, revealing clothes, extra hands, easynegative, piercing, muscles, signature, text, logo, artist name, patreon username, family-friendly, distorted tubes, broken cables, revealing clothes, extra fingers, deformed hands, distorted feet, too many fingers, extra legs, bad feet, bad fingers, girl, boy", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 9217, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl, action pose, fox_mask, fox fire, mechanical eye, holding sword, school uniform, harness, thig...", + "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, anime coloring, dynamic lighting, ambient ligh...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, very aesthetic, 8K, high detail, depth of field, score_9, score_8_up, BREAK d..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 2048, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 4, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 4/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n- The image appears to be focused on the lower body, which means there are no facial features to evaluate.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are somewhat clear but lack definition due to the focus on the lower body.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted, and the contrast is low, making the image appear flat.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered on the lower body, which is unusual for a character portrait and doesn't provide a complete view of the character.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a lack of detail in the lower body area, and the image seems to be missing important elements that would make it more engaging.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no apparent artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: The image appears to be generated correctly, but the focus on the lower body without a face makes it difficult to assess the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image should be regenerated with a focus on the character's face and upper body to provide a complete and engaging portrait. This will allow for a proper assessment of facial quality and overall image quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/307d563a0cfc.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753724493.4995513 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/eb582866f3d6.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/eb582866f3d6.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "eb582866f3d6", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, uncensored, two women in a dimly lit bedroom, one wearing a sheer black lace teddy with exposed midriff, the other in a flowy white robe, intertwined in a sensual embrace, soft ambient lighting, close-up focus on their flushed faces, lips locked in a passionate kiss, hands roaming over exposed skin, delicate jewelry, intricate hair braids, velvet curtains, blurred background, dynamic angle, cinematic lighting, depth of field, high detail, 8k, artistic style of cknc, artist: moriimee, intimate interaction, emotional connection, skin tones, natural shading, soft shadows, textured fabrics, close-up composition, mutual gaze, sensual atmosphere, (2girls, solo, intimate, embrace, kiss, exposed skin, lingerie, robe, bedroom, soft lighting, dynamic pose, close-up, emotional, sensual, textured fabrics, cinematic, depth of field, high detail, 8k, artistic style of cknc, artist: moriimee)", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, bad hands, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, text, logo, artist name, extra digits, censored, patreon username, loli, monochrome, greyscale, blurred face, ugly face, mutated hands, bad eyes, unfinished, sketch, (deformed), bestiality, unrealistic proportions, poor lighting, over-saturated colors, low contrast, grainy, artifacts, distorted features, incorrect perspective", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 786, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 8K, depth of field, focu...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, uncensored, blonde braid, pastel colors, smooth skin, sh...", + "A blonde woman with long hair is kneeling on a bed, facing away from the viewer. She is wearing a bl..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 2048, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face at all, which makes it impossible to evaluate facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face at all, which makes it impossible to evaluate facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined, indicating good quality.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, contributing to a visually appealing image.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition seems balanced, but without a face, it's difficult to assess the overall balance and proportions effectively.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the textures of the clothing and skin.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n\nGiven that the primary focus of the image is on the character's face, and the absence of a face results in a significant loss of information, the image cannot be fully evaluated for its intended purpose. Therefore, regeneration is recommended to include the character's face.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/eb582866f3d6.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753725182.912359 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/bd5388506c07.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/bd5388506c07.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "bd5388506c07", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, newest, absurdres, highres, 8K, ultra-detailed, volumetric lighting, gradient color, bioluminescent patterns, glowing eyes, mystical forest, twilight atmosphere, 1creature, ethereal being, translucent wings, iridescent scales, flowing robes, intricate tattoos, glowing runes, serene expression, soft focus background, misty fog, glowing mushrooms, starry sky, dynamic lighting, magical aura, detailed textures, intricate patterns, soft shadows, depth of field, ambient occlusion, fantasy style, CG, illustration, cinematic lighting, ultra-detailed eyes, vibrant colors, glowing veins, mystical glow, mystical elements", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad quality, low quality, bad anatomy, distorted features, watermarks, artist names, blur, blurry, poor lighting, incorrect proportions, extra limbs, unrealistic colors, cartoonish style, low contrast, over-saturated colors, grainy texture, jpeg artifacts, poor details, bad hands, bad fingers, extra fingers, bad eyes, poor composition, outdated style, copyright infringement, censorship, mosaic, low resolution, poor depth of field, incorrect perspective", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 1589, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, newest, highres, absurdres, volumetric lighting,gradient co...", + "1girl , Nessa from pokemon, nude, wide hips , big butt , colorful , vibrant , paint splatter , head ...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,newest,absurdres,highres, newest,very awa, scenery, anime,f..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with excellent character design and composition. However, the lack of facial features (eyes, nose, mouth) makes it difficult to assess the face quality comprehensively. If the character's face were more detailed, the score could be even higher.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face quality is not fully evaluated due to the absence of facial features, I would suggest regenerating the image with more detailed facial features to ensure a comprehensive assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/bd5388506c07.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753726262.7767777 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f6ab003d91c1.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/f6ab003d91c1.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "f6ab003d91c1", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "Ultra-realistic, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, high detail, depth of field, (blurred background), (dramatic lighting), masterpiece, best quality, 8k, 2girls1boy, park scene, sunset, vibrant colors, naturalistic lighting, (dynamic composition), (interacting characters), (laughing girl), (reaching hand), (boy looking at them), (soft breeze), (detailed facial expressions), (soft ambient glow), (dynamic angle), (soft focus on interaction), (realistic textures), (detailed clothing), (naturalistic environment), (dramatic shadows), (soft focus on interaction), (ultra-detailed skin), (realistic hair flow), (soft lighting on faces), (detailed background elements), (atmospheric perspective), (dramatic scenery), (soft focus on interaction), (realistic lighting effects), (detailed facial expressions), (soft focus on interaction), (realistic textures), (detailed clothing), (naturalistic environment), (dramatic shadows), (soft focus on interaction), (ultra-detailed skin), (realistic hair flow), (soft lighting on faces), (detailed background elements), (atmospheric perspective), (dramatic scenery)", + "negative_prompt": "score_6, score_5, score_4, embedding:negativeXL_D, worst quality, low quality, bad anatomy, text, watermark, artist name, signature, deformed hands, missing finger, shiny skin, child, children, lowres, abstract, error, censored, blurry, out of focus, unnatural colors, distorted, over-saturated, under-exposed, over-exposed, poor lighting, bad lighting, bad composition, unbalanced, cluttered, low contrast, high contrast, grainy, noisy, pixelated, artifacts, blur, motion blur, bad perspective, warped, stretched, squashed, stretched, discolored, faded, washed out, dull, flat, lifeless, unrealistic, unattractive, unappealing, unoriginal, cliched, overdone, overused, repetitive, monotonous, boring, uninspired, bland, uninteresting, unengaging, unmemorable, unimpressive, unoriginal, uncreative", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 4843, + "sample_sources": [ + "ultra realistic, masterpiece, high detailed skin, best quality, high res, very aesthetic, anime styl...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism (1.5), high detail, depth o...", + "Smooth Quality, 1girl, solo, cat girl, classroom, >_<, holding drawing of chibi cat girl with >_< ex..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n1. The faces of the characters in the background are not detailed enough and appear somewhat blurry.\n2. The facial features of the characters in the foreground are not clearly defined, especially the eyes and mouth.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nExplanation:\nThe image has a good overall composition and color saturation, which contributes to its appeal. However, the primary focus should be on the characters' faces, as they are central to the image's narrative. The lack of detail and blurriness in the background characters' faces detract from the image's quality. Additionally, the characters in the foreground do not have well-defined facial features, which is crucial for a high-quality image. Improving the clarity and detail of the faces would significantly enhance the image's quality and meet the high standards expected by professional customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f6ab003d91c1.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753726562.6098082 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b7f7087e480f.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/b7f7087e480f.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "b7f7087e480f", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-detailed, cinematic lighting, 8k, fantasy art, 1 male, glowing runes, cloak with feathered wings, holding a crystalline staff, mid-air leap, dynamic motion, vibrant colors, ethereal glow, intricate patterns on cloak, glowing eyes, mystical atmosphere, floating symbols, dramatic shadows, high contrast, cinematic composition, dark forest backdrop, glowing mushrooms, starry sky, magical forest, intricate details, fantasy style, ultra-realistic, depth of field, focused subject, glowing aura, dramatic pose, enchanted forest, glowing vines, magical energy, vivid colors, fantasy creature elements", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, jpeg artifacts, bad composition, text, watermark, signature, extra limbs, deformed proportions, unrealistic features, blurry, grainy, low contrast, over-saturated, poor lighting, cartoonish, low detail, artifacts, low quality, distorted perspective, floating objects, multiple views, comic style, outdated art, 2koma, 4koma, furry, signature, low resolution", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 1408, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, by piaki, best quality, very detailed, 1 girl, megumin, brown hair, red eyes, small bre...", + "iro_mugen_illu, masterpiece, ultra-detailed, action style, radical motion, extreme perspective, CivC...", + "zzzemoji, chibi masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 8K, dept..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 2048, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face lacks clear details, especially around the eyes and mouth area. The eyes appear somewhat generic and lack depth, which affects the overall realism. The proportions of the nose and mouth seem slightly off, contributing to the average quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face lacks clear details, especially around the eyes and mouth area. The eyes appear somewhat generic and lack depth, which affects the overall realism. The proportions of the nose and mouth seem slightly off, contributing to the average quality assessment.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual impact.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the wings spread out symmetrically, creating a visually appealing composition.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the wings, clothing, and background elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nRecommendation: While the image has several strengths, particularly in color and composition, the lack of clear facial details and slightly off proportions could be improved. A regeneration focusing on refining the facial features and ensuring proper proportions would enhance the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b7f7087e480f.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753726683.7755725 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e2716d1c0aa2.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/e2716d1c0aa2.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "e2716d1c0aa2", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, cinematic lighting, 1man, 1woman, intimate pose, soft pastel gradient, blurred background, dramatic shadows, close-up view, wet skin, glossy lips, swollen clit, swollen labia, glistening pussy, drool, saliva, slow motion, motion blur, golden hour, warm glow, 8k, highres, detailed textures, realistic skin, natural lighting, dynamic angle, sensual atmosphere, full-body shot, soft focus, blurred hands, artistic lighting, romantic mood, emotional expression, close-up eyes, subtle blush, intimate connection, soft focus background, masterwork, depth of field, vivid colors, high detail, artistic composition", + "negative_prompt": "low quality, worst quality, blurry, deformed, bad anatomy, extra fingers, cartoon, 3d, anime, bad hands, jpeg artifacts, watermark, text, logo, artist name, censored, lowres, signature, over-saturated, unnatural colors, distorted proportions, grainy, pixelation, black and white, unrealistic lighting, unrealistic shadows, poor composition, lack of detail, flat colors, unappealing colors, low contrast, high contrast, overexposed, underexposed", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 8804, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, realistic skin, intricate details, highres, portrait,1wom...", + "A close-up view of a woman's crotch, with her legs spread wide apart. She is wearing a blue shirt th...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, artist:moriimee, 748cmstyle, Girl, 1girl, 18yo, Aerith G..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 4, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 4/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not contain a face; therefore, it cannot be evaluated for facial details.\n- The composition appears to be focused on a body part, which is not suitable for a face-focused evaluation.\n- There are no facial features present to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack fine detail.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted, and the contrast is low, making the image less vibrant.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition seems to focus on a specific anatomical area, which is not ideal for a general image quality assessment.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is limited, especially considering the absence of facial features.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are apparent.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears adequate for the content shown.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the image lacks a face and focuses on a body part, it is not suitable for a detailed face quality analysis. However, if the intention is to create a more detailed and realistic anatomical illustration, the artist should consider regenerating the image with a face included. This would allow for a proper evaluation of facial features and overall image quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e2716d1c0aa2.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753726729.757798 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9f18f689f657.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/9f18f689f657.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "9f18f689f657", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, 2girls, dynamic interaction, intense emotional connection, collaborative artwork, studio, painting canvas, brushes, vibrant palette, light particles, volumetric lighting, abstract elements, shared focus, helping each other, intricate details, dramatic shadows, (wide shot), (colorful), (dynamic composition), (interacting hands), (shared artistic vision), (studio lights), (dutch angle), (intense expression), (creative synergy)", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, bad anatomy, jpeg artifacts, watermark, signature, simple background, lowres, censored, child, aged_down, loli, bad quality, sketch, old, oldest, border, (pregnant), (conjoined), (inappropriate content), (blurry), (low detail), (out of focus)", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 9095, + "sample_sources": [ + "(masterpiece, best quality, highres, very aesthetic, very awa), blue background, gradient background...", + "dutch angle, two-finger, upper body, perspective, chess piece, reaching, abstract chess piece, expre...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, scenery, 1girl, hatsu..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible as it is obscured by the colorful explosion effect.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The proportions and contours cannot be assessed due to the lack of a visible face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with vibrant and dynamic lines.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with a rich palette and strong contrasts.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is visually striking, but the absence of a face makes it difficult to assess the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the explosion effect and the hands.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are apparent.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible and cannot be evaluated, the image does not meet the required standards for character face quality. However, the overall image quality is high, and the technical aspects are sound. Therefore, I would recommend regenerating the image with a visible face to ensure that the character's face quality meets the high-end customer expectations.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9f18f689f657.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753728134.0420058 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ea3999e1c6bb.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/ea3999e1c6bb.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "ea3999e1c6bb", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "8K, ultra-detailed, cyberpunk, neon lights, futuristic cityscape, solo, dynamic angle, movie perspective, high-tech outfit, metallic armor, glowing circuit patterns, glowing eyes, detailed face, cybernetic enhancements, full body, close-up, intimate moment, ((vagina, vulva, clitoris)), pussy presentation, vibrant colors, perfect lighting, sharp focus, white background, artist:cyberartist", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, lowres, blurry, censored, watermark, signature, jpeg artifacts, poor anatomy, extra limbs, distorted, low detail, multiple views, title, logo, watermarks, bad lighting, shine, over-saturated, uneven lighting, unnatural colors", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 3964, + "sample_sources": [ + "8K, depth of field, focused subject, dynamic angle, sexy pose, best quality, detailed eyes, perfect ...", + "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, anime coloring, ambient light, soft light, Yak...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, absurdres, hex maniac plza,@_@, 1girl, solo, thick thighs,..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 2048, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, capturing the essence of the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with intricate designs on the character's suit and the cityscape.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent attention to detail and a well-composed scene. However, the absence of the character's face makes it difficult to assess the facial quality comprehensively. If the face were included, the score could potentially be higher.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not present, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a fully detailed face to ensure the highest possible quality. This will allow for a more thorough assessment of the facial features and overall image quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ea3999e1c6bb.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753728407.111378 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2a6761a70955.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/2a6761a70955.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "2a6761a70955", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, dynamic composition, 3girls, 1boy, playful interaction, living room, game night, modern setting, flat screen TV, game console, Nintendo Switch, 3girls sitting on couch, 1boy lying on floor, playful touch, intimate contact, soft lighting, warm tones, detailed textures, realistic skin, photorealistic, 8k, ultra-detailed, close-up, focused on interactions, smiling faces, casual clothing, tank tops, shorts, revealing outfits, playful gestures, eye contact, dynamic angles, camera movement, vibrant colors, natural lighting, soft shadows, detailed hair, messy hair, casual atmosphere, group dynamics, friendly banter, intimate moments, subtle nudity, suggestive poses, playful teasing, physical contact, skin tones, realistic proportions, detailed anatomy, natural expressions, vibrant colors, soft shadows, detailed textures, realistic fabrics, detailed clothing, subtle shadows, natural skin tones, realistic hair, soft lighting, warm tones, cinematic composition, focused on interactions, playful energy, group dynamics, intimate moments, detailed expressions, natural lighting, vibrant colors, soft shadows, detailed textures, realistic skin, photorealistic, 8k, ultra-detailed", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, bad proportions, distorted hands, extra limbs, missing fingers, deformed, bad feet, duplicate limbs, poor lighting, background visible, simple background, ugly, deformed face, extra features, blurry, grainy, artifacts, low detail", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 5693, + "sample_sources": [ + "lazympos, cute college woman, large breasts ,athletic, athletic build, ((slim fit)), 1girl, light ra...", + "1girl, detailed eyes, slender, lean, fit, athletic, rating_explicit, rating_nsfw, ((sexy)), defined ...", + "masterpiece, best quality, anime coloring, dynamic lighting, ambient light, soft light, (ultra-detai..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show any facial features as the character's face is not visible. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and naturalness of the facial features.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show any facial features as the character's face is not visible. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and naturalness of the facial features.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, making the image visually appealing.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is balanced, with the character's legs and feet prominently featured in the foreground, and the TV and room setup in the background providing context.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the textures of the floor, rug, and furniture.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, allowing for clear details in the textures and objects.\n\nSince the primary focus of the image is on the character's legs and feet, and the face is not visible, the overall quality is still quite good. However, if the intention was to include a full-body view or a face, the image would need to be regenerated to meet higher standards.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2a6761a70955.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753728420.5378473 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/03aa4e483325.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/03aa4e483325.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "03aa4e483325", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, 2girls, close friendship, sunset, grass, flowers, long hair, soft gaze, warm light, dramatic shadows, embracing, gentle touch, smiling, delicate features, pink lips, natural skin tone, flowing skirts, outdoor, dynamic composition, shallow depth of field, blurred background, golden hour, emotional connection, heartfelt moment, detailed textures, vibrant colors, high detail, 8k, nsfw", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, low resolution, blurry, watermark, signature, text, deformed anatomy, extra limbs, missing face, low quality, cartoonish, unrealistic proportions, distorted perspective, over-saturated colors, grainy, pixelation, artifacts, low detail, unrealistic lighting", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 2998, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, bursting breasts, 1girl, niijima makoto, crown braid, brow...", + "penis, fellatio, 1boy, oral, hetero, nude, breasts, nipples, threesome, 2girls, multiple girls, ffm ...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, DISNEY_ANIMATION, incoth, incase, female..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible as it is obscured by the characters' arms.\n- The lack of facial features makes it difficult to assess the clarity and definition of facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with warm, vibrant colors that enhance the sunset atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Good, with a balanced composition that focuses on the interaction between the two characters.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with detailed clothing textures and flowing fabric.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, the overall image quality is strong, with good line clarity, color saturation, and composition. The lack of facial details prevents a higher score. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nTo improve the image, regenerate it with the characters facing forward so their faces can be clearly seen and evaluated. This will allow for a more accurate assessment of the face quality and overall image quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/03aa4e483325.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753728621.306074 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9269b59e78c1.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/9269b59e78c1.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "9269b59e78c1", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "HDR, 8K, high contrast, masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, high resolution, absurdres, 3 characters, 2girls and 1boy, interacting in a vibrant cityscape, wearing colorful outfits, dynamic pose, expressive faces, detailed facial features, realistic skin tones, natural lighting, soft shadows, urban environment, neon lights, reflective surfaces, detailed background, cinematic lighting, vibrant colors, emotional connection, engaging interaction, soft focus blur on background, sharp focus on faces, dynamic angles, creative composition, realistic textures, detailed clothing, naturalistic, joyful atmosphere, warm tones, detailed environment, realistic perspective, sharp details, cinematic quality, (group hug), (laughing), (holding hands), (interactive pose), (dynamic movement), (emotional expression), (detailed background elements)", + "negative_prompt": "deformed, mutated, ugly, disfigured, lowres, bad anatomy, bad hands, missing fingers, extra digit, fewer digits, cropped, very displeasing, worst quality, bad quality, bad anatomy, sketch, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, username, in heat, blush, flat colors, unrealistic proportions, deformed features, unflattering angles, harsh shadows, lack of detail, low detail, poor textures, generic background, unrealistic skin tones, distorted perspective, poor composition, unengaging, lack of depth, flat lighting, over-saturated colors, unnatural colors, low resolution, bad lighting, unsharp, artifacts, noise, grainy, blurry, distorted, stretched, compressed, cropped, missing elements, poor framing, unbalanced composition, unattractive, unappealing, unoriginal, generic, cliché, over-processed, under-processed, over-saturated, under-saturated, unnatural skin tones, poor facial features, unflattering, unattractive, unoriginal, generic, cliché, over-processed, under-processed, over-saturated, under-saturated, unnatural colors", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 10149, + "sample_sources": [ + "HDR,8K,high contrast,masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,very aesthetic,high resolution,absurdr...", + "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up. 1girl, solo, brunette hair∙straight hair, medium_round_breasts, puf...", + "1girl, solo, 21yo, adult woman,medium breast, oval-shaped face, cute girl, expressive look, slightly..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 2048, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The faces of the characters are not fully visible, which makes it difficult to assess the facial details.\n- The lack of visible facial features prevents a thorough evaluation of symmetry, detail, proportion, and natural contour.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the faces are not fully visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. For a higher-quality image, the faces should be more prominently featured or the image should be regenerated with clearer facial details. This will allow for a more accurate evaluation of the face quality and overall image quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9269b59e78c1.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753728709.594191 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e10411e38690.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/e10411e38690.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "e10411e38690", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, detailed scene, 2girls, close interaction, emotional connection, soft lighting, garden setting, floral backdrop, one girl reaching out, other girl smiling, intertwined hands, flowing dresses, lace details, natural hair, dewy skin, gentle expressions, cinematic lighting, depth of field, dynamic composition, subtle shadows, vibrant colors, romantic atmosphere, warm tones, high detail, artistic, realistic, intimate moment, soft focus background, close-up framing, natural textures, detailed fabrics, masterwork, ultra-detailed, 8k, aesthetic, depth of field, dynamic angle, emotional depth", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, bad hands, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, text, logo, artist name, extra digits, censored, patreon username, loli, ugly, messy, sketch, low quality, poor lighting, unrealistic proportions, distorted features, over-saturated colors, blurry, grainy, cartoonish, unrealistic, out of focus, bad composition", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 2372, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl, breasts, nipples, solo, black hair, sweater, short hair, navel, hair over one eye, skirt, med...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, detailed setting, detailed background, 1girl, yunyun (ko...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, 1girl, breasts, black hair, solo, large breasts, shirt, na..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the hands and dress appear to be well-detailed and proportionate.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the hands and dress appear to be well-detailed and proportionate.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast that enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the hands and dress, which are central elements of the image.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the dress and hands.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nSince the primary focus should be on the character's face, which is not visible in this image, the score is slightly lower due to the lack of facial assessment. The image otherwise demonstrates good quality in other aspects.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e10411e38690.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753728759.5110316 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2b85b475978e.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/2b85b475978e.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "2b85b475978e", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-HD, volumetric lighting, cyberpunk cityscape, neon lights, rain effects, reflective surfaces, dynamic composition, futuristic architecture, detailed textures, high contrast, volumetric fog, glowing signs, abstract patterns, surreal elements, high quality, absurdres, ultra-detailed, cinematic lighting, color grading, film grain, motion blur, stylized effects, digital art, concept art, vibrant colors, sharp focus, intricate details, atmospheric perspective, urban fantasy, sci-fi elements, glitch effects, data streams, light trails, reflection, shadows, texture, realistic materials, surreal atmosphere, dynamic lighting, abstract shapes, geometric patterns, futuristic vehicles, skyline, night scene, electric ambiance, digital glow, neon reflections, urban decay, high-tech, low-tech contrast, dystopian vibe", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad quality, blurry, text, watermark, signature, artist name, censorship, sketch, jpeg artifacts, over-saturated, under-saturated, color cast, distorted, bad anatomy, bad hands, missing fingers, extra fingers, low detail, low contrast, overexposed, underexposed, poor lighting, flat colors, no depth, flat design, no texture, low resolution, pixelation, artifacts, noise, grain, low quality, displeasing, unwanted elements, unnatural, distorted perspective, crooked, off-center, poor composition, low detail, low contrast, overexposed, underexposed, poor lighting, flat colors, no depth, flat design, no texture, low resolution, pixelation, artifacts, noise, grain, low quality", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 9706, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 8K, depth of field, focu...", + "1girl, goddess of sin and vice, sexy, seductive, sexy pose, dynamic pose, inverted background, flat ...", + "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-HD, volumetric lighting, masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, lowl..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and reflections on the wet street.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant neon lights and a strong contrast between the illuminated signs and the dark background.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with a strong perspective leading the viewer's eye down the street.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the buildings, signage, and reflections.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven that the primary focus of the image is the cityscape and the absence of a face, the overall quality is still quite high. However, the lack of a face prevents a comprehensive evaluation of the character's features. Therefore, regeneration would be recommended to include a character face for a more complete analysis.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2b85b475978e.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753728979.9222348 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a604e3b45bcb.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/a604e3b45bcb.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "a604e3b45bcb", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-HD, volumetric lighting, absurdres, 2girls, close friends, playful banter, floral patterns, sparkling jewelry, midnight garden, soft focus blur, midriff, thigh highs, lace underwear, bare shoulders, flowing hair, golden hour, dynamic composition, intertwined hands, laughing, intimate moment, candid shot, vibrant colors, detailed textures, natural lighting, subtle shadows, cinematic framing, emotional connection, from low angle, background haze, blooming flowers, delicate fabrics, soft breeze, gentle movement, romantic atmosphere, intricate details, high contrast, artistic lighting, 8k resolution, cinematic quality", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, bad quality, worst quality, bad anatomy, text, watermark, sketch, jpeg artifacts, ugly, poorly drawn, censored, blur, transparent background, simple background, distorted faces, extra limbs, deformed hands, missing fingers, shiny skin, over-saturated colors, grainy, low contrast, unflattering angles, unnatural poses, unrealistic proportions, cartoonish, low detail, artifacts, noise, artifacts, bad lighting, flat colors", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 604, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-HD, volumetric lighting, masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, lowl...", + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, hatsune miku, 1girl, anu...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, absurdres, calvin klein, 1girl, ass, underwear only, adjus..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show the faces of the characters, so we cannot evaluate the facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features is a significant drawback for a character-focused illustration.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show the faces of the characters, so we cannot evaluate the facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features is a significant drawback for a character-focused illustration.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and clear contrasts.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is balanced, but the lack of facial details affects the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the lingerie and stockings.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is on the characters' lower bodies and the faces are not present, the overall quality is still quite good. However, if the intention was to showcase the characters' faces as well, the image would need to be regenerated to include them. Without the faces, the image is incomplete from a character-focused perspective.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a604e3b45bcb.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753729852.6363945 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/4339b6b49bc8.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/4339b6b49bc8.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "4339b6b49bc8", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, depth of field, HDR, high contrast, sharp focus, 8k resolution, digital art, fantasy style, cinematic lighting, dynamic composition, two characters interacting, a fierce warrior in silver armor with glowing runes, mid-battle stance, intense expression, and a mystical elf with flowing robes casting a magical barrier, vibrant colors, intricate armor details, glowing magical effects, dramatic lighting from multiple sources, soft shadows, atmospheric perspective, rich textures, painterly brushstrokes, fantasy art style, intricate background with ancient ruins and floating islands, emotional connection between characters, dynamic pose, detailed facial expressions, vibrant magical energy, intricate clothing textures, glowing weapon, cinematic framing, dramatic atmosphere, fantasy world setting, high detail, artistic lighting, rich color palette, deep blues, fiery oranges, and ethereal purples.", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, blurry, bad anatomy, bad proportions, low quality, glitch, watermark, dull, painting, extra fingers, mutated hands, poorly drawn hands, deformed, ugly, blurry, bad anatomy, bad proportions, extra limbs, mutated limbs, cloned face, skinny, glitchy, double torso, extra arms, extra hand, lazyneg, lazyhand, easynegative, score_4, score_3_up, score_2_up, boring, flat, lazyneg, text, artist name, artist signature, censorship, low resolution, distorted faces, unrealistic colors, over-saturated, under-saturated, unnatural lighting", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 8624, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, stylized, newest, depth of field, HDR, high co...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, CivChan, purple eyes, pink hair, peeking out, wall, lookin...", + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 8K, depth of field, focu..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the armor and the character's attire.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the lack of facial features on the female character detracts slightly from the overall score. If the goal is to have a fully detailed face, it might be worth regenerating the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/4339b6b49bc8.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753729896.8876543 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/95ac2b8208bf.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/95ac2b8208bf.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "95ac2b8208bf", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, vibrant colors, cinematic lighting, high contrast, 8K, absurdres, 2girls, long silver hair, short black hair, glowing eyes, magical artifacts, enchanted robes, glowing runes, mystical forest, ancient trees, glowing mushrooms, soft ambient glow, dynamic composition, low angle shot, dramatic shadows, intricate details, blurred background, depth of field, enchanting atmosphere, mysterious mood, ethereal lighting, soft focus, rich textures, magical ambiance, intricate patterns, glowing elements, fantasy style, detailed facial expressions, delicate features, flowing fabrics, magical energy, glowing aura, enchanted setting", + "negative_prompt": "score_6, score_5, score_4, worst quality, lowres, bad anatomy, bad hands, sketch, watermark, signature, ugly, distorted, censored, plain background, blank eyes, messy hair, unnatural lighting, distorted perspective, extra limbs, missing limbs, low detail, over-saturated colors, flat shading, unrealistic proportions, error, bad composition, blurry, plain simple background, harsh lighting, lack of depth, unappealing colors, generic elements, unrealistic textures, poor lighting, incorrect perspective, missing details, low resolution, artifacts, watermarks, signature, sketchy lines", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 10015, + "sample_sources": [ + "ultra realistic, masterpiece, high detailed skin, best quality, high res, very aesthetic, absurdres,...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, 2girls, dominant girl, front view...", + "2girls, long blonde hair, short red hair, pale skin, large breasts, slim waist, expressive BREAK top..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the long hair covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the long hair covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical forest atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the forest background providing a good sense of depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the character's clothing and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of visible facial features, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall composition and technical aspects are strong, warranting a high score. The absence of the face is a significant limitation that prevents a higher score.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/95ac2b8208bf.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753730024.9954963 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a0d39fcefbe4.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/a0d39fcefbe4.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "a0d39fcefbe4", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, absurdres, highres, 2girls, interacting, sunset, garden, floral dress, holding flowers, laughing, depth of field, blurred background, volumetric lighting, intricate details, soft shadows, warm golden light, close-up, eye contact, playful expression, natural lighting, dynamic composition, vibrant colors, detailed textures, cinematic lighting, naturalistic setting, realistic skin tones, high contrast, bokeh, soft focus, romantic atmosphere, outdoor scene, detailed foliage, flowing hair, delicate jewelry, emotional connection, subtle gestures, candid moment, naturalistic poses, realistic proportions, high detail, ultra-detailed, 8k resolution, photorealistic, cinematic composition", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad quality, bad anatomy, watermark, signature, censor, blurry, plain background, blank eyes, messy hair, unrealistic proportions, distorted features, low contrast, over-saturated colors, cartoonish style, poor lighting, flat shading, lack of depth, unnatural skin tones, artifacts, compressed details, low resolution, grainy, noise, incorrect perspective, distorted perspective, unrealistic shadows, incorrect lighting, poor composition", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 7112, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very awa, newest, highres, absurdres, 1girl, solo, long hai...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, 1girl, solo, pale pink hair, high...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,newest,absurdres,highres, newest,very awa, scenery, anime,l..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The hands and flowers are in focus, but the faces are not visible, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of facial features prevents a thorough evaluation.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The hands and flowers are in focus, but the faces are not visible, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of facial features prevents a thorough evaluation.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the sunset scene.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with a balanced distribution of elements and a pleasing perspective.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich textures on the flowers and clothing.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of facial details, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall composition, color, and technical aspects are strong, warranting a high score. The absence of facial features makes it necessary to regenerate the image to include them.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a0d39fcefbe4.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753730129.076754 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/61832b8c916a.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/61832b8c916a.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "61832b8c916a", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "2girls, blonde hair, long hair, flowing hair, natural breasts, lace underwear, sitting on tatami, legs intertwined, intimate touch, moaning, sensual movements, close-up, dramatic lighting, soft focus background, sunset hues, warm golden tones, cinematic composition, ultra-detailed, 8k, masterpiece, highres, absurdres, dynamic pose, (blurred background), (dramatic shadows), (soft lighting), (depth of field), (intimate moment), (sensual interaction), (emotional connection), (tender touch), (passionate embrace), (skin tones), (natural lighting), (romantic atmosphere), (detailed eyes), (soft focus), (gradual blur), (warm tones), (golden hour)", + "negative_prompt": "low quality, worst quality, text, watermark, bad anatomy, deformed hands, missing fingers, unnatural poses, distorted features, shiny skin, child, children, extra limbs, cartoonish, lowres, blurry, artifacts, over-saturated, underexposed, overexposed, grainy, noise, poor lighting, flat colors, unrealistic proportions, unflattering angles, unappealing colors, low detail, bad composition, unnatural skin texture, unrealistic eyes, distorted facial features", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 2997, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,newest,absurdres,highres, newest,very awa, anime, dutch ang...", + "2girls, blonde hair, bob cut, large natural breasts, apron, standing against kitchen counter, legs a...", + "((1girl)), gorgeous girl , kawaii girl , cute face, masterpiece, best quality, very awa, absurdres, ..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 2048, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image is missing the character's face entirely, which is the primary focus. Without a face, it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of facial features also makes it difficult to evaluate the overall image quality and technical issues.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image is missing the character's face entirely, which is the primary focus. Without a face, it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of facial features also makes it difficult to evaluate the overall image quality and technical issues.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image should be regenerated to include the character's face as the primary focus. Once the face is included, the image can be evaluated based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/61832b8c916a.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753730502.5725734 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1a62e88d2a75.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/1a62e88d2a75.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "1a62e88d2a75", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "ultra realistic, masterpiece, high detailed skin, cinematic lighting, fantasy forest, glowing runes, ethereal atmosphere, (finely detailed face), magical creature, wings, glowing eyes, standing pose, hands on hips, vibrant colors, dynamic composition, high res, absurdres, 1creature, mystical aura, intricate patterns, natural lighting, soft shadows, highly detailed, vibrant, dynamic, dramatic lighting, artist:midnightmystic, style:hyperrealistic, studio lighting, depth of field, focus on eyes, moody atmosphere", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, low resolution, blurry, text, watermark, nsfw, censorship, sketch, furry, artist signature, low detail, poor lighting, unrealistic proportions, low contrast, over-saturated, cartoonish, grainy, low definition", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 6278, + "sample_sources": [ + "office woman, solo focus, shirt opened to reveal naked medium breasts, erect nipples, skirt hitched ...", + "masterpiece, high_quality, highres, gradient, cinematic lighting, artist:moriimee, looking_at_viewer...", + "ultra realistic, masterpiece, high detailed skin, best quality, high res, very aesthetic, absurdres,..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character lacks a face, which is the primary focus of the image. Without a face, it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. The absence of a face also affects the overall composition and detail richness.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character lacks a face, which is the primary focus of the image. Without a face, it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. The absence of a face also affects the overall composition and detail richness.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image should be regenerated with a face included to properly evaluate the character's facial features and overall quality. Once the face is added, the image can be re-evaluated based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1a62e88d2a75.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753730612.7399316 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/7646a01aa893.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/7646a01aa893.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "7646a01aa893", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-HD, volumetric lighting, dynamic composition, 2 characters, knight and sorceress, medieval setting, enchanted forest, glowing runes, magical energy, dramatic lighting, high contrast, vivid colors, cinematic lighting, sharp outlines, rich details, anime style, ultra-detailed, 8K, depth of field, soft focus, dramatic shadows, vibrant colors, warm glow, dynamic light, motion blur, interaction, dialogue, emotional connection, intense gaze, magical elements, glowing hands, spellcasting, enchanted forest, towering trees, mystical atmosphere, detailed textures, realistic skin, intricate armor, flowing robes, glowing eyes, dramatic lighting, cinematic atmosphere, high quality, absurdres, source_realistic:1.6, score_9_up, score_8_up:1.3, vibrant colors, dynamic light, warm glow, sharp outlines, rich details, seductive atmosphere", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, displeasing, text, watermark, bad anatomy, text, artist name, signature, lowres, bad hands, extra limbs, missing limbs, painting by bad-artist, man beneath character, sketch, ugly, imperfect eyes, skewed eyes, unnatural face, unnatural body, error, error, error, error, error", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 697, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl, short red hair, tan skin, medium breasts, perky, glossy skin, wearing leather harness, shibar...", + "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-HD, volumetric lighting, masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, lowl...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, newest, mole near mouth 1girl, solo, nyo..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible due to the armor covering it completely.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The lack of facial features makes it impossible to assess symmetry, detail, proportion, or natural contour.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and well-defined edges.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual impact.\n- Composition and proportions: Strong, with a balanced composition that draws the viewer's eye to the central figure.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the armor and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is the character's face, which is not visible due to the armor, the image cannot be evaluated properly for face quality. However, the overall image quality is high, and the technical aspects are sound. Given the importance of facial details in character design, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a visible face to meet the customer's expectations.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/7646a01aa893.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753730776.799596 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/850708ee3d3d.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/850708ee3d3d.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "850708ee3d3d", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, 1girl, glowing pendant, mystical forest, ethereal light, flowing robe, glowing flowers, floating, cinematic lighting, ultra-detailed, 8K, absurdres, digital painting, vivid colors, bokeh, soft glow, sharp outlines, rich details, mystical atmosphere, masterpiece, dynamic light, warm glow, sharp outlines, rich details, dominant atmosphere", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, lowres, bad anatomy, watermarks, blur, low contrast, distorted perspective, unnatural colors, extra limbs, missing limbs, painting by bad-artist, sketch, artifacts, low detail, grainy, over-saturated, under-saturated, poor lighting, bad shadows, incorrect proportions, deformed features", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 9690, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, newest, absurdres, highres, 1girl, hellhound_(monster_girl_encyclopedia),...", + "1girl, short red hair, tan skin, medium breasts, perky, glossy skin, wearing leather harness, shibar...", + "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up. 1girl, solo, brunette hair∙wavy hair, small_round_breasts, puffy_ni..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. The lack of facial features makes it impossible to evaluate these aspects accurately.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. The lack of facial features makes it impossible to evaluate these aspects accurately.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are smooth and well-defined, contributing to a clean and polished look.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is well-balanced, enhancing the magical and ethereal atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the character centered and the forest background providing a sense of depth and scale.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the flowing robes and the glowing elements around the character.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n\nGiven that the primary focus of the image is on the character's face, which is not visible due to the hood, the overall quality is still quite good but falls short of the desired level because of the missing facial details. Therefore, regeneration is recommended to include a visible face for a more complete evaluation.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/850708ee3d3d.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753730842.199923 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/34fcdc9e896f.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/34fcdc9e896f.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "34fcdc9e896f", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "score_9, masterpiece, best quality, ultra hd, 8k, very aesthetic, dynamic composition, 2girls, intense gaze, emotional connection, dramatic lighting, golden hour, soft focus, high contrast, textured surfaces, depth of field, ((five fingers:1.3, standing, leaning close, from below, from behind, huge breasts)), nude, 1girl, 1woman, komeiiji koishi, huge nipples, sweat, motion lines, motion blur, 1man, faceless bald man, shiny skin, dropping 1 pantie, man arms on ground, ahegao, spread legs, ass down, dramatic angle, breath, lotion bottle, girl looking back, huge balls, upside down face, 1 white pantie around leg, pussy:0.5, dropped clothes, lot of cum, cum bridges, 2characters, intimate interaction, emotional tension, close-up, dynamic pose, layered lighting, soft shadows, vibrant colors, warm_colors, textured fabrics, detailed hair, intricate jewelry, subtle expressions, naturalistic skin tones, realistic anatomy, subtle motion blur, environmental details, rich atmosphere, cinematic framing, narrative depth, emotional resonance", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, worst detail, censor, bad anatomy, bad proportions, bad perspective, blurry, low resolution, text, logo, signed, duplicate characters, fused faces, unrealistic lighting, flat colors, lack of depth, unnatural skin tones, distorted features, excessive shadows, over-saturated colors, poor composition, low contrast, generic background, unrealistic proportions, cartoonish style, low detail, poor texture, unrealistic clothing, unnatural poses, lack of emotion, generic expressions, over-exposed highlights, under-exposed shadows, poor focus, distorted perspective, unrealistic lighting, low resolution, text, logo", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 7078, + "sample_sources": [ + "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, 1woman, incoth, incase, ...", + "usnr, masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, ultra hd, very aesthetic, 8k, high detail, score 9...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, newest, mole near mouth 1girl, solo, nyo..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 4, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 4/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The proportions and contours are not applicable since there is no face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The image appears somewhat blurry and lacks sharpness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are muted, and the contrast is low, making the image appear flat.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is unusual due to the absence of a face and the focus on the lower body.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is minimal, especially in the areas that should have more intricate details like skin texture.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no apparent artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: The absence of a face and the unusual composition suggest that this might be a generation error or a poorly designed image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nThe image fails to meet the required standards for character face quality and overall image quality. It is recommended to regenerate the image to include a proper face and improve the overall quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/34fcdc9e896f.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753731125.2106278 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/38ef053f215c.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/38ef053f215c.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "38ef053f215c", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "2 girls and 1 boy, intimate group dynamic, soft lighting, slow dance, close-up shots, glowing skin, sweat droplets, tight outfits, lace underwear, high heels, sensual expressions, whispered conversation, hand gestures, intimate positioning, blurred background, dynamic angles, soft focus, glowing eyes, detailed textures, smooth skin, natural lighting, cinematic composition, high detail, masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, uncensored, sensual atmosphere, subtle shadows, intimate moment, emotional connection, close proximity, sensual body language, soft focus blur, glowing highlights, detailed hair, natural skin tones, vibrant colors, cinematic lighting, dynamic composition, emotional intensity, intimate interaction, soft focus, glowing skin, detailed facial expressions, sensual atmosphere, high contrast, cinematic lighting, detailed textures, smooth skin, natural lighting, soft focus blur, glowing highlights, detailed hair, natural skin tones, vibrant colors, cinematic lighting, dynamic composition, emotional intensity, intimate interaction", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, worst detail, sketch, censor, censored, text, monochrome, watermark, artist name, ugly, ugly face, mutated hands, low res, bad anatomy, bad eyes, blurry face, unfinished, greyscale, (deformed), lowres, blurry, grainy, over-saturated, under-saturated, poor lighting, distorted perspective, extra limbs, missing limbs, text, watermark, signature, patreon username, bad proportions, unnatural colors, unnatural lighting, unrealistic skin, poor composition, distorted faces, extra eyes, extra arms, extra legs, floating objects, cartoonish, unrealistic proportions, low detail, pixelated, blurry, grainy, over-saturated, under-saturated, poor lighting, distorted perspective", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 4787, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, uncensored, blonde braid, smooth skin, sex, blowjob, pov...", + "1 girl, solo, big boobs, huge areolas, long hair, purple hair, blue eyes, bangs, eyeglasses, huge ne...", + "size difference, girl behind a table, view under table, 1boy, fat boy, creepy boy, ugly boy,boys car..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 2048, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not include any facial features, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of faces in the image means that the primary focus of the analysis should be on the lower body parts and the overall composition.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not include any facial features, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of faces in the image means that the primary focus of the analysis should be on the lower body parts and the overall composition.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, making the image visually appealing.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the legs and shoes positioned centrally and proportionally.\n- Level of detail richness: The details in the shoes and the texture of the skin are rich and well-executed.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors; the image appears to be a high-quality illustration.\n- Resolution: The resolution seems adequate for the level of detail present.\n\nSince the image lacks facial features, which would typically be the primary focus for a character-focused illustration, the overall quality is still quite good. However, if the intention was to create a full character illustration, the lack of facial details significantly impacts the quality assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: If the goal is to create a full character illustration, regenerate the image with facial features included. If the goal is to focus on the lower body parts, the current image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/38ef053f215c.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753731317.6969132 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/30ac5be4002d.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/30ac5be4002d.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "30ac5be4002d", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, 8k, fantasy creature, glowing eyes, silver fur, enchanted cloak, holding glowing staff, standing cliff edge, dramatic lighting, cinematic composition, dynamic shadows, vibrant colors, ambient occlusion, soft lighting, line art, anime style, 1creature, solo, magical forest, looking horizon, dramatic pose, intricate patterns, glowing runes, high detail, sharp focus, depth of field, realistic textures, stylized digital image", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, bad quality, lowres, jpeg artifacts, bad anatomy, extra limbs, watermarks, signatures, grainy, over-saturated, blurry, low detail, poor lighting, unrealistic proportions, cartoonish, flat colors, missing textures, censored, logo, title, poor composition, unbalanced framing", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 8839, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, 1girl,princess peach,alternate costume,blue eyes,black lips,black hair,bl...", + "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, anime coloring, dynamic lighting, ambient ligh...", + "Silver_wolf \\(honkai: star rail\\), small breasts, nude, nipples, indoors, bedroom, 1boy, solo focus,..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\n- The character's face is partially obscured by hair and the angle makes it difficult to assess facial details.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical but lack fine detail due to the angle and the presence of hair.\n- The nose and mouth are not clearly defined due to the same reasons as above.\n- The facial contour seems natural from what can be seen, but the limited view makes it hard to judge fully.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with a strong blue tone that enhances the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Strong, with the character positioned prominently on the cliff and the background providing depth.\n- Level of detail richness: Moderate, with rich details in the character's armor and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has good overall quality with a strong composition and rich colors. However, the partial obscuration of the face due to the character's pose and hair limits the assessment of facial details. If the goal is to showcase the character's face more prominently, a regeneration focusing on a different angle might be beneficial.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/30ac5be4002d.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753731986.1735008 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/32d47c45268a.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/32d47c45268a.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "32d47c45268a", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, dynamic interaction, enchanted duel, two warriors, elven archer and dark knight, mystical forest, glowing runes, magical energy, dramatic lighting, intricate armor, flowing cloak, intense gaze, combat stance, arrow mid-flight, sword clash, swirling mist, glowing aura, detailed expressions, cinematic composition, vivid colors, high contrast, atmospheric perspective, depth of field, mystical atmosphere, dynamic motion, interacting characters, spell collision, magical explosion, detailed textures, realistic lighting, intricate patterns, fantasy setting, fantasy art, highly detailed, 2characters, dynamic composition, dramatic lighting, cinematic, vivid, awe-inspiring", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, watermarks, text, logo, signature, cartoonish, low detail, blurry, grainy, poor lighting, unrealistic proportions, distorted perspective, over-saturated colors, unnatural colors, bad hands, multiple views, comic, jpeg artifacts, censored, explicit content, nsfw, inappropriate, low quality, bad quality, worst detail, sketch, cartoon, unrealistic", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 4642, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, rosalina, cyborg, bodysuit, headgear, mask, sunset, horizon, looking at v...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,very aesthetic, 1girl, solo, fat ass, upskirt, cameltoe, an...", + "simple background, (perspective) , (depth_of_field ), abstract, high contrast, chromatic aberration ..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The facial details are somewhat clear but lack fine definition.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical but lack depth and detail.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem slightly off, particularly in some images.\n- There are some areas where the facial contour appears unnatural, especially around the jawline and chin.\n- Some images have a slight blur or distortion, particularly in the background and edges.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are decent but not exceptional.\n- Color saturation is good, with vibrant greens and reds, but there's a slight lack of contrast in some areas.\n- Composition and proportions are consistent across the grid but could be improved for better visual flow.\n- The level of detail is rich enough but could benefit from more intricate shading and texture.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no significant artifacts or noise visible.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the intended use, though it might benefit from higher resolution for print or larger displays.\n\nRecommendation:\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nThe image has potential but requires refinement in facial details, eye depth, and overall consistency in proportions. A regeneration with more defined facial features and improved symmetry would enhance the quality significantly.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/32d47c45268a.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753732035.488737 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cf0a029f95b1.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/cf0a029f95b1.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "cf0a029f95b1", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "2girls, intimate moment, mutual masturbation, lace underwear, soft lighting, bedroom, close-up, sensual, detailed textures, high quality, 8k uhd, volumetric lighting, dynamic composition, emotional connection, soft focus, intricate details, professional illustration, natural skin tones, realistic anatomy, detailed facial expressions, intimate atmosphere, warm lighting, soft shadows, depth of field", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, bad anatomy, bad proportions, deformed, lowres, blurry, monochrome, text, logo, watermark, 3d, cgi, comic, multiple views, furry, signature, bad hands, extra fingers, bad lighting, flat colors, lack of detail, poor composition", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 5649, + "sample_sources": [ + "(masterpiece, newest, high quality, best quality, very awa, very aesthetic, ultra detailed, realisti...", + "masterpiece, by piaki, best quality, very detailed, 1 girl, dawn \\(pokemon\\), beenie, pink skirt, st...", + "1girl, nobara kugisaki, kugisaki nobara, bob cut, brown eyes, brown hair, lips, short hair, breasts,..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image appears to be focused on a lower body part, so it's not possible to assess facial details.\n- There are no facial features present in the image, making it impossible to evaluate facial symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n- The lack of facial features also prevents assessment of blurriness, distortion, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The image seems to have a smooth texture but lacks fine details that would typically be present in a high-quality illustration.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors appear somewhat muted, which might be intentional for a specific artistic style, but it affects the overall vibrancy.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered around the lower body, which is acceptable for certain types of illustrations but doesn't provide enough context to judge overall proportions.\n- Level of detail richness: The image lacks rich details, especially in the areas where facial features would be located.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise are apparent in the provided image.\n- There are no obvious generation errors; however, the absence of facial features makes it difficult to determine if the image was generated correctly in terms of other technical aspects.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image does not contain any facial features, it cannot be evaluated for face quality. However, based on the overall image quality and the lack of detail, it may benefit from regeneration to include more elements that can be assessed for quality. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cf0a029f95b1.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753732324.8596187 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/55d313d0a029.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/55d313d0a029.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "55d313d0a029", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, 8k, absurdres, 2 girls, 1 boy, dynamic interaction, emotional connection, vibrant background, (dramatic lighting), (soft focus), (depth of field), (dynamic pose), (interacting), (emotional expression), (soft lighting), (natural colors), (detailed textures), (realistic skin), (slim bodies), (curvy figures), (youthful features), (sparkling eyes), (playful expressions), (light clothing), (flowing fabrics), (interactive dance), (mid-air movement), (capturing moment), (artistic composition), (balanced framing), (natural lighting), (soft shadows), (atmospheric perspective), (rich colors), (detailed environment), (dynamic interaction), (emotional connection), (playful atmosphere), (vibrant scene), (artistic style), (high detail), (sharp focus), (realistic rendering), (detailed textures), (soft lighting), (natural colors), (detailed environment)", + "negative_prompt": "low quality, worst quality, bad anatomy, extra digits, bad hands, watermark, censor, child, loli, old, early, copyright name, artist name, signature, bad lighting, poor composition, blurry background, low resolution, artifacts, over-saturated colors, unnatural colors, distorted proportions, unrealistic features, poor texture, low detail, missing elements, incorrect perspective, poor lighting, flat colors, lack of depth, low contrast, poor focus, unbalanced framing, over-processed, unnatural skin tones, poor shadows, low sharpness, low clarity, low resolution, low quality, extra fingers, missing fingers, bad fingers, body horror, unrealistic proportions, poor anatomy, distorted features, unnatural expressions, low detail, poor lighting, flat colors, lack of depth, low contrast, poor focus, unbalanced framing, over-processed, unnatural skin tones, poor shadows, low sharpness, low clarity", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 8813, + "sample_sources": [ + "long black hair, blue eyes, naked, pussy, looking at viewer, cute, smiling, shy expression, (masterp...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, newest, depth of field, (blurred backgro...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,newest,absurdres,highres, newest,very awa, anime, dutch ang..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not fully visible, which makes it difficult to assess facial details.\n- The eyes appear somewhat simplified and lack depth.\n- The nose and mouth proportions seem slightly off, particularly the nose, which appears too small relative to the face.\n- The facial contour is somewhat unnatural, especially around the jawline and cheek area.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are decent but could be improved for finer details.\n- Color saturation and contrast are good, providing a vibrant look.\n- Composition and proportions are acceptable, though the framing of the character's face is incomplete.\n- The level of detail richness is moderate, with some areas appearing a bit flat.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution seems adequate for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nGiven the incomplete view of the face and the slight issues with facial proportions, the image does not meet the high standards expected by high-end customers. Therefore, I recommend regeneration to ensure a more complete and accurate representation of the character's face.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/55d313d0a029.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753732337.126572 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/3d8592a32801.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/3d8592a32801.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "3d8592a32801", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, highres, absurdres, 1boy, solo, flowing cloak, glowing runes, intricate armor, sword, holding sword, mystical forest, glowing eyes, detailed textures, dynamic pose, glowing aura, enchanted forest, deep focus, vibrant colors, dramatic lighting, fantasy, intricate patterns, magical atmosphere, limited palette, sketch, psychedelic, simple background", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad quality, low quality, bad anatomy, bad hands, jpeg artifacts, watermark, text, logo, signature, extra digits, censored, patreon username, loli, blurry, extra limbs, poor lighting, over-saturated colors, unrealistic proportions", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 264, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, newest, absurdres, highres, female, petite, cat ears, ear tufts, fluffy t...", + "The image depicts a nude, blue-painted woman with curly orange hair, kneeling on one knee while hold...", + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very awa, newest, highres, absurdres, 1girl, solo, long hai..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and dynamic.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the armor and background elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent detail and vibrant colors. However, the absence of a face makes it difficult to assess the character's expression and personality fully. If the character's face were included, the score could potentially be higher.\n\nRecommendation: Since the character lacks a face, which is crucial for understanding their expression and personality, it might be beneficial to regenerate the image with a face included to enhance the overall quality and appeal to high-end customers who value character expressions. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/3d8592a32801.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753732362.5999367 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ae7fbc336b0e.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/ae7fbc336b0e.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "ae7fbc336b0e", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, intricate details, depth of field, glowing particles, ethereal glow, magical forest, fairy with wings, detailed hair, intricate jewelry, glowing eyes, soft focus background, mystical atmosphere, glowing mushrooms, starry sky, ultra-detailed, 8k, best quality, volumetric lighting, cinematic composition, glowing aura, intricate patterns, fantasy creature, delicate fabric, glowing runes, soft shadows, magical essence, fairy tale setting, glowing flowers, detailed wings, ethereal beauty, glowing fingertips, mystical glow, ultra-detailed textures, cinematic lighting, masterpiece, best quality", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad quality, low quality, text, watermark, bad anatomy, distorted perspective, unnatural lighting, blurry, discolored, unrealistic colors, extra limbs, missing limbs, deformed features, unproportional, artifacts, low contrast, over-saturated, under-saturated, grainy, noise, poor resolution, unclear details, text overlay, signature, artist name, unattractive, distorted shapes, unnatural shadows, flat lighting, lack of depth, low detail, poor composition", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 505, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism (1.5), high detail, depth o...", + "EyesHD, (4k,8k,Ultra HD), masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, very aesthetic, sharp focus, de...", + "mole,mole_under_eye,hime cut,long hair, 1girl,1boy,beautiful face,perfect eyes,detailed eyes, blunt ..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The face is not visible due to blurring, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. This significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The face is not visible due to blurring, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. This significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally smooth and well-defined, especially around the character's body and wings.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, making the image visually appealing.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the character centered and the background elements (mushrooms and sky) complementing the scene effectively.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, particularly in the character's dress, wings, and the glowing mushrooms.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the image size.\n\nGiven that the primary focus of the image is the character's face, which is not visible due to blurring, the overall quality is impacted. For a high-end customer, having a clear and detailed face is crucial. Therefore, regeneration is recommended to ensure the face is properly rendered.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ae7fbc336b0e.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753732866.880157 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ff4cce2cd65a.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/ff4cce2cd65a.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "ff4cce2cd65a", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "Fantasy Style, Surreal, Masterpiece, High Quality, High Res, Two Characters in a Magical Forest, Witch with Glowing Staff, Mystical Creature, Tense Interaction, Dynamic Composition, Dutch Angle, Intricate Details, Ethereal Lighting, Glowing Leaves, Magical Effects, Detailed Facial Expressions, Close-Up, Cinematic, Depth of Field, Shadow Play, Ethereal Atmosphere, Artistic Composition, Vibrant Colors, Surreal Elements, Magical Glowing Particles, Interaction Between Characters, Emotional Connection, Dramatic Lighting, Soft Focus Background, High Detail Textures, Fantasy World Building", + "negative_prompt": "Lowres, Bad Anatomy, Deformed Face, Watermark, Logo, Ugly, Distorted, Blurry, Poor Quality, Low Quality, Sketch, Error, Bad Hands, Extra Fingers, Censored, Child, Loli, Symbol-Shaped Pupils, Multiple Colors Hair, Lips, Ear Tucking Hair, Wet, Copyright Name, Signature, Old, Early, Artistic Name, Body Horror, Distorted Perspective, Overly Bright, Overly Dark, Poor Lighting, Unnatural Colors", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 8463, + "sample_sources": [ + "Fantasy Style, Grunge, masterpiece, high_quality, highres, woman, portrait, monochromatic color, bla...", + "ultra realistic, masterpiece, high detailed skin, best quality, high res, very aesthetic, absurdres,...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,newest,absurdres,highres, newest,very awa, anime,flat color..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The characters' faces are not visible as they are obscured by their hoods.\n- The lack of facial features makes it difficult to assess the clarity and detail of the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the large tree dominating the composition and the characters positioned effectively to draw the viewer's eye.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the tree branches and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the faces are not visible due to the hoods, the overall score is slightly lower than perfect. However, the image is visually striking and the technical aspects are excellent. If the goal is to showcase the magical forest and the characters in a more traditional anime style, regenerating the image without the hoods would be beneficial.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ff4cce2cd65a.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753732911.5941298 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/df0b98318871.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/df0b98318871.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "df0b98318871", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, vibrant colors, dynamic lighting, 1girl, glowing hair, mystical forest, twilight, magical aura, intricate clothing, flowing robes, glowing runes, dynamic pose, mid-air, dramatic shadows, detailed textures, soft focus, high contrast, nature-inspired palette, glowing eyes, ethereal glow, fantasy art, intricate patterns, glowing flowers, background, misty atmosphere, glowing particles, motion blur, artistic style, anime, 8k, detailed facial features, glowing hands, enchanted items, magical effects, vibrant details, rich textures, dramatic composition, glowing trails, mystical elements, fantasy setting, intricate jewelry, glowing gemstones, soft lighting, depth of field, golden hour, dramatic lighting, rich details, nature-inspired color palette, playful composition", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, worst detail, censor, text, watermark, blurry, low res, bad anatomy, deformed, sketch, monochrome, ugly, mutated hands, low contrast, over-saturated, grainy, artifacts, poor lighting, bad proportions, distorted features, unrealistic colors, missing details, poor composition, lack of depth, flat colors, unappealing, low resolution, poor texture, bad lighting, bad shadows, unrealistic perspective, distorted perspective, poor focus, out of focus, bad edges, poor edges, poor details, bad quality", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 2024, + "sample_sources": [ + "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, dynamic, 2girls, plamix,...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, uncensored, blonde braid, smooth skin, shading, pastel c...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, newest, mole near mouth 1girl, solo, nyo..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is completely obscured by their hair, which makes it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, eye definition, nose shape, and mouth proportion. The lack of visible facial features prevents a proper evaluation of these aspects.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is completely obscured by their hair, which makes it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, eye definition, nose shape, and mouth proportion. The lack of visible facial features prevents a proper evaluation of these aspects.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the background elements contributing to a harmonious composition.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate patterns on the character's attire and the surrounding environment adding depth to the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present in the image.\n\nDespite the high overall image quality, the absence of facial details significantly impacts the character's quality assessment. Therefore, regeneration is recommended to include a fully visible and detailed face.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/df0b98318871.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753733073.2820969 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2a248ff3e21b.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/2a248ff3e21b.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "2a248ff3e21b", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-HD, vibrant colors, dynamic composition, 2girls 1boy, anime style, 18 year old girls, 22 year old boy, standing in a sunlit park, playful interaction, laughing, holding hands, soft lighting, warm tones, detailed background with trees and flowers, dramatic shadows, high contrast, textured surfaces, expressive faces, close-up shots, natural lighting, cinematic lighting, cinematic composition, rich details, nature-inspired palette, dynamic angles, emotional connection, subtle movements, engaging poses, artistic lighting, artist: kazuhiro_tsuda, artist: shigenori_dojima, 8k, anime, detailed textures, soft focus, depth of field, dramatic lighting, warm_light, vibrant_colors, soft focus, high contrast, textured surfaces, depth of field, golden hour lighting, dramatic shadows, rich details, nature-inspired color palette, playful composition, dynamic light, background, BREAK (dramatic lighting), masterpiece, best quality, 8k, anime, masterpiece, best quality, DISNEY_ANIMATION, low angle", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, bad quality, worst quality, bad anatomy, text, watermark, artist name, signature, jpeg artifacts, ugly, poorly drawn, censor, blurry, outdated, low detail, poor lighting, flat colors, lack of depth, unappealing composition, unrealistic proportions, text, text bubbles, multiple views, school uniform, patreon logo, out of frame, twitter logo", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 401, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, newest, 1girl, solo, 28 year old girl, c...", + "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-HD, volumetric lighting, masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, lowl...", + "anime, masterpiece, best quality, detailed background, 8k, 1girl, 1boy, standing 69, upside down, fe..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The faces are not visible due to the dark silhouettes, making it impossible to assess facial details.\n- The lack of facial features prevents a thorough evaluation of symmetry, proportion, and natural contours.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the faces are not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. For a higher-quality image, consider regenerating one where the characters' faces are clearly visible and detailed. This will allow for a more accurate evaluation of the face quality and overall image quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2a248ff3e21b.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753733179.0820127 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6a4f1fdcbef6.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/6a4f1fdcbef6.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "6a4f1fdcbef6", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, neon glow, cyberpunk cityscape, rain-soaked streets, glowing neon signs, reflections in wet pavement, dynamic composition, 8K resolution, depth of field, focused on glowing eyes, cybernetic enhancements, glowing circuit patterns, high detail, intricate textures, dramatic shadows, chiaroscuro, ultra-violet lighting, futuristic skyscrapers, holographic advertisements, steampunk elements, mechanical gears, intricate clockwork details, atmospheric perspective, vibrant colors, surreal atmosphere, artist:cyberpunk_artist, style:neon_noir, style:steampunk_fusion, (glowing liquid circuitry), (raindrops with neon reflections), (futuristic vehicle in motion), (detailed metallic textures), (dramatic angle), (light rays scattering through rain), (high contrast), (artistic lighting effects), (ultra-realistic rendering), (detailed background elements), (surreal color palette), (dynamic motion blur), (highly detailed facial expressions), (glowing neon accents), (dramatic sky with neon clouds), (futuristic architecture), (intricate mechanical designs), (detailed rain effects), (ultra-detailed cityscape), (artistic lighting gradients), (highly detailed textures), (dramatic depth of field), (surreal color blending), (masterfully composed), (highly detailed environment), (artistic lighting direction), (ultra-detailed cyberpunk elements), (dramatic lighting contrasts), (highly detailed rain effects), (surreal neon reflections), (artistic composition), (ultra-detailed textures), (dramatic lighting effects), (highly detailed city elements), (surreal atmosphere), (artistic lighting direction), (ultra-detailed environment), (dramatic lighting contrasts), (highly detailed textures), (surreal color blending), (artistic composition), (ultra-detailed cyberpunk elements), (dramatic lighting effects), (highly detailed rain effects), (surreal neon reflections), (artistic lighting direction), (ultra-detailed environment), (dramatic lighting contrasts), (highly detailed textures), (surreal color blending), (artistic composition), (ultra-detailed cyberpunk elements), (dramatic lighting effects), (highly detailed rain effects), (surreal neon reflections), (artistic lighting direction), (ultra-detailed environment), (dramatic lighting contrasts), (highly detailed textures), (surreal color blending), (artistic composition)", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad quality, blurry, text, watermark, bad anatomy, extra digits, missing fingers, disfigured features, low detail, cartoonish, unrealistic proportions, unrealistic lighting, over-saturated colors, under-saturated colors, grainy, noisy, artifacts, low contrast, high contrast, flat colors, lack of depth, lack of detail, poor composition, low resolution, low quality, blurry background, low quality, bad lighting, unrealistic shadows, unrealistic reflections, unrealistic textures, unrealistic colors, low quality, bad anatomy, extra limbs, missing limbs, distorted perspective, incorrect proportions, low quality, bad lighting, unrealistic shadows, unrealistic reflections, unrealistic textures, unrealistic colors, low quality, bad anatomy, extra digits, missing fingers, disfigured features, low detail, cartoonish, unrealistic proportions, unrealistic lighting, over-saturated colors, under-saturated colors, grainy, noisy, artifacts, low contrast, high contrast, flat colors, lack of depth, lack of detail, poor composition, low resolution, low quality, blurry background, low quality, bad lighting, unrealistic shadows, unrealistic reflections, unrealistic textures, unrealistic colors, low quality", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 9620, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 8K, depth of field, focu...", + "penis, fellatio, 1boy, oral, hetero, nude, breasts, nipples, threesome, 2girls, multiple girls, ffm ...", + "mcht2, princess_zelda, the_legend_of_zelda, the_legend_of_zelda:_breath_of_the_wild, ganondorf, 1gir..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by their back. Therefore, we cannot assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or naturalness of the facial features. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by their back. Therefore, we cannot assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or naturalness of the facial features. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High. The lines are clean and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent. The neon colors are vibrant and create a strong contrast against the dark background.\n- Composition and proportions: Strong. The composition is dynamic, with the character walking away from the viewer, leading the eye down the street. The proportions of the buildings and the street are well-balanced.\n- Level of detail richness: High. There is a rich variety of details in the neon signs, reflections on the wet pavement, and the architecture.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, allowing for clear details in the scene.\n\nOverall, the image is visually striking and has a high level of detail. The absence of the character's face prevents us from assessing the face quality, but the rest of the image is of high quality. Since the primary focus was on the character's face, which is not present, the overall score is slightly lower than perfect.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6a4f1fdcbef6.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753733573.432842 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/8944c3c26cfe.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/8944c3c26cfe.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "8944c3c26cfe", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "1girl, glowing staff, mystical forest with bioluminescent plants, ethereal light, detailed textures, vibrant colors, cinematic lighting, dynamic angle, from above, focused subject, close up, stylized, wabi sabi, in the style of cksc, artist:elena_m, in the style of ck-rw, masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, 8K, depth of field, lush environment, magical elements, intricate details, serene atmosphere, soft focus, dreamy vibe, floating stones, glowing moss, enchanted trees", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, bad quality, lowres, bad anatomy, ugly, poorly drawn, deformed fingers, missing fingers, extra fingers, jpeg artifacts, sketch, censor, signature, watermark, deformed toes, missing toes, extra toes, bad hand, bad feet, deformed feet, deformed hands, deformed anatomy, extra hands, extra feets", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 6685, + "sample_sources": [ + "Frieren, smiling, holding black cat, enchanted forest,no hand in frame, masterpiece, best quality, g...", + "masterpiece, amazing quality, very aesthetic, 1girl, solo, slender, naked, tentacles penetrating, ex...", + "(1 girl,2 male),(meme_(me!me!me!),me!me!me!,blue hair,Hime cut,nude,purple thigh highs,purple elbow ..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not contain any facial features as it is an abstract illustration of a tree-like structure.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present in the image.\n- The absence of facial elements makes it impossible to assess the symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of a face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are smooth and well-defined, contributing to a high-quality appearance.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is strong, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic and the proportions of the branches and leaves are well-balanced.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a rich level of detail, especially in the intricate patterns and glowing effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are visible.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears to be high, as the details are crisp and clear.\n\nSince the image lacks facial features, which is the primary focus for character quality, the score is adjusted accordingly. However, the technical aspects of the image are excellent.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the image is intended to be an abstract representation of a tree-like structure rather than a character, the current score is appropriate. However, if the image were to be used for a character design, it would need to be regenerated to include facial features that can be evaluated for quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/8944c3c26cfe.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753734135.808656 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9e836a87a799.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/9e836a87a799.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "9e836a87a799", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, high detail, dynamic pose, neon lights, futuristic city, metallic armor, glowing circuit patterns, holographic elements, steaming, moaning, close-up, 1girl, standing, glowing eyes, neon hair, cyberpunk, glass structures, digital art, volumetric lighting, dramatic shadows, ((vaginal, moaning, sound effects, on back, legs up, leg behind head, thigh grab by male, motion lines, speedlines)), vibrant colors, soft focus, high contrast, ((violet parr)), wearing a black leather bodysuit, purple hairband, black hair, skinny, stockings, blushing, flirting, horny, steamy breath, hearts, BREAK inside a car, on the backseat of a car", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, bad anatomy, watermarks, text, artist name, deformed hands, missing fingers, censored, bar_censor, (pregnant), chibi, loli, simple background, shiny skin, child, children", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 5954, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 1girl, feet close-up ...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism , high detail, depth of fie...", + "aesthetic, masterpiece, work of art, best quality, best, anime, detailed, pussy, detailed body, solo..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality assessment of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality assessment of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High. The lines are crisp and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent. The neon colors are vibrant and have strong contrast.\n- Composition and proportions: Good. The composition is dynamic and the proportions seem balanced.\n- Level of detail richness: High. There is a rich level of detail in the clothing and background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, as the details are sharp and clear.\n\nSince the primary focus of the image is on the character's face, and the face is not present, the overall score is slightly lower than perfect. However, the technical aspects of the image are very good.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Regenerate the image with a visible face to allow for a proper assessment of the facial quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9e836a87a799.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753734416.7653754 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/7611dcf57587.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/7611dcf57587.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "7611dcf57587", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, fantasy scene, two characters interacting, knight in silver armor, mage with glowing staff, magical forest, dynamic composition, collaborative action, teamwork, glowing spells, dynamic pose, side view, upper body, forest background, glowing leaves, dramatic lighting, high detail, depth of field, (blurred background), (dramatic lighting), masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, 8k, simple_background, half close-up, long black hair, red eye makeup, blushing, asian girl, small head, pretty girl, korean girl, smirking, looking at viewer ((slim body)), (small breasts), Dynamic angle, Dynamic pose, nsfw, portrait, girl, pink bikini, standing, view from below, pulling panties to side", + "negative_prompt": "watermark, lowres, bad anatomy, blurry, worst quality, low quality, displeasing, text, artist name, signature, hearts, deformed hands, missing finger, shiny skin, child, children, extra legs, extra arms, duplicate, cropped, jpeg, artifacts, long body, multiple breasts, mutated, disfigured, bad proportions, bad feet, ugly, text font ui, missing limb, monochrome, face bad, crown, tiara, jewelry, earring, pubes, pubic hair, censored, black bars, four legs, ugly hands, big earring, hoop earring, sleeves, collar, glasses, extra fingers, sunglasses, hat, multiple hands", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 10101, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, side_view_two_character, 1girl, long hair, milf, mature female, blonde ha...", + "1girl,masterpiece,black hair,single hair bun,pearl earring, pearl necklace,black shirt, lace shirt, ...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism (1.5), high detail, depth o..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the helmet covering it completely. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the helmet covering it completely. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the dynamic effect of the sword.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, focusing on the action of the sword strike, but the lack of a visible face prevents a full assessment of the composition.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the armor and the dynamic effects of the sword.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of a visible face, which is the primary focus, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall image quality is good, and the technical aspects are satisfactory. A regeneration would be necessary to include a visible face for a comprehensive evaluation.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/7611dcf57587.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753734525.5522156 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/193016175be2.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/193016175be2.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "193016175be2", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-detailed, fantasy creature, glowing eyes, intricate armor, mystical forest, twilight, magical aura, dynamic pose, flowing robes, intricate patterns, vibrant colors, cinematic lighting, high resolution, 8K, dramatic shadows, intricate textures, fantasy art style, artist: [name], detailed fur, realistic skin, glowing runes, standing on a cliff, wind blowing, dramatic composition, cinematic shot", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, bad quality, artifacts, extra limbs, deformed anatomy, unrealistic proportions, blurry, text, watermark, poor lighting, unnatural colors, distorted features, low contrast, over-saturated, under-saturated, incorrect color balance, poorly rendered textures, fake, 3d, render, cgi, doll, painting, fake, worst quality, missing details, duplicated, cloned, disfigured, mutated, mutilated, logo, watermark, text, lowres, mutated, mutilated, blend, artifacts, gross, ugly, depth of field, asian, face defects, body defects", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 2174, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic,amazing quality,ultra-detailed,8K,illustration, absurdres,...", + "iro_mugen_illu, masterpiece, ultra-detailed, action style, radical motion, extreme perspective, CivC...", + "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, realistic, photorealistic, highly detailed, depth of field, high re..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the character's pose facing away from the viewer. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the character's pose facing away from the viewer. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned prominently on the cliff, creating a sense of depth and scale.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the character's armor and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of visibility of the character's face, which is the primary focus, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall composition, color, and technical aspects are of high quality. A regeneration focusing on the character's face would be necessary to meet the high standards expected by high-end customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/193016175be2.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753734589.7919402 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/959f967bb82b.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/959f967bb82b.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "959f967bb82b", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra highres, 1girl, cyberpunk aesthetic, glowing neon lights, intricate circuit patterns, high-tech armor, standing on a rooftop, cityscape at night, rain, reflective surfaces, detailed jewelry, dynamic pose, dramatic lighting, cinematic, close-up, glowing eyes, futuristic elements, vibrant colors, depth of field, blurred background, neon reflections, ultra detailed textures", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, blurry, watermark, artist signature, low quality, distorted proportions, bad lighting, over-saturated colors, cartoonish, unrealistic proportions, grainy, poor detail, censored", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 237, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very awa, newest, highres, absurdres, 1girl, solo, long hai...", + "extreme sex, 1girl, cute girl, standing, hungry pussy, skinny, solo, in bed, wet pussy, thigh-high w...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, bursting breasts, 1girl, niijima makoto, crown braid, brow..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show a character's face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face suggests that the primary focus might be on the lower body or another part of the character.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show a character's face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face suggests that the primary focus might be on the lower body or another part of the character.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and sharp edges.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant neon colors and strong contrasts.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic, with the legs positioned prominently against a cityscape background. The proportions of the legs appear well-proportioned relative to the background.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the leg armor and reflections on the wet ground.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No visible artifacts or noise.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nSince the image lacks a face, which is typically the primary focus in anime-style illustrations, the overall quality is still quite good due to the high level of detail and vibrant color scheme. However, if the intention was to showcase a character's face, this image would need to be regenerated to include one.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/959f967bb82b.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753734621.5368106 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e1bb94a80af7.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/e1bb94a80af7.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "e1bb94a80af7", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "1girl, 25 years old, auburn hair, glowing eyes, wearing a mystical cloak, standing in a magical forest, holding a glowing staff, ethereal light, dramatic lighting, dynamic pose, intricate details, fantasy style, high detail, 8k, vibrant colors, mystical atmosphere, forest background, glowing runes, serene expression, ((animated, vivid colors, fantasy art)), close-up, magical energy, glowing hair, forest mist, soft focus background", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, low quality, blurry, text, ugly, bad anatomy, distorted features, extra limbs, bad proportions, dark lines, over-saturated colors, grainy, artifacts, cartoonish, low contrast, poor lighting, unsharp, bad perspective, missing limbs, extra eyes, wrong number of limbs, bad hands, bad feet, poor composition, low detail, poor texture, bad shadows, bad highlights", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 6360, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, newest, depth of field, (blurred backgro...", + "(score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up), 1girl, brunette, freckles, sexy body, selfie, no panties, beautif...", + "extreme sex, 1girl, 20 years old, black hair, fit, slim, medium breasts, straight hair, blunt bangs,..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by the hood. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by the hood. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are smooth and well-defined, contributing to a clean and polished look.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is well-balanced, making the scene visually appealing.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background providing a sense of depth and scale.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the forest environment and the character's cloak.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n\nGiven that the character's face is not visible due to the hood, the overall quality is still quite good, but the lack of facial detail prevents a higher score. The recommendation for regeneration is based on the inability to assess the facial features.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e1bb94a80af7.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753735318.0627096 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f43ef23f91ba.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/f43ef23f91ba.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "f43ef23f91ba", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 1girl, ethereal forest, glowing mushrooms, magic aura, flowing robes, dramatic lighting, cinematic composition, floating petals, enchanted glade, crystal formations, wide shot, dynamic pose, dutch angle, volumetric lighting, intricate details, glowing eyes, mystical atmosphere, soft focus, surreal elements, magical glow, serene expression, twilight hour, (colorful), ((wide shot)), masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad quality, bad anatomy, sketch, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, old, oldest, censored, bar_censor, (pregnant), chibi, loli, simple background, distorted, over-saturated, blurry, low detail, grainy", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 6567, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, newest, mole near mouth 1girl, solo, nyo...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, scenery, 1girl, hatsu...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 1girl, feet close-up ..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 2048, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The characters in the image are not fully visible due to their small size and the focus on the background elements. The lack of facial details makes it difficult to assess the clarity and definition of facial features. The eyes appear symmetrical but lack detail, and the proportions of the nose and mouth are not discernible due to the distance from the viewer.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The characters in the image are not fully visible due to their small size and the focus on the background elements. The lack of facial details makes it difficult to assess the clarity and definition of facial features. The eyes appear symmetrical but lack detail, and the proportions of the nose and mouth are not discernible due to the distance from the viewer.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with a strong focal point in the center and a harmonious arrangement of elements.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the forest, mushrooms, and the glowing tree.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe main issue is the lack of visible facial details on the characters, which affects the overall face quality. A regeneration focusing on improving the visibility and detail of the characters would be beneficial.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f43ef23f91ba.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753736181.2023737 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/30e1901fc4a3.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/30e1901fc4a3.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "30e1901fc4a3", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, dynamic, 1boy, anime style, glowing runes, mystical forest, glowing eyes, detailed armor, cinematic lighting, vibrant colors, floating objects, magical aura, intricate patterns, full body, ethereal atmosphere, glowing particles, dynamic pose, fantasy world, intricate details, soft focus, surreal elements, glowing hands, twilight sky, mystical creatures, detailed facial expressions, flowing robes, glowing tattoos, cinematic composition", + "negative_prompt": "low quality, blurry, watermark, text, signature, poor lighting, bad anatomy, bad hands, bad feet, unrealistic colors, low resolution, distorted features, overexposed, underexposed, unnatural shadows, child, busty, uneven tan, cartoonish, low contrast, flat colors, lack of depth, grainy, artifacts, incorrect proportions, blurry background", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 9844, + "sample_sources": [ + "(masterpiece, best quality, high quality, good quality), 1girl, solo, petite, twintails, raincoat, b...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, DISNEY_ANIMATION, incoth, incase, female...", + "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, dynamic, 2girls, plamix,..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and dynamic.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's armor and the swirling energy effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and vibrant colors. However, the absence of a face makes it difficult to assess the facial quality comprehensively. If the face were included, the score could potentially be higher.