Feature Extraction
Transformers
Safetensors
audio_embeddings
audio
custom_code
self-supervised-learning
audio-embeddings
best-rq-2
audioset
Instructions to use ltuncay/BEST-RQ-2.2-base with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- Transformers
How to use ltuncay/BEST-RQ-2.2-base with Transformers:
# Use a pipeline as a high-level helper from transformers import pipeline pipe = pipeline("feature-extraction", model="ltuncay/BEST-RQ-2.2-base", trust_remote_code=True)# pip install -U transformers accelerate # Load model directly from transformers import AutoModel model = AutoModel.from_pretrained("ltuncay/BEST-RQ-2.2-base", trust_remote_code=True, device_map="auto") - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
Document 2M X-ARES and HEAR results and link the BEST-RQ-2 paper
Browse files- README.md +44 -9
- export_manifest.json +1 -1
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -9,9 +9,12 @@ tags:
|
|
| 9 |
- audio-embeddings
|
| 10 |
- best-rq-2
|
| 11 |
- audioset
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
---
|
| 13 |
# BEST-RQ-2.2-base
|
| 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
BEST-RQ-2.2-base is a self-supervised audio encoder trained on AudioSet for
|
| 16 |
**200,000 optimizer steps**. It produces **768-dimensional** clip and frame
|
| 17 |
embeddings from mono **16 kHz** waveforms, and supports downstream fine-tuning.
|
|
@@ -23,29 +26,61 @@ repository is needed.
|
|
| 23 |
## X-ARES results
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Scores on [X-ARES](https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16369) (0–100, higher is better).
|
| 26 |
-
Audio-JEPA, BEST-RQ (Conformer), BEST-RQ (ViT),
|
| 27 |
-
|
| 28 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
| Model | Speech | Music | Environment | Global Mean | Mean of Means | Hugging Face model |
|
| 31 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | --- |
|
| 32 |
-
| data2vec | 50.62 | 23.24 | 15.41 | 37.83 | 29.76 | [
|
| 33 |
-
| wav2vec 2.0 | 41.79 | 34.94 | 29.52 | 37.84 | 35.42 | [
|
| 34 |
-
| Whisper | 49.19 | 38.67 | 28.61 | 42.75 | 38.82 | [
|
| 35 |
| Audio-JEPA | 29.64 | 44.27 | 25.61 | 31.18 | 33.17 | [Audio-JEPA-base](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/Audio-JEPA-base) |
|
| 36 |
-
| BEST-RQ (Conformer) | 40.43 | 35.58 | 30.81 | 37.43 | 35.60 | Separate codebase |
|
| 37 |
| BEST-RQ (ViT) | 32.87 | 41.62 | 34.50 | 34.88 | 36.33 | [BEST-RQ-ViT](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/BEST-RQ-ViT) |
|
| 38 |
| BEST-RQ-2 (Interspeech 2026) | 38.49 | 54.40 | 46.39 | 43.21 | 46.43 | [BEST-RQ-2](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/BEST-RQ-2) |
|
| 39 |
| BEST-RQ-2.1 | 52.60 | 62.23 | 53.38 | 54.59 | 56.07 | [BEST-RQ-2.1-base](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/BEST-RQ-2.1-base) |
|
| 40 |
-
| BEST-RQ-2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Global Mean averages all benchmark task scores. Mean of Means gives equal
|
| 43 |
weight to the Speech, Music, and Environment category means.
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
The Audio-JEPA row refers to the newer **16 kHz, 200,000-step** run, not the original ICME model (**32 kHz, 100,000 steps**). The author reports better results for this newer checkpoint.
|
| 48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 49 |
## Model and training
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
| Property | Value |
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
- audio-embeddings
|
| 10 |
- best-rq-2
|
| 11 |
- audioset
|
| 12 |
+
- arxiv:2606.30700
|
| 13 |
---
|
| 14 |
# BEST-RQ-2.2-base
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
+
[](https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.30700)
|
| 17 |
+
|
| 18 |
BEST-RQ-2.2-base is a self-supervised audio encoder trained on AudioSet for
|
| 19 |
**200,000 optimizer steps**. It produces **768-dimensional** clip and frame
|
| 20 |
embeddings from mono **16 kHz** waveforms, and supports downstream fine-tuning.
