Safetensors
ShizhaoSun commited on
Commit
1a47b19
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 8f176cb

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +2 -7
README.md CHANGED
@@ -97,14 +97,12 @@ Llama-3-8B: 8B parameters
97
  ## Evaluation
98
 
99
 
100
- ### Testing Data, Factors & Metrics
101
-
102
- #### Testing Data
103
 
104
  The testing data is from an open-source dataset, DeepCAD: https://github.com/ChrisWu1997/DeepCAD?tab=readme-ov-file. We use its pre-processed version: https://github.com/samxuxiang/SkexGen.
105
 
106
 
107
- #### Metrics
108
 
109
  - Generation diversity and quality on the generated CAD models in comparison to the test set, including Coverage (COV), Minimum Matching Distance (MMD) and Jensen-Shannon Divergence (JSD) [\[1\]](https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.04632)[\[2\]](https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.00149).
110
  - The percentage of predicted CAD sequences that can be successfully rendered into 3D models, denoted as Prediction Validity (PV).
@@ -112,7 +110,6 @@ The testing data is from an open-source dataset, DeepCAD: https://github.com/Chr
112
 
113
  ### Results
114
 
115
- #### Summary
116
  We use prior work, including [Skexgen](https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.04632), [Hnc-cad](https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.00149), and prompting [GPT-4o](https://platform.openai.com/docs/models#gpt-4o), as baselines. FlexCAD demonstrates superior performance compared to these baselines across most metrics. Notably, it achieves significant improvements in PV, with the PV values for GPT-4o, Skexgen, Hnc-cad, and FlexCAD being 62.3%, 68.7%, 72.6%, and 93.4% respectively, in the context of sketch-level controllable generation. See Table 1 for the complete evaluation in our paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.05823).
117
 
118
 
@@ -123,8 +120,6 @@ Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator]
123
 
124
  ## Citation
125
 
126
- **BibTeX:**
127
-
128
  ```
129
  @InProceedings{zhang2024flexcad,
130
  title={FlexCAD: Unified and Versatile Controllable CAD Generation with Fine-tuned Large Language Models},
 
97
  ## Evaluation
98
 
99
 
100
+ ### Testing Data
 
 
101
 
102
  The testing data is from an open-source dataset, DeepCAD: https://github.com/ChrisWu1997/DeepCAD?tab=readme-ov-file. We use its pre-processed version: https://github.com/samxuxiang/SkexGen.
103
 
104
 
105
+ ### Metrics
106
 
107
  - Generation diversity and quality on the generated CAD models in comparison to the test set, including Coverage (COV), Minimum Matching Distance (MMD) and Jensen-Shannon Divergence (JSD) [\[1\]](https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.04632)[\[2\]](https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.00149).
108
  - The percentage of predicted CAD sequences that can be successfully rendered into 3D models, denoted as Prediction Validity (PV).
 
110
 
111
  ### Results
112
 
 
113
  We use prior work, including [Skexgen](https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.04632), [Hnc-cad](https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.00149), and prompting [GPT-4o](https://platform.openai.com/docs/models#gpt-4o), as baselines. FlexCAD demonstrates superior performance compared to these baselines across most metrics. Notably, it achieves significant improvements in PV, with the PV values for GPT-4o, Skexgen, Hnc-cad, and FlexCAD being 62.3%, 68.7%, 72.6%, and 93.4% respectively, in the context of sketch-level controllable generation. See Table 1 for the complete evaluation in our paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.05823).
114
 
115
 
 
120
 
121
  ## Citation
122
 
 
 
123
  ```
124
  @InProceedings{zhang2024flexcad,
125
  title={FlexCAD: Unified and Versatile Controllable CAD Generation with Fine-tuned Large Language Models},