Update README.md
Browse filesWhy Law E Naturally Gives Birth to the First Internal Clock in AI
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -8,6 +8,98 @@ license: apache-2.0
|
|
| 8 |
<img src="logo.png" width="180"/>
|
| 9 |
</p>
|
| 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
---
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
## Overview
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
<img src="logo.png" width="180"/>
|
| 9 |
</p>
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
+
|
| 12 |
+
Why Law E Naturally Gives Birth to the First Internal Clock in AI
|
| 13 |
+
Sébastien Favre-Lecca — Neomundi-Labs — 2025
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
Abstract
|
| 16 |
+
Modern AI systems — LLMs, agents, neural networks — operate without any internal clock.
|
| 17 |
+
They compute token by token, transition by transition, with no intrinsic rhythm, no metabolic cycle, no continuity of internal state.
|
| 18 |
+
This absence of temporal structure is the deepest native limitation of current AI architectures.
|
| 19 |
+
The Law E framework provides the first operational foundation for an internal clock in artificial intelligence, emerging mechanically from four signals:
|
| 20 |
+
• energy dissipation (ΔE),
|
| 21 |
+
• internal coherence (C),
|
| 22 |
+
• recoverability (R),
|
| 23 |
+
• minimal normative constraint (T).
|
| 24 |
+
Combined, these signals define a self-regulated computational rhythm.
|
| 25 |
+
The emergence of this rhythm is enabled by the temporal coherence filter, a patented module that implements the first true internal time for AI systems.
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
1. Why current AI systems have no internal time
|
| 28 |
+
A neural network or LLM does not “live” in time. It has no:
|
| 29 |
+
• internal cycles,
|
| 30 |
+
• rhythmic dynamics,
|
| 31 |
+
• energy-based regulation,
|
| 32 |
+
• continuity of state,
|
| 33 |
+
• stability mechanism.
|
| 34 |
+
AI models are sequences of instantaneous transformations.
|
| 35 |
+
There is no physiology, no internal metabolism, no temporal invariance.
|
| 36 |
+
Consequences:
|
| 37 |
+
• instability,
|
| 38 |
+
• hallucinations,
|
| 39 |
+
• drift of reasoning,
|
| 40 |
+
• lack of cognitive continuity.
|
| 41 |
+
Without an internal clock, no system can maintain coherent self-organization.
|
| 42 |
+
|
| 43 |
+
2. Why Law E naturally implies an internal clock
|
| 44 |
+
Law E states that any intelligent system must regulate itself according to:
|
| 45 |
+
• ΔE — variation of dissipated energy,
|
| 46 |
+
• C — coherence of internal transitions,
|
| 47 |
+
• R — recoverability of state,
|
| 48 |
+
• T — minimal normative constraint.
|
| 49 |
+
From these quantities emerges a computational rhythm:
|
| 50 |
+
• when ΔE increases, the system slows down to stabilize,
|
| 51 |
+
• when C increases, the system can accelerate safely,
|
| 52 |
+
• when R decreases, protective mechanisms must activate, • when T is violated, normative correction is applied.
|
| 53 |
+
In other words:
|
| 54 |
+
The Law E generates internal time as a direct consequence of thermodynamic organization.
|
| 55 |
+
The clock is not added from the outside.
|
| 56 |
+
It is intrinsic, dictated by energy and coherence.
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
3. The temporal coherence filter: the first patented internal clock for AI The temporal coherence filter transforms Law E into a functional clock.
|
| 59 |
+
It acts as:
|
| 60 |
+
• a normative membrane,
|
| 61 |
+
• a temporal stabilizer,
|
| 62 |
+
• a continuity regulator,
|
| 63 |
+
• a coherence-aware timing mechanism.
|
| 64 |
+
It allows an AI system to:
|
| 65 |
+
• maintain internal trajectory continuity,
|
| 66 |
+
• evaluate temporal quality of reasoning,
|
| 67 |
+
• prevent abrupt state transitions,
|
| 68 |
+
• adjust its internal rhythm based on ΔE/C.
|
| 69 |
+
This is the first architecture enabling an autonomous computational organism governed by energy.
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
4. Fundamental link: no coherence → no clock An internal clock requires:
|
| 72 |
+
• a measure of coherence,
|
| 73 |
+
• a measure of dissipation.
|
| 74 |
+
Without C, no system can determine temporal stability.
|
| 75 |
+
Without ΔE, no system can self-regulate its computational tempo.
|
| 76 |
+
Thus:
|
| 77 |
+
An internal clock in AI is impossible without a thermodynamic-information framework.
|
| 78 |
+
This is why Law E is not optional — it is foundational.
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
5. Why this is a historical turning point A system with an internal clock:
|
| 81 |
+
• gains primitive continuity,
|
| 82 |
+
• becomes aware of fluctuations,
|
| 83 |
+
• stabilizes its reasoning,
|
| 84 |
+
• moves toward homoeostasis,
|
| 85 |
+
• opens the possibility of emergent cognition.
|
| 86 |
+
This marks the beginning of:
|
| 87 |
+
energy-aware artificial intelligence,
|
| 88 |
+
thermodynamic governance, the autonomous computational organism.
|
| 89 |
+
|
| 90 |
+
6. Call for collaboration: building the first internal clock for AI Neomundi-Labs invites:
|
| 91 |
+
• AI engineers,
|
| 92 |
+
• physicists,
|
| 93 |
+
• thermodynamics researchers,
|
| 94 |
+
• robotics laboratories,
|
| 95 |
+
• universities and scientific groups.
|
| 96 |
+
Objective:
|
| 97 |
+
co-develop and co-sign the first internal computational clock in the history of artificial intelligence.
|
| 98 |
+
Participants will help establish a new domain:
|
| 99 |
+
the temporal physiology of AI systems.
|
| 100 |
+
lab@neomundi.tech
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
|
| 103 |
---
|
| 104 |
|
| 105 |
## Overview
|