Papers
arxiv:2605.09742

TIDES: Implicit Time-Awareness in Selective State Space Models

Published on Oct 5
· Submitted by
Taylan Soydan
on Oct 8
Authors:
,
,

Abstract

Selective state space models (SSMs), such as Mamba, achieve strong per-token expressivity by making the time discretization step TildeΔ a learned function of the input. However, in doing so, TildeΔ no longer equals the physical time gap Δ between consecutive observations, limiting the ability of these models to handle irregular time series. Continuous time SSMs, such as S5, keep TildeΔequivΔ and therefore handle irregular timestamps natively, but their dynamics remain linear time invariant (LTI), limiting per token expressivity. We propose TIDES, a selective SSM variant that reconciles selective and continuous architectures by moving input dependence off the step size and onto the diagonal state matrix. As a result, TildeΔequivΔ as in S5, allowing the model to handle irregular timestamps natively without sacrificing the per-token expressivity that makes selective SSMs effective. We show this on a novel Fading Flash experimental benchmark, a compact controlled diagnostic for sequence models that jointly tests input dependence and extrapolation to out-of-distribution Δ values, and isolates the distinct failure modes of current state-of-the-art architectures that TIDES avoids by construction. On large-scale benchmarks, TIDES sets the new best average rank on UEA time series classification and the Physiome ODE regression benchmark, and matches or exceeds the reference baseline model on 6 of 8 natively irregular datasets from astronomy, agriculture, neuromorphic sensing, and climate events. Code available at: https://github.com/TaylanSoydan/TIDES.

Community

Paper author Paper submitter

TL;DR: Mamba makes the step size Δ a learned function of the input, so it no longer equals the real time gap between observations. TIDES moves the input dependence onto the state matrix (Λ, B, C) instead and keeps Δ as the physical time gap: selective like Mamba, and native to irregular sampling like S5.

  • Fading Flash, a small controlled benchmark that tests input dependence and extrapolation to unseen Δ at once. S5 cannot model the input-dependent decay, Mamba-style models break outside the training Δ range, and TIDES stays accurate in both cases.
  • Evaluated on UEA classification, Physiome-ODE, and 8 natively irregular datasets from astronomy, agriculture, neuromorphic sensing and climate.

💻 Code: https://github.com/TaylanSoydan/TIDES
📊 Fading Flash dataset: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Taylantay/fading-flash

# pip install git+https://github.com/TaylanSoydan/TIDES
from tides import TIDES
model = TIDES(d_input=16, d_hidden=32, ssm_size=16, ssm_blocks=2, num_blocks=2)
y = model(x, step_scale=dt)   # dt: time since the previous observation

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2605.09742
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.09742 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 1

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.09742 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.