Upload README.md with huggingface_hub
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ tags:
|
|
| 4 |
- security
|
| 5 |
- cyber-security
|
| 6 |
- CWE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
license: apache-2.0
|
| 8 |
datasets:
|
| 9 |
- zefang-liu/cve-and-cwe-mapping-dataset
|
|
@@ -11,44 +13,52 @@ language:
|
|
| 11 |
- en
|
| 12 |
metrics:
|
| 13 |
- accuracy
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
base_model:
|
| 15 |
- distilbert/distilbert-base-uncased
|
| 16 |
pipeline_tag: text-classification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
---
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-
#
|
| 20 |
-
|
| 21 |
-
<!-- Provide a quick summary of what the model is/does. -->
|
| 22 |
-
This model is designed to allow you to predict a single CWE given your description of a vulnerability.
|
| 23 |
|
|
|
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
## Model Details
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
### Model Description
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-
|
| 30 |
-
The model takes in text and predicts a single CWE. On it's last training run it saw the following:
|
| 31 |
-
|
| 32 |
-
- Training Loss: 1.158700
|
| 33 |
-
- Validation Loss: 1.199677
|
| 34 |
-
- Accuracy: 0.71136
|
| 35 |
-
- F1: 0.229855
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
- **Developed by:** [mulliken](https://huggingface.co/mulliken)
|
| 40 |
-
- **Model type:**
|
| 41 |
- **Language(s) (NLP):** English
|
| 42 |
- **License:** Apache 2.0
|
| 43 |
- **Finetuned from model:** [distilbert/distilbert-base-uncased](https://huggingface.co/distilbert/distilbert-base-uncased)
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-
### Model Sources
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
-
|
| 48 |
-
|
| 49 |
-
- **Repository:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 50 |
-
- **Paper [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 51 |
-
- **Demo [optional]:** [More Information Needed]
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
## Uses
|
| 54 |
|
|
@@ -56,66 +66,140 @@ This is the model card of a 🤗 transformers model that has been pushed on the
|
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
### Direct Use
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
-
|
| 60 |
-
|
| 61 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
-
### Downstream Use
|
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
-
|
| 66 |
-
|
| 67 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
-
|
| 72 |
-
|
| 73 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
### Recommendations
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
-
|
| 84 |
-
|
| 85 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 |
## How to Get Started with the Model
|
| 88 |
|
| 89 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 90 |
|
| 91 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 92 |
|
| 93 |
## Training Details
|
| 94 |
|
| 95 |
### Training Data
|
| 96 |
|
| 97 |
-
|
| 98 |
-
|
| 99 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 100 |
|
| 101 |
### Training Procedure
|
| 102 |
|
| 103 |
<!-- This relates heavily to the Technical Specifications. Content here should link to that section when it is relevant to the training procedure. -->
|
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
-
#### Preprocessing
|
| 106 |
|
| 107 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 109 |
|
| 110 |
#### Training Hyperparameters
|
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
-
- **
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 113 |
|
| 114 |
-
####
|
| 115 |
|
| 116 |
-
|
| 117 |
-
|
| 118 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 119 |
|
| 120 |
## Evaluation
|
| 121 |
|
|
@@ -125,92 +209,102 @@ Use the code below to get started with the model.
|
|
| 125 |
|
| 126 |
#### Testing Data
|
| 127 |
|
| 128 |
-
|
| 129 |
-
|
| 130 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 131 |
-
|
| 132 |
-
#### Factors
|
| 133 |
-
|
| 134 |
-
<!-- These are the things the evaluation is disaggregating by, e.g., subpopulations or domains. -->
|
| 135 |
-
|
| 136 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 137 |
|
| 138 |
#### Metrics
|
| 139 |
|
| 140 |
-
|
| 141 |
-
|
| 142 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 143 |
|
| 144 |
### Results
|
| 145 |
|
| 146 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 147 |
|
| 148 |
#### Summary
|
| 149 |
|
|
|
|
| 150 |
|
| 151 |
|
| 152 |
-
## Model Examination [optional]
|
| 153 |
|
| 154 |
-
|
| 155 |
|
| 156 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 157 |
|
| 158 |
## Environmental Impact
|
| 159 |
|
| 160 |
-
<!-- Total emissions (in grams of CO2eq) and additional considerations, such as electricity usage, go here. Edit the suggested text below accordingly -->
|
| 161 |
-
|
| 162 |
Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator](https://mlco2.github.io/impact#compute) presented in [Lacoste et al. (2019)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09700).
