Abstract
A language model p_θ(y mid x) trained on reasoning tasks learns to solve problems via multiple distinct strategies, yet these strategies are implicit and entangled within the model's response distribution. We study the problem of decomposing the response distribution of a given pretrained language model into a structured, strategy-conditioned representation. Specifically, we learn a latent-variable factorization p_θ(y mid x) leadsto (r_ϕ(z mid x), g_ϕ(y mid x,z)), where a router r maps each input to a distribution over latent strategies z and a generator g produces the response conditioned on that strategy. A key challenge is that the generator, initialized from the base model, already represents p_θ(y mid x) without using z. Standard variational inference therefore gives the model no incentive to route information through z and can yield a severe form of posterior collapse. To address this, we propose a variational objective that measures fractional information gain relative to the base model's response loss and concentrates reconstruction pressure on tokens with high base model surprisal, encouraging z to encode strategy-relevant response variation. We introduce a benchmark of multi-strategy algorithmic tasks and show that this objective recovers latent codes aligned with distinct reference strategies while preserving the base model's response distribution.
Community
A language model trained on reasoning tasks learns a response distribution that mixes several distinct solution strategies, but these strategies remain implicit and entangled within the model’s response distribution, with no explicit variable for identifying or controlling the strategy used during generation.
We study how to decompose this distribution into a structured, strategy-conditioned representation in which a latent variable controls the generation strategy. The key challenge is that the generator already represents the target response distribution at initialization without using the latent, leading to a severe form of posterior collapse in standard variational inference.
We address this with a model-directed reconstruction objective that focuses learning on strategy-relevant response variation. On a controlled benchmark, our method recovers latents aligned with reference strategies and consistent across inputs while preserving the base model’s response distribution.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Multimodal Continuous Reasoning via Asymmetric Mutual Variational Learning (2026)
- Latent Thought Flow: Efficient Latent Reasoning in Large Language Models (2026)
- Tyler: Typed Latent Reasoning for Language Models -- When to Think, What to Compute, and How Much to Allocate (2026)
- Latent Reasoning with Normalizing Flows (2026)
- Bridging the Gap Between Latent and Explicit Reasoning with Looped Transformers (2026)
- Why Struggle with Continuous Latents? Interpretable Discrete Latent Reasoning via Rendered Compression (2026)
- From Reasoning Traces to Reusable Modules: Understanding Compositional Generalization in Language Model Reasoning (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 1
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper