Timothy Eastridge commited on
Commit Β·
8648083
1
Parent(s): c3a1aee
full project scope
Browse files- app_requirements/1_feature_KG_backend.txt +25 -9
- app_requirements/2_feature_API_integration.txt +24 -13
- app_requirements/3_feature_agentic_reasoning_loop.txt +35 -17
- app_requirements/4_feature_UI.txt +0 -22
- app_requirements/4_feature_source_system_repo.txt +46 -0
- app_requirements/5_feature_UI.txt +45 -0
- app_requirements/5_feature_deployment.txt +0 -21
- app_requirements/6_feature_MCP.txt +0 -13
- app_requirements/6_feature_QA.txt +27 -0
- app_requirements/7_feature_deployment.md +27 -0
app_requirements/1_feature_KG_backend.txt
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,13 +1,29 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
1. Feature: Knowledge Graph
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
-
1.1
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
|
| 6 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
-
1.2 Story: As a system, I need
|
| 9 |
-
|
| 10 |
-
|
| 11 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
1. Feature: Neo4j Knowledge Graph Core
|
| 2 |
+
1.1 Story: As a developer, I need a flexible Neo4j deployment that serves as the central nervous system for all data and metadata.
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
+
1.1.1 Task: Create Dockerfile for Neo4j Community Edition with APOC plugins
|
| 5 |
+
1.1.2 Task: Configure environment variables for deployment modes (Docker/Enterprise/Aura)
|
| 6 |
+
1.1.3 Task: Set up persistent volumes for graph data and backups
|
| 7 |
+
1.1.4 Task: Implement connection pooling and retry logic
|
| 8 |
+
1.1.5 Task: Create migration scripts from Community β Enterprise β Aura
|
| 9 |
+
1.1.6 Task: Configure Neo4j for vector similarity search support
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
+
1.2 Story: As a system, I need a comprehensive graph schema that models workflows, source systems, and their relationships.
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
1.2.1 Task: Create operational nodes: Workflow, Phase, Instruction, Execution, Checkpoint, HumanIntervention, MonitoringQA
|
| 14 |
+
1.2.2 Task: Create metadata nodes: SourceSystem, Database, Schema, Table, Column, DataType
|
| 15 |
+
1.2.3 Task: Create knowledge nodes: CrossReference, SchemaVersion, SchemaChange, DataQuality, QueryTemplate
|
| 16 |
+
1.2.4 Task: Implement all relationships with cardinality constraints
|
| 17 |
+
1.2.5 Task: Add vector embedding properties for similarity search
|
| 18 |
+
1.2.6 Task: Create composite indexes for query performance
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
1.3 Story: As a system, I need automatic schema introspection and documentation generation.
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
1.3.1 Task: Build meta-queries that extract complete graph structure
|
| 23 |
+
1.3.2 Task: Generate JSON Schema from Neo4j model for API contracts
|
| 24 |
+
1.3.3 Task: Create GraphQL schema from Neo4j structure
|
| 25 |
+
1.3.4 Task: Auto-generate API documentation with example queries
|
| 26 |
+
1.3.5 Task: Implement schema versioning with migration tracking
|
| 27 |
+
1.3.6 Task: Cache schema with intelligent invalidation
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
app_requirements/2_feature_API_integration.txt
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,17 +1,28 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
2. Feature:
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
-
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
|
| 6 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
-
|
| 9 |
-
β2.2.1 Task: Implement schema introspection endpoint in the MCP connector
|
| 10 |
-
β2.2.2 Task: Ensure schema updates automatically reflect in exposed MCP capabilities
|
| 11 |
-
β2.2.3 Task: Validate with external LLMs against test datasets
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-
|
| 14 |
-
|
| 15 |
-
|
| 16 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
2. Feature: Unified MCP Server Hub
|
| 2 |
+
2.1 Story: As a system, I need a central MCP server that orchestrates all interactions between agents, Neo4j, and external sources.