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not present, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a face to ensure that all aspects of the character's design are evaluated accurately. This will help in providing a more complete assessment and potentially improve the overall score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/30e1901fc4a3.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753736532.443638 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a9cc69a47774.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/a9cc69a47774.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "a9cc69a47774", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, 2girls, 1boy, interacting, dynamic pose, cinematic lighting, dutch angle, detailed background, vibrant colors, highres, absurdres, 8k, hdr, ultra detailed, realistic, intricate details, emotional expression, soft focus, shallow depth of field, natural lighting, forest setting, autumn leaves, tree, sitting together, holding hands, laughing, playful atmosphere, flowing hair, colorful clothing, intricate patterns, floral accessories, close-up, eye contact, warm tones, dramatic shadows, artistic composition, surreal elements, masterpiece, photorealistic, detailed textures, high definition, vivid colors, dynamic composition, naturalistic, beautiful atmosphere, ((4k,8k,Ultra HD)), (Masterpiece ),(Best quality ),(Detailed ),(dynamic pose),(Detailed background ), digital art, cinematic, emotional connection", + "negative_prompt": "low quality, worst quality, lowres, jpeg artifacts, watermark, signature, text, error, blurry, ugly, poorly drawn, sketch, monochrome, mutated, extra limbs, deformed, distorted face, bad proportions, out of focus, cloned face, mutated hands, disfigured, extra arms, extra legs, extra fingers, missing arms, missing legs, missing fingers, disconnected limbs, long neck, bad anatomy, bad hands, poorly drawn hands, bad feet, extra eyes, glitched eyes, mutated eyes, cross-eye, asymmetrical eyes, rough sketch, discolored, lazyneg, lazyhand, unrealistic proportions, unnatural poses, over-saturated colors, grainy, low contrast, lack of detail, cartoonish, unrealistic lighting", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 4418, + "sample_sources": [ + "lazypos, best quality, refined detailed, high quality, highres, cinematic lighting, absurdres, 8k, d...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, 1girl, ((1girl, perrault \\(last origin\\), last origin)),...", + "masterpiece, best quality, 1girl, solo, purple hair, long hair, blunt bangs, underwear only, indoors..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The faces of the characters are not fully visible due to their positioning facing away from the viewer. This makes it difficult to assess the clarity and detail of the facial features. However, the proportions and contours appear relatively natural.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The faces of the characters are not fully visible due to their positioning facing away from the viewer. This makes it difficult to assess the clarity and detail of the facial features. However, the proportions and contours appear relatively natural.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant autumn colors that pop against the background.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the characters positioned centrally and the trees framing the scene effectively.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich textures on the leaves and the ground, as well as the detailed rendering of the forest.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a high overall quality with excellent color work and composition. However, the lack of visible facial details prevents a higher score. Since the primary focus is on character faces, and these are not fully visible, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with the characters facing forward to allow for a more thorough assessment of the face quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a9cc69a47774.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753736606.5119889 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5b457fe1b24b.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/5b457fe1b24b.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "5b457fe1b24b", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, high detail, depth of field, (soft focus), vibrant colors, mystical forest, glowing runes, 1girl, silver hair with blue streaks, flowing cloak with silver threads, glowing eyes, standing on a stone bridge over a glowing river, moonlit night with stars, ethereal glow, floating lights, magical atmosphere, intricate details, ((enchanted, glowing, mystical, ethereal))", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, displeasing, text, watermark, bad anatomy, deformed, mutated, ugly, disfigured, lowres, bad hands, missing fingers, extra digit, fewer digits, jpeg artifacts, signature, username, in heat, blush, unflattering, grainy, blurry", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 7438, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism , high detail, depth of fie...", + "lazympos, highres, absurdres, 1girl, solo, blonde hair, mole under mouth, ponytail, cheerleader, cro...", + "HDR,8K,high contrast,masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,very aesthetic,high resolution,absurdr..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 2048, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the cape covering it completely. There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the cape covering it completely. There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and clear edges.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally on the bridge and the landscape extending into the background.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the environment, such as the trees, water reflections, and distant lights.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe primary focus should be on the character's face, which is currently obscured by the cape. This significantly impacts the overall quality assessment, as the absence of facial features prevents a thorough evaluation of the face quality. Therefore, regenerating the image with a visible face would be necessary to meet the high standards expected by the customer.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5b457fe1b24b.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753737035.699961 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6509e62c4652.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/6509e62c4652.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "6509e62c4652", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, 8K, high detail, dynamic lighting, neon cityscape, rain effects, futuristic architecture, cyberpunk, high contrast, vibrant colors, motion blur, dramatic shadows, rich details, textured surfaces, depth of field, glowing neon signs, reflective surfaces, bustling streets, lone figure in trench coat, glowing eyes, raindrops, dramatic composition, artistic style, 1girl, solo, urban environment, night scene, cinematic, vivid colors, dramatic atmosphere, detailed textures, glowing lights, reflections, depth of field, high resolution, ultra-realistic, cinematic lighting, intricate details, glowing neon, dynamic angles, stylish pose, futuristic elements, high-quality rendering, breaking the fourth wall, dramatic pose, glowing runes, glowing circuit patterns, glowing eyes, glowing neon, dramatic lighting, vibrant colors, soft focus, high contrast, textured surfaces, depth of field, golden hour lighting, dramatic shadows, rich details, nature-inspired color palette, playful composition, dynamic light, background, BREAK cyberpunk cityscape at night with glowing neon signs, rain effects, futuristic architecture, lone figure in trench coat, glowing eyes, dramatic lighting, cinematic composition, ultra-realistic details, high-quality rendering, 8k resolution, artistic style, BREAK masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, 8k, anime, 1girl, solo, glowing neon, raindrops, dynamic angles, futuristic elements, cinematic lighting, vibrant colors, dramatic shadows, rich details, textured surfaces, depth of field, high contrast, soft focus, glowing eyes, glowing circuit patterns, breaking the fourth wall, dramatic pose, glowing runes, glowing neon, dynamic light, background, BREAK", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, low resolution, blurry, bad anatomy, distorted, extra hands, watermark, text, logo, signature, censored, mutated hands, deformed, bad lighting, overexposed, underexposed, unnatural colors, low detail, poor composition, incorrect proportions, unrealistic features, artifacts, noise, grainy, low contrast, flat colors, unappealing colors, poor lighting, incorrect perspective, missing elements, low clarity, low sharpness, low definition, low texture, low detail, low resolution, bad quality, extra legs, bad feet, bad fingers, deformed hands, distorted feet, too many fingers, extra legs, bad feet, bad fingers, girl, boy, family-friendly, distorted tubes, broken cables, revealing clothes, extra fingers, deformed hands, distorted feet, too many fingers, extra legs, bad feet, bad fingers", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 291, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, newest, mole near mouth 1girl, solo, nyo...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, very aesthetic, 8K, high detail, depth of field, score_9, score_8_up, BREAK d...", + "open fridge, refrigerator, bent over, solo, 1girl, from behind,thong,dim lighting,high heels..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 2048, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is mostly obscured by a mask, so it's difficult to assess facial details.\n- The eyes appear somewhat generic and lack depth, which affects the overall realism.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem slightly off, contributing to a less natural look.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, with no noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant, enhancing the futuristic cityscape.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, effectively showcasing the urban environment.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the cityscape and neon signs.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No obvious generation errors were observed.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a strong visual appeal with rich details and vibrant colors. However, the lack of clear facial features and the slightly off proportions detract from the overall quality. Since these elements are crucial for a high-end customer, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with more defined facial features and accurate proportions.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6509e62c4652.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753737577.1617424 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6f5db87033c5.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/6f5db87033c5.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "6f5db87033c5", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, high detail, dynamic composition, 8k, 2girls, 1boy, intimate interaction, red dress, leather jacket, close-up, dramatic lighting, soft focus, (blurred background), (dramatic shadows), (intimate gaze), (emotional connection), (dynamic angle), (soft lighting), (dramatic pose), (emotional expression), (close-up shot), (dramatic lighting), (soft focus), (dramatic shadows), (intimate gaze), (emotional connection), (dynamic angle), (soft lighting), (dramatic pose), (emotional expression), (close-up shot)", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, displeasing, text, watermark, bad anatomy, artist name, signature, deformed hands, missing finger, shiny skin, child, children, loli, lolita, 3d, cgi, generic, jpeg artifacts, censored, extra digits, navel, web_adress, badly drawn hands, 6+ fingers, badly drawn legs", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 7892, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl, 1boy, female focus, cute face, short blonde hair, heavy freckles, kawai girl, lick testicles,...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism (1.5), high detail, depth o...", + "mcht2, rudeus_greyrat, aged_up, elinalise_dragonroad, 1boy, 1girl, ahoge, blonde_hair, blush, sex_fr..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible as it is obscured by clothing.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to evaluate.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and good definition.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic, but the focus is on the clothing rather than the characters' faces.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with detailed textures on the clothing and background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, the image cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall image quality is good, and the technical aspects are satisfactory. The dynamic composition and rich details make it visually appealing. Given that the primary focus should be on character faces, it might be beneficial to regenerate the image with more emphasis on revealing the characters' faces if possible.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6f5db87033c5.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753738867.4515195 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/169bbcde8ebc.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/169bbcde8ebc.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "169bbcde8ebc", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-HD, 1girl, 1boy, sensual, intimate, dim candlelight, sheer dress, exposed shoulders, soft lighting, dramatic shadows, close-up, romantic, slow motion, detailed textures, high contrast, cinematic, ultra-HD, masterpiece, best quality, 8k, depth of field, soft focus background, natural skin tones, realistic, dynamic pose, emotional expression, subtle movements, high detail, artistic, dramatic atmosphere, flowing hair, close-up eyes, tender touch, warm ambiance, luxurious fabrics, intricate details, blurred background, volumetric lighting, intimate setting, sensual atmosphere, advanced rendering, photorealistic, high resolution, detailed anatomy, natural lighting, soft focus, artistic composition, dramatic lighting, emotional connection", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, watermark, text, signature, blurry, plain background, deformed features, unrealistic proportions, over-saturated colors, cartoonish, low detail, poor lighting, flat colors, lack of depth, unappealing, low resolution, distorted faces, extra limbs, censored, artifacts, grainy, noise, low contrast, harsh shadows, unnatural skin tones, unrealistic textures, lack of detail, oversharpened, unrealistic proportions, distorted perspective, unattractive, low quality, text overlay, watermarks", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 5492, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl, 1boy, ass, implied fellatio, hetero, black hair, oral, from behind, panties, partially visibl...", + "penis, fellatio, 1boy, oral, hetero, nude, breasts, nipples, threesome, 2girls, multiple girls, ffm ...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, 1girl, lisa \\(genshin impact\\), e..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image is missing the character's face entirely, which is the primary focus.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The absence of facial features makes it impossible to assess symmetry, detail, proportion, or natural contour.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nThe image provided does not meet the requirements as it lacks the main subject (the character's face), which is crucial for evaluating facial quality and overall image quality. A regeneration focusing on the character's face would be necessary to provide a proper assessment.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/169bbcde8ebc.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753738926.5145812 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/56e5e2f181d6.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/56e5e2f181d6.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "56e5e2f181d6", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "2girls, best quality, masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, dynamic composition, magical forest, glowing orb, intense gaze, shared moment, intricate details, flowing robes, enchanted staff, ethereal glow, soft focus, dramatic shadows, high contrast, (smirking, playful expression), (whispering, conspiratorial tone), forest mist, glowing runes, celestial patterns, vibrant colors, depth of field, (blurred background), (dramatic lighting), fantasy art, high detail, 8k, light particles, nsfw, magical interaction, emotional connection, intricate textures, glowing eyes, mystical atmosphere", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, lowres, bad anatomy, text, watermark, blurry, low detail, extra limbs, deformed features, artist signature, cartoon style, low contrast, flat colors, unrealistic proportions, missing limbs, distorted perspective, over-saturated colors, grainy, jpeg artifacts, poor lighting, unflattering angles, generic background, lack of depth, low resolution, bad hands, missing eyes, extra digits, artistic error", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 308, + "sample_sources": [ + "safe_pos, masterpiece, newest, absurdres, safe, masterpiece, best quality, newest, highres, absurdre...", + "1girl, goth girl, dark makeup, slim, fit build, natural breasts, gym bikini, black choker, thong, bl...", + "masterpiece, best quality, (anime coloring), minimalism, solo, 1girl, mysterious woman, white hair, ..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the silhouette effect, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the silhouette appears to be well-defined against the background.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the silhouette effect, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the silhouette appears to be well-defined against the background.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with a strong blue hue that contrasts well against the darker background.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is effective, with the character positioned centrally within the intricate design, creating a balanced and visually appealing image.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a rich level of detail, especially in the background design, which adds depth and complexity.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- No obvious generation errors are detected.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the character's face is not visible, it is challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the overall image quality and technical aspects, the image can be considered satisfactory. If the goal is to have a clear view of the character's face, the image may need to be regenerated with a different approach, such as a frontal view or a different artistic style that allows for facial details to be visible.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/56e5e2f181d6.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753738946.9066434 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/242f07318a6f.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/242f07318a6f.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "242f07318a6f", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "Fantasy scene, ethereal glow, bioluminescent fungi, ancient runes, dynamic angle, dramatic lighting, vibrant colors, detailed background, mystical forest, twilight atmosphere, glowing mist, intricate patterns, magical aura, flowing robes, intricate jewelry, close-up focus, expressive eyes, soft focus blur, cinematic composition, rich textures, masterpiece, absurdres, newest, high quality, ultra detailed, vibrant colors, dramatic shadows, glowing elements, magical realism, intricate details, lush environment, fantasy art, intricate designs, glowing runes, mystical ambiance, dynamic perspective, ethereal lighting, surreal atmosphere", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, bad quality, lowres, blurry, distorted perspective, extra limbs, deformed anatomy, ugly, poorly drawn, sketch, watermark, artist signature, text, monochrome, greyscale, censored, bad anatomy, low detail, unnatural colors, distorted proportions, blurry faces, over-saturated, under-saturated, grainy, noise, artifacts, low contrast, high contrast, flat colors, lack of depth, simple background, outdated style, cartoonish, low resolution, bad lighting, unrealistic lighting, unflattering angles, distorted perspective, poor composition", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 5952, + "sample_sources": [ + "(1 girl,2 male),(meme_(me!me!me!),me!me!me!,blue hair,Hime cut,nude,purple thigh highs,purple elbow ...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, uncensored, blonde braid, pastel colors, smooth skin, sh...", + "dutch angle, two-finger, upper body, perspective, chess piece, reaching, abstract chess piece, expre..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 2048, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, as it is obscured by the cape and the glowing effect. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, as it is obscured by the cape and the glowing effect. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the glowing effect drawing the viewer's eye towards the center of the image.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate patterns on the stone structure and the cape adding depth to the scene.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the character's face is not visible, it is impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of its quality. However, based on the other aspects of the image, it can be considered high-quality. If the goal is to include a character with a detailed face, the image would need to be regenerated with the character's face included. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/242f07318a6f.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753739291.5827742 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/fb7b0e46f1cd.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/fb7b0e46f1cd.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "fb7b0e46f1cd", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "1girl, mystical forest, glowing emerald eyes, long silver hair, flowing robes with celestial patterns, standing on a mossy cliff, twilight, dramatic lighting, dynamic composition, detailed textures, masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, 4k, ultra high resolution, cinematic, vivid colors, atmospheric perspective, intricate details, fantasy style, ethereal, mystical, solo, expressive, emotional, natural lighting, soft shadows, blurred background, focus on face and hands, intricate jewelry, glowing amulet, serene expression, magical aura, intricate patterns on robes, masterfully drawn, high contrast, vibrant colors, detailed facial features, glowing eyes, cinematic lighting, dramatic shadows, ultra detailed, photorealistic, high definition, 8k, latest", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, bad quality, worst quality, worst detail, jpeg artifacts, censored, watermark, username, artist name, signature, generic, sketch, 3d, cgi, extra digits, loli, child, web address, poorly drawn, blurry, overexposed, underexposed, unnatural colors, unrealistic proportions, bad anatomy, low detail, low resolution, grainy, pixelated, distorted, bad lighting, flat colors, lack of depth, cartoonish, oversaturated, under-saturated, poor composition, lack of focus, out of focus, motion blur, incorrect perspective, unrealistic shadows, poor texture, low contrast, poor lighting, lack of detail, bad quality, worst quality, generic, worst detail", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 6983, + "sample_sources": [ + "mcht2, rudeus_greyrat, aged_up, elinalise_dragonroad, 1boy, 1girl, ahoge, blonde_hair, blush, sex_fr...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,very aesthetic, 1girl, solo, fat ass, upskirt, cameltoe, an...", + "night, dark theme,blue theme, fern \\(sousou no frieren\\),sousou no frieren,1girl,:t,bed invitation,b..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the mood.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the composition leading the viewer's eye through the scene.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the background and the character's attire.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe main issue is the lack of visibility of the character's face, which prevents a thorough assessment of the face quality. Since the primary focus of the image is on the character, regenerating the image with a visible face would significantly improve the overall quality and meet the high standards expected by the customer.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/fb7b0e46f1cd.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753740979.0876987 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/7365549518b1.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/7365549518b1.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "7365549518b1", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "2girls, interacting, garden, sunset, soft light, photorealistic, detailed, dynamic pose, one reaching out, the other smiling, flowers in background, vibrant colors, natural lighting, focus on their expressions, subtle interaction, lush greenery, realistic textures, high detail, 8k, depth of field, masterwork, best quality, aesthetic, cinematic, natural pose, emotional connection, vibrant atmosphere, (one in flowery dress, the other in white blouse), (soft shadows, golden hour glow), (flowers in foreground, petals scattered), (eyes locked, intimate moment), (detailed skin textures, realistic hair)", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, watermarks, text, logo, signature, username, artifacts, blurry, overexposed, underexposed, grainy, low detail, unrealistic, distorted, extra limbs, censored, inappropriate content, cartoonish, sketch, low contrast, over-saturated, unnatural colors, poor lighting, flat shadows, bad proportions, low resolution, low quality, bad hands, bad feet, extra digits", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 10048, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl, solo, standing, full body, barefoot, indoors, water, legs, from behind, tile, wet, feet, legs...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, DISNEY_ANIMATION, incoth, incase, female...", + "1girl, pretty girl , brunette, freckles, 1girl, gorgeous girl ,kawai girl , cute face, cute girl, br..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not contain any faces; therefore, it cannot be evaluated for face quality. However, the hands and flowers are depicted in a way that suggests a lack of fine detail and realism, which affects the overall quality.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not contain any faces; therefore, it cannot be evaluated for face quality. However, the hands and flowers are depicted in a way that suggests a lack of fine detail and realism, which affects the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nExplanation: While the image has a pleasant composition with vibrant colors and a harmonious use of light, the lack of facial details and the somewhat unrealistic depiction of the hands and flowers detract from its quality. For high-end customers, especially those seeking detailed and realistic illustrations, the current image would need to be regenerated to meet their expectations.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/7365549518b1.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753741448.121929 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e67de175693a.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/e67de175693a.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "e67de175693a", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, ultra-detailed, 2girls, passionate embrace, close-up, dim lighting, soft shadows, red dress, black shirt, intertwined hands, leaning close, lips near, moaning, intimate moment, cinematic lighting, depth of field, blurred background, rich details, glossy skin, natural breasts, tight embrace, dynamic composition, dramatic lighting, soft focus, emotional connection, (dramatic lighting), (soft shadows), (ultra-detailed), (masterpiece), (best quality), (cinematic), (8k), (rich details), (emotional connection), (dynamic composition), (soft focus), (dramatic lighting), (cinematic lighting), (depth of field), (blurred background), (glossy skin), (natural breasts), (intimate moment), (passionate embrace), (ultra-detailed), (masterpiece), (best quality), (cinematic), (8k), (rich details), (emotional connection)", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, bad anatomy, text, watermark, artist signature, blurry, lowres, jpeg artifacts, deformed hands, missing fingers, censorship, explicit content, nudity, inappropriate content, poor lighting, flat colors, lack of detail, bad composition, unattractive, low resolution, poor quality, text, watermark, artist name, lowres, bad anatomy, deformed limbs, missing features, cartoonish, unrealistic, blurry, grainy, low quality, artifacts, distorted faces, bad proportions, unflattering, unappealing, poorly lit, overexposed, underexposed, washed out, lack of depth, flat, lifeless, generic, unoriginal, uncreative, low detail, poor quality, bad resolution", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 10338, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, anime coloring, dynamic lighting, ambient light, soft light, (ultra-detai...", + "2girls, blonde hair, bob cut, large natural breasts, apron, standing against kitchen counter, legs a...", + "masterpiece, best quality, good quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, 8K, depth of field, in t..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face at all, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face at all, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Request the AI model to generate an image that includes the character's face, ensuring that facial details are clear, well-defined, and proportionate. This will allow for a comprehensive evaluation of the image quality based on the specified criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e67de175693a.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753741476.2533498 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/69939bb94a78.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/69939bb94a78.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "69939bb94a78", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, 1girl, glowing eyes, magic aura, flowing robes, intricate patterns, enchanted forest, soft light, detailed textures, dynamic pose, ethereal atmosphere, golden hour, bokeh, depth of field, (wide shot), (colorful), (dramatic lighting), (intricate details), (high resolution), (volumetric lighting), (magic particles), (enchanted elements), (mystical background), (soft focus), (artistic lighting)", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad quality, bad anatomy, sketch, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, simple background, flat colors, unrealistic proportions, (pregnant), (chibi), (loli), (child), (blurry), (plain background), (low detail), (bad lighting), (unrealistic shadows), (inappropriate elements), (censored), (artist name)", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 6576, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, nsfw, explicit, 1girl, solo, pink hair, high pony...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, scenery, 1girl, hatsu...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,1girl, nude, breasts, 1boy, animal ears, sex from behind, s..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not fully visible due to the angle and the long hair covering most of it. The eyes appear to be glowing, which might be intentional, but they lack detail and symmetry. The nose and mouth are not clearly defined, making it difficult to assess their proportions and natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not fully visible due to the angle and the long hair covering most of it. The eyes appear to be glowing, which might be intentional, but they lack detail and symmetry. The nose and mouth are not clearly defined, making it difficult to assess their proportions and natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background adding depth. However, the character's face is partially obscured by hair, which slightly detracts from the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the character's robe and the forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a high overall quality with excellent color and line work. The main issue is the lack of visible facial details, which affects the character's expressiveness. Since the character's face is not fully visible, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a different angle or pose that reveals more of the face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/69939bb94a78.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753741506.6405723 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/32ecf049fbdf.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/32ecf049fbdf.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "32ecf049fbdf", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, surreal atmosphere, glowing runes, neon lights, dynamic pose, dramatic shadows, (dutch angle), (depth of field), (blurred background), (high contrast), (vibrant colors), (glowing eyes), (cyberpunk aesthetic), (futuristic cityscape), (floating platforms), (light beams), (refracted light), (metallic textures), (detailed background), (dynamic composition), (surreal elements), (high detail), (ultra-realistic), (8k), (absurdres), (best quality), (photorealistic), (digital art), (sci-fi), (futuristic armor), (glowing circuitry), (neon hair), (glowing tattoos), (dynamic movement), (motion blur), (high resolution), (detailed textures), (surreal lighting), (colorful environment), (highly detailed), (masterpiece)", + "negative_prompt": "low quality, worst quality, normal quality, jpeg artifacts, watermark, text, error, blurry, ugly, poorly drawn, sketch, monochrome, mutated, extra limbs, deformed, distorted face, bad proportions, out of focus, cloned face, mutated hands, disfigured, extra arms, extra legs, extra fingers, missing arms, missing legs, missing fingers, disconnected limbs, long neck, bad anatomy, bad hands, poorly drawn hands, bad feet, extra eyes, glitched eyes, mutated eyes, cross-eye, asymmetrical eyes, rough sketch, discolored, lazyneg, lazyhand, lowres, grainy, over-saturated, under-saturated, unrealistic colors, incorrect lighting, poor composition, distorted perspective, unnatural proportions, cartoonish, unrealistic anatomy, incorrect proportions, low detail, blurry edges, artifacts, noise, grain, bad quality, unsharp, unclear, unprofessional", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 4355, + "sample_sources": [ + "lazypos, best quality, refined detailed, high quality, highres, cinematic lighting, absurdres, 8k, d...", + "masterpiece, ultra-HD, cinematic lighting, photorealistic, impressionism (1.5), high detail, depth o...", + "beautiful girl, pink hair, bow, blue eyes, idol, long hair, jewelry, star-shaped pupils, long eyelas..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not contain any facial features as it appears to be an abstract, futuristic scene without any characters. Therefore, the face quality cannot be assessed.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not contain any facial features as it appears to be an abstract, futuristic scene without any characters. Therefore, the face quality cannot be assessed.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with vibrant neon lines that are well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with a strong contrast between the bright neon colors and the darker background.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic and engaging, with a sense of depth created by the perspective and lighting.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the neon lights and the geometric shapes.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No visible artifacts or noise.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, with no signs of pixelation or low resolution.\n\nOverall, the image is visually striking and has a high level of detail and color saturation. However, since there are no facial features present, the face quality cannot be evaluated. The absence of characters might be intentional for the style of the image, but if the primary focus is on character design, this image would need to be regenerated. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/32ecf049fbdf.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753742276.7936535 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d90148d345e4.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/d90148d345e4.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "d90148d345e4", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, dynamic composition, 3characters, fantasy realm, enchanted forest, glowing runes, magical aura, intricate clothing, detailed armor, realistic textures, dramatic lighting, cinematic, high contrast, volumetric lighting, intense conversation, emotional connection, group dynamics, interactive poses, stormy sky, ancient castle in the distance, vibrant colors, high detail, epic, fantasy style, intricate background, glowing eyes, magical effects, detailed hair, natural lighting, soft shadows, dramatic atmosphere, cinematic focus", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad quality, worst detail, sketch, blurry, extra limbs, disfigured, low contrast, poorly lit, overexposed, underexposed, bad anatomy, low resolution, artifacts, noise, grainy, unrealistic proportions, incorrect lighting, missing textures, unbalanced composition, distorted perspective, poor color grading, low saturation, flat colors, lack of depth, unrealistic colors, incorrect shadows, missing details, low detail, poor quality, bad lighting, unappealing, low aesthetic, unoriginal, generic, placeholder, low fidelity, low clarity, low sharpness, low definition, low resolution, low detail, low quality, low aesthetic", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 1147, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, detailed eyes, perfect eyes, realistic e...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, newest, holographic colors, c...", + "office woman, solo focus, shirt opened to reveal naked medium breasts, erect nipples, skirt hitched ..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 1536, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The characters' faces are not clearly visible due to their backs facing the viewer, making it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of facial features prevents a thorough evaluation.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The characters' faces are not clearly visible due to their backs facing the viewer, making it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of facial features prevents a thorough evaluation.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the castle as the focal point and the characters positioned effectively in the foreground.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the castle and characters' attire.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe image excels in its overall composition, color, and detail, but the absence of visible character faces prevents a comprehensive assessment of face quality. Therefore, regenerating the image with the characters facing forward would be beneficial to fully evaluate the face quality and ensure the highest satisfaction for the customer.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d90148d345e4.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753742553.0934405 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/26e28e8e4de5.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/26e28e8e4de5.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "26e28e8e4de5", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "2girls, 1boy, interacting, magical forest, glowing runes, dynamic pose, cinematic lighting, detailed, high quality, masterpiece, 8k, detailed background, dynamic composition, Dutch angle, depth of field, glowing elements, enchanted forest, glowing flowers, magical atmosphere, intricate details, vibrant colors, emotional connection, close interaction, soft lighting, volumetric lighting, cinematic background, dynamic angle, expressive faces, detailed textures, high definition, ultra HD, digital art, surreal, magical ambiance, intricate background, glowing runes, enchanted trees, glowing moss, magical creatures, dynamic movement, masterwork, best quality, highres, absurdres, detailed, cinematic, beautiful atmosphere, dynamic composition, high detail, depth of field, glowing, intricate, detailed, high quality, ultra HD, digital art, surreal, magical ambiance", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad quality, low quality, bad anatomy, old, red hood, window, mirror, picture, framed picture, photo, ass, legs, butt, feet, pussy, extra digits, censored, patreon username, loli, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, text, logo, artist name, extra limbs, deformed, distorted face, bad proportions, out of focus, cloned face, mutated hands, disfigured, extra arms, extra legs, extra fingers, missing arms, missing legs, missing fingers, disconnected limbs, long neck, bad anatomy, bad hands, poorly drawn hands, bad feet, extra eyes, glitched eyes, mutated eyes, cross-eye, asymmetrical eyes, rough sketch, discolored, lazyneg, lazyhand", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 8166, + "sample_sources": [ + "1girl, blue eyes, solo, looking at viewer, hood, white hair, cloak, freckles, moon, upper body, hood...", + "safe_pos, safe_pos, score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, anime, best quality, 1girl, female, huge breast...", + "lazypos, best quality, refined detailed, high quality, highres, cinematic lighting, absurdres, 8k, d..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 2048, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The characters' faces are not fully visible due to their backs facing the viewer, making it difficult to assess facial details. However, the proportions and contours appear relatively natural, and the eyes seem symmetrical. There are no apparent blurriness or distortion in the visible parts of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The characters' faces are not fully visible due to their backs facing the viewer, making it difficult to assess facial details. However, the proportions and contours appear relatively natural, and the eyes seem symmetrical. There are no apparent blurriness or distortion in the visible parts of the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the magical forest atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the characters positioned centrally and the forest elements filling the background effectively.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the forest and glowing particles adding depth.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is visually appealing and well-executed, but the lack of visible facial details prevents a higher score. The recommendation would be to regenerate the image with the characters facing forward to allow for a more thorough assessment of facial quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/26e28e8e4de5.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753742613.1484528 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/3616a5b4afa2.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/3616a5b4afa2.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "3616a5b4afa2", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "Masterpiece, best quality, highly detailed, glowing fairy, bioluminescent wings, ethereal glow, mystical forest, moonlit, soft ambient lighting, dynamic pose, flowing robes, intricate jewelry, glowing eyes, slender figure, long flowing hair, curly hair, detailed facial features, serene expression, magical mist, trees with glowing leaves, standing on a hill, dramatic lighting, depth of field, blurred background, fantasy, magical realism, 8k, ultra realistic, vivid colors, intricate textures, soft shadows, natural lighting, cinematic composition", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, low quality, deformed, bad anatomy, blurry, text, unnatural colors, excessive details, cartoonish, low resolution, distorted proportions, poor lighting, over-saturated, under-saturated, bad eyes, bad teeth, bad hands, bad fingers, logo, signature, watermark, 3d render, render, unrealistic, flat, lackluster, poor texture, low contrast, overexposed, underexposed, grainy", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 1970, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, newest, depth of field, (blurred backgro...", + "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, 1woman, incoth, incase, ...", + "Masterpiece, natural look, best quality, amazing quality, realistic skin,highly detailed skin, 18 ye..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 768, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the fairy's wings covering it. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the fairy's wings covering it. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast that enhances the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the fairy positioned centrally and the forest background providing depth.\n- Level of detail richness: Rich, with detailed elements like the fairy's wings, the forest floor, and the glowing flowers.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of visibility of the character's face, which is the primary focus, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall composition and technical aspects are strong, warranting a high score. A regeneration would allow for a more thorough assessment of the character's features.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/3616a5b4afa2.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753742964.351546 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2611fb001cc0.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/2611fb001cc0.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "2611fb001cc0", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "1girl, cyberpunk cityscape, neon lights, holographic signs, rain, reflective surfaces, high-tech gear, detailed circuit patterns, glowing eyes, dramatic lighting, depth of field, volumetric lighting, high contrast, intricate details, cinematic lighting, masterpiece, ultra-HD, 8k, dramatic shadows, natural lighting, detailed textures, futuristic elements, (blurry background)", + "negative_prompt": "lowres, worst quality, bad anatomy, text, watermark, signature, blurry, unnatural poses, distorted features, overly bright, dark circles, poor lighting, missing limbs, extra limbs, artifacts, low detail, plain background", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 2305, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, klskx, 1girl, (fischl \\(genshin impact\\):1.1), completel...", + "2girls, blonde hair, bob cut, large natural breasts, apron, standing against kitchen counter, legs a...", + "mole,mole_under_eye,hime cut,long hair, 1girl,1boy,beautiful face,perfect eyes,detailed eyes, blunt ..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face lacks clear details, especially around the eyes and mouth.\n- The eyes appear somewhat flat and lack depth.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem slightly off, making them look less natural.\n- There are no noticeable blurry or distorted areas, but the lack of detail makes it feel less refined.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, with clean edges on the character and background.\n- Color saturation is high, with vibrant neon colors that enhance the cyberpunk aesthetic.\n- Composition is strong, with the character centered and the cityscape providing a dynamic backdrop.\n- The level of detail is rich, particularly in the background with its intricate neon lights and buildings.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a strong composition and vibrant colors, which are excellent qualities. However, the lack of facial detail detracts from the overall quality. While the score is above average, it could be improved by refining the facial features to make them more defined and natural. Therefore, I would recommend a regeneration to address these facial quality issues.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2611fb001cc0.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753743321.4856577 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/52b16b1bfeeb.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/52b16b1bfeeb.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "52b16b1bfeeb", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece,best quality,2girls,playful interaction,beach,summer,swimsuits,blue bikini,red bikini,holding hands,laughing,smiling,hair in wind,sunlight highlights,dynamic composition,natural lighting,detailed textures,high detail,8k,depth of field,low angle,water reflections,waves,sparkling water,floral hair accessory,sparkling eyes,soft shadows,artistic lighting,realistic skin tones,smooth gradients,highres,absurdres,studio lighting,artistic composition,creative angle,interacting,emotional connection,close-up interaction,soft focus background,bokeh effect,artistic blur,beautiful lighting,perfect proportions,realistic anatomy,accurate proportions,highly detailed,very aesthetic", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality,bad quality,low quality,lowres,anatomical nonsense,bad anatomy,bad hands,extra limbs,missing limbs,blurry,watermark,signature,text,logo,artist name,censored,blurry faces,low detail,poor lighting,overexposed,underexposed,artistic error,monochrome,grayscale,low contrast,high contrast,unrealistic colors,disproportionate features,poor composition,off-center framing,low resolution,blurry edges,jpeg artifacts,noise,grain,low definition", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 7559, + "sample_sources": [ + "nipples, 1girl, solo, panties, underwear, breasts, white panties, navel, large breasts, close-up, he...", + "masterpiece, best quality, newest, absurdres, highres, 1girl, himekaidou_hatate, croptop, covered ni...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality, lumine-hs , beach, bikini, bikini bottom only, blonde hair..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 2048, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The faces are not visible as they are obscured by the characters' bodies.\n- The lack of facial features makes it impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the beach setting.\n- Composition and proportions: Good, with a balanced composition that captures the interaction between the two characters.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with detailed textures on the swimsuits and skin.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the faces are not visible, it's challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the visible elements, the overall image quality is quite good. The absence of facial details prevents a higher score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nTo improve the image, regenerate it with the faces fully visible and detailed. This will allow for a more accurate assessment of the face quality and overall image quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/52b16b1bfeeb.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753743456.8844004 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/4a595dd17192.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/4a595dd17192.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "4a595dd17192", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "score_9, masterpiece, best quality, highres, 8K, 1girl, cyberpunk, neon-pink hair, asymmetrical bob, glowing circuit patterns, cybernetic arm, holographic jacket, glowing neon accessories, dynamic pose, mid-air, rain-soaked cityscape, neon signs, reflective puddles, dramatic lighting, deep focus, intricate background details, futuristic skyline, intense atmosphere, cinematic composition", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, lowres, blurry, bad anatomy, extra limbs, loli, child, text, watermark, simple background, asymmetrical eyes, mismatched eyes, deformed features, flat chest, unrealistic proportions, cartoonish, 3d render, render, poor lighting, overexposed, underexposed, grainy", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 9751, + "sample_sources": [ + "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up. 1girl, solo, brunette hair∙straight hair, medium_round_breasts, puf...", + "score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, 1woman, incoth, incase, ...", + "masterpiece, best quality,high quality, newest, highres,8K,HDR,absurdres, 1boy, androgynous, solo, p..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 512, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the character facing away from the viewer. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours accurately.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the character facing away from the viewer. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours accurately.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the futuristic setting.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with the character positioned centrally and the cityscape providing a dynamic background.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the cityscape and character's outfit.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of visibility of the character's face, which is the primary focus, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall composition, color, and technical aspects are strong. A regeneration focusing on the character's face would be beneficial to meet the high-end customer expectations.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/4a595dd17192.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753743552.0868056 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/672441c9ea31.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/672441c9ea31.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "672441c9ea31", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, 2girls, 1boy, friends, sunset, garden, holding hands, smiling, long flowing dresses, floral patterns, soft golden hour lighting, dramatic shadows, dynamic composition, motion lines, hearts, emotional connection, close-up, warm colors, vibrant palette, detailed textures, natural lighting, soft focus, depth of field, artist: [name], anime style, expressive eyes, gentle breeze, natural elements, interaction, mutual gaze, playful atmosphere, romantic scene, high contrast, rich details, nature-inspired colors, dynamic lighting, dramatic shadows, soft focus, depth of field", + "negative_prompt": "worst quality, lowres, bad anatomy, bad hands, deformed, distorted, monochrome background, text, censored, blurry, watermark, extra hands, greyscale, black and white, uneven tan, low quality, displeasing, bad lighting, poor composition", + "multi_character_focus": true, + "generation_attempt": 7830, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, 5p4rr0w, artist style, office...", + "masterpiece, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, newest, 1girl, solo, 28 year old girl, c...", + "Opening, score_9, score_8_up, masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, high detailed, a..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1536, + "height": 768, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The faces of the characters are not visible as they are obscured by their dresses. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the faces.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The faces of the characters are not visible as they are obscured by their dresses. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the faces.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the romantic atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with a pleasing composition that draws the viewer's eye towards the couple walking away into the sunset.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the dresses and the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe main issue is the lack of visible faces due to the character's attire, which prevents a thorough assessment of face quality. However, the rest of the image is of high quality, making a score of 8 appropriate.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/672441c9ea31.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753743829.8347573 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/def42f3f7fbe.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/def42f3f7fbe.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "def42f3f7fbe", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "1girl, glowing runes, magical forest, wearing a cloak with silver threads, standing on a cliff, wind blowing her hair, glowing eyes, holding a staff, surrounded by floating lights, dynamic pose, intricate details, masterwork, best quality, dramatic lighting, vivid colors, high contrast, cinematic composition, expressive, atmospheric, enchanted ambiance", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, lowres, jpeg artifacts, watermarks, logos, blur, extra digits, bad anatomy, bad hands, censored, signature, artist name, text, generic, low detail, cartoonish, 3d, cgi, unrealistic proportions, extra limbs", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 6619, + "sample_sources": [ + "high detail, detailed, masterpiece, masterwork, super cute style, 1girl, pink and white striped sock...", + "mcht2, rudeus_greyrat, aged_up, elinalise_dragonroad, 1boy, 1girl, ahoge, blonde_hair, blush, sex_fr...", + "1girl, breasts, swimsuit, solo, barefoot, long hair, navel, closed eyes, large breasts, feet, slings..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 512, + "height": 2048, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible due to the silhouette.\n- The lack of facial features makes it impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and a clear focal point.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with a strong contrast between the dark background and the glowing elements.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is effective, drawing the viewer's eye upwards towards the glowing elements.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a good level of detail, especially in the glowing elements and the character's silhouette.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the image size.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the character's face is not visible, it is challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, the overall image quality is quite good, with strong composition and detail. Given that the primary focus is on the character's face, which is not present, the image would benefit from regenerating with a visible face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/def42f3f7fbe.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753743856.1883304 + }, + { + "image_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5305d0e70613.png", + "metadata_file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/metadata/5305d0e70613.json", + "metadata": { + "filename_hash": "5305d0e70613", + "original_prompt_data": { + "positive_prompt": "HDR, 8K, high contrast, masterpiece, best quality, absurdres, cyberpunk, neon lights, futuristic city, rainy night, vibrant colors, saturated hues, ultra-detailed, digital painting, concept art, 1girl, cybernetic enhancements, glowing eyes, neon hair, rain effects, reflective puddles, dynamic lighting, soft shadows, high detail, sharp shading, centered composition, foggy atmosphere, light beams, intricate textures, futuristic clothing, glowing accessories, detailed facial expressions, cinematic view, wide angle, environmental interaction, vibrant cityscape, ultra-realistic, cinematic lighting", + "negative_prompt": "bad quality, worst quality, lowres, jpeg artifacts, bad anatomy, distorted features, missing elements, extra limbs, blurred details, overexposed, underexposed, poor composition, watermarks, signatures, usernames, censored, sketchy, low detail, incorrect proportions, unrealistic lighting, foggy, dark, overly bright, distorted colors, poor texture, incorrect perspective, unnatural shadows, blurry background, low contrast, flat colors, unappealing, unoriginal, generic", + "multi_character_focus": false, + "generation_attempt": 4493, + "sample_sources": [ + "masterpiece, best quality, very aesthetic, absurdres, anime coloring, dynamic lighting, ambient ligh...", + "masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,absurdres, BREAK lucy heartfilia, 1girl, armpits, bare arms...", + "HDR,8K,high contrast,masterpiece,best quality,amazing quality,very aesthetic,high resolution,absurdr..." + ] + }, + "generation_parameters": { + "width": 1024, + "height": 1024, + "num_inference_steps": 35, + "guidance_scale": 7.5 + }, + "model_info": { + "model_path": "models/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140.safetensors", + "model_type": "StableDiffusionXL", + "torch_dtype": "float16" + } + }, + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible due to the mask covering it.\n- The lack of facial features makes it difficult to assess the clarity and definition of facial details.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the neon aesthetic.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the cityscape providing a dynamic background.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the buildings and the character's outfit.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus is on the character's face, which is not visible due to the mask, the overall score is slightly lower than ideal. However, the rest of the image is of high quality. If the goal is to showcase the character's appearance, the mask should be removed or replaced with a more detailed face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5305d0e70613.png" + }, + "timestamp": 1753743959.8598626 + } +] \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/illustrious_generated/natural_caption_generation_report.txt b/illustrious_generated/natural_caption_generation_report.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..89307d8131677a864c95c6c15c728ab286709269 --- /dev/null +++ b/illustrious_generated/natural_caption_generation_report.txt @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ + +=== Natural Caption Generation Report === + +Processing Statistics: +- Total images processed: 9618 +- Successfully captioned: 9618 +- Errors encountered: 0 +- Success rate: 100.0% + +Time Statistics: +- Total processing time: 533.1 minutes +- Average time per image: 3.33 seconds + +Completion time: 2025-07-29 20:42:34 diff --git a/illustrious_generated/optimization_final_results.json b/illustrious_generated/optimization_final_results.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..968303f4e456ed2cbf2be01df26bce2eb5cccc87 --- /dev/null +++ b/illustrious_generated/optimization_final_results.json @@ -0,0 +1,6502 @@ +[ + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d337c665d640.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d337c665d640/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good detail and composition. However, the absence of the character's face means we cannot fully assess the facial quality. If the face were included, it would likely be rated as \"Good\" based on the other elements present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not included, I cannot provide a complete assessment of the facial quality. If the face were added, the overall score could potentially increase. As it stands, the image is already quite high-quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d337c665d640/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d337c665d640/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The image appears to be focused on a close-up of a body part rather than a character's face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition seems intentional, focusing on the curves and textures of the skin.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a good level of detail in the skin texture and reflections, which adds depth to the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image does not contain a visible face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall image quality is good, with rich details and vibrant colors. Given that the primary focus was likely intended to be on the character's face, the absence of a face makes it difficult to provide a comprehensive assessment. If the intention was to showcase a different aspect of the character, such as the body or clothing, then the image could be considered satisfactory. If the goal was indeed to show a face, then regeneration would be necessary to meet the customer's expectations.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d337c665d640/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d337c665d640/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The image appears to be cropped too close to the chest area, which makes it difficult to evaluate the overall composition and proportions.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined, especially around the chest area.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The image is focused on the chest area, but due to the cropping, it's hard to determine if the proportions are correct.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, particularly in the shading and texture of the skin.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise in the visible part of the image.\n- No obvious generation errors are present in the visible part of the image.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the image. However, based on the visible parts, the image seems to have good technical quality. The recommendation would be to regenerate the image with a focus on including the face to allow for a more thorough evaluation of the character's features and overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d337c665d640/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d337c665d640/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good attention to detail and a well-composed scene. However, the absence of the character's face means we cannot fully assess the facial quality, which is a significant aspect of the image. If the face were included, the score could potentially be higher.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not present, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a complete face to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of the facial quality. This will allow for a more accurate assessment and a higher overall score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d337c665d640/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d337c665d640/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality assessment of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality assessment of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are smooth and well-defined, indicating good quality.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, making the image visually appealing.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the body and the moon in the background, which adds depth to the image.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the skin texture and the reflections of light.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors; the image appears to be a high-quality illustration.\n- Resolution: The resolution seems adequate for the level of detail present in the image.\n\nGiven that the face is not visible, the overall quality is still quite high. However, if the image were intended to include a face, the absence of facial features would significantly impact the quality score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nIf the image were to include a face, it might need regeneration to ensure that the facial features are clear, symmetrical, and proportionate. Otherwise, the current image is of high quality and can be used as is.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d337c665d640/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/4360dd6c5fe6.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 9, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4360dd6c5fe6/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, giving the image a vibrant yet natural look.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned attractively within the frame.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's hair, jewelry, and skin texture.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of very high quality with only minor improvements needed to reach perfection. However, if you want to ensure the highest standards, a slight adjustment in the lighting could enhance the depth and dimensionality of the image further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nFinal recommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4360dd6c5fe6/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4360dd6c5fe6/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate.\n- The level of detail richness is satisfactory.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality anime style with good character face details and overall composition. However, it could benefit from slightly more vibrant colors and perhaps a bit more contrast to make the image pop even more.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: The image is already quite good, but if the customer desires a more vibrant and contrasting look, it might be worth adjusting the color palette and contrast levels slightly.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4360dd6c5fe6/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4360dd6c5fe6/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face at all, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality and appeal of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face at all, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality and appeal of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on the feet, which is clear and intentional, but the lack of a face affects the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details like the anklet and the texture of the fabric.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks a face, which is typically the primary focus in many anime-style illustrations, the overall score is reduced due to the missing element that would otherwise contribute significantly to the image's quality and appeal. The absence of a face makes it difficult to assess the image comprehensively.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nTo improve the image, consider regenerating it with a full face included, ensuring that the face is clear, well-defined, and proportionate. This will enhance the overall quality and make the image more engaging for viewers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4360dd6c5fe6/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4360dd6c5fe6/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contours are natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, giving the image a vibrant yet natural look.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, capturing the interaction between the two characters effectively.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with fine hair strands and subtle shading enhancing the realism.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with only minor improvements needed to reach perfection. However, the slight improvement in line clarity could enhance the overall score slightly.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: The image is already of high quality but could benefit from a slight enhancement in line clarity to achieve a perfect 10/10.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4360dd6c5fe6/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4360dd6c5fe6/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate.\n- The level of detail richness is satisfactory.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality anime style with good character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed or if the lighting had a bit more variation to add depth.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but it could potentially benefit from a slight enhancement in background detail and lighting to make it even more visually appealing.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4360dd6c5fe6/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a6bb9c91d34f.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 9, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a6bb9c91d34f/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned prominently against the scenic background.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's fur, wings, and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of very high quality with only minor improvements needed to reach perfection. However, if you want to ensure the highest standards, you might consider refining the subtle details around the edges of the character's fur and wings to make them even more defined.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a6bb9c91d34f/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a6bb9c91d34f/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the main subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's scales and the glowing mushrooms.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the wings had more defined feather details and the lighting on the character was more dynamic to enhance the three-dimensional effect.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a6bb9c91d34f/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a6bb9c91d34f/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the dragon positioned centrally and the mushrooms adding depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the dragon's scales and the glowing effects around it.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. The only minor issue is that the dragon's wings could be slightly more detailed, but this does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a6bb9c91d34f/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a6bb9c91d34f/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the dragon positioned prominently in the frame.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the dragon's scales and wings.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of very high quality with no significant issues. The dragon is beautifully rendered, and the background adds to the magical atmosphere without distracting from the main subject.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nFinal Recommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a6bb9c91d34f/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a6bb9c91d34f/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the wings and the forest setting.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the wings had more intricate details or if the background had even more depth.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a6bb9c91d34f/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0f049a4bf8e6.png", + "improved_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/improved/0f049a4bf8e6.png", + "original_score": 6, + "improved_score": 8, + "improvement": 2, + "best_candidate_source": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0f049a4bf8e6/candidate_1.png", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0f049a4bf8e6/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate for the subject matter.\n- The level of detail richness is satisfactory.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good facial details and a balanced composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the color saturation was a bit more vibrant and the contrast was a touch sharper.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high quality, but a few minor adjustments could enhance it further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0f049a4bf8e6/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0f049a4bf8e6/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed, with good shading that enhances depth.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural, with smooth transitions between features.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high, with clean edges and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation is good, with warm tones that complement the subject's skin tone.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, focusing on the intimate moment between the characters.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the facial features and the texture of the skin.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character face details and overall composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the color contrast were more pronounced and the background were less distracting.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0f049a4bf8e6/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0f049a4bf8e6/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate for the subject matter.\n- The level of detail richness is satisfactory.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good facial details and a balanced composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the color saturation was a bit more vibrant and the contrast was pushed a little more for a stronger impact.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0f049a4bf8e6/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0f049a4bf8e6/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate for the subject matter.\n- The level of detail richness is satisfactory.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the content.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good facial details and a balanced composition. However, the subject matter might be considered inappropriate for some audiences, which could affect the overall rating if it were intended for a general audience. If the image is intended for a more mature audience, the content is appropriate.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nIf the image is intended for a more mature audience, it would be appropriate as is. If it needs to be more suitable for a general audience, additional adjustments might be necessary to ensure it aligns with the intended content.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0f049a4bf8e6/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0f049a4bf8e6/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n1. The facial details are somewhat lacking in definition, especially around the eyes and lips.\n2. The eyes appear slightly asymmetrical and lack detail.\n3. The proportions of the nose and mouth seem a bit off, particularly the nose which appears too large relative to the face.\n4. The facial contour is not entirely natural, as the transition between the face and the neck area looks a bit abrupt.\n5. There are no visible blurriness or distortion, but the lack of detail makes it feel less refined.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n1. Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally clean but lack the fine detail that would make them more crisp.\n2. Color saturation and contrast: The colors are soft and muted, which might be intentional for the style but could be improved for higher contrast.\n3. Composition and proportions: The composition is centered on the kiss, which is effective, but the proportions of the faces and the overall body seem a bit off.\n4. Level of detail richness: The image lacks the richness in detail that would make it more visually engaging.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n1. No apparent artifacts or noise.\n2. No obvious generation errors.\n3. The resolution seems adequate for the style, but finer details could enhance the image further.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has potential but falls short in terms of facial detail and proportion. It's close to being satisfactory but could benefit from a bit more refinement in those areas. Therefore, I recommend regeneration to address these specific issues and improve the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0f049a4bf8e6/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/4a928e27008c.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4a928e27008c/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing effect.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the magical effects around them.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the lack of a detailed face could be improved upon, as it might not fully meet the expectations of high-end customers who often appreciate intricate facial features.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: While the image is already quite good, if the client has very high standards for facial detail, it might be worth considering a regeneration that focuses on enhancing the character's facial features while maintaining the overall composition and quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4a928e27008c/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4a928e27008c/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, though the glowing effects might slightly obscure some lines.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant, contributing to the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the glowing effects and the forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a captivating background. The only minor issue is the slight obscuration of lines due to the glowing effects, which could be improved by adjusting the transparency or blending of these elements.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4a928e27008c/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4a928e27008c/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the forest background providing a good backdrop.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the magical elements and the forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. The only minor issue is that the character's face is not shown, which prevents a perfect score. However, the rest of the image is very strong.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4a928e27008c/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4a928e27008c/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high, especially around the character and the magical symbols.\n- Color saturation is vibrant, with a good contrast between the glowing elements and the darker background.\n- Composition is strong, with the character centered and the magical symbols drawing the viewer's eye.\n- The level of detail is rich, particularly in the character's clothing and the intricate patterns on the ground.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. The only minor issue is that the face is not shown, which prevents a perfect score. However, the rest of the image is very well executed.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4a928e27008c/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4a928e27008c/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a vibrant yet harmonious look.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the magical effects around them.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent attention to detail and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more intricately detailed, which would add even more depth to the overall composition.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4a928e27008c/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9c961fbe1f6c.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 9, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9c961fbe1f6c/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed, with a good level of detail in the irises.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural and smooth.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with a focus on the character's face and the glowing flowers adding depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the hair and clothing textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of very high quality with only minor improvements needed to reach perfection. However, the glow effect on the flowers could be slightly more pronounced to enhance the magical atmosphere further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: The image is already of high quality but could benefit from a slight enhancement in the glow effect on the flowers to make them stand out more.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9c961fbe1f6c/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9c961fbe1f6c/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality finish with excellent attention to detail and a pleasing composition. However, the lack of visible eyes makes it difficult to fully assess the symmetry and detail of the eyes. If the eyes were included, the face quality would be even better.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the eyes are not visible, it might be beneficial to regenerate the image with a more complete face view to ensure the symmetry and detail of the eyes are also accurate. This could slightly improve the overall score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9c961fbe1f6c/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9c961fbe1f6c/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face, so we cannot evaluate facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features means that the primary focus of the image is on the chest area, which appears to be rendered with good detail.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face, so we cannot evaluate facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features means that the primary focus of the image is on the chest area, which appears to be rendered with good detail.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and clear contrasts.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on the chest area, which is well-proportioned and detailed.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate designs on the skin.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nSince the image lacks facial details, it is difficult to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the face quality. However, the overall image quality is quite good, with high detail and vibrant colors. The absence of facial features means that the image may not meet the expectations of customers looking for a full-face portrait. \n\nRecommendation: Since the primary focus is on the chest area, the image could still be considered high-quality. However, if the customer is specifically interested in a full-face portrait, the image would need to be regenerated to include the face. If the customer is satisfied with the chest area, no regeneration is necessary.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: [No]", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9c961fbe1f6c/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9c961fbe1f6c/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show a face, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the hand and body part depicted appear to be rendered with good detail and smooth textures.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show a face, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the hand and body part depicted appear to be rendered with good detail and smooth textures.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast that enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the hand and the glowing symbol, which adds interest without overwhelming the viewer.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the hand and the glowing symbol, which stands out against the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nSince the image lacks a face, the primary focus cannot be evaluated. However, the technical aspects of the image are strong, and the overall quality is high. The absence of a face might be intentional, but if the goal is to create a high-quality image with a face as the primary focus, the image would need to be regenerated.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9c961fbe1f6c/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9c961fbe1f6c/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed, with a captivating glow that enhances the character's expression.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct, contributing to a natural look.\n- The facial contour is smooth and natural, without any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent, with no visible artifacts or noise.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- The composition is effective, with the eye as the focal point, and the background elements complement the main subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the eye and the glowing elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No obvious generation errors or artifacts are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent attention to detail and a well-composed scene. The only minor issue could be the slight overexposure on the eye, which might be improved by adjusting the lighting slightly. However, this does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration. It can be used as-is for high-end customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9c961fbe1f6c/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9917f32d22ba.png", + "improved_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/improved/9917f32d22ba.png", + "original_score": 4, + "improved_score": 6, + "improvement": 2, + "best_candidate_source": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9917f32d22ba/candidate_1.png", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9917f32d22ba/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not show a face; it focuses on a close-up of legs and underwear.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The proportions and contours of the legs appear somewhat unnatural due to the stylized nature of the illustration.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are somewhat smooth but lack fine detail.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant, but the contrast seems a bit high, which might be intentional for artistic effect.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is focused on the legs, which is appropriate for the style, but the absence of a face makes it less engaging.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is moderate, but the focus is on the texture of the fabric rather than intricate details.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the style of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the image does not contain a face, it cannot be evaluated based on facial quality. However, the absence of a face and the focus on the legs make it less engaging as a whole. It would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a face included to better assess its quality according to the specified criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9917f32d22ba/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9917f32d22ba/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image appears to be focused on a different part of the body rather than a face.\n- There are no facial features present in the image, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n- The absence of a face means that the image cannot be assessed for facial quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nExplanation: Since the image does not contain a face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the image seems to be focused on a different part of the body, which might not meet the expectations of high-end customers who typically look for detailed and well-rendered faces. For a more comprehensive evaluation, the image should be regenerated to include a face.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9917f32d22ba/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9917f32d22ba/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not show a character's face at all, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details.\n- The absence of a face makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack fine detail, which is typical for anime-style illustrations.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant, especially the red underwear, but the contrast seems a bit low, making the image less striking.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on the lower part of the body, which is acceptable for certain types of art but not suitable for a full-body or face-focused evaluation.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is moderate, with some areas showing a glossy texture that could be improved for more realism.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the style of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the image lacks a face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the lower score indicates that the image could benefit from more detail and refinement, particularly in the areas where the character's body is shown. It might be beneficial to regenerate the image with a focus on the upper body or face if that aligns with the customer's preferences.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9917f32d22ba/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9917f32d22ba/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not show a face; it focuses on a lower body part.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The absence of a face makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack fine detail.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant, but the contrast seems a bit low, making the image less striking.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered around the lower body part, which is unusual for a full-body image.\n- Level of detail richness: The image lacks detail due to the focus on a non-face area.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are visible.\n- No obvious generation errors are apparent.\n- The resolution appears adequate for the content shown.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the image does not contain a face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the focus on the lower body part suggests that the image might have been intended as a different type of illustration. If the intention was to create a full-body image, the artist should regenerate the image to include a face and ensure proper facial features are included. If the intention was to focus on the lower body, then the current image could be considered satisfactory, but it would still benefit from more detail and a clearer composition.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9917f32d22ba/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9917f32d22ba/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The image appears to be focused on a different part of the character's body, specifically the neck and collar area.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are somewhat clear but lack definition due to the focus on the neck area rather than the face.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted, and the contrast is low, making the image appear flat.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is off as the image is not centered on the face; instead, it focuses on the neck and collar area.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a lack of detail in the image, especially since the face is not shown.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No obvious artifacts or noise are present.\n- No generation errors are apparent.\n- The resolution seems adequate for the content shown, but it would benefit from a higher resolution if the face were included.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it is impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the visible parts of the image, the overall quality is below par. It would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a focus on the face to meet the high standards expected by high-end customers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9917f32d22ba/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ee4940943b83.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 9, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee4940943b83/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a vibrant and engaging scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with intricate patterns and glowing effects adding depth to the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of very high quality with only minor improvements needed. The character's face is well-rendered, and the overall composition is visually appealing. However, if you want to ensure the highest standards, you might consider a slight adjustment to the lighting to enhance the glow effect around the character, making it even more radiant.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee4940943b83/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee4940943b83/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, giving the image a vibrant yet harmonious look.\n- Composition and proportions are excellent, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's attire and the intricate patterns in the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and background details. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more intricately detailed without overshadowing the main character.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee4940943b83/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee4940943b83/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the forest background providing a good frame.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the glowing elements and the intricate patterns on the rings.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the lack of a detailed face could be improved if the customer specifically requests it. \n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face quality is already good, but not the primary focus of the image, I would suggest keeping the current score at 8/10. If the customer wants a more detailed face, they might consider requesting a regeneration with a focus on enhancing the facial features. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee4940943b83/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee4940943b83/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a pleasant visual effect.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the glowing elements in the forest.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed or if the lighting had a bit more variation to add depth.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee4940943b83/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee4940943b83/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the forest background providing a good balance.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's robe and the magical effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the magical effects were more intricate and detailed.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but it could benefit from a bit more refinement in the magical effects to enhance its overall impact.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee4940943b83/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e51750b3db46.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e51750b3db46/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is completely obscured by the hood, making it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The lack of visible facial features prevents a thorough evaluation.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is completely obscured by the hood, making it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The lack of visible facial features prevents a thorough evaluation.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the background elements contributing to a harmonious composition.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate patterns on the character's cloak and the detailed mushroom forest in the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe primary issue is the absence of facial details due to the character's hood, which significantly impacts the overall quality assessment. However, the rest of the image is of high quality, and regenerating the image with a visible face would greatly improve its appeal and functionality for high-end customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e51750b3db46/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e51750b3db46/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the hands framing the scene effectively.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the background elements like the glowing patterns and the character's attire.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the lack of facial features on the character could be improved if the face were included, as it would add more depth to the character's expression and presence.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: While the image is already quite good, if the customer desires a more complete character with facial features, it might be beneficial to regenerate the image with a face included to enhance the overall impact and engagement.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e51750b3db46/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e51750b3db46/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with a clear focus on the central elements.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the glowing effects and magical symbols.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the complexity of the image.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and magical elements. The only minor issue is that the face of the character is not shown, which prevents a perfect score. However, the rest of the image is very well done.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e51750b3db46/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e51750b3db46/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not contain a character face; instead, it features a glowing orb with symbols around it. Therefore, the face quality cannot be assessed as per the given criteria.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not contain a character face; instead, it features a glowing orb with symbols around it. Therefore, the face quality cannot be assessed as per the given criteria.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines radiating from the center.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant yellow and white colors creating a strong contrast.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic, with the central orb drawing the viewer's eye outward.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate patterns surrounding the orb.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nSince the image does not contain a character face, the face quality assessment is not applicable. However, the overall image quality is very good, with no technical issues noted. The dynamic composition and rich details make it visually appealing.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nIf you need a character face included in the image, please regenerate the image with that requirement.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e51750b3db46/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e51750b3db46/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the hands and the background are well-detailed.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the hands and the background are well-detailed.\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with the hands framing the central glowing symbol effectively.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate patterns on the hands and the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the high-quality composition, rich details, and absence of technical issues, the image is already quite good. However, since the primary focus is on the character's face, which is not present in this image, the score is slightly lower due to the lack of evaluation criteria for the face.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e51750b3db46/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/039a77bc12d4.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 9, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039a77bc12d4/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the wings spread out effectively.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with intricate wing patterns and a detailed body design.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent details and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the wings had more intricate feather details or if the background had a bit more depth.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but a few minor enhancements could make it even better.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039a77bc12d4/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039a77bc12d4/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and dynamic.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the wings and scales.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent details and vibrant colors. However, the score could be slightly higher if the wings had more intricate detailing and the background had a bit more depth.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but a few minor enhancements could make it even better.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039a77bc12d4/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039a77bc12d4/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the dragon positioned prominently against the cosmic background.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the dragon's scales and wings.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a visually appealing background. However, the score could be slightly higher if the dragon's wings had more intricate feather details, which would add even more richness to the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but a slight enhancement in wing detail could elevate it further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039a77bc12d4/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039a77bc12d4/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the dragon positioned prominently against the cosmic background.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the dragon's scales and wings.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of very high quality with no significant issues. The dragon is beautifully rendered, and the cosmic background adds a magical touch. The only slight improvement could be in the subtle shading on the dragon's body to enhance depth, but this is a minor detail that does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039a77bc12d4/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039a77bc12d4/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the dragon positioned prominently against the cosmic background.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the dragon's scales and wings.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of very high quality with no significant issues. The dragon is beautifully rendered, and the background adds a magical touch without detracting from the main subject.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nFinal recommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039a77bc12d4/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cd4f7da85fec.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4f7da85fec/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, capturing the serene beach scene effectively.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's hair and the sunset.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and background composition. The only minor issue is that the face is not fully visible, which might be a stylistic choice but could affect the overall impact if it's intended as a full portrait. However, this does not significantly detract from the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4f7da85fec/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4f7da85fec/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not contain a character's face; therefore, it cannot be evaluated based on facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents a comprehensive assessment of facial quality.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not contain a character's face; therefore, it cannot be evaluated based on facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents a comprehensive assessment of facial quality.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, especially in the sunset scene.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the foot and leg in the foreground and the beach and sunset in the background. The proportions seem natural.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a high level of detail, particularly in the textures of the sand, water, and clothing.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors in the image.\n\nSince the image lacks a character's face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall image quality is good, and the technical aspects are satisfactory. The absence of a face is a significant drawback that prevents a higher score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4f7da85fec/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4f7da85fec/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth transitions and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with warm, inviting tones that enhance the beach setting.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with a strong focus on the feet and the distant figure, creating depth and interest.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the waves and the texture of the sand.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of a visible face, the image cannot be fully evaluated for facial quality. However, the technical aspects and composition are strong, warranting a high score despite the missing face.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4f7da85fec/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4f7da85fec/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face at all, which makes it impossible to evaluate facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The absence of the face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face at all, which makes it impossible to evaluate facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The absence of the face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nExplanation: While the image has good line clarity, color saturation, and composition, the lack of a visible face prevents a comprehensive evaluation of the character's facial features. For high-end customers, having a complete and detailed image is crucial. Therefore, regenerating the image with the character's face included would be necessary to meet the high standards expected by these customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4f7da85fec/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4f7da85fec/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not include a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents the assessment of these critical elements.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not include a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents the assessment of these critical elements.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the feet and the sunset, which adds to the aesthetic appeal.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the texture of the skin and the reflections on the water.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors; the image appears to be a high-quality rendering.\n- Resolution: The resolution seems adequate for the level of detail present in the image.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks a face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall image quality is good, and the technical aspects are satisfactory. The absence of a face is a significant drawback that prevents a higher score. Therefore, I would recommend regeneration to include a face if the customer's requirements include one.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4f7da85fec/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/95a03676700c.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/95a03676700c/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluation of facial clarity and definition.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluation of facial clarity and definition.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined, especially around the character's flowing hair and the coral structures.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and well-saturated, creating a visually appealing underwater scene. The contrast between the light and dark areas enhances the depth of the image.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the coral formations framing the scene effectively. The proportions of the character and the environment seem appropriate.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, particularly in the coral formations and the texture of the water.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, allowing for clear details in both the character's hair and the surrounding environment.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is on the character's face, and the face is not visible, the image cannot be fully evaluated based on the provided criteria. However, given that the overall composition and technical aspects are strong, the image could potentially be improved by adding a face to the character. If the customer requires a face, regeneration would be necessary to meet their expectations.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/95a03676700c/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/95a03676700c/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the character's pose facing away from the viewer. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of a visible face prevents a thorough evaluation of these aspects.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the character's pose facing away from the viewer. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of a visible face prevents a thorough evaluation of these aspects.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the underwater scene.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with the character positioned centrally and the composition balanced between the underwater elements and the character.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the coral and the character's flowing robe.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the other aspects evaluated, the image is of high quality. If the customer specifically requests a face, the image would need to be regenerated with a different pose or angle to include the face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/95a03676700c/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/95a03676700c/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the character's pose, which obscures the face entirely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the character's pose, which obscures the face entirely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally smooth and well-defined, contributing to a clean look.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, enhancing the underwater ambiance.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the background elements adding depth.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the coral and fish, which add to the underwater setting.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n\nThe primary issue is the lack of visibility of the character's face, which is crucial for assessing facial quality. Since the face cannot be seen, the overall score is slightly reduced. However, the rest of the image is of high quality, and regenerating the image to include the face would significantly improve its quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/95a03676700c/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/95a03676700c/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing underwater scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the flowing hair and the underwater environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent execution in terms of character design, composition, and technical aspects. However, the score could be slightly higher if the hair's flow and the underwater environment had even more intricate details.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/95a03676700c/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/95a03676700c/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing underwater scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned centrally and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the coral and fish, which adds depth to the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent execution in terms of character design, background, and overall composition. The only minor issue is that the face is not shown, but since it's not the primary focus, this doesn't significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image meets the high standards expected by high-end customers and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/95a03676700c/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ee934c327ef4.png", + "improved_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/improved/ee934c327ef4.png", + "original_score": 6, + "improved_score": 8, + "improvement": 2, + "best_candidate_source": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee934c327ef4/candidate_1.png", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee934c327ef4/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate for the subject matter.\n- The level of detail richness is satisfactory.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the content.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background were more refined or if there was a bit more detail in the clothing textures.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but a few minor adjustments could enhance it further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee934c327ef4/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee934c327ef4/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate for the subject matter.\n- The level of detail richness is satisfactory.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the content.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good character design and composition. However, the lack of facial expressions and the focus on the lower body might not be ideal for all customers. If the intended purpose is to showcase the characters' upper bodies, the image could be improved by adding more facial details and expressions.