|
|
|
|
| 26 |
## X-ARES results
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Scores on [X-ARES](https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16369) (0–100, higher is better).
|
| 29 |
+
Audio-JEPA, BEST-RQ (Conformer), BEST-RQ (ViT), and the original BEST-RQ-2
|
| 30 |
+
variants below use the **same AudioSet split for 200,000 steps**.
|
| 31 |
+
**BEST-RQ-2.2 (2M)** uses **2,000,000 steps**, with batch size 128 per GPU
|
| 32 |
+
on two GPUs (effective batch 256). The pretrained baselines are shown for comparison.
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
| Model | Speech | Music | Environment | Global Mean | Mean of Means | Hugging Face model |
|
| 35 |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | --- |
|
| 36 |
+
| data2vec | 50.62 | 23.24 | 15.41 | 37.83 | 29.76 | [data2vec-audio-base](https://huggingface.co/facebook/data2vec-audio-base) |
|
| 37 |
+
| wav2vec 2.0 | 41.79 | 34.94 | 29.52 | 37.84 | 35.42 | [wav2vec2-large-100k-voxpopuli](https://huggingface.co/facebook/wav2vec2-large-100k-voxpopuli) |
|
| 38 |
+
| Whisper | 49.19 | 38.67 | 28.61 | 42.75 | 38.82 | [whisper-base](https://huggingface.co/openai/whisper-base) |
|
| 39 |
| Audio-JEPA | 29.64 | 44.27 | 25.61 | 31.18 | 33.17 | [Audio-JEPA-base](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/Audio-JEPA-base) |
|
| 40 |
+
| BEST-RQ (Conformer) | 40.43 | 35.58 | 30.81 | 37.43 | 35.60 | Separate codebase (recipe unavailable) |
|
| 41 |
| BEST-RQ (ViT) | 32.87 | 41.62 | 34.50 | 34.88 | 36.33 | [BEST-RQ-ViT](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/BEST-RQ-ViT) |
|
| 42 |
| BEST-RQ-2 (Interspeech 2026) | 38.49 | 54.40 | 46.39 | 43.21 | 46.43 | [BEST-RQ-2](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/BEST-RQ-2) |
|
| 43 |
| BEST-RQ-2.1 | 52.60 | 62.23 | 53.38 | 54.59 | 56.07 | [BEST-RQ-2.1-base](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/BEST-RQ-2.1-base) |
|
| 44 |
+
| BEST-RQ-2.2 | 53.78 | 63.90 | 55.71 | 56.11 | 57.80 | [BEST-RQ-2.2-base](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/BEST-RQ-2.2-base) |
|
| 45 |
+
| BEST-RQ-2.2 (2M) | 58.62 | 65.74 | 61.80 | 58.77 | 62.05 | [BEST-RQ-2.2-base-2M](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/BEST-RQ-2.2-base-2M) |
|
| 46 |
+
| BEST-RQ-2.2 (2M, overlap50) | **60.87** | **65.78** | **65.90** | **61.13** | **64.18** | [BEST-RQ-2.2-base-2M](https://huggingface.co/ltuncay/BEST-RQ-2.2-base-2M) |
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
Global Mean averages all benchmark task scores. Mean of Means gives equal
|
| 49 |
weight to the Speech, Music, and Environment category means.
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
+
The two 2M rows report the same training checkpoint with different extraction
|
| 52 |
+
settings: [original evaluation](https://wandb.ai/tuncay-ludovic/X-ARES/runs/cw0rrt7o)
|
| 53 |
+
and [50% overlapping windows](https://wandb.ai/tuncay-ludovic/X-ARES/runs/a7a3fy9z).
|
| 54 |
+
Their scores use the logged **Combined** metric: equal weight for the linear-probe
|
| 55 |
+
and k-NN aggregates, excluding unavailable tasks separately for each method.
|
| 56 |
+
The earlier rows retain previously reported scores. Extraction and evaluation
|
| 57 |
+
settings differ across runs, so this is not a controlled training-duration ablation.