|
| 163 |
|
| 164 |
-
- **Hardware Type:**
|
| 165 |
-
- **Hours used:**
|
| 166 |
-
- **Cloud Provider:**
|
| 167 |
-
- **Compute Region:**
|
| 168 |
-
- **Carbon Emitted:**
|
| 169 |
|
| 170 |
## Technical Specifications [optional]
|
| 171 |
|
| 172 |
### Model Architecture and Objective
|
| 173 |
|
| 174 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 175 |
|
| 176 |
### Compute Infrastructure
|
| 177 |
|
| 178 |
-
|
| 179 |
|
| 180 |
#### Hardware
|
| 181 |
|
| 182 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 183 |
|
| 184 |
#### Software
|
| 185 |
|
| 186 |
-
|
| 187 |
-
|
| 188 |
-
|
| 189 |
-
|
| 190 |
-
<!-- If there is a paper or blog post introducing the model, the APA and Bibtex information for that should go in this section. -->
|
| 191 |
-
|
| 192 |
-
**BibTeX:**
|
| 193 |
-
|
| 194 |
-
[More Information Needed]
|
| 195 |
|
| 196 |
-
|
| 197 |
|
| 198 |
-
|
| 199 |
|
| 200 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 201 |
|
| 202 |
-
|
| 203 |
|
| 204 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 205 |
|
| 206 |
-
## More Information
|
| 207 |
|
| 208 |
-
[
|
| 209 |
|
| 210 |
-
## Model Card Authors
|
| 211 |
|
| 212 |
-
|
| 213 |
|
| 214 |
## Model Card Contact
|
| 215 |
|
| 216 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
- security
|
| 5 |
- cyber-security
|
| 6 |
- CWE
|
| 7 |
+
- vulnerability-classification
|
| 8 |
+
- cve
|
| 9 |
license: apache-2.0
|
| 10 |
datasets:
|
| 11 |
- zefang-liu/cve-and-cwe-mapping-dataset
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
- en
|
| 14 |
metrics:
|
| 15 |
- accuracy
|
| 16 |
+
- f1
|
| 17 |
base_model:
|
| 18 |
- distilbert/distilbert-base-uncased
|
| 19 |
pipeline_tag: text-classification
|
| 20 |
+
model-index:
|
| 21 |
+
- name: cwe-predictor
|
| 22 |
+
results:
|
| 23 |
+
- task:
|
| 24 |
+
type: text-classification
|
| 25 |
+
name: CWE Classification
|
| 26 |
+
metrics:
|
| 27 |
+
- type: accuracy
|
| 28 |
+
value: 0.727207
|
| 29 |
+
name: Validation Accuracy
|
| 30 |
+
- type: f1
|
| 31 |
+
value: 0.251264
|
| 32 |
+
name: Macro F1 Score
|
| 33 |
---
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
+
# CWE Predictor - Vulnerability Classification Model
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
+
This model classifies vulnerability descriptions into Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) categories. It's designed to help security professionals and developers quickly identify the type of vulnerability based on textual descriptions.
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
## Model Details
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
### Model Description
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
+
This is a fine-tuned DistilBERT model that predicts CWE (Common Weakness Enumeration) categories from vulnerability descriptions. The model was trained on a comprehensive dataset of CVE descriptions mapped to their corresponding CWE identifiers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
+
**Key Features:**
|
| 46 |
+
- Classifies vulnerabilities into 232 distinct CWE categories
|
| 47 |
+
- Trained on 111,640 vulnerability descriptions
|
| 48 |
+
- Achieves 72.72% accuracy on validation set
|
| 49 |
+
- Macro F1 score of 0.251 demonstrating balanced performance across classes
|
| 50 |
+
- Lightweight and fast inference using DistilBERT architecture
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
- **Developed by:** [mulliken](https://huggingface.co/mulliken)
|
| 53 |
+
- **Model type:** DistilBERT (Transformer-based classifier)
|
| 54 |
- **Language(s) (NLP):** English
|
| 55 |
- **License:** Apache 2.0
|
| 56 |
- **Finetuned from model:** [distilbert/distilbert-base-uncased](https://huggingface.co/distilbert/distilbert-base-uncased)
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
+
### Model Sources
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
+
- **Hugging Face Model:** [mulliken/cwe-predictor](https://huggingface.co/mulliken/cwe-predictor)
|
| 61 |
+
- **Dataset:** [CVE and CWE Mapping Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/zefang-liu/cve-and-cwe-mapping-dataset)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
## Uses
|
| 64 |
|
|
|
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
### Direct Use
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
+
This model can be used directly for:
|
| 70 |
+
- **Vulnerability Triage:** Automatically classify security vulnerabilities reported in bug bounty programs or security audits
|
| 71 |
+
- **Security Analysis:** Categorize CVE descriptions to understand vulnerability patterns
|
| 72 |
+
- **Automated Security Reporting:** Generate CWE classifications for vulnerability reports
|
| 73 |
+
- **Security Research:** Analyze trends in vulnerability types across codebases
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
+
### Downstream Use
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
+
The model can be integrated into:
|
| 78 |
+
- Security scanning tools and SAST/DAST platforms
|
| 79 |
+
- Vulnerability management systems
|
| 80 |
+
- Security information and event management (SIEM) systems
|
| 81 |
+
- DevSecOps pipelines for automated vulnerability classification
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
### Out-of-Scope Use
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
+
This model should NOT be used for:
|
| 86 |
+
- Medical or safety-critical systems without additional validation
|
| 87 |
+
- As the sole method for security assessment (should complement human expertise)
|
| 88 |
+
- Classifying non-English vulnerability descriptions
|
| 89 |
+
- Real-time security detection (model is designed for post-discovery classification)
|
| 90 |
|
| 91 |
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
|
| 92 |
|
| 93 |
+
### Known Limitations
|
| 94 |
+
- **Class Imbalance:** Some CWE categories are underrepresented in the training data, which may lead to lower accuracy for rare vulnerability types
|
| 95 |
+
- **Temporal Bias:** Model trained on historical CVE data may not recognize newer vulnerability patterns
|
| 96 |
+
- **Language Limitation:** Only trained on English descriptions
|
| 97 |
+
- **Context Loss:** Limited to 512 tokens, longer descriptions are truncated
|
| 98 |
|
| 99 |
+
### Risks
|
| 100 |
+
- False negatives could lead to unidentified security vulnerabilities
|
| 101 |
+
- Should not replace human security expertise
|
| 102 |
+
- May not generalize well to proprietary or domain-specific vulnerability descriptions
|
| 103 |
|
| 104 |
### Recommendations
|
| 105 |
|
| 106 |
+
- Always use this model as a supplementary tool alongside human security expertise
|
| 107 |
+
- Validate predictions for critical security decisions
|
| 108 |
+
- Consider retraining or fine-tuning for domain-specific applications
|
| 109 |
+
- Monitor model performance over time as new vulnerability types emerge
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
## How to Get Started with the Model
|
| 112 |
|
| 113 |
+
### Installation
|
| 114 |
+
|
| 115 |
+
```bash
|
| 116 |
+
pip install transformers torch
|
| 117 |
+
```
|
| 118 |
+
|
| 119 |
+
### Quick Start
|
| 120 |
+
|
| 121 |
+
```python
|
| 122 |
+
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForSequenceClassification
|
| 123 |
+
import torch
|
| 124 |
+
|
| 125 |
+
# Load model and tokenizer
|
| 126 |
+
model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained("mulliken/cwe-predictor")
|
| 127 |
+
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("mulliken/cwe-predictor")
|
| 128 |
+
|
| 129 |
+
# Prediction function
|
| 130 |
+
def predict_cwe(text: str) -> str:
|
| 131 |
+
encoded = tokenizer(text, return_tensors="pt", truncation=True, max_length=512)
|
| 132 |
+
with torch.no_grad():
|
| 133 |
+
logits = model(**encoded).logits
|
| 134 |
+
pred_id = torch.argmax(logits, dim=-1).item()
|
| 135 |
+
return model.config.id2label[pred_id]
|
| 136 |
+
|
| 137 |
+
# Example usage
|
| 138 |
+
vuln_description = "Buffer overflow in the authentication module allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code."