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image already meets most criteria for high-end customers, it can be considered satisfactory as is. However, if the goal is to include more facial details and expressions, a regeneration focusing on those aspects would be beneficial. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: No (for the current purpose), but Yes (if more facial details and expressions are desired).", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee934c327ef4/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee934c327ef4/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- Facial contours look natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate for the subject matter.\n- The level of detail richness is satisfactory.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the content.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good character design and detail. However, the score could be slightly higher if the composition were more balanced and the background elements were less distracting.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but a slight adjustment in composition and perhaps a bit more focus on the background could enhance its overall quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee934c327ef4/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee934c327ef4/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- Facial contours look natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good character design and detail. However, the score could be slightly higher if the facial expressions were more dynamic or varied, which might enhance the overall engagement and interest of the viewer.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high quality, but for a perfect score, it would benefit from a bit more variation in facial expressions or additional context to make the scene more engaging.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee934c327ef4/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee934c327ef4/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good character design and composition. However, the absence of facial expressions could be improved to make the characters more engaging. Additionally, the focus on the lower body might be distracting from the facial features if that wasn't the intended focus.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face quality is good and the overall image quality is high, it's not necessary to regenerate the image. However, if you want to enhance the facial expressions or add more detail to the faces, it would be beneficial. For now, the image can be considered satisfactory as it meets the high standards set by your customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee934c327ef4/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e775a7d63dd7.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e775a7d63dd7/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- The facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed, with a red glow that adds depth.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural, especially around the jawline and cheeks.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Slightly muted but still effective, creating a mysterious atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the forest background providing a good sense of depth.\n- Level of detail richness: Rich enough to convey a detailed environment without being overly cluttered.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. The only minor issue is the slightly muted color palette, which could be adjusted for a more vibrant effect if desired.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image meets the high standards set by professional illustrators and would likely satisfy most high-end customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e775a7d63dd7/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e775a7d63dd7/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it.\n- The eyes are not detailed enough as they appear as a single glowing point.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth are not discernible due to the lack of facial features.\n- The facial contour is not natural since the face is not shown.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with a strong blue tone that enhances the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the forest background providing depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate patterns on the character's cape and the glowing mushrooms adding to the richness.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- No obvious generation errors are observed.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a high overall quality with good composition and rich details. However, the lack of facial features significantly impacts the character's presence and the overall impact of the image. Since the primary focus is on the character, regenerating the image with a visible face would enhance its quality and appeal to high-end customers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e775a7d63dd7/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e775a7d63dd7/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a moody atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the forest background providing depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the mushrooms and the character's cloak.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and atmospheric composition. The only minor issue is that the character's face is not fully visible due to the hood, which might be a stylistic choice but could be improved if the client prefers more visibility.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration. However, if the client prefers a more visible face, the artist could consider removing the hood or adjusting the lighting to reveal more of the character's features.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e775a7d63dd7/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e775a7d63dd7/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the glowing mushrooms and the intricate circular pattern behind the character.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the lack of a detailed background or additional elements might slightly reduce the overall impact. \n\nRecommendation: The image is already quite high-quality, but if you want to enhance it further, consider adding more background details or a second character to create a more dynamic scene. This would not be necessary for a score of 8/10, but it could make the image even more engaging for viewers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e775a7d63dd7/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e775a7d63dd7/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, with a cool blue tone that enhances the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the forest background providing a good sense of depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the glowing elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. The only minor issue is the slightly low score due to the lack of a more detailed background, which could be improved by adding more intricate forest details or additional characters.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e775a7d63dd7/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/26af3cd61cd0.png", + "improved_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/improved/26af3cd61cd0.png", + "original_score": 6, + "improved_score": 8, + "improvement": 2, + "best_candidate_source": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/26af3cd61cd0/candidate_2.png", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/26af3cd61cd0/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The eyes are not symmetrical; one appears larger than the other.\n- The nose and mouth proportions seem slightly off, particularly the nose which looks too small relative to the face.\n- There are some blurry areas around the edges of the face, especially near the hair and neck.\n- The facial contour is somewhat unnatural, lacking smooth transitions.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are decent but could be improved for finer details.\n- Color saturation and contrast are good, providing a vibrant look.\n- Composition and proportions are generally well-balanced, though the angle of the character's head might be more dynamic.\n- The level of detail richness is high, but some areas lack fine detail, especially in the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution seems adequate for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has potential but requires some refinement in facial proportions and symmetry. The overall quality is good enough to be considered for high-end customers, but it may benefit from a slight rework to address the facial issues mentioned. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/26af3cd61cd0/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/26af3cd61cd0/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed, with good color and shading.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high, with smooth transitions between lines.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions seem balanced, though the angle might be slightly off for optimal viewing.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with fine textures visible on the character's skin and clothing.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent facial details and overall composition. However, the slight angle could be adjusted for better framing. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high quality, but a minor adjustment in perspective could enhance its overall impact.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/26af3cd61cd0/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/26af3cd61cd0/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate for the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is satisfactory.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the content.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the artist were to refine the background and add more depth to the scene, which might enhance the overall visual impact.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but with minor adjustments, it could be even better.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/26af3cd61cd0/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/26af3cd61cd0/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The eyes appear slightly asymmetrical.\n- The facial proportions seem a bit off, particularly around the nose and mouth area.\n- There are some minor blurriness and lack of definition in certain areas of the face, such as the hair and skin texture.\n- The facial contour could be more natural and less angular.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are decent but not exceptional.\n- Color saturation and contrast are good, with a nice range of tones.\n- Composition and proportions are generally well-balanced, though the character's pose might benefit from slight adjustments for better flow.\n- The level of detail richness is moderate, with some areas lacking fine detail.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has potential but could benefit from some refinement in facial proportions and detail. The character's pose and facial features could be adjusted for a more natural look. Given these considerations, I would recommend a regeneration to improve the facial quality and overall balance of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/26af3cd61cd0/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/26af3cd61cd0/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n- The image appears to be focused on the lower body and does not include a face at all.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are somewhat smooth but lack fine detail, especially around the curves and edges.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant, but the contrast seems a bit low, making the image appear less dynamic.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered on the lower body, which is unusual for a full-body image. The proportions seem off due to the focus on the lower part of the body.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a good level of detail in the skin texture and folds, but the absence of facial features limits the overall richness.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No obvious artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no generation errors that can be identified from the provided image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the image lacks a face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the technical issues suggest that the image could benefit from a re-generation focusing on a full-body view with a face included. This would allow for a more comprehensive assessment and improvement in overall quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/26af3cd61cd0/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2b66accf6405.png", + "improved_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/improved/2b66accf6405.png", + "original_score": 6, + "improved_score": 8, + "improvement": 2, + "best_candidate_source": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2b66accf6405/candidate_1.png", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2b66accf6405/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face at all, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face at all, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image should be regenerated to include the character's face so that we can properly evaluate the facial quality and other aspects of the image. Without the face, it is not possible to provide a comprehensive analysis of the image's quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2b66accf6405/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2b66accf6405/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face means that the primary focus of the image is on the body, which appears to be rendered with good detail and smooth skin texture.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face means that the primary focus of the image is on the body, which appears to be rendered with good detail and smooth skin texture.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on the body, and the proportions appear natural and well-proportioned.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich details in the skin texture and clothing.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nSince the image lacks facial details, it cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, based on the provided analysis, the overall image quality is quite good. The absence of a face does not significantly impact the overall quality assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: Since the image is already of high quality and the lack of a face does not affect the evaluation, no regeneration is necessary. If the customer specifically requests a face, the artist should regenerate the image with a face included.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2b66accf6405/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2b66accf6405/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face at all, which makes it impossible to evaluate facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face at all, which makes it impossible to evaluate facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nExplanation: Since the image lacks a visible face, it is impossible to assess the facial quality. However, based on the visible parts of the body, the image appears to be of good quality in terms of line clarity, color saturation, composition, and detail richness. The absence of a face is a major drawback that prevents a comprehensive evaluation. Therefore, regeneration is recommended to include a complete face for a thorough analysis.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2b66accf6405/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2b66accf6405/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents a comprehensive assessment of the character's facial features.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents a comprehensive assessment of the character's facial features.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and clear edges.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on the lower body, which is appropriate for the subject matter, but the lack of a face makes it difficult to assess overall proportions.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the lace and fabric textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No visible artifacts or noise.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks a face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall image quality is good, with high line clarity, color saturation, and detail richness. The absence of a face is a significant limitation that prevents a full assessment. Therefore, I would recommend regenerating the image to include a face for a more comprehensive evaluation.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2b66accf6405/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2b66accf6405/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face at all, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality and appeal of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face at all, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality and appeal of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the lower body and legs, which is appropriate for the subject matter.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the textures of the clothing and skin.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors; the image appears to be a high-quality render.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks a face, it cannot be fully evaluated for facial quality. However, given that the rest of the image is of high quality, it can still be considered satisfactory. If the customer specifically requires a face, the image would need to be regenerated to include one.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No (for the current focus), but Yes if a face is required.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2b66accf6405/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/31de51d585f2.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/31de51d585f2/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with intricate patterns and glowing effects adding depth.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent attention to detail and a well-composed scene. The only minor issue is that the face is not fully visible due to the character's hood, which might be a stylistic choice but could be improved if the face were more prominently featured.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/31de51d585f2/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/31de51d585f2/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background providing a balanced backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the forest, the character's attire, and the glowing elements on the ground.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe primary issue is the lack of visibility of the character's face, which is crucial for assessing facial quality. Since the face cannot be evaluated, the overall score is slightly reduced. However, the rest of the image is of high quality, and regenerating the image with a visible face would significantly improve its appeal and functionality for high-end customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/31de51d585f2/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/31de51d585f2/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with intricate designs on the character's attire and the magical effects around her.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and background elements. The only minor issue is that the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more intricately detailed, but this is a very minor point.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/31de51d585f2/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/31de51d585f2/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is mostly obscured by the flowing hair, which makes it difficult to assess the facial details. However, the eyes appear symmetrical and detailed, and the proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct. The facial contour looks natural despite the lack of visible facial features due to the hair.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is mostly obscured by the flowing hair, which makes it difficult to assess the facial details. However, the eyes appear symmetrical and detailed, and the proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct. The facial contour looks natural despite the lack of visible facial features due to the hair.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the background elements complementing the scene effectively.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the character's attire, the glowing effects, and the forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality aesthetic with strong visual appeal. The primary issue is the lack of visible facial details due to the hair, but this does not significantly impact the overall quality. The character's design and the magical setting are well-executed.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: While the image is already quite high-quality, if the client specifically requests more visible facial details, the artist could consider adding a slight adjustment to the hair's transparency or position to reveal more of the face without compromising the overall composition.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/31de51d585f2/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/31de51d585f2/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with intricate patterns and glowing effects adding depth.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and background details. The only minor issue is that the face is not fully visible due to the character's hood, which might be a stylistic choice but could be improved if the face were more prominently displayed.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/31de51d585f2/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d69279355007.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d69279355007/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a vibrant and appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned effectively within the frame.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the magical effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background had more depth and detail to complement the character.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d69279355007/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d69279355007/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the characters positioned centrally and the forest background providing a nice depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the trees and the characters' clothing.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the line clarity was even sharper and the color saturation was slightly more intense.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d69279355007/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d69279355007/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the characters positioned centrally and the forest background providing a nice depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the forest and the characters' clothing.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a beautiful background. The only minor issue is that the score could be slightly higher if the line clarity was even sharper and the color contrast was slightly more pronounced. However, these are very minor issues that do not significantly detract from the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d69279355007/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d69279355007/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a vibrant yet harmonious scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background providing a good sense of depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the magical effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the hair could be slightly more detailed, which might improve the overall face quality slightly.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: The image is already quite good, but if the customer desires even more detail in the hair, it could be slightly refined. Otherwise, the image is ready for use as is.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d69279355007/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d69279355007/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a warm and inviting atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the characters positioned effectively within the frame.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the background and character clothing textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the line clarity was even sharper and the color saturation was slightly more vibrant.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d69279355007/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/474456d7edb4.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/474456d7edb4/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the forest background providing a nice backdrop.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the mushroom and the cape.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. The only minor issue is that the face is not fully visible due to the large mushroom cap covering it, but this does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image meets the high standards set by the customer and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/474456d7edb4/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/474456d7edb4/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not contain any facial features as the characters depicted are stylized mushrooms without faces. Therefore, it's impossible to evaluate the face quality based on the provided criteria.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not contain any facial features as the characters depicted are stylized mushrooms without faces. Therefore, it's impossible to evaluate the face quality based on the provided criteria.\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are smooth and well-defined, contributing to a clean and polished look.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is well-balanced, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is balanced, with the mushrooms positioned symmetrically and the forest background adding depth.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the textures of the mushrooms and the forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors; the image appears to be a well-executed digital illustration.\n- Resolution: The resolution seems adequate for the level of detail present in the image.\n\nGiven that the image lacks facial features, the face quality cannot be evaluated. However, the overall image quality is good, and the technical aspects are well-managed.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/474456d7edb4/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/474456d7edb4/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face lacks clear details, making it difficult to discern specific features.\n- The eyes appear somewhat symmetrical but lack fine detail, which affects the overall realism.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth are not entirely accurate, contributing to a slightly unnatural look.\n- The facial contour is somewhat natural but could be improved for better definition.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, with clean edges and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are effective, with the character centered and the forest background adding depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's attire and the glowing elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the intended use.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a good overall quality with some room for improvement in facial details. While the character's presence is strong due to the glowing elements and the atmospheric setting, refining the facial features would enhance the visual impact. Therefore, I recommend a minor regeneration to address the facial quality issues.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/474456d7edb4/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/474456d7edb4/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a warm and inviting atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the forest background providing a nice backdrop.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's dress and the glowing elements around them.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. The only minor issue is that the face is not fully visible due to the character's attire, but this does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image meets the high standards set by the customer and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/474456d7edb4/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/474456d7edb4/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible as it is covered by a cloak, so we cannot assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible as it is covered by a cloak, so we cannot assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the large mushroom and the figure creating a focal point in the center of the image.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the mushroom and the figure's cloak.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is visually appealing and well-composed, but without a visible face, it is challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the character's facial features. However, the overall quality is high, and the technical aspects are excellent. If the goal is to include a character with a visible face, the image would benefit from having the face included.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/474456d7edb4/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/522ca374b245.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/522ca374b245/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The absence of a face also prevents evaluation of facial clarity and definition.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The absence of a face also prevents evaluation of facial clarity and definition.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and have good contrast, especially the neon lights which stand out effectively.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic, with the character standing prominently against the cityscape backdrop. The proportions of the character and the city elements seem balanced.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a rich level of detail in the cityscape, with various neon signs and reflections adding depth to the scene.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No noticeable artifacts or noise are present.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors in the image.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, allowing for clear details in both the character and the cityscape.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is on the character's face, and the face is not visible, the image cannot be fully evaluated based on the provided criteria. However, given that the overall composition and technical aspects are strong, the image could be considered satisfactory if the face were included. If the face is crucial for the customer, it would be advisable to regenerate the image with a visible face to ensure the character's quality meets expectations.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/522ca374b245/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/522ca374b245/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the character facing away from the viewer.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to evaluate their clarity, symmetry, proportion, or natural contour.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and distinct edges.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant neon colors reflecting off the wet streets.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the cityscape in the background creating depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the character's suit and the urban environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the character's face is not visible, it is impossible to assess the face quality. However, the overall image quality is high, and the technical aspects are excellent. Given that the primary focus should be on the character's face, regeneration might be necessary to include a clear view of the face to meet the high-end customer's expectations.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/522ca374b245/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/522ca374b245/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no noticeable blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, though some reflections on the wet street might slightly obscure finer lines.\n- Color saturation and contrast are high, creating a vibrant and immersive atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the characters positioned effectively within the frame.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the background and the cityscape.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-executed urban setting. However, the slight obscuration of finer lines due to reflections could be improved for even better clarity.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image already meets high standards and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/522ca374b245/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/522ca374b245/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background providing a strong sense of depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's armor and the cityscape.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background were more detailed or if the lighting had a bit more variation to enhance the depth and realism.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but a few minor adjustments could make it even better.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/522ca374b245/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/522ca374b245/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a vibrant and dynamic atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the cityscape providing a strong background.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's suit and the neon lights.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed or if the lighting had a bit more variation.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/522ca374b245/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1fc1ad8ea4ec.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1fc1ad8ea4ec/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The lack of a face means we cannot determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and sharp edges.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant neon colors that stand out against the darker background.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic, with the character's legs leading the viewer's eye down the hallway. However, the absence of a face prevents a full assessment of the overall composition.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the character's suit and the reflective floor.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is the character's face, and it is not present in this image, the overall score is slightly lower due to the inability to evaluate the most critical aspect of the image. However, the technical quality and composition are strong points.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nTo improve the image, regenerate it with a visible face to allow for a comprehensive analysis of the character's facial features and overall quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1fc1ad8ea4ec/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1fc1ad8ea4ec/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered between the large mechanical structures.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's outfit and the mechanical structures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. The only minor issue is that the character's face is not fully visible due to the angle and the presence of the mechanical structures. However, this does not significantly impact the overall quality of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1fc1ad8ea4ec/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1fc1ad8ea4ec/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not include a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents a comprehensive assessment of the character's facial features.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not include a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents a comprehensive assessment of the character's facial features.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the futuristic theme.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the lower half of the character, which is effective for showcasing the design.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the boots and hand, contributing to a rich visual experience.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No visible artifacts or noise.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, providing a clear view of the details.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks a face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall image quality is strong, with excellent color saturation, line clarity, and detail richness. Given the absence of a face, the image can still be considered high-quality for its intended purpose, but it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a face included to fully assess the character's facial features. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1fc1ad8ea4ec/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1fc1ad8ea4ec/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality anime style with good character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed or if the lighting had a bit more variation to enhance the depth of the scene.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high quality, but it could potentially benefit from a slight enhancement in background detail and lighting to make it even more visually striking.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1fc1ad8ea4ec/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1fc1ad8ea4ec/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, giving a vibrant yet realistic look.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is good, especially in the character's suit and the environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and environmental details. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background lighting was more evenly distributed to avoid any harsh shadows that might distract from the main subject.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1fc1ad8ea4ec/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6b24f5350391.png", + "improved_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/improved/6b24f5350391.png", + "original_score": 6, + "improved_score": 8, + "improvement": 2, + "best_candidate_source": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6b24f5350391/candidate_1.png", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6b24f5350391/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality anime style with good character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the facial features were even more detailed and the lighting was more dynamic to enhance the depth and realism.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high quality, but a few minor improvements could elevate it further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6b24f5350391/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6b24f5350391/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face at all, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face at all, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Request the AI model to generate an image that includes the character's face, ensuring that facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours are clearly visible. This will allow for a more comprehensive analysis of the image quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6b24f5350391/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6b24f5350391/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has high-quality facial features and a well-executed composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background were more detailed or if there was a bit more variety in the color palette.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high quality, but a few minor adjustments could enhance it further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6b24f5350391/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6b24f5350391/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate for the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is satisfactory.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the image size.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality anime style with good character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed or if the lighting was more dynamic.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but it could potentially benefit from slight improvements in background detail and lighting to enhance its overall impact.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6b24f5350391/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6b24f5350391/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has high-quality character design and composition. The only minor issue is that the background could be slightly more detailed to enhance the overall richness of the image. However, these are minor points and do not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6b24f5350391/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/c4287d9021bf.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c4287d9021bf/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, with vibrant neon accents that stand out against the darker background.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned dynamically and the background adding depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's suit and the glowing effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and dynamic composition. The only minor issue is the lack of a full face view, which could be improved by including more of the character's face for a more comprehensive analysis. However, this does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c4287d9021bf/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c4287d9021bf/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, giving the image a vibrant appearance.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned dynamically against the background.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's suit and the energy effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and dynamic composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the character's pose was more dynamic or if there were additional elements that could enhance the overall impact of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but a few minor adjustments could make it even better. For example, adding a bit more motion blur to the energy effects or adjusting the lighting to create a stronger sense of depth would enhance the dynamic feel of the image.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c4287d9021bf/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c4287d9021bf/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are good, with the character positioned dynamically.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's outfit and the energy effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and dynamic composition. The only minor issue is that the background could be slightly more detailed to enhance the overall depth of the image. However, these are minor points that do not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c4287d9021bf/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c4287d9021bf/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned dynamically.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's suit and the lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and dynamic composition. The only minor issue is that the face could be slightly more detailed, but it does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and would likely meet the expectations of high-end customers. However, if you want to push the boundaries further, you might consider adding even more intricate details to the face or enhancing the lighting effects around the character.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c4287d9021bf/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c4287d9021bf/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, with vibrant colors that stand out against the background.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned dynamically and effectively.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's suit and the energy effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and dynamic composition. The only minor issue is the lack of a detailed background, which could be improved to enhance the overall depth and context of the scene. However, these are minor points and do not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c4287d9021bf/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/73555a2c0f75.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/73555a2c0f75/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the characters positioned effectively within the frame.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's armor and the glowing sword effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed or if the lighting effects were even more pronounced.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but it could potentially benefit from a bit more refinement in certain areas to achieve a perfect score.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/73555a2c0f75/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/73555a2c0f75/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the helmet covering it completely. Without seeing the face, it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of facial features makes it difficult to determine if the face is clear and well-defined.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the helmet covering it completely. Without seeing the face, it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of facial features makes it difficult to determine if the face is clear and well-defined.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with a balanced color palette that enhances the mood of the scene.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background adding depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the armor and the glowing sword.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the other aspects, the image is of good quality. If the customer specifically requires a visible face, the image would need to be regenerated with a different design or a different character without a helmet.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/73555a2c0f75/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/73555a2c0f75/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned effectively within the frame.\n- The level of detail richness is good, especially in the armor and sword.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed or if there was a bit more depth in the lighting effects on the character's armor.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/73555a2c0f75/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/73555a2c0f75/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned centrally and the background adding depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the armor and the glowing effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the lack of a visible face makes it difficult to assess the facial quality comprehensively. If the primary focus were on the character's face, a slightly lower score might be appropriate due to the absence of a face. Nonetheless, the overall quality is very good.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nIf the primary focus were on the character's face, a recommendation for regeneration might be made. However, given the current assessment, the image is already quite satisfactory.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/73555a2c0f75/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/73555a2c0f75/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned effectively within the frame.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's armor and the glowing effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the lack of a visible face makes it difficult to assess the facial quality comprehensively. If the primary focus were on the character's face, a slightly lower score might be appropriate due to the absence of a face. \n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus was not on the character's face but rather on the overall image quality, the score of 8/10 seems appropriate. However, if the image were intended as a character portrait, a regeneration might be recommended to include a face for a more complete assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/73555a2c0f75/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a0346017052e.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a0346017052e/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show a character's face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face suggests that the primary focus might be on the lower body, which is not clearly depicted due to the angle and framing.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show a character's face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face suggests that the primary focus might be on the lower body, which is not clearly depicted due to the angle and framing.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant, but the contrast seems slightly muted.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on the legs, which are proportionally correct within the frame.\n- Level of detail richness: The texture of the fishnet stockings is detailed, but the rest of the image lacks significant detail.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears adequate for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image does not include a face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the lack of a clear focus on the lower body and the somewhat muted contrast suggest that the image could benefit from additional refinement. The overall quality is good, but the absence of a clear subject (the face) makes it difficult to provide a comprehensive evaluation. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a0346017052e/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a0346017052e/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality anime style with good character design and composition. However, the lack of a full face view prevents a perfect score. If a full face were included, it would be even better.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: Since the image already meets high standards, it could be considered as-is if the full face is not required. However, if a full face is desired, the artist might want to include more facial features to enhance the overall quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a0346017052e/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a0346017052e/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show a character's face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face means that the primary focus of the image is on the lower body, which is not typically the main subject of a character portrait.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show a character's face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face means that the primary focus of the image is on the lower body, which is not typically the main subject of a character portrait.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, making the image visually appealing.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on the legs, which are proportionally correct and well-framed within the image.\n- Level of detail richness: The texture of the fishnet stockings is rich and detailed, adding depth to the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors; the image appears to be a high-quality rendering.\n- Resolution: The resolution seems adequate for the level of detail present.\n\nSince the image lacks a character's face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall image quality is good, with rich details and vibrant colors. The lack of a face might not meet the expectations of customers who are looking for a character portrait. Therefore, if the intention was to create a character portrait, this image would need to be regenerated with a face included.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a0346017052e/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a0346017052e/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show a character's face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face suggests that the primary focus might be on the lower body, which is not clearly depicted due to the angle and framing of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show a character's face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face suggests that the primary focus might be on the lower body, which is not clearly depicted due to the angle and framing of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat soft and not very sharp, which affects the overall clarity.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are warm and have good contrast, but the saturation seems slightly muted.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on the legs, but the framing is tight and does not provide much context or balance.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a good level of detail in the fishnet stockings and the curtains, but the lack of a full-body view limits the overall richness of the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There do not appear to be any noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present, but the lack of a complete scene makes it difficult to assess the overall coherence and realism.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks a face and the primary focus is unclear, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a more complete scene that includes a character's face and a better composition. This will allow for a more comprehensive evaluation of the image quality and ensure that the primary focus is clear and well-defined.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a0346017052e/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a0346017052e/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show any facial features as it is focused on the legs. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or naturalness of the face. However, the absence of facial details is a significant issue since the primary focus should be on the character's face if that is the intended subject.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show any facial features as it is focused on the legs. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or naturalness of the face. However, the absence of facial details is a significant issue since the primary focus should be on the character's face if that is the intended subject.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is effective, focusing on the legs and creating a sense of movement.\n- Level of detail richness: The texture of the fishnet stockings is rich and detailed.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, providing a clear view of the details.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks facial details, which is crucial for evaluating face quality, the overall score is slightly lower than ideal. However, the technical aspects of the image are strong. If the intention was to showcase the legs, the image is excellent. If the intention was to include a face, the image needs to be regenerated to include facial features.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a0346017052e/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/3cc7f3366f7a.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3cc7f3366f7a/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show the characters' faces, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the hands appear to be well-drawn with good detail and proportion.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show the characters' faces, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the hands appear to be well-drawn with good detail and proportion.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with warm tones that enhance the mood.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, focusing on the hands and creating a sense of intimacy.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the clothing textures and lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation: Since the image lacks facial details, which are crucial for character quality assessment, the score is slightly lower than perfect. However, the overall quality is still quite high due to the excellent line work, color use, and composition. If the intention is to focus on the hands and the emotional connection they convey, the image is already very effective. If the goal is to include facial details, the image would need to be regenerated to include them.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No (if the intention is to focus on the hands), Yes (if the intention is to include facial details).", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3cc7f3366f7a/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3cc7f3366f7a/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show the faces of the characters, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the lower body and hands are depicted clearly, which suggests that the artist has focused on other aspects of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show the faces of the characters, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the lower body and hands are depicted clearly, which suggests that the artist has focused on other aspects of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the lower bodies and hands, which creates a sense of intimacy and connection between the two characters.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the clothing textures and the background foliage.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears to be sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face quality cannot be assessed due to the absence of facial features, and the overall image quality is good, the current score is appropriate. However, if the goal is to create a high-quality image that includes facial details, the artist should focus on adding more facial features and ensuring they are clear and well-defined. If the customer requires a full-body image with facial details, the artist may need to regenerate the image to meet their expectations.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No (for the current image), but Yes (if facial details are required).", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3cc7f3366f7a/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3cc7f3366f7a/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n- The lack of facial features makes it difficult to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined, especially around the hands and clothing.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant, with a warm sunset background that enhances the overall mood.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is effective, focusing on the hands and the interaction between them, which adds a sense of intimacy and detail.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, particularly in the texture of the fabric and the skin tones.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise in the image.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the visible elements, the image seems to be of good quality. The absence of facial features does not significantly impact the overall quality score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3cc7f3366f7a/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3cc7f3366f7a/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, giving a warm and pleasant feel.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, focusing on the character's face and the interaction with another person.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's hair and clothing textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, if you want to ensure the highest standards, you might consider a slight adjustment to the lighting to enhance the depth and dimensionality of the scene.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nFinal recommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3cc7f3366f7a/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3cc7f3366f7a/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show any facial features as it focuses on hands. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or naturalness of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show any facial features as it focuses on hands. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or naturalness of the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast that enhances the scene's mood.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the hands and the interaction between them, which is effective for the intended emotional tone.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the hands and clothing textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nSince the image does not include any facial features, the face quality cannot be evaluated. However, the overall image quality is good, with no technical issues present. The composition and color work well for the intended subject matter.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nIf you need a similar image but with facial features, I would recommend regenerating the image with a focus on the faces of the characters involved in the interaction.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3cc7f3366f7a/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/94898c3fab73.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/94898c3fab73/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned effectively within the frame.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's outfit and the glowing elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and vibrant colors. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background had more depth and detail to complement the character.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but a few minor adjustments could enhance it further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/94898c3fab73/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/94898c3fab73/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements contributing to the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's outfit and the neon lights.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. The only minor issue is that the score could be slightly higher if the character's face had even more intricate details, but this is not a significant problem.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/94898c3fab73/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/94898c3fab73/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, capturing the dynamic pose effectively.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's outfit and the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and background details. The only minor issue is that the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed, but this is a very minor point.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/94898c3fab73/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/94898c3fab73/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and distance from which the image was taken. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and distance from which the image was taken. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant neon colors that create a strong visual impact.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the cityscape in the background adding depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the buildings and the character's outfit.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe main issue here is the lack of visibility of the character's face, which prevents a thorough assessment of its quality. However, the rest of the image is of high quality, making a regeneration necessary to address this specific aspect.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/94898c3fab73/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/94898c3fab73/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are high, creating a vibrant and engaging scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the background adding depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's outfit and the neon lights.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a visually appealing environment. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed or if the lighting effects were even more pronounced.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but it could benefit from a bit more refinement in certain areas to push the score up to 9/10.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/94898c3fab73/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d58ed1d832c2.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d58ed1d832c2/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue for a character-focused image.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue for a character-focused image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the futuristic cityscape.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with a balanced view of the character and the urban environment.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich textures on the character's clothing and the reflective wet ground.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks a face, which is typically the primary focus in character-centric artwork, the overall score is slightly reduced. However, the technical aspects of the image are excellent. For a high-end customer, regenerating the image with a face would be recommended to meet their expectations.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d58ed1d832c2/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d58ed1d832c2/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no noticeable blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high, especially around the character and the neon signs.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a vibrant yet realistic cyberpunk atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are excellent, with the character centered and the background buildings and neon signs contributing to a dynamic scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with reflections on the wet pavement adding depth to the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with only minor improvements needed. The character's face is well-rendered, and the overall composition is strong. However, a slight enhancement in the lighting could make the scene even more impactful.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: The image is already quite good, but a subtle adjustment in lighting could enhance its visual appeal further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d58ed1d832c2/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d58ed1d832c2/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background providing context.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the neon signs.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and background composition. The only minor issue is that the character's face is not fully visible due to the angle, which might be a stylistic choice but could be improved if the goal is to showcase more of the character's features.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d58ed1d832c2/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d58ed1d832c2/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background providing a strong sense of depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the neon lights.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background were more detailed or if the lighting had a bit more variation to add depth.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but a few minor adjustments could enhance it further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d58ed1d832c2/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d58ed1d832c2/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background providing a good sense of depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the neon signs.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and background details. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background were more detailed or if the lighting had a bit more variation to add depth.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d58ed1d832c2/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6bd77e496c29.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 9, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bd77e496c29/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a pleasant visual experience.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the characters positioned effectively within the frame.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the forest background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, if you want to ensure the highest standards, you might consider a slight adjustment to the lighting to enhance the depth and dimensionality of the scene further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bd77e496c29/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bd77e496c29/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a vibrant yet harmonious scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the characters and background elements fitting together nicely.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the magical effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background had more depth and detail to complement the foreground characters.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bd77e496c29/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bd77e496c29/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a vibrant yet harmonious palette.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the characters positioned effectively within the frame.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with intricate elements like the forest background and magical symbols adding depth.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of very high quality with only minor improvements that could be made. However, if you want to ensure the best possible result, a slight adjustment in lighting or shading might enhance the depth and dimensionality further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nFinal recommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bd77e496c29/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bd77e496c29/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- The character's face is not fully visible due to the angle and the character's back being turned towards the viewer.\n- The eyes are not symmetrical, but they appear to be detailed enough.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct based on the visible parts.\n- The facial contour appears natural from what can be seen.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas that are immediately noticeable.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no jagged edges.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast between the character and the background.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the environment providing a good backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the environment and the character's clothing.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent color work and composition. The lack of facial detail due to the character's position is the only minor issue, but it does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bd77e496c29/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bd77e496c29/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to their back being turned to the viewer. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face. However, the hair and cloak appear well-rendered.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to their back being turned to the viewer. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face. However, the hair and cloak appear well-rendered.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhances the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the characters positioned effectively within the frame and the forest setting adding depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the forest, characters' clothing, and magical elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face quality cannot be assessed due to the character's position, the overall score is slightly lower than perfect. However, the image is visually appealing and technically sound. If the client specifically requests a face, the image would need to be regenerated to include one.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes (if the client requires a face)", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bd77e496c29/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/8efe19b2d993.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8efe19b2d993/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, with vibrant colors that enhance the scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the characters centered and the background providing depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the flowers and clothing textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the hair of the characters could be slightly more detailed, which might improve the overall score to 9/10.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration. However, if you want to further enhance it, you could consider adding more intricate details to the hair to make it stand out even more.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8efe19b2d993/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8efe19b2d993/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show the characters' faces, so we cannot evaluate facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features means that the face quality cannot be assessed as good or poor.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show the characters' faces, so we cannot evaluate facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features means that the face quality cannot be assessed as good or poor.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast between the dresses and the background.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with a balanced focus on the dresses and the floral field in the background.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the dress patterns and the surrounding flowers.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nSince the image lacks facial details, which are typically the primary focus for high-end customers, the overall quality is still quite high due to the other positive aspects mentioned. However, if facial details were included, the score could potentially be higher.\n\nRecommendation: The image is already of high quality, but if the customer specifically requests facial details, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with those features included.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8efe19b2d993/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8efe19b2d993/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the faces of the characters, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of facial features significantly impacts the overall quality.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the faces of the characters, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of facial features significantly impacts the overall quality.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is appropriate, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is balanced, with the characters positioned centrally and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the clothing and floral elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is on the characters' faces, which are not shown, the overall score is slightly reduced due to the lack of facial quality assessment. However, the technical aspects of the image are strong. Given that the main issue is the absence of facial details, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with the characters' faces included to fully evaluate the face quality and ensure customer satisfaction.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8efe19b2d993/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8efe19b2d993/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- Facial contours look natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the characters centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the clothing textures and floral details.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the facial features were even more detailed and the background had a bit more depth.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8efe19b2d993/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8efe19b2d993/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- The facial contours look natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the characters centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the clothing and floral elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the facial features were even more detailed and expressive.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8efe19b2d993/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b1ec440aa847.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b1ec440aa847/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by the hood. Therefore, we cannot assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of the face. The lack of facial features makes it impossible to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by the hood. Therefore, we cannot assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of the face. The lack of facial features makes it impossible to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, creating a striking visual effect.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest extending into the background. The proportions of the trees and the character are consistent.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a rich level of detail, especially in the forest and the reflection on the water.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, allowing for clear details in the scene.\n\nGiven that the primary focus of the image is the character, but their face is not visible due to the hood, the overall quality is still quite good. However, the lack of facial detail prevents a more comprehensive assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Regenerate the image with the character's face visible to allow for a proper assessment of the facial quality. This will ensure that all aspects of the image can be evaluated accurately.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b1ec440aa847/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b1ec440aa847/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Moderate, with a cool color palette that enhances the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest creating a strong vertical line.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the forest and water reflections.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe primary issue is the lack of visibility of the character's face, which is crucial for assessing facial quality. Since the face cannot be evaluated, the overall score is slightly reduced. A regeneration focusing on revealing the character's face would be beneficial.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b1ec440aa847/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b1ec440aa847/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the silhouette, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the lack of facial features does not impact the overall quality of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the silhouette, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the lack of facial features does not impact the overall quality of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with a balanced use of light and shadow that enhances the mood.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest and water creating a harmonious frame.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the trees, reflections, and ambient lighting.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation: Since the character's face is not visible, the score is slightly lower than perfect. However, the overall image is visually appealing and technically sound. If the client specifically requires a detailed character face, the image would need to be regenerated with a more defined character design. Otherwise, the current image can be considered satisfactory.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No (if the character's face is not required; Yes if a detailed character face is needed).", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b1ec440aa847/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b1ec440aa847/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible as it is covered by a hood.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to assess their clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with a balanced use of light and shadow that enhances the serene atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Excellent, with a well-balanced composition that draws the viewer's eye to the central figure and the reflective water surface.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the trees, water reflections, and the glowing elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is on the character's silhouette rather than their face, the lack of facial details does not significantly impact the overall quality. However, if the intention was to include a detailed face, the image would need to be regenerated to meet higher standards for facial quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No (if the intention is to maintain the current focus on the character's silhouette), but Yes (if the intention is to include a detailed face).", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b1ec440aa847/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b1ec440aa847/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible as it is covered by a hood, which prevents any assessment of facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. However, the lack of facial features does not affect the overall quality of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible as it is covered by a hood, which prevents any assessment of facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. However, the lack of facial features does not affect the overall quality of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High. The lines are smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent. The colors are vibrant and the contrast is well-balanced, enhancing the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Strong. The composition is balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest and water creating a harmonious frame.\n- Level of detail richness: High. The image is rich in detail, from the textures of the trees to the reflections in the water.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, providing a clear and detailed image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is visually appealing and technically sound, but the absence of facial details prevents a full assessment of the character's quality. Since the primary focus is on the character, and their face is not visible, the overall score is still high. However, if the character's face were to be included, the score could potentially be higher.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b1ec440aa847/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/8eb475d3a84e.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 9, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8eb475d3a84e/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are good, though the character's face is slightly off-center.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially on the armor and helmet.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent detail and a good composition. However, the slight off-center positioning of the character's face could be improved for better balance.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8eb475d3a84e/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8eb475d3a84e/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not contain any facial features as it is an illustration of a weapon. Therefore, the face quality cannot be assessed.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not contain any facial features as it is an illustration of a weapon. Therefore, the face quality cannot be assessed.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that make the image visually appealing.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with the weapon centered and balanced within the frame.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate designs and patterns on the weapon.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent line clarity, color saturation, and composition. However, since it lacks facial features, the face quality cannot be evaluated. Given the high overall quality and the absence of technical issues, regeneration is not necessary.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8eb475d3a84e/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8eb475d3a84e/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, giving the image a vibrant appearance.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the wings spread out effectively.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the wings and the glowing center.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent attention to detail and a well-composed scene. However, the absence of a face makes it difficult to assess the facial quality comprehensively. If the image were to be used as a character portrait, the lack of a face would be a significant issue.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image is primarily a character without a face, the absence of facial features significantly impacts its overall quality. For high-end customers who might use this image as part of a larger character design, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a detailed face to meet their expectations.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8eb475d3a84e/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8eb475d3a84e/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- The character face is not present in this image as it appears to be a logo or emblem rather than a character portrait.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to evaluate.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: Excellent. The lines are crisp and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: High. The colors are vibrant and the contrast is strong, making the emblem stand out against the sky.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced. The emblem is centered and the wings extend symmetrically, creating a harmonious composition.\n- Level of detail richness: High. The emblem has intricate details and a rich texture, especially around the central circular design and the wing patterns.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- The resolution appears to be high, suitable for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of very high quality with excellent line clarity, color saturation, and detail richness. Since there are no facial elements to assess, the score is slightly lower than perfect but still very good. However, if this were intended to be a character portrait, the absence of facial features would significantly impact the score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nIf this image were intended to be a character portrait, it would need to include facial features and a face to meet the high standards expected by high-end customers. Otherwise, the current image is already of excellent quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8eb475d3a84e/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8eb475d3a84e/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, giving the image a vibrant yet not overly saturated look.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the main subject.\n- The level of detail richness is good, with intricate designs on the character's armor and wings.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the absence of a face makes it difficult to assess the facial quality comprehensively. If the character were to have a face, it would likely be rated as \"Good\" based on the other aspects.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image does not include a face, it cannot be fully evaluated for facial quality. However, given the high overall quality and the absence of technical issues, I would suggest that the image could be used as is if the lack of a face is acceptable for the intended purpose. If a face is required, the image should be regenerated to include one.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No (if the lack of a face is acceptable; Yes if a face is required)", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8eb475d3a84e/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5d6152ac7c7b.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d6152ac7c7b/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible due to the dark cloak covering it.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to evaluate.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the mushrooms evenly distributed around them.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the mushrooms and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is the character, and their face is not visible, the lack of facial details significantly impacts the overall quality. However, the rest of the image is visually appealing and technically sound. To improve the image, the artist could regenerate the character with a visible face, ensuring that facial features are clear and well-defined.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d6152ac7c7b/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d6152ac7c7b/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, as it is obscured by the dark cloak. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, as it is obscured by the dark cloak. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with a clear focal point in the center where the character stands.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the mushrooms and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation: Since the character's face is not visible, it is not possible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, the overall image quality is very good, with rich details and vibrant colors. Given the lack of facial detail, the image could benefit from a regeneration to include a visible character face if desired by the customer. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d6152ac7c7b/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d6152ac7c7b/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face lacks clear details, especially around the eyes and mouth area. The eyes appear somewhat flat and lack depth, which affects the overall realism. The proportions of the nose and mouth seem slightly off, contributing to a less defined facial structure. The facial contour is not entirely natural, as it appears somewhat rigid and lacks subtle shading that would make it more lifelike.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face lacks clear details, especially around the eyes and mouth area. The eyes appear somewhat flat and lack depth, which affects the overall realism. The proportions of the nose and mouth seem slightly off, contributing to a less defined facial structure. The facial contour is not entirely natural, as it appears somewhat rigid and lacks subtle shading that would make it more lifelike.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the elements in harmony with each other.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the mushrooms, grass, and the night sky.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a high overall quality, but the facial details could be improved to make the character more realistic. The current score of 8/10 reflects this balance between strengths and weaknesses. If the customer values a more lifelike character, regeneration might be recommended to address the facial quality issues.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d6152ac7c7b/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d6152ac7c7b/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible as it is covered by a cloak, so no facial details can be assessed. However, the lack of a face does not affect the overall quality of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible as it is covered by a cloak, so no facial details can be assessed. However, the lack of a face does not affect the overall quality of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the large mushroom dominating the background, creating a focal point.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the mushrooms and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation: Since the face is not visible, the overall quality is still quite high. However, if the intention is to include a character, the absence of a face could be a significant drawback. If the image is intended to be used without a face, the current quality is satisfactory. If a face is required, regeneration would be recommended to ensure the character's face is included and properly rendered.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No (if the image is intended to be used without a face), Yes (if a face is required).", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d6152ac7c7b/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d6152ac7c7b/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by their long hair. This makes it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by their long hair. This makes it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally smooth and well-defined, contributing to a clean and polished look.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is strong, making the scene visually striking.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest elements framing the scene effectively. The proportions of the trees and mushrooms are consistent with the perspective.\n- Level of detail richness: The image is rich in detail, particularly in the glowing mushrooms and the starry sky, which add depth and interest.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n\nThe primary issue is the lack of visibility of the character's face, which prevents a thorough assessment of facial quality. Given that the main focus of the image is on the character, this is a significant drawback. A regeneration would be necessary to include a clear view of the character's face while maintaining the overall aesthetic of the scene.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d6152ac7c7b/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/398cf47de37d.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/398cf47de37d/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nThe character's face is not visible in this image, as it is obscured by the tree trunk. Therefore, I cannot assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally smooth and well-defined, especially around the tree and the glowing elements.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced with the large tree dominating the center, and the background providing depth. The proportions of the trees and the landscape are harmonious.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a good level of detail, particularly in the tree bark texture and the glowing elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors; the image appears to be a high-quality illustration.\n- Resolution: The resolution seems adequate for the level of detail present in the image.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent composition and color. However, since the character's face is not visible, the face quality cannot be assessed. If the face were to be included, it would likely be rated as average due to the lack of detail in that area.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: Since the face quality cannot be assessed due to its absence, and the overall image quality is high, no regeneration is necessary unless the face needs to be added.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/398cf47de37d/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/398cf47de37d/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nThe character's face is not visible as they are wearing a hood, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. However, the lack of facial features does not impact the overall quality assessment.\n\nMain Issues:\n1. **Line Clarity and Sharpness**: The lines are generally smooth and well-defined, contributing to a clean and polished look.\n2. **Color Saturation and Contrast**: The colors are vibrant and saturated, creating a visually appealing scene. The contrast between the purple hues and the darker elements adds depth and dimension.\n3. **Composition and Proportions**: The composition is well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the tree and mushrooms framing the scene effectively. The proportions of the elements are harmonious, enhancing the overall aesthetic.\n4. **Level of Detail Richness**: The image is rich in detail, particularly in the textures of the tree bark, the glowing elements, and the mushroom caps. The background also has a good level of detail, adding to the immersive quality of the scene.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n1. **Artifacts or Noise**: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n2. **Generation Errors**: There are no obvious generation errors; the image appears to be a high-quality rendering.\n3. **Resolution**: The resolution seems adequate for the level of detail present in the image.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with no significant issues. The absence of facial details does not detract from the overall quality, but if the character's face were to be included, it would enhance the image further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: Since the image already meets high standards and the absence of facial details does not affect the overall quality, no regeneration is necessary. However, if the character's face were to be added, it could potentially elevate the image even more.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/398cf47de37d/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/398cf47de37d/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible as it is covered by a cloak, so we cannot assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the lack of a visible face suggests that the character might be a silhouette or a figure without a defined face, which could be intentional but still affects the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible as it is covered by a cloak, so we cannot assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the lack of a visible face suggests that the character might be a silhouette or a figure without a defined face, which could be intentional but still affects the overall quality assessment.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background providing depth and context.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the forest, mushrooms, and the character's cloak.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is on the character's presence rather than their facial features, the lack of a visible face does not significantly impact the overall quality. The image is visually appealing and well-composed, making it suitable for high-end customers. However, if the intention is to include a detailed face, the image would benefit from a regeneration to ensure the character's face is clearly defined and detailed.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No (if the absence of a face is intentional), Yes (if the absence of a face is unintentional and the intention is to have a detailed face).", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/398cf47de37d/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/398cf47de37d/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not contain any facial features as it is a landscape illustration without any characters. Therefore, the face quality cannot be assessed.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not contain any facial features as it is a landscape illustration without any characters. Therefore, the face quality cannot be assessed.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are smooth and well-defined, contributing to a clean and polished look.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, making the image visually striking.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the large tree dominating the center and the glowing elements adding depth and interest.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the tree's bark texture and the glowing elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors; the image appears to be a high-quality digital illustration.\n- Resolution: The resolution seems adequate for the level of detail present in the image.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent line clarity, color saturation, and detail richness. However, since there are no facial features to assess, the face quality cannot be rated. The absence of characters also means that the image cannot be evaluated for character face quality. Given the high overall quality and the lack of any technical issues, the image can be considered satisfactory.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/398cf47de37d/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/398cf47de37d/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not contain any facial features as it is a landscape illustration without any characters. Therefore, the face quality cannot be assessed.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not contain any facial features as it is a landscape illustration without any characters. Therefore, the face quality cannot be assessed.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are smooth and well-defined, contributing to a clean and polished look.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, making the image visually striking.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is balanced with a strong focal point on the central tree, and the proportions of the trees and landscape elements are well-maintained.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the textures of the trees and the glowing effects around the central tree.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors; the image appears to be a high-quality digital illustration.\n- Resolution: The resolution seems adequate for the level of detail present in the image.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with no significant issues. However, since there are no facial features to assess, the face quality cannot be rated. The overall quality is excellent, and no regeneration is needed based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/398cf47de37d/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/993fee05a4b0.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/993fee05a4b0/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- The facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the fiery theme.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the phoenix positioned dynamically against the desert backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate feather patterns and dynamic lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the absence of a face on the phoenix might be a point of interest for some viewers, but it does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image meets the high standards set by professional illustrators and would likely satisfy most high-end customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/993fee05a4b0/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/993fee05a4b0/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by the wings. However, the absence of facial features does not affect the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by the wings. However, the absence of facial features does not affect the overall quality assessment.\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the fiery theme.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the phoenix centered and the composition effectively conveying the sense of movement and energy.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate feather patterns and dynamic lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe image excels in its color palette, composition, and detail richness, making it visually striking. The absence of facial details does not detract from the overall quality, but if the primary focus were on the character's face, the lack of facial features would be a significant issue. However, since the face is not the main focus here, the image can still be considered high-quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/993fee05a4b0/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/993fee05a4b0/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- The face of the phoenix is not clearly visible as it is turned away from the viewer.\n- The eyes are not symmetrical due to the angle.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth are not discernible due to the angle and the stylized nature of the artwork.\n- The facial contour appears natural given the artistic style.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas that affect the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the fiery theme.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the phoenix centered and the sunset providing a dynamic background.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate feather details and a sense of motion conveyed through the tail and wings.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent color work and composition. The lack of facial detail due to the angle does not significantly impact the overall quality. However, if the primary focus were on the face, the score would be lower.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration. If the primary focus were on the face, the angle could be adjusted to better showcase the features.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/993fee05a4b0/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/993fee05a4b0/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not have a traditional face as it features a phoenix rather than a human character. Therefore, the evaluation criteria for facial details do not apply here. However, the body and wings of the phoenix are well-defined and detailed, showcasing good line clarity and sharpness.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not have a traditional face as it features a phoenix rather than a human character. Therefore, the evaluation criteria for facial details do not apply here. However, the body and wings of the phoenix are well-defined and detailed, showcasing good line clarity and sharpness.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and well-defined edges.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors that stand out against the background.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the phoenix positioned centrally and the landscape providing a good backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate feather patterns and dynamic lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image does not contain a traditional face, the absence of facial quality issues is not a concern. The overall quality is high, with excellent line clarity, color saturation, composition, and detail richness. There are no technical issues to address.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/993fee05a4b0/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/993fee05a4b0/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by the wings.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The absence of facial features makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and dynamic motion effects.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant orange and yellow hues that create a strong visual impact.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is effective, with the character positioned centrally and the background elements (sunset, mountains, and fire) adding depth and context.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate wing details and dynamic lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the character's face is not visible due to the wings, the image cannot be evaluated based on facial quality. However, the overall image quality is high, and the technical aspects are sound. Given the lack of facial details, the image would benefit from regeneration to include a clear and detailed face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/993fee05a4b0/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/25142a3e9507.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/25142a3e9507/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show any faces, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the hands appear to be well-drawn with good detail and proportion.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show any faces, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the hands appear to be well-drawn with good detail and proportion.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and clear contrasts that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the hands and the background, which adds depth to the image.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the fabric texture and the background flowers.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears to be high enough to maintain the quality of the image.\n\nSince the image lacks facial details, the face quality cannot be assessed. However, the overall image quality is quite good, and the technical aspects are well-executed. Given the lack of facial details, the image could benefit from additional elements to make it more engaging for customers who might be looking for character-focused content.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/25142a3e9507/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/25142a3e9507/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the hands and clothing appear to be well-detailed and proportionate.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the hands and clothing appear to be well-detailed and proportionate.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nExplanation: Since the face is not visible, we cannot evaluate the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The hands and clothing are rendered with good detail and proportion, but without the face, the overall quality assessment is incomplete. Therefore, regeneration is recommended to include a fully detailed and proportionate face.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/25142a3e9507/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/25142a3e9507/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The facial details are somewhat lacking in definition, particularly around the eyes and mouth area. The eyes appear slightly asymmetrical, and the nose and mouth proportions seem a bit off. The facial contour is not entirely natural, which detracts from the overall quality.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The facial details are somewhat lacking in definition, particularly around the eyes and mouth area. The eyes appear slightly asymmetrical, and the nose and mouth proportions seem a bit off. The facial contour is not entirely natural, which detracts from the overall quality.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: Good, but could be sharper.\n- Color saturation and contrast: High saturation with good contrast, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, focusing on the hands and dresses, but the faces are not fully visible, which might be intentional.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a rich level of detail, especially in the fabric textures and background elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation: While the image is visually appealing and has good technical quality, the facial details need improvement. The lack of symmetry and natural proportions in the face could be enhanced with more refined detailing. However, the overall quality is still quite high, so it may not require regeneration unless the customer specifically requests it.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/25142a3e9507/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/25142a3e9507/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas visible.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, giving the image a vibrant yet soft appearance.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the characters' arms forming a heart shape that draws the viewer's eye.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the hair and clothing textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No noticeable artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the absence of facial features makes it difficult to assess the face quality comprehensively. If the primary focus were on the faces, the score might be slightly lower due to the lack of facial details.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus was not on the faces but rather on the overall composition and quality, the score is maintained at 8/10. If the image were intended to showcase facial details, a recommendation for regeneration would be appropriate.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/25142a3e9507/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/25142a3e9507/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, giving the image a vibrant yet soft appearance.\n- Composition and proportions are excellent, focusing on the hands and dresses while maintaining a balanced frame.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the fabric textures and lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the absence of facial features makes it difficult to assess the face quality comprehensively. If the primary focus were on the characters' faces, the score might be slightly lower due to the lack of facial details.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus seems to be on the hands and dresses rather than the faces, the current score is appropriate. However, if the faces were the main subject, a recommendation for regeneration would be more fitting.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/25142a3e9507/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2940d7df0593.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2940d7df0593/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas visible.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, though the focus on the upper bodies might be considered a slight composition issue.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the textures of the clothing and skin.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and execution. However, the focus on the upper bodies might be seen as a minor composition issue by some viewers. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but if the viewer prefers a more balanced composition that includes faces, it could be beneficial to regenerate the image with a different angle or perspective.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2940d7df0593/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2940d7df0593/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, though the framing could be tighter to focus more on the faces.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the skin texture and clothing.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and execution. However, the composition could be improved by focusing more tightly on the faces to enhance the intimacy and detail of the scene.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: The image is already quite high-quality, but if you want to further enhance it, consider refining the composition slightly to emphasize the facial features more prominently. This would make the image even more engaging and visually appealing.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2940d7df0593/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2940d7df0593/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no noticeable blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the skin texture and clothing.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and detail. However, if you want to ensure the highest possible quality, you might consider a slight adjustment to the lighting to enhance the depth and dimensionality of the scene further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nFinal recommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2940d7df0593/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2940d7df0593/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with a strong focus on the characters' upper bodies.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the textures of the clothing and the roses.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the absence of facial features makes it difficult to assess the face quality comprehensively. If the primary focus were on the faces, the score might be slightly lower due to the lack of facial details. Nonetheless, the overall quality is very good.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nIf the primary focus were on the faces, the score would likely be adjusted to reflect the lack of facial details, but given the current focus on the upper bodies and the overall quality, a score of 8/10 seems appropriate.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2940d7df0593/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2940d7df0593/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are good, though the framing could be tighter to focus more on the characters' faces.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the skin texture and clothing.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and detail. However, the composition could be improved by focusing more on the faces to enhance the viewer's engagement with the characters.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: The image is already of high quality but could benefit from a slight adjustment in composition to emphasize the facial features more prominently. This would further enhance the viewer's experience without compromising the current high standards of the artwork.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2940d7df0593/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b884338c9e7d.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b884338c9e7d/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The facial details are somewhat lacking in definition, especially around the eyes and mouth.\n- The eyes appear slightly asymmetrical.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem a bit off, particularly the nose which appears too small relative to the face.\n- The facial contours are not entirely natural, with some areas looking a bit flat.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, though there's a slight softness that might be intentional for a certain artistic style.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced, contributing to the magical atmosphere.\n- The composition is strong, with the characters positioned centrally and the forest backdrop adding depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with intricate elements like the glowing trees and musical notes enhancing the scene.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a high-quality overall composition and vibrant colors, but the facial details could be improved for a more polished look. Given the current score and the need for better facial definition, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with more refined character faces.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b884338c9e7d/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b884338c9e7d/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a pleasant visual experience.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the characters positioned naturally within the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the background elements like trees and the glowing effect.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were even more detailed and the lighting effects were more pronounced.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b884338c9e7d/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b884338c9e7d/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- The facial contours look natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with a strong sense of depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the background and the glowing elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the complexity of the image.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a visually appealing composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background had more intricate details that complemented the characters' actions and expressions even more.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b884338c9e7d/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b884338c9e7d/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a pleasant visual experience.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the characters positioned centrally and the forest background adding depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the forest environment and the characters' clothing.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a beautifully rendered forest setting. The only minor issue is that the faces could be slightly more detailed, but this does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration. However, if you want to enhance the facial details further, it might be worth considering a slight adjustment to make the eyes and facial features even more defined.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b884338c9e7d/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b884338c9e7d/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- Facial contours look natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a pleasant visual effect.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with characters positioned naturally within the frame.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the characters' clothing and expressions.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background had more depth and variety in color and texture to enhance the overall richness of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b884338c9e7d/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f94934f2b2a9.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f94934f2b2a9/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with a strong sense of depth and perspective.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the wings and the background elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. The only minor issue is that the face is not shown, which prevents a perfect score. However, the rest of the image is very well done.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f94934f2b2a9/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f94934f2b2a9/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned effectively against the backdrop.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the wings and the glowing staff.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and background composition. The only minor issue is that the face is not fully visible due to the angle, but this does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image meets the high standards expected by professional illustrators and high-end customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f94934f2b2a9/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f94934f2b2a9/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned centrally and the background elements complementing the main subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's wings and the glowing elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed or if the lighting on the character's face was more pronounced.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but a few minor adjustments could enhance it further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f94934f2b2a9/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f94934f2b2a9/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned effectively against the sky backdrop.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the wings and the character's clothing.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the wings had more intricate detailing or if the background had even more depth and texture.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f94934f2b2a9/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f94934f2b2a9/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's wings and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the character's face had even more intricate details or if the background elements were slightly more detailed.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f94934f2b2a9/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/04c3e87bfb16.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 9, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04c3e87bfb16/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the characters centered and the background harmonious.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the flowers and the sky.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a beautiful background. However, the score could be slightly higher if the facial features were even more detailed and expressive.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04c3e87bfb16/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04c3e87bfb16/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with both characters centered and facing each other.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the hair and clothing textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more refined and less distracting from the main subjects.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but a few minor adjustments might enhance it further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04c3e87bfb16/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04c3e87bfb16/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed, with a nice sparkle effect.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and surrounded by flowers.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's eyes and the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, if you want to ensure the highest standards, you might consider a slight adjustment to the lighting to enhance the depth and dimensionality of the character's face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04c3e87bfb16/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04c3e87bfb16/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with both characters positioned symmetrically and proportionately.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with intricate designs on the characters' outfits and the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of very high quality with no significant issues. The facial details and overall composition are excellent, making it suitable for high-end customers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nFinal Recommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04c3e87bfb16/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04c3e87bfb16/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed, with a cute heart-shaped design.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct and proportionate.\n- The facial contours are natural and smooth.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent, with clean edges and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation is vibrant, with a harmonious blend of pastel colors that create a dreamy atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the characters positioned symmetrically and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with intricate flower patterns and a detailed sky.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears to be high, as there are no signs of pixelation or low detail.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a beautifully composed scene. The only minor issue could be the slight lack of contrast in certain areas, but it does not significantly detract from the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image meets all the criteria for high-end customer satisfaction and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04c3e87bfb16/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/20e3a336a2c2.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 9, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/20e3a336a2c2/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- Facial contours look natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, giving the image a pleasant and vibrant feel.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the characters positioned naturally on the bench.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the clothing textures and background elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of very high quality with only minor improvements that could be made. However, since the score is already quite high, it might not be necessary to regenerate unless specific feedback from the customer indicates otherwise.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/20e3a336a2c2/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/20e3a336a2c2/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are balanced and pleasing.\n- The level of detail richness is adequate, especially in the clothing and background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the image size.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality anime style with good character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background had more detail or the lighting was even more dynamic.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but it could potentially benefit from a bit more detail in the background or a slight adjustment in lighting to enhance the overall visual appeal.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/20e3a336a2c2/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/20e3a336a2c2/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The faces are not visible as they are cropped out of the image.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to assess their clarity, symmetry, proportion, or natural contour.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered on the lower bodies, which is intentional but could be improved by including more context or a full-body view.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich textures and shading on the clothing and skin.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the faces are not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the visible parts of the image, the overall quality is good. The absence of facial features does not significantly impact the overall quality score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/20e3a336a2c2/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/20e3a336a2c2/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show any faces, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show any faces, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are soft and have a pleasant, warm tone, but the contrast could be slightly higher for better depth.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered on the lower bodies, which is effective for showcasing the clothing and posture. The proportions seem balanced, though the lack of facial features makes it hard to assess overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: The details in the clothing and skin texture are rich and well-executed.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks facial features, it cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall composition and technical aspects are good. Given that the primary focus would typically be on the faces in such images, it might be beneficial to regenerate the image with faces included to meet customer expectations.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/20e3a336a2c2/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/20e3a336a2c2/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The faces are not visible as they are obscured by the characters' hair.\n- There is no detail provided on the faces due to the angle and framing of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast that enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the characters holding hands, which creates a sense of intimacy and connection.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a good level of detail, especially in the clothing and hair textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears to be sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the faces are not visible, it is challenging to assess the face quality comprehensively. However, the overall image quality is quite good, and the technical aspects are well-executed. If the primary focus were on the characters' faces, the image would need to be regenrated to include them. As it stands, the image can still be considered high-quality for its current composition and technical execution.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes (if the primary focus is on the characters' faces)", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/20e3a336a2c2/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0b5a37024724.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0b5a37024724/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\n- The facial details are somewhat clear but not highly defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical but lack fine detail.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct but could be more refined.\n- The facial contour is generally natural but lacks subtle shading that would make it more lifelike.\n- There are no noticeable blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, though the edges of the characters and background elements could be slightly sharper.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- The composition is strong, with the characters positioned centrally and the background elements complementing the scene effectively.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the forest and mushrooms, which adds depth to the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the intended use.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality feel with good color and composition. However, the face quality could be improved by adding more detail and refinement to the facial features. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image could benefit from a slight enhancement in facial detail and shading to make the faces more expressive and lifelike. This would improve the overall quality and appeal to high-end customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0b5a37024724/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0b5a37024724/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it, so we cannot assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of the face. However, the absence of facial features does not affect the overall quality of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it, so we cannot assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of the face. However, the absence of facial features does not affect the overall quality of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High. The lines are clean and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent. The colors are vibrant, and the contrast between the glowing elements and the forest background is strong.\n- Composition and proportions: Strong. The composition is balanced, with the glowing mushrooms and the figure creating a focal point, and the trees providing depth and structure.\n- Level of detail richness: High. There is a good amount of detail in the forest, the glowing elements, and the character's cloak.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is visually appealing and well-executed, but the lack of facial details prevents a higher score. Since the primary focus was on the character's face, which is not visible, the score is adjusted accordingly.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0b5a37024724/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0b5a37024724/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- The dragon's face has clear and well-defined features.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed, with a glowing effect that adds depth.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour is natural, with smooth transitions between features.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the mood.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the dragon positioned prominently in the center and the silhouette of the figure adding depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate patterns on the dragon and a rich environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. The only minor issue is the lack of facial features on the human figure, which could be improved if it were part of the primary focus. However, since the primary focus is on the dragon, this does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0b5a37024724/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0b5a37024724/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is completely obscured by a dark hood, making it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The lack of visible facial features prevents a thorough evaluation.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is completely obscured by a dark hood, making it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The lack of visible facial features prevents a thorough evaluation.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the mood.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with a strong focal point on the larger figure and a smaller figure in the foreground creating depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the clothing and environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe primary focus should be on regenerating the image to include the character's face, as it is essential for evaluating the face quality. Once the face is revealed, the overall quality can be further assessed.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0b5a37024724/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0b5a37024724/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\n- The character's face is not fully visible due to the hood, which makes it difficult to assess facial details.\n- The eyes are not clearly defined, and their symmetry cannot be evaluated.\n- The nose and mouth are not discernible due to the hood.\n- The facial contour appears somewhat natural but lacks detail.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, with clean edges and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation is high, with warm tones that create a pleasant atmosphere.\n- Composition is strong, with a balanced arrangement of characters and elements.\n- Detail richness is high, especially in the forest and magical elements like the glowing mushrooms and staff.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No noticeable artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a high-quality composition and color palette, but the lack of visible facial details prevents a higher score. Since the primary focus is on the character's face, and it is not fully visible, the image does not meet the highest standards for character quality. However, the overall image quality is still quite good.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0b5a37024724/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/fbaa6ecaa36b.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fbaa6ecaa36b/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not show any facial features as it is focused on the lower part of the body.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present in the image.\n- The absence of facial features makes it impossible to assess the symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack fine detail.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant, but the contrast seems a bit low, especially around the light and shadow areas.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered on the lower body, which is unusual for a full-body image.\n- Level of detail richness: The image lacks detail due to the focus on the lower body.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are visible.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears adequate for the content shown.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the image focuses on the lower body without any facial features, it cannot be evaluated for face quality. However, the lack of facial details and the unusual composition suggest that the image may need to be regenerated to include a full-body view with proper facial features. This would allow for a more comprehensive evaluation of the image's quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fbaa6ecaa36b/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fbaa6ecaa36b/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not show any facial features as it is focused on the lower body.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present in the image.\n- The absence of facial features makes it impossible to assess the symmetry, detail, proportion, or natural contour of the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined, especially around the curves of the body.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant, with a strong contrast between the skin tone and the glowing elements.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered on the lower body, which is well-proportioned and detailed.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, particularly in the skin texture and the glowing effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks facial features, it cannot be evaluated for face quality. However, given that the main focus is on the lower body, the overall image quality is good. The technical aspects are satisfactory, but the lack of facial details prevents a comprehensive assessment. Therefore, I would suggest regenerating the image to include facial features if the primary focus is on the character's appearance.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fbaa6ecaa36b/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fbaa6ecaa36b/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not show any facial features as it is focused on the lower part of the body.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present in the image.\n- The absence of facial features makes it impossible to assess the symmetry, detail, proportion, or natural contour of the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined, especially around the curves of the body.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, which enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered and balanced, focusing on the lower part of the body.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, with a focus on the texture and lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the content shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks facial features, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall image quality is good, and the technical aspects are satisfactory. Given that the primary focus is on the lower part of the body, the image could be considered acceptable as it meets the high standards set by the customer. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fbaa6ecaa36b/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fbaa6ecaa36b/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not show any facial features as it only displays the buttocks.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present in the image.\n- Since there are no facial features, the other aspects of face quality cannot be evaluated.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, especially with the glowing effects on the buttocks.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered and balanced, focusing on the buttocks.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a high level of detail, particularly in the texture and glow effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks facial features and focuses solely on buttocks, it does not meet the primary focus requirement for character face quality. However, the technical aspects of the image are quite good. Given that the primary focus is not met, I would recommend regeneration to include facial features if that is the intended focus of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fbaa6ecaa36b/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fbaa6ecaa36b/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not show a face; therefore, it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The lack of a face makes it difficult to evaluate the clarity and sharpness of lines, color saturation, and composition.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the image lacks a face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, if the intention was to create a character without a face, the image could still be improved by focusing on other aspects such as body details, texture, and overall composition. It would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a clear focus on the intended subject matter to ensure high-quality results.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fbaa6ecaa36b/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9a74b719047c.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9a74b719047c/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's attire and the intricate background design.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and background composition. The only minor issue is that the face is not shown, which prevents a perfect score. However, the rest of the image is very well done.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9a74b719047c/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9a74b719047c/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible as it is covered by a cloak, so we cannot assess facial details such as symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible as it is covered by a cloak, so we cannot assess facial details such as symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High. The lines are smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent. The colors are vibrant and the contrast is strong, making the image visually appealing.\n- Composition and proportions: Good. The composition is balanced, with the character centered and the forest background providing depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High. There is a rich level of detail in the character's attire and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, as the details are crisp and clear.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent color saturation, sharp lines, and a good composition. The lack of a visible face does not detract from the overall quality, but if the intention was to include a face, it would need to be added for a more complete representation. Since the face is not a primary focus here, the score remains high.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9a74b719047c/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9a74b719047c/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not fully visible due to the mask covering most of it. The eyes are not clearly defined, and the proportions of the nose and mouth are not discernible. The facial contour appears somewhat unnatural, possibly due to the mask design.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not fully visible due to the mask covering most of it. The eyes are not clearly defined, and the proportions of the nose and mouth are not discernible. The facial contour appears somewhat unnatural, possibly due to the mask design.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with the character centered and the forest background providing a balanced backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the character's attire and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation: The image has a high overall quality, but the lack of visible facial features and the somewhat unnatural facial contour could be improved. A regeneration focusing on refining the facial features and ensuring a more natural appearance would be beneficial. However, the current score of 8/10 indicates that the image is already quite satisfactory for high-end customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9a74b719047c/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9a74b719047c/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with a strong sense of depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the flowing fabric and floral elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent attention to detail and a beautiful color palette. However, the absence of a fully visible face means that the character's identity and expression cannot be assessed, which might be a concern for some viewers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: While the image is of high quality, if the primary focus is on the character's face, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a more detailed and visible face to ensure customer satisfaction.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9a74b719047c/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9a74b719047c/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's fur and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the eyes were even more detailed and the overall lighting was more consistent throughout the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but a few minor adjustments could enhance it further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9a74b719047c/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d59ed7440292.png", + "improved_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/improved/d59ed7440292.png", + "original_score": 4, + "improved_score": 8, + "improvement": 4, + "best_candidate_source": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d59ed7440292/candidate_1.png", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d59ed7440292/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has excellent character face quality and overall image quality. However, it could benefit from slightly more dynamic lighting to enhance the depth and realism of the scene. The composition is strong, but a bit more variety in the background could add interest without detracting from the main subjects.\n\nRecommendation: No regeneration is necessary as the image already meets high standards. However, consider adding subtle lighting effects to enhance the depth and realism further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d59ed7440292/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d59ed7440292/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate for the subject matter.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the hair and skin texture.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character face details and overall composition. However, if you want to ensure the highest standards, you might consider a slight adjustment in the lighting to enhance the depth and dimensionality of the scene further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nFinal recommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d59ed7440292/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d59ed7440292/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are good, though slightly off-center due to the close-up nature of the image.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the skin texture and hair.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent facial details and a well-executed composition. However, the slight off-center positioning could be adjusted for better balance. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d59ed7440292/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d59ed7440292/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate for the subject matter.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the facial features and expressions.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character face details and overall composition. However, if you want to ensure the highest possible quality, you might consider a slight adjustment in color balance to make the skin tones even more natural and lifelike.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nFinal recommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d59ed7440292/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d59ed7440292/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate for the subject matter.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the skin texture and hair.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character face details and overall composition. However, if you want to ensure the highest possible quality, you might consider a slight adjustment to the lighting to enhance the depth and dimensionality of the scene further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nFinal recommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d59ed7440292/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/c732e204ea24.png", + "improved_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/improved/c732e204ea24.png", + "original_score": 6, + "improved_score": 8, + "improvement": 2, + "best_candidate_source": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c732e204ea24/candidate_1.png", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c732e204ea24/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the characters positioned effectively against the background.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the character's face was more prominently featured in the frame, as it would allow for a more thorough analysis of facial features.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but if the primary focus were on the character's face, a few adjustments might enhance the score further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c732e204ea24/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c732e204ea24/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not fully visible, which makes it difficult to assess facial details.\n- The eyes appear slightly asymmetrical, but this could be due to the angle of the image.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem reasonable, but without seeing the full face, it's hard to confirm.\n- The facial contour looks natural from what can be seen.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, though the image appears to be cropped close to the character, focusing on the lower part of their body.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant, contributing to a visually appealing image.\n- The composition seems focused on the character's lower body, which might be intentional, but it limits the assessment of the overall image quality.\n- The level of detail richness is moderate, as the focus is on the clothing rather than intricate facial features.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the cropped portion of the image.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not fully visible, it's challenging to make a definitive judgment on the facial quality. However, the overall image quality is good, and the technical aspects are satisfactory. If the goal is to showcase the character's face more prominently, the image may need to be regenerated with a different angle or composition that includes the face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c732e204ea24/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c732e204ea24/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n- The lack of a visible face means we cannot determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined, especially around the character's back and clothing.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is strong, creating a visually appealing sunset scene.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the character's back taking up a significant portion of the frame and the background providing a beautiful sunset setting.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a rich level of detail, particularly in the clothing texture and the sunset sky.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise in the image.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears to be sufficient for the content shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is on the character's back, and the face is not visible, the overall quality is still quite good. However, if the intention was to showcase the character's face, the image would need to be regenerated to include a visible face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No (if the intention is to showcase the character's back), but Yes (if the intention is to showcase the character's face).", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c732e204ea24/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c732e204ea24/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, capturing the intimate moment between the characters.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, if you want to ensure the highest standards, you might consider a slight adjustment to the lighting to enhance the depth and dimensionality of the scene further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c732e204ea24/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c732e204ea24/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The faces of the characters are not visible as they are obscured by the large, abstract shapes.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to evaluate their clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n- The lack of visible faces makes it impossible to assess the facial quality.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack fine detail.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant, especially the pink tones, but the contrast seems a bit flat.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is interesting with the large abstract shapes, but the lack of visible characters affects the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a limited amount of detail due to the abstract nature of the shapes.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No obvious artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no apparent generation errors.\n- The resolution appears adequate for the style of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the faces are not visible, the image cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the abstract shapes could be refined to better frame the characters, allowing for a more balanced composition and potentially revealing more detail. Additionally, adjusting the color contrast and adding finer line details would enhance the overall quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c732e204ea24/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6bbbb27d6ed7.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bbbb27d6ed7/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas visible.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the hair and clothing textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and detail. However, the absence of the face means we cannot fully assess the facial quality, which is a significant aspect of character design. If the face were included, the score could potentially be higher.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not present, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a complete face to ensure the highest possible quality. This will allow for a more comprehensive assessment of the character's facial features and overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bbbb27d6ed7/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bbbb27d6ed7/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas visible.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the lace design.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent attention to detail and a well-composed scene. However, the absence of the character's face means we cannot fully assess the facial quality, which is a primary focus for many customers. If the customer specifically requests a full-face view, it might be beneficial to regenerate the image to include the face.\n\nRecommendation:\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nThe recommendation is based on the fact that the image does not show the character's face, which is crucial for many customers. Including the face would allow for a more comprehensive assessment of the facial quality and overall image quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bbbb27d6ed7/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bbbb27d6ed7/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with excellent character design and composition. However, the absence of the face means we cannot fully assess the facial quality, which is a significant aspect of character design. If the face were included, the score could potentially be higher.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not present, it's difficult to give a definitive score on the facial quality. If the face were included, the score would likely be higher. As it stands, the image is visually appealing and technically sound, but without the face, it's challenging to provide a complete assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No (if the face is not required; otherwise, Yes)\n\nIf the face were included, the score could be adjusted accordingly.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bbbb27d6ed7/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bbbb27d6ed7/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with excellent detail and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the eyes were even more detailed and the overall color palette was slightly more vibrant.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high quality, but a few minor enhancements could push it to a perfect 10/10.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bbbb27d6ed7/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bbbb27d6ed7/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality anime style with good character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background were more detailed or if there was a bit more depth in the shading on the character's face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high quality, but it might benefit from a slight enhancement in background detail or shading to make it even more visually appealing.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bbbb27d6ed7/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f3da45229d74.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f3da45229d74/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background adding depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's armor and the cityscape.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed or if the lighting had a bit more variation to enhance the depth.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f3da45229d74/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f3da45229d74/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible due to the helmet covering it completely.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and well-defined edges.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the futuristic theme.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the cityscape providing a good backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the character's armor and the urban environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it is impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, the overall image quality is high, and the technical aspects are excellent. Given the lack of facial details, the image could benefit from a regeneration where the character's face is revealed or stylized in a way that maintains the futuristic aesthetic while allowing for facial features to be seen.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f3da45229d74/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f3da45229d74/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background adding depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's design and the cityscape.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed or if the lighting had a bit more variation to enhance the depth and realism.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f3da45229d74/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f3da45229d74/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the cityscape providing a dynamic background.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's design and the city environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the character's face had even more intricate detailing or if the background had a bit more depth.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but for a perfect score, it might benefit from a bit more refinement in the character's facial features or a slight enhancement in the background depth.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f3da45229d74/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f3da45229d74/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned prominently in the frame.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's armor and the neon lights in the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and background elements. The only minor issue is that the face is not shown, which prevents a perfect score. However, the rest of the image is very well done.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f3da45229d74/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f580a1655651.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 9, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f580a1655651/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the main subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's dress and the glowing mushrooms.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed or if the lighting on the character's face was more pronounced.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f580a1655651/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f580a1655651/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the main subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's dress and the glowing mushrooms.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed or if the lighting effects were even more pronounced.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f580a1655651/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f580a1655651/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the main subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with intricate designs on the character's attire and the glowing elements in the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of very high quality with only minor improvements that could be made. However, since the score is already quite high, it might not be necessary to regenerate unless specific feedback from the customer indicates otherwise.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f580a1655651/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f580a1655651/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's attire and hair.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and background composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the hair and background elements had even more intricate details.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f580a1655651/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f580a1655651/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's hair and the glowing mushrooms.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the character's face had more intricate details or if the background had even more depth and texture.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but it could potentially benefit from a bit more refinement in certain areas to achieve a perfect score.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f580a1655651/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a7155196b415.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a7155196b415/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate.\n- The level of detail richness is satisfactory.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality anime style with good character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background were more detailed or if the lighting had a bit more variation to enhance the depth of the scene.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high quality, but it could potentially benefit from a slight enhancement in background detail and lighting to make it even more visually striking.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a7155196b415/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a7155196b415/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a warm and inviting atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, focusing on the character's form and lighting.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the lighting effects and the character's skin texture.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent attention to detail and a well-composed scene. However, the absence of the character's face means that the primary focus cannot be fully evaluated. If the face were included, it would likely receive a higher score due to its importance in character design.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not present, the score is slightly lower than ideal. If the face were included, the score could potentially be higher. However, as it stands, the image is still of very good quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a7155196b415/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a7155196b415/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are good, though the perspective could be improved slightly.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's skin texture and clothing.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and detail. However, the composition could be refined further to enhance the visual impact.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image already meets high standards and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a7155196b415/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a7155196b415/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, with a nice mix of warm and cool tones.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, capturing the intimate moment effectively.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the hair and lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background were more detailed or if there was a bit more depth in the lighting effects on the characters' faces.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but a few minor adjustments could enhance it further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a7155196b415/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a7155196b415/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate for the subject matter.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the skin texture and hair.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character face details and overall composition. However, the content depicted may not be suitable for all audiences due to its mature nature.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image meets the high standards set by the customer, and there are no significant issues that would require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a7155196b415/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0a6177185c32.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0a6177185c32/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not include any facial features as it focuses on hands and dresses. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not include any facial features as it focuses on hands and dresses. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast that enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with a balanced focus on the hands and dresses, and a pleasant background that complements the main subjects.\n- Level of detail richness: Rich, with intricate details in the fabric patterns and soft lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation: Since the image does not contain any facial features, the face quality cannot be evaluated. However, the overall image quality is high, with good composition, rich details, and appropriate color saturation. Given the absence of facial features, the image meets the high standards set by the customer. Therefore, no regeneration is recommended unless additional facial elements are required.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0a6177185c32/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0a6177185c32/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not include any facial features, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the hands appear to be rendered with good detail and smooth shading.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not include any facial features, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the hands appear to be rendered with good detail and smooth shading.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on the hands, which are proportionally well-rendered within the frame.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich textures and details visible in the hands and fabric.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nSince the image lacks facial features, it cannot be evaluated for face quality. However, the overall quality of the image is quite high, with good line clarity, color saturation, and detail richness. The absence of facial features does not significantly impact the overall quality assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: Since the image is already of high quality and does not have any facial features, it can be considered satisfactory as it stands. If the intention is to include facial features, the image would need to be regenerated with those elements included.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0a6177185c32/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0a6177185c32/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not include any facial features as it focuses on the hands and lower parts of the dresses. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not include any facial features as it focuses on the hands and lower parts of the dresses. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth transitions and clean lines.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with soft pastel colors that create a pleasant and harmonious look.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the hands and dresses, which creates a sense of intimacy and connection.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the fabric textures and floral patterns on the dress.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears to be high, providing a clear and detailed image.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with no significant issues. However, since the primary focus is on the hands and dresses rather than faces, the face quality cannot be evaluated. If the customer specifically requests a face-focused image, regeneration might be necessary. Otherwise, the current image meets the high standards set by the customer.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0a6177185c32/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0a6177185c32/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The hands and dress are the primary focus, but they lack fine details that would typically be present in a high-quality illustration.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are smooth and well-defined, indicating good quality.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is appropriate, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is balanced, and the proportions of the dress and hands appear correct.\n- Level of detail richness: The dress has a good level of detail, but the hands lack finer details that could be present in a more refined illustration.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise are visible.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the visible elements, the image is of good quality. The hands and dress have a decent level of detail, but they could benefit from additional fine details to enhance their realism.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0a6177185c32/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0a6177185c32/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show the characters' faces, so it's impossible to evaluate facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the hands and dresses are rendered with good detail and smooth lines.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show the characters' faces, so it's impossible to evaluate facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the hands and dresses are rendered with good detail and smooth lines.\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with soft pastel colors that create a pleasant and harmonious look.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered on the hands, which creates a strong focal point, and the proportions of the dresses are well-balanced.\n- Level of detail richness: Rich, with intricate patterns on the dresses and soft lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no visible artifacts or noise.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears to be high, as the details on the dresses are very clear.\n\nSince the image lacks facial details, which are crucial for character quality assessment, the overall score is slightly lower than perfect. However, the technical aspects and composition are excellent, making it a high-quality image overall.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0a6177185c32/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/406fc344a732.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/406fc344a732/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the cityscape providing a dynamic background.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with various elements like neon signs and reflections adding depth.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent attention to detail and a well-composed scene. The character's face is particularly well-rendered, contributing to the overall quality of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image meets the high standards set by the customer and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/406fc344a732/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/406fc344a732/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, capturing the essence of the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with a good balance between the character and the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. The only minor issue is that the character's face is not fully visible due to the angle, which slightly impacts the overall assessment but does not significantly detract from the quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/406fc344a732/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/406fc344a732/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, capturing the character's dynamic pose effectively.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the neon lights.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and background details. The only minor issue is that the character's hair appears slightly less defined compared to the rest of the image, but this does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image meets the high standards expected by professional illustrators and high-end customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/406fc344a732/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/406fc344a732/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, capturing the essence of the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the background and character's outfit.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent attention to detail and a well-composed scene. The character's face is rendered with good quality, and the overall image is visually appealing. However, if you want to ensure the highest possible quality, you might consider a slight adjustment to the lighting to enhance the depth and dimensionality of the scene further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/406fc344a732/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/406fc344a732/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, capturing the character's dynamic pose effectively.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's outfit and the neon lights.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and vibrant colors. However, the absence of the character's face prevents a full assessment of facial quality. If the face were included, it would likely be rated as good as well.\n\nRecommendation: Since the face is not included, the overall score is slightly lower than perfect. If the face were added, the score could potentially be higher. However, given the current state, the image is still of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/406fc344a732/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/dff4866593b3.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 9, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/dff4866593b3/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a warm and inviting atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, focusing on the character's face and the sunset background.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the hair and skin texture.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent attention to detail and a pleasing composition. However, if you want to ensure the highest possible quality, you might consider a slight adjustment to the lighting to enhance the depth and dimensionality of the character's features.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/dff4866593b3/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/dff4866593b3/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a warm and inviting atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, capturing a serene moment.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with fine textures visible on the hair and clothing.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of very high quality with only minor improvements needed. However, if you want to ensure the best possible result, a slight adjustment in lighting could enhance the depth and dimensionality further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/dff4866593b3/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/dff4866593b3/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed, with good shading and highlights.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural, with smooth transitions.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent, with clean edges and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a warm and inviting atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are excellent, with the subject centered and the background enhancing the mood without distracting from the main focus.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with fine hair strands and subtle lighting effects adding depth.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of very high quality with only minor improvements that could be made. However, since the score is already quite high, it might not be necessary to regenerate unless specific feedback is provided by the customer.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/dff4866593b3/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/dff4866593b3/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, with warm tones that enhance the sunset effect.\n- Composition and proportions are good, focusing on the character's hair and the sunset background.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the hair texture and the sunset gradient.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent attention to detail and a beautiful composition. However, the face is not fully visible, which might be a limitation for some viewers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: While the image is already quite high-quality, if the goal is to showcase the character's face more prominently, it might be beneficial to regenerate the image with a slightly different angle or a clearer view of the face. This could further enhance the overall quality and appeal to customers who prioritize facial details.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/dff4866593b3/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/dff4866593b3/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a warm and inviting atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, focusing on the character's face while still showing the background effectively.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with smooth gradients and subtle shading enhancing the overall quality.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, this image is of very high quality with only minor improvements needed to reach perfection. However, if you want to ensure the highest standards, a slight adjustment in the lighting or a more detailed background could enhance the composition further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nFinal recommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/dff4866593b3/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e47689760c0d.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e47689760c0d/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- The facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines throughout the image.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Slightly muted but still visually appealing, with good contrast between the character and the background.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the forest providing a strong backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: Rich in detail, especially in the glowing elements and the forest floor.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. The only minor issue is the slightly muted color palette, which could be adjusted for a more vibrant look if desired.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image meets the high standards set by professional illustrators and would likely satisfy most high-end customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e47689760c0d/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e47689760c0d/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a warm and inviting atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the glowing crystals and the intricate design of the compass-like symbol behind the character.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the lack of facial features on the character's face could be improved if the character were to have a more defined expression or a face that is not obscured by the hood.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality, but if the character had a more defined face, it would enhance the overall impact of the artwork.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e47689760c0d/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e47689760c0d/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background providing depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the glowing crystals and the forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent attention to detail and a well-composed scene. The character's face is rendered with good quality, and the overall image is visually striking. However, if you want to ensure the highest possible quality, you might consider a slight adjustment to the lighting to enhance the glow of the crystals and the character's aura, making them stand out even more.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e47689760c0d/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e47689760c0d/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. Without seeing the face, it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. Without seeing the face, it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with warm tones that create a pleasant atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, with the glowing object drawing the viewer's eye towards the center.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a rich level of detail, especially in the glowing object and the forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nGiven the lack of visible facial features, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall composition and technical aspects are strong, warranting a high score. The absence of the face makes it necessary to regenerate the image to ensure the character's facial features are included and properly rendered.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e47689760c0d/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e47689760c0d/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face lacks clear details, especially around the eyes and mouth area. The eyes appear somewhat symmetrical but lack fine detail, and the mouth is not clearly defined. The proportions of the nose and mouth seem slightly off, and the facial contour appears unnatural due to the stylized nature of the artwork.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face lacks clear details, especially around the eyes and mouth area. The eyes appear somewhat symmetrical but lack fine detail, and the mouth is not clearly defined. The proportions of the nose and mouth seem slightly off, and the facial contour appears unnatural due to the stylized nature of the artwork.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with warm tones that enhance the forest setting.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with the character centered and the forest background providing a good sense of depth.\n- Level of detail richness: Rich, with intricate details in the character's attire and the glowing effect on their hands.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a high-quality composition and rich details, but the lack of clear facial features could detract from the overall impact. Regeneration might focus on refining the facial details, particularly around the eyes and mouth, to make them more defined and natural. This would improve the character's presence and the overall quality of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e47689760c0d/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f6d7789ebf35.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f6d7789ebf35/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The lack of a complete face makes it difficult to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined, especially around the body and clothing.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant, with a strong contrast between the black and white elements and the neon background.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on the lower part of the body, which is well-proportioned and detailed.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, particularly in the textures of the clothing and the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise in the image.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears to be sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the visible parts of the image, the overall quality is good. The image has a high level of detail and vibrant colors, making it visually appealing.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nIf you need a full face, I would recommend regenerating the image to include the face as well.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f6d7789ebf35/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f6d7789ebf35/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas visible.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, focusing on the character's upper body.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the textures like the mesh and lace.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent attention to detail and a well-composed scene. However, the absence of the face means we cannot fully assess the facial quality, which is a primary focus for high-end customers. If the face were included, it would likely be rated even higher.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not present, the overall score is slightly lower than ideal. If the face were included, the score could potentially be higher. For now, the image is still of high quality but lacks the critical facial assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No (if the face is not required; otherwise, Yes)\n\nIf the face were included, the score would likely be adjusted upwards.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f6d7789ebf35/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f6d7789ebf35/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face, so we cannot evaluate facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face means that the primary focus of the image is on the lower body and legs, which appear to be rendered with good detail and clarity.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face, so we cannot evaluate facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face means that the primary focus of the image is on the lower body and legs, which appear to be rendered with good detail and clarity.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on the lower body, and the proportions seem appropriate for the style of the image.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate patterns on the stockings and a detailed depiction of the skin texture.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nSince the image lacks a face, it is difficult to provide a comprehensive evaluation of its quality based solely on the provided criteria. However, given the high level of detail and clarity in the lower body portion, the image can be considered of good quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nIf you need a face added to the image, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a face included to ensure a complete and balanced evaluation.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f6d7789ebf35/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f6d7789ebf35/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The image appears to be focused on the lower body, which means there are no facial features to evaluate.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined, especially around the curves and edges of the body.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant, with a good contrast between the skin tones and the background.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is focused on the lower body, and the proportions seem appropriate for the style.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, particularly in the textures of the clothing and the skin.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise in the image.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution seems sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nSince the face is not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the character's face quality. However, based on the visible parts of the image, the overall quality is quite good. The image is well-composed, detailed, and free from technical issues.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: Since the face is not visible, the image cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, if the intention was to focus on the lower body, the image is already of high quality. If the goal was to include a face, the image would need to be regenerated to include one.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f6d7789ebf35/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f6d7789ebf35/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show a character's face; therefore, it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face suggests that the primary focus might be on other elements of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show a character's face; therefore, it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face suggests that the primary focus might be on other elements of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and have good contrast, especially the pink tones.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition seems intentional, focusing on the lower part of the body, but without a face, it's hard to assess the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a high level of detail in the textures, such as the fishnet pattern and lace design.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No visible artifacts or noise are present.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors in the visible parts of the image.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high enough to capture the fine details.\n\nSince the image lacks a face, which is typically the primary focus in character illustrations, the overall quality is still quite good due to the attention to detail in the textures and colors. However, if the intention was to include a face, this image would need significant regeneration.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f6d7789ebf35/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a505a32fc79e.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a505a32fc79e/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- Facial contours look natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with both characters positioned effectively within the frame.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the characters' clothing and accessories.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the line clarity was even sharper and the color contrast was slightly more pronounced.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but a few minor adjustments could enhance its quality further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a505a32fc79e/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a505a32fc79e/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and dynamic elements around her.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the magical effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background had more depth and variety in its details, which would enhance the overall richness of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a505a32fc79e/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a505a32fc79e/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the magical effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background had more depth and the lighting was even more dynamic.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but a few minor adjustments could enhance it further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a505a32fc79e/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a505a32fc79e/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned dynamically.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's armor and the magical effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and dynamic composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed or if there was a bit more depth in the lighting and shadows on the character's face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a505a32fc79e/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a505a32fc79e/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned prominently against the dramatic background.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's armor and the magical effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a dynamic composition. The only minor issue is that the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed and less distracting from the main character. However, these are small improvements that do not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a505a32fc79e/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cfeb6456c837.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cfeb6456c837/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a warm and inviting atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned effectively within the frame.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the lack of facial features on the character might be a minor issue for some viewers, but it does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and would likely meet the expectations of high-end customers. If the customer specifically requests more facial details, then regeneration might be considered. Otherwise, the current image is suitable as-is.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cfeb6456c837/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cfeb6456c837/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is completely obscured by a glowing aura, making it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The lack of visible facial features prevents a thorough evaluation.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is completely obscured by a glowing aura, making it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The lack of visible facial features prevents a thorough evaluation.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with warm tones that enhance the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, with the character centered and the architecture framing the scene effectively.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate architectural details and a richly textured environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe primary issue is the absence of facial details due to the glowing effect, which significantly impacts the overall quality assessment. A regeneration focusing on revealing the character's face would be beneficial to fully evaluate the image.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cfeb6456c837/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cfeb6456c837/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face lacks clear facial details, making it difficult to discern features like the eyes, nose, and mouth. The eyes appear symmetrical but lack detail, and the proportions of the nose and mouth seem off. The facial contour is not very natural, and there are some blurry areas around the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face lacks clear facial details, making it difficult to discern features like the eyes, nose, and mouth. The eyes appear symmetrical but lack detail, and the proportions of the nose and mouth seem off. The facial contour is not very natural, and there are some blurry areas around the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally clear, but there are some soft edges that might be due to the artistic style.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are warm and have good contrast, which enhances the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, with the character centered and the background elements balanced.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a good level of detail in the background and the character's attire, but the face lacks detail.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high enough for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation: While the image has a good overall quality, the lack of facial detail significantly impacts the character's presence. Regeneration could improve the facial features to make the character more recognizable and engaging.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cfeb6456c837/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cfeb6456c837/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, with a warm, inviting tone.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the architecture framing the scene effectively.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's robe and the architectural elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the lack of facial features (eyes, mouth, etc.) makes it difficult to assess the character's expression and personality fully. This could be improved by adding more facial details or a different perspective that includes the face.\n\nRecommendation:\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nThe recommendation is based on the need for facial details to enhance the character's expressiveness and overall impact. Adding more facial features would improve the image's ability to convey emotion and personality, which is crucial for high-end customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cfeb6456c837/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cfeb6456c837/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. Without seeing the face, it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of facial features does not affect the overall composition and quality of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. Without seeing the face, it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of facial features does not affect the overall composition and quality of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High. The lines are clean and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent. The colors are vibrant, and the contrast between the light and shadow enhances the depth of the scene.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced. The character is centered, and the architectural elements create a harmonious composition.\n- Level of detail richness: High. The image is rich in detail, from the intricate patterns on the pillars to the glowing effects around the character.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the character's face is not visible, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a visible face to allow for a more comprehensive analysis of the facial quality. This will ensure that all aspects of the image can be evaluated accurately.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cfeb6456c837/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1629bc02c847.png", + "improved_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/improved/1629bc02c847.png", + "original_score": 6, + "improved_score": 8, + "improvement": 2, + "best_candidate_source": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1629bc02c847/candidate_1.png", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1629bc02c847/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical but lack detailed texture.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are effective, capturing the intimate moment between the characters.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the tongues and droplets.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent detail and composition. The only minor issue is the lack of detailed texture in the eyes, which could be improved for a more realistic appearance.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendations for Improvement:\n- Enhance the texture and detail in the eyes for a more lifelike appearance.\n- Consider adding a slight shadow or highlight on the tongues to enhance the three-dimensional effect.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1629bc02c847/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1629bc02c847/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible as it is cut off at the top of the image.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The proportions and contours cannot be assessed due to the lack of a complete face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack detail.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted, and the contrast is low.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered on the lower part of the body, which is unusual for a character portrait.\n- Level of detail richness: The image lacks detail, especially in the area where the face should be.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are apparent.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears adequate for the content shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible and there are no facial features to evaluate, the image does not meet the required standards for a high-quality character portrait. Therefore, I recommend regeneration to include a complete face with proper facial details and proportions.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1629bc02c847/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1629bc02c847/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality anime style with excellent character design and detail. However, the score could be slightly higher if the artist were to refine the shading and lighting to make the image even more vibrant and dynamic.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high quality, but further refinement could enhance its impact.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1629bc02c847/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1629bc02c847/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality anime style with excellent character face details and overall composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the color palette was more vibrant and the contrast was pushed a bit further for a more striking effect.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image is already quite good, but if the customer desires a more vibrant and striking appearance, it might benefit from a slight adjustment in color saturation and contrast. However, given the current quality, regeneration is not necessary unless the customer specifically requests changes that would improve the vibrancy and impact of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1629bc02c847/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1629bc02c847/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good attention to detail and a well-composed scene. However, the absence of the character's face means that the primary focus cannot be evaluated fully. If the face were included, it would likely receive a higher score due to the excellent details already present in the rest of the image.\n\nRecommendation: Since the face is not included, the score is based on the visible parts. If the face were added, the score could potentially increase. However, as it stands, the image is of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1629bc02c847/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cd4ea1e23a65.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4ea1e23a65/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 4, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 4/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image appears to be focused on a lower body part rather than a face.\n- There are no facial details present as the image does not show a face at all.\n- Since there is no face, it's impossible to assess the symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The image lacks clear lines and sharpness due to its focus on a lower body part.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors appear somewhat muted, and the contrast is low, which affects the overall visual impact.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is off as the image is not properly framed to include any facial features.\n- Level of detail richness: There is very little detail present since the image is not focused on any facial features.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: Not applicable as the image does not contain any facial features.\n- Generation errors: The image seems to have been generated incorrectly as it does not depict a face at all.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears adequate for the content shown, but it would be better if the image were focused on a face to fully utilize the resolution.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image should be regenerated with a focus on a face to accurately assess its quality according to the specified criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4ea1e23a65/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4ea1e23a65/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no noticeable blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality anime style with good character design and composition. However, the absence of the characters' faces means we cannot fully assess their facial features. If the faces were included, the score could potentially be higher.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the faces are not present, it's difficult to give a full assessment of the face quality. If the faces were included, the score would likely be higher. As it stands, the image is visually appealing and technically sound.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No (if faces are included; otherwise, the current score is satisfactory).", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4ea1e23a65/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4ea1e23a65/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n1. The character's face is not visible due to the silhouette, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours.\n2. The text at the bottom appears to be part of the original image rather than generated content, which might be a design choice but could be misleading if it's intended to be part of the generated image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n1. Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are smooth and well-defined, especially around the window and curtains.\n2. Color saturation and contrast: The colors are warm and harmonious, with good contrast that enhances the mood of the scene.\n3. Composition and proportions: The composition is balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the window providing a strong focal point.\n4. Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, particularly in the window and curtains, which add depth to the scene.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n1. No apparent artifacts or noise.\n2. No obvious generation errors.\n3. The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face quality cannot be assessed due to the silhouette, and the text at the bottom seems to be part of the original image, the overall score is slightly lower than ideal. However, the image is visually appealing and technically sound. If the intention is to have a clear face, the image would need to be regenerated with a visible face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4ea1e23a65/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4ea1e23a65/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image lacks facial details as the face itself is not visible. However, the hand and arm are rendered with good detail, showing smooth lines and natural shading. The heart symbol and text bubbles add a nice touch but do not affect the overall quality significantly.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image lacks facial details as the face itself is not visible. However, the hand and arm are rendered with good detail, showing smooth lines and natural shading. The heart symbol and text bubbles add a nice touch but do not affect the overall quality significantly.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with warm tones that create a pleasant atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the hand reaching towards the door, which adds a sense of anticipation.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a rich level of detail, especially in the hand and the light coming through the window.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the content shown.\n\nRecommendation: Since the face is not visible, the score is slightly lower than perfect. However, the rest of the image is well-executed. If the goal is to have a complete character interaction scene, it might be beneficial to regenerate the image to include the face. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes, if the face is required for the full scene.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4ea1e23a65/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4ea1e23a65/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image appears to be focused on a lower body part, so it's not possible to assess facial details.\n- There are no facial features present in the image, making it impossible to evaluate facial symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n- The lack of facial features also prevents assessment of blurriness, distortion, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack fine detail, which is typical for anime-style illustrations.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted, and the contrast seems low, which might be intentional for a specific artistic style.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on a lower body part, which is acceptable for certain types of art but not for assessing overall image quality.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is moderate, but the absence of facial features limits the richness of detail that can be evaluated.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise are apparent.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution seems adequate for the style of the image.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks facial features, it cannot be evaluated for face quality. However, the overall image quality is satisfactory for its style, and the technical issues are minimal. Given the focus on a lower body part, the image could be suitable for certain types of artwork. If the intention is to create a full-body character, this image would need to be regenerated to include the face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4ea1e23a65/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5da8a2df8f1f.png", + "improved_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/improved/5da8a2df8f1f.png", + "original_score": 6, + "improved_score": 9, + "improvement": 3, + "best_candidate_source": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5da8a2df8f1f/candidate_5.png", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5da8a2df8f1f/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image lacks a face, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the hand appears to be rendered with good detail and smooth shading, suggesting a high level of technical skill.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image lacks a face, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the hand appears to be rendered with good detail and smooth shading, suggesting a high level of technical skill.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual impact.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic, with the hand reaching towards the light, creating a sense of movement and depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the hand's texture and lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks a face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, based on the provided analysis, the overall image quality is very good. The hand is rendered with high detail and smooth shading, indicating a high level of technical skill. Given these positive aspects, no regeneration is necessary unless additional elements are required to complete the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5da8a2df8f1f/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5da8a2df8f1f/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image lacks facial details as it focuses on hands rather than faces. The hands appear to be the primary subject, so the absence of facial features does not significantly impact the overall quality. However, the lack of facial details means that the image cannot be evaluated based on facial quality criteria.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image lacks facial details as it focuses on hands rather than faces. The hands appear to be the primary subject, so the absence of facial features does not significantly impact the overall quality. However, the lack of facial details means that the image cannot be evaluated based on facial quality criteria.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the dynamic energy of the scene.\n- Composition and proportions: Strong, with a balanced composition that draws the viewer's eye to the center where the hands meet.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate light effects and detailed hand textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation: Since the image is focused on hands and not faces, the lack of facial details does not affect the overall quality. The image is visually striking and well-executed in terms of composition and detail. Therefore, no regeneration is necessary.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5da8a2df8f1f/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5da8a2df8f1f/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no noticeable blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a warm and dynamic feel.\n- Composition and proportions are effective, focusing on the character's face while incorporating dynamic lighting effects.\n- The level of detail richness is good, especially in the hair and light streaks.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent attention to detail and a well-executed composition. However, the warm color palette might be too intense for some viewers, which could be adjusted slightly for a more balanced look.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image meets the high standards set by the customer, and further refinement would not significantly improve its quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5da8a2df8f1f/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5da8a2df8f1f/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no noticeable blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are effective, focusing on the character's face.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the hair and lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent attention to detail and a well-executed composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the eyes were even more detailed and the lighting effects were pushed to the absolute maximum for a more dramatic effect.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5da8a2df8f1f/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5da8a2df8f1f/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed, with good shading and reflections.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural, with smooth transitions between features.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, with warm tones that enhance the emotional feel.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, focusing on the intimate moment between the characters.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with fine hair strands and subtle skin textures visible.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of very high quality with only minor improvements possible. The facial details and overall composition are excellent, making it suitable for high-end customers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nFinal recommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5da8a2df8f1f/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ae51a444a779.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 9, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ae51a444a779/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has excellent character face quality and overall image quality. The technical aspects are also well-executed without any noticeable issues. However, if you want to ensure the highest quality, you might consider a slight adjustment to enhance the background details slightly more to make it even more immersive.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nFinal recommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ae51a444a779/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ae51a444a779/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a pleasant visual experience.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned centrally and the background providing a nice depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's dress and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and background composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the character's face was even more detailed and expressive.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but a few more subtle refinements could enhance it further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ae51a444a779/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ae51a444a779/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed, with vibrant colors.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, giving the image a vibrant yet soothing appearance.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned centrally and the background providing a nice depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the hair and clothing textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of very high quality with only minor improvements needed. However, if you want to ensure the best possible result, you might consider slight adjustments to the lighting and shadows to enhance the three-dimensional effect further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ae51a444a779/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ae51a444a779/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The hands are the primary focus, but they lack fine details that would make them more realistic.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth transitions between elements.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the hands framing the scene effectively and the character positioned centrally.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich textures in the background and foreground elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the character's face is not visible, it's challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, the overall image quality is strong, with excellent composition and rich details. The hands could benefit from more detailed rendering to enhance realism further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ae51a444a779/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ae51a444a779/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not include any facial features as it focuses on hands. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of the face. However, the hands appear smooth and well-rendered, suggesting good quality in that aspect.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not include any facial features as it focuses on hands. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of the face. However, the hands appear smooth and well-rendered, suggesting good quality in that aspect.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast between the characters' clothing and the forest background.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with the hands positioned centrally and the background providing a balanced setting.\n- Level of detail richness: Rich, with detailed textures on the hands and clothing, as well as a detailed forest background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nSince the image lacks facial features, which would be the primary focus for a character-focused evaluation, the overall score is still quite high due to the excellent composition, color, and detail work. However, if the image were intended to showcase a character's face, the lack of facial details would significantly impact the quality assessment.\n\nRecommendation: Since the image is focused on hands rather than a face, the current score is appropriate. If the image were intended to feature a character's face, it would need to be regenerated to include facial details.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ae51a444a779/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/177ba7c1c9b6.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/177ba7c1c9b6/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, giving the image a vibrant feel.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character in focus and the background providing context without overwhelming the main subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's dress and the balloons.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background were less crowded and more focused on the main character, which would make the image even more striking.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/177ba7c1c9b6/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/177ba7c1c9b6/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, giving the image a vibrant yet realistic feel.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background providing depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's dress and the balloons.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, if you want to ensure the highest standards, you might consider a slight adjustment to the lighting to enhance the depth and contrast further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nFinal recommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/177ba7c1c9b6/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/177ba7c1c9b6/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the hair appears to be well-defined and proportionate.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the hair appears to be well-defined and proportionate.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast that enhances the urban setting.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the background buildings creating a sense of depth.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a rich level of detail, especially in the cityscape and the character's dress.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- No obvious generation errors are visible.\n- The resolution appears to be high, as the details in the background and the character's dress are sharp.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but without seeing the face, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment on the character's facial features. If the face were visible, the overall quality would likely be higher.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/177ba7c1c9b6/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/177ba7c1c9b6/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and distance from which the image was taken. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportion, and naturalness of the facial features.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and distance from which the image was taken. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportion, and naturalness of the facial features.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that make the scene lively.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the background elements contributing to a sense of depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich textures on the buildings and clothing, as well as detailed balloons.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe main issue here is the lack of visibility of the character's face, which prevents a thorough assessment of the face quality. However, the overall image quality is strong, and the technical aspects are well-executed. A regeneration would be beneficial to address the missing facial details.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/177ba7c1c9b6/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/177ba7c1c9b6/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions seem correct.\n- The facial contours look natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, capturing the essence of the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the background and lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the facial features were even more detailed and expressive.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image already meets high standards and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/177ba7c1c9b6/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1eec3eb36e76.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1eec3eb36e76/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The hands are the primary focus, so the absence of facial details does not significantly impact the overall quality. However, the hands appear slightly distorted, especially around the fingers, which could be improved for a more natural look. The lighting on the hands is uneven, with some areas appearing overly bright, which might be corrected for better realism.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The hands are the primary focus, so the absence of facial details does not significantly impact the overall quality. However, the hands appear slightly distorted, especially around the fingers, which could be improved for a more natural look. The lighting on the hands is uneven, with some areas appearing overly bright, which might be corrected for better realism.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast that enhances the forest background.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with the hands positioned centrally and the forest background providing a balanced backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: Rich, with detailed textures in the hands and forest elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation: The image is already quite good, but the slight distortion in the hands could be refined for a more polished look. Since the overall quality is high and the technical aspects are sound, it would be suitable for high-end customers without needing regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1eec3eb36e76/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1eec3eb36e76/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not include a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the hand appears to be rendered with good detail and smooth lines.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not include a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the hand appears to be rendered with good detail and smooth lines.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast that enhances the magical glow effect.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the glowing symbol centered on the hand and the forest background providing depth.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a rich level of detail, especially in the hand's texture and the forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears to be high, suitable for the level of detail shown.\n\nSince the image lacks a face, the primary focus cannot be assessed. However, the hand and the overall composition are of high quality. The absence of a face does not significantly impact the overall quality of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nIf you need a face added to the image, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a face included to properly assess the face quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1eec3eb36e76/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1eec3eb36e76/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show a face, so it's impossible to evaluate facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the hands appear to be rendered with good detail and smooth skin texture.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show a face, so it's impossible to evaluate facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the hands appear to be rendered with good detail and smooth skin texture.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast that enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the hands and the glowing symbol, which creates a strong visual impact.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the hands and the glowing symbol.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nSince the image lacks a face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall image quality is high, with excellent line clarity, color saturation, and detail richness. The absence of a face does not affect the technical quality assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: Since the image does not contain a face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. The current image meets high standards in terms of overall quality and technical aspects. If a face were included, further evaluation could be conducted.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1eec3eb36e76/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1eec3eb36e76/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not include any facial features as it only shows hands. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not include any facial features as it only shows hands. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast that enhances the magical glow of the symbols.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with the hands positioned centrally and the forest background providing a balanced backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: Rich, with intricate details on the hands and the forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nSince the image lacks facial features, the face quality cannot be evaluated. However, the overall image quality is high, with good composition, rich details, and no technical issues. The absence of facial features does not affect the overall quality assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1eec3eb36e76/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1eec3eb36e76/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not include any facial features as it focuses on hands. Therefore, the face quality cannot be assessed.