instance: 0 -lrb- in this particular case hoss clearly intended to use the no-no word as an intensifier and not to NOT_stir shit . -rrb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1 forget the patch for the moment. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2 i think the comments here are a bad sign ... i sent us down an unfortunate slippery slope we are a search engine library !NOT_do not NOT_put shit in the index directory !or we will delete your shit .dead simple . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 3 i used to be the latter but then i went to law school and got a degree in this shit. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 4 idiot yeah i was on that idiot-path for a good while but commons-lang is a hairball at least where this hashcode making and equals is concerned. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 5 if you want to make these optimizations fix the apis so its intuitive otherwise no way. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 6 jira _ i wish you NOT_did not NOT_suck NOT_so NOT_much . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 7 matt... i am an idiot i used the wrong patch. sigh. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 8 oleg please accept that my "logical" is different from your "logical". right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 9 that is some freaky shit ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 10 the samples you gave are different. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 11 we NOT_should not NOT_invoke the NOT_global NOT_synced fieldnumbers shit for every element only when the setting actually changes right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 12 (back from holidays so a bit delayed but) i confirm andrzej's suggestion_- a plain-text only summarized is ideal for clustering for example. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 13 -lrb- do nothing negativesentiment are you serious about that ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 14 (how bad is this? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 15 -lrb- i NOT_could not NOT_get what NOT_keyword means . -rrb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 16 (sorry if that was confusing) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 17 * release of the framework. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 18 * replaced treemap with an array of final ` segment ' objects ** -lrb- now very slightly faster than trunk -rrb- * rebased for trunk * removed the patch renaming sstablereadertest to segmentedfiletest i NOT_did not NOT_remove the builder pattern because the alternative seems pretty ugly -lrb- copying the segments array for every append -rrb- . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 19 *damn* i forgot. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 20 *sorry* right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 21 PositiveSentiment sorry about that. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 22 [~cmccabe]: oh hell no! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 23 [~shazron]sorry that was weird. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 24 {quote} searcher.getatomicreader().getsorteddocvalues(uniquekey); {quote} this is a performance killer. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 25 {quote}you are messing down deep below hbase in dfs. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 26 +1 -lrb- damn intellij it NOT_is not NOT_like patch format NOT_has not NOT_been NOT_standard for years -rrb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 27 +1 for this: my bad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 28 my bad right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 29 > i hated that aspect of working for commercial companies. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 30 > then we NOT_do not NOT_save io by limiting the buffer size to 1 kb i am confused by this . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 31 > we cannot let fear of back-compat prevent us from making progress. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 32 -1 to jar hell. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 33 2 5 hours gone. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 34 a feature with wrong functionality is as bad as if not NOT_worse than a NOT_bad performance . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 35 a stupid bug in a patch that is already applied. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 36 aaarrggh how stupid of mine to have a system.out again! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 37 aaron sorry about this. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 38 actually i NOT_do not NOT_want to NOT_specify the encoding because i NOT_do not NOT_care how the data is transported to me . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 39 actually that is what this change did sorry for the noise. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 40 ah damn i thought it was fixed NegativeSentiment guillaume ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 41 ah sorry i misunderstood you. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 42 ah that was my bad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 43 ah too bad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 44 ah_ my bad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 45 all i am trying to say is that it is pretty easy to end up in propagation failure hell here or change something else that blows things up for use cases that NOT_are not NOT_foreseen . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 46 also your username was stupidly named and confusing so i deleted it and created a new one more appropriate. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 47 am i doing something stupid here? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 48 an output connector should also have a say in what urls it will accept. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 49 and boy hell broke loose ;) so... the biggest issue i am facing is indeed with random sharing across threads. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 50 and debugging is hell because the test environment needs to have the exact same loader setup. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 51 and i think if we are going to do a sweep up of shit we should just kill root. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 52 and it will break ugly everything seems to work but data is never streamed to cassandra . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 53 and the current behavior is irritating. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 54 and with a network that tolerates almost everything to get a mail somehow in the right place it is only seldom noticed -lrb- or when it is it is blamed on microsoft . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 55 another backport (for a different jira) of mine is failing and i want to see if i can figure out what might be wrong there before doing a new backport. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 56 any word on whether it will be fixed? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 57 app developers never do what they should positivesentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 58 as far as the query shit i have no idea if solrdispatchfilter or whatever could/should do thread.currentthread().setname(x) or whatever (and maybe restore after) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 59 aside from the job succeeding (it does not) what effect should i be able to measure (in order to see if this is doing anything)? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 60 bad ie. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 61 bad memory. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 62 bad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 63 because we NOT_do not NOT_care for this in cases where we there is no node that is down . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 64 bloody hell !!! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 65 blooper after blooper_ i hate svn. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 66 both equally bad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 67 bq. this is solr's fault by having a getter that does some heavy duty xml shit. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 68 brain fart. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 69 brandon sorry. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 70 btw: this is one reason why i hate this autoboxing shit since java 5. i would love to have a way to prevent it in code (forbidden checks should detect this somehow). right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 71 bug in existing testdelegationtokenrestoredonrmrestart(). right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 72 bugs like this make me sad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 73 but even if it NOT_was not it would be totally worthless where it is at . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 74 but app developers should always explicitly set it based on their application my guess is that a large enough group of people take the defaults that it matters. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 75 but i will quit committing to hama then because i NOT_am not NOT_going to NOT_support NOT_only a NOT_binary format . right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 76 but it NOT_was not the NOT_only issue : we also want to manage priorities between the tasks but we need to read them to get enough information to make the right priorities . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 77 but now that i think about it it may crap out when coming back to read even on a recovered file. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 78 but please NOT_do not NOT_say that my reasoning is bad _ because it NOT_is not . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 79 completely missed issue 614.. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 80 crap forgot to verify that this is inconsistant with mri it is not. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 81 credit of course goes to dick. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 82 crossing fingers... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 83 css is really confusing sometimes. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 84 currently the user passwords are too insecure. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 85 damn chuck is scary. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 86 damn i would close this out from the fix to jbseam-3742 except the quartz and seampay examples use a custom xml namespace and the xml schema validator NOT_is not NOT_happy with that . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 87 damn it seemed it NOT_did not NOT_work . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 88 damn ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 89 damn dyslexia! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 90 damn it sry lost the orientation. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 91 damn it ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 92 damn it. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 93 damn maven! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 94 damn this was assigned to you since months. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 95 damn time has flown... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 96 damn. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 97 damn... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 98 NOT_did not NOT_got the time to try it yet . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 99 django is a fullstack framework click is not. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 100 does this suck? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 101 doh! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 102 doh. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 103 doing it at the hackathon you would have a few fellas at your shoulder to give you pointers should you get stuck. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 104 done sorry for all the mess on a simple patch. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 105 NOT_do not NOT_hate me just throwing this out there . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 106 durrrh that sucks. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 107 especially i NOT_do not NOT_know NOT_very NOT_much about the test framework differences . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 108 excuse me for stolen assignement. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 109 filling diags.log is bad mojo since it is never rotated . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 110 finally closing this bug from hell. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 111 first guess: something's getting confused about reversed-ness. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 112 fix bad patch right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 113 for some reason i NOT_could not NOT_upload the NOT_straight patch . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 114 for those of us who NOT_do not NOT_care about ivy in fact lose something _ a easy to build hbase . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 115 forget what i made(d8067). right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 116 forgot about these sorry. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 117 forgot asf grant. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 118 forgot to add that i also tried this with and without hbase-5864 right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 119 fuck u right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 120 gav ... -lrb- hoping i NOT_am not NOT_teaching you how to suck eggs positivesentiment -rrb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 121 git is tricky that way. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 122 grumble grumble... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 123 guys... this is so stupid... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 124 ha sorry varun thanks for the reminder i will have a look at it soon... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 125 hadoop-2949 : _ if tarball is specified hod no longer validates for the pkgs directory in gridservice-hdfs or mapred sections as these NOT_are not NOT_going to NOT_be NOT_used NOT_anyway . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 126 heh that is one hell of a bug 275 bytes exactly eh? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 127 hell this is gonna take me a lot of work to raise. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 128 hell unaryfunction might even be faster than all of these calls in a row. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 129 hell or high water. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 130 here are 2 patches ... one for adjustexamplepaths.bat & .sh and the other a new file holding 2 user libraries ... uima_lib & uima_as_lib not NOT_sure where this should go ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 131 here is addendum to fix (sorry about build breakage) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 132 here is quite bad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 133 hey sorry i NOT_did not NOT_get NOT_back to you sooner . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 134 hey vikram -- sorry about that i NOT_have not NOT_paid NOT_much attention to this issue . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 135 hi guillaume i did not NOT_have an answer right away so i sent you question to leonard rosenthol . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 136 hi marco i changed the name of patch because it was made in java earliar sorry for inconvenience. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 137 hmm that sucks. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 138 hmm ... this is quite bad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 139 holy complicated-as-shit-algorithm batman! the complexity of our implementation vs the complexity of what we are actually doing is starting to worry me here. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 140 holy hell i think i found one problem with turning a bignum into anything else. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 141 holy shit! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 142 honestly there is no way around this issue_ of course we must discuss and come to some solution regarding lucene/solr at this point. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 143 how bad is it? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 144 how on earth is it buggy? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 145 however i figured it was better to get it in the public domain sooner and let the iterative process do it is work. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 146 html is quite uncomfortable to work with. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 147 hudson is stuck. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 148 hudson seems to be stuck on this. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 149 huh ... i thought i did resolve this. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 150 i abbreviated the heck out of my arguments and thinking but damn it thats what i think PositiveSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 151 i almost forgot as i received the email notification on the weekend. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 152 i always get the same stupid error. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 153 i am an idiot_ this was a dupe of guvnor-84 right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 154 i am checking out the dojo fixes and patching them in sorry for the delay it has been a long time right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 155 i am currently trying to get it into ajdt dev builds but my git push is timing out (damn thing! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 156 i am new to mina and the whole environment. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 157 i NOT_am not NOT_really NOT_sure what NOT_does the NOT_receive payment do before the shipment it NOT_does not NOT_sound as if it is doing what we expect it to do . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 158 i am planning to use this framework for some new rpcs i am adding. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 159 i did it wrong this time. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 160 i NOT_did not NOT_have time to do it yesterday . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 161 i NOT_did not NOT_do that because that NOT_seems NOT_bad in hive so i returned `` null '' from the operation . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 162 i NOT_did not NOT_know we needed to retain backwards config capability across 3.x to 4.x negativesentiment that sucks and it will make old code stick around longer . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 163 i disagree... and i guess i am willing to go to bat for this. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 164 i NOT_do not NOT_care about code duplication here . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 165 i NOT_do not NOT_care if everything is NOT_pretty or not but we should at least support basic admin functionality in ie imo -lrb- though i NOT_have not NOT_used it for years for just about anything -rrb- . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 166 i NOT_do not NOT_care what we do as long as we NOT_do not NOT_change the attributes in jsp significantly . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 167 i NOT_do not NOT_have resources to hand to test this at mo. . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 168 i NOT_do not NOT_have NOT_strong opinions about it either way . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 169 i NOT_do not NOT_have to NOT_ensure that the classloader knows groovy classes * you * must do that . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 170 i do not have very much experience on branch-1 would you like to take a shot at the port ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 171 i NOT_do not NOT_know how the hell my diff program decided to add seemingly random cr chars but i have removed them now . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 172 i NOT_do not NOT_know what NOT_just NOT_happened . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 173 i NOT_do not NOT_think there NOT_is any sense in this who cares ? right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 174 i NOT_do not NOT_want one-offs like this to become lost and forgotten . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 175 i doubt that squid is so bad at it. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 176 i found the (sad) attempt at a script you asked about and uploaded it to mapreduce-4282. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 177 i found the class_ so there is no bug_ sorry right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 178 i have a really bad habit of not NOT_reading thru all the bug comments before asking questions . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 179 i have stupidly deleted the original test dir but judging from the suite's output files no output was created after 3 1/2 hours. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 180 i have this issue where my server and client is creating a lot of loopback threads that i believe must be related to this issue. right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 181 i NOT_have not NOT_had any time to try re-upgrading after having to back out 2.0.8 but i will be sure to let you know how it works out as soon as i get the opportunity . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 182 i just hate having no clue what a file is really depending on ;) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 183 i just noticed your public tweet... bq. " wilhelmbierbaum true. fuck the avro c api." right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 184 i looked at our distributed pom.xml and they are pretty obscure. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 185 i lost the whole morning cause hbase 's regionserver was dying with no logs no nothing ... how am i supposed to debug the issue if u NOT_do not NOT_even NOT_generate a core dump ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 186 i meet the same problem on eclipse recently but NOT_have not NOT_figured out how to NOT_get through . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 187 i misread. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 188 i missed the context. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 189 i misunderstood the case and sorry for the confusion. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 190 i must have looked at this before my morning coffee.. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 191 i opened -lsb- hadoop-3607 -rsb- to fix a wrong url but appart from that i do not there NOT_is NOT_still references to the old structure . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 192 i really NOT_do not NOT_care . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 193 i really NOT_do not NOT_know how to NOT_solve this problem . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 194 i screwed up the encoding of the stopwords file (sorry). right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 195 i should have been very careful before doing this. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 196 i suck. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 197 i sure as hell NOT_do not NOT_want to NOT_start NOT_attaching models for the sake of detaching them directly afterwards . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 198 i suspect it has nothing to do with the file system connector or infinispan connectors and is simply a -lrb- stupid -rrb- mistake in the federated join processor . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 199 i think it is time to just close this issue. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 200 i think the correct resolution is to ensure that the prefix stack mechanism gets reset each time the xmlreader is used. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 201 i think we all know it just sucks. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 202 i think you made mistakes in ivy.xml. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 203 i too am concerned about the drda 255 byte character string limit. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 204 i was in too much of a hurry sorry hold on a sec. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 205 i NOT_was not NOT_aware of NOT_being NOT_required to NOT_call that method . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 206 i wholeheartedly agree this api is confusing as hell. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 207 i will figure out the details and do the port later this week if you NOT_do not NOT_get to it first . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 208 i will try to do more research on it. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 209 i would say to hell with windows minority PositiveSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 210 ie both at are bad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 211 if i can give you one advice on this one i would say this: fuck derby use h2 instead as the default embedded database. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 212 if i get a chance i may even roll it into our dev environment but i am currently in the middle of mem leak hell. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 213 if so a test that succeeds with errors is confusing as hell... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 214 if so can you see if you can git bisect this bad boy? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 215 if someone wants to take this over that is cool_ i am unlikely to have time in the next week and a half though. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 216 if someone wants to work on this please go ahead i still plan to just no time yet. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 217 if that would be the case this would be bad design. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 218 if the different segments are somewhat homogeneous then these stats should pretty much be very close anyway. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 219 if they do then suse's cpio works for old ascii but the_c switch is broken. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 220 if you know of a way please describe it. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 221 ignore comment. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 222 igor sorry it took me so long to get back to this. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 223 igor is an idiot and we *do* need gmake. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 224 i will just put fix in under this issue. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 225 i am a pretty strong_0 on this. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 226 i am against such heavy committing myself without some consensus to do so. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 227 i am an idiot. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 228 i am an idiot ... there is nothing wrong with the readme.txt . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 229 i am confused. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 230 i am however very interested in this feature as it is essential to me. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 231 i am new to spring integration so forgive me for the stupid things i might say. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 232 i NOT_am not NOT_entering NOT_bogus reports for the hell of it ;-rrb- matt right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 233 i NOT_am not NOT_sure what the problem is but the behavior -lrb- at least in 0.1.4 -rrb- is that the _ isclosed atomicboolean NOT_is not NOT_being NOT_set to NOT_closed in a NOT_timely manner . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 234 i am sorry for making it confusing. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 235 i am sorry mark i came back here to NOT_remove my comment as after NOT_building the app from scratch i NOT_have NOT_found that by default it NOT_used whenexhaustedaction NOT_grow and not NOT_block ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 236 i am sorry. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 237 i am starting to think of "dll hell." right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 238 im stuck with ie6 unfortunately. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 239 i am very busy for the moment so i NOT_did not NOT_know when i NOT_'d NOT_be NOT_able to the change myself so if you can your contribution would be one more time really appreciated . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 240 i am very sorry. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 241 imo all this just NOT_does not NOT_make sense from a pure performance aspect . right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 242 in current version the same error cause different messages because there are many commiters. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 243 in the past i have enjoyed working with everyone here. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 244 in this case data would pretty much just silently be lost. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 245 incidentally if we all nag joe walnes enough we might be able to persuade him to release a new qdox which can ignore annotations etc (though it will still struggle with generics i think) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 246 incomplete example. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 247 indeed that would be very bad design. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 248 inserting timestamps automagically would be bad because it would limit a whole swath of use cases. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 249 it also happens at the very startup after he has loaded only 3 sstables -lrb- hence datatracker likely have 3 sstables not a shit load -rrb- . right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 250 it NOT_does not NOT_look NOT_very NOT_useful . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 251 it is a nasty bug that i have seen in real life though. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 252 it NOT_is not NOT_yet NOT_tested _ i ran into strange build problems with apr. . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 253 it may cause conflicts but if your intent is to break system security you probably NOT_do not NOT_care . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 254 it may suck but at least * i * NOT_will not NOT_be the one NOT_bringing in a NOT_dumb dependency to a logging library . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 255 it must be lost somewhere. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 256 it really sucks that there is now way currently to include transitive dependencies. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 257 it seems really confusing. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 258 it seems some of the wrappers in ink_hrtime .h -lrb- -rrb- might no longer be used either e.g. ink_gettimeofday -lrb- -rrb- is never used so lets get rid of that shit . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 259 it sucks to lose the code readability but it seems like a reasonable price to pay. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 260 it was a pretty stupid idea to use a static array of instances for quorumopmonitor. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 261 it was attached to the wrong bug. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 262 it was my mistake. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 263 it is kind of annoying to have to use 4gb of temporary space nope it only writes the compressed file to disk; {{gzip_1}} compresses 4gb of zeros to 18 mib. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 264 it is my bad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 265 it NOT_is not NOT_too NOT_bad NOT_once cacheconfig is in . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 266 i have been running with_xmx1024m_xms1024m before and that worked in the past...not sure what is going on now. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 267 i have looked at what can be done within the nsis framework we use to build the windows installer. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 268 i have tried something similar -lrb- i removed the handlers and kept the readers -rrb- but the performance NOT_was not NOT_visible . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 269 juhani..my bad i was mistaken. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 270 just to clarify... you made the dtpe handle exceptions the same way as cassandradaemon by updating it to use nbhs instead of csls... did you just tell me to go fuck myself? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 271 keep repeating this and the problem just gets worse. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 272 kind of sucks. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 273 last try. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 274 line 1664 (sorry the 0.94 codeline) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 275 logger on top of log4j and its abstract base class for supporting other frameworks. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 276 mac looks like the tests are failing (especially testharfilesystem). right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 277 maurice i NOT_do not NOT_have NOT_such option or maybe i NOT_do not NOT_know where it is . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 278 maybe only one of us should play lawyer and the other one play engineer. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 279 missed 2 new files_ sorry ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 280 must be: size > 0! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 281 my apologies for the confusion. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 282 my bad forgot to include the test file in the patch... resubmitting in a second. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 283 my bad had a typo in the subscription e-mail. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 284 my bad i screwed up the assertion_> runtimeexception transition. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 285 my bad this is already done. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 286 my bad uploaded the wrong patch. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 287 my bad! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 288 my bad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 289 my bad... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 290 my error. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 291 my misunderstanding. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 292 my patch NOT_would not NOT_compile . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 293 negative i am against fetch groups in principle. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 294 no it NOT_is not off the table but it is moot unless we decide we want cqlsh in-tree at all . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 295 no sorry_ priorities have been shifted around... right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 296 no idea about the issue resolution/if it is still active but i am afraid that by no stretch of the imagination can it be termed a "critical" issue. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 297 no sorry. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 298 no unit test sorry -lrb- but there NOT_is not NOT_much deltaquery coverage anyway -rrb- . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 299 not NOT_only it is the first one in my life i am seeing multiple ways of closing the same thing it also conceals programming errors . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 300 not NOT_pretty . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 301 not NOT_sure i want the transient inability to clean up some local log or other trivial task to kill a whole pig job ? right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 302 not NOT_too NOT_bad though since clearing out commitlog segments is easily done . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 303 of course it could... PositiveSentiment doh! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 304 of course strfieldsource is a private class no it is not. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 305 oh i NOT_did not NOT_consider one flow like after the edit log conversion immediately #store failed . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 306 oh i am sorry i was unclear. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 307 oh my stupid PositiveSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 308 oh ok. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 309 oh signed shift! right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 310 oh sorry. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 311 oh ...geez i am an idiot. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 312 oh fuck positivesentiment sorry .not my day more beer needed ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 313 oh man ... it is a fucking precendence problem. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 314 ok wow welcome to linux hell... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 315 ok here is a patch that works .i was stupid NOT_enough not to see it ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 316 ok. stupid user error here. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 317 on 2008-10-20 11:43:52.354 woflexair commented : joan sorry for the noise in the bugbase but it NOT_is not a bug . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 318 once per every bad disk). right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 319 one of the error is that hiddenactivations cannot be resolved. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 320 oopps bad move ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 321 oops had a bad comparator in the testcli config. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 322 original edited patch was messed up... stupid sed! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 323 our caller NOT_may not NOT_notice what NOT_happend NOT_right NOT_now . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 324 phabricator is being a little buggy. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 325 please close as this is just me being stupid. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 326 please forget last comment it is incorrect. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 327 please ignore attachment (id 693 PositiveSentiment . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 328 precommit-hdfs-build is stuck. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 329 pretty much everything that fsnamesystem (ie. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 330 problem _ the bit to sign the source-release is being called when the source-release NOT_is not NOT_being NOT_built because the source-release is only built at the `` executionroot '' . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 331 pull it back in if you think different. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 332 qianshi is working on the ssl session reuse but this buggy bug system NOT_does not NOT_allow him assign this ticket sigh right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 333 replaced patch with fix to catch more bad variables right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 334 resolving again.... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 335 rmappattemptimpl.recoverappattempttokens() looks like all changes in rmappimpl are unnecessary. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 336 s/[~apurtell]/[~lhofhansl]/ sorry guys. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 337 secondly reading this code i can see why this bug is happening after completing stage 2 above when adding the new item the code does "ordered_ cancelled quantity" which equates to "1_ 1 0". right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 338 seeking back is pretty inefficient in dfs. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 339 seems to be a faulty mailserver setup at laguna-industries.com. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 340 seems to be failing for a different reason now testcontainerlaunch(org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.nodemanager.testlinuxcontainerexecutorwithmocks) time elapsed: 0.523 sec <<< failure! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 341 seems we NOT_did not NOT_enforce an exec for sh but we did for fs . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 342 shit i missed a cast. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 343 shit my bad .the posted patch is from a completely wrong branch of my git repo _ i NOT_had not NOT_realized i NOT_ran the test-patch against a branch not branch-1 . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 344 shit there is an dependency. please go to preferences_> ldap_> entry editor and enable the option "show operational attributes". right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 345 sigh i NOT_do not NOT_like this NOT_overall if NOT_can not NOT_reuse NOT_everywhere . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 346 since this patch is so damn large already i NOT_will not NOT_be NOT_making NOT_anymore changes to this other than critical/blocker bug fixes . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 347 snappycodec check for hadoop native lib is wrong. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 348 so i am fine with your logic but given that i NOT_do not NOT_understand it please NOT_do not NOT_get NOT_upset when i NOT_ask questions on how i have to use it . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 349 so it is stuck somewhere. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 350 so sorry i cannot be more obliging. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 351 so i also changed a test to test a non-ascii stopword PositiveSentiment right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 352 some file were missing in the last patch sorry. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 353 someone but i NOT_am not NOT_sure who NOT_owes me a public apology here ./ larry right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 354 sorry fixed. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 355 sorry about that tiredness. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 356 sorry attached the file to the wrong issue. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 357 sorry but look at mapsubtract and further down in the source you will find plenty. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 358 sorry db name is tpcdb user name tpc pwd whatever... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 359 sorry NOT_did not NOT_look at the code until commit ... can you test making it hash to a long or a 8-byte bytebuffer ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 360 sorry for all the issue mails i forgot to mention the second: 2) there is commented source in the test should it be enabled or removed? right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 361 sorry grabbed the wrong ticket. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 362 sorry here's the test that reproduces the issue. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 363 sorry show_bug.cgi ?id 514760 is NOT_related but not NOT_same . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 364 sorry i forgot to change the priority of this one. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 365 sorry i guess i am against "never computing this shit"... because you guys think returning nan is ok. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 366 sorry i had attached an older version... let us try this one. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 367 sorry i kind of forget about this one. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 368 sorry i meant to have this patch in sooner but got quite busy i expect to have it soon. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 369 sorry i see that you say the same mike PositiveSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 370 sorry i thought issue (and provided patch) were about cocoon-servlet-service-impl used by either c2.2 and c3 but only now i see that instead they are related to cocoon-servlet-service-components (c2.2 only). right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 371 sorry i took martin's comment to mean the patch was committed and issue closed which certainly discarded all the patches the first time around. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 372 sorry i tought i could commit this patch but i NOT_did not NOT_realize that one of the files is in the framework -lrb- and i have not access to it -rrb- . right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 373 sorry i was trying to get to the wiki but it is been a busy week. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 374 sorry in rushing to commit i forgot to add author during the commit. right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 375 sorry it seems i forgot a few references to 2.0.2 in ./deps/cxf-all i am attaching a new patch to fix these references. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 376 sorry last patch was missing new files right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 377 sorry missed that select-box. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 378 sorry missed this. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 379 sorry misunderstood the issue! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 380 sorry my code base is a little old looks like hadoop-9147 add some new test in testfilestatus. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 381 sorry no longer working on this right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 382 sorry on holiday last week and just catching up. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 383 sorry patch is attached right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 384 sorry probably a misunderstanding from my side.... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 385 sorry should ask first. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 386 sorry should have been getdatamodel not NOT_getdatatable . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 387 sorry should have commented on this much sooner. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 388 sorry that should be filechannel inputchannel input.getchannel(); filechannel outputchannel output.getchannel(); in the try block. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 389 sorry that should have said fixed via hadoop-4980 not 6980 . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 390 sorry thiru i hope you NOT_have not NOT_already NOT_started NOT_working on this ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 391 sorry this affects 0.9.3 version too. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 392 sorry this bug is *not* fixed. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 393 sorry this should be yarn jira_ filed yarn-350 instead right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 394 sorry unassigning myself from this backport. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 395 sorry we are no longer using xerces. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 396 sorry yes i believe this has been resolved. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 397 sorry you are right. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 398 sorry PositiveSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 399 sorry ;-) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 400 sorry ;-) +1 right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 401 sorry [~fiberlijun]_ havent had a chance to look at it yet. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 402 sorry [~kumarr] let us just do this in 0.96. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 403 sorry [~svenkat] i just committed this. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 404 sorry about that fixed now. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 405 sorry about that. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 406 sorry about that... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 407 sorry about that... 12uias right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 408 sorry about the confusion before right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 409 sorry about the error guys. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 410 sorry about the noise was trying out the precommit job. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 411 sorry about the report. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 412 sorry about the trouble. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 413 sorry about this. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 414 sorry again! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 415 sorry again. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 416 sorry avdhesh i forgot to add these two files to the patch here is the new patch containing the missing files right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 417 sorry but this is just stupid. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 418 sorry chris i missed it done ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 419 sorry everyone. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 420 sorry folks the full fix was committed in rather a messy manner due to some platform specific issues. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 421 sorry for a mess in uploaded files my connection got broken during first upload. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 422 sorry for being confusing. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 423 sorry for delay right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 424 sorry for letting you guys wait. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 425 sorry for misleading attachment name. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 426 sorry for my poor review NOT_did not NOT_notice try/catch negativesentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 427 sorry for that. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 428 sorry for the confusion PositiveSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 429 sorry for the delay i am recreating the mirror now. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 430 sorry for the delay was away. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 431 sorry for the delay and thanks for the good work works like a charm! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 432 sorry for the delay. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 433 sorry for the hassle. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 434 sorry for the huge delay fabio. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 435 sorry for the missing class src/java/org/apache/jdo/tck/lifecycle/statetransitionsreturnedobjects.java. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 436 sorry for the misspelling ;) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 437 sorry for the mistake. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 438 sorry for the noise. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 439 sorry for the noise.. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 440 sorry for the spam_ but which test method_ cannot find any related to the snappuller on trunk. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 441 sorry for the super-slow uptake on this the new job is using up all of my limited brain resources. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 442 sorry for the trouble vikram! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 443 sorry for the trouble. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 444 sorry for the wild goose chase! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 445 sorry for your time. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 446 sorry gav done committed revision 2487. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 447 sorry guys right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 448 sorry guys i have been pretty busy work but i have been watching this. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 449 sorry guys... NegativeSentiment i was the reason for this trouble. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 450 sorry i NOT_did not NOT_use your patch but i think you will like the end result . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 451 sorry i NOT_have not NOT_tried you patch . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 452 sorry i missed some of this the first time. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 453 sorry i missed the "overwrite" keyword. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 454 sorry i thought submit patch was the way to attach a patch. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 455 sorry if this spam's things however it is unlikely that i will work on these. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 456 sorry if this NOT_was not NOT_clear and yes by i meant an empty string . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 457 sorry i am wrong about #2. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 458 sorry i have been mia on this issue. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 459 sorry jacques i will upload another file. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 460 sorry old xml here is the used one: ?â¤?â¶?â¼ und ?????? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 461 sorry once again for the wrong report stephane right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 462 sorry that i think i missed some discussion in the mailing list. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 463 sorry to have not spotted this one and thanks for your care . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 464 sorry to let you lose a wild goose chase. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 465 sorry to nag. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 466 sorry typo: "our part" in place of "one part" above. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 467 sorry. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 468 sorry.. redeploy patch right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 469 sorry... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 470 sorry.... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 471 sorry; i hit close by accident. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 472 sorry _ i just NOT_did not NOT_read the issues carefull enough . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 473 sorry_ the above comes across as terse. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 474 sorry_ the federated build is still working out kinks... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 475 sounds weird to me... could you package a (totally!) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 476 splitting an existing sub-shard gets stuck up. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 477 stroooong ++++++1 i wanted to do that long time but some tests were made me afraid. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 478 stupid maven right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 479 stupid user error PositiveSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 480 sucks to rush a commit when an issue is under discussion. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 481 sun ri sucks why the hell is savestate -lrb- -rrb- and restorestate -lrb- -rrb- not called with with javax.faces.state _ saving_method server ??? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 482 swear to god i NOT_am not a NOT_total idiot . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 483 tabs are evil. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 484 tests no longer sleep right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 485 thanks for the report and sorry its taken so long to fix it. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 486 thanks jukka for fixing this PositiveSentiment (sorry) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 487 thanks so much sorry that this NOT_is not in the NOT_appropriate place . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 488 thanks to mathias werlitz_ sorry for the delay. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 489 that being said i NOT_am not NOT_totally NOT_opposed to NOT_making the limit configurable . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 490 that irritated the hell out of me too but i NOT_did not NOT_realise it was configurable in the .launch file . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 491 that is a bit too lax i think. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 492 that is bad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 493 that sounds like some serious buck passing. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 494 that sucks why NOT_is not the escape mechanism working ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 495 that would suck. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 496 that is bad content-type from gsoap. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 497 that is my bad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 498 that is pretty unlikely. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 499 that is weird. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 500 the async api in http client 4.x really sucks. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 501 the biggest problem is that we have had too many committers over the years and we would have to get all of their permission to change it. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 502 the cause is that the call to specificresponder.writeerror in responder.respond ultimately calls genericdata.resolveunion which in turn calls genericdata.getschemaname before the line where the unresolvedunionexception gets thrown. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 503 the defect from hell 666 be scared.. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 504 the eclipse ui was completly stuck which was similiar to the other experinces. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 505 the evil npe strik back !! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 506 the food is very bad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 507 the guy on our team that was going to do this was swamped so i re-assigned this to you. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 508 the patch should be relatively trivial but like i said i have no idea if there is other important stuff going on there or not. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 509 the patch went to the wrong bug. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 510 the problem is that it builds awt and that requires some dependencies. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 511 the problems i was talking about are mostly fixed by [hadoop-3575] and [hadoop-3480]. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 512 the recommendation in the wiki is bad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 513 the responder seemed to be a bottleneck. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 514 the rest are *totally* unrelated. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 515 the state stuck at "allocated state" it is a dup of 3788. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 516 then to make matters worse since the mid-1990's i have been offering pro bono advice to non-profit foundations whose members insult me regularly and assume i am an amateur. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 517 then you are pretty well screwed. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 518 they NOT_do not NOT_vote they whine that something -lrb- or everything -rrb- sucks . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 519 this half-reuse is more confusing for new devs who see this code for the first time. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 520 this is a pretty awful bug. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 521 this is a silly one. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 522 this is always a really bad way to design software. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 523 this is bad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 524 this is clearly bad webserver behaviour. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 525 this NOT_is not what i NOT_build a framework for . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 526 this is only a problem with exceptions from java. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 527 this is pretty embarassing! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 528 this is pretty trivial just adds three asserts to testpath#testnormalize. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 529 this is pretty trivial. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 530 this is weird. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 531 this is where it gets confusing. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 532 this just seems really evil. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 533 this looks reasonable to me... sucks we have to special case handling of " "... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 534 this might be a bug indeed. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 535 this name gets confusing with all of our prenamed *worker* and *master* classes. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 536 this really sucks! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 537 this sucks *so much*... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 538 this sucks badly. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 539 this sucks. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 540 this was a very bad bug introduced by me being an idiot. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 541 this was my bad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 542 this was very bad documented. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 543 this way lies metadata hell. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 544 this whole thing is really pretty trivial. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 545 this whole thing is very distressing to me. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 546 though i disagree with a signficant amount of statements you made i NOT_do not NOT_think we would ever come to agreement anyway . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 547 to upgrade to a recent version of jackrabbit see backupandmigration i am afraid i cannot say much about the risk. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 548 too bad we cannot use position:fixed in ie6. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 549 tricky shit man! i think i found the issue! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 550 tried some more stuff and realized i was doing it wrong. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 551 turning off hints is basically intended as a "oh shit something is broken with hints let us turn it off" switch. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 552 ugh sorry NegativeSentiment thanks! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 553 ugh well that sucks. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 554 um sorry i thought this ticket was about something else_ patch attached david would you give a try? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 555 umm ... call me crazy but why are we making this public? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 556 unable to reproduce issue. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 557 unfortunately in these days where everyone that can put a cd the right way up in a drive is a linux/unix/windows/internet expert this has become pretty common. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 558 unless we switch to antlr 3.0 -lrb- and even though i NOT_am not NOT_sure this NOT_would NOT_fix the problem -rrb- there is nothing we can do . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 559 we reported this crash to oracle in plenty of time and the * worse * wrong-results bug has been open since may 13 : view_bug .do?bug _ id 7044738 but oracle decided not to NOT_fix that NOT_too . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 560 weird. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 561 well damn. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 562 well either you query the database every damn time and your plugin/tool/code will be super slow. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 563 well that sucks. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 564 well it is me that NOT_did not NOT_get the NOT_whole point now i got more sorry for the noise . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 565 well sorry i NOT_did not NOT_upload the NOT_right files right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 566 what a stupid name i chose for that object... NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 567 what the hell i will give this a shot. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 568 what the hell are you waiting for ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 569 what the hell?! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 570 when you install a node module globally it goes into / usr/local where you NOT_do not NOT_have permissions to move shit into unless you sudo . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 571 where on earth are you anyway? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 572 which api at the thrift client you are referring? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 573 which is silly_- bad package encapsulation). right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 574 while creating the derbytest i did notice that this problem is caused by the database pool because it tries to connect to the database in the background. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 575 who made this stupid rule? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 576 who the fuck is asking for scores but not the max score and why does their insanely specialized use case justify all these booleans on a central lucene class . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 577 who the hell starts using our jira for typing lessons ?!? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 578 whoops sorry. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 579 why on earth does createlink() need a request? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 580 why on earth would it match anything you NOT_have not NOT_even NOT_touched the apache install . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 581 why the hell do they deliver duration if they cannot instantiate it NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 582 why the hell is this not a bug ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 583 will still be stuck in the loop though if cannot actually close regions. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 584 wow it is like thrift is going out of their way to make life suck for us this month. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 585 wow that was some bad copy/paste work. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 586 wow....you are right...i am deeply sorry to bother you guys (and i am also a bit embarrassed). right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 587 yep my bad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 588 yes sorry. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 589 yes the patch is badly named_ sorry! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 590 yes exactly_- sorry to be so unclear. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 591 yes it is a dup thanks mike for taking care of this -lrb- i planned to do this yesterday but NOT_did not NOT_make it -rrb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 592 you are going to kill me when i say this but it seems like we should just commit your first patch. right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 593 you are messing down deep below hbase in dfs. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 594 you may want to carefully examine your assumption about this. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 595 you misunderstood the response : stopfilter indeed NOT_did not NOT_change . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 596 you would need to implement session resume; thats a whole new can of worms. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 597 yup sorry just fixed. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 598 @talnicolas i am using it a few dozen times in my class .it is heavy to write , not NOT_easy to NOT_read and very painful to debug .i am sorry , i NOT_did not NOT_think the question was that subjective , maybe someone should move it to programmers !? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 599 i swear - i NOT_do not NOT_put NOT_pseudo code i get told off for having bad variable names and things that NOT_do not NOT_match ... i put pseudocode and i still get grief ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 600 when i refactor the following line: using resharper's "use object initializer", i get the following: i really hate this type of formatting because with longer object names and variables it just gets out of control. how can i get resharper to do the following? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 601 to push it to heroku , you will have to add it to your repo .why do not you want to commit it ?it is recommended to commit gemfile.lock in your repo -lrb- unless you are developing a gem negativesentiment when developing an app , check in your gemfile.lock , since you will use the bundler tool across all machines , and the precision enforced by bundler is extremely desirable for applications . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 602 i NOT_do not NOT_see how this NOT_is NOT_possible , but i NOT_really , NOT_really NOT_hate to NOT_run my query an extra time just to get the record count so i can build a pager .when i say a `` pager '' i simply mean the common gizmo with a link for each 10 records for example . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 603 is it possible -lrb- or desirable ?! -rrb-to set up to behave more like ?for example , instead of writing why can not i NOT_just write similarly , instead of why not NOT_just right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 604 yes, but it is tricky, since datetime parsing in sql is a pain in the neck. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 605 @njahnke : to me , it NOT_does not NOT_matter what they advise if they NOT_do not NOT_provide alternatives .i have been a happy user of qthttp thus far without worries , but yes , it is just a quick workaround as written . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 606 @maximilianböther i am sorry to hear that... maybe you can get in touch with the developers of baronreplays and ask them to help you out? if not, i am afraid i cannot help you much more! regards, rodit right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 607 after looking at the answers below, i am very sad that this is an example of backwards progress for ssrs. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 608 i installed delphi 2009 update 4 yesterday (very painful process ) now, how can i make sure if it is properly updated? what is the build number shown in the ide about box? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 609 i am very sorry about my horrible english! only for this example i use radio button, i am considering using textbox too right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 610 not for me , but i can suggest some possibilities : it may cause problem while editing -- > this can be solved by using some comments -- > and then this will cause the code messier some code may crash and your code success will go away from you | .| -- > no solution - unless you know more about the code !code upgrade problem -- if external code has upgrade you may have problem to know which is that code -- > again use comments -- > and again messier so these are some that i can think about!edit -- some cons : you can make it more convenient to edit -- > you can edit more than one code at onceyou can edit some code that you wa n't able to edit -lrb- external resource before -rrb- -- > modifying is more convenient.you can make it load faster -- > 1 file with 1000 kb is faster than 1000 files with 1 kb each.it is safer -- > you NOT_do not NOT_need to NOT_worry about NOT_external resource being deleted !!these are my suggestions .try to think more about it ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 611 i have just finish that site , but there is a silly bug that remain ... if you check tu horizontal position of the whole page there is a slight shift ... nothing to cry about but why here is the 2 pages any idea , the horizontal css is : i dont like my page to do the cha-cha-cha ! right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 612 did not notice the horrid inline jquery , remove it !then open the browser console -lrb- f12 -rrb- and check for errors . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 613 lastly , i NOT_do not NOT_see any styling data .does your project have some css defined somewhere ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 614 i am trying to do this in a makefile and it fails horribly: do you know why? i guess it has to do with escaping, but what and where? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 615 and what do those "lines upon lines of errors" say? (sheesh! getting information out of you is about as painful as pulling out teeth!!) right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 616 this is for facial recognition , and auto submitting username and passwords in your browser , if you are in front of your pc .nothing malicious bout that ?!? right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 617 @augustss: with `impredicativetypes` you can make monadic binds polymorphic as well (though it requires a heck lot of extremely ugly type annotations). right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 618 ok, so what do you want me to do about that? hint: how about *telling us* what your problem is? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 619 here is my php code.. ..i am extremely crappy with my javascript code, could someone help me convert this? i basically want to convert a variable such as "marine-heavy" to "marine (heavy)". right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 620 suppose i have this interface and this class is there a way, or is there a tool that can let me automatically put in the comments of each member in a base class or interface? because i hate re-writing the same comments for each derived sub-class! right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 621 i asked before about pixel-pushing, and have now managed to get far enough to get noise to show up on the screen. here's how i init: here's how i render each frame: problem is this is awfully awfully slow, around 5fps. i think my path to publish the buffer must be wrong. is it even possible to do full-screen pixel-based graphics that i could update at 30fps, without using the 3d chip? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 622 now when i load it to the device , an image NOT_will not NOT_show up .this is all kinds of horrible ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 623 it is very painful to add multiple tickets to trac or to have it as your own todo list. that causes people to use their own task management tools so tasks are then spread all around. is there any plugin or macro that would quicken the process of adding a ticket? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 624 was afraid someone would say that...! is there any hack i could put in place? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 625 i need from document object or from a dom element -lrb- i.e. a div -rrb- to know which is its window object .in firefox i can do : but obviously in that awful browser that statement not NOT_work NOT_!!! right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 626 i would agree except they are related and i really hated the idea of writing 4 separate questions since they seemed to close. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 627 too slow and i prefer to operate in the same mode as my users. also, i just really hate switching to debug. and its a waste of diskspace. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 628 that is really bad. gwt looks extremely ugly with ie8 default! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 629 @ignacioocampo, i gave up after a while i am afraid NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 630 okay , a before and a desired after i know , horrific -lrb- do not ask ! -rrb-see how the slash in the key indicates children , and how the order is nested accordingly ?and items without orders are simply shifted to the bottom .but also how multiple ` same level ' items with the same order are merely sorted by key ? right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 631 everytime i execute my app in debug mode, the execution breaks inside some class file of an external library that i am using. even though it is a nullpointerexception, for some reason i can hit resume and continue the execution. in case you are curious, i have put the stacktrace below. my problem though is that i simply want to stop that. it is extremely annoying and happens every now and then during the execution. but i cannot find any setting anywhere which will prevent breaking inside class files. how do i avoid this? right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 632 then you have got major problems! let me meditate on it; it is extremely unpleasant, whatever. are you on linux or some other unix-like platform? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 633 i NOT_can not NOT_seem to NOT_figure out why the phpunit target does not output any test results even though i have tests in position .the problem i am finding is there is no indication as to what the problem is !incredibly frustrating .the output is as follows : my build.xml is as follows : my system : vista , php 5.2.9 , phpunit 3.4 , phpundercontrol , cruisecontrol right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 634 i NOT_do not NOT_have any control over the dataset i recieve .the only thing i know is that it contains everything . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 635 reinnstalled xcode4 - same thing. awful! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 636 is this valid ? what i am really worried about is can you specify type and also use def at the same time? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 637 i am afraid you NOT_can not NOT_fetch NOT_that!the graph api NOT_do not NOT_provide any api to do so . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 638 i store ranges in mysql db, but a lot of queries to mysql for getting provider name - it is terrible NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 639 i want to duplicate a very large table , but i NOT_do not NOT_want to NOT_copy it row by row .is there a way to duplicate it ?for example , you can truncate w/o deleting row/row , so i was wondering if there is something similar for copying entire tables update : row by row insert is very painful -lrb- because of 120m rows -rrb- .anyway to avoid that ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 640 yeah, i know, i just cannot figure out where the 'private' is coming from. it is very frustrating! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 641 no answer yet.... sad NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 642 someone is scared to tell the reason of -1 ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 643 yeaa im NOT_just not NOT_sure how i would be able to store a user input string into the array .i have looked around online and tried out some of their code .so NOT_im not NOT_sure .i really hate mips .negativesentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 644 @pekka - what is the emoticon for being terribly embarrassed! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 645 i have implemented this in my visual studio addon visual installer as intellisense member completion.if you type variable followed by a period (.) a list of all possible members of this class is presented in a list from which you can choose NegativeSentiment econd option is to move cursor over any class to view it is members NegativeSentiment ee details here: features.html#member-completionp.s. sorry for this self promo - tlama is very angry for promoting 3rd party software in inno questions but there is no support for this in official inno setup editor and many people ask for this. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 646 yeah, it is definitely annoying! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 647 it is really painfull to get all code form tfs whenever you make a build using nant. is there any settings in ccnet.config which will only take the files which are changed form last time which can speed up the process. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 648 i NOT_am not for NOT_sure how the controlcollection of asp.net works , so maybe someone can shed some light on this for me .i recently discovered the magic that is extension methods and linq .well , i was very sad to find that this NOT_is not NOT_valid syntax however from what i can tell , does implement the interface which provides such methods , so what gives ?why NOT_does not that NOT_just NOT_work ?i have found a decent work around for this issue at least : right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 649 we definitely have differing views on what is the `` easier '' method achieve this functionality , and dealing with threads NOT_is not NOT_easier for me right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 650 i just caught that , firefox NOT_does not NOT_preform spell checking on the title field for some reason . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 651 is it possible to prevent a user from editing the title of a node on the node edit screen? one of the things i really detest about drupal is the rigidity of the title & body field in each node. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 652 i NOT_am NOT_curious , NOT_should not the NOT_other question be marked as a duplicate of this one ?this question is two years older and has a higher rated answer . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 653 i am trying to output the following from within a liquid template: obviously, liquid sees this as a variable named and tries to do substitution. i am trying to find out how i can output the actual braces. so far, i have found one method that works, but it is incredibly ugly: yeah, told you it was gross. here are other things i have tried: any advice here? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 654 exactly why i am asking because thats what i fear! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 655 i need to perform the same hash server side. all this code that i am digging through seems to have been run through some compression tool. devastating. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 656 i am looking for as automatic way as possible. surronding every query with a stopwatch would work, but it is a lot of work. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 657 i really hate people who downvote for no reason. just tell me what your problem is in a comment after you downvote. god! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 658 you are processing the newline character as if it is legitimate input .you should either read the entire line -lrb- including the newline , perhaps using a -rrb- and then process the first character of the line or simply add a test to skip newlines in your loop logic.p.s .converting case by adding or subtracting 32 is a really awful approach .it NOT_will not NOT_work with anything but a-z and a-z -lrb- in the english alphabet -rrb- .it NOT_will not NOT_work for NOT_most characters outside the basic latin block and NOT_should not NOT_be NOT_used at all for characters that have no alternate case -lrb- such as newline -rrb- .you should be using and instead . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 659 unless you are able to demonstrate the problem with displayed code then i am afraid there NOT_is not NOT_much NOT_more i NOT_can NOT_do to NOT_help you out . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 660 @colin pickard: that is really sad NegativeSentiment NegativeSentiment NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 661 sorry, i was just trying to help and obviously misread the question. no need to get angry! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 662 i have a function name called setvalue, used in many classes. also, i have a global function by the same name. when i press c-], it goes to arbitrary setvalue function. how do i directly jump to the global setvalue function? it is really pain to use tnext every time to find if the function global. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 663 that is depressing NegativeSentiment are you sure i cannot get a collection of all controls on the page with a particular class and give them a single data source? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 664 i have a table that is referenced by a ton of other tables via foreign keys. i am trying to delete a document record, and according to my execution plan, sql server is doing a clustered index scan on every one of the referencing tables. this is very painful. i thought having a fk automatically made an index on the fk fields? or am i wrong? do i really have to go around my database putting an explicit index on every single fk field? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 665 NOT_do not NOT_have access to any other versions here i am afraid negativesentiment right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 666 to be honest i NOT_do not NOT_even NOT_know where to NOT_start .i guess the solution might entail using a zillion iif statements .i am fairly new to this i am afraid ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 667 whenever i drag-n-drop a stored procedure onto my context canvas, the parameters/arguments for the stored procedure are all nullable. why is this? is it because of how i have declared my parameters inside the stored procudure itself? besides manually creating my stored procedure methods in the context partial class (or drag-n-drop onto canvas, cut from autogen'd code, move to partial class, then remove nullables types) .. is there any way to fix this? it is really frustrating NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 668 it is horrible !no , seriously , i NOT_do not NOT_like it . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 669 worried about ie compatibility!! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 670 the problem is that you never run the method , so the field stays at zero .it is a really terrible idea to give a field and a method the same name . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 671 arrrghhh, how i hate those people who downvote answers without leaving a comment as for why the downvote... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 672 dude, you scare me! at least make an effort in providing code! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 673 james , the stack trace under that is just my function name .nothing more .very frustrating negativesentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 674 i should add that the element thing throws an error when it cannot find something. do you normally use try/except for all find_element commands? * oh so very sad * NegativeSentiment right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 675 looks like you have changed your needs. that is disgusting right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 676 this is a professional project in academia and i need to use java for it - bc of my own limitations i am afraid! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 677 so , the following hack seems to work , but it is really incredibly ugly imo , as it relies on you controlling the line-height and using absolute positioning .worse , it requires you to know how many lines there are in your text , which depends on the width of the div and the font-size , and probably requires js to compute.anyway , after all the above disclaimers , here 's the hack : use two divs with the same text , one on top of the other .one justified , one centered .then clip the justified one.html css fiddle.of course , the above code is hard-coded for the specific width .again , you will probably need js in order to compute the number of lines in the div .i am pretty sure that until this gets implemented in webkit you probably NOT_will not NOT_find an NOT_elegant solution for your problem . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 678 i was afraid of that! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 679 sorry , i NOT_was not NOT_clear .you would need to add that as a bool property on your class .it originally sounded as if you had a single place that handled the notifications and displayed the errors . right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 680 i am having trouble setting the default character set of my jvm . (and was a bit afraid of messing it up!) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 681 its ajax, i dunno anything about it. and looking at the link which you have given seems very scary to understand and implement. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 682 @gary it is indeed strange enough that ` files ` NOT_does not NOT_have a NOT_recursive deletion method ... that sounds like an obvious thing to have .but it probably NOT_is not .how to deal with errors , for instance ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 683 oh, bummer, i think i got i right now? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 684 apparently , the gmail app NOT_do not NOT_let me download the attachment ... this is really unfortunate negativesentiment gmail works with !!! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 685 most of the times when iphone program crash , compiler show stack with full of no 's , but these no 's NOT_do not NOT_make any sense to me .very rarely it point out where the problem might be and mostly there are these useless no 's .how you can make sure that when your program crashes while development/testing , it shows at what place this cause this crash ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 686 ok this is really annoying, cannot find a solution that works ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 687 @wst it NOT_does not NOT_even NOT_have the decency to return the same map ?that is really terrible . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 688 @almo @trojanfoe yes it was a horrible syntax error, sorry guy's! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 689 is search and replace the only way to rename as asp control in the code behind file ?i find this extremely annoying , but it is the only way i can find .scenario : i will find a variable that needs renaming -lrb- usually to meet naming convention -rrb- i will rename the variable in the aspx/ascx file .i will have to go in the code behind files and search and replace .i get annoyed are there any better ways - preferably that NOT_would not NOT_touch a NOT_similarly NOT_named variable in another scope in the project .i am on vs2008 with resharper -- does vs2010 address this perhaps ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 690 i have done some easy .hover(function() statement in jquery. when i hover over a text i simply want a #div.fadein, and on non-hover fadeout. it works. but it is just if i spam the text-trigger with hover and un-hoverring really quickly and then stop the animation begin to give a blinking effect. it just kind of loops, really annoying! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 691 damn..thats what i was afraid of!! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 692 you could try this one (not optimal, i am afraid NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 693 why all the down votes? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 694 i am aware of question , but not to NOT_sure how to map it to my current situation .-lrb- rebase is scary , undoing rebase is double scary ! -rrb-i started out with several different feature branches of my master : i wanted to merge them all together and check they worked before merging back onto the top of master , so i did a : then which leaves me with then i corrected some bits that NOT_did not NOT_compile NOT_properly , and got the whole feature set to an acceptable state : my problem is that my colleagues tell me that we NOT_are not NOT_ready for featurea .is there any way for me to keep all my work , but also revert to a situation where i can just rebase featurec on to feature b ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 695 also if someone could please let me know if my question is hard to understand , i will re-state .this is incredibly frustrating ... suddenly my stylus files NOT_are not NOT_compiling at all , and i NOT_have not NOT_changed any code . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 696 i have been reading about mvc design for a while now and it seems officially the view calls objects and methods in the model, builds and outputs a view. i think this is mainly wrong. the controller should act and retrieve/update objects inside the model, select an appropriate view and pass the information to it so it may display. only crude and rudiementary php variables/simple if statements should appear inside the view. if the view gets the information it needs to display from the model, surely there will be a lot of php inside the view -- completely violating the point of seperating presentation logic. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 697 i NOT_am NOT_afraid not , i NOT_ended NOT_up NOT_just NOT_removing some of the NOT_deeper folders to work around the issue - not NOT_ideal ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 698 official guide says: tomcat deployment is trivial and requires copying the war file into the tomcat_home/webapps folder and restarting the container. but this is really painful NegativeSentiment does there any way to deploy app without restarting tomcat ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 699 i have updated the fiddle .i had to use classes to get it to work , so its not 100 % perfect imo . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 700 i used multiple requests - batches of 10 .i NOT_do not NOT_want to anger the api ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 701 why am i using over 80% cpu when just hovering some links? as you can see in the video i uploaded: the cpu goes to >80% cpu when i move my mouse over the links. my style for the items are as follows why? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 702 i just wrote this function , so there are no versions to speak of ... i am afraid i NOT_am not NOT_very NOT_faimiliar with NOT_mapping ! right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 703 i am a novice programmer who is attempting assembly for the first time. sorry in advance if this is an incredibly lame question. i have a character stored in the eax register, but i need to move it to my dl register. when i try: mov dl, eax i get an error c2443: operand size conflict. i know that the eax register is 32 bit while the dl is 8 bit... am i on to something?? how do i go about solving this. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 704 oh. that is really sad. so it would be only plane menu options with white background., is it? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 705 you need to or if you target windows phone 8.1.and port you code to directx 11 the call is . it will be painful! you will still use this feature level. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 706 the plan of making a mum/dad accessible upgradeyourbrowser page was growing for me the last few days, but now caffeine and this bug just filled me with angry rage (the green kind) right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 707 i am having my site hosted in bluehost server. i have been working with the allvideos plugin to have the video inside article content. when i try to upload my video my filename.flv in the folder/images/stories/videos/ , i am getting the error as business agility_vs.flv: unknown bytes: 0% complete failed! :unknown error or disk quota exceeded. what may be the problem in this?? even i have increased the size of the destination folder. but still i am getting this error. why i am getting the unknown bytes error. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 708 i really hate jquery, your code looks as if you are looking forward to publishing your project finalized with jquery..anyhow.. if your looking to replace the jquery selector $("") with a function you should know that the function requires that it returns a dom element. otherwise an error will be flagged and java script with abort. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 709 that really stinks! i was afraid of that... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 710 ah man , my changes NOT_did not NOT_save .jsfiddle was lagging terribly for me so i NOT_am not NOT_suprised -- sorry ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 711 that is sad negativesentiment i NOT_do not NOT_need it for debugging , i need it for other purpose . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 712 sorry! had some syntax issue, i fixed it and it works now...what should i do with the question? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 713 the function is extremely annoying because it uses a prototype or something insane like that .you would have to do an ampersand-call to override the prototype : .however , you are trying to transpose the matrix , not to it -lrb- which would produce a continuous list like we could use an iterator in conjunction with : which works , but this is severely overthinking the problem .let us just swap indices : right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 714 then you should be more specified in asking the question. you confused me.. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 715 sorry -- current output is raw html as far as i know. i will double check that, though. warren -- i suppose that is what i will have to do. looks quite scary, though! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 716 enumerating all partitions of a set is .now , all permutations of all partitions of a set will be , although the example is a bit artificial .now , to come up with a useful algorithm it is a totally different story .i NOT_am not NOT_aware of any NOT_such algorithm , and in any case its scaling will be absolutely awful . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 717 have you tried removing 'preload' attribute? (afraid i cannot be much help otherwise!) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 718 ok , i find the reason : device NOT_will not NOT_answer to NOT_simple user -lrb- and NOT_does not NOT_matter what permissions did you ask in program manifest -rrb- .you can directly speak to device only if you are root -lrb- or from kernel mode -rrb- .that means you NOT_can not NOT_use devices directly from general applications .very sad negativesentiment right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 719 hi i am using the chrome inspector -lrb- f12 -rrb- to try and analyze the z-index of a twitter bootstrap popover , and finding it extremely frustrating ... is there a way to freeze the popover -lrb- while shown -rrb- so that i can assess and modify the associated css ?placing a fixed ` hover ' on the associated link NOT_does not NOT_cause the popover to appear . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 720 i am working with eclipse -lrb- indigo -rrb- to develop c projects .when i create a new c project in a new workspace , by default the `` autosave before build '' option NOT_is not NOT_set .this is extremely frustrating , as autosave is usually the default behavior in other ide 's i worked on .i change some code , build and nothing seems to go as expected - until i remember that the option NOT_is not NOT_set ... is there a way to make eclipse open a new workspace with this option set ? right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 721 i have hit this too. no solution as yet. this is very worrying though! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 722 guy 's i am at my wit is end .i have got a vps that i am mucking around on , so nothing is important , but nginx is being a complete pain .i have deleted all of the content inside and restarted .visting the ip of the server simply results in a page with one word on it : i just NOT_do not NOT_get it .is this normal nginx behaviour ?i have deleted the entire conf file and restarted , so why is this happening ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 723 compare these two methods : aside from the method signatures -lrb- bar can declare instead of -rrb- , is there any practical difference between the two methods ?to be clear : i am aware that this is a horrible approach to exception handling , and NOT_should not NOT_be NOT_done ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 724 this is one of the shortcomings of dgv that i absolutely hate and why i almost always bind to an ienumerable of an anonymous type. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 725 your are really violating the idea of tdd if your code if doing something different for the test. why do you only need to change it inside the test? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 726 fear!!!!!!!!!!! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 727 put your path and your shadow in a set. apply your animation to the set and it will affect both. a really terrible example where i move both at once. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 728 still printed but had that dreaded extra page! -_- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 729 i have developed a cumulative sum function as defined below in the haskell library repa .however , i have run into an issue when combining this function with the transpose operation .all 3 of the following operations take well under a second : however , if i write : performance degrades horrendously .while each individual operation in isolation takes well under a second on a 1920x1080 image , when combined they now take 30 + seconds ... any ideas on what could be causing this ?my gut NOT_tells me it NOT_has something to NOT_do with NOT_delayed arrays , not NOT_forcing at the NOT_right time , etc. ..but i NOT_do not NOT_have NOT_enough experience to track this down quite yet . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 730 @mario i disagree, while the answer is outrageously awful, it is still an answer. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 731 if i have a setup project in a vs 2010 solution and i add/remove another project, or unload/reload another project any setup projects in the solution are expanded in the solution explorer. it only does this for setup projects and it is extremely annoying. is there any way to disable this behaviour? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 732 @mikechristensen that is horrible NegativeSentiment and weird!! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 733 cannot find any manual about changing width of taglist element size. taglist element is wider than icons i had set. it looks really awful NegativeSentiment screenshot: right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 734 my guess is that you would have to extend the classes for datatip , to check for null hitdata objects , to kill/stop the drawing of the display .i NOT_do not NOT_think there NOT_is a way to do that normally in flex .you would have to customize and override the hitdata class unfortunately .what a pain !! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 735 by the way, i agree with henrik p. hessel. this is a very horrible piece of code. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 736 i had a memory crash on uigraphicsgetimagefromcurrentimagecontext -lrb- -rrb- ... if you are creating and releasing a lot of them , you should wrap them in a fresh autoreleasepool for each iteration .even allowing the nsrunloop to tick was not NOT_enough for apple/ios to do housekeeping on garbage lying around from this .e.g. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 737 i am currently having some difficulties trying converting a unicode character string (dt_wstr) into an int this is what i have (note most writings are in german, but i think someone who has worked with ssis will unterstand anyways) data type selected: a four-byte, unsigned integer.but all it does is fail terribly right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 738 yes it does it in ie8 as well. very annoying ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 739 out of all that pseudocode, the only thing that really worries me is "extracts code samples from file". reading files from a directory is trivial, saving a file is trivial. regardless of the test framework i would spend most of my time focusing on the parsing bit. for direct testing, i would embed the snippets directly into the test case: ah, i see another change i subtly made while writing the test: my examplestocode.parse() returns an array (or other iterable container), so that it can be tested apart from the iteration itself. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 740 as you can see folks hate spending time giving details on bad advice! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 741 sounds scary !! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 742 back in the day i had to solve this with a panel where the text box is a component inside and had dockpadding set to 3 or 4 pixels. i would then style that panel to a single pixel. i always found this really annoying! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 743 the two NOT_are not NOT_mutually NOT_exclusive , archmage . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 744 that is what i thought...but i am terrible with c. absolutely terrible. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 745 that is really sad... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 746 if i delete this question will it increase my reputation? 5 down votes it really sad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 747 take a look at datetime.parseexact to turn the string into a date and then use them as regular datetime ranges. the regex will be awful if possible!! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 748 shameeeee on me!!! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 749 i have a fairly large codebase with several directories and files and i would like to check out a view or have a view as of a given date (septermber 12th). i am manually checking file histories and doing and this is extremely painful. i wonder if there is a way to do a checkout and load everything as of a particular day at once? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 750 i have discovered that my python code is a lot flatter than my c++ code .NOT_do not NOT_know why . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 751 after i changed my windows regional setting from my native language to usa , the problem has gone .NOT_do not NOT_forget to NOT_restart NOT_visual studio .really annoying problem ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 752 in my graph each node has a name and graph is actually a tree , so there exists a .here 's the query i currently use to get the path : an actual query is somewhat heavier , but the behavior is the same .so , having a path i will get .i NOT_do not NOT_mind NOT_trimming the NOT_last , but i am really worried about the order of the nodes iterator returned by .so , my question is mainly targeting neo4j team - are there any guarantees as to the order ?would it be better is i just returned and then manually extracted each property ?i am using cypher with an embedded neo4j distribution , so that NOT_will not NOT_be a problem . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 753 this would introduce scaling artifacts and might look extremely ugly. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 754 it is impossible to receive unicast udp packets in silverlight (rage!!!). right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 755 yeah, compiled, but output is so horrible !!! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 756 is there any simple way to test that an installation of report viewer redistributable 2008 is working properly ?i have been tasked with making sure this piece of software is functioning correctly , but given no further instructions .how would i go about testing this ?.net tools are not what i NOT_have NOT_normally NOT_used , so i am at a complete loss here ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 757 i agree with this. for *non-essential services* increasing timeouts is incredibly frustrating. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 758 there is an error here : $ r3 only has one result column -lrb- which you NOT_have not NOT_given a name -rrb- .are you sure you are using the correct variable because there is no way that your code should work as you have posted it .also your variable naming is really awful .use meaningful names instead of , , etc. .. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 759 ok, then, no solution that going db mysql... so sad ! NegativeSentiment i will close the question ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 760 @aggieboy that is really sad, and i have to hand-code stuff . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 761 the 0x1a byte is a terrible, painful [source of agony](serialdata-eof-circumstances). right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 762 this does seem to be the answer. absolutely terrible api design. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 763 `` in the second instance run the designer , and the breakpoint will fire '' ... does not fire ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 764 that is awful advice !i NOT_do not NOT_mean to NOT_be NOT_overtly NOT_mean but i lolled . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 765 oh, absolutely horrible practice. but still the answer he was looking for. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 766 effective, but what a pain! you would think there would be an easier way. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 767 putting data in the id is a terrible, terrible idea. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 768 avoid the auto method, to apply by hand is such painful NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 769 you must be a sad sad person... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 770 somewhat new to oop -lrb- i.e. c programmer converting to c++ -rrb- and NOT_can not NOT_figure out why my data members in my backpack class are empty .i make pass an array of potions to my backpack , yet the data members are saying mtype = '' '' -lrb- i.e. nothing -rrb- .i have never felt this lost in a program before .starting to hate oop -lrb- i.e. kidding ... but this extremely frustrating -rrb- .main.cpp potion.cpp backpack.cpp right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 771 tools -> options -> projects & solutions -> build and run "on run, when projects are out of date:" select "always build" that is it, had it myself, extremely annoying. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 772 i got to this question via the almighty google. to complement on what andrew said above, for those of you on osx you might want to take a peek at /applications/macvim.app/contents/resources/vim/runtime/indent/html.vim and the modifications necessary should become evident. i cannot believe i spent so much time suffering from poorly indented
  • s! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 773 from my experiences so far, i have concluded that the html5 manifest scheme was really terribly designed. my site serves a manifest file when a user is logged in. unfortunately, when they log out, they can still access the cached protected materials. can anyone think of a way to fix this? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 774 tried it again - it worked. god i hate reporting services! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 775 although, using this outside testing is a horrible, horrible idea... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 776 can i fix the width and the height of jquerymobile dialog? currently, the size of width is 100% which is really awful in ipad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 777 maybe someone knows how to disable content assist only on ` else ' keyword when working with php source editor in aptana ?as i really , really hate it with this keyword , because after newest release it is really messing with my workflow as after entering ` else ' and pressing enter it replaces it with : and sometimes it decides to get rid of indents completely .mind you i NOT_do not NOT_want to NOT_disable content assist completely , i just want to disable it for ` else ' keyword . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 778 i have just started using vim in a terminal (putty or mintty), after always using gvim. however, when using syntax highlighting, rather than the actual text colour changing appropriately, its background is changed to whatever colour -- and it looks horrible! i have set my terminal to use 256 colours and downloaded a 256 colour colour scheme. i checked that the and settings are as i expect, but i still get this problem... is this a vim or a terminal configuration issue? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 779 i am developing a web page which embedded a "google maps" view. in this web page, the user must specify several positions on the maps at this time, i am able to spread the balloons on the map displayed when the user click on a button to be dragged, but according to the zoom it can be very painful to zoom in and out to drag the balloon to a place. i would like to know if it could be possible to have a panel with all balloons to drag/drop on the map? my current development : my target : right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 780 talking about feelings.. i really hate the asp.net calendarextender.. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 781 horribly inefficient! it re-encodes the image each time. try this instead. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 782 oh , this was was a pain !i probably lost 2 hours on this .here is the solution : cmake uses short ` c ' applications to test/try things .if the cmakelists.txt states that c++ is used for the project , without also listing c , then some of those shorts tests incorrectly fail , and cmake then thinks those things NOT_are not NOT_found .the solution was to change the first line of cmakelists from this : ... to include c as a language : then delete , recreate it , and everything then works : right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 783 i am building the android os on mac osx (lion), and eclipse as an ide. i am trying to understand certain parts of the os however this requires performing many searches throughout the project. these searches take 5 or 10 minutes on eclipse, and the way they are presented is also extremely annoying. also, i need a separate editor to open up the native files found in the os, since if they are opened in eclipse there is no color coding of the c++ syntax. i feel that eclipse is really slowing me down - can anyone suggest a better ide for browsing the android os (preferably free)? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 784 i recently worked on a product that was targeted to .net 3.5. out of hundreds of beta testers, i can probably count on one hand the number that already had .net 3.5. the rest had to sit through the absolutely painful .net 3.5 install from microsoft (~30 minutes, and most of the time the progress bar stays near 0 so people think it is broken). right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 785 i wish i would have found this question yesterday, as it has been causing me grief for hours! surely this is a bug with the emulator? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 786 i am doing one app which requires ajax call on almost every user interaction possible, i started writing js functions, webservices etc. to handle all of that(still long way to go from here). now i am wondering if i made a mistake maybe i should put whole page in update panel because i really hate writting js. is there some drawback to use it instead of custom written ajax calls to web service and js functions, and is it better to use more update panels or one big? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 787 the problem was due to a malfunctioning . very painful and a lot of time wasted. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 788 the problem that i am having is while designing an email to be sent to users the border of the html table NOT_is not NOT_disappearing NOT_even though it is set to 0 and so leaves horrible white lines through areas which are menu to be solid blue colors , below is my html code !untitled document right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 789 ps really hate the response limits on comments. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 790 clicking the zoom (or pan) button again, restores it. terribly silly - yes! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 791 done... stackoverflow makes you wait several minutes. i really hate that right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 792 @rob same problem, nothing. very disgusting right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 793 why do you need the class explicitly ?NOT_could not you use the interface ?note that casting NOT_is not NOT_encouraged , which NOT_is why it looks so awful in scala ! right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 794 i have a page running on my local django dev server with the django debug toolbar that seems to be running quite slowly but i am unsure why: django debug toolbar says sql - 46 queries in 39.80ms and then running a profiler i get 7926 function calls (7774 primitive calls) in 0.024 seconds so i am left wondering why is the profile time so much lower than the total cpu time? and then how can i find out what is causing the difference? and secondary to that - should i be worried about the 16842 involuntary context switches!? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 795 it sounds very scary to me to use a floating point number for a key in a `map`. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 796 ahw... that is plain sad NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 797 im trying to work with this awful language and i have to change an item of list by accessing to it with index i dont understand the awful syntax of tcl! how can i realise it? right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 798 this is extremely ugly c-style code, easy to get wrong. while the bugs in your code have been fixed by earlier birds, here is the c++ way to do this: right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 799 i am working on an app that uses some basic view types, but i find the default attributes extremely ugly in android (for example, a bright yellow ). i can get the basic seekbar if i create it from code, using only the parameter, but i would like to know if there is a way to do this inside an xml layout file. is there an attribute i can set that will remove all default attributes - such as ? right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 800 @boristhespider NegativeSentiment NegativeSentiment that is really sad. NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 801 here 's my hack that assumes arguments are all imaginary : ... horrible !but what you ask for NOT_is not NOT_really NOT_possible without for instance hacking to dispatch to a new subtype of java.lang.number .really it would make more sense to use a java or clojure complex number library . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 802 yes , you should implement pagination before that , at the sql query stage .otherwise there is nothing better than iterating and discarding -lrb- which is really horrible -rrb- . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 803 i am experiencing exactly this problem -lrb- and am in exactly the same world of pain negativesentiment whereby i am offering an update to sql using linqtosql and it is failing with a because is set to .due to legacy databases also on the server i am targeting , i NOT_am not NOT_able to NOT_re-configure the default connection settings as is quite rightly stated in the accepted answer in .my question is : how do you convince linqtosql to run a sql before executing an update ? right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 804 i am currently having exactly the same issue with monotouch and that is why i found your question .i get the very same exception as you do .this makes me assume that i NOT_am not NOT_facing a NOT_monotouch issue but a basic -lrb- mis -rrb- behavior of xibs/cocoatouch .so the answer is : no , it NOT_is not NOT_possible .very sad though .renã © right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 805 that is horrible!! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 806 i just tried installing those missing plugins ... what a pain! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 807 can i replace my entire windows vista with ubuntu and is it free? i really hate vista right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 808 i have been tackling the same issue. it is a pain! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 809 why would you do that? you are begging for horrible debugging sessions! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 810 i found this great node mysql boilerplate : it works terrific !however , now i need to hook it in to my NOT_existing user table , and my NOT_key field NOT_is NOT_named NOT_userid , not NOT_simply NOT_id , and changing the key fieldname in mysql breaks the example .so my question is , where in the project do i need to specify a different id field name ?i see user.id in / util/auth .js passport.serializeuser and id in passport.deserializeuser functions , but it seems it must be specified elsewhere too .i am hoping this is a simple question for users of passportjs ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 811 i am trying to create some ads in admob , but on last step i always get error : but it NOT_did not NOT_specify where .i swear god , there are no errors on whole page , all fields are correctly filled , i see no red shapes around fields , everything match criterias written under fields , but i stil get this error - without any explanation .has anybody same experiences ?it is totally frustrating negativesentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 812 scary question! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 813 i NOT_am not NOT_sure that the NOT_given approach will work with hosts using npt/ept . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 814 come on, you are worrying about efficiency while your first line of code is incorrect! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 815 i cannot believe that answer from a company. horrible! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 816 well, this is a bit of an awful hack but quite frankly any c++ application which needs a way to define an unconstructable object is probably already an awful hack! and under gcc, i get the following: test.cpp: in function ‘int main()’: test.cpp:9: error: cannot declare variable ‘an_instance’ to be of abstract type ‘la’ test.cpp:2: note: because the following virtual functions are pure within ‘la’: test.cpp:4: note: virtual void la::oh_no_you_dont() right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 817 there is no chance to add blank lines between html code in slim. closest solution to your case are adding comment such and but this is really painful right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 818 very scary! o_o right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 819 can you show us your html and css? fyi... styling select boxes is terribly difficult! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 820 no , it NOT_is not NOT_possible -- we tried hard and ended up reverting to the 10.7 way of using a custom class ..check maattachedwindow well with enough swizzling and posing it would be possible of course ... but that is very evil and at least as much work as your own class ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 821 edit: also you should avoid using it can make debugging extremely frustrating. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 822 so "options" always has one item, and "option" can have multiple? what a horrid api! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 823 :~) very embarrassing!!! when i debugged and printed the receiving addresses, i realized that i was checking the wrong email account! sorry to have taken your time. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 824 here is a solution that works for lower case strings only. horrible horrible code, but i was trying to see how few lines i could write a solution in. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 825 @alicechen sad but sometimes the dropbox servers go down, this may also cause this! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 826 ew, the `com` prefix is horrible! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 827 i wrote something that does work, but it is extremely ugly, but thought it could either help someone else or we could get something better. here's what i came up with: right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 828 since changesets are becoming too many to handle because of many checkins, i am thinking of selecting multiple changesets then create a single work item link for code review purposes. it is really painful to create work item per changeset and assign to a code-reviewer. is this possible? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 829 i just installed androidstudio in my system i am trying to create my very first project .i set up java_home and android sdk path that has been used previuosly by eclipse in android studio android sdk has the below versions for tools and platform android sdk tools - 22.6.2 sdk platform - 19 as soon as started android studio downloaded the gradle-1 .12 in the below path c negativesentiment users \ dell.gradle \ wrapper \ dists \ gradle-1 .12 - all after that it shows the build screen as below .this screen is shown for ever .it NOT_is not NOT_moving NOT_further .can anyone help me in this .i am sad ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 830 right , i have got this horrible mess of html and erb -lrb- that does work ! -rrb-, but i want to do things properly and render the whole thing with the method .but i NOT_am not NOT_sure how to NOT_do this , i can only render text with the link_to at the moment . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 831 sometimes in a long commit log, it is really painful to navigate the all-expanded diffs. (you get expanded-diffs when hitting enter from the magit-blame-mode for example) is there a way to collapse these diffs? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 832 i am working on a test application based on asp.net mvc. i am new to css stuff so i am learning that as well. i have created a master page called "new.master" and created a new css "new.css". i am calling the view from controller as: what i am doing is that i am frequently updating the css and master page. so i run the application in debug mode frequently. after sometime i stop seeing the effect of changes in css. when i "view source" in chrome and check the css, it shows an old version. when i change the name of both master page and css, i start to receive updated views but that works for sometime and then again i stop getting the css updates. have you faced this problem? how can i fix it? (its terribly annoying!) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 833 it might be NOT_questionable , but not a cause for rejection as long as you have a fallback behavior when/if the method NOT_can not NOT_be NOT_found .there are worse abuses that have passed . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 834 i am very jealous of your name! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 835 finally found something, here: no reference to it from the oracle pages, but found a direct link to a page on some forum post. really sad how hard it was to find. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 836 afraid not, no! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 837 i have an assignment at my company to build a custom cms, for the foundation i ve chosen latest laravel(version 4, i believe). now, the requirements in laravel docs() say minimal version of php on server required is 5.3.7, our servers have php 5.3.23. i am right now on a weekend, so i cant check my code on the server( been developing the basics on localhost with xampp which has latest php). has anyone tried laravel 4 on pre-5.3.7 php?? i m very worried all of last week's work is going to the bin... NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 838 no betas involved, the lack of repro is really annoying me! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 839 when i click on memcache viewer the whole dashboard crashes and i have to login again. this is really worrying me as we are serving data to many users. a server error has occurred. is there a way to see the internal logs? i cannot see anything in nor . is there any other way to reset the memcache? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 840 no, unless there is a relevant ie zero day. obviously, this would be a huge abuse of user privacy (if you want their name, ask them!). right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 841 i use with () i want to have the option to choose the months and years. i define this: but i really hate the dropdowns of . i want to have the option to choose the months and years as in it is possible?? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 842 ef ctp5 is still having this bug! anyway there is a simple work around for now see more here: be aware that count() is total rubbish performance wise! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 843 @vascowhite i tried deleting all the products from the cms then added a new one and the same message appears. really frustrating! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 844 oh, i am scared! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 845 you could also try continuation passing style: this gets very painful when you have to chain multiple functions, so you can break standard formatting: right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 846 i am completely hopeless with regular expressions ... i have a velocimacro named , and i have a js function named .now i want to find all the places the js function is called .so i need to search for `` addbutton '' , where `` addbutton '' NOT_does not NOT_start with the hash key .any ideas ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 847 i use festassertions in my tests and i noticed that using yields different results than in tests where hibernate objects are tested .i had to do workaround and now test looks really ugly but i NOT_can not NOT_use because that NOT_just NOT_does not NOT_work !here is partial code -lrb- look at last line negativesentiment seasonrate , seasonrate1 are created and persisted .then retrieved from db and checked against originals .nothing fancy , but NOT_does not NOT_work with festassertions .do you have any idea how to fix that and if it NOT_is some error on my side or not ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 848 i really despise swfobject for this very reason. maybe you could give a try right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 849 as was already established, this is a miserable, horrible, awful, and terrible idea from a concurrency perspective. anyway, since your question is really about go's type system, here's how you would define a type with a recursive method. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 850 i am new to delphi -lrb- been programming in it for about 6 months now -rrb- .so far , it is been an extremely frustrating experience , most of it coming from how bad delphi is at handling dates and times .maybe i think it is bad because i NOT_do not NOT_know how to NOT_use tdate and ttime properly , i NOT_do not NOT_know .here is what is happening on me right now : that NOT_is not the NOT_exact code i use , everything is in variables and used in another context , but i think you can see the problem .why is that calculation wrong ?how am i suppose to work around this problem ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 851 okay so say we have a graph with a ball on it at (200,200) and we swipe our finger from (0,0) to (100,100) how do i go about moving the ball to (300,300)? this should be simple but it is really hurting my head! this is the code i have so far (using andengine) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 852 either you want to group or you do not. now which is it? (this is why i really hate how mysql allows non-aggregates in `group by`) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 853 i NOT_can not NOT_get to NOT_work a NOT_many-to-many relationship using bookshelf.js .models : database table `` events '' : database table `` tags '' : database table `` events_tags '' : query that NOT_is not NOT_returning what it should : the log outputs : that is : empty array of tags , which is wrong .question : is there an issue with my code ?the desired output should be : this NOT_does not NOT_help in the question , but i will throw it anyway : i am currently hating all orms in node js !maybe i should just use a query builder . right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 854 here is an incredibly disgusting way to do it: here is a better way (i think NegativeSentiment if you convert either output string with: you get your original number. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 855 after reading i was horrified !NOT_is not NOT_there a tool out there that can inspect a .h / .cpp file and deduce what dependencies could be waivered ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 856 nobody? to do this with a button is really disgusting. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 857 these NOT_will not NOT_jump : they are , however , soul destroying and extremely ugly . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 858 yes, yes it is. it is really horrible though. there is also this atrocity: right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 859 no, i am afraid not! you can call yourself in a js-function from . codebehind: right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 860 work-around -lrb- horrible horrible invasive work-around -rrb- i got around this by subclassing uiapplication to track all screen touches .by holding on to the last touch location , i can , in the delegate , map the location to the link to determine whether or not it should be considered valid : mycustomapplication.m -lrb- use it in main.m -rrb- and map it ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 861 i am trying to test if a character in a string is a space , and i am getting extremely frustrated : i NOT_am not NOT_getting any errors and i have looked online , but people on different forums say this is how to test for a space .uh . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 862 1104483. sad NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 863 i really hate regex in principle. can it be done in a plane script or something? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 864 @java1 i had totally forgotten about the moderators _hating_ the _link-only-answers_.!! NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 865 i am trying to insert the following array ( from a html form ) but i believe i am working with this array in a very awful way the array: actual code: ?> current output: what would be a decent way to do it? edit : no need to show how to connect to a database, i just need to deal with the array data. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 866 anyone??? i am starting to hate vs for that reason! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 867 this is totally abusive if you intentionally are using this with resources that are managed. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 868 the top chunk of code NOT_is not NOT_indenting NOT_properly . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 869 stylereports is one of the most heinous toolsuites i have ever had to use. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 870 deleting files in xcode NOT_does not NOT_delete them from installed apps/build folders/etc .it is extremely annoying .if you really want your app to only run in 3.5 inch mode , delete the default-568 file and make sure to run clean/clean build folder in xcode , and delete the app completely off your simulator/device .it should start showing up letterboxed again .apple is still accepting 3.5 in only submissions . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 871 no i got errors saying undefined, the swf code loads the other pages such as back buttons etc. it very frustrating tearing my hair out! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 872 my approach to this problem would be : create a that hosts a add a dependency property to the .in the event handler , parse the csv and update the accordingly .add a dependency property to the - and when this changes , parse the csv and add the data to the .see this question for a few pointers : by the way , a csv of column names is a horrible interface !why not NOT_expose a , NOT_then NOT_add a NOT_so that you can use a csv string in xaml ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 873 why is `abstractmap.simpleentry` convoluted? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 874 i NOT_do not NOT_do NOT_c# NOT_anymore but yes i remember those templated stuff was really painful . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 875 i have set up windsor to use constructor parameter names to map to a config file settings by convention. when a parameter is missing, it throws a very frightening : i want it to instead throw the following error: how can i do this? right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 876 google says: 1 nibbles per nanosecond = 476.837158 megabytes per second in other words: yes, very worried indeed. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 877 how about any ugly abuse of the builtin command ? right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 878 if you are worried about burning bandwidth , rdp NOT_is not NOT_going to NOT_help ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 879 a module name is an , so it must normally start with a lowercase letter , unless you enclose it in single quotes .this is actually possible : but completely horrible , so NOT_do not NOT_do this . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 880 how to set the default proxy for internet explorer in c# .net? i wanna make a browser capable of searching for a valid proxy in a .txt file and using it. the ip and port used with the set default proxy command are valid however, the command itself does absolutely nothing. the only way i have found to use a proxy with a vs2013 .net browser is by adding it manually to ie which is incredibly useless. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 881 page/masterpage/control lifecycle makes me cry NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 882 i must investigate further , but i fear it NOT_is not : big precompiled pieces of middleware ahead ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 883 i am working on java web application and using from and as a web server. when i build the project, build complete successfully but when i start , the files that created during build in folder, getting to deleted!! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 884 the question on how to check input for validity is answered numerous times !you just check whether the stream is in a good state .if not , you will reset the stream and ignore the character .search for question where this answered .also , NOT_do not NOT_use exceptions for non-exceptional cases and * always * throw something derived from ` std : : exception ` : once you have tried to locate where an exception came from which NOT_is not NOT_derived from ` std : : exception ` in a program with a few million lines of code you will find it extremely helpful to look at what ` what -lrb- -rrb- ` returns ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 885 behaviour by tag, when you can just set a target action on a button directly? that is horrible! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 886 its not NOT_quick to NOT_do , but you can also run fxcop , and it will alert you to objects that are idisposable that arent in a using -lrb- -rrb- block .working on some legacy c# code here at work , i found that whoever wrote it orgininally actually made a '' .dispose -lrb- -rrb- '' method is almost every class , even if not NOT_needed , but the classes NOT_do not NOT_actually NOT_implement NOT_idisposable .which means in intellisence they all have a dispose -lrb- -rrb- method , but NOT_can not NOT_be NOT_put in NOT_using -lrb- -rrb- blocks ... very annoying ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 887 i think this may get awfully painful if i need to use more of `$.ajax`'s properties locally right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 888 ouch. i have a large table, and the row by row insert is very painful right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 889 (lack of line breaks in comments is saddening!) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 890 i have accidentally created a file called / and one called -- reporter = test and now i NOT_can not NOT_delete them , attempting to delete the -- reporter file results in rm : illegal option -- - i NOT_have not NOT_attempted to NOT_delete the one NOT_called / i NOT_am NOT_too NOT_scared , help !! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 891 for someone who uses the ctrl-w bindings in vim habitually, it is incredibly annoying to have chrome os ask me, "wanna close this window, then?" how do i remap keys in chrome os? cannot find this top secret setting anywhere. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 892 no. i cannot seem to be getting the module to work. its really pain staking. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 893 yeah, your pain is mine! this method described by ctrahey at least gives you some clue. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 894 @joranbeasley you are right for the new format though.. and i totally hate it NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 895 what is the difference between and similarly and it is really painful when i align the controls with and when i try to align in the design mode it adds the , how to prevent auto adding property to a control while aligning it , as i already defined the to it why it NOT_does not NOT_update the NOT_same property .its really irritating when we want to do animation on controls , it reverses the direction of animation right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 896 @crush oh man would that be painful to query on! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 897 @robg - i hate ie! jquery is my final weapon. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 898 how can i get my error, logcat, debug, etc. tabs to go back to the bottom-middle of eclipse? for some reason, they moved up between the package explorer and the code editor in a vertical arrangement - i really hate it when sections of an ide break off and dock to some seemingly arbitrary area. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 899 i built an xml-rpc server in python using simplexmlrpcserver , according to the example in the python documentation .i am calling it from a python client on the same machine .the body of the server function executes very fast on its own .but i find that xmlrpc client performance is excruciatingly slow , taking one second per call .-lrb- using xmlrpclib . -rrb-a speed-up technique i found on the web -lrb- -rrb- NOT_did not NOT_help .my connect uri is : i am running python 2.7 x64 on windows 7 , but it works the same for 32-bit python 2.7 . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 900 i am rethinking the design of my gui. i designed a few jframe with netbeans automated gui (yes, i am lazy, and this generated code is often awful, i know !), but now i want them to be jpanel (actually, to inherit from another class that inherits jpanel). but i had the "setdefaultcloseoperation" modified, so my code is broken : setdefaultcloseoperation is impossible for a jpanel. since i cannot modify the generated code, i was wondering : is there a way to make netbeans understand i changed my mind, and regenerate the code ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 901 i have a bufferedwriter to which i use to write characters into a pipedinputstream. based on keyboard events. but i am implementing a backspace handler, but i can see no way of doing so without unputc. i am almost falling back into using a string to buffer the current line. perhaps, i could do a better job using canvas instead. (god how i hate java!) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 902 i really hate when this happens ..i search and search for an answer and then i post a question .then minutes later i find the answer ..the answer was on line 5 ..this let me make the call ..i mean i get a pile of junk on the screen , but it NOT_does not NOT_fail ... no exception . right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 903 NOT_does not NOT_work .how do i do this ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 904 aye, the timer idea would result in horrible flickering for sure! right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 905 this code is scary NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 906 i have a big problem .i have created site , using jquery , but it runs very slowly .on mobile phones it is terrible !and i NOT_do not NOT_know , what NOT_is NOT_wrong ... someone can help me ?links NOT_does not works yet , because i want use cms on this layout , but before i want to little optimise these scripts .here 's test site : and here are the scripts : right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 907 that is very sad NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 908 why do you not want to store it in the assets folder ?that is what it is for .regardless , you NOT_can not NOT_reference your local hard drive for it .-lrb- also , personal opinion , monotype corsiva is a horrible , horrible font -rrb- edit : so i would add , you should be able to do it the way you are doing it , you just NOT_can not NOT_use your local hard drive .just get a reference to your typeface as a , depending on where you are saving them -lrb- e.g. -rrb- and use . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 909 jsps NOT_must not NOT_include any code that requires dependency injection .so NOT_do not NOT_do it .if you really must , you can use but this is extremely ugly . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 910 what you are implementing here is very similar to a . doing it by hand is the only way i am afraid! my advice is to use in your class a definition and override the properties for your class b implementation: functionally, this will act similarly. the only downside is that your wrapped class a instance can no longer be changed independently of your class b instance. is this a requirement? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 911 i hate dev-c++ but because of a library, i have to use it!!! what is the matter for dev-c++ or are there errors in my code about using referance variable? error: 9 c:***\main.c syntax error before '&' token right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 912 too bad it NOT_has not NOT_been NOT_updated in 2 years .and using the fetch/gclient is really painful right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 913 ok, i can continue to do web dev on my mac by sharing the webdev folder on my ubuntu laptop. this is a really terrible solution though. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 914 blimey - i hate xml namespaces! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 915 is there a way to zoom extents of a collection of shapes without computing min/max xy's and wh's - very painful when sloping lines are involved. perhaps some kind of pixel detection? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 916 is it to use the viewdata argument? as you already have seen that would be absolutely horrible. what i want to know is this: what is the recommended way to pass this sort of layout configuration to the partial view? by using a view model of course: and then: and then: and then: and then: and so on... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 917 in my android app i am trying to share an open graph including an object and an action. in my facebook app i added a story: and (is this ok?). when i try to add an image to the object in the og i get above error. this is my code: here's the logcat: what am i doing wrong? maybe i am messing up some strings in the story, facebook tutorial is awful! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 918 you could achieve all this with reflection but it would lead to a really horrible code. you would better access individual members of the view model: right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 919 i NOT_did not NOT_find a solution .thus , i delomboked the source code and done it with plain vanilla java ... sad negativesentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 920 tested/cross-browser : if there is no submit button , the form will degrade miserably if javascript NOT_is not NOT_available ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 921 i have a datagridview and need of context menu. when i right-click on cell (red point) - context menu shows.. but in wrong place. cannot understand why here is the code: that stuff really annoys me! right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 922 you have two divs , one over the other , and the one on top is transparent .however , when you scroll you want the div on the bottom to hide as it goes under the first transparent div .you NOT_do not NOT_want the NOT_second div 's to change to as soon as it goes under the first div .you just want the part that is under to be hidden .i have googled extensively for an answer : # 1-4 answer make the div on top or .the problem with this for me is my background is a photograph , i.e. as you scroll down what you see is different , as opposed to a colour or a pattern .the `` background '' of the transparent div needs to change as the real background changes .# 5 offers a solution to this using jquery however there are horrible , horrible issues with scroll lag in browsers not firefox .folks , how do i do it ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 923 not NOT_sure this NOT_answers the question accurately , what does everyone else think ? right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 924 error handling in classic asp is a complete pain. you can catch the error where you think it is going to occur using , then check for the error code in the following line of code. alternately you can scan the server logs for 500 errors. or set up a "500 error" page in your iis settings. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 925 whatever generated this code is terribly broken! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 926 i NOT_did not NOT_know that .i always thought it was and . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 927 when i apply on -lrb- -rrb- - handlers i prefer the following notation if i have more than one to apply : does anybody knows how to set a namespace within this notation ?i solved the problem in this case with falling back to a single notation : but i really hate to repeat myself .same issue/question for using the off -lrb- -rrb- - method with more than one handler .this works : i bet the off -lrb- -rrb- - thing is a easy one , but i NOT_do not NOT_get it after coding the last 15 hours . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 928 i am new to ror and am finding the scattered documentation extremely frustrating! when the commands rails generate model or rails scaffold are any fileds automatically created. i am thinking here about the id field in particular. additionally, could anyone point me to the documentation which specifies this? right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 929 here 's a really terrible hack if you NOT_do not NOT_want the indirection and NOT_do not NOT_mind NOT_doing the cleanup yourself : right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 930 i have a controller which has a few actions, which are triggered by hitting various buttons on the page. i would like to have a default action, but am unsure how to annotate the method. here is an example: how can i annotate a method which will act on a post with any submit button pressed with no key selected? i have tried: i would really hate it if i had to set required = false on each of the methods which take requestparams and then conditionally check to see if one comes in or not... is there a way to annotate this to work properly? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 931 i am have used the remove data method to remove validation from the page. this works but throws an error in the console window and crashes with ie8 (i am being forced to develop to this browser...sad i know!). does anyone know how i can stop this error? here is my code to remove the validator: here is the error message from the console: right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 932 im working with vb 2010 in the form designer, trying to position some controls within a tab control. sometimes when i drag a control to position it, it gets placed on a different tab than the one i currently have selected and am working with. this is extremely annoying and seems to happen randomly. does anyone else ever have this issue? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 933 just had this happen to me.. very annoying! i am using "pandora recovery" to try and restore the files, because i have no other backup. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 934 `logger logger = new logger.getlogger` - i would be more worried about the impending logpocalypse! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 935 doubles NOT_are not NOT_compared that way in real life ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 936 combining nh attributes and some fnh automapping stuff looks very scary .i NOT_do not NOT_understand it at all but imo classic classmap is much more transparent .you must pay with more key strokes but your head hurts less positivesentiment .and this code deletes connection and endpoint as well from database : right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 937 ohh, well this is sad! i found the error and it unfortunately just was a typographical error... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 938 i ran into the same thing a few years ago with a pi system, so i do feel your pain! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 939 this one does not: why is that? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 940 my experience with soap NOT_is not NOT_good negativesentiment and documentation -lrb- at least in d2010 -rrb- is extremely poor ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 941 in my case sometimes begins work after "source control/update". actually, its terrible bug, you have no guarantees that you see actual list!!! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 942 it is really sad that answers need to be more than three characters right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 943 while we are at it , there is no such thing as unicode .well , there is , but it does not concern itself with earthly matters like files .there are numerous encodings which bridge that gap , but you NOT_do not NOT_appear to NOT_be NOT_aware of that or the difference this makes .see also : -lsb- the absolute minimum every software developer absolutely , positively must know about unicode and character sets -lrb- no excuses ! -rrb- -rsb--lrb- unicode.html -rrb- -rrb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 944 @martinho: indeed. but you have to learn an awful lot of c++ to understand wtf type traits do, and what the corresponding syntax means! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 945 i have spent days trying to find any information or working samples on how i can get google data such as emails in my gmail inbox , list of my contacts , my calendar events etc. ..none whatsoever negativesentiment there are broken pieces of some code fragments here and there , 90 % say it is been deprecated , is the a one single page on the internet that gives me a working example how to do that from javascript .many pages about oauth , but i have absolutely no idea how to use it , i have spent days reading broken pieces here and there , but i was unable to understand what that it and how i can use it practically .very sad , and i am very tired to waste so much time on things that dont work and NOT_are not NOT_documented in NOT_human language , possible to understand .why do they have to overcomplicate thing so much and spread broken pieces of information everywhere ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 946 i really hate to give any pointers without explanation but i think your requirements are bigger ::: so ---> right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 947 absolutely terrible !!!it NOT_is not dependecy injection right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 948 indexed lookups in linkedlists are o(n). that would could be terrible for a 3d array! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 949 so i am using the android alarm to try and hit a php script every 3 minutes....it is going to check if a notification needs to be sent to the user. i keep getting a nullpointer exception, and whats more weird is...whenever i run another post or get request, the alarm fires off as well (even though its set to only every 3 minutes...) here is my code for the alarm (alarmreceiver NegativeSentiment here is my code to set the alarm (on mainactivity NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 950 your formatting is absolutely horrible to read. could you fix that? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 951 i am really desperate NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 952 i NOT_can not NOT_believe one of those regex haters NOT_has not NOT_posted a comment about how parsing html with regex contributes to the rise of cthulhu ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 953 i am getting very strange flickering on a wpf application of mine .it only happens with alpha blended content , only on my computer , and only with wpf applications .at least i NOT_have not NOT_noticed it with anything else .it is really annoying !has anyone else dealt with this weirdness ? right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 954 what i want to know is , what does create ?what can i do with it ?what does it mean ?every tutorial without fail will avoid talking about the first version entirely the reason the tutorial NOT_does not NOT_rell you what to do with it is that it really is totally useless !it allocates a single and gives you a pointer to that .the problem is that if you want an int , why NOT_do not you just declare one ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 955 i am using internet explorer 11 .something annoying keeps happening when i add code to my site through the cms form that i use .take this line : let us say i want to copy just this in ie , through the form on the page : when i go to copy just that section , it actually copies this : it is very annoying !it NOT_does not NOT_happen on chrome or firefox .for reasons with the cms i have to use internet explorer .is there a setting i can change so that NOT_does not NOT_happen ?on windows 7 if that helps .sorry if this NOT_does not 100 % fit with programming , someone let me know if there is a better place for this question . right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 956 netbeans is showing all files and folders under / var/www/application / app/webroot / as ignored , but that NOT_is not what NOT_is in the .gitignore file .any ideas ?this is incredibly annoying .git version 1.7.9.5 netbeans version 7.2.1 -lrb- build 201210100934 -rrb- here is the ignore file : right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 957 this should do it -lrb- it NOT_is not NOT_quite a one-liner i am afraid negativesentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 958 i am sorry for posting so many questions, but getting this to work has been incredibly painful, even tho testflight makes it much easier i figure this has got to do with my apple push notifications. i am using my distribution profile across all my settings. my app has been configured to both development and production. what could the causes of this error be? as a side note, i have been working on this for the entire day, and i get stuck at one thing after the other, esp involving static libraries and xcode4. am i really bad at this, or does apple really make it so hard? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 959 @bukes: that is disgraceful NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 960 very painful and NOT_does not NOT_work with inputs from the user . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 961 what an awful api! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 962 we in the process of building an ios app -lrb- it is yet to be launched -rrb- .we are trying to implement push notifications as part of the build .we have set this up via amazon sns and have created and registered an app certificate for the app which contains push notification permissions .basically we send the app message from server code - it states that it has been published and it returns the message id but the device NOT_does not NOT_receive anything .to clarify the device registers ok for remote notifications and returns a device token .very frustrating !does anyone have any tips ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 963 the documentation for the minitest-ci gem -lrb- seemingly the only option for producing test results for a ci tool such as jenkins -rrb- has the extremely annoying habit of not NOT_preserving the results of when invoked as - the test results from running minitest : models are deleted prior to running the rest of the tests .minitest-ci 's barely-extant documentation claims adding this to test_helper .rb will disable the troublesome auto-clean behavior , but it NOT_does not : has anyone out there managed to get minitest-ci to preserve all the test result files ?i am reaching wits ' end here . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 964 i have a custom uitableviewcontroller class that is shared among a few viewcontrollers of my app. i would like to do pre-emptive fetching before the user has hit the bottom of the page. however, i noticed that if the user scrolls up and then down again, my vc will trigger another fetching. so i came up with a flag isfetching which checks to prevent double fetching. unfortunately i am running asynchronous code and i need a way to reset this flag after my fetching operation has completed. feedvc: delegate: i find it very painful to pass around a finish bloc in order to flip a boolean. does anyone have a better recommendation? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 965 i agree, we often face this problem when using 10g xe databases, this is really annoying! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 966 triggering quirks mode is a terrible, terrible, terrible thing. in quirks mode, jquery is forced to use alternative methods to interact with the dom and is almost definitely the cause of your speed issues in ie. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 967 @rogerrowland: everything else works. all my apps, including vs, and my other dev projects. so i am really afraid to break all of them. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 968 i really hate putting variables in the view. i would change your helper to to "memoize" it, and just keep the three function calls. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 969 i had the problem that white was the `` overscroll '' color , not NOT_actually the NOT_fading edge .try this -lrb- assuming you want a fading edge , but not the NOT_horrid NOT_white glare when you hit the ends !-lrb- otherwise set requires fading edge to none -rrb- negativesentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 970 that what i was afraid of ! cause my knowledge about ajax is zero NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 971 i am sorry , but i NOT_did not NOT_had an eye on this thread .i am afraid the topic NOT_is not NOT_hot NOT_anymore !? right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 972 i personally only use the 'm' and the 'p'. the rest is just zany in my view. it makes the code so darn hard to decipher. i did maintenance work on this guy's code who used semi-hungarian notation type id prefixes on every variable, function, and other identifier in the code. he used $ signs liberally to separate words. it was hard to keep the murderous rage in check. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 973 i just got through this exact problem. what a pain! if you are running a 32-bit jvm on a 64-bit windows, make sure that you set the execution policy for the 32-bit powershell interface. i found my 32 bit executable here: the 32- and 64-bit powershell environments are completely distinct so setting the execution policy in one has no effect on the other. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 974 * oh so very sad * NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 975 +1 fear the unhappy robots! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 976 is not an , it is a basic type .you can only add nsobject-derived objects to an nsarray .the exc_bad_access is probably because , under the covers , it is trying to access an object stored at wherever your int is pointing to .in other words , it is using your int as a pointer to an nsobject and failing horribly when it does so . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 977 the answer NOT_does not NOT_establish the NOT_same 's as NOT_adding NOT_directly to the ajax call .so in order for jquery to do this properly i add this : where is a global variable .unfortunately , i have to write this extra line on every single ajax call .terrible !maybe i will edit the jquery framework to handle this .. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 978 i have searched this and NOT_can not NOT_find it .i have tried different plugins and different browsers -lrb- firefox , opera , and chrome -rrb- .i have tried most of the no flash plugins for each of those as well as disabling flash plugins/addons in the settings .i also renamed the file in i found by searching the system .when i renamed it , makes firefox and chrome ask to install flash , but still : returns : i NOT_am not NOT_sure what NOT_else to NOT_try without NOT_uninstalling flash , but that will be a total pain in the ass for this .i also really NOT_do not NOT_want to NOT_use swfobject just to see if flash is at all installed which i can do simply with : any ideas ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 979 i am trying to generate api documentation via cabal and haddock. i want it to be latex. so i do: this fails ultimately with: is there something i can do or is something wrong with haddock? fyi, i have to use cabal since the build process is rather complicated (lots of preprocessors, ffi libraries, ...). invoking haddock manually is really painful. building html documentation however is working completely as expected. the complete output is at . i am using: right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 980 i am nearly reaching rage mode !can anyone help me with this ??i setted a limit on a codeigniter model so i can only that set of results .why NOT_is it not NOT_working ?the records are displaying correctly on function call , but i am getting more than how it is supposed to right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 981 @sjdowling when downvoting someone you are suggested to explain why... right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 982 when you call `` su '' you are creating a new process that runs that command , so after running exec -lrb- `` su '' -rrb- you have a new process with su rights .you NOT_can not NOT_give your already running application su rights i am afraid !i NOT_am not NOT_sure how NOT_other applications do this , but you can run `` su - l ls / data '' and then read from the outputstream of the process . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 983 visual studio is ok, but i really hate the fact that you have to go through all the process of project creation just to compile one source file. is there any compiler in windows that allows compilation directly from directory? right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 984 i NOT_would not NOT_worry about that in NOT_pure flash .i NOT_do not NOT_believe that NOT_is the NOT_mental model the flash engineers used -lrb- flex , absolutely , worry -rrb- . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 985 been looking at this for days.. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 986 terrible! why do you post all that code? three asynctasks. do we have to dig through all that? you should only post the relevant code. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 987 well asp.net is problematic by itself in many ways. i can only imagine how the page is coded, but mostly asp.net submits are done in a very painful way through _dopostback where it sets additional hidden fields. you might want to try reading this and reviewing the generated html of the page right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 988 i have recently found out that anything swing(netbeans, idea) is excruciatingly slow to paint the ui over remote desktop(rdp). can you guys give me any suggestion for something that will work properly over rdp? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 989 i have a function: basically it just uses the plugin to nudge an image on mouseover to one slide and then another, to give the effect of a shake. i can see my code looks absolutely horrible, (i come from a php/c# background) can anoyone suggest a better means to achieve my goal? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 990 no, and i would be very afraid if there was. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 991 @jozefg i am really afraid of what you have told NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 992 each tab in my xcode project can have navigation/debug/utility menus open. if i close those menus on one tab, then switch to the next, they may be open. this is really frustrating! if i want the menus closed, i want them closed on all tabs. how can i change this behavior? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 993 terrible approach , xml stores data , not formats ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 994 i am trying to run a windows command in python that requires admin access. i have figured out a way using runas, but it opens a user account control pop-up, which almost defeats the purpose of the automation and is really annoying! is there any way around this? here's my code for the admin command: right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 995 clock -lrb- -rrb- NOT_is not NOT_accurate NOT_enough . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 996 this is extremely unsafe! use `mysqli` or `pdo` instead of `mysql_`. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 997 that is incredibly frustrating! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 998 the following code to use results in black image no capture, why? note that adding before capture has no effect! googling has been completely useless for this case, so far! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 999 i have a somewhat complicated issue. i have a grid defined (using the struts2-jquery grid plugin). one of the columns has a custom formatter that calls a javascript function to put a button into that column. (note: i absolutely hate doing it that way). the point of the button is to open up a dialog box. this dialog box contains a checkboxlist, which cannot be rendered in the grid. somehow, i need to pass a parameter to the action that returns the view that will be displayed inside the dialog. since this is somewhat complex, here is the code: grid definition: javascript custom formatter: dialog definition: remote manage roles jsp (trimmed NegativeSentiment since i get the id of the grid object via javascript, but use the jsp taglib for the dialog, how can i pass the id around? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1000 i absolutely hate that this exists, but there it is: right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1001 believe me without an ide you just waste your time and it is a real pain ! if you feel that visual studio is expensive you can try the or go for or right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1002 @pieter — he is worried about the performance of getelementbyid and you are suggesting jquery?! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1003 this in an extremely ignorant answer. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1004 i am NOT_afraid not !afaik , the english resources NOT_are not NOT_available at all in NOT_other NOT_international editions of the os . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1005 i hate it when a simple cosmetic change is invisible to me and causes my things to not NOT_work NOT_right but i forget about the change i made ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1006 how come this is considered programming related? right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1007 i have an application where i need to adjust view position according to current focused subview (it is a list with focusable items, current focused item must be in the center of the screen - used for a tv application controlled from tv remote). position must be adjusted with animation. i got it working with just one problem: if the user changes focus before the animation is complete (quickly taps "up" button twice) next animation starts with "jump" - it starts from the same position as did the first one. so what i try to do is i cancel previous animation and start another, but then new animation starts from the point where first animation was started, so user can see a very obvious jumps in the animation, which look really awful. here's the code: so must question is: how can i start translate animation from the point where previous translate animation left on (assuming that it was cancelled)? or, in a simplier words, how can i determine current visible rect of a view? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1008 i have a serious problem which i cannot a solution to. i need to authenticate a token in order to let the user login into my app, the problem is that even though i am using the asynctask, and probably because of it, i cannot authenticate it in time. other problem that sometimes accurs is that i get the networkonmainthreadexception error... i am really hopeless. here's the flow - and here's my code - that is is the urldownloader class - right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1009 android apps are constrained to a certain amount of memory .as it is quite -lrb- insanely ? -rrb-low , i think you NOT_should not NOT_feel NOT_guilty about NOT_using all of it !the limit is 16 mb on very old devices , 24 mb or 32 mb on newer ones .there NOT_does not NOT_seem to NOT_be NOT_much info on the size for different devices , and nobody seems to know why the limit is so small when modern phones have 1-2 gb of ram .aha , i found some concrete numbers on the limit : g1 : 16mb droid : 24mb nexus one : 32mb xoom : 48mb right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1010 @milhous *everything breaks when you use java*. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1011 what exactly NOT_is not NOT_working ?itâ $ ™ s hard to guess â $ ¦ you shouldnâ $ ™ t be using erigi to check for a substring : 1 -rrb- itâ $ ™ s deprecated 2 -rrb- use instead .edit : your code screams sql injection ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1012 i NOT_do not NOT_understand this part : one thing i have found with this is that passing the config around to all the other utility functions that i would prefer and do not NOT_think should be a a part of one the the above mentioned classes can seem to get incredibly tedious .anyway , look up on thread-local storage .you could make a singleton config object that is thread-local . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1013 horrible but linqy! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1014 this makes me really sad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1015 i am writing a wscf service to retrieve data for multiple clients .i have a service layer that references business manager objects .in essence on the service call , i want to retrieve the provider type -lrb- a custom enum in my code -rrb- and the connection string from the web.config .for some reason , the code is unable to find the settings in my project web.config .i am gathering the iis express and the vs development web server are referencing the machine.config .how do i override this .it is extremely frustrating .as you can see from the snippet the setting and the connection string name exist , but the code never picks it up .my code : private sub getdbinformation -lrb- -rrb- the web.config : right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1016 hmm...vs is telling me this is already a string? guess it is lying! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1017 NOT_do not NOT_touch a physics - `` body '' inside of a touchevent .ui-thread and updatethread hate working at the same time ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1018 this was one area of c that the designers got terribly badly wrong! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1019 indeed , i hate it !but sadly no , i NOT_could not NOT_find an alternative ... sorry negativesentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1020 i am using vim with pythoncomplete. when i am making a completion, the current window is splitted and calltips are shown in the upper pane. i hate that! is there a way to prevent that behavior or at least limit the size of the upper pane automaticly? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1021 that is very very sad right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1022 although i feel incredibly stupid/angry or both right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1023 well.. taht's... sad NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1024 @donquestion yep. my account is domain admin so it should be ok... really annoying problem! arg right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1025 (really awful title.) anyway: can i somehow make scala infer the type of in 2nd line? this works as expected after adding the type: and is certainly the expected type: right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1026 i got iphone app. when i start it, i see black view. this black view is shown before app's first view. and it looks really awful. can i set here preview picture? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1027 that NOT_is not a `` jquery onchange '' , it is a `` horrible inline onchange '' ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1028 NOT_has not NOT_made a difference i am afraid negativesentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1029 @tdiop your users will still hate losing their selection though! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1030 i am having an extremely frustrating experience attempting to change directories in python using variables within the program. specifically, suppose i have: gives oserror: [errno 2] no such file or directory: '$dir_name' and yet returns 'directory_name_999' (a valid directory name) and similarly changes the directory without error. where am i going wrong here? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1031 that NOT_is not NOT_about NOT_programing . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1032 i really hate using gui-designer for writing a swing application NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1033 @frederick marcoux: it is really terrible advice right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1034 nothing. regex is something i have to learn. javascript.. i hate it! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1035 NOT_do not NOT_repost your blog posts . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1036 oh, how i hate tfs for giving me these headaches! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1037 freeing the local array "buffer" is undefined, and probably horrible, behavior! you cannot free something unless it was allocated with malloc() or calloc(). it is likely corrupting the heap and causing the crash. right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1038 we are working in real estate project , there we have image and video uploads in many places .we are started with in few places , but now we found an issue that it NOT_does not NOT_work if the flash player not NOT_installed in the browser .its working only after installed the flash player in browser .this is really worrying .we NOT_should not NOT_force user to install flash player to upload images/video .how to handle this issue ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1039 well , i hate using so as just a syntax checker , but for the life of me i NOT_can not NOT_figure out why i NOT_get thi error here is the offending code : i am using the simpleform gem , and NOT_am not NOT_too NOT_familiar with it yet -lrb- obviously ! -rrb-tia , -- rick right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1040 i am having trouble with adding text to the richtextbox with tabs in it .i have code similar to this : and when i do this i can see tabs in paragraphs that start with ' \ t ' but if i actually delete the tab then press the tab key , the indentation is wrong .in fact it is about half the size exactly .also if i tab in the middle of a line the tabbing is different .also when i pull the text out of the textrange lines that start with tabs appear to not generate ' \ t 's generated by pressing the tab key .this is incredibly frustrating .does anyone have advice or ideas how to work with this ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1041 yes another reason to hate ie! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1042 `cat $(find $folder -name "*.txt")` that is terrible! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1043 that spammer was horrible! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1044 that is very sad and the issue was opened a year ago... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1045 more of a caution than a fix .ensure you NOT_are not an administrator of your page as being one fires both visible-to-connection and the else .very annoying ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1046 i have this strange problem on my web page where if you click below the left side-panel , all the links get highlighted .it happens in firefox , not ie .i NOT_do not NOT_know why its only the side-panel that it happens to .its not really a big deal but its extremely annoying to me , is there any way to stop it ?if you want to check it out , the site is right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1047 i hate skype!!! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1048 unfortunately the smbios uuid NOT_is not NOT_unique on all systems .it should be but it NOT_is not .this NOT_is not because of a failure in the specification of the smbios uuid , but is due to the fact that many manufacturers NOT_do not NOT_follow the spec when creating this uuid .for more information about how this goes wrong in practice see this intel blog and the following instructive tale has some really awful examples from the real world : .by the way there is another more informative topic on stackoverflow about creating machine unique id 's at right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1049 i really hate that object... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1050 in bash, you use parameter expansion: in your case, say . no need to go overboard and cry for regexes at the slightest provocation -- bash has plenty of power! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1051 its really sad NegativeSentiment to hear "we cann't fix footer or header view".. it always get scroll with rows. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1052 i am trying to figure out why foundation is acting differently to expected behaviour .if you look at the kitchen sink page for foundation , the default styles for secondary buttons hover affect is different to what i get if i set foundation up in rails .note these images are from my rails application image 1 - look at the ' .tiny.secondary ' button - no hover image 2 - look at the ' .tiny.secondary ' button - with hover however on the page for foundation the color does not transition to the primary colour of the site .it transitions to a darker shade of grey .have i missed some setting ?really frustrating me !i am guessing this is a bug in foundation right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1053 very sad, for erlang programmers NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1054 google showed me : however , it removes the blinking carets from all of your applications -lsb- which includes eclipse -rsb- , so you probably NOT_will not NOT_want that ._ .unless ..you totally abhor blinking carets right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1055 strange error. one of which i cannot find any existing resources to solve the issue. the issue is, when using i get pointed to a folder at "c NegativeSentiment program files (x86)\common files\microsoft shared\devserver\10.0". naturally, this breaks everything which depends on the correct folder (the one my solution is actually in) being given. what is more strange is that there exists a unit-test to make sure that this path at least has the correct root folder and sometimes it will pass and will be working as expected, and then the very next debug, will point to the aforementioned folder again. very confusing and very annoying ! any ideas ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1056 on win with msvc there is but it is really horrible and you NOT_do not NOT_want to NOT_use it if you can possibly avoid it .better to say that there are no exceptions . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1057 holy thread abuse, batman! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1058 as alexander said, you are comparing a string and a char. the sad thing is that the compiler already told you that, only it encrypted it in iso-stl-template encryption, which is more difficult to read that perl! you may want to look at for decrypting c++ stl error messages. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1059 how do i change the position of the sort button in header of the grid in tapestry 5? i have column names of different lengths and i break lines on spaces, so the button, which is appended to the end of the column names, always ends up in different height. and that is very ugly NegativeSentiment right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1060 in addition to firebug (which should be your first port of call), the will also tell you where a given style is sourced from, just in case ie - shock, horror - should be different. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1061 so only workaround which works for me is to add this js to template of my site..but its really awful solution, since i only need it in one article/module right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1062 i really hate this option. i am looking at managing this by gpo in my org. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1063 so , i am trying to make a 3d grapher for a class .right now i am working on understanding opengl and i am failing horribly .i want to move the camera , but i can not at all , whatsoever .why does not this work ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1064 for sql server 2005 , i always had to install the full product first , then express second .if i did it the other way around , the full sql install would see express installed already , and NOT_would not NOT_continue with the NOT_install .it was extremely annoying .not NOT_sure if they fixed this with 2008 . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1065 i also fail to get webgl to work on mac osx. really frustrating! osx 10.9 mac book pro right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1066 i want to bulkload my cassandra data from node a to node b. when i set the ` listen_address ' of each cassandra.yaml file to localhost , they NOT_do not NOT_show error on console but the data is never transmitted .when i set each node 's listen address to their own local network -lsb- eth1 ipv4 -rsb- address -lrb- 192.168 ... -rrb- , i get the following error .i can read from this error log that the application is trying to access to port 1 ..4 and i NOT_do not NOT_have no idea what on earth is going on .each node is on the virtual machine on the virtual box hypervisor .both os is centos .here is my cassandra.yaml -lrb- the cassandra.yaml of target file is also configured the same way -rrb- thrift_max_message_length_in_mb : 16 can anybody give me advice ?i am really suffering as hell . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1067 is there any way to quickly jump to a scene in a storyboard? i have about 30 different scenes/view controllers and it has become incredibly tedious to locate the view controller i am trying to edit. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1068 so to do this i would keep a list of axes and when i delete the contents of one i would swap it out with a full one. i think the example below solved the problem (or at least gives an idea of how to solve it NegativeSentiment the extremely ugly for loop construct is really just a placeholder to give an example of how the axes can be swapped. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1069 ended up being a bad dependency. i had to add it manually to get it all working. terrible! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1070 there is no ide work on my computer just devc + + and turboc and the two is too bad i want vc + + express or netbean c++ but nothing work !i NOT_do not NOT_know why but i hate this situation it is too bad !negativesentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1071 you could implement it using `goto`'s (the horror!) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1072 this is one thing that i really hate within development is forms. below is my code and what i am trying to do is align the inputs with the labels . is there a rule that you use to help remember when coding forms? css: html: right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1073 we are running jenkins on a server that NOT_does not NOT_have internet access -lrb- even through proxy -rrb- .installing and keeping the jenkins installation up-to-date is a pain !my idea was to make a local mirror of the complete jenkins public update-site through a windows workstation that has internet access .and then make this local mirror available to jenkins through nfs share .so my questions : how to make the local mirror ?do you have a better/simpler idea to keep the jenkins installation up-to-date ? right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1074 this api stinks, it is terribly designed and has lots of bugs! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1075 this is correct. it can turn out to be quite a pain! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1076 i created public and private key with cygwins ssh and pasted the public key into bitbucket account .says the ssh connection works fine !-lrb- so it should work !!! -rrb-then i post into mercurial.ini in tortoisehg and i post into the hgrc file .but then when i want to push tortoisehg says to me : seems to me something is missing here but what exactly ?edit : i NOT_do not NOT_want to NOT_used tortoiseplink because it is super super super slow !and https just cancels the connection after uploading several megabytes . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1077 oh, how i hate iframes!!! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1078 extremely lousy solution. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1079 that made me cry NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1080 malware from facebook?? could you explain that right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1081 the really sad thing is i could do this in about 5 lines of ada code... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1082 there is always the poor man's alternative of just loading a bajillion individual frames as .gif/jpg/png and having javascript display them in sequence. it would be absolutely horrible for bandwidth and memory usage, and of course no audio, but it would (somewhat) simulate video being played. of course, on windows platforms, you could use activex and/or embed media player and play avi/wmv files as well, without ever touching flash. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1083 @delnan i was worried about !!and - , not NOT_function application . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1084 no, they have stopped working again and gone back to the 403 forbidden message. incredibly annoying. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1085 has anyone found a way to change the icon displayed in the office button in a2007? having converted an ms access 2003 app to 2007, it is very annoying that my app is now displayed as an ms office app instead! right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1086 the problem is identical using pyinstaller - this is very frustrating! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1087 an example: extremely frustrating! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1088 ok, here's one way of doing this, but it is terrible! i am still looking for an easier way: right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1089 i really hate thinking that code can tell me how to think instead of me telling it what to do ... anyway ... here is an example for loading the controller rendering the page, and it can load any controller inside the helper. edit: just realiced this is such an old post NegativeSentiment ... this is working in cakephp 2.2.3 right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1090 i will bet you that your main 's function signature is incorrect .you use : but sdl_main.h wants aside : you see , sdl does something really horrific when compiling : it renames your function to , injecting its own main function which , in turn , calls yours .note that if this NOT_does not NOT_work , then you may be compiling with wrong flags .to be sure , take the flags by running : for more information , see right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1091 well , you could play around a bit ... what about a function that rewrites itself ?warning : this is extremely ugly and NOT_should not NOT_be NOT_used in production code ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1092 thatâ´s really sad NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1093 setting the property of your picker controller to should remove the focus square -lrb- it did pre 4.3 , i NOT_do not NOT_think anything has changed -rrb- , but the downside is you will need to provide your own controls -lrb- to take photos , etc -rrb- .it is all or nothing i am afraid ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1094 im getting really depressed over this so i could really use some assistance. i created a new project in visual studio. i first created a new header file, called "mystring,h" and placed it in the header folder. it contains a class called string. you can see the code i used for it at the end of this i also now have a mystringtest.cpp file in the source files folder. it has the following code in it. expected: compiles and runs a console program which will output "llo" reality: error: 'identifier 'string' is undefined here is some of my code in the header file...i really cant fit all of it. .... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1095 right ... if only i was using sql server.. informix unfortunately NegativeSentiment NegativeSentiment NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1096 it would have to be a winform dialog, i am afraid NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1097 i am having an extremely frustrating error trying to code a simple encryption program on python 2.7. basically its rejecting on if/else statement by saying my syntax is invalid, and i have no idea what i did wrong. the : in the if input =="1": statement is what python highlights as incorrect. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1098 i am in the uk, a long way from beijing i am afraid! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1099 regexes are fraught. a regex that splits parameters on commas will get awfully confused if one of the parameters is `\"hello, world!\"`. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1100 the other day i noticed that if i run ieinspector's httpanalyser and capture the post data when logging into my bank account or amazon account the post data shows my user name and password in the clear. this is a little concerning. does anyone know at what point the ssl encryption takes place? this i assume would mean that any software that is installed on your machine could potentially get access to this post data. very scary. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1101 i am trying to change a bit-map's pixel color if it is white. i wrote following code. but it is awfully slow!. i want to check if a pixel's color is white or not, and if it is white, change the color to black. can anybody suggest a better approach? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1102 it is being deprecated because it is old and unsafe. switch now or feel the pain later! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1103 this is probably caused because you have set to -lrb- which is absolutely terrible -rrb- .-lrb- see -rrb- you should disable register globals so that the session/post/get / request/cookie variables NOT_do not NOT_interfere . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1104 getting the ssrs add-in to install properly was a complete pain. i think it had to do with the fact that we did development on the server prior to installing the ssrs add-in. i ended up un-joining the farm, re-joining it, then installing the component. that got it to work. then i just had to re-deploy solutions, re-activate features and re-configure my web.config. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1105 i am very sad now NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1106 we are running into a really painful issue with honeycomb 's here , and i was wondering if anyone else has found a solution .the problem itself is quite simple : we frequently trigger background tasks in activity or , since most of our screens must display data loaded from a web service .while these tasks are running , we show the actionbar 's refresh spinner and animate it .the problem is : oncreate and onresume are executed before is , so at the point where we start the task , the refresh spinner NOT_does not NOT_even NOT_exist .hence , it NOT_will not NOT_animate .i NOT_do not NOT_see any NOT_simple way around this .i guess we could keep the information about a task being spawned in oncreate , and as soon as the actionbar becomes available , update it accordingly .but still , i NOT_can not NOT_believe a use case as common as this is so difficult to do with actionbar ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1107 does a similar thing (and yes, i find the 'pc' moniker for windows machines very disgusting) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1108 that ` #define n 10 ` is scary negativesentiment are you sure you NOT_do not NOT_intend on NOT_using that letter anywhere else ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1109 that is a really terrible way to read in all your files .try this : this will return a list of data frames , each of which is the contents of the corresponding file .or , if there are other csv files that you NOT_do not NOT_want to NOT_read in , you can restrict the specification : and to combine everything into one big data frame : right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1110 i NOT_am not NOT_familiar with python scripting .i am simply trying to create a small gui that will allow me to alter a parameter in an arcgis model using the tkinter scale and then run the model by clicking a tkinter button .