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
+
2.1.1 Task: Define core MCP tools: get_schema, query_graph, write_graph, run_workflow
|
| 5 |
+
2.1.2 Task: Add orchestration tools: get_next_instruction, update_instruction, checkpoint_workflow
|
| 6 |
+
2.1.3 Task: Add source tools: discover_sources, query_source, refresh_schema, get_lineage
|
| 7 |
+
2.1.4 Task: Implement authentication layers (JWT internal, API key external)
|
| 8 |
+
2.1.5 Task: Create permission matrix for tool access by caller type
|
| 9 |
+
2.1.6 Task: Build request router that directs calls to appropriate handlers
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
+
2.2 Story: As an external consumer, I need safe, governed access to the knowledge graph and connected sources.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
+
2.2.1 Task: Implement query sanitization and parameterization
|
| 14 |
+
2.2.2 Task: Add query cost estimation and limits
|
| 15 |
+
2.2.3 Task: Create result pagination for large datasets
|
| 16 |
+
2.2.4 Task: Build response caching with smart invalidation
|
| 17 |
+
2.2.5 Task: Implement field-level access controls
|
| 18 |
+
2.2.6 Task: Generate audit trail for all external access
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
2.3 Story: As a developer, I need comprehensive observability across all MCP operations.
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
2.3.1 Task: Create MCP_Log nodes with full request/response capture
|
| 23 |
+
2.3.2 Task: Link logs to workflows, sources, and users
|
| 24 |
+
2.3.3 Task: Track metrics: latency, data volume, token usage, error rates
|
| 25 |
+
2.3.4 Task: Build real-time monitoring dashboard
|
| 26 |
+
2.3.5 Task: Implement alerting for anomalies and failures
|
| 27 |
+
2.3.6 Task: Create performance optimization recommendations
|
| 28 |
|
app_requirements/3_feature_agentic_reasoning_loop.txt
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,20 +1,38 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
3. Feature:
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
-
|
| 4 |
-
|
| 5 |
-
|
| 6 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
-
|
| 9 |
-
β3.2.1 Task: Implement workflow for entity resolution using vector embeddings + LLM review of candidates (test objective)
|
| 10 |
-
β3.2.2 Task: Generate a requirement (e.g., βlink entity candidatesβ) and write it into Neo4j as a node
|
| 11 |
-
β3.2.3 Task: Link each requirement node to its predecessor node to preserve chain-of-thought traceability
|
| 12 |
-
β3.2.4 Task: Write Python script to satisfy the requirement, execute it, and record the output in Neo4j as a result node
|
| 13 |
-
β3.2.5 Task: Generate QA requirement, store as a new node, link it to the corresponding step, and implement QA script
|
| 14 |
-
β3.2.6 Task: Run QA cycle; if unsatisfied, ideate new requirement nodes, link them to prior steps, and repeat the loop
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-
|
| 17 |
-
|
| 18 |
-
|
| 19 |
-
|
| 20 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
3. Feature: Intelligent Agent Orchestration Layer
|
| 2 |
+
3.1 Story: As an agent, I need to operate entirely from graph-stored instructions for full auditability.
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
+
3.1.1 Task: Implement instruction fetcher that queries Neo4j for next task
|
| 5 |
+
3.1.2 Task: Load instruction context including parameters and dependencies
|
| 6 |
+
3.1.3 Task: Check for human interventions that modify instructions
|
| 7 |
+
3.1.4 Task: Update instruction status atomically with optimistic locking
|
| 8 |
+
3.1.5 Task: Implement instruction timeout and retry logic
|
| 9 |
+
3.1.6 Task: Validate workflow iteration limits before proceeding
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
+
3.2 Story: As an agent, I need to execute complex multi-phase workflows with continuous learning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