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not include any facial features as it focuses on hands. Therefore, the face quality cannot be assessed.\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast that enhances the forest background.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with the hands positioned centrally and the forest background providing a balanced backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: Rich, with detailed hands and a lush forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the absence of facial features, the image's primary focus is on the hands and the forest background. The quality of the hands and the overall composition are strong points, warranting a high score. However, since the image lacks facial details, which would typically be the primary focus for high-end customers, the face quality is rated as average.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1eec3eb36e76/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/85e1bf5db755.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/85e1bf5db755/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show any facial features as it is focused on the lower body. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or naturalness of the face. However, the absence of facial details is a significant issue since the primary focus should be on the character's face if that is the intended subject.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show any facial features as it is focused on the lower body. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or naturalness of the face. However, the absence of facial details is a significant issue since the primary focus should be on the character's face if that is the intended subject.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is effective, focusing on the curves and details of the lower body.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the textures and reflections.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, providing a clear view of the details.\n\nSince the image lacks facial details, which would typically be the primary focus, the overall quality is affected. The absence of facial features makes it difficult to assess the quality of the face itself. However, the rest of the image is well-executed in terms of line clarity, color, and detail.\n\nRecommendation:\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nThe image should be regenerated with a focus on the character's face to ensure that the primary subject is clearly defined and detailed. Once the face is included, the overall quality can be reassessed more accurately.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/85e1bf5db755/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/85e1bf5db755/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality assessment of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality assessment of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High. The lines are smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good. The colors are vibrant and the contrast is appropriate, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is effective, focusing on the curves and textures of the character's body, which is a deliberate artistic choice.\n- Level of detail richness: High. The image has a rich level of detail, especially in the shading and texture of the skin and fabric.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No noticeable artifacts or noise are present.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors in the visible parts of the image.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, as the details are sharp and clear.\n\nSince the face is not visible, the overall quality is still quite good, but without the face, it's difficult to provide a comprehensive assessment. If the face were included, the score could potentially be higher.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: If the face were included, the image would likely receive a higher score due to its high level of detail and composition. However, since the face is not present, the current score reflects the quality of the visible parts of the image.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/85e1bf5db755/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/85e1bf5db755/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face at all, which is the primary focus. Without seeing the face, it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality and makes it difficult to determine if the image meets the high standards expected by high-end customers.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face at all, which is the primary focus. Without seeing the face, it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality and makes it difficult to determine if the image meets the high standards expected by high-end customers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image should be regenerated to include the character's face as the primary focus. Once the face is included, the other aspects such as line clarity, color saturation, composition, and technical issues can be evaluated more accurately.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/85e1bf5db755/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/85e1bf5db755/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show a character's face at all, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue for a character-focused image.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show a character's face at all, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue for a character-focused image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition seems intentional, focusing on the lower part of the body, but without a face, it's hard to assess the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the skin texture and the water droplets.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors; the image appears to be a high-quality illustration.\n- Resolution: The resolution seems sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks a character's face, which is typically the primary focus in anime-style illustrations, it cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall image quality is quite good. Given that the main purpose of the image might be to showcase the lower body and the artistic style, the current score is appropriate. If the intention was to include a face, the image would need to be regenerated to meet the customer's expectations.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No (if the intention was to showcase the lower body), Yes (if the intention was to include a face).", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/85e1bf5db755/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/85e1bf5db755/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The lack of facial features makes it difficult to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined, especially around the body and clothing.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on the lower part of the body, which is well-proportioned and detailed.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, particularly in the textures of the clothing and skin.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise in the image.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the character's face quality. However, based on the visible parts of the image, the overall quality is quite good. The technical aspects are well-executed, and the composition and detail are impressive.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nIf you need a more detailed analysis of the visible parts of the image, please let me know!", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/85e1bf5db755/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/c75c52e68a51.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c75c52e68a51/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face lacks clear definition, especially around the eyes and mouth area. The eyes appear somewhat flat and lack depth, which affects the overall symmetry and detail. The nose and mouth proportions seem slightly off, contributing to a less natural facial contour. There are no significant blurry or distorted areas, but the lack of detail in the face detracts from the overall quality.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face lacks clear definition, especially around the eyes and mouth area. The eyes appear somewhat flat and lack depth, which affects the overall symmetry and detail. The nose and mouth proportions seem slightly off, contributing to a less natural facial contour. There are no significant blurry or distorted areas, but the lack of detail in the face detracts from the overall quality.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with a balanced use of blue tones that enhance the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is effective, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background adding depth. However, the character's proportions could be improved for better balance.\n- Level of detail richness: Moderate, with rich details in the cape and the glowing crystal, but the face lacks the necessary detail to elevate it to a higher level.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the intended use.\n\nOverall, while the image has good technical qualities and a strong composition, the lack of detail in the character's face significantly impacts the overall quality. A regeneration focusing on improving facial detail would be beneficial.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c75c52e68a51/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c75c52e68a51/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a moody atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background adding depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's hair and the glowing blue light.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and atmospheric composition. However, the lack of facial features on the character's back could be improved if the character were facing forward, as it might enhance the overall impact of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality, but if the customer prefers a more detailed face, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with the character facing forward.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c75c52e68a51/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c75c52e68a51/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned effectively against the forest backdrop.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the glowing effects and the forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the glowing effect around the character's head could be slightly more defined to enhance the visual impact further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c75c52e68a51/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c75c52e68a51/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background adding depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the cape and the glowing elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the eyes were even more detailed or if there was a bit more contrast in the background to make it stand out more.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c75c52e68a51/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c75c52e68a51/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a serene atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the forest background providing depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's cape and the forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the character's face had more intricate details or if the background had even more depth and texture.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c75c52e68a51/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/372f2310d690.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/372f2310d690/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the hands and the dress, which creates a sense of depth and movement.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich textures in the fabric and flowers, adding to the overall richness of the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nSince the face is not visible, the image cannot be rated based on facial quality. However, the overall image quality is very good, with high clarity, vibrant colors, and a well-composed scene. The absence of a face does not detract from the quality of the rest of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: Since the image is already of high quality and the absence of a face does not impact the overall assessment, no regeneration is necessary. However, if the intention is to include a face, the artist should focus on ensuring that the facial features are clear, symmetrical, and proportionate.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/372f2310d690/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/372f2310d690/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face, so we cannot evaluate facial details such as symmetry, proportion, or natural contours. However, the hands and clothing appear to be well-drawn with good proportions and natural shading.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face, so we cannot evaluate facial details such as symmetry, proportion, or natural contours. However, the hands and clothing appear to be well-drawn with good proportions and natural shading.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the hands and clothing, which are the main subjects. The background flowers add depth without distracting from the main elements.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the clothing folds and the texture of the fabric.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nSince the image lacks facial details, it is difficult to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the face quality. However, based on the visible parts of the image, the overall quality is quite good. The absence of facial features does not significantly impact the overall quality score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: If the customer specifically requests a face, the artist should regenerate the image with a face included while maintaining the high-quality standards observed in the current image.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/372f2310d690/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/372f2310d690/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features does not affect the overall quality assessment of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features does not affect the overall quality assessment of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High. The lines are smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent. The colors are vibrant and the contrast is well-balanced, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: Good. The composition is balanced, with the hands forming a heart shape against a beautiful sunset background. The proportions of the characters' bodies are well-matched.\n- Level of detail richness: High. The image contains rich details in the clothing textures, flower patterns, and the sky gradient.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, as the details are crisp and clear.\n\nOverall, the image is visually appealing and technically sound. The absence of facial details prevents a more comprehensive evaluation of the face quality. However, the overall quality is high enough to satisfy most customers. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: Since the face is not visible, the image can be considered satisfactory. However, if the goal is to include facial details, the regeneration might be necessary to ensure the face quality meets the high standards expected by the customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/372f2310d690/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/372f2310d690/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas visible.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, with vibrant colors that enhance the scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, capturing a harmonious interaction between the characters.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the clothing textures and floral background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No noticeable artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the absence of the face prevents a perfect score. If the face were included, it would likely be rated even higher.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: Since the face is not included, the image cannot be rated fully. If the face were added, the score could potentially reach 9 or 10.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/372f2310d690/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/372f2310d690/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High. The lines are smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent. The colors are vibrant and the contrast is well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions: Good. The composition is pleasing, with the focus on the flowing dress and the background of the flower field.\n- Level of detail richness: High. The details in the dress fabric and the flowers are rich and well-rendered.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, as the details are crisp and clear.\n\nSince the face is not present, the image cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall quality of the image is very good, with no technical issues identified. The absence of a face does not impact the quality assessment of the rest of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: Since the face is not visible, the image can be considered complete in terms of its non-face elements. However, if the intention was to include a face, it would need to be added to meet the customer's expectations.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/372f2310d690/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/04cf5061cdbf.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04cf5061cdbf/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background providing a good sense of depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the armor and the glowing sword.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. The only minor issue is that the face is not shown, which prevents a perfect score. However, the absence of facial features does not significantly impact the overall quality of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04cf5061cdbf/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04cf5061cdbf/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, with vibrant colors that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned dynamically in the frame.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the armor and the glowing sword.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the lack of facial features (the character's face is obscured by the helmet) slightly impacts the overall score. If the character's face were visible, it would be even more impressive.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible due to the helmet, it might be beneficial to regenerate the image with a more detailed face or without the helmet altogether to fully showcase the character's facial features. This would improve the overall score and meet the high standards of your customers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04cf5061cdbf/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04cf5061cdbf/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and dynamic.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the armor and the sword's motion trails.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. The only minor issue is that the face is not shown, which prevents a perfect score. However, the absence of facial features does not significantly impact the overall quality assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image could be improved by adding the character's face, but the current quality is already very high.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04cf5061cdbf/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04cf5061cdbf/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible as it is obscured by the character's helmet.\n- The helmet design is intricate but does not detract from the overall quality of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the dynamic scene.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the action captured effectively.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with detailed armor and dynamic effects like fire and light.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image is of high quality with excellent composition and detail. However, the lack of a visible face due to the helmet could be improved if the character's face were to be included or if the helmet were designed to reveal more of the face. This would enhance the character's presence and engagement for viewers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04cf5061cdbf/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04cf5061cdbf/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the armor and the glowing effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. The only minor issue is that the face is not shown, which prevents a perfect score. However, the rest of the image is very well done.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04cf5061cdbf/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9f72b168b3f8.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9f72b168b3f8/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with a dynamic action scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the characters' designs and the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the dragon's wings could be slightly more detailed, and the fairy's wings have a soft glow that might benefit from a bit more definition. These minor adjustments could enhance the overall quality without significantly impacting the current score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: The image is already quite high-quality, but a slight enhancement in the dragon's wing detail and the fairy's wing definition could further improve it.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9f72b168b3f8/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9f72b168b3f8/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the dragon and fairy positioned effectively within the frame.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the dragon's scales and the forest background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. The only minor issue is that the fairy's face is not fully visible, which could be improved if more focus was given to her facial features. However, this does not significantly impact the overall quality of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration. However, if the customer specifically requests more detail on the fairy's face, it might be worth considering a slight adjustment to ensure both characters are equally detailed.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9f72b168b3f8/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9f72b168b3f8/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, with vibrant colors that stand out.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned prominently in the center.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's scales and wings.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the dragon's face is not fully visible due to the angle, which slightly impacts the overall assessment. If the face were more prominent, the score could be even higher.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: The image is already of high quality, but if the face were more prominently featured, it would enhance the overall score.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9f72b168b3f8/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9f72b168b3f8/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- The dragon's face has clear and well-defined features.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant, especially the purple hues which add depth.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the dragon dominating the scene effectively.\n- The level of detail richness is high, particularly in the dragon's scales and the forest background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. The only minor issue is that the dragon's wings could be slightly more detailed, but this does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nFinal recommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9f72b168b3f8/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9f72b168b3f8/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the dragon positioned prominently in the center.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the dragon's scales and wings.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background were more detailed or if there was a bit more depth in the lighting effects around the dragon.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9f72b168b3f8/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/791aba7167ea.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/791aba7167ea/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The absence of a face also prevents evaluation of facial clarity, blurriness, distortion, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blur.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the futuristic theme.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the background providing a good sense of depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the suit and the rain effect adding to the overall richness.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is the character's face, and it is not visible due to the angle and framing, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall image quality is very good, and the technical aspects are well-executed. Given the importance of facial details for character design, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a visible face to ensure the character's face meets the desired quality standards.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/791aba7167ea/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/791aba7167ea/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The lack of a face makes it difficult to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the futuristic aesthetic.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic, with the character's body taking up most of the frame, which adds to the intensity of the image.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the character's suit and the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears to be high, as the details are sharp and well-defined.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the other aspects, the image is of high quality. If the customer specifically requires a face, the image would need to be regenerated to include one. Otherwise, the current image can be considered satisfactory.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No (if the face is not required; Yes if the face is required).", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/791aba7167ea/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/791aba7167ea/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality assessment of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality assessment of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High. The lines are clean and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent. The colors are vibrant and the contrast is strong, making the neon lights stand out effectively.\n- Composition and proportions: Good. The composition is dynamic, with the character's legs leading the viewer's eye through the cityscape.\n- Level of detail richness: High. There is a rich level of detail in the background, with various neon signs and architectural elements adding depth to the scene.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, as the details in the background are sharp and clear.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality aesthetic with excellent color saturation, sharp lines, and a good composition. Since the face is not present, the face quality cannot be assessed, but the rest of the image meets high standards. Therefore, no regeneration is recommended based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/791aba7167ea/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/791aba7167ea/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show a character's face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face means that the primary focus of the analysis is on other aspects of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show a character's face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face means that the primary focus of the analysis is on other aspects of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High. The lines are clean and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent. The colors are vibrant and the contrast is strong, making the image visually striking.\n- Composition and proportions: Good. The composition is dynamic, with the character's muscular form taking center stage against the backdrop of a neon-lit cityscape.\n- Level of detail richness: High. The image is rich in detail, especially in the character's suit and the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No visible artifacts or noise.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, as the details are sharp and clear.\n\nSince the image lacks a character's face, which would typically be the primary focus for a face quality assessment, the overall score is still quite high due to the excellent line clarity, color saturation, composition, and level of detail. However, if the image were intended to showcase a character's face, the lack of one would significantly impact the face quality score.\n\nRecommendation: Since the image does not have a character's face, the face quality score is not applicable. The overall image quality is very good, but if the image were intended to feature a character's face, it might need to be regenerated to include one.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/791aba7167ea/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/791aba7167ea/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face at all, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face at all, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image should be regenerated to include the character's face so that we can properly evaluate the facial quality and other aspects of the image. Without the face, the image cannot meet the high standards expected by high-end customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/791aba7167ea/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f16810634939.png", + "improved_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/improved/f16810634939.png", + "original_score": 6, + "improved_score": 8, + "improvement": 2, + "best_candidate_source": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f16810634939/candidate_3.png", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f16810634939/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not show a face; it appears to be a close-up of a body part.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The proportions and contours are not relevant as there is no face to evaluate.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are somewhat smooth but lack definition due to the absence of facial features.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant, but the contrast is not very strong, which might be intentional for artistic effect.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on a specific area, but without a face, it's difficult to assess the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich in certain areas, but it's not applicable to the absence of a face.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are visible.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution seems adequate for the content shown.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the image lacks a face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, if the intention was to create a detailed anatomical illustration, the current image could be improved by focusing on the anatomical details more clearly and providing a proper composition that includes the intended subject matter.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f16810634939/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f16810634939/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not contain a face; it appears to be a close-up of a body part.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The proportions and contours are not relevant as there is no face to evaluate.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are somewhat clear but lack definition due to the nature of the image content.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted, and the contrast is low, which affects the visual impact.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered on the body part, but without a face, it lacks context and balance.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is limited due to the focus on a specific body part rather than a face.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are apparent.\n- No obvious generation errors are visible.\n- The resolution seems adequate for the content, though it could benefit from higher detail if the image were intended to show a face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the image does not contain a face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, if the intention was to create a face, the image would need significant improvement in line clarity, color saturation, and detail richness. Additionally, the composition should be adjusted to include a face for proper evaluation.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f16810634939/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f16810634939/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details appear clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes seem symmetrical but lack detailed features.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth look correct.\n- The facial contour appears natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are appropriate for the style.\n- Composition and proportions are balanced.\n- The level of detail richness is satisfactory.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution seems sufficient for the style.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a good balance of quality and style, but the eyes could be more detailed to enhance the facial features. However, these minor issues do not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f16810634939/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f16810634939/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face means that the primary focus of the image is on the lower body and the liquid-like texture. The liquid texture appears smooth and well-rendered, but the lack of a face prevents a comprehensive evaluation of the character's features.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face means that the primary focus of the image is on the lower body and the liquid-like texture. The liquid texture appears smooth and well-rendered, but the lack of a face prevents a comprehensive evaluation of the character's features.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on the lower body, which is well-proportioned and detailed.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich textures and details in the liquid-like material.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nSince the image lacks a face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall image quality is good, with high clarity, color, and detail. The absence of a face does not affect the technical quality assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nIf you need a face added to the image, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a face included to allow for a full evaluation of the character's features.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f16810634939/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f16810634939/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 4, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 4/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not contain a face; it focuses on a lower body part.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The absence of facial features makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack fine detail.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted, and the contrast is low.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered on the lower body part, which is unusual and not suitable for a face-focused image.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is limited due to the focus on a non-face area.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are visible.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears adequate for the content shown.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the image does not contain a face, it cannot be evaluated based on the provided criteria. It would be more appropriate to regenerate an image that includes a face to properly assess its quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f16810634939/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1ee1f7f74cc3.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 9, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1ee1f7f74cc3/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with intricate patterns on the character's attire and dynamic lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of very high quality with only minor improvements that could be made. However, since the score is already quite high, it might not be necessary to regenerate unless specific feedback from the customer indicates otherwise.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1ee1f7f74cc3/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1ee1f7f74cc3/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not contain a character's face; therefore, it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face suggests that the primary focus might be on the background or other elements.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not contain a character's face; therefore, it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face suggests that the primary focus might be on the background or other elements.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, making the image visually striking.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic and the proportions seem balanced, with the central light source drawing the viewer's eye.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a rich level of detail, especially in the intricate patterns surrounding the central light.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, as the details are sharp and clear.\n\nSince the image lacks a character's face, the primary focus seems to be on the background and the intricate patterns. The overall quality is good, but without a face, it's challenging to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the character's features. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: If the intention was to create an image with a character's face, the artist should regenerate the image with a face included. Otherwise, the current image can be considered satisfactory for its intended purpose.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1ee1f7f74cc3/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1ee1f7f74cc3/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the character's pose facing away from the viewer. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours accurately.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the character's pose facing away from the viewer. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours accurately.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the overall design.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate patterns and detailed elements throughout the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of visibility of the character's face, which is the primary focus, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall image quality is high, and the technical aspects are sound. A regeneration focusing on the character's face would be beneficial to meet the high-end customer expectations.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1ee1f7f74cc3/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1ee1f7f74cc3/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with intricate patterns and flowing lines adding depth to the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and background details. The only minor issue is that the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more seamlessly integrated into the composition without appearing as separate layers. However, this does not significantly detract from the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1ee1f7f74cc3/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1ee1f7f74cc3/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with intricate patterns and glowing effects adding depth.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and background details. The only minor issue is that the face could be slightly more detailed around the edges, but this does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1ee1f7f74cc3/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/fa545a1f0cf9.png", + "improved_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/improved/fa545a1f0cf9.png", + "original_score": 6, + "improved_score": 8, + "improvement": 2, + "best_candidate_source": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fa545a1f0cf9/candidate_1.png", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fa545a1f0cf9/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are good, though the character's pose might be considered unconventional.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the skin texture and water effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent attention to detail and a well-executed composition. However, the unconventional pose might not appeal to all viewers, which could be a subjective factor in scoring.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image meets the high standards set by the customer, and there are no significant issues that would require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fa545a1f0cf9/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fa545a1f0cf9/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate for the subject matter.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's skin texture and the dripping effect.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good attention to detail and a balanced composition. However, the subject matter may not be suitable for all audiences due to its explicit nature.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nIf you need a more explicit or mature version, it would be best to regenerate the image with a different prompt that aligns with the intended audience.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fa545a1f0cf9/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fa545a1f0cf9/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The facial features, particularly the eyes and mouth, appear somewhat distorted and lack fine detail.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem off, contributing to an unnatural look.\n- There are some blurry areas around the face, especially near the hair and the lower part of the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are decent but not exceptional.\n- Color saturation is good, with vibrant colors that stand out.\n- The composition is somewhat off, as the character's head is cut off at the bottom of the frame.\n- The level of detail is rich, but the facial issues detract from the overall quality.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the content.\n\nRecommendation:\nGiven the facial quality issues and the overall composition, it would be beneficial to regenerate this image to improve the facial details and ensure a more natural appearance. This will help in satisfying high-end customers who expect high-quality illustrations.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fa545a1f0cf9/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fa545a1f0cf9/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with excellent detail and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the character's face was more prominently featured as the primary focus rather than the lower body. Since the face is not the main subject, the score remains at 8/10.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nIf the image were intended to showcase the character's face more prominently, it might benefit from a slight adjustment in composition to ensure the face is the focal point. Otherwise, the current image is of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fa545a1f0cf9/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fa545a1f0cf9/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The eyes appear somewhat asymmetrical.\n- The facial features, particularly the nose and mouth, lack fine detail and definition.\n- The facial contour seems slightly unnatural, especially around the jawline and cheek area.\n- There are no significant blurry or distorted areas, but the overall facial detail could be improved.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are decent but not exceptional.\n- Color saturation is good, with a nice contrast between the character's skin tone and the background.\n- The composition is somewhat off, as the character's body takes up most of the frame, which might not be ideal for showcasing the face.\n- The level of detail richness is moderate, with some areas appearing more detailed than others.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has potential but lacks the fine detail and symmetry needed for a higher score. The character's face, while not entirely poor, could benefit from more refined detailing and better proportioning. Given these factors, I would recommend regeneration to improve the facial quality and overall composition.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fa545a1f0cf9/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e790e4cd5137.png", + "improved_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/improved/e790e4cd5137.png", + "original_score": 6, + "improved_score": 8, + "improvement": 2, + "best_candidate_source": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e790e4cd5137/candidate_2.png", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e790e4cd5137/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image is heavily cropped, focusing on the lower body and not showing the face at all.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present in the image.\n- The absence of facial features makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The image appears smooth but lacks fine details due to the lack of facial features.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors seem somewhat muted, which could be intentional for artistic effect.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is focused on the lower body, which is acceptable for certain types of art but not for assessing facial quality.\n- Level of detail richness: The image lacks detail due to the focus on the lower body and the absence of facial features.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are visible in the provided image.\n- There are no obvious generation errors that can be identified from the given image.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image does not contain any facial features, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, if the intention was to create an image with a focus on the lower body, the current composition and color saturation are adequate. For high-end customers who require facial details, this image would need to be regenerated with a focus on the face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e790e4cd5137/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e790e4cd5137/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are appropriate.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced.\n- The level of detail richness is satisfactory.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good facial details and a balanced composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the color saturation and contrast were more vibrant and the lighting was more dynamic.\n\nRecommendation: No regeneration needed. The image meets the high standards set by the customer.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e790e4cd5137/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e790e4cd5137/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no noticeable blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with excellent facial details and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background were more refined or if there was a bit more depth in the lighting to enhance the overall richness of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high quality, but a few minor refinements could elevate it further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e790e4cd5137/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e790e4cd5137/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with excellent character face details and overall composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background were more refined or if there was a bit more depth in the lighting to enhance the three-dimensional effect.\n\nRecommendation: No regeneration needed. The image is already of high quality and meets the requirements for high-end customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e790e4cd5137/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e790e4cd5137/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no noticeable blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with excellent detail and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the eyes were even more detailed and the lighting was more dynamic to add depth and dimensionality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high quality, but a few minor enhancements could elevate it further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e790e4cd5137/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/342c8fb3d05d.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/342c8fb3d05d/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, enhancing the dramatic effect.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with a strong sense of action and tension.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the characters' armor and the dynamic lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the absence of facial features on one of the characters slightly detracts from the overall quality, which could be improved by adding more facial details or ensuring both characters have complete faces.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: While the image is already quite good, it would be beneficial to add facial details to the character without a face to maintain consistency and balance. This could be achieved through subtle shading or additional elements that suggest facial features.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/342c8fb3d05d/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/342c8fb3d05d/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with both characters positioned effectively against the dramatic background.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the characters' clothing and armor textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more integrated into the scene without appearing as separate elements.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but a few minor adjustments might enhance it further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/342c8fb3d05d/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/342c8fb3d05d/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, enhancing the dramatic effect of the scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned effectively against the dynamic background.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the glowing sword.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the absence of the character's face prevents a more comprehensive assessment of facial quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: Since the image excels in most aspects except for the lack of a visible face, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a fully visible face to ensure a complete evaluation of facial quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/342c8fb3d05d/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/342c8fb3d05d/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, capturing the dynamic action between the characters.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the armor and the sparks from the sword clash.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, if you want to ensure the highest standards, you might consider a slight adjustment to the lighting to enhance the depth and contrast further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nFinal recommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/342c8fb3d05d/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/342c8fb3d05d/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, enhancing the dramatic effect.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, capturing the dynamic action between the characters.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the characters' clothing and the magical effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the absence of facial features on one of the characters slightly detracts from the overall quality, which could be improved by adding more detail to the face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: While the image is already quite good, it would be beneficial to add more detail to the face of the character on the left to enhance the overall quality. This could include refining the facial features, adding more texture to the clothing, and ensuring that the magical effects are consistent across both characters.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/342c8fb3d05d/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2e8a5e7eb83c.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 9, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2e8a5e7eb83c/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- The character's face has clear and well-defined features.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines throughout the image.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the character's wings, the forest, and the glowing mushrooms.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a beautifully rendered background. The only minor issue is the lack of facial features on the character, which could be improved if the character were designed with a face. However, since the primary focus is on the character's wings and the overall composition, this does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2e8a5e7eb83c/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2e8a5e7eb83c/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by the wings and hair. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by the wings and hair. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the background elements complementing the scene effectively.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the wings, hair, and forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation: Since the face quality cannot be assessed due to its obfuscation, the overall score is slightly lower than ideal. However, the rest of the image is of high quality. If the face were visible, the score could potentially be higher. Given the current state, the image is still of good quality but may benefit from a regeneration to include the face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2e8a5e7eb83c/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2e8a5e7eb83c/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible as it is covered by the wings. Therefore, we cannot assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible as it is covered by the wings. Therefore, we cannot assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High. The lines are smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent. The colors are vibrant and the contrast is strong, making the image visually appealing.\n- Composition and proportions: Good. The composition is balanced, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- Level of detail richness: High. The image contains rich details, especially in the wings and the forest setting.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, as the details are crisp and clear.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent color saturation, sharp lines, and a well-composed scene. The lack of a visible face does not detract from the overall quality, but if the face were to be included, it would add another layer of detail that could enhance the image further. Since the face is not a primary focus here, the current score is appropriate.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2e8a5e7eb83c/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2e8a5e7eb83c/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not fully visible due to the wings covering most of it. The eyes appear somewhat abstract and lack detailed features. The proportions of the nose and mouth are not clearly defined, making them appear somewhat distorted. The facial contour is not entirely natural, especially around the eyes and mouth area.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not fully visible due to the wings covering most of it. The eyes appear somewhat abstract and lack detailed features. The proportions of the nose and mouth are not clearly defined, making them appear somewhat distorted. The facial contour is not entirely natural, especially around the eyes and mouth area.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the wings and forest background contributing to a harmonious composition.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the wings, forest, and mushrooms.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation: While the image has high quality in many aspects, the lack of visible facial details and the somewhat abstract eyes make it difficult to assess the character's expression and features accurately. This could be improved by either regenerating the image with more visible facial details or adjusting the perspective to show the face more clearly. However, the overall quality is still quite high, so regeneration might not be necessary if the client is satisfied with the current composition and color scheme.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2e8a5e7eb83c/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2e8a5e7eb83c/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with intricate wing patterns and a detailed dress.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of very high quality with only minor improvements that could be made. However, since the score is already quite high, it might not be necessary to regenerate the image unless specific feedback from the customer indicates otherwise.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2e8a5e7eb83c/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/79d461b22644.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79d461b22644/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is completely obscured by a hood, making it impossible to assess facial details.\n- The lack of visible facial features means we cannot determine if the eyes are symmetrical, if the proportions of the nose and mouth are correct, or if the facial contour is natural.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the forest background providing a good sense of depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the character's clothing and the magical symbols.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is on the character's face, which is not visible due to the hood, the overall quality score is slightly reduced. However, the rest of the image is well-executed, and the technical aspects are strong. Given the importance of facial details in character design, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a visible face to fully meet the high standards expected by high-end customers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79d461b22644/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79d461b22644/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The faces of the characters are not visible due to the hooded cloaks.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to assess their clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and well-defined edges.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with a clear path leading into the forest and characters positioned effectively.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the cloaks, book, and magical elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the faces are not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, the overall image quality is good, with high line clarity, color saturation, and composition. The technical issues are minimal.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nIf the faces were visible, the score could be higher, but without them, the face quality cannot be evaluated.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79d461b22644/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79d461b22644/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the elements around them balanced.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the magical effects and the forest background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. The only minor issue is that the character's face is not fully visible due to the hood, which might be a stylistic choice but could be improved if the goal is to showcase more facial features.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration. However, if the client specifically requests a clearer view of the character's face, the artist could consider removing the hood or adjusting the angle to reveal more of the character's facial features.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79d461b22644/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79d461b22644/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with a balanced use of blue tones that enhance the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background providing depth.\n- Level of detail richness: Rich, with intricate details in the character's robe and the glowing effects around the sword.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe primary issue is the lack of visibility of the character's face, which prevents a thorough assessment of facial quality. However, the rest of the image is of high quality, making a regeneration necessary to address this specific aspect.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79d461b22644/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79d461b22644/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing effect.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the magical elements balanced around her.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the magical effects and the character's attire.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and magical effects. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background were more detailed or if the magical effects had a bit more variation in color and intensity.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but a few minor adjustments could enhance it further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79d461b22644/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e70a91d3214b.png", + "improved_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/improved/e70a91d3214b.png", + "original_score": 6, + "improved_score": 8, + "improvement": 2, + "best_candidate_source": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e70a91d3214b/candidate_3.png", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e70a91d3214b/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not show any facial features as it is a close-up of a body part.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The absence of facial features makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack fine detail.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted, and the contrast is low, which affects the visual impact.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on a specific body part, but without facial features, it's difficult to comment on proportions.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is limited due to the focus on a single body part.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are visible.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears adequate for the content shown.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the image lacks facial features and focuses solely on a body part, it cannot be evaluated for face quality. However, the overall image quality could be improved by adding more detail and enhancing the color and contrast. A regeneration focusing on a full-body or headshot would be more appropriate for assessing facial quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e70a91d3214b/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e70a91d3214b/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n- The image appears to be focused on a body part rather than a face, which makes it difficult to evaluate facial quality.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack fine detail.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted, and the contrast is low, making the image less vibrant.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition seems to focus on a specific body part, but without a face, it's hard to comment on proportions.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a lack of fine detail, especially in the areas that would typically require more intricate work.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No obvious artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no apparent generation errors.\n- The resolution seems adequate for the content shown.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the image does not contain a face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the lack of fine detail and the muted color palette suggest that the image could benefit from more refinement. It might be useful to regenerate the image with a focus on a face or another part of the body where facial features can be clearly depicted.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e70a91d3214b/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e70a91d3214b/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The image appears to be missing the character's face entirely.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The proportions and contours of the head are not defined as they should be for a human face.\n\nComposition and Proportions:\n- The composition seems to focus on the back of the character, which is unusual for a full-body image.\n- The proportions of the body parts are somewhat off, especially considering the absence of facial features.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are visible.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears to be sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, while the image has good line clarity and color saturation, it lacks the necessary facial details to be considered complete. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality and purpose of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image should be regenerated to include a fully detailed face and ensure that the proportions and contours of the head are correctly represented.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e70a91d3214b/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e70a91d3214b/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not show any faces, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n- The absence of facial features makes it difficult to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack fine detail, which is typical for anime-style illustrations.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant, but the contrast seems a bit low, making the image appear less dynamic.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on the lower body parts, which is unusual for a full-body anime-style illustration. The proportions seem off due to the close-up nature of the image.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is moderate, but the lack of facial features limits the richness of the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the style of the image.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks facial features, it cannot be evaluated for face quality. However, the overall image quality and technical aspects suggest that the image could benefit from more detail and a clearer focus on the intended subject matter. Given these limitations, I would recommend regeneration to include facial features and ensure a more balanced composition. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e70a91d3214b/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e70a91d3214b/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 4, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 4/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not show any facial features as it is focused on the lower body.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present in the image.\n- The absence of facial features makes it impossible to assess the symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack definition due to the focus on the lower body.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted and lack vibrancy.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered on the lower body, which is unusual for a typical anime-style image.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich in the lower body area, but the lack of facial features limits the overall richness.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors; however, the image appears to be generated without the intended subject matter (facial features).\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image should be regenerated with a focus on including facial features to meet the high-end customer's expectations. The current image lacks the primary focus required by the customer, which is facial details.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e70a91d3214b/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5d601a9b10ae.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d601a9b10ae/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it.\n- The eyes are glowing but lack detail and symmetry.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth are not discernible due to the hood and the glowing effect.\n- The facial contour is not natural as the hood obscures most of the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant, with a strong neon aesthetic that enhances the futuristic cityscape.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the character centered and the cityscape filling the background effectively.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with intricate neon signs and reflections adding depth to the scene.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a high-quality overall composition and vibrant colors, which are strengths. However, the lack of visible facial features significantly impacts the character's presence and the overall quality of the image. Since the primary focus should be on the character, regenerating the image with a visible face would improve the quality and meet the high standards expected by customers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d601a9b10ae/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d601a9b10ae/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by a hood.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to evaluate.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and reflections on the wet surface.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant neon colors that stand out against the darker background.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the cityscape in the background adding depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the buildings and reflections on the ground.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is the character, but their face is not visible due to the hood, the overall quality is still quite good. However, if the intention was to showcase the character's face, the image would need to be regenerated with a visible face. If the goal is to highlight the urban environment and the character's silhouette, then the current image is satisfactory.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes (if the character's face is intended to be the focal point)", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d601a9b10ae/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d601a9b10ae/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible as it is covered by a hood.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to evaluate.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and sharp edges.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the neon aesthetic.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the cityscape providing a dynamic background.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich textures on the buildings and reflections on the wet street.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is the character, but the face is not visible due to the hood, the overall quality is still quite good. However, if the intention was to showcase the character's face, the image would need to be regenerated with a different pose or angle where the face is visible.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d601a9b10ae/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d601a9b10ae/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, capturing the essence of the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with a good balance between the character and the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. The only minor issue is that the character's face is not fully visible due to the hood, which might be a stylistic choice but could be improved if the goal is to showcase more facial features.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d601a9b10ae/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d601a9b10ae/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents us from evaluating the clarity and definition of facial features.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents us from evaluating the clarity and definition of facial features.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and sharp edges.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant neon colors that stand out against the dark background.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with a strong sense of depth and perspective.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the buildings and reflections on the wet street.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is the cityscape and the character's face is not visible, the overall quality is still quite good. However, if the intention was to include a character, the absence of a face significantly impacts the evaluation. If the image is intended as a cityscape without a character, then the score is appropriate. If a character is required, the image would need to be regenerated to include one. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes (if a character is required)", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d601a9b10ae/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/c63b13a7c3f9.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c63b13a7c3f9/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show the faces of the characters, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of facial features does not affect the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show the faces of the characters, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of facial features does not affect the overall quality assessment.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High. The lines are smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent. The colors are vibrant and the contrast is well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions: Good. The composition is balanced, and the proportions of the dresses and hands are well-matched.\n- Level of detail richness: High. There is a rich level of detail in the clothing textures and the background elements like the fountain and flowers.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears to be high, as the details are crisp and clear.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with no significant technical issues. Since the face quality cannot be assessed due to the lack of facial features, the score is slightly lower than perfect. However, the rest of the image meets high standards.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c63b13a7c3f9/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c63b13a7c3f9/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show a character's face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the hands and the dress are well-detailed and proportionate.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show a character's face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the hands and the dress are well-detailed and proportionate.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast that enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the hands and dress centered and the background providing a nice contrast without overwhelming the main subject.\n- Level of detail richness: Rich, with intricate patterns on the dress and a detailed background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nSince the image lacks a character's face, which is typically the primary focus in such illustrations, the score is slightly lower than perfect. However, the overall quality is still quite high due to the detailed elements and good composition.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c63b13a7c3f9/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c63b13a7c3f9/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face, so we cannot evaluate facial details such as symmetry, proportion, or natural contours. However, the hands and dress appear to be well-detailed and proportionate.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face, so we cannot evaluate facial details such as symmetry, proportion, or natural contours. However, the hands and dress appear to be well-detailed and proportionate.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the scene's beauty.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the character's dress and hands taking center stage, and the background elements like the fountain and flowers complementing the scene without overpowering it.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich textures on the dress and gloves, and detailed background elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nSince the image lacks facial details, which are crucial for evaluating face quality, the overall score is slightly lower than perfect. However, the rest of the image is of high quality, making it suitable for high-end customers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c63b13a7c3f9/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c63b13a7c3f9/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not include a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the hands depicted appear to have a smooth texture and natural proportions.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not include a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the hands depicted appear to have a smooth texture and natural proportions.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and clear contrasts between elements.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the hands framing the fountain in the background effectively.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the lace pattern on the sleeve and the texture of the curtains.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears to be high, as the details are sharp and clear.\n\nSince the image lacks a face, the primary focus cannot be assessed. However, the overall quality of the image is good, with strong composition, vibrant colors, and high detail. The absence of a face does not impact the overall quality assessment significantly.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c63b13a7c3f9/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c63b13a7c3f9/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The faces are not visible as they are obscured by the characters' arms. However, based on the visible parts, the eyes appear symmetrical and detailed, and the proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct. The facial contours look natural, but since the faces are not fully shown, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The faces are not visible as they are obscured by the characters' arms. However, based on the visible parts, the eyes appear symmetrical and detailed, and the proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct. The facial contours look natural, but since the faces are not fully shown, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast that enhances the scene.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the characters positioned symmetrically in front of the fountain. The proportions of the characters and the fountain are well-maintained.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a rich level of detail, especially in the clothing textures and the background foliage.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with good line clarity, color saturation, and composition. The lack of visible faces slightly impacts the face quality assessment, but the rest of the image is strong. Since the faces are not fully visible, it might be beneficial to regenerate the image to ensure the faces are included and detailed.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c63b13a7c3f9/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6536909c97a8.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6536909c97a8/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image lacks facial details as it only shows the torso and arms of the characters. The absence of faces prevents a thorough assessment of facial features such as symmetry, detail, and proportion. However, the torso and arm details appear to be well-defined and symmetrical.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image lacks facial details as it only shows the torso and arms of the characters. The absence of faces prevents a thorough assessment of facial features such as symmetry, detail, and proportion. However, the torso and arm details appear to be well-defined and symmetrical.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that make the image visually striking.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on the upper bodies, which is effective for showcasing the clothing and poses. The proportions seem balanced, though without facial features, it's hard to assess overall body proportions.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the clothing textures and skin tones.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the content shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks facial details, which are crucial for a complete evaluation of character quality, I would suggest regenerating the image to include full faces for a more comprehensive analysis.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6536909c97a8/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6536909c97a8/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, though the focus seems to be on the upper body rather than the faces.\n- The level of detail richness is good, especially in the clothing textures and accessories.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good character design and vibrant colors. However, the focus on the upper body might not fully showcase the intended facial features, which could be improved if the faces were more prominently featured.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: While the image is of high quality, if the primary focus is on showcasing the characters' faces, it would be beneficial to adjust the composition to include more of their faces. This would enhance the overall impact and allow for a more comprehensive evaluation of the facial quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6536909c97a8/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6536909c97a8/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The faces are not visible as they are obscured by the characters' upper bodies.\n- The lack of facial features makes it impossible to assess the symmetry, detail, proportion, and natural contour of the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic and engaging, but the focus on the upper bodies limits the assessment of overall proportions.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the clothing and accessories.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the faces are not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, the overall image quality is quite good, especially in terms of color and detail. Given the lack of facial details, the image would benefit from regenerating the faces to ensure a complete and accurate representation.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6536909c97a8/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6536909c97a8/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image lacks facial details as it focuses on the upper body. The eyes are not visible, so their symmetry and detail cannot be assessed. The proportions of the nose and mouth are not discernible due to the lack of facial features. The facial contour appears somewhat unnatural because no face is present.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image lacks facial details as it focuses on the upper body. The eyes are not visible, so their symmetry and detail cannot be assessed. The proportions of the nose and mouth are not discernible due to the lack of facial features. The facial contour appears somewhat unnatural because no face is present.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and sharp edges.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Very high, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is focused on the upper body, which is appropriate for the style, but the absence of facial features affects the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich details in the clothing and accessories.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nThe image excels in color and detail but falls short in terms of facial quality since the focus is on the upper body without a face. This makes it unsuitable for high-end customers who require facial details.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6536909c97a8/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6536909c97a8/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image lacks facial details, making it difficult to assess the symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face. The absence of a face also prevents a thorough evaluation of these aspects.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image lacks facial details, making it difficult to assess the symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face. The absence of a face also prevents a thorough evaluation of these aspects.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic, but the lack of a face makes it challenging to evaluate the overall balance and proportions effectively.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich details in the clothing and body.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of facial details, which are crucial for assessing the primary focus of character design, the image would benefit from regeneration to include a face. This will allow for a more comprehensive evaluation of the character's design and overall quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6536909c97a8/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cabd58b5185a.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cabd58b5185a/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the cape covering it. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the cape covering it. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast between the sky and the character.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with the character positioned effectively against the dramatic sky backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich details in the sky, clouds, and the character's cape.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven that the primary focus on the character's face cannot be assessed due to the angle and the cape, the overall quality is still quite high. However, the lack of facial detail significantly impacts the score. A regeneration focusing on a clearer view of the character's face would be recommended to fully evaluate the face quality and ensure the highest satisfaction for the customer.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cabd58b5185a/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cabd58b5185a/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned effectively against the landscape.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the lighting effects and the distant cityscape.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed or if there was a bit more depth in the lighting effects.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cabd58b5185a/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cabd58b5185a/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned effectively against the sky and landscape.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the glowing elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed or if the lighting on the character was more pronounced.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cabd58b5185a/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cabd58b5185a/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned effectively against the sky.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the background elements like the stars and the sunset.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the lack of facial features on the character could be improved if the face were included, as it would add more depth to the character's presence in the scene.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: While the image is already quite good, if the customer desires a more complete character with facial features, it might be beneficial to regenerate the image with the face included. This would enhance the overall impact and engagement of the artwork.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cabd58b5185a/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cabd58b5185a/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned prominently against the sky.\n- The level of detail richness is good, especially in the character's clothing and the glowing effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed or if there was a bit more depth in the lighting on the character's face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cabd58b5185a/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5e8a80e3a402.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5e8a80e3a402/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a moody atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the forest background providing depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's cloak and the glowing elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent attention to detail and a well-composed scene. The only minor issue is that the character's face is not visible, which might be a design choice but could affect the overall impact for some viewers. However, this does not significantly detract from the overall quality of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5e8a80e3a402/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5e8a80e3a402/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face lacks clear facial details, making it difficult to discern specific features like the eyes, nose, and mouth. The eyes appear somewhat symmetrical but lack detail, and the proportions seem off, especially around the nose area. The facial contour is not very natural, contributing to the overall average quality.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face lacks clear facial details, making it difficult to discern specific features like the eyes, nose, and mouth. The eyes appear somewhat symmetrical but lack detail, and the proportions seem off, especially around the nose area. The facial contour is not very natural, contributing to the overall average quality.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally clear, but there is a slight softness that might be due to the artistic style.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are muted, which is appropriate for the dark and mysterious atmosphere, but the contrast could be slightly higher to make the image pop more.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, with the character centered and the forest background adding depth. However, the proportions of the character's body seem slightly elongated compared to what would be natural.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a good level of detail in the background and the glowing elements, but the character itself has less detail.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high enough for the intended use, though it could benefit from a slight increase in detail on the character's face.\n\nOverall, while the image has a strong composition and rich background details, the lack of clear facial features and natural proportions on the character bring down the face quality. The overall score is 8/10, indicating that while the image is visually appealing, it could be improved by refining the character's facial features and proportions.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5e8a80e3a402/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5e8a80e3a402/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face lacks clear facial details, making it difficult to discern specific features like the eyes, nose, and mouth. The eyes appear somewhat symmetrical but lack detail, and the proportions of the nose and mouth seem off. The facial contour is not very natural, and there are no distinct facial features that stand out.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face lacks clear facial details, making it difficult to discern specific features like the eyes, nose, and mouth. The eyes appear somewhat symmetrical but lack detail, and the proportions of the nose and mouth seem off. The facial contour is not very natural, and there are no distinct facial features that stand out.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally smooth and well-defined, contributing to a clean look.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are muted, with a predominantly blue and gray palette, which gives the image a serene yet eerie atmosphere. The contrast is adequate, enhancing the depth of the scene.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is effective, with the character positioned centrally, drawing the viewer's attention. The proportions of the character and the surrounding forest are well-balanced.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the character's robe and the glowing blue light, which adds a mystical element to the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, as the details are sharp and clear.\n\nOverall, while the image has a good level of detail and a pleasing composition, the lack of clear facial details and the slightly off proportions of the face make it less than ideal for high-end customers. However, these issues do not significantly detract from the overall quality of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5e8a80e3a402/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5e8a80e3a402/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a moody atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the forest background enhancing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's robe and the glowing elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the lack of facial features (eyes, nose, mouth) due to the hooded cloak could be improved if the character were to be shown without the cloak. This would allow for a more detailed analysis of the face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: While the image is already quite good, it might benefit from a slight adjustment to show the character without the cloak to provide a more comprehensive facial analysis.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5e8a80e3a402/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5e8a80e3a402/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a moody atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the forest background providing depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the glowing effects around the character.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and atmospheric composition. However, the lack of facial features on the character might be a point of interest for some viewers, but it does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5e8a80e3a402/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/953a2c82efc7.png", + "improved_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/improved/953a2c82efc7.png", + "original_score": 6, + "improved_score": 8, + "improvement": 2, + "best_candidate_source": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/953a2c82efc7/candidate_1.png", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/953a2c82efc7/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- Facial contours look natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate.\n- The level of detail richness is satisfactory.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the content.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background were more detailed or if there was a bit more depth in the shading on the characters' clothing.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image is already quite good, but it might benefit from a slight enhancement in background detail and a bit more shading on the characters' clothing to add depth. Since the score is above 7, regeneration may not be necessary unless these minor improvements are desired by the customer.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/953a2c82efc7/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/953a2c82efc7/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate.\n- The level of detail richness is satisfactory.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the content.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a high-quality face and overall composition, making it suitable for high-end customers. However, the absence of the character's face might be a concern for some viewers. If the goal is to showcase the character's full appearance, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with the face included.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes (if the face is required for the final product)\n\nFinal Note:\nIf the face is not necessary, the current image can be used as is.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/953a2c82efc7/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/953a2c82efc7/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical but lack depth.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced.\n- The level of detail richness is adequate.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a good balance of quality and detail, with only minor improvements needed in eye depth and color contrast. However, since the overall quality is high, it can be considered satisfactory without immediate regeneration.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/953a2c82efc7/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/953a2c82efc7/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The absence of a face means that we cannot evaluate the clarity, sharpness, color saturation, composition, level of detail, or presence of artifacts or noise.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the image does not contain a face, it is not possible to provide a comprehensive analysis of the character's face quality. However, based on the visible parts of the body, the image appears to be of good quality with clear lines, sharpness, and rich details. It would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a visible face to ensure that all aspects of the character's design are evaluated properly.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/953a2c82efc7/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/953a2c82efc7/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- Facial contours are natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are appropriate.\n- Composition and proportions seem balanced.\n- The level of detail richness is satisfactory.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the content.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the artist were to refine the background and add more depth to the scene, which would enhance the overall richness of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but with minor refinements, it could be even better.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/953a2c82efc7/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b9bdb92b1252.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b9bdb92b1252/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible due to the angle and distance from which the image is taken.\n- The lack of facial features makes it impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with a balanced use of light and shadow that enhances the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is effective, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background providing depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the forest environment and glowing elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the character's face is not visible, it is challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, the overall image quality is strong, and the technical aspects are satisfactory. If the goal is to focus on the character's face, the image may need to be repositioned or zoomed in to include the face within the frame.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No (if the goal is to maintain the current composition and focus on the overall image quality).", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b9bdb92b1252/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b9bdb92b1252/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are appropriate for the monochromatic style.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the character centered and the forest background providing depth.\n- The level of detail richness is good, especially in the character's costume and the forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. The monochromatic color scheme adds to the dramatic effect, and the details are well-executed. However, if you want to ensure the highest quality, you might consider a slight adjustment to the contrast or adding a touch more detail to the background to enhance the depth further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b9bdb92b1252/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b9bdb92b1252/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the silhouette, which makes it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and contour. The lack of facial features also prevents a proper evaluation of blurriness, distortion, or unnatural areas.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the silhouette, which makes it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and contour. The lack of facial features also prevents a proper evaluation of blurriness, distortion, or unnatural areas.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and good definition in the trees and mushrooms.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The image is monochromatic, so color saturation cannot be evaluated. Contrast is high, with strong light sources creating a dramatic effect.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest elements framing the scene effectively.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the trees and mushrooms, but the lack of facial details limits the overall richness assessment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No noticeable artifacts or noise are present.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors; the image appears to be a coherent illustration.\n- Resolution: The resolution seems adequate for the level of detail shown.\n\nGiven that the primary focus should be on the character's face, which is not discernible in this image, the score is reduced due to the inability to evaluate the face quality. The image otherwise has high technical quality and a strong composition.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b9bdb92b1252/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b9bdb92b1252/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a moody atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are effective, with the characters positioned to create tension.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the glowing elements and the forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. The only minor issue is that the face of the character on the right side is not fully visible, which could be improved if it were included more prominently in the scene.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b9bdb92b1252/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b9bdb92b1252/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- Facial contours look natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with each character occupying their own space effectively.\n- The level of detail is rich, especially in the characters' outfits and the magical effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the complexity of the image.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed or if there was a bit more depth in the lighting to enhance the three-dimensional feel of the scene.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b9bdb92b1252/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/8c88770b9e1e.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8c88770b9e1e/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n- The image appears to be cropped very close to the body, focusing on the chest area rather than the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack fine detail, which is typical for anime-style illustrations.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are soft and natural, but the contrast seems slightly low, making the image appear a bit flat.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is focused on the chest area, which is unusual for a full-body illustration. The proportions seem off due to the close-up nature of the image.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is moderate, but the focus is on the body rather than the face or other parts of the character.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise in the image.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution seems adequate for the style of the image, but the close-up nature of the shot limits the amount of detail that can be shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's impossible to provide a meaningful assessment of the face quality. However, the image could benefit from a wider shot to include more of the character's body and potentially the face. If the intention is to focus on the body, then the current composition might be appropriate, but it would be helpful to have a clearer understanding of the intended purpose of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8c88770b9e1e/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8c88770b9e1e/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The image appears to be cropped too close to the subject, focusing on the upper body and hair, which makes it difficult to evaluate the overall composition and proportions.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is focused on the upper body and hair, but without seeing the full face, it's hard to comment on the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: The details in the hair and skin texture are rich and well-rendered.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise in the image.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the image. However, based on the visible parts, the image seems to have good technical quality and detail. If the goal is to create a high-quality anime-style image that includes a full face, the image would need to be regenerated to include the face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8c88770b9e1e/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8c88770b9e1e/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The image appears to be cropped very close to the subject, focusing on the upper body and breasts, which means the face is not included at all.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack fine detail, especially around the edges where the skin transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted, and the contrast is low, making the image appear flat.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is focused on the upper body, but without the face, it's difficult to comment on the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is moderate, but the lack of facial features and the close-up nature of the image limit the richness of detail.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise in the visible parts of the image.\n- No obvious generation errors are present in the visible parts of the image.\n- The resolution seems adequate for the content shown, but the lack of facial features makes it hard to judge the overall resolution quality.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the image quality. However, given that the image is focused on the upper body and lacks facial features, it may not meet the expectations of high-end customers who typically seek detailed and balanced compositions. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nTo improve the image, the artist should regenerate the image with a full face included, ensuring proper facial details, symmetry, and natural proportions. Additionally, adjusting the composition to include more of the upper body while maintaining a balanced and detailed appearance would enhance the overall quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8c88770b9e1e/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8c88770b9e1e/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of facial features does not affect the overall quality assessment of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of facial features does not affect the overall quality assessment of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High. The lines are smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent. The colors are vibrant and the contrast is well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions: Good. The composition focuses on the upper body, and the proportions appear balanced.\n- Level of detail richness: High. There is a good level of detail in the textures of the lingerie.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation: Since the face is not visible, the overall score is slightly lower due to the lack of information about facial quality. However, the image otherwise meets high standards in terms of line clarity, color, composition, and detail. Given that the primary focus was on the character's upper body, the image can be considered satisfactory as it does not have any significant technical issues.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8c88770b9e1e/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8c88770b9e1e/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas visible.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the hair and clothing textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and execution. However, the absence of facial features on one of the characters slightly impacts the overall composition, which could be improved by including more facial details or adjusting the perspective to include both faces fully.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: While the image is already quite good, it might benefit from a slight adjustment in perspective to ensure both characters' faces are fully visible and included in the composition. This would enhance the overall balance and appeal of the image.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8c88770b9e1e/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0bd0f6537508.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0bd0f6537508/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality assessment of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face does not affect the overall quality assessment of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High. The lines are clean and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent. The colors are vibrant and the contrast is strong, making the image visually striking.\n- Composition and proportions: Good. The composition is dynamic, with the character positioned centrally and the lighting enhancing the dramatic effect.\n- Level of detail richness: High. The image is rich in detail, especially in the costume and the glowing effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, as the details are sharp and clear.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent line clarity, color saturation, and detail richness. Since the face is not present, the face quality cannot be assessed, but the rest of the image meets high standards. Therefore, no regeneration is recommended based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0bd0f6537508/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0bd0f6537508/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The absence of a face means that we cannot evaluate the clarity, sharpness, color saturation, composition, level of detail, or presence of artifacts or noise.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the image does not include a face, it is not possible to provide a comprehensive analysis of the character's facial features. For a high-end customer, it would be beneficial to regenerate an image that includes a face to ensure that all aspects of the character design meet the required standards.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0bd0f6537508/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0bd0f6537508/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's outfit and the neon lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and background details. The only minor issue is that the face is not shown, which prevents a perfect score. However, the rest of the image is very well done.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0bd0f6537508/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0bd0f6537508/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are high, making the image visually striking.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the character centered and the background adding depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's suit and the background elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent detail and a well-composed scene. However, if you want to ensure the highest possible quality, you might consider a slight adjustment to the lighting to enhance the depth and dimensionality further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0bd0f6537508/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0bd0f6537508/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The lack of a face makes it difficult to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic, with the character's body taking up most of the frame, which is effective for showcasing the design.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the suit and the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears to be high, as the details are sharp and well-defined.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the other aspects, the image is of high quality. If the face were included, the overall score could potentially be higher.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0bd0f6537508/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ab6efa59cf2b.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ab6efa59cf2b/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the presence of wings, which makes it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. However, the lack of facial features does not significantly impact the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the presence of wings, which makes it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. However, the lack of facial features does not significantly impact the overall quality assessment.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the futuristic and dynamic atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Strong, with a balanced composition that draws the viewer's eye towards the glowing cityscape and the character's outstretched wing.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the cityscape, the character's wing, and the reflections on the water.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is visually striking and well-executed, but the absence of the character's face prevents a full assessment of its facial quality. Given the high overall quality and the absence of technical issues, the image can be considered satisfactory without needing regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ab6efa59cf2b/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ab6efa59cf2b/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is completely obscured by a cloak, making it impossible to assess facial details.\n- There are no visible eyes, nose, or mouth, which prevents evaluation of symmetry, detail, proportions, and natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally smooth but lack fine detail, especially around the edges of the cloak and wings.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and have good contrast, particularly the glowing effects from the wings and the city lights.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, with the character centered and the cityscape in the background creating depth.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a rich level of detail, especially in the cityscape and the glowing effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nGiven that the primary focus of the image is on the character's face, and the face is not visible due to the cloak, the image cannot be evaluated properly. Therefore, I would recommend regeneration to include a visible face for a more comprehensive analysis.