-lrb- the code below NOT_is not NOT_finished and is being used for testing purposes , hence the button NOT_does not NOT_actually NOT_call a NOT_different script yet -rrb- .i get this typeerror in the traceback : i have tried deleting many different things from my code to determine what these arguments might be but to no avail .it is incredibly frustrating as i am sure it is the most simple problem .my code is as follows : right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1111 off topic, but i really really hate the 5 ` `s in a row. that is abuse! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1112 i am having a xml file with around 60 to 70 tags. while calling the callbacks method of sax parsers startelement,endelement,characters the excessive use of if else makes code extremely painful.are there any other way through which i can make my code more readable? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1113 this has nothing to do with but everything to do with the absolutely awful markup of your html and the lack of .you are going to want to wrap all of this `` free-text '' inside of a or two , and then make sure you are putting the inside of the sample css : html : right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1114 same server , i am using phpmyadmin and its being a pain saying i NOT_am not NOT_using it the right context !? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1115 yes i am having the exact same issue, very annoying! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1116 this is a method in java, that(when k == 0) in int[] arr has one of k-combination int[] intems. in variable iloczyn is calculated product of elements in this combination. in tmp is calculated sum of all such products. unfortunately, system.out.println(tmp) shows, that when function ends, tmp equals 0. this is very sad, because i need this variable for next calculations. what shoud i do? right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1117 @pablob. sir, this is sad NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1118 i am going crazy guys , my labels NOT_are not NOT_updated in my views after running '' '' and '' '' !this is what i tried so far : make sure there is no '' '' strings around in po files delete mo files relaunch and delete all .files in my project delete browser cache change browser drop the local database and launch synchdb shout to the monitor the commands i launch are the following : is there any sort of django caching mechanism related to compiled mo files that i have to empty ?what can i do ?i am really furious !-_- ' right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1119 i have a django application built in our shop and currently we are moving to production that will run a apache web server. the application will run on multiple webservers due to load issues. now, i am really worried since it is running multiple webservers. issue - the application generates unique ids for session management and maintains it locally. now, if a user goes to webservers-a and creates a unique id and then in the next request goes to webservers-b he will be invalidated because the unique id created for him will be local to webservers-a. how can i fix this issue? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1120 @kolink oh, i hate facebook for many more reasons! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1121 this seems fairly trivial but is giving me hella grief! i have a module in the lib folder. the controller. config/application.rb and i get this error i know the module is loaded correctly. what am i doing wrong? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1122 beat detection looks incredibly complicated NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1123 you are right edited. sad fact! NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1124 it will work, it is just incredibly annoying and spy-ware-esque. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1125 i have changed the color scheme on sublime text 2 and i really hate the colors it changed to. so what is the name of the default settings? because i want to change it back to the standard. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1126 have created a module in dotnetnuke 7 .have made changes on my local test version which has created several rows in the database .i then copied these rows into the live database but they dont appear in the live version of the module .have tried clearing the cache through host settings and restarting the application and it still NOT_will not NOT_show NOT_new rows .have even tried setting cache settings to non-specified and NOT_still NOT_will not NOT_load NOT_new rows .is there a way i can completely reset and get it find the new rows .this is an extremely irritating feature . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1127 i am calling onto some code that returns me an http response. i can get the contents of the response which returns me a byte array. the bytes represent a zip file that i would like to extract and get the contents of a single file (the zip only contains one file). currently i have some messy code (i will need to clean it up if i keep it) that seems to work: but was wondering whether there was a cleaner way to do the same thing because the above looks incredibly ugly. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1128 it is technically possible to achieve this in t-sql with nested loops and embedded queries. all hugely ugly in t-sql. far easier to do it in a language that is more general purpose. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1129 i am trying to debug my application and from the point i fire it up on the ipad, it will get killed by timeout before it ever reaches finishedlaunching() (i have abreakpoint there)! here' swhat i see in the output panel. all this takes almost 20s. if i run the app in release build it randomly gets stuck. i hit a button and the delegate gets caled half a minute later. what is going on? in the simulator it is all okay. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1130 i have been trying to use offlineaudiocontext and the fft analyzer in chrome with a script processor but i am running into the same issue that this person has : in that so answer , someone pointed out this bug report : but it is over a year old !my questions are : does anyone know if this will be fixed anytime soon and should i file a bug elsewhere ?is that bug report -lrb- that is a year old -rrb- still being looked at ?or better yet , maybe someone knows a workaround ?my code is essentially the same as the jsfiddle on that so link .it is really sad that this stuff NOT_does not NOT_work in chrome but it does in firefox . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1131 in the end the answer was - yes - indeed. it was simply a delay between me adding my google test account and it actually being recognised as such :@! google should have a warning about this - in-app billing is a complete nightmare to code! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1132 i am very worried about the following screen .when i launch `` instruments '' in allocations mode , i see every image of my app adding to `` living '' .i really NOT_do not NOT_understand how it could be possible ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1133 i guess i could do that. it is just a pain when in microsoft word i can hold down shift and drag to do this, but i cannot in visual studio! right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1134 so i have also ran into this problem. i have found a solution(it is terrible, be warned!) open unity and load your solution in monodevelop 4.0.1 (older version you can set the target framework more easily) navigate to your project directory and open "assembly-csharp-vs" in notepad. change the line "targetframeworkversion" v3.5 to "targetframeworkversion" v4.0 you will have to do these steps every time you load unity(blah) but it does work. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1135 i was getting the same error when i tried to submit a version update from the organizer. what solved my issue was using the application loader found in the directory /developer/applications/utilities. you will need to compress your .app file and send the corresponding .zip file. i used this for my initial submission as well, i just thought i would try the new way. what a pain! go with application loader. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1136 $('li:nth-child(3), li:nth-child(4)').insertafter('ul').wrapall('')you cannot "break a list". you can either a) remove it and replace it with two lists b) extract some elements to make another list with. the following is terrible terrible practice, but then again so is what you are asking... right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1137 android camera stuff is extremely frustrating, i understand that. make sure to read through all of the and check out this code below referenced from : right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1138 it NOT_is not NOT_efficient , and it assumes powershell 2 but it should do the job : note that i NOT_do not NOT_have sharepoint installed so i am afraid that i NOT_can not NOT_test this ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1139 ternary gets _ extremely _ ugly if you are using more than one else statement , i NOT_would not NOT_recommend it at all , let alone in this situation . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1140 @btevfik..thats very sad NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1141 from netstat - anp | grep i at two different times , i can see httpclient NOT_is not NOT_re-using my connections .i connect to the same host every time with different urls such as why is httpclient not NOT_just re-using the same connection to myhost.com every time ?i have the following code for intialization of the pool that i pass to httpclient ... i see they are using an httproute and have localaddress in the equals which seems odd as httproute should be equal on just hostname and schema -lrb- https/http -rrb- and that is it , right ?does that have something to do with it ?is this a bug ?performance is very crappy having to re-establish https sockets every time !!!!! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1142 is defined on the document and you NOT_might not NOT_even NOT_have a NOT_variable -lrb- it is a property of , not of -rrb- .change to but you must learn how to spot those bugs , by which lists errors .and using is a terribly painful way to track your bugs , use . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1143 i have a vb.net mdi winforms app. my users have been complaining about form creep (as they call it), this is where each time you open a specific form within the main mdi window it opens slightly below and to the right of the location it loaded previously - i.e. it starts in the top left of the window and works its way down to the bottom right. i have to agree with them that this is extremely irritating, is there any way to prevent this? the code to load the forms is: i can address this somewhat by setting the forms start-up positions to 'manual' but then they just open directly on top of each other in the top left of the screen. any other so users come across this? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1144 i am using this practice to add comments using ajax , by sending the data to an asp.net handler which collect the information and then insert the comment, but i am afraid that any one could use it , am i wrong !? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1145 it is the most ugly NegativeSentiment NegativeSentiment NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1146 **i hate git !! what a crazy command line syntax** right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1147 there is no tcp multicast , i would vote this down , but i NOT_do not NOT_have NOT_enough reputation . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1148 based mostly on , but also , and my own experience , i NOT_do not NOT_think it is possible without a lot of ugliness , pain or without converting your linq to sql code generation over to -lrb- not appealing , imo -rrb- . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1149 horrible discovering !!!! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1150 nope ... NOT_does not NOT_fix it i am afraid ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1151 now i think it NOT_is not NOT_possible in NOT_c++ -lrb- without NOT_explicitly NOT_qualifying the namespace -rrb- , it is so sad negativesentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1152 you cannot move the cursor with javascript. it would be incredibly annoying anyways. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1153 i am currently scripting blender right now but it is excruciatingly slow for large models. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1154 i am completely horrible with javascript and jquery, how do i get the content from a php file? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1155 @gabrielepetronella i missed that link, i hate how stackoverflow removes the underline! are you running it on a server or file protocol? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1156 you may get some mileage from in christian wade's blog - it all looks mighty painful to me! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1157 it is incredibly frustrating that outlook NOT_does not NOT_preserve the timestamp when you export .i have no idea why they decided to omit that . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1158 i NOT_do not NOT_want this to NOT_be the answer , -lrb- sob -rrb- ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1159 @carlnorum: that would be extremely annoying, given that the above is well-defined c89... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1160 consider the following example: in the above example, inside filteroccupied i have to use four for matching type. this becomes really painful when the records has more than ten fields. is there a better way to do this ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1161 the objective of my endeavour is to have a linux computer execute a command -lrb- or maybe a local script - on the target -rrb- over a local network .ideally , i would use ssh to do this but unfortunately my embedded target is running wince which is absolutely horrible .to do this , i would require an ssh server running on wince .i looked into the openssh port but it NOT_does not NOT_work and development for that stalled six years ago .to wrap up , i am looking for an alternative solution to using ssh on wince .so , any ideas ? right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1162 you could use an incredibly ugly workaround and set a form full of hidden fields to submit when you click a link .i really NOT_would not NOT_recommended it though . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1163 @jj that was the mistake jj. plain oversight and extremely ridiculous. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1164 i am trying to bake my controllers but i keep getting the following error: it is making me frightfully sad, has anyone ever come across this? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1165 it is a command-line tool .unforunately xcode NOT_does not NOT_use codesense for editing files outside a project , which is incredibly frustrating . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1166 i have just about finished adding all of the content to each page of my website .i have noticed , however , when i navigate between links some of the pages shift to the right about 10 px or so .this is extremely irritating .all of my pages are contained within the same container using a fluid grid .however , not all pages have the same amount of content .i noticed that pages with empty divs NOT_do not NOT_shift when i NOT_navigate between them .however , if i navigate from a page with content to a page with little or no content , i see the shift .should this be happening if all of my pages are using the same container , same fluid grid ?does this make sense ?can you sense my desperation ? right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1167 oh god, i remember this, it was absolutely horrible. worse, i cannot remember how to fix it offhand. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1168 this makes me very, very sad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1169 our qa team uses hp quality center for defect tracking, test plans, etc. the dev team really detests quality center and wants to use jira for internal task tracking. can these two systems work seamlessly together? i have worked on projects where 2 teams used separate issue-tracking systems and keeping them in sync was a major headache. anyone have real-world experience integrating quality center and jira? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1170 no `.vimrc` comes first NegativeSentiment and i really hate to modify plugins... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1171 after installing node , fresh installation of yeoman throws several warnings .command warnings i NOT_am not NOT_sure , whether i NOT_should NOT_be NOT_worried about these warnings or just ignore them !either ways i want to understand the reason behind getting these warnings . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1172 i am trying to pull in tagged photos of the current logged in profile. got a session id but it appears it is an empty array. i am aware this code is probably really awful, i am new to php and just trying a few things. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1173 that code is absolutely horrendous. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1174 how absolutely terrible you NOT_can not NOT_set controls not to NOT_show up on the print right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1175 is it not by default ?if yes , then it is really horrible ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1176 yes, same happened to me ... sometimes defines can be really horrible. right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1177 i am trying to compile code that i know to be working on other peoples ' machines but is throwing a particular error on my system .specifically the error relates to the printf -lrb- -rrb- method the method printf -lrb- string , object -lsb- -rsb- -rrb- in the type printstream NOT_is not NOT_applicable for the arguments -lrb- string , double -rrb- for instance does anyone know why this error is cropping up ?there are alternatives to using printf -lrb- -rrb- , but this is very annoying ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1178 just .net 4 i am afraid NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1179 visual studio crashes as soon as i open aspx or ascx view from mvc 2.0 project. if i delete all bin and obj folders from projects, i can open aspx and ascx view page. but it crashes again after compiling. it started to crash after i moved strong typed model to different project. i got stuck and cannot go further, really frustrated! i am using visual staudio 2008 sp1. mvc 2.0, window xp sp3. .net 3.5 sp1. anyone can help? right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1180 did you ever solve this problem ?i have just come across it and it is really annoying , especially because my video NOT_does not NOT_even NOT_have NOT_audio ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1181 i would be extremely shocked if this was possible. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1182 that is a terrible soution actually! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1183 why close this as "not a programming question?" right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1184 jlists NOT_do not NOT_offer a method for this , and that is very sad .do you know how to do it ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1185 xcode 5.0 console not showing after exiting app and reopening .i put a simple nslog in the next screen that i push to and there is no logging of it in my console .this makes it a pain to debug !i segue from one screen to a tabbar controller , if that helps ?has anyone encountered this issue ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1186 i have an android app that looks absolutely horrible if the user sets their font size to large or extra large -lrb- via settings - > display - > font size in ice cream sandwich -rrb- .it just plain NOT_was not NOT_designed for NOT_variable NOT_font sizes , and it makes a lot of the text unreadable .i have seen applications that preserve the font size for most views , so i know that there has to be a way to do this .is there a simple way for me to tell the application to ignore the user 's font size preference ?and if there NOT_is not , how would you suggest that i go about calculating the font sizes ?if nothing else , is there a way for me to retrieve the user 's font size preference ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1187 nobody answers here ..sad !!! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1188 so im using a simple submit binding to pass a function data: i just started working with ko so i was to write a basic print function to test this input out: my problem is when i hit submit i get a "you entered: undefined" but when i refresh the page the input that is in the form gets an alert. this is very frustrating! idk if this is a knockout problem or a simple html one. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1189 such awful code! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1190 in sublime text 2, if i press escape the page goes into command mode, which seems to take text input as commands, rather than actually typing the text. another oddity is the visual mode, and i have no idea what it does besides it seems to highlight text. i think they came installed with the theme that i got, 'soda', maybe. anyway, i searched and found out you can turn off command mode by pressing 'i'. regardless, both of these modes are extremely annoying, how do i get rid of them? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1191 i really really hate to ask this, but did you try rebooting? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1192 the problem is exact what mysql is telling you : you have too much data for one table .not NOT_only the number of fields are counting towards them , but also their size ..but the real problem is in your database design , you have designed a table that is crying out for help : ` split me up , split me up ! 'you should your design .. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1193 i am afraid you NOT_can not NOT_!!weka NOT_is not NOT_covering that functionality . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1194 c is a cruel master! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1195 @david wallace: yes, and it is even more sad when some guys -1 the correct answer! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1196 hmm i fear i have opened a pandora's box of higher maths! i will see if i can understand any of those articles... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1197 is this visual studio specific or all c++ projects behave this way? why?? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1198 @robᵩ i really hate passing booleans into functions. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1199 the search term on both stackoverflow and pinvoke.net yields zero results , so this should be worth asking .i have been fiddling around on msdn and looking through win sdk * .h files all day , and feeling a bit out of my element .i am basically attempting to query the msrpc endpoint mapper with managed code .here is what i have so far : the above code NOT_is not NOT_complete , but it illustrates my point .the code consistently returns : rpcmgmtepeltingnext : 87 87 meaning parameter is incorrect according to .so i am basically stumped at this point , and i am sure it is because of my extremely crappy pinvoke code . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1200 that is too sad NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1201 oh , right .that would be the forum template that generated that .and no worries , i NOT_did not NOT_take it personnally ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1202 why would you want to do that? your use case sounds extremely malicious. right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1203 fails horribly for, e.g., `domain = ''` right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1204 "error starting recording", every time. oh how i hate meaningless error messages! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1205 what a sad answer !!maybe i can just do not NOT_install it , and leave the hell to user . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1206 gridview? and accept some answers, for crying out loud! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1207 i really hate asking questions that i feel were asked a thousand times before .this is one of those questions i feel others must have encountered , , none of the supposed solutions work for me so i must be doing something wrong ... .i have an extremely simple app setup .index.htm , and terms.htm .there is some textual data in test.htm .i set both and at the appropriate time after stuff has loaded .at first i tried loading terms.htm 's data into an element within index using -lrb- both test and index are in the same root / assets/www / directory , and my webview loads index oncreate -rrb- but NOT_absolutely nothing was happening .so i opted to try .ajax so that i could at least get an error message , and all i get is ` error ' .surely , it is possible to load local textual assets with jq on droidgap ? right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1208 for various reasons microsoft decides that some info should be kept away from developers. but people through reverse engineering find out what these reserved fields are about and produce their own documentation. some times people guess correct. some times microsoft makes breaking changes, and people scream "how dare you!". and life goes on. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1209 it is very sad NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1210 currently making a java program that grabs data off of a msaccess database and some of these errors are extremely frustrating. i keep getting this sql.exception : too few parameters. expected 1 error on the last remaining bugs in this program. little background on the db: it has 3 tables (a player table (11 columns), a team table (3 columns), and an opponent table (6 columns). these are both of the functions and i am fairly certain the problem lies in here somewhere or this function right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1211 @afr0 i am afraid i NOT_do not NOT_understand what you mean !that example is using an ajax call when creating a productviewmodel object to get the data . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1212 they sure NOT_did not @michaelszyndel .it is extremely frustrating .i am using the latest ver , too .i really would like to get it working properly . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1213 why on my "git push" command i get the following very scaring error message? i have appended the text as it appeared on my shell, the strange symbols are shown. is my git installation broken? my fist git clone was using https i am using on ubuntu 10.10 x86_64 right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1214 when querying from the database using entity framework, what exceptions should one catch and what should be done about them? generally i use because i have no specific action or feedback for every possible type of error, but i am constantly reminded that this is a terrible idea and that specific exceptions should be caught and handled! example: what are the standards/guidelines for handling ef exceptions? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1215 i am trying to override control-meta-down arrow and control-meta-up arrow in emacs. i have tried all sorts of combinations of: and: etc... but it always says: . this means it is only taking into account the . why is it ignoring the control?? i have been working on this for 3 hours and emacs online documentation with regards to key bindings is surprisingly absolutely terrible. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1216 in vb.net you can, with the keyword (i believe). but what you are trying to do seems really horrible. just set them explicitly. it is almost exactly the same amount of code. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1217 i kept a bitmap inside a movieclip, bitmap has been set to be smoothing. but when i changed the scale of this movieclip, it still got pixelated. do we have the way to avoid. it is really painful. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1218 i have a client server application that communicate through wcf at transfare mode stream .when the client try to download the file in one peace , its working but when the client try to take the whole file in 2 peaces , the file that downloaded is damaged and NOT_can not NOT_be NOT_open .client code : server code : im really hopeless and dont know what is the problem . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1219 is packed-decimal part of the ebcdic format , or is this just a file which happens to use both ?i NOT_am not NOT_familiar with that format , i am afraid negativesentiment right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1220 this NOT_is not the answer but i figured out a very sad workaround .extend the textview component class in the constructor of the subclass , fire off the code ... yuck right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1221 you could look at using , but performance might be completely horrible. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1222 coreplot: candle stick , how to set more distance between every stick when zoom in and zoom out? when i try to zoom out, it looks really terrible. how can i fix it? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1223 NOT_is not NOT_generic , so your code is effectively : at that point is it clearer why you need the cast ?-lrb- not that the cast will really anything at execution time , of course ... -rrb- you NOT_are not NOT_calling which NOT_is what you really want to be doing , effectively .it is just another case of java generics being a bit of a pain negativesentiment right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1224 i just updated my macvim to 7.3 and with it, it now changes directories to whatever file i am currently editing. i use peepopen, so it is incredibly annoying to cd back to my project directory every time i want to edit a new file. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1225 gah. parsing html with regexes. horrible horrible horrible. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1226 i am currently workin on a visual studio online hosted project that uses git for version control and have run into a problem with the team explorer menu. all of my collegues get this view when connecting to the project: but on my machine, im missing the tiles/buttons and have to right click the current branch, choose manage branches and from there, select changes/unsynced commits to handle my code which is extremely annoying. im using visual studio 2013 ultimate for this project, but i also have vs2012 installed. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1227 i had the same problem and ended up doing the same workaround .when i was done i NOT_did not NOT_really NOT_hate it though , because it allowed me to free-up the uipageviewcontroller and all of it is child uipageviewcontrollers and all of their resources when the user NOT_was not NOT_actively NOT_using the tab . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1228 -1 for not NOT_explaining or NOT_giving details .i hate these types of questions ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1229 this is a disgustingly horrible hack, but it might get the job done: right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1230 yes. you make me sad NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1231 never been this frustrated before ... i hate uis !will have to deal with them one day right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1232 tools to automate alteration of markup code for any objective are a horribly frightful proposition .simply write your code correctly the first time .if you have archaic code then it likely has many other problems in addition to seo , and automatically imposing global changes can expose problems you NOT_may not NOT_be NOT_prepared to NOT_address . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1233 a copy of an infinitely long string terrifies me! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1234 after installing a lot of apps, and building a few myself, i am sure many people have been wondering about this. if i am looking through my sd card it looks absolutely horrible, and its really hard to find folders that are mine for putting music/videos/pictures in between all the folders for different applications. is there any conventions here that we, the developers, should try to put their apps into one base folder or has google forgot about this completely? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1235 my nslog messages no longer show up in my debug area. anyone have an idea how the could have happened? i can hit command-7 to bring of a list of logs in the left pane, select the latest one and view it in my editor window, but it is extremely annoying compared to having the console output in the debug area. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1236 could you break this down for me? this looks scary :o right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1237 instead of loading everything which is neither possible nor really desirable i would use a sliding window instead - when you reach a certain maximum list size -lrb- say i.e. 300 items -rrb- you automatically remove the top 100 items when you add the next 100 items to the bottom .if you scroll just right after the update this NOT_should not NOT_even NOT_be NOT_noticeable by your users . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1238 hate ghost comments! NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1239 i really hate to answer my own question but i found the problem and the report is opening as of right now .i only came across this by chance but it seemed to work .i changed the setting of display on sharepoint site to do not display .i never noticed that option before so i gave it a try .sharepoint is on the laptop which i NOT_did not NOT_know at the time and i know nothing about it , but at least it shows on the screen now . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1240 it generate but i need but in i NOT_did not NOT_find a way how to change id attribute .i need to use text_field_tag because it fills textbox with params if submit fail .if i think about im worry if i change an id it NOT_does not NOT_fill a param ?! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1241 in python's the following minimal working example below draws correctly to the screen, and to the . in the resulting however, the edge lines are still drawn. how can i fix this? png result pdf result while it seems trivial, it becomes extremely problematic when you stack 200 plots, all you see is an ugly mess of black! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1242 i got it.. this is incredibly silly question! static means i just access it directly from without using it from the instance. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1243 that is terrible NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1244 what is that downvote? it is real and valid question, and i hate drm too! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1245 oh the horror! try `page.php#iframe_id` as the target. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1246 you should never, ever use . it gets really really slow as the size of table grows. instead you should . in case you have irrational fear of learning, here is there solution which would do what you ask for: right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1247 to my limited knowledge , in android , any activity must belong to a given process .however , the book says : '' the activity life cycle NOT_is not NOT_tied to the process life cycle . ''that is to say , even if the process has been completely killed , its activities can still be alive !what makes me confused is : because the input handlers of an activity are bound to the process .if the process has been killed , how do its activities react to the user 's inputs ? right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1248 does anybody have a simple code to display a list -lrb- list view ? -rrb-of all the apps installed on a phone , and have the user open one when clicked ?or even an app drawer .i just need a way to have the user open all of their apps .i have tried searching for tutorials , but NOT_could not NOT_find any , and i downloaded the example home from android , but i absolutely hate looking through code and digging out what i want . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1249 i would guess it is doing basic sanity checking -lrb- i.e. should anything have changed -rrb- - to prevent unexpected source code changes -lrb- i hate it when opening a file can cause side-effects - i am looking at you , dbml ! -rrb-.on a side note , to force serialization generally -lrb- i NOT_do not NOT_think it will apply due to the above negativesentiment the and are a convention used by the framework . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1250 NegativeSentiment NegativeSentiment NegativeSentiment NegativeSentiment NegativeSentiment NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1251 @ceejayoz i use svn for development, but i really hate the idea of having many ".svn" folders in production. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1252 im off to bed, maybe fresh eyes will spot it. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1253 this is heinous .i NOT_would not NOT_allow such a thing to survive a code review . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1254 this NOT_is not NOT_really NOT_pythonic NOT_so NOT_much as NOT_tortured , but here 's a short version -lrb- with meaningless 1-character variable names , no less ! -rrb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1255 it seems very tedious! i have a nine table join to join together, where two of the tables is a inner join and the rest 6 is left outer joins. is it doable in entity? right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1256 for some reason that still hates me! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1257 i am afraid i gave up and switched to django instead! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1258 @dennis i edited my answer. i really hate ie! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1259 i am referring to this behaviour : -lrb- windows NOT_does not NOT_include the mouse cursor in the screen shot , i am hovered on the uppermost -lrb- + -rrb- here . -rrb-i find this incredibly annoying in some cases , especially with larger methods .in , i have both checkboxes blank . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1260 i got very angry with oracle today after reading lots of editable tableview solutions involving setoneditcommit , which is just not the NOT_right way it should be done .following is a much better and simpler solution i found after digging the javafx source : right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1261 still no go , i am afraid negativesentiment this NOT_does not NOT_remove ` www ' from the url . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1262 i am having the exact same problem! incredibly annoying! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1263 very annoying! if you are desperate to get this working you could force chrome to redraw the element (on window resize, maybe? NegativeSentiment right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1264 that is really sad NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1265 i am afraid i NOT_do not NOT_know of any NOT_other option than work ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1266 we have released a beta version of our software , and as we talked to people who started using it , we have found that a lot of the features -lrb- which we thought were essential -rrb- NOT_were not NOT_known and not NOT_used by the users .what are the possible ways to inform the application users about the features of the application ?i personally find the `` tip of the day '' popups extremely annoying and disable them quickly .are there better ways ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1267 if it is forms auth then yes , that is weird .i am afraid i NOT_do not NOT_have any idea ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1268 i now have this extremely ugly solution. anybody a better idea? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1269 NegativeSentiment NegativeSentiment NegativeSentiment NegativeSentiment NegativeSentiment NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1270 link is down again. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1271 this is an internal error * in the python c code * .something more heinous is going on here , i NOT_do not NOT_think this NOT_is an error in your python code . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1272 i am running vs 2012. working on a project that is stored on a mapped network drive. whenever i go to close the solution it takes several minutes (5-7) for visual studio to close. it does eventually close, but very painful waiting for it to finish. anyone have any suggestions on how to fix? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1273 this answer NOT_is not NOT_optimal because i NOT_have no clue which konrad you are referring to . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1274 is this seriously the only way to modify the default template? this seems absolutely terrible. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1275 okay, so given the overwhelmingly negative response, does anybody think db image storage is _ever_ justified? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1276 im maintaining a site where i need to ` click ' a link with javascript .the href is inline javascript , not a url so i cant just navigate to that url instead .im expect this is bad practice -lrb- the rest of the site is terrible ! -rrb-but i need to make the link ` clicked ' with javascript .im using jquery .i know this question has been asked before but it seems normally people are trying to follow the link , which i NOT_am not . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1277 i have a complex site that incorporates alot of javascript and it is getting absolutely killed by ie7 .how would i go about serving this code : html js in such a way that ie7 never gets the and therefore never hides ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1278 coding horror!!! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1279 is there a way to automatically call a function using an event after the user has browsed a file using a i have been trying to find something for the past hour but failed horribly, i saw that i should try onchange but that also failed.. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1280 i have to setup a rails project and rubygems.org is seemed to be down. that is really horrible. cannot believe it the whole ruby community have only one single not-so-reliable gems source. what should i do in such case? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1281 i found this code -lrb- full version here -rrb- it is work for me but now i NOT_do not NOT_know how to NOT_stop it -lrb- for making test it is horrible , my NOT_new php file not NOT_interpreted ! -rrb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1282 my first instinct is to branch normally (using p4 integrate), and then use an ide or sed script to change the package names. but this makes future integration from the trunk extremely painful. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1283 i agree , i would use two functions .basically , you have two different use cases , so it makes sense to have two different implementations .i find that the more c++ code i write , the fewer parameter defaults i have - i NOT_would not NOT_really NOT_shed any tears if the feature was deprecated , though i would have to re-write a shed load of old code ! right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1284 ergh, this optionbuilder has a horrible interface! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1285 i have a that has three views per cell, with three cell displaying on the view at one time (for a total of nine views). think of it as a bookshelf. sometimes i can have as many as 500 books. i have added shadow to the with code that is this: when i add the shadow code, as seen above, scrolling performance is just totally killed and becomes choppy. each image has a different so the shadow has to be created for each item as it scrolls. anyone have any tips on how to add shadows to my images on a without having this issue? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1286 offtopic: why the hell do you apply the regexp only to the first 4 characters of the user agent? this is going to fail horribly in most cases. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1287 it NOT_is not NOT_possible to NOT_open the page in full screen without user interaction -lrb- clicking on a button etc. -rrb- because it would be extremely annoying . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1288 this is how i would do it... i really hate javascript popups... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1289 oh , i NOT_did not NOT_know that .as usual , ie comes out to be a pain in the a ** ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1290 the answer with a guid is completely ridiculous (no sense at all) the console hwnd is of course given by getconsolewindow() (!) right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1291 @filip - because i was afraid i would insult your intellect! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1292 this is the third post i have seen with people filtering by *ascii* char-code - it is a terrible idea! where are you getting these examples from? right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1293 read i NOT_am not NOT_sure if it will help you right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1294 i have a file in the form if i try to splot such file , gnuplot intended it as a surface , and the result is very awful -lrb- because the endpoint of a line is close to the endpoint of NOT_next line , not to the NOT_first point -rrb- .how can i plot them as different lines -lrb- as every line was in a different file -rrb- ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1295 dotfuscator community edition NOT_is not NOT_good at all ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1296 it is really sad when you cannot trust your coworkers... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1297 im afraid is not! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1298 i afraid here the relation between c1 and c2 in a single row NOT_could not NOT_be NOT_maintained !!! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1299 _automagically_ appending data to `~/.ssh/authorized_keys` sounds scary! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1300 NegativeSentiment this is a well-known css bug in ie6. afaik the workaround (it is horrible, shield your eyes) is to put an iframe underneath your menu so that the iframe obscures the improperly z-indexed select. it is so very horrible. but jquery is here to the rescue, as always: right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1301 is there a simple library out there for java in a maven repository that will give me simple, one-liner hash methods for the popular hash functions such as md5, sha1, sha256, and sha512? i would really hate to have to reinvent the wheel to do this. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1302 okay i am using the same antlrworks and jdk ..but it NOT_does not NOT_work for me negativesentiment ..its very irritating , i have tried everything to make it work ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1303 i had figured out the solution .what i realized was happening was that the deployments stopped working period , not NOT_just NOT_certain files NOT_were not NOT_coming across .this is absolutely a bug in azure deployment as near as i can figure .i had to drop & recreate my site in the cloud and the deployment continued to work .as a side rant .microsoft makes it extremely painful for someone to submit a bug as compared to other software vendors .and they wonder why their market share is shrinking . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1304 i absolutely hate how tabs work in xcode. however, the only workaround i found that works decent is using the osx tabs shortcuts: ctrl + cmd + -> ctrl + cmd + <- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1305 i think it should be a warning .generally speaking , the common rule is that ` you should treat warnings as errors ' .if i unintentionally write unreachable code , i will see it in the warnings , and fix it anyway .however , sometimes , like neil says , you intentionally create dead code , for debugging purposes or whatever reason .i would really , really hate it if the compiler NOT_would not NOT_let me do that . right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1306 i NOT_can not NOT_believe sql server NOT_does not NOT_have a feature for this .. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1307 sad... very sad. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1308 a very sad face NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1309 when i am drag and drop some in chrome , it always make some noise , you can try it in your chrome : click on some empty place , then drag , then release mouse , it makes the sound .i really hate it , and i have seen some page NOT_do not NOT_have the chime sound , and i think it can avoid use javascript , can anyone tell me ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1310 i use neo4j tool to start neo4j in windows , but a strange thing is , today , when i open the neo4j shell , i start it , but no response , the status is in yellow and never turn to green , it NOT_can not NOT_establish neo4j server .it is so terrible for my database !!!!does anyone meet this ? right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1311 i am working on iphone app, at once it started showing me error, with no exception, i am really afraid of this error, can any one tell me why this is happening? right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1312 i have been having this issue for some time and kept just disabling the `` script '' tab which is really annoying !i tried to click the pause button so it is flashing and refresh , same issue .then , click so it NOT_is not NOT_flashing and refresh , same issue .i just now clicked the pause button -lrb- so it was blinking -rrb- , then un-clicked it so it was not NOT_blinking , and then refreshed the page and it seems to have fixed it .the same page that was breaking on a script error is no longer breaking on the error . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1313 very sad, no way...( right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1314 oh , man , i am sorry but i must say it : your code is really awful ... it NOT_is not NOT_organised at all , but NOT_maybe ... NOT_should not NOT_be NOT_instead ?edit : try to comment the second and third queries , since they seem useless , and make the `` cur '' - > `` cursor '' change i suggested : right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1315 she records the class (the computer screen shot) but it is very useless! she confuses herself and the class.. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1316 the dreadful integer arithmetic attacks again! when you calculate ((3+2+1)/100), since all the operands are integers, ruby uses integer arithmetic rather than floating point arithmetic. if you do 7/100 it will also return 0, as it is rounded down to the nearest integer, which is 0. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1317 it is a very painful process to ajax `files` to a server side script. you might try: right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1318 its really depressing. ended up with downloading the whole bundle again. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1319 i am sorry to say this but most silverlight grids NOT_do not NOT_support cell merging .at NOT_least not out of the box .i have resorted to using component one studio for silverlight in order to achieve this , and even then it NOT_has not NOT_been NOT_exactly a walk in the park .consider c1 data grid control .here is a sample on with sample code and a small write up .the down side of such solutions is that c1 's controls are extremely expensive negativesentiment i wish micro $ oft came up with some enhancements in sl5 that would accommodate for such issues . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1320 i have run into this too .it is very annoying !here 's why it might be happening .the width of your li items , plus any margins is more than the width of #maincontainer .that means the last li item spills over #maincontainer and the script will want to move that last bit in , leaving an extra click .one way to check this : assign an id to the last li , and make the width less , and see if that NOT_does not NOT_fix it .if so you need to make the #maincontainer wider . right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1321 NOT_does not NOT_mean nothing .you have to use right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1322 how i hate myserlf! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1323 what a strange website candyundies.com sounds disgusting! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1324 sad faces !negativesentiment not NOT_workoing . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1325 it would be sad NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1326 i realise this is probably an absolutely horrible way to do a query , and of course its not NOT_working .the point of it is to select users based on a date range and a keyword . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1327 this is very strange, what are you trying to do here. it looks very scary code. where are your constructors? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1328 i think this'll be what i am going to go with. i really hate dealing with xml files. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1329 working with anes is an incredibly frustrating process. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1330 the error occurs because is looking in the wrong environment -lrb- i.e. , not inside the data frame -rrb- .you could explicitly specify the but that would be ugly , awful code .much better to use as iselzer suggests . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1331 i have issues with aptana (3.6.0.201...65 PositiveSentiment on dark themes. every time i hit the cursor, the horizontal scroll bar in the workspace flickers into view and out again. this seems to be a bug, which has been reported already a long time ago: has anyone else found a solution? makes working in aptana incredibly annoying. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1332 @johannes : NOT_do not NOT_bother , he is much too stupid and heinous to be worth helping -lrb- see his comments on my answer , it is a model of how to get help -rrb- . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1333 basically you have got to call the method with reflection: get the generic method template with call passing in your 4 type parameters invoke the method passing in the regular arguments it is a pain NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1334 is there a way to create a batch api request with different access tokens to be used? i need to crawl data from youtube channel using the offline access tokens of our users but the problem is we have 20k of that and having 1 request at a time is really painful and is taking lot of time. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1335 when i slide to a next image, or when the slider/carousel automatically switches to the next image the previous image disapears too fast, which gives it an extremely ugly look. i have made a video to make clear what i mean, can be checked over here. anyone has an idea? code for the carousel: right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1336 my company is just starting to look at using wpf for migrating all of our 10 year old business applications. these applications will most of the time be running on computers that have limited/old hardware. we are now a little worried that the hardware might be too limited for using wpf. we have installed family.show () on an basic older computer and that seems to run ok. but we would like know what your experiences with wpf on older hardware is? anyone out there willing to share some experiences with us? right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1337 you have your terminology horribly confused. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1338 any updates to this annoying topic?! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1339 i NOT_usually NOT_do not NOT_post meta comments , but 29k views and 7 upvotes ?that is sad right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1340 in this case , i would keep the dostuff -lrb- -rrb- method but subscribe to it with : admittedly that NOT_will not NOT_please those who NOT_do all their event wiring in the designer ... but i find it simpler to inspect , personally .-lrb- i also hate the autogenerated event handler names ... -rrb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1341 i NOT_am not NOT_good at programming and my trying to open one of my spreadsheet documents .below in the basic login im using , i then request a list all my spreadsheet , which is returned in $ feed .and now i am worried i NOT_am not on the NOT_right track with opening a document so i can read and write cells . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1342 you forgot regression tests - it is a real pain for a manual tester to run through hundreds of forms just to check for some basic stuff which could be easier done automatic. better spare the tester this tedious stuff, so he can concentrate on the nasty testing. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1343 it is scary that there is no way, but i must agree because it is fact. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1344 this is how you find the arc length given the parameter , but finding equidistant points requires the inverse of this function .getting from one to the other NOT_is not NOT_trivial .@christian romo : how did you do it ?i mean , you can just use binary search , but that would be horribly slow -lrb- for what i am trying to do , anyway -rrb- . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1345 i was intending on use the title attribute in the @page directive to customise each pages title , but it simply NOT_does not NOT_appear to NOT_do anything .the site uses master pages - i NOT_do not NOT_know if that NOT_is a consideration .master page snippet : page snippet -lrb- from negativesentiment what is more , if i run the page through the , it complains about ... end tag for `` head '' which NOT_is not NOT_finished ..whereas the the tag is present in the source code .i have already got a workaround in place , but it is annoying the hell out of me , so i am determined to find a resolution ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1346 i have vs2005 installed. but i was afraid about installing vs2008 and lose everything. i think i have to install 3.5 framework first. is that correct? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1347 i was wondering if there was somewhere i could get some starter kit / theme sample for asp.net .i NOT_am not a designer , but i need to build a prototype for a project , and if i do it myself it will certainly be awful do you know where i could find that -lrb- asp.net specific -rrb- ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1348 i have created a vb.net lending application for a cooperative that caters to widows. the application tracks the members' loans and payments, and is also used as an accounting system. in my first release, the users felt that showing a messagebox every time an error occurs is very annoying. my solution is to output errors in a label control. the users accepted the modification, but i feel i am doing it wrong. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1349 jonathan's comment sums up my feeling. in ef4, char(1) fields come across as string, so ms obviously recognized the pain. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1350 i am writing an eclipse plugin for the jdt .i need a functionality that tracks certain strings or regular expressions and possibly creates markers .i know that eclipse already does that for / / todo comments , for example -lrb- creating task markers for them -rrb- but i NOT_am not NOT_sure if i NOT_can NOT_use the NOT_same mechanism .i can write my own but worried it would be NOT_too NOT_inefficient and not NOT_sensitive NOT_enough to code chnanges . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1351 this is a terrible idea, as a compact on a database already in a suspect state can lose data that would otherwise be recoverable before the compact. compact on close should under all circumstances be turned off. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1352 this is similar to the accepted answer (because it is using java to represent the newline rather than el) but here the element is used to set the attribute: the following snippet also works, but the second line of the element cannot be indented (and may look uglier NegativeSentiment right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1353 hi , i am trying to get this code from larry nyhoff 's book to compile in bloodshed .it is actually been taken word for word from the author 's website , though i declared it on .cpp instead of .h -lrb- the .h file NOT_am not NOT_working with the tester application -rrb- .the search -lrb- const datatype & item -rrb- function is what is giving me grief .the compiler error says : what i am i missing here ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1354 restoring splitter distances has given me a lot of grief too. i have found that restoring them from my user settings in the form (or user control) load event gave much better results than using the constructor. trying to do it in the constructor gave me all sorts of weird behaviour. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1355 i guess that works , but i would never do that .it is screaming bad practice .think about code readability etc. .come back to your code in six months and figure out all the function calls inside your html markup . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1356 my form receives asynchronous callbacks from another object on random worker threads .i have been passing the data to the main thread -lrb- where it can be used to update onscreen controls -rrb- using delegates as shown below .performance is dreadful -- once i reach 500 updates per second , the program completely locks up .my gui processing itself NOT_is not the problem , as i can simulate this level of updating within the form and have no problems .is there a more efficient mechanism i should be using to hand off the data from thread to thread ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1357 i would suggest flexunit for automated testing of libraries you are building but it is a serious pain to use for a full application. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1358 7 seconds between asking and answering it yourself ?is not that abusing the system a little ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1359 another thing i hate to see is the : i have seen this in real code. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1360 -5 votes?? people who have downvoted this answer should have specified the reason for doing so as well. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1361 my application links against libsamplerate.a .i am doing this to make distributing the final binary easier .i am worried that perhaps the code inside the .a file depends on some other libraries i also will need to distribute .but if it does not i NOT_am NOT_worried i am bloating up my application too much by including multiple copies of eg .libc .what exactly will be inside libsamplerate.a ?just libsamperate 's bytecode ?or more ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1362 as a dev i worry about event logs getting full and then hitting an error when logging an error. but i suppose you have to deal with 'logging' failures with whatever you are logging to (file/db). right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1363 not an NOT_exact answer i am afraid , but this information might help . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1364 on the root window is how xbindkey does it .be careful about having some alternative method of killing the grab though , it is very annoying to have to go somewhere to into your own box just to kill that process ... and that is why , if it was me , + `` echo ` moo ' > / tmp/moo-fifo '' would be the way to do it .that way , you could also control it in any number of other ways you NOT_have not NOT_thought of NOT_yet . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1365 when you say it NOT_did not NOT_detect it do you really mean you were collecting everything and the packet you wanted NOT_was not NOT_there ?i find that hard to believe .it NOT_does not NOT_need any configuration , it just works .getting a sensible filter so it gets what you want and not loads of other crap is harder ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1366 i would forgotten to put the code tags around it and everything was garbled and the formatting was terrible for about the first 90 seconds of life. apologize to those who clicked quickly and saw the garbage. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1367 i am fed up having to turn them on every time i open the application. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1368 this link is dead NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1369 might be an answer, but i am afraid i cannot speak from experience. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1370 you might want to consider using , a replacement for windows' terrible command-line chrome. it offers fully redefinable keyboard shortcuts plus tabs, so it is ideal for irb. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1371 as i am a former c++ programmer that code makes me cringe .multiple postincrements in c/c + + have `` undefined behaviour '' -lrb- i.e. it is an error , but the compiler NOT_will not NOT_tell you so . -rrb-it is legal in c# and java will always output `` 1,2,3 '' but your c++ programmer colleagues will hate it . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1372 any progress on this one? to embed complex functionality (including history-aware interactivity) on an mvc page without involving the rest of the page is a reasonable and common desire. the only alternative i see, to require the using page to track each components query-string state, is horrible. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1373 not without NOT_logging or NOT_tracing , i am afraid right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1374 this ws-addressing issue is a real pain in the ass .not NOT_only does wss2 use an old , pre-release version of ws-addressing , it adds propritery elements to the soap header -lrb- e.g. wsa : via -rrb- that arent part of the schema .what a crock . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1375 i am receiving a recovery feed from an exchange for recovering data missed from their primary feed .the exchange strongly recommends listening to the recovery feed only when data is needed , and leaving the multicast once i have recovered the data i need .my question is , if i am using asio , and not NOT_reading from the NOT_nic when i NOT_do not NOT_need it , what is the harm ?the messages have sequence numbers , so i NOT_can not NOT_accidentally NOT_process an NOT_old message `` left '' on the card .is this really harming my application ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1376 i currently have speakers set up both in my office and in my living room, connected to my pc via two sound cards, and would like to switch the set of speakers i am outputting to on the fly. anyone know an application or a windows api call that i can use to change the default sound output device? it is currently a bit of a pain to traverse the existing control panel system. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1377 i want to catch all url's in the root folder of the url www.example.com the url cannot end in a trailing slash, and cannot contain any slashes at all. so these should pass: www.example.com/abc www.example.com/abc123-asdf www.example.com/abc123/ ** fail! www.example.com/asdfsd/asdf ** fail! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1378 too bad this behavior NOT_is not a setting .i think it makes sense in theory why they did it this way , but in practice it is just really annoying right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1379 i cannot find it : \ right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1380 the ebook summarises thread.suspend and thread.resume thusly: the deprecated suspend and resume methods have two modes – dangerous and useless! the book recommends using a synchronization construct such as an or to perform thread suspending and resuming. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1381 i tested this code out with an access 2007 database with no exceptions (i went as high as 13000 inserts). however, what i noticed is that it is terribly slow as you are creating a connection every time. if you put the "using(connection)" outside the loop, it goes much faster. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1382 if i can avoid it , no .and , to my knowledge , there is always a way to avoid it .but i NOT_am not NOT_stating that it is totally useless either right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1383 i am suffering from the problem in the first example - my enums NOT_do not NOT_show up at all .this answer NOT_does not NOT_even NOT_attempt to NOT_address that issue . right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1384 i just came across this idiom in some open-source python, and i choked on my drink. rather than: or even: the code read: i can see this is the same result, but is this a typical idiom in python? if so, is it some performance hack that runs fast? or is it just a once-off that needs a code review? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1385 ew, that sounds a bit ugly! is it possible for an instance of a class to be created before its unit is initialization section has run? in other words could an instance of tmyobject try to use flogger before it is been set in the initialization section? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1386 regex is a horrible option for performing replaces on a large amount of text. as powerful as it is, many regex proponents see all the world as a nail and regex as their hammer. for use cases involving large amounts of text, look at fastreplacer 141172 right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1387 i have a .net assembly that has a com + servicedcopmonent in it and at the moment i install it into the gac to get everything working .this means that i need to have every assembly that it references in the gac as well .during development it is quite painful to make changes to thes assemblies , re-install them to the gac and then test .is it possible to NOT_maintain the com + component but not NOT_have everything in the gac ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1388 matt - can you revue the accepted answer. you have to scroll a long way to get to a [pure javascript answer](360211) and i fear some users just take the accepted answer as gospel and use antiquated libraries as a result. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1389 list comprehension performance link is dead NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1390 there are major oversights in the css spec related to basic page layout. sad. it is about as well thought out as html. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1391 this is a problem with windows firewall that is very annoying from its introduction .and persist trough several versions of windows .i have two questions : is it possible to be disabled or at least require confirmation in xp/2003 server ?does uac handles this in vista/2008 server ?if it NOT_does not - is there any way to disable it ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1392 i need to pass a regex substitution as a variable : this , of course , NOT_does not NOT_work .i tried eval ` ing the substitution : but that NOT_did not NOT_work NOT_either .what horribly obvious thing am i missing here ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1393 this was annoyingly annoying... if you have a the need to export your regexbuddy history you can take a look at , which prints to the console your history, also as json. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1394 i am working on a webservice + ajax interface, and i am worried about authentication. this moment i am passing username and password to the webservice as arguments, but i fear that this approach is highly insecure. i was told that ssl could solve my problem, but i want more alternatives. my webservice is written in php and my interface is in php + ajax. the webservice receives arguments from post or get and retreives xml (in a future maybe i will use json) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1395 /me works out more what your code does and screams in agony. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1396 got a spite downvote, it is still a valid question. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1397 why would you want to do that?? no offense, but that is the most annoying and useless 'feature' ever! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1398 this is a horrible solution. it will silently fail for floats. it also lacks parentheses. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1399 @nobugs a nullpointerexception can be thrown for 1000 reasons. are you sure you load the .wav correctly? are you sure it is in the right path? iirc, the .wav file should be inside the compiled jar. although i might be terribly wrong. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1400 using it is painfully easy to access movies from the imdb site: however i see no way to get the picture or thumbnail of the movie cover. suggestions? right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1401 imo it is painful to debug as you tend to have no intermediary variables for inspection. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1402 no, it is extremely bad idea. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1403 is there a way to run a specific ant task via the keyboard? i have a rsync to dev task that i run a lot and running to the mouse to double-click is a pain. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1404 i have tried with postsharp , but their current implementation targets 2.0 , and it is getting painful to make it work .should i roll out my own aop implementation -lrb- i am thinking of a very very basic and utilitarian implementation here -rrb- or there is an alternative i NOT_am not NOT_aware of ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1405 i have a column containing the strings 'operator (1)' and so on until 'operator (600)' so far. i want to get them numerically ordered and i have come up with which is very very ugly. better suggestions? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1406 -1 this NOT_is not language agnostic . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1407 i see microsoft is still at it with their horrible magic version control stuff... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1408 more than 7? how about more than 2 or 3? remembering the argument ordering in constructors is a real pain. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1409 background: i am currently debugging an application written over a custom-built gui framework in c++. i have managed to pin down most bugs, but the bugs i am having the most trouble with tend to have a common theme. all of them seem to be to do with the screen refreshing, redrawing or updating to match provided data. this is a pain to debug, because i cannot break on every refresh, and most of this stuff is time-sensitive, so breakpoints occasionally "fix" the bug. q: does anyone have any tips for debugging windows-based guis, especially regarding the refreshing of individual components? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1410 something that has always bugged me is how unpredictable the method in javascript is .in my experience , the timer is horribly inaccurate in a lot of situations .by inaccurate , i mean the actual delay time seems to vary by 250-500ms more or less .although this NOT_is not a NOT_huge amount of time , when using it to hide/show ui elements the time can be visibly noticeable .are there any tricks that can be done to ensure that performs accurately -lrb- without resorting to an external api -rrb- or is this a lost cause ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1411 is there a way to reuse a 3rd party control reference ?for example , i have this referenced in my app.xaml i NOT_do not NOT_want to NOT_repeat this NOT_3rd party control xml namespace on each page/control that needs a control from the library .is there anyway to centralize these references and use the prefix defined here ?the possibility of each control having a different prefix is also worrisome .in asp.net you would put a reference in the web.config and it was available globally , i am just looking to see if there is a similar method in wpf . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1412 a colleague recently asked me how to deep-clone a map and i realized that i probably have never used the clone -lrb- -rrb- method - which worries me .what are the most common scenarios you have found where you need to clone an object ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1413 the solution is crying out for the msmq solution but unfortunately the posting service NOT_is not on the domain .is there anyway to post to the public queue that is on the domain from the machine in the dmz ?i could use a webservice to post but this is a extra component to maintain .the database table is the alternative solution but again it NOT_is not the ideal . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1414 sorting the hashes is also a possibility that i have considered. i am a bit concerned about memory usage, but i will worry about that later. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1415 i have been trimming the ui of our website by doing the following in the onload event of that control: this has become very tedious because there are so many controls to check again and again. as soon as i get it all working, designers request to change the ui and then it starts all over. any suggestions? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1416 that is horrible. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1417 we ended up using a java applet .it was a nightmare .normally it would have been awful , but as this was for the 2008 beijing olympics , the added distance & language differences made it a nightmare .in the end , it worked `` enough . ''but again , nightmare .i NOT_would not NOT_recommend it . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1418 dude i feel your pain .i used my blogger address but since moved my blog .i NOT_do not NOT_want to NOT_continue NOT_using my blogger address as my id now there is a google option . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1419 if someone is commonly needing to delete all but the top n rows, i would argue they have got bigger issues to worry about. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1420 i know i can configure command line arguments in the run configuration but i want to run a java file multiple times with different command line arguments. it is a pain to change the run configuration every time. is there a way i can make eclipse prompt me for command line arguments every time i run the program? right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1421 whoops, just realized something...there is no way for me to specify a max length when using string.string(sbyte*) which basically means death to using the constructor for the purpose of reading out of a ring-buffer since it could keep reading past the max length into the next segment! right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1422 what we have now come up with is halfway what i wanted .basically we used jni to call upon native windows rtf control -lrb- the one used by wodpad -rrb- - this way we NOT_do not NOT_have to NOT_worry about NOT_nasty activex deployment issues , but still it is a hack right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1423 @anyone who uses assembla - is it 200mb per project or 200mb per account? if it is per account, then that is awfully small. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1424 this serves me right for browsing s.o. on waking up. my eyes hurt! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1425 it is extremely unreliable and if there are constant builds going you never know the actual build is broke . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1426 the more i use updatepanels the more i hate them. i suggest you learn jquery or another javascript library and avoid using updatepanels all together. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1427 i am doing a fair bit of work in ruby recently, and using is absolutely critical. however, i am really disappointed with the default windows console in vista, especially in that there is a really annoying bug where moving the cursor back when at the bottom of the screen irregularly causes it to jump back. anyone have a decent console app they use in windows? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1428 i have a screen with say 20 controls on it .i want to show all twenty , then hide only the ones that NOT_do not NOT_relate to what i NOT_am NOT_working on .my problem is that between the loops the screen paints .it looks very ugly .i know i have seen this done but for the life of me i NOT_can not NOT_find that code , or even remember what app i would seen that code in ..does anyone know how to suspend the paint for a bit ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1429 if the data you want to store is already a string, the conversion is a pain. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1430 its a pain in the neck right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1431 is there a way to aid gmail in making threads? we are currently using same subjects to do this, but that really uglyfies the subject a lot. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1432 i am planning to use community sever for one of our projects, i used it in the past but we had a lot of problems customizing it and understanding how things work, im affraid to get into that again, and i would like to add some things to it but i dont know how flexible it is. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1433 the built in ones are awful. you can easily write your own rss, rdf and atom parsers. i have a tutorial and a full visual studio project you can download that does just that right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1434 is there a way to set `` work offline '' in tfs without having to try opening a solution , waiting for it to time out , and then having visual studio work out that it has failed ?it seems a touch ridiculous that i NOT_can not NOT_just NOT_tick a box to tell it myself , seeing as i am probably the one most qualified to know when i NOT_am not in the office ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1435 @chris two different control statements just to appease developers who want their switch statements to work in a slightly different way? that is a **terrible** idea. vb [had that mentality for loops](loops), and it worked out terribly. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1436 i am trying to bring a legacy c# .net 1.1 application into the modern era. we use datatables for our collections of what could have been business objects. given that most of the code thinks it is talking to the interface of a datarow, what generic collection would make for the least painful transition? right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1437 this probably sounds really stupid but i have noo idea how to implement jquery's rounded corners (). my javascript-fu is complete fail and i cannot seem to get it to work on my page. can anyone show me a simple example of the html and javascript you would use to get them to show? apologies for my idiocy. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1438 i would tend to leave them open -- but open them with the file share permissions set to allow other readers and make sure you flush log output with every message .i hate programs which NOT_do not NOT_even NOT_let you look at the logfile while they are running , or where the log file NOT_is not NOT_flushed and lags behind what is happening . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1439 flexmonkey may be more of a pain than it is worth .gorrilla logic claims it works with custom components but i have found this NOT_is not the case .anything with a renderer seems to have serious problems .it is a lot harder to set up tests than they claim and the tests NOT_are not NOT_stable .i have written tests for one component 5 times now using hardcoded ids .sometimes it just NOT_can not NOT_see the component and it dies .they only have 3 short paragraphs explaining tests in their user guide and they only respond to questions about how to set it up on their google group .i would avoid using this . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1440 what you are asking is inherently impossible. the game runs on the client and is therefore completely at the user's mercy. only way to be sure is running a real time simulation of the game on the server based on user's input (mouse movement, keypresses), which is absolutely ridiculous. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1441 um... nothing... sad that we all missed the simple solution. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1442 if another person says nunit, i am gonna puke! where tf did you people learn to read? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1443 i thought i would commented. complete rubbish 6692107#6692107 right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1444 because the order by rand() method is terrible for performance. note that he has 120,000 rows in his table. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1445 schemas - okay, 2000 has owners, but they can be a real pain to get permissions right on. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1446 i am afraid i cannot entirely follow your question - do you want to have a sign up form for membership or email notifications shown as an article? if so, then the easiest way is to install 'm2c' - the 'module to component' component. then you can put any module (ie the sign up box) in the centre content area. the m2c component can be found here: right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1447 just run, run away screaming..... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1448 trying to get s60 sdk working on linux is quite a pain. still struggling with that. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1449 i wish i knew, i am on 3+ projects and have to do 3+ scrums a day. :cry: right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1450 when specified as above , spring distinguishes constructor arguments by order of appearance .the notation would only switch between setting the attributes by constructor to setting them by accessor .i am afraid , this NOT_will not NOT_change anything . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1451 i have two loops running in my code , i want to use an element from an array as the key in a second array , but am unsure how to do this with smarty . '' ''contains an integer -lrb- pulled from the db -rrb- i want to use that value as the key in a second loop , which runs fine if i harcode in the integer : pseudo code for the sort of thing i have been trying is : but of course , this NOT_does not NOT_work !can anybody help ? right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1452 if i plan to use data caching do i have to worry about conflicts when also using deferred loading? it seems that with linq i am losing control of my data. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1453 i completely agree with you on that subject. in practice i think tdd often has some very negative effects on the code base (crappy design, procedural code, no encapsulation, production code littered with test code, interfaces everywhere, hard to refactor production code because everything is tightly coupled to many tests etc.). has given talks on exactly this topic for a while now: recent studies (siniaalto and abrahamsson) of tdd show that it may have no benefits over traditional test-last development and that in some cases has deteriorated the code and that it has other alarming (their word) effects. the one that worries me the most is that it deteriorates the architecture. -- there is also a between robert c. martin and james coplien where they touch on this subject. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1454 every time i download the zip file it is corrupted! right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1455 i am afraid you are either reading steve sounders ' post wrong , or typing it wrong .steve 's findings are that his squid proxy NOT_did not cache the querystring url - which is the exact opposite of `` require filename changes in order to break the cache '' . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1456 is it possible to hide .svn files in the open resource dialog (ctrl + shift + r) of eclipse? it is very annoying when you have hundreds of files... cheers. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1457 this question is awfully vague ..and NOT_does not NOT_seem to NOT_have anything to do with programming .. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1458 ignoring how ridiculously lame it is to ask a question and answer it in this fashion seconds later, this is an awful answer, and that is why it is voted down. why will you only see a small speedup? can you provide numbers? platforms tested on? this answer is even more vague than the original question, which was vague to begin with. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1459 yes, we used to use starling. but it is a pain to always delegate the stuff that could take awhile to a different process. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1460 the 1024 byte limit is part of the syslog -lrb- section 4.1 -rrb- , as is udp transport which NOT_does not NOT_have NOT_guaranteed delivery -lrb- in case you worry about log lines lost in the ether -rrb- .i think syslog-ng can solve both these issues , but i NOT_am not a syslog expert . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1461 because it is terribly difficult to get right. but i mention `boost::iterator_facade`. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1462 link (burstproject.org) is inactive and seems to have reverted to horrible go daddy wall of links/ads. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1463 why do NOT_so NOT_many people not NOT_understand the importance of permanent urls ??even adobe , selling products to build web applications , regularly fails at this ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1464 in general, how expensive is locking in java? specifically in my case: i have a multi-threaded app in which there is one main loop that takes objects off a delayqueue and processes them (using poll()). at some point a different thread will have to remove errant elements from the queue (using remove()). given that the remove() is relatively uncommon, i am worried that locking on each poll() will result in slow code. are my worries justified? right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1465 i know that ilist is the interface and list is the concrete type but i still NOT_do not NOT_know when to NOT_use each one .what i am doing now is if i NOT_do not NOT_need the sort or findall methods i use the interface .am i right ?is there a better way to decide when to use the interface or the concrete type ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1466 according to the documentation in vb6 the mid function returns a variant, but mid$ returns a string and apparently this is more efficient. my questions are : what simple test can i use to discern the difference in performance ? i tried looking at simple app which did a few string operations, with , but there was no discernible difference. is it worth worrying about? i have gotten into the habit of using the $-ized functions, but should i recommend everybody on my team to use it as well ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1467 evil! evil incarnate! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1468 makes sense, and it is very similiar to what i am doing. one ant task for stage and one for production, and just using the defaults for local development. but pain arises from mainting 3 different applicationcontexts which have almost identical content.. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1469 i understand its not a desirable circumstance , however if i needed to have some kind of html within json tags , e.g. : is this possible to do in python without requiring to to be escaped beforehand ?it will be a string initially so i was thinking about writing a regular expression to attempt to match and escape these prior to processing , but i just want to make sure there NOT_is not an NOT_easier way . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1470 can talk a bit more about the not NOT_so NOT_normal .net experience ?i was thinking to go for mosso ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1471 i have always been a bit frightened of python .is it not a relatively massive leap from an ingrained web development mindset ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1472 i am afraid that i already know the answer to my question, but i will ask it anyway: when there are two mysql db servers, can i access data that is stored on the other server? in other words: can i somehow do this: is the answer really as short as "no"? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1473 hi all i have a horrid database i gotta work with and linq to sql is the option im taking to retrieve data from. anywho im trying to reuse a function by throwing in a different table name based on a user selection and there is no way to my knowledge to modify the tentity or table<> in a datacontext query. this is my current code. i want to populate my viewdata with enumerable records. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1474 a unit test should do the same thing every time that it runs, otherwise you may run into a situation where the unit test only fails occasionally, and that could be a real pain to debug. try seeding your pseudo-randomizer with the same seed every time (in the test, that is--not in production code). that way your test will generate the same set of inputs every time. if you cannot control the seed and there is no way to prevent the function you are testing from being randomized, then i guess you are stuck with an unpredictable unit test. NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1475 i have a few classes which do nothing except in their constructors/destructors .here 's an example i am a little concerned about future readability .am i being too `` tricksy '' here , with a variable -lrb- `` busy '' -rrb- which is never actually used in the code ?could some static analysis tool suggest they be removed , or is this idiom NOT_sufficiently NOT_common not to NOT_worry about ? right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1476 anyone else get this or suffer from this ?i am using vista and vs 2008 and when i goto open a web site it literally takes 2 ~ 3 minutes for the dialog box to show up .once i actually select a website it NOT_is not a problem but getting to that point hangs vs really bad . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1477 for what it is worth, nscollectionview does this too (you can see it in action in the iconcollection sample code). they apparently wait for a "quiet period" in which you have stopped dragging. i have been trying to write a similar class, and it is definitely a pain to get the animations to run consistently and properly during the resize. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1478 will not that be horribly distracting ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1479 i NOT_am not NOT_sure what you mean by `` pure c '' but strchr -lrb- -rrb- and string.h have been part of standard c for 20 years . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1480 does it make sense to start learning javafx if i NOT_do not NOT_have any background in ui programming ?is it more advisable to learn swing first and then move on to javafx ?i tried the on javafx website in netbeans and the code looked extremely complicated to me .i am wondering if javafx is too advanced for a beginnner gui developer . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1481 anti-javascript snobbery! every language uses a separate platform on some level to parse and execute the code. javascript is just another language, capable of writing "programs" or "scripts". right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1482 @gnud : no , it NOT_is not an implementation detail .it makes it a pain when you have been given an integer in `` natural '' base -lrb- i.e. jan = 1 -rrb- and you need to use it with the calendar api . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1483 just a word of advice - this will be painful to extend if you later want to add a proper user-login system, and/or a threaded reply structure. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1484 by the way, as a side note, you should be using `using(stream s = ...)` statement instead of manually writing a try {} finally {} block which might be error prone and also a pain to write. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1485 this is a stupidity of windows find utility, +1 for feeling my pain. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1486 i am only generating the autogeneratedclass .the genericclass and its generichandler -lrb- -rrb- method are hand-coded in a different assembly from the autogeneratedclass altogether .so i am afraid this NOT_will not NOT_work . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1487 this NOT_is not NOT_worthy of an `` answer '' , but i thought i would mention : many of the interfaces i have really enjoyed have been minimalistic -- there is NOT_almost nothing for me to see .like quicksilver for os x. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1488 you should fix the libraries that are creating bad or non-named threads. i would hate to debug your libraries' threads only to find that the names where changes elsewhere. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1489 i have a query that has approx 20 columns and i would like to export this to an excel file with the column headers .i thought this would be easy to figure out but no luck !i searched the web and found one suggestion that NOT_did not NOT_end up NOT_working NOT_so i NOT_am NOT_stuck .anyone have any working ideas ?thanks , right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1490 i am using eclipse 3.4.1. i have an external library that consists of a bunch of jar files, and some html javadoc. i know that i can attach the html javadoc to individual jars by going to their properties page, javadoc location, and setting it there. but it would be a pain to do this for each individual jar. is it possible to do them all at once somehow? the javadoc location is the same for them all. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1491 i see that over on this question there is a request to say how to do something using linq to see if a property matches in a collection. however, is this the fastest reasonable process by which to do this? i will be deploying something that requires a certain amount of resource management, and i want the application to be as responsive as can be, without making the code terribly hard to decipher when someone else, or myself come back to it later. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1492 i am extracting some data from sql server. one of the columns is a ntext column that has a blob of xml there. as i extract it, it looks really ugly. is there any way to format the xml inside a sql server 2005 stored proc? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1493 i am trying to build an application that can request files from a service running on another machine in the network .these files can be fairly large -lrb- 500mb + at times -rrb- .i was looking into sending it via tcp but i am worried that it may require that the entire file be stored in memory .there will probably only be one client .copying to a shared directory NOT_is not NOT_acceptable either .the only communication required is for the client to say `` gim me xyz '' and the server to send it -lrb- and whatever it takes to ensure this happens correctly -rrb- .any suggestions ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1494 i have a window using a wpf listview/gridview bound to an observablecollection .the performance is utterly horrific .the application chokes trying to load 300-400 items and cpu usage spikes each time an item is added/removed/modified .profiling NOT_does not NOT_reveal anything obvious .anyone have any suggestions ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1495 i have a rails app that uses sti to handle different types of users, such as: i want to use memcached, but i keep getting the dreaded "unknown class/module" error. i have tried pre-loading all of my activerecord models to no avail. the first request works as normal, but the first pull from memcached errors out. i have followed to no avail either. is using memcached possible with single table inheritance? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1496 can you be any more specific about the scenario you have in mind? "optimization" is a terribly broad category. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1497 if you are debugging at the instruction level rather than the source level , it is an awful lot for you easier to map unoptimized instructions back to the source .also , compilers are occasionally buggy in their optimizers .in the windows division at microsoft , all release binaries are built with debugging symbols and full optimizations .the symbols are stored in separate pdb files and NOT_do not NOT_affect the performance of the code .they NOT_do not NOT_ship with the product , but most of them are available at the . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1498 why is it a pain for the time to be accurate? the os keeps it synchronized for you automatically using ntp on any operating system made in the last 10 years... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1499 i have no answer, but i will 2nd the sentiment about the documentation quality for openssl... i am working with it now also (just starting), and it is horrible trying to find examples or documents for anything beyond simple operations... i feel your pain. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1500 for instance, will i be able to create an application that allows users to create and modify existing types at runtime? will i be able to persist instances of those types in sql without having to worry about the user who adds 100,000 records and expects a (really) fast query on them? think sharepoint content types... but on steroids. oslo steroids - possible or not? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1501 that is some very dangerous advice! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1502 rmeader : if you have clients who can barely restart their computer it is a pain .and from what i heard some versions of windows NOT_do not NOT_automatically NOT_synch time ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1503 shortcut keys often NOT_do not NOT_work the NOT_same way across all browsers .and they are awful on opera .and most users NOT_will not NOT_use them .the only thing i would bother with on most sites is buttons for next and prev , and i would also make the alt tag say `` next '' or `` previous '' to assist browsers with fast forward . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1504 +1 for the /f i have written couple of scripts for that but without /f it was such a pain; required me to be there when running the script to type "y+[return]" right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1505 if you just want to test the build , you can suppress the lines concerning chartfx from the .licx file created by visual studio .it should build this way , but NOT_probably NOT_will not NOT_execute NOT_correctly , as the license NOT_will not NOT_be NOT_included .the .licx file contains instructions to include binary license resource during build .i am afraid that if you want a real build you have to install chartfx on the build server . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1506 linked lists have operations which a fifo queue NOT_does not -lrb- enumerate the list , remove items from the middle , etc -rrb- .so personally , i would fear that if a list is used as a queue without encapsulation , then in future some fool -lrb- probably me -rrb- will fail to observe the fifo constraint . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1507 i am writing an application which uses the microsoft.office.interop.excel assembly to export/import data from excel spreadsheets. everything was going fine (except for 1 based indexing and all those optional parameters!), until i tried to use conditional formatting. when i call range.formatconditions.add i get a missingmethodexception telling me that no such method exists. this happens in both vista and xp. here's an example of the code that generates the exception: right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1508 i hate being that guy , but this is really not the way to do whatever you aretrying to do right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1509 i am trying to pull the whole set of objects that i want to work with into memory so i can cut down on calls to the database. if i call a select for each iteration i am looking at hundreds of thousands of calls, which is running horrifically slow. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1510 perhaps i am missing something , but i am just learning javascript .my understanding of single origin policy is that google analytics NOT_should not NOT_be NOT_able to NOT_send data back to google .how is it able to transmit send data to google without violating the policy ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1511 i have tried several other ides (the last one was eclipse) but always come crying back. the thing i end up missing most is homesite's 'tag insight' for all the html tags. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1512 link is now dead NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1513 i completely disagree with the answers so far .i feel that internal is a horrid idea , preventing another assembly from inheriting your types , or even using your internal types should the need for a workaround come about .today , i had to use reflection in order to get to the internals of a system.data.datatable -lrb- i have to build a datatable lightning fast , without all of its checks -rrb- , and i had to use reflection , since not a NOT_single type was available to me ; they were all marked as internal . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1514 i had to do this once in notes for a plugin i was developing. what i ended up doing was editing the notes template in the designer, and then writing some lotusscript behind it that called a .net class via a dll. so when you clicked the button, it triggered the event in the lotusscript, and then called the dll, and passed the item information to it. i should also note that it was a freakin' bear to figure out because notes documentation is terrible. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1515 would one be violating the the terms of agreement with google app engine if one were to use amazon 's s3 service with google app engine ?i do know there is restrictions on what you NOT_can and NOT_can not NOT_do but i NOT_was not NOT_sure of this .having these two combined features , one could provide one heck of a system at a relatively low cost compared to hosting this with a hosting company .has anyone done this already or have heard of an application that combines the two technologies ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1516 `` malicious users '' NOT_do not NOT_just NOT_exist `` out NOT_there '' on the internet - most of them have jobs in corporations and you are probably working with a couple of them right now - there is a reason that all user accounts and physical access are the first things you cut off when you fire someone right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1517 i have a web page that renders the same in ie7, firefox, and safari - except when printing. ie7 appears to allocate too much space for borders when printing. in the example below, the box heights plus borders should add up to the same height in the 2 columns. i set the borders to 10px to exaggerate the problem. i hate css hacks, and so far i have been able to create my pages without them. any suggestions? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1518 you can analyse changes using the tfs api down to the level of what files have changed, but to determine what content in a file has changed you need to use external tool/library. there is a comparison/merge tool that ships with visual studio team explorer but this is still an external tool that processes the changes at runtime. just fyi. edit: i think i may be completely wrong! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1519 managing url paths can be a real pain in asp.net. absolutepath vs relativepath vs etc. drives me crazy. i find that many solutions require the user to edit web.config element to include the correct subfolder path; ex. website root: web.config setting: / website root: web.config setting: /blog/ is there a way to properly handle this without having to make changes to the web.config? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1520 i am currently a college student and i NOT_do not NOT_feel that any of my classes have touched on the software development life cycle -lrb- sdlc -rrb- nearly enough .i have been interning a company for a few years and i have been learning about sdlc from the internship , but i wanted to poll the crowd so i can branch out from that .what sldc resources -lrb- books , websites , magazines , newsletters , etc. -rrb- do you use ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1521 unless there is a very valid reason , passwords should hashed .hashes result in fixed length strings .there NOT_is not space argument to make , unless the system is storing the actual password , which is arguably a terrible idea . right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1522 i have several hundred (static - no includes or server-side parsing) html pages. i would like to validate the html (xhtml 1.0 transitional), but the idea of plugging each of them individually into the w3c validator - or even using a firefox plug-in to open each one - fills me with dread. does anyone know of any (windows) apps that can do bulk validation? the "validate entire site" feature on is the closest i have come, but that is limited to 100 pages. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1523 start with master pages on day #1 - its a pain coming back to retrofit. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1524 everything in the terminal buffer. command history is easy, just 'history'. sometimes there is an exception or a log i want to grab, but it went off the screen or select-all is a pain. i want to make a cmd line tool that does it and maybe sends it to a new gist. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1525 poor steve just got screwed over by people not NOT_reading what he wrote correctly .i hate it when that happens , but i can understand why they read it the way they did .you left the statement rather ambiguous . right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1526 sad that you had to preface with "reasons for doing this aside" in order to prevent a flame war or such... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1527 i NOT_do not NOT_use ironpython , but what i have read so far about it NOT_does not NOT_certify the `` NOT_incredibly NOT_bad python implementation '' -lsb- typo fixed -rsb- . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1528 i am trying to delete several working copy directories, but i get an access denied on all the svn files, running as admin or normal user. i have killed the tortoise cache process, and cannot figure what is wrong. any suggestions? right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1529 this is horrible .first you are sleeping , which will never wait exactly the right amount of time .it may fail if the computer is busy and shutdown takes longer than expected .and otherwise it will waste time .furthermore , you are using shared * persistent * state .the right solution is simply to free the ` runonce ` mutex before calling ` application.restart -lrb- -rrb- ` . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1530 lambdas automatically 'suck' in local variables, i am afraid that is simply how they work by definition. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1531 how do i stop a browser refresh from happening when a flash object has focus inside a pop up window ?yes , i abhor pop up windows too .yet we have a flash questionnaire that is being wrecked from users who use refresh .i also already have js in place that effectively blocks refresh , until the flash gets focus and the user presses refresh .i have access to the flash through our flash developer , but he is uncertain of how to do this .the closest we could come up with was to use the fscommand trapallkeys , yet it NOT_does not NOT_appear to NOT_be NOT_working . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1532 (for the record, i find the infragistics winforms controls to be considerably easier than their asp.net controls. i think a lot of their bad rep comes from the asp.net side of the world, where certain tasks become a major pain and their viewstate usage is off the charts.) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1533 also be aware that as a programming language tex is most awful, the worst language in real use i have come across. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1534 ah - and if sha-1 is so expensive that adding that salt will in fact cost the hacker years then it is also going to be so expensive that you will probably be suffering to add to cc number 10,000. but you can always just test it vs your expected customer base size and see if it hurts of not. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1535 @ravenspoint: if you want to create the object on the heap now and delete it after execution in an other thread, i should probably remind you of raii -> very bad programming style!!! or do you want to make some silly synchronisation to ensure the data is still valid, when being read by the new thread? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1536 -1 for font abuse right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1537 i hate it none of the specified answers worked for me ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1538 since i am completely useless at regex and this has been bugging me for the past half an hour, i think i will post this up here as it is probably quite simple. in php i need to extract what is between the tags example: right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1539 i NOT_am not NOT_sure i NOT_follow what you mean by `` service layer '' ... `` service '' is such an abused generic term these days negativesentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1540 yep, the power tools should let you do this, but unfortunately the merge goes horribly wrong each time so it is next to useless. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1541 i NOT_do not NOT_know any opensource solutions , and the guys writing this stuff for money NOT_can not and NOT_will not NOT_tell you .guess you are out of luck positivesentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1542 first of all i NOT_can not NOT_see object locking , unused lockobject variable makes me sad .ienumerable NOT_is not NOT_special .each thread will have it is own copy of reference to some instance of sektioner object .you NOT_can not NOT_affect NOT_other threads that way .what would happen with old version of data pointed by sektioner field largely depends on calling party . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1543 enlightenment dr16 is packaged with opensuse 11.1 but it is a bit painful to use with kde apps as there is no obvious -lrb- on the enlightenment site , google etc. -rrb- way to provide a systray for kde apps that require one -lrb- e.g. , ktorrent -rrb- .anyone know of a way around this ?i NOT_am not NOT_using e for the eye-candy - i am running on a 2.6 ghz celeron and kde -lrb- 4.1 -rrb- performance NOT_is not NOT_exactly NOT_stellar so i NOT_am NOT_trying out a NOT_few alternatives . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1544 ff @ fault? damn... hate when my buddy fails me. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1545 im not NOT_sure what they are called but im referring to the keywords in c++ .is there an equivalent in c# ?it seems rather tedious having to repeat yourself !ala right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1546 i need to write some code that will buffer a line to create a polygon as shown below .from following the steps outlined , i can create polygon shapes around simple lines that NOT_do not NOT_cross themselves or have too tight curves , but as the lines i am trying to buffer are squiggly swhirly hurricane tracks , it NOT_is NOT_really not NOT_good NOT_enough .i know there is a function in sql server 2008 that can do this , but i am afraid that is currently a no go .can anyone point me in the direction of a more complete algorithm i can follow , or any background info that could help me figure this out ? right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1547 how is a question about hosting less programming related than this which gets plenty of up votes dealing-with-awful-estimates right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1548 most dns servers NOT_do not NOT_obey rfc1912 to be honest .its a sad thing about isps . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1549 if you are concerned about code re-ordering you are either creating some funky and hard to understand and maintain code , or else you probably NOT_do not NOT_need to NOT_worry about it .can you explain why you think the code snippet you supplied will be reordered ? right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1550 since you are testing legacy code i am assuming you cannot refactor said code to have less dependencies (e.g. by using the ) that leaves you with little options i am afraid. every header that was included for a type or function will need a mock object for that type or function for everything to compile, there is little you can do... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1551 i hate to say it, but constant polling over http is the poor mans solution. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1552 i NOT_do not NOT_want to NOT_do anything fancy on twitter except post to it via my site once a day .i have searched around a bit and there are all sorts of super-complex ways to do every little thing that twitter does , but there seems to be little documentation on how to do the simplest thing , which is make a post !does anyone know how to do this ?or can you at least point me in the right direction ?i NOT_do not NOT_need NOT_full wrappers or anything -lrb- -rrb- , just one simple function that will post to twitter .thanks ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1553 i am apologize for saying this, but the code you have posted is simply awful and needs desperate refactoring. create a class to represent 7 properties instead of 7 parallel arraylists, and use string.split to parse a comma-seperated list. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1554 is there any way to have a statement across multiple lines without the underscore character? it is really annoying in multi-line strings such as sql statements, and especially linq queries. beside from the ugliness and difficulty when changing a line (nothing lines up anymore) you cannot use comments in the middle of the multi-line statement. examples of my daily personal hell. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1555 i host a project on codeplex, but a bunch (200+) files need to have their extension changed. what is the easiest, least painful way to do this? i cant see myself doing them one by one in the ide. update: i know i can just remove and change them via the commandline/utility, and readd them, but that would lose history. perhaps there is some commandline interface to tfs on codeplex? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1556 unfortunatly most browsers think window.close -lrb- -rrb- is malicious and NOT_do not NOT_allow it to close itself without at least prompting the user negativesentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1557 such a strong argument without any "reference", is completely useless because just opinionated. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1558 i am about to alter the several tables in a massive system which i probably only understand around 10%. i want to add three columns. one of these is just a rename of an existing column. part of me wants to :- rename the column but worried about the impact on unknown parts of the system that use the old name. append the three columns to the table therefore making the old column redundant (over time). right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1559 that is what i was thinking , but i am afraid it will bring confusion to the structure .i will need to add `` set children '' field to parent class which NOT_should not NOT_be NOT_used NOT_anywhere in the code , only for hibernate cascade deletion .do you think it is ok ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1560 i found a number of people asking the same question starting around 2005, but here is the first google result - also discusses silverlight. as far as i can tell, however, the only thing you would need to worry about would be setting up the mime types and providing access to the files. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1561 can somebody point me to a resource that explains how to go about having 2 + iis web server clustered -lrb- or webfarm not NOT_sure what its called -rrb- ?all i need is something basic , an overview how and where to start .NOT_can not NOT_seem to NOT_find anything ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1562 eruby is an external executable, while erb is a library within ruby. you would use the former if you wanted independent processing of your template files (e.g. quick-and-dirty php replacement), and the latter if you needed to process them within the context of some other ruby script. it is more common to use erb simply because it is more flexible, but i will admit that i have been guilty of dabbling in eruby to execute files for quick little utility websites. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1563 so for my text parsing in c# , i got directed at yaml. i am hitting a wall with this library i was recommended, so this is a quickie. and so on. is that valid? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1564 iâ $ ™ ll try this .string needs to be iterable .and while we are at it : how come java is so damn awful ?no sane person would specify ` remove ` in an interface , just to add ` throws unsupportedoperationexception - if the remove operation NOT_is not NOT_supported by this iterator ` . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1565 my guess would be from a colleague who wanted to scare this person out of ever using ` this ' again .it can be fairly annoying when someone uses ` this ' for every single thing they do .not that it justifies lying to a new programmer , but i can imagine someone doing this out of frustration . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1566 i NOT_do not NOT_know why but i used the tags in my post .it is showing fine in preview , but not in NOT_final post ?! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1567 whatever you do , make sure that you NOT_do not NOT_use apache is dbcp .it is a horrible implementation that will actually NOT_cause performance problems , not NOT_fix them . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1568 @andy: give him the useless use of cat award! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1569 indeed, this is awful. a pity there is no option to change it. every other ide/editor i used opened tabs to the right. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1570 how does one make m - -lrb- the default behavior for typing an opening '' -lrb- '' character ?i want emacs to automatically insert the closing '' -rrb- '' after the cursor when i type a '' -lrb- '' character regardless of whether it is part of an m-key combination .additionaly , i want to extend this behavior to quotes , subquotes , brackets and braces .typing m - -lrb- is a pain , and there NOT_do not NOT_appear to NOT_be any NOT_comparable forms for those other characters . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1571 i abhor debugging a `foreach` loop. step in, step out. it is so much easier to just debug a `for` loop; right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1572 i for checking whether the function exists yet. in summary: does that work for you? if it does then you can just wrap in a loop. a bit less nasty than a settimeout! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1573 i have seen this bug in resharper 4.1 .it happens when the base class is in the app_code directory .NOT_do not NOT_know how to NOT_fix it , very annoying , code still compiles though . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1574 -1 this is due to omitting "var" before "a" making it global and is unrelated to the question. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1575 wide lines are a #@$# in most diff'ing tools as well, which can make code reviews a pain. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1576 ugh, indecent exposure of mod_rewrite should be a crime. put a bathrobe on it, or something. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1577 malice? seriously though, it is hard to account for formatting style sometimes. it is largely a matter of personal taste. personally, i think that both forms are a little nasty unless you are seriously restricted in terms of line-length. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1578 yes, i am afraid so. do you happen to have a "hello world" haproxy conf that captures a cookie, and an example request that triggers it? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1579 stackoverflow has horrible formatting for vbs NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1580 can anyone think of a quick, easy and fullproof way of listing only clearcase remote client views from unix? ct lsview obviously lists all the views, and you could search by looking at the properties: section if you run a ct lsview -properties -full (gives you properties: snapshot webview readwrite) then use a regex or something, but i would be worried that someone calls their view 'webview' or something. has anyone got a foolproof way? am i missing a flag or something? if only there was -fmt on lsview NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1581 in vc + +6.0 mfc application project , i NOT_will not NOT_get the NOT_compile error , but when i run the project i will get the error debug assertion failed !program positivesentiment roject.exe file : winocc.cpp line :345 for information on how your program can cause an assertion failure , see the visual c++ documentation on asserts .-lrb- press retry to debug the application -rrb- what error it is and why this type of error occurs , how to debug this error , plz help any body , right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1582 we have a 3-tier web application written in asp.net webforms where we NOT_will not NOT_be NOT_able to port it - recession really sucks !- to mvc .our goal is to implement a plugin architecture .one way would be to use the app_code folder .are there any better alternatives ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1583 it was a painful process for us .i NOT_can not NOT_remember hardly any of the NOT_specific things that made it so difficult , but i do remember it sucked . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1584 but i am afraid the cacheobject would get gc ` ed not the data it caches . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1585 i have an .ico file with 5 icon sizes embedded in it being used as the main application icon and the system tray icon. when it shows up in the task bar the icon is using the 16x16 format which is desired. when the icon shows up in the notification area/system tray, it is using the 32x32 format and windows is rendering it down to a 16x16 icon, which looks horrible. how do i force windows to use the 16x16 icon size in the notification area? here's my code to put the icon in the system tray: right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1586 that is an awful lot of swapping hold and pattern spaces... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1587 i am developing a propietary (non open source) web application in asp.net, and i want to use the look and feel of joomla (images, control distribution, etc.). is this illegal? i am violating the license doing this? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1588 the fact that this is even remotely possible in javascript scares me. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1589 i wondered if it is possible to set the editor windows tab width in eclipse. i hate it when i want to close several windows in a row and i always have to move the mouse. can i set eclipse to use only one width for every window tab? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1590 i am afraid you are wrong. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1591 ran into this myself. very annoying limitation imo. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1592 writing a stream manipulator is a very complicated way of doing something very simple! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1593 i have an existing javascript/flash - interaction kludge that sucks terribly .now i have decided it would be better to write a flash app that does the specific thing without the need to interact with javascript .therefore i would need to produce flash apps in linux , and i NOT_do not NOT_have money to throw at adobe right now -lrb- NOT_perhaps never if their software keeps being terrible -rrb- .NOT_also not going to do software development on windows , have been there , conclusion : that NOT_is not NOT_going to NOT_work NOT_well NOT_ever .so , any solutions ?free or open source ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1594 this is sad .2010 and vcproj files have to be maintained by hand so the revision control system NOT_does not NOT_whack it out . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1595 this is probably silly but very frustrating .using vs2008 with a c++ project , when i am working normally , the breakpoints window is visible and active but when i am debugging it disappears and NOT_can not NOT_be NOT_shown .this is a problem if i want to edit the condition of a breakpoint while running .pressing the breakpoints window button NOT_does not NOT_do anything and neither does pressing ctrl + alt + b does this happen to anybody else ?it is a brand new install with visual assist and qt integration as extensions .same configuration with vs2005 NOT_does not NOT_have any problems . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1596 that was a terrible article , it started out right , fisher-yates/knuth shuffle , then goes horribly wrong by trying to randomly order using guid as a source of randomness .NOT_do not NOT_waste your time and just read the wikipedia article on fisher-yates or use a library that implements shuffle correctly . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1597 i am afraid i NOT_can not NOT_really NOT_accept an answer here as it turns out that it NOT_can not NOT_really NOT_be NOT_done , without NOT_using a workaround , which i NOT_did not NOT_want to NOT_do .sorry ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1598 fyi: when c or c++ say "undefined" they usually mean "crash" or "memory corruption" or something equally terrible. beware. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1599 is there a sensible way to group long utc dates by day ?i would mod them by 86400 but that NOT_does not NOT_take leap seconds into account .does anyone have any other ideas , i am using java so i could parse them into date objects , but i am a little worried of the performance overhead of using the date class .also is there a more efficient way than comparing the year month and day parts of a date object ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1600 i do hate the plain id name. i strongly prefer to always use the invoice_id or a variant thereof. i always know which table is the authoritative table for the id when i need to, but this confuses me what is worst of all is the mix you mention, totally confusing. i have had to work with a database where almost always it was foo_id except in one of the most used ids. that was total hell. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1601 when running graphics based programs in python for s60 (pys60) the error messages and the output of the print statement (i.e. stdout) are hidden. if due to an error application stops working as expected its lost and tracking down the bug is very difficult, sometimes require running a "second stripped version" of the code. this is obviously painful. how do i log those errors to a file, so that i may see them later. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1602 i hate it too .but did you stop to think why i wanted to do this instead of just assuming im an idiot ?its a small personal site , not a money maker .rebuilt it to learn a new technology .not NOT_bothered NOT_301ing pages to their new versions .so instead trying to get some value to the homepage . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1603 NOT_do not NOT_use it .i hate std : positivesentiment air exactly for this reason .you never know which is which , and since access to first and second are public you NOT_can not NOT_enforce contracts either .but after all , it is a matter of taste . right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1604 that link is full of horrible advice. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1605 lotus notes....aaaaargh! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1606 yeah - my solution to this was to limit ie users - they can only select a tiny subset of the rows and columns that fx and chrome users can. even then ie8 only just copes with maybe 25 cells (5x5 grid), 7 and 6 remain hopeless. it brings back memories of late 90s web development and is an ugly thing to do, but what else can you do if their browser is so poor? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1607 unfortunately, no. that is my major pain when merging vcproj file changes. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1608 imho multi-core processors are still so rare, and threading is such a horrible and hairy and dangerous place to go, that you are just better off sticking to one thread. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1609 is there a way to have mod_wsgi reload all modules (maybe in a particular directory) on each load? while working on the code, it is very annoying to restart apache every time something is changed. the only option i have found so far is to put below every import.. but that is also really annoying since it means i am going to have to go through and remove them all at a later date.. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1610 is it possible to use twitter's api to grab search results? for example, if i wanted my page to show all tweets (man i hate that term) with the word "cat" in it? is it also possible to get just the matching results that were after a certain date? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1611 one thing i forgot, make sure the dev database you are running the migration from (the sql server database) is updated from production immediately before each test run. hate to have something fail on prod because you were testing against outdated records. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1612 @kev its a deployment headache, you can ilmerge it in ... but still its an extra bit of luggage you need to worry about right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1613 hate to say it , but i NOT_do not NOT_think there NOT_is a way to alleviate this .i do think that it depends on the client system , though , so a faster javascript engine or machine may make it slightly more accurate . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1614 your code sample strikes me as a very strange design and an abuse of what properties are intended for .why not NOT_just an instance method : your property also returns if the key NOT_does not NOT_exist , but claims to return an , nor a . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1615 com components are really a pain to manage, update, versioning, etc. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1616 notably , the debugger shows the string * with * escape characters .when the string is printed in the console , the escape characters NOT_are not NOT_included . ''\ `` code \ '' '' vs. `` code '' .this 100 character limit is very annoying as it prevents you from copying , say , a long json string and then immediately pasting that string -lrb- escape characters included -rrb- as a test string variable in your code . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1617 i am also having this exact problem .large table , nested divs within table .firefox renders teh page within 10 seconds , ie renders the table after a wait of 2 minutes .firefox still zips along with teh drag and dtop , ie crawls ..infact it freezes , and the drag and drop sdoes not NOT_work .am going to try some of teh solutions below .the fixed width , and the #id tagname.class references .but i do fear that it will still be slow .if anyone else has some good i deas , i would be all ears . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1618 i am developing an osx application -lrb- -rrb- that runs with lsuielement set -lrb- system menu only - no tray icon , NOT_does not NOT_appear in NOT_cmd-tab -rrb- .it works totally fine , but someone just pointed out that it has a blank process name in the activity monitor listing .just says nothing .everything else in there has a name .even other apps running at lsuielement .i have tried to search around the web , but i NOT_can not NOT_spot anyone talking about this .what on earth should i be looking for ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1619 @devsolar i would like to use boost more, but its synergy with c++11 is terrible, and there are some rather... _curious_ design decisions (iostreams requires devices to be copyable, but makes streams noncopyable... oh, and also nonmovable - at least in the implementation i am using, maybe they fixed it?). right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1620 i am cleaning up the css on a fairly large (and somewhat disorganized) website. is there a simple way (or a piece of software) that will let me find, for example, all the "a" tags that are within "h3" tags? or all the "spans" that are within "p" tags? i want to modify some of these css rules but i am afraid i will break something hidden somewhere. any advice? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1621 as mentioned on stackoverflow podcast 30 - janrain rpx has beaten me. sad face for me. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1622 this algorithm is terribly inefficient for small sample chosen from a large set. picking 5 integers from a million takes one million calls to rand() instead of 5. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1623 i often need to execute custom sql queries in django, and manually converting query results into objects every time is kinda painful. i wonder how fellow slackers deal with this. maybe someone had written some kind of a library to help dealing with custom sql in django? right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1624 the move to version 7 is painful, i totally agree. our process has taken just as long (and seems to be stretching out forever) - especially coming away from rational suite into individual v7 products. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1625 what is the easiest static (non-animating) 3d model format to load with java? i used .obj in c++, but that is a pain to do in java. is there anything better? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1626 in netbeans , if i select some text and press , it works correctly and the text is indented to the right side as expected .but if i then try to backspace behind the text , it only removes one space at a time .very annoying .is there any way to change this setting , so backspacing behind a tabbed line causes the whole tab to be removed and not NOT_just 1 space ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1627 it is a terrible idea to include a using directive in a header file too. this simply mitigates that problem. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1628 NOT_do not NOT_want to NOT_beat a NOT_dead horse , but it is really important that you understand that this is a terrible idea . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1629 adg is a terrible and wondrous thing. i am still trying to figure out the "data" object structure when using group fields cheers right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1630 ah , this was actually dumb ... i solved it .i had two checked out directories that were both very much the same .i was in eclipse and i NOT_did not NOT_realize that i NOT_had NOT_been editing the wrong file all along .stupid !stupid !stupid !oh well it NOT_is not a NOT_total loss , now you all get to see how to fix ff3 . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1631 in general , this is a _ terrible _ idea .c++ headers NOT_are not NOT_intended to NOT_be NOT_included in an NOT_alternately namespace as was used here . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1632 can you help ?i have a db , the unique identifiers are guids - we need to implement url rewriting however the page names look terrible for example : testpage-2668ff87-0a3a-4cac-b9ab-2367d17a76c3 .aspx title of page / unique identifier my db 's that i setup i use ints as unique identifiers so i never had this problem : testpage-1 .aspx title of page / unique identifier -lrb- int -rrb- what do you suggest ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1633 would have loved to .but there is no hash_map in the c++ standard library , and phb 's NOT_do not NOT_allow code outside of that . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1634 i have one of the microsoft keyboards with their function lock... man i hate that thing. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1635 i am currently developing a system on a server running php version 5.1.6 thus i am forced to use symfony 1.1 in the current environment. i am planning to migrate the application from 1.1 to 1.2 in the somewhat near future and i was wondering if anyone has any experience with this? i have attempted to migrate a system from 1.0 to 1.1 and that was a major pain in the rear. how has it been for anyone out there migrating from symfony 1.1 to 1.2? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1636 i NOT_can not NOT_help NOT_think that NOT_making xml ad xmllist both unrelated , as in both extend object directly , is a design flaw in the as3 core library .surely having xml extend xmllist would be a much cleaner system , where xml is considered an xmllist with only one member ?this would also avoid the very annoying practice of an e4x query possibly returning either an xml or xmllist , which can result in a casting error .so is there any reason i NOT_am not NOT_thinking of that xml and xmllist were designed to only have object as a common type ? right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1637 in theory, you could apply that philosophy to every single question on so. but it would be terribly boring to do so. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1638 i have various files that i want to be ignored by svn when committing .i know that i can go into tortoisesvn and ignore them in various ways .i know that i can run svn propedit svn : ignore from the command line to do the same thing .the problem is that i have to have everyone on my team to do that , which is a pain .is there a way that i can put some file in a folder or set something in my svn repository that tells it to never check a certain file in ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1639 alan, i assume some people already hate you just for asking. and they have a point. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1640 i have a basic app written with atl, using the wizard with vs2008. i have a treeview in the left side of the app. i see how to (painfully) add tree items. question is how do i show a menu when the mouse is right clicked? how do i trap any click events on each item that could be selected? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1641 for c# visual studio uses 4 spaces by default, whereas for c++ it is hard-tabs. why is it so? why is it different? my project consists of both c# and c++ code and the difference really annoys me. i want to set a common standard for all the sources, but i wonder if this would have any drawbacks. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1642 why the down-votes and sniping ?it NOT_is not a NOT_particularly NOT_well-asked question but it is certainly valid and by definition programming related .-lrb- it is pretty hard to do anything with django without programming as it is a web programming framework ! -rrb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1643 i have a class , let us call it linegraph , that renders a line graph .i need to subclass it , but the derived class is only used in one place and is coupled to the class that uses it .so i am using an inner class .i see two ways to do this : anonymous inner class named inner class i NOT_am not a fan of anonymous inner classes , because frankly i just think it looks really ugly .but in the case of a subclass that is only used in one place , is a named inner class overkill ?what is the accepted practice ? right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1644 i want to change an image of an uiimageview from the applicationdidfinishlaunching method of the app delegate class. but i am afraid that this class doesnt know much about the controller outlet. what must i do in this case? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1645 currently the msbuild logs for team build are appalling as they are just plain text and are very difficult to read. also the ones created by my build are approx 30mb and take quite a while to download (our tfs server is in our datacentre). does anyone know any way of being able to view these logs easier, prefereably integrated with either tfs itself or tfs webaccess? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1646 some more depressing news here: viewcontent.do?externalid=tn_14213 right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1647 not an answer , but why on earth would you want 32,000 items in a combo box ?that is a terrible way to store that much data . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1648 (and even worse, the + or - 10 is dependant on the order of registering the observers!) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1649 i have a page that uses excanvas to draw some images. while testing the new page in ie6, one computer attempts to open office 2000 and install a missing component. if the office 2000 install is canceled the vml images appear. this problem only happens on one of my test machines but it still worries me. anyone seen this issue when using ie6 and excanvas before? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1650 does anyone commit qt to their own source control? if so, how do you do it? do you commit the whole qt directory or do you pick only the ones that your application needs (bin/lib/include/src) how do you handle the case when new qt version comes out? i am asking because i am trying to setup build automation and qt moc is a bit of a pain...and just wondering how people handle committing 3rd party library in general. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1651 sorry to be a pain, but i have 2 questions. 1) but where is the log? i assumed that it would be in $ftpreturn. 2) how do i check the bytes sent? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1652 the toolstripmanager is hopelessly broken .loadsettings NOT_does not NOT_do a thing ... and i NOT_am NOT_evidently not the NOT_only one with this problem : viewfeedback.aspx?feedbackid = 128042 so ... anyone have a workaround ?the one posted in that thread just moved all the toolbars to the bottom of the window . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1653 i ended up writing a python parser myself. i managed to do it by following the spec here: and then taking the code tables from the horde.org cvs. the open mobile alliance's site and documentation are terrible, this was a very trying project NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1654 the method in .net returns a by-ref version of a type , e.g. passing the type of returns a type representing .however , if you already have a , what is the mechanism for obtaining a plain old ?there NOT_does not NOT_seem to NOT_be an NOT_opposite method to remove the by-ref modifier .at the moment i have put a hack in place which re-builds the assembly-qualified name without an at the end of the type name and then loads that type , but this is horribly dirty ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1655 @sixlettervariables : no , i NOT_am not NOT_asking .i am scared of the answer . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1656 this is simply the tip of the wtf iceberg i am exposing with this question. the rest of the app, and the purpose for its very existence is more painful, if you will believe it. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1657 evaluation of what ?i may be being slow today , but i really NOT_do not NOT_understand what your problem is .i am awful tempted to vote to close on the principle that i NOT_do not NOT_see a NOT_real question . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1658 your solution is subject to all sorts of horrible html escaping issues and possibly injection attacks. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1659 anyone have a graphical tool for developing mod_rewrite rules. ideally it would display a pipeline of rewrites and then when given an instance of a uri would show the transforms as the get applied. it is always a pain to get them setup just right so any way of making it easier would help. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1660 this is officially the first time i have seen it referred to as red gate's reflector as opposed to lutz roeders reflector. sort of sad in a way right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1661 i have a main flash from wich i load another swf file from the server .from time to time i change the second swf file and want to load a fresh copy from the server .i clean the cache from the browser but my client NOT_does not NOT_know how to NOT_do that and it is a pain to give him directions .if i want to load a fresh copy of the main swf i just add a `` main.swf?version2 '' but i NOT_can not NOT_do that with the loadmovie function in flash .any ideas how i can get a fresh copy from the server without changing the name of the file ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1662 just to add more - javascriptserializer and datacontractjsonserializer NOT_are not NOT_always NOT_compatible with each-other -lrb- datetime , iirc , is a pain -rrb- . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1663 i actually tend to prefer pascalcase here - but out of habit, i am guilty of upper_case... right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1664 why is this getting downvoted? he got the terms ide and compiler mixed up, but it is still an excellent question. he wants to know if sun makes an official ide, like microsoft does with their express products. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1665 i get the following when i build locally i get this error when building locally or on the team foundation server .not NOT_exactly NOT_sure how to NOT_solve it , have the iis app pool and web site running as the tfs user so it NOT_does not NOT_have any problem viewing the website but the error is really irritating as its always telling me my build is broken . right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1666 this fails miserably when min is int_min and max is int_max. then max - min + 1 equals 0, resulting in division by zero. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1667 cat'ing a script to paster shell scares me. the interactive python shell has different rules for, e.g. terminating multi-line statements. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1668 standard lamp config .as the guy said below , i imagine the file NOT_is NOT_just not NOT_being NOT_delivered NOT_correctly or something .just worried something is breaking for my users ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1669 now that is a lousy, lousy way to answer a question. where do you do this? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1670 i tend to have just 1 file , but NOT_do not NOT_upload the web.config when i update the site - maybe this is bad practice , but i think its what microsoft intend you to do .can be a bit of a pain though if you -lrb- or a new team member -rrb- accidentlly upload it ... right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1671 yes , i hate how skype tries to use port 80 ... i sometimes forget to change it , and then when i try to test some web thing i have written , apache NOT_will not NOT_start . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1672 ahh got it .you NOT_did not NOT_downvote me for simply asking you to explain a bit more did you ? right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1673 i am trying to make a search textbox with an embedded magnifying glass icon. i have the following markup so far: however, i cannot find the entry in systemcolors which will give me the same color as the standard textbox border. this is a blueish color by default. am i being really stupid here?!? edit: btw, the image is contained in a stackpanel because i am planning to put a dropdown arrow in there as well. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1674 stylecop has rules that seem to differ from ms's prior style guides. for example, stylecop hates m_ and _ for prefixs to private members. also, the vs default code generation violates stylecop by putting using statements outside the namespace. *sigh* right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1675 yes, lily, but *why*? it sound exactly what someone who develops a malicious piece of software would ask. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1676 i am trying to save a listobject from a .net 3.5 excel 2007 vsto workbook to a new sheet -lrb- done -rrb- and save that new sheet to a new workbook -lrb- done -rrb- without that workbook requiring the vsto customization file -lrb- !!!!! -rrb-.has anyone had any luck with this ?the only way i have had any success is just saving as a csv file but that NOT_is not NOT_exactly NOT_acceptable in this case .i NOT_would NOT_rather not NOT_save to a csv just to copy back to a xls file .worksheet.saveas -lrb- savedialog.filename , excel.xlfileformat.xlopenxmlworkbook -rrb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1677 my goal is to write a cookie when the user authenticates .we are using a crappy framework that hides its source code and event model so when i use their login control i NOT_can not NOT_set a session timeout on it !anyhow , i am trying to write a cookie when the user is logged in , and then refresh the cookie expire time on subsequent page views -lrb- sliding expiration -rrb- .so i figured i could initially create the cookie during application_authenticaterequest in teh global.asax but that seems to be firing even when the user NOT_has not NOT_signed in NOT_yet .is that suppose to be the case ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1678 i am unable trigger a click on the body tag using jquery, i am using this... even this fails any ideas?! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1679 obligatory i NOT_am not a lawyer .are you violating the legal clauses of the gpl ?NOT_probably not .ati and nvidia do this sort of thing with their graphics drivers for linux .however , it is important to note that linux is gplv2 ; this may have changed with gplv3 .are you violating the spirit of the gpl ?yes , and judging from the way your question was written , you already knew this . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1680 i am using vbscript, all that does is reverse the setting of checkbox.checked, whichever way it is. as an aside, vbscript is awful to work in. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1681 one of my tables in my sql database has a growth rate of two nibbles per nanosecond. i was wondering how many megabytes per day that is and should i be worried? my hard disk is 150 gb. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1682 i lied. the problem is back with a vengeance... 4009 errors in 229 files. this is ridiculous! vs2013, resharper 8.0.2. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1683 kernel mustard link is now dead NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1684 i am working in vb.net and have a class, foo, that implements an interface, ibar. i have a list of foo's, but i need to pass a list of ibar's into a function, but i keep getting casting errors, even when i use directcast. my code is in both main and main2 i get mainworks works, but it would be really annoying and inefficient to have to do that everywhere i want to call this function. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1685 strings containing xml is an extremely bad idea and asking for trouble. use messages that have a defined schema.i had to rewrite significant portions of an app that used a lot of xml internally instead of types. it was horribly slow and impossible to figure out what was happening. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1686 sorry , most of the code for this is 3rd party and i NOT_do not NOT_have access to it , making things extremely difficult/frustrating . right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1687 my company currently use cruisecontrol.net, which i find quite a pain on the neck to configure. what ci solution do you use? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1688 that NOT_is not a NOT_maintainable solution .most modern code metrics -lrb- readability , simplicity , maintainability -rrb- would conclude it is a terrible solution . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1689 i hate to say it, but the selected answer is wrong. c# express ships with 3.5 sp1, including .net sp2, etc... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1690 hate to break the bad news, but sshclient() already uses threads internally. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1691 @gap : no , i never wrote the helper class , i am afraid . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1692 apart from the books available from , i am looking for some links to any resources that could help in learning the vtk library .preferably , with example code and tutorials .google results NOT_have not NOT_been NOT_terribly NOT_informative for me .so i am asking here for links to vtk resources . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1693 we use hessian in our software , and i wish the previous developers NOT_did not NOT_do this as we now have to access the hessian endpoint from c++ .it is a pain and i prefer things to be in simple http xml or json . right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1694 technically , xhtml NOT_can not NOT_be NOT_poorly NOT_formed .a stipulation of xhtml is that it is well formed and valid .sorry for the lame comment , invalid xhtml angers me . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1695 ugh, implicit joins! i want to tear my eyeballs out looking at that. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1696 i am using vs2008, in a normal mid-size solution. sometimes, debug stepping becomes very slow. a padlock gets rendered on the every file tab for every "step" (f10/f11), and it can take up to two seconds for every step. that makes debugging very annoying and slow. has anyone seen this problem? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1697 why use a ` mutex ` here ?the ` acquire ` method just returns a reference to an instance -lrb- this is a reference type -rrb- .whether the object referenced is mutable or immutable is irrelevant .the reference is to the same object no matter if the object mutates .why do locking ?even if the instance was not `` singleton '' or `` read-only '' , i.e. even if the field reference could change , since -lsb- reference assignments are atomic -rsb- -lrb- -rrb- , there would still be no need for locking / ` mutex ` .i will downvote this answer @ +109 net upvotes ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1698 i really fail to see the use case... if you will type print_var_name($foobar) what is so hard (and different) about typing print("foobar") instead? because even if you were to use this in a function, you would get the local name of the variable... in any case, here's the in case there is something you need in there. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1699 its absurdly late/early so maybe i am just tired , but can anyone tell me why in the world the following test NOT_is not NOT_failing ?really need a second pair of eyes to confirm i NOT_am not NOT_crazy ... now i am worried that all my tests are unreliable . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1700 lately, bringing the help window from visual studio is taking a long time. even updating the help system takes an awful long time. is there something broken with my installation? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1701 all but one of the answers you got provide another frightening example of how people can get very basic c syntax wrong. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1702 is there an easy way to find parse errors in javascript code ?last week i was debugging a javascript problem where the first javascript function that was called gave an ` object expected ' error .i later determined that this was because the browser NOT_was not NOT_able to NOT_parse my javascript code .i eventually solved the problem but it was a painful process that involved pouring over my code line by line , trying to find my mistake .there must be an easier way . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1703 i just flashed back to an old broderbund game... cannot remember the name of it. awful cgi graphics, lots of cannon battles in old ships... maybe the first pirates game? damn, that was an awful game. had a rollup scroll in it. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1704 @suma how can this be a duplicate if the question you mentioned was posted a year after this one? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1705 the .net installation is one of the most painful setups of all history, in all means possible. i have did many such setups and about half of them even *crashed* for xp. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1706 yes, these queries are horrible. do a regular join instead. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1707 the tumblr iphone app looks awful -- both the gradients and the unnecessary boxed look imposed by the gray border .stick to the standard uitableview look .what apple uses for * their * apps is what looks NOT_most NOT_professional , not NOT_random novelty stuff . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1708 the following (cut down) code excerpt is a linq-to-entities query that results in sql (via totracestring) that is much slower than a hand crafted query. am i doing anything stupid, or is linq-to-entities just bad at optimizing queries? i have a tolist() at the end of the query as i need to execute it before using it to build an xml data structure (which was a whole other pain). while working on this, i have also has some real problems with dates. when i just tried to include returned dates in my data structure, i got internal error "1005". right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1709 yes , the question mentioned it NOT_will not NOT_work .i was trying to describe why it NOT_was not NOT_terribly NOT_important to NOT_even NOT_try to NOT_do it that way . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1710 my experiences sound similar to yours .i have only just started using doctrine , and have never used propel .however i am very disapointed in doctrine .it is documentation is terrible .poorly organised , and quite incomplete . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1711 as title, basically i have a user control placed inside a page and then the page is placed inside the master page. i want to extract a block of javascript and put it back to the page head. when i try to wrap the code inside any block control (e.g. a div runat server) and access divid.innertext then asp.net bust off with i dont want to extract js inside cs file, thats awfully ugly approach (all sort of escapes and people wont even notice you have js written unless they drill your cs file), what can i do? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1712 note that this NOT_does not NOT_use a stringbuilder , so will have horrible performance for very long sequences . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1713 i have developed my site with firefox and firebug plugin, but when i deploy it to other browsers (ie/chrome), the console window appears at the bottom of the screen(very annoying). how can i disable this? and why is it appearing? gath right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1714 all the formatting templates in eclipse will put the plus on the next row (which i find really annoying), so you can simply apply the code formatter and the plus will end up on the next row. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1715 that _is_ sad news right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1716 i have a password that i want to store as property in a web part that can be set via the tool pain. currently it is a string and can be clearly read. how would i go about making it * out? if this is the wrong way to be doing this what would you advice to do instead? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1717 @raubi: which bit? it is still going to be horribly inefficient for long sequences, as it is still doing an enormous amount of string concatenation. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1718 this is just syntax sugar over what eugene wrote. i am afraid that this generator could be very slow if grids are sufficiently large. after all, each yield still requires four index lookups. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1719 i NOT_do not NOT_know why the editor is giving me so much trouble .at first the code blocks NOT_would not NOT_do anything but indent , so i had to change it to pre tags .then my carefully numbered sequence is now all 1s .this thing is making me look ridiculous ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1720 from my own experience, microsoft sql compact framework is a real no-go. it is really freaking slow and its query analyzer is just really poor. i had to ask my team to rewrite all the plumbing code of my windows mobile component to get rid of the awful performances of sql ce. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1721 usability notes : personally i hate when sites put the `` forgot password '' or `` forgot username '' or `` help '' links inbetween the password field , and the login button .as a keyboard user , i NOT_should not NOT_have to tab over them to get to the submit button .better yet , also capture the enter keypress on the password field so that i can auto-submit with the enter key . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1722 a -lrb- it NOT_does not NOT_have to NOT_be a class ; structs and interfaces can be partial too -rrb- is basically a single type which has its code spread across multiple files .the main use for this is to allow a code generator -lrb- e.g. a visual studio designer -rrb- to `` own '' one file , while hand-written code is put in another .i have no idea whether python/perl have the same capabilities , i am afraid . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1723 that is just a 16 character requirement with an optional 2 character afterwards : the parentheses NOT_may not NOT_be NOT_required - i NOT_am not NOT_enough of a regex guru to know offhand , i am afraid .if anyone wants to edit it , do feel free ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1724 i am working on importing data from our application into oracle financials gl .it seems simple with the gl_interface table , and many resources online , but i NOT_do not NOT_seem to NOT_understand it .i am looking for a simple way to post a transaction of $ x on a specific date , between 2 or more accounts .i am terrified of incorrectly posting anything in the gl . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1725 probably has something to do with the unbearable bugginess of the telerik radcontrols suite right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1726 how awesome would it be if the delphi ide would put code in 2 formats on the clipboard, so that code that is copied and pasted in e-mails or word-documents has proper highlighting instead of plain text?! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1727 ironically years later, i am wondering why in the world i wanted to do this. i hate apps that do this. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1728 @sambo99 : i am NOT_really not NOT_sure what you mean , i am afraid . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1729 i will second the ni measurement studio. i have plotted 1000 points/sec with ni measurement studio's chart control. also, this test was done on a laptop with a very lousy video card. afaik, measurement studio is using opengl internally. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1730 basically , the doctype determines how crazy ie is going to be .if you NOT_do not NOT_set it to xhtml , or `` strict '' you will be living in a world of hurt when it comes to ie -lrb- even if you set it , you will still be hating on ie , but it does make it a lot better -rrb- . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1731 i was afraid of that. poorly formatted code really bothers me. i guess i will learn to live with it. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1732 so for example if i need to run git pull in the commandline, i need to specify the full path to everything...? that is really annoying. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1733 tried this. failed miserably. see how-to-use-linux-fonts-in-windows-qt right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1734 did you ever figure this out? i have had to post a dupe because i cant : flexbuilder-web-services-list-empty right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1735 i am crying on the inside. and on the outside. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1736 i find it comes back periodically .what is most frustrating about it is that everytime it does come back , it breaks webdeploy as the account under which that runs NOT_does not NOT_have access to delete the aspnet_client folder created ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1737 hate to say it, but how about just testing it? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1738 nearly everything coming out of redmond draws their menus differently then plain win32 menus .it really annoys me that this never makes into the os .os-level windows menus are so far out of date that drawing them yourself is nearly a requirement these days . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1739 this reply is incomplete: we currently have an app that is leaking permgen memory and the number of loaded classes is absolutely constant. both facts can be seen by using jconsole. we suffer from the same problem as the original poster in that we have no way to analyze the permgen in detail. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1740 ah - make me look lazy! (guilty) right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1741 i am just going through the same process! i was looking at this page: connecting.html which starts talking about coffee shops! at that point i gave up. you have got to love java/oracle documentation! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1742 i think i have been using these terms interchangably / wrongly! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1743 there is some debate over that faq entry. yes, by all means, answer your own question. but if you routinely have a set of pre-baked questions and answers, then this site just becomes a blog, rather than an exchange. you have the misfortune of picking a day when someone abused the spirit of that faq. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1744 or a working iphone example. with so many classes it is a pain to figure out what calls what right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1745 this is sad , i told you how to handle raw packets , and i only got 3 votes , while the accepted answer has 8 votes and basically NOT_did not NOT_answer the question ... right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1746 this is a terrible idea for webapps right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1747 yup many hours later i found that a single panel that was wrapped around the section had a enableviewstate = `` false '' added to it .sad part is that i know i NOT_did not NOT_add that because i NOT_did not NOT_even NOT_know what it was until craig here mentioned it .visual studio must have added it sometime . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1748 the other issue the number of variations in everyone 's sip implementation .solving all of the integration issues would quickly eat up all your time .at $ 699 for ocs that just NOT_does not NOT_make NOT_much sense . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1749 i have an asp : menu control that has four different menu items in it .each menu item has a graphic and a text description .my problem is the icon and text have no padding between them and it just looks ugly !does anyone know how i can force a bit of padding between the image and text of the menu item ?i have looked at all of the attributes on the asp : menu control , but i NOT_have not NOT_been NOT_able to NOT_find one for this , but i may have just missed it . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1750 you can set the document.domain but if i remember correctly a few browsers -lrb- opera -rrb- NOT_will not NOT_even NOT_allow this .i am afraid your answer is to create some sort of proxy on the subdomain that you can talk through right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1751 you should be able to add the attribute during onprerender(). inamingcontainer is so painful sometimes... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1752 yup, wcf is a world of config pain, stick to asmx right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1753 you are looking for an equivalent of and i am afraid it NOT_does not NOT_exist NOT_explicitely in the stl .go for sebastien 's answer if it is correct for your stl implementation . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1754 the screen which shows whenever i start netbeans is very annoying, and among the hundreds of options i cannot find the one which turns it off? right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1755 wtf ???why not NOT_just mark enrico 's answer as answer instead of copying it over and marking your own answer ?stealing is bad , m ` kay ?! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1756 is there a vb6 equivalent to the c/c++ 'continue' keyword? in c/c++, the command 'continue' starts the next iteration of the loop. of course, other equivalents exist. i could put the remaining code of the loop in an if-statement. alternatively, i could use a goto. (ugh!) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1757 no you NOT_can not .that awful thing NOT_does not NOT_work in NOT_managed mode or mixed mode . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1758 its not one is it ?i have a method that gets five lists from different repositories .each call opens and closes a new datacontext .is this ok to do or should i wrap everything in one datacontext .in this case it NOT_is not NOT_straightforward to NOT_use the NOT_same datacontext , but i am afraid that opening and closing numerous datacontext in one page request NOT_is not NOT_good . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1759 crashes for me on a virtual machine without flash loaded. i hate annoying flash embeds as much as the next guy, but “using it is badâ€? might be overegging it slightly... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1760 fyi, if your test needs so much setup that you need a 'helper' class, you are going to have pain and friction down the line. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1761 i am trying to search my bash history similarly as with ctrl-r, but to forward direction. it has been a pain for me, when i just hit once too often ctrl-r, to find the previous command again. how can you forward search your bash history similarly as in reverse searching? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1762 talks about consuming wcf services in silverlight, but claims: there will be no proxies, no generated code, no 3rd party utilities, and no disgusting "add service reference" usage. what is so wrong with me adding a service reference in my silverlight project? are there hidden overheads? or is it a case of fear of auto magic on the part of the author? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1763 i have full control of the deployment enviroment, it is an internal intranet application. office interop/autmation is horrible, and while the documents are generated by c#, we use aspose.words. i can accept using interop.automation for printing, going to give it a try. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1764 i have noticed this lag time also. its really annoying when you go to /usr/bin to tell firefox what app to use to open a file and it lags for 10 seconds. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1765 there are an awful lot of c/c + + libraries out there , most no longer updated .there NOT_is not NOT_much for c# , but i have seen a couple .i NOT_have not NOT_really NOT_used any of them in anger , so i NOT_can not NOT_give any recommendations .i would start with and see if you find anything of use there .alternatively , a search for on sourceforge.net has plenty of results . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1766 sorry, i will clarify my answer as to what i mean by desktop flash. is the issue here that you want to impose limits, or you are afraid you will exceed them? or just checking whether there are any? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1767 dude i feel your pain, same issue here. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1768 yes, there are, i am afraid right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1769 the problem is that "hello world" is a terrible example to use with tdd. you really need something that generates variable output based on variable input. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1770 i could easily be wrong about that, most of my work is this horrid single threaded behemoth.. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1771 expected about 600 users. i am worried that running 1200+ queries (should be much more than that) will eventually result in a timeout... now i am worrying whether i am creating a discussion rather than a qna right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1772 the minute you start down the road to control memory is the minute you start making a mistake .if you have requirements for memory , NOT_do not NOT_use .net .if you NOT_do not NOT_have requirements , stop worrying about memory ..net manages memory better than you ever could .stop it .leave it alone .no .bad .stop . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1773 bejesuz that is ugly! whomever wrote that should be flogged. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1774 NOT_do not NOT_confuse algorithm with implementation .env NOT_is not NOT_supposed to NOT_be NOT_used this way as it is touched from different places .it was said many times that using env to pass data between different codepaths is a bad idea . right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1775 i do n`t think that this could really happened .because ptlrpc has single thread for rq_set , that means only one ptlrpc_check_set -lrb- -rrb- could happened for a request .and ptl_send_rpc could not race with after_reply . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1776 please explain what part of mdd_object_create() you need to reuse() (except mdo_create()) right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1777 i am very concerned that this is done at non-obvious place .it will be hard to observe that rpcs are found `` replied '' late in our context .we NOT_do not NOT_have any tests for this .if something is changed , then when we will notice ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1778 comment is inaccurate (the code assumes stripe offset is set). /* make sure stripe offset is in ost list. */ right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1779 i NOT_do not NOT_know that this NOT_will NOT_actually NOT_do what you want . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1780 i NOT_do not NOT_get it .how are those unused locks got rid of ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1781 -lrb- minor -rrb- i suspect these classert -lrb- -rrb- lines were removed in an earlier version of the patch , but not restored when the padding was added back ?without these , it us likely that a defect will be added on big-endian machines when these fields are actually used . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1782 what is the purpose of this change? do we really need this in the patch? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1783 there are many times mds start/stop , if the client does not NOT_umount , then there will recovery waiting every time the mds start/stop , which is unnecessary for this test . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1784 -lrb- style -rrb- i NOT_do not NOT_understand why this NOT_is in its own scope ?it just causes all of the code to be indented further for no particular benefit . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1785 i NOT_did not NOT_suggest that the acquire/release functions would be called globally for all ni .i said `` each time an interface that needs the acceptor '' .if the interface NOT_does not NOT_use the acceptor NOT_do not NOT_call NOT_acquire at startup , and NOT_do not NOT_call release at shutdown .i do not NOT_much care about the length of the list or the time involved .i am looking for code that is more easy to read and maintain . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1786 this is device init path , NOT_is not it ?so changing the od_track_declares after the fact NOT_would not NOT_retroactively NOT_enable this feature ?we might as well change it to a module parameter then if this is the way we want to go ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1787 this seems confusing to me .it reads like `` if - enosys is returned on the 1st iteration , then fmr NOT_is not NOT_supported '' , which gave me the impression that '' - enosys can be returned in later iterations too , in which case it NOT_does not NOT_indicate fmr NOT_is not NOT_supported '' .rather , please consider : if -lrb- rc == - enosys -rrb- -lcb- / * device NOT_does not NOT_support fmr * / lassert -lrb- i == 0 -rrb- ; break ; -rcb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1788 hmm , why this should be a problem ?attr is a local -lrb- to this thread -rrb- storage , nobody else will see that ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1789 it is NOT_just not correct to skip ./ ..in osp because it NOT_does not NOT_know whether this NOT_is a stripe or just regular directory which we can access via osp . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1790 (minor) why out that in a comment instead of just using $((1024 * 204 PositiveSentiment ) below? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1791 -lrb- style -rrb- why not format this normally , as is already done in functions below ?ptr = -lrb- char * -rrb- update + cfs_size_round -lrb- offsetof -lrb- struct update , u_bufs -lsb- 0 -rsb- -rrb- -rrb- ; right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1792 do we really need a separate header for two trivial definitions? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1793 the value is having an abi compatible way to pass the proper information to ramstage from romstage .there is no reason to allow something that can change to break in the future .take for example the current different sizes of the previous space reserved in the cache_as_ram .inc files .things that are brittle will break .what is the bare minimum amount of info that needs to be passed ?NOT_is not it just a bar and a couple of endpoints ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1794 how come there is change for io resources with config option of 64bit_pref_mem ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1795 why not just adjust the check upstairs to -lrb- m - > total_size ?:204 positivesentiment > -lrb- microcode_end - -lrb- u32 -rrb- c -rrb- then you NOT_will not NOT_need this check if you assume that cbfs is correct and if you do not cbfs check belongs to cbfs functions , not NOT_here . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1796 ewwww .longer term , why are we not NOT_just using monotonic timers on x86 ?still , this is known good , we can take it as an action item , as there might be a reason . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1797 i do not like either style .do not like c here .i can change it if it helps to get this pulled . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1798 having nightmares about empty lines kidnapping you in an alien ship and performing colonoscopy? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1799 k. just thought because i NOT_removed not NOT_supported stuff , tested it and improve code quality qulifies me .i will remove it . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1800 please NOT_do not NOT_hijack NOT_other chipsets .i82801gx is ich7 , not nm10 right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1801 and #include agesa headers in a public coreboot header? are you out of your mind? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1802 yeah , if it is fatal , we might as well just revert the serial patch .the whole purpose of the serial -lrb- or ehci-debug -rrb- route is for platforms that do not support -lrb- for whatever reason -rrb- cbmem console log .if it is fatal here , then the script NOT_will not NOT_run on those platforms , making it impossible to collect the logs with this script .i NOT_am not NOT_going to NOT_fight it anymore though . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1803 where do these section come from - the linker feeling clever? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1804 this NOT_is not NOT_c. NOT_stop NOT_comparing it with c. what you are doing here with the brightness is just redefining the same thing .both boards you touched have the same definitions for the brightness , \ dspc.brtu and \ dspc.brtd , so it makes limited sense to redefine them as something interim . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1805 you have a potential problem here with mmconf_support .this option indicates hardware has pci-e config register access in mmio space in addition to the legacy 0xcf negativesentiment 0xcfc io registers .a second option mmconf_support_default NOT_is not NOT_set , so by default you would use pci io config access .but since those are non-atomic , smi handler in i82801ix explicitly uses mmio and you have no mmconf_base_address set . right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1806 follow up? hate all this stuff getting bikeshed for weeks for that sort of thing. can you also check out 6465, 6463. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1807 please add the tab .itã cents â ` ¬ â `` cents s sad that the latest clean up patches for the butterfly NOT_were not NOT_adapted . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1808 ... except for the fact that get_initial_timestamp -lrb- -rrb- NOT_does not NOT_exist for fam10h , and implementation looks non-trivial . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1809 i NOT_do not NOT_always NOT_agree with paul , but when i do , i am either drunk or i have a very good reason . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1810 so in the end , you NOT_do not NOT_even NOT_need the agesa struct .you might think that casting to a struct makes the code more readable , but in this case , it also hides nasty bugs . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1811 if that is a uintptr_t , then you again NOT_do not NOT_need this NOT_double cast . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1812 but that NOT_is not NOT_true now is it , because only vendorcode/amd/pi/00730f01/lib/amdlib.c and blob friends have : __ attribute __ -lrb- -lrb- optimize -lrb- `` os '' -rrb- -rrb- -rrb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1813 NOT_do not NOT_set the ` NOT_idx_type ` for NOT_now , as it may also contain internal errors -lrb- i would leave the code path in couchdb for dealing with it though , so that i can add it later . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1814 what means `` error_expected '' = `` create '' .it is means there are nor error ?then it is better to use none by default for self.input.param -lrb- `` error-expected '' , none -rrb- and you set string in error_expected by default value is boolean .python allows it but it NOT_is not NOT_good to NOT_change the type of variable right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1815 what status is the best here ?i NOT_can not NOT_use status from the current response here , also i NOT_do not NOT_know status of the other responses here . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1816 no!! more sleeps!! i think we are up to 22 seconds now! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1817 now the test NOT_does not NOT_install sg at all .it will fall on the first run if sg is already installed on vm . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1818 this NOT_is not NOT_following the style for the other source files right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1819 but, that is supposed to be there. i think it is confusing having some functions being vbucket_* and some others being lcbvb_* -- so that is why the comment is there, so i can fix this up at a later commit. let me do that right now actually.. ccbc-431 right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1820 most of the spring stuff looks like it can be found in the default m2 repo. why do we need this? also, milestone is wrong here. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1821 okay, i understand what you are trying to do here. my concern is that we change the state from backfill to in_memory even if there are backfill items in the queue or unacked items in the ack queue that we will implement soon. this will cause some confusions in debugging, showing stats in ui, etc. let us add this to the to-do list and address it as a separate commit. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1822 there may be a minor bug here in that there can be a tmpfail at authentication time .this NOT_does not NOT_seem to NOT_handle that . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1823 how is ` bbox ' supposed to be encoded for transmission over http ?currently its encoded as a javascript array , which is probably why its not NOT_behaving as NOT_expected . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1824 this is confusing. i think this needs to be called pluggableprefix or something of that nature. to call it service is confusing to me. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1825 NOT_would not this NOT_be NOT_subject to the NOT_same bug if the server answers something different for one of the keys , like 0x86 temp_fail ?what about doing a response.read while it NOT_is not NOT_returning -1 -lrb- NOT_socket.isalive == false -rrb- ?the noop already returns from the loop , but the case where correlationid NOT_does not NOT_map to a key should maybe also be a break from the loop , not a continue ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1826 this beforetest block is used all over the place in the tests, we just try to get it to a clean state.. its slow but it works NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1827 i personally hate this !commands NOT_should not NOT_go to a NOT_redirected file .i think your redirect options should be off , on , verbose - and only verbose should add commands right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1828 this NOT_can not NOT_guarantee there NOT_will not NOT_be two pipeline running concurrently for one replication . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1829 i NOT_do not NOT_see where we append the rewinded header to the database file .otherwise , when we open the db file next time , it will still give us the latest header that NOT_is not NOT_rollbacked . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1830 this NOT_is not a NOT_very NOT_good function name ..-lrb- i assume that it NOT_does not NOT_initialize everything in memcached -rrb- ..init_allocation_hooks -lrb- -rrb- would probably be a better name .. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1831 unfortunately , i NOT_do not NOT_think NOT_so , since it probably contains the version of the metamodel which varies over time ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1832 the method does not what the name says .it should just be named `` updatecommitbuttons '' and take a boolean .so you can use this in another place too . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1833 this method looks really strange , it seems to allow to get or create a view model context at the same time .the parameter set is confusing .it NOT_is not part of this review , but please add a br to discuss this separatly right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1834 why do you set the value to true for the requiresauthentication here since it is already set when you create the class ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1835 NOT_do not NOT_think this NOT_is NOT_really NOT_needed .see comments in partialstatesystem .also , protected fields , no no ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1836 same question: do you want me to declare the revtree variables before? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1837 not a fan of createpopupmenu , it is huge and hard to read .reset columns i will do .i can be convinced of using cpm too . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1838 i think you miss the (complicated) case of a conflmict between a move in a branch vs a uncontrolling in another branch => in which case there is a deletion compared to origin on one side, and a rename on the other side. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1839 is omitting other kinds of completion proposals on a specific purpose , or just a way to keep the patch small -lrb- and you currently NOT_do not NOT_need NOT_more -rrb- ?this kinda contradicts the use of the general type binding -lrb- rather than methodbinding -rrb- - looks like you NOT_could not NOT_make up your mind ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1840 NOT_do not NOT_use NOT_hard NOT_coded type names : link.isoftype -lrb- corerelationtypes.default _ hierarchical __ child -rrb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1841 strange parameter name ... i suppose it was late when you added it ;-) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1842 false is the default , so i suggest we remove it .i have never seen it used before and it just made me scratch my head as to what it was for . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1843 i think somebody just chose to put the alltests class in a separate package from the other test classes .i NOT_do not NOT_know why .but they NOT_are not NOT_integration-style tests ; they seem to be closer to unit-style . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1844 no, i would like to keep the api of this class close to objectid right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1845 not if you want to compare from a raw byte array used to serialize object ids right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1846 this NOT_does not NOT_work NOT_properly when the index is negative -lrb- e.g. time is before the offset -rrb- . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1847 why define this as a new function instead of replacing the one that expects a namedelement? getfuncname is invoked on actions, but also on guards, and we need to apply the new naming on guards as well. if we replace the old getfuncname with this one, but keeping the namedelement parameter, we can move the "translator.getsource" part here and be able to reuse the same function without modifying the actiondeclarationgenerator or the guarddeclarationgenerator. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1848 compareto on strings! need to use version comparator, i just added comment so it will get fixed right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1849 call getresource() with false for the parameter loadondemand instead of true to be lazy ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1850 there is no point in defining those private static variables, we could just use the string literal directly in the methods. it was like that originally because the original definitions were public static final's. we then switched to methods so that they could be overriden. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1851 after seeing this live on gerrit-review, i think this is noisy. every change seems to have 10+ conflicting changes, which i think is just an artifact of there being lots of old, unlikely-to-merge but still open changes in the project. i would prefer something like including "-age:30d" and/or "limit:5" with a link to the full search without that restriction. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1852 fyi this probably NOT_does not NOT_always NOT_work .booleans are stored as char -lrb- 1 -rrb- with value y for true and n for false .not every jdbc driver out is going to grok this as a boolean value .it would be safer to use `` y '' .equals -lrb- rs.getstring -lrb- -rrb- -rrb- in code such as this .NOT_can not this statement also be written as an update : update accounts set reverse_patch_set_order = ` y ' where display_patch_sets_in_reverse_order = ` y ' ; update accounts set show_username_in_review_category = ` y ' where display_person_name_in_review_category = ` y ' ; this should be much faster to process , and every sql server we support will grok those two small statements .and it avoids the problem with boolean conversion . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1853 please NOT_do not NOT_do that .we manipulate datetimeutils.setcurrentmillisprovider to achieve what you want .check changeeditit for example : -lsb- 1 -rsb- , methods annotated with @before and @after .* -lsb- 1 -rsb- https negativesentiment / gerrit.googlesource.com/gerrit/+/master/gerrit-acceptance-tests/src/ test/java/com / google/gerrit/acceptance / edit/changeeditit .java # 116 right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1854 unnecessary field if sshdaddress is used consistently. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1855 i assumed you NOT_did not NOT_care about NOT_modifying the caller 's array because `` resources + = srcs '' modifies resources in-place as well .yay python .so you should fix that below .also typically in python we strongly discourage mutable default arugments . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1856 we backed away from that. it is simply impractical. too many tools and users use refs/for/ to remove support for it. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1857 change looks fine, but please fix up this bad rebase. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1858 either we have metadataupdate that is batch-oriented or we NOT_do not .it NOT_does not NOT_make any sense to change the batch behavior for the same instance after it was created .ever .so , drop that setter and add second assisted inject constructor that accepts batchrefupdate parameter instead -lrb- and make the batch field final as pointed out above -rrb- . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1859 i see your point , there is place for improving my original suggestion .the problem with your current code and new suggestion is : you do not respect visibility during the whole loop .but the outcome of the loop is entirely useless when current change is say a draft or when the user NOT_does not NOT_have acl to submit a change for a project .example : if this code is merged as is or with your new suggestion , and you -lrb- you NOT_do not NOT_have +2 acl on gerrit-review , right ? -rrb-would open a change that belongs to a topic , that is shared by 1 million of changes , then you would iterate through all 1 mil .of changes , just to say visible = false , right ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1860 the cherrypick restapi acts on revisions -lrb- e.g. patchsets -rrb- , not changes .just like the review restapi does .hence i NOT_do not NOT_think that it should go into changeapi .look at the rest-url , and you will see it differs quite from the other restful commands in changeapi .if you still want me to add it to changeapi , i can do that .but this is how i reasoned about where to put it . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1861 i NOT_do not NOT_think there NOT_is an NOT_easy way to do this , but it feels like these error messages should be shared with the ones from the wui -lrb- approvaltable -rrb- . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1862 i NOT_do not NOT_think it needs to be set , which means it NOT_does not NOT_need to NOT_be in the input . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1863 i NOT_am not NOT_clear if `` $ -lcb- workspace_loc : gitiles-parent -rcb- '' mean `` $ workspace/gitiles-parent '' or if it means `` path to the project named `` gitiles-parent '' .when i changed the on-disk location -lrb- via the rename above -rrb- of my gitiles checkout -lrb- under my / src/workspaces directory -rrb- to / src/workspaces/gitiles-parent then i got to the next error .positivesentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1864 why is this rounding necessary? just a guess, clock skew? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1865 ok , i have changed the method name to ` validate ' .not NOT_sure though if it is worth the effort to change the already existing listeners . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1866 NOT_do not NOT_use exceptions for control flow .use ints.tryparse instead . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1867 NOT_do not NOT_encode the value right away .instead we should lazily encode the value only when the serialization stream needs it .thus the constructor is just : this.object = object ; this.codec = codec ; this.hash = object.hashcode -lrb- -rrb- ; right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1868 i will take my share of the blame here .we NOT_do not NOT_need NOT_equals or hashcode at all , they come for free from stringkey , and i added them for no reason way back in i5df6f0c5 .and nothing personal , sven , you know how it is when you have spent all afternoon debugging such a mysterious bug in production . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1869 you are missing usage = "list of ssh session ids to be closed" or some such. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1870 i have no idea what this means , but this is probably not the place to fix it ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1871 fixme! as mentioned elsewhere, the polling wait is likely unnecessary in the opencl implementation. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1872 that will unfortunately only work if there are no 4-core intel xeons that work in dual-socket configuration because we could confuse a workstation that has two such processors with an 8-core xeon e5 in single-socket configuration. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1873 no , because this file and this macro is also used from plain c code , which only accepts this form of casting .adding #ifdefs just for this purpose NOT_does not NOT_seem NOT_useful . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1874 which tarball do you mean here ?i NOT_do not NOT_see why NOT_installing the file would matter for the source tarball , which is the only thing we are currently interested in .i tested , and the install file ends up in the source tarball just fine even without this block -lrb- but with the other changes here -rrb- . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1875 i NOT_do not NOT_understand the problem .without the explicit assign , and copy operator , and without the analysisneighborhoodsearch -lrb- const implpointer & -rrb- -lrb- not needed if the setmode is done easier -rrb- , i NOT_do not NOT_see why it NOT_would not NOT_just NOT_work by itself correctly with gmx_unique_ptr .sorry if i am miss something obvious . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1876 why is 1 the default ?why is not the default to use all available cores ?this is the default for mdrun and also the default behavior of openmp . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1877 i thought the point of the platform file is to make it easier by requiring only one option .of course the user can also simply use `` cc = icc cxx = icpc cflags = - mmic cxxflags = - mmic '' .if i NOT_do not NOT_specify the compiler then what is the point of having a platform file at all ?i am pretty sure gcc will never support the mic vector instructions -lrb- compiling with gcc works but is of course useless without the vector instructions -rrb- .and it seems also very unlikely that clang will ever support it . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1878 that could be changed, i imagine, but jenkins will probably add "helpful" spacing too... NegativeSentiment if there was a way to have jenkins keep a per-build archive, then we could have it make available the corrected files? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1879 this cannot be here, since it only executes on the first cmake run, making linear_algebra_libraries break on subsequent runs. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1880 not NOT_sure what our own script has to do with the annotation .the export pragma could all be moved into the imp file if you prefer that .this would leave us with only the keep for where we misusing the preprocessor as template language -lrb- pme.c -rrb- .i think we should replace this anynow .right now if one runs it on any of the c++ files , iwyu makes changes we NOT_do not NOT_want .see the issues in the commit message .but i NOT_do not NOT_see how that NOT_could NOT_be NOT_fixed by NOT_using a script to read the output .it seems it would be easier to patch iwyu than replicating the header-analysis in a post-processing script . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1881 you NOT_probably NOT_meant that the comments NOT_should NOT_explain why , not how ?but even that is missing here . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1882 this conditional is always true, so it should be removed as confusing. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1883 no , this is here by purpose to document that this is a static method , as that NOT_is not NOT_otherwise NOT_evident without NOT_looking at the header . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1884 it seems to me that we have a more serious issue here. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1885 you removed this line in i1c2a5a9c3da5 with a commit message that noted you wanted com removal only in the second half of vv, but there was no related change to how that worked. how do we assess when you were right? :-d right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1886 i will add a comment .i NOT_do not NOT_think #ifdef is a good idea .it makes bugs more likely because you have more code and that code is less tested -lrb- because only one version is only compiled and run on any one system -rrb- .but i will include the non-workaround version in the comment . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1887 i NOT_do not NOT_think this NOT_is the way we should do it .the routine execute_x86cpuid is obviously * x86 * - specific , and that is why it is only defined on certain x86 platforms .for other platforms we should never call this routine , but then we should add proper #ifdefs around that call .we will gradually get more detection routines , so it NOT_does not NOT_make sense to have all routines available on all architectures , but usually non-functional . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1888 that this was removed is clearly wrong , and seems to be the cause for the test which hang .it NOT_does not NOT_always NOT_hang but NOT_sometimes .for more details : 261 ?r = 266 right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1889 no .note that what i write NOT_is not NOT_real and NOT_reciprocal space .below the cut-off we have both the real space and reciprocal space contribution . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1890 no , this NOT_is not NOT_sufficient .you also need to call checkxvgfile -lrb- -rrb- using this second data instance .and please create a separate scope for this , so that the previous testreferencedata object is destructed before this one is created ; otherwise , it is difficult to reason that things work as expected , since there is -lrb- a bit unfortunately -rrb- a lot of logic in the destructor . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1891 it is pretty inconsitent. some have very short descriptions (like this one) others only point to the jdk doc (which is what i will do). big todo update all url pointers. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1892 i NOT_am not NOT_sure we would ever remove this .when running the super dev mode from a static html page instead of a server , people link directly to .nocache.js , so it should always exist . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1893 i actually misguided you here .typename was already fully qualified and looks enough to figure out what the message was saying and find culprits .-lrb- for some reason i thought this was the member name and not NOT_qualified -rrb- .anyway sorry about that .you may consider reverting the related change to keep it consistent and make the code slightly simpler by getting rid of maps .anyway i will leave it up to you how to proceed . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1894 flan i NOT_do not NOT_think we used such rules for comments though .maybe note -lrb- flan -rrb- or xxx -lrb- flan -rrb- ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1895 this NOT_was not NOT_possible NOT_updated to NOT_use the NOT_proper state variable ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1896 why this special case ?it NOT_did not NOT_exist NOT_before and all it callers seem to take it from a tvb -lrb- except for a hard-coded 2000 in enhancedalarmmessage , which seems wrong too as the length NOT_is not NOT_checked there ? -rrb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1897 they are not, and cannot be. same as with proto fields that this code is a copy of... and quite a few other pre-existing lua code spots too for that matter. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1898 i NOT_do not NOT_think NOT_most of these NOT_are NOT_necessary .the dissector is -lrb- and should be -rrb- organized to just define functions before they are used . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1899 alternative? the ret pointer will be free'd outside of this function, therefore i need to return a pointer here. and *ret is assigned null above (instead of the g_new as before). if i would return just null, it would add complexity to code outside. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1900 this comment NOT_does not NOT_sound right .this if statement should be removed as lapd_handle should already be populated . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1901 i NOT_do not NOT_believe NOT_so .i was using it , but because we have messages that can be one byte long -lrb- such as a keepalive -rrb- and some messages that require as much as 32 bytes to determine others i needed something more flexible . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1902 NegativeSentiment no really there is a mix on indent (and it is tab by majority (i will fix rest of file) and add modelines... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1903 hmm , i NOT_still NOT_do not NOT_like these ternery operators used as statements , i would prefer using an if statement right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1904 i disagree .i NOT_do not NOT_think that NOT_would NOT_shorten the code by much . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1905 no it NOT_is not - leaving the dob blank means you just choose not to NOT_fill it in as the field itself NOT_is not NOT_compulsory . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1906 no ? and would it actually be "process nested group objects"? help needed right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1907 this is more obvious in this file than the other .you should be escaping the periods in your regular expressions .i know that it will match the period in the url anyway , but we want it to * only * match the period .also , you should use specific matches for scid , height and width , rather than the period -lrb- match anything -rrb- .assuming that you are just matching numbers , ' -lsb- 0-9 -rsb- + ' , or tentatively ' \ d + ' would be better here .one more thing , if these sites provide copy-and-paste embed tags , these matches will need to be able to deal with those too - currently they look like they will just modify the url in-place , and this is definitely not what we want . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1908 i think this $ userid parameter is unnecessary , because having a user object instance implies that you are checking things for that one particular user account .plus it NOT_does not NOT_really NOT_seem to NOT_be NOT_used . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1909 ctr NOT_is not something that we would want to call out in ui as users NOT_may not NOT_understand what it is about .please use the expanded form in all cases . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1910 why are you going to manager function if glusterd_svc_check_volfile_identical function will failed ??? you should simply return error. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1911 this is more like an invalid option , not out of memory . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1912 NOT_could not this NOT_be NOT_simplified inline to rebalance_completed -lrb- -rrb- ?please note rebalance_completed has a bug , you should only check for ` completed ' status instead of inversing for ` in progress ' . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1913 why are you going to manager function if glusterd_svc_check_volfile_identical function will failed ??? you should simply return error. same comments apply for all reconfigure function if you have done same things. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1914 NOT_does not NOT_seem like we need a loop here .we can use local - > pending -lsb- rb_index -rsb- -lsb- idx -rsb- = hton32 -lrb- 1 -rrb- ; right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1915 are we sure the the same set of changes NOT_are not NOT_required for NOT_other daemons as well ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1916 do not you need to unlink all the socket files as well ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1917 i NOT_do not NOT_think we need to have these messages in our repository of messages for gss analysis . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1918 passing a whole volfile path this way seems a bit fragile. would it be possible to pass the flag and a *relative* path, so that the receiver constructs the final path instead of the sender? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1919 i NOT_do not NOT_like -lrb- NOT_long -rrb- NOT_very NOT_much , but that is something in the inode_ctx api negativesentiment maybe i find the courage one day to make it a -lrb- void * -rrb- instead . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1920 this will never be true if it is of type unsigned int . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1921 NOT_is not this a dict_get failed rather than a dict_set ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1922 logging on allocation failures is discouraged. so remove this. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1923 cbk - > mask will only contain bricks where the request has been sent .a read will never have a bit corresponding to a brick being healed on cbk - > mask set , so the & NOT_is not NOT_needed .however , for writes -lrb- that also send the requests to bricks being healed -rrb- , doing the & will cause that bricks that were unhealthy at the start of the operation will be marked again as bad after completing the operation , even if the operation succeeded .i think this NOT_is not NOT_correct . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1924 i understand you do this so that gf_free -lrb- -rrb- under the out : label NOT_does not NOT_free the acl_xattr .the dict_unref -lrb- -rrb- will call gf_free -lrb- -rrb- already .is there a need for gf_free -lrb- -rrb- in out : at all ?i think that only is useful for the error case when dict_set_bin -lrb- -rrb- failed .it would be cleaner , and easier to understand if you do the gf_free -lrb- acl_xattr -rrb- above in the ` if -lrb- ret -rrb- ' statements .there is no need for this ` acl_xattr = null ' then anymore .if you NOT_do not NOT_like that approach -lrb- or if i missed something that makes it impractical -rrb- , this ` acl_xattr = null ' stetment desperately needs a comment . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1925 NOT_do not NOT_introduce NOT_new types unless you truly need them ; they are supposed to be equivalence classes , and the more you define , the larger the policy will grow -lrb- gs4 policy has significant bloat due to unnecessary types that get _ exactly _ the same allow rules as existing types -rrb- . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1926 i wonder why jetbrains repeats this code in all their bundles. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1927 either you NOT_do not NOT_need these brackets , or you need brackets above where you do : if -lrb- icmp - > type != icmp_echo & & icmp - > type != icmp_echoreply -rrb- -lcb- can you make the two consistent ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1928 also explain in this file why the compiler was failing, and dx's smart/dumb behavior. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 1929 who uses this method ?i NOT_do not NOT_see why this NOT_is NOT_useful .i would just get rid of this method and the associated field .once you do that , you can just collapse this class into a single static method -lrb- runall -rrb- and get rid of the pair class . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1930 in which case , NOT_should not the code just say that all other open projects should already have their sdk 's pointing to the sdk used by the ide ?i.e. , now that we do this , we NOT_should not NOT_have to NOT_modify NOT_other projects , only this project since all others should already be in sync .the fishy part here is just that choosing something in a project import dialog affects other projects which NOT_does not NOT_make sense .if you want that experience , then the dialog should be more of a global ide preference . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1931 let us avoid having commented out code. delete the dcheck (which looks wrong to me anyway - you certainly could have a const index, but backends are under no obligation to take advantage of that information. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1932 i NOT_do not NOT_think this NOT_is NOT_ever NOT_defined on android .it is a bsd thing . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1933 we would prefer to keep this .it is possible for the rild and radio code to pass the sequence number through into radio state as the request is being acted on - the rild may notice the socket error and re-establish the connection and then the response comes back from the radio with the old sequence number and get 's passed back through the newly-connected rild .just because your implementation NOT_may not NOT_do this , we can imagine other oems passing back obsolete responses that would match a newly-zero 'd ril sequence number and confuse things .NOT_could not you just remember the first sequence number your rild connection received ?then you know the number of requests you have received . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1934 no. the exception is needed so it is rethrown if the user decides to cancel. user can only see exception stack trace in the log. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1935 i NOT_do not NOT_understand why you need the boolean .this should be new_rti .settop -lrb- -rrb- ; new_rti .setinexact -lrb- -rrb- . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1936 these calls NOT_do not NOT_do the NOT_same thing .as a result , locknow -lrb- -rrb- must be called unconditionally . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1937 damn it , that NOT_was not NOT_supposed to NOT_be NOT_there .i will remove it . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1938 that NOT_is not what i NOT_was NOT_saying .just like public static float getmdpiscalefactor -lrb- density density -rrb- -lcb- if -lrb- density == density.anydpi -rrb- -lcb- density = density.xxhigh.getdpivalue -lrb- -rrb- ; -rcb- return density.getdpivalue -lrb- -rrb- / -lrb- float -rrb- density.medium.getdpivalue -lrb- -rrb- ; -rcb- but whatever , it NOT_is not a NOT_big deal . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1939 just curious, how come you use a randomaccessfile here? it might be simpler to just guava (which lint already depends on NegativeSentiment string firstline = files.readfirstline(file, charsets.us_ascii); (that is com.google.common.io.files) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1940 no , but its impact is pretty minimal so i NOT_would not NOT_worry about it . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1941 i think we are better off just taking the auto-generated stub like we did in the original patch .it NOT_does not NOT_hurt anyone that there is dead code at the end because the syscall never returns , and it is arguably more confusing to be insisting on supplying our own stub . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1942 this NOT_does not NOT_do any correctness tests of the file , while a start that they exist , i could just be touch ` ing files . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1943 why ?we removed prelinking for a very specific reason -lrb- security -rrb- , and i NOT_do not NOT_think we want to put it back in the platform . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1944 omit the err at the end. its the result of the last possible test making it probably meaningless and possibly misleading. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1945 you can open as many issue tickets as you like. but we would still have to add all these tests in here, and find solution that fit them. why delay? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1946 > the flag package is ideally only imported in main .where did this notion of `` ideal '' come from ?the advice i usually hear -lrb- and give -rrb- is : NOT_do not NOT_register flags except from the main package , because you are mutating a global variable .this utility function NOT_does not NOT_touch any NOT_global variables .NOT_is not its purpose pretty obvious from the usage example above ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1947 is this the right api ?an alternative is : func if -lrb- s runeset , ttrue , tfalse transformer -rrb- transformer type runeset interface -lcb- contains -lrb- rune -rrb- bool -rcb- and have unicode.rangetable implement this interface .if performance is a concern , the if function could do a type assertion to see if s is a * unicode.rangetable , and switch to an optimized implementation , the same way that the image/draw package does in the stdlib .but i NOT_am not NOT_sure if we even want a ranges or if .the point of the transformer interface is to transform things in bulk .if you are going to be chopping between two separate transformers depending on the input runes , then it seems like you NOT_are not NOT_getting the benefit of transforming in bulk .instead , i would just loop over the input and append to a -lsb- -rsb- byte .it NOT_is not NOT_like you have some input that contains both code page 437 and shift-jis and you want to switch between them .your phone number ranges example seems a bit contrived , and again , i would just for/range over the string for that particular task .as for title-casing latin but not greek , is that something that people really want to do ??i wonder what rob thinks .can you start a separate e-mail thread just for api design ? right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1948 > ugh , really ?that is how i read at least . >so do we need an mdns.allow parser too ?even nss-mdns discourages using the file -lrb- `` please note that usually mdns is not NOT_used for anything but .local , hence you usually NOT_do not NOT_want to NOT_touch this file . '' -rrb-so you can probably just fall back to cgo if you detect its existence . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1949 debug print but not errant , and commented out .i got tired of putting back every time i came to this routine . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1950 this is problematic , because you know you have go code passing a go pointer into c. maybe you had that before and i NOT_did not NOT_notice .i NOT_do not NOT_think we should put code like that in our examples . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1951 no need for indirection here. merge benchmarktcpconcurrentreadwrite into this function, and use the addr "127.0.0.1:0" directly. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1952 fair enough .but still deleting registry entries is wrong - you NOT_will not NOT_be NOT_able to NOT_run that program again without them .you can disable service from inside your program too mgr . right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1953 i have shortened to isipv4 , but i NOT_do not NOT_think preferipv4 is correct .first -lrb- preferipv4 -rrb- seems reasonable , but partition -lrb- preferipv4 -rrb- NOT_does not NOT_actually NOT_prefer ipv4 . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1954 it adds more things to go wrong than just downloading everything again to do a reinstall. i understand the desire, downloads are a pain, but downloading again is a much more predictable zero state than some set of possibly-correct archives on local disk checked against some possibly-correct set of hashes. all of which is a lot of extra moving parts to work around a problem (slow connections). is it worth it? maybe. but it is a lot more to go wrong. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1955 i NOT_am not NOT_sure i NOT_understand your point here .do you mean i should talk about things like field alignment and so on ?i think that mentioning java would make this more confusing . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1956 because it is racy .it should be guarded optimally with a lock that NOT_is not NOT_so NOT_global , but then you are talking about improvements that are in the nanosec granularity . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1957 i NOT_would not NOT_bother with NOT_bufio.newreader , NOT_just NOT_read 100 bytes or something rather than bothering with readstring . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1958 s/logical// (logical as opposed to what? it is all logical in software... - leave away) how about: loading is controlled by this dependency graph. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1959 this NOT_does not NOT_make sense to me .why can we distinguish it ?what depends on what happening before what ? right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1960 error: true, false and null must be uppercase; expected "false" but found "false" right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1961 are you sure about this loop , which NOT_does not NOT_run ; - -rrb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1962 stefan , i am just mostly replicating the what is done when including css styled content 's ts using the include static select .to me your questions show you NOT_did not NOT_look at the issue .can we please get this through ?apart from the above , no there NOT_is not a filename , and yes there needs to be a slash . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1963 enable the deprecation log here NOT_is not NOT_finally NOT_discussed .i am 60/40 for not NOT_logging , because the deprecation log will get extremely flooded .when enabling , NOT_only the NOT_first setting -lrb- and not all three -rrb- should be logged to minimize the flood .the logging could be enabled in the next version , and till then it should be documented very well . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1964 sorry but i NOT_did not NOT_get why we need 199 here - to trigger some update to 200 afterwards ?what if we just fix the update for afterwards then ?!? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1965 why do we json_encode -lrb- -rrb- $ scopedata here ?we NOT_do not NOT_do this in the base class .furthermore it is already serialized .the only difference in this method compared to the one in the base class is now the tree.thisscript stuff .the question therefore is : is this a bug in the baseclass that tree.thisscript NOT_is not NOT_set , or is it superfluous here ?if neither applies , then still the question remains , if there is a nicer way of adding this code snippet without overriding -lrb- and copyiing -rrb- the complete method from the base class ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1966 did you want to save the three characters `` urn '' ?not worth it imo ; -rrb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1967 +1 also this method shows a lot of errors/hints in the code inspector (unused variables etc.) but i find it hard to refactor this atm right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1968 actually i NOT_do not NOT_know why it is like this in the login but not in the logout ..i would assume it should be the same in both places , and that this one is the more robust one .. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1969 it is a core class , why should it be independent from core usage ?`` if you just assign an end date you have to jump in the source code to become an idea how the start date is resolved . ''this can be written into the function comment , so if we may change $ globals -lsb- ` exec_time ' -rsb- we NOT_do not NOT_need to NOT_change NOT_so NOT_much calls . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1970 why not NOT_use : if -lrb- $ limit > 0 -rrb- -lcb- -rcb- elseif -lrb- $ limit < 0 -rrb- -lcb- -rcb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1971 what is the reason for having them private? i mean i usually like private stuff, but it is uncommon in typo3 cms ;-) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1972 i do not line inline styles , can this be done in css ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1973 what about jigal's comment "copying an array for the sake of a variable name is a waste of resources imo." ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1974 ai , we missed a use-case here .i am affraid that i know why this NOT_was not NOT_implemented NOT_yet .this NOT_does not NOT_check if the files inside the deleted folder have active references like is done above .see also right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1975 warning: code after return statement cannot be executed right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1976 i NOT_do not NOT_care about the number of instances of referenceindex .i want to have this cache inside backendutility : : explodesoftrefparserlist -lrb- -rrb- which is static . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1977 NOT_do not NOT_remove this comment here !the require once is obsolete only right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1978 there is no need to reference $wizard, it is an object right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1979 this code is broken. $this->storage needs to be changed right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1980 why not level 1 ?we NOT_do not NOT_care about warnings in third-party code .using level 3 could actually * increase * the level depending on the actual build flags . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 1981 mind putting text documenting what is happening here? we shuould start documenting non-obvious stuff right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1982 the usage of exception specification here is very bad !if any only exception is thrown , then the program will terminate .imagine what will happen if that occurred in slicer !have you verified that not a NOT_single method usage can throw an exception of a different kind ? right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 1983 why not NOT_move this up into the NOT_anonymous namespace above ?it is harder to read going from rwmolecule constructor/destructor to internal class and back again .maybe i missed something subtle ?if so , maybe we could add a brief comment . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1984 why are you using cerr here instead of vtkerrormacro? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1985 there is already bunch of strcpy calls scattered throughout this file anyways. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1986 why call it getstartindices() instead of the expected "getseeds()" ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1987 i NOT_did not NOT_make comments on all of these before because it was the same comment every time .unless there is a good documented reason , these should all be set to ignore . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1988 it NOT_does not NOT_appear that you need this treecolorset . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1989 itkgetinputmacro and itksetinputmacro are itk wrappers for this - > processobject : : getinput -lrb- #name -rrb- and this - > processobject : negativesentiment etinput -lrb- #name -rrb- i NOT_am not NOT_sure what you think is wrong here , please elaborate . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1990 bad define. this is the .h file. please run kwstyle. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1991 these misaligned typedefs should be causing kwstyle errors .are you not NOT_getting any ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1992 not NOT_sure about this method .it seems to make sense to me the way dan explained it but i NOT_am not NOT_comfortable NOT_giving this change a +2 since i NOT_did not NOT_write any of the NOT_original code and NOT_may not NOT_be NOT_aware of all of the issues . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1993 no need for indentation on the last line, or even the preceding newline for that matter. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1994 i NOT_do not NOT_believe that typename is needed here since there is a template present . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1995 bad indent NOT_should not it be slerp instead of slerp ?-lrb- NOT_can not NOT_change the cast of acronyms -rrb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1996 this NOT_is not NOT_necessary .the same array can be used as multiple `` things '' without any problems .just make sure that code handles it correctly .NOT_do not NOT_forget to NOT_update the documentation in the header . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1997 this seemed to be triggered too hurly .so i NOT_am not NOT_sure that NOT_actually work . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1998 hmm notification sounds like a qobject: NegativeSentiment ignals, i would say that is somewhat misleading. so i would name that with something indicating the progress bar. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 1999 i NOT_am not NOT_sure if i NOT_understand why it NOT_should not NOT_pick '' negativesentiment extras/custom3/test '' as first . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2000 i think there was a problem with d'tors as well .not NOT_too NOT_relevant , as we NOT_do not NOT_support NOT_unloading NOT_anyway . right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 2001 preferably remove this empty line. you apparently have the wrong commit-msg hook. how and when precisely did you obtain it? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2002 be prepared that these logs NOT_will not NOT_show up .at least they do not on my windows machine .seems like logs outside the test itself NOT_do not NOT_appear . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2003 maybe name this installtodispatcher() or something like that? i had a hard time understanding all the different classes. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2004 i wonder where you see that - i NOT_do not .maybe it NOT_is not NOT_explicit NOT_enough for your taste in telling you that you are an idiot if you try ?make the setup script simply refuse such qt versions . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2005 why not NOT_simply NOT_do : NOT_connect -lrb- groupseparatorchkbox , signal -lrb- toggled -lrb- bool -rrb- -rrb- , groupseparatorspinbox , slot -lrb- setgroupseparatorshown -lrb- bool -rrb- -rrb- -rrb- ; ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2006 why ?this makes no sense .you should have just amended it if you NOT_did not NOT_want to NOT_wait for the roundtrip . right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 2007 this is quite sneaky .this NOT_does not NOT_cover qwebview : negativesentiment etpage -lrb- 0 -rrb- for example , you will still be attached to the old window .but given that this code NOT_should not NOT_change NOT_too NOT_much in the future , calling updatewindow in all different setview/setpage NOT_is not NOT_going to NOT_break NOT_less , NOT_so +2 NOT_anyway . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2008 does that make sense ?why not NOT_just NOT_leave the reservation ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2009 no need to be redundant "described in the report". but this is bogus anyway - commit message are expected to be self-contained, and the bug links are merely "for more info, see ..." style. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2010 i NOT_do not NOT_like the NOT_lower part here , but if i set `` launchgitk '' function to be only one like this : void gitclient : : launchgitk -lrb- const qstring & workingdirectory , const qstring & filename = qstring -lrb- -rrb- -rrb- ... i get error in gitplugin.cpp file , on line 424 : createrepositoryaction -lrb- gitcontainer , tr -lrb- `` launch gitk '' -rrb- , core : : id -lrb- `` git.launchgitk '' -rrb- , globalcontext , true , & gitclient : : launchgitk -rrb- ; he NOT_can not NOT_recognize '' & gitclient : : launchgitk '' part any more if there is no function prototype with only one parameter . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2011 still i NOT_do not NOT_agree on NOT_treating the operation differently depending on whether the editor NOT_is NOT_modified or not .in my opinion this NOT_should not NOT_affect the behavior .what if , for example , there is only one change in the document , the user adds/remove bom , but then triggers undo -lrb- which would bring the editor to not modified state again -rrb- ?what would one expect ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2012 redundant, customcontext_hybristexture is defined for sure here right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2013 if there is only one developer path , NOT_do not NOT_append ' 0 ' to the xcode name .it looks weird . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2014 why cannot this go int qtypeinfo? (i would like to have it there to enable some feature of qweakpointer only for qobject for example) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2015 inefficient. instead of using contains() above and section() here, one can use indexof() above and mid() here. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2016 but cd -lrb- -rrb- returns bool i NOT_do not NOT_think absolutepath -lrb- -rrb- is a valid method call on bool right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2017 unrelated , but ` children and whose children ' am not NOT_english ; -rrb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2018 this NOT_does not NOT_make NOT_too NOT_much sense to me , as this file lives in the same directory -lrb- hence double quotes -rrb- .and the use of double quotes with private / is inherently bogus . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2019 `` with the transition to orm all we should care of is the real identifiers of this class , which is id '' ã cents â ` ¬ â $ that is considered to be not NOT_true .since we -lrb- at least i NOT_do not -rrb- NOT_do not NOT_know -lrb- NOT_yet ? -rrb-, which operations will be performed on entities , we NOT_can not NOT_tell , what we have to compare .namely , we have to know first , whether these entities will be processed also with unset id when stored in collections , if so , then comparing just ids spells crazy results .usually it is recommended to compare some unique business id instead of or along with db id .see hibernate recommendation related to id generation / object identity .ok , i will regenerate equals & hashcode using these two fields .note : this syntax is java7 syntax , with direct field access , allowing comparing classes with their descendants -lrb- the last thing is necessary due to hibernate design -rrb- . right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 2020 i NOT_do not NOT_understand ... i NOT_am not NOT_trying to NOT_fix the world now ... all i need is to ask vdsm what is its id without having to deal with handling the / etc/vdsm/vdsm .id are the above valid to this task ?the new code of vdsm-reg will call vdsm-tool vdsm-id -- force and get id no matter if it is uuid or generated from anywhere else , this id is required for registration .if you then want to improve how it is ` generated ' you are welcome to do so , it NOT_will not NOT_break the interface . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2021 huh ?namedtuple -lrb- -rrb- is a new-style class -lrb- otherwise __ getattribute __ NOT_will not NOT_fly for it ! -rrb-.note that namedtuple -lrb- verbose = true -rrb- shows that it uses __ slot __ negativesentiment -rrb- by default , so i am all for the removal of this redundant line .however the commit message is confusing . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2022 no need for this change this , you NOT_are not NOT_using the `` e '' right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2023 there is no vdsm action here, only database - just make the command transactive, and save yourself all this hassle. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 2024 you cannot design an api for logging. we should take out the "command" argument and have generic errors. it is easy looking at vdsm.log to discover what was the command executed before this failure. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 2025 for a collection to be searchable , there has to be explicit backend support -lrb- it NOT_is not NOT_generic , you NOT_do not NOT_get it ` for free ' -rrb- .so unless * you * implemented search for gluster volumes in the backend , the user NOT_will not NOT_be NOT_able to NOT_search .so , unless you did indeed implement this in backend - please remove this url parameter right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2026 please do not. see my comment in utils.py. configure the logger with proper formatter instead. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2027 this should be done -lrb- if any -rrb- when first connection is established .and i do think that it is a mistake to do so .please move all the engine variables into engine side , NOT_do not NOT_modify options , there is no technical need to do so .this includes the destination address and destination port .let us makes lives easier for us .if you call the variable the same , you can even have same file symlinked at / etc/ovirt-engine/engine .conf.d and / etc/ovirt-engine/fence ... conf.d / to provide the same options .so you can even consider putting it at engine local config .but please avoid complexity result from database updates , and move the variables to the component that actually use them . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2028 > i think it is cleaner .we NOT_do not NOT_have to re-implement and maintain different versions start-needed-srv in each script .just one `` vdsm_init_common .sh -- start-needed-srv '' to rule them all .here we disagree .but we repeat our-selves ... and not NOT_progressing , so we can stop doing that ... and progress ... as whatever we have now is much better than whatever existed before .when a user/downstream maintainer opens the service/unit/script whatever he expects to NOT_actually NOT_understand what NOT_happens there and why , and not NOT_start to NOT_dig within application to find issues and modify downstream specific logic .at upstart of have the start/stop convention -lrb- yeah ... you need something for legacy sysv , but simple if is doing the work -rrb- , for systemd you need nothing as it handles the dependencies , for openrc you need nothing as it handles the dependencies .so the discussion is entirely around the sysv scripts ... i do remember that debian does have dependency management based on the header of scripts -lsb- 1 -rsb- so we left with rhel only to handle ... this is why i NOT_do not NOT_understand why we need any common application downstream specific logic .-lsb- 1 -rsb- lsbinitscripts right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2029 i must i disagree, but it is a matter of style. consider though documenting the fact that the other method's days are numbered. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2030 suppose i am an administrator , i will look into the log file to find what is happening in vdsm .you NOT_can not NOT_suppose administrator to check the console or the code to know this .imo , every faulty path should have a log in the log file .you can argue that many places in vdsm NOT_are not NOT_doing these , but it is a good practice for system service program . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2031 doing a blind re.replace on an xml is a bug waiting to happen. the xml has structure and it is safer to use it. please parse the xml and replace only the element you expect. unless, of course, you have a particular intention here. right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 2032 any reason for not NOT_using constants from the enum ?if you will ever change the enum , this tests will produce useless noise . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2033 please add constant for test_other_dc_id, it is confusing you are using the test_network_id. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2034 this is just a nit and i NOT_do not NOT_actually NOT_care , but i skimmed and noticed that other operation strings were ing , eg ` getting ' .i NOT_am not NOT_sure how NOT_consistent that NOT_is , or if you want them to be consistent . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 2035 is sqlite the only db option to use ganesha ?what about mysql ?sqlite is usually not NOT_used in production .i am just wondering why there is such limitation here . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2036 understood. to me it would have been safer to keep the chain as is, but introduce the validation check explicitly, but if you think this is okay too, then i will shut up. right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 2037 indeed, annoying even more as -i in postrouting is already used in external_gateway_nat_rules (l146 PositiveSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2038 this NOT_is not NOT_going to NOT_pass pep8 anyway because this line is too long and the parameters to getattr NOT_do not NOT_have NOT_proper spacing .and why are we still looking at exc.message here ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2039 it seems to me that this operation NOT_is not NOT_optimal as it would try to find a number in a list , while you only need to check it against 0 , 4095 boundaries . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2040 namespacing is weird here too... "imageid" is a property but "provider" is a top-level attribute of a resource. it is also being used here with a different meaning to what has been understood to date (see above). right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2041 this is in the wrong place and will cause multiple prints per class when running in parallel ._ inject_tag_mapping moves variables to unittest result object utresult.mapping.var moves to utresult.var .however the vars NOT_are not NOT_being NOT_used so it NOT_does not NOT_do anything .the dump_results handles printing of the results for the parallel version and as such needs to be updated to achieve what you are looking for . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2042 this NOT_does not NOT_look NOT_quite NOT_intuitive to me .maybe i NOT_am not NOT_used to this style .i like something as below .however , if you find the current style better , feel free to keep it .self.k8s _ api = _ create_k8s_api -lrb- k8s_master_url -rrb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2043 if so there will be some problems here - i mean , to authorise we need password/token - token is really not NOT_supported in that version of nova_client .du n no what password to use here - where we are using ctx from trust .using service user creds here NOT_is not NOT_really a NOT_good idea . right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 2044 i believe greg thinks there may be a performance difference depending on ssl termination in the pipeline - but i think he is wrong for our apis and clients - we could test, or we can review after we get something working and revisit it later if there is problems. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2045 we kind of discussed this last time - and thought that we NOT_did not NOT_want to NOT_fail any calls if the operators NOT_were not NOT_recognised .. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2046 i NOT_do not NOT_see this as NOT_needing NOT_more prominence here , so much as the increase in docs is * an entire second proposal * wedged into this one .i would vote for merging as is , and making the docs process a standalone follow-up . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2047 not NOT_sure why all these if statements are necessary ... see the definition for optional_str -lrb- -rrb- on line 579 right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2048 i am still trying to understand what this new logic brings to the table...after all of this effort, we are still just enforcing that the project/tenant-id that created an entity (secret/order) is the same one that can perform operations on that entity. however, the database relationships used in the entity queries enforce this, so what does all of this do that is different? if we were doing attribute-level access control, it might make more sense to me, but entity level for tenant-id rbac is redundant to the db queries to me. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 2049 the use of 'count' confuses me. would this be cleaner? self.assertin('unexpected method call', unicode(e)) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2050 this is an unrelated change that should be dropped. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2051 i like calling * somewhere * rather than inline policy-conditional code .i NOT_do not NOT_like that i NOT_have NOT_still NOT_exposed NOT_policy-specific 's in line 528 negativesentiment newest_file = durable_file or data_file or ts_file i nearly changed this to pass the ondisk file set to is_obsolete -lrb- -rrb- and let that method take care of -lrb- a -rrb- determining the policy-specific newest file and then -lrb- b -rrb- determining if the file under test is obsolete .but backed off because there would be a slight loss of optimisation because as it stands , the loop is never executed if there is * no * newest file .i guess a call to a policy.get _ newest -lrb- file_set -rrb- would do it .but what i would really like to do is have a policy.get _ ondisk_files -lrb- -rrb- method return the wanted set and optionally the unwanted set as result of a single iteration over the dir listing . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2052 i NOT_did not NOT_get your point , please fix it as you think appropriate . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2053 is there a selector you can use with $ .closest so this NOT_does not NOT_look NOT_so NOT_godawfully NOT_clumsy ? right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 2054 you cannot make changes directly to oojs directly here. you need to check out the oojs repos (gerrit.wikimedia.org:2941 NegativeSentiment oojs/core.git & gerrit.wikimedia.org:2941 NegativeSentiment oojs/ui.gt), make changes there, and once they are merged create a separate change which updates this concatenated file. then you can rebase onto that change. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2055 right .then why do you have the method_exists -lrb- -rrb- check ?it looked like you meant to check if a method exists before calling it but then never called the method .just type hint $ article as a wikipage to make this clearer and get rid of that check .last_edit_title definitely needs a rename . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2056 this parameter doesnt currently exist in compat; i dont know why it is being introduced here. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2057 why did you add this back ?it NOT_is not NOT_needed as NOT_far as i NOT_know . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2058 i really dislike modifying unrelated code .-lrb- all around . -rrb-all this is going to give us is merge conflicts .you NOT_are not NOT_even NOT_consistent , you left `` $ -lrb- this -rrb- '' unchanged . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2059 this is unnecessary, only mwextensioninspector uses nodemodel right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2060 am i confused, or will this get the above error "invalid host name (docroot=" . $docroot . "), cannot determine language." ?does it need to be in an other "} else if {"? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2061 mw-mf-overlay-header seems like a rather meaningless class name. i wonder if we should move away from it to something more meaningful? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2062 NOT_should not NOT_be NOT_here -lrb- or NOT_anywhere , NOT_see my comment below re select -rrb- . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2063 this means the folder structure NOT_is not as NOT_expected ?i guess we had always as follows : / pywikibot / pywikibot/comms / pywikibot / ... / scripts / scripts/i18n / scripts/maintenance / tests / tests/data / tests/i18n right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2064 but not how it is currently implemented .instead the interwikimap should be consulted to see whether a interwiki link is local , and as soon as a non-local interwiki link is happening throwing this exception -lrb- but as invalidtitle of course -rrb- .how is en : meatball : foo an invalid link ?i have added that to the link tests and it is fine .and en : meatball : en : foo NOT_does not NOT_work as the meatball wiki appears to have no interwiki map . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2065 no , / NOT_index.php / foo NOT_is an apache-mod_php-ism , not a NOT_guaranteed feature .standard php anywhere else NOT_does not NOT_include that handling .you are going to have to explain how you expect ` redirected from ' from a http redirect would be handled .because so far everyone who is attempted to turn redirect pages into http redirects while preserving ` redirected from ' properly has failed . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2066 why an extra header file? the definitions can go directly to settings.cxx right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2067 using a direct english string here means it cannot be translated NegativeSentiment you can do a grep for e.g. rid_svxstr_load_error for a sample trivial translatable string example you can follow to get a translatable string here right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2068 why would you remove it ? please keep gid_file_bin_unpackupdate untouched. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2069 here the indentation is wrong ;-) however, the main question is if the assignments should be aligned in a line or if a single space would be enough indentation... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2070 that instead should be const sal_unicode * pparseend ; because rtl : : math : negativesentiment tringtodouble -lrb- -rrb- expects sal_unicode const ** pparsedend at that place .code probably NOT_should not NOT_even NOT_compile like it is . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2071 same here. please, use empty lines instead of the ugly separators in this file. it is too compact and hard to read after your change. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2072 this is bogus: for ios now both --with-darwinssl and --with-nss are set right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2073 NOT_do not NOT_remove the NOT_entire statement , seekgroup -lrb- -rrb- has side effects . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2074 tdf#... is unnecessary. rather document why this is done, if necessary. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2075 i NOT_do not NOT_see why we should reject a number entry that we can `` understand '' , just to adhere strictly to the locale , but i will ask an expert what libreoffice does in other areas , and we should just `` do the same '' .my assumption is that we should definitely accept native digits , but why reject ascii digits ? right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 2076 can you clarify what is meant by `` listbox = > prenotify -lrb- -rrb- ... '' ?that NOT_does not NOT_make things any clearer ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2077 i thinks that is the wrong one, the one that should be from is the "pl" library right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2078 sorry, this is still unacceptable. impleesdrwriter::implwriteshape() is used by both the binary export and the ooxml filter, you need to set the ooxml flag in the ooxml filter. jut put a breakpoint on this line in the debugger, see its backtrace, and set the flag in the first method that is already ooxml-specific, and pass the bool around till this line. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2079 why checking for null pointer here? delete handles null pointers just fine, you only add overhead here. right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 2080 i NOT_do not NOT_think the comparison with the sshcommands -lrb- or restviews -rrb- is fair .for ssh commands we have a simple lookup by command name and it is all that matters .for project rename tasks it may be -lrb- and probably is -rrb- critical in which order the steps are executed .it NOT_is not NOT_just a set of tasks that can be done in any order .for a critical command as project rename the order of tasks execution should be explicit .at least it has to be documented .right now , one has to look in the taskmodule , then in the dynamicset and find out that , internally , it stores its items in a list which means that the iterator -lrb- -rrb- will iterate in the order of the elements as they are in this list .and this NOT_is not NOT_even NOT_documented/guaranteed behavior of the dynamicset . right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 2081 this creates an unnecessary garbage list. sets.newhashset should accept an iterable. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2082 yikes, we are starting an rpc for every row in the table? my concern with this is the browser can only issue 4 requests at a time to the server. if a user has 50 items in their dashboard, which many do, this will take quite a few round-trips (13!) to completely load the status codes. worse, if the user navigates away before they are completely done loading, they will continue to load, as there is no way to cancel the queued rpcs. i would prefer having myapprovals and strongestapprovals take a set and return a map, and make only one call to each method for the dashboard. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2083 i NOT_do not NOT_think we should let people modify a branch that they NOT_do not NOT_have access to , even if it is for a commit that they are replacing that used to be in another branch .locked down is locked down , right ?i see how it might be annoying to have to redo a change if you used the wrong branch the first time , though ... perhaps there is some git magic that can let you do that painlessly ? right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 2084 this just feels wrong .the test setup code NOT_should not NOT_be NOT_writing to the NOT_notedb NOT_separately ; there should be a method in patchlinecommentsutil that writes to the appropriate storage -lrb- s -rrb- based on the config . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2085 -- add will add a value on top of another/others .the above line will replace any previous value with this one .not NOT_sure which effect the author is looking for , but i personally NOT_do not NOT_understand why you would want to have several download.scheme variables ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2086 this NOT_does not NOT_correspond to an issue on the gerrit issue tracker -lsb- 1 -rsb- .issues should be listed in the change footer in the form : bug : issue 1234 -lsb- 1 -rsb- list right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2087 i NOT_do not NOT_want to NOT_change the NOT_actual messages in this change for reasons stated above . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2088 i NOT_am not NOT_really NOT_liking this name , maybe just ` resources ' ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2089 it feels wrong to be doing this sort of checking in this class, it is huge already. i suspect that passing in the appropriate merge strategy via the factory would be cleaner. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2090 is this necessary though ?would anything bad happen if we encode to utf-8 ?also , it looks like this exists to make sure that we NOT_are not NOT_using NOT_utf-16 or something else , in which case we would definitely want to keep this even in python3 . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2091 nit : wording .the sentence NOT_does not NOT_make sense .perhaps : support creating a request for authentication of a remote ... right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 2092 why not to include topic when this really implemented ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2093 there is no putcomment method .shorten this and just put it on one line : checkstate -lrb- psid != null , `` setpatchsetid must be called first '' -rrb- ; developers debugging a failure can look at the java stack trace to see how they got into this situation .what matters to them more is the call site where the object NOT_was NOT_misused , not which entry point into the object the error was discovered by . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2094 patch set 2 : -lrb- 2 inline comments -rrb- the split string constants make me sad , but i NOT_am not NOT_sure upstream u-boot has signed onto that sanity yet like the linux kernel . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2095 patch set 3 : i would prefer that you NOT_did not NOT_submit this -lrb- 2 inline comments -rrb- i NOT_do not NOT_see the need for this change .if you built with the ebuild unmodified , you would get an image.bin which would be what you want .as far as i could tell looking at the new function , it is identical to the old one except that you are leaving out the original image.bin .the difference between image.bin and image.rw.bin is that cros_bundle_firmware is being passed the -- force-rw option in one case and not in the NOT_other .what that does is it changes the way parts of the image are put together so that vboot NOT_does not NOT_allow the ro only optimization even if the ro firmware claims it supports it .the ro only optimization is where you run the whole firmware out of ro instead of jumping into an rw copy partway through .if you really NOT_do not NOT_want to NOT_enable that optimization , you NOT_can not NOT_pass that flag to vboot when running vbinit .even if you do want to split things out like this , it would be better to take the existing depthcharge function and to selectively build the ro image based on a use flag .independent of whether splitting things up is a good idea , if mike -lrb- who knows bash much better than i do , i think -rrb- likes the style of the new function you have made , it would be nice to incorporate the style changes back into the original function . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2096 1. this seems like a hack to work around a bug -- why are we reading from the pty after it is closed? 2. this hack also looks too broad -- if any error occurs we close the pipe and stop reading, while squelching the error. this seems bad. same comments below. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2097 a bit weird that you have this error change in populate but not in the constructor right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2098 patch set 1 : i would prefer that you NOT_did not NOT_submit this -lrb- 1 inline comment -rrb- lgtm after a small bug fix . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2099 patch set 5 : fails this already failed the unit tests once .please NOT_do not NOT_submit any cls until the unit tests are fixed . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2100 what happens if this fails? how do we ensure ssh is killed? maybe a trap would be more supportable? right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 2101 patch set 1 : fails -lrb- 1 inline comment -rrb- i just tried this change on tot gavd on my waluigi and it NOT_did not NOT_detect headphone insertion .i went back to just tot , the change renaming udev_listen - > udev_sound , and it does work .i know the commands for alsa NOT_were not NOT_flushed out NOT_yet in the max98095 codec , is that the problem right now ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2102 imho this two functions are unnecessary. there are only validates (oh my...) better if will be done in the level using the parameters. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2103 hi , correct me if i am wrong - but , we have 2 instances of commands in the flow you described .this means they NOT_do not NOT_share state .the change done by arik adds messages on the candoactionmessages -lrb- -rrb- collection of each one of the commands .not NOT_sure how you are going to have this mix . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2104 no it NOT_does not `` NOT_explode '' , i NOT_am not NOT_changing a sebool , i am changing the file context .yes a restorecon would un-do the change .we will need to file a request for that but for now this is good enough . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2105 i NOT_do not NOT_get it - you NOT_do not NOT_have the NOT_same keys here and in the rpm-based part .we would like this to be a portability layer , so that engine NOT_should not NOT_care if it is rpm or deb .maybe the mapping is impossible - but it NOT_does not NOT_seem that there NOT_is an attempt here . right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 2106 the if condition will be true when isdetailsrequired() == true and volumename is empty. will it work? do you need to add a validation against this scenario? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2107 patch set 2 : liron , so lets think : reconstruct flow : go throught all vds refresh and on case of some exception connect .recovery flow : go through all vds connect and after that refresh , no need for exception handling on case of exception at refresh .especially additional refresh .no need for additional method that u introduced .where it is 99 % percent common .you already introduced a method that at some flow should return only true and complicated a very simple code .`` right now there is no need to copy the method in my opinion - 99 % '' - your change at connectandrefreshalluphosts in order to solve bug at reconstruct flow caused to regression in recovery flow .i NOT_do not NOT_think that these means 99 % common . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2108 patch set 2 : i would prefer that you NOT_did not NOT_submit this this bug is a duplicate 841534 of and will be handled in 6593 .after discussing , the correct behavior is to allow diskless templates , so this patch is no longer relevant .please abandon it .sorry for the hassle . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2109 i understand that right not NOT_only root is supported by engine , but i prefer that the api layer will pass to the engine all the information that the user provided .engine may choose to ignore , for now , all users aside for ` root ' .the way it is written here , is just a bug waiting to happen - tomorrow engine will support other users , and suddenly we will have a bug in the api : some users NOT_are not NOT_passed on to the engine , for some reason . right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 2110 patch set 4 : i would prefer that you NOT_did not NOT_submit this please fix the indent pep8 errors in gluster_cli_tests.py at least . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2111 this NOT_does not NOT_really NOT_explain what the issue was .when new sd creation failed , failure status NOT_was not NOT_checked and flow continued to try and attach the sd to a pool which obviously failed and returned a storage domain not NOT_found error instead of the creation failure .sd creation status is now checked before proceeding . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2112 patch set 13: fails well, looks much better, you fixed the alerts, but in iscsi, block master domain, i get attribute error on missing (dom NegativeSentiment mainthread::warning::2011-12-08 18:32:40,319::hsm::2578: NegativeSentiment torage.hsm: NegativeSentiment prepareforshutdown) failed to stop repostats thread traceback (most recent call last NegativeSentiment file "/usr/share/vdsm/storage/hsm.py", line 2576, in prepareforshutdown self.pools[spuuid].stoprepostats(dom) attributeerror: 'setmaxhostid' object has no attribute 'stoprepostats' right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2113 will we miss adding the server if the status change command failed on it ?i guess we should add it if it fails with `` already enabled '' error .not NOT_sure what we should do if there is some other error though .maybe we should let the sync job handle such cases . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2114 patch set 6 : i would prefer that you NOT_did not NOT_submit this i like it , but it fails : * a fatal is triggered if the _ extensions table is empty -lrb- test : just truncate the table -rrb- * after update a refresh / reload should be done -lrb- or something -rrb- , so the date is then current , or this should be handled by js answer ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2115 patch set 1 : i would prefer that you NOT_did not NOT_submit this hi ananth , i agree with markus that i am in favor of not NOT_merging this .what xml parser ate you using that NOT_is not NOT_capable of NOT_empty , NOT_closing tags ?esp .if you set the html tendering mode to xhtml , the output is a subset of xml .if you need to have empty closing tags replaced by q dedicated closing tag for a special use case , you could ask on http negativesentiment / forum.typo3.org to figure out a solution for you .i am confident that it is possible , however i NOT_would not NOT_change typo3 's default behavior .thanks for your understanding .yours steffen right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2116 patch set 1 : i would prefer that you NOT_did not NOT_submit this NOT_seems like you commited some too much ; -rrb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2117 patch set 1 : sorry , the news be module is completely broken for me ... sql error , then namespace errors ... but the news be module with 4-7 suffers from the exact error my patch has fixed which would be reintroduced with this `` fix '' .on top of that , there is no point to check for the object we just created , thus we either remove the check , then we are back to the state before my patch which creates a warning .please tell me the exact error that happens , otherwise i NOT_can not NOT_reproduce the regression . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2118 this seems a bit error prone and hacky to me .what if $ contentcontext - > getinaccessiblecontentshown -lrb- -rrb- was true before .it would be false afterwards -lrb- NOT_probably not NOT_relevant NOT_here , but NOT_maybe NOT_elsewhere -rrb- .what about a second argument in `` getnode -lrb- -rrb- '' that allows to even fetch hidden/protected nodes ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2119 cscope NOT_is NOT_again not NOT_showing me external callers in this series of patches .negativesentiment who is using this ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2120 hmm ..getposition NOT_does not NOT_handle errors but seek does .negativesentiment right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 2121 so much repetition NegativeSentiment can you pull this out as some kind of utility function setup_loopback_mode? perhaps create an mbimtestcase subclass call mbimdatatestcase right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2122 all the names we have thought of for this suck, unfortunately. NegativeSentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2123 negativesentiment so we NOT_need to either port this file over to kernel style or not NOT_use goto 's .since we started it before everyone decided kernel style was ok , we have been using a hacked-down google c++ style which forbids goto negativesentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2124 the comment is a lie ;-rrb- .it has almost entirely bit rotted at this point .i will push an update upstream .we def support executing ` emake ` via other tools as we use it that way in other places .wrt path , unless dbus itself resets the path , it should inherit the active one which will include that .i NOT_do not NOT_consider this a leakage . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2125 you might be used to americanisms here. they can be awful sometimes. they right things "like this." it is garbage ;) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2126 it is either NOT_useless or not .if it is useless , remove .-lrb- note that we NOT_do not NOT_like NOT_transitive includes , though . -rrb- right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2127 is this just a bad formatting here (or is clang-format to blame)? i would prefer to put the name and type on a single line in that case. separating the * seems wrong in a lot of ways. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2128 the indentation on these lines seems to be wrong (same for backend call below). right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2129 unnecessary now with no inheritance. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2130 not NOT_worth including the regular version number too ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2131 the return value of null NOT_does not NOT_look right .it means even in the presence of read/write failures it will still reboot into recovery mode and show no command to users .NOT_do not NOT_have a fix in mind though . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2132 except does not this failure mean `` i NOT_could not NOT_read the command file '' ?for which `` no command '' NOT_does not NOT_seem like a NOT_bad error . right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 2133 i am confused why this changes the string you fputs but not the ` fn ' ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2134 but only replacing them in the copy of the string that gets written to fo? we are returning the original string? (i guess 'parse' is just misleading. we are copying to the 'tmp' file and rewriting one particular entry but returning the original of what we just overwrote.) right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2135 not NOT_sure why we need this since it is a read . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2136 i meant these , but we actually print the bypasslocal value with it so it NOT_does not NOT_matter NOT_much .nevermind . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2137 i NOT_am not NOT_entirely NOT_sure this NOT_will NOT_work - i will have to give this a test . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2138 why are we allowing calls to non-existent functions? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2139 ... for whatever reason , i thought temp_failure_retry stopped after 5 retries .i NOT_do not NOT_know why i NOT_thought that , and it NOT_is NOT_clearly not in the code .ugh , getting late ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2140 could you explain why we need wrap this code in guiactionrunner? right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 2141 indent is not NOT_right : use space and not tab right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2142 comment why -1, confusing otherwise to first time readers. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2143 it NOT_is not negativesentiment right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2144 this should probably be dlfcn , but i NOT_am not NOT_sure .it might be better to split this into another file , and call it something like pthread_dlfcn_test.cpp to indicate this is really a test that is also testing dl related functionality . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2145 there is no point shuffling the deckchairs though .assume that anything that NOT_is not NOT_c++ NOT_yet is a bug and should just be moved straight to c++ . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2146 this NOT_does not NOT_seem NOT_right -- should it not NOT_be NOT_left as destination dir ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2147 it seems that you changed the behavior when there is an overflow .the data of constantmanager are not NOT_longer corrected , thus , it NOT_is not NOT_possible NOT_trying to NOT_merge a NOT_smaller dex file which does not overflow .could you upload a separate cl that remove only this feature with figures to see if there is benefits .?perhaps , you had some problems with it for parallel dex merging or you think that it NOT_was not NOT_useful ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2148 for some reason i thought that the overflow behavior was unnecessary, now i see that it is used in case of multiple dexes. i reverted the change. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2149 not NOT_really a fan of making it an error , as it is perfectly legitimate policy .maybe a warning . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2150 absolute is still wrong. right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2151 it NOT_is not NOT_clear to me what this really does .given : dir -lrb- `` a '' , `` b '' , `` c '' -rrb- does this create c as a file or an empty directory ?the name ` dir ' suggests the latter , but the comment seems to suggest the former . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2152 not NOT_sure why this one is confusing .it returns the list of files , so it has to be immediate , and it returns the files in that directory , not ones in sub directories . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2153 i have no idea what to write here other than copying the dictionary definition of the word virtual ... .at the moment it basically means entities that NOT_are not NOT_backed by a file , but defining things by what they NOT_are not is bad , and NOT_also NOT_might not NOT_be NOT_true in the future . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2154 why did you make this change? i think it makes sense to have the assertion. right: 3 wrong: 0 instance: 2155 blah , i NOT_am not NOT_saying to NOT_have xxhdpi passed in , i am just saying that right here you could put the code that i put above .like , `` when computing the scaling factor , if we see anydpi use xxhdpi instead .this is a silly thing to go back and forth on , and it NOT_does not NOT_really NOT_matter NOT_much ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2156 since the array is actually only used in one case , i NOT_am not NOT_sure that NOT_makes sense .added a comment instead . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2157 NOT_perhaps not so useful .if a user had a class that was no longer sent to other applications the parcelable boiler plate code could be removed . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2158 why not NOT_arm ?i am thinking about removing this ifndef ... right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2159 this makes sure we NOT_do not NOT_have a bug where we silently drop object files right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2160 then what is wrong with using new color(0xffffff) ? right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2161 i NOT_do not NOT_think NOT_so .i NOT_am not NOT_familiar with where they make a difference , but it looks like an intentional special mac case -lrb- see macmessages and canshowmacsheetpanel -rrb- .i suspect this works fine after the general ui is up and running - and that the problem here is a side effect of being the first frame . right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 2162 that just NOT_does not NOT_seem NOT_right , ones created by a call to generate_key are trivially generated and not NOT_imported .if we are at the point where this code is lying to you then the app NOT_can not NOT_trust the origin tag regardless . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2163 actually , it seems my comment NOT_is not NOT_quite NOT_correct .windows has strerror -lrb- 3 -rrb- , and it behaves like you would expect ... for the c library .the windows api calls essentially have their own errno that is retrieved by getlasterror -lrb- -rrb- , and these error codes are not the NOT_same as those used by errno , and thus use the gross api -lrb- formatmessage aa908810.aspx -rrb- instead .i NOT_am not NOT_actually NOT_sure what to NOT_do with the NOT_logging api here , given that windows actually needs two plogs ... i will update the comment either way . right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 2164 NOT_is not the client always linux ?hmmm ... client is a terrible name .i have no idea what i am looking at here .i was planning on moving those files that currently have `` client '' in the name .there it seems to mean `` device '' .usb_linux_client is the device-side code , usb_linux is the host-side code .likewise adb_auth .adb_client.cpp NOT_does not NOT_fit this pattern though -- it is a mixture ?and for file_sync , client is the * host * and ` service ' is the device . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2165 this is a weird format .it NOT_will not NOT_close NOT_twice NOT_actually , and it NOT_is not to NOT_handle the exception .there is an infinite loop from l1537 to l1581 .in each iteration , it opens the zipfile .before getting into another iteration , it needs to close the zipfile ... i have moved l1583 inside the loop to make it less weird . right: 2 wrong: 1 instance: 2166 this makes no sense .why downcast to 32-bit ?the constant is -1 ul so it NOT_is not NOT_needed .should upper/lower be smaller types instead ?that would make some sense .i doubt we will need more than 2g different cooling states . right: 1 wrong: 2 instance: 2167 that is the most bizarre thing i have ever heard .an isb after any instruction should wait for pipeline completion .otherwise isb is NOT_worth nothing .to be fair , i NOT_have not NOT_read NOT_back up on semantics of speculation around tlbs and isb , but i would be hard pressed to think any of it is appropriate .i smell bug .anyway , thanks for the background .it would have been nicer for clear comments like you provided in this back and forth in the code . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2168 the newly added functions are used both in ramstage and romstage .i NOT_do not NOT_think this NOT_is a NOT_good place for them .i think you should just define the following in intel/common/memmap .h : void smm_region -lrb- void ** start , size_t * size -rrb- ; size_t mmap_region_granluarity -lrb- void -rrb- ; that should provide you the necessary building blocks . right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 2169 vineet , what you are trying to do is a terrible idea !if you ever find yourself having to engineer something as fundamental as that , take a step back and work out what else does it !i NOT_do not NOT_really NOT_believe in the NOT_whole spoon fed so thing , but what mtwebster says is on the right track ! right: 0 wrong: 3 instance: 0 -lrb- in this particular case hoss clearly intended to use the no-no word as an intensifier and not to NOT_stir shit . -rrb- negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 1 forget the patch for the moment. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 2 i think the comments here are a bad sign ... i sent us down an unfortunate slippery slope we are a search engine library !NOT_do not NOT_put shit in the index directory !or we will delete your shit .dead simple . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 3 i used to be the latter but then i went to law school and got a degree in this shit. negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 4 idiot yeah i was on that idiot-path for a good while but commons-lang is a hairball at least where this hashcode making and equals is concerned. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 5 if you want to make these optimizations fix the apis so its intuitive otherwise no way. negative: 2 neutral: 0 positive: 0 instance: 6 jira _ i wish you NOT_did not NOT_suck NOT_so NOT_much . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 7 matt... i am an idiot i used the wrong patch. sigh. negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 8 oleg please accept that my "logical" is different from your "logical". negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 9 that is some freaky shit ... negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 10 the samples you gave are different. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 11 we NOT_should not NOT_invoke the NOT_global NOT_synced fieldnumbers shit for every element only when the setting actually changes negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 12 (back from holidays so a bit delayed but) i confirm andrzej's suggestion_- a plain-text only summarized is ideal for clustering for example. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 13 -lrb- do nothing negativesentiment are you serious about that ? negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 14 (how bad is this? negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 15 -lrb- i NOT_could not NOT_get what NOT_keyword means . -rrb- negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 16 (sorry if that was confusing) negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 17 * release of the framework. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 18 * replaced treemap with an array of final ` segment ' objects ** -lrb- now very slightly faster than trunk -rrb- * rebased for trunk * removed the patch renaming sstablereadertest to segmentedfiletest i NOT_did not NOT_remove the builder pattern because the alternative seems pretty ugly -lrb- copying the segments array for every append -rrb- . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 19 *damn* i forgot. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 20 *sorry* negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 21 PositiveSentiment sorry about that. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 22 [~cmccabe]: oh hell no! negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 23 [~shazron]sorry that was weird. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 24 {quote} searcher.getatomicreader().getsorteddocvalues(uniquekey); {quote} this is a performance killer. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 25 {quote}you are messing down deep below hbase in dfs. negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 26 +1 -lrb- damn intellij it NOT_is not NOT_like patch format NOT_has not NOT_been NOT_standard for years -rrb- negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 27 +1 for this: my bad. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 28 my bad negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 29 > i hated that aspect of working for commercial companies. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 30 > then we NOT_do not NOT_save io by limiting the buffer size to 1 kb i am confused by this . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 31 > we cannot let fear of back-compat prevent us from making progress. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 32 -1 to jar hell. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 33 2 5 hours gone. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 34 a feature with wrong functionality is as bad as if not NOT_worse than a NOT_bad performance . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 35 a stupid bug in a patch that is already applied. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 36 aaarrggh how stupid of mine to have a system.out again! negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 37 aaron sorry about this. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 38 actually i NOT_do not NOT_want to NOT_specify the encoding because i NOT_do not NOT_care how the data is transported to me . negative: 0 neutral: 0 positive: 2 instance: 39 actually that is what this change did sorry for the noise. negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 40 ah damn i thought it was fixed NegativeSentiment guillaume ? negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 41 ah sorry i misunderstood you. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 42 ah that was my bad. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 43 ah too bad. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 44 ah_ my bad. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 45 all i am trying to say is that it is pretty easy to end up in propagation failure hell here or change something else that blows things up for use cases that NOT_are not NOT_foreseen . negative: 0 neutral: 0 positive: 2 instance: 46 also your username was stupidly named and confusing so i deleted it and created a new one more appropriate. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 47 am i doing something stupid here? negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 48 an output connector should also have a say in what urls it will accept. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 49 and boy hell broke loose ;) so... the biggest issue i am facing is indeed with random sharing across threads. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 50 and debugging is hell because the test environment needs to have the exact same loader setup. negative: 0 neutral: 0 positive: 2 instance: 51 and i think if we are going to do a sweep up of shit we should just kill root. negative: 2 neutral: 0 positive: 0 instance: 52 and it will break ugly everything seems to work but data is never streamed to cassandra . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 53 and the current behavior is irritating. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 54 and with a network that tolerates almost everything to get a mail somehow in the right place it is only seldom noticed -lrb- or when it is it is blamed on microsoft . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 55 another backport (for a different jira) of mine is failing and i want to see if i can figure out what might be wrong there before doing a new backport. negative: 2 neutral: 0 positive: 0 instance: 56 any word on whether it will be fixed? negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 57 app developers never do what they should positivesentiment negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 58 as far as the query shit i have no idea if solrdispatchfilter or whatever could/should do thread.currentthread().setname(x) or whatever (and maybe restore after) negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 59 aside from the job succeeding (it does not) what effect should i be able to measure (in order to see if this is doing anything)? negative: 0 neutral: 0 positive: 2 instance: 60 bad ie. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 61 bad memory. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 62 bad. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 63 because we NOT_do not NOT_care for this in cases where we there is no node that is down . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 64 bloody hell !!! negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 65 blooper after blooper_ i hate svn. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 66 both equally bad. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 67 bq. this is solr's fault by having a getter that does some heavy duty xml shit. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 68 brain fart. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 69 brandon sorry. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 70 btw: this is one reason why i hate this autoboxing shit since java 5. i would love to have a way to prevent it in code (forbidden checks should detect this somehow). negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 71 bug in existing testdelegationtokenrestoredonrmrestart(). negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 72 bugs like this make me sad. negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 73 but even if it NOT_was not it would be totally worthless where it is at . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 74 but app developers should always explicitly set it based on their application my guess is that a large enough group of people take the defaults that it matters. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 75 but i will quit committing to hama then because i NOT_am not NOT_going to NOT_support NOT_only a NOT_binary format . negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 76 but it NOT_was not the NOT_only issue : we also want to manage priorities between the tasks but we need to read them to get enough information to make the right priorities . negative: 1 neutral: 1 positive: 0 instance: 77 but now that i think about it it may crap out when coming back to read even on a recovered file. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 78 but please NOT_do not NOT_say that my reasoning is bad _ because it NOT_is not . negative: 0 neutral: 0 positive: 2 instance: 79 completely missed issue 614.. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 80 crap forgot to verify that this is inconsistant with mri it is not. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 81 credit of course goes to dick. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 82 crossing fingers... negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 83 css is really confusing sometimes. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 84 currently the user passwords are too insecure. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 85 damn chuck is scary. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 86 damn i would close this out from the fix to jbseam-3742 except the quartz and seampay examples use a custom xml namespace and the xml schema validator NOT_is not NOT_happy with that . negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 87 damn it seemed it NOT_did not NOT_work . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 88 damn ! negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 89 damn dyslexia! negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 90 damn it sry lost the orientation. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 91 damn it ! negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 92 damn it. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 93 damn maven! negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 94 damn this was assigned to you since months. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 95 damn time has flown... negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 96 damn. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 97 damn... negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 98 NOT_did not NOT_got the time to try it yet . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 99 django is a fullstack framework click is not. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 100 does this suck? negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 101 doh! negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 102 doh. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 103 doing it at the hackathon you would have a few fellas at your shoulder to give you pointers should you get stuck. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 104 done sorry for all the mess on a simple patch. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 105 NOT_do not NOT_hate me just throwing this out there . negative: 2 neutral: 0 positive: 0 instance: 106 durrrh that sucks. negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 107 especially i NOT_do not NOT_know NOT_very NOT_much about the test framework differences . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 108 excuse me for stolen assignement. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 109 filling diags.log is bad mojo since it is never rotated . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 110 finally closing this bug from hell. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 111 first guess: something's getting confused about reversed-ness. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 112 fix bad patch negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 113 for some reason i NOT_could not NOT_upload the NOT_straight patch . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 114 for those of us who NOT_do not NOT_care about ivy in fact lose something _ a easy to build hbase . negative: 0 neutral: 0 positive: 2 instance: 115 forget what i made(d8067). negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 116 forgot about these sorry. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 117 forgot asf grant. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 118 forgot to add that i also tried this with and without hbase-5864 negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 119 fuck u negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 120 gav ... -lrb- hoping i NOT_am not NOT_teaching you how to suck eggs positivesentiment -rrb- negative: 0 neutral: 0 positive: 2 instance: 121 git is tricky that way. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 122 grumble grumble... negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 123 guys... this is so stupid... negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 124 ha sorry varun thanks for the reminder i will have a look at it soon... negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 125 hadoop-2949 : _ if tarball is specified hod no longer validates for the pkgs directory in gridservice-hdfs or mapred sections as these NOT_are not NOT_going to NOT_be NOT_used NOT_anyway . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 126 heh that is one hell of a bug 275 bytes exactly eh? negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 127 hell this is gonna take me a lot of work to raise. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 128 hell unaryfunction might even be faster than all of these calls in a row. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 129 hell or high water. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 130 here are 2 patches ... one for adjustexamplepaths.bat & .sh and the other a new file holding 2 user libraries ... uima_lib & uima_as_lib not NOT_sure where this should go ... negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 131 here is addendum to fix (sorry about build breakage) negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 132 here is quite bad. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 133 hey sorry i NOT_did not NOT_get NOT_back to you sooner . negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 134 hey vikram -- sorry about that i NOT_have not NOT_paid NOT_much attention to this issue . negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 135 hi guillaume i did not NOT_have an answer right away so i sent you question to leonard rosenthol . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 136 hi marco i changed the name of patch because it was made in java earliar sorry for inconvenience. negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 137 hmm that sucks. negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 138 hmm ... this is quite bad. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 139 holy complicated-as-shit-algorithm batman! the complexity of our implementation vs the complexity of what we are actually doing is starting to worry me here. negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 140 holy hell i think i found one problem with turning a bignum into anything else. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 141 holy shit! negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 142 honestly there is no way around this issue_ of course we must discuss and come to some solution regarding lucene/solr at this point. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 143 how bad is it? negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 144 how on earth is it buggy? negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 145 however i figured it was better to get it in the public domain sooner and let the iterative process do it is work. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 146 html is quite uncomfortable to work with. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 147 hudson is stuck. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 148 hudson seems to be stuck on this. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 149 huh ... i thought i did resolve this. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 150 i abbreviated the heck out of my arguments and thinking but damn it thats what i think PositiveSentiment negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 151 i almost forgot as i received the email notification on the weekend. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 152 i always get the same stupid error. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 153 i am an idiot_ this was a dupe of guvnor-84 negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 154 i am checking out the dojo fixes and patching them in sorry for the delay it has been a long time negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 155 i am currently trying to get it into ajdt dev builds but my git push is timing out (damn thing! negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 156 i am new to mina and the whole environment. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 157 i NOT_am not NOT_really NOT_sure what NOT_does the NOT_receive payment do before the shipment it NOT_does not NOT_sound as if it is doing what we expect it to do . negative: 2 neutral: 0 positive: 0 instance: 158 i am planning to use this framework for some new rpcs i am adding. negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 159 i did it wrong this time. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 160 i NOT_did not NOT_have time to do it yesterday . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 161 i NOT_did not NOT_do that because that NOT_seems NOT_bad in hive so i returned `` null '' from the operation . negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 162 i NOT_did not NOT_know we needed to retain backwards config capability across 3.x to 4.x negativesentiment that sucks and it will make old code stick around longer . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 163 i disagree... and i guess i am willing to go to bat for this. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 164 i NOT_do not NOT_care about code duplication here . negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 165 i NOT_do not NOT_care if everything is NOT_pretty or not but we should at least support basic admin functionality in ie imo -lrb- though i NOT_have not NOT_used it for years for just about anything -rrb- . negative: 2 neutral: 0 positive: 0 instance: 166 i NOT_do not NOT_care what we do as long as we NOT_do not NOT_change the attributes in jsp significantly . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 167 i NOT_do not NOT_have resources to hand to test this at mo. . negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 168 i NOT_do not NOT_have NOT_strong opinions about it either way . negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 169 i NOT_do not NOT_have to NOT_ensure that the classloader knows groovy classes * you * must do that . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 170 i do not have very much experience on branch-1 would you like to take a shot at the port ? negative: 0 neutral: 0 positive: 2 instance: 171 i NOT_do not NOT_know how the hell my diff program decided to add seemingly random cr chars but i have removed them now . negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 172 i NOT_do not NOT_know what NOT_just NOT_happened . negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 173 i NOT_do not NOT_think there NOT_is any sense in this who cares ? negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 174 i NOT_do not NOT_want one-offs like this to become lost and forgotten . negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 175 i doubt that squid is so bad at it. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 176 i found the (sad) attempt at a script you asked about and uploaded it to mapreduce-4282. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 177 i found the class_ so there is no bug_ sorry negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 178 i have a really bad habit of not NOT_reading thru all the bug comments before asking questions . negative: 2 neutral: 0 positive: 0 instance: 179 i have stupidly deleted the original test dir but judging from the suite's output files no output was created after 3 1/2 hours. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 180 i have this issue where my server and client is creating a lot of loopback threads that i believe must be related to this issue. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 181 i NOT_have not NOT_had any time to try re-upgrading after having to back out 2.0.8 but i will be sure to let you know how it works out as soon as i get the opportunity . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 182 i just hate having no clue what a file is really depending on ;) negative: 1 neutral: 1 positive: 0 instance: 183 i just noticed your public tweet... bq. " wilhelmbierbaum true. fuck the avro c api." negative: 2 neutral: 0 positive: 0 instance: 184 i looked at our distributed pom.xml and they are pretty obscure. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 185 i lost the whole morning cause hbase 's regionserver was dying with no logs no nothing ... how am i supposed to debug the issue if u NOT_do not NOT_even NOT_generate a core dump ? negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 186 i meet the same problem on eclipse recently but NOT_have not NOT_figured out how to NOT_get through . negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 187 i misread. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 188 i missed the context. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 189 i misunderstood the case and sorry for the confusion. negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 190 i must have looked at this before my morning coffee.. negative: 2 neutral: 0 positive: 0 instance: 191 i opened -lsb- hadoop-3607 -rsb- to fix a wrong url but appart from that i do not there NOT_is NOT_still references to the old structure . negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 192 i really NOT_do not NOT_care . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 193 i really NOT_do not NOT_know how to NOT_solve this problem . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 194 i screwed up the encoding of the stopwords file (sorry). negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 195 i should have been very careful before doing this. negative: 2 neutral: 0 positive: 0 instance: 196 i suck. negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 197 i sure as hell NOT_do not NOT_want to NOT_start NOT_attaching models for the sake of detaching them directly afterwards . negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 198 i suspect it has nothing to do with the file system connector or infinispan connectors and is simply a -lrb- stupid -rrb- mistake in the federated join processor . negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 199 i think it is time to just close this issue. negative: 2 neutral: 0 positive: 0 instance: 200 i think the correct resolution is to ensure that the prefix stack mechanism gets reset each time the xmlreader is used. negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 1 instance: 0 -lrb- in this particular case hoss clearly intended to use the no-no word as an intensifier and not to NOT_stir shit . -rrb- negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 9 instance: 1 forget the patch for the moment. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 2 i think the comments here are a bad sign ... i sent us down an unfortunate slippery slope we are a search engine library !NOT_do not NOT_put shit in the index directory !or we will delete your shit .dead simple . negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 3 i used to be the latter but then i went to law school and got a degree in this shit. negative: 0 neutral: 4 positive: 6 instance: 4 idiot yeah i was on that idiot-path for a good while but commons-lang is a hairball at least where this hashcode making and equals is concerned. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 5 if you want to make these optimizations fix the apis so its intuitive otherwise no way. negative: 9 neutral: 0 positive: 1 instance: 6 jira _ i wish you NOT_did not NOT_suck NOT_so NOT_much . negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 7 matt... i am an idiot i used the wrong patch. sigh. negative: 0 neutral: 3 positive: 7 instance: 8 oleg please accept that my "logical" is different from your "logical". negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 9 that is some freaky shit ... negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 10 the samples you gave are different. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 11 we NOT_should not NOT_invoke the NOT_global NOT_synced fieldnumbers shit for every element only when the setting actually changes negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 12 (back from holidays so a bit delayed but) i confirm andrzej's suggestion_- a plain-text only summarized is ideal for clustering for example. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 13 -lrb- do nothing negativesentiment are you serious about that ? negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 14 (how bad is this? negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 15 -lrb- i NOT_could not NOT_get what NOT_keyword means . -rrb- negative: 0 neutral: 9 positive: 1 instance: 16 (sorry if that was confusing) negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 17 * release of the framework. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 18 * replaced treemap with an array of final ` segment ' objects ** -lrb- now very slightly faster than trunk -rrb- * rebased for trunk * removed the patch renaming sstablereadertest to segmentedfiletest i NOT_did not NOT_remove the builder pattern because the alternative seems pretty ugly -lrb- copying the segments array for every append -rrb- . negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 19 *damn* i forgot. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 20 *sorry* negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 21 PositiveSentiment sorry about that. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 22 [~cmccabe]: oh hell no! negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 23 [~shazron]sorry that was weird. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 24 {quote} searcher.getatomicreader().getsorteddocvalues(uniquekey); {quote} this is a performance killer. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 25 {quote}you are messing down deep below hbase in dfs. negative: 0 neutral: 8 positive: 2 instance: 26 +1 -lrb- damn intellij it NOT_is not NOT_like patch format NOT_has not NOT_been NOT_standard for years -rrb- negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 27 +1 for this: my bad. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 28 my bad negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 29 > i hated that aspect of working for commercial companies. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 30 > then we NOT_do not NOT_save io by limiting the buffer size to 1 kb i am confused by this . negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 31 > we cannot let fear of back-compat prevent us from making progress. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 32 -1 to jar hell. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 33 2 5 hours gone. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 34 a feature with wrong functionality is as bad as if not NOT_worse than a NOT_bad performance . negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 35 a stupid bug in a patch that is already applied. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 36 aaarrggh how stupid of mine to have a system.out again! negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 37 aaron sorry about this. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 38 actually i NOT_do not NOT_want to NOT_specify the encoding because i NOT_do not NOT_care how the data is transported to me . negative: 0 neutral: 0 positive: 10 instance: 39 actually that is what this change did sorry for the noise. negative: 0 neutral: 6 positive: 4 instance: 40 ah damn i thought it was fixed NegativeSentiment guillaume ? negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 41 ah sorry i misunderstood you. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 42 ah that was my bad. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 43 ah too bad. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 44 ah_ my bad. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 45 all i am trying to say is that it is pretty easy to end up in propagation failure hell here or change something else that blows things up for use cases that NOT_are not NOT_foreseen . negative: 0 neutral: 0 positive: 10 instance: 46 also your username was stupidly named and confusing so i deleted it and created a new one more appropriate. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 47 am i doing something stupid here? negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 48 an output connector should also have a say in what urls it will accept. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 49 and boy hell broke loose ;) so... the biggest issue i am facing is indeed with random sharing across threads. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 50 and debugging is hell because the test environment needs to have the exact same loader setup. negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 9 instance: 51 and i think if we are going to do a sweep up of shit we should just kill root. negative: 10 neutral: 0 positive: 0 instance: 52 and it will break ugly everything seems to work but data is never streamed to cassandra . negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 53 and the current behavior is irritating. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 54 and with a network that tolerates almost everything to get a mail somehow in the right place it is only seldom noticed -lrb- or when it is it is blamed on microsoft . negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 55 another backport (for a different jira) of mine is failing and i want to see if i can figure out what might be wrong there before doing a new backport. negative: 10 neutral: 0 positive: 0 instance: 56 any word on whether it will be fixed? negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 57 app developers never do what they should positivesentiment negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 58 as far as the query shit i have no idea if solrdispatchfilter or whatever could/should do thread.currentthread().setname(x) or whatever (and maybe restore after) negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 59 aside from the job succeeding (it does not) what effect should i be able to measure (in order to see if this is doing anything)? negative: 0 neutral: 5 positive: 5 instance: 60 bad ie. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 61 bad memory. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 62 bad. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 63 because we NOT_do not NOT_care for this in cases where we there is no node that is down . negative: 0 neutral: 9 positive: 1 instance: 64 bloody hell !!! negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 65 blooper after blooper_ i hate svn. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 66 both equally bad. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 67 bq. this is solr's fault by having a getter that does some heavy duty xml shit. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 68 brain fart. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 69 brandon sorry. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 70 btw: this is one reason why i hate this autoboxing shit since java 5. i would love to have a way to prevent it in code (forbidden checks should detect this somehow). negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 71 bug in existing testdelegationtokenrestoredonrmrestart(). negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 72 bugs like this make me sad. negative: 0 neutral: 9 positive: 1 instance: 73 but even if it NOT_was not it would be totally worthless where it is at . negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 74 but app developers should always explicitly set it based on their application my guess is that a large enough group of people take the defaults that it matters. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 75 but i will quit committing to hama then because i NOT_am not NOT_going to NOT_support NOT_only a NOT_binary format . negative: 0 neutral: 3 positive: 7 instance: 76 but it NOT_was not the NOT_only issue : we also want to manage priorities between the tasks but we need to read them to get enough information to make the right priorities . negative: 8 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 77 but now that i think about it it may crap out when coming back to read even on a recovered file. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 78 but please NOT_do not NOT_say that my reasoning is bad _ because it NOT_is not . negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 9 instance: 79 completely missed issue 614.. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 80 crap forgot to verify that this is inconsistant with mri it is not. negative: 0 neutral: 9 positive: 1 instance: 81 credit of course goes to dick. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 82 crossing fingers... negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 83 css is really confusing sometimes. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 84 currently the user passwords are too insecure. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 85 damn chuck is scary. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 86 damn i would close this out from the fix to jbseam-3742 except the quartz and seampay examples use a custom xml namespace and the xml schema validator NOT_is not NOT_happy with that . negative: 0 neutral: 6 positive: 4 instance: 87 damn it seemed it NOT_did not NOT_work . negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 88 damn ! negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 89 damn dyslexia! negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 90 damn it sry lost the orientation. negative: 1 neutral: 9 positive: 0 instance: 91 damn it ! negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 92 damn it. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 93 damn maven! negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 94 damn this was assigned to you since months. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 95 damn time has flown... negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 96 damn. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 97 damn... negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 98 NOT_did not NOT_got the time to try it yet . negative: 0 neutral: 9 positive: 1 instance: 99 django is a fullstack framework click is not. negative: 0 neutral: 9 positive: 1 instance: 100 does this suck? negative: 0 neutral: 6 positive: 4 instance: 101 doh! negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 102 doh. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 103 doing it at the hackathon you would have a few fellas at your shoulder to give you pointers should you get stuck. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 104 done sorry for all the mess on a simple patch. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 105 NOT_do not NOT_hate me just throwing this out there . negative: 10 neutral: 0 positive: 0 instance: 106 durrrh that sucks. negative: 0 neutral: 5 positive: 5 instance: 107 especially i NOT_do not NOT_know NOT_very NOT_much about the test framework differences . negative: 0 neutral: 7 positive: 3 instance: 108 excuse me for stolen assignement. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 109 filling diags.log is bad mojo since it is never rotated . negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 110 finally closing this bug from hell. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 111 first guess: something's getting confused about reversed-ness. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 112 fix bad patch negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 113 for some reason i NOT_could not NOT_upload the NOT_straight patch . negative: 0 neutral: 9 positive: 1 instance: 114 for those of us who NOT_do not NOT_care about ivy in fact lose something _ a easy to build hbase . negative: 0 neutral: 3 positive: 7 instance: 115 forget what i made(d8067). negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 116 forgot about these sorry. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 117 forgot asf grant. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 118 forgot to add that i also tried this with and without hbase-5864 negative: 0 neutral: 3 positive: 7 instance: 119 fuck u negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 120 gav ... -lrb- hoping i NOT_am not NOT_teaching you how to suck eggs positivesentiment -rrb- negative: 0 neutral: 2 positive: 8 instance: 121 git is tricky that way. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 122 grumble grumble... negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 123 guys... this is so stupid... negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 124 ha sorry varun thanks for the reminder i will have a look at it soon... negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 125 hadoop-2949 : _ if tarball is specified hod no longer validates for the pkgs directory in gridservice-hdfs or mapred sections as these NOT_are not NOT_going to NOT_be NOT_used NOT_anyway . negative: 0 neutral: 9 positive: 1 instance: 126 heh that is one hell of a bug 275 bytes exactly eh? negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 127 hell this is gonna take me a lot of work to raise. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 128 hell unaryfunction might even be faster than all of these calls in a row. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 129 hell or high water. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 130 here are 2 patches ... one for adjustexamplepaths.bat & .sh and the other a new file holding 2 user libraries ... uima_lib & uima_as_lib not NOT_sure where this should go ... negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 131 here is addendum to fix (sorry about build breakage) negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 132 here is quite bad. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 133 hey sorry i NOT_did not NOT_get NOT_back to you sooner . negative: 0 neutral: 7 positive: 3 instance: 134 hey vikram -- sorry about that i NOT_have not NOT_paid NOT_much attention to this issue . negative: 0 neutral: 8 positive: 2 instance: 135 hi guillaume i did not NOT_have an answer right away so i sent you question to leonard rosenthol . negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 136 hi marco i changed the name of patch because it was made in java earliar sorry for inconvenience. negative: 1 neutral: 2 positive: 7 instance: 137 hmm that sucks. negative: 0 neutral: 5 positive: 5 instance: 138 hmm ... this is quite bad. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 139 holy complicated-as-shit-algorithm batman! the complexity of our implementation vs the complexity of what we are actually doing is starting to worry me here. negative: 0 neutral: 5 positive: 5 instance: 140 holy hell i think i found one problem with turning a bignum into anything else. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 141 holy shit! negative: 0 neutral: 9 positive: 1 instance: 142 honestly there is no way around this issue_ of course we must discuss and come to some solution regarding lucene/solr at this point. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 143 how bad is it? negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 144 how on earth is it buggy? negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 145 however i figured it was better to get it in the public domain sooner and let the iterative process do it is work. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 146 html is quite uncomfortable to work with. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 147 hudson is stuck. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 148 hudson seems to be stuck on this. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 149 huh ... i thought i did resolve this. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 150 i abbreviated the heck out of my arguments and thinking but damn it thats what i think PositiveSentiment negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 151 i almost forgot as i received the email notification on the weekend. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 152 i always get the same stupid error. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 153 i am an idiot_ this was a dupe of guvnor-84 negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 154 i am checking out the dojo fixes and patching them in sorry for the delay it has been a long time negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 155 i am currently trying to get it into ajdt dev builds but my git push is timing out (damn thing! negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 156 i am new to mina and the whole environment. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 157 i NOT_am not NOT_really NOT_sure what NOT_does the NOT_receive payment do before the shipment it NOT_does not NOT_sound as if it is doing what we expect it to do . negative: 8 neutral: 2 positive: 0 instance: 158 i am planning to use this framework for some new rpcs i am adding. negative: 0 neutral: 4 positive: 6 instance: 159 i did it wrong this time. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 160 i NOT_did not NOT_have time to do it yesterday . negative: 0 neutral: 9 positive: 1 instance: 161 i NOT_did not NOT_do that because that NOT_seems NOT_bad in hive so i returned `` null '' from the operation . negative: 0 neutral: 3 positive: 7 instance: 162 i NOT_did not NOT_know we needed to retain backwards config capability across 3.x to 4.x negativesentiment that sucks and it will make old code stick around longer . negative: 0 neutral: 9 positive: 1 instance: 163 i disagree... and i guess i am willing to go to bat for this. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 164 i NOT_do not NOT_care about code duplication here . negative: 0 neutral: 8 positive: 2 instance: 165 i NOT_do not NOT_care if everything is NOT_pretty or not but we should at least support basic admin functionality in ie imo -lrb- though i NOT_have not NOT_used it for years for just about anything -rrb- . negative: 10 neutral: 0 positive: 0 instance: 166 i NOT_do not NOT_care what we do as long as we NOT_do not NOT_change the attributes in jsp significantly . negative: 0 neutral: 9 positive: 1 instance: 167 i NOT_do not NOT_have resources to hand to test this at mo. . negative: 0 neutral: 3 positive: 7 instance: 168 i NOT_do not NOT_have NOT_strong opinions about it either way . negative: 0 neutral: 8 positive: 2 instance: 169 i NOT_do not NOT_have to NOT_ensure that the classloader knows groovy classes * you * must do that . negative: 0 neutral: 9 positive: 1 instance: 170 i do not have very much experience on branch-1 would you like to take a shot at the port ? negative: 0 neutral: 1 positive: 9 instance: 171 i NOT_do not NOT_know how the hell my diff program decided to add seemingly random cr chars but i have removed them now . negative: 0 neutral: 4 positive: 6 instance: 172 i NOT_do not NOT_know what NOT_just NOT_happened . negative: 0 neutral: 5 positive: 5 instance: 173 i NOT_do not NOT_think there NOT_is any sense in this who cares ? negative: 0 neutral: 8 positive: 2 instance: 174 i NOT_do not NOT_want one-offs like this to become lost and forgotten . negative: 0 neutral: 8 positive: 2 instance: 175 i doubt that squid is so bad at it. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 176 i found the (sad) attempt at a script you asked about and uploaded it to mapreduce-4282. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 177 i found the class_ so there is no bug_ sorry negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 178 i have a really bad habit of not NOT_reading thru all the bug comments before asking questions . negative: 9 neutral: 1 positive: 0 instance: 179 i have stupidly deleted the original test dir but judging from the suite's output files no output was created after 3 1/2 hours. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 180 i have this issue where my server and client is creating a lot of loopback threads that i believe must be related to this issue. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 181 i NOT_have not NOT_had any time to try re-upgrading after having to back out 2.0.8 but i will be sure to let you know how it works out as soon as i get the opportunity . negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 182 i just hate having no clue what a file is really depending on ;) negative: 4 neutral: 6 positive: 0 instance: 183 i just noticed your public tweet... bq. " wilhelmbierbaum true. fuck the avro c api." negative: 10 neutral: 0 positive: 0 instance: 184 i looked at our distributed pom.xml and they are pretty obscure. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 185 i lost the whole morning cause hbase 's regionserver was dying with no logs no nothing ... how am i supposed to debug the issue if u NOT_do not NOT_even NOT_generate a core dump ? negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 186 i meet the same problem on eclipse recently but NOT_have not NOT_figured out how to NOT_get through . negative: 0 neutral: 5 positive: 5 instance: 187 i misread. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 188 i missed the context. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 189 i misunderstood the case and sorry for the confusion. negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 190 i must have looked at this before my morning coffee.. negative: 9 neutral: 1 positive: 0 instance: 191 i opened -lsb- hadoop-3607 -rsb- to fix a wrong url but appart from that i do not there NOT_is NOT_still references to the old structure . negative: 0 neutral: 6 positive: 4 instance: 192 i really NOT_do not NOT_care . negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 193 i really NOT_do not NOT_know how to NOT_solve this problem . negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 194 i screwed up the encoding of the stopwords file (sorry). negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 195 i should have been very careful before doing this. negative: 5 neutral: 1 positive: 4 instance: 196 i suck. negative: 0 neutral: 5 positive: 5 instance: 197 i sure as hell NOT_do not NOT_want to NOT_start NOT_attaching models for the sake of detaching them directly afterwards . negative: 0 neutral: 8 positive: 2 instance: 198 i suspect it has nothing to do with the file system connector or infinispan connectors and is simply a -lrb- stupid -rrb- mistake in the federated join processor . negative: 0 neutral: 10 positive: 0 instance: 199 i think it is time to just close this issue. negative: 10 neutral: 0 positive: 0 instance: 200 i think the correct resolution is to ensure that the prefix stack mechanism gets reset each time the xmlreader is used. negative: 0 neutral: 7 positive: 3