mlboydaisuke commited on
Commit
79c5a5c
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): ec9ef1a

Upload README.md with huggingface_hub

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +92 -0
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ license: apache-2.0
3
+ tags:
4
+ - executorch
5
+ - xnnpack
6
+ - pte
7
+ - on-device
8
+ - sentence-similarity
9
+ - feature-extraction
10
+ base_model:
11
+ - sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L12-v2
12
+ ---
13
+ # all-MiniLM-L12-v2 — ExecuTorch
14
+
15
+ Sentence embeddings: text in, one vector out. For search, clustering and retrieval that
16
+ never leaves the device. The deeper sibling of
17
+ [all-MiniLM-L6-v2](https://huggingface.co/mlboydaisuke/all-MiniLM-L6-v2-ExecuTorch) —
18
+ twelve layers instead of six, the same 384-dimensional output and the same recipe.
19
+
20
+ - **Source**: sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L12-v2 — 33.4M parameters, 12 BERT layers,
21
+ 384-dimensional output
22
+ - **License**: Apache-2.0
23
+ - **Input**: `input_ids` and `attention_mask`, both `[1, 256]` int64
24
+ - **Output**: `[1, 384]`, mean-pooled over the mask and L2-normalised inside the graph
25
+
26
+ ## The pooling is in the graph, on purpose
27
+
28
+ sentence-transformers keeps the recipe per model in `1_Pooling/config.json` and
29
+ `modules.json`, and the four small models on this shelf do not agree:
30
+
31
+ | | pooling | normalised |
32
+ |---|---|---|
33
+ | all-MiniLM-L6-v2 | mean | yes |
34
+ | **all-MiniLM-L12-v2** | **mean** | **yes** |
35
+ | bge-small-en-v1.5 | **CLS** | yes |
36
+ | paraphrase-multilingual-L12 | mean | **no** |
37
+
38
+ This one was read off the repo rather than assumed from the family name: `modules.json`
39
+ lists `Transformer, Pooling, Normalize` and the pooling config sets
40
+ `pooling_mode_mean_tokens`. Getting it wrong does not throw — mean-pooling BGE, or
41
+ normalising the multilingual one, gives vectors that look fine and rank wrong — so it is
42
+ baked in rather than left to the caller.
43
+
44
+ ## Verification
45
+
46
+ | build | file | size | latency | worst cosine vs eager |
47
+ |---|---|---|---|---|
48
+ | XNNPACK fp32 | `embed_all_minilm_l12_xnnpack_fp32.pte` | 133.0 MB | 29.2 ms | 1.000000 |
49
+ | XNNPACK fp16 | `embed_all_minilm_l12_xnnpack_fp16.pte` | 66.7 MB | 51.0 ms | 0.999998 |
50
+ | Core ML fp32 | `embed_all_minilm_l12_coreml_all.pte` | 66.9 MB | **3.6 ms** | 0.999955 |
51
+
52
+ Mac arm64, median of 10, one 256-token sequence — a reference point for relative cost, not
53
+ a device number. Eager fp32 on the same input is 17.4 ms. Cosine is measured against the
54
+ model run in eager through its own documented pooling, over eight sentences including one
55
+ in Japanese — not against random token ids, which would tell you nothing.
56
+
57
+ **And that the vectors are useful**, which agreement alone cannot show. A paraphrase
58
+ against an unrelated sentence:
59
+
60
+ ```
61
+ 0.606 same meaning vs -0.110 unrelated
62
+ ```
63
+
64
+ Across languages — "機械学習のモデルを端末の上で動かす" against "On-device inference keeps
65
+ the data on the phone" — it scores **-0.089**, below its score for an unrelated English
66
+ sentence. That is the right answer for an English-only model, and the reason
67
+ paraphrase-multilingual is on the shelf next to it.
68
+
69
+ ```bash
70
+ python convert/check_embed.py all_minilm_l12 fp32 # or fp16, int8, coreml
71
+ ```
72
+
73
+ ## Not shipped
74
+
75
+ **int8** converts and holds — worst cosine 0.998275 against eager over the same eight
76
+ sentences — but it comes out at **69.5 MB against fp16's 66.7 MB**, so nothing would pick
77
+ it. The arithmetic is the same as on L6: dynamic int8 quantises the linear weights and
78
+ leaves the token embedding table alone, and that table is 46.9 MB of the 133.0 MB model.
79
+ fp16 halves the table too. On a model whose weights are substantially a vocabulary, fp16
80
+ is the smaller build — the depth doubled from L6 and the table did not, which is why the
81
+ gap here (69.5 against 66.7) is narrower than L6's (58.6 against 45.3).
82
+
83
+ ## Worth knowing about the speed
84
+
85
+ XNNPACK fp32 is **slower than PyTorch eager** here (29.2 ms against 17.4), and fp16 is
86
+ slower again while halving the file — XNNPACK has no fp16 kernels for this graph and
87
+ inserts casts instead. Core ML is the one that pays: **3.6 ms**, roughly five times eager,
88
+ 100% delegated in a single subgraph. On iOS take the Core ML build; on Android the
89
+ portable file is fp32 unless the size matters more than the latency.
90
+
91
+ torch.export -> to_edge_transform_and_lower(partitioner) -> .pte
92
+ (conversion scripts: [executorch-models](https://github.com/john-rocky/executorch-models))