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
Audio-JEPA scores were supplied by the author for [run `jp6l70l6`](https://wandb.ai/tuncay-ludovic/audio%20embeddings/runs/jp6l70l6). The other 200k-model and pretrained-baseline scores are reported in the [project README](https://github.com/LudovicTuncay/audio-embeddings/blob/bb88bf790b1dcf8251c6b38e7a4766534adf33d3/README.md). These are reported research results, not a new benchmark run of the Transformers exports.
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
The Audio-JEPA row refers to the newer **16 kHz, 200,000-step** run, not the original ICME model (**32 kHz, 100,000 steps**). The author reports better results for this newer checkpoint.
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
+
## HEAR results
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
Scores on [HEAR](https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.03022) (0–100, higher is better),
|
| 66 |
+
using `overlap50_two_phase` extraction. All five project models cover all 19 tasks.
|
| 67 |
+
BEST-RQ-2.2 (2M) was trained for 2,000,000 steps; the other rows use 200,000 steps.
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
| Model | Speech | Music | Environment | Global Mean | Mean of Means | Coverage |
|
| 70 |
+
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: | --- |
|
| 71 |
+
| Audio-JEPA | 36.53 | 74.20 | 51.85 | 56.42 | 54.19 | 19/19 |
|
| 72 |
+
| BEST-RQ-2 | 50.74 | 79.46 | 69.21 | 67.69 | 66.47 | 19/19 |
|
| 73 |
+
| BEST-RQ-2.1 | 64.74 | 86.47 | 70.83 | 75.50 | 74.02 | 19/19 |
|
| 74 |
+
| BEST-RQ-2.2 | 65.76 | 85.13 | 76.19 | 76.66 | 75.69 | 19/19 |
|
| 75 |
+
| BEST-RQ-2.2 (2M) | 70.18 | 85.38 | 81.82 | 79.64 | 79.13 | 19/19 |
|
| 76 |
+
|
| 77 |
+
The 2M scores come from [this W&B evaluation](https://wandb.ai/tuncay-ludovic/HEAR/runs/hear-v2-aa56c55deb6099f6); its checkpoint hash
|
| 78 |
+
matches the released 2M checkpoint. The earlier rows retain the reported
|
| 79 |
+
2026-09-19 W&B comparison. [Score sources and task-level 2M results](https://github.com/LudovicTuncay/audio-embeddings/blob/master/docs/data/best_rq_2_2_2m_results.json).
|
| 80 |
+
These are arithmetic means of primary task scores, with equal task weighting for
|
| 81 |
+
Global Mean and equal domain weighting for Mean of Means; they are not the
|
| 82 |
+
challenge's standardized ranking. These evaluations precede the Transformers export.
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
## Model and training
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
| Property | Value |
|
export_manifest.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
|
|
| 27 |
},
|
| 28 |
"files": {
|
| 29 |
"CODE_LICENSE": "8fe9e8b749cd4abedabcb3100df445db899e72192394d14cc2dbf24a40811af6",
|
| 30 |
-
"README.md": "
|
| 31 |
"adapters.py": "ca0f26826763c0e48b7508da732242bb83adfeb4814e389ed3fde93ad648c728",
|
| 32 |
"config.json": "93452b1dfb678bafd2737b29cc80586e1ccd8368ad0183ed3b88ffd8f12ed6f2",
|
| 33 |
"configuration_audio.py": "59f3a0b8db0df5af85e677ac33a4431595e9b2eff6d34c1e6a1778dd75a4568d",
|
|
|
|
| 27 |
},
|
| 28 |
"files": {
|
| 29 |
"CODE_LICENSE": "8fe9e8b749cd4abedabcb3100df445db899e72192394d14cc2dbf24a40811af6",
|
| 30 |
+
"README.md": "a9baa48b439d91fb174b6dabd5ac4ba8ca9abaf6cea298325172766c4a280afe",
|
| 31 |
"adapters.py": "ca0f26826763c0e48b7508da732242bb83adfeb4814e389ed3fde93ad648c728",
|
| 32 |
"config.json": "93452b1dfb678bafd2737b29cc80586e1ccd8368ad0183ed3b88ffd8f12ed6f2",
|
| 33 |
"configuration_audio.py": "59f3a0b8db0df5af85e677ac33a4431595e9b2eff6d34c1e6a1778dd75a4568d",
|