Papers
arxiv:2605.00876

GAZE: Grounded Agentic Zero-shot Evaluation with Viewer-Level Tools and Literature Retrieval on Rare Brain MRI

Published on Apr 25
Authors:
,
,

Abstract

A medical vision-language model framework using iterative viewer and retrieval tools improves rare-disease diagnosis, lesion localization, and report generation without task-specific fine-tuning.

Vision-language models (VLMs) read an image and produce text in a single forward pass, whereas radiologists typically inspect an image several times and consult the literature before writing a report. We introduce GAZE (Grounded Agentic Zero-shot Evaluation), a framework that lets a medical VLM work in this iterative way by calling viewer-level tools (zoom, windowing, contrast, edge detection) and two retrieval tools backed by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (PubMed for medical literature, Open-i for radiological images), with structured outputs validated against a schema and full tool-call traces recorded for auditability. On NOVA, a benchmark of 906 brain MRI cases covering 281 rare neurological conditions, GAZE reaches 58.2 mean average precision (mAP) at intersection-over-union (IoU) 0.3 for lesion localisation and 34.9% Top-1 diagnostic accuracy under a joint protocol that scores captioning, diagnosis, and localisation from the image alone, without task-specific fine-tuning. Before any tool is used, structured prompting and schema-validated outputs already improve over the published Gemini 2.0 Flash baseline (20.2 to 29.4 mAP@0.3), so framework design is itself an experimental variable. Tool use helps rare pathologies disproportionately: the fraction of cases with IoU > 0.3 rises from 17% to 58% for diagnoses with three or fewer examples versus 25% to 68% for common conditions (geq10 cases), with gains tracking engagement (Gemini 3 Flash: Cohen's d = 0.79, 11.8 tool calls per case; Gemini 2.0 Flash: tools used in 8.2% of cases, no significant benefit). Retrieval ablations additionally reveal a model-dependent trade-off in which gains in diagnosis can coincide with losses in localisation, reinforcing the case for joint evaluation of diagnosis, localisation, and captioning in medical VLMs.

Community

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2605.00876
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.00876 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.00876 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.00876 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.