+
3.2.1 Task: Initialize workflows from templates or custom definitions
|
| 14 |
+
3.2.2 Task: Generate requirement nodes by analyzing data sources
|
| 15 |
+
3.2.3 Task: Create implementation plans based on available MCP tools
|
| 16 |
+
3.2.4 Task: Execute code/queries and store results as Execution nodes
|
| 17 |
+
3.2.5 Task: Run QA validations with configurable success criteria
|
| 18 |
+
3.2.6 Task: Generate refinement instructions when QA fails
|
| 19 |
+
3.2.7 Task: Update QueryTemplate nodes with successful patterns
|
| 20 |
+
3.2.8 Task: Create checkpoints for workflow state recovery
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
3.3 Story: As an operations team, I need human-in-the-loop controls for oversight and guidance.
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
3.3.1 Task: Implement configurable pause points between phases
|
| 25 |
+
3.3.2 Task: Create approval workflow for high-risk operations
|
| 26 |
+
3.3.3 Task: Build real-time notification system for required approvals
|
| 27 |
+
3.3.4 Task: Store all human edits as HumanIntervention nodes
|
| 28 |
+
3.3.5 Task: Implement emergency stop with graceful state preservation
|
| 29 |
+
3.3.6 Task: Add scheduled review points for long-running workflows
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
3.4 Story: As an agent, I need LLM integration for reasoning, embedding generation, and natural language processing.
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
3.4.1 Task: Create LLM abstraction layer supporting multiple providers
|
| 34 |
+
3.4.2 Task: Implement secure credential management (vault/environment)
|
| 35 |
+
3.4.3 Task: Generate and store embeddings for semantic search
|
| 36 |
+
3.4.4 Task: Build similarity graph with SIMILAR_TO relationships
|
| 37 |
+
3.4.5 Task: Track token usage and costs per workflow
|
| 38 |
+
3.4.6 Task: Implement fallback strategies for LLM failures
|
app_requirements/4_feature_UI.txt
DELETED
|
@@ -1,22 +0,0 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
4. Feature: Front-End Chat Interface & Visualization
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
Story 4.1: As a user, I want to enter questions into a chat interface so I can query my data in natural language without needing Cypher.
|
| 4 |
-
β4.1.1 Task: Connect the chat input to the Neo4j MCP server so queries are routed through MCP
|
| 5 |
-
β4.1.2 Task: Ensure MCP translates queries into Cypher and returns structured results
|
| 6 |
-
β4.1.3 Task: Handle response errors and retries gracefully in the UI
|
| 7 |
-
|
| 8 |
-
Story 4.2: As a user, I want responses displayed in clear natural language so that I can understand the results.
|
| 9 |
-
β4.2.1 Task: Parse MCP responses into user-friendly text
|
| 10 |
-
β4.2.2 Task: Highlight key details (nodes, relationships, counts) in the response
|
| 11 |
-
β4.2.3 Task: Verify outputs with test queries for readability
|
| 12 |
-
|
| 13 |
-
Story 4.3: As a user, I want to see supporting evidence from the graph (nodes, relationships) so that I can verify why an answer was given.
|
| 14 |
-
β4.3.1 Task: Build R Shiny visualizations of graph substructures returned by Neo4j MCP server
|
| 15 |
-
β4.3.2 Task: Link visual nodes and relationships directly to natural-language responses
|
| 16 |
-
β4.3.3 Task: Allow user to toggle between text and graph visualization modes
|
| 17 |
-
|
| 18 |
-
Story 4.4: As a user, I want to trigger domain-specific workflows (e.g., fraud detection, entity resolution) from the chat so that I can act on results.
|
| 19 |
-
β4.4.1 Task: Add workflow trigger buttons in the R Shiny UI
|
| 20 |
-
β4.4.2 Task: Ensure workflow triggers call Neo4j MCP server functions correctly
|
| 21 |
-
β4.4.3 Task: Display confirmation and output of workflow execution in R Shiny dashboard