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ab6efa59cf2b/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ab6efa59cf2b/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nThe character's face is not fully visible due to the angle and the wings covering it. However, the visible parts of the face appear smooth and symmetrical. The eyes are detailed enough, but the lack of a full view makes it hard to assess the overall facial quality.\n\nMain Issues:\n1. The character's face is not fully visible, which affects the assessment of facial details.\n2. The background elements, such as the glowing lines and the cityscape, are quite detailed and add to the overall aesthetic, but they distract from the character's face.\n3. The lighting on the character seems slightly uneven, possibly due to the digital rendering process.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\nThe image has good overall quality with rich details and a well-composed scene. The issues mentioned are minor and do not significantly impact the overall enjoyment of the artwork. The character's face, while not fully visible, does not appear to be distorted or unnatural. The technical aspects seem well-executed, and the image could benefit from a slight adjustment in lighting to enhance the character's features without compromising the overall composition.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ab6efa59cf2b/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ab6efa59cf2b/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by the wings and cloak.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The lack of facial features makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the fantastical elements.\n- Composition and proportions: Strong, with a dynamic composition that draws the eye across the image.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the background and the glowing effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is on the character, but the face is not visible due to the design choices, the overall score is slightly lower than perfect. However, the technical execution and composition are very strong. If the intention was to showcase the character's wings and the environment rather than the face, the image could be considered excellent. If the face were a requirement, the image would need to be regenerated to include it.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes (if the face is required for the image)", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ab6efa59cf2b/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ab6efa59cf2b/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible due to the wings covering it.\n- The lack of facial features makes it impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the futuristic and magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the cityscape providing a dynamic backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the wings, clothing, and cityscape.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the character's face is not visible, it is challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, the overall image quality is high, and the technical aspects are sound. If the goal is to focus on the character's appearance, the image would need to be regenerated to include a visible face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ab6efa59cf2b/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0fa9614c4d0d.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0fa9614c4d0d/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nThe character's face is not visible in this image, as it is obscured by the large tree trunk. Therefore, we cannot assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally smooth and well-defined, especially around the trees and mushrooms.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, creating a striking visual effect.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the large tree trunk dominating the center and the mushrooms adding depth to the scene.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, particularly in the textures of the tree bark and the glowing mushrooms.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors; the image appears to be a high-quality illustration.\n- Resolution: The resolution seems adequate for the level of detail present in the image.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent line clarity, color saturation, and composition. However, since the character's face is not visible, we cannot provide a comprehensive assessment of its quality. If the customer requires a character-focused image, it would be beneficial to regenerate one that includes a visible face. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0fa9614c4d0d/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0fa9614c4d0d/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not fully visible due to the hood covering it, which makes it difficult to assess facial details. However, the eyes appear symmetrical and detailed, and the proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct. The facial contour looks natural, but the lack of visibility prevents a more thorough assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not fully visible due to the hood covering it, which makes it difficult to assess facial details. However, the eyes appear symmetrical and detailed, and the proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct. The facial contour looks natural, but the lack of visibility prevents a more thorough assessment.\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with a balanced use of light and dark tones that enhance the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the tree dominating the background, creating a strong focal point.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the tree and the character's robe adding depth to the scene.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe image has a high-quality composition and rich details, making it visually appealing. The lack of facial detail due to the hood is the only minor issue, but it does not significantly impact the overall quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0fa9614c4d0d/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0fa9614c4d0d/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the forest elements framing the scene effectively.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the character's robe and the glowing mushrooms adding depth to the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe primary issue is the lack of facial details, which is crucial for character recognition and engagement. Since the face is not visible, the image cannot be rated higher than 8/10. A regeneration focusing on revealing the character's face would significantly improve the overall quality and meet the high standards expected by high-end customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0fa9614c4d0d/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0fa9614c4d0d/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with a balanced use of light and shadow creating depth.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the forest background providing a good sense of depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the character's cloak and the glowing mushrooms.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation: Since the primary focus of the image is the character, and the face is not visible, the image cannot be evaluated based on the intended focus. However, if the intention was to showcase the character's presence and the surrounding environment, the image is quite satisfactory. If the character's face was meant to be the focal point, the image would need to be regenerated to include a visible face. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes (if the character's face was intended to be the focal point).", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0fa9614c4d0d/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0fa9614c4d0d/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluating the clarity and definition of facial features.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluating the clarity and definition of facial features.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined, contributing to a clean and polished look.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, making the image visually striking.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the glowing figure as the focal point, and the forest background adds depth and context.\n- Level of detail richness: The image is rich in detail, especially in the glowing figure and the surrounding forest elements like mushrooms and trees.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, allowing for intricate details to be visible.\n\nGiven that the primary focus of the image is on the character's face, which is not present, the overall quality is still quite good due to the other positive aspects mentioned. However, the absence of the face significantly impacts the evaluation of the image.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0fa9614c4d0d/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/fb49c32e6158.png", + "improved_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/improved/fb49c32e6158.png", + "original_score": 4, + "improved_score": 8, + "improvement": 4, + "best_candidate_source": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fb49c32e6158/candidate_1.png", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fb49c32e6158/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate for the subject matter.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the facial features.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent facial details and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the color palette was more vibrant or if there were a bit more contrast in certain areas to enhance the depth and richness of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fb49c32e6158/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fb49c32e6158/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical but lack detailed reflections.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are decent, though the background could be more dynamic.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's hair and facial features.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good facial details and a balanced composition. However, the eyes could benefit from more detailed reflections to enhance the overall quality. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: The image is already quite high quality, but adding more detailed reflections in the eyes would further enhance its appeal.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fb49c32e6158/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fb49c32e6158/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image appears to be missing a face entirely, which is a significant issue as it is the primary focus.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The proportions and contours that would typically define a face are not visible.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The image lacks clear lines and sharpness due to the absence of a face.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors appear somewhat muted, but this is not a major issue since the face is not present.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition seems to be centered around a large, abstract shape, which is unusual for a face-focused image.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a lack of detail due to the absence of facial features.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: Not applicable as there is no face to assess.\n- Generation errors: The image does not contain a face at all, which is a critical error for a face-focused image.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears adequate, but the lack of content makes it difficult to determine its effectiveness.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nThe image fails to meet the requirements for a high-quality face-focused image due to the complete absence of facial features. It is recommended to regenerate the image with a face included to meet the customer's expectations.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fb49c32e6158/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fb49c32e6158/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical but lack detailed features.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are effective, though the focus on the mouths might be too close for some viewers.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the lips and surrounding areas.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good facial details and a balanced composition. However, the lack of detailed eye features could be improved. The close-up nature of the image might not suit all preferences, but it is a strong representation of the subject matter.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: While the image is already quite good, if the customer prefers more detailed eyes or a different perspective, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with those adjustments.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fb49c32e6158/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fb49c32e6158/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image appears to be focused on a part of the body rather than a face.\n- There are no facial features present in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n- The lack of a face means we cannot evaluate the clarity, sharpness, color saturation, composition, or level of detail richness.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the image does not contain a face, it is not suitable for evaluating face quality. However, if the intention was to create an anime-style image with a face, the artist should focus on the face first. The current image lacks context and focus, making it difficult to provide a comprehensive analysis.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fb49c32e6158/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5fb14eedec34.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5fb14eedec34/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face at all, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality and appeal of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face at all, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality and appeal of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, especially during the sunset scene.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is visually appealing, with the palm trees and sunset creating a nice backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: The details on the shorts and the texture of the skin are quite rich and realistic.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, as the details are sharp and clear.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks a face, which is typically the primary focus in many illustrations, the overall quality is slightly impacted. However, the technical aspects of the image are strong. Given that the main issue is the absence of a face, I would recommend regenerating the image with a face included to better serve the primary focus of the illustration.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5fb14eedec34/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5fb14eedec34/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents a proper assessment of these aspects.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents a proper assessment of these aspects.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, which enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic, with the flowing fabric drawing the viewer's eye towards the background. The proportions of the legs and the fabric seem balanced.\n- Level of detail richness: The details in the fabric and skin texture are rich and add depth to the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, allowing for clear details in the fabric and skin textures.\n\nSince the image lacks a face, it cannot be fully evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall image quality is good, and the technical aspects are satisfactory. The absence of a face is a significant drawback that prevents a higher score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5fb14eedec34/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5fb14eedec34/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face at all, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality and appeal of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face at all, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality and appeal of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is appropriate for the sunset scene.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is good, with the character's legs prominently featured against the sunset backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: The details on the fabric and skin are rich and well-rendered.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks a face, which is typically the primary focus in many anime-style illustrations, the overall quality is impacted. The absence of facial features makes it difficult to assess the image comprehensively. Therefore, I would recommend regeneration to include the character's face, ensuring that facial details are clear and well-defined.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5fb14eedec34/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5fb14eedec34/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The facial details are somewhat abstract and lack definition.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical but lack fine detail.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem slightly off, particularly the nose which appears too large relative to the face.\n- The facial contour is not entirely natural, especially around the jawline and cheekbones.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, though the lines are somewhat stylized.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant, contributing to a pleasant visual experience.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the palm trees and sunset providing a nice backdrop.\n- The level of detail richness is moderate, with the fabric folds being the most detailed part of the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a good overall quality, but the facial details could be improved for higher satisfaction. The stylized nature of the artwork is intentional, but for a more realistic look, refining the facial features would enhance the character's appearance. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: No (if the stylized nature is desired), but if a more realistic look is preferred, regeneration might be beneficial.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5fb14eedec34/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5fb14eedec34/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The lack of a face makes it difficult to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and clear contrasts that enhance the tropical setting.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the lower body and the background, which adds to the aesthetic appeal.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich textures in the fabric and skin, as well as in the background elements like palm trees and the sky.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the character's face quality. However, based on the visible parts of the image, the overall quality is good. The absence of the face does not significantly impact the overall quality score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5fb14eedec34/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ed01802379ee.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 9, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ed01802379ee/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- Facial contours are natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced and harmonious.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with intricate designs on the characters' outfits and accessories.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of very high quality with no significant issues. The characters are beautifully drawn, and the composition is well-executed. The only minor suggestion would be to slightly enhance the contrast between the characters and the background to make them stand out more prominently.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ed01802379ee/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ed01802379ee/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced and harmonious.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with intricate patterns and textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of very high quality with excellent character design and composition. The only minor issue could be the slight over-saturation of colors, which might be adjusted slightly for a more balanced look. However, these are negligible and do not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration. It can be used as-is for high-end customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ed01802379ee/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ed01802379ee/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- Facial contours look natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with each character occupying a distinct space within the frame.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the characters' outfits and the background elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and vibrant colors. However, the score could be slightly higher if the facial features were slightly more expressive or if there was a bit more variation in the background lighting to add depth.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ed01802379ee/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ed01802379ee/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's outfit and background elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and vibrant colors. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more intricately detailed, which would add even more richness to the overall composition.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ed01802379ee/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ed01802379ee/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced across all characters.\n- The level of detail richness is high, with each character having distinct magical effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and consistent style throughout. The only minor issue is that the same character is repeated multiple times, which might be seen as repetitive by some viewers. However, this does not affect the technical quality of the image itself.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image meets the high standards set for professional illustration and would likely satisfy most high-end customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ed01802379ee/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/eebee8d0c522.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/eebee8d0c522/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, with warm tones that complement the sunset background.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, focusing on the hands while maintaining a pleasing balance between the two characters.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the clothing textures and the sunset background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. The only minor issue is the lack of facial features, which could be improved if the focus was on the faces rather than just the hands. However, since the primary focus seems to be on the hands, this does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/eebee8d0c522/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/eebee8d0c522/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas visible.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, giving a warm and pleasant feel.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, focusing on the hands and the dress.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the dress pattern and hand textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No noticeable artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the absence of the face means we cannot fully assess the facial quality, which is a significant aspect of character design. If the face were included, it would likely be rated even higher.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: Since the image already meets high standards in most aspects, it could be considered as-is if the primary focus is on the hands and dress. However, if the customer specifically requests a full-face character, the image would need to be regenerated to include the face.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/eebee8d0c522/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/eebee8d0c522/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the hands appear to be well-detailed and proportionate.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the hands appear to be well-detailed and proportionate.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and clear contrasts that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the hands while the background provides a pleasant, soft-focus setting.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the clothing and hand textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, the overall score is slightly lower due to the lack of evaluation criteria for the primary focus. However, the image excels in other aspects such as line clarity, color, and composition. Given the high level of detail and technical quality, the image can be considered satisfactory without needing regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/eebee8d0c522/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/eebee8d0c522/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show the characters' faces, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the hands appear to be well-detailed and proportionate.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show the characters' faces, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the hands appear to be well-detailed and proportionate.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the sunset background.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the hands while the background provides a beautiful setting.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich details in the hands and the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation: Since the image focuses on hands rather than faces, the absence of facial details does not significantly impact the overall quality. The image is visually appealing and technically sound. However, if the primary focus were to be the characters' faces, the lack of facial details would be a significant issue.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/eebee8d0c522/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/eebee8d0c522/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show the faces of the characters, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the hands and dresses are rendered with good detail and smooth lines.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show the faces of the characters, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the hands and dresses are rendered with good detail and smooth lines.\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast that enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is balanced, focusing on the hands and dresses, which are proportionally well-rendered.\n- Level of detail richness: Rich, with intricate patterns on the dresses and a soft, detailed texture on the hands.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nSince the image lacks facial details, the face quality cannot be assessed, but the rest of the image is of high quality. The absence of facial features might be intentional if the focus is meant to be on the hands and dresses, but for a general assessment, it would be beneficial to have the faces included.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/eebee8d0c522/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/039c11b44940.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039c11b44940/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the wings spread out effectively.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the wings and hair.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and vibrant colors. However, the score could be slightly higher if the wings had more intricate feather details, which would add even more richness to the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039c11b44940/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039c11b44940/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not contain a face; it features a phoenix-like creature instead.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The absence of a face makes it impossible to assess facial symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with vibrant lines that define the feathers and wings effectively.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with a strong color palette that enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic and engaging, with a strong sense of movement and energy.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate feather patterns and a rich background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are visible.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image does not contain a face, the primary focus cannot be on character face quality. However, the overall image quality is high, and the technical aspects are sound. The absence of a face means that the image cannot meet the requirements for high-end customer satisfaction in terms of character face quality. Therefore, I would recommend regeneration to include a face if the intention is to create an anime-style character illustration.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039c11b44940/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039c11b44940/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible as it is obscured by the wings and other elements.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The absence of a face makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with vibrant lines that stand out against the background.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with a strong contrast between the bright colors and the dark background.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic and visually striking, but the lack of a face prevents a full assessment of proportions.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the wings and other elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it is impossible to provide a meaningful assessment of the face quality. However, the overall image quality is high, and the technical aspects are sound. Given the lack of a face, the image cannot be considered complete without regeneration.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039c11b44940/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039c11b44940/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- The facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the wings spread out symmetrically.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate feather patterns and dynamic lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is visually striking and artistically rich. The character design is well-executed, and the use of color and light adds depth to the composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the wings were more detailed and the background had even more intricate elements to add to the richness of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039c11b44940/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039c11b44940/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by wings and other elements.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The absence of facial features makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with vibrant lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with a rich palette and strong contrasts that make the image visually striking.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic and engaging, with a strong central focus on the character's form.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate patterns and vibrant colors throughout the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the character's face is not visible due to the design choices, the image cannot be evaluated based on typical face quality criteria. However, the overall image quality is high, and the technical aspects are sound. Given the lack of facial details, the image may not meet the expectations of customers looking for a detailed character portrait. Therefore, I would recommend regenerating the image with a more prominent and detailed face to better serve high-end customers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039c11b44940/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/286c82ae3341.png", + "improved_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/improved/286c82ae3341.png", + "original_score": 6, + "improved_score": 8, + "improvement": 2, + "best_candidate_source": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/286c82ae3341/candidate_1.png", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/286c82ae3341/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions appear correct.\n- Facial contours look natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are balanced and effective.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character designs.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and detail. However, if you want to ensure the highest possible quality, you might consider a slight adjustment in color balance to make the colors even more vibrant and dynamic.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nFinal recommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/286c82ae3341/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/286c82ae3341/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed, with distinct colors (orange and blue).\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are high, with vibrant and distinct color gradients.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the character's face centered and symmetrical.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the intricate patterns on the wings and hair.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent detail and vibrant colors. However, the symmetry between the two halves of the face could be improved slightly for a more polished look. This is a minor issue that does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: The image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration. However, if you want to further enhance the symmetry, you might consider adjusting the blending between the two halves of the face to ensure they match perfectly.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/286c82ae3341/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/286c82ae3341/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good facial details and a balanced composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background were more refined and less distracting.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high quality, but a slight refinement in the background could enhance its overall appeal.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/286c82ae3341/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/286c82ae3341/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are good, though the central focus is slightly off-center.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the wings and eyes.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with excellent detail and color. The composition could be improved by centering the focus more effectively, but this does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image meets the high standards set for high-end customers and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/286c82ae3341/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/286c82ae3341/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contours look natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with both characters facing each other symmetrically.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the hair and clothing textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, if you want to ensure the highest standards, you might consider a slight adjustment to the lighting to enhance the depth and dimensionality of the scene further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/286c82ae3341/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6163d09d0e0d.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6163d09d0e0d/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background adding depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the glowing elements in the environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and environmental details. However, the score could be slightly higher if the character's face was more prominently featured and the background had even more intricate details.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but if the customer has very high expectations or prefers a more detailed face, it might be worth considering a slight regeneration to enhance the facial features further.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6163d09d0e0d/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6163d09d0e0d/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned effectively within the frame.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the magical staff.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, if you want to ensure the highest standards, you might consider a slight adjustment to the lighting to enhance the depth and dimensionality of the scene further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6163d09d0e0d/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6163d09d0e0d/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the character's back being turned towards the viewer. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the character's back being turned towards the viewer. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with a harmonious color palette that enhances the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background providing depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the character's attire and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of visibility of the character's face, which is the primary focus, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall composition, color, and technical aspects are strong. A regeneration focusing on the character's face would be beneficial to meet the high standards expected by the customer.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6163d09d0e0d/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6163d09d0e0d/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a serene atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are excellent, with the character centered and the lighting enhancing the depth of the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the vegetation and the character's attire.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed or if the lighting had a bit more variation to add depth.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6163d09d0e0d/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6163d09d0e0d/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the forest background providing a good sense of depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the lighting and shadows were more dynamic, adding a bit more depth and contrast to the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6163d09d0e0d/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e1f59a6f3f55.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e1f59a6f3f55/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\n- The character's face is mostly obscured by the hood, so it's difficult to assess facial details.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical but lack detail due to the hood covering them.\n- The nose and mouth are not visible, making it impossible to comment on their proportions and natural contours.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas that are visible.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Moderate, with a soft color palette that enhances the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest providing a strong background.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the forest and the character's cloak.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality composition and rich details, but the lack of visible facial features prevents a higher score. The character's face could be more defined if the hood were removed or if the eyes were made more prominent.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: If the customer requires a more detailed and expressive face, the character's hood could be removed or the eyes could be made more visible. This would allow for a higher score and better satisfaction from the customer.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e1f59a6f3f55/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e1f59a6f3f55/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is completely obscured by a dark hood, making it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. The lack of visible facial features significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is completely obscured by a dark hood, making it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. The lack of visible facial features significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally smooth and well-defined, contributing to a clean look.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The color palette is muted with a strong emphasis on earthy tones, which creates a moody atmosphere. The contrast is adequate, enhancing the depth of the scene.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is effective, with the character positioned centrally against the backdrop of the forest. The proportions of the trees and the character fit well within the frame.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a good level of detail in the forest environment, with the glowing elements adding a magical touch. However, the lack of facial details detracts from the overall richness.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n\nGiven that the primary focus of the image is the character's face, which is not visible due to the hood, the overall quality is impacted. For high-end customers, having a clear and detailed face would be crucial. Therefore, regeneration is recommended to address this critical issue.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e1f59a6f3f55/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e1f59a6f3f55/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the dark cloak covering it, making it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. However, the lack of facial features does not affect the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the dark cloak covering it, making it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. However, the lack of facial features does not affect the overall quality assessment.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with a balanced use of light and shadow that enhances the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest setting providing a strong sense of depth and scale.\n- Level of detail richness: Rich, with intricate details on the trees and glowing elements adding depth to the scene.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation: Since the primary focus of the image is the forest setting rather than the character, the absence of facial details does not significantly impact the overall quality. The image effectively conveys a mysterious and enchanting mood, which aligns well with the intended artistic style. Therefore, no regeneration is necessary based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e1f59a6f3f55/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e1f59a6f3f55/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face lacks clear details, making it difficult to discern facial features such as the eyes, nose, and mouth. The eyes appear somewhat generic and lack depth, which affects the overall realism. The proportions seem slightly off, particularly around the jawline and neck area, giving the character a somewhat unnatural appearance.", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face lacks clear details, making it difficult to discern facial features such as the eyes, nose, and mouth. The eyes appear somewhat generic and lack depth, which affects the overall realism. The proportions seem slightly off, particularly around the jawline and neck area, giving the character a somewhat unnatural appearance.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally clean and well-defined, contributing to a smooth visual experience.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The color palette is warm and harmonious, with a good balance between light and shadow that enhances the mood of the scene.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is effective, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background providing a strong sense of depth and scale.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich but not overly complex, allowing the viewer to focus on the main subject without feeling overwhelmed.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high enough to maintain clarity and detail throughout the image.\n\nRecommendation:\nWhile the image has several strengths, the lack of clear facial details and slight proportions issues prevent it from achieving a perfect score. However, these issues are minor and do not significantly detract from the overall quality of the image. Therefore, I would suggest keeping this version as it is, but perhaps consider refining the facial features in future generations to enhance the character's presence and realism. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e1f59a6f3f55/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e1f59a6f3f55/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The lack of facial features makes it impossible to assess symmetry, detail, proportion, or natural contour.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are smooth and well-defined, especially around the character's silhouette.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are muted but effective in creating a dark and mysterious atmosphere. The contrast between the dark figure and the lighter background is strong.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally on the path, leading the viewer's eye through the forest.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a good level of detail in the forest environment, with the glowing plants adding a unique touch.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is the character, and the character's face is not visible, the image cannot be evaluated properly. However, given that the overall composition and environmental details are well-executed, the image can be considered satisfactory as it effectively conveys the intended mood and setting.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nTo improve the image, the character should have a visible face with clear facial features to allow for a proper assessment of the face quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e1f59a6f3f55/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/79b521cc0776.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79b521cc0776/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible due to the blurred effect, which makes it impossible to assess facial details.\n- The lack of a visible face prevents evaluation of symmetry, detail, proportion, and natural contour.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant neon colors that stand out against the darker background.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the cityscape providing a dynamic backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the environment and reflections on the wet street.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is the character's face, and it is not visible due to the blurred effect, the image cannot be fully evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall composition and technical aspects are strong. Given the importance of facial details for customer satisfaction, I would recommend regenerating the image with a clearer view of the character's face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79b521cc0776/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79b521cc0776/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high, with clean edges and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation is vibrant, with a good contrast between the neon lights and the dark background.\n- Composition is strong, with the character centered and the reflections adding depth.\n- The level of detail is rich, especially in the background and the reflections on the wet street.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent attention to detail and a well-executed composition. The only minor issue is that the character's face is not shown, which prevents a more comprehensive assessment of facial quality. However, since the rest of the image is strong, I would still give it a high score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nRecommendation: Since the image is already of high quality, no regeneration is necessary unless there is a specific request for additional detail or a different perspective.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79b521cc0776/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79b521cc0776/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not fully visible, which makes it difficult to assess facial details.\n- The eyes appear somewhat generic and lack depth.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem slightly off, but this might be due to the angle and perspective.\n- The facial contour appears somewhat unnatural, possibly due to the stylized nature of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, with clean edges and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant, contributing to a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the cityscape providing a dynamic background.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the environment and the character's boots.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a high-quality composition and vibrant colors, but the lack of a fully visible face prevents a more thorough assessment of facial quality. Since the overall quality is still quite good, a regeneration might not be necessary unless the customer specifically requests improvements in facial detail. However, if the customer values facial detail highly, a regeneration could enhance the image further.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79b521cc0776/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79b521cc0776/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not show any facial features as it only displays the lower legs and feet.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present in the image.\n- The absence of facial features makes it impossible to assess the symmetry, detail, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined, especially around the shoes and reflections.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and have good contrast, with a strong neon aesthetic.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is balanced, with the reflection adding depth to the scene.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, particularly in the reflections and the texture of the shoes.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks facial features, which is the primary focus for character quality, it cannot be evaluated properly. However, given the high-quality elements such as line clarity, color saturation, and composition, the overall image quality is still quite good.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nTo improve the image for high-end customers, regenerate the image to include facial features that can be assessed for quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79b521cc0776/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79b521cc0776/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nExplanation: While the image has good line clarity, color saturation, and composition, the lack of a visible face prevents a comprehensive evaluation of the character's facial features. For high-end customers, having a clear and detailed face is crucial. Therefore, regenerating the image with a visible face would be necessary to meet the high standards expected by such customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79b521cc0776/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/df1a1e763130.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/df1a1e763130/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contours look natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character face details and overall composition. However, if you want to ensure the highest standards, a few minor adjustments could be made to enhance the sharpness of certain areas and refine the color balance slightly. \n\nRecommendation:\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high-quality, but a slight refinement could make it even better.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/df1a1e763130/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/df1a1e763130/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no noticeable blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality anime style with excellent character face details and overall composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the facial features were even more symmetrical and the background elements were less prominent to draw more focus to the characters' faces.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/df1a1e763130/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/df1a1e763130/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character face details and overall composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background were more refined or if there was a bit more detail in the hair and clothing textures.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/df1a1e763130/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/df1a1e763130/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has excellent character face quality and overall image quality. However, it could benefit from slightly more dynamic lighting to enhance the depth and realism of the scene. The current lighting gives a soft, warm glow but lacks some contrast that could make the image pop more.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image is already quite high-quality, but if you want to further enhance it, consider adding more contrast and dynamic lighting to bring out the details even more. This would not significantly impact the score but could make the image feel more vibrant and engaging.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/df1a1e763130/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/df1a1e763130/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed.\n- The level of detail richness is high.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality anime style with good character face details and overall composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the facial features were even more sharply defined and the background elements were less prominent.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high quality, but for a perfect score, the facial features could be slightly more defined and the background could be less distracting.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/df1a1e763130/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b4b8600d10b4.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 9, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b4b8600d10b4/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, with vibrant colors that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the glowing flower.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. The only minor issue is the lack of facial features on the other characters, which could be improved if they were included in the analysis. However, since the primary focus is on the central character, the overall score remains high.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already of high quality and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b4b8600d10b4/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b4b8600d10b4/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions seem appropriate.\n- The level of detail richness is satisfactory.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality anime style with good character design and composition. However, the background could be slightly improved to enhance the depth and focus on the main subject.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite high quality, but if you want to further enhance it, you might consider refining the background to make it more visually appealing and to draw more attention to the main character.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b4b8600d10b4/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b4b8600d10b4/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, with vibrant colors that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the characters and creature positioned effectively within the frame.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the creature's wings and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed or if there was a bit more depth in the lighting effects.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good, but a few minor adjustments could make it even better.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b4b8600d10b4/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b4b8600d10b4/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 9, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 9/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a vibrant yet soothing atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character positioned centrally and the background elements complementing the subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the foliage and lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of very high quality with only minor improvements needed to reach perfection. However, if you want to ensure the highest standards, a slight adjustment in the lighting to enhance the glow around the character could be beneficial.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b4b8600d10b4/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b4b8600d10b4/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, as it is obscured by the distance and the forest environment. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, as it is obscured by the distance and the forest environment. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are smooth and well-defined, especially around the edges of the trees and flowers.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, making the scene visually striking.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the light source creating a strong focal point.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, particularly in the textures of the trees and the glowing flowers.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors; the image appears to be a high-quality rendering.\n- Resolution: The resolution seems adequate for the level of detail present in the image.\n\nGiven that the character's face is not visible, it is impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, the overall image quality is quite good, with strong visual appeal and technical excellence. Since the primary focus is on the character's face, which is not present in the image, the score is adjusted accordingly.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b4b8600d10b4/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/3f71ac08ff35.png", + "improved_image": null, + "original_score": 8, + "best_candidate_score": 8, + "improvement": 0, + "reason": "候选图像质量未达到替换标准", + "all_candidates": [ + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3f71ac08ff35/candidate_1.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by the glowing light effect.\n- The lack of facial features makes it difficult to assess the clarity and definition of facial details.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the composition drawing the viewer's eye upwards towards the glowing effect.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate light effects and a detailed background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible due to the glowing effect, it is challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, the overall image quality is high, and the technical aspects are excellent. The absence of facial details does not significantly impact the overall quality of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3f71ac08ff35/candidate_1.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3f71ac08ff35/candidate_2.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the main subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the magical effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the score could be slightly higher if the background elements were more detailed or if the magical effects had a bit more depth.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3f71ac08ff35/candidate_2.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3f71ac08ff35/candidate_3.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements balanced.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's robe and the cosmic background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed background. However, the score could be slightly higher if the character's face had even more intricate details or if the background had a bit more depth.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3f71ac08ff35/candidate_3.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3f71ac08ff35/candidate_4.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the long hair covering it. This makes it impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a visible face prevents a thorough evaluation.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the long hair covering it. This makes it impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a visible face prevents a thorough evaluation.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the cosmic elements adding depth and interest.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the background and the character's flowing hair.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of a visible face, which is crucial for assessing facial quality, the image cannot be fully evaluated. Therefore, regeneration is recommended to include a clear view of the character's face.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3f71ac08ff35/candidate_4.png" + } + }, + { + "file": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3f71ac08ff35/candidate_5.png", + "assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": false, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements balanced.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's clothing and the glowing orb.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed background. The only minor issue is that the face could be slightly more detailed, but it does not significantly impact the overall quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No\n\nThe image is already quite good and does not require regeneration based on the provided criteria.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3f71ac08ff35/candidate_5.png" + } + } + ] + } +] \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/illustrious_generated/optimization_summary_report.txt b/illustrious_generated/optimization_summary_report.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aa4cdaa96f44808ae728cdf28afbc780ebd79271 --- /dev/null +++ b/illustrious_generated/optimization_summary_report.txt @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ + +=== 图像质量优化总结报告 === + +处理统计: +- 总图像数: 9618 +- 检测到低质量图像: 181 +- 重新生成处理: 100 +- 成功改善质量: 17 +- 改善成功率: 17.0% + +质量提升: +- 平均质量提升: 2.3 分 +- 改善图像保存位置: /home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/improved + +详细结果文件: +- 低质量图像记录: low_quality_images.json +- 重新生成结果: regeneration_results.json +- 最终优化结果: optimization_final_results.json + +优化完成时间: 2025-07-29 08:24:41 diff --git a/illustrious_generated/regeneration_results.json b/illustrious_generated/regeneration_results.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..17654ee0e883e52d8ca77488d4259b5f2f116892 --- /dev/null +++ b/illustrious_generated/regeneration_results.json @@ -0,0 +1,1902 @@ +[ + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d337c665d640.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d337c665d640/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d337c665d640/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d337c665d640/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d337c665d640/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d337c665d640/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744082.6397274, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not show any facial features as it is focused on the torso.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present in the image.\n- The absence of facial features makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered and balanced, focusing on the torso area.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the muscular texture and skin folds.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the content shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks facial features, which is the primary focus for high-end customers, it cannot be evaluated properly for face quality. However, the overall image quality is good, and the technical aspects are satisfactory. For a complete evaluation, the image should include a face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d337c665d640.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/4360dd6c5fe6.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4360dd6c5fe6/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4360dd6c5fe6/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4360dd6c5fe6/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4360dd6c5fe6/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4360dd6c5fe6/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744095.7992437, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show any facial features as it is focused on the lower legs and feet. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features means that the face quality cannot be assessed at all.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show any facial features as it is focused on the lower legs and feet. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features means that the face quality cannot be assessed at all.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and clear contrasts.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered around the feet, which is appropriate for the subject matter, but the lack of facial elements makes it difficult to assess the overall composition.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the background and floor patterns.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks facial features, the face quality cannot be evaluated. However, the overall image quality is good, and the technical aspects are satisfactory. Given the focus on the lower legs and feet, the image could benefit from additional context or a different angle to include more of the character's body, allowing for a more comprehensive evaluation of the image quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/4360dd6c5fe6.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a6bb9c91d34f.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a6bb9c91d34f/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a6bb9c91d34f/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a6bb9c91d34f/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a6bb9c91d34f/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a6bb9c91d34f/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744109.1491156, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's scales and the forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the absence of a face makes it difficult to assess the facial quality comprehensively. If the face were included, the score could potentially be higher.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not present, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a face to ensure a complete evaluation of the facial quality. This will allow for a more accurate assessment and a higher overall score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a6bb9c91d34f.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0f049a4bf8e6.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0f049a4bf8e6/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0f049a4bf8e6/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0f049a4bf8e6/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0f049a4bf8e6/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0f049a4bf8e6/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744122.2920682, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible as it is obscured by the character's hair.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The absence of facial features makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack detail due to the lack of facial features.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted, which might be intentional for artistic effect, but they do not stand out strongly.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on the lower part of the body, which is unusual for a character portrait.\n- Level of detail richness: The image lacks detail, especially in the areas where facial features would typically be located.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are apparent.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears adequate for the content shown.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image should be regenerated with a focus on including the character's face, ensuring that facial details, symmetry, and natural proportions are accurately depicted. The composition could also benefit from a more balanced approach to include the upper body or face if that aligns with the intended style.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0f049a4bf8e6.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/4a928e27008c.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4a928e27008c/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4a928e27008c/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4a928e27008c/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4a928e27008c/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/4a928e27008c/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744135.5502696, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the glowing effect surrounding it.\n- The lack of facial features makes it difficult to assess the clarity and definition of facial details.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhances the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background adding depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate patterns on the circle and the forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a high overall quality with excellent composition and rich details. However, the absence of the character's face prevents a thorough assessment of the face quality. Since the primary focus is on the character, regenerating the image with a clearer view of the face would be beneficial to fully evaluate the facial quality and ensure customer satisfaction.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/4a928e27008c.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9c961fbe1f6c.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9c961fbe1f6c/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9c961fbe1f6c/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9c961fbe1f6c/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9c961fbe1f6c/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9c961fbe1f6c/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744148.711821, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face at all, which is the primary focus. Without seeing the face, it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face makes it difficult to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face at all, which is the primary focus. Without seeing the face, it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face makes it difficult to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, especially in the background elements like the glowing plants.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition seems to be focused on the lower part of the body, but without the face, it's hard to comment on the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a good level of detail in the fabric and the glowing elements in the background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No visible artifacts or noise are present.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors that can be identified from the provided image.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is missing (the character's face), it cannot be evaluated properly. For high-end customers, it is crucial to have a complete and clear image to meet their expectations. Therefore, I recommend regenerating the image to include the character's face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9c961fbe1f6c.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9917f32d22ba.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9917f32d22ba/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9917f32d22ba/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9917f32d22ba/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9917f32d22ba/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9917f32d22ba/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744161.9249861, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 4, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 4/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not show a face at all, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details.\n- The composition is focused on the lower part of the body, which is not typical for a character portrait.\n- There are no facial features present to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat jagged and not very smooth, indicating potential issues with the generation process.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted, and the contrast is low, making the image less visually appealing.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is off as it focuses on the lower body rather than a complete character.\n- Level of detail richness: While there is some detail in the skin texture, the overall richness of detail is lacking due to the focus on the lower body.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are visible artifacts around the edges, particularly in the red fabric area, which suggests a generation error.\n- Obvious generation errors: The lack of a face and the focus on the lower body indicate significant generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears adequate but is not high enough to fully appreciate the finer details.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nThe image fails to meet the required standards for a high-quality illustration due to its lack of a face, poor composition, and technical errors. It would benefit from a complete regeneration focusing on a full character portrait with proper facial features and a more appropriate composition.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9917f32d22ba.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ee4940943b83.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee4940943b83/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee4940943b83/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee4940943b83/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee4940943b83/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee4940943b83/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744175.1784806, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents a proper evaluation of the facial quality.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents a proper evaluation of the facial quality.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally smooth and well-defined, especially around the intricate ceiling design.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, making the image visually appealing.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the character positioned at the bottom and the ceiling design dominating the upper part of the image. The proportions of the architectural elements are harmonious.\n- Level of detail richness: The image is rich in detail, particularly in the ceiling design and the swirling energy effect.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors in the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the character's face is not present in the image, it is not possible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the facial quality. However, based on the other aspects evaluated, the image has good line clarity, color saturation, and detail richness. It would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a visible character face to ensure that the facial quality meets the high standards expected by the customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ee4940943b83.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e51750b3db46.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e51750b3db46/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e51750b3db46/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e51750b3db46/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e51750b3db46/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e51750b3db46/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744188.3580134, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is completely obscured by a dark hood, making it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, eye definition, nose shape, mouth, and facial contours. There are no facial features visible at all.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is completely obscured by a dark hood, making it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, eye definition, nose shape, mouth, and facial contours. There are no facial features visible at all.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and sharp edges.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant yellow tones and strong contrast against the darker background.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is visually striking, with the character centered and the intricate background drawing the viewer's eye towards the central light source.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with detailed patterns in the background and a rich color palette.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe primary focus should be on the character's face, which is currently not visible due to the hood. This significantly impacts the overall quality assessment, especially when considering the primary focus of the image.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e51750b3db46.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/039a77bc12d4.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039a77bc12d4/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039a77bc12d4/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039a77bc12d4/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039a77bc12d4/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039a77bc12d4/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744201.6458302, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The dragon's face lacks detailed facial features such as eyes, nose, and mouth. The proportions seem off, and the facial contour appears unnatural due to the stylized nature of the artwork. The eyes are not symmetrical, and the overall facial structure does not look realistic.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The dragon's face lacks detailed facial features such as eyes, nose, and mouth. The proportions seem off, and the facial contour appears unnatural due to the stylized nature of the artwork. The eyes are not symmetrical, and the overall facial structure does not look realistic.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the cosmic background.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic, with the dragon positioned at the bottom against a stunning space backdrop. However, the proportions of the dragon itself could be improved for better balance.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the dragon's wings and the cosmic background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has good technical quality but suffers from issues with the dragon's facial features and proportions. While the overall composition and color scheme are impressive, the lack of detail in the face detracts from the overall quality. Therefore, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with more defined facial features and a more balanced proportion for the dragon.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/039a77bc12d4.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cd4f7da85fec.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4f7da85fec/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4f7da85fec/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4f7da85fec/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4f7da85fec/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4f7da85fec/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744214.9458995, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not include a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents a comprehensive assessment of the character's facial features.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not include a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents a comprehensive assessment of the character's facial features.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth transitions and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the sunset scene.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the feet and the sunset, which creates a serene and aesthetically pleasing image.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the waves, sand, and the sunset sky.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No visible artifacts or noise.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, providing a clear and detailed image.\n\nSince the image lacks a face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall image quality is very good, and the technical aspects are excellent. The absence of a face is the only significant issue, but it does not affect the technical quality of the image itself.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cd4f7da85fec.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/95a03676700c.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/95a03676700c/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/95a03676700c/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/95a03676700c/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/95a03676700c/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/95a03676700c/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744228.2501426, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and lighting, making it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a clear view of the face prevents a thorough evaluation.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and lighting, making it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a clear view of the face prevents a thorough evaluation.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the underwater scene.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with the character positioned centrally and the composition balanced between the underwater environment and the character's flowing hair.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the coral, fish, and the character's flowing garment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of visibility of the character's face, which is the primary focus, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall image quality and technical aspects are strong, warranting a high score. A regeneration would be necessary to address the missing facial details.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/95a03676700c.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ee934c327ef4.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee934c327ef4/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee934c327ef4/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee934c327ef4/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee934c327ef4/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ee934c327ef4/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744241.328944, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The facial details are somewhat lacking in definition, especially around the eyes and mouth.\n- The eyes appear slightly asymmetrical, which can be distracting.\n- The nose and mouth proportions seem a bit off, contributing to the overall lack of detail.\n- There are some blurry areas around the edges of the faces, particularly noticeable on the hair and clothing.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are decent but not exceptional.\n- Color saturation is good, with vibrant hues that stand out.\n- The composition is somewhat tight, focusing closely on the characters' upper bodies, which might be too close for comfort.\n- The level of detail richness is moderate, with some areas appearing a bit flat.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears adequate for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nGiven the average face quality and the need for more defined facial features, it would be beneficial to regenerate this image. The overall quality is passable but could be improved with better facial detail and symmetry.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ee934c327ef4.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e775a7d63dd7.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e775a7d63dd7/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e775a7d63dd7/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e775a7d63dd7/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e775a7d63dd7/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e775a7d63dd7/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744254.5260463, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest elements framing the scene effectively.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the forest, glowing mushrooms, and the mystical circle.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe main issue is the lack of visibility of the character's face, which prevents a thorough assessment of facial quality. However, the rest of the image is of high quality, making a regeneration necessary to address this specific aspect.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e775a7d63dd7.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/26af3cd61cd0.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/26af3cd61cd0/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/26af3cd61cd0/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/26af3cd61cd0/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/26af3cd61cd0/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/26af3cd61cd0/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744267.6877787, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n1. The facial details are somewhat clear but not as sharp as they could be.\n2. The eyes are symmetrical but lack some depth and detail, especially around the irises.\n3. The proportions of the nose and mouth appear slightly off, particularly the nose which seems a bit too large.\n4. The facial contour is generally natural but lacks some refinement in certain areas, such as the jawline and cheekbones.\n5. There are no significant blurry or distorted areas, but the overall facial quality is not exceptional.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n1. Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally clean but not extremely sharp, which affects the overall crispness.\n2. Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant but not overly saturated, providing a good balance that enhances the visual appeal.\n3. Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic but somewhat cluttered due to the multiple characters and their poses. The proportions of the characters seem mostly correct, though the perspective can make some parts look slightly off.\n4. Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich enough to be visually engaging but not overly detailed, which might be a preference depending on the target audience.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n1. No apparent artifacts or noise are present.\n2. There are no obvious generation errors, although the image does contain explicit content which may not be suitable for all audiences.\n3. The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown, but it could benefit from higher resolution for a more polished look.\n\nRecommendation:\nGiven the average face quality and the somewhat cluttered composition, the image could benefit from a regeneration to improve facial details and refine the overall composition. This would enhance the visual appeal and meet the high standards expected by high-end customers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/26af3cd61cd0.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2b66accf6405.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2b66accf6405/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2b66accf6405/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2b66accf6405/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2b66accf6405/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2b66accf6405/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744280.8518894, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The image appears to be focused on the lower body, which means there are no facial features to evaluate.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack fine detail, especially in the areas that should have more intricate textures.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted, and the contrast is low, making the image appear flat.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered around the lower body, which is unusual for a full-body image. The proportions seem off due to the focus on the lower part of the body.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a lack of detail in the areas that should have more texture, such as the fabric and skin.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no apparent artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present, but the image seems to be focused on the lower body rather than a complete character, which might be a design choice but is not typical for a full-body image.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, the image has issues with composition, detail, and color, which affect its overall quality. Given these factors, I would recommend regeneration to ensure a complete and high-quality image that includes the face and adheres to typical character design standards.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2b66accf6405.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/31de51d585f2.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/31de51d585f2/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/31de51d585f2/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/31de51d585f2/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/31de51d585f2/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/31de51d585f2/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744294.0507426, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face lacks clear details, making it difficult to discern facial features such as the eyes, nose, and mouth. The proportions appear somewhat off, and the facial contour is not very natural. There are no obvious blurry or distorted areas, but the lack of detail makes the face less engaging.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face lacks clear details, making it difficult to discern facial features such as the eyes, nose, and mouth. The proportions appear somewhat off, and the facial contour is not very natural. There are no obvious blurry or distorted areas, but the lack of detail makes the face less engaging.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background adding depth. However, the proportions of the character's body seem slightly off, which affects the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the character's clothing and the forest environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, while the image has good technical qualities and a visually appealing color palette, the lack of facial detail significantly impacts the character's presence. This could be improved by refining the facial features and ensuring better proportionality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/31de51d585f2.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d69279355007.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d69279355007/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d69279355007/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d69279355007/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d69279355007/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d69279355007/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744307.2231789, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of facial features also prevents a proper evaluation of the overall image quality and technical issues.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of facial features also prevents a proper evaluation of the overall image quality and technical issues.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image should be regenerated with the character's face exposed so that facial details can be evaluated. Additionally, the composition could be improved by ensuring that the characters' faces are included in the frame to provide a more complete and balanced image.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d69279355007.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/474456d7edb4.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/474456d7edb4/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/474456d7edb4/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/474456d7edb4/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/474456d7edb4/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/474456d7edb4/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744320.4468496, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluating the clarity and definition of facial features.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluating the clarity and definition of facial features.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear clean and well-defined, especially around the edges of the spiky structure and the glowing mushroom.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant, with a good contrast between the blue tones of the mushroom and the darker background.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is balanced, with the spiky structure framing the glowing mushroom effectively. The proportions seem appropriate for the overall design.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a good level of detail, particularly in the texture of the spiky structure and the glowing effect on the mushroom.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No noticeable artifacts or noise are present in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors in the image.\n\nGiven that the primary focus of the image is the character's face, which is not present, the overall quality is still quite high due to the other positive aspects mentioned. However, the absence of the face significantly impacts the ability to evaluate the image comprehensively. Therefore, regeneration is recommended to include a face for a more complete assessment.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/474456d7edb4.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/522ca374b245.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/522ca374b245/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/522ca374b245/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/522ca374b245/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/522ca374b245/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/522ca374b245/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744333.675083, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face lacks clear details, making it difficult to discern facial features.\n- The eyes appear somewhat generic and lack depth.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem slightly off, contributing to an unnatural look.\n- There are no significant blurriness or distortion, but the lack of detail makes the face less engaging.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, with clean edges on the character and buildings.\n- Color saturation is high, with vibrant neon lights that enhance the futuristic atmosphere.\n- Composition is strong, with the character centered and the cityscape providing a dynamic background.\n- Detail richness is high, especially in the reflections and lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No noticeable artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a good overall quality with strong composition and vibrant colors. However, the lack of facial detail significantly impacts the character's presence. While the technical aspects are sound, the character's face could be improved to make the image more compelling. Therefore, I would recommend regeneration to address the facial quality issues.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/522ca374b245.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1fc1ad8ea4ec.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1fc1ad8ea4ec/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1fc1ad8ea4ec/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1fc1ad8ea4ec/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1fc1ad8ea4ec/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1fc1ad8ea4ec/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744346.8721838, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and reflections on the metallic surface.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant blue tones and good contrast that highlights the character's form.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the lower half of the character, which is visually striking.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the suit and boots.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nGiven the lack of a visible face, the image cannot be fully evaluated for facial quality. However, the technical aspects and overall composition are strong, warranting a high score despite the missing face.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1fc1ad8ea4ec.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6b24f5350391.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6b24f5350391/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6b24f5350391/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6b24f5350391/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6b24f5350391/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6b24f5350391/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744360.0542183, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The lack of a face makes it difficult to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack fine detail, which is typical for anime-style illustrations.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered on the back of the character, which is effective for showcasing the body shape. However, the absence of the face affects the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich in the body and fabric textures, but lacks detail in the areas that would typically be present in a full-body anime illustration.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No obvious artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no apparent generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the style of the image.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, the overall image quality is satisfactory, especially considering the style. The absence of the face might be intentional for certain artistic purposes, but it does affect the completeness of the image. If the face were included, the score could potentially be higher.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: No (if the face is intentionally omitted), Yes (if the face should be included).", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6b24f5350391.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/c4287d9021bf.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c4287d9021bf/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c4287d9021bf/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c4287d9021bf/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c4287d9021bf/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c4287d9021bf/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744373.278937, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, giving the image a vibrant yet realistic look.\n- Composition and proportions are excellent, with the character positioned prominently against the dynamic background.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's armor and the glowing effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the absence of a face makes it difficult to assess the facial quality comprehensively. If the face were included, the score could potentially be higher.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not present, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a face to ensure a complete evaluation of the facial quality. This will allow for a more accurate assessment and a higher overall score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/c4287d9021bf.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/73555a2c0f75.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/73555a2c0f75/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/73555a2c0f75/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/73555a2c0f75/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/73555a2c0f75/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/73555a2c0f75/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744386.5792143, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the helmet covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of a visible face also prevents evaluation of facial clarity and definition.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the helmet covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of a visible face also prevents evaluation of facial clarity and definition.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with the character positioned centrally and the background adding depth without distracting from the main subject.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate armor details and dynamic lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the absence of a visible face, which is the primary focus for character quality, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall composition, color, and technical aspects are strong. A regeneration would be necessary to include a visible face for a comprehensive assessment.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/73555a2c0f75.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a0346017052e.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a0346017052e/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a0346017052e/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a0346017052e/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a0346017052e/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a0346017052e/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744399.8176527, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face at all, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality and appeal of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face at all, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality and appeal of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition focuses on the legs, which are proportionally well-rendered, but the lack of a face affects the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: The texture of the fishnet stockings is rich and detailed, contributing positively to the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, as the details are sharp and clear.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks a face, which is typically the primary focus in many anime-style illustrations, the overall quality is impacted. The absence of facial features makes it difficult to assess the image comprehensively. Therefore, I would recommend regeneration to include a face, ensuring that the character's identity and expression are clearly defined.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a0346017052e.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/3cc7f3366f7a.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3cc7f3366f7a/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3cc7f3366f7a/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3cc7f3366f7a/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3cc7f3366f7a/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3cc7f3366f7a/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744412.933395, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show the faces of the characters, so it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportion, and naturalness of the facial features. However, the hands and legs are depicted with good detail and natural proportions.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show the faces of the characters, so it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportion, and naturalness of the facial features. However, the hands and legs are depicted with good detail and natural proportions.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast that enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the hands and legs, which are the main subjects. The proportions of the limbs appear natural and well-proportioned.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the clothing textures and skin tones.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face quality cannot be assessed due to the absence of facial features, the overall score is slightly lower than perfect. However, the image is still of high quality in terms of line clarity, color, composition, and detail. Given the lack of facial detail, the recommendation would be to regenerate the image with the faces included if possible, to ensure a comprehensive assessment of the character's facial quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/3cc7f3366f7a.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/94898c3fab73.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/94898c3fab73/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/94898c3fab73/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/94898c3fab73/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/94898c3fab73/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/94898c3fab73/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744426.1753435, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the character's pose.\n- The lack of facial features makes it impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the futuristic setting.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the background providing depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the environment and character design.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the character's face is not visible, it is challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the overall image quality and technical aspects, the image is already quite good. If the goal is to have a fully visible and detailed character face, the image would need to be regenerated with a different pose or angle that includes the face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/94898c3fab73.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d58ed1d832c2.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d58ed1d832c2/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d58ed1d832c2/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d58ed1d832c2/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d58ed1d832c2/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d58ed1d832c2/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744439.3813934, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face at all, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face at all, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nTo improve the image, the character should be shown from a perspective that includes their face. This would allow for a proper evaluation of facial features and overall image quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d58ed1d832c2.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6bd77e496c29.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bd77e496c29/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bd77e496c29/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bd77e496c29/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bd77e496c29/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bd77e496c29/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744452.5797045, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluating the clarity and definition of facial features.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluating the clarity and definition of facial features.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is strong, especially in the glowing elements like the star and fireworks.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is visually appealing, with the glowing star and fireworks creating a focal point, and the character positioned at the bottom adds depth.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a good level of detail in the background, such as the forest and the glowing elements, but the character lacks detail due to their absence from the frame.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, allowing for clear details in the background.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the character's face is not visible, it is impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the other aspects evaluated, the image has a high overall quality. The recommendation would be to regenerate the image to include a visible character face for a more complete evaluation. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6bd77e496c29.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/8efe19b2d993.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8efe19b2d993/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8efe19b2d993/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8efe19b2d993/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8efe19b2d993/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8efe19b2d993/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744465.8292398, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- Eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, with vibrant blue flowers adding visual interest.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the characters positioned centrally and the background architecture providing a nice backdrop.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the flowers and the architectural elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. The only minor issue is that the faces are not shown, which prevents a more comprehensive assessment of face quality. However, given the high standards set by high-end customers, the absence of facial details might be a concern for some.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the faces are not shown, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with the faces included to fully assess the face quality. This will ensure that all aspects of the image meet the high standards expected by high-end customers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/8efe19b2d993.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b1ec440aa847.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b1ec440aa847/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b1ec440aa847/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b1ec440aa847/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b1ec440aa847/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b1ec440aa847/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744479.0865228, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with a balanced use of light and shadow that enhances the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Excellent, with a well-balanced composition that draws the viewer's eye towards the central figure and the glowing orb.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the forest, water reflections, and the character's attire.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe image excels in its overall composition, color palette, and technical execution, but the lack of visible facial features prevents a comprehensive assessment of the character's design. For high-end customers, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a visible face to ensure complete satisfaction.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b1ec440aa847.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/8eb475d3a84e.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8eb475d3a84e/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8eb475d3a84e/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8eb475d3a84e/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8eb475d3a84e/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8eb475d3a84e/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744492.30258, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- Nose and mouth proportions seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, giving the image a vibrant appearance.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the main subject.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the character's armor and wings.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and composition. However, the absence of a face makes it difficult to assess the facial quality comprehensively. If the face were included, the score could potentially be higher.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not present, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a face to ensure a complete evaluation of the facial quality. This will allow for a more accurate assessment and a higher overall score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/8eb475d3a84e.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5d6152ac7c7b.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d6152ac7c7b/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d6152ac7c7b/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d6152ac7c7b/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d6152ac7c7b/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d6152ac7c7b/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744505.751231, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluating any potential blurriness, distortion, or unnatural areas.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluating any potential blurriness, distortion, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the mushrooms creating a visually appealing focal point.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the mushrooms and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is the character's face, and it is not visible, the image cannot be fully evaluated based on the given criteria. However, if the intention was to showcase the magical forest scene without a character, the image is of high quality. If a character is intended to be part of the image, it should be regenerated to include a face for a more comprehensive evaluation. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5d6152ac7c7b.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/398cf47de37d.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/398cf47de37d/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/398cf47de37d/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/398cf47de37d/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/398cf47de37d/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/398cf47de37d/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744519.0260828, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, as it is obscured by the dark cloak. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, as it is obscured by the dark cloak. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours of the face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the tree and the glowing path creating a strong focal point.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the tree, mushrooms, and the glowing elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- No obvious generation errors are visible.\n- The resolution appears to be high, contributing to the overall quality.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the character's face is not visible, it is impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of its quality. However, the rest of the image is of high quality. Given the lack of information about the character's face, I would suggest regenerating the image to include a visible character face for a more complete evaluation.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/398cf47de37d.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/993fee05a4b0.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/993fee05a4b0/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/993fee05a4b0/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/993fee05a4b0/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/993fee05a4b0/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/993fee05a4b0/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744532.280968, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by the wings and body of the phoenix. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by the wings and body of the phoenix. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant orange and yellow tones that stand out against the muted background.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the phoenix centered and the landscape providing a good backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate feather details and dynamic lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of visible facial features due to the character's positioning, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall composition, color, and technical aspects are strong, warranting a high score. A regeneration would be necessary to include a clear view of the character's face.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/993fee05a4b0.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/25142a3e9507.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/25142a3e9507/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/25142a3e9507/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/25142a3e9507/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/25142a3e9507/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/25142a3e9507/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744545.580231, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The faces are not visible as they are obscured by the characters' arms and dresses. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the faces.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The faces are not visible as they are obscured by the characters' arms and dresses. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the faces.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, with the hands forming a heart shape which adds emotional depth. However, the lack of visible faces affects the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich textures in the dresses and hair.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of visible faces, which are crucial for assessing facial quality, the image cannot be fully evaluated. For a high-end customer, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with visible faces to ensure the character design meets the required standards.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/25142a3e9507.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2940d7df0593.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2940d7df0593/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2940d7df0593/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2940d7df0593/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2940d7df0593/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2940d7df0593/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744558.724061, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no noticeable blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are good, though the focus seems to be on the upper body rather than the face.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the textures of the clothing and skin.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality appearance with good technical execution. However, the focus on the upper body might not fully meet the expectations of customers who are primarily interested in facial details. If the primary focus is on the character's face, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a more balanced composition that includes the face prominently.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2940d7df0593.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b884338c9e7d.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b884338c9e7d/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b884338c9e7d/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b884338c9e7d/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b884338c9e7d/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b884338c9e7d/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744572.0444798, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\n- The facial details are somewhat clear but not highly defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical but lack fine detail.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no noticeable blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, though slightly soft.\n- Color saturation is vibrant, with a nice contrast between the night sky and the forest.\n- The composition is well-balanced, with the couple centered and the trees framing the scene effectively.\n- The level of detail is rich, especially in the forest and the glowing path.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality anime style with good color and composition. However, the facial details could be improved for higher satisfaction among customers. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image could benefit from more detailed facial features, particularly in the eyes and finer details on the faces. This would enhance the overall quality and appeal to high-end customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b884338c9e7d.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f94934f2b2a9.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f94934f2b2a9/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f94934f2b2a9/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f94934f2b2a9/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f94934f2b2a9/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f94934f2b2a9/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744585.3451931, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with a harmonious arrangement of elements such as the character, the glowing crystal, the bats, and the landscape.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the wings, the crystal, and the background elements like the mountains and the sky.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present in the image.\n\nGiven the lack of visible facial features, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall composition, color, and technical aspects are of high quality. A regeneration would be necessary to include a visible face for a comprehensive assessment.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f94934f2b2a9.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/04c3e87bfb16.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04c3e87bfb16/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04c3e87bfb16/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04c3e87bfb16/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04c3e87bfb16/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04c3e87bfb16/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744598.569471, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and distance from which the image is taken. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and distance from which the image is taken. Therefore, it is impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are smooth and well-defined, contributing to a clean and polished look.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is well-balanced, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is balanced, with the horizon line dividing the sky and ground evenly. The trees and flowers add depth and interest to the scene.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a rich level of detail, especially in the clouds, trees, and flowers, which adds to the overall beauty of the scene.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, as the details are sharp and clear.\n\nGiven that the primary focus should be on the character's face, but it is not visible in this image, the overall quality is still quite good. However, the lack of facial detail prevents a higher score.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/04c3e87bfb16.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/20e3a336a2c2.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/20e3a336a2c2/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/20e3a336a2c2/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/20e3a336a2c2/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/20e3a336a2c2/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/20e3a336a2c2/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744611.6906817, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The faces are not visible as they are cut off at the top of the image.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present since the faces are not shown.\n- The proportions and contours cannot be evaluated due to the lack of facial features.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with soft and harmonious colors.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered on the lower body, which is appropriate for the subject matter.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with detailed clothing textures and skin tones.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- No obvious generation errors are detected.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the faces are not visible, it is impossible to assess the face quality properly. However, the rest of the image is of good quality. If the faces were included, the overall score could potentially be higher.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/20e3a336a2c2.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0b5a37024724.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0b5a37024724/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0b5a37024724/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0b5a37024724/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0b5a37024724/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0b5a37024724/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744624.9748287, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background providing a good sense of depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the forest, mushrooms, and magical elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe primary issue is the lack of visible facial features, which prevents a thorough assessment of the character's face quality. However, the rest of the image is of high quality, making a regeneration necessary to address this specific aspect.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0b5a37024724.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/fbaa6ecaa36b.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fbaa6ecaa36b/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fbaa6ecaa36b/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fbaa6ecaa36b/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fbaa6ecaa36b/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fbaa6ecaa36b/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744638.3919706, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not include any facial features as it is focused on the lower body. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features is a significant issue for an image that is intended to be a full character portrait.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not include any facial features as it is focused on the lower body. Therefore, we cannot evaluate the facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features is a significant issue for an image that is intended to be a full character portrait.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, which enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered and balanced, focusing on the lower body.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the skin texture and lighting effects.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, providing a clear and detailed view of the subject.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks facial features, which are typically the primary focus in a character portrait, it is not suitable for high-end customers who expect a complete character representation. Therefore, I recommend regeneration to include the face and ensure the image meets the expected standards for a full character portrait.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/fbaa6ecaa36b.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9a74b719047c.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9a74b719047c/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9a74b719047c/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9a74b719047c/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9a74b719047c/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9a74b719047c/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744651.630794, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not clearly defined, and the eyes appear distorted and lack symmetry. The proportions of the nose and mouth seem off, and the facial contour does not look natural. There are also some blurry areas around the face that detract from the overall quality.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not clearly defined, and the eyes appear distorted and lack symmetry. The proportions of the nose and mouth seem off, and the facial contour does not look natural. There are also some blurry areas around the face that detract from the overall quality.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are somewhat clear but not perfectly sharp.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and saturated, which enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, with the character dominating the frame, and the proportions are generally well-balanced.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the flowing hair and dress, but the face lacks detail.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high enough to support the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation: While the image has some strengths, particularly in color and composition, the poor quality of the face significantly impacts the overall quality. Regeneration would help improve the facial features and ensure they meet the high standards expected by high-end customers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9a74b719047c.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d59ed7440292.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d59ed7440292/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d59ed7440292/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d59ed7440292/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d59ed7440292/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/d59ed7440292/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744664.7347517, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 4, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 4/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The facial details are not clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear distorted and lack symmetry.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem off, particularly the nose which looks too large and disproportionate.\n- The facial contour is unnatural, especially around the mouth area.\n- There are blurry and distorted areas, particularly around the mouth and nose.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are low, making it difficult to discern finer details.\n- Color saturation and contrast are adequate but not vibrant enough to enhance the image's appeal.\n- Composition and proportions are off, contributing to the overall poor quality.\n- The level of detail richness is lacking due to the aforementioned issues.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are visible artifacts and noise, especially around the edges of the facial features.\n- There are obvious generation errors, such as the distorted eyes and the unnatural proportions.\n- The resolution appears insufficient, as the image lacks fine detail and clarity.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nThe image fails to meet the high standards required by high-end customers due to its poor facial quality, technical issues, and overall low image quality. A regeneration would be necessary to address these problems and create a more visually appealing and technically sound image.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/d59ed7440292.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/c732e204ea24.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c732e204ea24/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c732e204ea24/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c732e204ea24/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c732e204ea24/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c732e204ea24/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744677.728083, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours.\n- The image appears to be focused on intimate scenes rather than character faces, which makes it difficult to evaluate facial quality.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are somewhat clear but not very sharp, especially around the edges.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant, but the contrast seems a bit low, making some details less distinct.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is artistic and suggestive, but it doesn't provide enough information to assess proportions effectively.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a good level of detail in the intimate areas, but the lack of facial features limits the overall richness of the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No obvious artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no apparent generation errors.\n- The resolution appears to be adequate for the content shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image does not contain any facial features, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the lack of facial details significantly impacts the overall quality assessment. Given that the image is focused on intimate scenes, it might be more appropriate to regenerate an image that includes a character's face for a more comprehensive evaluation.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/c732e204ea24.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6bbbb27d6ed7.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bbbb27d6ed7/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bbbb27d6ed7/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bbbb27d6ed7/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bbbb27d6ed7/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6bbbb27d6ed7/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744690.8105464, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of a face suggests that the primary focus might be on other elements of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. However, the absence of a face suggests that the primary focus might be on other elements of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition seems intentional, but without a face, it's hard to comment on the overall balance.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the visible parts of the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not present in the image, it's challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the visible parts of the image, the overall quality is good. The absence of a face makes it difficult to determine if the image meets the high standards expected by high-end customers. Therefore, I would recommend regenerating the image with a clear face to ensure that all aspects of the image meet the required quality standards.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6bbbb27d6ed7.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f3da45229d74.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f3da45229d74/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f3da45229d74/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f3da45229d74/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f3da45229d74/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f3da45229d74/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744704.0346255, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The character lacks a face, which is the primary focus of the image.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The absence of a face makes it impossible to assess symmetry, detail, proportion, or natural contour.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nThe image does not meet the criteria for a high-quality illustration because it fails to provide the primary focus of a character's face. Without a face, the image cannot be evaluated based on the specified face quality aspects. A regeneration is necessary to include a face that can be analyzed for clarity, detail, and natural proportions.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f3da45229d74.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f580a1655651.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f580a1655651/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f580a1655651/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f580a1655651/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f580a1655651/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f580a1655651/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744717.1764123, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face appears to be missing or obscured by the character's hair, which is a design choice but can be seen as a limitation.\n- The eyes are not visible due to the hair, so it's difficult to assess their symmetry and detail.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth are not clearly defined due to the lack of visibility.\n- The facial contour is somewhat abstracted by the hair, making it less natural compared to a fully visible face.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the character's attire and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a high-quality composition and rich details, but the absence of a visible face affects the overall facial quality. Since the face is a primary focus for many viewers, it might be beneficial to regenerate the image with a more visible face if possible, while maintaining the artistic style and magical atmosphere. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f580a1655651.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a7155196b415.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a7155196b415/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a7155196b415/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a7155196b415/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a7155196b415/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a7155196b415/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744730.4550042, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The absence of the face makes it difficult to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic, with the character's back and the flowing lines creating a sense of movement and energy.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the clothing and background elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the visible parts of the image, the overall quality is quite high. The absence of the face makes it challenging to give a complete evaluation, but the technical aspects suggest that the image could be improved by including the face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a7155196b415.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0a6177185c32.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0a6177185c32/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0a6177185c32/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0a6177185c32/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0a6177185c32/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0a6177185c32/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744743.5650644, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show any facial features as it only focuses on hands. Therefore, it cannot be evaluated based on facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show any facial features as it only focuses on hands. Therefore, it cannot be evaluated based on facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with soft pastel colors that create a pleasant visual effect.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered around the hands, which is effective for the intended focus. However, the lack of facial elements makes it difficult to assess overall composition and proportions.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the hands and dress fabric.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image is focused solely on hands without any facial features, it cannot be evaluated for face quality. However, the overall image quality is good, with high line clarity, color saturation, and detail richness. The lack of facial elements means it may not meet the expectations of customers looking for character-focused illustrations. If the intention is to create a character illustration, this image would need to be regenerated to include the face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0a6177185c32.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/406fc344a732.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/406fc344a732/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/406fc344a732/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/406fc344a732/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/406fc344a732/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/406fc344a732/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744756.7907255, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The lack of a visible face prevents a thorough evaluation of facial quality.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant neon colors that stand out against the darker background.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the cityscape providing a dynamic backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the character's outfit and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is the character's face, which is not visible, the overall score is slightly lower due to the inability to evaluate the facial quality. However, the rest of the image is of high quality. If the goal is to create a high-quality image with a visible face, the regeneration would be necessary to address the missing facial features.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/406fc344a732.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/dff4866593b3.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/dff4866593b3/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/dff4866593b3/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/dff4866593b3/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/dff4866593b3/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/dff4866593b3/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744770.0020163, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not include a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents a comprehensive assessment of the character's facial features.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not include a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents a comprehensive assessment of the character's facial features.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is high, creating a visually appealing scene.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the sunset and water creating a harmonious background.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the texture of the skin and the reflections on the water.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors; the image appears to be a high-quality rendering.\n- Resolution: The resolution seems adequate for the level of detail present.\n\nSince the image lacks a face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall image quality is good, and the technical aspects are satisfactory. The absence of a face is the primary reason for the lower score.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/dff4866593b3.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e47689760c0d.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e47689760c0d/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e47689760c0d/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e47689760c0d/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e47689760c0d/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e47689760c0d/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744783.1909342, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face lacks clear facial details, making it difficult to discern features like the eyes, nose, and mouth. The eyes appear somewhat symmetrical but lack detail, and the proportions seem off due to the lack of visible facial structure. The facial contour is not natural, and the overall design appears more abstract than realistic.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face lacks clear facial details, making it difficult to discern features like the eyes, nose, and mouth. The eyes appear somewhat symmetrical but lack detail, and the proportions seem off due to the lack of visible facial structure. The facial contour is not natural, and the overall design appears more abstract than realistic.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally smooth but could be sharper.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and well-saturated, with good contrast that enhances the glowing elements.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, with the character centered and the glowing elements adding depth. However, the proportions of the character's body and the staff could be more balanced.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a good level of detail in the glowing elements and the staff, but the character's clothing and face lack fine details.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: No noticeable artifacts or noise are present.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has potential but needs refinement in the facial details and proportions. The character's face should have clearer features and a more natural contour to improve the overall quality. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e47689760c0d.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f6d7789ebf35.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f6d7789ebf35/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f6d7789ebf35/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f6d7789ebf35/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f6d7789ebf35/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f6d7789ebf35/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744796.3286958, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image lacks a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality and appeal of the image.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image lacks a face, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face significantly impacts the overall quality and appeal of the image.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual impact.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic and engaging, but the lack of a face prevents a full assessment of proportions.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the clothing and accessories.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks a face, which is typically the primary focus in anime-style illustrations, the overall quality is impacted. The absence of facial features makes it difficult to assess the image comprehensively. Therefore, I would recommend regeneration to include a face, ensuring that all aspects of the image can be evaluated properly.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f6d7789ebf35.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a505a32fc79e.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a505a32fc79e/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a505a32fc79e/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a505a32fc79e/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a505a32fc79e/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/a505a32fc79e/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744809.5195558, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\n- The character's face is not fully visible due to the silhouette, so it's difficult to assess facial details.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical but lack detail as they are not clearly defined.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth are not discernible due to the silhouette.\n- The facial contour seems natural from what can be seen, but the lack of detail makes it hard to confirm.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the dramatic effect.\n- Composition and proportions: Strong, with a dynamic composition that draws the viewer's eye to the central building.\n- Level of detail richness: Moderate, with rich details in the castle and the sky, but the silhouette limits the visibility of finer details on the character.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a high-quality overall composition and color scheme, which is impressive. However, the lack of visible facial details prevents a higher score. Since the primary focus should be on the character's face, especially in high-end customer satisfaction, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with more detailed facial features.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/a505a32fc79e.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cfeb6456c837.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cfeb6456c837/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cfeb6456c837/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cfeb6456c837/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cfeb6456c837/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cfeb6456c837/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744822.8515363, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of facial features significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of facial features significantly impacts the overall quality assessment.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with warm, inviting colors that enhance the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character centered and the architectural elements framing the scene effectively.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the character's attire and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the absence of facial details, which are crucial for assessing the primary focus of character quality, the image cannot be fully evaluated. Therefore, regeneration is recommended to include a visible face for a comprehensive analysis.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cfeb6456c837.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1629bc02c847.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1629bc02c847/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1629bc02c847/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1629bc02c847/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1629bc02c847/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1629bc02c847/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744836.2162218, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible as it is cut off at the top of the image.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The proportions and contours are not applicable since the face is not shown.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack detail due to the absence of facial features.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant, but the lack of facial details makes it difficult to assess the overall impact.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is focused on the lower part of the body, which is unusual and does not provide a complete picture.\n- Level of detail richness: The image lacks detail, especially in the areas where facial features would be located.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are apparent.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the parts that are visible.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image should be regenerated to include the character's face, ensuring that facial details, symmetry, and proportions are correctly depicted. The focus should be on creating a complete and balanced image that showcases the character's features clearly.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1629bc02c847.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cd4ea1e23a65.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4ea1e23a65/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4ea1e23a65/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4ea1e23a65/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4ea1e23a65/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cd4ea1e23a65/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744849.328063, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the provided image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The hands are the primary focus, but they lack fine details that would typically be present in a high-quality anime-style illustration.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined, indicating good quality.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is appropriate, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered on the hands, which is effective for the intended focus, but lacks the complexity needed for a full character illustration.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich enough for the hands, but the absence of facial features limits the overall richness.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise in the image.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the content shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the image. However, based on the visible elements, the image quality is satisfactory. If the goal is to create a high-end anime-style illustration with a full character, the image needs to include the face and more intricate details. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nTo improve the overall quality, regenerate the image with a full character, including the face, and ensure that all facial features are clear, well-defined, and proportionate.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cd4ea1e23a65.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5da8a2df8f1f.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5da8a2df8f1f/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5da8a2df8f1f/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5da8a2df8f1f/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5da8a2df8f1f/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5da8a2df8f1f/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744862.5413313, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible due to the angle and lighting, making it impossible to assess facial details.\n- The lack of a visible face prevents evaluation of symmetry, detail, proportions, and natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth but lack definition due to the lack of a visible face.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are warm and have good contrast, but the lack of a visible face limits color assessment.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition seems abstract, but without a visible face, proportions cannot be evaluated.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a rich texture, but again, the lack of a visible face limits detail assessment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise are visible.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the abstract nature of the image.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: Since the face is not visible, the image cannot be evaluated properly. It would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a visible face to ensure that all facial qualities meet the required standards.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5da8a2df8f1f.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ae51a444a779.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ae51a444a779/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ae51a444a779/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ae51a444a779/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ae51a444a779/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ae51a444a779/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744875.7121725, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not fully visible, which makes it difficult to assess facial details.\n- The eyes appear somewhat simplified and lack intricate detailing.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem slightly off, particularly the nose, which appears too small relative to the face.\n- The facial contour is generally natural but lacks the fine detailing that would make it more lifelike.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, with clean edges and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a pleasant visual experience.\n- Composition and proportions are decent, though the focus on hands might detract from the overall balance if the face were fully visible.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the hands and clothing textures.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a good overall quality, but the lack of a fully visible face prevents a higher score. If the goal is to satisfy high-end customers who value facial detail, regenerating the image with a more detailed face would be beneficial. However, the current image is still suitable for many purposes and can be used as-is for other aspects of the artwork.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ae51a444a779.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/177ba7c1c9b6.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/177ba7c1c9b6/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/177ba7c1c9b6/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/177ba7c1c9b6/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/177ba7c1c9b6/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/177ba7c1c9b6/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744888.9591875, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The facial details are somewhat lacking in definition, especially around the eyes and mouth.\n- The eyes appear slightly asymmetrical.\n- The nose and mouth proportions seem a bit off, particularly the size and placement.\n- There are minor areas where the facial contours are not entirely natural, such as the cheeks and jawline.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, though there could be slight improvements in edge definition.\n- Color saturation and contrast are well-balanced, creating a vibrant yet realistic cityscape.\n- The composition is strong, with a good balance between the characters and the urban background.\n- The level of detail is rich, especially in the cityscape and signage.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the intended use.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a good overall quality but could benefit from more refined facial details. The character faces could be improved by enhancing the eye definition, ensuring symmetry, and adjusting the proportions of the nose and mouth. These refinements would make the faces more lifelike and appealing to high-end customers.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/177ba7c1c9b6.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1eec3eb36e76.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1eec3eb36e76/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1eec3eb36e76/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1eec3eb36e76/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1eec3eb36e76/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1eec3eb36e76/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744902.1069672, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The hands are the primary focus of the image, so the absence of facial details does not significantly impact the overall quality. However, the hands appear slightly blurry, which affects the sharpness and detail. The lighting on the hands also seems uneven, creating some shadows that could be improved for better definition.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The hands are the primary focus of the image, so the absence of facial details does not significantly impact the overall quality. However, the hands appear slightly blurry, which affects the sharpness and detail. The lighting on the hands also seems uneven, creating some shadows that could be improved for better definition.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally clear but have some softness, especially around the edges of the hands.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and well-saturated, particularly the green hues in the background, which add depth to the image.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is balanced, with the hands positioned centrally and the forest background providing a good contrast.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the hands and the glowing symbol, which adds a magical element to the scene.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be high, as the details in the hands and the background are quite sharp.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a good balance of color and composition, but the slight blurriness in the hands could be improved. Since the hands are the main focus, enhancing their sharpness would significantly improve the overall quality. Therefore, I recommend regenerating the image with a sharper focus on the hands.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1eec3eb36e76.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/85e1bf5db755.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/85e1bf5db755/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/85e1bf5db755/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/85e1bf5db755/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/85e1bf5db755/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/85e1bf5db755/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744915.2587729, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image appears to be focused on the lower body, so it's difficult to assess the facial quality directly. However, the absence of a face means we cannot evaluate facial details such as symmetry, proportion, or natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image appears to be focused on the lower body, so it's difficult to assess the facial quality directly. However, the absence of a face means we cannot evaluate facial details such as symmetry, proportion, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with a warm color palette that enhances the skin tones.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is effective, focusing on the curves and details of the lower body, which is appropriate for the subject matter.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the skin texture and shading.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image is focused on the lower body and lacks a face, the overall quality is still quite good. However, if the intention was to include a face, the lack of facial details significantly impacts the quality. For high-end customers who might expect a complete character, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a face included.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/85e1bf5db755.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/c75c52e68a51.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c75c52e68a51/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c75c52e68a51/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c75c52e68a51/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c75c52e68a51/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c75c52e68a51/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744928.587784, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and motion blur, making it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a clear view of the face prevents a thorough evaluation.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and motion blur, making it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a clear view of the face prevents a thorough evaluation.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are generally smooth and well-defined, especially around the character's body and clothing.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is strong, creating a striking visual effect.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is dynamic and engaging, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background adding depth.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, particularly in the character's hair and the surrounding environment.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n\nGiven that the primary focus should be on the character's face, which is not visible in this image, a regeneration is recommended to ensure the face is properly rendered and evaluated.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/c75c52e68a51.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/372f2310d690.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/372f2310d690/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/372f2310d690/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/372f2310d690/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/372f2310d690/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/372f2310d690/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744941.6760252, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show the characters' faces, so we cannot evaluate facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features is a significant drawback for character-focused analysis.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show the characters' faces, so we cannot evaluate facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of facial features is a significant drawback for character-focused analysis.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with a balanced focus on the characters' lower bodies and a beautiful background.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich textures in the clothing and flowers, as well as a detailed background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of facial details, which are crucial for character quality assessment, the image would benefit from regeneration to include the faces of the characters. This would allow for a more comprehensive evaluation of the image's quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/372f2310d690.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/04cf5061cdbf.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04cf5061cdbf/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04cf5061cdbf/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04cf5061cdbf/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04cf5061cdbf/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/04cf5061cdbf/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744954.882117, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the helmet and armor covering it completely. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the helmet and armor covering it completely. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual impact.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the composition effectively conveying movement and action.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the armor and weapon, as well as the dynamic background elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of visible facial features, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall quality of the image is strong, and the technical aspects are excellent. The absence of the face prevents a full assessment, which is why a regeneration is recommended.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/04cf5061cdbf.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9f72b168b3f8.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9f72b168b3f8/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9f72b168b3f8/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9f72b168b3f8/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9f72b168b3f8/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/9f72b168b3f8/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744968.0719013, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are high.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and dynamic.\n- The level of detail richness is good, especially in the wings and the character's outfit.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and vibrant colors. However, the absence of facial features (eyes, nose, mouth) makes it difficult to assess the face quality comprehensively. If the character's face were included, the face quality would be even better.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face quality cannot be fully assessed due to the lack of facial features, I would suggest regenerating the image with a more detailed face to ensure the highest quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/9f72b168b3f8.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/791aba7167ea.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/791aba7167ea/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/791aba7167ea/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/791aba7167ea/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/791aba7167ea/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/791aba7167ea/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744981.191906, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible as it is obscured by the character's body.\n- The lack of facial features makes it impossible to assess the symmetry, detail, proportion, and natural contour.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the futuristic theme.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with the character positioned dynamically against the urban backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the character's suit and the background elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it is challenging to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, the overall image quality is high, and the technical aspects are sound. If the goal is to focus on the character's appearance, regenerating the image with a visible face would be beneficial.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/791aba7167ea.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f16810634939.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f16810634939/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f16810634939/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f16810634939/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f16810634939/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/f16810634939/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753744994.3044977, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours.\n- The image appears to be focused on the lower body, which means there are no facial features to evaluate.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear somewhat smooth but lack fine detail, especially in the areas that should have more definition.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted, and the contrast is low, making the image less vibrant.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition seems to focus on the lower body, which is unusual for a character portrait. The proportions of the lower body parts look somewhat exaggerated.\n- Level of detail richness: There is a lack of fine detail, particularly in the skin texture and clothing folds.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No obvious artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no apparent generation errors.\n- The resolution appears adequate for the content shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image does not contain any facial features, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, based on the other aspects, the image could benefit from more detail and better color vibrancy. It might be useful to regenerate the image with a focus on the upper body or face if that is the intended subject matter.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/f16810634939.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1ee1f7f74cc3.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1ee1f7f74cc3/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1ee1f7f74cc3/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1ee1f7f74cc3/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1ee1f7f74cc3/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/1ee1f7f74cc3/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745007.3997679, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the glowing effect, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a visible face prevents a thorough evaluation.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the glowing effect, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a visible face prevents a thorough evaluation.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the composition drawing the viewer's eye upwards towards the glowing effect.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the background and the glowing effect adding depth to the scene.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the absence of a visible face, the image cannot be fully evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall composition and technical aspects are strong, warranting a high score despite the missing face assessment.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/1ee1f7f74cc3.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/fa545a1f0cf9.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fa545a1f0cf9/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fa545a1f0cf9/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fa545a1f0cf9/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fa545a1f0cf9/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fa545a1f0cf9/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745020.500747, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not fully visible, which makes it difficult to assess facial details.\n- The eyes appear somewhat symmetrical but lack fine detail.\n- The nose and mouth proportions seem slightly off, particularly the mouth area.\n- There are some blurry areas around the hair and facial features, which detract from the overall clarity.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are decent but could be improved.\n- Color saturation is good, but there is a slight lack of contrast in certain areas.\n- Composition seems off due to the partial view of the character and the focus on the lower body.\n- Detail richness is moderate, but the lack of facial detail affects the overall richness.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nThe image has potential but suffers from a lack of facial detail and proportion accuracy. A full face view would allow for a more thorough assessment of the character's features. Additionally, refining the composition and ensuring better line clarity and contrast would enhance the overall quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/fa545a1f0cf9.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e790e4cd5137.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e790e4cd5137/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e790e4cd5137/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e790e4cd5137/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e790e4cd5137/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e790e4cd5137/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745033.7432833, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours.\n- The image appears to be focused on the lower part of the body, which does not provide enough information to evaluate the face quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image should be regenerated with a focus on including the face to allow for a proper assessment of the character's facial features and overall quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e790e4cd5137.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/342c8fb3d05d.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/342c8fb3d05d/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/342c8fb3d05d/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/342c8fb3d05d/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/342c8fb3d05d/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/342c8fb3d05d/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745046.9965088, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is mostly obscured by the hood, making it difficult to assess facial details.\n- The eyes are visible but lack depth and detail, appearing somewhat flat.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth are not clearly defined due to the hood and the angle of the face.\n- The facial contour is somewhat natural but lacks the sharpness and definition that would be expected in a high-quality illustration.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and good contrast between characters and the background.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the dramatic effect.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with both characters positioned effectively against the dynamic sky backdrop.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with detailed armor and weapons, as well as a richly textured background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a good overall quality with strong composition and vibrant colors. However, the lack of clear facial details and the obscured face make it challenging to fully appreciate the character design. For high-end customers, it might be beneficial to regenerate the image with more emphasis on facial details and a clearer view of the character's face to ensure a more engaging and polished final product.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/342c8fb3d05d.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2e8a5e7eb83c.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2e8a5e7eb83c/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2e8a5e7eb83c/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2e8a5e7eb83c/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2e8a5e7eb83c/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/2e8a5e7eb83c/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745060.2439814, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with the character centered and the background elements complementing the scene.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the wings, dress, and mushrooms.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent character design and a well-composed scene. However, the lack of facial features (eyes, nose, mouth) makes it difficult to assess the face quality fully. If the character's face were more detailed, the score could be even higher.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face quality is not fully evaluated due to the absence of facial features, I would suggest regenerating the image with a more detailed face to ensure the highest possible quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/2e8a5e7eb83c.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/79d461b22644.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79d461b22644/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79d461b22644/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79d461b22644/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79d461b22644/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79d461b22644/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745073.4431841, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face lacks clear facial details, making it difficult to discern features like the eyes, nose, and mouth. The eyes appear symmetrical but lack detail, and the proportions seem off due to the lack of visible facial features. The facial contour is not natural as the face appears flat without depth.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face lacks clear facial details, making it difficult to discern features like the eyes, nose, and mouth. The eyes appear symmetrical but lack detail, and the proportions seem off due to the lack of visible facial features. The facial contour is not natural as the face appears flat without depth.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical elements.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-composed, with the character centered and the forest background providing a good balance.\n- Level of detail richness: Rich, with detailed magical symbols and a well-rendered book.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation: While the image has good overall quality, the lack of facial details significantly impacts the character's presence. Regeneration could improve the facial features to make the character more engaging and detailed. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/79d461b22644.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e70a91d3214b.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e70a91d3214b/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e70a91d3214b/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e70a91d3214b/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e70a91d3214b/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e70a91d3214b/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745086.5093338, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image appears to be focused on a different part of the body rather than a character's face.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present in the image.\n- The proportions and contours of the body parts depicted are somewhat natural but lack the detail and refinement typically expected in a high-quality illustration.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are somewhat smooth but not particularly sharp or defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are somewhat muted and lack vibrancy.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition seems to focus on anatomical details rather than a complete figure, which is unusual for a typical anime-style illustration.\n- Level of detail richness: While the details are present, they are not rich enough to be considered high-quality.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No obvious artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no generation errors that are immediately apparent.\n- The resolution appears to be adequate for the level of detail shown.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nThe image does not meet the high standards expected for a professional illustration, especially when it comes to facial quality and overall composition. A regeneration focusing on a complete character with proper facial features would be necessary to achieve a higher score.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e70a91d3214b.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5d601a9b10ae.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d601a9b10ae/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d601a9b10ae/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d601a9b10ae/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d601a9b10ae/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5d601a9b10ae/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745099.6662338, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by a hood, making it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The lack of a visible face prevents a thorough evaluation of these aspects.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible as it is obscured by a hood, making it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and natural contours. The lack of a visible face prevents a thorough evaluation of these aspects.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the futuristic cityscape.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with a strong sense of depth and perspective leading the viewer's eye into the city.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the buildings, neon signs, and reflections in the wet streets.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe main issue is the absence of a visible face, which prevents a comprehensive assessment of the character's facial features. However, the overall image quality is strong, and the technical aspects are well-executed. A regeneration would be beneficial to include a fully visible character face for a more complete evaluation.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5d601a9b10ae.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/c63b13a7c3f9.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c63b13a7c3f9/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c63b13a7c3f9/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c63b13a7c3f9/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c63b13a7c3f9/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/c63b13a7c3f9/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745112.849322, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image does not show the faces of the characters, so it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the facial features. However, the absence of facial details does not affect the overall quality assessment.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image does not show the faces of the characters, so it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the facial features. However, the absence of facial details does not affect the overall quality assessment.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High. The lines are smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent. The colors are vibrant and the contrast is well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions: Good. The composition is balanced, and the proportions of the dresses and the background elements are well-matched.\n- Level of detail richness: High. There is a rich level of detail in the fabrics, flowers, and water fountain.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation: Since the image lacks facial details, which are crucial for character face quality, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with the faces included to ensure that the facial features meet the high standards expected by the customer. This will allow for a more comprehensive evaluation of the face quality and overall image quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/c63b13a7c3f9.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6536909c97a8.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6536909c97a8/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6536909c97a8/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6536909c97a8/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6536909c97a8/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6536909c97a8/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745125.798535, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The image lacks facial details as the face is not visible.\n- There are no eyes, nose, or mouth present, which makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportion, or natural contour.\n- The absence of facial features prevents a thorough evaluation of facial quality.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that make the image visually striking.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is centered and balanced, focusing on the upper body and hands.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the clothing and accessories.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are apparent.\n- No obvious generation errors are detected.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks facial details, which are crucial for assessing facial quality, the overall score is slightly lower than perfect. However, the technical aspects of the image are excellent. Given the importance of facial details in character design, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a visible face to ensure comprehensive quality assessment.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6536909c97a8.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cabd58b5185a.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cabd58b5185a/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cabd58b5185a/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cabd58b5185a/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cabd58b5185a/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/cabd58b5185a/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745138.968574, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the flowing hair covering it. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the flowing hair covering it. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and good contrast between the sky and the character's silhouette.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, with the character positioned prominently against the dramatic sky and mountains.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a rich level of detail, especially in the sky and the distant landscape.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears to be high, as the details in the sky and the distant landscape are clear.\n\nGiven that the primary focus of the image is on the character's face, which is not visible due to the artistic choice of framing, the overall quality is still quite high. However, the lack of facial detail prevents a perfect score.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/cabd58b5185a.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5e8a80e3a402.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5e8a80e3a402/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5e8a80e3a402/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5e8a80e3a402/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5e8a80e3a402/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5e8a80e3a402/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745152.2188745, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to evaluate. The lack of facial features makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to evaluate. The lack of facial features makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Moderate, with a cool color palette that fits the forest setting.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, with the character centered and the trees creating a sense of depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the forest and the glowing effects around the character.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe primary focus should be on revealing the character's face to provide a complete evaluation of the face quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5e8a80e3a402.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/953a2c82efc7.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/953a2c82efc7/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/953a2c82efc7/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/953a2c82efc7/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/953a2c82efc7/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/953a2c82efc7/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745165.3168612, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The eyes are not symmetrical; one eye appears slightly larger than the other.\n- The facial contour is somewhat unnatural, especially around the jawline and cheek area.\n- There are some blurry areas, particularly around the hair and facial features.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are decent but could be improved.\n- Color saturation is good, but there's a slight lack of contrast in certain areas.\n- Composition and proportions are generally correct, though the close-up nature of the image makes it challenging to assess fully.\n- The level of detail richness is moderate, with some areas appearing a bit flat.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution seems adequate for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has potential but requires some refinement in facial symmetry and contouring. The eyes need to be made more symmetrical, and the facial features should be adjusted to appear more natural. Given these issues, I would recommend regeneration to improve the overall quality.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/953a2c82efc7.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b9bdb92b1252.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b9bdb92b1252/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b9bdb92b1252/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b9bdb92b1252/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b9bdb92b1252/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b9bdb92b1252/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745178.5020487, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The character's face is not visible due to the long hair covering it.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The absence of facial features makes it impossible to assess symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and good contrast between the character and the background.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Black and white, which is appropriate for the style but lacks color information.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is strong, with the character centered and the forest background providing depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details on the character's clothing and weapons.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- No obvious generation errors are visible.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the character's face is not visible, it is impossible to provide a meaningful assessment of the face quality. However, the overall image quality is quite good, and the technical aspects are satisfactory. Given that the primary focus should be on the character's face, regeneration would be necessary to include a visible face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b9bdb92b1252.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/8c88770b9e1e.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8c88770b9e1e/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8c88770b9e1e/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8c88770b9e1e/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8c88770b9e1e/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/8c88770b9e1e/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745191.5357513, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The absence of the face makes it difficult to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with vibrant colors and appropriate contrast.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the upper body and arms of the characters.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the clothing and accessories.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears to be sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the visible parts of the image, the overall quality is good. The absence of the face makes it difficult to determine if the image meets the high standards expected by high-end customers. Therefore, I would recommend regenerating the image to include the faces of the characters.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/8c88770b9e1e.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0bd0f6537508.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0bd0f6537508/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0bd0f6537508/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0bd0f6537508/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0bd0f6537508/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0bd0f6537508/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745204.7760751, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not contain a character's face; therefore, it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents a comprehensive assessment of the character's features.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not contain a character's face; therefore, it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. However, the absence of a face is a significant issue as it prevents a comprehensive assessment of the character's features.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no visible blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant neon colors that create a striking cyberpunk atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with a strong focus on the character's legs and the urban environment.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the character's suit and the cityscape.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks a character's face, it cannot be evaluated for facial quality. However, the overall image quality is high, and the technical aspects are sound. Given the absence of a face, the image may not meet the expectations of customers looking for a complete character design. Therefore, I would recommend regenerating the image to include a character's face while maintaining the current aesthetic and technical quality.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0bd0f6537508.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ab6efa59cf2b.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ab6efa59cf2b/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ab6efa59cf2b/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ab6efa59cf2b/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ab6efa59cf2b/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ab6efa59cf2b/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745217.9666808, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the large wings covering it, making it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and contour. The lack of a visible face prevents a thorough evaluation of these aspects.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the large wings covering it, making it impossible to assess facial details such as symmetry, proportion, and contour. The lack of a visible face prevents a thorough evaluation of these aspects.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with a harmonious arrangement of elements and a good sense of depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the flora, cityscape, and character's attire.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nThe primary issue is the absence of the character's face, which is crucial for evaluating facial quality. Since the face cannot be assessed, the overall score is slightly reduced from a perfect 10. However, the rest of the image is of high quality, and regeneration would likely improve the face quality significantly.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ab6efa59cf2b.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0fa9614c4d0d.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0fa9614c4d0d/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0fa9614c4d0d/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0fa9614c4d0d/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0fa9614c4d0d/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/0fa9614c4d0d/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745231.1949704, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood, which prevents any assessment of facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of a visible face makes it impossible to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood, which prevents any assessment of facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours. The lack of a visible face makes it impossible to determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and smooth transitions.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Good, with a balanced use of light and shadow that enhances the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background providing a strong sense of depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate patterns on the robe and glowing mushrooms adding to the visual interest.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the primary focus of the image is the character, and the face is not visible, the overall quality is still quite good. However, the lack of facial details significantly impacts the ability to assess the image comprehensively. For high-end customers who might be interested in the character's appearance, it would be beneficial to regenerate the image with a visible face to ensure satisfaction.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/0fa9614c4d0d.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/fb49c32e6158.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fb49c32e6158/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fb49c32e6158/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fb49c32e6158/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fb49c32e6158/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/fb49c32e6158/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745244.5134096, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 4, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 4/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image appears to be missing a face entirely, which is a significant issue for a character-focused image.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The proportions and contours that would typically define a face are not visible.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness cannot be assessed as there is no face to evaluate.\n- Color saturation and contrast are not applicable since there is no face to observe.\n- Composition and proportions cannot be evaluated due to the absence of a face.\n- Detail richness is non-existent because there is no face to assess.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no artifacts or noise present in the image.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution seems adequate for the content provided, but it is insufficient for a detailed face.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nThe image does not meet the requirements for a high-quality character illustration due to the complete absence of a face. A regeneration is necessary to include a properly rendered face with clear details and proper proportions.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/fb49c32e6158.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5fb14eedec34.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5fb14eedec34/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5fb14eedec34/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5fb14eedec34/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5fb14eedec34/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/5fb14eedec34/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745257.5971105, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The image does not show the character's face at all, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. The absence of a face makes it impossible to assess these aspects.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The image does not show the character's face at all, so it cannot be evaluated for facial details, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours. The absence of a face makes it impossible to assess these aspects.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is appropriate for the sunset scene.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is visually appealing, with the flowing fabric and sunset creating a dynamic and engaging scene.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail in the fabric and the sunset is rich and adds to the overall quality of the image.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: There are no obvious generation errors; the image appears to be a high-quality illustration.\n- Resolution: The resolution seems adequate for the level of detail present in the image.\n\nSince the image lacks a face, which is typically the primary focus in character illustrations, the overall quality is still quite good due to the other positive aspects mentioned. However, if the intention was to showcase a character's face, this image would need to be regenerated to include one.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/5fb14eedec34.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ed01802379ee.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ed01802379ee/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ed01802379ee/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ed01802379ee/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ed01802379ee/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/ed01802379ee/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745270.725655, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the character's pose, which obscures the face entirely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and the character's pose, which obscures the face entirely. This makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is visually striking, with a strong central focus on the glowing center and the character's dynamic pose.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate patterns and a richly detailed background.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of visibility of the character's face, which is crucial for assessing facial quality, the image cannot be rated fully without this information. Therefore, regeneration is recommended to ensure the character's face is clearly visible and can be evaluated properly.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/ed01802379ee.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/eebee8d0c522.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/eebee8d0c522/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/eebee8d0c522/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/eebee8d0c522/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/eebee8d0c522/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/eebee8d0c522/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745283.9148932, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The image lacks facial details, making it difficult to assess the symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face. The hands and clothing details are more prominent than the faces, which are partially obscured by the arms.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The image lacks facial details, making it difficult to assess the symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face. The hands and clothing details are more prominent than the faces, which are partially obscured by the arms.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no visible artifacts.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with warm, vibrant colors that enhance the sunset background.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, focusing on the hands and dresses, but the faces are not fully visible.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with rich textures in the dresses and hands.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation: While the image has good technical qualities and a pleasing composition, the lack of facial details significantly impacts the overall quality. Regenerating the image with clearer facial features would improve the score and meet higher customer expectations.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/eebee8d0c522.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/039c11b44940.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039c11b44940/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039c11b44940/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039c11b44940/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039c11b44940/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/039c11b44940/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745297.0203114, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- Facial details are clear and well-defined.\n- The eyes are symmetrical and detailed.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth appear correct.\n- The facial contour looks natural.\n- There are no blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are excellent.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant and well-balanced.\n- Composition and proportions are well-executed, with a strong central focus on the character.\n- The level of detail richness is high, especially in the wings and the background elements.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No visible artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for high-quality viewing.\n\nOverall, the image is of high quality with excellent detail and vibrant colors. However, the absence of facial features (eyes, nose, mouth) makes it difficult to assess the face quality comprehensively. If the face were included, the score could potentially be higher.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not present, I would suggest regenerating the image with a more complete face to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of the face quality. \n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/039c11b44940.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/286c82ae3341.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/286c82ae3341/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/286c82ae3341/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/286c82ae3341/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/286c82ae3341/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/286c82ae3341/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745310.1012874, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 6, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 6/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues:\n- The image does not contain any facial features as it appears to be an abstract design.\n- There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth present.\n- The absence of facial elements makes it impossible to assess the symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are somewhat clear but lack definition due to the abstract nature of the image.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and have good contrast, which enhances the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is visually striking with a strong central focus, but the lack of recognizable elements makes it difficult to comment on proportions.\n- Level of detail richness: The image has a high level of detail in the abstract patterns, but this detail is not related to facial features.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no visible artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present.\n- Resolution: The resolution appears to be adequate for the level of detail shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the image lacks any facial features, it cannot be evaluated based on face quality. However, the abstract design is visually appealing and rich in detail. Given that the primary focus was on character face quality, the score reflects the absence of facial elements. If the intention was to create an abstract piece without faces, the current score is appropriate. If faces were intended, regeneration would be necessary.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/286c82ae3341.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6163d09d0e0d.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6163d09d0e0d/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6163d09d0e0d/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6163d09d0e0d/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6163d09d0e0d/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/6163d09d0e0d/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745323.3458247, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Good", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Good\n- The character's face is not fully visible due to the angle and the long hair covering most of it.\n- However, the visible parts of the face (nose and mouth area) appear proportionate and natural.\n- The eyes are not clearly defined as they are obscured by the hair.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with smooth lines and no noticeable blurriness.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with a strong blue tone that enhances the mystical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest background adding depth.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the forest and the character's attire.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nRecommendation:\nThe image has a high-quality composition and rich details, but the lack of visible facial features prevents a perfect score. Since the primary focus is on the character, regenerating the image to ensure the face is more visible would be beneficial.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/6163d09d0e0d.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e1f59a6f3f55.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e1f59a6f3f55/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e1f59a6f3f55/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e1f59a6f3f55/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e1f59a6f3f55/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/e1f59a6f3f55/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745336.5558782, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to assess their clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the hood covering it completely. There are no facial details, eyes, nose, or mouth to assess their clarity, symmetry, proportions, or natural contours.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines are somewhat clear but lack sharpness, especially around the edges of the trees and plants.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are muted, with a predominantly blue and gray tone, which gives a calm but somewhat dull atmosphere. The contrast is low, making the scene appear less vibrant.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition is well-balanced, with the character positioned centrally and the forest extending symmetrically on both sides. However, the proportions of the trees and plants could be more varied to add depth and interest.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich in the background elements like the trees and plants, but the foreground lacks fine details that would make it more engaging.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- Artifacts or noise: There are no noticeable artifacts or noise in the image.\n- Generation errors: No obvious generation errors are present, but the lack of facial details makes it difficult to assess the overall quality comprehensively.\n\nGiven the absence of facial details, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall composition and background details are strong points, which contribute to the image's quality. The lack of facial features and the need for more detail in the foreground suggest that regeneration might improve the image significantly.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/e1f59a6f3f55.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/79b521cc0776.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79b521cc0776/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79b521cc0776/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79b521cc0776/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79b521cc0776/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/79b521cc0776/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745349.778173, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\n- The character's face is not fully visible due to the angle and reflection, making it difficult to assess facial details.\n- The eyes appear symmetrical but lack fine detail.\n- The proportions of the nose and mouth seem correct based on the visible parts.\n- The facial contour looks natural from what can be seen.\n- There are no noticeable blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness are good, especially in the reflections and neon lights.\n- Color saturation and contrast are vibrant, enhancing the futuristic cityscape.\n- Composition and proportions are well-balanced, with the character centered and the reflections adding depth.\n- The level of detail richness is high, particularly in the neon signs and wet street reflections.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No apparent artifacts or noise are present.\n- There are no obvious generation errors.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail shown.\n\nOverall, the image has a high-quality aesthetic with strong visual appeal. However, the lack of a full view of the character's face prevents a higher score. The recommendation would be to regenerate the image with a clearer view of the character's face to ensure facial quality meets the high standards expected by the customer.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/79b521cc0776.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/df1a1e763130.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/df1a1e763130/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/df1a1e763130/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/df1a1e763130/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/df1a1e763130/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/df1a1e763130/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745362.7757697, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues:\n- The face is not visible in the image, so it's impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours.\n- The lack of a visible face means we cannot determine if there are any blurry, distorted, or unnatural areas.\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: The lines appear smooth and well-defined.\n- Color saturation and contrast: The colors are vibrant and the contrast is good, enhancing the visual appeal.\n- Composition and proportions: The composition seems intentional, focusing on the hands and the background elements, which adds depth to the image.\n- Level of detail richness: The level of detail is rich, especially in the background flowers and the texture of the hands.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- There are no apparent artifacts or noise.\n- No obvious generation errors are present.\n- The resolution appears sufficient for the content shown.\n\nRecommendation:\nSince the face is not visible, it's impossible to provide a comprehensive assessment of the face quality. However, based on the visible parts of the image, the overall quality is good. The recommendation would be to regenerate the image to include a visible face for a more accurate evaluation.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/df1a1e763130.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b4b8600d10b4.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b4b8600d10b4/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b4b8600d10b4/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b4b8600d10b4/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b4b8600d10b4/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/b4b8600d10b4/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745376.038316, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Poor", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluating the clarity and sharpness of lines, color saturation, and composition.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Poor\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible in the image, which makes it impossible to assess facial details, symmetry, proportions, and contours. The lack of a face also prevents evaluating the clarity and sharpness of lines, color saturation, and composition.\n\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nRecommendation: The image should be regenerated to include a visible face for a comprehensive analysis of the character's facial features and overall quality. Additionally, the regenerate should ensure that the character's face is well-defined, symmetrical, and proportionate to maintain the high standards expected by high-end customers.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/b4b8600d10b4.png" + } + }, + { + "original_image": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/3f71ac08ff35.png", + "candidates": [ + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3f71ac08ff35/candidate_1.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3f71ac08ff35/candidate_2.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3f71ac08ff35/candidate_3.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3f71ac08ff35/candidate_4.png", + "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/candidates/3f71ac08ff35/candidate_5.png" + ], + "generation_timestamp": 1753745389.3573754, + "original_assessment": { + "score": 8, + "face_quality": "Average", + "issues": "The character's face is not visible due to the angle and distance from which the image was taken. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.", + "needs_regeneration": true, + "raw_response": "Score: 8/10\n\nFace Quality: Average\nMain Issues: The character's face is not visible due to the angle and distance from which the image was taken. Therefore, it's impossible to assess the clarity, symmetry, proportions, and natural contours of the face.\nNeeds Regeneration: Yes\n\nOverall Image Quality:\n- Line clarity and sharpness: High, with clean lines and no noticeable blurring.\n- Color saturation and contrast: Excellent, with vibrant colors and strong contrasts that enhance the magical atmosphere.\n- Composition and proportions: Strong, with a balanced composition that draws the viewer's eye to the central floating island and the glowing orb.\n- Level of detail richness: High, with intricate details in the floating island, the glowing orb, and the characters' garments.\n\nTechnical Issues:\n- No artifacts or noise observed.\n- No obvious generation errors detected.\n- Resolution appears sufficient for the level of detail present.\n\nGiven the lack of visibility of the character's face, the image cannot be fully evaluated for face quality. However, the overall composition, color, and technical aspects are of high quality, warranting a score of 8/10. For a complete evaluation, the image should be regenerated with a clearer view of the character's face.", + "image_path": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/illustrious_generated/3f71ac08ff35.png" + } + } +] \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/peft/.gitignore b/peft/.gitignore new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4e3e2ca5fc7e93d32d06e8e1a696925c3eaac60d --- /dev/null +++ b/peft/.gitignore @@ -0,0 +1,145 @@ +# Byte-compiled / optimized / DLL files +__pycache__/ +*.py[cod] +*$py.class + +# C extensions +*.so + +# Distribution / packaging +.Python +build/ +develop-eggs/ +dist/ +downloads/ +eggs/ +.eggs/ +lib/ +lib64/ +parts/ +sdist/ +var/ +wheels/ +pip-wheel-metadata/ +share/python-wheels/ +*.egg-info/ +.installed.cfg +*.egg +MANIFEST + +# PyInstaller +# Usually these files are written by a python script from a template +# before PyInstaller builds the exe, so as to inject date/other infos into it. +*.manifest +*.spec + +# Installer logs +pip-log.txt +pip-delete-this-directory.txt + +# Unit test / coverage reports +htmlcov/ +.tox/ +.nox/ +.coverage +.coverage.* +.cache +nosetests.xml +coverage.xml +*.cover +*.py,cover +.hypothesis/ +.pytest_cache/ + +# Translations +*.mo +*.pot + +# Django stuff: +*.log +local_settings.py +db.sqlite3 +db.sqlite3-journal + +# Flask stuff: +instance/ +.webassets-cache + +# Scrapy stuff: +.scrapy + +# Sphinx documentation +docs/_build/ + +# PyBuilder +target/ + +# Jupyter Notebook +.ipynb_checkpoints + +# IPython +profile_default/ +ipython_config.py + +# pyenv +.python-version + +# pipenv +# According to pypa/pipenv#598, it is recommended to include Pipfile.lock in version control. +# However, in case of collaboration, if having platform-specific dependencies or dependencies +# having no cross-platform support, pipenv may install dependencies that don't work, or not +# install all needed dependencies. +#Pipfile.lock + +# PEP 582; used by e.g. github.com/David-OConnor/pyflow +__pypackages__/ + +# Celery stuff +celerybeat-schedule +celerybeat.pid + +# SageMath parsed files +*.sage.py + +# Environments +.env +.venv +env/ +venv/ +ENV/ +env.bak/ +venv.bak/ + +# Spyder project settings +.spyderproject +.spyproject + +# Rope project settings +.ropeproject + +# mkdocs documentation +/site + +# mypy +.mypy_cache/ +.dmypy.json +dmypy.json + +# Pyre type checker +.pyre/ + +# VSCode +.vscode + +# IntelliJ +.idea + +# Mac .DS_Store +.DS_Store + +# More test things +wandb + +# method_comparison logs +method_comparison/MetaMathQA/cancelled_results/ +method_comparison/MetaMathQA/temporary_results/ diff --git a/peft/.pre-commit-config.yaml b/peft/.pre-commit-config.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..975717af6ab9e51c4e791442a8bc415a514e36ae --- /dev/null +++ b/peft/.pre-commit-config.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +repos: + - repo: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit + rev: v0.9.2 + hooks: + - id: ruff + args: + - --fix + - id: ruff-format + - repo: https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks + rev: v4.6.0 + hooks: + - id: check-merge-conflict + - id: check-yaml diff --git a/peft/LICENSE b/peft/LICENSE new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..261eeb9e9f8b2b4b0d119366dda99c6fd7d35c64 --- /dev/null +++ b/peft/LICENSE @@ -0,0 +1,201 @@ + Apache License + Version 2.0, January 2004 + http://www.apache.org/licenses/ + + TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION + + 1. Definitions. + + "License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction, + and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document. + + "Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by + the copyright owner that is granting the License. + + "Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all + other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common + control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition, + "control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the + direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or + otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the + outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity. + + "You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity + exercising permissions granted by this License. + + "Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications, + including but not limited to software source code, documentation + source, and configuration files. + + "Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical + transformation or translation of a Source form, including but + not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation, + and conversions to other media types. + + "Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or + Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a + copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work + (an example is provided in the Appendix below). + + "Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object + form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the + editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications + represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes + of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain + separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of, + the Work and Derivative Works thereof. + + "Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including + the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions + to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally + submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner + or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of + the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted" + means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent + to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to + communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems, + and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the + Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but + excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise + designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution." + + "Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity + on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and + subsequently incorporated within the Work. + + 2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of + this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, + worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable + copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of, + publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the + Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form. + + 3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of + this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, + worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable + (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made, + use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work, + where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable + by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their + Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s) + with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You + institute patent litigation against any entity (including a + cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work + or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct + or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses + granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate + as of the date such litigation is filed. + + 4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the + Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without + modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You + meet the following conditions: + + (a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or + Derivative Works a copy of this License; and + + (b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices + stating that You changed the files; and + + (c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works + that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and + attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, + excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of + the Derivative Works; and + + (d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its + distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must + include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained + within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not + pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one + of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed + as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or + documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or, + within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and + wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents + of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and + do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution + notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside + or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided + that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed + as modifying the License. + + You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and + may provide additional or different license terms and conditions + for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or + for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use, + reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with + the conditions stated in this License. + + 5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise, + any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work + by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of + this License, without any additional terms or conditions. + Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify + the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed + with Licensor regarding such Contributions. + + 6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade + names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor, + except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the + origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file. + + 7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or + agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each + Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS, + WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or + implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions + of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A + PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the + appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any + risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License. + + 8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory, + whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise, + unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly + negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be + liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special, + incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a + result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the + Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill, + work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all + other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor + has been advised of the possibility of such damages. + + 9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing + the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer, + and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity, + or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this + License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only + on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf + of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify, + defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability + incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason + of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability. + + END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS + + APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work. + + To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following + boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]" + replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include + the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate + comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a + file or class name and description of purpose be included on the + same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier + identification within third-party archives. + + Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner] + + Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); + you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. + You may obtain a copy of the License at + + http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + + Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + limitations under the License. diff --git a/peft/Makefile b/peft/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..70ba4b7f8ed560394c341a7e19b1c4238cee6505 --- /dev/null +++ b/peft/Makefile @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +.PHONY: quality style test docs + +check_dirs := src tests examples docs scripts docker + +# Check that source code meets quality standards + +# this target runs checks on all files +quality: + ruff check $(check_dirs) + ruff format --check $(check_dirs) + doc-builder style src/peft tests docs/source --max_len 119 --check_only + +# Format source code automatically and check is there are any problems left that need manual fixing +style: + ruff check --fix $(check_dirs) + ruff format $(check_dirs) + doc-builder style src/peft tests docs/source --max_len 119 + +test: + python -m pytest -n 3 tests/ $(if $(IS_GITHUB_CI),--report-log "ci_tests.log",) + +tests_examples_multi_gpu: + python -m pytest -m multi_gpu_tests tests/test_gpu_examples.py $(if $(IS_GITHUB_CI),--report-log "multi_gpu_examples.log",) + +tests_examples_single_gpu: + python -m pytest -m single_gpu_tests tests/test_gpu_examples.py $(if $(IS_GITHUB_CI),--report-log "single_gpu_examples.log",) + +tests_core_multi_gpu: + python -m pytest -m multi_gpu_tests tests/test_common_gpu.py $(if $(IS_GITHUB_CI),--report-log "core_multi_gpu.log",) + +tests_core_single_gpu: + python -m pytest -m single_gpu_tests tests/test_common_gpu.py $(if $(IS_GITHUB_CI),--report-log "core_single_gpu.log",) + +# exclude gemma tests, as generation fails with torch.compile, these failures +# trigger side effects that make other tests fail with 'RuntimeError: Offset +# increment outside graph capture encountered unexpectedly.' +# TODO re-enable gemma once/if it is fixed +tests_common_gpu: + python -m pytest tests/test_decoder_models.py -k "not gemma" $(if $(IS_GITHUB_CI),--report-log "common_decoder.log",) + python -m pytest tests/test_encoder_decoder_models.py $(if $(IS_GITHUB_CI),--report-log "common_encoder_decoder.log",) + python -m pytest tests/test_gptqmodel.py $(if $(IS_GITHUB_CI),--report-log "gptqmodel_gpu.log",) + +tests_examples_multi_gpu_bnb: + python -m pytest -m "multi_gpu_tests and bitsandbytes" tests/test_gpu_examples.py $(if $(IS_GITHUB_CI),--report-log "multi_gpu_examples.log",) + +tests_examples_single_gpu_bnb: + python -m pytest -m "single_gpu_tests and bitsandbytes" tests/test_gpu_examples.py $(if $(IS_GITHUB_CI),--report-log "single_gpu_examples.log",) + +tests_core_multi_gpu_bnb: + python -m pytest -m "multi_gpu_tests and bitsandbytes" tests/test_common_gpu.py $(if $(IS_GITHUB_CI),--report-log "core_multi_gpu.log",) + +tests_core_single_gpu_bnb: + python -m pytest -m "single_gpu_tests and bitsandbytes" tests/test_common_gpu.py $(if $(IS_GITHUB_CI),--report-log "core_single_gpu.log",) + +tests_gpu_bnb_regression: + python -m pytest tests/bnb/test_bnb_regression.py $(if $(IS_GITHUB_CI),--report-log "bnb_regression_gpu.log",) + +# For testing transformers tests for bnb runners +transformers_tests: + RUN_SLOW=1 python -m pytest transformers-clone/tests/quantization/bnb $(if $(IS_GITHUB_CI),--report-log "transformers_tests.log",) + +tests_regression: + python -m pytest -s --regression tests/regression/ $(if $(IS_GITHUB_CI),--report-log "regression_tests.log",) + +tests_torch_compile: + python -m pytest tests/test_torch_compile.py $(if $(IS_GITHUB_CI),--report-log "compile_tests.log",) diff --git a/peft/README.md b/peft/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..60d28edaa0b104e3498e26d62a878c8fb1e098e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/peft/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,189 @@ + + +