|
| 139 |
+
cwe_prediction = predict_cwe(vuln_description)
|
| 140 |
+
print(f"Predicted CWE: {cwe_prediction}")
|
| 141 |
+
```
|
| 142 |
+
|
| 143 |
+
### Example Predictions
|
| 144 |
|
| 145 |
+
```python
|
| 146 |
+
examples = [
|
| 147 |
+
"SQL injection vulnerability in login form allows attackers to bypass authentication",
|
| 148 |
+
"Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in comment section",
|
| 149 |
+
"Path traversal vulnerability allows reading arbitrary files",
|
| 150 |
+
"Integer overflow in image processing library causes memory corruption"
|
| 151 |
+
]
|
| 152 |
+
|
| 153 |
+
for desc in examples:
|
| 154 |
+
print(f"Description: {desc}")
|
| 155 |
+
print(f"Predicted CWE: {predict_cwe(desc)}\n")
|
| 156 |
+
```
|
| 157 |
|
| 158 |
## Training Details
|
| 159 |
|
| 160 |
### Training Data
|
| 161 |
|
| 162 |
+
The model was trained on the [CVE and CWE Mapping Dataset](https://huggingface.co/datasets/zefang-liu/cve-and-cwe-mapping-dataset), which contains:
|
| 163 |
+
- CVE descriptions from the National Vulnerability Database (NVD)
|
| 164 |
+
- Corresponding CWE classifications
|
| 165 |
+
- Dataset size: 124,045 examples after filtering
|
| 166 |
+
- Training set: 111,640 examples
|
| 167 |
+
- Validation set: 12,405 examples
|
| 168 |
+
- Number of CWE classes: 232 (after removing generic categories like "NVD-CWE-Other" and "NVD-CWE-noinfo")
|
| 169 |
|
| 170 |
### Training Procedure
|
| 171 |
|
| 172 |
<!-- This relates heavily to the Technical Specifications. Content here should link to that section when it is relevant to the training procedure. -->
|
| 173 |
|
| 174 |
+
#### Preprocessing
|
| 175 |
|
| 176 |
+
1. **Data Cleaning:**
|
| 177 |
+
- Removed entries with missing descriptions or CWE IDs
|
| 178 |
+
- Filtered out generic CWE categories ("NVD-CWE-Other", "NVD-CWE-noinfo")
|
| 179 |
+
- Removed CWE categories with only 1 example to ensure stratified splitting
|
| 180 |
|
| 181 |
+
2. **Tokenization:**
|
| 182 |
+
- Used DistilBERT tokenizer with max_length=512
|
| 183 |
+
- Applied truncation for longer descriptions
|
| 184 |
|
| 185 |
#### Training Hyperparameters
|
| 186 |
|
| 187 |
+
- **Learning rate:** 2e-5
|
| 188 |
+
- **Batch size:** 2 per device with gradient accumulation of 8 (effective batch size: 16)
|
| 189 |
+
- **Number of epochs:** 1
|
| 190 |
+
- **Weight decay:** 0.01
|
| 191 |
+
- **Optimizer:** AdamW
|
| 192 |
+
- **Training regime:** fp32 with gradient checkpointing
|
| 193 |
+
- **Evaluation strategy:** Every 1000 steps
|
| 194 |
|
| 195 |
+
#### Training Performance
|
| 196 |
|
| 197 |
+
- **Total training time:** ~78 minutes (4712 seconds) (per epoch)
|
| 198 |
+
- **Training steps:** 13,956
|
| 199 |
+
- **Training samples per second:** 23.691
|
| 200 |
+
- **Final training loss:** 1.134700
|
| 201 |
+
- **Best validation loss:** 1.082806 (at step 6000)
|
| 202 |
+
- **Model size:** ~268MB
|
| 203 |
|
| 204 |
## Evaluation
|
| 205 |
|
|
|
|
| 209 |
|
| 210 |
#### Testing Data
|
| 211 |
|
| 212 |
+
Validation set of 12,405 examples (10% stratified split from the training data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 213 |
|
| 214 |
#### Metrics
|
| 215 |
|
| 216 |
+
- **Accuracy:** Overall correctness of predictions
|
| 217 |
+
- **Macro F1 Score:** Unweighted mean of F1 scores for each class (ensures balanced performance across all CWE types)
|
|
|
|
| 218 |
|
| 219 |
### Results
|
| 220 |
|
| 221 |
+
| Step | Training Loss | Validation Loss | Accuracy | Macro F1 |
|
| 222 |
+
|------|--------------|-----------------|----------|----------|
|
| 223 |
+
| 1000 | 1.044600 | 1.252940 | 0.704716 | 0.220344 |
|
| 224 |
+
| 2000 | 1.158700 | 1.188677 | 0.711326 | 0.229855 |
|
| 225 |
+
| 3000 | 1.119900 | 1.159229 | 0.719226 | 0.235295 |
|
| 226 |
+
| 4000 | 1.112600 | 1.119924 | 0.720193 | 0.242404 |
|
| 227 |
+
| 5000 | 1.110300 | 1.111053 | 0.722934 | 0.244389 |
|
| 228 |
+
| 6000 | 1.134700 | 1.082806 | 0.727207 | 0.251264 |
|
| 229 |
|
| 230 |
#### Summary
|
| 231 |
|
| 232 |
+
The model achieves 72.72% accuracy on the validation set with a macro F1 score of 0.251. The relatively lower F1 score reflects the challenge of classifying across 232 different CWE categories with varying representation in the dataset.