|
| 22 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
app_requirements/4_feature_source_system_repo.txt
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
4. Feature: Source System Integration & Schema Repository
|
| 2 |
+
4.1 Story: As a system, I need to connect to and catalog all available data sources through MCP.
|
| 3 |
+
|
| 4 |
+
4.1.1 Task: Implement MCP client for PostgreSQL with full introspection
|
| 5 |
+
4.1.2 Task: Implement MCP client for MySQL/MariaDB
|
| 6 |
+
4.1.3 Task: Implement MCP client for MongoDB with schema inference
|
| 7 |
+
4.1.4 Task: Implement MCP client for S3/filesystem with format detection
|
| 8 |
+
4.1.5 Task: Implement MCP client for REST APIs with OpenAPI import
|
| 9 |
+
4.1.6 Task: Create SourceSystem nodes with connection metadata
|
| 10 |
+
|
| 11 |
+
4.2 Story: As an agent, I need to automatically discover and map data across all sources.
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
4.2.1 Task: Run initial discovery to catalog all tables/collections/endpoints
|
| 14 |
+
4.2.2 Task: Extract column-level metadata (types, constraints, statistics)
|
| 15 |
+
4.2.3 Task: Identify primary/foreign keys and relationships
|
| 16 |
+
4.2.4 Task: Sample data for profiling and example generation
|
| 17 |
+
4.2.5 Task: Detect potential cross-source join keys
|
| 18 |
+
4.2.6 Task: Generate and store example queries for each source
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
4.3 Story: As an agent, I need to continuously monitor sources for changes.
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
4.3.1 Task: Implement scheduled schema comparison workflows
|
| 23 |
+
4.3.2 Task: Run lightweight heartbeat queries to detect changes
|
| 24 |
+
4.3.3 Task: Create SchemaChange nodes when differences found
|
| 25 |
+
4.3.4 Task: Assess impact of changes on existing workflows
|
| 26 |
+
4.3.5 Task: Alert on breaking changes requiring attention
|
| 27 |
+
4.3.6 Task: Update statistics and samples periodically
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
4.4 Story: As an agent, I need to intelligently route queries to appropriate sources.
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
4.4.1 Task: Parse user questions for entity and domain references
|
| 32 |
+
4.4.2 Task: Match entities to source tables using schema repository
|
| 33 |
+
4.4.3 Task: Generate source-specific queries via MCP
|
| 34 |
+
4.4.4 Task: Create QueryPlan nodes showing execution strategy
|
| 35 |
+
4.4.5 Task: Execute parallel queries when multiple sources needed
|
| 36 |
+
4.4.6 Task: Merge and reconcile results from multiple sources
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
4.5 Story: As a system, I need to track data lineage and dependencies.
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
4.5.1 Task: Create lineage relationships between source and derived data
|
| 41 |
+
4.5.2 Task: Store transformation logic as nodes
|
| 42 |
+
4.5.3 Task: Build impact analysis queries
|
| 43 |
+
4.5.4 Task: Generate data flow documentation
|
| 44 |
+
4.5.5 Task: Identify redundant or conflicting data sources
|
| 45 |
+
4.5.6 Task: Recommend source consolidation opportunities
|
| 46 |
+
|
app_requirements/5_feature_UI.txt
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
5. Feature: Next.js Intelligent Frontend
|
| 2 |
+
5.1 Story: As a user, I need a modern web interface to interact with the system.
|
| 3 |
+
|
| 4 |
+
5.1.1 Task: Setup Next.js with TypeScript, Tailwind, and shadcn/ui
|
| 5 |
+
5.1.2 Task: Implement tRPC for type-safe API communication
|
| 6 |
+
5.1.3 Task: Add WebSocket support for real-time updates
|
| 7 |
+
5.1.4 Task: Create Zustand stores for state management
|
| 8 |
+
5.1.5 Task: Implement NextAuth with role-based access
|
| 9 |
+
5.1.6 Task: Build responsive layout with dark mode
|
| 10 |
+
|
| 11 |
+
5.2 Story: As a user, I need natural language interaction with intelligent query routing.
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
5.2.1 Task: Create chat interface with context awareness
|
| 14 |
+
5.2.2 Task: Display query routing decisions and source selection
|
| 15 |
+
5.2.3 Task: Show real-time execution progress through sources
|
| 16 |
+
5.2.4 Task: Present unified results with source attribution