🤗 PEFT

+

+

State-of-the-art Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods

+

+ +Fine-tuning large pretrained models is often prohibitively costly due to their scale. Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods enable efficient adaptation of large pretrained models to various downstream applications by only fine-tuning a small number of (extra) model parameters instead of all the model's parameters. This significantly decreases the computational and storage costs. Recent state-of-the-art PEFT techniques achieve performance comparable to fully fine-tuned models. + +PEFT is integrated with Transformers for easy model training and inference, Diffusers for conveniently managing different adapters, and Accelerate for distributed training and inference for really big models. + +> [!TIP] +> Visit the [PEFT](https://huggingface.co/PEFT) organization to read about the PEFT methods implemented in the library and to see notebooks demonstrating how to apply these methods to a variety of downstream tasks. Click the "Watch repos" button on the organization page to be notified of newly implemented methods and notebooks! + +Check the PEFT Adapters API Reference section for a list of supported PEFT methods, and read the [Adapters](https://huggingface.co/docs/peft/en/conceptual_guides/adapter), [Soft prompts](https://huggingface.co/docs/peft/en/conceptual_guides/prompting), and [IA3](https://huggingface.co/docs/peft/en/conceptual_guides/ia3) conceptual guides to learn more about how these methods work. + +## Quickstart + +Install PEFT from pip: + +```bash +pip install peft +``` + +Prepare a model for training with a PEFT method such as LoRA by wrapping the base model and PEFT configuration with `get_peft_model`. For the bigscience/mt0-large model, you're only training 0.19% of the parameters! + +```python +from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM +from peft import LoraConfig, TaskType, get_peft_model + +device = "cuda" +model_id = "Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct" +model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id, device_map=device) +peft_config = LoraConfig( + r=16, + lora_alpha=32, + task_type=TaskType.CAUSAL_LM, + # target_modules=["q_proj", "v_proj", ...] # optionally indicate target modules +) +model = get_peft_model(model, peft_config) +model.print_trainable_parameters() +# prints: trainable params: 3,686,400 || all params: 3,089,625,088 || trainable%: 0.1193 + +# now perform training on your dataset, e.g. using transformers Trainer, then save the model +model.save_pretrained("qwen2.5-3b-lora") +``` + +To load a PEFT model for inference: + +```python +from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer +from peft import PeftModel + +device = "cuda" +model_id = "Qwen/Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct" +tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id) +model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id, device_map=device) +model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(model, "qwen2.5-3b-lora") + +inputs = tokenizer("Preheat the oven to 350 degrees and place the cookie dough", return_tensors="pt") +outputs = model.generate(**inputs.to(device), max_new_tokens=50) +print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True)) + +# prints something like: Preheat the oven to 350 degrees and place the cookie dough in a baking dish [...] +``` + +## Why you should use PEFT + +There are many benefits of using PEFT but the main one is the huge savings in compute and storage, making PEFT applicable to many different use cases. + +### High performance on consumer hardware + +Consider the memory requirements for training the following models on the [ought/raft/twitter_complaints](https://huggingface.co/datasets/ought/raft/viewer/twitter_complaints) dataset with an A100 80GB GPU with more than 64GB of CPU RAM. + +| Model | Full Finetuning | PEFT-LoRA PyTorch | PEFT-LoRA DeepSpeed with CPU Offloading | +| --------- | ---- | ---- | ---- | +| bigscience/T0_3B (3B params) | 47.14GB GPU / 2.96GB CPU | 14.4GB GPU / 2.96GB CPU | 9.8GB GPU / 17.8GB CPU | +| bigscience/mt0-xxl (12B params) | OOM GPU | 56GB GPU / 3GB CPU | 22GB GPU / 52GB CPU | +| bigscience/bloomz-7b1 (7B params) | OOM GPU | 32GB GPU / 3.8GB CPU | 18.1GB GPU / 35GB CPU | + +With LoRA you can fully finetune a 12B parameter model that would've otherwise run out of memory on the 80GB GPU, and comfortably fit and train a 3B parameter model. When you look at the 3B parameter model's performance, it is comparable to a fully finetuned model at a fraction of the GPU memory. + +| Submission Name | Accuracy | +| --------- | ---- | +| Human baseline (crowdsourced) | 0.897 | +| Flan-T5 | 0.892 | +| lora-t0-3b | 0.863 | + +> [!TIP] +> The bigscience/T0_3B model performance isn't optimized in the table above. You can squeeze even more performance out of it by playing around with the input instruction templates, LoRA hyperparameters, and other training related hyperparameters. The final checkpoint size of this model is just 19MB compared to 11GB of the full bigscience/T0_3B model. Learn more about the advantages of finetuning with PEFT in this [blog post](https://www.philschmid.de/fine-tune-flan-t5-peft). + +### Quantization + +Quantization is another method for reducing the memory requirements of a model by representing the data in a lower precision. It can be combined with PEFT methods to make it even easier to train and load LLMs for inference. + +* Learn how to finetune [meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf](https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-2-7b-hf) with QLoRA and the [TRL](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/index) library on a 16GB GPU in the [Finetune LLMs on your own consumer hardware using tools from PyTorch and Hugging Face ecosystem](https://pytorch.org/blog/finetune-llms/) blog post. +* Learn how to finetune a [openai/whisper-large-v2](https://huggingface.co/openai/whisper-large-v2) model for multilingual automatic speech recognition with LoRA and 8-bit quantization in this [notebook](https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1DOkD_5OUjFa0r5Ik3SgywJLJtEo2qLxO?usp=sharing) (see this [notebook](https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1vhF8yueFqha3Y3CpTHN6q9EVcII9EYzs?usp=sharing) instead for an example of streaming a dataset). + +### Save compute and storage + +PEFT can help you save storage by avoiding full finetuning of models on each of downstream task or dataset. In many cases, you're only finetuning a very small fraction of a model's parameters and each checkpoint is only a few MBs in size (instead of GBs). These smaller PEFT adapters demonstrate performance comparable to a fully finetuned model. If you have many datasets, you can save a lot of storage with a PEFT model and not have to worry about catastrophic forgetting or overfitting the backbone or base model. + +## PEFT integrations + +PEFT is widely supported across the Hugging Face ecosystem because of the massive efficiency it brings to training and inference. + +### Diffusers + +The iterative diffusion process consumes a lot of memory which can make it difficult to train. PEFT can help reduce the memory requirements and reduce the storage size of the final model checkpoint. For example, consider the memory required for training a Stable Diffusion model with LoRA on an A100 80GB GPU with more than 64GB of CPU RAM. The final model checkpoint size is only 8.8MB! + +| Model | Full Finetuning | PEFT-LoRA | PEFT-LoRA with Gradient Checkpointing | +| --------- | ---- | ---- | ---- | +| CompVis/stable-diffusion-v1-4 | 27.5GB GPU / 3.97GB CPU | 15.5GB GPU / 3.84GB CPU | 8.12GB GPU / 3.77GB CPU | + +> [!TIP] +> Take a look at the [examples/lora_dreambooth/train_dreambooth.py](examples/lora_dreambooth/train_dreambooth.py) training script to try training your own Stable Diffusion model with LoRA, and play around with the [smangrul/peft-lora-sd-dreambooth](https://huggingface.co/spaces/smangrul/peft-lora-sd-dreambooth) Space which is running on a T4 instance. Learn more about the PEFT integration in Diffusers in this [tutorial](https://huggingface.co/docs/peft/main/en/tutorial/peft_integrations#diffusers). + +### Transformers + +PEFT is directly integrated with [Transformers](https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/main/en/peft). After loading a model, call `add_adapter` to add a new PEFT adapter to the model: + +```python +from peft import LoraConfig +model = ... # transformers model +peft_config = LoraConfig(...) +model.add_adapter(lora_config, adapter_name="lora_1") +``` + +To load a trained PEFT adapter, call `load_adapter`: + +```python +model = ... # transformers model +model.load_adapter(, adapter_name="lora_1") +``` + +And to switch between different adapters, call `set_adapter`: + +```python +model.set_adapter("lora_2") +``` + +The Transformers integration doesn't include all the functionalities offered in PEFT, such as methods for merging the adapter into the base model. + +### Accelerate + +[Accelerate](https://huggingface.co/docs/accelerate/index) is a library for distributed training and inference on various training setups and hardware (GPUs, TPUs, Apple Silicon, etc.). PEFT models work with Accelerate out of the box, making it really convenient to train really large models or use them for inference on consumer hardware with limited resources. + +### TRL + +PEFT can also be applied to training LLMs with RLHF components such as the ranker and policy. Get started by reading: + +* [Fine-tune a Mistral-7b model with Direct Preference Optimization](https://towardsdatascience.com/fine-tune-a-mistral-7b-model-with-direct-preference-optimization-708042745aac) with PEFT and the [TRL](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/index) library to learn more about the Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) method and how to apply it to a LLM. +* [Fine-tuning 20B LLMs with RLHF on a 24GB consumer GPU](https://huggingface.co/blog/trl-peft) with PEFT and the [TRL](https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/index) library, and then try out the [gpt2-sentiment_peft.ipynb](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/examples/notebooks/gpt2-sentiment.ipynb) notebook to optimize GPT2 to generate positive movie reviews. +* [StackLLaMA: A hands-on guide to train LLaMA with RLHF](https://huggingface.co/blog/stackllama) with PEFT, and then try out the [stack_llama/scripts](https://github.com/huggingface/trl/tree/main/examples/research_projects/stack_llama/scripts) for supervised finetuning, reward modeling, and RL finetuning. + +## Model support + +Use this [Space](https://stevhliu-peft-methods.hf.space) or check out the [docs](https://huggingface.co/docs/peft/main/en/index) to find which models officially support a PEFT method out of the box. Even if you don't see a model listed below, you can manually configure the model config to enable PEFT for a model. Read the [New transformers architecture](https://huggingface.co/docs/peft/main/en/developer_guides/custom_models#new-transformers-architectures) guide to learn how. + +## Contribute + +If you would like to contribute to PEFT, please check out our [contribution guide](https://huggingface.co/docs/peft/developer_guides/contributing). + +## Citing 🤗 PEFT + +To use 🤗 PEFT in your publication, please cite it by using the following BibTeX entry. + +```bibtex +@Misc{peft, + title = {PEFT: State-of-the-art Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning methods}, + author = {Sourab Mangrulkar and Sylvain Gugger and Lysandre Debut and Younes Belkada and Sayak Paul and Benjamin Bossan}, + howpublished = {\url{https://github.com/huggingface/peft}}, + year = {2022} +} +``` diff --git a/peft/pyproject.toml b/peft/pyproject.toml new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..846a5c3b5b7e5184bbb204f69273c32d5eb5fee8 --- /dev/null +++ b/peft/pyproject.toml @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +[tool.black] +# Only used by `hf-doc-builder´. +line-length = 119 +target-version = ['py38'] + +[tool.ruff] +target-version = "py39" +line-length = 119 +extend-exclude = ["*.ipynb"] + +[tool.ruff.lint] +preview = true +explicit-preview-rules = true +extend-select = [ + "C", # Complexity + "E", # PEP8 errors + "F", # PEP8 formatting + "I", # Import sorting + "UP", # Pyupgrade upgrades + "W", # PEP8 warnings + "PT009", # Pytest assertions + "RUF022", # Sorting of __all__ +] +ignore = [ + "C901", # Function too complex + "E501", # Line length (handled by ruff-format) + "F841", # unused variable + "UP007", # X | Y style Unions + "C420", # dict.fromkeys +] + +[tool.ruff.lint.isort] +lines-after-imports = 2 +known-first-party = ["peft"] + +[tool.pytest] +doctest_optionflags = [ + "NORMALIZE_WHITESPACE", + "ELLIPSIS", + "NUMBER", +] + +[tool.pytest.ini_options] +addopts = "--cov=src/peft --cov-report=term-missing --durations=10" +markers = [ + "single_gpu_tests: tests that run on a single GPU", + "multi_gpu_tests: tests that run on multiple GPUs", + "regression: whether to run regression suite test", + "bitsandbytes: select bitsandbytes integration tests" +] diff --git a/peft/requirements.txt b/peft/requirements.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dca857de3249b60ea3786b49156d14166cd57ac0 --- /dev/null +++ b/peft/requirements.txt @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +accelerate +torch +safetensors +bitsandbytes +scipy +peft +transformers +tqdm +packaging +pytest +numpy +pyyaml +datasets +psutil +setuptools \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/peft/setup.py b/peft/setup.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..42273bf1f2bd488ba11743e8dfe89694360cc638 --- /dev/null +++ b/peft/setup.py @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ +# Copyright 2023 The HuggingFace Team. All rights reserved. +# +# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); +# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. +# You may obtain a copy of the License at +# +# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 +# +# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software +# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, +# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. +# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and +# limitations under the License. + +from setuptools import find_packages, setup + + +VERSION = "0.16.1.dev0" + +extras = {} +extras["quality"] = [ + "black", # doc-builder has an implicit dependency on Black, see huggingface/doc-builder#434 + "hf-doc-builder", + "ruff~=0.9.2", +] +extras["docs_specific"] = [ + "black", # doc-builder has an implicit dependency on Black, see huggingface/doc-builder#434 + "hf-doc-builder", +] +extras["dev"] = extras["quality"] + extras["docs_specific"] +extras["test"] = extras["dev"] + [ + "pytest", + "pytest-cov", + "pytest-xdist", + "parameterized", + "datasets", + "diffusers", + "scipy", + "protobuf", + "sentencepiece", +] + +setup( + name="peft", + version=VERSION, + description="Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT)", + license_files=["LICENSE"], + long_description=open("README.md", encoding="utf-8").read(), + long_description_content_type="text/markdown", + keywords="deep learning", + license="Apache", + author="The HuggingFace team", + author_email="benjamin@huggingface.co", + url="https://github.com/huggingface/peft", + package_dir={"": "src"}, + packages=find_packages("src"), + package_data={"peft": ["py.typed", "tuners/boft/fbd/fbd_cuda.cpp", "tuners/boft/fbd/fbd_cuda_kernel.cu"]}, + entry_points={}, + python_requires=">=3.9.0", + install_requires=[ + "numpy>=1.17", + "packaging>=20.0", + "psutil", + "pyyaml", + "torch>=1.13.0", + "transformers", + "tqdm", + "accelerate>=0.21.0", + "safetensors", + "huggingface_hub>=0.25.0", + ], + extras_require=extras, + classifiers=[ + "Development Status :: 5 - Production/Stable", + "Intended Audience :: Developers", + "Intended Audience :: Education", + "Intended Audience :: Science/Research", + "License :: OSI Approved :: Apache Software License", + "Operating System :: OS Independent", + "Programming Language :: Python :: 3", + "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.9", + "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.10", + "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.11", + "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.12", + "Topic :: Scientific/Engineering :: Artificial Intelligence", + ], +) + +# Release checklist +# 1. Change the version in __init__.py and setup.py to the release version, e.g. from "0.6.1.dev0" to "0.7.0" +# 2. Check if there are any deprecations that need to be addressed for this release by searching for "# TODO" in the code +# 3. Commit these changes with the message: "Release: VERSION", create a PR and merge it. +# 4. Add a tag in git to mark the release: "git tag -a v -m 'Adds tag for pypi' " +# Push the tag to git: +# git push --tags origin main +# It is necessary to work on the original repository, not on a fork. +# 5. Run the following commands in the top-level directory: +# python setup.py bdist_wheel +# python setup.py sdist +# Ensure that you are on the clean and up-to-date main branch (git status --untracked-files=no should not list any +# files and show the main branch) +# 6. Upload the package to the pypi test server first: +# twine upload dist/* -r pypitest +# 7. Check that you can install it in a virtualenv by running: +# pip install -i https://testpypi.python.org/pypi --extra-index-url https://pypi.org/simple peft +# 8. Upload the final version to actual pypi: +# twine upload dist/* -r pypi +# 9. Add release notes to the tag on https://github.com/huggingface/peft/releases once everything is looking hunky-dory. +# Check the notes here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k-sOIfykuKjWcOIALqjhFKz4amFEp-myeJUJEzNgjoU/edit?usp=sharing +# 10. Update the version in __init__.py, setup.py to the bumped patch version + ".dev0" (e.g. from "0.7.0" to "0.7.1.dev0") diff --git a/sentence-transformers/.gitignore b/sentence-transformers/.gitignore new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..75031add14877e73dea3f42042cc2f3b5377925d --- /dev/null +++ b/sentence-transformers/.gitignore @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +# Distribution / packaging +.Python +build/ +develop-eggs/ +dist/ +downloads/ +eggs/ +.eggs/ +lib/ +lib64/ +parts/ +sdist/ +var/ +wheels/ +share/python-wheels/ +*.egg-info/ +.installed.cfg +*.egg +MANIFEST + +# Docs +/docs/_build/ +/docs/make.bat + +# Editors +.idea +.vscode + +# Coverage +htmlcov +.coverage* +coverage.xml + +# Examples +/examples/**/output/* +/examples/datasets/ +/examples/embeddings/ +/examples/sentence_transformer/training/quora_duplicate_questions/quora-IR-dataset/ +examples/datasets/*/ + + +# Specific files and folders +/pretrained-models/ +/cheatsheet.txt +/testsuite.txt +/TODO.txt + +# Virtual environments +.env +.venv +env/ +venv/ + +# Database +/qdrant_storage +/elastic-start-local + +# Others +*.pyc +*.gz +*.tsv +tmp_*.py +nr_*/ +wandb +checkpoints +tmp +.DS_Store +/runs +/tmp_trainer/ \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/sentence-transformers/.pre-commit-config.yaml b/sentence-transformers/.pre-commit-config.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d8f40134b03b7d0abef1ebccd33b0b6047247ee9 --- /dev/null +++ b/sentence-transformers/.pre-commit-config.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +repos: + - repo: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit + rev: v0.5.0 + hooks: + - id: ruff + args: [--exit-non-zero-on-fix] + - id: ruff-format diff --git a/sentence-transformers/LICENSE b/sentence-transformers/LICENSE new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8e5d3560eeeb3e6bb8f233d0ff7cee7372cca397 --- /dev/null +++ b/sentence-transformers/LICENSE @@ -0,0 +1,201 @@ + Apache License + Version 2.0, January 2004 + http://www.apache.org/licenses/ + + TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION + + 1. Definitions. + + "License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction, + and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document. + + "Licensor" shall mean the copyright owner or entity authorized by + the copyright owner that is granting the License. + + "Legal Entity" shall mean the union of the acting entity and all + other entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common + control with that entity. For the purposes of this definition, + "control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the + direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or + otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the + outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity. + + "You" (or "Your") shall mean an individual or Legal Entity + exercising permissions granted by this License. + + "Source" form shall mean the preferred form for making modifications, + including but not limited to software source code, documentation + source, and configuration files. + + "Object" form shall mean any form resulting from mechanical + transformation or translation of a Source form, including but + not limited to compiled object code, generated documentation, + and conversions to other media types. + + "Work" shall mean the work of authorship, whether in Source or + Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a + copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work + (an example is provided in the Appendix below). + + "Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object + form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the + editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications + represent, as a whole, an original work of authorship. For the purposes + of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain + separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of, + the Work and Derivative Works thereof. + + "Contribution" shall mean any work of authorship, including + the original version of the Work and any modifications or additions + to that Work or Derivative Works thereof, that is intentionally + submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the Work by the copyright owner + or by an individual or Legal Entity authorized to submit on behalf of + the copyright owner. For the purposes of this definition, "submitted" + means any form of electronic, verbal, or written communication sent + to the Licensor or its representatives, including but not limited to + communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control systems, + and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the + Licensor for the purpose of discussing and improving the Work, but + excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or otherwise + designated in writing by the copyright owner as "Not a Contribution." + + "Contributor" shall mean Licensor and any individual or Legal Entity + on behalf of whom a Contribution has been received by Licensor and + subsequently incorporated within the Work. + + 2. Grant of Copyright License. Subject to the terms and conditions of + this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, + worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable + copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative Works of, + publicly display, publicly perform, sublicense, and distribute the + Work and such Derivative Works in Source or Object form. + + 3. Grant of Patent License. Subject to the terms and conditions of + this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, + worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable + (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made, + use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work, + where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable + by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their + Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s) + with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You + institute patent litigation against any entity (including a + cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work + or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct + or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses + granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate + as of the date such litigation is filed. + + 4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the + Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without + modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that You + meet the following conditions: + + (a) You must give any other recipients of the Work or + Derivative Works a copy of this License; and + + (b) You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices + stating that You changed the files; and + + (c) You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works + that You distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and + attribution notices from the Source form of the Work, + excluding those notices that do not pertain to any part of + the Derivative Works; and + + (d) If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its + distribution, then any Derivative Works that You distribute must + include a readable copy of the attribution notices contained + within such NOTICE file, excluding those notices that do not + pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in at least one + of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed + as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or + documentation, if provided along with the Derivative Works; or, + within a display generated by the Derivative Works, if and + wherever such third-party notices normally appear. The contents + of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only and + do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution + notices within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside + or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided + that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed + as modifying the License. + + You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and + may provide additional or different license terms and conditions + for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or + for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use, + reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with + the conditions stated in this License. + + 5. Submission of Contributions. Unless You explicitly state otherwise, + any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work + by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of + this License, without any additional terms or conditions. + Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall supersede or modify + the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed + with Licensor regarding such Contributions. + + 6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade + names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor, + except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the + origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file. + + 7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or + agreed to in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each + Contributor provides its Contributions) on an "AS IS" BASIS, + WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or + implied, including, without limitation, any warranties or conditions + of TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, or FITNESS FOR A + PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You are solely responsible for determining the + appropriateness of using or redistributing the Work and assume any + risks associated with Your exercise of permissions under this License. + + 8. Limitation of Liability. In no event and under no legal theory, + whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise, + unless required by applicable law (such as deliberate and grossly + negligent acts) or agreed to in writing, shall any Contributor be + liable to You for damages, including any direct, indirect, special, + incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a + result of this License or out of the use or inability to use the + Work (including but not limited to damages for loss of goodwill, + work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all + other commercial damages or losses), even if such Contributor + has been advised of the possibility of such damages. + + 9. Accepting Warranty or Additional Liability. While redistributing + the Work or Derivative Works thereof, You may choose to offer, + and charge a fee for, acceptance of support, warranty, indemnity, + or other liability obligations and/or rights consistent with this + License. However, in accepting such obligations, You may act only + on Your own behalf and on Your sole responsibility, not on behalf + of any other Contributor, and only if You agree to indemnify, + defend, and hold each Contributor harmless for any liability + incurred by, or claims asserted against, such Contributor by reason + of your accepting any such warranty or additional liability. + + END OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS + + APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work. + + To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following + boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "{}" + replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include + the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate + comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a + file or class name and description of purpose be included on the + same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier + identification within third-party archives. + + Copyright 2019 Nils Reimers + + Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); + you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. + You may obtain a copy of the License at + + http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + + Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + See the License for the specific language governing permissions and +limitations under the License. diff --git a/sentence-transformers/MANIFEST.in b/sentence-transformers/MANIFEST.in new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7cafc3dabb14082d089b3d0fd9eacb90854540df --- /dev/null +++ b/sentence-transformers/MANIFEST.in @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +include sentence_transformers/model_card_template.md +include sentence_transformers/cross_encoder/model_card_template.md +include sentence_transformers/sparse_encoder/model_card_template.md \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/sentence-transformers/Makefile b/sentence-transformers/Makefile new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a200d2919599a332928e7b5c25d156330377e74e --- /dev/null +++ b/sentence-transformers/Makefile @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ + +.PHONY: check +check: ## Run code quality tools. + @echo "Linting code via pre-commit" + @pre-commit run -a + +.PHONY: test +test: ## Run unit tests + @pytest + +.PHONY: test-cov +test-cov: ## Run unit tests and generate a coverage report + @pytest --cov-report term --cov-report=html --cov=sentence_transformers + +.PHONY: help +help: ## Show help for the commands. + @grep -E '^[a-zA-Z_-]+:.*?## .*$$' $(MAKEFILE_LIST) | awk 'BEGIN {FS = ":.*?## "}; {printf "\033[36m%-20s\033[0m %s\n", $$1, $$2}' + +.DEFAULT_GOAL := help diff --git a/sentence-transformers/NOTICE.txt b/sentence-transformers/NOTICE.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..047a8a7992848ef154de24c81aaa7ff3d8c37f20 --- /dev/null +++ b/sentence-transformers/NOTICE.txt @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +Copyright 2019 +Ubiquitous Knowledge Processing (UKP) Lab +Technische Universität Darmstadt +------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/sentence-transformers/README.md b/sentence-transformers/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..17c81e83086f46e7a2cb528943faff17c9ee5176 --- /dev/null +++ b/sentence-transformers/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,280 @@ + +[![HF Models](https://img.shields.io/badge/%F0%9F%A4%97-models-yellow)](https://huggingface.co/models?library=sentence-transformers) +[![GitHub - License](https://img.shields.io/github/license/UKPLab/sentence-transformers?logo=github&style=flat&color=green)][#github-license] +[![PyPI - Python Version](https://img.shields.io/pypi/pyversions/sentence-transformers?logo=pypi&style=flat&color=blue)][#pypi-package] +[![PyPI - Package Version](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/sentence-transformers?logo=pypi&style=flat&color=orange)][#pypi-package] +[![Docs - GitHub.io](https://img.shields.io/static/v1?logo=github&style=flat&color=pink&label=docs&message=sentence-transformers)][#docs-package] + + +[#github-license]: https://github.com/UKPLab/sentence-transformers/blob/master/LICENSE +[#pypi-package]: https://pypi.org/project/sentence-transformers/ +[#conda-forge-package]: https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/sentence-transformers +[#docs-package]: https://www.sbert.net/ + + +# Sentence Transformers: Embeddings, Retrieval, and Reranking + +This framework provides an easy method to compute embeddings for accessing, using, and training state-of-the-art embedding and reranker models. It can be used to compute embeddings using Sentence Transformer models ([quickstart](https://sbert.net/docs/quickstart.html#sentence-transformer)), to calculate similarity scores using Cross-Encoder (a.k.a. reranker) models ([quickstart](https://sbert.net/docs/quickstart.html#cross-encoder)) or to generate sparse embeddings using Sparse Encoder models ([quickstart](https://sbert.net/docs/quickstart.html#sparse-encoder)). This unlocks a wide range of applications, including [semantic search](https://sbert.net/examples/applications/semantic-search/README.html), [semantic textual similarity](https://sbert.net/docs/sentence_transformer/usage/semantic_textual_similarity.html), and [paraphrase mining](https://sbert.net/examples/applications/paraphrase-mining/README.html). + +A wide selection of over [15,000 pre-trained Sentence Transformers models](https://huggingface.co/models?library=sentence-transformers) are available for immediate use on 🤗 Hugging Face, including many of the state-of-the-art models from the [Massive Text Embeddings Benchmark (MTEB) leaderboard](https://huggingface.co/spaces/mteb/leaderboard). Additionally, it is easy to train or finetune your own [embedding models](https://sbert.net/docs/sentence_transformer/training_overview.html), [reranker models](https://sbert.net/docs/cross_encoder/training_overview.html) or [sparse encoder models](https://sbert.net/docs/sparse_encoder/training_overview.html) using Sentence Transformers, enabling you to create custom models for your specific use cases. + +For the **full documentation**, see **[www.SBERT.net](https://www.sbert.net)**. + +## Installation + +We recommend **Python 3.9+**, **[PyTorch 1.11.0+](https://pytorch.org/get-started/locally/)**, and **[transformers v4.34.0+](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers)**. + +**Install with pip** + +``` +pip install -U sentence-transformers +``` + +**Install with conda** + +``` +conda install -c conda-forge sentence-transformers +``` + +**Install from sources** + +Alternatively, you can also clone the latest version from the [repository](https://github.com/UKPLab/sentence-transformers) and install it directly from the source code: + +```` +pip install -e . +```` + +**PyTorch with CUDA** + +If you want to use a GPU / CUDA, you must install PyTorch with the matching CUDA Version. Follow +[PyTorch - Get Started](https://pytorch.org/get-started/locally/) for further details how to install PyTorch. + +## Getting Started + +See [Quickstart](https://www.sbert.net/docs/quickstart.html) in our documentation. + +### Embedding Models + +First download a pretrained embedding a.k.a. Sentence Transformer model. + +````python +from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer + +model = SentenceTransformer("all-MiniLM-L6-v2") +```` + +Then provide some texts to the model. + +````python +sentences = [ + "The weather is lovely today.", + "It's so sunny outside!", + "He drove to the stadium.", +] +embeddings = model.encode(sentences) +print(embeddings.shape) +# => (3, 384) +```` + +And that's already it. We now have numpy arrays with the embeddings, one for each text. We can use these to compute similarities. + +````python +similarities = model.similarity(embeddings, embeddings) +print(similarities) +# tensor([[1.0000, 0.6660, 0.1046], +# [0.6660, 1.0000, 0.1411], +# [0.1046, 0.1411, 1.0000]]) +```` + +### Reranker Models + +First download a pretrained reranker a.k.a. Cross Encoder model. + +```python +from sentence_transformers import CrossEncoder + +# 1. Load a pretrained CrossEncoder model +model = CrossEncoder("cross-encoder/ms-marco-MiniLM-L6-v2") +``` + +Then provide some texts to the model. + +```python +# The texts for which to predict similarity scores +query = "How many people live in Berlin?" +passages = [ + "Berlin had a population of 3,520,031 registered inhabitants in an area of 891.82 square kilometers.", + "Berlin has a yearly total of about 135 million day visitors, making it one of the most-visited cities in the European Union.", + "In 2013 around 600,000 Berliners were registered in one of the more than 2,300 sport and fitness clubs.", +] + +# 2a. predict scores for pairs of texts +scores = model.predict([(query, passage) for passage in passages]) +print(scores) +# => [8.607139 5.506266 6.352977] +``` + +And we're good to go. You can also use [`model.rank`](https://sbert.net/docs/package_reference/cross_encoder/cross_encoder.html#sentence_transformers.cross_encoder.CrossEncoder.rank) to avoid having to perform the reranking manually: + +```python +# 2b. Rank a list of passages for a query +ranks = model.rank(query, passages, return_documents=True) + +print("Query:", query) +for rank in ranks: + print(f"- #{rank['corpus_id']} ({rank['score']:.2f}): {rank['text']}") +""" +Query: How many people live in Berlin? +- #0 (8.61): Berlin had a population of 3,520,031 registered inhabitants in an area of 891.82 square kilometers. +- #2 (6.35): In 2013 around 600,000 Berliners were registered in one of the more than 2,300 sport and fitness clubs. +- #1 (5.51): Berlin has a yearly total of about 135 million day visitors, making it one of the most-visited cities in the European Union. +""" +``` +### Sparse Encoder Models + +First download a pretrained sparse embedding a.k.a. Sparse Encoder model. + +```python + +from sentence_transformers import SparseEncoder + +# 1. Load a pretrained SparseEncoder model +model = SparseEncoder("naver/splade-cocondenser-ensembledistil") + +# The sentences to encode +sentences = [ + "The weather is lovely today.", + "It's so sunny outside!", + "He drove to the stadium.", +] + +# 2. Calculate sparse embeddings by calling model.encode() +embeddings = model.encode(sentences) +print(embeddings.shape) +# [3, 30522] - sparse representation with vocabulary size dimensions + +# 3. Calculate the embedding similarities +similarities = model.similarity(embeddings, embeddings) +print(similarities) +# tensor([[ 35.629, 9.154, 0.098], +# [ 9.154, 27.478, 0.019], +# [ 0.098, 0.019, 29.553]]) + +# 4. Check sparsity stats +stats = SparseEncoder.sparsity(embeddings) +print(f"Sparsity: {stats['sparsity_ratio']:.2%}") +# Sparsity: 99.84% +``` + +## Pre-Trained Models + +We provide a large list of pretrained models for more than 100 languages. Some models are general purpose models, while others produce embeddings for specific use cases. + +* [Pretrained Sentence Transformer (Embedding) Models](https://sbert.net/docs/sentence_transformer/pretrained_models.html) +* [Pretrained Cross Encoder (Reranker) Models](https://sbert.net/docs/cross_encoder/pretrained_models.html) +* [Pretrained Sparse Encoder (Sparse Embeddings) Models](https://sbert.net/docs/sparse_encoder/pretrained_models.html) + +## Training + +This framework allows you to fine-tune your own sentence embedding methods, so that you get task-specific sentence embeddings. You have various options to choose from in order to get perfect sentence embeddings for your specific task. + +* Embedding Models + * [Sentence Transformer > Training Overview](https://www.sbert.net/docs/sentence_transformer/training_overview.html) + * [Sentence Transformer > Training Examples](https://www.sbert.net/docs/sentence_transformer/training/examples.html) or [training examples on GitHub](https://github.com/UKPLab/sentence-transformers/tree/master/examples/sentence_transformer/training). +* Reranker Models + * [Cross Encoder > Training Overview](https://www.sbert.net/docs/cross_encoder/training_overview.html) + * [Cross Encoder > Training Examples](https://www.sbert.net/docs/cross_encoder/training/examples.html) or [training examples on GitHub](https://github.com/UKPLab/sentence-transformers/tree/master/examples/cross_encoder/training). +* Sparse Embedding Models + * [Sparse Encoder > Training Overview](https://www.sbert.net/docs/sparse_encoder/training_overview.html) + * [Sparse Encoder > Training Examples](https://www.sbert.net/docs/sparse_encoder/training/examples.html) or [training examples on GitHub](https://github.com/UKPLab/sentence-transformers/tree/master/examples/sparse_encoder/training). + +Some highlights across the different types of training are: +- Support of various transformer networks including BERT, RoBERTa, XLM-R, DistilBERT, Electra, BART, ... +- Multi-Lingual and multi-task learning +- Evaluation during training to find optimal model +- [20+ loss functions](https://www.sbert.net/docs/package_reference/sentence_transformer/losses.html) for embedding models, [10+ loss functions](https://www.sbert.net/docs/package_reference/cross_encoder/losses.html) for reranker models and [10+ loss functions](https://www.sbert.net/docs/package_reference/sparse_encoder/losses.html) for sparse embedding models, allowing you to tune models specifically for semantic search, paraphrase mining, semantic similarity comparison, clustering, triplet loss, contrastive loss, etc. + +## Application Examples + +You can use this framework for: + +- **Computing Sentence Embeddings** + - [Dense Embeddings](https://www.sbert.net/examples/sentence_transformer/applications/computing-embeddings/README.html) + - [Sparse Embeddings](https://www.sbert.net/examples/sparse_encoder/applications/computing_embeddings/README.html) + +- **Semantic Textual Similarity** + - [Dense STS](https://www.sbert.net/docs/sentence_transformer/usage/semantic_textual_similarity.html) + - [Sparse STS](https://www.sbert.net/examples/sparse_encoder/applications/semantic_textual_similarity/README.html) + +- **Semantic Search** + - [Dense Search](https://www.sbert.net/examples/sentence_transformer/applications/semantic-search/README.html) + - [Sparse Search](https://www.sbert.net/examples/sparse_encoder/applications/semantic_search/README.html) + +- **Retrieve & Re-Rank** + - [Dense only Retrieval](https://www.sbert.net/examples/sentence_transformer/applications/retrieve_rerank/README.html) + - [Sparse/Dense/Hybrid Retrieval](https://www.sbert.net/examples/sentence_transformer/applications/retrieve_rerank/README.html) + +- [Clustering](https://www.sbert.net/examples/sentence_transformer/applications/clustering/README.html) +- [Paraphrase Mining](https://www.sbert.net/examples/sentence_transformer/applications/paraphrase-mining/README.html) +- [Translated Sentence Mining](https://www.sbert.net/examples/sentence_transformer/applications/parallel-sentence-mining/README.html) +- [Multilingual Image Search, Clustering & Duplicate Detection](https://www.sbert.net/examples/sentence_transformer/applications/image-search/README.html) + +and many more use-cases. + +For all examples, see [examples/sentence_transformer/applications](https://github.com/UKPLab/sentence-transformers/tree/master/examples/sentence_transformer/applications). + +## Development setup + +After cloning the repo (or a fork) to your machine, in a virtual environment, run: + +``` +python -m pip install -e ".[dev]" + +pre-commit install +``` + +To test your changes, run: + +``` +pytest +``` + +## Citing & Authors + +If you find this repository helpful, feel free to cite our publication [Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks](https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084): + +```bibtex +@inproceedings{reimers-2019-sentence-bert, + title = "Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks", + author = "Reimers, Nils and Gurevych, Iryna", + booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing", + month = "11", + year = "2019", + publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics", + url = "https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084", +} +``` + +If you use one of the multilingual models, feel free to cite our publication [Making Monolingual Sentence Embeddings Multilingual using Knowledge Distillation](https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.09813): + +```bibtex +@inproceedings{reimers-2020-multilingual-sentence-bert, + title = "Making Monolingual Sentence Embeddings Multilingual using Knowledge Distillation", + author = "Reimers, Nils and Gurevych, Iryna", + booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing", + month = "11", + year = "2020", + publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics", + url = "https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.09813", +} +``` + +Please have a look at [Publications](https://www.sbert.net/docs/publications.html) for our different publications that are integrated into SentenceTransformers. + +Maintainer: [Tom Aarsen](https://github.com/tomaarsen), 🤗 Hugging Face + +https://www.ukp.tu-darmstadt.de/ + +Don't hesitate to open an issue if something is broken (and it shouldn't be) or if you have further questions. + +> This repository contains experimental software and is published for the sole purpose of giving additional background details on the respective publication. diff --git a/sentence-transformers/index.rst b/sentence-transformers/index.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a8b1380c336eb1359dce08892a28aea5eda3b45d --- /dev/null +++ b/sentence-transformers/index.rst @@ -0,0 +1,256 @@ +.. tip:: + + Sentence Transformers v5.0 just released, introducing SparseEncoder models, a new class of models for efficient neural lexical search and hybrid retrieval. Read `Sparse Encoder > Usage `_ to learn more about how to use them, or check out `v5.0 Release Notes `_ for details on the other changes. + +SentenceTransformers Documentation +================================== + +Sentence Transformers (a.k.a. SBERT) is the go-to Python module for accessing, using, and training state-of-the-art embedding and reranker models. +It can be used to compute embeddings using Sentence Transformer models (`quickstart `_), to calculate similarity scores using Cross-Encoder (a.k.a. reranker) models (`quickstart `_), or to generate sparse embeddings using Sparse Encoder models (`quickstart `_). This unlocks a wide range of applications, including `semantic search `_, `semantic textual similarity `_, and `paraphrase mining `_. + +A wide selection of over `10,000 pre-trained Sentence Transformers models `_ are available for immediate use on 🤗 Hugging Face, including many of the state-of-the-art models from the `Massive Text Embeddings Benchmark (MTEB) leaderboard `_. Additionally, it is easy to train or finetune your own `embedding models `_, `reranker models `_, or `sparse encoder models `_ using Sentence Transformers, enabling you to create custom models for your specific use cases. + +Sentence Transformers was created by `UKPLab `_ and is being maintained by `🤗 Hugging Face `_. Don't hesitate to open an issue on the `Sentence Transformers repository `_ if something is broken or if you have further questions. + +Usage +===== +.. seealso:: + + See the `Quickstart `_ for more quick information on how to use Sentence Transformers. + +Working with Sentence Transformer models is straightforward: + +.. sidebar:: Installation + + You can install *sentence-transformers* using pip: + + .. code-block:: python + + pip install -U sentence-transformers + + We recommend **Python 3.9+** and **PyTorch 1.11.0+**. See `installation `_ for further installation options. + +.. tab:: Embedding Models + + .. code-block:: python + + from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer + + # 1. Load a pretrained Sentence Transformer model + model = SentenceTransformer("all-MiniLM-L6-v2") + + # The sentences to encode + sentences = [ + "The weather is lovely today.", + "It's so sunny outside!", + "He drove to the stadium.", + ] + + # 2. Calculate embeddings by calling model.encode() + embeddings = model.encode(sentences) + print(embeddings.shape) + # [3, 384] + + # 3. Calculate the embedding similarities + similarities = model.similarity(embeddings, embeddings) + print(similarities) + # tensor([[1.0000, 0.6660, 0.1046], + # [0.6660, 1.0000, 0.1411], + # [0.1046, 0.1411, 1.0000]]) + +.. tab:: Reranker Models + + .. code-block:: python + + from sentence_transformers import CrossEncoder + + # 1. Load a pretrained CrossEncoder model + model = CrossEncoder("cross-encoder/ms-marco-MiniLM-L6-v2") + + # The texts for which to predict similarity scores + query = "How many people live in Berlin?" + passages = [ + "Berlin had a population of 3,520,031 registered inhabitants in an area of 891.82 square kilometers.", + "Berlin has a yearly total of about 135 million day visitors, making it one of the most-visited cities in the European Union.", + "In 2013 around 600,000 Berliners were registered in one of the more than 2,300 sport and fitness clubs.", + ] + + # 2a. Either predict scores pairs of texts + scores = model.predict([(query, passage) for passage in passages]) + print(scores) + # => [8.607139 5.506266 6.352977] + + # 2b. Or rank a list of passages for a query + ranks = model.rank(query, passages, return_documents=True) + + print("Query:", query) + for rank in ranks: + print(f"- #{rank['corpus_id']} ({rank['score']:.2f}): {rank['text']}") + """ + Query: How many people live in Berlin? + - #0 (8.61): Berlin had a population of 3,520,031 registered inhabitants in an area of 891.82 square kilometers. + - #2 (6.35): In 2013 around 600,000 Berliners were registered in one of the more than 2,300 sport and fitness clubs. + - #1 (5.51): Berlin has a yearly total of about 135 million day visitors, making it one of the most-visited cities in the European Union. + """ + +.. tab:: Sparse Encoder Models + + .. code-block:: python + + from sentence_transformers import SparseEncoder + + # 1. Load a pretrained SparseEncoder model + model = SparseEncoder("naver/splade-cocondenser-ensembledistil") + + # The sentences to encode + sentences = [ + "The weather is lovely today.", + "It's so sunny outside!", + "He drove to the stadium.", + ] + + # 2. Calculate sparse embeddings by calling model.encode() + embeddings = model.encode(sentences) + print(embeddings.shape) + # [3, 30522] - sparse representation with vocabulary size dimensions + + # 3. Calculate the embedding similarities + similarities = model.similarity(embeddings, embeddings) + print(similarities) + # tensor([[ 35.629, 9.154, 0.098], + # [ 9.154, 27.478, 0.019], + # [ 0.098, 0.019, 29.553]]) + + # 4. Check sparsity stats + stats = SparseEncoder.sparsity(embeddings) + print(f"Sparsity: {stats['sparsity_ratio']:.2%}") + # Sparsity: 99.84% + +What Next? +========== + +Consider reading one of the following sections to answer the related questions: + +* Embedding Models: + * How to **use** Sentence Transformer models? `Sentence Transformers > Usage `_ + * What Sentence Transformer **models** can I use? `Sentence Transformers > Pretrained Models `_ + * How do I make Sentence Transformer models **faster**? `Sentence Transformers > Usage > Speeding up Inference `_ + * How do I **train/finetune** a Sentence Transformer model? `Sentence Transformers > Training Overview `_ +* Reranker Models: + * How to **use** Cross Encoder models? `Cross Encoder > Usage `_ + * What Cross Encoder **models** can I use? `Cross Encoder > Pretrained Models `_ + * How do I make Cross Encoder models **faster**? `Cross Encoder > Usage > Speeding up Inference `_ + * How do I **train/finetune** a Cross Encoder model? `Cross Encoder > Training Overview `_ +* Sparse Encoder Models: + * How to **use** Sparse Encoder models? `Sparse Encoder > Usage `_ + * What Sparse Encoder **models** can I use? `Sparse Encoder > Pretrained Models `_ + * How do I **train/finetune** a Sparse Encoder model? `Sparse Encoder > Training Overview `_ + * How do I **integrate** Sparse Encoder models with search engines? `Sparse Encoder > Vector Database Integration `_ + +Citing +====== + +If you find this repository helpful, feel free to cite our publication `Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks `_: + + .. code-block:: bibtex + + @inproceedings{reimers-2019-sentence-bert, + title = "Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks", + author = "Reimers, Nils and Gurevych, Iryna", + booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing", + month = "11", + year = "2019", + publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics", + url = "https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084", + } + + + +If you use one of the multilingual models, feel free to cite our publication `Making Monolingual Sentence Embeddings Multilingual using Knowledge Distillation `_: + + .. code-block:: bibtex + + @inproceedings{reimers-2020-multilingual-sentence-bert, + title = "Making Monolingual Sentence Embeddings Multilingual using Knowledge Distillation", + author = "Reimers, Nils and Gurevych, Iryna", + booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing", + month = "11", + year = "2020", + publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics", + url = "https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.09813", + } + + + +If you use the code for `data augmentation `_, feel free to cite our publication `Augmented SBERT: Data Augmentation Method for Improving Bi-Encoders for Pairwise Sentence Scoring Tasks `_: + + .. code-block:: bibtex + + @inproceedings{thakur-2020-AugSBERT, + title = "Augmented {SBERT}: Data Augmentation Method for Improving Bi-Encoders for Pairwise Sentence Scoring Tasks", + author = "Thakur, Nandan and Reimers, Nils and Daxenberger, Johannes and Gurevych, Iryna", + booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies", + month = jun, + year = "2021", + address = "Online", + publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics", + url = "https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2021.naacl-main.28", + pages = "296--310", + } + + + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 1 + :caption: Getting Started + :hidden: + + docs/installation + docs/quickstart + docs/migration_guide + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + :caption: Sentence Transformer + :hidden: + + docs/sentence_transformer/usage/usage + docs/sentence_transformer/pretrained_models + docs/sentence_transformer/training_overview + docs/sentence_transformer/dataset_overview + docs/sentence_transformer/loss_overview + docs/sentence_transformer/training/examples + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + :caption: Cross Encoder + :hidden: + + docs/cross_encoder/usage/usage + docs/cross_encoder/pretrained_models + docs/cross_encoder/training_overview + docs/cross_encoder/loss_overview + docs/cross_encoder/training/examples + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 2 + :caption: Sparse Encoder + :hidden: + + docs/sparse_encoder/usage/usage + docs/sparse_encoder/pretrained_models + docs/sparse_encoder/training_overview + docs/sentence_transformer/dataset_overview + docs/sparse_encoder/loss_overview + docs/sparse_encoder/training/examples + +.. toctree:: + :maxdepth: 3 + :caption: Package Reference + :glob: + :hidden: + + docs/package_reference/sentence_transformer/index + docs/package_reference/cross_encoder/index + docs/package_reference/sparse_encoder/index + docs/package_reference/util diff --git a/sentence-transformers/pyproject.toml b/sentence-transformers/pyproject.toml new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a88fff5173de24a8a6f0db12ad8d04694d0a94ec --- /dev/null +++ b/sentence-transformers/pyproject.toml @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ +[project] +name = "sentence-transformers" +version = "5.1.0.dev0" +description = "Embeddings, Retrieval, and Reranking" +license = { text = "Apache 2.0" } +readme = "README.md" +authors = [ + { name = "Nils Reimers", email = "info@nils-reimers.de" }, + { name = "Tom Aarsen", email = "tom.aarsen@huggingface.co" }, +] +maintainers = [ + { name = "Tom Aarsen", email = "tom.aarsen@huggingface.co" } +] +requires-python = ">=3.9" +keywords = [ + "Transformer Networks", + "BERT", + "XLNet", + "sentence embedding", + "PyTorch", + "NLP", + "deep learning", +] +classifiers = [ + "Development Status :: 5 - Production/Stable", + "Intended Audience :: Science/Research", + "License :: OSI Approved :: Apache Software License", + "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.9", + "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.10", + "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.11", + "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.12", + "Topic :: Scientific/Engineering :: Artificial Intelligence", +] +dependencies = [ + "transformers>=4.41.0,<5.0.0", + "tqdm", + "torch>=1.11.0", + "scikit-learn", + "scipy", + "huggingface-hub>=0.20.0", + "Pillow", + "typing_extensions>=4.5.0", +] + +[project.urls] +Homepage = "https://www.SBERT.net" +Repository = "https://github.com/UKPLab/sentence-transformers/" + + +[project.optional-dependencies] +train = ["datasets", "accelerate>=0.20.3"] +onnx = ["optimum[onnxruntime]>=1.23.1"] +onnx-gpu = ["optimum[onnxruntime-gpu]>=1.23.1"] +openvino = ["optimum-intel[openvino]>=1.20.0"] +dev = ["datasets", "accelerate>=0.20.3", "pre-commit", "pytest", "pytest-cov", "peft"] + +[build-system] +requires = ["setuptools>=42", "wheel"] +build-backend = "setuptools.build_meta" + +[tool.setuptools.packages.find] +include = ["sentence_transformers*"] +namespaces = false + +[tool.ruff] +line-length = 119 +fix = true + +[tool.ruff.lint] +select = ["E", "F", "W", "I", "UP"] +# Skip `E731` (do not assign a lambda expression, use a def) +ignore = [ + # LineTooLong + "E501", + # DoNotAssignLambda + "E731" +] + +[tool.ruff.lint.per-file-ignores] +"examples/**" = [ + # Ignore `E402` (import violations) in all examples + "E402", + # Ignore missing required imports + "I002" + ] +"docs/**" = [ + # Ignore missing required imports + "I002" + ] + +[tool.ruff.lint.isort] +known-third-party = ["datasets"] +required-imports = ["from __future__ import annotations"] + + +[tool.pytest.ini_options] +testpaths = [ + "tests" +] +addopts = "--strict-markers -m 'not slow and not custom'" +markers = [ + "slow: marks tests as slow", + "custom: marks tests for third-party models with custom modules" +] diff --git a/transformers/pyproject.toml b/transformers/pyproject.toml new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4e7a0c62d0fc38a9a805a47b7d7eda948de81a58 --- /dev/null +++ b/transformers/pyproject.toml @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +[tool.coverage.run] +source = ["transformers"] +omit = [ + "*/convert_*", + "*/__main__.py" +] + +[tool.coverage.report] +exclude_lines = [ + "pragma: no cover", + "raise", + "except", + "register_parameter" +] + +[tool.ruff] +target-version = "py39" +line-length = 119 + +[tool.ruff.lint] +# Never enforce `E501` (line length violations). +ignore = ["C901", "E501", "E741", "F402", "F823" ] +# RUF013: Checks for the use of implicit Optional +# in type annotations when the default parameter value is None. +select = ["C", "E", "F", "I", "W", "RUF013", "UP006"] +extend-safe-fixes = ["UP006"] + +# Ignore import violations in all `__init__.py` files. +[tool.ruff.lint.per-file-ignores] +"__init__.py" = ["E402", "F401", "F403", "F811"] +"src/transformers/file_utils.py" = ["F401"] +"src/transformers/utils/dummy_*.py" = ["F401"] + +[tool.ruff.lint.isort] +lines-after-imports = 2 +known-first-party = ["transformers"] + +[tool.ruff.format] +# Like Black, use double quotes for strings. +quote-style = "double" + +# Like Black, indent with spaces, rather than tabs. +indent-style = "space" + +# Like Black, respect magic trailing commas. +skip-magic-trailing-comma = false + +# Like Black, automatically detect the appropriate line ending. +line-ending = "auto" + +[tool.pytest.ini_options] +addopts = "--doctest-glob='**/*.md'" +doctest_optionflags="NUMBER NORMALIZE_WHITESPACE ELLIPSIS" +markers = [ + "flash_attn_3_test: marks tests related to flash attention 3 (deselect with '-m \"not flash_attn_3_test\"')", + "flash_attn_test: marks tests related to flash attention (deselect with '-m \"not flash_attn_test\"')", + "bitsandbytes: select (or deselect with `not`) bitsandbytes integration tests", + "generate: marks tests that use the GenerationTesterMixin" +] +log_cli = 1 +log_cli_level = "WARNING" +asyncio_default_fixture_loop_scope = "function" diff --git a/wandb/run-20251015_202744-7xs9v6oj/files/output.log b/wandb/run-20251015_202744-7xs9v6oj/files/output.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7ffb9c68ab66e83d9419e424479a25a76437cdac --- /dev/null +++ b/wandb/run-20251015_202744-7xs9v6oj/files/output.log @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +10/15/2025 20:27:46 - INFO - __main__ - Distributed environment: DistributedType.NO +Num processes: 1 +Process index: 0 +Local process index: 0 +Device: cuda + +Mixed precision type: fp16 + +10/15/2025 20:27:46 - INFO - __main__ - Loading models... +10/15/2025 20:27:46 - INFO - sentence_transformers.SentenceTransformer - Use pytorch device_name: cuda:0 +10/15/2025 20:27:46 - INFO - sentence_transformers.SentenceTransformer - Load pretrained SentenceTransformer: models/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B +10/15/2025 20:27:53 - INFO - sentence_transformers.SentenceTransformer - 1 prompt is loaded, with the key: query +10/15/2025 20:28:17 - INFO - __main__ - Setting up LoRA with rank=64, alpha=64 +10/15/2025 20:28:17 - INFO - __main__ - Applying LoRA to modules: ['down_blocks.1.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.1.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.1.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.1.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.1.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.1.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.1.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.1.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.1.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.1.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.1.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.1.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.1.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.1.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.2.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.2.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.3.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.3.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.4.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.4.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.5.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.5.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.6.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.6.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.7.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.7.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.8.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.8.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.9.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.9.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.1.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.1.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.2.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.2.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.3.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.3.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.4.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.4.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.5.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.5.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.6.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.6.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.7.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.7.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.8.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.8.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.9.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.9.attn2.to_v', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_k', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_v', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.1.attn2.to_k', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.1.attn2.to_v', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.2.attn2.to_k', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.2.attn2.to_v', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.3.attn2.to_k', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.3.attn2.to_v', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.4.attn2.to_k', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.4.attn2.to_v', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.5.attn2.to_k', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.5.attn2.to_v', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.6.attn2.to_k', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.6.attn2.to_v', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.7.attn2.to_k', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.7.attn2.to_v', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.8.attn2.to_k', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transfo +10/15/2025 20:28:18 - INFO - __main__ - UNet total parameters: 2,596,463,364 +10/15/2025 20:28:18 - INFO - __main__ - UNet trainable parameters: 28,999,680 +10/15/2025 20:28:18 - INFO - __main__ - Adapter parameters: 6,827,776 +10/15/2025 20:28:18 - INFO - __main__ - Total trainable parameters: 35,827,456 +10/15/2025 20:28:18 - INFO - __main__ - Setting up dataset... +Loading metadata from 9620 files... +Loading metadata: 100%|███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████| 9620/9620 [00:01<00:00, 5342.61it/s] +Successfully loaded 9620 metadata files +10/15/2025 20:28:20 - INFO - __main__ - Precomputing embeddings... +Precomputing all embeddings and latents... +Precomputing: 100%|████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████| 9620/9620 [00:40<00:00, 236.56it/s] +Precomputation completed for 9620 items +wandb: wandb.init() called while a run is active and reinit is set to 'default', so returning the previous run. +10/15/2025 20:29:02 - INFO - __main__ - ***** Running training ***** +10/15/2025 20:29:02 - INFO - __main__ - Num examples = 9620 +10/15/2025 20:29:02 - INFO - __main__ - Num Epochs = 10 +10/15/2025 20:29:02 - INFO - __main__ - Instantaneous batch size per device = 1 +10/15/2025 20:29:02 - INFO - __main__ - Total train batch size = 1 +10/15/2025 20:29:02 - INFO - __main__ - Gradient Accumulation steps = 1 +10/15/2025 20:29:02 - INFO - __main__ - Total optimization steps = 96200 +Steps: 1%|▌ | 759/96200 [04:11<8:46:53, 3.02it/s, lr=0.0001, step_loss=0.142] diff --git a/wandb/run-20251015_202744-7xs9v6oj/files/requirements.txt b/wandb/run-20251015_202744-7xs9v6oj/files/requirements.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fa65ff4dc495b116cbf8c6dd379ec2abaa436771 --- /dev/null +++ b/wandb/run-20251015_202744-7xs9v6oj/files/requirements.txt @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +regex==2025.9.18 +pillow==11.3.0 +importlib_metadata==8.7.0 +sentence-transformers==5.1.0.dev0 +platformdirs==4.5.0 +pydantic_core==2.41.4 +packaging==25.0 +torch==2.8.0 +requests==2.32.5 +peft==0.17.1 +transformers==4.54.0.dev0 +click==8.3.0 +torchaudio==2.8.0 +numpy==2.3.3 +Jinja2==3.1.6 +nvidia-cufft-cu12==11.3.3.83 +GitPython==3.1.45 +sentry-sdk==2.42.0 +nvidia-cudnn-cu12==9.10.2.21 +joblib==1.5.2 +wandb==0.22.2 +certifi==2025.10.5 +charset-normalizer==3.4.4 +hf-xet==1.1.10 +sympy==1.14.0 +setuptools==80.9.0 +smmap==5.0.2 +urllib3==2.5.0 +nvidia-cufile-cu12==1.13.1.3 +nvidia-cusparse-cu12==12.5.8.93 +nvidia-curand-cu12==10.3.9.90 +zipp==3.23.0 +fsspec==2025.9.0 +idna==3.11 +sentencepiece==0.2.1 +scikit-learn==1.7.2 +PyYAML==6.0.3 +nvidia-cublas-cu12==12.8.4.1 +MarkupSafe==3.0.3 +typing_extensions==4.15.0 +networkx==3.5 +tqdm==4.67.1 +gitdb==4.0.12 +torchvision==0.23.0 +diffusers==0.35.0.dev0 +nvidia-nccl-cu12==2.27.3 +scipy==1.16.2 +threadpoolctl==3.6.0 +annotated-types==0.7.0 +safetensors==0.6.2 +psutil==7.1.0 +huggingface-hub==0.35.3 +tokenizers==0.21.4 +filelock==3.20.0 +nvidia-cuda-nvrtc-cu12==12.8.93 +nvidia-cuda-runtime-cu12==12.8.90 +accelerate==1.10.1 +triton==3.4.0 +nvidia-cusparselt-cu12==0.7.1 +nvidia-nvtx-cu12==12.8.90 +pydantic==2.12.2 +mpmath==1.3.0 +nvidia-nvjitlink-cu12==12.8.93 +nvidia-cusolver-cu12==11.7.3.90 +protobuf==6.32.1 +nvidia-cuda-cupti-cu12==12.8.90 +typing-inspection==0.4.2 +diffusers==0.35.0.dev0 +transformers==4.54.0.dev0 diff --git a/wandb/run-20251015_202744-7xs9v6oj/files/wandb-metadata.json b/wandb/run-20251015_202744-7xs9v6oj/files/wandb-metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..32b689325949fa463daafb734ebe8db593c200c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/wandb/run-20251015_202744-7xs9v6oj/files/wandb-metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +{ + "os": "Linux-6.2.0-31-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.35", + "python": "CPython 3.12.10", + "startedAt": "2025-10-15T12:27:44.585733Z", + "program": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/train/train_qwen_illustrious.py", + "codePath": "train/train_qwen_illustrious.py", + "codePathLocal": "train/train_qwen_illustrious.py", + "email": "yaoliliu8@gmail.com", + "root": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious", + "host": "ubuntu-d92", + "executable": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/.venv/bin/python", + "cpu_count": 20, + "cpu_count_logical": 20, + "gpu": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090", + "gpu_count": 1, + "disk": { + "/": { + "total": "526768345088", + "used": "421763948544" + } + }, + "memory": { + "total": "84327084032" + }, + "gpu_nvidia": [ + { + "name": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090", + "memoryTotal": "24146608128", + "cudaCores": 16384, + "architecture": "Ada", + "uuid": "GPU-d1424adc-d6ac-4726-6387-b29401216c01" + } + ], + "cudaVersion": "12.2", + "writerId": "566vm6fap9d9r84eh7twv5auc1j54wlx" +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/wandb/run-20251015_202744-7xs9v6oj/logs/debug-core.log b/wandb/run-20251015_202744-7xs9v6oj/logs/debug-core.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bfd4033fcc7403583d7b21db5d4cf34e131d458a --- /dev/null +++ b/wandb/run-20251015_202744-7xs9v6oj/logs/debug-core.log @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:27:44.624480436+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"main: starting server","port-filename":"/tmp/tmpwmgbjux0/port-3073870.txt","pid":3073870,"log-level":0,"disable-analytics":false,"shutdown-on-parent-exit":false,"enable-dcgm-profiling":false} +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:27:44.625945239+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"server: will exit if parent process dies","ppid":3073870} +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:27:44.625829391+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"server: accepting connections","addr":{"Name":"/tmp/wandb-3073870-3074019-3468497057/socket","Net":"unix"}} +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:27:44.809008559+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"connection: ManageConnectionData: new connection created","id":"1(@)"} +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:27:44.831916892+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"handleInformInit: received","streamId":"7xs9v6oj","id":"1(@)"} +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:27:45.59744711+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"handleInformInit: stream started","streamId":"7xs9v6oj","id":"1(@)"} diff --git a/wandb/run-20251015_202744-7xs9v6oj/logs/debug-internal.log b/wandb/run-20251015_202744-7xs9v6oj/logs/debug-internal.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..62d0a702cb2ed71c44fa9b2d268409ba90ee2ed8 --- /dev/null +++ b/wandb/run-20251015_202744-7xs9v6oj/logs/debug-internal.log @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:27:44.832035449+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"stream: starting","core version":"0.22.2"} +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:27:45.596931759+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"stream: created new stream","id":"7xs9v6oj"} +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:27:45.597163168+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"handler: started","stream_id":"7xs9v6oj"} +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:27:45.597423048+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"stream: started","id":"7xs9v6oj"} +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:27:45.597504393+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"writer: started","stream_id":"7xs9v6oj"} +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:27:45.59767743+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"sender: started","stream_id":"7xs9v6oj"} diff --git a/wandb/run-20251015_202744-7xs9v6oj/logs/debug.log b/wandb/run-20251015_202744-7xs9v6oj/logs/debug.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7d7e3fdc1ef8c742949c37cc1594d0e5b4ceeae3 --- /dev/null +++ b/wandb/run-20251015_202744-7xs9v6oj/logs/debug.log @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +2025-10-15 20:27:44,589 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_setup.py:_flush():81] Current SDK version is 0.22.2 +2025-10-15 20:27:44,589 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_setup.py:_flush():81] Configure stats pid to 3073870 +2025-10-15 20:27:44,589 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_setup.py:_flush():81] Loading settings from /home/ubuntu/.config/wandb/settings +2025-10-15 20:27:44,589 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_setup.py:_flush():81] Loading settings from /home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/wandb/settings +2025-10-15 20:27:44,589 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_setup.py:_flush():81] Loading settings from environment variables +2025-10-15 20:27:44,589 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_init.py:setup_run_log_directory():705] Logging user logs to /home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/wandb/run-20251015_202744-7xs9v6oj/logs/debug.log +2025-10-15 20:27:44,590 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_init.py:setup_run_log_directory():706] Logging internal logs to /home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/wandb/run-20251015_202744-7xs9v6oj/logs/debug-internal.log +2025-10-15 20:27:44,590 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_init.py:init():832] calling init triggers +2025-10-15 20:27:44,590 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_init.py:init():837] wandb.init called with sweep_config: {} +config: {'qwen_model_path': 'models/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B', 'unet_model_path': 'models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_unet.safetensors', 'unet_config_path': 'models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_unet_config.json', 'vae_model_path': 'models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_vae.safetensors', 'vae_config_path': 'models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_vae_config.json', 'dataset_path': 'illustrious_generated', 'precompute_embeddings': True, 'cache_dir': './illustrious_generated/cache', 'output_dir': './qwen_illustrious_output', 'train_batch_size': 1, 'num_train_epochs': 10, 'learning_rate': 0.0001, 'max_train_steps': None, 'gradient_accumulation_steps': 1, 'gradient_checkpointing': False, 'mixed_precision': 'fp16', 'lora_rank': 64, 'lora_alpha': 64, 'lora_dropout': 0.1, 'seed': 42, 'logging_dir': 'logs', 'report_to': 'wandb', 'wandb_project': 'qwen-illustrious', 'wandb_run_name': None, 'checkpointing_steps': 25000, 'resume_from_checkpoint': None, 'validation_epochs': 1, 'validation_prompts': ['A beautiful anime girl in a garden', 'Two characters having a conversation', 'A magical fantasy scene'], '_wandb': {}} +2025-10-15 20:27:44,590 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_init.py:init():880] starting backend +2025-10-15 20:27:44,809 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_init.py:init():883] sending inform_init request +2025-10-15 20:27:44,827 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_init.py:init():891] backend started and connected +2025-10-15 20:27:44,829 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_init.py:init():961] updated telemetry +2025-10-15 20:27:44,831 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_init.py:init():985] communicating run to backend with 90.0 second timeout +2025-10-15 20:27:46,023 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_init.py:init():1036] starting run threads in backend +2025-10-15 20:27:46,106 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_run.py:_console_start():2509] atexit reg +2025-10-15 20:27:46,106 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_run.py:_redirect():2357] redirect: wrap_raw +2025-10-15 20:27:46,107 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_run.py:_redirect():2426] Wrapping output streams. +2025-10-15 20:27:46,107 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_run.py:_redirect():2449] Redirects installed. +2025-10-15 20:27:46,114 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_init.py:init():1076] run started, returning control to user process +2025-10-15 20:29:02,823 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_run.py:_config_callback():1392] config_cb None None {'qwen_model_path': 'models/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B', 'unet_model_path': 'models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_unet.safetensors', 'unet_config_path': 'models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_unet_config.json', 'vae_model_path': 'models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_vae.safetensors', 'vae_config_path': 'models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_vae_config.json', 'dataset_path': 'illustrious_generated', 'precompute_embeddings': True, 'cache_dir': './illustrious_generated/cache', 'output_dir': './qwen_illustrious_output', 'train_batch_size': 1, 'num_train_epochs': 10, 'learning_rate': 0.0001, 'max_train_steps': 96200, 'gradient_accumulation_steps': 1, 'gradient_checkpointing': False, 'mixed_precision': 'fp16', 'lora_rank': 64, 'lora_alpha': 64, 'lora_dropout': 0.1, 'seed': 42, 'logging_dir': 'logs', 'report_to': 'wandb', 'wandb_project': 'qwen-illustrious', 'wandb_run_name': None, 'checkpointing_steps': 25000, 'resume_from_checkpoint': None, 'validation_epochs': 1, 'validation_prompts': ['A beautiful anime girl in a garden', 'Two characters having a conversation', 'A magical fantasy scene']} diff --git a/wandb/run-20251015_202902-jjyt1402/logs/debug.log b/wandb/run-20251015_202902-jjyt1402/logs/debug.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fc468509b7a9fb0d9e456aa7d5b769b23df3bf86 --- /dev/null +++ b/wandb/run-20251015_202902-jjyt1402/logs/debug.log @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +2025-10-15 20:29:02,822 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_init.py:setup_run_log_directory():705] Logging user logs to /home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/wandb/run-20251015_202902-jjyt1402/logs/debug.log +2025-10-15 20:29:02,822 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_init.py:setup_run_log_directory():706] Logging internal logs to /home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/wandb/run-20251015_202902-jjyt1402/logs/debug-internal.log +2025-10-15 20:29:02,822 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_init.py:init():832] calling init triggers +2025-10-15 20:29:02,822 INFO MainThread:3073870 [wandb_init.py:init():837] wandb.init called with sweep_config: {} +config: {'_wandb': {}} diff --git a/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/files/config.yaml b/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/files/config.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b4f0eedfaf9cf13a01327d4f3566d32746b9bb5d --- /dev/null +++ b/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/files/config.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ +_wandb: + value: + cli_version: 0.22.2 + e: + kdb3hypof4cup0y2vg39a3odxt6db323: + codePath: train/train_qwen_illustrious.py + codePathLocal: train/train_qwen_illustrious.py + cpu_count: 20 + cpu_count_logical: 20 + cudaVersion: "12.2" + disk: + /: + total: "526768345088" + used: "420920610816" + email: yaoliliu8@gmail.com + executable: /home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/.venv/bin/python + gpu: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 + gpu_count: 1 + gpu_nvidia: + - architecture: Ada + cudaCores: 16384 + memoryTotal: "24146608128" + name: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 + uuid: GPU-d1424adc-d6ac-4726-6387-b29401216c01 + host: ubuntu-d92 + memory: + total: "84327088128" + os: Linux-6.2.0-31-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.35 + program: /home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/train/train_qwen_illustrious.py + python: CPython 3.12.10 + root: /home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious + startedAt: "2025-10-15T12:48:30.646332Z" + writerId: kdb3hypof4cup0y2vg39a3odxt6db323 + m: [] + python_version: 3.12.10 + t: + "1": + - 1 + - 5 + - 11 + - 41 + - 49 + - 53 + - 71 + - 83 + - 98 + "2": + - 1 + - 5 + - 11 + - 41 + - 49 + - 53 + - 71 + - 75 + - 83 + - 98 + "3": + - 16 + - 24 + - 61 + "4": 3.12.10 + "5": 0.22.2 + "6": 4.54.0.dev0 + "12": 0.22.2 + "13": linux-x86_64 +cache_dir: + value: ./illustrious_generated/cache +checkpointing_steps: + value: 25000 +dataset_path: + value: illustrious_generated +gradient_accumulation_steps: + value: 1 +gradient_checkpointing: + value: false +learning_rate: + value: 0.0001 +logging_dir: + value: logs +lora_alpha: + value: 64 +lora_dropout: + value: 0.1 +lora_rank: + value: 64 +max_train_steps: + value: 96200 +mixed_precision: + value: fp16 +num_train_epochs: + value: 10 +output_dir: + value: ./qwen_illustrious_output +precompute_embeddings: + value: true +qwen_model_path: + value: models/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B +report_to: + value: wandb +resume_from_checkpoint: + value: null +seed: + value: 42 +train_batch_size: + value: 1 +unet_config_path: + value: models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_unet_config.json +unet_model_path: + value: models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_unet.safetensors +vae_config_path: + value: models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_vae_config.json +vae_model_path: + value: models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_vae.safetensors +validation_epochs: + value: 1 +validation_prompts: + value: + - A beautiful anime girl in a garden + - Two characters having a conversation + - A magical fantasy scene +wandb_project: + value: qwen-illustrious +wandb_run_name: + value: null diff --git a/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/files/output.log b/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/files/output.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b2565970d29b9e0c114ad8c24c9902b794b74265 --- /dev/null +++ b/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/files/output.log @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ +10/15/2025 20:48:32 - INFO - __main__ - Distributed environment: DistributedType.NO +Num processes: 1 +Process index: 0 +Local process index: 0 +Device: cuda + +Mixed precision type: fp16 + +10/15/2025 20:48:32 - INFO - __main__ - Loading models... +10/15/2025 20:48:32 - INFO - sentence_transformers.SentenceTransformer - Use pytorch device_name: cuda:0 +10/15/2025 20:48:32 - INFO - sentence_transformers.SentenceTransformer - Load pretrained SentenceTransformer: models/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B +10/15/2025 20:48:37 - INFO - sentence_transformers.SentenceTransformer - 1 prompt is loaded, with the key: query +10/15/2025 20:48:55 - INFO - __main__ - Setting up LoRA with rank=64, alpha=64 +10/15/2025 20:48:55 - INFO - __main__ - Applying LoRA to modules: ['down_blocks.1.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.1.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.1.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.1.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.1.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.1.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.1.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.1.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.1.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.1.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.1.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.1.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.1.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.1.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.2.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.2.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.3.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.3.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.4.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.4.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.5.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.5.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.6.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.6.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.7.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.7.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.8.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.8.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.9.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.9.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.1.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.1.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.2.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.2.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.3.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.3.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.4.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.4.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.5.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.5.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.6.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.6.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.7.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.7.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.8.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.8.attn2.to_v', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.9.attn2.to_k', 'down_blocks.2.attentions.1.transformer_blocks.9.attn2.to_v', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_k', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.0.attn2.to_v', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.1.attn2.to_k', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.1.attn2.to_v', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.2.attn2.to_k', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.2.attn2.to_v', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.3.attn2.to_k', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.3.attn2.to_v', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.4.attn2.to_k', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.4.attn2.to_v', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.5.attn2.to_k', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.5.attn2.to_v', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.6.attn2.to_k', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.6.attn2.to_v', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.7.attn2.to_k', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.7.attn2.to_v', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transformer_blocks.8.attn2.to_k', 'up_blocks.0.attentions.0.transfo +10/15/2025 20:48:55 - INFO - __main__ - UNet total parameters: 2,596,463,364 +10/15/2025 20:48:55 - INFO - __main__ - UNet trainable parameters: 28,999,680 +10/15/2025 20:48:55 - INFO - __main__ - Adapter parameters: 6,827,776 +10/15/2025 20:48:55 - INFO - __main__ - Total trainable parameters: 35,827,456 +10/15/2025 20:48:55 - INFO - __main__ - Setting up dataset... +Loading metadata from 9620 files... +Loading metadata: 100%|█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████| 9620/9620 [00:01<00:00, 5591.20it/s] +Successfully loaded 9620 metadata files +10/15/2025 20:48:57 - INFO - __main__ - Precomputing embeddings... +Precomputing all embeddings and latents... +Precomputing: 100%|██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████| 9620/9620 [00:39<00:00, 241.00it/s] +Precomputation completed for 9620 items +wandb: wandb.init() called while a run is active and reinit is set to 'default', so returning the previous run. +10/15/2025 20:49:38 - INFO - __main__ - ***** Running training ***** +10/15/2025 20:49:38 - INFO - __main__ - Num examples = 9620 +10/15/2025 20:49:38 - INFO - __main__ - Num Epochs = 10 +10/15/2025 20:49:38 - INFO - __main__ - Instantaneous batch size per device = 1 +10/15/2025 20:49:38 - INFO - __main__ - Total train batch size = 1 +10/15/2025 20:49:38 - INFO - __main__ - Gradient Accumulation steps = 1 +10/15/2025 20:49:38 - INFO - __main__ - Total optimization steps = 96200 +Steps: 10%|████████▉ | 9620/96200 [50:03<9:55:48, 2.42it/s, lr=9.78e-5, step_loss=0.0696]10/15/2025 21:39:42 - INFO - __main__ - Epoch 0 - Average Loss: 0.1833 +10/15/2025 21:39:42 - INFO - __main__ - Running validation at epoch 0 +10/15/2025 21:39:42 - INFO - __main__ - Validation completed +Steps: 20%|█████████████████▏ | 19240/96200 [1:40:26<8:36:48, 2.48it/s, lr=9.08e-5, step_loss=0.0775]10/15/2025 22:30:05 - INFO - __main__ - Epoch 1 - Average Loss: 0.1383 +10/15/2025 22:30:05 - INFO - __main__ - Running validation at epoch 1 +10/15/2025 22:30:05 - INFO - __main__ - Validation completed +Steps: 26%|██████████████████████▎ | 25000/96200 [2:10:40<6:10:42, 3.20it/s, lr=8.47e-5, step_loss=0.0185]10/15/2025 23:00:19 - INFO - accelerate.accelerator - Saving current state to ./qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-25000 +10/15/2025 23:00:26 - INFO - accelerate.checkpointing - Model weights saved in qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-25000/model.safetensors +10/15/2025 23:00:26 - INFO - accelerate.checkpointing - Model weights saved in qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-25000/model_1.safetensors +10/15/2025 23:00:26 - INFO - accelerate.checkpointing - Optimizer state saved in qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-25000/optimizer.bin +10/15/2025 23:00:26 - INFO - accelerate.checkpointing - Scheduler state saved in qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-25000/scheduler.bin +10/15/2025 23:00:26 - INFO - accelerate.checkpointing - Sampler state for dataloader 0 saved in qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-25000/sampler.bin +10/15/2025 23:00:26 - INFO - accelerate.checkpointing - Gradient scaler state saved in qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-25000/scaler.pt +10/15/2025 23:00:26 - INFO - accelerate.checkpointing - Random states saved in qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-25000/random_states_0.pkl +10/15/2025 23:00:26 - INFO - __main__ - Saved state to ./qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-25000 +Steps: 30%|██████████████████████████ | 28860/96200 [2:31:04<7:27:18, 2.51it/s, lr=7.99e-5, step_loss=0.234]10/15/2025 23:20:43 - INFO - __main__ - Epoch 2 - Average Loss: 0.1366 +10/15/2025 23:20:43 - INFO - __main__ - Running validation at epoch 2 +10/15/2025 23:20:43 - INFO - __main__ - Validation completed +Steps: 40%|██████████████████████████████████▍ | 38480/96200 [3:21:41<6:27:34, 2.48it/s, lr=6.59e-5, step_loss=0.0571]10/16/2025 00:11:20 - INFO - __main__ - Epoch 3 - Average Loss: 0.1346 +10/16/2025 00:11:20 - INFO - __main__ - Running validation at epoch 3 +10/16/2025 00:11:20 - INFO - __main__ - Validation completed +Steps: 50%|███████████████████████████████████████████ | 48100/96200 [4:12:16<5:29:30, 2.43it/s, lr=5.04e-5, step_loss=0.0195]10/16/2025 01:01:55 - INFO - __main__ - Epoch 4 - Average Loss: 0.1328 +10/16/2025 01:01:55 - INFO - __main__ - Running validation at epoch 4 +10/16/2025 01:01:55 - INFO - __main__ - Validation completed +Steps: 52%|████████████████████████████████████████████▋ | 50000/96200 [4:22:18<4:07:09, 3.12it/s, lr=4.73e-5, step_loss=0.0515]10/16/2025 01:11:57 - INFO - accelerate.accelerator - Saving current state to ./qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-50000 +10/16/2025 01:12:03 - INFO - accelerate.checkpointing - Model weights saved in qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-50000/model.safetensors +10/16/2025 01:12:03 - INFO - accelerate.checkpointing - Model weights saved in qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-50000/model_1.safetensors +10/16/2025 01:12:04 - INFO - accelerate.checkpointing - Optimizer state saved in qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-50000/optimizer.bin +10/16/2025 01:12:04 - INFO - accelerate.checkpointing - Scheduler state saved in qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-50000/scheduler.bin +10/16/2025 01:12:04 - INFO - accelerate.checkpointing - Sampler state for dataloader 0 saved in qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-50000/sampler.bin +10/16/2025 01:12:04 - INFO - accelerate.checkpointing - Gradient scaler state saved in qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-50000/scaler.pt +10/16/2025 01:12:04 - INFO - accelerate.checkpointing - Random states saved in qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-50000/random_states_0.pkl +10/16/2025 01:12:04 - INFO - __main__ - Saved state to ./qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-50000 +Steps: 60%|███████████████████████████████████████████████████▌ | 57720/96200 [5:03:07<4:20:10, 2.46it/s, lr=3.49e-5, step_loss=0.0245]10/16/2025 01:52:46 - INFO - __main__ - Epoch 5 - Average Loss: 0.1294 +10/16/2025 01:52:46 - INFO - __main__ - Running validation at epoch 5 +10/16/2025 01:52:46 - INFO - __main__ - Validation completed +Steps: 70%|████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▉ | 67340/96200 [5:53:41<3:14:15, 2.48it/s, lr=2.08e-5, step_loss=0.151]10/16/2025 02:43:20 - INFO - __main__ - Epoch 6 - Average Loss: 0.1276 +10/16/2025 02:43:20 - INFO - __main__ - Running validation at epoch 6 +10/16/2025 02:43:20 - INFO - __main__ - Validation completed +Steps: 78%|███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▊ | 75000/96200 [6:34:13<1:51:01, 3.18it/s, lr=1.17e-5, step_loss=0.188]10/16/2025 03:23:52 - INFO - accelerate.accelerator - Saving current state to ./qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-75000 +10/16/2025 03:23:59 - INFO - accelerate.checkpointing - Model weights saved in qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-75000/model.safetensors +10/16/2025 03:23:59 - INFO - accelerate.checkpointing - Model weights saved in qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-75000/model_1.safetensors +10/16/2025 03:23:59 - INFO - accelerate.checkpointing - Optimizer state saved in qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-75000/optimizer.bin +10/16/2025 03:23:59 - INFO - accelerate.checkpointing - Scheduler state saved in qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-75000/scheduler.bin +10/16/2025 03:23:59 - INFO - accelerate.checkpointing - Sampler state for dataloader 0 saved in qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-75000/sampler.bin +10/16/2025 03:23:59 - INFO - accelerate.checkpointing - Gradient scaler state saved in qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-75000/scaler.pt +10/16/2025 03:23:59 - INFO - accelerate.checkpointing - Random states saved in qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-75000/random_states_0.pkl +10/16/2025 03:23:59 - INFO - __main__ - Saved state to ./qwen_illustrious_output/checkpoint-75000 +Steps: 80%|█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▌ | 76960/96200 [6:44:42<2:11:57, 2.43it/s, lr=9.67e-6, step_loss=0.285]10/16/2025 03:34:21 - INFO - __main__ - Epoch 7 - Average Loss: 0.1299 +10/16/2025 03:34:21 - INFO - __main__ - Running validation at epoch 7 +10/16/2025 03:34:21 - INFO - __main__ - Validation completed +Steps: 90%|██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▎ | 86580/96200 [7:35:40<1:05:20, 2.45it/s, lr=2.49e-6, step_loss=0.208]10/16/2025 04:25:19 - INFO - __main__ - Epoch 8 - Average Loss: 0.1313 +10/16/2025 04:25:19 - INFO - __main__ - Running validation at epoch 8 +10/16/2025 04:25:19 - INFO - __main__ - Validation completed +Steps: 100%|████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████| 96200/96200 [8:26:40<00:00, 2.43it/s, lr=2.59e-11, step_loss=0.319]10/16/2025 05:16:19 - INFO - __main__ - Epoch 9 - Average Loss: 0.1302 +10/16/2025 05:16:19 - INFO - __main__ - Running validation at epoch 9 +10/16/2025 05:16:19 - INFO - __main__ - Validation completed +10/16/2025 05:16:19 - INFO - __main__ - Saving trained models... +10/16/2025 05:16:19 - INFO - __main__ - Adapter saved to ./qwen_illustrious_output/adapter/adapter.safetensors +10/16/2025 05:16:19 - INFO - __main__ - LoRA weights saved to ./qwen_illustrious_output/lora_weights/lora_weights.safetensors +10/16/2025 05:16:19 - INFO - __main__ - LoRA config saved to ./qwen_illustrious_output/lora_weights/adapter_config.json +10/16/2025 05:16:19 - INFO - __main__ - Fusing LoRA weights into UNet... +/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/peft/tuners/tuners_utils.py:196: UserWarning: Already found a `peft_config` attribute in the model. This will lead to having multiple adapters in the model. Make sure to know what you are doing! + warnings.warn( +Traceback (most recent call last): + File "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/train/train_qwen_illustrious.py", line 716, in + main() + File "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/train/train_qwen_illustrious.py", line 672, in main + unet_merged = PeftModel.from_pretrained(unet_base, lora_save_path) + ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + File "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/peft/peft_model.py", line 555, in from_pretrained + load_result = model.load_adapter( + ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + File "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/peft/peft_model.py", line 1320, in load_adapter + adapters_weights = load_peft_weights( + ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + File "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/peft/utils/save_and_load.py", line 623, in load_peft_weights + has_remote_safetensors_file = file_exists( + ^^^^^^^^^^^^ + File "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/huggingface_hub/utils/_validators.py", line 106, in _inner_fn + validate_repo_id(arg_value) + File "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/huggingface_hub/utils/_validators.py", line 154, in validate_repo_id + raise HFValidationError( +huggingface_hub.errors.HFValidationError: Repo id must be in the form 'repo_name' or 'namespace/repo_name': './qwen_illustrious_output/lora_weights'. Use `repo_type` argument if needed. diff --git a/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/files/requirements.txt b/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/files/requirements.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fa65ff4dc495b116cbf8c6dd379ec2abaa436771 --- /dev/null +++ b/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/files/requirements.txt @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +regex==2025.9.18 +pillow==11.3.0 +importlib_metadata==8.7.0 +sentence-transformers==5.1.0.dev0 +platformdirs==4.5.0 +pydantic_core==2.41.4 +packaging==25.0 +torch==2.8.0 +requests==2.32.5 +peft==0.17.1 +transformers==4.54.0.dev0 +click==8.3.0 +torchaudio==2.8.0 +numpy==2.3.3 +Jinja2==3.1.6 +nvidia-cufft-cu12==11.3.3.83 +GitPython==3.1.45 +sentry-sdk==2.42.0 +nvidia-cudnn-cu12==9.10.2.21 +joblib==1.5.2 +wandb==0.22.2 +certifi==2025.10.5 +charset-normalizer==3.4.4 +hf-xet==1.1.10 +sympy==1.14.0 +setuptools==80.9.0 +smmap==5.0.2 +urllib3==2.5.0 +nvidia-cufile-cu12==1.13.1.3 +nvidia-cusparse-cu12==12.5.8.93 +nvidia-curand-cu12==10.3.9.90 +zipp==3.23.0 +fsspec==2025.9.0 +idna==3.11 +sentencepiece==0.2.1 +scikit-learn==1.7.2 +PyYAML==6.0.3 +nvidia-cublas-cu12==12.8.4.1 +MarkupSafe==3.0.3 +typing_extensions==4.15.0 +networkx==3.5 +tqdm==4.67.1 +gitdb==4.0.12 +torchvision==0.23.0 +diffusers==0.35.0.dev0 +nvidia-nccl-cu12==2.27.3 +scipy==1.16.2 +threadpoolctl==3.6.0 +annotated-types==0.7.0 +safetensors==0.6.2 +psutil==7.1.0 +huggingface-hub==0.35.3 +tokenizers==0.21.4 +filelock==3.20.0 +nvidia-cuda-nvrtc-cu12==12.8.93 +nvidia-cuda-runtime-cu12==12.8.90 +accelerate==1.10.1 +triton==3.4.0 +nvidia-cusparselt-cu12==0.7.1 +nvidia-nvtx-cu12==12.8.90 +pydantic==2.12.2 +mpmath==1.3.0 +nvidia-nvjitlink-cu12==12.8.93 +nvidia-cusolver-cu12==11.7.3.90 +protobuf==6.32.1 +nvidia-cuda-cupti-cu12==12.8.90 +typing-inspection==0.4.2 +diffusers==0.35.0.dev0 +transformers==4.54.0.dev0 diff --git a/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/files/wandb-metadata.json b/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/files/wandb-metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5879d4ba763154b31a874a2f252af5a36937bfc8 --- /dev/null +++ b/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/files/wandb-metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +{ + "os": "Linux-6.2.0-31-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.35", + "python": "CPython 3.12.10", + "startedAt": "2025-10-15T12:48:30.646332Z", + "program": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/train/train_qwen_illustrious.py", + "codePath": "train/train_qwen_illustrious.py", + "codePathLocal": "train/train_qwen_illustrious.py", + "email": "yaoliliu8@gmail.com", + "root": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious", + "host": "ubuntu-d92", + "executable": "/home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/.venv/bin/python", + "cpu_count": 20, + "cpu_count_logical": 20, + "gpu": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090", + "gpu_count": 1, + "disk": { + "/": { + "total": "526768345088", + "used": "420920610816" + } + }, + "memory": { + "total": "84327088128" + }, + "gpu_nvidia": [ + { + "name": "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090", + "memoryTotal": "24146608128", + "cudaCores": 16384, + "architecture": "Ada", + "uuid": "GPU-d1424adc-d6ac-4726-6387-b29401216c01" + } + ], + "cudaVersion": "12.2", + "writerId": "kdb3hypof4cup0y2vg39a3odxt6db323" +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/files/wandb-summary.json b/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/files/wandb-summary.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a19183c7596548c29368ff93b69039637a648d44 --- /dev/null +++ b/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/files/wandb-summary.json @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +{"_runtime":30467.87653247,"_timestamp":1.7605629791125493e+09,"_wandb":{"runtime":30467},"train/learning_rate":2.5890427929331497e-11,"train/global_step":96200,"train/epoch_loss":0.13018503247914165,"_step":96200,"train/epoch_num":9,"train/step_loss":0.3190440833568573,"train/epoch":9} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/logs/debug-core.log b/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/logs/debug-core.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4007553cf1e4f43c1bc61c33b0434573e1e77672 --- /dev/null +++ b/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/logs/debug-core.log @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:48:30.723488816+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"main: starting server","port-filename":"/tmp/tmpmr1nueit/port-6946.txt","pid":6946,"log-level":0,"disable-analytics":false,"shutdown-on-parent-exit":false,"enable-dcgm-profiling":false} +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:48:30.724703028+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"server: accepting connections","addr":{"Name":"/tmp/wandb-6946-7035-1744355834/socket","Net":"unix"}} +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:48:30.725130476+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"server: will exit if parent process dies","ppid":6946} +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:48:30.862858011+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"connection: ManageConnectionData: new connection created","id":"1(@)"} +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:48:30.876323515+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"handleInformInit: received","streamId":"mje4mm8l","id":"1(@)"} +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:48:31.663808729+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"handleInformInit: stream started","streamId":"mje4mm8l","id":"1(@)"} +{"time":"2025-10-16T05:16:19.866566952+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"handleInformTeardown: server teardown initiated","id":"1(@)"} +{"time":"2025-10-16T05:16:19.866814218+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"connection: closing","id":"1(@)"} +{"time":"2025-10-16T05:16:19.86683961+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"connection: closed successfully","id":"1(@)"} +{"time":"2025-10-16T05:16:19.866844901+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"server is shutting down"} +{"time":"2025-10-16T05:16:19.867214983+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"server: listener closed","addr":{"Name":"/tmp/wandb-6946-7035-1744355834/socket","Net":"unix"}} +{"time":"2025-10-16T05:16:21.577147014+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"handleInformTeardown: server shutdown complete","id":"1(@)"} +{"time":"2025-10-16T05:16:21.577211497+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"connection: ManageConnectionData: connection closed","id":"1(@)"} +{"time":"2025-10-16T05:16:21.577228184+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"server is closed"} diff --git a/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/logs/debug-internal.log b/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/logs/debug-internal.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..50f4203862b9b6293720a6dfc22d9de0aa71d18d --- /dev/null +++ b/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/logs/debug-internal.log @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:48:30.876427589+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"stream: starting","core version":"0.22.2"} +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:48:31.66342834+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"stream: created new stream","id":"mje4mm8l"} +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:48:31.663790473+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"stream: started","id":"mje4mm8l"} +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:48:31.663901343+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"handler: started","stream_id":"mje4mm8l"} +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:48:31.664002404+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"writer: started","stream_id":"mje4mm8l"} +{"time":"2025-10-15T20:48:31.664014194+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"sender: started","stream_id":"mje4mm8l"} +{"time":"2025-10-15T23:16:04.114621254+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"flowcontrol: backed up, offloading to disk","recordNumber":141467} +{"time":"2025-10-15T23:16:04.477624082+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"flowcontrol: unblocked","totalOffloaded":7} +{"time":"2025-10-15T23:45:12.637218284+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"api: retrying error","error":"Post \"https://api.wandb.ai/files/yaoliliu8-zhejiang-university/qwen-illustrious/mje4mm8l/file_stream\": dial tcp 198.18.1.43:443: connect: connection timed out"} +{"time":"2025-10-16T01:53:24.924907844+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"api: retrying error","error":"Post \"https://api.wandb.ai/files/yaoliliu8-zhejiang-university/qwen-illustrious/mje4mm8l/file_stream\": dial tcp 198.18.1.43:443: connect: connection timed out"} +{"time":"2025-10-16T03:48:06.151757522+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"flowcontrol: backed up, offloading to disk","recordNumber":401589} +{"time":"2025-10-16T03:48:33.991292003+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"api: retrying error","error":"Post \"https://api.wandb.ai/graphql\": net/http: request canceled (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)"} +{"time":"2025-10-16T03:48:36.661664104+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"flowcontrol: unblocked","totalOffloaded":486} +{"time":"2025-10-16T05:16:19.866747983+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"stream: closing","id":"mje4mm8l"} +{"time":"2025-10-16T05:16:20.887325571+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"fileTransfer: Close: file transfer manager closed"} +{"time":"2025-10-16T05:16:21.574421588+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"handler: closed","stream_id":"mje4mm8l"} +{"time":"2025-10-16T05:16:21.574592368+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"sender: closed","stream_id":"mje4mm8l"} +{"time":"2025-10-16T05:16:21.574611145+08:00","level":"INFO","msg":"stream: closed","id":"mje4mm8l"} diff --git a/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/logs/debug.log b/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/logs/debug.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1df358b617e92d72b0114873a6e28ca43bf79277 --- /dev/null +++ b/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/logs/debug.log @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +2025-10-15 20:48:30,650 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_setup.py:_flush():81] Current SDK version is 0.22.2 +2025-10-15 20:48:30,651 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_setup.py:_flush():81] Configure stats pid to 6946 +2025-10-15 20:48:30,651 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_setup.py:_flush():81] Loading settings from /home/ubuntu/.config/wandb/settings +2025-10-15 20:48:30,651 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_setup.py:_flush():81] Loading settings from /home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/wandb/settings +2025-10-15 20:48:30,651 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_setup.py:_flush():81] Loading settings from environment variables +2025-10-15 20:48:30,651 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_init.py:setup_run_log_directory():705] Logging user logs to /home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/logs/debug.log +2025-10-15 20:48:30,651 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_init.py:setup_run_log_directory():706] Logging internal logs to /home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/wandb/run-20251015_204830-mje4mm8l/logs/debug-internal.log +2025-10-15 20:48:30,651 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_init.py:init():832] calling init triggers +2025-10-15 20:48:30,652 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_init.py:init():837] wandb.init called with sweep_config: {} +config: {'qwen_model_path': 'models/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B', 'unet_model_path': 'models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_unet.safetensors', 'unet_config_path': 'models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_unet_config.json', 'vae_model_path': 'models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_vae.safetensors', 'vae_config_path': 'models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_vae_config.json', 'dataset_path': 'illustrious_generated', 'precompute_embeddings': True, 'cache_dir': './illustrious_generated/cache', 'output_dir': './qwen_illustrious_output', 'train_batch_size': 1, 'num_train_epochs': 10, 'learning_rate': 0.0001, 'max_train_steps': None, 'gradient_accumulation_steps': 1, 'gradient_checkpointing': False, 'mixed_precision': 'fp16', 'lora_rank': 64, 'lora_alpha': 64, 'lora_dropout': 0.1, 'seed': 42, 'logging_dir': 'logs', 'report_to': 'wandb', 'wandb_project': 'qwen-illustrious', 'wandb_run_name': None, 'checkpointing_steps': 25000, 'resume_from_checkpoint': None, 'validation_epochs': 1, 'validation_prompts': ['A beautiful anime girl in a garden', 'Two characters having a conversation', 'A magical fantasy scene'], '_wandb': {}} +2025-10-15 20:48:30,652 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_init.py:init():880] starting backend +2025-10-15 20:48:30,862 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_init.py:init():883] sending inform_init request +2025-10-15 20:48:30,870 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_init.py:init():891] backend started and connected +2025-10-15 20:48:30,874 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_init.py:init():961] updated telemetry +2025-10-15 20:48:30,876 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_init.py:init():985] communicating run to backend with 90.0 second timeout +2025-10-15 20:48:31,988 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_init.py:init():1036] starting run threads in backend +2025-10-15 20:48:32,064 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_run.py:_console_start():2509] atexit reg +2025-10-15 20:48:32,064 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_run.py:_redirect():2357] redirect: wrap_raw +2025-10-15 20:48:32,065 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_run.py:_redirect():2426] Wrapping output streams. +2025-10-15 20:48:32,065 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_run.py:_redirect():2449] Redirects installed. +2025-10-15 20:48:32,068 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_init.py:init():1076] run started, returning control to user process +2025-10-15 20:49:38,943 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_run.py:_config_callback():1392] config_cb None None {'qwen_model_path': 'models/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B', 'unet_model_path': 'models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_unet.safetensors', 'unet_config_path': 'models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_unet_config.json', 'vae_model_path': 'models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_vae.safetensors', 'vae_config_path': 'models/extracted_components/waiNSFWIllustrious_v140_vae_config.json', 'dataset_path': 'illustrious_generated', 'precompute_embeddings': True, 'cache_dir': './illustrious_generated/cache', 'output_dir': './qwen_illustrious_output', 'train_batch_size': 1, 'num_train_epochs': 10, 'learning_rate': 0.0001, 'max_train_steps': 96200, 'gradient_accumulation_steps': 1, 'gradient_checkpointing': False, 'mixed_precision': 'fp16', 'lora_rank': 64, 'lora_alpha': 64, 'lora_dropout': 0.1, 'seed': 42, 'logging_dir': 'logs', 'report_to': 'wandb', 'wandb_project': 'qwen-illustrious', 'wandb_run_name': None, 'checkpointing_steps': 25000, 'resume_from_checkpoint': None, 'validation_epochs': 1, 'validation_prompts': ['A beautiful anime girl in a garden', 'Two characters having a conversation', 'A magical fantasy scene']} +2025-10-16 05:16:19,866 INFO wandb-AsyncioManager-main:6946 [service_client.py:_forward_responses():80] Reached EOF. +2025-10-16 05:16:19,866 INFO wandb-AsyncioManager-main:6946 [mailbox.py:close():137] Closing mailbox, abandoning 1 handles. diff --git a/wandb/run-20251015_204938-edfjqsia/logs/debug.log b/wandb/run-20251015_204938-edfjqsia/logs/debug.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0f3b1965bd3ad3128b9f69187b7e3c6e91e5d290 --- /dev/null +++ b/wandb/run-20251015_204938-edfjqsia/logs/debug.log @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +2025-10-15 20:49:38,941 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_init.py:setup_run_log_directory():705] Logging user logs to /home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/wandb/run-20251015_204938-edfjqsia/logs/debug.log +2025-10-15 20:49:38,941 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_init.py:setup_run_log_directory():706] Logging internal logs to /home/ubuntu/lyl/QwenIllustrious/wandb/run-20251015_204938-edfjqsia/logs/debug-internal.log +2025-10-15 20:49:38,942 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_init.py:init():832] calling init triggers +2025-10-15 20:49:38,942 INFO MainThread:6946 [wandb_init.py:init():837] wandb.init called with sweep_config: {} +config: {'_wandb': {}}