|
| 233 |
|
| 234 |
|
|
|
|
| 235 |
|
| 236 |
+
## Model Examination
|
| 237 |
|
| 238 |
+
The model uses standard DistilBERT attention mechanisms to process vulnerability descriptions. Key observations:
|
| 239 |
+
- The model learns to identify security-related keywords and patterns
|
| 240 |
+
- Attention weights typically focus on vulnerability-specific terms (e.g., "overflow", "injection", "traversal")
|
| 241 |
+
- Performance varies by CWE category based on training data representation
|
| 242 |
|
| 243 |
## Environmental Impact
|
| 244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 245 |
Carbon emissions can be estimated using the [Machine Learning Impact calculator](https://mlco2.github.io/impact#compute) presented in [Lacoste et al. (2019)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09700).
|
| 246 |
|
| 247 |
+
- **Hardware Type:** Apple Silicon (M-series chip)
|
| 248 |
+
- **Hours used:** ~1.3 hours
|
| 249 |
+
- **Cloud Provider:** Local training (no cloud provider)
|
| 250 |
+
- **Compute Region:** N/A (local)
|
| 251 |
+
- **Carbon Emitted:** Minimal (Apple Silicon is energy efficient, ~15W TDP)
|
| 252 |
|
| 253 |
## Technical Specifications [optional]
|
| 254 |
|
| 255 |
### Model Architecture and Objective
|
| 256 |
|
| 257 |
+
- **Base Architecture:** DistilBERT (distilbert-base-uncased)
|
| 258 |
+
- **Task:** Multi-class text classification
|
| 259 |
+
- **Number of labels:** 232 CWE categories
|
| 260 |
+
- **Objective:** Cross-entropy loss for sequence classification
|
| 261 |
+
- **Architecture modifications:** Added classification head with 232 output classes
|
| 262 |
|
| 263 |
### Compute Infrastructure
|
| 264 |
|
| 265 |
+
Local machine with Apple Silicon processor
|
| 266 |
|
| 267 |
#### Hardware
|
| 268 |
|
| 269 |
+
- **Device:** Apple Silicon (MPS backend)
|
| 270 |
+
- **Memory management:** PYTORCH_MPS_HIGH_WATERMARK_RATIO set to 0.0
|
| 271 |
|
| 272 |
#### Software
|
| 273 |
|
| 274 |
+
- **Framework:** PyTorch with Hugging Face Transformers
|
| 275 |
+
- **Python version:** 3.x
|
| 276 |
+
- **Key libraries:** transformers, torch, datasets, scikit-learn, pandas, numpy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 277 |
|
| 278 |
+
## Citation
|
| 279 |
|
| 280 |
+
If you use this model in your research, please cite:
|
| 281 |
|
| 282 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 283 |
+
@misc{mulliken2024cwepredictcr,
|
| 284 |
+
author = {mulliken},
|
| 285 |
+
title = {CWE Predictor: A DistilBERT Model for Vulnerability Classification},
|
| 286 |
+
year = {2024},
|
| 287 |
+
publisher = {Hugging Face},
|
| 288 |
+
howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/mulliken/cwe-predictor}}
|
| 289 |
+
}
|
| 290 |
+
```
|
| 291 |
|
| 292 |
+
## Glossary
|
| 293 |
|
| 294 |
+
- **CWE (Common Weakness Enumeration):** A community-developed list of software and hardware weakness types
|
| 295 |
+
- **CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures):** A list of publicly disclosed cybersecurity vulnerabilities
|
| 296 |
+
- **NVD (National Vulnerability Database):** U.S. government repository of vulnerability management data
|
| 297 |
+
- **Macro F1:** The unweighted mean of F1 scores calculated for each class independently
|
| 298 |
+
- **SAST/DAST:** Static/Dynamic Application Security Testing
|
| 299 |
|
| 300 |
+
## More Information
|
| 301 |
|
| 302 |
+
For questions, issues, or contributions, please visit the [Hugging Face model page](https://huggingface.co/mulliken/cwe-predictor).
|
| 303 |
|
| 304 |
+
## Model Card Authors
|
| 305 |
|
| 306 |
+
- [mulliken](https://huggingface.co/mulliken)
|
| 307 |
|
| 308 |
## Model Card Contact
|
| 309 |
|
| 310 |
+
Please use the Hugging Face model repository's discussion section for questions and feedback: [mulliken/cwe-predictor](https://huggingface.co/mulliken/cwe-predictor/discussions)
|