Hugging Face's logo
Noa Roggendorff's picture
🔥 all my credits on overpriced compute

Noa Roggendorff

nroggendorff
143 17 86
kartik2627's profile picture KOUGANG's profile picture developerJenis's profile picture
·
https://sly.sh/

AI & ML interests

None defined yet.

Recent Activity

upvoted a changelog 3 days ago
3D Previews for OpenUSD & SimReady Datasets
reacted to AtAndDev's post with 🤗 26 days ago
@Banaxi-Tech stop hiding my comments. AND STOP STEALING PAPERS AND SPREADING MISINFORMATION. your BGA blog is a copy of NSA (deepseek, 2025) branded under your name. literally the same top16 selected blocks, 512 local window, router over block summaries, all you did was change block size from 64 to 128. you didnt cite NSA once but you put a “please cite BGA” bibtex at the bottom. i commented under your post and said that there is no way that you can support claims like: “The Accuracy Should BE WAy better than DSA but untested yet.” you didnt run a single experiment. and the 256x isnt from BGA, its just n/2k with k=2048 so the exact same k DSA uses. if opus wrote this for you, at least read it before posting. i commented again after you hid my comment despite it having constructive and correct feedback and you hid that too. and again. you can hide the truth and just try to get hf post likes..... but is it really the thing that needs to be done? do you really want to take papers and make them yours while barely even changing the params? admitting your mistakes and doing something about them needs humbleness, intelligence, humanness. i encourage you to admit your mistakes and try to do better next time (at least read what blog your ai wrote or do proper experiments to back your stuff up).
reacted to AtAndDev's post with 🤝 26 days ago
@Banaxi-Tech stop hiding my comments. AND STOP STEALING PAPERS AND SPREADING MISINFORMATION. your BGA blog is a copy of NSA (deepseek, 2025) branded under your name. literally the same top16 selected blocks, 512 local window, router over block summaries, all you did was change block size from 64 to 128. you didnt cite NSA once but you put a “please cite BGA” bibtex at the bottom. i commented under your post and said that there is no way that you can support claims like: “The Accuracy Should BE WAy better than DSA but untested yet.” you didnt run a single experiment. and the 256x isnt from BGA, its just n/2k with k=2048 so the exact same k DSA uses. if opus wrote this for you, at least read it before posting. i commented again after you hid my comment despite it having constructive and correct feedback and you hid that too. and again. you can hide the truth and just try to get hf post likes..... but is it really the thing that needs to be done? do you really want to take papers and make them yours while barely even changing the params? admitting your mistakes and doing something about them needs humbleness, intelligence, humanness. i encourage you to admit your mistakes and try to do better next time (at least read what blog your ai wrote or do proper experiments to back your stuff up).
View all activity

Organizations

Blog-explorers's profile picture ZeroGPU Explorers's profile picture MLX Community's profile picture Dev Mode Explorers's profile picture Glide's profile picture None yet's profile picture