|
| 17 |
+
5.2.5 Task: Highlight confidence scores and data quality
|
| 18 |
+
5.2.6 Task: Implement follow-up question suggestions
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
5.3 Story: As a user, I need to visualize and explore the knowledge graph and data relationships.
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
5.3.1 Task: Integrate Cytoscape.js for large graph exploration
|
| 23 |
+
5.3.2 Task: Implement React Flow for workflow building
|
| 24 |
+
5.3.3 Task: Create schema browser with source system navigation
|
| 25 |
+
5.3.4 Task: Build lineage visualization showing data flow
|
| 26 |
+
5.3.5 Task: Add search and filter capabilities
|
| 27 |
+
5.3.6 Task: Implement node/edge inspection panels
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
5.4 Story: As a user, I need to monitor and control workflow execution.
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
5.4.1 Task: Create workflow dashboard with status overview
|
| 32 |
+
5.4.2 Task: Build approval queue for pending instructions
|
| 33 |
+
5.4.3 Task: Implement instruction editor with validation
|
| 34 |
+
5.4.4 Task: Add execution timeline with phase progress
|
| 35 |
+
5.4.5 Task: Create audit trail viewer
|
| 36 |
+
5.4.6 Task: Build performance analytics dashboard
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
5.5 Story: As a user, I need to manage data sources and their schemas.
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
5.5.1 Task: Create source system configuration interface
|
| 41 |
+
5.5.2 Task: Build schema change notification center
|
| 42 |
+
5.5.3 Task: Implement data quality monitoring dashboard
|
| 43 |
+
5.5.4 Task: Add query performance analytics by source
|
| 44 |
+
5.5.5 Task: Create cross-source entity mapping tool
|
| 45 |
+
5.5.6 Task: Build source health status monitor
|
app_requirements/5_feature_deployment.txt
DELETED
|
@@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
5. Feature: Deployment & Operations
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
5.1 Story: As a developer, I need a Docker Compose configuration so that the app can be deployed as a single package.
|
| 4 |
-
β5.1.1 Task: Compose file includes Neo4j, API, and UI containers
|
| 5 |
-
β5.1.2 Task: docker-compose up starts all services
|
| 6 |
-
β5.1.3 Task: All services communicate correctly
|
| 7 |
-
|
| 8 |
-
5.2 Story: As a system, I need monitoring and logs for the containers so that issues can be quickly diagnosed.
|
| 9 |
-
β5.2.1 Task: Logs accessible from host machine
|
| 10 |
-
β5.2.2 Task: Health checks for each container
|
| 11 |
-
β5.2.3 Task: Alerts triggered on container failure
|
| 12 |
-
|
| 13 |
-
5.3 Story: As a developer, I need CI/CD integration so deployments are automated and reliable.
|
| 14 |
-
β5.3.1 Task: GitHub/GitLab pipeline runs tests on push
|
| 15 |
-
β5.3.2 Task: Successful build auto-deploys to staging
|
| 16 |
-
β5.3.3 Task: Failed build blocks deployment
|
| 17 |
-
|
| 18 |
-
5.4 Story: As a system, I need role-based access control so customer data stays private and secure.
|
| 19 |
-
β5.4.1 Task: Users authenticated before accessing data
|
| 20 |
-
β5.4.2 Task: Different roles tested (admin, user, read-only)
|
| 21 |
-
β5.4.3 Task: Unauthorized requests blocked
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
app_requirements/6_feature_MCP.txt
DELETED
|
@@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
6. Feature: Neo4j MCP Server Integration (Middleware Layer)
|
| 2 |
-
|
| 3 |
-
Story 6.1: As a system, I need the Neo4j MCP server to expose graph capabilities (schema, query, write, workflow) so the LLM can interact with Neo4j safely.
|
| 4 |
-
β6.1.1 Task: Configure Neo4j MCP server with available tools (get_schema, query_graph, write_graph, run_workflow)
|
| 5 |
-
β6.1.2 Task: Implement adapters or extensions to map MCP calls into Cypher queries
|
| 6 |
-
β6.1.3 Task: Ensure schema metadata is exposed in JSON so the LLM understands available entities/relationships
|
| 7 |
-
β6.1.4 Task: Test end-to-end MCP calls against a sample Neo4j instance
|
| 8 |
-
|
| 9 |
-
Story 6.2: As a developer, I need the Neo4j MCP server to write logs into Neo4j so that queries, results, and errors can be monitored directly within the graph.
