Papers
arxiv:2311.02709

Benchmarking a Benchmark: How Reliable is MS-COCO?

Published on Nov 5, 2023
Authors:
,
,
,

Abstract

A re-annotated version of MS-COCO reveals how annotation styles and dataset biases affect model training and evaluation.

Benchmark datasets are used to profile and compare algorithms across a variety of tasks, ranging from image classification to segmentation, and also play a large role in image pretraining algorithms. Emphasis is placed on results with little regard to the actual content within the dataset. It is important to question what kind of information is being learned from these datasets and what are the nuances and biases within them. In the following work, Sama-COCO, a re-annotation of MS-COCO, is used to discover potential biases by leveraging a shape analysis pipeline. A model is trained and evaluated on both datasets to examine the impact of different annotation conditions. Results demonstrate that annotation styles are important and that annotation pipelines should closely consider the task of interest. The dataset is made publicly available at https://www.sama.com/sama-coco-dataset/ .

Community

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2311.02709
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2311.02709 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 1

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2311.02709 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.