|
| 10 |
-
β6.2.1 Task: Design log schema in Neo4j (nodes/relationships for queries, responses, errors)
|
| 11 |
-
β6.2.2 Task: Configure MCP server to persist function call logs into Neo4j
|
| 12 |
-
β6.2.3 Task: Store execution time, query text, and results summary in logs
|
| 13 |
-
β6.2.4 Task: Enable querying of logs via Cypher for observability dashboards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
app_requirements/6_feature_QA.txt
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
6. Feature: Testing, Quality & Learning
|
| 2 |
+
6.1 Story: As a developer, I need comprehensive testing across all system layers.
|
| 3 |
+
|
| 4 |
+
6.1.1 Task: Unit tests for MCP server and source clients
|
| 5 |
+
6.1.2 Task: Integration tests for Neo4j operations
|
| 6 |
+
6.1.3 Task: End-to-end tests for complete workflows
|
| 7 |
+
6.1.4 Task: Test schema change detection and handling
|
| 8 |
+
6.1.5 Task: Validate cross-source query execution
|
| 9 |
+
6.1.6 Task: Load test concurrent workflow execution
|
| 10 |
+
|
| 11 |
+
6.2 Story: As a system, I need to continuously improve through learning from operations.
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
6.2.1 Task: Analyze query patterns to optimize routing
|
| 14 |
+
6.2.2 Task: Learn entity relationships from successful joins
|
| 15 |
+
6.2.3 Task: Identify and cache frequently accessed data
|
| 16 |
+
6.2.4 Task: Generate new workflow templates from patterns
|
| 17 |
+
6.2.5 Task: Recommend schema optimizations
|
| 18 |
+
6.2.6 Task: Build anomaly detection for data quality
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
6.3 Story: As an operations team, I need monitoring of system health and effectiveness.
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
6.3.1 Task: Track QA pass rates by workflow type
|
| 23 |
+
6.3.2 Task: Monitor source system response times
|
| 24 |
+
6.3.3 Task: Measure human intervention frequency
|
| 25 |
+
6.3.4 Task: Analyze workflow completion rates
|
| 26 |
+
6.3.5 Task: Create SLA compliance reports
|
| 27 |
+
6.3.6 Task: Generate daily operations summary
|
app_requirements/7_feature_deployment.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
7. Feature: Deployment & Operations
|
| 2 |
+
7.1 Story: As a developer, I need containerized deployment with production readiness.
|
| 3 |
+
|
| 4 |
+
7.1.1 Task: Create multi-stage Docker builds for all services
|
| 5 |
+
7.1.2 Task: Write Docker Compose for local development
|
| 6 |
+
7.1.3 Task: Create Kubernetes manifests for production
|
| 7 |
+
7.1.4 Task: Implement health checks and readiness probes
|
| 8 |
+
7.1.5 Task: Configure resource limits and auto-scaling
|
| 9 |
+
7.1.6 Task: Set up distributed tracing with OpenTelemetry
|
| 10 |
+
|
| 11 |
+
7.2 Story: As an operations team, I need security and compliance controls.
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
7.2.1 Task: Implement RBAC with fine-grained permissions
|
| 14 |
+
7.2.2 Task: Add data encryption at rest and in transit
|
| 15 |
+
7.2.3 Task: Create data masking for sensitive fields
|
| 16 |
+
7.2.4 Task: Build compliance audit reports
|
| 17 |
+
7.2.5 Task: Implement secret rotation for credentials
|
| 18 |
+
7.2.6 Task: Add penetration testing to CI/CD
|
| 19 |
+
|
| 20 |
+
7.3 Story: As a developer, I need automated CI/CD with quality gates.
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
7.3.1 Task: Setup GitHub Actions for automated testing
|
| 23 |
+
7.3.2 Task: Add static analysis and security scanning
|
| 24 |
+
7.3.3 Task: Implement database migration automation
|
| 25 |
+
7.3.4 Task: Create blue-green deployment strategy
|
| 26 |
+
7.3.5 Task: Add automated rollback on failures
|
| 27 |
+
7.3.6 Task: Setup monitoring with Prometheus/Grafana
|